Technological advances in ventricular tachycardia catheter ablation: the relentless quest for novel solutions to old problems

Pulsed Field Ablation in Ventricular Arrhythmias

Pulsed field ablation (PFA) is a novel nonthermal energy source for catheter ablation, which is potentially useful also for ablation of ventricular arrhythmias since it mitigates the risk of collateral damage to adjacent tissues and may better penetrate through the scar tissue. Solid-tip PFA within the great cardiac vein appears to be advantageous for arrhythmias originating from the left ventricular summit. The use of a large-footprint catheter that toggles between radiofrequency current and PFA may provide an additional advantage since it allows the development of larger lesions to modify myocardial substrate. More experience is expected in the next few years.

Comparing pulsed field ablation with very high-power and high-power short-duration radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Catheter ablation is a key treatment for atrial fibrillation (AF), with high-power, very high-power short-duration and pulsed field ablation (PFA) being efficient options. However, direct comparisons between these techniques are lacking.

OBJECTIVE

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis, which included predominantly observational studies (four retrospective and one prospective study), to compare PFA and High-power short-duration (HPSD) and very high-power short-duration (vHPSD) radiofrequency (RF) ablation in patients with AF.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Central. Outcomes of interest included: Arrhythmia-free survival (AF, atrial flutter, and atrial tachycardia recurrences 30 s during follow-up after a 1-month blanking period), procedure time, fluoroscopy time, fluoroscopy dose, complications overall. Statistical analysis was performed using the R program (version 4.3.2). Heterogeneity was assessed with I2 statistics.

RESULTS

Our meta-analysis included 1,255 patients from 5 studies, with a mean age ranging from 63 to 68 years. Among them, 554 (45.2%) underwent pulsed field ablation (PFA) and 701 (55.8%) received high/very high potential short-duration ablation. PFA improved arrhythmia-free survival (RR 1.05; 95% CI 1.002-1.120; P = 0.004; I2 = 0%) and reduced procedure time (MD -29.95 min; 95% CI -30.90 to -29.00; P < 0.01; I2 = 0%). However, PFA increased fluoroscopy time (MD 6.33 min; 95% CI 1.65 to 11.01; P < 0.01; I2 = 98%) and showed no significant difference in overall complications (RR 0.88; 95% CI 0.38-2.02; P = 0.756; I2 = 47%), cardiac tamponade (RR 1.62; 95% CI 0.27-9.85; P = 0.599; I2 = 40%), or stroke/transient ischemic attack (TIA) incidence (RR 0.64; 95% CI 0.15-2.80; P = 0.555; I2 = 0%). PFA was associated with a reduced need for redo procedures (RR 0.66; 95% CI 0.45-0.97; P = 0.036; I2 = 0%) and did not significantly affect the fluoroscopy dose (MD 896.86 mGy·cm2; 95% CI -1269.44 to 3063.15; P = 0.42; I2 = 39%).

CONCLUSION

In this meta-analysis, PFA was associated with improved arrhythmia-free survival and reduced procedure time, although it resulted in increased fluoroscopy time. PFA and high/very high power short-duration ablation yielded similar outcomes regarding overall complications, cardiac tamponade, and stroke/TIA incidence. Both techniques demonstrated comparable efficacy in treating atrial fibrillation.

Contemporary Trends in Pulsed Field Ablation for Cardiac Arrhythmias

Pulsed field ablation (PFA) is a catheter-based procedure that utilizes short high voltage and short-duration electrical field pulses to induce tissue injury. The last decade has yielded significant scientific progress and quickened interest in PFA as an energy modality leading to the emergence of the clinical use of PFA technologies for the treatment of atrial fibrillation. It is generally agreed that more research is needed to improve our biophysical understanding of PFA for clinical cardiac applications as well as its potential as a potential alternative energy source to thermal ablation modalities for the treatment of other arrhythmias. In this review, we discuss the available preclinical and clinical evidence for PFA for atrial fibrillation, developments for ventricular arrhythmia (VA) ablation, and future perspectives.

Sigmoid ventricular septum treated with endocardial ablation to improve left ventricular outflow: cases report

Background

Sigmoid Ventricular Septum (SVS) is a type of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy characterized by a reduced angle between the basal interventricular septum and the ascending aorta, and SVS can lead to dynamic Left Ventricular Outflow Tract obstruction (LVOTO) during hypercontractile states. Patients experiencing LVOTO may manifest symptoms such as angina, syncope, etc. Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) has been utilized to treat patients with hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy, but there is no reports on its use in treating LVOTO resulting from SVS. Our report describes two cases of SVS treated with endocardial ablation to improve LVOTO.

Case report

Case 1: A 74-year-old female patient with angina and syncope was admitted to the hospital and diagnosed with SVS by transthoracic echocardiogram. The patient exhibited LVOTO and Systolic Anterior Motion (SAM) phenomena during the administration of the dobutamine stress test. After RFA was performed, the patient's symptoms significantly improved. Additionally, septum decreased from 16 to 13 mm after ten months, and the morphological changes associated with SVS also disappeared. Case 2: A 57-year-old female was admitted to the hospital due to recurrent chest pain after physical activity for more than four years. The transthoracic echocardiogram indicated that the patient met the diagnostic criteria for SVS, and LVOTO and SAM phenomenaoccurred following dobutamine stress test. The patient had significant improvement in symptoms after undergoing RFA treatment.

Conclusions

These two cases represent the first documented instances where dynamic LVOTO caused by SVS could be effectively managed through endocardial RFA.

Pulsed field vs very high-power short-duration radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillation: Results of a multicenter, real-world experience

BACKGROUND

Pulsed field ablation (PFA) and very high-power short-duration (vHPSD) radiofrequency ablation are the most recently introduced technologies for atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. The procedural performance, safety, and effectiveness of PFA vs vHPSD are currently unknown.

OBJECTIVE

The study aimed to compare PFA with vHPSD for the treatment of paroxysmal or persistent AF.

METHODS

We conducted an observational, multicenter study enrolling 534 consecutive patients (63 ± 9 years; 36% female) with paroxysmal (n = 368 [69%]) or persistent (n = 166 [31%]) AF undergoing ablation by either PFA (Farapulse; n = 192) or vHPSD (90 W/4 seconds; QDOT Micro; n = 342) between 2020 and 2023. Atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence after a 1-month blanking period was the primary efficacy end point and was assessed both overall and in propensity score-matched patients. The primary safety end point was a composite of procedure-related complications.

RESULTS

Successful pulmonary vein isolation was achieved in all patients, with shorter procedure duration (PFA,70 minutes; vHPSD, 100 minutes; P < .001) but longer fluoroscopy time (PFA, 15 minutes; vHPSD, 7 minutes; P < .001) in the PFA group. PFA was associated with more frequent use of general anesthesia (P < .001). Primary safety outcome events occurred in 19 patients (3.5%), with similar prevalence in both groups (PFA, 4%; vHPSD, 3%; P = .745). After a median follow-up of 12 (9-12) months, survival free from recurrent atrial tachyarrhythmia was similar between the PFA and vHPSD groups, both overall (12-month estimate: PFA, 75%; vHPSD, 76%; log-rank P = .73) and in propensity score-matched patients (n = 342; 12-month estimate: PFA, 75%; vHPSD, 77%; log-rank P = .980).

CONCLUSION

In a large, multicenter experience, PFA was associated with more common use of general anesthesia, shorter procedural times, and longer fluoroscopy exposure compared with vHPSD ablation, with both techniques displaying superimposable safety and efficacy.

Substrate Characterization and Outcomes of Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation in Amyloid Cardiomyopathy: A Multicenter Study

BACKGROUND

Sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) in cardiac amyloidosis is uncommon, and the substrate and outcomes of catheter ablation are not defined.

METHODS

We included 22 consecutive patients (mean age, 68±10 years; male sex, 91%) with cardiac amyloidosis (ATTR [transthyretin], n=16; light chain, n=6) undergoing catheter ablation for VT/ventricular fibrillation (VF) between 2013 and 2023 in a retrospective, observational, international study. The primary efficacy outcome was recurrent VT/VF during follow-up, while the primary safety end point included major procedure-related adverse events.

RESULTS

The indication for ablation was drug-refractory VT in 17 patients (77%), and premature ventricular complex-initiated polymorphic VT/VF in 5 patients (23%). Catheter ablation was performed using endocardial (n=17.77%) or endo-epicardial approaches (n=5.23%). Complete endocardial electroanatomical voltage maps of the left and right ventricles were obtained in 17 (77%) and 10 (45%) patients, respectively. Each patient had evidence of low-voltage areas, most commonly involving the interventricular septum (n=16); late potentials were recorded in 16 patients (73%). A median of 1 (1-2) VT was inducible per patient; 12 of the 26 mappable VTs (46%) originated from the interventricular septum. Complete procedural success was achieved in 16 patients (73%), with 4 (18%) major procedure-related adverse events. After a median follow-up of 32 (14-42) months, sustained VT/VF recurrence was observed in 9 patients (41%); survival free from VT/VF recurrence was 56% (95% CI, 36%-86%) at 36-month follow-up, and most patients remained on antiarrhythmic drugs. A significant reduction in per patient implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapies was noted in the 6-month period after ablation (before: 6 [4-9] versus after: 0 [0-0]; P<0.001). In multivariable analysis, complete procedural success was associated with reduced risk of recurrent VT/VF (hazard ratio, 0.002; P=0.034).

CONCLUSIONS

Catheter ablation can achieve control of recurrent VT/VF in more than half of patients with cardiac amyloidosis, and the reduction in VT/VF burden post-ablation may be relevant for quality of life. Septal substrate and risk of procedure-related complications challenge successful management of patients with cardiac amyloidosis and VT/VF.

Posterior wall ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation: Very-high-power short-duration versus standard-power radiofrequency ablation

Background

Posterior wall ablation (PWA) is commonly added to pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) during catheter ablation (CA) of persistent atrial fibrillation (AF).

Objective

The purpose of this study was to compare PVI plus PWA using very-high-power short-duration (vHPSD) vs standard-power (SP) ablation index-guided CA among consecutive patients with persistent AF and to determine the voltage correlation between microbipolar and bipolar mapping in AF.

Methods

We compared 40 patients undergoing PVI plus PWA using vHPSD to 40 controls receiving PVI plus PWA using SP. The primary efficacy endpoint was recurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmias after a 3-month blanking period. The primary safety outcome was a composite of major complications within 30 days after CA. In the vHPSD group, high-density mapping of the posterior wall was performed using both a multipolar catheter and microelectrodes on the tip of the ablation catheter.

Results

PVI was more commonly obtained with vHPSD compared to SP ablation (98%vs 75%; P = .007), despite shorter procedural and fluoroscopy times (P <.001). Survival free from recurrent atrial tachyarrhythmias at 18 months was 68% and 47% in the vHPSD and SP groups, respectively (log-rank P = .071), without major adverse events. The vHPSD approach was significantly associated with reduced risk of recurrent AF at multivariable analysis (hazard ratio 0.39; P = .030). Microbipolar voltage cutoffs of 0.71 and 1.69 mV predicted minimum bipolar values of 0.16 and 0.31 mV in AF, respectively, with accuracies of 0.67 and 0.88.

Conclusion

vHPSD PWA plus PVI may be faster and as safe as SP CA among patients with persistent AF, with a trend for superior efficacy. Adapted voltage cutoffs should be used for identifying atrial low-voltage areas with microbipolar mapping.

Idiopathic Premature Ventricular Contraction Catheter Ablation, Sedentary Population vs. Athlete's Populations: Outcomes and Resumption of Sports Activity

There are no investigations about the outcomes of idiopathic PVC catheter ablation (CA) in athletes compared to the sedentary population. We conducted a prospective single-centre observational study. The primary and secondary procedural outcomes were the post-ablation reduction of premature ventricular contractions (PVCs) in an athletes vs. non-athletes group and in agonist vs. leisure-time athletes. The third was the evaluation of the resumption of physical activity and the improvement of symptoms in agonist and leisure-time athletes. From January 2020 to October 2022 we enrolled 79 patients with RVOT/LVOT/fascicular PVC presumed origin. The median percentage of decrease between the pre-procedure and post-procedure Holter monitoring in the non-athletes group was 96 (IQR 68-98) and 98 in the athletes group (IQR 92-99) (p = 0.08). Considering the athletes, the median percentage of decrease in the number of PVCs was 98 (IQR 93-99) and 98 (IQR 87-99), respectively, in leisure-time and agonistic athletes (p = 0.42). Sixteen (70%) leisure time and seventeen (90%) agonist athletes (p = 0.24) have resumed physical activity 3 months after PVC CA; among agonistic athletes, 59% have resumed competitive physical activity. Many leisure-time (88%) and agonist (70%) athletes experienced an improvement in symptoms after ablation. PVC CA was effective and safe in both groups, reducing symptoms and allowing a quick and safe return to sports activities in athletes.

Arrhythmic Mitral Valve Prolapse and Sports Activity: Pathophysiology, Risk Stratification, and Sports Eligibility Assessment

Although mitral valve prolapse (MVP) is the most prevalent valvular abnormality in Western countries and generally carries a good prognosis, a small subset of patients is exposed to a significant risk of malignant ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) and sudden cardiac death (SCD), the so-called arrhythmic MVP (AMVP) syndrome. Recent work has emphasized phenotypical risk features of severe AMVP and clarified its pathophysiology. However, the appropriate assessment and risk stratification of patients with suspected AMVP remains a clinical conundrum, with the possibility of both overestimating and underestimating the risk of malignant VAs, with the inappropriate use of advanced imaging and invasive electrophysiology study on one hand, and the catastrophic occurrence of SCD on the other. Furthermore, the sports eligibility assessment of athletes with AMVP remains ill defined, especially in the grey zone of intermediate arrhythmic risk. The definition, epidemiology, pathophysiology, risk stratification, and treatment of AMVP are covered in the present review. Considering recent guidelines and expert consensus statements, we propose a comprehensive pathway to facilitate appropriate counseling concerning the practice of competitive/leisure-time sports, envisioning shared decision making and the multidisciplinary "sports heart team" evaluation of borderline cases. Our final aim is to encourage an active lifestyle without compromising patients' safety.