Examining continuity of care for Medicaid-enrolled children receiving oral health services in medical offices

Policy interventions to improve the accessibility and affordability of Dutch dental care. A scoping review of effective interventions

Caries and periodontitis remain prevalent in the Netherlands. Given the assumption that increasing the accessibility and affordability of dental care can improve oral health outcomes, policy interventions aimed at improving these aspects may contribute to better oral health. To identify possible solutions, this scoping review firstly identifies policy interventions from around the world that have effectively improved the accessibility or affordability of dental care. Secondly, this review discusses the potential of the policy interventions identified that are applicable to the Dutch healthcare sector specifically. A literature search was performed in four databases. Two reviewers independently screened all potentially relevant titles and abstracts before doing the same for the full texts. Only studies that had quantitatively evaluated the effectiveness of policy interventions aimed at improving the accessibility or affordability of dental care were included. 61 of the 1288 retrieved studies were included. Interventions were grouped into four categories. Capacity interventions (n = 5) mainly focused on task delegation. Coverage interventions (n = 25) involved the expansion of covered dental treatments or the group eligible for coverage. Managed care interventions (n = 20) were frequently implemented in school or community settings. Payment model interventions (n = 11) focused on dental reimbursement rates or capitation. 199 indicators were identified throughout the 61 included studies. Indicators were grouped into three categories: accessibility (n = 137), affordability (n = 21), and oral health status (n = 41). Based on the included studies, increasing managed care interventions for children and adding dental coverage to the basic health insurance plan for adults could improve access to dental care in the Netherlands. Due to possible spillover effects, it is advisable to investigate a combination of these policy interventions. Further research will be necessary for the development of effective policy interventions in practice.

An approach to developing oral health knowledge for allied health students

BACKGROUND

Oral health competency-based education approaches have been proposed as a mechanism to address oral health outcomes and equity issues. Recommendations for oral health education for allied health professional students include practices to increase team members' knowledge and skills in the integration of oral health and primary care practice (IOHPCP) initiative's oral health clinical competencies for primary care providers.

AIMS

This study aimed to examine changes in self-reported knowledge of occupational students in the topics of oral health, the dental profession, and dental healthcare systems following participation in a series of webinars and a community-engaged learning project.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study utilized an oral health education program through webinars and a community-engaged learning project for occupational therapy students. Program evaluation measures were utilized to assess the oral health education activities through self-reported knowledge in oral health topics aligned with IOHPCP domains along with topics identified by the community partner organization.

RESULTS

Findings demonstrate that asynchronous webinars can increase self-reported knowledge in occupational therapy students.

DISCUSSION

Recommendations for inclusion of oral health education for allied health students related to knowledge of oral health, the dental profession, and dental healthcare systems are shared.

CONCLUSIONS

Asynchronous webinars have the potential to increase self-reported oral health knowledge for allied health professionals.

Association between Medicaid expansion, dental coverage policies for adults, and children's receipt of preventive dental services

OBJECTIVE

To examine whether low-income children's use of preventive dental services is linked to variation in state Medicaid policies that affect parents' access to dental care in Medicaid.

DATA SOURCES

Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (2011-2016), Area Health Resources File, and Medicaid adult dental coverage policies.

STUDY DESIGN

We conducted a quasi-experimental analysis using linked parent-child dyads in low-income families (≤125 percent of the Federal Poverty Level). We assessed whether expansions of Medicaid to low-income adults under the Affordable Care Act were associated with increases in the use of preventive dental services among low-income children when state Medicaid programs did vs did not cover these services for adults.

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

Over the study period, 37.8 percent of low-income children received at least one annual preventive dental visit. We found no change in children's receipt of preventive dental care associated with Medicaid expansions in states that covered (1.26 percentage points; 95% CI: -3.74 to 6.27) vs did not cover preventive dental services for adults (3.03 percentage points; 95% CI: -2.76 to 8.81). (differential change: -1.76 percentage points; 95% CI: -8.09, 4.56). However, our estimates are imprecise, with wide confidential intervals that are unable to rule out sizable effects in either direction.

CONCLUSION

We did not find an association between Medicaid expansions with concurrent coverage of preventive dental services for adults and children's use of these services. Factors other than parental access to dental benefits through Medicaid may be more salient determinants of preventive dental care use among low-income children.

Do Oral Health Services in Medical Offices Replace Pediatric Dental Visits?

In the United States, state Medicaid programs pay for medical and dental care for children from low-income families and support nondental primary care providers delivering preventive oral health services (POHS) to young children in medical offices ("medical POHS"). Despite the potential of these policies to expand access to care, there is concern that they may replace dental visits with medical POHS. Using Medicaid claims from 38 states from 2006 to 2014, we conducted a repeated cross-sectional study and used linear probability regression to estimate the association between the annual proportion of children in a county receiving medical POHS and the probability that a child received 1) dental POHS and 2) a dental visit in a given year. Models included county and year fixed effects and controlled for child- and county-level factors, and standard errors were clustered at the state level. In a weighted population of 45.1 million child-years (age, 6 mo to <6 y), we found no significant nor substantively important association between the proportion of children in a county receiving medical POHS and the probability that a child received dental POHS or a dental visit. Additionally, we found an almost zero probability (<0.001) that the reduction in dental POHS was at least as large as the expansion in medical POHS (full substitution) and a 0.50 probability that increased medical POHS was associated with an increase in dental POHS of at least 6.6% of the expansion of medical POHS. Results were similar when receipt of dental visits was examined. This study failed to find evidence that medical POHS replaced dental visits for young children enrolled in Medicaid and, in fact, offers evidence that increased medical POHS was associated with increased utilization of dental care. Given lower-than-desired rates of dental visits for this population, delivery of medical POHS should be expanded.

Impact of Medicaid Policy on the Oral Health of Publicly Insured Children

Objective Fluoride varnish (FV) applications among non-dentist primary care providers has increased due to state Medicaid policies. In this study we examine the impact of FV policies on the oral health of publicly insured children aged 2-6 years old. Methods Using three waves of the National Survey of Children's Health (2003, 2007, 2011/12), we used a logistic regression model with state and year fixed effects, adjusting for relevant child characteristics, to examine the association between years since a state implemented a FV policy and the odds of a publicly insured child having very good or excellent teeth. We compared children with public insurance in states with FV policies to children with public insurance in states without FV policies, controlling for the same difference among children with private insurance who were unlikely to be affected by Medicaid FV policies. Results Among 68,890 children aged 2-6 years, 38% had public insurance. Compared to privately insured children, publicly insured children had significantly lower odds of having very good or excellent teeth [odds ratio (OR) 0.70, 95% CI 0.62-0.81]. Publicly insured children in states with FV policies implemented for four or more years had significantly greater odds of having very good or excellent teeth (OR 1.28, 95% CI 1.03-1.60) compared to publicly insured children in states without FV policies. Conclusions for Practice State policies supporting non-dental primary care providers application of FV were associated with improvements in oral health for young children with public insurance.

Access to preventive services after the integration of oral health care into early childhood education and medical care

BACKGROUND

The effect of Early Head Start (EHS) on receipt of preventive oral health services (POHS) from both oral and medical health care providers is not known.

METHODS

The authors compared children enrolled in North Carolina EHS programs with similar children enrolled in Medicaid but not EHS on the use of POHS. They analyzed 4 dependent variables (oral assessment by medical health care provider, oral assessment by oral health care provider, fluoride application by medical health care provider, fluoride application by oral health care provider) by using multivariate logistic regression that controlled for covariates.

RESULTS

Primary caregivers of children enrolled in EHS (n = 479) and Medicaid (n = 699) were interviewed when children were approximately 10 and 36 months of age. An average of 81% of EHS and non-EHS children received POHS from an oral or medical health care provider at follow-up. EHS children had greater odds of receiving an oral health assessment (odds ratio [OR], 2.33; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.74 to 3.13) and fluoride (OR, 1.53; 95% CI, 1.16 to 2.03) from an oral health care provider than children not enrolled. EHS children had decreased odds (OR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.54 to 0.99) of receiving fluoride from a medical health care provider.

CONCLUSIONS

Both children enrolled in EHS and community control participants had high rates of POHS, but the source of services differed. EHS children had greater odds of receiving POHS from oral health care providers than non-EHS children. EHS and non-EHS children had equal rates for fluoride overall because of the greater percentage of non-EHS children with medical fluoride visits.

PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS

The integration of POHS in early education and Medicaid medical benefits combined with existing dental resources in the community greatly improves access to POHS.

Contribution of preventive methods in controlling caries among Saudi primary schoolchildren: a population-based cross-sectional study

OBJECTIVE

This study assessed the association between caries preventive measures including regular dental checkups, twice a day tooth brushing using fluoridated toothpaste and pit and fissure sealants on one side and the presence of caries among primary schoolchildren in the Eastern Province of Saudi Arabia.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A cross-sectional study was conducted in 2016 including 1198, 6-12-year-old children from 13 randomly selected schools. The outcome variable was caries presence. The explanatory variables were brushing twice a day using fluoridated toothpaste, the presence of sealant and regular dental checkups. Multivariable logistic regression model was conducted to assess the associations controlling for confounders (age, gender, ability to get treatment, being health insured and school) using SPSS version 20.0.

RESULTS

Data of 921 participants (83.8%) were available. The prevalence of caries was 63.5%, whereas 67.6% brushed their teeth twice a day, 28.3% visited the dentist for regular checkups and 7.6% had sealant. In multivariable regression, out of the three main explanatory variables, only having regular checkups was significantly associated with caries presence (OR = 0.65, 95% CI = 0.48, 0.88).

CONCLUSIONS

Lower odds of caries presence were associated with regular dental checkups but not with regular brushing or having sealant.

Pediatric Workforce Issues

Untreated dental disease remains one of the most prevalent health conditions for children, driven in part by disparities in access to care. This article examines evidence-based workforce strategies being used to facilitate better access to pediatric health services and to improve oral health status and outcomes for children. The workforce strategies described in this article include promising new models in the dental field, with new and existing providers as well as emerging workforce models outside of the dental field. Case studies for some of these workforce strategies are also presented. Future directions and health policy implications are considered.