1
|
Kidanemariam M, Neve OM, van den Heuvel I, Douz S, Hensen EF, Stiggelbout AM, Pieterse AH. Patient-reported outcome measures in value-based healthcare: A multiple methods study to assess patient-centredness. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2024; 125:108243. [PMID: 38678860 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2024.108243] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2023] [Revised: 03/01/2024] [Accepted: 03/05/2024] [Indexed: 05/01/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Value-based healthcare (VBHC) involves the use of standardised outcome measures, including patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). This study aimed to assess to what extent discussion of PROMs is associated with patient- and person-centredness. METHODS This study used a separate sample pre-/post-test design and multiple methods (observations, questionnaires, and interviews) in a VBHC care pathway for patients with a vestibular schwannoma, to assess to what extent the implementation of PROMs is associated with a difference in patient- and person-centredness. RESULTS A total of 139 patients with a vestibular schwannoma and their four treating physicians were included in the study. No significant differences were found in observed patient-centredness (Mpre=6.71 ± 2.42 vs. Mpost=6.93 ± 2.01; P = 0.60) or patient-reported patient-centredness (Mpre=1.73 vs. Mpost=1.68; P = 0.63) and person-centredness after PROM implementation (Mpre=11.81 vs. Mpost=13.42; P = 0.34). We observed more discussion of patient-reported outcomes. However, a majority of patients did not expect PRO discussion in consultations. CONCLUSIONS The implementation of standardised PROMs in a VBHC care pathway was associated with more discussion on patient-reported outcomes in clinical consultations. Overall, the implementation of PROMs was not observed or perceived as leading to more patient-centred consultations. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS Physicians should assess whether the discussion of PROMs add value collaboratively with patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martha Kidanemariam
- Medical Decision Making, Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
| | - Olaf M Neve
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Isabelle van den Heuvel
- Erasmus School of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Sana Douz
- Medical Decision Making, Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Erik F Hensen
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Anne M Stiggelbout
- Medical Decision Making, Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands; Erasmus School of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Arwen H Pieterse
- Medical Decision Making, Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Pattyn E, Gemmel P, Willems R, Lagaert S, Trybou J. Validation of the Psychological Empowerment Scale and Client-Centered Care Questionnaire in budget holders with disabilities. Disabil Rehabil 2024:1-13. [PMID: 38644617 DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2024.2343417] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2023] [Accepted: 03/23/2024] [Indexed: 04/23/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Several high-income countries install Cash-for-Care Schemes (CCSs) by granting budgets to care users. However, little quantitative evidence exist on empowerment and client-centered care levels, due to a lack of validated scales. This research aimed to validate the Psychological Empowerment Scale (PE scale) and Client-Centered Care Questionnaire (CCCQ) in budget holders with disabilities. METHODS A survey was developed based on a literature review and experts and budget holders input. Principal Axis Factoring with direct oblimin rotation, Cronbach's Alpha, and hypotheses testing with socio-demographic and budget characteristics as independent variables, and PE scale and CCCQ as dependent, were undertaken to assess both scales' internal consistency and validity. RESULTS A convenience sample of 224 Flemish (proxy) budget holders completed the survey. Our analysis showed a two-factor solution for both scales; for the PE scale consisting of "meaning" and "competence," and "self-determination" and "impact," for CCCQ consisting of items 1-7 (conduct by caregiver) and items 8-15 (autonomy). Cronbach's Alpha of both scales was 0.94. The majority of our hypotheses were confirmed. CONCLUSIONS The findings show that both scales are valid and internally consistent, meaning that they can be further tested in a respondent sample of people with disabilities and in other care contexts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eva Pattyn
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Paul Gemmel
- Department of Marketing, Innovation and Organization - Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Ruben Willems
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Susan Lagaert
- Department of Social Work and Social Pedagogy, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Jeroen Trybou
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Óladóttir S, Pálmadóttir G, Óskarsson GK, Egilson ST. Psychometric properties of the client-centred rehabilitation questionnaire-is derived from a large and varied group of rehabilitation users. Disabil Rehabil 2024; 46:387-394. [PMID: 36587629 DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2022.2160835] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2022] [Accepted: 12/16/2022] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to inspect and establish the factor structure of the Icelandic Client-Centred Rehabilitation Questionnaire [CCRQ-is] and investigate the service experiences of a large and varied sample of rehabilitation users. MATERIALS AND METHODS Altogether 499 rehabilitation users completed the questionnaire. Confirmatory and exploratory factor analysis was conducted for analysis of items. Mann-Whitney's U and Kruskal-Wallis test was used to compare subscale responses based on participants' characteristics. RESULTS Four factors explained 53,2% of the variance: Respect and attentiveness, Interaction with significant others, Responsiveness to needs and preferences and Education and enablement. Subscales showed internal consistency from 0.72-0.91 and 0.92 for the whole instrument. The subscale Respect and attentiveness represented user centred rehabilitation the most and Interaction with significant others the least. Significant differences in relation to health conditions and age were obtained on all four subscales and differences by gender on one subscale. CONCLUSIONS Our results suggest the CCRQ-is is a reliable tool that can be used with rehabilitation users with a broad range of characteristics within the Icelandic context. The extent to which the intersection of age, gender and health issues influence users' perception of services needs to be further scrutinized.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sólrún Óladóttir
- Centre of Disability Studies, School of Social Sciences, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland
- Department of Occupational Therapy, School of Health Sciences, University of Akureyri, Akureyri, Iceland
| | - Guðrún Pálmadóttir
- Department of Occupational Therapy, School of Health Sciences, University of Akureyri, Akureyri, Iceland
| | | | - Snæfrídur Thóra Egilson
- Centre of Disability Studies, School of Social Sciences, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Klimesch A, Martinez-Pereira A, Topf C, Härter M, Scholl I, Bravo P. Conceptualization of patient-centered care in Latin America: A scoping review. Health Expect 2023; 26:1820-1831. [PMID: 37491799 PMCID: PMC10485332 DOI: 10.1111/hex.13797] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2022] [Revised: 05/18/2023] [Accepted: 06/04/2023] [Indexed: 07/27/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Patient-centered care (PCC) has been declared as a desirable goal for health care in Latin American countries, but a coherent definition of what exactly PCC entails for clinical practice is missing. This article's aim was to identify how PCC is conceptualized in Latin American countries. METHODS Scientific databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Scielo, Scopus, Web of Science) and webpages of the ministries of health were searched, and experts were contacted for suggestions of literature. References were included if they contained one of a range of a priori defined keywords related to PCC in the title, were published between 2006 and 2021, and were carried out in or concerned Latin America. Definitions of PCC were extracted from the included articles and analyzed using deductive and inductive coding. Deductive coding was based on the integrative model of patient-centeredness, which unites the definitions of PCC in the international literature (mainly North America and Europe) and proposes 16 dimensions describing PCC. RESULTS Thirty-two articles were included in the analysis and about half of them were from Brazil. Numerous similarities were found between the integrative model of patient-centeredness and the definitions of PCC given in the selected literature. The dimensions of the integrative model of patient-centeredness that were least and most prominent in the literature were physical support and patient information, respectively. A differentiation between PCC and family-centered care (FCC) was observed. Definitions of PCC and FCC as well as their cited references were diverse. CONCLUSION A considerable overlap between the conceptualization of PCC in Latin America and the integrative model of patient-centeredness has been identified. However, there are substantial differences between countries in Latin America regarding the emphasis of research on PCC versus FCC and diverse conceptualizations of PCC and FCC exist. PATIENT CONTRIBUTION This scoping review takes the patient's perspective based on the integrative model of patient-centeredness. Due to the study being a review, no patients, neither caregivers, nor members of the public, were involved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne Klimesch
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
- Department of Medical Psychology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | | | - Cheyenne Topf
- Department of Medical Psychology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Martin Härter
- Department of Medical Psychology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Isabelle Scholl
- Department of Medical Psychology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Paulina Bravo
- School of Nursing, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile
- Instituto Oncológico Fundación Arturo López Pérez, Santiago, Chile
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kidanemariam M, Pieterse AH, van Staalduinen DJ, Bos WJW, Stiggelbout AM. Does value-based healthcare support patient-centred care? A scoping review of the evidence. BMJ Open 2023; 13:e070193. [PMID: 37429675 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070193] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/12/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Standardisation of outcome measures is integral to value-based healthcare (VBHC), which may conflict with patient-centred care, focusing on personalisation. OBJECTIVES We aimed to provide an overview of measures used to assess the effect of VBHC implementation and to examine to what extent the evidence indicates that VBHC supports patient-centred care. DESIGN A scoping review guided by the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology. SOURCES OF EVIDENCE We searched the following databases on 18 February 2021: Cochrane Library, EMBASE, MEDLINE and Web of Science. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA We included empirical papers assessing the effect of the implementation of VBHC, published after introduction of VBHC in 2006. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS Two independent reviewers double-screened papers and data were extracted by one reviewer and checked by the other. We classified the study measures used in included papers into six categories: process indicator, cost measure, clinical outcome, patient-reported outcome, patient-reported experience or clinician-reported experience. We then assessed the patient-centredness of the study measures used. RESULTS We included 39 studies using 94 unique study measures. The most frequently used study measures (n=72) were process indicators, cost measures and clinical outcomes, which rarely were patient-centred. The less frequently used (n=20) patient-reported outcome and experience measures often measured a dimension of patient-centred care. CONCLUSION Our study shows that the evidence on VBHC supporting patient-centred care is limited, exposing a knowledge gap in VBHC research. The most frequently used study measures in VBHC research are not patient-centred. The major focus seems to be on measures of quality of care defined from a provider, institution or payer perspective.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martha Kidanemariam
- Biomedical Data Sciences, Medical Decision Making, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Arwen H Pieterse
- Biomedical Data Sciences, Medical Decision Making, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Dorine J van Staalduinen
- Biomedical Data Sciences, Medical Decision Making, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
- Institute of Public Administration, Leiden University, The Hague, The Netherlands
| | - Willem Jan W Bos
- Internal Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
- Internal Medicine, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | - Anne M Stiggelbout
- Biomedical Data Sciences, Medical Decision Making, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
- Erasmus School of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Gustavsson K, van Diepen C, Fors A, Axelsson M, Bertilsson M, Hensing G. Healthcare professionals' experiences of job satisfaction when providing person-centred care: a systematic review of qualitative studies. BMJ Open 2023; 13:e071178. [PMID: 37295826 PMCID: PMC10277035 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-071178] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2022] [Accepted: 05/15/2023] [Indexed: 06/12/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This qualitative systematic review aimed to explore and synthesise healthcare professionals' (HCPs) experiences of job satisfaction when providing person-centred care (PCC) in healthcare settings in Europe. METHOD This systematic review of qualitative studies was followed by a thematic synthesis applying an inductive approach. Studies concerning HCPs and different levels of healthcare in Europe were eligible for inclusion. The CINAHL, PubMed and Scopus databases were searched. Study titles, abstracts and full texts were screened for relevance. Included studies were assessed for methodological quality using a quality appraisal checklist. Data were extracted and synthesised via thematic synthesis, generating analytical themes. RESULTS Seventeen studies were included in the final thematic synthesis, and eight analytical themes were derived. Most studies were conducted in Sweden and the UK and were performed in hospitals, nursing homes, elderly care and primary care. Thirteen of these studies were qualitative and four used a mixed-method design in which the qualitative part was used for analysis. HCPs experienced challenges adapting to a new remoulded professional role and felt torn and inadequate due to ambiguities between organisational structures, task-oriented care and PCC. Improved job satisfaction was experienced when providing PCC in line with ethical expectations, patients and colleagues expressed appreciation and team collaboration improved, while learning new skills generated motivation. CONCLUSION This systematic review found varied experiences among HCPs. Notably, the new professional role was experienced to entail disorientation and uncertainty; importantly, it also entailed experiences of job satisfaction such as meaningfulness, an improved relationship between HCPs and patients, appreciation and collaboration. To facilitate PCC implementation, healthcare organisations should focus on supporting HCPs through collaborational structures, and resources such as time, space and staffing. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42022304732.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Cornelia van Diepen
- Centre for Person-Centred Care (GPCC), University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Andreas Fors
- Centre for Person-Centred Care (GPCC), University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Institute of Health and Care Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Region Västra Götaland, Research, Education, Development and Innovation, Primary Health Care, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Malin Axelsson
- Department of Care Science, Faculty of Health and Society, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Monica Bertilsson
- School of Public Health and Community Medicine, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Gunnel Hensing
- School of Public Health and Community Medicine, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Biel M, Haley KL. Motivation in Aphasia Treatment: Self-Determination Theory Applied to the FOURC Model. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY 2023; 32:1016-1036. [PMID: 36889681 DOI: 10.1044/2022_ajslp-22-00251] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/06/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Although the importance of motivation to successful rehabilitation is frequently acknowledged in the aphasia literature, little evidence-based guidance has been provided on how to support it. The purpose of this tutorial is to introduce a well-validated theory of motivation, self-determination theory (SDT); explain its role as the foundation for the FOURC model of collaborative goal setting and treatment planning; and explain how it may be applied during rehabilitation to support the motivation of people with aphasia. METHOD We provide an overview of SDT, explore the link between motivation and psychological wellness, and discuss how psychological needs are addressed in SDT and the FOURC model. Concrete examples from aphasia therapy are used to illustrate main concepts. CONCLUSIONS SDT offers tangible guidance for supporting motivation and wellness. SDT-based practices support positive forms of motivation, which is one of the targets of FOURC. An understanding of SDT's theoretical foundation will help clinicians maximize the impact of collaborative goal setting and aphasia therapy more generally.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Biel
- Department of Communication Disorders and Sciences, California State University, Northridge
| | - Katarina L Haley
- Department of Health Sciences, School of Medicine, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Forsgren E, Wallström S, Feldthusen C, Zechner N, Sawatzky R, Öhlén J. The use of text-mining software to facilitate screening of literature on centredness in health care. Syst Rev 2023; 12:73. [PMID: 37120578 PMCID: PMC10148558 DOI: 10.1186/s13643-023-02242-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2023] [Accepted: 04/20/2023] [Indexed: 05/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Research evidence supporting the implementation of centredness in health care is not easily accessible due to the sheer amount of literature available and the diversity in terminology and conceptualisations used. The use of text-mining functions to semi-automate the process of screening and collating citations for a review is a way of tackling the vast amount of research citations available today. There are several programmes that use text-mining functions to facilitate screening and data extraction for systematic reviews. However, the suitability of these programmes for reviews on broad topics of research, as well as the general uptake by researchers, is unclear. This commentary has a dual aim, which consists in outlining the challenges of screening literature in fields characterised by vague and overlapping conceptualisations, and to exemplify this by exploratory use of text-mining in the context of a scoping review on centredness in health care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emma Forsgren
- Institute of Health and Care Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Box 457, SE-405 30, Gothenburg, Sweden.
- University of Gothenburg Centre for Person-Centred Care (GPCC), Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
| | - Sara Wallström
- Institute of Health and Care Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Box 457, SE-405 30, Gothenburg, Sweden
- University of Gothenburg Centre for Person-Centred Care (GPCC), Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Department of Forensic Psychiatry, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Caroline Feldthusen
- Institute of Health and Care Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Box 457, SE-405 30, Gothenburg, Sweden
- University of Gothenburg Centre for Person-Centred Care (GPCC), Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Department of Occupational Therapy and Physiotherapy, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Niklas Zechner
- Department of Swedish, Multilingualism, Language Technology, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Richard Sawatzky
- Institute of Health and Care Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Box 457, SE-405 30, Gothenburg, Sweden
- University of Gothenburg Centre for Person-Centred Care (GPCC), Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
- School of Nursing, Trinity Western University, Langley, British Columbia, Canada
- Centre for Health Evaluation and Outcome Sciences, Providence Health Care, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Joakim Öhlén
- Institute of Health and Care Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Box 457, SE-405 30, Gothenburg, Sweden
- University of Gothenburg Centre for Person-Centred Care (GPCC), Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Palliative Centre, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Volkmer A, Cartwright J, Ruggero L, Beales A, Gallée J, Grasso S, Henry M, Jokel R, Kindell J, Khayum R, Pozzebon M, Rochon E, Taylor-Rubin C, Townsend R, Walker F, Beeke S, Hersh D. Principles and philosophies for speech and language therapists working with people with primary progressive aphasia: an international expert consensus. Disabil Rehabil 2023; 45:1063-1078. [PMID: 35352609 DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2022.2051080] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Primary progressive aphasia (PPA) is a language-led dementia associated with Alzheimer's pathology and fronto-temporal lobar degeneration. Multiple tailored speech and language interventions have been developed for people with PPA. Speech and language therapists/speech-language pathologists (SLT/Ps) report lacking confidence in identifying the most pertinent interventions options relevant to their clients living with PPA during their illness trajectory. MATERIALS AND METHODS The aim of this study was to establish a consensus amongst 15 clinical-academic SLT/Ps on best practice in selection and delivery of speech and language therapy interventions for people with PPA. An online nominal group technique (NGT) and consequent focus group session were held. NGT rankings were aggregated and focus groups video recorded, transcribed, and reflexive thematic analysis undertaken. RESULTS The results of the NGT identified 17 items. Two main themes and seven further subthemes were identified in the focus groups. The main themes comprised (1) philosophy of person-centredness and (2) complexity. The seven subthemes were knowing people deeply, preventing disasters, practical issues, professional development, connectedness, barriers and limitations, and peer support and mentoring towards a shared understanding. CONCLUSIONS This study describes the philosophy of expert practice and outlines a set of best practice principles when working with people with PPA.Implications for rehabilitationPrimary progressive aphasia (PPA) describes a group of language led dementias which deteriorate inexorably over time.Providing speech and language therapy for people with PPA is complex and must be person centred and bespoke.This study describes the philosophy of expert practice and outlines a set of best practice principles for speech and language therapists/pathologists working with people with people with PPA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Volkmer
- Division of Psychology and Language Sciences, University College London, London, UK
| | - J Cartwright
- Curtin School of Allied Health, Curtin University, Perth, Australia
| | - L Ruggero
- School of Psychological Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia
| | - A Beales
- Curtin School of Allied Health, Curtin University, Perth, Australia
- Community Rehabilitation Unit, Hobart, Australia
| | - J Gallée
- Division of Medical Sciences, Program in Speech and Hearing Bioscience and Technology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA
- Evergreen Speech and Hearing Clinic, Redmond, WA, USA
| | - S Grasso
- Department of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, Moody College of Communication, Austin, TX, USA
- Department of Neurology, Dell Medical School, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA
| | - M Henry
- Department of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, Moody College of Communication, Austin, TX, USA
- Department of Neurology, Dell Medical School, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA
| | - R Jokel
- Rotman Research Institute, Toronto, Canada
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- Baycrest Health Sciences, Toronto, Canada
| | - J Kindell
- Pennine Care NHS Foundation Trust, Ashton-under-Lyne, UK
| | - R Khayum
- Cognitive Neurology and Alzheimer's Disease Center, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
- MemoryCare Corporation, Aurora, IL, USA
| | - M Pozzebon
- Speech Pathology Department, Royal Melbourne Hospital - Royal Park Campus, Melbourne, Australia
| | - E Rochon
- Department of Speech-Language Pathology and Rehabilitation Sciences Institute, University of Toronto, KITE Research Institute, Toronto Rehab, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| | - C Taylor-Rubin
- Speech Pathology Department, War Memorial Hospital, Sydney, Australia
- Department of Cognitive Science, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia
| | | | - F Walker
- Speech Pathology Department, Carrington Health, Melbourne, Australia
| | - S Beeke
- Division of Psychology and Language Sciences, University College London, London, UK
| | - D Hersh
- Speech Pathology, School of Allied Health, Curtin University, Perth, Australia
- Speech Pathology, School of Medical and Health Sciences, Edith Cowan University, Perth, Australia
- School of Allied Health Science and Practice, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Gender Differences among Healthcare Providers in the Promotion of Patient-, Person- and Family-Centered Care-And Its Implications for Providing Quality Healthcare. Healthcare (Basel) 2023; 11:healthcare11040565. [PMID: 36833099 PMCID: PMC9957388 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare11040565] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2022] [Revised: 02/08/2023] [Accepted: 02/11/2023] [Indexed: 02/17/2023] Open
Abstract
The concept of "patient-centered care" (PCC) emphasizes patients' autonomy and is commonly promoted as a good healthcare practice that all of medicine should strive for. Here, we assessed how six medical specialties-pediatrics, OBGYN, orthopedics, radiology, dermatology, and neurosurgery-have engaged with PCC and its derivative concepts of "person-centered care" (PeCC) and "family-centered care" (FCC) as a function of the number of female physicians in each field. To achieve this, we conducted a scoping review of three databases-PubMed, CINAHL, and PsycInfo-to assess the extent that PCC, PeCC, FCC, and RCC were referenced by different specialties in the medical literature. Reference to PCC and PeCC in the literature correlates significantly with the number of female physicians in each field (all p < 0.00001) except for neurosurgery (p > 0.5). Pediatrics shows the most extensive reference to PCC, followed by OBGYN, with a significant difference between all disciplines (p < 0.001). FCC remains exclusively embraced by pediatrics. Our results align with documented cognitive differences between men and women that recognize gender differences in empathizing (E) versus systemizing (S) with females demonstrating E > S, which supports PCC/PeCC/FCC approaches to healthcare.
Collapse
|
11
|
Hersh D, Azul D, Carroll C, Lyons R, Mc Menamin R, Skeat J. New perspectives, theory, method, and practice: Qualitative research and innovation in speech-language pathology. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY 2022; 24:449-459. [PMID: 35172643 DOI: 10.1080/17549507.2022.2029942] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
Purpose: Research in speech-language pathology has been dominated by experimental, empirical, and scientific approaches, which build on hypothesis testing and logical, deductive reasoning. Qualitative approaches stem from a different paradigm or world view which imply different questions and methodologies which, for example, emphasise codesign, reciprocity, individual experience and context. This article explores the relationship between qualitative inquiry in the field of speech-language pathology and innovation. It aims to show how the aspirations of the profession can be supported, and how innovation can be achieved, through research which sheds light on the lived experiences and perceptions of clients and families and builds an understanding of how they function in their everyday contexts.Method: We summarise qualitative approaches in speech-language pathology, explain the notion of innovation, and review qualitative research as a source of theoretical, methodological, and practice innovation in speech-language pathology.Result: Not only has qualitative inquiry underpinned examples of theoretical, methodological and practice innovations in speech-language pathology, but it can also play a part in enhancing translation and implementation of research innovations.Conclusion: An explicit consideration of what we mean by innovation is useful for speech-language pathologists. Qualitative research complements other forms of research in the field and has prompted new theoretical understandings, new methodologies and methods of research, and new ways to deliver our services in ways that are responsive to our clients and communities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deborah Hersh
- Speech Pathology, School of Allied Health, Curtin University, Perth, Australia
- Speech Pathology, School of Medical and Health Sciences, Edith Cowan University, Perth, Australia
- School of Allied Health Science and Practice, Adelaide University, Adelaide, Australia
| | - David Azul
- Speech Pathology, Rural Department of Allied Health, La Trobe University, Bendigo, Australia
| | - Clare Carroll
- Department of Speech and Language Therapy, National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland
| | - Rena Lyons
- Department of Speech and Language Therapy, National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland
| | - Ruth Mc Menamin
- Department of Speech and Language Therapy, National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland
| | - Jemma Skeat
- Health Professions Education, School of Medicine, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Fridberg H, Wallin L, Tistad M. Operationalisation of person-centred care in a real-world setting: a case study with six embedded units. BMC Health Serv Res 2022; 22:1160. [PMID: 36104690 PMCID: PMC9476689 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-022-08516-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2022] [Accepted: 08/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Although person-centred care (PCC) is growing globally in popularity it is often vague and lacks conceptual clarity and definition. The ambiguity stretches from PCC’s underlying philosophical principles and definitions of the concept to how it is operationalised and practised on the ground by health care professionals. We explore how the PCC model by the Gothenburg University Centre for Person-centred Care (GPCC) was operationalised in a real-world setting by using a set of recommendations by Fixsen and others that define and structure the core components of innovations in four distinct but interrelated components: philosophical principles and values, contextual factors, structural elements and core practices. Thus, this study aimed to increase knowledge about core practices in PCC in six health care units in real-world circumstances. Methods A case study with six embedded health care units was conducted from 2016 to 2019. We collected data from three sources: interviews (n = 12) with change agents, activity logs and written documents. Data were triangulated, and core practices were identified and deductively coded to the PCC model’s structural elements: initiating, working and safeguarding the partnership with patients. Results We identified operationalisations of PCC in line with the three structural elements in the GPCC model at all included health care units. A range of both similarities and dissimilarities between units were identified, including the level of detail in describing PCC practices, when these practices were conducted and by whom at the workplace. The recommendations for describing the core components of PCC also helped us identify how some operationalisations of PCC seemed more driven by contextual factors, including a new regulation for planning and documenting care across health care specialities. Conclusions Our findings show how PCC is operationalised in different health care units in a real-world setting based on change agents’ understanding of the concept and their unique context. Increased knowledge of PCC and its philosophical principles and values, contextual factors, structural elements and core practices, is necessary to build a common understanding of the PCC-concept. Such knowledge is essential when PCC is operationalised as part of implementation efforts in health care. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-022-08516-y.
Collapse
|
13
|
Smith JB, Willis EM, Hopkins-Walsh J. What does person-centred care mean, if you weren't considered a person anyway: An engagement with person-centred care and Black, queer, feminist, and posthuman approaches. Nurs Philos 2022; 23:e12401. [PMID: 35749609 DOI: 10.1111/nup.12401] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2021] [Revised: 05/05/2022] [Accepted: 05/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Despite the prominence of person-centred care (PCC) in nursing, there is no general agreement on the assumptions and the meaning of PCC. We sympathize with the work of others who rethink PCC towards relational, embedded, and temporal selfhood rather than individual personhood. Our perspective addresses criticism of humanist assumptions in PCC using critical posthumanism as a diffraction from dominant values We highlight the problematic realities that might be produced in healthcare, leading to some people being more likely to be disenfranchised from healthcare than others. We point to the colonial, homo- and transphobic, racist, ableist, and ageist consequences of humanist traditions that have influenced the development of PCC. We describe the deep rooted conditions that structurally uphold inequality and undermine nursing practice that PCC reproduces. We advocate for the self-determination of patients and emphasize that we support the fundamental mechanisms of PCC enabling patients' choice; however, without critical introspection, these are limited to a portion of humans. Last, we present limitations of our perspective based on our white*-cisheteropatriarchy** positionality. We point to the fact that any reimagining of models such as PCC should be carefully done by listening, following, and ceding power to people with diversity dimensions*** and the lived experience or expertise that exists from diverse perspectives. We point towards Black, queer feminism, and critical disabilities studies to contextualize our point of critique with humanism and PCC to amplify equity for all people and communities. Theory and philosophy are useful to understand restrictive factors in healthcare delivery and to inform systematic strategies to improve the quality of care so as not to perpetuate the oppression of groups of people with diversity dimensions. * We purposely capitalize Black and use lower case for white to decentre whiteness and as an intentional act of antiracism (see White Homework a podcast series by Tori W. Douglas). ** Cisheteropatriarchy describes people with intersecting identities of dominant social groups; cisgender is the gender identity that aligns with the gender you were assigned at birth, hetero means heterosexual, and patriarchy refers to structural systems of power based on maleness where women are often excluded and hold less power. *** With diversity dimensions, we refer to subjective lived experience and material realities of people that exist outside the 'dominant minorities' of white-cisheteropatriarchy, meaning groups of people in society who historically and currently hold more power and through this, structurally dominate the norms and possibilities of living for other people.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jamie B Smith
- Institute for Clinical Nursing Science, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Eva-Maria Willis
- Institute for Clinical Nursing Science, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Sturgiss EA, Peart A, Richard L, Ball L, Hunik L, Chai TL, Lau S, Vadasz D, Russell G, Stewart M. Who is at the centre of what? A scoping review of the conceptualisation of 'centredness' in healthcare. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e059400. [PMID: 35501096 PMCID: PMC9062794 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059400] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES We aimed to identify the core elements of centredness in healthcare literature. Our overall research question is: How has centredness been represented within the health literature published between 1990 and 2019? METHODS A scoping review across five databases (Medline (Ovid), PsycINFO, CINAHL, Embase (Ovid) and Scopus; August 2019) to identify all peer-reviewed literature published since 1990 that focused on the concept of centredness in any healthcare discipline or setting. Screening occurred in duplicate by a multidisciplinary, multinational team. The team met regularly to iteratively develop and refine a coding template that was used in analysis and discuss the interpretations of centredness reported in the literature. RESULTS A total of 23 006 title and abstracts, and 499 full-text articles were screened. A total of 159 articles were included in the review. Most articles were from the USA, and nursing was the disciplinary perspective most represented. We identified nine elements of centredness: Sharing power; Sharing responsibility; Therapeutic relationship/bond/alliance; Patient as a person; Biopsychosocial; Provider as a person; Co-ordinated care; Access; Continuity of care. There was little variation in the concept of centredness no matter the preceding word (eg, patient-/person-/client-), healthcare setting or disciplinary lens. Improving health outcomes was the most common justification for pursuing centredness as a concept, and respect was the predominant driving value of the research efforts. The patient perspective was rarely included in the papers (15% of papers). CONCLUSIONS Centredness is consistently conceptualised, regardless of the preceding word, disciplinary lens or nation of origin. Further research should focus on centring the patient perspective and prioritise research that considers more diverse cultural perspectives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth Ann Sturgiss
- School of Primary and Allied Health Care, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Annette Peart
- Eastern Health Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Lauralie Richard
- Department of General Practice and Rural Health, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
| | - Lauren Ball
- Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University,School of Public Health, Southport, Queensland, Australia
| | - Liesbeth Hunik
- Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Tze Lin Chai
- School of Primary and Allied Health Care, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Steven Lau
- Department of Physiotherapy, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Danny Vadasz
- Health Issues Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Grant Russell
- Department of General Practice, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Moira Stewart
- Department of Family Medicine, Centre for Studies in Family Medicine, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Marulappa N, Anderson NN, Bethell J, Bourbonnais A, Kelly F, McMurray J, Rogers HL, Vedel I, Gagliardi AR. How to implement person-centred care and support for dementia in outpatient and home/community settings: Scoping review. BMC Health Serv Res 2022; 22:541. [PMID: 35459214 PMCID: PMC9034625 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-022-07875-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2021] [Accepted: 03/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Little prior research focused on person-centred care and support (PCCS) for dementia in home, community or outpatient care. We aimed to describe what constitutes PCCS, how to implement it, and considerations for women who comprise the majority of affected persons (with dementia, carers). Methods We conducted a scoping review by searching multiple databases from 2000 inclusive to June 7, 2020. We extracted data on study characteristics and PCCS approaches, evaluation, determinants or the impact of strategies to implement PCCS. We used summary statistics to report data and interpreted findings with an existing person-centred care framework. Results We included 22 studies with qualitative (55%) or quantitative/multiple methods design (45%) involving affected persons (50%), or healthcare workers (50%). Studies varied in how PCCS was conceptualized; 59% cited a PCC definition or framework. Affected persons and healthcare workers largely agreed on what constitutes PCCS (e.g. foster partnership, promote autonomy, support carers). In 4 studies that evaluated care, barriers of PCCS were reported at the affected person (e.g. family conflict), healthcare worker (e.g. lack of knowledge) and organizational (e.g. resource constraints) levels. Studies that evaluated strategies to implement PCCS approaches were largely targeted to healthcare workers, and showed that in-person inter-professional educational meetings yielded both perceived (e.g. improved engagement of affected persons) and observed (e.g. use of PCCS approaches) beneficial outcomes. Few studies reported results by gender or other intersectional factors, and none revealed if or how to tailor PCCS for women. This synthesis confirmed and elaborated the PCC framework, resulting in a Framework of PCCS for Dementia. Conclusion Despite the paucity of research on PCCS for dementia, synthesis of knowledge from diverse studies into a Framework provides interim guidance for those planning or evaluating dementia services in outpatient, home or community settings. Further research is needed to elaborate the Framework, evaluate PCCS for dementia, explore determinants, and develop strategies to implement and scale-up PCCS approaches. Such studies should explore how to tailor PCCS needs and preferences based on input from persons with dementia, and by sex/gender and other intersectional factors such as ethnicity or culture. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-022-07875-w.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nidhi Marulappa
- Toronto General Hospital Research Institute, University Health Network, 200 Elizabeth Street, 13EN-228, Toronto, ON, M5G2C4, Canada
| | - Natalie N Anderson
- Toronto General Hospital Research Institute, University Health Network, 200 Elizabeth Street, 13EN-228, Toronto, ON, M5G2C4, Canada
| | - Jennifer Bethell
- Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, 550 University Avenue, Toronto, ON, M5G 2A2, Canada
| | - Anne Bourbonnais
- Faculty of Nursing, Université de Montréal, PO Box 6128, Montreal, QC, H3C 3J7, Canada
| | - Fiona Kelly
- Division of Nursing, Queen Margaret University, Queen Margaret University Drive, Musselburgh, East Lothian, EH21 6UU, UK
| | - Josephine McMurray
- Lazaridis School of Business and Economics/Health Studies, Wilfrid Laurier University, 73 George Street, Brantford, ON, N3T 3Y3, Canada
| | - Heather L Rogers
- Biocruces Bizkaia Health Research Institute and Ikerbasque Basque Foundation for Science, Bilbao, Spain, Plaza Cruces s/n, E-48903, Barakaldo, Spain
| | - Isabelle Vedel
- Department of Family Medicine, McGill University, 5858 Côte-des-Neiges, Montreal, QC, H3S 1Z1, Canada
| | - Anna R Gagliardi
- Toronto General Hospital Research Institute, University Health Network, 200 Elizabeth Street, 13EN-228, Toronto, ON, M5G2C4, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Knowing-in-action that centres humanising relationships on stroke units: an appreciative action research study. BRAIN IMPAIR 2022. [DOI: 10.1017/brimp.2021.34] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background:
Equal, collaborative and therapeutic relationships centred on the person affected by stroke are important for supporting recovery and adjustment. However, realising these relationships in hospital practice is challenging when there is increasing focus on biomedical needs and organisational pressures. Despite a body of evidence advocating for quality relationships, there remains limited research describing how to achieve this in clinical practice. This appreciative action research (AAR) study aimed to describe the processes involved in co-creating meaningful relationships on stroke units.
Design and methods:
An AAR approach was used to develop humanising relationship-centred care (RCC) within two hospital stroke units. Participants were staff (n = 65), patients (n = 17) and relatives (n = 7). Data generation comprised of interviews, observations and discussion groups. Data were analysed collaboratively with participants using sense-making as part of the AAR cyclical process. Further in-depth analysis using immersion crystallisation confirmed and broadened the original themes.
Findings:
All participants valued similar relational experiences around human connections to support existential well-being. The AAR process supported changes in self, and the culture on the stroke units, towards increased value being placed on human relationships. The processes supporting human connections in practice were: (i) sensitising to humanising relational knowing; (ii) valuing, reflecting and sharing relational experiences with others that co-created a relational discourse; and (iii) having the freedom to act, enabling human connections. The outcomes from this study build on existing lifeworld-led care theories through developing orientations for practice that support relational knowing and propose the development of RCC to include humanising values.
Collapse
|
17
|
Feldthusen C, Forsgren E, Wallström S, Andersson V, Löfqvist N, Sawatzky R, Öhlén J, J Ung E. Centredness in health care: A systematic overview of reviews. Health Expect 2022; 25:885-901. [PMID: 35261138 PMCID: PMC9122448 DOI: 10.1111/hex.13461] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2021] [Revised: 02/10/2022] [Accepted: 02/15/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction The introduction of effective, evidence‐based approaches to centredness in health care is hindered by the fact that research results are not easily accessible. This is partly due to the large volume of publications available and because the field is closely linked to and in some ways encompasses adjoining fields of research, for example, shared decision making and narrative medicine. In an attempt to survey the field of centredness in health care, a systematic overview of reviews was conducted with the purpose of illuminating how centredness in health care is presented in current reviews. Methods Searches for relevant reviews were conducted in the databases PubMed, Scopus, Cinahl, PsychINFO, Web of Science and EMBASE using terms connected to centredness in health care. Filters specific to review studies of all types and for inclusion of only English language results as well as a time frame of January 2017–December 2018, were applied. Results The search strategy identified 3697 unique reviews, of which 31 were included in the study. The synthesis of the results from the 31 reviews identified three interrelated main themes: Attributes of centredness (what centredness is), Translation from theory into practice (how centredness is done) and Evaluation of effects (possible ways of measuring effects of centredness). Three main attributes of centeredness found were: being unique, being heard and shared responsibility. Aspects involved in translating theory into practice were sufficient prerequisites, strategies for action and tools used in safeguarding practice. Further, a variety and breadth of measures of effects were found in the included reviews. Conclusions Our synthesis demonstrates that current synthesized research literature on centredness in health care is broad, as it focuses both on explorations of the conceptual basis and the practice, as well as measures of effects. This study provides an understanding of the commonalities identified in the reviews on centredness in healthcare overall, ranging from theory to practice and from practice to evaluation. Patient or Public Contribution Patient representatives were involved during the initiation of the project and in decisions about its focus, although no patient or public representatives made direct contributions to the review process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caroline Feldthusen
- Institute of Health and Care Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.,University of Gothenburg Centre for Person-Centred Care (GPCC), University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Emma Forsgren
- Institute of Health and Care Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.,University of Gothenburg Centre for Person-Centred Care (GPCC), University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Sara Wallström
- Institute of Health and Care Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.,University of Gothenburg Centre for Person-Centred Care (GPCC), University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Viktor Andersson
- Institute of Health and Care Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.,University of Gothenburg Centre for Person-Centred Care (GPCC), University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Noah Löfqvist
- Institute of Health and Care Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.,University of Gothenburg Centre for Person-Centred Care (GPCC), University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Richard Sawatzky
- Institute of Health and Care Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.,University of Gothenburg Centre for Person-Centred Care (GPCC), University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.,School of Nursing, Trinity Western University, Langley, British Columbia, Canada.,Centre for Health Evaluation and Outcome Sciences, Providence Health Care, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Joakim Öhlén
- Institute of Health and Care Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.,University of Gothenburg Centre for Person-Centred Care (GPCC), University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.,Palliative Centre, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Region Västra Götaland, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Eva J Ung
- Institute of Health and Care Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.,University of Gothenburg Centre for Person-Centred Care (GPCC), University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Scarinci N, Meyer C, Hickson L. "When that understanding is there, you work much better together": the role of family in audiological rehabilitation for older adults. Int J Audiol 2021; 61:984-992. [PMID: 34747668 DOI: 10.1080/14992027.2021.1995789] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study aimed to explore the experiences and perceptions of adults with hearing impairment and family members regarding the role of family in audiological rehabilitation. DESIGN A qualitative descriptive methodology was used. STUDY SAMPLE A total of 37 people participated, 24 older adults with hearing impairment and 13 family members (11 spouses and 2 adult children). Four focus group interviews were conducted with the adults with hearing impairment, and 3 with family members. RESULTS Five key themes emerged from analysis of the transcripts: (1) knowledge and understanding of hearing impairment and treatment; (2) the role of family members in rehabilitation is complex and multifaceted; (3) audiologists have an influential role in facilitating family member involvement; (4) the role of communication in rehabilitation; and (5) outcomes of family member involvement. Importantly, although perceptions were generally very positive, there was some uncertainty about the role of family. CONCLUSIONS Audiologists have a key role in facilitating family involvement in audiological rehabilitation that is identified by adults with hearing impairment and their families. Although participants reported limited involvement in audiological rehabilitation currently, they identified potential for involvement in areas such as goal setting and decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nerina Scarinci
- School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Queensland, Saint Lucia, Australia.,The HEARing Cooperative Research Centre, Australia
| | - Carly Meyer
- School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Queensland, Saint Lucia, Australia.,The HEARing Cooperative Research Centre, Australia.,Behavioural Science Policy Research Unit, University College London, London, UK
| | - Louise Hickson
- School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Queensland, Saint Lucia, Australia.,The HEARing Cooperative Research Centre, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Judge H, Ceci C. Problematising assumptions about 'centredness' in patient and family centred care research in acute care settings. Nurs Inq 2021; 29:e12448. [PMID: 34453480 DOI: 10.1111/nin.12448] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2021] [Revised: 07/10/2021] [Accepted: 07/16/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Over the last two decades significant efforts have been made to implement patient and family 'centred' care as both a practical and moral imperative for adult acute care delivery. Although many resources have been developed and adopted by institutions, research suggests persistent and diverse barriers to implementing and achieving patient and family 'centred' care in adult acute care practice settings. These issues in implementation suggest re-examining the nature of 'centredness' in care may be useful. A structured problematisation method, as outlined by Alvesson and Sandberg, is utilised to identify and analyse assumptions about the central notions of 'centring' that inform patient and family centred care intervention research. From our analysis, we highlight three predominant areas within 'centring' intervention research that may benefit from rethinking: Vitruvian spatiality, democratising care, and 'centring' positioned as primarily a problem and accomplishment for nursing. As a challenge to these assumptions, we argue for the adoption of theoretical lenses that 'de-centre' individual actors to better account for complex relations among multiple actors, both human and nonhuman, which work to involve patients and families in care practices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Harkeert Judge
- Faculty of Nursing, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Christine Ceci
- Faculty of Nursing, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Davison G, Kelly MA, Conn R, Thompson A, Dornan T. How do children and adolescents experience healthcare professionals? Scoping review and interpretive synthesis. BMJ Open 2021; 11:e054368. [PMID: 34244289 PMCID: PMC8273482 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054368] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2021] [Accepted: 06/22/2021] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Explore children's and adolescents' (CADs') lived experiences of healthcare professionals (HCPs). DESIGN Scoping review methodology provided a six-step framework to, first, identify and organise existing evidence. Interpretive phenomenology provided methodological principles for, second, an interpretive synthesis of the life worlds of CADs receiving healthcare, as represented by verbatim accounts of their experiences. DATA SOURCES Five key databases (Ovid Medline, Embase, Scopus, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) Plus, and Web of Science), from inception through to January 2019, reference lists, and opportunistically identified publications. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA Research articles containing direct first-person quotations by CADs (aged 0-18 years inclusive) describing how they experienced HCPs. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS Tabulation of study characteristics, contextual information, and verbatim extraction of all 'relevant' (as defined above) direct quotations. Analysis of basic scope of the evidence base. The research team worked reflexively and collaboratively to interpret the qualitative data and construct a synthesis of children's experiences. To consolidate and elaborate the interpretation, we held two focus groups with inpatient CADs in a children's hospital. RESULTS 669 quotations from 99 studies described CADs' experiences of HCPs. Favourable experiences were of forming trusting relationships and being involved in healthcare discussions and decisions; less favourable experiences were of not relating to or being unable to trust HCPs and/or being excluded from conversations about them. HCPs fostered trusting relationships by being personable, wise, sincere and relatable. HCPs made CADs feel involved by including them in conversations, explaining medical information, and listening to CADs' wider needs and preferences. CONCLUSION These findings strengthen the case for making CADs partners in healthcare despite their youth. We propose that a criterion for high-quality child-centred healthcare should be that HCPs communicate in ways that engender trust and involvement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gail Davison
- Centre for Medical Education, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK
- Children's Emergency Department, Royal Belfast Hospital for Sick Children, Belfast, UK
| | - Martina Ann Kelly
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Calgary Faculty of Medicine, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Richard Conn
- Centre for Medical Education, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK
- General Paediatrics Department, Royal Belfast Hospital for Sick Children, Belfast, UK
| | - Andrew Thompson
- General Paediatrics Department, Royal Belfast Hospital for Sick Children, Belfast, UK
| | - Tim Dornan
- Centre for Medical Education, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Cardinali F, Carzaniga S, Duranti G, Labella B, Lamanna A, Cerilli M, Caracci G, Carinci F. A nationwide participatory programme to measure person-centred hospital care in Italy: Results and implications for continuous improvement. Health Expect 2021; 24:1145-1157. [PMID: 34014021 PMCID: PMC8369125 DOI: 10.1111/hex.13231] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2020] [Revised: 02/01/2021] [Accepted: 02/21/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Patient‐centredness has been targeted by the Italian government as a key theme for the future development of health services. Objective Measuring patient‐centred health services in partnership with citizens, health professionals and decision makers. Design National participatory survey in a large test set of hospitals at national level. Setting and participants A total of 387 hospital visits conducted in 16 Italian regions by over 1,500 citizens and health professionals during 2017‐2018. Main variables and outcome measures An ad hoc checklist was used to assess person‐centredness in hospital care through 243 items, grouped in 4 main areas, 12 sub‐areas and 29 person‐centred criteria (scored 0‐10). GEE linear multivariate regression was used to explore the relation between hospital characteristics and person‐centredness. Results Person‐centred scores were moderately high, with substantial variation overall (median score: 7.0, range: 3.2‐9.5) and by area (Care Processes: 6.8, 2.0‐9.8; Access: 7.4, 2.7‐9.7; Transparency: 6.7, 3.4‐9.5 and Relationship: 7.3, 0.8‐10.0). Multivariate regression found higher scores for increasing volumes of activity (quartile increase: +0.21; 95% CI: 0.13, 0.29) and lower scores in the south and islands (−1.03; −1.62,‐0.45). Discussion The checklist has been applied successfully by over 1,500 collaborators who assessed hospitals in 16 distinct Regions and Autonomous Provinces of Italy. Despite an overall positive mark, all scores were highly variable by location and hospital characteristics. Conclusion and patient or public contribution A national participatory programme to improve patient‐centredness in Italian hospitals highlighted critical areas with the direct input of citizens.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Flavia Cardinali
- Italian National Agency for Regional Health Services (AGENAS), Roma, Italy
| | - Sara Carzaniga
- Italian National Agency for Regional Health Services (AGENAS), Roma, Italy
| | - Giorgia Duranti
- Italian National Agency for Regional Health Services (AGENAS), Roma, Italy
| | - Barbara Labella
- Italian National Agency for Regional Health Services (AGENAS), Roma, Italy
| | - Alessandro Lamanna
- Italian National Agency for Regional Health Services (AGENAS), Roma, Italy
| | - Micaela Cerilli
- Italian National Agency for Regional Health Services (AGENAS), Roma, Italy
| | - Giovanni Caracci
- Italian National Agency for Regional Health Services (AGENAS), Roma, Italy
| | - Fabrizio Carinci
- Italian National Agency for Regional Health Services (AGENAS), Roma, Italy.,University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Developing a model of care for substance use in pregnancy and parenting services, Sydney, Australia: Service provider perspectives. J Subst Abuse Treat 2021; 131:108420. [PMID: 34098295 DOI: 10.1016/j.jsat.2021.108420] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2020] [Revised: 04/14/2021] [Accepted: 04/15/2021] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The absence of a clear model of care for services supporting pregnant women and mothers with substance use disorders has impeded opportunities to build an evidence base for the effectiveness of these services. Previous research has typically focused on the needs of pregnant women or mothers, as two distinct groups. This paper explores service providers' perceptions of key components of a model of care, extending from perinatal care to community-based support for up to 17 years post-delivery. A model of care is outlined and feasibility factors affecting implementation are highlighted. METHODS Qualitative methods were adopted as a first step to informing development of the model of care. Semi-structured in-depth interviews were conducted with thirty-eight staff providing a range of substance use in pregnancy and parenting services (SUPPS) in hospital and community-based agencies, in a metropolitan health district in Sydney, Australia. Interview data was entered into NVivo and analysed using constant comparative methods. RESULTS Guiding principles for the model of care included integrated care, harm reduction and person-centredness. Practice approaches integral to the model of care were promoting engagement with women, flexible service provision, trauma-informed care, and continuity of care. Feasibility factors influencing implementation of the model of care included fragmentation or siloing of the service network and workforce sustainability. CONCLUSIONS A harm reduction approach was crucial for promoting engagement of women with SUPPS, particularly child protection services. A greater focus on providing ongoing community-based support for mothers also has the potential to achieve sustainable positive outcomes for women and children. Implementation of the SUPPS model of care could be undermined by threats to integration of service delivery and continuity of care. Further research is needed to explore consumer perspectives and inform the model of care as a framework for evaluation.
Collapse
|
23
|
King G, Chiarello LA, McLarnon MJW, Ziviani J, Pinto M, Wright FV, Phoenix M. A measure of parent engagement: plan appropriateness, partnering, and positive outcome expectancy in pediatric rehabilitation sessions. Disabil Rehabil 2021; 44:3459-3468. [PMID: 33390023 DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2020.1864036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To examine the psychometric properties of a parent-report measure of engagement in pediatric rehabilitation. METHOD 113 parents (of children 4 months to 18 years, varying in diagnoses) were recruited from standard outpatient/inpatient, early intervention, and life skills programs, sampled from different sites in Canada, the US, and Australia. Parents completed the Pediatric Rehabilitation Intervention Measure of Engagement-Parent version (PRIME-P) twice, after two therapy sessions approximately two weeks apart. Analyses examined factor structure, internal consistency, and test-retest reliability, and assessed construct validity hypotheses concerning participant characteristics and contextual factors. RESULTS The resulting 11-item PRIME-P has three factors capturing engagement in terms of Plan Appropriateness, Partnering, and Positive Outcome Expectancy. The factors displayed strong internal consistency and test-retest reliability (Partnering demonstrated slightly weaker test-retest reliability). Construct validity was shown by significant associations between the PRIME-P scales and parents' presence versus absence during the sessions, as well as service providers' years of experience. CONCLUSIONS The PRIME-P captures parent engagement as a multifaceted construct involving appropriateness of the therapy plan, a sense of active partnership in the intervention process, and an expectation for a positive outcome. The PRIME-P has promise for research, clinical practice, and educational purposes.IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONThe PRIME-P is a psychometrically sound tool that fills a gap in how researchers and practitioners can measure the engagement of parents in the therapy process.To enhance parent engagement, service providers can encourage collaboration in planning, foster a sense of working in partnership, and convey a sense of hope.The findings point to the need to pay attention to parents' beliefs about the therapy plan and outcomes, in addition to their behavioral involvement.The PRIME-P is a promising tool for pediatric rehabilitation that can be used to investigate the role of a crucial, yet poorly understood variable in the therapy process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gillian King
- Bloorview Research Institute, Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital, Toronto, Canada.,Department of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Lisa A Chiarello
- Department of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Sciences, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | | | - Jenny Ziviani
- School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Madhu Pinto
- Bloorview Research Institute, Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital, Toronto, Canada
| | - F Virginia Wright
- Bloorview Research Institute, Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital, Toronto, Canada.,Department of Physical Therapy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Michelle Phoenix
- Bloorview Research Institute, Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital, Toronto, Canada.,School of Rehabilitation Science and CanChild, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
van Diepen C, Fors A, Ekman I, Hensing G. Association between person-centred care and healthcare providers' job satisfaction and work-related health: a scoping review. BMJ Open 2020; 10:e042658. [PMID: 33293327 PMCID: PMC7722824 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042658] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This scoping review aimed to explore and describe the research on associations between person-centred care (PCC) and healthcare provider outcomes, for example, job satisfaction and work-related health. DESIGN Scoping review. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA Studies were included if they were empirical studies that analysed associations between PCC measurement tools and healthcare providers outcomes. SEARCH STRATEGY Searches in PubMed, CINAHL, Psychinfo and SCOPUS databases were conducted to identify relevant studies published between 2001 and 2019. Two authors independently screened studies for inclusion. RESULTS Eighteen studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Twelve studies were cross-sectional, four quasi-experimental, one longitudinal and one randomised controlled trial. The studies were carried out in Sweden, The Netherlands, the USA, Australia, Norway and Germany in residential care, nursing homes, safety net clinics, a hospital and community care. The healthcare provider outcomes consisted of job satisfaction, burnout, stress of conscience, psychosocial work environment, job strain and intent to leave. The cross-sectional studies found significant associations, whereas the longitudinal studies revealed no significant effects of PCC on healthcare provider outcomes over time. CONCLUSION Most studies established a positive association between PCC and healthcare provider outcomes. However, due to the methodological variation, a robust conclusion could not be generated. Further research is required to establish the viability of implementing PCC for the improvement of job satisfaction and work-related health outcomes through rigorous and consistent research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cornelia van Diepen
- Institute of Health and Care Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Goteborg, Sweden
- Centre for Person-Centred Care (GPCC), University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Andreas Fors
- Institute of Health and Care Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Goteborg, Sweden
- Centre for Person-Centred Care (GPCC), University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Inger Ekman
- Institute of Health and Care Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Goteborg, Sweden
- Centre for Person-Centred Care (GPCC), University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Gunnel Hensing
- School of Public Health and Community Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Toro J, Martiny K. New perspectives on person-centered care: an affordance-based account. MEDICINE, HEALTH CARE, AND PHILOSOPHY 2020; 23:631-644. [PMID: 32886295 DOI: 10.1007/s11019-020-09977-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/27/2020] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
Despite the growing interest and supporting evidence for person-centered care (PCC), there is still a fundamental disagreement about what makes healthcare person-centered. In this article, we define PCC as operating with three fundamental conditions: personal, participatory and holistic. To further understand these concepts, we develop a framework based on the theory of affordances, which we apply to the healthcare case of rehabilitation and a concrete experiment on social interactions between persons with cerebral palsy and physio- and occupational therapists. Based on the application of the theory, we argue that in order for healthcare to be considered as PCC, professionals need to adopt a personalistic attitude in their care, defined (at the how-level) in terms of mutual affordances: how the professional and the person of care acknowledges each other as a person in an interaction. In opposition, we define (at the what level) the functionalistic attitude in terms of object affordances, those related to a concrete goal. We show that PCC requires a balance of personalistic and functionalistic attitudes, since this contributes to a participatory and holistic conception of, and interaction with, the person of care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juan Toro
- Center for Subjectivity Research, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
- The Enactlab, Copenhagen, Denmark.
| | - Kristian Martiny
- Center for Subjectivity Research, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
- The Enactlab, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Summer Meranius M, Holmström IK, Håkansson J, Breitholtz A, Moniri F, Skogevall S, Skoglund K, Rasoal D. Paradoxes of person-centred care: A discussion paper. Nurs Open 2020; 7:1321-1329. [PMID: 32802352 PMCID: PMC7424463 DOI: 10.1002/nop2.520] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2020] [Accepted: 05/04/2020] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Aim Previous research has mainly focused on the advantages of PCC and less on its disadvantages. Hence, there is a need to further explore the recent research regarding PCC from both sides. Therefore, the aim of this paper is to elucidate the advantages and disadvantages of PCC. Design Discussion paper. Methods We searched relevant literature published January 2000-March 2018 in PubMed, Medline, CHINAL, Scopus and Web of Science. Results The results showed that PCC can contribute to improved health and well-being, improved mutual interaction in relationships, improved cost-effectiveness and improved work environment, while the disadvantages can involve increased personal and financial costs, exclusion of certain groups, increased personal and financial costs, exclusion of staff's personhood and unfairness due to empathy. An analysis of the existing literature on PCC showed paradoxes, which call for further investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Inger K. Holmström
- School of Health, Care and Social WelfareMälardalen UniversityVästeråsSweden
- Department of Public Health and Caring SciencesUppsala UniversityUppsalaSweden
| | - Jakob Håkansson
- School of Health, Care and Social WelfareMälardalen UniversityVästeråsSweden
| | - Agneta Breitholtz
- School of Health, Care and Social WelfareMälardalen UniversityVästeråsSweden
| | - Farah Moniri
- School of Health, Care and Social WelfareMälardalen UniversityVästeråsSweden
| | - Sofia Skogevall
- School of Health, Care and Social WelfareMälardalen UniversityVästeråsSweden
| | - Karin Skoglund
- School of Health, Care and Social WelfareMälardalen UniversityVästeråsSweden
| | - Dara Rasoal
- School of Health, Care and Social WelfareMälardalen UniversityVästeråsSweden
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Azios JH, Damico JS. Clinical Practice Recommendations for Improving Life Participation for People With Aphasia in Long-Term Care. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2020. [DOI: 10.1044/2019_persp-19-00136] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
Purpose
The purpose of this clinical focus article is to present an overview of the Life Participation Approach to Aphasia as it relates to issues in long-term care (LTC) and provide practical recommendations for implementing the approach in this setting. The Framework for Living With Aphasia is used as a guide to (a) highlight specific challenges to life participation for residents with aphasia in LTC and (b) propose clinical tools that might help clinicians move through the therapeutic process when implementing the Life Participation Approach to Aphasia.
Recommendations
Clinicians in LTC facilities have the responsibility of delivering services that have a positive impact on communication, social relationships, emotional health, and quality of life. Clinical tools and approaches most appropriate for LTC settings are identified that help to address these goals. Approaches are discussed across several stages representing the therapeutic process, which is ultimately aimed at moving a resident toward recovery and increased independence. Case demonstrations are provided to illustrate approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jamie H. Azios
- Department of Speech and Hearing Sciences, Lamar University, Beaumont, TX
| | - Jack S. Damico
- Department of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, University of Colorado Boulder
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Duff C, Kokanović R, Flore J, Thomas SDM, Callard F, Blackman L. Perspectives on person-centred care for borderline personality disorder: a critical research agenda. HEALTH SOCIOLOGY REVIEW : THE JOURNAL OF THE HEALTH SECTION OF THE AUSTRALIAN SOCIOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION 2020; 29:1-15. [PMID: 33411664 DOI: 10.1080/14461242.2020.1715815] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2019] [Accepted: 11/17/2019] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD) is a highly contentious psychiatric diagnosis with ongoing tensions over nomenclature, aetiology and treatment recommendations. This article examines a number of these tensions and assesses how greater attention to the voices of people living with BPD may help inform the delivery of new modes of person-centred care. To this end, we present a critical social science research agenda for investigating the experiences, social contexts and support needs of people living with BPD. We canvass issues pertaining to the diagnosis of BPD (including its name), the strongly gendered dimensions of BPD, and the pressing need to improve support for people living with this condition. Throughout our analysis, we indicate how critical interdisciplinary inquiry may drive new responses to these challenges. Our analysis is illustrated with reference to experiences of BPD recounted in two Australia-wide surveys conducted in 2011 and 2017. We argue that greater progress towards person-centred care requires novel forms of evidence grounded in critical social inquiry into experiences of treatment and support among people living with BPD, and the varied social, cultural and political contexts underpinning these experiences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cameron Duff
- Centre for People, Organisation and Work, RMIT University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Renata Kokanović
- Social and Global Studies Centre, RMIT University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Jacinthe Flore
- Social and Global Studies Centre, RMIT University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Stuart D M Thomas
- Social and Global Studies Centre, RMIT University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Felicity Callard
- Department of Psychosocial Studies, Birkbeck, University of London, London, UK
| | - Lisa Blackman
- Department of Media, Communications and Cultural Studies, Goldsmiths, University of London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Driessen A, Ibáñez Martín R. Attending to difference: enacting individuals in food provision for residents with dementia. SOCIOLOGY OF HEALTH & ILLNESS 2020; 42:247-261. [PMID: 31705562 DOI: 10.1111/1467-9566.13004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
In the face of warnings about total institutions and growing concern about the quality of care, healthcare professionals in Western Europe and North America have increasingly been exhorted to tailor their services to individuals in their care. In this article, we invite our readers to become more interested in the kinds of differences care is being tailored to, and with what effects. Focusing on food provision for residents with dementia, we present three repertoires through which care workers attend to, and enact different sets of differences between individuals: providing choice allows residents to express fleeting preferences; knowing residents places emphasis on care providers' familiarity with a person; and catering to identities brings to the fore the tastes which make up part of who someone is. The analysis brings attending to difference to the fore as a practical process and suggests that tailoring care requires sensitivity to the different kinds of individuals enacted when attending to difference.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annelieke Driessen
- Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Rebeca Ibáñez Martín
- Ethnology Department, Meertens Institute, Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences, KNAW, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Thuesen J, Ravn MB, Petersen KS. Towards person-centred rehabilitation in dementia – a narrative synthesis. Disabil Rehabil 2020; 43:2673-2679. [DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2019.1709910] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Jette Thuesen
- REHPA, The Danish Knowledge Centre for Rehabilitation and Palliative Care, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Maiken Bay Ravn
- REHPA, The Danish Knowledge Centre for Rehabilitation and Palliative Care, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Kirsten Schultz Petersen
- Department of Health Science and Technology, Faculty of Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Langberg EM, Dyhr L, Davidsen AS. Development of the concept of patient-centredness - A systematic review. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2019; 102:1228-1236. [PMID: 30846206 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2019.02.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 110] [Impact Index Per Article: 22.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2018] [Revised: 02/21/2019] [Accepted: 02/22/2019] [Indexed: 05/10/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Patient-centredness is often linked to high-quality patient care, but the concept is not well-defined. This study aims to provide an overview of how patient-centredness has been defined in the literature since Mead and Bower's review in 2000, and to provide an updated definition of the concept. METHOD & DESIGN We performed a systematic literature search in PubMed to identify original articles with a sufficient definition of patient-centredness. We analysed extracted data defining patient-centredness. RESULTS Eighty articles were included. The dimensions "biopsychosocial", "patient-as-person", "sharing power and responsibility" and "therapeutic alliance" corresponded to four of five dimensions described by Mead and Bower. "Coordinated care" was a new dimension. CONCLUSION The identified dimensions are encompassed by three elements: the patient, the doctor-patient relationship and the framework of care i.e. the health care system. The additional focus on coordinated care could reflect increasing complexity of the health care system. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS Narrowing down the understanding of patient-centredness to these three focus areas, viz. 1) understanding of the patients' experience of the illness in their life situation, 2) the professional's relationship with the patient, and 3) coordination of care in the system, could make the operationalisation and implementation of a patient-centred approach more manageable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emil Mørup Langberg
- The Research Unit for General Practice and Section of General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Øster Farimagsgade 5, 1014, Copenhagen K, Denmark.
| | - Lise Dyhr
- The Research Unit for General Practice and Section of General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Øster Farimagsgade 5, 1014, Copenhagen K, Denmark.
| | - Annette Sofie Davidsen
- The Research Unit for General Practice and Section of General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Øster Farimagsgade 5, 1014, Copenhagen K, Denmark.
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Lazzari C, Kotera Y, Thomas H. Social Network Analysis of Dementia Wards in Psychiatric Hospitals to Explore the Advancement of Personhood in Patients with Alzheimer's Disease. Curr Alzheimer Res 2019; 16:505-517. [PMID: 31195945 PMCID: PMC6806538 DOI: 10.2174/1567205016666190612160955] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2019] [Revised: 03/27/2019] [Accepted: 04/29/2019] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
Background: Little is known on investigating how healthcare teams in dementia wards act for promoting personhood in persons with Alzheimer’s disease (PWA). Objective: The current research aimed to identify the social networks of dementia health carers promoting the personhood of PWA in acute or long-term dementia wards in public and private psychiatric hospitals. Methods: We used a mixed-method research approach. Ethnographic observations and two-mode Social Network Analysis (SNA) captured the role and social networks of healthcare professionals promoting PWA personhood, using SocNetv version 2.4. The social network graphs illustrated how professionals participated in PWA care by computing the degree of centrality (%DC) for each professional; higher values indicated more statistical significance of a professional role compared to others in the provision of personhood care. The categories of personhood were biological, individual, and sociologic. Nurses, doctors, ward managers, hospital managers, clinical psychologists, occupational therapists, care coordinators, physiotherapists, healthcare assistants, and family members were observed if they were promoting PWA personhood. Results: The highest %DC in SNA in biological personhood was held by the ward nurses (36%), followed by the ward doctors (20%) and ward managers (20%). All professional roles were involved in 16% of cases in the promotion of individual personhood, while the hospital managers had the highest %DC (33%) followed by the ward managers and nurses (27%) in the sociologic personhood. Conclusion: All professional roles were deemed to promote PWA personhood in dementia wards, although some limitation exists according to the context of the assessment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carlo Lazzari
- Centre for Health Care and Medical Education, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Yasuhiro Kotera
- Centre for Human Sciences Research, University of Derby, United Kingdom
| | - Hywel Thomas
- College of Human and Health Sciences, Swansea University, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Evaluation of Person-Centredness in Rehabilitation for People Living with Dementia Is Needed: A Review of the Literature. J Aging Res 2019; 2019:8510792. [PMID: 31192013 PMCID: PMC6525915 DOI: 10.1155/2019/8510792] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2018] [Revised: 03/14/2019] [Accepted: 03/24/2019] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Background With an expected increase in the prevalence of dementia, change in care policies and healthcare systems worldwide is needed. Rehabilitation is increasingly recognised as contributing to dementia care. Rehabilitation subscribes to person-centredness, and thus, evaluations of person-centredness in rehabilitation for people living with dementia are relevant in order for healthcare professionals to know how best to practice person-centredness. Aim The aim of this study was to identify methods of evaluating person-centeredness in rehabilitation for people living with dementia. Materials and Methods Review of the literature using the search terms dementia, person-centredness, and rehabilitation or occupational therapy. Databases searched included: CINAHL, PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO, OTseeker, and SveMed+. The study included peer-reviewed articles from year 2000 to 2018 in Danish, English, Norwegian, or Swedish. Results Only one academic article met the inclusion criteria. In that article, person-centred practice was evaluated using observation and interview as well as analytical frameworks from person-centred care and occupational therapy. Conclusion Evaluations of person-centred practice in rehabilitation for people living with dementia in peer-reviewed literature are lacking. Evaluations are needed to identify effective strategies to pursue and uphold person-centred care. Given the dearth of research on evaluations of person-centredness in rehabilitation, this article included research in person-centred dementia care in the discussion, which potentially can inspire practice and research of rehabilitation for people living with dementia. To understand the complex nature of person-centredness, a variety of research methodologies of qualitative and quantitative characters are recommended for evaluations.
Collapse
|
34
|
Gibson BE, Terry G, Setchell J, Bright FAS, Cummins C, Kayes NM. The micro-politics of caring: tinkering with person-centered rehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil 2019; 42:1529-1538. [PMID: 30978119 DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2019.1587793] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
Purpose: In this paper, we critically investigate the implementation of person-centered care with the purpose of advancing philosophical debates regarding the overarching aims and delivery of rehabilitation. While general agreement exists regarding person centered care's core principles, how practitioners reconcile the implementation of these principles with competing practice demands remains an open question.Materials and methods: For the paper, we drew on post-qualitative methods to engage in a process of "diffractive" analysis wherein we analyzed the micro-doings of person-centered care in everyday rehabilitation work. Working from our team members' diverse experiences, traditions, and epistemological commitments, we engaged with data from nine "care events" generated in previous research to interrogate the multiple forces that co-produce care practices.Results: We map our analyses under three categories: scripts mediate practice, securing compliance through "benevolent manipulations", and care(ful) tinkering. In the latter, we explore the notion of tinkering as a useful concept for approaching person centered care. Uncertainty, humility, and doubt in one's expertise are inherent to tinkering, which involves a continual questioning of what to do, what is best, and what is person centered care within each moment of care. The paper concludes with a discussion of the implications for rehabilitation and person-centered care.Implications for rehabilitationDeterminations of what constitutes good, better, or best rehabilitation practices are inevitably questions of ethics.Person-centered care is promoted as good practice in rehabilitation because it provides a framework for attending to the personhood of all engaged in clinical encounters.Post-critical analyses suggest that multiple interacting forces, conditions, assumptions, and actions intersect in shaping each rehabilitation encounter such that what constitutes good care or person-centered care cannot be determined in advance."Tinkering" is a potentially useful approach that involves a continual questioning of what to do, what is best, and what is person-centered care within each moment of care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Barbara E Gibson
- Department of Physical Therapy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.,Bloorview Research Institute, Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital, Toronto, Canada
| | - Gareth Terry
- Centre for Person Centred Research, Faculty of Health and Environmental Sciences, School of Clinical Sciences, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Jenny Setchell
- Faculty of Health and Behavioural Sciences, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Felicity A S Bright
- Centre for Person Centred Research, Faculty of Health and Environmental Sciences, School of Clinical Sciences, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Christine Cummins
- Centre for Person Centred Research, Faculty of Health and Environmental Sciences, School of Clinical Sciences, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Nicola M Kayes
- Centre for Person Centred Research, Faculty of Health and Environmental Sciences, School of Clinical Sciences, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
O'Rourke DJ, Thompson GN, McMillan DE. Ethical and moral considerations of (patient) centredness in nursing and healthcare: Navigating uncharted waters. Nurs Inq 2019; 26:e12284. [PMID: 30916429 DOI: 10.1111/nin.12284] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2018] [Revised: 12/02/2018] [Accepted: 12/09/2018] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
This discussion paper aims to explore potential ethical and moral implications of (patient) centredness in nursing and healthcare. Healthcare is experiencing a philosophical shift from a perspective where the health professional is positioned as the expert to one that re-centres care and service provision central to the needs and desires of the persons served. This centred approach to healthcare delivery has gained a moral authority as the right thing to do. However, little attention has been given to its moral and ethical theoretical grounding and potential implications for nurses, persons served and the healthcare system. Based upon a review of academic and grey literature, centredness is proposed as a value-laden concept in nursing inquiry. Potential moral and ethical implications of centredness on nurses/healthcare providers, persons served and the healthcare system are discussed. These challenges are then considered within the context of normative and relational ethical theories. These perspectives may offer guidance relative to how one should act in those circumstances as well as an understanding as to how interdependency and engagement with the other person(s) can help navigate the challenges of a centred care approach. Viewing centredness through an ethical theoretical lens provides a valuable discourse to nursing in efforts to expand the knowledge base and integrate centred approaches into practice and policy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deanne J O'Rourke
- Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, College of Nursing, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Genevieve N Thompson
- Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, College of Nursing, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Diana E McMillan
- Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, College of Nursing, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.,Health Sciences Centre, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Terry G, Kayes N. Person centered care in neurorehabilitation: a secondary analysis. Disabil Rehabil 2019; 42:2334-2343. [DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2018.1561952] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Gareth Terry
- Centre for Person Centred Research, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Nicola Kayes
- Centre for Person Centred Research, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Håkansson Eklund J, Holmström IK, Kumlin T, Kaminsky E, Skoglund K, Höglander J, Sundler AJ, Condén E, Summer Meranius M. "Same same or different?" A review of reviews of person-centered and patient-centered care. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2019; 102:3-11. [PMID: 30201221 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2018.08.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 357] [Impact Index Per Article: 71.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2017] [Revised: 08/24/2018] [Accepted: 08/25/2018] [Indexed: 05/25/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To provide a synthesis of already synthesized literature on person-centered care and patient-centered care in order to identify similarities and differences between the two concepts. METHODS A synthesis of reviews was conducted to locate synthesized literature published between January 2000 and March 2017. A total of 21 articles deemed relevant to this overview were synthesized using a thematic analysis. RESULTS The analysis resulted in nine themes present in person-centered as well as in patient-centered care: (1) empathy, (2), respect (3), engagement, (4), relationship, (5) communication, (6) shared decision-making, (7) holistic focus, (8), individualized focus, and (9) coordinated care. The analysis also revealed that the goal of person-centered care is a meaningful life while the goal of patient-centered care is a functional life. CONCLUSIONS While there are a number of similarities between the two concepts, the goals for person-centered and patient-centered care differ. The similarities are at the surface and there are important differences when the concepts are regarded in light of their different goals. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS Clarification of the concepts may assist practitioners to develop the relevant aspects of care. Person-centered care broadens and extends the perspective of patient-centered care by considering the whole life of the patient.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jakob Håkansson Eklund
- School of Health, Care and Social Welfare, Mälardalen University, Postbox 883, SE-72123, Sweden.
| | - Inger K Holmström
- School of Health, Care and Social Welfare, Mälardalen University, Postbox 883, SE-72123, Sweden; Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Uppsala University, Sweden
| | - Tomas Kumlin
- School of Health, Care and Social Welfare, Mälardalen University, Postbox 883, SE-72123, Sweden
| | - Elenor Kaminsky
- Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Uppsala University, Sweden
| | - Karin Skoglund
- School of Health, Care and Social Welfare, Mälardalen University, Postbox 883, SE-72123, Sweden
| | - Jessica Höglander
- School of Health, Care and Social Welfare, Mälardalen University, Postbox 883, SE-72123, Sweden
| | - Annelie J Sundler
- Faculty of Caring Science, Work Life and Social Welfare, University of Borås, SE-50190, Borås, Sweden
| | - Emelie Condén
- Centre for Clinical Research, Västmanland Hospital, Uppsala University, Sweden
| | - Martina Summer Meranius
- School of Health, Care and Social Welfare, Mälardalen University, Postbox 883, SE-72123, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Chakrabarti S. Treatment alliance and adherence in bipolar disorder. World J Psychiatry 2018; 8:114-124. [PMID: 30425942 PMCID: PMC6230924 DOI: 10.5498/wjp.v8.i5.114] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2018] [Revised: 10/07/2018] [Accepted: 10/23/2018] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
The clinician patient relationship lies at the core of psychiatric practice and delivery of mental health care services. The concept of treatment alliance in psychiatry has its origins in psychotherapy, but has also been influenced by several other constructs such as patient-centred care (PCC) and shared decision-making (SDM). Similarly, there has been a shift in conceptualization of treatment-adherence in psychiatric disorders including bipolar disorder (BD) from illness-centred and clinician-centred approaches to patient-centred ones. Moreover, the traditional compliance based models are being replaced by those based on concordance between clinicians and patients. Newer theories of adherence in BD place considerable emphasis on patient related factors and the clinician patient alliance is considered to be one of the principal determinants of treatment-adherence in BD. Likewise, current notions of treatment alliance in BD also stress the importance of equal and collaborative relationships, sensitivity to patients' viewpoints, sharing of knowledge, and mutual responsibility and agreement regarding decisions related to treatment. Accumulated evidence from quantitative research, descriptive accounts, qualitative studies and trials of psychosocial interventions indicates that efficacious treatment alliances have a positive influence on adherence in BD. Then again, research on the alliance-adherence link in BD lags behind the existing literature on the subject in other medical and psychiatric conditions in terms of the size and quality of the evidence, the consistency of its findings and clarity about underlying processes mediating this link. Nevertheless, the elements of an effective alliance which could have a positive impact on adherence in BD are reasonably clear and include PCC, collaborative relationships, SDM, open communication, trust, support, and stability and continuity of the relationship. Therefore, clinicians involved in the care of BD would do well to follow these principles and improve their interpersonal and communication skills in order to build productive alliances with their patients. This could go a long way in confronting the ubiquitous problem of non-adherence in BD. The role of future research in firmly establishing the alliance-adherence connection and uncovering the processes underlying this association will also be vital in devising effective ways to manage non-adherence in BD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Subho Chakrabarti
- Department of Psychiatry, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh 160012, India
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Coyne I, Holmström I, Söderbäck M. Centeredness in Healthcare: A Concept Synthesis of Family-centered Care, Person-centered Care and Child-centered Care. J Pediatr Nurs 2018; 42:45-56. [PMID: 30219299 DOI: 10.1016/j.pedn.2018.07.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 101] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2018] [Revised: 06/12/2018] [Accepted: 07/02/2018] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Increasingly within healthcare, different kind of 'centeredness' are used to denote the focus of care which can create confusion for practitioners. METHODS A concept analysis was undertaken to identify the antecedents, attributes and relationship between family-, person-, and child-centered care. PubMed and CINAHL were searched from 2012 to 2017 and thirty-five papers were reviewed. RESULTS Both person- and child-centered care are focused on individuals, a symmetric relationship and the tailoring of care to individual needs while family- centered care is focused on the family as a unit of which the child is included. Person-centered care focuses on an adult person with autonomy, while the focus in child-centered care is the individual child as an own actor with rights but still close to a family. CONCLUSION It appears at a conceptual level that the concepts of centeredness contain both similarities and differences. Finding ways to structure nursing and focus the care that respects a person's dignity and humanity is essential in healthcare and should be a major goal of health policy and health systems worldwide. IMPLICATIONS The identification of the antecedents and attributes embedded in the concepts may help raise professionals' awareness of the different foci and how this will influence one's practice. There is a need to recognize strengths and weaknesses of the centeredness in different settings and environments. Furthermore, it is important to know which approach to apply within different situations so that quality care is enabled for every person, child and family.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Imelda Coyne
- School of Nursing & Midwifery, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
| | - Inger Holmström
- School of Health, Care and Social Welfare, Mälardalen University, Västerås, Sweden; Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Health Services Research, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
| | - Maja Söderbäck
- School of Health, Care and Social Welfare, Mälardalen University, Västerås, Sweden.
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Thompson G, Shindruk CL, Adekoya AA, Demczuk L, McClement S. Meanings of 'centredness' in long-term care facilities: a scoping review protocol. BMJ Open 2018; 8:e022498. [PMID: 30099403 PMCID: PMC6089323 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022498] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION There is a growing demand for long-term care services for older adults that embrace a model of care centred on individual recipients of care. In long-term care, models of person, resident and relationship-centred care have been developed and implemented to promote independence, decision making and choices of residents. Although the concepts of centredness have been readily adopted in these environments, what constitutes centredness is often vague and lacks conceptual clarity and definition. The research questions guiding this scoping review are: (1) What are the defining attributes, conceptual boundaries and theoretical underpinnings of each centredness term in long-term care? (2) For what purposes have centredness directed models of care been used in this context? (3) What types of study designs have been used to examine centredness in this context? (4) What outcomes related to centredness have been reported or evaluated and how were they measured in long-term care? METHODS AND ANALYSIS This review uses the methodological framework for conducting a scoping review by Arksey and O'Malley. The search strategy will be applied to nine bibliographic and citation databases, Google Scholar and the grey literature. Study selection will occur in a two-step process. First, the titles and abstracts of all search results will be screened by individual reviewers. Second, a full-text review will be conducted by a pair of reviewers. To be included articles must (1) define centredness in the context of long-term care; (2) describe the defining features of centredness; (3) explore the theoretical underpinnings of centredness; (4) outline outcomes of centredness or (5) use outcome measures related to centredness. Data will be extracted from included studies and analysed using thematic analysis as described by Braun and Clark. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Research ethics approval is not required for this scoping review. Dissemination strategies will follow a targeted and tailored approach based on study findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Genevieve Thompson
- College of Nursing, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Chloe Lyn Shindruk
- College of Nursing, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Adebusola Abiodun Adekoya
- College of Nursing, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Lisa Demczuk
- Elizabeth Dafoe Library, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Susan McClement
- College of Nursing, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Berntsen G, Høyem A, Lettrem I, Ruland C, Rumpsfeld M, Gammon D. A person-centered integrated care quality framework, based on a qualitative study of patients' evaluation of care in light of chronic care ideals. BMC Health Serv Res 2018; 18:479. [PMID: 29925357 PMCID: PMC6011266 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-018-3246-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2017] [Accepted: 05/29/2018] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Person-Centered Integrated Care (PC-IC) is believed to improve outcomes and experience for persons with multiple long-term and complex conditions. No broad consensus exists regarding how to capture the patient-experienced quality of PC-IC. Most PC-IC evaluation tools focus on care events or care in general. Building on others' and our previous work, we outlined a 4-stage goal-oriented PC-IC process ideal: 1) Personalized goal setting 2) Care planning aligned with goals 3) Care delivery according to plan, and 4) Evaluation of goal attainment. We aimed to explore, apply, refine and operationalize this quality of care framework. METHODS This paper is a qualitative evaluative review of the individual Patient Pathways (iPP) experiences of 19 strategically chosen persons with multimorbidity in light of ideals for chronic care. The iPP includes all care events, addressing the persons collected health issues, organized by time. We constructed iPPs based on the electronic health record (from general practice, nursing services, and hospital) with patient follow-up interviews. The application of the framework and its refinement were parallel processes. Both were based on analysis of salient themes in the empirical material in light of the PC-IC process ideal and progressively more informed applications of themes and questions. RESULTS The informants consistently reviewed care quality by how care supported/ threatened their long-term goals. Personal goals were either implicit or identified by "What matters to you?" Informants expected care to address their long-term goals and placed responsibility for care quality and delivery at the system level. The PC-IC process framework exposed system failure in identifying long-term goals, provision of shared long-term multimorbidity care plans, monitoring of care delivery and goal evaluation. The PC-IC framework includes descriptions of ideal care, key questions and literature references for each stage of the PC-IC process. This first version of a PC-IC process framework needs further validation in other settings. CONCLUSION Gaps in care that are invisible with event-based quality of care frameworks become apparent when evaluated by a long-term goal-driven PC-IC process framework. The framework appears meaningful to persons with multimorbidity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gro Berntsen
- Norwegian center for eHealth research, University Hospital of Northern Norway, PB. 35, 9038 Tromsø, Norway
- Department of primary care, Institute of community medicine, UIT – The Arctic University of Norway, PB 6050, Langnes, 9037 Tromsø, Norway
| | - Audhild Høyem
- Department of Integrated Care, University Hospital of Northern Norway, PB. 35, 9038 Tromsø, Norway
| | - Idar Lettrem
- General Practice Health Centre, 9050, Storsteinnes, Norway
| | - Cornelia Ruland
- Department of Integrated Care, University Hospital of Northern Norway, PB. 35, 9038 Tromsø, Norway
| | - Markus Rumpsfeld
- Department of primary care, Institute of community medicine, UIT – The Arctic University of Norway, PB 6050, Langnes, 9037 Tromsø, Norway
- Department for Internal Medicine, University Hospital of Northern Norway, PB 101, 9038 Tromsø, Norway
| | - Deede Gammon
- Norwegian center for eHealth research, University Hospital of Northern Norway, PB. 35, 9038 Tromsø, Norway
- Center for Shared Decision Making and Collaborative Care Research, Oslo University Hospital, Sogn Arena, Pb 4950 Nydalen, N-0424 Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Douglas A, Kelly-Campbell RJ. Readability of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Adult Audiologic Rehabilitation. Am J Audiol 2018; 27:208-218. [PMID: 29625434 DOI: 10.1044/2018_aja-17-0095] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2017] [Accepted: 12/10/2017] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to examine the readability of published patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) designed for use in adult audiologic rehabilitation. The readability results were compared with the readability levels recommended for health information by health literacy experts. METHOD Reading grade levels were calculated using the Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level Formula (Flesch, 1948), Gunning Fog Index (Gunning, 1952), Simple Measure of Gobbledygook (McLaughlin, 1969), and FORCAST (Caylor, Sticht, Fox, & Ford, 1973) readability formulas for 10 published PROMs. Descriptive statistics were computed across the different PROM sections: instructions, items, response scale, and overall contents of the measure directed toward respondents. RESULTS The majority of the PROM sections exceeded the 6th grade reading level recommended by health literacy experts, regardless of the formula applied. All PROM sections exceeded the 6th grade reading level when calculated according to the FORCAST formula, the most appropriate readability formula for use with a nonnarrative text format, such as PROMs. CONCLUSIONS When developing or reevaluating PROMs designed for use in adult audiologic rehabilitation, researchers should consider ways to improve the readability of their measure, as poor readability may affect the validity of the empirical data collected using the PROM. Additionally, the adequate readability of audiologic PROMs is required if patient/family-centered care values are to be adhered to within the field of adult audiologic rehabilitation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alana Douglas
- University of Canterbury, Department of Communication Disorders, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
Fontein-Kuipers Y, de Groot R, van Staa A. Woman-centered care 2.0: Bringing the concept into focus. Eur J Midwifery 2018; 2:5. [PMID: 33537566 PMCID: PMC7846029 DOI: 10.18332/ejm/91492] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2018] [Revised: 04/30/2018] [Accepted: 05/22/2018] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Woman-centered care has become a midwifery concept with implied meaning. In this paper we aim to provide a clear conceptual foundation of woman-centered care for midwifery science and practice. METHODS An advanced concept analysis was undertaken. At the outset, a systematic search of the literature was conducted in PubMed, OVID and EBSCO. This was followed by an assessment of maturity of the retrieved data. Principle-based evaluation was done to reveal epistemological, pragmatic, linguistic and logic principles, that attribute to the concept. Summative conclusions of each respective component and a detailed analysis of conceptual components (antecedents, attributes, outcomes, boundaries) resulted in a definition of woman-centered care. RESULTS Eight studies were selected for analyses. In midwifery, woman-centered care has both a philosophical and a pragmatic meaning. There is strong emphasis on the woman-midwife relationship during the childbearing period. The concept demonstrates a dual and equal focus on physical parameters of pregnancy and birth, and on humanistic dimensions in an interpersonal context. The concept is epistemological, dynamic and multidimensional. The results reveal the concept’s boundaries and fluctuations regarding equity and control. The role of the unborn child is not incorporated in the concept. CONCLUSION An in-depth understanding and a broad conceptual foundation of womancentered care has evolved. Now, the concept is ready for research and educational purposes as well as for practical utility.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yvonne Fontein-Kuipers
- Rotterdam University of Applied Sciences - Research Centre Innovations in Care & School of Midwifery, Netherlands.,Rotterdam University of Applied Sciences - Research Centre Innovations in Care, Netherlands
| | | | - AnneLoes van Staa
- Rotterdam University of Applied Sciences - Research Centre Innovations in Care, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Du Toit SHJ, Shen X, McGrath M. Meaningful engagement and person-centered residential dementia care: A critical interpretive synthesis. Scand J Occup Ther 2018; 26:343-355. [PMID: 29490537 DOI: 10.1080/11038128.2018.1441323] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND People with moderate to advanced dementia living in residential care are at risk of occupational deprivation. Person-centered care has been adopted as a guiding principle in the provision of residential care for older adults with dementia. In this context, there has been shift in occupational therapy practice from addressing occupational performance towards focusing on meaningful engagement. While both meaningful engagement and person-centered care have been well researched the relationship between the two concepts is poorly understood. AIM A critical interpretative synthesis was conducted to determine how principles of person-centered care inform occupational therapy practice in relation to promotion of meaningful engagement among residents with moderate to advanced dementia. METHODS A systematic search of research addressing meaningful engagement of people with moderate to advanced dementia identified 26 papers. RESULTS Papers were classified as theoretical papers and empirical research. Two overarching constructs emerged, namely promoting a culture of collaborative care and understanding the resident as a person with a past, present and future. CONCLUSIONS Occupational deprivation prevails and person-centered care is not fully addressed if opportunities for growth and engagement for residents with moderate to advanced dementia is not extended beyond their life history. SIGNIFICANCE Creating continued opportunities for building agency of residents with dementia could promote occupational justice in residential care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sanetta H J Du Toit
- a Faculty of Health Sciences , The University of Sydney , Lidcombe , NSW , Australia
| | - Xizi Shen
- a Faculty of Health Sciences , The University of Sydney , Lidcombe , NSW , Australia
| | - Margaret McGrath
- a Faculty of Health Sciences , The University of Sydney , Lidcombe , NSW , Australia
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Moore L, Britten N, Lydahl D, Naldemirci Ö, Elam M, Wolf A. Barriers and facilitators to the implementation of person-centred care in different healthcare contexts. Scand J Caring Sci 2017; 31:662-673. [PMID: 27859459 PMCID: PMC5724704 DOI: 10.1111/scs.12376] [Citation(s) in RCA: 225] [Impact Index Per Article: 32.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2016] [Accepted: 07/06/2016] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND To empower patients and improve the quality of care, policy-makers increasingly adopt systems to enhance person-centred care. Although models of person-centredness and patient-centredness vary, respecting the needs and preferences of individuals receiving care is paramount. In Sweden, as in other countries, healthcare providers seek to improve person-centred principles and address gaps in practice. Consequently, researchers at the University of Gothenburg Centre for Person-Centred Care are currently delivering person-centred interventions employing a framework that incorporates three routines. These include eliciting the patient's narrative, agreeing a partnership with shared goals between patient and professional, and safeguarding this through documentation. AIM To explore the barriers and facilitators to the delivery of person-centred care interventions, in different contexts. METHOD Qualitative interviews were conducted with a purposeful sample of 18 researchers from seven research studies across contrasting healthcare settings. Interviews were transcribed, translated and thematically analysed, adopting some basic features of grounded theory. ETHICAL ISSUES The ethical code of conduct was followed and conformed to the ethical guidelines adopted by the Swedish Research Council. RESULTS Barriers to the implementation of person-centred care covered three themes: traditional practices and structures; sceptical, stereotypical attitudes from professionals; and factors related to the development of person-centred interventions. Facilitators included organisational factors, leadership and training and an enabling attitude and approach by professionals. Trained project managers, patients taking an active role in research and adaptive strategies by researchers all helped person-centred care delivery. CONCLUSION At the University of Gothenburg, a model of person-centred care is being initiated and integrated into practice through research. Knowledgeable, well-trained professionals facilitate the routines of narrative elicitation and partnership. Strong leadership and adaptive strategies are important for overcoming existing practices, routines and methods of documentation. This study provides guidance for practitioners when delivering and adapting person-centred care in different contexts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucy Moore
- Institute of Health ResearchUniversity of Exeter Medical SchoolExeterUK
| | - Nicky Britten
- Institute of Health ResearchUniversity of Exeter Medical SchoolExeterUK
| | - Doris Lydahl
- Department of Sociology and Work SciencesUniversity of GothenburgGothenburgSweden
| | - Öncel Naldemirci
- Department of Sociology and Work SciencesUniversity of GothenburgGothenburgSweden
| | - Mark Elam
- Department of Sociology and Work SciencesUniversity of GothenburgGothenburgSweden
| | - Axel Wolf
- Institute of Health Care SciencesSahlgrenska AcademyUniversity of GothenburgGothenburgSweden
- Gothenburg Centre for Person Centred Care (GPCC)University of GothenburgGothenburgSweden
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
de Witt L, Fortune D. Relationship-Centered Dementia Care: Insights from a Community-Based Culture Change Coalition. DEMENTIA 2017; 18:1146-1165. [DOI: 10.1177/1471301217708814] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Darla Fortune
- Department of Applied Human Sciences, Concordia University, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Krupic F, Sköldenberg O, Samuelsson K, Eisler T. Nurses' Experience of Patient Care in Multibed Hospital Rooms: Results From In-Depth Interviews With Nurses After Further Education in Anesthesia. J Perianesth Nurs 2017; 33:78-86. [PMID: 29362050 DOI: 10.1016/j.jopan.2016.09.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2016] [Revised: 08/24/2016] [Accepted: 09/04/2016] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to investigate and explore nurse's previous experiences of patient care in MBRs before their further education in anesthesia. DESIGN Qualitative research. METHODS Data were collected through three focus group interviews using content data analysis. FINDINGS Maintaining patient privacy, providing conditions for communication between health care professionals and patients, and undertaking daily practical care were stated as the main problems in MBR care. Inferior conditions for providing sensitive information and communication with proxies, especially in association with language problems, were frequently encountered. Patient's proxies could facilitate several problematic issues in MBR care. CONCLUSIONS The present study characterized well-defined and easily recognizable clinical problems experienced in the care of patients in an MBR setting from a nurse's perspective. The opinion shared by most nurses was that the inability to implement privacy, dignity, and sound communication with patients should be taken into account in future hospital designs. General dissatisfaction with work environment, increased stress, and the risk of errors in care may otherwise follow.
Collapse
|
48
|
Effects and meanings of a person-centred and health-promoting intervention in home care services - a study protocol of a non-randomised controlled trial. BMC Geriatr 2017; 17:57. [PMID: 28209122 PMCID: PMC5314690 DOI: 10.1186/s12877-017-0445-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/20/2016] [Accepted: 02/08/2017] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The literature indicates that current home care service are largely task oriented with limited focus on the involvement of the older people themselves, and studies show that lack of involvement might reduce older people’s quality of life. Person-centred care has been shown to improve the satisfaction with care and quality of life in older people cared for in hospitals and nursing homes, with limited published evidence about the effects and meanings of person-centred interventions in home care services for older people. This study protocol outlines a study aiming to evaluate such effects and meanings of a person-centred and health-promoting intervention in home aged care services. Methods/design The study will take the form of a non-randomised controlled trial with a before/after approach. It will include 270 older people >65 years receiving home care services, 270 relatives and 65 staff, as well as a matched control group of equal size. All participants will be recruited from a municipality in northern Sweden. The intervention is based on the theoretical concepts of person-centredness and health-promotion, and builds on the four pedagogical phases of: theory apprehension, experimental learning, operationalization, and clinical supervision. Outcome assessments will focus on: a) health and quality of life (primary outcomes), thriving and satisfaction with care for older people; b) caregiver strain, informal caregiving engagement and relatives’ satisfaction with care: c) job satisfaction and stress of conscience among care staff (secondary outcomes). Evaluation will be conducted by means of self-reported questionnaires and qualitative research interviews. Discussion Person-centred home care services have the potential to improve the recurrently reported sub-standard experiences of home care services, and the results can point the way to establishing a more person-centred and health-promoting model for home care services for older people. Trial registration NCT02846246.
Collapse
|
49
|
Määttä S, Lützén K, Öresland S. Contract theories and partnership in health care. A philosophical inquiry to the philosophy of John Rawls and Seyla Benhabib. Nurs Philos 2016; 18. [PMID: 28009093 DOI: 10.1111/nup.12164] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2016] [Revised: 10/11/2016] [Accepted: 11/14/2016] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
Over the last 20 years, a paternalistic view in health care has been losing ground. The question about less asymmetrical positions in the healthcare professional-patient relationship is, for example, being addressed by the increased emphasis on person-centred care, promoted in disciplines such as medicine and nursing. Partnership is considered as a key component in person-centred care. Although the previous studies have addressed the attributes inherent in partnership, there is still potential for further discussion on how the various interpretations of partnership influence their use in healthcare literature. A vague understanding might also affect education and evaluation. As we see it, the philosophical underpinnings of the idea of partnership have not been sufficiently explored and discussed. The study reveals that partnership originates in the term "partener" defined as a relationship between individuals or groups characterized by cooperation and responsibility. Etymologically speaking, partnership is hence bound by a contract, which in this study is discussed in the frame of Rawls' contract theory, which in turn intersects with Benhabib and her distinction between "the abstract" and "the concrete Other." Further, the expression "equal partnership," which often appears in the context of person-centredness, is explored in relation to the philosophies of Rawls and Benhabib. The opportunity for partnership, as well as the risk of partnership becoming a tempting magnet with a vague and imprecise meaning, is discussed. Without exploration, reflection and discussion of the philosophical underpinnings, partnership carries a substantial risk of becoming an indistinct idea used in health care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sylvia Määttä
- Associate Professor, Centre for Equity in Healthcare/Institute for Health and Care Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Kim Lützén
- Senior professor, Department of Women's and Children's Health, Pediatric Oncology Research, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Stina Öresland
- University College of Southeast Norway, Health and social work, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Castro EM, Van Regenmortel T, Vanhaecht K, Sermeus W, Van Hecke A. Patient empowerment, patient participation and patient-centeredness in hospital care: A concept analysis based on a literature review. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2016; 99:1923-1939. [PMID: 27450481 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2016.07.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 466] [Impact Index Per Article: 58.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2016] [Revised: 07/14/2016] [Accepted: 07/16/2016] [Indexed: 06/06/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The concepts of patient empowerment, patient participation and patient-centeredness have been introduced as part of the trend towards a more participatory health care and have largely been used interchangeably. Although these concepts have been discussed for a number of years, their exact meaning in hospital care remains somewhat unclear. This absence of theoretical and conceptual clarity has led to (1) poor understanding and communication among researchers, health practitioners and policy makers and (2) problems in measurement and comparison between studies across different hospitals. METHODS This paper examines all three concepts through a concept analysis based on the method of Avant and Walker (2005) [1] and the simultaneous concept analysis of Haase et al. (1992) [2]. RESULTS Through these methods, the antecedents, attributes, consequences and empirical referents of each concept are determined. In addition, similarities and differences between the three concepts are identified and a definition offered for each concept. Furthermore, the interrelatedness between the key concepts is mapped, and definitions are proposed. CONCLUSIONS It can be concluded that patient empowerment is a much broader concept than just patient participation and patient-centeredness. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS The present study may provide a useful framework that researchers, policy makers and health care providers can use to facilitate patient empowerment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Tine Van Regenmortel
- Faculty of Social Sciences - HIVA, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium, Belgium; Tilburg University, Tilburg School of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Tranzo, Tilburg, Netherlands
| | - Kris Vanhaecht
- Leuven Institute for Healthcare Policy, Department of Public Health & Primary Care, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Quality Management, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Walter Sermeus
- Leuven Institute for Healthcare Policy, Department of Public Health & Primary Care, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Ann Van Hecke
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Department of Public Health - University Center for Nursing and Midwifery, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|