Design and α-testing of an electronic rounding tool (CERTAINp) to improve process of care in pediatric intensive care unit

A Pediatric Intensive Care Checklist for Interprofessional Rounds: The R-PICniC Study

BACKGROUND

The use of checklists in the pediatric intensive care unit can help improve the quality of care and patient safety.

OBJECTIVES

To build and validate a checklist for use in interprofessional rounds in a pediatric intensive care unit.

METHODS

This methodological study was conducted in a 20-bed pediatric intensive care unit serving children up to 14 years old. A checklist prototype was constructed through review of the literature and achievement of consensus among the professionals providing care in the unit. Content validation was performed using a modified Delphi technique involving specialists with more than 5 years of experience in pediatric intensive care, methodological studies, and patient safety. Content validity ratios were calculated for the elements of the checklist, which were considered valid when they reached values greater than 0.78. The checklist was tested for usability, application time, and effects on patient care, and feedback was obtained from potential users.

RESULTS

Before content validation, the checklist contained 11 domains, 32 items, and 6 daily goals. The invitation to validate content was sent to 86 specialists, and content validity was achieved after 2 rounds of evaluation, with the checklist elements having content validity ratios ranging from 0.94 to 0.97. The mean application time of the checklist was 5 minutes. The final version consisted of 11 domains, 33 items, and 8 daily goals.

CONCLUSIONS

This study resulted in a useful and valid instrument for application in interprofessional rounds that was tailored to the needs of local health care professionals.

Standardization of rounds on a general paediatric ward: Implementation of a checklist to improve efficiency, quality of rounds, and family satisfaction

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to develop a standardized rounding tool for use on the general paediatric ward and to determine if its use can improve quality of rounds as well as patient and parent satisfaction.

METHODOLOGY

The study used a pre- and post-intervention prospective observational methodology. The intervention consisted of the implementation of a Checklist Rounding Tool (CRT) entitled the 'Paediatric Inpatient Rounding Checklist (PIRC)' which outlined items deemed essential to discuss during rounds for all patients admitted to the paediatric ward. The PIRC was created by the research team after reviewing the literature and it was peer reviewed by a panel of expert paediatricians. Performance on rounds based on discussion of checklist items as well as patient and parent satisfaction were evaluated by an external observer both pre- and post-PIRC implementation.

RESULTS

Four of the five less frequently addressed checklist items were discussed significantly more post-intervention. The Rounds Quality Score was significantly improved after checklist implementation, the pre- and post-intervention scores being 8.24 and 9.61/10, respectively (P-value <0.001). Patient and parent satisfaction were rated higher with the use of the checklist. There was no difference in the duration of rounds between the pre- and post-implementation phases.

CONCLUSION

In summary, utilization of a standardized rounding tool on an inpatient paediatric ward led to improvement in quality of rounds as well as patient and parent satisfaction.

eSIMPLER: A Dynamic, Electronic Health Record-Integrated Checklist for Clinical Decision Support During PICU Daily Rounds

OBJECTIVES

Design, implement, and evaluate a rounding checklist with deeply embedded, dynamic electronic health record integration.

DESIGN

Before-after quality-improvement study.

SETTING

Quaternary PICU in an academic, free-standing children's hospital.

PATIENTS

All patients in the PICU during daily morning rounds.

INTERVENTIONS

Implementation of an updated dynamic checklist (eSIMPLER) providing clinical decision support prompts with display of relevant data automatically pulled from the electronic health record.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

The prior daily rounding checklist, eSIMPLE, was implemented for 49,709 patient-days (7,779 patients) between October 30, 2011, and October 7, 2018. eSIMPLER was implemented for 5,306 patient-days (971 patients) over 6 months. Checklist completion rates were similar (eSIMPLE: 95% [95% CI, 88-98%] vs eSIMPLER: 98% [95% CI, 92-100%] of patient-days; p = 0.40). eSIMPLER required less time per patient (28 ± 1 vs 47 ± 24 s; p < 0.001). Users reported improved satisfaction with eSIMPLER (p = 0.009). Several checklist-driven process measures-discordance between electronic health record orders for stress ulcer prophylaxis and user-recorded indication for stress ulcer prophylaxis, rate of venous thromboembolism prophylaxis prescribing, and recognition of reduced renal function-improved during the eSIMPLER phase.

CONCLUSIONS

eSIMPLER, a dynamic, electronic health record-informed checklist, required less time to complete and improved certain care processes compared with a prior, static checklist with limited electronic health record data. By focusing on the "Five Rights" of clinical decision support, we created a well-accepted clinical decision support tool that was integrated efficiently into daily rounds. Generalizability of eSIMPLER's effectiveness and its impact on patient outcomes need to be examined.

Effectiveness of a Daily Rounding Checklist on Processes of Care and Outcomes in Diverse Pediatric Intensive Care Units Across the World

BACKGROUND

Implementation of checklists has been shown to be effective in improving patient safety. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of implementation of a checklist for daily care processes into clinical practice of pediatric intensive care units (PICUs) with limited resources.

METHODS

Prospective before-after study in eight PICUs from China, Congo, Croatia, Fiji, and India after implementation of a daily checklist into the ICU rounds.

RESULTS

Seven hundred and thirty-five patients from eight centers were enrolled between 2015 and 2017. Baseline stage had 292 patients and post-implementation 443. The ICU length of stay post-implementation decreased significantly [9.4 (4-15.5) vs. 7.3 (3.4-13.4) days, p = 0.01], with a nominal improvement in the hospital length of stay [15.4 (8.4-25) vs. 12.6 (7.5-24.4) days, p = 0.055]. The hospital mortality and ICU mortality between baseline group and post-implementation group did not show a significant difference, 14.4% vs. 11.3%; p = 0.22 for each. There was a variable impact of checklist implementation on adherence to various processes of care recommendations. A decreased exposure in days was noticed for; mechanical ventilation from 42.6% to 33.8%, p < 0.01; central line from 31.3% to 25.3%, p < 0.01; and urinary catheter from 30.6% to 24.4%, p < 0.01. Although there was an increased utilization of antimicrobials (89.9-93.2%, p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Checklists for the treatment of acute illness and injury in the PICU setting marginally impacted the outcome and processes of care. The intervention led to increasing adherence with guidelines in multiple ICU processes and led to decreased length of stay.

Improving Efficiency Using Electronic Medical Record Rounding Report & Sign-Out Report

INTRODUCTION

Standardized rounding and sign-out reports can improve provider efficiency and satisfaction. The purpose of this quality improvement project was to evaluate implementing an electronic medical record-integrated neonatal intensive care unit-specific rounding report and sign-out report on provider efficiency and satisfaction.

METHOD

A pre- and post-quality improvement project was implemented to evaluate the effectiveness of standardized electronic rounding and sign-out reports on a 48-bed level-4 neonatal intensive care unit staffed daily by two neonatologists and four advanced practice providers.

RESULTS

The electronic rounding and sign-out reports were implemented on 745 patient encounters. The process of using the electronic rounding report was found to be faster than the paper prerounding report. Completing the standardized sign-out report was faster than the previous method used.

DISCUSSION

Improving efficiency is essential for optimizing patient care and improving provider satisfaction. Electronic rounding and standardized sign-out reports can improve efficiency and provider satisfaction.

Development and Testing of an Electronic Multidisciplinary Rounding Tool

Patients hospitalized with neurologic and medical issues in the neuroscience critical care unit have widely varying and complex disease states that can change rapidly. The large amount of data that must be reviewed regularly by medical staff members presents a challenge to the provision of high-quality care to these patients. In an effort to lessen the burden, the authors' team implemented an electronic multidisciplinary rounding tool, which facilitates team communication by allowing accurate and concise review of patient information. The rounding tool is part of an ongoing quality improvement project and has been in use for 4 years. Nurses have reported that the tool provides a comprehensive summary of the patient's hospital stay that facilitates handoff during shift changes. A survey of nursing staff members demonstrated high levels of satisfaction with the tool during both multidisciplinary rounds and handoffs.

Improving Reliability to a Care Goal Rounding Template in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit

Background:

Effective pediatric intensive care requires addressing many important aspects of care delivery during morning rounds, often achieved using a rounding checklist. Our objective was to develop a care goal rounding template and then double the reliability of discussion of rounding topics during morning rounds without the use of a checklist.

Methods:

The Institute for Healthcare Improvement Model for Improvement was used for this initiative. A care goal rounding template was established through discussions and consensus with pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) faculty. Rounds were audited in a blinded fashion over a 3-month period to obtain baseline data on rounding topic discussion. Three interventions were then trialed (plan, do, study, act cycles) over a 12-month period. Weekly reliability in rounding topic discussion was tracked.

Results:

Baseline reliability with discussion of rounding topics was 36%. The first intervention included the use of a standardized progress note in the electronic health record, which contained topics and served to prompt the discussion on rounds. The second intervention was implementation of laminated cards provided to PICU fellows highlighting the elements of the care goal rounding template. The third intervention addressed a standardized handoff sheet often used during rounds. Mean reliability for discussion of rounding topics improved to 52% shortly following the second intervention. Reliability was sustained more than 1 year later.

Conclusions:

Following the establishment of a PICU care goal rounding template and various interventions, the reliability in discussing important care goal elements on patient rounds improved.

Clinician-Driven Design of VitalPAD-An Intelligent Monitoring and Communication Device to Improve Patient Safety in the Intensive Care Unit

The pediatric intensive care unit (ICU) is a complex environment, in which a multidisciplinary team of clinicians (registered nurses, respiratory therapists, and physicians) continually observe and evaluate patient information. Data are provided by multiple, and often physically separated sources, cognitive workload is high, and team communication can be challenging. Our aim is to combine information from multiple monitoring and therapeutic devices in a mobile application, the VitalPAD, to improve the efficiency of clinical decision-making, communication, and thereby patient safety. We observed individual ICU clinicians, multidisciplinary rounds, and handover procedures for 54 h to identify data needs, workflow, and existing cognitive aid use and limitations. A prototype was developed using an iterative participatory design approach; usability testing, including general and task-specific feedback, was obtained from 15 clinicians. Features included map overviews of the ICU showing clinician assignment, patient status, and respiratory support; patient vital signs; a photo-documentation option for arterial blood gas results; and team communication and reminder functions. Clinicians reported the prototype to be an intuitive display of vital parameters and relevant alerts and reminders, as well as a user-friendly communication tool. Future work includes implementation of a prototype, which will be evaluated under simulation and real-world conditions, with the aim of providing ICU staff with a monitoring device that will improve their daily work, communication, and decision-making capacity. Mobile monitoring of vital signs and therapy parameters might help improve patient safety in wards with single-patient rooms and likely has applications in many acute and critical care settings.

A Pediatric Intensive Care Unit Bedside Computer Clinical Decision Support Protocol for Hyperglycemia Is Feasible, Safe and Offers Advantages

BACKGROUND

Computer clinical decision support (CDS) systems are uncommon in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU), despite evidence suggesting they improve outcomes in adult ICUs. We reasoned that a bedside CDS protocol for intravenous insulin titration, eProtocol-insulin, would be feasible and safe in critically ill children.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed data from non-diabetic children admitted to the PICU with blood glucose (BG) ≥140 mg/dL who were managed with intravenous insulin by either unaided clinician titration or eProtocol-insulin. Primary outcomes were BG measurements in target range (80-110 mg/dL) and severe hypoglycemia (BG ≤40 mg/dL); secondary outcomes were 60-day mortality and PICU length of stay. We assessed bedside nurse satisfaction with the eProtocol-insulin protocol by using a 5-point Likert scale and measured clinician compliance with eProtocol-insulin recommendations.

RESULTS

Over 5 years, 69 children were titrated with eProtocol-insulin versus 104 by unaided clinicians. eProtocol-insulin achieved target range more frequently than clinician titration (41% vs. 32%, P < 0.001). Severe hypoglycemia was uncommon in both groups (4.3% of patients in eProtocol-insulin, 8.7% in clinician titration, P = 0.37). There were no differences in mean time to BG target or median BG between the groups. Mortality was 23% in both groups. Clinician compliance with eProtocol-insulin recommendations was 89%. Nurses believed that eProtocol-insulin was easy to understand and safer than clinician titration.

CONCLUSIONS

eProtocol-insulin is safe for titration of intravenous insulin in critically ill children. Clinical research protocols and quality improvement initiatives aimed at optimizing BG control should utilize detailed computer protocols that enable replicable clinician decisions.