Day 5 vs day 6 single euploid blastocyst frozen embryo transfers: which variables do have an impact on the clinical pregnancy rates?

Predictive model for live birth outcomes in single euploid frozen embryo transfers: a comparative analysis of logistic regression and machine learning approaches

PURPOSE

To develop and validate a predictive model for live birth (LB) outcomes in single euploid frozen embryo transfers (seFET) based on patient's characteristics and embryo parameters.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was performed including 1979 seFET performed between March 2017 and December 2023. Prediction models were built using logistic regression (LR), random forest classifier (RFC), support vector machines (SVM), and a gradient booster (XGBoost). Considered variables associated with LB outcomes were blastocyst expansion, blastocyst inner cell mass (ICM) and TE quality, day (D) of TE biopsy (D5, D6, and D7), female age and body mass index (BMI), distance from the uterine fundus at embryo transfer, endometrial preparation as natural cycles (NC) or hormonal replacement therapy (HRT), and endometrial thickness. Model performance was evaluated using area under the precision-recall curve and calibration metrics.

RESULTS

Variables that were negatively associated with LB rate were BMI (OR = 0.79 [0.64-0.96], P = 0.020 for overweight and OR = 0.76 [0.60-0.95], P = 0.015 for obese class I/II), ICM grade B (OR = 0.72 [0.57-0.90], P = 0.005) or C (OR = 0.21 [0.15-0.30], P < 0.001), TE grade C (OR = 0.32 [0.24-0.43], P < 0.001), and blastocyst biopsied on D6 (OR = 0.66 [0.55-0.80], P < 0.001 or D7 (OR = 0.19[0.09-0.37], P < 0.001). The LR model was the best in terms of overall classification performance (C-statistics: 0.626 ± 0.018 vs. 0.606 ± 0.018, 0.581 ± 0.018, 0.601 ± 0.017, LR vs. RFC, XGBoost, and SVM, respectively, P < 0.001). A prediction model of LB outcome was developed and is free to access: https://artfertilityclinics.shinyapps.io/ABLE/ .

CONCLUSION

LR demonstrated a stable validation performance and superior LB prediction, aiding as a predictive tool for patient counselling and assessing success in seFET cycles.

The Istanbul Consensus update: a revised ESHRE/ALPHA consensus on oocyte and embryo static and dynamic morphological assessment† ‡

This European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE)/Alpha Scientists in Reproductive Medicine (ALPHA) consensus document provides several novel recommendations to assess oocyte and embryo morphology and rank embryos for transfer. A previous ALPHA/ESHRE consensus on oocyte and embryo morphological assessment was published in 2011. After more than a decade, and the integration of time-lapse technology into embryo culture and assessment, a thorough review and update was needed. A working group consisting of ALPHA members and ESHRE Special interest group of Embryology members formulated recommendations on oocyte and embryo assessment. The working group included 17 internationally recognized experts with extensive experience in clinical embryology. Seven members represented ALPHA and eight members represented ESHRE, along with two methodological experts from the ESHRE central office. Based on a systematic literature search and discussion of existing evidence, the recommendations of the Istanbul Consensus (2011) were reassessed and, where appropriate, updated based on consensus within the working group. A stakeholder review was organized after the updated draft was finalized. The final version was approved by the working group, the ALPHA Executive Committee and the ESHRE Executive Committee. This updated consensus paper provides 20 recommendations focused on the timeline of preimplantation developmental events and morphological criteria for oocyte, zygote and embryo assessment. Based on the duration of embryo culture, recommendations are given on the frequency and timing of assessments to ensure consistency and effectiveness. Several criteria relevant to oocyte and embryo morphology have not been well studied, leading to either a recommendation against their use for grading or for their use in ranking rather than grading. Future updates may require further revision of these recommendations. This document provides embryologists with advice on best practices when assessing oocyte and embryo quality based on the most recent evidence.

The Istanbul consensus update: a revised ESHRE/ALPHA consensus on oocyte and embryo static and dynamic morphological assessment†,‡

STUDY QUESTION

What are the current recommended criteria for morphological assessment of oocytes, zygotes, and embryos?

SUMMARY ANSWER

The present ESHRE/Alpha Scientists in Reproductive Medicine consensus document provides several novel recommendations to assess oocyte and embryo morphology and rank embryos for transfer.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

A previous Alpha Scientists in Reproductive Medicine/ESHRE consensus on oocyte and embryo morphological assessment was published in 2011. After more than a decade, and the integration of time-lapse technology into embryo culture and assessment, a thorough review and update was needed.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

A working group consisting of Alpha Scientists in Reproductive Medicine executive committee members and ESHRE Special interest group of Embryology members formulated recommendations on oocyte and embryo assessment.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS

The working group included 17 internationally recognized experts with extensive experience in clinical embryology. Seven members represented Alpha Scientists in Reproductive Medicine and eight members represented ESHRE, along with to two methodological experts from the ESHRE central office. Based on a systematic literature search and discussion of existing evidence, the recommendations of the Istanbul Consensus (2011) were reassessed and, where appropriate, updated based on consensus within the working group. A stakeholder review was organized after the updated draft was finalized. The final version was approved by the working group, the Alpha executive committee and the ESHRE Executive Committee.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

This updated consensus paper provides 20 recommendations focused on the timeline of preimplantation developmental events and morphological criteria for oocyte, zygote, and embryo assessment. Based on duration of embryo culture, recommendations are given on the frequency and timing of assessments to ensure consistency and effectiveness.

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION

Several criteria relevant to oocyte and embryo morphology have not been well studied, leading to either a recommendation against their use for grading or for their use in ranking rather than grading. Future updates may require further revision of these recommendations.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

This document provides embryologists with advice on best practices when assessing oocyte and embryo quality based on the most recent evidence.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)

The consensus meeting and writing of the paper were supported by funds from ESHRE and Alpha Scientists in Reproductive Medicine. The working group members did not receive any payment. G.C. declared payments or honoraria for lectures from Gedeon Richter and Cooper Surgical. A.C. declared text book royalties (Mastering Clinical Embryology, published 2024), consulting fees from Cooper Surgical, Gedeon Richter and TMRW Life Sciences, honoraria for lectures from Merck, Ferring, and Gedeon Richter, and participation in the HFEA Scientific Advances Committee; she also disclosed being treasurer and vice-president of Alpha Scientists in Reproductive Medicine, a shareholder in Care Fertility Limited and Fertile Mind Limited, and having stock options in TMRW Life Sciences and U-Ploid Biotechnology Ltd. L.R. declared consulting fees from Organon, payments or honoraria for lectures from Merck, Organon, IBSA, Finox, Geden Richter, Origio, Organon, Ferring, Fundation IVI; she also disclosed being a member of the Advisory Scientific Board of IVIRMA (Paid) and a member of the Advisory Scientific Board of Nterilizer (unpaid). I.S. declared payments or honoraria for lectures from Vitrolife and Cooper Surgical, and stock options from Alife Health. M.A. declared payments or honoraria for lectures from Vitrolife and support for attending meetings from Vitrolife and Cooper Surgical (both unrelated to this manuscript). The other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

DISCLAIMER

This Good Practice Recommendations (GPRs) document represents the consensus views of the members of this working group based on the scientific evidence available at the time of the meeting. GPRs should be used for information and educational purposes. They should not be interpreted as setting a standard of care or be deemed inclusive of all proper methods of care or be exclusive of other methods of care reasonably directed to obtaining the same results. They do not replace the need for application of clinical judgement to each individual presentation, or variations based on locality and facility type.

Maternal age-related declines in live birth rate following single euploid embryo transfer: a retrospective cohort study

PURPOSE

To assess whether maternal age influences the pregnancy outcomes after single frozen euploid embryo transfer.

METHODS

This retrospective analysis was conducted on 1037 cycles of single euploid embryo transfer performed at Nanjing Women and Children's Healthcare Hospital between January 2016 and April 2023. Patients with severe uterine pathologies, immune disorders, or endocrine diseases were excluded. The cycles were categorized into three age groups: <35 years, 35-37 years, and ≥ 38 years. Primary outcomes included live birth rate, clinical pregnancy rate, early pregnancy loss, and miscarriage rate. Data were analyzed using multivariable logistic regression with generalized estimating equations (GEE) to account for confounding factors and restricted cubic splines to visualize the relationship between maternal age and pregnancy outcomes.

RESULTS

Women aged ≥ 38 years demonstrated a significantly diminished live birth rate (41.7%) ,which was lower than that observed in women aged < 35 years (54.5%) and 35-37 years (54.0%), with statistical significance (P < 0.05). Multivariable regression analysis revealed that compared with women aged ≥ 38 years, younger women had reduced risk of miscarriage (aOR = 0.371, 95% CI: 0.139-0.988 for the < 35 years group; aOR = 0.317, 95% CI: 0.106-0.954 for the 35-37 years group) and increased likelihood of live birth (aOR = 2.188, 95% CI: 1.154-4.147 for the < 35 years group; aOR = 2.239, 95% CI: 1.0103-4.548 for the 35-37 years group) after adjusting for relevant confounders. Additionally, the analysis showed that embryos biopsied on day 5 were linked to higher clinical pregnancy rates than those biopsied on day 6, and high-grade blastocysts were associated with superior pregnancy outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Advanced maternal age is associated with a higher miscarriage rate and lower live birth rate following euploid embryo transfer. Despite the exclusion of aneuploidy, age-related factors beyond chromosomal abnormalities appear to impact reproductive outcomes.

Risk factors associated with pregnancy loss after single euploid blastocysts transfer

Objective

To detect primary factors influencing pregnancy loss(PL) following the transfer of euploid blastocysts?

Design

Retrospective cohort study.

Methods

To identify potential factors influencing PL, we analyzed multiple variables in both the PL group and the live birth group. In order to minimize the impact of confounding factors, various variables were included in a binary logistic regression analysis.

Results

The PL rate after the transfer of euploid embryos is 13.3% (36 cases of PL out of 270 cases of single embryo transfer). Compared to the live birth group, the PL group had lower E2 levels (2376.03 ± 1553.25 vs 3412.88 ± 2116.47, P=0.007), higher LH levels (2.66 ± 2.47 vs 1.96 ± 1.52, P=0.023) on trigger day of fresh cycle, fewer retrieved oocytes (10.08 ± 5.01 vs 12.77 ± 7.20, P=0.044), higher female BMI (23.26 ± 3.27 vs 22.05 ± 2.69, P=0.016), higher proportion of maternal smokers (50% vs 20.51%, P<0.001), and more day 6 blastocyst transfers ((38.89% vs14.53, P=0.001). Logistic regression analysis revealed that higher LH levels(OR=1.304, 95%CI=1.054-1.613, P=0.015), low E2 levels (OR=0.438, 95%CI=0.242-0.794, P=0.007) on trigger day of fresh cycle, maternal smoking(OR=4.574, 95%CI=1.974-10.601, P<0.001), and day 6 blastocyst transfer(OR=4.610, 95%CI=1.907-11.141, P=0.001) appeared to be associated with increased risk of PL following the transfer of euploid embryos.

Conclusions

Maternal smoking, day of blastocyst transferred, estradiol (E2) and Luteinizing hormone (LH) levels on trigger day of corresponding fresh cycle for transferred blastocysts are all associated with PL following transfer of euploid embryos.

Assessing the clinical value of day 7 blastocysts: a predictive model for preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) cycles

PURPOSE

To identify the benefit of extending embryo culture until day (D)7 based on patients and cycle characteristics.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted including 25,120 blastocysts from 5278 PGT-A autologous cycles between 2017 and 2022. A theoretical cumulative live birth rate (CLBR) was calculated by binomial density function. An increase of ≥ 5% in theoretical CLBR was considered a tangible benefit when obtaining ≥ 1 euploid D7 blastocyst and ≤ 3 euploid blastocysts from D5/D6. A predictive model was built considering the number of embryos eligible for extended culture until D7, number of blastocysts already biopsied on D5/D6, and patient's age.

RESULTS

Euploidy rates decreased for blastocysts biopsied on D5, D6, and D7 (55.6%, 39.7%, and 27.1%, P < 0.001, respectively). The probability of tangible benefit was increased with more embryos available for extended culture until D7, was decreased with higher D5/D6 blastocysts already biopsied and for older patients. The overall AUC of the final model in the validation sets was 0.75 (95% CI 0.72-0.78). Based on the predictive model, in poor cycles (< 1% tangible benefit), the benefit rate from extended culture was 0.3% and for moderate, good, and best cycles (1-10%, 10-20%, and ≥ 20% tangible benefit) were 4.4%, 14.0%, and 29.3%, respectively. An application of the predictive model is available online for external testing: https://artfertilityclinics.shinyapps.io/WET-D7/ .

CONCLUSION

The predictive model provides a decision-making tool to objectively identify cycles that would benefit from extending embryo culture until D7.

Steady morphokinetic progression is an independent predictor of live birth: a descriptive reference for euploid embryos

STUDY QUESTION

Can modelling the longitudinal morphokinetic pattern of euploid embryos during time-lapse monitoring (TLM) be helpful for selecting embryos with the highest live birth potential?

SUMMARY ANSWER

Longitudinal reference ranges of morphokinetic development of euploid embryos have been identified, and embryos with steadier progression during TLM are associated with higher chances of live birth.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

TLM imaging is increasingly adopted by fertility clinics as an attempt to improve the ability of selecting embryos with the highest potential for implantation. Many markers of embryonic morphokinetics have been incorporated into decision algorithms for embryo (de)selection. However, longitudinal changes during this temporal process, and the impact of such changes on embryonic competence remain unknown. Aiming to model the reference ranges of morphokinetic development of euploid embryos and using it as a single longitudinal trajectory might provide an additive value to the blastocyst morphological grade in identifying highly competent embryos.

STUDY DESIGN SIZE DURATION

This observational, retrospective cohort study was performed in a single IVF clinic between October 2017 and June 2021 and included only autologous single euploid frozen embryo transfers (seFET).

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS SETTING METHODS

Reference ranges were developed from [hours post-insemination (hpi)] of the standard morphokinetic parameters of euploid embryos assessed as tPB2, tPNa, tPNf, t2-t9, tSC, tM, tSB, and tB. Variance in morphokinetic patterns was measured and reported as morphokinetic variance score (MVS). Nuclear errors (micronucleation, binucleation, and multinucleation) were annotated when present in at least one blastomere at the two- or four-cell stages. The blastocyst grade of expansion, trophectoderm (TE), and inner cell mass (ICM) were assessed immediately before biopsy using Gardner's criteria. Pre-implantation genetic diagnosis for aneuploidy (PGT-A) was performed by next-generation sequencing. All euploid embryos were singly transferred in a frozen transferred cycle and outcomes were assessed as live birth, pregnancy loss, or not pregnant. Association of MVS with live birth was investigated with regression analyses.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

TLM data from 340 seFET blastocysts were included in the study, of which 189 (55.6%) resulted in a live birth. The median time for euploid embryos to reach blastulation was 109.9 hpi (95% CI: 98.8-121.0 hpi). The MVS was calculated from the variance in time taken for the embryo to reach all morphokinetic points and reflects the total morphokinetic variability it exhibits during its development. Embryos with more erratic kinetics, i.e. higher morphokinetic variance, had higher rates of pregnancy loss (P = 0.004) and no pregnancy (P < 0.001) compared to embryos with steadier morphokinetic patterns. In the multivariable analysis adjusting for ICM, TE grade, presence of nuclear errors, and time of blastulation, MVS was independently associated with live birth (odds ratio [OR]: 0.62, 95% CI: 0.46-0.84, P = 0.002) along with ICM quality. Live birth rate of embryos with the same ICM grading but different morphokinetic variance patterns differed significantly. Live birth rates of embryos exhibiting low MVS with ICM grades A, B, and C were 85%, 76%, and 67%, respectively. However, ICM grades A, B, and C embryos with high MVS had live birth rates of 65%, 48%, and 21% (P < 0.001). The addition of the MVS to embryo morphology score (ICM and TE grading) significantly improved the model's AUC value (0.67 vs 0.62, P = 0.015) and this finding persisted through repeat cross-validation (0.64 ± 0.08 vs 0.60 ± 0.07, P < 0.001).

LIMITATIONS REASONS FOR CAUTION

The exclusion of IVF cases limits, for now, the utility of the model to only ICSI-derived embryos. The utility of these reference ranges and the association of MVS with various clinical outcomes should be further investigated.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

We have developed reference ranges for morphokinetic development of euploid embryos and a marker for measuring total morphokinetic variability exhibited by developed blastocysts. Longitudinal assessment of embryonic morphokinetics rather than static time points may provide more insight about which embryos have higher live birth potential. The developed reference ranges and MVS show an association with live birth that is independent of known morphological factors and could emerge as a valuable tool in prioritizing embryos for transfer.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS

This study received no external funding. The authors declare no conflicting interests.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

N/A.

The Impact of Embryo Quality on Pregnancy Outcomes in Single Day 5 versus Day 6 Euploid Blastocyst Transfer: A Retrospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Selecting embryos with the highest implantation potential is crucial for in vitro fertilization (IVF) success. Both the timing of blastulation, day 5 (D5) or D6, and the embryo quality have been suggested as influential factors in determining the clinical outcome of single euploid blastocyst transfers. However, evidence supporting the superiority of D5 over D6 blastocysts remains inconclusive. The aim of this study was to compare clinical outcomes following the transfer of euploid blastocysts with different quality and timing of blastulation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted at our Assisted Reproductive Center, analyzing the outcome of 774 transfers with D5 euploids and 155 transfers with D6 euploids performed between January 2019 and February 2022.

RESULTS

The live birth rate was significantly lower in the euploid D6 group compared to the euploid D5 group (38.71vs. 55.04%, P=0.001). The outcome was significantly influenced by the quality of the embryos. Live birth rates were 62.14 and 53.61% following transfers of D5 and D6 excellent embryos respectively, 45.18 and 32.21% following transfer of D5 and D6 good embryos but only 28.64 and 19.32% following transfer of D5 and D6 fair embryos. The outcome difference was statistically significant across embryo quality categories (P=0.001). The adjusted risk ratios (RR) of clinical outcomes indicated that excellent euploid D5 embryos consistently outperformed other types of embryo quality.

CONCLUSION

The timing of blastulation and embryo quality are crucial factors in determining the success of single euploid blastocyst transfers. Excellent euploid D5 transfers yielded superior clinical outcomes, providing valuable insights for IVF teams and patients when selecting embryos to be transferred.

Fresh or frozen day 6 blastocyst transfer: is there still a question?

BACKGROUND

The Live Birth Rate (LBR) after day 5 (D5) blastocyst transfer is significantly higher than that with D6 embryos in both fresh and frozen-vitrified embryo transfer cycles, according to the most recently published meta-analyses. Therefore, for women obtaining only D6 blastocysts, the chances of pregnancy may be lower but nonetheless sufficient to warrant transferring such embryos. The best strategy for transfer (i.e., in fresh versus frozen cycles) remains unclear and there is a paucity of data on this subject.

METHODS

A total of 896 couples with D6 single blastocyst transfers were retrospectively analyzed: patients receiving a fresh D6 embryo transfer (Fresh D6 transfer group, n = 109) versus those receiving a frozen-thawed D6 embryo transfer (Frozen D6 transfer group, n = 787). A subgroup comprising a freeze-all cycle without any previous fresh or frozen D5 embryo transfers (Elective frozen D6, n = 77) was considered and also compared with the Fresh D6 transfer group. We compared LBR between these two groups. Correlation between D6 blastocyst morphology according to Gardner's classification and live birth occurrence was also evaluated. Statistical analysis was carried out using univariate and multivariate logistic regression models.

RESULTS

The LBR was significantly lower after a fresh D6 blastocyst transfer compared to the LBR with a frozen-thawed D6 blastocyst transfer [5.5% (6/109) vs. 12.5% (98/787), p = 0.034]. Comparison between LBR after Elective frozen D6 group to the Fresh D6 blastocyst transfers confirmed the superiority of frozen D6 blastocyst transfers. Statistical analysis of the blastocyst morphology parameters showed that both trophectoderm (TE) and inner cell mass (ICM) grades were significantly associated with the LBR after D6 embryo transfer (p < 0.001, p = 0.037). Multiple logistic regression revealed that frozen D6 thawed transfer was independently associated with a higher LBR compared with fresh D6 transfer (OR = 2.54; 95% CI: [1.05-6.17]; p = 0.038). Our results also show that transferring a good or top-quality D6 blastocyst increased the chances of a live birth by more than threefold.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results indicate that transferring D6 blastocysts in frozen cycles improves the LBR, making it the best embryo transfer strategy for these slow-growing embryos.

CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER

Not applicable.

Reproductive outcomes with delayed blastocyst development: the clinical value of day 7 euploid blastocysts in frozen embryo transfer cycles

Embryos of optimal development reach blastocyst stage 116 ± 2 h after insemination. Usable D7 blastocysts represent nearly 5% of embryos in IVF with acceptable pregnancy and live birth rates, however data are still limited. Therefore, this study aimed to analyze the ongoing pregnancy rate (OPR) of D7 blastocysts in single euploid frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycles. An observational study was performed including 1527 FET cycles with blastocysts biopsied on D5 (N = 855), D6 (N = 636) and D7 (N = 36). Blastocysts were classified as good (AA/AB/BA), fair (BB) or poor (AC/BC/CC/CA/CB) (Gardner scoring). FETs were performed in natural cycles (NC) or hormone replacement therapy (HRT) cycles. Patient's age differed significantly between D5, D6 and D7 blastocysts FET cycles (33.2 ± 5.6, 34.4 ± 5.3 and 35.9 ± 5.2, P < 0.001). OPRs were higher when D5 euploid blastocysts were transferred compared with D6 and D7 (56.0% vs. 45.3% and 11.1%, P < 0.001). Poor quality blastocysts were predominant in D7 blastocyst FET cycles (good quality: 35.4%, 27.2%, 5.6%; fair quality: 52.1%, 38.5%, 11.1%; poor quality: 12.5%, 34.3%, 83.3%, P < 0.001 for D5, D6 and D7 blastocysts; respectively). OPR was significantly reduced by D7 blastocyst FETs (OR = 0.23 [0.08;0.62], P = 0.004), patient's BMI (OR = 0.96 [0.94;0.98], P < 0.001), HRT cycles (OR = 0.70 [0.56;0.88], P = 0.002) and poor quality blastocysts (OR = 0.33 [0.24;0.45], P < 0.001). OPR is significantly reduced with D7 compared with D5/D6 euploid blastocysts in FET cycles. The older the patient, the more likely they are to have an FET cycle with blastocysts biopsied on D7, therefore culturing embryos until D7 can be a strategy to increase OPR outcomes in patients ≥38 years.

D6 high-quality expanded blastocysts and D5 expanded blastocysts have similar pregnancy and perinatal outcomes following single frozen blastocyst transfer

Objective

We compared the pregnancy and perinatal outcomes between expanded blastocysts vitrified on D5 versus D6 following single frozen blastocyst transfer.

Methods

Clinical data on 7,606 cycles of frozen-thawed blastocyst implantations were retrospectively analyzed. Depending on whether blastocysts were vitrified on D5 or D6 and the transferred blastocysts, the blastocysts were divided into 6 groups: HQB-D5, HQB-D6, 4XC-D5, 4XC-D6, 4CX-D5, and 4CX-D6 groups. The differences in clinical pregnancy rate, live birth rate, first trimester abortion rate, preterm birth rate, gestational age, birth weight, and sex ratio at birth among the groups were compared.

Results

Our study showed that there was no difference in pregnancy and perinatal outcomes between the delayed formation of D6 high-quality expanded blastocysts and D5 expanded blastocysts, whether they were high-quality blastocysts or not. For low-quality blastocysts, the clinical pregnancy rate of D5 was higher than that of D6, and D5 was also better than D6 in live birth rate for those with inner cell mass rating B or above, while there was no difference between D5 and D6 for those with inner cell mass rating C.

Conclusion

Based on our research, we suggest that when we are developing the implantation strategy, we give priority to the selection of high-quality expanded blastocysts, regardless of D5 and D6, whose clinical outcomes are not different. For low-quality blastocysts, D5 expanded blastocysts are preferred for transfer.

Increased incidence of live births in implanted day 5 versus day 6 blastocysts following single embryo transfers with PGT-A

Elective single-embryo transfers of euploid or low-level mosaic blastocysts were analyzed in this retrospective study to determine the correlations of live birth (LB) probability with embryonic developmental features of implanted day 5 (D5, n = 245) or day 6 (D6, n = 73) blastocysts using time-lapse (TL) monitoring. According to the logistic regression analyses (adjusted odds ratio [OR] = 0.341, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.169-0.685, P < 0.05), the LB probability was negatively associated with the D6 group. The LB rate of the D5 group was higher than the D6 group (88.2% vs. 75.3%; P < 0.05). Compared with the D5 blastocysts, the D6 blastocysts exhibited comparable dysmorphisms except for the multinucleation at the 4-cell stage (10.9% vs. 2.9%, P < 0.05). Moreover, D6 blastocysts had considerably slower developmental kinetics and poorer blastocyst morphologies. Further analysis confirmed that the LB rate was not associated with developmental kinetics or dysmorphisms but rather with blastocyst morphology (inner cell mass [ICM] grade ≤ C vs. ICM grade A, adjusted OR = 0.155, 95% CI = 0.04-0.596, P < 0.05; trophectoderm [TE] grade ≤ C vs. TE grade A, adjusted OR = 0.157, 95% CI = 0.032-0.760, P < 0.05). In conclusion, D6 implanted blastocysts have a considerably lower LB rate than D5 implanted blastocysts. As determined by TL monitoring, the diminished blastocyst morphology can be one of the primary reasons underlying the decreased likelihood of LB.

Frozen embryo transfers in a natural cycle: how to do it right

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Assisted reproductive technology treatment has seen a significant shift from fresh to frozen embryo transfers (FET). Endometrial receptivity in the FET cycle can be achieved through a hormonal replacement cycle or a natural cycle, and the preparation approach has important implications on the pregnancy itself. In the natural cycle approach, planning of the embryo transfer timing might be challenging due to the need to identify ovulation correctly.

RECENT FINDINGS

Ovulation in a natural cycle is characterized by a luteinizing hormone surge, followed by the rise in progesterone (P4) levels, inducing secretory transformation. However, the luteinizing hormone surge can vary widely in its pattern, amplitude and duration and might not even result in the formation of a corpus luteum and P4 production. Monitoring of the luteinizing hormone surge using urinary luteinizing hormone kits might be a convenient approach, however, it is deemed unreliable and should be considered inadequate for securing the best outcome of a FET cycle.

SUMMARY

Endometrial receptivity depends on the duration of progesterone exposure to the adequately estrogenized endometrium. In a natural cycle endometrial preparation approach, correct planning for the embryo transfer timing should include the measurement of luteinizing hormone, estradiol and P4.

Features of chromosomal abnormalities in relation to consanguinity: analysis of 10,556 blastocysts from IVF/ICSI cycles with PGT-A from consanguineous and non-consanguineous couples

Consanguineous marriage is defined as marriage between first or second-degree cousins, with high prevalence in many cultures and societies. Descendants from consanguineous unions have an increased risk for genetic diseases. Additionally, in consanguineous couples, chromosomal disjunction during embryogenesis could also be affected, increasing the risk of chromosomal errors. Nowadays, genomic testing allows to identify new genetic syndromes and variants related to copy-number variations (CNV), including whole chromosome, segmental and micro-segmental errors. This is the first study evaluating chromosomal ploidy status on blastocysts formed from consanguineous couples during IVF/ICSI treatments with Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidies (PGT-A), compared to non-consanguineous couples. Although consanguine couples were significantly younger, no differences were observed between groups for fertilisation rate, blastulation rate and euploidy rate, once adjusted by age. Nevertheless, the number of blastocysts biopsied on day 5 was lower for consanguine couples. Segmental errors, and aneuploidies of chromosomes 13 and 14 were the most prominent abnormalities in relation to consanguinity, together with errors in chromosome 16 and sex chromosomes when the female partner was younger than 35. Once euploid blastocysts were considered for subsequent frozen embryo transfer, pregnancy outcomes were similar in both groups. The current findings point toward the fact that in consanguine unions, not only the risk of having a child with genetic disorders is increased, but also the risk of specific chromosomal abnormalities seems to be increased. Premarital counselling and tailored reproductive treatments should be offered to these couples.

Clinical and laboratory parameters associated with pregnancy outcomes in patients undergoing frozen euploid blastocyst transfer

RESEARCH QUESTION

Which factors impact on clinical pregnancy rate (CPR) and live birth rates (LBR) in euploid frozen embryo transfer (eFET) cycles?

DESIGN

Retrospective observational study including 1660 eFET cycles with 2439 euploid blastocysts, from November 2016 to December 2020. The impact of clinical and laboratory parameters on CPR, biochemical miscarriage rate (BMR), clinical miscarriage rate (CMR) and LBR was evaluated.

RESULTS

CPR per transfer was 63.4%, LBR per transfer 51.6%. CPR and LBR were significantly higher when double embryo transfer (DET) was performed (71.6% versus 57.7%, P < 0.001; 55.2% versus 49.1%, P = 0.016, respectively). However, pregnancy loss was significantly higher in the DET group (28.8% versus 22.8%, P = 0.02). When patients were classified by body mass index (BMI), no differences were observed for CPR, but CMR was lower (P < 0.001) and LBR higher (p = 0.031) for the normal BMI group. The natural cycle protocol revealed lower CMR (P < 0.001) and lower pregnancy loss (P < 0.001); subsequently, higher LBR (57.6%, 48.8%, 45.0%, P = 0.001) compared with hormonal replacement protocol and stimulated cycle. Day of trophectoderm biopsy affected CPR (P < 0.001) and LBR (P < 0.001), yet no differences were observed for BMR, CMR or pregnancy loss. The multivariate analysis showed that day 6/7 embryos had lower probabilities for pregnancy; overweight and obesity had a negative impact on LBR, and natural cycle improved LBR (adjusted odds ratio 1.445, 95% confidence interval 0.519-0.806).

CONCLUSIONS

Day of biopsy affected CPR, while BMI and endometrial preparation protocol were associated with LBR in eFET. DET should be discouraged as it will increase the risk of pregnancy loss. Women with higher BMI should be aware of the higher risk of pregnancy loss and lower LBR even though a euploid blastocyst is transferred.

Prolonging the time of progesterone supplementation to improve the pregnancy outcomes of single day 6 blastocyst transfer in frozen-thawed cycles: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Infertility is one of the most important and underappreciated reproductive health problems in developing countries. Currently, in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer is the most effective treatment strategy for infertility. In a frozen-thawed cycle, single-blastocyst transfer can not only ensure relatively higher pregnancy and live birth rates but also effectively reduce the risk of maternal and neonatal complications. In frozen-thawed cycles, progesterone is initiated to promote the final phase of endometrial preparation prior to embryo transfer. However, the optimal duration of exposure to progesterone has remained inconclusive. Therefore, we designed a randomized controlled trial (RCT) to compare the effects of different prolonged progesterone transformation times (P+6 and P+7) on the pregnancy outcomes of D6 single blastocyst transfer in a frozen-thawed cycle.

METHODS

This is a single-center, prospective, randomized controlled clinical trial involving 900 patients with single blastocyst transfer in the frozen-thawed cycle, aged from 20 to 38 years, with less than three transfers, and with HRT-cycle single D6 blastocyst transfer in the current cycle. Participants will be randomly assigned (1:1) into two parallel groups: the transfer of day 6 blastocysts on the 7th day of progesterone supplementation and the transfer of day 6 blastocysts on the 6th day of progesterone supplementation. The primary outcome measure is the clinical pregnancy rate. Secondary outcome measures include the miscarriage rate and live birth rate.

DISCUSSION

This is the first randomized controlled trial to compare the transfer of day 6 blastocysts on the 6th and 7th day of progesterone supplementation. The results of this study will provide evidence for whether to prolong the duration of exposure to progesterone prior to embryo transfer.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov, ID: NCT04938011. Registered on 19 June 2021.

The role of timing in frozen embryo transfer

The process of implantation is characterized by a complex cross-talk between the endometrium and the blastocyst, with the endometrium only being receptive to implantation during a transient window of implantation of approximately 2-3 days during the midsecretory phase. The timing of embryo transfer, including frozen embryo transfer, is therefore critical to the success of implantation. In this article, we discuss various elements that may guide the timing of frozen embryo transfer, including the role of endometrial characteristics such as thickness, days postovulation or length of progesterone administration, stage of the embryo, and the application of endometrial receptivity tests to guide personalized embryo transfer.