Randomized phase II trial of neoadjuvant everolimus in patients with high-risk localized prostate cancer

The role of autophagy in prostate cancer and prostatic diseases: a new therapeutic strategy

BACKGROUND

Autophagy is a well-conserved catabolic process that plays a key role in cell homeostasis. In the prostate, defective autophagy has been implicated in the genesis and progression of several pathological conditions.

AIM

The present review explored the autophagy pathway in prostate-related dysfunctions, focusing on prostate cancer (PCa), benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and prostatitis.

RESULTS

Impaired autophagy activity has been shown in animal models of BPH and prostatitis. Moreover, autophagy activation by specific and non-specific drugs improved both conditions in pre-clinical studies. Conversely, the efficacy of autophagy inducers in PCa remains controversial, depending on intrinsic PCa characteristics and stage of progression. Intriguingly, autophagy inhibitors have shown beneficial effects in PCa suppression or even to overcome chemotherapy resistance. However, there are still open questions regarding the upstream mechanisms by which autophagy is deregulated in the prostate and the exact role of autophagy in PCa. The lack of specificity and increased toxicity associated with the currently autophagy inhibitors limits its use clinically, reflecting in reduced number of clinical data.

CONCLUSION

New therapeutic strategies to treat prostatic diseases involving new autophagy modulators, combination therapy and new drug formulations should be explored. Understanding the autophagy signaling in each prostatic disease is crucial to determine the best pharmacological approach.

Effectiveness and durability of benefit of mTOR inhibitors in a real-world cohort of patients with metastatic prostate cancer and PI3K pathway alterations

BACKGROUND

Alterations in the PTEN/PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway are prevalent in prostate cancer. In this retrospective study, we evaluated the clinical effectiveness of mTOR inhibitors (mTORi) in patients with metastatic prostate cancer (mPCA) and tissue assessed phosphatidyl-3-inositol kinase (PI3K) pathway alterations.

METHODS

This study used a nationwide (US-based) de-identified PCA clinico-genomic database, originating from approximately 280 US cancer clinics (~800 sites of care). We evaluated treatment data for patients with PCA from October 2014 to February 2020. In a cohort of 2301 PCA patients with 7208 evaluable treatment lines, we selected 17 mPCA patients (2 hormone-sensitive, 15 castrate-resistant) with tissue assessed PI3K pathway alterations by comprehensive genomic profiling who received mTORi treatment.

RESULTS

Patients had a median age of 72 years (IQR 68.0, 76.0) and were heavily pretreated with a median 3 lines of therapy prior to mTORi use (range 0-6). The PI3K pathway alterations included PTENdel (10 patients, 58.8%), AKT1mut (4 patients, 23.5%), PTENmut (2 patients, 11.8%), and dual PTENmut and PIK3CAmut (1 patient, 5.9%). Most (15 patients, 88.2%) were treated with everolimus monotherapy. Among 10 patients with on treatment PSA available, 2 patients had a PSA decrease ≥10% at week 12 and 5 patients overall had a subsequent PSA decrease. For those on mTORi, the median time to next treatment was 3.62 months (range 0, 8.52).

CONCLUSIONS

In this small cohort of mPCA patients with tissue assessed PI3K pathway alterations, mTORi therapy was not effective with few PSA responses and short duration of therapy.

mTOR inhibition attenuates chemosensitivity through the induction of chemotherapy resistant persisters

Chemotherapy can eradicate a majority of cancer cells. However, a small population of tumor cells often survives drug treatments through genetic and/or non-genetic mechanisms, leading to tumor recurrence. Here we report a reversible chemoresistance phenotype regulated by the mTOR pathway. Through a genome-wide CRISPR knockout library screen in pancreatic cancer cells treated with chemotherapeutic agents, we have identified the mTOR pathway as a prominent determinant of chemosensitivity. Pharmacological suppression of mTOR activity in cancer cells from diverse tissue origins leads to the persistence of a reversibly resistant population, which is otherwise eliminated by chemotherapeutic agents. Conversely, activation of the mTOR pathway increases chemosensitivity in vitro and in vivo and predicts better survival among various human cancers. Persister cells display a senescence phenotype. Inhibition of mTOR does not induce cellular senescence per se, but rather promotes the survival of senescent cells through regulation of autophagy and G2/M cell cycle arrest, as revealed by a small-molecule chemical library screen. Thus, mTOR plays a causal yet paradoxical role in regulating chemotherapeutic response; inhibition of the mTOR pathway, while suppressing tumor expansion, facilitates the development of a reversible drug-tolerant senescence state.

Uterine perivascular epithelioid tumors (PEComas) with lung metastasis showed good responses to mTOR and VEGFR inhibitors: A case report

Perivascular epithelioid cell tumors (PEComas) are extremely rare mesenchymal neoplasms for which the uterus is the most common site. The prognosis of malignant PEComa is poor as it is characterized by resistance to classical chemotherapies. Both mTOR inhibitors and VEGFR inhibitors exhibited clinical utility in treating malignant PEComas, but the combination of these two regimens has rarely been reported. In the present case, a uterine PEComa patient developed lung and bone metastases after the failure of chemotherapies and derived benefit from the combination regimen of an mTOR inhibitor (everolimus) and a VEGFR inhibitor (apatinib), achieving a 15-month progression-free survival. Targeted NGS revealed TP53 and TSC2 mutations in the patient’s primary uterine tumors and plasma ctDNA at disease progression. Plasma ctDNA clearance was consistent with a radiologic partial response determined by RECIST 1.1 and a reduction of neuron-specific enolase (NSE) and cancer antigen 125 (CA125) levels. Thus, we provided clinical evidence supporting the administration of combined therapy of mTOR and VEGFR inhibitors to metastatic uterine PEComa patients and highlighted the application of serial plasma ctDNA profiling for dynamic disease monitoring.

Signaling Pathways and Targeted Therapies for Stem Cells in Prostate Cancer

Prostate cancer (PCa) is one of the most frequently occurring cancers among men, and the current statistics show that it is the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths among men. Over the years, research in PCa treatment and therapies has made many advances. Despite these efforts, the standardized therapies such as radiation, chemotherapy, hormonal therapy and surgery are not considered completely effective in treating advanced and metastatic PCa. In most situations, fast-dividing tumor cells are targeted, leaving behind relatively slowly dividing, chemoresistant cells known as cancer stem cells. Therefore, following the seemingly successful treatments, the lingering quiescent cancer stem cells are able to renew themselves, undergo differentiation into mature tumor cells, and sufficiently reinitiate the disease, leading to cancer relapse. Thus, prostate cancer stem cells (PCSCs) have been reported to play a vital role in controlling the dynamics of tumorigenesis, progression, and resistance to therapies in PCa. However, the complete knowledge on the mechanisms regulating the stemness of PCSCs is still unclear. Thus, studying the stemness of PCSCs will allow for the development of more effective cancer therapies due to the durable response, resulting in a reduction in recurrences of cancer. In this Review, we will specifically describe the molecular mechanisms responsible for regulating the stemness of PCSCs. Furthermore, current developments in stem cell-specific therapeutic approaches along with future prospects will also be discussed.

Efficient Everolimus Treatment for Metastatic Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer with AKT1 Mutation: A Case Report

Metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), the advanced stage of prostate cancer (PCa), develops resistance to first line androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). Aberrant androgen receptor (AR) and PI3K-Akt-mTOR signaling pathway are responsible for the development and progression of mCRPC. We herein describe a case of a 64-year-old male mCRPC patient with somatic AKT1 and AR mutations. The patient, who had been heavily pretreated by ADT and AR inhibitors, showed stable disease progression when he received everolimus, an mTOR inhibitor. The PSA level dropped drastically from 1493.0 ng/mL to 237.6 ng/mL, after 3 months of treatment. The overall survival (OS) was 43 months, of which the progression-free survival (PFS) with everolimus treatment was 7 months. The administration of mTOR inhibitor, everolimus, could achieve good clinical responses along with prolonging PFS for mCRPC patients harboring AKT1 mutations. Technology in precision medicine, such as targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS) of cancer-relevant genes, has promising function in personalized therapy.

Impact of Value Frameworks on the Magnitude of Clinical Benefit: Evaluating a Decade of Randomized Trials for Systemic Therapy in Solid Malignancies

In the era of rapid development of new, expensive cancer therapies, value frameworks have been developed to quantify clinical benefit (CB). We assessed the evolution of CB since the 2015 introduction of The American Society of Clinical Oncology and The European Society of Medical Oncology value frameworks. Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) assessing systemic therapies for solid malignancies from 2010 to 2020 were evaluated and CB (Δ) in 2010–2014 (pre-value frameworks (PRE)) were compared to 2015–2020 (POST) for overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), response rate (RR), and quality of life (QoL). In the 485 studies analyzed (12% PRE and 88% POST), the most common primary endpoint was PFS (49%), followed by OS (20%), RR (12%), and QoL (6%), with a significant increase in OS and decrease in RR as primary endpoints in the POST era (p = 0.011). Multivariable analyses revealed significant improvement in ΔOS POST (OR 2.86, 95% CI 0.46 to 5.26, p = 0.02) while controlling for other variables. After the development of value frameworks, median ΔOS improved minimally. The impact of value frameworks has yet to be fully realized in RCTs. Efforts to include endpoints shown to impact value, such as QoL, into clinical trials are warranted.

Regulation of mRNA Translation by Hormone Receptors in Breast and Prostate Cancer

Simple Summary

The estrogen and androgen receptors (ER, AR) are key oncogenic drivers and therapeutic targets in breast and prostate cancer, respectively. These receptors bind to DNA and regulate gene expression but emerging evidence indicates that they also play important roles in controlling the process of mRNA translation, which dictates cellular protein production. Here, we review the mechanisms by which abnormal activities of ER and AR can dysregulate mRNA translation in breast and prostate cancer cells. Specifically, we explore how the intricate cellular signalling pathways that keep mRNA translation in check are perturbed by aberrant ER and AR signalling, which can lead to enhanced cancer cell growth. We also discuss the potential of targeting mRNA translation as a strategy to treat patients with breast and prostate cancer.

Abstract

Breast and prostate cancer are the second and third leading causes of death amongst all cancer types, respectively. Pathogenesis of these malignancies is characterised by dysregulation of sex hormone signalling pathways, mediated by the estrogen receptor-α (ER) in breast cancer and androgen receptor (AR) in prostate cancer. ER and AR are transcription factors whose aberrant function drives oncogenic transcriptional programs to promote cancer growth and progression. While ER/AR are known to stimulate cell growth and survival by modulating gene transcription, emerging findings indicate that their effects in neoplasia are also mediated by dysregulation of protein synthesis (i.e., mRNA translation). This suggests that ER/AR can coordinately perturb both transcriptional and translational programs, resulting in the establishment of proteomes that promote malignancy. In this review, we will discuss relatively understudied aspects of ER and AR activity in regulating protein synthesis as well as the potential of targeting mRNA translation in breast and prostate cancer.

Compensatory combination of mTOR and TrxR inhibitors to cause oxidative stress and regression of tumors

Background: Cancer is a leading cause of death worldwide. Extensive research over decades has led to the development of therapies that inhibit oncogenic signaling pathways. The mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) signaling pathway plays an important role in the development of many cancers. Several mTOR inhibitors are approved for the treatment of cancers. However, the anticancer efficacies of mTOR inhibitor monotherapy are still limited.

Methods: Western blot was used to detect the expression of indicated molecules. Thioredoxin reductase (TrxR) activity in cells was determined by the endpoint insulin reduction assay. Immunofluorescence staining was used to analyze precise location and expression of target proteins. Nude mice were used for xenograft tumor models.

Results: We identified a synergistic lethal interaction of mTOR and TrxR inhibitors and elucidated the underlying molecular mechanisms of this synergism. We demonstrated that mTOR and TrxR inhibitors cooperated to induce cell death by triggering oxidative stress, which led to activation of autophagy, endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress and c-Jun N-terminal Kinase (JNK) signaling pathway in cancer cells. Remarkably, we found that auranofin (AF) combined with everolimus significantly suppressed tumor growth in HCT116 and SGC-7901 xenograft models with no significant signs of toxicity.

Conclusion: Our findings identify a promising therapeutic combination for cancer and has important implications for developing mTOR inhibitor-based combination treatments.

The PTEN Conundrum: How to Target PTEN-Deficient Prostate Cancer

Loss of the tumor suppressor phosphatase and tensin homologue deleted on chromosome 10 (PTEN), which negatively regulates the PI3K-AKT-mTOR pathway, is strongly linked to advanced prostate cancer progression and poor clinical outcome. Accordingly, several therapeutic approaches are currently being explored to combat PTEN-deficient tumors. These include classical inhibition of the PI3K-AKT-mTOR signaling network, as well as new approaches that restore PTEN function, or target PTEN regulation of chromosome stability, DNA damage repair and the tumor microenvironment. While targeting PTEN-deficient prostate cancer remains a clinical challenge, new advances in the field of precision medicine indicate that PTEN loss provides a valuable biomarker to stratify prostate cancer patients for treatments, which may improve overall outcome. Here, we discuss the clinical implications of PTEN loss in the management of prostate cancer and review recent therapeutic advances in targeting PTEN-deficient prostate cancer. Deepening our understanding of how PTEN loss contributes to prostate cancer growth and therapeutic resistance will inform the design of future clinical studies and precision-medicine strategies that will ultimately improve patient care.

Neoadjuvant Therapy in High-Risk Prostate Cancer

High-risk prostate cancer (PCa) is associated with higher rates of biochemical recurrence, clinical recurrence, metastasis, and PCa-specific death, compared to low-and intermediate-risk disease. Herein, we review the various definitions of high-risk PCa, describe the rationale for neoadjuvant therapy prior to radical prostatectomy, and summarize the contemporary data on neoadjuvant therapies. Since the 1990s, several randomized trials of neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) have consistently demonstrated improved pathological parameters, specifically tumor downstaging and reduced extraprostatic extension, seminal vesicle invasion, and positive surgical margins without improvements in cancer-specific or overall survival. These studies, however, were not exclusive to high-risk patients and were limited by suboptimal follow-up periods. Newer studies of neoadjuvant ADT in high-risk PCa show promising pathological and oncological outcomes. Recent level 1 data suggests neoadjuvant chemohormonal therapy (CHT) may improve longer-term survival in high-risk PCa. Immunologic neoadjuvant trials are in their infancy, and further study is required. Neoadjuvant therapies may be promising additions to the multimodal therapeutic landscape of high-risk and locally advanced PCa in the near future.