Morphometric and morphokinetic differences in the sperm- and oocyte-originated pronuclei of male and female human zygotes: a time-lapse study

The Istanbul Consensus update: a revised ESHRE/ALPHA consensus on oocyte and embryo static and dynamic morphological assessment† ‡

This European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE)/Alpha Scientists in Reproductive Medicine (ALPHA) consensus document provides several novel recommendations to assess oocyte and embryo morphology and rank embryos for transfer. A previous ALPHA/ESHRE consensus on oocyte and embryo morphological assessment was published in 2011. After more than a decade, and the integration of time-lapse technology into embryo culture and assessment, a thorough review and update was needed. A working group consisting of ALPHA members and ESHRE Special interest group of Embryology members formulated recommendations on oocyte and embryo assessment. The working group included 17 internationally recognized experts with extensive experience in clinical embryology. Seven members represented ALPHA and eight members represented ESHRE, along with two methodological experts from the ESHRE central office. Based on a systematic literature search and discussion of existing evidence, the recommendations of the Istanbul Consensus (2011) were reassessed and, where appropriate, updated based on consensus within the working group. A stakeholder review was organized after the updated draft was finalized. The final version was approved by the working group, the ALPHA Executive Committee and the ESHRE Executive Committee. This updated consensus paper provides 20 recommendations focused on the timeline of preimplantation developmental events and morphological criteria for oocyte, zygote and embryo assessment. Based on the duration of embryo culture, recommendations are given on the frequency and timing of assessments to ensure consistency and effectiveness. Several criteria relevant to oocyte and embryo morphology have not been well studied, leading to either a recommendation against their use for grading or for their use in ranking rather than grading. Future updates may require further revision of these recommendations. This document provides embryologists with advice on best practices when assessing oocyte and embryo quality based on the most recent evidence.

The Istanbul consensus update: a revised ESHRE/ALPHA consensus on oocyte and embryo static and dynamic morphological assessment†,‡

STUDY QUESTION

What are the current recommended criteria for morphological assessment of oocytes, zygotes, and embryos?

SUMMARY ANSWER

The present ESHRE/Alpha Scientists in Reproductive Medicine consensus document provides several novel recommendations to assess oocyte and embryo morphology and rank embryos for transfer.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

A previous Alpha Scientists in Reproductive Medicine/ESHRE consensus on oocyte and embryo morphological assessment was published in 2011. After more than a decade, and the integration of time-lapse technology into embryo culture and assessment, a thorough review and update was needed.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

A working group consisting of Alpha Scientists in Reproductive Medicine executive committee members and ESHRE Special interest group of Embryology members formulated recommendations on oocyte and embryo assessment.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS

The working group included 17 internationally recognized experts with extensive experience in clinical embryology. Seven members represented Alpha Scientists in Reproductive Medicine and eight members represented ESHRE, along with to two methodological experts from the ESHRE central office. Based on a systematic literature search and discussion of existing evidence, the recommendations of the Istanbul Consensus (2011) were reassessed and, where appropriate, updated based on consensus within the working group. A stakeholder review was organized after the updated draft was finalized. The final version was approved by the working group, the Alpha executive committee and the ESHRE Executive Committee.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

This updated consensus paper provides 20 recommendations focused on the timeline of preimplantation developmental events and morphological criteria for oocyte, zygote, and embryo assessment. Based on duration of embryo culture, recommendations are given on the frequency and timing of assessments to ensure consistency and effectiveness.

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION

Several criteria relevant to oocyte and embryo morphology have not been well studied, leading to either a recommendation against their use for grading or for their use in ranking rather than grading. Future updates may require further revision of these recommendations.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

This document provides embryologists with advice on best practices when assessing oocyte and embryo quality based on the most recent evidence.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)

The consensus meeting and writing of the paper were supported by funds from ESHRE and Alpha Scientists in Reproductive Medicine. The working group members did not receive any payment. G.C. declared payments or honoraria for lectures from Gedeon Richter and Cooper Surgical. A.C. declared text book royalties (Mastering Clinical Embryology, published 2024), consulting fees from Cooper Surgical, Gedeon Richter and TMRW Life Sciences, honoraria for lectures from Merck, Ferring, and Gedeon Richter, and participation in the HFEA Scientific Advances Committee; she also disclosed being treasurer and vice-president of Alpha Scientists in Reproductive Medicine, a shareholder in Care Fertility Limited and Fertile Mind Limited, and having stock options in TMRW Life Sciences and U-Ploid Biotechnology Ltd. L.R. declared consulting fees from Organon, payments or honoraria for lectures from Merck, Organon, IBSA, Finox, Geden Richter, Origio, Organon, Ferring, Fundation IVI; she also disclosed being a member of the Advisory Scientific Board of IVIRMA (Paid) and a member of the Advisory Scientific Board of Nterilizer (unpaid). I.S. declared payments or honoraria for lectures from Vitrolife and Cooper Surgical, and stock options from Alife Health. M.A. declared payments or honoraria for lectures from Vitrolife and support for attending meetings from Vitrolife and Cooper Surgical (both unrelated to this manuscript). The other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

DISCLAIMER

This Good Practice Recommendations (GPRs) document represents the consensus views of the members of this working group based on the scientific evidence available at the time of the meeting. GPRs should be used for information and educational purposes. They should not be interpreted as setting a standard of care or be deemed inclusive of all proper methods of care or be exclusive of other methods of care reasonably directed to obtaining the same results. They do not replace the need for application of clinical judgement to each individual presentation, or variations based on locality and facility type.

Could cleaved embryo morphology and morphokinetics be associated with prenatal and neonatal outcomes?

PURPOSE

To evaluate if morphology and morphokinetics of cleaved embryos affect prenatal and perinatal outcomes.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included 734 single fresh embryo transfer (SET) from ICSI from January 2014 to December 2020 at the Dijon University Hospital. Using time-lapse technology, embryos were defined as TOP or non-TOP according to morphological/morphokinetic criteria. Linear regression, adjusted for maternal factors, explored the association between cleaved-embryo quality and implantation rate, miscarriage rate, live birth rate, term, birthweight, and birthweight Z-score.

RESULTS

Multivariate analyses showed that non-implanted embryos were significantly more often out of the interquartile range than implanted embryos for cell events t2 (p = 0.019), t3 (p = 0.038), t4 (p = 0.013), ECC1 (p = 0.047), and ECC2 (p = 0.001). After implantation, the morphokinetics was significantly different for non-TOP embryos ending in miscarriage or live birth. A significant high risk of miscarriage was found for embryos with a short or long ECC1 (3.27 [95% CI: 1.44;8.37]. There was no significant difference in birthweight, birthweight Z-score, or term between TOP and non-TOP embryos. An association with increased birthweight was observed in multivariate analysis for pronuclei appearance (tPNa) (p = 0.001out of the range. Late tPNa was associated with a higher birthweight Z-score (p < 0.0001) while late pronuclei disappearance (tPNf) was associated with a lower Z-score (p = 0.006).

CONCLUSION

Morphological and morphokinetic parameters significantly influence implantation rates and the likelihood of a live birth from embryos with non-optimal morphological features. Birthweight Z-scores were significantly higher with late tPNa and lower with late tPNf.

Abnormal cleavage up to Day 3 does not compromise live birth and neonatal outcomes of embryos that have achieved full blastulation: a retrospective cohort study

STUDY QUESTION

Do embryos displaying abnormal cleavage (ABNCL) up to Day 3 have compromised live birth rates and neonatal outcomes if full blastulation has been achieved prior to transfer?

SUMMARY ANSWER

ABNCL is associated with reduced full blastulation rates but does not impact live birth rates and neonatal outcomes once full blastulation has been achieved.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY?

It is widely accepted that ABNCL is associated with reduced implantation rates of embryos when transferred at the cleavage stage. However, evidence is scarce in the literature reporting birth outcomes from blastocysts arising from ABNCL embryos, likely because they are ranked low priority for transfer.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

This retrospective cohort study included 1562 consecutive autologous in vitro fertilization cycles (maternal age 35.1 ± 4.7 years) performed at Fertility North, Australia between January 2017 and June 2022. Fresh transfers were performed on Day 3 or 5, with remaining embryos cultured up to Day 6 before vitrification. A total of 6019 embryos were subject to blastocyst culture, and a subset of 664 resulting frozen blastocysts was included for live birth and neonatal outcome analyses following single transfers.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS

ABNCL events were annotated from the first mitotic division up to Day 3, including direct cleavage (DC), reverse cleavage (RC) and <6 intercellular contact points at the 4-cell stage (<6ICCP). For DC and RC in combination, the ratios of affected blastomeres over the total number of all blastomeres up to Day 3 were also recorded. All pregnancies were followed up until birth with gestational age, birthweight, and sex of the baby being recorded.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

Full blastulation rates for embryos showing DC (19.5%), RC (41.7%), <6ICCP (58.8%), and mixed (≥2) ABNCL types (26.4%) were lower than the rates for those without ABNCL (67.2%, P < 0.01 respectively). Subgroup analysis showed declining full blastulation rates with increasing ratios of combined DC/RC affected blastomeres over all blastomeres up to the 8-cell stage (66.2% when 0 affected, 47.0% when 0.25 affected, 27.4% when 0.5 affected, 14.5% when 0.75 affected, and 7.7% when all affected, P < 0.01). However, once full blastulation had been achieved, no difference was detected between DC, RC, <6ICCP, and no ABNCL blastocysts following single frozen transfers in subsequent live birth rates (25.9%, 33.0%, 36.0% versus 30.8%, P > 0.05, respectively), gestational age (38.7 ± 1.6, 38.5 ± 1.2, 38.3 ± 3.5 versus 38.5 ± 1.8 weeks, P > 0.05, respectively) and birthweight (3343.0 ± 649.1, 3378.2 ± 538.4, 3352.6 ± 841.3 versus 3313.9 ± 509.6 g, P > 0.05, respectively). Multiple regression (logistic or linear as appropriate) confirmed no differences in all of the above measures after accounting for potential confounders.

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION

Our study is limited by its retrospective nature, making it impossible to control every known or unknown confounder. Embryos in our dataset, being surplus after selection for fresh transfer, may not represent the general embryo population.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

Our findings highlight the incremental impact of ABNCL, depending on the ratio of affected blastomeres up to Day 3, on subsequent full blastulation. The reassuring live birth and neonatal outcomes of ABNCL blastocysts imply a potential self-correction mechanism among those embryos reaching the blastocyst stage, which provides valuable guidance for clinical practice and patient counseling.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETTING INTEREST(S)

This research is supported by an Australian Government Research Training Program (RTP) Scholarship. All authors report no conflict of interest.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

N/A.

A brief history of artificial intelligence embryo selection: from black-box to glass-box

With the exponential growth of computing power and accumulation of embryo image data in recent years, artificial intelligence (AI) is starting to be utilized in embryo selection in IVF. Amongst different AI technologies, machine learning (ML) has the potential to reduce operator-related subjectivity in embryo selection while saving labor time on this task. However, as modern deep learning (DL) techniques, a subcategory of ML, are increasingly used, its integrated black-box attracts growing concern owing to the well-recognized issues regarding lack of interpretability. Currently, there is a lack of randomized controlled trials to confirm the effectiveness of such black-box models. Recently, emerging evidence has shown underperformance of black-box models compared to the more interpretable traditional ML models in embryo selection. Meanwhile, glass-box AI, such as interpretable ML, is being increasingly promoted across a wide range of fields and is supported by its ethical advantages and technical feasibility. In this review, we propose a novel classification system for traditional and AI-driven systems from an embryology standpoint, defining different morphology-based selection approaches with an emphasis on subjectivity, explainability, and interpretability.

Spontaneous collapse as a prognostic marker for human blastocysts: a systematic review and meta-analysis

STUDY QUESTION

Is spontaneous collapse (SC) by human blastocysts a prognostic factor in IVF treatment?

SUMMARY ANSWER

SC in human blastocyst is associated with reduced euploid embryo and pregnancy rates.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

SC of the human blastocyst is a phenomenon that was revealed relatively recently following the clinical application of time-lapse monitoring in IVF laboratories. The ploidy and clinical prognosis of affected blastocysts are still poorly understood, with inconsistent reports. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses on this topic are currently absent in the literature but its potential as a marker of embryo viability holds great clinical value. In this study, we aimed to comprehensively evaluate the potential of SC as a prognostic factor in regard to ploidy status, and pregnancy, live birth and miscarriage rates.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed according to PRISMA guidelines, with a protocol registered with PROSPERO (CRD42022373749). A search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library for relevant studies was carried out on 10 October 2022, using key words relevant to 'blastocyst collapse' and 'time-lapse imaging'.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS

Two independent reviewers systematically screened and evaluated each study in terms of participants, exposure, comparator, and outcomes (PECO). The Quality In Prognosis Studies tool was used for quality assessment. Data were extracted according to Cochrane methods. Pregnancy, live birth, ploidy, or miscarriage data were summarized by risk ratios (RRs) or odds ratios and their 95% CIs. All meta-analyses were performed with random-effects models.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

Following removal of duplicates, a total of 196 records were identified by the initial search. After screening according to PECO, 19 articles were included for further eligibility assessment. For meta-analysis, seven retrospective cohort studies were eventually included. After data pooling, the incidence of blastocyst SC was 37.0% (2516/6801) among seven studies (ranging from 17.4% to 56.2%). SC was associated with significantly lower clinical pregnancy rates (two studies, n = 736; RR = 0.77, 95% CI = 0.62-0.95; I2 = 30%), ongoing pregnancy rates (five studies, n = 2503; RR = 0.66, 95% CI = 0.53-0.83; I2 = 60%), and reduced euploidy rates (three studies, n = 3569; RR = 0.70, 95% CI = 0.59-0.83; I2 = 69%). Nevertheless, live birth rates (two studies, n = 816; RR = 0.76, 95% CI = 0.55-1.04; I2 = 56%) and miscarriage rate (four studies, n = 1358; RR = 1.31, 95% CI = 0.95-1.80; I2 = 0%) did not differ between blastocysts with or without SC. There was, however, significant heterogeneity between the studies included for evaluation of ongoing pregnancy rates (I2 = 60%, P = 0.04), live birth rates (I2 = 56%, P = 0.13), and ploidy rates (I2 = 69%, P = 0.04). Subgroup analyses were conducted according to different definitions of SC, number of collapse events, and whether the transferred blastocyst had undergone preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy; with inconclusive findings across subgroups.

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION

All studies in the meta-analysis were retrospective with varying levels of heterogeneity for different outcomes. Not all studies had accounted for potential confounding factors, therefore only unadjusted data could be used in the main meta-analysis. Studies employed slightly different strategies when defining blastocyst SC. Standardization in the definition for SC is needed to improve comparability between future studies.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

Our results indicate that blastocyst SC has negative implications for a pregnancy. Such blastocysts should be given a low ranking when selecting from a cohort for intrauterine transfer. Blastocyst SC should be considered as a contributing variable when building blastocyst algorithms to predict pregnancy or live birth.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)

There is no external funding to report. All authors report no conflict of interest.

REGISTRATION NUMBER

PROSPERO 2022 CRD42022373749.

Maternal age affects pronuclear and chromatin dynamics, morula compaction and cell polarity, and blastulation of human embryos

STUDY QUESTION

Does maternal ageing impact early and late morphokinetic and cellular processes of human blastocyst formation?

SUMMARY ANSWER

Maternal ageing significantly affects pronuclear size and intra- and extra-nuclear dynamics during fertilization, dysregulates cell polarity during compaction, and reduces blastocoel expansion.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

In ART, advanced maternal age (AMA) affects oocyte yield, fertilization, and overall developmental competence. However, with the exception of chromosome segregation errors occurring during oocyte meiosis, the molecular and biochemical mechanisms responsible for AMA-related subfertility and reduced embryo developmental competence remain unclear. In particular, studies reporting morphokinetics and cellular alterations during the fertilization and pre-implantation period in women of AMA remain limited.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

A total of 2058 fertilized oocytes were stratified by maternal age according to the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology classification (<35, 35-37, 38-40, 41-42, and >42 years) and retrospectively analysed. AMA effects were assessed in relation to: embryo morphokinetics and morphological alterations; and the presence and distribution of cell polarity markers-Yes-associated protein (YAP) and protein kinase C-ζ (PKC-ζ)-involved in blastocyst morphogenesis.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS

A total of 1050 cycles from 1050 patients met the inclusion criteria and were analysed. Microinjected oocytes were assessed using a time-lapse culture system. Immature oocytes at oocyte retrieval and mature oocytes not suitable for time-lapse monitoring, owing to an excess of residual corona cells or inadequate orientation for correct observation, were not analysed. Phenomena relevant to meiotic resumption, pronuclear dynamics, cytoplasmic/cortical modifications, cleavage patterns and embryo quality were annotated and compared among groups. Furthermore, 20 human embryos donated for research by consenting couples were used for immunofluorescence.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

Static microscopic observation revealed that blastocyst formation and expansion were impaired in the 41-42 and >42-year groups (P < 0.0001). The morphological grades of the inner cell mass and trophectoderm were poorer in the >42-year group than those in the <35-year group (P = 0.0022 and P < 0.0001, respectively). Time-lapse microscopic observation revealed a reduction in nucleolus precursor body alignment in female pronuclei in the 41-42 and >42-year groups (P = 0.0010). Female pronuclear area decreased and asynchronous pronuclear breakdown increased in the >42-year group (P = 0.0027 and P < 0.0122, respectively). Developmental speed at cleavage stage, incidence of irregularity of first cleavage, type and duration of blastomere movement, and number of multinucleated cells were comparable among age groups. Delayed embryonic compaction and an increased number of extruded blastomeres were observed in the >42-year group (P = 0.0002 and P = 0.0047, respectively). Blastulation and blastocyst expansion were also delayed in the 41-42 and >42-year groups (P < 0.0001 for both). YAP positivity rate in the outer cells of morulae and embryo PKC-ζ immunoflourescence decreased in the >42-year group (P < 0.0001 for both).

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION

At the cellular level, the investigation was limited to cell polarity markers. Cell components of other developmental pathways should be studied in relation to AMA.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

The study indicates that maternal ageing affects the key functions of embryo morphogenesis, irrespective of the well-established influence on the fidelity of oocyte meiosis.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)

This study was supported by the participating institutions. The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

N/A.