Psychosocial Challenges in Solid Organ Transplantation

Advances in fertility preservation and pregnancy care for transplant patients

Fertility preservation and pregnancymanagement are critical considerations for patients undergoing organtransplantation. Innovations in assisted reproductive technologies, hormonalmodulation, and personalized medicine have expanded options for these patients, who face unique challenges due to immunosuppressive therapy and organ functionconcerns. This mini-review explores advancements in cryopreservationtechniques, pre-conception counseling, and multidisciplinary strategies forsafe pregnancies post-transplantation. Emphasis is placed on balancing maternalhealth, graft function, and fetal outcomes. The integration of reproductive andtransplant medicine is paving the way for improved quality of life andreproductive autonomy for this patient population.

Do We Need a Predischarge Psychosocial Evaluation? A Case Report on Peri-Allograft Abscess in a Noncompliant Elderly Kidney Transplant Patient

Although postrenal transplant surgical site infections are relatively uncommon, we present the case of a 72-year-old diabetic and hypertensive male patient who developed a delayed peri-graft abscess and severe surgical site infection due to a closed drain exit site infection 1 month following a living-related kidney transplant. While the transplant itself was successful and the patient had passed the pretransplant psychosocial evaluation, their post-transplant noncompliance and unresolved social barriers-such as missed outpatient follow-up appointments-significantly contributed to these complications. This case highlights the limitations of relying solely on pretransplant evaluations and, therefore, emphasizes the critical need for a comprehensive predischarge psychosocial assessment. Such an assessment is particularly vital, especially in elderly patients, as it helps identify and address risks for noncompliance and barriers to follow-up care. To address these challenges, we propose implementing a predischarge psychosocial scoring system that evaluates psychological well-being, social support, cognitive function, understanding of the care plan, and potential obstacles. By identifying high-risk patients, this tool can, in turn, guide tailored interventions to improve adherence. Consequently, a structured predischarge assessment system becomes essential for optimizing post-transplant care, enhancing outcomes, and reducing complications.

Lived experiences for individuals with cystic fibrosis who have undergone lung transplantation: a qualitative study

BACKGROUND

Cystic Fibrosis (CF) significantly affects the respiratory system, often requiring lung transplantation in advanced stages. This life-saving procedure presents substantial challenges and uncertainties. While there is existing research on support and information needs post-lung transplant from various perspectives, this study aims to specifically address the unique experiences and challenges faced by individuals with CF during both the pre-transplant and post-transplant periods.

METHODS

Twenty-three lung-transplanted individuals with CF participated in this exploratory qualitative study. Data was collected through individual semi-structured interviews and analyzed using inductive content analysis.

RESULTS

Participants faced physical and mental challenges, including fatigue, depression, and anxiety. The waiting period involved isolation, dependence on family, and guilt. Post-transplant, they dealt with relief but also severe pain and adjusted to a new identity. Participants highlighted the importance of taking immunosuppressive medications as prescribed, even though the regimen was complicated and these medications had side effects. Participants stressed the need for earlier and more open dialogue with healthcare professionals and better emotional preparation for the transplant process, including preparedness for pain and previously inadequately addressed concerns such as depression and anxiety.

CONCLUSIONS

This study underscores the significant physical and emotional challenges individuals with CF face during lung transplantation, highlighting the need for comprehensive, person-centered care. Psychological support, effective post-transplant pain management, and early palliative care may be beneficial approaches to improve the patient experience. Nurses can play a pivotal role in this process by ensuring clear communication, managing pain, educating patients on immunosuppressive regimens, and advocating for holistic care.

Pilot implementation of two specific problem lists before and after solid organ transplantation into routine care

Introduction

Psychosocial distress and mental health problems are common in patients before and after solid organ transplantation and can negatively affect morbidity, mortality, and adherence. Even though regular screening is recommended to identify patients with high levels of distress, the implementation in routine care has been insufficient so far.

Methods

Two newly developed problem lists for patients before and after transplantations were pilot implemented for 8 weeks at the Medical Center Hamburg Eppendorf (UKE) to identify factors facilitating and impeding their implementation.

Results

Health care professionals evaluated its appropriateness, feasibility, and the cooperation with the psychologists before (HCPs: n = 23) and after (HCPs: n = 19) the implementation. Four psychologists assessed the appropriateness and feasibility by answering to open-ended and close-ended questions. Additionally, patients before (n = 8) and after (n = 100) transplantation filled out the screening and rated its acceptance. Only the data of the patients after transplantation were analyzed due to the small sample size of patients before transplantation. HCPs and psychologists rated the screenings as very appropriate [HCPs: M = 3.84 (SD = 0.77) to M = 4.32 (SD = 0.58)]. It was also highly accepted among patients [M = 4.23 (SD = 0.85) to M = 4.68 (SD = 0.65)]. Contentment with the psychological support and understanding of the mental health problems among HCPs increased significantly from before to after the implementation (U = 107.50, p < 0.05, r = 0.33; U = 107.00, p < 0.05, r = 0.34). The feasibility of the problem list post-Tx in routine care, however, was seen as challenging [HCPs: M = 3.11 (SD = 1.05) to M = 3.47 (SD = 1.07)].

Discussion

The distress screening was accepted and improved the cooperation between different professions. Barriers to implementation can be lack of staff and resources. Future studies should assess the adoption and sustainability of the screening in routine care.

Association of psychosocial risk factors and liver transplant evaluation outcomes in metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease

The Stanford Integrated Psychosocial Assessment for Transplantation (SIPAT) is a standardized psychosocial assessment tool used in liver transplantation (LT) evaluation and has been primarily studied in patients with alcohol-associated liver disease. We aimed to evaluate the relationship between SIPAT score and metabolic syndrome severity and LT waitlist outcomes in a large cohort of patients with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD). We performed a single-center retrospective cohort study of patients with MASLD evaluated for LT from 2014 to 2021. The utility of the previously defined total SIPAT cutoff (<21 [excellent/good candidates] vs. ≥21 [minimally acceptable/high-risk candidates]) was studied. Multivariable logistic regression analyses examined associations between continuous SIPAT scores and LT waitlisting outcomes. The Youden J statistic was used to identify the optimal SIPAT cutoff for patients with MASLD. A total of 480 patients evaluated for transplant with MASLD were included. Only 9.4% of patients had a SIPAT score ≥21. Patients with SIPAT score ≥21 had higher hemoglobin A1c compared to patients with lower psychosocial risk (median [IQR]: 7.8 [6.0-9.7] vs. 6.6 [5.8-7.9]; p = 0.04). There were no other differences in metabolic comorbidities between SIPAT groups. Increasing SIPAT score was associated with decreased odds of listing (OR: 0.82 per 5-point increase; p = 0.003) in multivariable models. A SIPAT of ≥12 was identified as the optimal cutoff in this population, resulting in an adjusted OR for a listing of 0.53 versus SIPAT <12 ( p = 0.001). In this large cohort of patients with MASLD evaluated for LT, few patients met the previously defined high SIPAT cutoff for transplant suitability. Nevertheless, increasing the SIPAT score was associated with waitlist outcomes. Our suggested SIPAT cutoff of ≥12 for patients with MASLD warrants further external validation using data from other centers.

International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation Guidelines for the Evaluation and Care of Cardiac Transplant Candidates-2024

The "International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation Guidelines for the Evaluation and Care of Cardiac Transplant Candidates-2024" updates and replaces the "Listing Criteria for Heart Transplantation: International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation Guidelines for the Care of Cardiac Transplant Candidates-2006" and the "2016 International Society for Heart Lung Transplantation Listing Criteria for Heart Transplantation: A 10-year Update." The document aims to provide tools to help integrate the numerous variables involved in evaluating patients for transplantation, emphasizing updating the collaborative treatment while waiting for a transplant. There have been significant practice-changing developments in the care of heart transplant recipients since the publication of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT) guidelines in 2006 and the 10-year update in 2016. The changes pertain to 3 aspects of heart transplantation: (1) patient selection criteria, (2) care of selected patient populations, and (3) durable mechanical support. To address these issues, 3 task forces were assembled. Each task force was cochaired by a pediatric heart transplant physician with the specific mandate to highlight issues unique to the pediatric heart transplant population and ensure their adequate representation. This guideline was harmonized with other ISHLT guidelines published through November 2023. The 2024 ISHLT guidelines for the evaluation and care of cardiac transplant candidates provide recommendations based on contemporary scientific evidence and patient management flow diagrams. The American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association modular knowledge chunk format has been implemented, allowing guideline information to be grouped into discrete packages (or modules) of information on a disease-specific topic or management issue. Aiming to improve the quality of care for heart transplant candidates, the recommendations present an evidence-based approach.

Disparities in access to hematopoietic cell transplant persist at a transplant center

Disparities in access to hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) are well established. Prior studies have identified barriers, such as referral and travel to an HCT center, that occur before consultation. Whether differences in access persist after evaluation at an HCT center remains unknown. The psychosocial assessment for transplant eligibility may impede access to transplant after evaluation. We performed a single-center retrospective review of 1102 patients who underwent HCT consultation. We examined the association between race/ethnicity (defined as Hispanic, non-Hispanic Black, non-Hispanic White, and Other) and socioeconomic status (defined by zip code median household income quartiles and insurance type) with receipt of HCT and Psychosocial Assessment of Candidates for Transplantation (PACT) scores. Race/ethnicity was associated with receipt of HCT (p = 0.02) with non-Hispanic Whites comprising a higher percentage of HCT recipients than non-recipients. Those living in higher income quartiles and non-publicly insured were more likely to receive HCT (p = 0.02 and p < 0.001, respectively). PACT scores were strongly associated with income quartiles (p < 0.001) but not race/ethnicity or insurance type. Race/ethnicity and socioeconomic status impact receipt of HCT among patients evaluated at an HCT center. Further investigation as to whether the psychosocial eligibility evaluation limits access to HCT in vulnerable populations is warranted.

A systematic review of psychosocial and sex-based contributors to gender disparities in the United States across the steps towards kidney transplantation

INTRODUCTION

Persistent findings suggest women and patients identified as "female" are less likely to receive a kidney transplant. Furthermore, the limited research on transplantation among transgender and gender diverse people suggests this population is susceptible to many of the same psychosocial and systemic barriers.

OBJECTIVE

This review sought to 1) highlight terminology used to elucidate gender disparities, 2) identify barriers present along the steps to transplantation, and 3) summarize contributors to gender disparities across the steps to transplantation.

METHODS

A systematic review of gender and sex disparities in the steps towards kidney transplantation was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines across four social science and public health databases from 2005 to 23.

RESULTS

The search yielded 1696 initial results, 33 of which met inclusion criteria. A majority of studies followed a retrospective cohort design (n = 22, 66.7%), inconsistently used gender and sex related terminology (n = 21, 63.6%), and reported significant findings for gender and sex disparities within the steps towards transplantation (n = 28, 84.8%). Gender disparities among the earlier steps were characterized by patient-provider communication and perception of medical suitability whereas disparities in the later steps were characterized by differential outcomes based on older age, an above average BMI, and Black racial identity. Findings for transgender patients pointed to issues computing eGFR and the need for culturally tailored care.

DISCUSSION

Providers should be encouraged to critically examine the diagnostic criteria used to determine transplant eligibility and adopt practices that can be culturally tailored to meet the needs of patients.

Indications for Lung Transplantation and Patient Selection

Globally, thousands of patients undergo lung transplantation owing to end-stage lung disease each year. As lung transplantation evolves, recommendations and indications are constantly being updated. In 2021, the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation published a new consensus document for selecting candidates for lung transplantation. However, it is still difficult to determine appropriate candidates for lung transplantation among patients with complex medical conditions and various diseases. Therefore, it is necessary to analyze each patient’s overall situation and medical condition from various perspectives, and ongoing efforts to optimize the analysis will be necessary. The purpose of this study is to review the extant literature and discuss recent updates.

The Combined Roles of Race/Ethnicity and Substance Use in Predicting Likelihood of Kidney Transplantation

BACKGROUND

Racial/ethnic minorities face known disparities in likelihood of kidney transplantation. These disparities may be exacerbated when coupled with ongoing substance use, a factor also reducing likelihood of transplantation. We examined whether race/ethnicity in combination with ongoing substance use predicted incidence of transplantation.

METHODS

Patients were enrolled between March 2010 and October 2012 at the time of transplant evaluation. Substance use data were retrieved from transplant evaluations. Following descriptive analyses, the primary multivariable analyses evaluated whether, relative to the referent group (White patients with no substance use), racial/ethnic minority patients using any substances at the time of evaluation were less likely to receive transplants by the end of study follow-up (August 2020).

RESULTS

Among 1152 patients, 69% were non-Hispanic White, 23% non-Hispanic Black, and 8% Other racial/ethnic minorities. White, Black, and Other patients differed in percentages of current tobacco smoking (15%, 26%, and 18%, respectively; P = 0.002) and illicit substance use (3%, 8%, and 9%; P < 0.001) but not heavy alcohol consumption (2%, 4%, and 1%; P = 0.346). Black and Other minority patients using substances were each less likely to receive transplants than the referent group (hazard ratios ≤0.45, P ≤ 0.021). Neither White patients using substances nor racial/ethnic minority nonusers differed from the referent group in transplant rates. Additional analyses indicated that these effects reflected differences in waitlisting rates; once waitlisted, study groups did not differ in transplant rates.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of minority race/ethnicity and substance use may lead to unique disparities in likelihood of transplantation. To facilitate equity, strategies should be considered to remove any barriers to referral for and receipt of substance use care in racial/ethnic minorities.

Depression, Quantified Medication Adherence, and Quality of Life in Renal Transplant Candidates and Recipients

Like patients with many chronic illnesses, ESRD patients experience psychological challenges with greater incidence of depression and reduced quality of life (QoL). A series of 139 transplant candidates' depression and QoL, and a subset of 82 candidates' medication adherence were monitored, revealing heterogenous patterns of depression and adherence and reduced QoL. Twenty-eight patients who received kidney transplants were re-evaluated 6 months post-transplant revealing mixed patterns. Mean depression and quantitated adherence decreased and QoL increased. Some patients improved whereas others declined in depression and adherence. Pre-transplant depression was negatively correlated with post-transplant adherence but positively correlated with post-transplant depression. Nevertheless, the ability to predict individuals' post-transplant adherence and depression, principal objectives of pre-transplant psychological evaluations, is limited. Consequently, it is important to provide periodic screening of ESRD patients for depression and adherence pre- and post-transplant as they reflect changing states, rather than static traits, with variable patterns across patients.

Social Support of Organ Donor Families in China: A Quantitative and Qualitative Study

Background: Donor families experienced a difficult time during and after the process of organ donation. There is a necessity to understand the support they received and what they need to help them get through a painful time. This study aimed to investigate the social support level and social support needs of the donor families in China. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted among 102 donor families using a questionnaire to investigate their demographics and social support level. To further understand their social support needs, in-depth interviews were conducted among 9 donor families. Results: Findings of the study showed that (1) Most of the family members (74, 72.6%) lacked social support, and only a small number of families (28, 27.5%) received sufficient social support (2). The coping style had an impact on the overall social support level (P = 0.014) (3). There was a lack of emotional support, information support and material support toward the donor's family members. Both emotional support and material support are significantly needed. Conclusions: The overall social support level remained insufficient and the utilization degree of social support was low. Organ donor families are in desperate need of material and emotional support. The level of social support is largely influenced by the donor familie's coping style. Compared with a negative coping style, donor families who adopted a positive coping style acquire more social support.

Consensus document for the selection of lung transplant candidates: An update from the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation

Tens of thousands of patients with advanced lung diseases may be eligible to be considered as potential candidates for lung transplant around the world each year. The timing of referral, evaluation, determination of candidacy, and listing of candidates continues to pose challenges and even ethical dilemmas. To address these challenges, the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation appointed an international group of members to review the literature, to consider recent advances in the management of advanced lung diseases, and to update prior consensus documents on the selection of lung transplant candidates. The purpose of this updated consensus document is to assist providers throughout the world who are caring for patients with pulmonary disease to identify potential candidates for lung transplant, to optimize the timing of the referral of these patients to lung transplant centers, and to provide transplant centers with a framework for evaluating and selecting candidates. In addition to addressing general considerations and providing disease specific recommendations for referral and listing, this updated consensus document includes an ethical framework, a recognition of the variability in acceptance of risk between transplant centers, and establishes a system to account for how a combination of risk factors may be taken into consideration in candidate selection for lung transplantation.

Psychological functioning and psychosocial issues in pediatric kidney transplant recipients

Research demonstrates that psychological factors are important for positive transplant outcomes, though there is little literature that synthesizes these factors in a comprehensive model among pediatric kidney transplant patients. This review analyzes psychological and psychosocial factors related to medical outcomes and overall well-being post-transplant by utilizing the PPPHM and referencing the existing literature on risk and resilience. Pediatric kidney transplant recipients are more susceptible to mental health concerns such as depression, anxiety, and ADHD, as well as developmental and neurocognitive delays, compared to healthy peers. Complex medical care and psychosocial needs for patients have implications for family functioning, parental and sibling mental health, and youth readiness to transition to adult care. It is important to carefully monitor patient functioning with empirically validated tools and to intervene in a multidisciplinary setting as early as possible to identify patients at risk and reduce potential negative impact. Psychologists are uniquely trained to assess and address these issues and are a valuable component of multidisciplinary, culturally competent care. While research in this expansive field is improving, more data are needed to establish gold standard approaches to mental health and psychosocial care in this population.

The Utility of a Pre-Transplant Psychosocial Evaluation in Predicting Post-Liver Transplant Outcomes

BACKGROUND

There is insufficient evidence about the ability of pretransplant psychosocial evaluations to predict posttransplant outcomes. While standardized assessments were developed to increase predictive validity, it is unclear whether the risk scores they yield predict outcomes. We investigated if the Stanford Integrated Psychosocial Assessment for Transplantation (SIPAT), a scaling approach to those assessments, would have been a superior predictor than the standard psychosocial evaluation.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, medical records of 182 adult liver transplant recipients who were at least 1 year posttransplant and prescribed tacrolimus for immunosuppression were analyzed. Regression analyses predicted outcomes of interest, including immunosuppressant nonadherence and biopsy-proven rejection, obtained 1-year posttransplant to time of data collection. Nonadherence was determined using the medication level variability index (MLVI).

RESULTS

Approximately 49% of patients had MLVI > 2.5, suggestive of nonadherence, and 15% experienced rejection. SIPAT total score did not predict adherence either using the continuous (P = .70), or dichotimized score, above or below > 2.5 (P = .14), or rejection (P = 0.87). Using a SIPAT threshold (total score > 69) did not predict adherence (p = .16) nor was a superior predictor of the continuous adherence score (P = .45), MLVI > 2.5 (P = .42), or rejection (P = 0.49), than the standard evaluation.

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that the SIPAT is unable to predict 2 of the most important outcomes in this population, immunosuppressant adherence and rejection. Research efforts should attempt to evaluate the best manner to use psychosocial evaluations.

A Review of the Prevalence of Illicit Substance Use in Solid-Organ Transplant Candidates and the Effects of Illicit Substance Use on Solid-Organ Transplant Treatment Outcomes

Solid-organ transplantation is one of the significant advances in the medical field that have improved the quality of life and survival rates of numerous patients with end-organ dysfunction. Substance use is a common condition of individuals who are in need of solid-organ transplantation. The implications of substance use on solid-organ transplants are gaining increasing attention over the past decade. The current review seeks to explore the prevalence rate of illicit substance use among those who receive solid-organ transplantation (pre and post-transplant) and whether illicit substance use before solid-organ transplantation affects the outcome of solid-organ transplants. We searched the Medline database for all the articles available in English on the prevalence of substance use in the context of solid-organ transplant and the effect on outcome measures. We found 21 relevant articles. It appears that substance use is fairly common among solid-organ transplant candidates, with cannabis being the most common substance of abuse. A heterogeneous sample precludes the drawing of a clear-cut conclusion. But it appears that substance use may affect various outcomes of solid-organ transplants. The existing literature may not be sufficient to adequately assess the risk but limited evidence indicates that illicit substance use, particularly cannabis use, may not affect the overall survival following a solid-organ transplant.

A Multisite Study on Using Symptom-Targeted Interventions to Improve Mental Health Outcomes of Solid Organ Transplant Patients

INTRODUCTION

Depression and anxiety are common affective experiences during the first year following a solid organ transplant. This study examined the degree to which an evidenced-based clinical intervention implemented by social workers-Symptom Targeted Intervention-can alter self-reported depression and anxiety in heart, kidney, liver, and lung transplant recipients.

RESEARCH QUESTIONS

This investigation explored 2 questions: (1) Can symptom-targeted interventions significantly reduce posttransplant recipients' self-reported depression and anxiety at the conclusion of treatment and at 1-month follow-up? and (2) Does the response differ by gender?

DESIGN

A 1-group pretest-posttest design with a 1-month follow-up was used to test for changes in anxiety and depression after transplantation. Forty-eight patients at 2 US transplant centers were enrolled between January 2016 and May 2017. Data were collected using an online platform and analyzed to assess for differences over time and by gender.

RESULTS

Anxiety decreased significantly between pretest and posttest using the General Anxiety Disorder-2 (P < .05). Comparisons by gender indicated that women had a significant decrease in anxiety between pretest and posttest (P < .001); however, there was no significant decrease in anxiety for men. Analyses by gender and time yielded no significant differences for depression.

DISCUSSION

Symptom-targeted interventions have the potential to reduce anxiety in solid organ transplant patients and enhance their psychosocial adjustment after surgery.

Mental health and chemical dependency services at US transplant centers

The purpose of this study was to assess the availability of mental health (MH) and chemical dependency (CD) services at US transplant centers, because appropriate psychosocial assessment and care is associated with better transplant outcomes. We used the 2017-2018 American Hospital Association survey, Area Health Resource File, and Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Hospital Compare databases to quantify availability of services and examined associations of hospital- and health services area-level characteristics with odds of offering services with generalized linear mixed models. We found that 15% of transplant centers did not offer MH services and 62% did not offer CD services. Hospitals were more likely to offer MH services if they were larger (OR [95% CI]: 1.03 [1.01, 1.06]) and had a lower rate of uninsured patients in the health services area (OR [95% CI]: 0.89 [0.80, 0.99]) and were more likely to offer CD services if they were larger (OR [95% CI]: 1.02 [1.01, 1.03]) or were members of a system (OR [95% CI]: 2.31 [1.26, 4.24]). Additional research is needed to understand whether lack of MH or CD services at transplant centers affects patients' ability to access comprehensive psychosocial care and whether this affects patient outcomes.

KDIGO Clinical Practice Guideline on the Evaluation and Management of Candidates for Kidney Transplantation

The 2020 Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Clinical Practice Guideline on the Evaluation and Management of Candidates for Kidney Transplantation is intended to assist health care professionals worldwide who evaluate and manage potential candidates for deceased or living donor kidney transplantation. This guideline addresses general candidacy issues such as access to transplantation, patient demographic and health status factors, and immunological and psychosocial assessment. The roles of various risk factors and comorbid conditions governing an individual's suitability for transplantation such as adherence, tobacco use, diabetes, obesity, perioperative issues, causes of kidney failure, infections, malignancy, pulmonary disease, cardiac and peripheral arterial disease, neurologic disease, gastrointestinal and liver disease, hematologic disease, and bone and mineral disorder are also addressed. This guideline provides recommendations for evaluation of individual aspects of a candidate's profile such that each risk factor and comorbidity are considered separately. The goal is to assist the clinical team to assimilate all data relevant to an individual, consider this within their local health context, and make an overall judgment on candidacy for transplantation. The guideline development process followed the Grades of Recommendation Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. Guideline recommendations are primarily based on systematic reviews of relevant studies and our assessment of the quality of that evidence, and the strengths of recommendations are provided. Limitations of the evidence are discussed with differences from previous guidelines noted and suggestions for future research are also provided.

Kidney Transplantation in Transgender Patients

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Kidney transplantation and gender affirmation treatments are becoming increasingly more prevalent due to advances in technology. However, there is a paucity of data regarding kidney transplantation in transgender patients. Interesting considerations must be made in this patient population, since there are many hormonal interactions with kidney function and the transplantation process.

RECENT FINDINGS

The diagnosis of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), preoperative assessment/counseling, decreased testosterone levels in a transgender male to female patient, increased estrogen/progesterone in a female to male patient, and drug side effects all have important and unique implications for kidney transplant recipients. Kidney transplantation can be safely and effectively managed in transgender patients with special considerations in eGFR calculations, mental health/lifestyle counseling, and drug interactions.

Ethical issues associated with solid organ transplantation and substance use: a scoping review

While solid organ transplantation for patients with substance use issues has attracted ethical discussion, a typology of the ethics themes has not been articulated in the literature. We conducted a scoping review of peer-reviewed literature on solid organ transplantation and substance use published between January 1997 and April 2016. We aimed to identify and develop a typology of the main ethical themes discussed in this literature and to identify gaps worthy of future research. Seventy articles met inclusion criteria and underwent inductive content analysis. Four main ethical themes were identified: (1) personal responsibility; (2) utility; (3) moral character; and (4) fairness. Each theme had multiple sub-themes and there was substantial overlap between themes. This scoping review identified a disproportionate emphasis in the literature regarding personal responsibility, which was referenced by each of the other themes, and a narrow focus on alcohol and liver. We recommend future research further investigate these connections between ethical themes and focus on ethical issues associated with transplants from organ groups other than liver for patients who use substances other than alcohol.

Psychosocial Assessment of Candidates for Transplant (PACT) as a tool for psychological and social evaluation of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation recipients

Psychosocial Assessment of Candidates for Transplant (PACT) is a tool originally developed to address psychosocial risks in solid organ transplant recipients and has the potential for application to hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) recipients. In a retrospective cohort study, we reviewed 404 adult allogeneic HCT cases from 2003 to 2014 to identify predictors of adverse psychosocial status as determined by PACT. Final PACT rating was poor/borderline (score 0-1) in 5%, acceptable (score 2) in 22%, good (score 3) in 44%, and excellent (score 4) in 29% recipients. In multivariable regression, higher PACT score was associated with White race (odds ratio [OR] 2.95, P < 0.001), having a related donor (OR 1.61, P = 0.015), and a higher quality of life score (OR 1.22/ 10-point increase in FACT-BMT total score, P < 0.001). PACT score correlated with all quality of life subscales. The final PACT score was associated with non-relapse mortality (HR 0.82/ 1-point increase, p = 0.03) in multivariable analysis that considered patient and disease factors, but not in models that also included transplant-related factors and performance status. PACT score was not associated with overall survival. PACT can be considered as part of a comprehensive psychosocial assessment for identifying patients who may require additional resources around allogeneic HCT.

Exploration of the Stanford Integrated Psychosocial Assessment for Transplantation With Psychosocial and Medical Outcomes in Kidney and Kidney–Pancreas Transplant Recipients

Introduction:

The Stanford Integrated Psychosocial Assessment for Transplantation (SIPAT) is a psychometric instrument designed to assess patient risk for transplant. We investigated the association between SIPAT scores and demographic data with psychosocial and medical outcomes within a diverse kidney/kidney–pancreas transplant population.

Design:

The SIPAT was administered to all pretransplant candidates. A retrospective review of transplanted patients who had at least 6 months of follow-up was completed.

Results:

The sample included 136 patients: male (n = 77 [57%]) with a mean age of 47 years old. Thirty-eight percent were black (n = 51), 55% had less than a high school education (n = 74), and 65% had low socioeconomic status (n = 89). Statistical difference was found among SIPAT scores and substance use and support system instability ( P = .035, P = .012). Females ( P = .012) and patients with a history of psychopathology ( P = .002) developed or had a relapse of psychopathology following transplant. Patients with more than a high school education ( P = .025) and who were less than 30 years ( P = .026) had higher rejection incidence rates. Risk factors for rehospitalizations included Hispanic race, diabetes, and low socioeconomic status ( P = .036, P = .038, P = .014). African American/Black and male patients had higher incidence of infection events ( P = .032, P = .049). Mortality and treatment nonadherence were not significantly associated with SIPAT scores or demographic variables.

Conclusion:

The SIPAT was associated with posttransplant substance use and support system instability, while demographic variables were associated with the development and/or relapse of psychopathology, graft loss, rejection, infection events, and medical rehospitalizations. Revision of the SIPAT to include additional demographic components may lend to improved prediction of transplant outcomes.

Psychopharmacology in transplantation medicine

Organ transplantation has become a well-established treatment option in patients with end-stage organ diseases. Although quality of life has markedly improved, psychiatric disorders before and after transplantation are more frequent compared to the general population. Psychopharmacological treatment is recommended for almost all mental disorders according to current guidelines, but may pose particular problems in organ transplant patients. Changes in the metabolism and elimination of drugs during organ insufficiency, drug interactions, and overlapping side effects between psychopharmacological and immunosuppressive drugs are challenging problems in clinical management. Furthermore, questions frequently arise concerning the use of psychopharmacological treatment options for sleeping and anxiety disorders. This article reviews psychopharmacology in organ transplant patients, with particular attention to frequent psychiatric disorders observed in the disease course of end-stage organ diseases.

Group Psychotherapy Could Improve Depression in Cirrhotic Patients on the Liver Transplant Waiting List

BACKGROUND

It is well-known that there is a high incidence of depression in patients on the liver transplant (LT) waiting list. However, there have been few studies of psychological intervention on these patients.

OBJECTIVES

To determine symptoms of depression in patients on the LT waiting list and the impact of group psychotherapy.

METHODS

Study population: patients on the LT waiting list who received group psychotherapy (n = 15).

CONTROL GROUP

patients who did not receive psychotherapy (n = 10). Measurement instrument: Beck's depression test, which was provided before psychotherapy was initiated and after it was completed (after 6 months). The control group was given the questionnaire at the same 2 points in time as the study group. The psychotherapeutic method consisted of discussing patients' feelings, which dealt with several matters related to transplantation. Different coping strategies were considered.

RESULTS

More than half of those surveyed initially had depressive symptoms. When the second survey was administered to the study population, all the patients improved in their psychopathological assessment. When the survey was administered to the control group, a worse psychopathological assessment was obtained in all cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggest an improvement in depressive symptoms in patients on the LT waiting list after receiving group psychotherapy.

The 2018 ISHLT/APM/AST/ICCAC/STSW recommendations for the psychosocial evaluation of adult cardiothoracic transplant candidates and candidates for long-term mechanical circulatory support

The psychosocial evaluation is well-recognized as an important component of the multifaceted assessment process to determine candidacy for heart transplantation, lung transplantation, and long-term mechanical circulatory support (MCS). However, there is no consensus-based set of recommendations for either the full range of psychosocial domains to be assessed during the evaluation, or the set of processes and procedures to be used to conduct the evaluation, report its findings, and monitor patients' receipt of and response to interventions for any problems identified. This document provides recommendations on both evaluation content and process. It represents a collaborative effort of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT) and the Academy of Psychosomatic Medicine, American Society of Transplantation, International Consortium of Circulatory Assist Clinicians, and Society for Transplant Social Workers. The Nursing, Health Science and Allied Health Council of the ISHLT organized a Writing Committee composed of international experts representing the ISHLT and the collaborating societies. This Committee synthesized expert opinion and conducted a comprehensive literature review to support the psychosocial evaluation content and process recommendations that were developed. The recommendations are intended to dovetail with current ISHLT guidelines and consensus statements for the selection of candidates for cardiothoracic transplantation and MCS implantation. Moreover, the recommendations are designed to promote consistency across programs in the performance of the psychosocial evaluation by proposing a core set of content domains and processes that can be expanded as needed to meet programs' unique needs and goals.