10 rare tumors that warrant a genetics referral

Risk assessment and genetic counseling for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndromes-Practice resource of the National Society of Genetic Counselors

Cancer risk assessment and genetic counseling for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC) are a communication process to inform and prepare patients for genetic test results and the related medical management. An increasing number of healthcare providers are active in the delivery of cancer risk assessment and testing, which can have enormous benefits for enhanced patient care. However, genetics professionals remain key in the multidisciplinary care of at-risk patients and their families, given their training in facilitating patients' understanding of the role of genetics in cancer development, the potential psychological, social, and medical implications associated with cancer risk assessment and genetic testing. A collaborative partnership of non-genetics and genetics experts is the ideal approach to address the growing number of patients at risk for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer. The goal of this practice resource is to provide allied health professionals an understanding of the key components of risk assessment for HBOC as well as the use of risk models and published guidelines for medical management. We also highlight what patient types are appropriate for genetic testing, what are the most appropriate test(s) to consider, and when to refer individuals to a genetics professional. This practice resource is intended to serve as a resource for allied health professionals in determining their approach to delivering comprehensive care for families and individuals facing HBOC. The cancer risk and prevalence figures in this document are based on cisgender women and men; the risks for transgender or non-binary individuals have not been studied and therefore remain poorly understood.

Compare and contrast: pediatric cancer versus adult malignancies

Cancer is a leading cause of death in both adults and children, but in terms of absolute numbers, pediatric cancer is a relatively rare disease. The rarity of pediatric cancer is consistent with our current understanding of how adult malignancies form, emphasizing the view of cancer as a genetic disease caused by the accumulation and selection of unrepaired mutations over time. However, considering those children who develop cancer merely as stochastically "unlucky" does not fully explain the underlying aetiology, which is distinct from that observed in adults. Here, we discuss the differences in cancer genetics, distribution, and microenvironment between adult and pediatric cancers and argue that pediatric tumours need to be seen as a distinct subset with their own distinct therapeutic challenges. While in adults, the benefit of any treatment should outweigh mostly short-term complications, potential long-term effects have a much stronger impact in children. In addition, clinical trials must cope with low participant numbers when evaluating novel treatment strategies, which need to address the specific requirements of children.

A Guide to Pheochromocytomas and Paragangliomas

Pheochromocytomas and extra-adrenal paragangliomas are rare neuroendocrine neoplasms with characteristic histologic and immunohistochemical features. These tumors can arise in several anatomic locations, necessitating that their diagnostic recognition extends beyond the realm of endocrine disorders. A practical and reproducible risk stratification system for these tumors is still in development. In this rapidly evolving era of molecular medicine, it is essential for pathologists to equip themselves with a framework for understanding the classification of paragangliomas and pheochromocytomas and be informed of how they might advise their colleagues with regard to prognostication and appropriate follow-up.

A new mutL homolog 1 c.1896+5G>A germline mutation detected in a Lynch syndrome-associated lung and gastric double primary cancer patient

BACKGROUND

Mismatch-repair genes (MMRs) ensure high fidelity in genome editing. Loss of function mutation of MMRs will lead to instability of the genome and increase the incidence of cancers. Human mutL homolog 1 (MLH1) is a member of the MMRs, and its mutation is found in Lynch syndrome (LS). In addition to the high incidence of colorectal cancer, LS patients often have other primary cancers. Here, a case of LS-associated lung and gastric double primary cancer was reported.

METHODS

Diagnosis of lung and gastric double primary cancer was mainly based on clinical findings, imaging examination, and histopathological data. The tumor tissues and blood samples were collected, and then genomic DNA was extracted and 450 cancer-related gene alteration screening was conducted by next-generation sequencing and the functional verification of a mutant gene was carried out using the PCR method.

RESULTS

We detected the epidermal growth factor receptor L858R, MSH2 R929* and telomerase reverse transcriptase amplification in the lung cancer specimen; CDH1 c.1320+1G>T mutation in the gastric cancer (GC) specimen; and MLH1 c.1896+5G>A germline mutation in the lung and GC specimens by 450 cancer-related gene mutations detection using next-generation sequencing technology. MLH1c.1896+5G>A is a novel germline mutation, and it was verified by the PCR subsequently. It was found that it could affect the splicing of intron 16. Nine relatives of three-generation of the patient were examined and the MLH1 c.1896+5G>A mutation and pedigree analysis were performed. The father's sister without cancer also carries this mutation.

CONCLUSION

Diagnosis of LS was mainly depended on the following: the cancer histories of his relatives, multi-primary cancers of lung and stomach in his own body, MLH1 and MSH2 gene mutations detected in the cancer tissues. The clinical significance of this new MLH1 c.1896+5G>A germline mutation detected in the LS-associated double primary cancer patient needed further study.

Family history-taking practices and genetic confidence in primary and tertiary care providers for childhood cancer survivors

BACKGROUND

There is growing impetus for increased genetic screening in childhood cancer survivors. Family history-taking is a critical first step in determining survivors' suitability. However, the family history-taking practices of providers of pediatric oncology survivorship care and the confidence of these providers to discuss cancer risks to relatives are unknown.

PROCEDURE

Fifty-four providers completed semistructured interviews in total, which included eight tertiary providers representing nine hospitals across two countries (63% male, 63% oncologists, 37% nurses) and 46 primary care providers (PCPs) nominated by a survivor (59% male, 35% regional practice). We used content analysis and descriptive statistics/regression to analyze the data.

RESULTS

Few tertiary (38%) or primary (35%) providers regularly collected survivors' family histories, often relying on survivors/parents to initiate discussions. Providers mostly took two-generation pedigrees (63% tertiary and 81% primary). Primary providers focused on adult cancers. Lack of time, alternative priorities, and perceived lack of relevance were common barriers. Half of all tertiary providers felt moderately comfortable discussing genetic cancer risk to children of survivors (88% felt similarly discussing risks to other relatives). Most primary providers lacked confidence: 41% felt confident regarding risks to survivors' children and 48% regarding risks to other relatives.

CONCLUSIONS

While family history-taking will not identify all survivors suitable for genetics assessment, recommendations for regular history-taking are not being implemented in tertiary or primary care. Additional PCP-targeted genetic education is warranted given that they are well placed to review family histories of pediatric cancer survivors.

Epidemiology of ovarian cancers in Zaria, Northern Nigeria: a 10-year study

Background

Globally, the absence of a premalignant stage of ovarian cancer and a reliable screening tool make early diagnosis difficult. Locally, poverty, ignorance, and lack of organized cancer services make prognosis poor. We describe the epidemiological features of ovarian cancer seen at Ahmadu Bello University Teaching Hospital Zaria, Northern Nigeria, a tertiary referral center, over a 10-year period in this challenging setting.

Methods

All cases of histologically diagnosed ovarian cancer between January 1, 2004 and December 31, 2013 were included in the study. Case notes were retrieved to collect clinical data including age, parity, clinical stage of disease at presentation, and known associated factors. Results were analyzed using Epi info™.

Results

A total of 78 patients were included in the study. About 4-13 cases were seen every year with a tendency to increasing incidence. The patients were aged 8-80 years with mean of 37 years. Sixty-two (79.5%) patients were premenopausal while postmenopausal women accounted for only seven cases or 9.0%. There were 17 cases (22.3%) of aggressive cancers in patients aged ≤20 years. A majority of the patients, 65 (83.3%), were parous with only nine (11.5%) patients being nulliparous. Serous cyst adenocarcinoma accounted for 32 (41%) cases. Granulosa cell tumor was the second commonest with 18 cases (23.1%). The mean age of occurrence of serous cyst adenocarcinoma was 31 years and for epithelial ovarian cancers in general it was 33.5 years. Endometrioid adenocarcinoma was rare with only one case in 10 years. Factors like age, parity, and premenopausal status did not appear to be protective to the occurrence of malignant ovarian tumor in this group.

Conclusion

Increasing numbers of patients with ovarian cancer were seen over the 10-year period. Young, premenopausal, parous women made up the majority of cases. Serous cystadenocarcinoma was the most common histological variant.

Using family history forms in pediatric oncology to identify patients for genetic assessment

OBJECTIVE

We set out to identify and offer genetic testing to the 5%-10% of pediatric cancer patients who have been estimated to carry germline mutations in inherited cancer predisposition syndromes. Clinical genetic testing has become widely available, and thus in busy oncology clinics, tools are needed to identify patients who could benefit from a referral to genetics.

METHODS

We studied the clinical utility of administering a family history form in the pediatric oncology long-term follow-up clinic to identify patients who might have an inherited cancer predisposition syndrome. Genetic testing involved primarily Sanger sequencing in clia (Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments)-certified laboratories.

RESULTS

Of 57 patients who completed forms, 19 (33.3%) met criteria for referral to genetics. A significant family history of cancer was present for 4 patients, and 12 patients underwent genetic testing. Of 18 genetic tests ordered, none identified a pathogenic mutation, likely because of a small sample size and a candidate-gene approach to testing. Three families were also identified for further assessment based on a family history of breast cancer, with two of families having members eligible for BRCA1 and BRCA2 testing.

CONCLUSIONS

Genetic testing in pediatric oncology patients is important to guide the management of patients who have an inherited cancer predisposition syndrome and to identify other family members at risk when mutations are identified. When no mutations are identified, that information is often reassuring to families who are worried about siblings. However, in the absence of an identified genetic cause in a patient, some uncertainty remains.

Cascade Fumarate Hydratase mutation screening allows early detection of kidney tumour: a case report

BACKGROUND

Fumarate hydratase (FH) deficiency is a rare autosomal recessive disorder which results in a major defect in cellular metabolism. It presents in infancy with progressive encephalopathy, hypotonia, seizures and failure to thrive and is often fatal in childhood. It is caused by mutations in the FH gene (1q42.1) that result in deficiency of the citric acid cycle enzyme fumarate hydratase, resulting in accumulation of fumaric acid. Heterozygous germline mutations in the FH gene predispose to an aggressive autosomal dominant inherited early-onset kidney cancer syndrome: hereditary leiomyomatosis and renal cell cancer (HLRCC).

CASE PRESENTATION

Cascade FH mutation screening enabled the early diagnosis of a renal tumour in an asymptomatic parent of a child with fumarate hydratase deficiency, resulting in timely and possibly life-saving treatment.

CONCLUSION

While the theoretical risk of kidney cancer in parents of children with recessive fumarate hydratase deficiency is well recognized, to our knowledge this is the first report of a kidney tumour being detected in a parent by screening performed for this indication. This underscores the importance of offering lifelong kidney surveillance to such parents and other heterozygous relatives of children born with fumarate hydratase deficiency.

Rare germline alterations in cancer-related genes associated with the risk of multiple primary tumor development

Multiple primary tumors (MPT) have been described in carriers of inherited cancer predisposition genes. However, the genetic etiology of a large proportion of MPT cases remains unclear. We reviewed 267 patients with hereditary cancer predisposition syndromes (HCPS) that underwent genetic counseling and selected 22 patients with MPT to perform genomic analysis (CytoScan HD Array, Affymetrix) aiming to identify new alterations related to a high risk of developing MPT. Twenty patients had a positive family history of cancer and 11 met phenotypic criteria for HCPS. Genetic testing for each of the genes associated with these syndromes revealed negative results for pathogenic mutations. Seventeen rare germline copy number variations (CNVs) covering 40 genes were identified in 11 patients, including an EPCAM/MSH2 deletion in one Lynch syndrome patient. An enrichment analysis revealed a significant number of genes (where the CNVs are mapped) associated with carcinogenesis and/or related to functions implicated with tumor development, such as proliferation and cell survival. An interaction network analysis highlighted the importance of TP53 pathway in cancer emergence. A high number of germline copy-neutral loss of heterozygosity (cnLOH) was identified in nine cases, particularly in two patients. Eighteen genes were covered by both rare CNVs and cnLOH, including 14 related to tumorigenesis and seven genes (ABCC1, KDM4C, KIAA0430, MYH11, NDE1, PIWIL2, and ULK2) specifically associated with cellular growth and proliferation. Overall, we identified 14 cases with rare CNVs and/or cnLOH that may contribute to the risk of MPT development.

KEY MESSAGE

CNVs may explain the risk of hereditary cancer syndromes in MPT patients. CNVs affecting genes related to cancer are candidates to be involved in MPT risk. EPCAM/MSH2 deletions should be investigated in patients suspected to have LS. Gene enrichment related to the TP53 network is associated with MPT development. cnLOH and CNVs contribute to the risk of MPT development.

Genetic causes of cancer predisposition in children and adolescents

The acquisition of de novo somatic mutations accounts for approximately 90% of all new cancer diagnoses, while the remaining 10% is due to inherited genetic traits. In this latter category, individuals harbouring germline mutations show a higher likelihood of developing potentially life-threatening cancers, often at a very young age. The study of cancer genetics has profoundly helped our understanding of cancer biology, leading to better characterised malignancies, tailored targeted therapies and the identification of individuals at high risk of cancer diagnosis. This review will discuss examples of cancer syndromes in children, adolescents and young adults, the main underlying gene mutations, and the use of genetic testing to identify gene mutation carriers. Finally, we will describe how gene mutation detection is employed for the life-long management of patients with high susceptibility to cancer, including genetic counselling, increased surveillance, early intervention and use of targeted therapies.

Hereditary Pheochromocytoma

INTRODUCTION

Pheochromocytomas (PHEO) and paragangliomas (PGL) are rare neuroendocrine tumors with an estimated occurrence of 2 to 5 patients per million per year and an incidence of about 1 per 100 000 in the general population. These tumors may arise sporadically or be associated to various syndromes, namely multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2, neurofibromatosis type 1, Von Hippel-Lindau syndrome, and hereditary paraganglioma-pheochromocytoma syndromes.

OBJECTIVES

This article aims to review the current epidemiology, pathogenesis, clinical presentation, and genetic aspects of syndromes associated with hereditary PHEO/PGL.

METHODS

The literature research, conducted at PubMed database, included review articles, published from February 2009 to February 2014, written in English or Portuguese, using as query: "Hereditary AND Pheochromocytoma."

CONCLUSION

These tumors can be part of a myriad hereditary conditions that are not yet fully understood. Nevertheless, important systemic symptoms and even fatal outcomes can occur. Knowledge of these hereditary conditions can ensure a more efficient detection, treatment, and even prevention of these neuroectodermal tumors, thus new tests and studies should be conducted.

Genetic testing and familial implications in breast-ovarian cancer families

DNA-testing for BRCA1 and BRCA2 has become incorporated in the diagnostic procedure of patients with breast and/or ovarian cancer. Since 1994 an immense amount of information has been gathered on mutation spectra, mutation risk assessment, cancer risks for mutation carriers, factors that modify these risks, unclassified DNA variants, surveillance strategies and preventive options. For the patient and family the main determinator still is whether a mutation is found or not. When a pathogenic mutation is detected in an index case, relatives can opt for pre-symptomatic DNA testing. However in the vast majority no mutation, or only unclear mutations are detectable yet. This means that a hereditary cause cannot be excluded, but pre-symptomatic DNA-testing is still unavailable for relatives. Surveillance for both index cases and relatives is based of the family history of cancer. Next generation genetic testing may help to elucidate genetic causes in these families.