Low Rates of Advance Care Planning (ACP) Discussions Despite Readiness to Engage in ACP Among Liver Transplant Candidates

Advance care planning and goals of care discussions in perioperative care: a scoping review

BACKGROUND

Advance care planning is well established in general medical wards, but its implementation in anaesthesia and perioperative care presents unique challenges. Effective communication and shared decision-making regarding treatment limitations are essential to clarify care goals and provide timely, high-quality end-of-life care. Terminally ill patients with complex care needs can experience a higher risk of postoperative mortality during anaesthesia.

METHODS

This scoping review examines the literature describing when and how advance care planning has been studied in perioperative care, focusing on patient characteristics, the content of advance care planning discussions, and impact on patient outcomes. The study follows PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Articles were collected from MEDLINE, CENTRAL, and CINAHL databases, using search terms from MeSH and synonyms for anaesthesia, surgery and perioperative care, advance care planning, living wills or advance directives, goals of care and terminal care, resuscitation orders, shared decision-making, and palliative care discussions.

RESULTS

Advance care planning documentation varies across surgical specialties and settings, with higher rates in emergency and palliative surgery. Patient factors, such as age and comorbidities, impact completion of advance care planning. Structurally, the presence of interdisciplinary teams, increased decision-making aids, and structured discussions improve implementation. Barriers included a lack of consistency in terminology, poor timing of needed conversations, a lack of cultural sensitivities, and patient fears of abandonment and palliative care.

CONCLUSIONS

Further research is required to determine the most appropriate and beneficial methods and outcomes for implementing advance care planning into perioperative and end-of-life care, ensuring appropriate, timely, and patient-oriented care delivery.

Integrating Palliative Care Consultation Into Inpatient Liver Transplant Evaluations: A Quality Improvement Study

Palliative care (PC) consultation in high-risk patients with liver disease who are undergoing liver transplant (LT) evaluation is underused due to common beliefs that PC would negatively impact a patient's desire for transplant. This population is at risk due to high morbidity, mortality, and negative impact to overall quality of life. A 4-week pilot study was conducted in a transplant surgical intensive care unit at a single academic center to increase PC consultation during inpatient LT evaluation and improve transitions in care. Two Plan, Do, Study, Act quality improvement cycles were subsequently led by the PC nurse practitioner and social worker to increase the effectiveness of this intervention. The first cycle (November 29, 2018, to September 30, 2019) identified the need to increase PC education of intensive care unit nurses and promote interdisciplinary collaboration. The second cycle (October 1, 2019, to June 13, 2022) modified the study protocol to prioritize high-risk patients undergoing inpatient LT evaluation. Palliative care consultation increased by 262.5% from 2018 to 2019, with consults completed on 19% of all patients admitted for inpatient LT evaluations throughout the duration of the quality improvement study. Palliative care consultation on high-risk patients undergoing inpatient LT evaluation is a promising targeted strategy to increase utilization of PC in this population.

Factors related to patients' readiness for advance care planning: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Advance care planning can help to align the care provided with the values, goals and preferences of patients at the end of life. Therefore, readiness for advanced care planning is considered a prerequisite and predictor of the patient's willingness to participate in the end of life conversation. The present study was conducted with the aim of investigating the factors affecting patients' readiness for advance care planning (RACP).

METHODS

This systematic review was searched in 4 databases: PubMed, Scopus, Web of science, ProQuest using relevant keywords. No time limit was considered. The quality of the articles was assessed using Joanna Briggs Institute tool for qualitative studies and the Appraisal Tool for cross-sectional Studies. The data was analyzed based on the directed content analysis approach guided by the theory of planned behavior (TPB).

RESULTS

3227 primary article titles were identified. After removing duplicates, screening and final selection, 22 relevant articles remained for analysis. Factors affecting RACP were extracted based on the TPB. Attitude factors include "ACP training", "perceived experiences of health status", "Socio-demographic factors", and "psycho-spiritual readiness". Subjective norms include "social support and family participation" and "accessibility to health services". The perceived behavioral control includes "dialogue about ACP", "readiness actions", and "determining a proxy decision maker."

CONCLUSION

In this study, according to the theory of planning behavior, various factors have an effect on the RACP. Therefore, according to the collaborative and multifactorial nature of the factors affecting preparation for ACP, it is suggested that different effective dimensions should be considered according to the specific conditions of each patient and the stage of the disease. Therefore, health service providers should first measure the level of readiness of patients and families, and by understanding the factors affecting their readiness, they should conduct training or dialogue in the field of ACP.

Role of Uncertainty in Illness and Coping Strategies in Advance Directive Completion in Patients With End-stage Liver Disease

OBJECTIVE

We examined the associations among advance directives (ADs) completion, coping, uncertainty in illness, and optimism and pessimism in patients with end-stage liver disease (ESLD).

BACKGROUND

Although associations among ADs, coping, and uncertainty have been studied in patients with other life-limiting illnesses, these concepts have not been studied together in patients with ESLD.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients were recruited at 2 health care institutions as part of a larger prospective study. They were enrolled if they had a diagnosis of nonhepatocellular carcinoma ESLD, Sodium Model for End-Stage Liver Disease ≥15, and no prior history of liver transplantation. Uncertainty, coping, optimism, and pessimism were assessed using the Uncertainty in Illness Scale for Adults, Revised Ways of Coping Checklist, and Life Orientation Test-revised. AD documentation at the time of study enrollment was retrospectively extracted from patient medical records.

RESULTS

In the sample [N = 181; median age = 57 y, 115 (64%) males], male sex [odds ratio (OR) = 4.66; 95% CI: 1.53, 14.17], being listed or under evaluation for liver transplantation (OR = 3.09; 95% CI: 1.10, 8.67), greater Sodium Model for End-Stage Liver Disease scores (OR = 1.10; 95% CI: 1.01, 1.20), and greater uncertainty (OR = 1.04; 95% CI: 1.01, 1.07) were positively associated with AD documentation. Higher coping avoidance was negatively associated with AD documentation (OR = 0.915; 95% CI: 0.840, 0.997).

CONCLUSIONS

Clinicians should consider the role of uncertainty and coping measures to improve patient-specific advance care planning conversations and expand opportunities for all patients with ESLD to file an AD, especially women and patients not listed or under evaluation for transplantation.

Serious Illness Communication in Cirrhosis Care: Tools to Improve Illness Understanding, Prognostic Understanding, and Care Planning

Patients with cirrhosis frequently experience an unpredictable illness trajectory, with frequent hospitalizations and complications. Along with the uncertain nature of the disease, the possibility of a lifesaving and curative transplant often makes prognostic discussions and future care decisions challenging. Serious illness communication (SIC) refers to supportive communication whereby clinicians assess patients' illness understanding, share prognostic information according to patients' preferences, explore patients' goals, and make recommendations for care that align with these goals. SIC includes 3 key components: (1) illness understanding; (2) prognostic understanding; and (3) care planning. In this piece, we explore current barriers to early implementation of SIC in cirrhosis care and share possible solutions, including adopting a multidisciplinary approach, delivering culturally competent care, and training clinicians in SIC core skills. By use of a case example, we aim to demonstrate SIC in action and to provide clinicians with tools and skills that can be used in practice.

Advance Care Planning and Palliative Care Consultation in Kidney Transplantation

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE

Because of the high risk of waitlist mortality and posttransplant complications, kidney transplant (KT) patients may benefit from advance care planning (ACP) and palliative care consultation (PCC). We quantified the prevalence and racial disparities in ACP and PCC among KT candidates and recipients.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective cohort study.

SETTING & PARTICIPANTS

2,575 adult KT candidates and 1,233 adult recipients (2008-2020).

EXPOSURE

Race and ethnicity.

OUTCOMES

All reports of ACP and PCC were abstracted from chart review. ACP was defined as patient self-report of an advance directive, presence of an advance directive in the medical record, or a documented goals-of-care conversation with a provider. PCC was defined as an ordered referral or a documented palliative care note in the medical record.

ANALYTICAL APPROACH

Racial/ethnic disparities in ACP/PCC were estimated using adjusted logistic regression.

RESULTS

21.4% of KT candidates and 34.9% of recipients engaged in ACP. There were racial/ethnic disparities in ACP among KT candidates (White, 24.4%; Black, 19.1%; Hispanic, 15%; other race and ethnicity, 21.1%; P=0.008) and recipients (White, 39.5%; Black, 31.2%; Hispanic, 26.3%; other race and ethnicity, 26.6%; P=0.007). After adjustment, Black KT recipients had a 29% lower likelihood of engaging in ACP (OR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.55-0.91) than White KT recipients. Among older (aged≥65 years) recipients, those who were Black had a lower likelihood of engaging in ACP, but there was no racial disparity among younger recipients (P=0.020 for interaction). 4.2% of KT candidates and 5.1% of KT recipients engaged in PCC; there were no racial disparities in PCC among KT candidates (White, 5.3%; Black, 3.6%; Hispanic, 2.5%; other race and ethnicity, 2.1%; P=0.13) or recipients (White, 5.5%; Black, 5.6%; Hispanic, 0.0%; other race and ethnicity, 1.3%; P = 0.21).

LIMITATIONS

Generalizability may be limited to academic transplant centers.

CONCLUSIONS

ACP is not common among KT patients, and minoritized transplant patients are least likely to engage in ACP; PCC is less common. Future efforts should aim to integrate ACP and PCC into the KT process.

PLAIN-LANGUAGE SUMMARY

Kidney transplant (KT) candidates and recipients are at elevated risk of morbidity and mortality. They may benefit from completing a document or conversation with their palliative care provider that outlines their future health care wishes, known as advance care planning (ACP), which is a component of palliative care consultation (PCC). We wanted to determine how many KT candidates and recipients have engaged in ACP or PCC and identify potential racial disparities. We found that 21.4% of candidates and 34.9% of recipients engaged in ACP. After adjustment, Black recipients had a 29% lower likelihood of engaging in ACP. We found that 4.2% of KT candidates and 5.1% of KT recipients engaged in PCC, with no racial disparities found in PCC.

Palliative Care in Advanced Liver Disease: Similar or Different Palliative Care Needs in Patients with a Prospect of Transplantation? Prospective Study from a Portuguese University Hospital and Transplantation Center

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

End-stage liver disease (ESLD) is an important cause of morbidity and mortality, comparable to a large extent to other organ insufficiencies. The need for palliative care (PC) in patients with ESLD is high. In Portugal, in the only identified study, more than 80% of patients hospitalized with ESLD had criteria for PC. No results specified which needs they identified or their transplantation prospect status.

METHODS

Prospective observational study including 54 ESLD patients who presented to a university hospital and transplantation center, between November 2019 and September 2020. Assessment of their PC needs through the application of NECPAL CCOMS-ICO© and IPOS, considering their transplantation perspective status.

RESULTS

Of the 54 patients, 5 (9.3%) were on active waiting list for transplantation and 8 (14.8%) under evaluation. NECPAL CCOMS-ICO© identified 23 patients (n = 42.6%) that would benefit from PC. Assessment of PC needs by clinicians, functional markers and significant comorbidities were the most frequent criteria (47.8%, n = 11). IPOS also revealed a different sort of needs: on average, each patient identified about 9 needs (8.9 ±2.8). Among the symptoms identified, weakness (77.8%), reduced mobility (70.3%), and pain (48.1%) stood out, as well as the psychoemotional symptoms of depression (66.7%) and anxiety (77.8%). There were no significant differences between the subgroups of patients analyzed. Only 4 patients (7.4%) were followed by the PC team.

CONCLUSION

All the ESLD patients included, independently of the group they belonged to, presented with PC needs. No significant differences between the subgroups of patients were identified, confirming that even patients with a transplantation prospect have important needs for PC.

Advance care planning engagement in patients with chronic, life-limiting illness: baseline findings from a cluster-randomised controlled trial in primary care

BACKGROUND

Advance care planning (ACP) has been characterised as a complex process of communication and decision making. For ACP behaviour change, underlying processes such as self-efficacy and readiness are needed. However, studies about which patient characteristics are associated with ACP have mainly focused on whether ACP actions are completed, leaving behaviour change processes unexplored.

AIM

To assess whether patients' characteristics and patient-perceived quality of GP ACP communication were associated with patients' ACP engagement.

DESIGN AND SETTING

Baseline data were used from the ACP-GP cluster-randomised controlled trial in patients with chronic, life-limiting illness (n = 95).

METHOD

Patients completed questionnaires detailing demographic and clinical characteristics, and their perception about their GPs' ACP information provision and listening. Engagement was measured using the 15-item ACP Engagement Survey, with self-efficacy and readiness subscales. Linear mixed models tested associations with engagement.

RESULTS

Demographic and clinical characteristics were not associated with engagement; nor was how much ACP information patients received from their GP or the extent to which the GP listened to what was important for the patient to live well or important to the patient regarding future care. Higher overall ACP engagement (P = 0.002) and self-efficacy (P<0.001) were observed in patients who gave a high rating for the extent to which their GP listened to their worries regarding future health.

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that GPs providing information about ACP alone is not associated with a patient's ACP engagement; an important element is to listen to patients' worries regarding their future health.

Understanding Prognosis: Discrepancy in Prognosis Estimates Between Patients With Cirrhosis and their Hepatologists

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Patients require a clear understanding of their prognosis to make informed decisions about their care. The aim of this study was to compare the perceptions of prognosis and transplant candidacy between patients with cirrhosis and their hepatologists.

METHODS

Patients with cirrhosis and their hepatologists were prospectively recruited at an urban liver transplant center. Patients and hepatologists were asked about transplant candidacy and about how many years patients would live with and without a liver transplant. Agreement between patients and hepatologists was assessed with the weighted kappa statistic. Associations between patient/hepatologists' prognostic estimates and those predicted by patients' Model for End-Stage Liver Disease-Sodium (MELD-Na) score were estimated using the Pearson correlation coefficient.

RESULTS

Seventy patients and 6 hepatologists were enrolled in the study. Patients were predominantly male (61.4%) and white (68.6%), with a mean MELD-Na score of 19 ± 9. There was no-slight agreement between patients and hepatologists regarding survival without and with a liver transplant (κ = 0.1 and 0.2, respectively), with patients more optimistic than their hepatologists. There was greater agreement between patients and hepatologists about transplant candidacy (κ = 0.6). There was a negligible association between MELD-Na and patient estimates (r = -0.24, P = .05) but a moderate association between MELD-Na and hepatologist estimates (r = -0.51, P < .001), with higher MELD-Na scores associated with lower predicted survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with cirrhosis are more optimistic and less accurate in their predictions of survival compared with hepatologists, although they are more realistic about their transplant candidacy. Aligning patient and provider expectations may increase the likelihood that patients receive value-concordant care.

Quality of end-of-life care with non-malignant liver disease: Analysis of the VOICES National Survey of Bereaved People

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Patients with liver disease struggle to access palliative care. We aimed to compare carers' perceptions of end-of-life care for decedents with non-malignant liver disease, malignant liver disease and other non-malignant diseases, and to identify associated factors in non-malignant liver disease.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of individual-level data from the National Survey of Bereaved People 2011-2015.

RESULTS

More decedents with non-malignant liver disease died in hospital than other diseases (76.9% vs. 40.9% vs. 50.2%, p < .001), despite 89% wishing to die at home. Fewer decedents received home/hospice specialist palliative care compared with those with malignant liver disease (10.0% vs. 54.6%, p < .001). Carers of decedents with non-malignant liver disease were less likely to rate overall end-of-life care quality as outstanding/excellent (29.3% vs. 43.9% vs. 42.3%, p < .001). For this group, poorer care was associated with younger (65-74 vs. 18-64 years, OR [odds ratio] 1.39, p = .01), more socially deprived decedents (OR .78, p = .02), and better care with greater social support (OR 1.82, p < .001) and community specialist palliative care involvement (OR 1.80, p < .001). There was no association between outstanding/excellent rating and underlying cause of non-malignant liver disease (alcohol-related vs. non-alcohol-related, p = .92) or place of death (hospital vs. non-hospital, p = .476).

CONCLUSIONS

End-of-life care could be improved by integrating hepatology and community services, particularly specialist palliative care, and advance care planning to facilitate care and death (where desired) at home. However, death in hospital may be appropriate for those with non-malignant liver disease.

Time of Clinic Appointment and Serious Illness Communication in Oncology

INTRODUCTION

Serious illness communication in oncology increases goal concordant care. Factors associated with the frequency of serious illness conversations are not well understood. Given prior evidence of the association between suboptimal decision-making and clinic time, we aimed to investigate the relationship between appointment time and the likelihood of serious illness conversations in oncology.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study of electronic health record data from 55 367 patient encounters between June 2019 to April 2020, using generalized estimating equations to model the likelihood of a serious illness conversation across clinic time.

RESULTS

Documentation rate decreased from 2.1 to 1.5% in the morning clinic session (8am-12pm) and from 1.2% to .9% in the afternoon clinic session (1pm-4pm). Adjusted odds ratios for Serious illness conversations documentation rates were significantly lower for all hours of each session after the earliest hour (adjusted odds ratios .91 [95% CI, .84-.97], P = .006 for overall linear trend).

CONCLUSIONS

Serious illness conversations between oncologists and patients decrease considerably through the clinic day, and proactive strategies to avoid missed conversations should be investigated.

What is known about the care and support provided for an ageing population with lived experience of chronic viral hepatitis as they near end-of-life: A scoping review

Ageing with a chronic hepatitis B (HBV) or hepatitis C (HCV) infection is an emerging public health priority. For people living with chronic viral hepatitis, their disease progression into old age is both underpinned by their existing blood borne virus and the potential emergence of other infectious and non-infectious conditions. These twinned pathways bring additional challenges to the care and support for people as they near end of life. This scoping review sought to examine what is known about the experiences of the end-of-life phase of an increasing population ageing with HBV and HCV in studies conducted in high-income settings and published in peer reviewed literature (2010-2021). In interpreting this literature, we found that challenges in determining the end-of life phase for people with lived experience of HBV or HCV are exacerbated by the conflation of aetiologies into a singular diagnosis of end-stage liver disease. Studies overwhelmingly reported the clinical aspects of end-of-life care (i.e. prognosis assessment and symptom management) with less attention paid to educative aspects (i.e. advance care directives and surrogate decision makers, discussion of treatment options and determining goals of care). Psychosocial interventions (i.e. quality of life beyond symptom management, including emotional/spiritual support and family and bereavement support) received limited attention in the literature, though there was some recognition that psychosocial interventions should be part of end-of-life care provision. Given the focus on the prominent disease presentation of liver cirrhosis and/or end-stage liver disease, the social and cultural dimensions of these infections have received less attention in the literature on end-of-life in the context of chronic viral hepatitis.

The explorations of the awareness, contemplation, self-Efficacy, and readiness of advance care planning, and its predictors in Taiwanese patients while receiving hemodialysis treatment

BACKGROUND

End-stage renal disease (ESRD) is a major chronic illness worldwide, and Taiwan reports one of the highest incidence rates of ESRD with 529 cases per million population (pmp). A number of patients with ESRD patients might require lifelong hemodialysis (HD) or peritoneal dialyses (PD). Due to the progression of dialysis, patients are likely to experience other chronic comorbidities, anxiety and depression, frequent hospitalizations, and higher rates of mortality compared to patients with other types of chronic illnesses. As a result, dialysis patients are prone to experience advance care planning (ACP) needs, such as whether they withdraw from receiving dialysis while approaching their end-of-life (EOL). Yet, existing studies have shown that dialysis patients seldom receive timely consultation regarding ACP and there are limited studies examining ACP amongst Taiwan HD patients.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to examine ACP awareness, contemplation, self-efficacy and readiness; and factors influencing ACP readiness.

DESIGN

This cross-sectional descriptive study with convenience sampling was conducted in the out-patient HD unit at a regional teaching hospital in southern Taiwan. A total of 143 ESRD patients undergoing HD treatments were recruited. A 55-item ACP engagement survey containing the subscales of awareness, contemplation, self-efficacy, and readiness was employed. The data were analyzed with t-tests, one-way ANOVAs, Pearson's correlations and multiple regressions.

RESULTS

The results of our investigation revealed that approximately half of the participants (n = 67, 46.9%) were not informed of ACP. Although they reported considering their EOL, medical decisions and desired care, they demonstrated significantly low self-efficacy in discussing ACP (t= -5.272, p < 0.001). HD duration influenced all four ACP subscales; religious beliefs significantly influenced ACP-self-efficacy and readiness; and marital status, education, and primary decision-maker status significantly influenced ACP-readiness. The predictors of ACP-readiness were high self-efficacy and being the primary decision-maker (Adjusted R2 61%).

CONCLUSION

Most of the HD patients in this study had low ACP-awareness, contemplation, self-efficacy, and readiness, and most had not completed any ACP-related advance directives (AD). Healthcare professionals should proactively provide HD patients with ACP-related information and answer patients' and medical decision-makers' questions in a timely manner, thereby improving the quality of EOL care.

Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial of an Advance Care Planning Video Decision Tool for Patients With Advanced Liver Disease

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Transplant-ineligible patients with advanced liver disease rarely receive timely advance care planning (ACP). Tools are needed to educate these patients about medical interventions available at the end of life to promote ACP.

METHODS

This single-site pilot randomized controlled trial assessed the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of an ACP video decision support tool for improving transplant-ineligible advanced liver disease patients' knowledge about and preferences for end-of-life care. Intervention participants watched a 5-minute video depicting 3 levels of goals of care: life-prolonging care (cardiopulmonary resuscitation [CPR] and intubation), life-limiting care (hospitalization, no CPR/intubation), and comfort care. Control subjects received only a verbal narrative of these 3 levels of goals of care. The primary outcome was feasibility (≥60% enrollment rate). Secondary outcomes included acceptability of the video, patients' knowledge of end-of-life care options (6-item test; range, 0-6), and postintervention goals-of-care and CPR or intubation preferences.

RESULTS

We enrolled 85% (n = 50 of 59) of eligible patients randomized to the video (n = 26) or verbal (n = 24) arm. In the video arm, 81% of patients reported being very comfortable watching the video. Patients in the video arm had higher mean knowledge scores (5.7 vs 4.8; P < .001) and were less likely to prefer to receive CPR compared with patients in the verbal arm (35% vs 63%; P = .09).

CONCLUSIONS

An ACP video decision support tool to improve knowledge about and preferences for end-of-life care is both feasible and highly acceptable to transplant-ineligible patients with advanced liver disease with a high enrollment rate and promising preliminary efficacy. Future studies should examine the efficacy of the ACP video for enhancing the quality of their end-of-life care. (ClinicalTrials.gov, Number: NCT03557086).

Preoperative Advance Care Planning for Older Adults Undergoing Major Abdominal Surgery

BACKGROUND

Advance care planning (ACP) is recommended for older patients undergoing surgery. ACP consists of creating advance directives (ADs), identifying surrogate decision makers (SDMs), and documenting goals of care. We identified factors associated with documentation of preoperative ACP to identify opportunities to optimize ACP for older surgical patients.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study of surgical patients ≥70 years old who underwent elective, high-risk abdominal procedures between 01/2015-08/2019. Clinical data were obtained from our institution's National Surgical Quality Improvement Project database. ACP metrics were extracted from the electronic medical record. We analyzed the data to identify patient factors associated with ACP metrics. We also analyzed whether ACP was more frequent for patients who experienced postoperative complications or death.

RESULTS

267/1,651 patients were included. 97 patients (36%) had an AD available on the day of surgery, 57 (21%) had an SDM identified, and 31 (12%) had a documented goals of care conversation. On multivariable analysis, older age and white race were associated with an increased likelihood of having an AD available on the day of surgery. Women were 1.7 times more likely to have an SDM (p = 0.02). No patient or surgeon factors were significantly associated with goals of care documentation. ACP was not performed more frequently in patients who experienced postoperative complications or death.

CONCLUSION

In this series, ACP was not routinely documented for older patients undergoing major surgery. ACP was not more frequent in patients who experienced complications or death, demonstrating the importance of universal preoperative ACP in older patients.

Advance Care Planning Among Elderly Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome Patients: A Qualitative Preference Study

Complications arising from human immunodeficiency virus may affect the ability of elderly AIDS patients to communicate and make decisions about future medical care. It is important for elderly AIDS patients to be able to express effectively their preferences for future treatments and care. This study explored preferences and influencing factors of advance care planning among elderly AIDS patients. A semistructured interview outline was developed based on the theory of planned behavior. A qualitative preference interview was conducted among 16 eligible elderly AIDS patients. Using thematic analysis, the data were analyzed and categorized into 3 themes and 9 subthemes that were classified under the theory of planned behavior framework. The 3 themes were as follows: a positive attitude toward advance care planning, a strong desire for family and social support, and some obstacles to discussing advance care planning in the current environment. These themes provided valuable insights to advance care planning educators and practitioners from different work environments and units to aid them in constructing future ACP intervention models for elderly AIDS patients.

Top Ten Tips Palliative Care Clinicians Should Know About Solid Organ Transplantation

Solid organ transplantation (SOT) is a life-saving procedure for people with end-stage organ failure. However, patients experience significant symptom burden, complex decision making, morbidity, and mortality during both pre- and post-transplant periods. Palliative care (PC) is well suited and historically underdelivered for the transplant population. This article, written by a team of transplant specialists (surgeons, cardiologists, nephrologists, hepatologists, and pulmonologists), PC clinicians, and an ethics specialist, shares 10 high-yield tips for PC clinicians to consider when caring for SOT patients.

Palliative Care for Patients with End-Stage Liver Disease on the Liver Transplant Waiting List: An International Systematic Review

People with end-stage liver disease on the liver transplant waiting list have high symptom burden, which can successfully be addressed by specialist palliative care. Potential tensions with the perceived curative nature of liver transplant make delivering specialist palliative care challenging. This systematic review seeks to establish what is known on the impact of specialist palliative care for patients on liver transplant waiting lists, healthcare professionals' perspectives of providing specialist palliative care for this population, and uptake of advance care planning (ACP). Medline, Embase, and CINAHL were searched to May 5, 2020. Qualitative and quantitative findings were grouped together according to main relevant themes. Eight studies of mixed quality and mainly quantitative, were identified. Findings suggest early palliative care intervention improve patients' symptoms and prompt ACP conversations, but patients on the waiting list receive limited palliative care input. Liver physicians' lack of clarity on referral criteria and liver transplant patients' concerns of being abandoned, were reasons for reluctance to refer to specialist palliative care. They felt referral to specialist palliative care is appropriate only for patients receiving hospice or end of life care. Uptake and understanding of ACP and goals of care designation by patients is poor. This review found evidence of benefit of specialist palliative care for patients on liver transplant waiting lists, but found in a limited understanding of their role. Evidence is limited to studies from North America. Future research is needed to understand better how palliative care could be provided into this clinical environment.

Advance Care Planning and Goals of Care Discussions in Advanced Liver Disease

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Advance care planning (ACP) has been shown to improve multiple outcomes in patients with serious illnesses; however, patients with advanced liver disease, or cirrhosis, rarely receive timely ACP. The purpose of this review is to evaluate the current state of ACP for patients with advanced liver disease and to provide practical guidance for integrating early ACP into routine outpatient hepatology care.

RECENT FINDINGS

Due to multiple patient-, physician-, and systems-level barriers, patients with advanced liver disease have low rates of timely ACP engagement. Early identification and preparation of a surrogate decision-maker, enhancing clinician ACP communication skills, use of patient-centered educational tools, optimizing outpatient processes for ACP documentation, and early referral to specialty palliative care may help to improve current deficits in ACP for this population.

SUMMARY

Provision of early ACP to patients with advanced liver disease may better ensure that patients receive medical care that is consistent with their goals and values.

Increasing the completion rate of the advance directives in primary care setting - a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

The completion rate of Advance Directives (ADs) has been low. This study aims to examine the effectiveness of two interventions 1) active counseling sessions coupled with passive patient education pamphlets, and 2) patient education pamphlets alone, compared with 3) control group (usual care), in increasing the completion rates of ADs in the primary care setting.

METHODS

Multicenter randomised controlled trial in four public primary care clinics in Singapore under Singapore Health Services. Randomization was performed via block randomization with Sequential Numbered Opaque Sealed Envelopes. Participants were randomized into 1) active intervention group (both counseling by primary care physicians and patient education pamphlets) or 2) passive intervention group (only patient education pamphlets), and 3) control group (usual care) with follow-up at 6 weeks. The main outcome measure is the proportion of participants who completed / planned to complete) ADs six weeks post-intervention.

RESULTS

Four hundred five participants were eligible to participate in the study. One hundred eighty-eight participants were recruited into the study (response rate = 46.4%), of which 158 completed the study. There was no significant difference between the control group, passive intervention group, and active intervention group, in terms of completion rates of ADs (29.4, 36.4, and 30.8% respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

This randomized controlled trial did not support the use of patient education pamphlets with or without active counseling sessions in increasing the completion of ADs in a primary care setting in Singapore. The optimal intervention strategy depends on each health system's context and resources, taking into consideration patients' profiles, which deserves further studies.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Registered on April 17, 2018 clinicaltrials.gov ( NCT03499847 ).