Vision-threatening bilateral panuveitis and TRAPS in a child: an uncommon association

Anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy in the treatment of systemic autoinflammatory diseases: the responses of innate immune cells

Systemic autoinflammatory diseases are rare conditions resulting from dysregulation of the innate immune system, culminating in repetitive bouts of systemic inflammation without the presence of external or self-antigens. Most systemic autoinflammatory diseases are associated with mutations in genes affecting the innate immune response. Tumor necrosis factor is a central player in the pathogenesis of numerous chronic inflammatory disorders, and anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy is widely used in the clinical management of systemic autoinflammatory diseases. Tumor necrosis factor inhibitors block the interaction of tumor necrosis factor with its 2 receptors, tumor necrosis factor receptor 1 and tumor necrosis factor receptor 2. These inhibitors primarily target soluble tumor necrosis factor, which mainly binds to tumor necrosis factor receptor 1, exerting anti-inflammatory effects. Interestingly, tumor necrosis factor inhibitors also affect transmembrane tumor necrosis factor, which engages tumor necrosis factor receptor 2 to initiate reverse signaling. This reverse signaling can activate innate immune cells, prevent apoptosis, or paradoxically inhibit the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines. Tumor necrosis factor inhibitors also promote the release of soluble tumor necrosis factor receptor 2, which neutralizes circulating tumor necrosis factor. Some agents targeting tumor necrosis factor receptor 2 can even act as agonists, triggering reverse signaling by binding to transmembrane tumor necrosis factor. While effective, prolonged use of tumor necrosis factor inhibitors may cause significant side effects due to the widespread expression and pleiotropic functions of tumor necrosis factor receptors. A more thorough understanding of the mechanisms underlying the action of tumor necrosis factor inhibitors is required to develop a more effective and safer treatment for systemic autoinflammatory diseases. This article reviews current studies on the role of the innate immune system in systemic autoinflammatory disease pathogenesis, the impact of anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy on innate immune cells, and perspectives on developing improved agents targeting tumor necrosis factor or its receptors.

Inherited retinal disease-associated uveitis

Inherited retinal diseases (IRDs) are genetic disorders characterized by progressive photoreceptor function loss, often leading to significant visual impairment. Uveitis has been increasingly recognized in the clinical course of some IRDs. Despite advances in understanding the genetic causes and pathophysiology of IRDs, gaps remain in understanding the roles of inflammation and autoimmunity in IRD and IRD-associated uveitis. This review discusses IRD-associated uveitis, including anterior, intermediate, posterior, and panuveitis, as well as complications such as cystoid macular edema and retinal vasculitis. In patients with IRD-associated uveitis, mutations affecting protein function in cilia or photoreceptor outer segments suggest a universal autoimmune mechanism triggered by the immunogenicity of shedding photoreceptor discs. Notably, in patients where uveitis is the initial sign, CRB1 mutations are often implicated, likely due to the compromised blood-retina barrier function or alterations in the external limiting membrane. Other mechanisms leading to uveitis preceding IRD diagnosis include ALPK1 mutations, which activate the proinflammatory NF-κB pathway, CAPN5 mutations, which lead to dysfunction of the innate and adaptive immune systems, and VCAN1 mutations, which elicit immunogenicity due to irregularities in vitreous modeling. Understanding these mechanisms could enhance the development of innovative treatments that target personalized inflammation pathways in IRDs.

Childhood-Onset Non-Infectious Uveitis in the "Biologic Era". Results From Spanish Multicenter Multidisciplinary Real-World Clinical Settings

OBJECTIVE

To characterize and describe clinical experience with childhood-onset non-infectious uveitis.

STUDY DESIGN

A multicenter retrospective multidisciplinary national web-based registry of 507 patients from 21 hospitals was analyzed. Cases were grouped as immune disease-associated (IMDu), idiopathic (IDIu) or ophthalmologically distinct. Characteristics of juvenile idiopathic arthritis-associated (non-HLA-B27-related) uveitis (JIAu), IDIu, and pars planitis (PP) were compared.

RESULTS

IMDu (62.3%) and JIAu (51.9%) predominated in young females; and IDIu (22.7%) and PP (13.6%) in older children, without sex imbalance. Ocular complications occurred in 45.3% of cases (posterior synechiae [28%], cataracts [16%], band keratopathy [14%], ocular hypertension [11%] and cystoid macular edema [10%]) and were associated with synthetic (86%) and biologic (65%) disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) use. Subgroups were significantly associated (p < 0.05) with different characteristics. JIAu was typically anterior (98%), insidious (75%), in ANA-positive (69%), young females (82%) with fewer complications (31%), better visual outcomes, and later use of uveitis-effective biologics. In contrast, IDIu was characteristically anterior (87%) or panuveitic (12.1%), with acute onset (60%) and more complications at onset (59%: synechiae [31%] and cataracts [9.6%]) and less DMARD use, while PP is intermediate, and was mostly bilateral (72.5%), persistent (86.5%) and chronic (86.8%), with more complications (70%; mainly posterior segment and cataracts at last visit), impaired visual acuity at onset, and greater systemic (81.2%), subtenon (29.1%) and intravitreal (10.1%) steroid use.

CONCLUSION

Prognosis of childhood uveitis has improved in the "biologic era," particularly in JIAu. Early referral and DMARD therapy may reduce steroid use and improve outcomes, especially in PP and IDIu.

Knowledge and Current Practices in Monogenic Uveitis: An International Survey by IUSG and AIDA Network

INTRODUCTION

This study aims to explore awareness, knowledge, and diagnostic/therapeutic practices in monogenic uveitis (mU) among uveitis experts.

METHODS

This is an explorative, cross-sectional survey study. An anonymous, semi-structured, electronic survey was delivered to uveitis experts from the Autoinflammatory Diseases Alliance (AIDA) Network and International Uveitis Study Group (IUSG). We included respondents answering ≥ 50% of the survey.

RESULTS

Seventy-seven participants rated their knowledge of mU as proficient (3.9%), adequate (15.6%), sufficient (16.9%), or poor (63.6%). When asked about the first mU gene they thought of, 60.4% mentioned NOD2, 3.9% mentioned NLRP3 or MEFV, and 49.4% provided incorrect or no answers. Success rates in clinical scenarios varied from 15.6% to 55.8% and were higher for ophthalmologists working in multidisciplinary teams (p < 0.01). Genetic testing was ordered for suspected mU by 41.6% of physicians. The availability of molecular techniques did not significantly differ based on geography (p > 0.05). The public healthcare system ensured a higher percentage of tests prescribed were obtained by patients compared to private insurances (p < 0.00). In terms of disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs), tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitors were the most familiar to uveitis experts. The difficulties with off-label therapy procedures were the primary barrier to DMARDs prescription for patients with mU and correlated inversely with the obtained/prescribed drug ratio for interleukin-1 (p < 0.01) and interleukin-6 (p < 0.01) inhibitors.

CONCLUSIONS

This survey identifies proficiency areas, gaps, and opportunities for targeted improvements in patients care. The comprehensive outputs may inform evidence-based guidelines, empowering clinicians with standardized approaches, and drive an AIDA Network-IUSG unified effort to advance scientific knowledge and clinical practice.

Uveitis Associated with Monogenic Autoinflammatory Syndromes in Children

Monogenic autoinflammatory syndromes (MAISs), are caused by pathogenic genetic variants in the innate immune system, leading to dysregulation and aberrant inflammasome activation spontaneously or with minimal triggering. The diagnosis and treatment of MAISs can be intricate, relying on an increased recognition of potential differential diagnoses. This review examines the clinical features of MAIS, with a special focus on uveitis. It also evaluates treatment options and assesses the effects of activating molecular and cytokine pathways.

Retinopathy as an initial sign of hereditary immunological diseases: report of six families and challenges in eye clinic

Introduction

Retinal degenerative or inflammatory changes may occur with hereditary immunological disorders (HID) due to variants in approximately 20 genes. This study aimed to investigate if such retinopathy may present as an initial sign of immunological disorders in eye clinic.

Methods

The variants in the 20 genes were selected from in-house exome sequencing data from 10,530 individuals with different eye conditions. Potential pathogenic variants were assessed by multistep bioinformatic analysis. Pathogenic variants were defined according to the ACMG/AMP criteria and confirmed by Sanger sequencing, co-segregation analysis, and consistency with related phenotypes. Ocular clinical data were thoroughly reviewed, especially fundus changes.

Results

A total of seven pathogenic variants in four of the 20 genes were detected in six probands from six families, including three with hemizygous nonsense variants p.(Q308*), p.(Q416*), and p.(R550*) in MSN, one with homozygous nonsense variants p.(R257*) in AIRE, one with compound heterozygous nonsense variants p.(R176*) and p.(T902*) in LAMB2, and one with a known c.1222T>C (p.W408R) heterozygous variant in CBL. Ocular presentation, as the initial signs of the diseases, was mainly retinopathy mimicking other forms of hereditary retinal degeneration, including exudative vitreoretinopathy in the three patients with MSN variants or tapetoretinal degeneration in the other three patients. Neither extraocular symptoms nor extraocular manifestations were recorded at the time of visit to our eye clinic. However, of the 19 families in the literature with retinopathy caused by variants in these four genes, only one family with an AIRE homozygous variant had retinopathy as an initial symptom, while the other 18 families had systemic abnormalities that preceded retinopathy.

Discussion

This study, for the first time, identified six unrelated patients with retinopathy as their initial and only presenting sign of HID, contrary to the previous reports where retinopathy was the accompanying sign of systemic HID. Recognizing such phenotype of HID may facilitate the clinical care of these patients. Follow-up visits to such patients and additional studies are expected to validate and confirm our findings.

Ocular involvement in monogenic autoinflammatory disease

OBJECTIVE

Monogenic Autoinflammatory diseases (AIDs) are a broad spectrum of rare hereditary diseases whose ocular involvement has not been well characterized yet. This systematic review aims to provide an overview of the current knowledge about ocular findings in AIDs.

METHODS

A systematic literature review was conducted using 2 electronic databases, according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A combination of AIDs and ophthalmology-related search terms were used. All articles were screened by 2 independent reviewers for title, abstract and full text level. We included solely studies that investigated ocular findings in AIDs.

RESULTS

198 papers of 4268 records were retained. Data about 1353 patients with a diagnosis of autoinflammatory disease and ocular involvement were collected (680 CAPS, 211 FMF, 138 TRAPS, 238 Blau, 32 MKD, 21 SIFD, 7 Aicardi Goutières, 3 CANDLE, 8 DADA2, 9 HA20, 6 APLAID). Conjunctivitis was significantly more frequent in CAPS (p < 0.00001), uveitis in Blau, MKD, HA20 and CANDLE (p < 0.00001), papillitis/papilledema in CAPS (p < 0.00001), optic neuritis in Aicardi and DADA2 (p < 0.008), retinal vasculitis in FMF (p < 0.00001), progressive reduction in choroidal thickness in FMF and DADA2 (p < 0.00001), periorbital oedema in TRAPS (p < 0.00001) and retinitis in SIFD (p < 0.00001). Among AIDs with uveitis, granulomatous inflammation was more common in Blau syndrome (p < 0.00001).

CONCLUSION

This systematic literature review characterized the ocular involvement of several AIDs, and the present data may encourage to consider a timely ophthalmological screening program for these rare diseases.

Selective activation of pro-anti-IL-1β antibody enhances specificity for autoinflammatory disorder therapy

Canakinumab is a fully human monoclonal antibody that specifically neutralizes human interleukin (IL)-1β and has been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for treating different types of autoinflammatory disorders such as cryopyrin-associated periodic syndrome, tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated periodic syndrome and systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis. However, long-term systemic neutralization of IL-1β by Canakinumab may cause severe adverse events such as serious upper respiratory tract infections and inflammation, thereby decreasing the quality of life of patients. Here, we used an IgG1 hinge as an Ab lock to cover the IL-1β-binding site of Canakinumab by linking with matrix metalloprotease 9 (MMP-9) substrate to generate pro-Canakinumab that can be specifically activated in the inflamed regions in autoinflammatory diseases to enhance the selectivity and safety of treatment. The Ab lock significantly inhibited the IL-1β-binding by 68-fold compared with Canakinumab, and MMP-9 completely restored the IL-1β neutralizing ability of pro-Canakinumab within 60 min and blocked IL-1β-downstream signaling and IL-1β-regulated genes (i.e., IL-6). It is expected that MMP-9 cleavable and efficient Ab lock will be able to significantly enhance the selective reaction of Canakinumab at the disease site and reduce the on-target toxicities of Canakinumab during systemic circulation, thereby showing potential for development to improve the safety and quality of life of patients with autoinflammatory disorders in the future.

Hints for Genetic and Clinical Differentiation of Adult-Onset Monogenic Autoinflammatory Diseases

Monogenic autoinflammatory diseases (mAIDs) are inherited errors of innate immunity characterized by systemic inflammation recurring with variable frequency and involving the skin, serosal membranes, synovial membranes, joints, the gastrointestinal tube, and/or the central nervous system, with reactive amyloidosis as a potential severe long-term consequence. Although individually uncommon, all mAIDs set up an emerging chapter of internal medicine: recent findings have modified our knowledge regarding mAID pathophysiology and clarified that protean inflammatory symptoms can be variably associated with periodic fevers, depicting multiple specific conditions which usually start in childhood, such as familial Mediterranean fever, tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated periodic syndrome, cryopyrin-associated periodic syndrome, and mevalonate kinase deficiency. There are no evidence-based studies to establish which potential genotype analysis is the most appropriate in adult patients with clinical phenotypes suggestive of mAIDs. This review discusses genetic and clinical hints for an ideal diagnostic approach to mAIDs in adult patients, as their early identification is essential to prompt effective treatment and improve quality of life, and also highlights the most recent developments in the diagnostic work-up for the most frequent hereditary periodic febrile syndromes worldwide.

Phenotypic variability in two patients with tumor necrosis factor receptor associated periodic fever syndrome emphasizes a rare manifestation: Immunoglobulin A nephropathy

Tumor necrosis factor receptor associated periodic fever syndrome (TRAPS) is caused by heterozygote mutations in TNFRSF1A, characterized by recurrent inflammatory attacks. In this report, we described two patients with different heterozygote mutations in TNFRSF1A. Patient 1, a 15-year-old male, had suffered from recurrent fever attacks accompanied by abdominal pain, eye manifestations, and myalgia with increased acute phase reactants since the age of 6-month. He had been unsuccessfully treated with colchicine for having familial Mediterranean fever without an identifiable MEFV mutation since the age of 4-year. At the age of 15 years, he was diagnosed with immunoglobulin (Ig) A nephropathy due to massive proteinuria and renal biopsy findings. Next generation sequencing revealed NM_001065.3: c.236C>T; p. (Thr79Met); T50M heterozygote mutation in TNFRFS1A. He was treated with methylprednisolone and cyclosporine for IgA nephropathy, thereafter with canakinumab for TRAPS. Patient 2, a 17-year-old female, had recurrent arthritis attacks accompanied by increased acute phase reactants for the last two months. She had neither fever attacks nor rashes or myalgia. Her physical examination was normal between attacks. Magnetic resonance imaging of both knees and ankles showed no signs of chronic arthritis. MEFV analyzes showed no mutation. Next generation sequencing revealed NM_001065.3: c.362G>A; p.(Arg121Gln); R92Q heterozygote mutation in TNFRFS1A. Arthritis attacks were treated successfully with ibuprofen thereafter. In conclusion, we wish to emphasize the diversity of the clinical manifestations between these two patients with distinct sequence variants in TNFRSF1A. Moreover, we presented a rare manifestation of TRAPS, IgA nephropathy.