Testicular histology may predict the successful sperm retrieval in patients with non-obstructive azoospermia undergoing conventional TESE: a diagnostic accuracy study

Association of testicular histopathology with sperm retrieval success rates in men with idiopathic non-obstructive azoospermia

INTRODUCTION

Infertility is a major public health issue, with male factors alone contributing to 20-30% of cases. Non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA) is the most severe form, and although techniques like microdissection testicular sperm extraction (mTESE) offer hope, it remains challenging due to its uncertain causes. This study investigates the correlation between testicular histopathology and clinical parameters to enhance sperm retrieval (SR) prediction.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We reviewed 57 azoospermic men from Hanoi Medical University Hospital, recruited between January 2021 and September 2023. Inclusion criteria were confirmed azoospermia and exclusion of known NOA causes. All underwent mTESE with testicular biopsies classified into four histopathological patterns.

RESULTS

The patients' mean age was 31.75 ± 5.19 years. SR was successful in 19.3% (11/57). Higher follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) levels were noted in SR-positive men (p = 0.02). Sertoli cell-only syndrome (SCOS) was the most common pattern. While we found a significant difference in SR rate between testicular histopathology, multivariate analysis showed no strong association. However, FSH levels were predictive of histopathology patterns.

CONCLUSIONS

Idiopathic NOA (iNOA) represents over 60% of azoospermia cases. mTESE remains the gold standard, and FSH levels may help predict testicular histopathology patterns and improving patients prognosis of SR outcomes.

Interpretation of testicular biopsy for infertility: a practical guide

Testicular biopsies are often performed in men with unexplained infertility and azoospermia to ascertain the status of spermatogenesis. Testicular pathology is one of the primary causes of male infertility. However, infrequent exposure among pathologists and a lack of uniform reporting terminology pose diagnostic challenges and variability in interpretation. These issues may lead to inaccurate evaluations, potentially impacting clinical management. The goal of this review is to offer a straightforward, practical approach to interpreting testicular biopsies, thereby assisting pathologists who handle such rare samples. Accurate interpretation of testicular biopsy for infertility plays a crucial role in management of infertile men. In this review, we present a practical guide for reporting testicular biopsies.

A review of testicular histopathology in nonobstructive azoospermia

ABSTRACT

One major challenge in male factor infertility is nonobstructive azoospermia (NOA), which is characterized by spermatozoa-deficient semen without physical duct blockage. This review offers a thorough overview of the histopathology of the testes in NOA cases, clarifying its complex etiology and emphasizing the possible value of histopathology inspection for both diagnosis and treatment. Variable histopathological findings have been linked to NOA, such as tubular hyalinization, Sertoli cell-only syndrome, hypospermatogenesis, and germ cell arrest. Understanding the pathophysiology and forecasting the effectiveness of treatment are further enhanced by both morphometric and ultrastructural analyses. The potential significance of testicular biopsy in forecasting reproductive outcomes is assessed, especially concerning assisted reproductive technologies like intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). Besides, testicular microlithiasis, serum hormone profiles, and testicular size are investigated concerning NOA histopathology. It is concluded that understanding the histopathological patterns in NOA is crucial for its accurate diagnosis and appropriate management. Further research is still warranted to improve understanding of the complex pathophysiology underlying NOA.

European Association of Urology Guidelines on Male Sexual and Reproductive Health: 2025 Update on Male Infertility

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

To present a summary of the updated 2025 European Association of Urology (EAU) Guidelines on Sexual and Reproductive Health (SRH) on male infertility, providing practical recommendations on the clinical work-up with a focus on diagnosis, treatment and follow-up.

METHODS

For the 2025 SRH guidelines, new and relevant evidence was identified, collated, and appraised via a structured assessment of the literature. Databases searched included Medline, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Libraries. Recommendations within the guidelines were developed by the panel to prioritise clinically important care decisions. The strength of each recommendation was determined according to a balance between desirable and undesirable consequences of alternative management strategies, the quality of the evidence (including the certainty of estimates), and the nature and variability of patient values and preferences.

KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS

Key recommendations emphasise the importance of a thorough urological assessment of all men seeking medical help for fertility problems to ensure appropriate treatment. The guidelines also stress the clinical relevance of a parallel investigation of the female partner during the diagnostic and management work-up of the infertile couple, to promote shared-decision making in terms of timing and therapeutic strategies. Furthermore, the guidelines recommend to counsel all infertile men and men with abnormal semen parameters on the associated health risks. Key changes in the male infertility guidelines for 2025 include: the addition of two new sections addressing exome sequencing and probiotic treatment; and significant update of the evidence base and recommendations for the diagnostic work-up of male infertility.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

This overview of the 2025 SHR guidelines offers valuable insights into the diagnosis, classification, treatment and follow-up of male factor infertility and are designed for effective integration into clinical practice.

Genetic insights into non-obstructive azoospermia: Implications for diagnosis and TESE outcomes

BACKGROUND

Non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA) is considered one of the most severe forms of male infertility. Despite the limited range of testicular phenotypes, NOA exhibits considerable genetic heterogeneity. The aim of this study was to uncover the etiopathogenesis of NOA and provide insights into the outcomes of testicular sperm extraction (TESE).

MATERIAL METHOD

To elucidate the potential causes of testicular pathogenesis, a cohort of 61 patients was analyzed. The genetic etiology was assessed using our developed gene panel, based on genes with prior functional studies conducted specifically in the context of testicular characterization.

RESULTS

Our analytical approach, built upon these findings, enabled us to explore the potential genetic causes of NOA and assess their relevance to TESE outcomes. A potential causal defect was identified in 14 genes across a total of 26 individuals (42%). Of these, three genes-MEIOB, TERB1, and USP26-had been previously described in men, while eight genes-SPO11, RBBP7, STS, RBMXL3, ZCCHC13, HUWE1, ESR1, and ABCD1-had been reported in prior studies. Additionally, three genes-CEP85, NAP1L3, and CENPI-had been previously described only in knockout (KO) phenotype studies, and this study represents the first identification of these genes in men.

CONCLUSION

Interestingly, the histological findings of meiotic arrest were strongly linked to genes involved in meiosis, reinforcing the clinical diagnosis of patients in this cohort. Additionally, our study underscores the importance of refining diagnostic strategies that focus on genes associated with testicular phenotypes, which could enhance the accuracy of TESE success predictions.

Prediction of testicular histology in azoospermia patients through deep learning-enabled two-dimensional grayscale ultrasound

ABSTRACT

Testicular histology based on testicular biopsy is an important factor for determining appropriate testicular sperm extraction surgery and predicting sperm retrieval outcomes in patients with azoospermia. Therefore, we developed a deep learning (DL) model to establish the associations between testicular grayscale ultrasound images and testicular histology. We retrospectively included two-dimensional testicular grayscale ultrasound from patients with azoospermia (353 men with 4357 images between July 2017 and December 2021 in The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China) to develop a DL model. We obtained testicular histology during conventional testicular sperm extraction. Our DL model was trained based on ultrasound images or fusion data (ultrasound images fused with the corresponding testicular volume) to distinguish spermatozoa presence in pathology (SPP) and spermatozoa absence in pathology (SAP) and to classify maturation arrest (MA) and Sertoli cell-only syndrome (SCOS) in patients with SAP. Areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUCs), accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity were used to analyze model performance. DL based on images achieved an AUC of 0.922 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.908-0.935), a sensitivity of 80.9%, a specificity of 84.6%, and an accuracy of 83.5% in predicting SPP (including normal spermatogenesis and hypospermatogenesis) and SAP (including MA and SCOS). In the identification of SCOS and MA, DL on fusion data yielded better diagnostic performance with an AUC of 0.979 (95% CI: 0.969-0.989), a sensitivity of 89.7%, a specificity of 97.1%, and an accuracy of 92.1%. Our study provides a noninvasive method to predict testicular histology for patients with azoospermia, which would avoid unnecessary testicular biopsy.

A Nomogram Predicting Testicular Sperm Extraction Success in Men With Non-obstructive Azoospermia: A Multi-center Study

OBJECTIVE

To develop an efficient and easy-to-use nomogram that can predict testicular sperm extraction (TESE) success in men with non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA) by using pre-operative parameters.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data of 3093 men who underwent TESE for NOA were included in this study. Demographic data, testis volumes, presence of varicocele, length of infertility, history of previous surgeries, history of genitourinary infections, smoking status, chromosome abnormalities, presence of Y-chromosome microdeletion, family history of infertility, testis biopsy, surgical data, sperm retrieval rate, final pathology obtained at TESE, follicle-stimulating hormone, luteinizing hormone, and testosterone levels were recorded. The primary outcome was to develop an efficient nomogram that can predict the TESE success in men with NOA. The secondary outcomes were identifying the significant pre-operative parameters that are associated with success in TESE.

RESULTS

Sperm retrieval rate was 50.2%(1553/3093). Testis volume, history of varicocelectomy, chromosome abnormalities, and presence of Y-chromosome microdeletion were shown to affect sperm retrieval rate significantly (P <.05). Sperm retrieval success was higher in men with older age, higher testis volume (>10 mL), lower follicle-stimulating hormone level (≤12.92 mIU/mL), lower luteinizing hormone level, and higher testosterone level (P <.05). Only testis volume and patient's age were associated with successful sperm retrieval in multivariate logistic regression analysis.

CONCLUSION

In men with NOA, high testis volume, old age, low follicle-stimulating hormone level, low luteinizing hormone level, and high testosterone level are advantageous for successful sperm retrieval in TESE. Herein, we present a nomogram that can predict the outcome of TESE in men with NOA with adequate success.

Predictors of Successful Testicular Sperm Extraction: A New Era for Men with Non-Obstructive Azoospermia

Background/Objectives: Non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA) is a severe form of male infertility characterized by the absence of sperm in the ejaculate due to impaired spermatogenesis. Testicular sperm extraction (TESE) combined with intracytoplasmic sperm injection is the primary treatment, but success rates are unpredictable, causing significant emotional and financial burdens. Traditional clinical and hormonal predictors have shown inconsistent reliability. This review aims to evaluate current and emerging non-invasive preoperative predictors of successful sperm retrieval in men with NOA, highlighting promising biomarkers and their potential clinical applications. Methods: A comprehensive literature review was conducted, examining studies on clinical and hormonal factors, imaging techniques, molecular biology biomarkers, and genetic testing related to TESE outcomes in NOA patients. The potential role of artificial intelligence and machine learning in enhancing predictive models was also explored. Results: Traditional predictors such as patient age, body mass index, infertility duration, testicular volume, and serum hormone levels (follicle-stimulating hormone, luteinizing hormone, inhibin B) have limited predictive value for TESE success. Emerging non-invasive biomarkers-including anti-Müllerian hormone levels, inhibin B to anti-Müllerian hormone ratio, specific microRNAs, long non-coding RNAs, circular RNAs, and germ-cell-specific proteins like TEX101-show promise in predicting successful sperm retrieval. Advanced imaging techniques like high-frequency ultrasound and functional magnetic resonance imaging offer potential but require further validation. Integrating molecular biomarkers with artificial intelligence and machine learning algorithms may enhance predictive accuracy. Conclusions: Predicting TESE outcomes in men with NOA remains challenging using conventional clinical and hormonal parameters. Emerging non-invasive biomarkers offer significant potential to improve predictive models but require validation through large-scale studies. Incorporating artificial intelligence and machine learning could further refine predictive accuracy, aiding clinical decision-making and improving patient counseling and treatment strategies in NOA.

Artificial intelligence interpretation of touch print smear cytology of testicular specimen from patients with azoospermia

PURPOSE

Identification of mature sperm at microdissection testicular sperm extraction (mTESE) is a crucial step of sperm retrieval to help patients with non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA) proceed to intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Touch print smear (TPS) cytology allows immediate interpretation and prompt sperm identification intraoperatively. In this study, we leverage machine learning (ML) to facilitate TPS reading and conquer the learning curve for new operators.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

One hundred seventy-six microscopic TPS images from the testicular specimen of patients with azoospermia at Taipei Veterans General Hospital were retrospectively collected, including categories of Sertoli cell, primary spermatocytes, round spermatids, elongated spermatids, immature sperm, and mature sperm. Among them, 118 images were assigned as the training set and 29 images as the validation set. RetinaNet (Lin et al. in IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 42:318-327, 2020), a one-stage detection framework, was adopted for cell detection. The performance was evaluated at the cell level with average precision (AP) and recall, and the precision-recall (PR) curve was displayed among an independent testing set that contains 29 images that aim to assess the model.

RESULTS

The training set consisted of 4772 annotated cells, including 1782 Sertoli cells, 314 primary spermatocytes, 443 round spermatids, 279 elongated spermatids, 504 immature sperm, and 1450 mature sperm. This study demonstrated the performance of each category and the overall AP and recall on the validation set, which were 80.47% and 96.69%. The overall AP and recall were 79.48% and 93.63% on the testing set, while increased to 85.29% and 93.80% once the post-meiotic cells were merged into one category.

CONCLUSIONS

This study proposed an innovative approach that leveraged ML methods to facilitate the diagnosis of spermatogenesis at mTESE for patients with NOA. With the assistance of ML techniques, surgeons could determine the stages of spermatogenesis and provide timely histopathological diagnosis for infertile males.

A step closer to parenthood with non-obstructive azoospermia: Unveiling the impact of microdissection testicular sperm extraction in Australia's largest single-centre study

BACKGROUND

Non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA) diagnosis poses challenges for couples seeking parenthood. Microdissection testicular sperm extraction (MD-TESE) excels in retrieving testicular sperm cells for NOA cases. However, limited live birth data in Australian NOA patients hinders accurate counselling.

AIMS

This study aimed to determine the likelihood of infertile couples with a male partner diagnosed with NOA conceiving biological children using MD-TESE / intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective cohort study included 108 NOA men treated at a public fertility unit and a private fertility centre (May 2009-May 2022).

PRIMARY OUTCOME

live birth rate (LBR); secondary outcomes: sperm retrieval rate, pregnancy rate, and neonatal outcomes.

RESULTS

Among 108 patients undergoing MD-TESE, the positive sperm retrieval rate (PSRR) was 64.8% (70/108). Histology best predicted sperm retrieval success, with hypo-spermatogenesis yielding a 94.1% PSRR. Age, testicular volume, and hormonal parameters had no significant impact. Mean male age: 35.4 years; mean partner age: 32.7 years. Fertilisation rate: 50.7%. LBR per initiated cycle: 58.7% (37/63); per embryo transfer: 63.8% (37/58); per initially diagnosed NOA man: 34.3% (37/108). Cumulative LBR: 74.1% (43/58); twin rate: 10.8% (4/37). No neonatal deaths or defects were observed among 47 live offspring.

CONCLUSION

This study provides valuable data for counselling NOA couples on the probability of conceiving biological offspring. MD-TESE and ICSI yielded favourable PSRR (64.8%) and LBR (63.8%). However, couples should be aware that once NOA is confirmed, the chance of taking home a baby is 34%.

Non-invasive biomarkers for sperm retrieval in non-obstructive patients: a comprehensive review

Recent advancements in reproductive medicine have guided novel strategies for addressing male infertility, particularly in cases of non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA). Two prominent invasive interventions, namely testicular sperm extraction (TESE) and microdissection TESE (micro-TESE), have emerged as key techniques to retrieve gametes for assisted reproduction technologies (ART). Both heterogeneity and complexity of NOA pose a multifaceted challenge to clinicians, as the invasiveness of these procedures and their unpredictable success underscore the need for more precise guidance. Seminal plasma can be aptly regarded as a liquid biopsy of the male reproductive tract, encompassing secretions from the testes, epididymides, seminal vesicles, bulbourethral glands, and prostate. This fluid harbors a variety of cell-free nucleic acids, microvesicles, proteins, and metabolites intricately linked to gonadal activity. However, despite numerous investigations exploring potential biomarkers from seminal fluid, their widespread inclusion into the clinical practice remains limited. This could be partially due to the complex interplay of diverse clinical and genetic factors inherent to NOA that likely contributes to the absence of definitive biomarkers for residual spermatogenesis. It is conceivable that the integration of clinical data with biomarkers could increase the potential in predicting surgical procedure outcomes and their choice in NOA cases. This comprehensive review addresses the challenge of sperm retrieval in NOA through non-invasive biomarkers. Moreover, we delve into promising perspectives, elucidating innovative approaches grounded in multi-omics methodologies, including genomics, transcriptomics and proteomics. These cutting-edge techniques, combined with the clinical and genetics features of patients, could improve the use of biomarkers in personalized medical approaches, patient counseling, and the decision-making continuum. Finally, Artificial intelligence (AI) holds significant potential in the realm of combining biomarkers and clinical data, also in the context of identifying non-invasive biomarkers for sperm retrieval.

From Diagnosis to Treatment: Comprehensive Care by Reproductive Urologists in Assisted Reproductive Technology

Infertility is a global health concern, with male factors playing an especially large role. Unfortunately, however, the contributions made by reproductive urologists in managing male infertility under assisted reproductive technology (ART) often go undervalued. This narrative review highlights the important role played by reproductive urologists in diagnosing and treating male infertility as well as any barriers they face when providing services. This manuscript presents a comprehensive review of reproductive urologists' role in managing male infertility, outlining their expertise in diagnosing and managing male infertility as well as reversible causes and performing surgical techniques such as sperm retrieval. This manuscript investigates the barriers limiting urologist involvement such as limited availability, awareness among healthcare professionals, and financial constraints. This study highlights a decrease in male fertility due to lifestyle factors like sedentary behavior, obesity, and substance abuse. It stresses the significance of conducting an evaluation process involving both male and female partners to identify any underlying factors contributing to infertility and to identify patients who do not require any interventions beyond ART. We conclude that engaging urologists more effectively in infertility management is key to optimizing fertility outcomes among couples undergoing assisted reproductive technology treatments and requires greater education among healthcare providers regarding the role urologists and lifestyle factors that could have an effect on male fertility.

Testicular sperm aspiration has a poor effect in predicting micro-TESE outcomes in NOA patients with AZFc deletion

BACKGROUND

Testicular sperm aspiration (TESA) is widely used in the diagnosis and management of nonobstructive azoospermia. However, its ability for predicting microdissection testicular sperm extraction in nonobstructive azoospermia (NOA) patients with AZFc deletion remains uncertain. To investigate whether TESA affected the sperm retrieval rate (SRR) in NOA patients with AZFc deletion, a retrospective analysis of the clinical data of NOA patients with AZFc deletion who underwent microdissection testicular sperm extraction (micro-TESE) was conducted. The effects of age, testicular volume, follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) levels, luteinizing hormone (LH) levels, testosterone (T) levels and TESA on the SRR were analyzed in this group of patients.

RESULTS

A total of 181 individuals had their sperm successfully collected and underwent micro-TESE, with an SRR of 67.4%. The patients were separated into two groups based on their micro-TESE results (sperm acquisition and nonsperm acquisition), with no significant variations in age, testicular volume, FSH levels, LH levels, or T levels between the two groups. There was no significant difference in the SRR between any of the groups into which patients were classified based on reproductive hormone reference value ranges. Binary logistic regression was used to explore the absence of significant effects of age, testicular volume, FSH levels, LH levels, and T levels on sperm acquisition in patients undergoing micro-TESE. In the preoperative testicular diagnostic biopsy group, the sperm acquisition and nonsperm acquisition groups had SRRs of 90.1% and 65.1%, respectively. More significantly, there was no significant difference in the SRR between the negative preoperative testicular diagnostic biopsy group and the nonpreoperative testicular diagnostic biopsy group (65.1 vs. 63.8%, p = 0.855).

CONCLUSION

There is a high probability of successful sperm acquisition in the testis of men undergoing micro-TESE. In this group of patients, age, testicular volume, FSH levels, LH levels, and T levels may have little bearing on the micro-TESE outcome. In patients whose preoperative TESA revealed the absence of sperm, the probability of obtaining sperm by micro-TESE remained high (65.1%); negative TESA results appeared to not influence the SRR (63.8%) in patients undergoing micro-TESE.

Outcomes and predictive factors of successful salvage microdissection testicular sperm extraction (mTESE) after failed classic TESE: results from a multicenter cross-sectional study

Microdissection testicular sperm extraction (mTESE) has been proposed as a salvage treatment option for men with a previously failed classic TESE (cTESE), but data are scarce. We aimed to assess the outcome of and potential predictors of successful salvage mTESE in a cohort of men previously submitted to unfruitful cTESE. Data from 61 men who underwent mTESE after a failed cTESE between 01/2014 and 10/2020, at 6 tertiary-referral centres in Italy were analysed. All men were investigated with semen analyses, testicular ultrasound, hormonal and genetic blood testing. Pathological diagnosis from TESE was collected in every man. Descriptive statistics and logistic regression models were used to investigate potential predictors of positive sperm retrieval (SR+) after salvage mTESE. Baseline serum Follicle-Stimulating hormone (FSH) and total testosterone levels were 17.2 (8.6-30.1) mUI/mL and 4.7 (3.5-6.4) ng/mL, respectively. Sertoli-cell-only syndrome (SCOS), maturation arrest (MA) and hypospermatogenesis were found in 24 (39.3%), 21 (34.4%) and 16 (26.2%) men after cTESE, respectively. At mTESE, SR+ was found in 30 (49.2%) men. Patients with a diagnosis of hypospermatogenesis had a higher rate of SR+ (12/16 (75%)) compared to MA (12/21 (57.1%)) and SCOS (6/24 (25%)) patients at mTESE (p < 0.01). No clinical and laboratory differences were observed between SR+ and SR- patients at mTESE. There were no significant complications after mTESE. At multivariable logistic regression analysis, only hypospermatogenesis (OR 9.5; p < 0.01) was independently associated with SR+ at mTESE, after accounting for age and FSH.In conclusion, salvage mTESE in NOA men with previous negative cTESE was safe and promoted SR+ in almost 50%. A baseline pathology of hypospermatogenesis at cTESE emerged as the only independent predictor of positive outcomes at salvage mTESE.

Can PCNA and LIM15 gene expression levels predict sperm retrieval success in men with non-obstructive azoospermia?

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

It is necessary to be able to predict sperm retrieval before microdissection testicular sperm extraction (mTESE) in azoospermic men. This study established the importance of proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) and LIM15 gene expression levels in predicting the success of sperm retrieval by mTESE.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

One hundred and forty-three men who were diagnosed with non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA) were included in the study. Patients' age, total testosterone and follicle stimulating hormone values, testicular volume and testicular histology were recorded by prospectively. PCNA and LIM15 gene expression levels were determined by real-time PCR in the materials from both ejaculate and testicular specimens.

RESULTS

Testis volume and histology were the most important factors in predicting the sperm retrieval rate (SRR). The PCNA and LIM15 gene expression levels measured in testicular tissues and the LIM15 gene expression levels measured in ejaculate significantly correlated with the SRR in mTESE (p=0.038, p=0.022, and p=0.004, respectively). Although the PCNA gene expression level measured in ejaculate was higher in men with successful sperm retrieval, the difference was not statistically significant (p=0.061). According to the multivariate logistic regression analysis, testicular volume and LIM15 gene expression level in ejaculate were independent predictive parameters for sperm retrieval.

CONCLUSION

The data showed that LIM15 gene expression level in ejaculate is a useful molecular marker to predict the SRR before mTESE.

Intrasurgical Seminiferous Tubular Diameter Correlates with Total Motile Sperm Count in Azoospermia: a Prospective Cohort Study

We aimed to find a correlation between the intraoperative diameters of the seminiferous tubules evaluated at high magnification during micro-testicular sperm extraction (micro-TESE) and total motile sperm count (TMSC) in non-obstructive azoospermic (NOA) patients. Five hundred four consecutive NOA patients were included and underwent micro-TESE. The change in the mean TMSC and different seminiferous tubular diameters was of high statistical significance (p < 0.001). It should be noted that the highest mean TMSC was reported in the dilated tubules (DTs) group followed by the other study groups 941.72 ± 196.97, 487.37 ± 443.57, and 34.54 ± 60.79, respectively. Furthermore, 21 naïve cases had dilated tubules (DTs) and 18 (85.7%) of them had shown eventful micro-TESE. Conversely, 186 naïve cases had slightly dilated tubules (SDTs), and 101 (54.3%) of them had eventful micro-TESE. Only 8 (24.25%) cases of the 33 cases had non dilated tubules (NDTs) and showed eventful micro-TESE. The frequency of intrasurgical seminiferous tubular diameter and micro-TESE outcome among the naïve cases had demonstrated a highly statistical significance (p < 0.001). Interestingly, all salvaged cases (100%) with DTs and a previous eventful TESE had shown eventful TESE in the current study. The most dilated intrasurgical seminiferous tubular diameter is associated with the highest TMSC in NOA patients including SCO cases.

NBMA Promotes Spermatogenesis by Mediating Oct4 Pathway

Non-obstructive azoospermia is one of the most common causes of male infertility, but there is still no specific treatment drug. Given that the Oct4 (Octamer-binding transcription factor 4) has an important regulatory effect on spermatogenesis, activating it can effectively promote spermatogenesis, so it is of great value to develop Oct4-targeted drug design and elucidating its mechanism of action. Here, we screened out the Oct4-targeted drug molecule NBMA (N-benzyl-4-methoxy-2-(1-(4-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl)vinyl)aniline) by computer-assisted technology, and found that it has a significant promoting effect on spermatogenesis in the established mouse azoospermia model. Subsequently, through transcriptome sequencing and enrichment analysis, real-time fluorescent quantitative PCR (qPCR) and western blot experiments revealed that NBMA promotes the differentiation of spermatogonial stem cells by activating the Oct4 pathway, thereby promoting spermatogenesis. This study proves that NBMA is a molecule with great potential to be developed as a therapeutic drug for azoospermia. It also shows that computer-assisted, chemical and biological multidisciplinary methods play a very important role in innovative drug discovery.

Perceptions and practices regarding the process of obtaining informed consent from surgical patients at a tertiary care hospital

BACKGROUND

Proper informed consent is essential for patients to have sound knowledge about the indication, risks, and benefits of a proposed surgical procedure. The study aim was to assess the perceptions of postoperative patients about the informed consent process and identify various influential factors in a tertiary care hospital.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study was conducted from February to August 2018 at a tertiary care hospital in Lahore, Pakistan. A validated questionnaire was used to conduct interviews of 101 patients planning to undergo elective surgery after fulfilling all ethical considerations. A purposive sampling technique was employed to enroll and the data analysis was performed by using SPSS version 23.

RESULTS

Out of total 101 patients, 50 (49.5%) of them were males and the mean age of total sample was 36.98 ± 14.23 years. The majority 92 (91.1%) considered informed consent to be important and that it did not influence their surgical decision 85 (84.2%). Consent was obtained by the consulting surgeon from 41 (40.6%) patients and by the residents/house officer from 60 (59.4%) patients. Fifteen (14.8%) patients signed the consent form themselves, and 86 (85.1%) relatives of patients signed. Ninety-eight (97.0) patients were told about indications of the surgery, and 54 (53.5%) were told about possible complications. Seventy-five (74.3%) patients were informed about alternatives to surgery. Significant reasons for not signing were language (p = 0.03), educational status (p = 0.002), and not being informed by relatives before signing (p = 0.02).

CONCLUSION

The patients had adequate knowledge about the process of informed consent and considered it important. Factors identified as barriers to signing the consent form by the patients themselves included language, better educational status, and not being asked by relatives. It is imperative to involve the patients in the process of consent, especially in signing by them or in their presence by their surrogate.

Effect of testicular morphology on embryo development to the blastocyst stage after round spermatid injection

If spermatozoa cannot be found after testiculer sperm extraction (TESE) in patients followed up due to nonobstructive azospermia (NOA) and the patients do not want donor spermatozoa, performance of round spermatid injection (ROSI) with the current technology seems to be the last resort. This retrospective study was conducted to evaluate the effect of testicular morphology on the development of embryos to the blastocyst stage obtained from ROSI. Between September 2019 and March 2020, after TESE and biopsy 29 patients who had only spermatid were taken to study. Tubular appearance, basal membrane appearance, Johnson score, peritubular fibrosis, interstitial fibrosis, and Leydig cell proliferation were pathologically examined. Following egg collection, ROSI was applied to the oocytes using the piezoelectric method. The embryos were monitored until the blastocyst stage. The mean age of the 29 patients was 36.3±5.01 years. Also, 7 patients had not previously undergone TESE, 20 had previously undergone once, and 2 had previously undergone twice. It was observed that having a history of TESE and a high Johnson score increased the likelihood of the embryo remaining in the blastocyst stage (P=0.021 and 0.014, respectively). However, other parameters do not affect the likelihood of blastocyst formation (P>0.05). Low TESE history and high Johnson score were associated with embryo development to the blastocyst stage. If spermatozoa are not found in patients with nonobstructive azoospermia, ROSI performed during initial TESE increases the likelihood of blastocyst formation.

European Association of Urology Guidelines on Male Sexual and Reproductive Health: 2021 Update on Male Infertility

CONTEXT

The European Association of Urology (EAU) has updated its guidelines on sexual and reproductive health for 2021.

OBJECTIVE

To present a summary of the 2021 version of the EAU guidelines on sexual and reproductive health, including advances and areas of controversy in male infertility.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

The panel performed a comprehensive literature review of novel data up to January 2021. The guidelines were updated and a strength rating for each recommendation was included that was based either on a systematic review of the literature or consensus opinion from the expert panel, where applicable.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

The male partner in infertile couples should undergo a comprehensive urological assessment to identify and treat any modifiable risk factors causing fertility impairment. Infertile men are at a higher risk of harbouring and developing other diseases including malignancy and cardiovascular disease and should be screened for potential modifiable risk factors, such as hypogonadism. Sperm DNA fragmentation testing has emerged as a novel biomarker that can identify infertile men and provide information on the outcomes from assisted reproductive techniques. The role of hormone stimulation therapy in hypergonadotropic hypogonadal or eugonadal patients is controversial and is not recommended outside of clinical trials. Furthermore, there is insufficient evidence to support the widespread use of other empirical treatments and surgical interventions in clinical practice (such as antioxidants and surgical sperm retrieval in men without azoospermia). There is low-quality evidence to support the routine use of testicular fine-needle mapping as an alternative diagnostic and predictive tool before testicular sperm extraction (TESE) in men with nonobstructive azoospermia (NOA), and either conventional or microdissection TESE remains the surgical modality of choice for men with NOA.

CONCLUSIONS

All infertile men should undergo a comprehensive urological assessment to identify and treat any modifiable risk factors. Increasing data indicate that infertile men are at higher risk of cardiovascular mortality and of developing cancers and should be screened and counselled accordingly. There is low-quality evidence supporting the use of empirical treatments and interventions currently used in clinical practice; the efficacy of these therapies needs to be validated in large-scale randomised controlled trials.

PATIENT SUMMARY

Approximately 50% of infertility will be due to problems with the male partner. Therefore, all infertile men should be assessed by a specialist with the expertise to not only help optimise their fertility but also because they are at higher risk of developing cardiovascular disease and cancer long term and therefore require appropriate counselling and management. There are many treatments and interventions for male infertility that have not been validated in high-quality studies and caution should be applied to their use in routine clinical practice.

"Second-look" Micro Testicular Sperm Extraction (MicroTESE) in Patients with Non-obstructive Azoospermia Following Histopathological Analysis

Introduction:

Microdissection testicular sperm extraction (microTESE) is considered the gold standard method for surgical sperm retrieval among patients with non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA).

Aim:

This study aimed to evaluate the correlation between histopathological findings after failed microTESE procedure and outcomes of the „second-look“ procedure and to provide insight into the most common histopathological patterns after testicular biopsy within our population.

Methods:

The retrospective study included 33 selected patients with NOA, who had undergone unsuccessful sperm retrieval. The diagnosis of NOA was made after the assessment of the patient’s history data, a physical examination, semen analysis, the hormonal profile, and genetic studies. After negative sperm retrieval, histopathological report has been analyzed for „second-look“ microTESE attempt.

Results:

Five testicular histopathological patterns were found: hypospermatogenesis (9,1%), Sertoli cell-only syndrome (43%), germ cell maturation arrest (15%), seminiferous tubule hyalinization (15%), mixed pattern (21%). Y-microdeletions were detected in 5 patients, of which 3 patients showed AZFc region deletions. Only 3 patients (9,1%) underwent a „second-look“ procedure after the evaluation of histopathological reports. After the stimulation therapy and „second-look“ procedure, we had a positive outcome in a single patient (33,3%). Mean FSH value in patients with confirmed spermatogenesis was 17.26±3.11IU/l, while mean FSH value in patients without presence or germ cell statistically significantly exceeded and was 24.28±4.71IU/L (p=0.038).

Conclusion:

Histopathological reports following the microTESE procedure are obligatory for the proper selection of patients who are candidates for the „second-look“ microTESE attempt. Patients with Sertoli cell-only syndrome and hypospermatogenesis particularly can benefit from the “second-look” procedure.

Improving interpretation of biopsies during microsurgical testicular sperm exploration in azospermic patients: use of Davidson's fluid

Histological interpretation of testicular biopsies in the investigation of infertility in men with azoospermia requires adequate tissue fixation to preserve the nuclear and cytoplasmic detail, as well as the architectural organisation of germ cells in different phases of maturation within seminiferous tubules. The aim of the study was to assess the histomorphological quality of testicular biopsies using Davidson's fluid (DF) as fixative and compare it to standard 10% neutral buffered formalin. Concurrent testicular biopsies from the same testis from patients undergoing microsurgical testicular sperm exploration (m-TESE) were separately fixed in DF and formalin and processed for histological examination. Histological parameters including sloughing of cells, cytoplasmic shrinkage of seminiferous tubular cells, nuclear chromatin detail, cytoplasmic graininess and overall clarity of morphological detail were graded on a scale of 0-4 (0, none; 1, minimal; 2, slight; 3, moderate; 4, marked). The effect of DF on biopsy diagnoses was assessed by comparison with corresponding formalin fixed biopsy diagnoses. Eighty-seven testicular biopsies from 27 patients were examined. DF fixation resulted in significantly less luminal sloughing of cells (1.59±1.34 vs 3.44±0.83, p≤0.00001), less cytoplasmic shrinkage of seminiferous tubular cells (1.58±1.11 vs 3.11±1.07, p≤0.00001), better nuclear chromatin detail (3.06±0.91 vs 1.92±0.48, p≤0.00001), less cytoplasmic graininess (2.11±0.96 vs 2.86±0.87, p=0.0014) and better overall clarity of morphological detail than formalin fixation (3.14±0.69 vs 2.14±0.58, p≤0.00001). The diagnostic concordance between DF fixed and formalin fixed biopsies was 90.8%. This study supports the use of DF as a superior alternative fixative to formalin for histological assessment of testicular biopsies.

Non-obstructive azoospermia: current and future perspectives

Infertility affects 1 in 6 couples, and male factor infertility has been implicated as a cause in 50% of cases. Azoospermia is defined as the absence of spermatozoa in the ejaculate and is considered the most extreme form of male factor infertility. Historically, these men were considered sterile but, with the advent of testicular sperm extraction and assisted reproductive technologies, men with azoospermia are able to biologically father their own children. Non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA) occurs when there is an impairment to spermatogenesis. This review describes the contemporary management of NOA and discusses the role of hormone stimulation therapy, surgical and embryological factors, and novel technologies such as proteomics, genomics, and artificial intelligence systems in the diagnosis and treatment of men with NOA. Moreover, we highlight that men with NOA represent a vulnerable population with an increased risk of developing cancer and cardiovascular comorbodities.

Can preoperative parameters predict successful sperm retrieval and live birth in couples undergoing testicular sperm extraction and intracytoplasmic sperm injection for azoospermia?

Background

We aimed to determine if the success of TESE and live-birth following TESE-ICSI can be predicted from readily available preoperative parameters for couples with azoospermia. Our methodology was as follows, this was a cohort study of couples who attended the fertility service (from 2009-2019) at an NHS hospital in whom the male partner was diagnosed with azoospermia and required conventional TESE with multiple biopsies to obtain sperm. Of 414 men included, 223 had successful TESE and of those 178 have used sperm in ICSI cycle(s). Predictive models were developed using logistic regression. We assessed model performance by internally validated concordance statistics and calibration plots. Successful sperm retrieval was defined as the presence of motile sperm which survived the freeze-thaw process and live-birth defined as delivery after 34 weeks of gestation.

Results

Successful TESE was associated with higher male age and lower FSH. The TESE model discriminated well with a c statistic of 0.81 (0.77-0.85). Live-birth was associated with lower maternal age, earlier ICSI cycle, and lower testicular volume. The live-birth model also discriminated well with a c statistic of 0.70 (0.64-0.76).

Conclusions

These results support the pragmatic counselling of couples diagnosed with azoospermia about the chances of success of the TESE procedure and of biological parenthood prior to surgical intervention. The models help to discriminate between men who have a high or low chance of successful TESE and couples who have a higher chance of achieving a live-birth after successful TESE. This will allow couples to make a better assessment of the balance of risk versus benefit prior to commitment to surgical interventions.

Predictors of surgical sperm retrieval in non-obstructive azoospermia: summary of current literature

Intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), combined with surgical sperm retrieval (SR) techniques, is the sole option for patients with non-obstructive azoospermia to achieve fertility; however, with suboptimal results. Given the variability in clinical presentation, the potential role of factors that can predict the likelihood of successful testicular SR needs to be clarified. This article summarizes the current evidence concerning the variables predicting SR success in non-obstructive azoospermic patients with spermatogenic failure. For this, we used 60 articles, including 46 original papers and six meta-analyses. Clinical and laboratory factors, as well as adjuvant therapies and surgical retrieval methods, were the factors most commonly investigated. We found that Klinefelter syndrome, Y chromosome microdeletions in regions AZFa/b, and Sertoli cell-only histopathology were associated with reduced SR success. By contrast, testis volume > 12.5 ml, history of cryptorchidism, use of micro-TESE as the sperm retrieval method, and adjuvant therapy were associated with improved SR success. None of the predictors, alone or combined, provide definitive information about the chances of harvesting sperm in men with non-obstructive azoospermia, except for Y chromosome microdeletions in regions AZFa/b. In the latter, SR success is virtually nil. We conclude that SR outcomes in men with non-obstructive azoospermia are difficult to predict based on the existing variables. Although several predictors can be used for patient counseling, their clinical value is limited to either ensure SR success or discourage reproductive urologists from recommending SR to men with non-obstructive azoospermia seeking fertility. A notable exception includes the deletions involving the regions AZFa and/or AZFb of the Y chromosome; the affected patients should be counseled against undergoing SR.

Blood plasma miR-20a-5p expression as a potential non-invasive diagnostic biomarker of male infertility: A pilot study

BACKGROUND

Recently, alterations in miRNAs expression profile in semen have been linked to damaged spermatogenesis, suggesting miRNAs could be used as potential infertility biomarkers. In previous animal studies, miR-20a-5p was found to be down-expressed in low motile spermatozoa, implying its potential target of genes associated with cell apoptosis.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate miR-20a-5p expression in blood plasma of patients suffering from non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA), compared to normozoospermic controls.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between January 2018 and December 2019, from 52 infertile couples eligible for the study, 24 couples were finally enrolled in this monocentric observational prospective pilot study. Patients were included into two groups: Group 1 comprised men with NOA (n = 14) and Group 2 fertile men partners of women with female tubal factor infertility (n = 10). All NOA patients underwent testicular sperm extraction. The expression of circulating miR-20a-5p in plasma samples was assessed by RT-qPCR. A relative quantification strategy was adopted using the 2^-ΔCq method to calculate the target miR-20a-5p expression with respect to miR-16-5p as endogenous control.

RESULTS

Median blood plasma miR-20a-5p was significantly higher in patients affected by NOA (0.16 2^-ΔCt , range: 0.05-0.79 2^-ΔCt ) than in fertile controls (0.06 2^-ΔCt , range: 0.04-0.10 2^-ΔCt ), P < .001. MiR-20a-5p was positively correlated with follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) (r_rho  = -0.490, P = .015) and luteinizing hormone (LH) (r_rho  = -0.462, P = .023), and negatively correlated with serum total testosterone (TT) (r_rho  = -0.534, P = .007) and right and left testicular size (r_rho  = -0.473, P = .020 and r_rho  = -0.471, P = .020, respectively). Successful sperm retrieval (SR) rate was 50.0%. Median value of miR-20a-5p did not differ significantly among patients with successful SR and those with negative SR. Testicular histological examination showed: hypospermatogenesis in 6/14 (42.8%), maturation arrest in 4/14 (28.6%), sertoli cell-only syndrome in 4/14 (28.6%). No significant differences in miR-20a-5p were found between histopathological patterns (P > .05).

CONCLUSIONS

MiR-20a-5p could represent a novel non-invasive diagnostic biomarker of male infertility.

Sperm recovery and ICSI outcomes in men with non-obstructive azoospermia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Factor affecting sperm retrieval rate (SRR) or pregnancy rates (PR) after testicular sperm extraction (TESE) in patients with non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA) have not been systematically evaluated. In addition, although micro-TESE (mTESE) has been advocated as the gold standard for sperm retrieval in men with NOA, its superiority over conventional TESE (cTESE) remains conflicting.

OBJECTIVE AND RATIONALE

The objective was to perform a meta-analysis of the currently available studies comparing the techniques of sperm retrieval and to identify clinical and biochemical factors predicting SRR in men with NOA. In addition, PRs and live birth rates (LBRs), as derived from subjects with NOA post-ICSI, were also analysed as secondary outcomes.

SEARCH METHODS

An extensive Medline, Embase and Cochrane search was performed. All trials reporting SRR derived from cTESE or mTESE in patients with NOA and their specific determinants were included. Data derived from genetic causes of NOA or testicular sperm aspiration were excluded.

OUTCOMES

Out of 1236 studies, 117 studies met the inclusion criteria for this study, enrolling 21 404 patients with a mean age (± SD) of 35.0 ± 2.7 years. cTESE and mTESE were used in 56 and 43 studies, respectively. In addition, 10 studies used a mixed approach and 8 studies compared cTESE with mTESE approach. Overall, a SRR per TESE procedure of 47[45;49]% (mean percentage [95% CI]) was found. No differences were observed when mTESE was compared to cTESE (46[43;49]% for cTESE versus 46[42;49]% for mTESE). Meta-regression analysis demonstrated that SRR per cycle was independent of age and hormonal parameters at enrolment. However, the SRR increased as a function of testis volume. In particular, by applying ROC curve analysis, a mean testis volume higher than 12.5 ml predicted SRR >60% with an accuracy of 86.2% ± 0.01. In addition, SRR decreased as a function of the number of Klinefelter's syndrome cases included (S = -0.02[-0.04;-0.01]; P < 0.01. I = 0.12[-0.05;0.29]; P = 0.16). Information on fertility outcomes after ICSI was available in 42 studies. Overall, a total of 1096 biochemical pregnancies were reported (cumulative PR = 29[25;32]% per ICSI cycle). A similar rate was observed when LBR was analysed (569 live births with a cumulative LBR = 24[20;28]% per ICSI cycle). No influence of male and female age, mean testis volume or hormonal parameters on both PR and LBR per ICSI cycle was observed. Finally, a higher PR per ICSI cycle was observed when the use of fresh sperm was compared to cryopreserved sperm (PR = 35[30;40]%, versus 20[13;29]% respectively): however, this result was not confirmed when cumulative LBR per ICSI cycle was analysed (LBR = 30[20;41]% for fresh versus 20[12;31]% for cryopreserved sperm).

WIDER IMPLICATIONS

This analysis shows that cTESE/mTESE in subjects with NOA results in SRRs of up to 50%, with no differences when cTESE was compared to mTESE. Retrieved sperms resulted in a LBR of up to 28% ICSI cycle. Although no difference between techniques was found, to conclusively clarify if one technique is superior to the other, there is a need for a sufficiently powered and well-designed randomized controlled trial to compare mTESE to cTESE in men with NOA.

Could analysis of testis-specific genes, as biomarkers in seminal plasma, predict presence of focal spermatogenesis in non-obstructive azoospermia?

Cell-free seminal mRNA (cfs-mRNA) exists in the human ejaculate that is proposed as a potential noninvasive procedure to prognosis pathophysiological conditions. This study applied cfs-mRNA of ESX1, ZMYND15 and its target haploid genes (TNP1 and PRM1) to identify the presence of spermatozoa in men with azoospermia. This study included 35 semen samples from 16 normozoospermic and 19 nonobstructive azoospermic individuals. Expression levels of target genes were determined by real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction using ΔΔCt method. The expression level of these genes (ZMYND15, TNP1 and PRM1) was significantly decreased in semen samples of nonobstructive azoospermia compared to normozoospermia. Similarly, the expression level of TNP1 and PRM1 was significantly decreased in the sample with negative sperm (SR-) versus positive sperm retrieval (SR+). The expression level of these genes may have the potential for prediction of successful sperm retrieval with high sensitivity and specificity according to the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve analysis.

Prediction model for testis histology in men with non-obstructive azoospermia: evidence for a limited predictive role of serum follicle-stimulating hormone

PURPOSE

The present prediction model was intended to verify whether serum FSH level could be predictive of testis histology in patients with non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA).

METHODS

We evaluated two datasets of patients with NOA: the first (San Paolo dataset) comprising 558 patients, 18-63 years old, the second (Procrea dataset) composed by 143 patients, 26-62 years old; bot datasets were combined to obtain a validation set. Multinomial logistic regression was first run with serum FSH and testis volume as independent predictors of testis histology, then, the correctly classified histological subcategories were set as outcome variables of a prediction model in both development and validation sets.

RESULTS

Multinomial logistic regression showed that FSH was a significant predictor of testis histology in 58% of cases, although it was unable to correctly classify cases with focal SCO or maturation arrest (MA). A prediction model was then run with hypospermatogenesis (HYPO) and Sertoli-only syndrome (SCO) as outcome variables of a binary logistic regression. FSH significantly predicted both HYPO and SCO, with a sensitivity of 40.9 and 80.7 and a specificity of 84.3 and 46.8 respectively. The model showed a fair discriminative ability (ROC AUC 0.705 and 0.709 respectively) and was adequately calibrated.

CONCLUSIONS

Supported by a robust statistical analysis, we conclude that serum FSH level cannot be considered a prognostic marker of spermatogenic dysfunction in patients with NOA.

Sertoli cell only syndrome induced by a varicocele

A case is reported which describes the severity of testicular histological damage that can be induced by a high-grade varicocele in a male with secondary infertility. A chart review of a patient's case was performed. A 34-year-old male with a three-and-a-half-year-old son who was conceived spontaneously with timed intercourse, with a grade three left varicocele, who's semen parameters progressed to non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA). He did not regain sperm in the ejaculate three or six months post left subinguinal microsurgical varicocele repair. He underwent bilateral microdissection testicular sperm extraction (microTESE) without identification of sperm in the testicular samples. A testicular biopsy from the time of microTESE revealed a Sertoli cell only pattern. A high-grade varicocele has the potential to induce sufficient testicular damage to result in the most severe testicular histological architecture associated with non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA), Sertoli cell only syndrome (SCOS).

Novel method of histopathological analysis after testicular sperm extraction in patients with nonobstructive and obstructive azoospermia

Objective

To assess whether the “testicular pool” could be used for histological analysis and whether it gave more accurate information than the standard testicular biopsy.

Methods

Between January 2017 and March 2018, this single-center prospective study included 60 azoospermic men undergoing conventional bilateral testicular sperm extraction. Six samples were excised from each testicle and transferred to an embryologist. One additional biopsy was randomly taken from each testis for a histological analysis. After processing, the testicular pool was also sent for a histological analysis, which showed normal spermatogenesis (NS), hypospermatogenesis (HYPO), maturation arrest (MA), Sertoli cell-only syndrome (SCOS), and tubular atrophy (TA).

Results

Twenty of the 60 patients (33.3%) had obstructive azoospermia (OA), while the remaining 40 (66.6%) had nonobstructive azoospermia. Their mean age was 40.5 years. All patients with OA had previously undergone unsuccessful testicular fine-needle aspiration. Successful sperm retrieval (SSR) occurred in 93.3% of patients. Histological analysis of the testicular biopsy revealed NS in 12 patients (20%), HYPO and TA in 28 patients (46.6%), MA in eight patients (13.3%), and SCOS in 12 patients (20%). The testicular pool analysis showed NS in 12 patients (20%), HYPO and TA in 44 patients (73.3%), MA in four patients (6.6%), and SCOS in no patients. In four patients with MA (6.6% of the total sample) and 12 patients with SCOS (20% of the total sample) according to the standard testicular biopsy, the embryologist found SSR with cryopreservation. Overall, in 44 patients (73.3%), the testicular pool analysis confirmed the histological findings of the standard testicular biopsy. In the 16 cases (26.6%) with a discrepancy between the single-biopsy histological findings and SSR, the testicular pool analysis confirmed the embryological data on SSR.

Conclusion

The testicular pool proved to be easily analyzable, practical, manageable, and more accurate for predicting sperm retrieval than standard testicular biopsy.

DNA Flow cytometric analysis of the human testicular tissues to investigate the status of spermatogenesis in azoospermic patients

A single, rapid and reproducible diagnostic test to predict the type of azoospermia and outcome of sperm retrieval is not yet available. So the feasibility of employing DNA flow cytometry for rapid investigation of the status of spermatogenesis in the patients with azoospermia was investigated. Testicular biopsies of 44 patients with azoospermia undergoing sperm-retrieval surgery and 4 controls were analyzed by flow cytometry to ascertain their testicular germ-cell patterns. The observed germ-cell pattern was further confirmed by RT-PCR analysis of the cell-specific markers and histology for some patients. The patients with Obstructive Azoospermia (OA) exhibited normal spermatogenesis similar to the control fertile patients showing the presence of diploid, double-diploid and haploid cells. The non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA) patients exhibited disrupted spermatogenesis with arrest at the pre-meiotic (only diploid cells present) or meiotic (diploid and double-diploid cells present) stages. The germ-cell pattern, as ascertained by flow cytometry, provided a clear picture of the intra-testicular spermatogenesis and the presence of spermatozoa in the patients’ testes, which was prognostic of their sperm-retrieval. DNA flow cytometry test to ascertain the testicular germ-cell pattern is simple in execution, analysis and interpretation, requires small amount of tissue and provides quantitative data about the status of spermatogenesis in patients. This test would allow comparable analysis of the status of spermatogenesis in patients across clinics and may form the basis for deciding future treatment and intervention strategies.

Testicular histopathology, semen analysis and FSH, predictive value of sperm retrieval: supportive counseling in case of reoperation after testicular sperm extraction (TESE)

Background

To provide indicators for the likelihood of sperm retrieval in patients undergoing testicular sperm extraction is a major issue in the management of male infertility by TESE. The aim of our study was to determine the impact of different parameters, including testicular histopathology, on sperm retrieval in case of reoperation in patients undergoing testicular sperm extraction.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed 486 patients who underwent sperm extraction for intracytoplasmic sperm injection and testicular biopsy. Histology was classified into: normal spermatogenesis; hypospermatogenesis (reduction in the number of normal spermatogenetic cells); maturation arrest (absence of the later stages of spermatogenesis); and Sertoli cell only (absence of germ cells). Semen analysis and serum FSH, LH and testosterone were measured.

Results

Four hundred thirty patients had non obstructive azoospermia, 53 severe oligozoospermia and 3 necrozoospermia. There were 307 (63%) successful sperm retrieval. Higher testicular volume, lower levels of FSH, and better histological features were predictive for sperm retrieval. The same parameters and younger age were predictive factors for shorter time for sperm recovery. After multivariable analysis, younger age, better semen parameters, better histological features and lower values of FSH remained predictive for shorter time for sperm retrieval while better semen and histology remained predictive factors for successful sperm retrieval. The predictive capacity of a score obtained by summing the points assigned for selected predictors (1 point for Sertoli cell only, 0.33 points for azoospermia, 0.004 points for each FSH mIU/ml) gave an area under the ROC curve of 0.843.

Conclusions

This model can help the practitioner with counseling infertile men by reliably predicting the chance of obtaining spermatozoa with testicular sperm extraction when a repeat attempt is planned.

A clinical trial on the consistency of bilateral testicular tissue histopathology and Johnsen score: single side or bilateral side biopsy?

To evaluate and compare left and right testicular tissue histopathology and Johnsen score, and to investigate the necessity for bilateral testicular biopsy. We recruited180 patients with non-obstructiveazoospermia (NOA) on testicular biopsy who had undergonetesticular sperm aspiration (TESA). Pathological sections of testicular tissue were diagnosed by specially-assigned doctors, who evaluated pathological findings, determined the Johnsen score and confirmed for the presence or absence of sperm. Sperm positive rates for left and right testicular histopathology were 55.0% and 51.7% respectively, and the proportion of Johnsen scores≥8 for left and right testes were 53.3% and 50.0%, respectively. Cohen kappa values revealed that the identification of sperm in bilateral testicular samples was not consistent and was related to random effects; Optimized cut-off value for bilateral testicular volume was 11ml (Johnsen score ≥8), and optimized cut-off values of E₂ on left and right testes were 144.5pmol/L and 133.5 pmol/L (Johnsen score≤7). However, age, serum prolactin (PRL), follicle stimulating hormone (FSH), luteinizing hormone (LH) and total testosterone (TT) levels were not accurate predictors for the existence of testicular sperm. There was nostatistical significance between left and right testicular histopathology in terms of sperm positive rates or Johnsen score; the Johnsen score were caused entirely by random effects and a score from one side could not represent the other side. Therefore, we recommend that both testes need to undergo surgery when NOA patients undergo testicular biopsy or sperm retrieval.

Relevance of testicular histopathology on prediction of sperm retrieval rates in case of non-obstructive and obstructive azoospermia

Introduction:

The aim of our research was to establish the relevance of testicular histopathology on sperm retrieval after testicular sperm extraction in patients with non-obstructive azoospermia and in patients with obstructive azoospermia, who already underwent a previous failure testicular fine needle aspiration.

Methods:

We evaluated a total of 82 azoospermic men, underwent testicular sperm extraction, referring to the Assisted Reproductive Technology Centre of the University of Florence, Italy between January 2008 and March 2017. A general and genital physical examination, scrotal and trans-rectal ultrasound, semen analysis, hormone measurements, including follicle-stimulating hormone, luteinizing hormone and total testosterone, were collected.

Results:

Successful sperm retrieval was obtained in 36 men of total (43.9%). Successful sperm retrieval was 29.5% in non-obstructive azoospermia patients, while men with obstructive azoospermia, who, underwent a previous failure testicular fine needle aspiration, had sperm retrieval in 86% of cases. Mean luteinizing hormone was 6.55 IU/L, total testosterone 4.70 ng/mL, right testicular volume 13.7 mL and left testicular volume 13.6 mL. Mean Follicle-stimulating hormone was 13.45 IU/L in patients with negative sperm retrieval and 8.18 IU/L in men with successful sperm retrieval. According to histology, 20.7% had normal spermatogenesis, 35.3% hypospermatogenesis, 35.3% maturation arrest and 8.5% Sertoli cell-only syndrome. Successful sperm retrieval was 88.2% in patients with normal spermatogenesis, 24.1% in the maturation arrest group and 48.27% in patients with hypospermatogenesis, while negative sperm retrieval was reported in Sertoli cell-only syndrome patients. Seven cases with maturation arrest showed a successful sperm retrieval.

Conclusion:

Testicular histopathology after testicular sperm extraction offers important information on prediction of sperm retrieval and can guide the surgeon in choosing the more suitable therapeutic practice.

Expression of ZMYND15 in Testes of Azoospermic Men and Association With Sperm Retrieval

OBJECTIVE

To compare the expression levels of ZMYND15 and its target haploid genes (TNP1, PRM1, and SPEM1) in testicular samples of non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA) vs obstructive azoospermia (OA). The levels of these transcripts were also compared in azoospermic samples with positive and negative sperm retrieval (SR).

METHOD

This study included 63 testis biopsy samples from 16 OA and 47 NOA individuals. Expression levels of these target genes were determined by real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction using ΔΔCt method.

RESULT

The expression level of ZMYND15 and its target genes were significantly lower in testicular samples of NOA compared with OA. Similarly, the expression levels of these transcripts were lower in samples with negative vs positive SR.

CONCLUSION

Expression level of ZMYND15 may have potential for prediction of successful SR with sensitivity of 90% and specificity of 60% for total population and sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 75% for NOA, according to the receiver operating characteristics curve.

Artificial Sperm: New Horizons in Procreation

Azoospermia, the absence of any sperm cells from the ejaculated semen, poses a real challenge to the fertility urologist. While there are options to create happy families for azoospermic couples, such as the use of donor sperm and adoption, most couples still want to have genetically related offspring. Advances in urology, gynecology, and fertility laboratory technologies allow surgical sperm retrieval in azoospermic men and achievement of live births for many, but not all azoospermic couples. At present, there are extensive research efforts in several directions to create new fertility options by creating "artificial sperm cells." While these new horizons are exciting, there are significant obstacles that must be overcome before such innovative solutions can be offered to azoospermic couples. The present review article defines the problem, describes the theoretical basis for creation of artificial genetically related sperm cells, and provides an update on current successes and challenges in the long tortuous path to achieve the ultimate goal: enabling every azoospermic couple to have their own genetically related offspring. Hopefully, these research efforts will ripen in the foreseeable future, resulting in the ability to create artificial sperm cells and provide such couples with off-the-shelf solutions and fulfilling their desire to parent genetically related healthy babies.

Microdissection testicular sperm extraction

Microdissection testicular sperm extraction (microTESE) is considered the gold standard method for surgical sperm retrieval among patients with non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA). In this review, we will discuss the optimal evaluation of NOA patients and strategies to medically optimize NOA patients prior to microTESE. In addition, we will also discuss technical principles and pearls to maximize the chances of successful sperm retrieval, sperm retrieval rates (SRR) based upon testicular histology, predictors of successful sperm retrieval, gonadal recovery following microTESE, and potential complications.