1
|
Ulug ME, Ikram S, Sayyah E, Durdağı S. Employing steered MD simulations for effective virtual screening: Active pharmacophore search by dynamic corrections to target MKK3-MYC interactions. Int J Biol Macromol 2025; 310:142602. [PMID: 40157686 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2025.142602] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2024] [Revised: 02/05/2025] [Accepted: 03/26/2025] [Indexed: 04/01/2025]
Abstract
The protein-protein interaction (PPI) between mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase 3 (MKK3), and MYC is a crucial regulator of oncogenic signaling, particularly in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). Despite its clinical significance, effective small molecule inhibitors targeting this interaction remain elusive. In this study, we employed a comprehensive in silico approach integrating dynamic structure-based pharmacophore modeling, virtual screening, molecular docking, and molecular dynamics (MD) simulations to identify potential inhibitors disrupting the MKK3-MYC interaction. The pharmacophore-based screening of over 2 million compounds from ChemDiv and Enamine libraries led to the identification of 16,766 hits, which were further refined through docking and MD-based analyses. The top-ranked molecules underwent steered molecular dynamics (sMD) simulations to evaluate the mechanical stability of their binding interactions, followed by binding free energy calculations (MM/GBSA) to assess their affinity. Notably, several hit compounds exhibited stronger binding affinities and mechanical stability compared to the reference inhibitor SGI-1027, with Z332428622, 4476-2273, and 4292-0516 emerging as the most promising candidates. The lead compounds demonstrated stable interactions with key residues at the interface of MKK3 and MYC, suggesting their potential as novel modulators of MYC-driven malignancies. These findings provide a strong computational foundation for further experimental validation and offer promising candidates for targeted therapy development in MYC-dependent cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Muhammet Eren Ulug
- Computational Biology and Molecular Simulations Laboratory, Department of Biophysics, School of Medicine, Bahçeşehir University, Istanbul, Turkey; Lab for Innovative Drugs (Lab4IND), Computational Drug Design Center (HITMER), Bahçeşehir University, İstanbul, Türkiye
| | - Saima Ikram
- Computational Biology and Molecular Simulations Laboratory, Department of Biophysics, School of Medicine, Bahçeşehir University, Istanbul, Turkey; Lab for Innovative Drugs (Lab4IND), Computational Drug Design Center (HITMER), Bahçeşehir University, İstanbul, Türkiye
| | - Ehsan Sayyah
- Computational Biology and Molecular Simulations Laboratory, Department of Biophysics, School of Medicine, Bahçeşehir University, Istanbul, Turkey; Lab for Innovative Drugs (Lab4IND), Computational Drug Design Center (HITMER), Bahçeşehir University, İstanbul, Türkiye
| | - Serdar Durdağı
- Computational Biology and Molecular Simulations Laboratory, Department of Biophysics, School of Medicine, Bahçeşehir University, Istanbul, Turkey; Lab for Innovative Drugs (Lab4IND), Computational Drug Design Center (HITMER), Bahçeşehir University, İstanbul, Türkiye; Molecular Therapy Lab, Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, School of Pharmacy, Bahçeşehir University, Istanbul, Turkey.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Uijttewaal ECH, Lee J, Sell AC, Botay N, Vainorius G, Novatchkova M, Baar J, Yang J, Potzler T, van der Leij S, Lowden C, Sinner J, Elewaut A, Gavrilovic M, Obenauf A, Schramek D, Elling U. CRISPR-StAR enables high-resolution genetic screening in complex in vivo models. Nat Biotechnol 2024:10.1038/s41587-024-02512-9. [PMID: 39681701 DOI: 10.1038/s41587-024-02512-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2024] [Accepted: 11/19/2024] [Indexed: 12/18/2024]
Abstract
Pooled genetic screening with CRISPR-Cas9 has enabled genome-wide, high-resolution mapping of genes to phenotypes, but assessing the effect of a given genetic perturbation requires evaluation of each single guide RNA (sgRNA) in hundreds of cells to counter stochastic genetic drift and obtain robust results. However, resolution is limited in complex, heterogeneous models, such as organoids or tumors transplanted into mice, because achieving sufficient representation requires impractical scaling. This is due to bottleneck effects and biological heterogeneity of cell populations. Here we introduce CRISPR-StAR, a screening method that uses internal controls generated by activating sgRNAs in only half the progeny of each cell subsequent to re-expansion of the cell clone. Our method overcomes both intrinsic and extrinsic heterogeneity as well as genetic drift in bottlenecks by generating clonal, single-cell-derived intrinsic controls. We use CRISPR-StAR to identify in-vivo-specific genetic dependencies in a genome-wide screen in mouse melanoma. Benchmarking against conventional screening demonstrates the improved data quality provided by this technology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Esther C H Uijttewaal
- Institute of Molecular Biotechnology of the Austrian Academy of Science (IMBA), Dr. Bohr-Gasse 3, Vienna BioCenter (VBC), Vienna, Austria
- Vienna BioCenter PhD Program, University of Vienna and Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Joonsun Lee
- Institute of Molecular Biotechnology of the Austrian Academy of Science (IMBA), Dr. Bohr-Gasse 3, Vienna BioCenter (VBC), Vienna, Austria
- Vienna BioCenter PhD Program, University of Vienna and Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Annika Charlotte Sell
- Institute of Molecular Biotechnology of the Austrian Academy of Science (IMBA), Dr. Bohr-Gasse 3, Vienna BioCenter (VBC), Vienna, Austria
| | - Naomi Botay
- Institute of Molecular Biotechnology of the Austrian Academy of Science (IMBA), Dr. Bohr-Gasse 3, Vienna BioCenter (VBC), Vienna, Austria
| | - Gintautas Vainorius
- Institute of Molecular Biotechnology of the Austrian Academy of Science (IMBA), Dr. Bohr-Gasse 3, Vienna BioCenter (VBC), Vienna, Austria
- Vienna BioCenter PhD Program, University of Vienna and Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Maria Novatchkova
- Institute of Molecular Biotechnology of the Austrian Academy of Science (IMBA), Dr. Bohr-Gasse 3, Vienna BioCenter (VBC), Vienna, Austria
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology, Campus-Vienna-Biocenter 1, Vienna BioCenter (VBC), Vienna, Austria
| | - Juliane Baar
- Institute of Molecular Biotechnology of the Austrian Academy of Science (IMBA), Dr. Bohr-Gasse 3, Vienna BioCenter (VBC), Vienna, Austria
| | - Jiaye Yang
- Institute of Molecular Biotechnology of the Austrian Academy of Science (IMBA), Dr. Bohr-Gasse 3, Vienna BioCenter (VBC), Vienna, Austria
| | - Tobias Potzler
- Institute of Molecular Biotechnology of the Austrian Academy of Science (IMBA), Dr. Bohr-Gasse 3, Vienna BioCenter (VBC), Vienna, Austria
| | - Sophie van der Leij
- Institute of Molecular Biotechnology of the Austrian Academy of Science (IMBA), Dr. Bohr-Gasse 3, Vienna BioCenter (VBC), Vienna, Austria
| | - Christopher Lowden
- Centre for Molecular and Systems Biology, Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Julia Sinner
- Institute of Molecular Biotechnology of the Austrian Academy of Science (IMBA), Dr. Bohr-Gasse 3, Vienna BioCenter (VBC), Vienna, Austria
| | - Anais Elewaut
- Vienna BioCenter PhD Program, University of Vienna and Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology, Campus-Vienna-Biocenter 1, Vienna BioCenter (VBC), Vienna, Austria
| | - Milanka Gavrilovic
- Institute of Molecular Biotechnology of the Austrian Academy of Science (IMBA), Dr. Bohr-Gasse 3, Vienna BioCenter (VBC), Vienna, Austria
| | - Anna Obenauf
- Research Institute of Molecular Pathology, Campus-Vienna-Biocenter 1, Vienna BioCenter (VBC), Vienna, Austria
| | - Daniel Schramek
- Centre for Molecular and Systems Biology, Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Molecular Genetics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Ulrich Elling
- Institute of Molecular Biotechnology of the Austrian Academy of Science (IMBA), Dr. Bohr-Gasse 3, Vienna BioCenter (VBC), Vienna, Austria.
- Viverita Discovery, Vienna, Austria.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Wang J, Wang Y, Jiang X. Targeting anticancer immunity in melanoma tumour microenvironment: unleashing the potential of adjuvants, drugs, and phytochemicals. J Drug Target 2024; 32:1052-1072. [PMID: 39041142 DOI: 10.1080/1061186x.2024.2384071] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2024] [Revised: 07/16/2024] [Accepted: 07/18/2024] [Indexed: 07/24/2024]
Abstract
Melanoma poses a challenge in oncology because of its aggressive nature and limited treatment modalities. The tumour microenvironment (TME) in melanoma contains unique properties such as an immunosuppressive and high-density environment, unusual vasculature, and a high number of stromal and immunosuppressive cells. In recent years, numerous experiments have focused on boosting the immune system to effectively remove malignant cells. Adjuvants, consisting of phytochemicals, toll-like receptor (TLR) agonists, and cytokines, have shown encouraging results in triggering antitumor immunity and augmenting the therapeutic effectiveness of anticancer therapy. These adjuvants can stimulate the maturation of dendritic cells (DCs) and infiltration of cytotoxic CD8+ T lymphocytes (CTLs). Furthermore, nanocarriers can help to deliver immunomodulators and antigens directly to the tumour stroma, thereby improving their efficacy against malignant cells. The remodelling of melanoma TME utilising phytochemicals, agonists, and other adjuvants can be combined with current modalities for improving therapy outcomes. This review article explores the potential of adjuvants, drugs, and their nanoformulations in enhancing the anticancer potency of macrophages, CTLs, and natural killer (NK) cells. Additionally, the capacity of these agents to repress the function of immunosuppressive components of melanoma TME, such as immunosuppressive subsets of macrophages, stromal and myeloid cells will be discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jingping Wang
- Emergency Department, Zhejiang Provincial General Hospital of the Chinese People's Armed Police Force, Zhejiang, China
| | - Yaping Wang
- Respiratory and Oncology Department, Zhejiang Provincial General Hospital of the Chinese People's Armed Police Force, Zhejiang, China
| | - Xiaofang Jiang
- Respiratory and Oncology Department, Zhejiang Provincial General Hospital of the Chinese People's Armed Police Force, Zhejiang, China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Grützner C, Tan YP, Müller P, Schlee-Guimaraes TM, Jentzsch M, Schmid-Burgk JL, Renn M, Behrendt R, Hartmann G. Synthetic RIG-I agonist-mediated cancer immunotherapy synergizes with MAP kinase inhibition against BRAF-mutated melanoma. MOLECULAR THERAPY. NUCLEIC ACIDS 2024; 35:102283. [PMID: 39165562 PMCID: PMC11334831 DOI: 10.1016/j.omtn.2024.102283] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2024] [Accepted: 07/16/2024] [Indexed: 08/22/2024]
Abstract
The implementation of targeted molecular therapies and immunotherapy in melanoma vastly improved the therapeutic outcome in patients with limited efficacy of surgical intervention. Nevertheless, a large fraction of patients with melanoma still remain refractory or acquire resistance to these new forms of treatment, illustrating a need for improvement. Here, we report that the clinically relevant combination of mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase pathway inhibitors dabrafenib and trametinib synergize with RIG-I agonist-induced immunotherapy to kill BRAF-mutated human and mouse melanoma cells. Kinase inhibition did not compromise the agonist-induced innate immune response of the RIG-I pathway in host immune cells. In a melanoma transplantation mouse model, the triple therapy outperformed individual therapies. Our study suggests that agonist-induced activation of RIG-I with its synthetic ligand 3pRNA could vastly improve tumor control in a substantial fraction of patients with melanoma receiving MAP kinase inhibitors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christian Grützner
- Institute for Clinical Chemistry and Clinical Pharmacology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
- Department of Oncology, Hematology, Immuno-Oncology and Rheumatology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
- Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Düsseldorf (CIO ABCD), Bonn, Germany
| | - Yu Pan Tan
- Institute for Clinical Chemistry and Clinical Pharmacology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Patrick Müller
- Institute for Clinical Chemistry and Clinical Pharmacology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | | | - Marius Jentzsch
- Institute for Clinical Chemistry and Clinical Pharmacology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Jonathan L. Schmid-Burgk
- Institute for Clinical Chemistry and Clinical Pharmacology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Marcel Renn
- Institute for Clinical Chemistry and Clinical Pharmacology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Rayk Behrendt
- Institute for Clinical Chemistry and Clinical Pharmacology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Gunther Hartmann
- Institute for Clinical Chemistry and Clinical Pharmacology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Shan Z, Liu F. Advances in immunotherapy for mucosal melanoma: harnessing immune checkpoint inhibitors for improved treatment outcomes. Front Immunol 2024; 15:1441410. [PMID: 39234260 PMCID: PMC11373357 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1441410] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2024] [Accepted: 07/01/2024] [Indexed: 09/06/2024] Open
Abstract
Mucosal melanoma (MM) poses a significant clinical challenge due to its aggressive nature and limited treatment options. In recent years, immunotherapy has emerged as a promising strategy for MM, with a particular focus on immune checkpoint inhibitors such as PD-1 and CTLA-4 inhibitors. These inhibitors have demonstrated substantial efficacy by harnessing the body's immune response against tumors. Moreover, adoptive cell transfer (ACT), anti-angiogenic therapy, and combination therapies have garnered attention for their potential in MM treatment. ACT involves modifying T cells to target melanoma cells, showing promising antitumor activity. Anti-angiogenic therapy aims to impede tumor growth by inhibiting angiogenesis, while combination therapies, including immune checkpoint inhibitors and targeted therapies, offer a multifaceted approach to overcome treatment resistance. This comprehensive review explores the advancements in immunotherapy for MM, highlighting the role of diverse therapeutic modalities in enhancing treatment outcomes and addressing the challenges posed by this aggressive malignancy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zexing Shan
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Liaoning Cancer Hospital and Institute, Cancer Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Fei Liu
- Department of Bone and Soft Tissue Tumor Surgery, Cancer Hospital of China Medical University, Liaoning Cancer Hospital & Institute, Shenyang, China
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Finke C, Mohr P. BRAF V600E Metastatic Melanoma Journey: A Perspective from a Patient and his Oncologist. Adv Ther 2024; 41:2576-2585. [PMID: 38806993 PMCID: PMC11213783 DOI: 10.1007/s12325-024-02883-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2024] [Accepted: 04/22/2024] [Indexed: 05/30/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This article is co-authored by a patient with BRAFV600E metastatic melanoma and his treating oncologist. CASE DESCRIPTION The patient describes how he coped with his diagnosis and treatment. He details the pathway of his melanoma treatment, which has spanned over 10 years, including surgical interventions, medical treatment, and participation in clinical trials. He relates his experience of living with the disease-and the adverse effects of treatment-in the long term. The clinical perspective of his treating oncologist reviews the diagnostic process and explains how the therapeutic options were selected for and with the patient. The oncologist also addresses the integration of the patient into clinical trials involving programmed death-1 (PD-1) inhibitors and BRAF/MEK inhibitors. Challenges related to the adverse effects that occurred and the personalised treatment of the patient are also discussed. Finally, the article evaluates current advances in treatment and future therapeutic approaches. CONCLUSIONS This case highlights the challenges of identifying which therapeutic options are most appropriate for individual patients with BRAFV600E metastatic melanoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Peter Mohr
- Clinic of Dermatology, Elbe Klinikum Buxtehude, Am Krankenhaus 1, 21614, Buxtehude, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Shi H, Tian C, Wu M, Ma L, Sun J, Chen H. m6A- and m5C- modified lncRNAs orchestrate the prognosis in cutaneous melanoma and m6A- modified LINC00893 regulates cutaneous melanoma cell metastasis. Skin Res Technol 2024; 30:e13842. [PMID: 38965799 PMCID: PMC11224130 DOI: 10.1111/srt.13842] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2024] [Accepted: 06/17/2024] [Indexed: 07/06/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND As the most important modifications on the RNA level, N6-methyladenosine (m6A-) and 5-methylcytosine (m5C-) modification could have a direct influence on the RNAs. Long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) could also be modified by methylcytosine modification. Compared with mRNAs, the function of lncRNAs could be more potent to some extent in biological processes like tumorigenesis. Until now, rare reports have been done associated with cutaneous melanoma. Herein, we wonder if the m6A- and m5C- modified lncRNAs could influence the immune landscape and prognosis in melanoma, and we also want to find some lncRNAs which could directly affect the malignant behaviors of melanoma. METHODS Systematically, we explored the expression pattern of m6A- and m5C- modified lncRNAs in melanoma from datasets including UCSC Xena and NCBI GEO, and the prognostic lncRNAs were selected. Then, according to the expression pattern of lncRNAs, melanoma samples from these datasets were divided into several subtypes. Prognostic model, nomogram survival model, drug sensitivity, GO, and KEGG pathway analysis were performed. Furthermore, among several selected lncRNAs, we identified one lncRNA named LINC00893 and investigated its expression pattern and its biological function in melanoma cell lines. RESULTS We identified 27 m6A- and m5C- related lncRNAs which were significantly associated with survival, and we made a subtype analysis of melanoma samples based on these 27 lncRNAs. Among the two subtypes, we found differences of immune cells infiltration between these two subtypes. Then, LASSO algorithm was used to screen the optimized lncRNAs combination including ZNF252P-AS1, MIAT, FAM13A-AS1, LINC-PINT, LINC00893, AGAP2-AS1, OIP5-AS1, and SEMA6A-AS1. We also found that there was a significant correlation between the different risk groups predicted based on RS model and the actual prognosis. The nomogram survival model based on independent survival prognostic factors was also constructed. Besides, sensitivity to chemotherapeutic agents, GO and KEGG analysis were performed. In different risk groups, a total of 14 drug molecules with different distributions were obtained, which included AZD6482, AZD7762, AZD8055, camptothecin, dasatinib, erlotinib, gefitinib, gemcitabine, GSK269962A, nilotinib, rapamycin, and sorafenib. A total of 55 significantly related biological processes and 17 KEGG signaling pathways were screened. At last, we noticed that LINC00893 had a relatively lower expression in melanoma tissue and cell lines compared with adjacent tissues and epidermal melanocyte, and down-regulation of LINC00893 could promote the malignant behavior of melanoma cells in A875 and MV3. In these two melanoma cell lines, down-regulation of m6A-related molecules like YTHDF3 and METTL3 could promote the expression of LINC00893. CONCLUSION We made an analysis of m6A- and m5C- related lncRNAs in melanoma samples and a prediction of these lncRNAs' role in prognosis, tumor microenvironment, immune infiltration, and clinicopathological features. We also found that LINC00893, which is potentially regulated by m6A modification, could serve as a tumor-suppressor in melanoma and play an inhibitory role in melanoma metastasis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hao‐Ze Shi
- Institute of DermatologyChinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical CollegeNanjingChina
| | - Cui‐Cui Tian
- Institute of DermatologyChinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical CollegeNanjingChina
| | - Ming‐Yang Wu
- Institute of DermatologyChinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical CollegeNanjingChina
| | - Li Ma
- Jiangsu Cancer Hospital and The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Nanjing Medical UniversityNanjingChina
| | - Jian‐Fang Sun
- Institute of DermatologyChinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical CollegeNanjingChina
| | - Hao Chen
- Institute of DermatologyChinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical CollegeNanjingChina
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Bayer AL, Padilla-Rolon D, Smolgovsky S, Hinds PW, Alcaide P. Deletion of MyD88 in T Cells Improves Antitumor Activity in Melanoma. THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY 2024; 194:1007-1019. [PMID: 38442804 PMCID: PMC11156157 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2024.02.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2023] [Revised: 01/15/2024] [Accepted: 02/15/2024] [Indexed: 03/07/2024]
Abstract
Cytotoxic CD8+ T cells are central to the antitumor immune response by releasing cytotoxic granules that kill tumor cells. They are activated by antigen-presenting cells, which become activated by DAMPs (damage associated molecular patterns) through MyD88. However, the suppressive tumor microenvironment promotes T-cell tolerance to tumor antigens, in part by enhancing the activity of immune checkpoint molecules that prevent CD8+ T-cell activation and cytotoxicity. MyD88 limits CD4+ T-cell activation during cardiac adaptation to stress. A similar mechanism is hypothesized to exist in CD8+ T cells that could be modulated to improve antitumor immunity. Herein, adoptive transfer of MyD88-/- CD8+ T cells in melanoma-bearing T-cell-deficient mice resulted in slower tumor growth, greater intratumoral T-cell accumulation, and higher melanoma cell death compared with transfer of wild-type CD8+ T cells. These findings were also observed in T-cell-specific MyD88-/- mice compared with wild-type littermates implanted with melanoma. Mechanistically, deletion of MyD88 enhanced CD8+ T-cell activation and survival, and T-cell receptor induced degranulation of cytotoxic molecules, overall improving the killing of melanoma cells. This enhanced cytotoxicity was retained in mice bearing tumors expressing the specific antigen for which cytotoxic T-cells were restricted. This study's results demonstrate a conserved mechanism for MyD88 in modulating CD8+ T-cell activation and represent a novel target in improving cancer immunotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abraham L Bayer
- Department of Immunology, Tufts University, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | - Sasha Smolgovsky
- Department of Immunology, Tufts University, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Philip W Hinds
- Department of Genetics, Molecular and Cell Biology, Tufts University, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Pilar Alcaide
- Department of Immunology, Tufts University, Boston, Massachusetts.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Natarelli N, Aleman SJ, Mark IM, Tran JT, Kwak S, Botto E, Aflatooni S, Diaz MJ, Lipner SR. A Review of Current and Pipeline Drugs for Treatment of Melanoma. Pharmaceuticals (Basel) 2024; 17:214. [PMID: 38399429 PMCID: PMC10892880 DOI: 10.3390/ph17020214] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2024] [Revised: 01/29/2024] [Accepted: 01/30/2024] [Indexed: 02/25/2024] Open
Abstract
Malignant melanoma is the most aggressive form of skin cancer. Standard treatment options include surgery, radiation therapy, systemic chemotherapy, targeted therapy, and immunotherapy. Combining these modalities often yields better responses. Surgery is suitable for localized cases, sometimes involving lymph node dissection and biopsy, to assess the spread of the disease. Radiation therapy may be sometimes used as a standalone treatment or following surgical excision. Systemic chemotherapy, while having low response rates, is utilized as part of combination treatments or when other methods fail. The development of resistance to systemic chemotherapies and associated side effects have prompted further research and clinical trials for novel approaches. In the case of advanced-stage melanoma, a comprehensive approach may be necessary, incorporating targeted therapies and immunotherapies that demonstrate significant antitumor activity. Targeted therapies, including inhibitors targeting BRAF, MEK, c-KIT, and NRAS, are designed to block the specific molecules responsible for tumor growth. These therapies show promise, particularly in patients with corresponding mutations. Combination therapy, including BRAF and MEK inhibitors, has been evidenced to improve progression-free survival; however, concerns about resistance and cutaneous toxicities highlight the need for close monitoring. Immunotherapies, leveraging tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and CAR T cells, enhance immune responses. Lifileucel, an FDA-approved tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte therapy, has demonstrated improved response rates in advanced-stage melanoma. Ongoing trials continue to explore the efficacy of CAR T-cell therapy for advanced melanoma. Checkpoint inhibitors targeting CTLA-4 and PD-1 have enhanced outcomes. Emerging IL-2 therapies boost dendritic cells, enhancing anticancer immunity. Oncolytic virus therapy, approved for advanced melanoma, augments treatment efficacy in combination approaches. While immunotherapy has significantly advanced melanoma treatment, its success varies, prompting research into new drugs and factors influencing outcomes. This review provides insights into current melanoma treatments and recent therapeutic advances.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicole Natarelli
- Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL 33602, USA
| | - Sarah J. Aleman
- School of Medicine, Louisiana State University, New Orleans, LA 70112, USA
| | - Isabella M. Mark
- College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32610, USA
| | - Jasmine T. Tran
- School of Medicine, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA
| | - Sean Kwak
- College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32610, USA
| | - Elizabeth Botto
- Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL 33602, USA
| | - Shaliz Aflatooni
- Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL 33602, USA
| | - Michael J. Diaz
- College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32610, USA
| | - Shari R. Lipner
- Department of Dermatology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York City, NY 10021, USA
| |
Collapse
|