CXCL12 chemokine and CXCR4 receptor: association with susceptibility and prognostic markers in triple negative breast cancer

Research process of PET tracers for neuroendocrine tumors diagnosis

Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) can affect several organ systems and present a variety of clinical symptoms, which are difficult to diagnose by conventional methods. Somatostatin receptor (SSTR) is a group of specific receptors expressed on the well-differentiated NET cell membrane. [68Ga]-labeled somatostatin analogues (SSAs) PET/CT, endogenous ligands targeting SSTR, is widely used in currently clinical NETs diagnosis. The dual-tracer strategy ([68Ga]Ga-SSAs + [18F]FDG) allows for a more detailed evaluation of tumor metabolism and receptor expression. The NETPET score, integrating [68Ga]Ga-SSAs PET/CT and [18F]FDG PET/CT results, enhances the accuracy of predicting treatment response and prognosis. In addition, novel isotopes ([18F]/[64Cu]) labeled SSAs and SSTR antagonists outperformed [68Ga]-SSAs in lesion detection, tumor uptake, and tumor-to-background ratio. Due to undifferentiated or dedifferentiated NETs, SSTR may not be expressed. [68Ga]Ga-Pentixafor and [18F]-FDG PET/CT are applicable for SSTR-negative NET diagnosis. [18F]-MFBG and [18F]-DOPA have a higher sensitivity for identifying non-metastatic pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma (PPGL) than other radiotracers. This review addressed NET diagnosis with conventional imaging techniques, the clinical application of novel radiotracers, and the merits and limitations of the various radiotracers.

A systematic review of candidate genes and their relevant pathways for metastasis among adults diagnosed with breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Presently incurable, metastatic breast cancer is estimated to occur in as many as 30% of those diagnosed with early-stage breast cancer. Timely and accurate identification of those at risk for developing metastasis using validated biomarkers has the potential to have profound impact on overall survival rates. Our primary goal was to conduct a systematic review and synthesize the existing body of scientific knowledge on the candidate genes and their respective single nucleotide polymorphisms associated with metastasis-related outcomes among patients diagnosed with breast cancer. This knowledge is critical to inform future hypothesis-driven and validation research aimed at enhancing clinical decision-making for breast cancer patients.

METHODS

Using PRISMA guidelines, literature searches were conducted on September 13th, 2023, using PubMed and Embase databases. The systematic review protocol was registered with INPLASY (DOI: https://doi.org/10.37766/inplasy2024.8.0014 ). Covidence software was used to facilitate the screening and article extraction processes. Peer-reviewed articles were selected if authors reported on single nucleotide polymorphisms directly associated with metastasis among adults diagnosed with breast cancer.

FINDINGS

We identified 451 articles after 44 duplicates were removed resulting in 407 articles to be screened for study inclusion. Three reviewers completed the article screening process which resulted in 86 articles meeting the study inclusion criteria. Sampling varied across studies with the majority utilizing a case-control design (n = 75, 87.2%), with sample sizes ranging from 23 to 1,017 participants having mean age 50.65 ± 4.50 (min-max: 20-75). The synthesis of this internationally generated evidence revealed that the scientific area on the underlying biological contributions to breast cancer metastasis remains predominantly exploratory in nature (n = 74, 86%). Of the 12 studies with reported power analyses, only 9 explicitly stated the power values which ranged from 47.88 to 99%.

DISCUSSION

Understanding the underlying biological mechanisms contributing to metastasis is a critical component for precision oncological therapeutics and treatment approaches. Current evidence investigating the contribution of SNPs to the development of metastasis is characterized by underpowered candidate gene studies. To inform individualized precision health practices and improve breast cancer survival outcomes, future hypothesis-driven research is needed to replicate these associations in larger, more diverse datasets.

DNA methylation profile of inflammatory breast cancer and its impact on prognosis and outcome

BACKGROUND

Inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) is a rare disease characterized by rapid progression, early metastasis, and a high mortality rate.

METHODS

Genome-wide DNA methylation analysis (EPIC BeadChip platform, Illumina) and somatic gene variants (105 cancer-related genes) were performed in 24 IBCs selected from a cohort of 140 cases.

RESULTS

We identified 46,908 DMPs (differentially methylated positions) (66% hypomethylated); CpG islands were predominantly hypermethylated (39.9%). Unsupervised clustering analysis revealed three clusters of DMPs characterized by an enrichment of specific gene mutations and hormone receptor status. The comparison among DNA methylation findings and external datasets (TCGA-BRCA stages III-IV) resulted in 385 shared DMPs mapped in 333 genes (264 hypermethylated). 151 DMPs were associated with 110 genes previously detected as differentially expressed in IBC (GSE45581), and 68 DMPs were negatively correlated with gene expression. We also identified 4369 DMRs (differentially methylated regions) mapped on known genes (2392 hypomethylated). BCAT1, CXCL12, and TBX15 loci were selected and evaluated by bisulfite pyrosequencing in 31 IBC samples. BCAT1 and TBX15 had higher methylation levels in triple-negative compared to non-triple-negative, while CXCL12 had lower methylation levels in triple-negative than non-triple-negative IBC cases. TBX15 methylation level was associated with obesity.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings revealed a heterogeneous DNA methylation profile with potentially functional DMPs and DMRs. The DNA methylation data provided valuable insights for prognostic stratification and therapy selection to improve patient outcomes.

New Emerging Chemokine Receptors: CCR5 or CXCR5 on Tumor Is Associated with Poor Response to Chemotherapy and Poor Prognosis in Locally Advanced Triple-Negative Breast Cancer

BACKGROUND

We aim to investigate any possible associations between chemokine receptor expression and responses to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) along with outcomes in patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) with locally advanced disease.

METHOD

Expressions of chemokine receptors were examined immunohistochemically after staining archival tissue of surgical specimens (n = 63) using specific antibodies for CCR5, CCR7, CXCR4, and CXCR5.

RESULTS

Patients with high CCR5, CCR7, CXCR4, and CXCR5 expression on tumors and high CXCR4 expression on tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) were less likely to have a pathological complete response (pCR) or Class 0-I RCB-Index compared to others. Patients with residual lymph node metastases (ypN-positive), high CCR5TM(tumor), and high CXCR4TM expressions had an increased hazard ratio (HR) compared to others (DFS: HR = 2.655 [1.029-6.852]; DSS: HR = 2.763 [1.008-7.574]), (DFS: HR = 2.036 [0.805-5.148]; DSS: HR = 2.689 [1.020-7.090]), and (DFS: HR = 2.908 [1.080-7.829]; DSS: HR = 2.132 (0.778-5.846)), respectively. However, patients without CXCR5TIL expression had an increased HR compared to those with CXCR5TIL (DFS: 2.838 [1.266-6.362]; DSS: 4.211 [1.770-10.016]).

CONCLUSIONS

High expression of CXCR4TM and CCR5TM was found to be associated with poor prognosis, and CXCR5TM was associated with poor chemotherapy response in the present cohort with locally advanced TNBC. Our results suggest that patients with TNBC could benefit from a chemokine receptor inhibitor therapy containing neoadjuvant chemotherapy protocols.

Expression and clinical value of CXCR4 in high grade gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms

Background

CXC chemokine receptor 4 (CXCR4) is associated with the progression and metastasis of numerous malignant tumors. However, its relationship with Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms Grade 3 (GEP-NENs G3) is unclear. The aim of this study was to characterize the expression of CXCR4 in GEP-NENS and to explore the clinical and prognostic value of CXCR4.

Methods

This study retrospectively collected clinical and pathological data from patients with GEP-NENs who receiving surgery in Qilu Hospital of Shandong University from January 2013 to April 2021, and obtained the overall survival of the patients based on follow-up. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) was performed on pathological paraffin sections to observe CXCR4 staining. Groups were made according to pathological findings. Kaplan-Meier (K-M) curve was used to evaluate prognosis. SPSS 26.0 was used for statistical analysis.

Results

100 GEP-NENs G3 patients were enrolled in this study. There was a significant difference in primary sites (P=0.002), Ki-67 index (P<0.001), and Carcinoembryonic Antigen (CEA) elevation (P=0.008) between neuroendocrine tumor (NET) G3 and neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC). CXCR4 was highly expressed only in tumors, low or no expressed in adjacent tissues (P<0.001). The expression level of CXCR4 in NEC was significantly higher than that in NET G3 (P=0.038). The K-M curves showed that there was no significant difference in overall survival between patients with high CXCR4 expression and patients with low CXCR4 expression, either in GEP-NEN G3 or NEC (P=0.920, P=0.842. respectively).

Conclusion

Differential expression of CXCR4 was found between tumor and adjacent tissues and between NET G3 and NEC. Our results demonstrated that CXCR4 can be served as a new IHC diagnostic indicator in the diagnosis and differential diagnosis of GEP-NENs G3. Further studies with multi-center, large sample size and longer follow-up are needed to confirm the correlation between CXCR4 expression level and prognosis.

Allelic variants and immunostaining profile in CXCL12/CXCR4 axis: An investigation of association with prognosis in prostate cancer

Prostate cancer (PCa) is the malignant neoplasm that most commonly affects men and is an important cause of death. It can be detected by changes in serum levels of Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) and digital rectal examination, but often symptoms do not appear until advanced stages and metastases. The C-X-C Motif Chemokine Ligand 12/C-X-C Motif Chemokine Receptor 4 (CXCL12/CXCR4) axis acts in cell migration and may be involved in the metastatic process. In this context, the aim of this study was to evaluate the allelic variants rs1801157 (CXCL12) and rs2228014 (CXCR4) and the immunostaining of CXCR4 protein as candidates for prognostic markers in PCa. Samples (n = 60) were divided according to prognostic parameters (with and without metastasis at diagnosis) in tree groups: better prognosis, worse prognosis with metastasis at diagnosis and worse prognosis without metastasis at diagnosis, and immunostaining was evaluated by indirect immunohistochemistry, considering tumoral and adjacent tissues from the same patient (n = 120). A significant association was found between the C allele of rs2228014 (CXCR4) and the extraprostatic extension. For CXCR4 immunostaining a weak labeling and a cytoplasmic localization predominated, as well as a significant difference between malignant versus adjacent tissue, with higher protein expression in the malignant tissue. A significant association was found between CXCR4 tumor immunostaining with TNM staging (T2b-T2c) and PSA level (> 20 ng/mL). None of the allelic variants affected CXCR4 immunostaining. Prognostic groups did not differ in allelic variant frequency or immunostaining profile. Findings suggest that CXCR4 receptor may be one of the ways to worsen the prognosis of prostatic cancer.

Tissue immunostaining of candidate prognostic proteins in metastatic and non-metastatic prostate cancer

PURPOSE

Prostate cancer (PCa) lacks specific markers capable of distinguishing aggressive tumors from those with indolent behavior. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the immunostaining of candidate proteins (PTEN, AKT, TRPM8, and NKX3.1) through the immunohistochemistry technique (IHC) on patients with metastatic and non-metastatic PCa.

METHODS

Tissues from 60 patients were divided into three groups categorized according to prognostic parameters: better prognosis (n = 20), worse prognosis (n = 23), and metastatic (n = 17). Immunostaining was analyzed by a pathologist and staining classifications were considered according to signal intensity: (0) no staining, (+) weak, and (++ and +++) intermediate to strong.

RESULTS

AKT protein was associated (p = 0.012) and correlated (p = 0.014; Tau = - 0.288) with the prognostic groups. The immunostaining for TRPM8 (p = 0.010) and NKX3.1 (p = 0.003) proteins differed between malignant tumor and non-tumoral adjacent tissue as well as for proteins in cellular locations (nucleus and cytoplasm). TRPM8 was independently associated with the ISUP grade ≥ 4 (p = 0.024; OR = 8.373; 95% CI = 1.319-53.164). The NKX3.1 showed positive and predominantly strong immunostaining in all patients in both tumoral and non-tumoral adjacent tissues. All metastatic samples had positive immunostaining, with strong intensity for NKX3.1 (p = 0.021; Tau = - 0.302). In the non-metastatic group, this strong protein staining was not observed in any patients.

CONCLUSION

This study confirmed that NKX3.1 is highly specific for prostate tissue and indicated that NKX3.1, AKT, and TRPM8 may be candidate markers for prostate cancer prognosis.

Epigenetic regulation of CXCR4 signaling in cancer pathogenesis and progression

Signaling involving chemokine receptor CXCR4 and its ligand SDF-1/CXL12 has been investigated for many years for its possible role in cancer progression and pathogenesis. Evidence emerging from clinical studies in recent years has further established diagnostic as well as prognostic importance of CXCR4 signaling. CXCR4 and SDF-1 are routinely reported to be elevated in tumors, distant metastases, which correlates with poor survival of patients. These findings have kindled interest in the mechanisms that regulate CXCR4/SDF-1 expression. Of note, there is a particular interest in the epigenetic regulation of CXCR4 signaling that may be responsible for upregulated CXCR4 in primary as well as metastatic cancers. This review first lists the clinical evidence supporting CXCR4 signaling as putative cancer diagnostic and/or prognostic biomarker, followed by a discussion on reported epigenetic mechanisms that affect CXCR4 expression. These mechanisms include regulation by non-coding RNAs, such as, microRNAs, long non-coding RNAs and circular RNAs. Additionally, we also discuss the regulation of CXCR4 expression through methylation and acetylation. Better understanding and appreciation of epigenetic regulation of CXCR4 signaling can invariably lead to identification of novel therapeutic targets as well as therapies to regulate this oncogenic signaling.

CXCL12/CXCR4 axis gene variants contribute to an increased vulnerability to HPV infection and cervical oncogenesis

PURPOSE

Every year, more than half a million women are diagnosed with cervical cancer (CC). Individual factors may contribute to the cervical cancer development, such as immunogenetic variation. CXCL12/CXCR4 axis is involved in tumor progression and aggressiveness. In the present study, we aimed to investigate a possible association between two single-nucleotide variants (CXCL12 rs1801157 and CXCR4 rs2228014) with HPV infection and cervical cancer development.

METHODS

PCR technique was used to test HPV positivity in 424 women, in which the allelic frequency of CXCL12 rs1801157 and CXCR4 rs2228014 was also assessed by PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism.

RESULTS

CXCL12 rs1801157 was associated with HPV infection in the allelic distribution as well in the codominant, dominant and recessive genetic models; as well with squamous intraepithelial lesions (SIL) and CC in the codominant and dominant models. CXCR4 rs2228014 was associated to HPV infection in the codominant model and allelic distribution; as well with SIL/CC in the codominant, dominant and allelic models. Independent associations were found for CXCL12 AA genotype and HPV infection, SIL and CC development, as well as, CXCR4 allele T and HPV infection and CC. The variants interaction analysis demonstrated that the presence of both polymorphisms increases the susceptibility of HPV infection in 10.1 times, SIL (2 times) and CC development in 4.2 times.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first study demonstrating that the interaction of CXCL12 and CXCR4 variants contributes to the increased susceptibility of HPV infection, squamous intraepithelial lesions and cervical cancer development.

The Role of the CXCL12/CXCR4/CXCR7 Chemokine Axis in Cancer

Chemokines are a family of small, secreted cytokines which regulate a variety of cell functions. The C-X-C motif chemokine ligand 12 (CXCL12) binds to C-X-C chemokine receptor type 4 (CXCR4) and C-X-C chemokine receptor type 7 (CXCR7). The interaction of CXCL12 and its receptors subsequently induces downstream signaling pathways with broad effects on chemotaxis, cell proliferation, migration, and gene expression. Accumulating evidence suggests that the CXCL12/CXCR4/CXCR7 axis plays a pivotal role in tumor development, survival, angiogenesis, metastasis, and tumor microenvironment. In addition, this chemokine axis promotes chemoresistance in cancer therapy via complex crosstalk with other pathways. Multiple small molecules targeting CXCR4/CXCR7 have been developed and used for preclinical and clinical cancer treatment. In this review, we describe the roles of the CXCL12/CXCR4/CXCR7 axis in cancer progression and summarize strategies to develop novel targeted cancer therapies.

Novel role of BRCA1 interacting C-terminal helicase 1 (BRIP1) in breast tumour cell invasion

Breast cancer (BC) is the most common malignancy and the leading cause of death in women worldwide. Only 5%‐10% of mutations in BRCA genes are associated with familial breast tumours in Eastern countries, suggesting the contribution of other genes. Using a microarray gene expression profiling study of BC, we have recently identified BRIP1 (fivefold up‐regulation) as a potential gene associated with BC progression in the Omani population. Although BRIP1 regulates DNA repair and cell proliferation, the precise role of BRIP1 in BC cell invasion/metastasis has not been explored yet; this prompted us to test the hypothesis that BRIP1 promotes BC cell proliferation and invasion. Using a combination of cellular and molecular approaches, our results revealed differential overexpression of BRIP1 in different BC cell lines. Functional assays validated further the physiological relevance of BRIP1 in tumour malignancy, and siRNA‐mediated BRIP1 knockdown significantly reduced BC cell motility by targeting key motility‐associated genes. Moreover, down‐regulation of BRIP1 expression significantly attenuated cell proliferation via cell cycle arrest. Our study is the first to show the novel function of BRIP1 in promoting BC cell invasion by regulating expression of various downstream target genes. Furthermore, these findings provide us with a unique opportunity to identify BRIP1‐induced pro‐invasive genes that could serve as biomarkers and/or targets to guide the design of appropriate BC targeted therapies.

CXCL12/CXCR4 axis in the microenvironment of solid tumors: A critical mediator of metastasis

Tumors are dynamic tissue masses, so requiring continuous exposure to the host cells, nurturing them into pave a path for tumor growth and metastasis. C-X-C chemokine ligand 12 (CXCL12)/C-X-C chemokine receptor type 4 (CXCR4) is the key signaling for such aim. Gathering knowledge about the activity within this axis would deepen our insight into the utmost importance this signaling taken to attract and cross-connect multiple cells within the tumor microenvironment (TME) aiming for tumor progression and metastasis. The concept behind this review is to underscore the multi-tasking roles taken by CXCL12/CXCR4 signaling in tumor metastasis, and to also suggest some strategies to target the activities within this axis.

Saikosaponin A Inhibits Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Growth and Metastasis Through Downregulation of CXCR4

Purpose: Due to a lack of recognized molecular targets for therapy, patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), unlike other subtypes of breast cancers, generally have not benefited from the advances made with targeted agents. The CXCR4/SDF-1 axis is involved in tumor growth and metastasis of TNBC. Therefore, down-regulation of the expression of CXCR4 in cancer cells is a potential therapeutic strategy for inhibiting primary tumor growth and metastasis of TNBC. In order to identify bioactive compounds that inhibit the expression of CXCR4 in traditional Chinese medicines, we investigated the capacity of saikosaponin A (SSA), one of the active ingredients isolated from Radix bupleuri, to affect CXCR4 expression and function in TNBC cells. Methods: Analyses of cell growth, migration, invasion, and protein expression were performed. Knockdowns by small interfering RNA (siRNA) and non-invasive bioluminescence were also used. Results: SSA reduced proliferation and colony formation of SUM149 and MDA-MB-231 cells. SSA inhibited migration and invasion of TNBC cells. For mice, SSA inhibited primary tumor growth and reduced lung metastasis of highly metastatic, triple-negative 4T1-luc cells. SSA inhibited CXCR4 expression but did not regulate CXCR7 expression in vitro and in vivo. The inhibitory effects on the migration and invasion of TNBC cells were reversed by down-regulation of CXCR4 expression. In addition, SSA inactivated the Akt/mTOR signaling pathway and inhibited MMP-9 and MMP-2 expression. Conclusions: The results show that SSA exerts an anti-TNBC effect through the inhibition of CXCR4 expression and thus has the potential to be a candidate therapeutic agent for TNBC patients.

CXCL12-CXCL4 heterodimerization prevents CXCL12-driven breast cancer cell migration

Despite improvements in cancer early detection and treatment, metastatic breast cancer remains deadly. Current therapeutic approaches have very limited efficacy in patients with triple negative breast cancer. Among the many mechanisms associated that contribute to cancer progression, signaling through the CXCL12-CXCR4 is an essential step in cancer cell migration. We previously demonstrated the formation of CXCL12-CXCL4 heterodimers (Carlson et al., 2013). Here, we investigated whether CXCL12-CXCL4 heterodimers alter tumor cell migration. CXCL12 alone dose-dependently promoted the MDA-MB 231 cell migration (p < .05), which could be prevented by blocking the CXCR4 receptor. The addition of CXCL4 inhibited the CXCL12-induced cell migration (p < .05). Using NMR spectroscopy, we identified the CXCL4-CXCL12 binding interface. Moreover, we generated a CXCL4-derived peptide homolog of the binding interface that mimicked the activity of native CXCL4 protein. These results confirm the formation of CXCL12-CXCL4 heterodimers and their inhibitory effects on the migration of breast tumors cells. These findings suggest that specific peptides mimicking heterodimerization of CXCL12 might prevent breast cancer cell migration.

High Cytoplasmic CXCR4 Expression Predicts Prolonged Survival in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Patients Treated with Adjuvant Chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

Chemokine receptor CXC chemokine receptor type 4 (CXCR4) and its ligand CXC motif chemokine 12 (CXCL12; stromal cell-derived factor-1) are implicated in tumor growth, metastasis, and tumor cell-microenvironment interaction. A number of studies have reported that increased CXCR4 expression is associated with worse prognosis in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), but its prognostic significance has not been studied in TNBC patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy.

METHODS

Two hundred eighty-three TNBC patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy were retrospectively analyzed. Tissue microarray was constructed from formalinfixed, paraffin-embedded tumor tissue and immunohistochemistry for CXCR4 and CXCL12 was performed. Expression of each marker was compared with clinicopathologic characteristics and outcome.

RESULTS

High cytoplasmic CXCR4 expression was associated with younger age (p = .008), higher histologic grade (p = .007) and lower pathologic stage (p = .045), while high CXCL12 expression was related to larger tumor size (p = .045), positive lymph node metastasis (p = .005), and higher pathologic stage (p = .017). The patients with high cytoplasmic CXCR4 experienced lower distant recurrence (p = .006) and better recurrence-free survival (RFS) (log-rank p = .020) after adjuvant chemotherapy. Cytoplasmic CXCR4 expression remained an independent factor of distant recurrence (p = .019) and RFS (p = .038) after multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

High cytoplasmic CXCR4 expression was associated with lower distant recurrence and better RFS in TNBC patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy. This is the first study to correlate high CXCR4 expression to better TNBC prognosis, and the underlying mechanism needs to be elucidated in further studies.