Recurrent glioblastomas in the elderly after maximal first-line treatment: does preserved overall condition warrant a maximal second-line treatment?

Repeat resection for recurrent glioblastoma in the temozolomide era: a real-world multi-centre study

INTRODUCTION

In contrast to standard-of-care treatment of newly diagnosed glioblastoma, there is limited consensus on therapy upon disease progression. The role of resection for recurrent glioblastoma remains unclear. This study aimed to identify factors for overall survival (OS) and post-progression survival (PPS) as well as to validate an existing prediction model.

METHODS

This was a multi-centre retrospective study that reviewed consecutive adult patients from 2006 to 2019 that received a repeat resection for recurrent glioblastoma. The primary endpoint was PPS defined as from the date of second surgery until death.

RESULTS

1032 glioblastoma patients were identified and 190 (18%) underwent resection for recurrence. Patients that had second surgery were more likely to be younger (<70 years) (adjusted OR: 0.3; 95% CI: 0.1-0.6), to have non-eloquent region tumours (aOR: 1.7; 95% CI: 1.1-2.6) and received temozolomide chemoradiotherapy (aOR: 0.2; 95% CI: 0.1-0.4). Resection for recurrent tumour was an independent predictor for OS (aOR: 1.5; 95% CI: 1.3-1.7) (mOS: 16.9 months versus 9.8 months). For patients that previously received temozolomide chemoradiotherapy and subsequent repeat resection (137, 13%), the median PPS was 9.0 months (IQR: 5.0-17.5). Independent PPS predictors for this group were a recurrent tumour volume of >50cc (aOR: 0.6; 95% CI: 0.4-0.9), local recurrence (aOR: 1.7; 95% CI: 1.1-3.3) and 5-ALA fluorescence-guided resection during second surgery (aOR: 1.7; 95% CI: 1.1-2.8). A National Institutes of Health Recurrent Glioblastoma Multiforme Scale score of 0 conferred an mPPS of 10.0 months, a score of 1-2, 9.0 months and a score of 3, 4.0 months (log-rank test, p-value < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Surgery for recurrent glioblastoma can be beneficial in selected patients and carries an acceptable morbidity rate. The pattern of recurrence influenced PPS and the NIH Recurrent GBM Scale was a reliable prognostication tool.

Exploring management and outcomes of elderly patients with glioblastoma using data from two randomised trials (GEINO1401/EX-TEM)

PURPOSE

The impact of age on optimal management of glioblastoma remains unclear. A recent combined analysis of two randomised trials, GEINO14-01 and EX-TEM, found no benefit from extending post-radiation temozolomide in newly diagnosed glioblastoma. Here, we explore the impact of age.

METHODS

Relevant intergroup statistics were used to identify differences in tumour, treatment and outcome characteristics based on age with elderly patients (EP) defined as age 65 years and over. Survival was estimated using the Kaplan Meier method.

RESULTS

Of the combined 205 patients, 57 (28%) were EP. Of these, 95% were ECOG 0-1 and 65% underwent macroscopic resection compared with 97% and 61% of younger patients (YP) respectively. There were numerically less MGMT-methylated (56% vs. 63%, p = 0.4) and IDH-mutated (4% vs. 13%, p = 0.1) tumours in EP vs. YP. Following surgery, EP were more likely to receive short course chemoradiation (17.5% vs. 6%, p = 0.017). At recurrence, EP tended to receive or best supportive care (28.3% vs. 15.4%, p = 0.09) or non-surgical options (96.2% vs. 84.6%, p = 0.06), but were less likely to receive bevacizumab (23.1% vs. 49.5%, p < 0.01). Median PFS was similar at 9.3months in EP and 8.5months in YP, with similar median OS at 20months.

CONCLUSION

In this trial population of predominantly fit EP, survival was similar to YP despite a proportion receiving less aggressive therapy at diagnosis and recurrence. Advancing age does not appear to be an adverse prognostic factor for glioblastoma when patients are fit for treatment, and a less aggressive approach in selected patients may not compromise outcomes.

Management of glioblastoma in elderly patients: A review of the literature

High grade gliomas are the most common primary aggressive brain tumours with a very poor prognosis and a median survival of less than 2 years. The standard management protocol of newly diagnosed glioblastoma patients involves surgery followed by radiotherapy, chemotherapy in the form of temozolomide and further adjuvant temozolomide. The recent advances in molecular profiling of high-grade gliomas have further enhanced our understanding of the disease. Although the management of glioblastoma is standardised in newly diagnosed adult patients there is a lot of debate regarding the best treatment approach for the newly diagnosed elderly glioblastoma patients. In this review article we attempt to summarise the findings regarding surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and their combination in order to offer the best possible management modality for this group of patients. Elderly patients 65-70 with an excellent functional level could be considered as candidates for the standards treatment consisting of surgery, standard radiotherapy with concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide. Similarly, elderly patients above 70 with good functional status could receive the above with the exception of receiving a shorter course of radiotherapy instead of standard. In elderly GBM patients with poorer functional status and MGMT promoter methylation temozolomide chemotherapy can be considered. For elderly patients who cannot tolerate chemotherapy, hypofractionated radiotherapy is an option. In contrast to the younger adult patients, it seems that a careful individualised approach is a key element in deciding the best treatment options for this group of patients.

Treatment Outcomes after Dose-Escalated Moderately Hypofractionated Radiotherapy for Frail Patients with High-Grade Glioma

For high-grade glioma (HGG) patients with old age or poor performance status, hypofractionated radiotherapy (hypoRT) in 10-15 fractions is recommended. Also, limited data exist on the impact of salvage treatment after progression in frail patients. We retrospectively analyzed the outcomes of dose-escalated hypoRT in 40 frail HGG patients who were treated with hypoRT between 2013 and 2021. With a median biologically effective dose of 71.7 Gy, a total dose of 56 Gy in 20 fractions was the most frequently used regimen (53.7%). The median age and Karnofsky Performance Status of patients were 74 years and 70, respectively. Most patients (n = 31, 77.5%) were diagnosed with glioblastoma, IDH-wildtype, CNS WHO grade 4. Only 10 (25.0%) patients underwent surgical resection, and 28 (70.0%) patients received concurrent temozolomide during hypoRT. With a median follow-up of 9.7 months, the median overall survival (OS) was 12.2 months. Of the 30 (75.0%) patients with disease progression, only 12 patients received salvage treatment. The OS after progression differed significantly depending on salvage treatment (median OS, 9.6 vs. 4.6 months, p = 0.032). Dose-escalated hypoRT in 20 fractions produced survival outcomes outperforming historical data for frail patients.

Should Redo Surgery be Offered to Patients with Relapsed Glioblastoma? - Outcome Analyses of a Single Institution Comparative Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is the predominant malignant brain tumor originating intracranially. The established first-line treatment postsurgery is concurrent chemoradiation as a definitive measure. However, recurrent GBM's pose a challenge for clinicians who rely on institutional experience to determine the most suitable course of action. Second-line chemotherapy may be administered with or without surgery depending on the institution's practice. This study aims to present our tertiary center institution's experience with recurrent GBM patients who underwent redo surgery.

METHODS

In this retrospective study we analyzed the surgical and oncological data of patients with recurrent GBM who underwent redo surgery at the Royal Stoke University Hospitals between 2006 and 2015. The group 1 (G1) comprised the reviewed patients, while a control group (G2) was randomly selected, matching the reviewed group by age, primary treatment, and progression-free survival (PFS). The study collected data on various parameters, including overall survival, PFS, extent of surgical resection, and postoperative complications.

RESULTS

This retrospective study included 30 patients in G1 and 32 patients in G2, matched based on age, primary treatment, and PFS. The study found that the overall survival for the G1 group from the time of first diagnosis was 109 weeks (45-180) compared to 57 weeks (28-127) in the G2 group. The incidence of postoperative complications after the second surgery was 57%, which included hemorrhage, infarction, worsening neurology due to edema, cerebrospinal fluid leak, and wound infection. Furthermore, 50% of the patients in the G1 group who underwent redo surgery received second-line chemotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study found that redo surgery for recurrent GBM is a viable treatment option for a select group of patients with good performance status, longer PFS from primary treatment, and compressive symptoms. However, the use of redo surgery varies depending on the institution. A well-designed randomized controlled trial in this population would help establish the standard of surgical care.

Carmustine wafer implantation for supratentorial glioblastomas, IDH-wildtype in "extreme" neurosurgical conditions

We assessed the feasibility of Carmustine wafer implantation in "extreme" conditions (i.e. patients > 80 years and Karnofsky Performance Status score < 50) and of implantation ≥ 12 Carmustine wafers in adult patients harbouring a newly diagnosed supratentorial glioblastoma, IDH-wildtype. We performed an observational, retrospective single-centre cohort study at a tertiary surgical neuro-oncological centre between January 2006 and December 2021. Four hundred eighty patients who benefited from a surgical resection at first-line treatment were included. We showed that Carmustine wafer implantation in patients > 80 years, in patients with a Karnofsky performance status score < 50, and that implantation ≥ 12 Carmustine wafers (1) did not increase overall postoperative complication rates, (2) did not affect the completion of standard radiochemotherapy protocol, (3) did not worsen the postoperative Karnofsky Performance Status scores, and (4) did not significantly affect the time to oncological treatment. We showed that the implantation of ≥ 12 Carmustine wafers improved progression-free survival (31.0 versus 10.0 months, p = 0.025) and overall survival (39.0 versus 16.5 months, p = 0.041) without increasing postoperative complication rates. Carmustine wafer implantation during the surgical resection of a newly diagnosed supratentorial glioblastoma, IDH-wildtype is safe and efficient in patients > 80 years and in patients with preoperative Karnofsky Performance Status score < 50. The number of Carmustine wafers should be adapted (up to 16 in our experience) to the resection cavity to improve survival without increasing postoperative overall complication rates.

Effects of Reoperation Timing on Survival among Recurrent Glioblastoma Patients: A Retrospective Multicentric Descriptive Study

Glioblastoma inevitably recurs, but no standard regimen has been established for treating this recurrent disease. Several reports claim that reoperative surgery can improve survival, but the effects of reoperation timing on survival have rarely been investigated. We, therefore, evaluated the relationship between reoperation timing and survival in recurrent GBM. A consecutive cohort of unselected patients (real-world data) from three neuro-oncology cancer centers was analyzed (a total of 109 patients). All patients underwent initial maximal safe resection followed by treatment according to the Stupp protocol. Those meeting the following criteria during progression were indicated for reoperation and were further analyzed in this study: (1) The tumor volume increased by >20-30% or a tumor was rediscovered after radiological disappearance; (2) The patient's clinical status was satisfactory (KS ≥ 70% and PS WHO ≤ gr. 2); (3) The tumor was localized without multifocality; (4) The minimum expected tumor volume reduction was above 80%. A univariate Cox regression analysis of postsurgical survival (PSS) revealed a statistically significant effect of reoperation on PSS from a threshold of 16 months after the first surgery. Cox regression models that stratified the Karnofsky score with age adjustment confirmed a statistically significant improvement in PSS for time-to-progression (TTP) thresholds of 22 and 24 months. The patient groups exhibiting the first recurrence at 22 and 24 months had better survival rates than those exhibiting earlier recurrences. For the 22-month group, the HR was 0.5 with a 95% CI of (0.27, 0.96) and a p-value of 0.036. For the 24-month group, the HR was 0.5 with a 95% CI of (0.25, 0.96) and a p-value of 0.039. Patients with the longest survival were also the best candidates for repeated surgery. Later recurrence of glioblastoma was associated with higher survival rates after reoperation.

Surgical management of Glioma Grade 4: technical update from the neuro-oncology section of the Italian Society of Neurosurgery (SINch®): a systematic review

PURPOSE

The extent of resection (EOR) is an independent prognostic factor for overall survival (OS) in adult patients with Glioma Grade 4 (GG4). The aim of the neuro-oncology section of the Italian Society of Neurosurgery (SINch®) was to provide a general overview of the current trends and technical tools to reach this goal.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed. The results were divided and ordered, by an expert team of surgeons, to assess the Class of Evidence (CE) and Strength of Recommendation (SR) of perioperative drugs management, imaging, surgery, intraoperative imaging, estimation of EOR, surgery at tumor progression and surgery in elderly patients.

RESULTS

A total of 352 studies were identified, including 299 retrospective studies and 53 reviews/meta-analysis. The use of Dexamethasone and the avoidance of prophylaxis with anti-seizure medications reached a CE I and SR A. A preoperative imaging standard protocol was defined with CE II and SR B and usefulness of an early postoperative MRI, with CE II and SR B. The EOR was defined the strongest independent risk factor for both OS and tumor recurrence with CE II and SR B. For intraoperative imaging only the use of 5-ALA reached a CE II and SR B. The estimation of EOR was established to be fundamental in planning postoperative adjuvant treatments with CE II and SR B and the stereotactic image-guided brain biopsy to be the procedure of choice when an extensive surgical resection is not feasible (CE II and SR B).

CONCLUSIONS

A growing number of evidences evidence support the role of maximal safe resection as primary OS predictor in GG4 patients. The ongoing development of intraoperative techniques for a precise real-time identification of peritumoral functional pathways enables surgeons to maximize EOR minimizing the post-operative morbidity.

Is surgical resection predict overall survival in frail patients with glioblastoma, IDH-wildtype?

PURPOSE

We assessed the impact of frailty on surgical outcomes, survival, and functional dependency in elderly patients harboring a glioblastoma, isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH)-wildtype.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed records of old and frail patients surgical treated at a single neurosurgical institution between January 2018 to May 2021. Inclusion criteria were: (1) neuropathological diagnosis of glioblastoma, IDH-wildtype; (2) patient≥65years at the time of surgery; (3) available data to assess the frailty index according to the 5-modified Frailty Index (5-mFI).

RESULTS

A total of 47 patients were included. The 5-mFI was at 0 in 11 cases (23.4%), at 1 in 30 cases (63.8%), at 2 in two cases (4.2%), at 3 in two cases (4.2%), and at 4 in two cases (4.2%). A gross total resection was performed in 26 patients (55.3%), a subtotal resection was performed in 13 patients (27.6%), and a biopsy was performed in 8 patients (17.1%). The rate of 30-day postoperative complications was higher in the biopsy subgroup and in the 5-mFI=4 subgroup. Gross total resection and age≤70years were independent predictors of a longer overall survival. Sex, 5-mFI, postoperative complications, and preoperative Karnofsky Performance Status score did not influence overall survival and functional dependency.

CONCLUSION

In patients≥65years harboring a glioblastoma, IDH-wildtype, gross total resection remains an independent predictor of longer survival and good postoperative functional recovery. The frailty, assessed by the 5-mFI score, does not influence surgery and outcomes in this dataset. Further confirmatory analyses are required.

Updates in the Management of Recurrent Glioblastoma Multiforme

BACKGROUND

 Glioblastoma is the most aggressive and diffusely infiltrative primary brain tumor. Recurrence is almost universal even after all primary standard treatments. This article aims to review the literature and update the standard treatment strategies for patients with recurrent glioblastoma.

METHODS

 A systematic search was performed with the phrase "recurrent glioblastoma and management" as a search term in PubMed central, Medline, and Embase databases to identify all the articles published on the subject till December 2020. The review included peer-reviewed original articles, clinical trials, review articles, and keywords in title and abstract.

RESULTS

 Out of 513 articles searched, 73 were included in this review after screening for eligibility. On analyzing the data, most of the studies report a median overall survival (OS) of 5.9 to 11.4 months after re-surgery and 4.7 to 7.6 months without re-surgery. Re-irradiation with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (FSRT) result in a median OS of 10.2 months (range: 7.0-12 months) and 9.8 months (ranged: 7.5-11.0 months), respectively. Radiation necrosis was found in 16.6% (range: 0-24.4%) after SRS. Chemotherapeutic agents like nitrosourea (carmustine), bevacizumab, and temozolomide (TMZ) rechallenge result in a median OS in the range of 5.1 to 7.5, 6.5 to 9.2, and 5.1-13.0 months and six months progression free survival (PFS-6) in the range of 13 to 17.5%, 25 to 42.6%, and 23 to 58.3%, respectively. Use of epithelial growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitors results in a median OS in the range of 2.0 to 3.0 months and PFS-6 in 13%.

CONCLUSION

 Although recurrent glioblastoma remains a fatal disease with universal mortality, the literature suggests that a subset of patients may benefit from maximal treatment efforts.

Recurrent glioblastoma in elderly: Options and decision for the treatment

Background:

Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common primary malignant brain tumor in adult. Its incidence increases with age and nearly half of the all newly diagnosed GBM cases are older than 65 years. Management of GBM in elderly is challenging and recurrence poses further challenge. This article aims to review the literature, evaluate the various options, and to decide the treatment plan in elderly cases with GBM recurrence.

Methods:

A systemic search was performed with the phrase “recurrent GBM (rGBM) in elderly and management” as a search term in PubMed central, Medline, and Embase databases to identify all the articles published on the subject till February 2022. The review included peer-reviewed original articles, review articles, clinical trials, and keywords in title and abstract.

Results:

Out of 473 articles searched, 15 studies followed our inclusion criteria and were included in this review. In 15 studies, ten were original and five were review articles. The minimum age group included in these studies was ≥65 years. Out of 15 studies, eight studies had described the role of resurgery, four chemotherapy, three resurgery and/or chemotherapy, and only one study on role of reradiotherapy in patients with rGBM. Out of eight studies described the role of resurgery, six have mentioned improved survival and two have no survival advantage of resurgery in cases of rGBM.

Conclusion:

Resurgery is the main treatment option in selected elderly rGBM cases in good performance status. In patients with poor performance status, chemotherapy has better post progression survival than best supportive care.

Impacts of genotypic variants on survival following reoperation for recurrent glioblastoma

INTRODUCTION

Recurrent glioblastoma (rGBM) prognosis is dismal. In the absence of effective adjuvant treatments for rGBM, re-resections remain prominent in our arsenal. This study evaluates the impact of reoperation on post-progression survival (PPS) considering rGBM genetic makeup.

METHODS

To assess the genetic heterogeneity and treatment-related changes (TRC) roles in re-operated or medically managed rGBMs, we compiled demographic, clinical, histopathological, and next-generation genetic sequencing (NGS) characteristics of these tumors from 01/2005 to 10/2019. Survival data and reoperation were analyzed using conventional and random survival forest analysis (RSF).

RESULTS

Patients harboring CDKN2A/B loss (p = 0.017) and KDR mutations (p = 0.031) had notably shorter survival. Reoperation or bevacizumab were associated with longer PPS (11.2 vs. 7.4-months, p = 0.006; 13.1 vs 6.2, p < 0.001). Reoperated patients were younger, had better performance status and greater initial resection. In 136/273 (49%) rGBMs undergoing re-operation, CDKN2A/B loss (p = 0.03) and KDR mutations (p = 0.02) were associated with shorter survival. In IDH-WT rGBMs with NGS data (n = 166), reoperation resulted in 7.0-month longer survival (p = 0.004) than those managed medically. This reoperation benefit was independently identified by RSF analysis. Stratification analysis revealed that EGFR-mutant, CDKN2A/B-mutant, NF1-WT, and TP53-WT rGBM IDH-WT subgroups benefit most from reoperation (p = 0.03). Lastly, whether or not TRC was prominent at re-operation does not have any significant impact on PPS (10.5 vs. 11.5-months, p = 0.77).

CONCLUSIONS

Maximal safe re-resection significantly lengthens PPS regardless of genetic makeup, but reoperations are especially beneficial for IDH-WT rGBMs with EGFR and CDKN2A/B mutations with TP53-WT, and NF1-WT. Histopathology at recurrence may be an imperfect gauge of disease severity at progression and the imaging progression may be more reflective of the prognosis.

Re-irradiation for high-grade gliomas: Has anything changed?

Optimal management after recurrence or progression of high-grade gliomas is still undefined and remains a challenge for neuro-oncology multidisciplinary teams. Improved radiation therapy techniques, new imaging methods, published experience, and a better radiobiological knowledge of brain tissue have positioned re-irradiation (re-RT) as an option for many of these patients. Decisions must be individualized, taking into account the pattern of relapse, previous treatment, and functional status, as well as the patient’s preferences and expected quality of life. Many questions remain unanswered with respect to re-RT: Who is the most appropriate candidate, which dose and fractionation are most effective, how to define the target volume, which imaging technique is best for planning, and what is the optimal timing? This review will focus on describing the most relevant studies that include re-RT as salvage therapy, with the aim of simplifying decision-making and designing the best available therapeutic strategy.

Repeat Resection in Recurrent Glioblastoma (3rGBM) Trial: a randomized care trial

BACKGROUND

The prognosis for patients with recurrent glioblastoma (GBM) is dismal, and the question of repeat surgery at time of recurrence is common. Re-operation in the management of these patients remains controversial, as there is no randomized evidence of benefit. An all-inclusive pragmatic care trial is needed to evaluate the role of repeat resection.

METHODS

3rGBM is a multicenter, pragmatic, prospective, parallel-group randomized care trial, with 1:1 allocation to repeat resection or standard care with no repeat resection. To test the hypothesis that repeat resection can improve overall survival by at least 3 months (from 6 to 9 months), 250 adult patients with prior resection of pathology-proven glioblastoma for whom the attending surgeon believes repeat resection may improve quality survival will be enrolled. A surrogate measure of quality of life, the number of days outside of hospital/nursing/palliative care facility, will also be compared. Centers are invited to participate without financial compensation and without contracts. Clinicians may apply to local authorities to approve an investigator-led in-house trial, using a common protocol, web-based randomization platform, and simple standardized case report forms.

DISCUSSION

The 3rGBM trial is a modern transparent care research framework with no additional risks, tests, or visits other than what patients would encounter in normal care. The burden of proof remains on repeat surgical management of recurrent GBM, because this management has yet to be shown beneficial. The trial is designed to help patients and surgeons manage the uncertainty regarding optimal care.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT04838782.

Extent of resection and survival outcomes of geriatric patients with glioblastoma: Is there benefit from aggressive surgery?

OBJECTIVE

We examine the impact of age and extent of resection (EOR) on overall survival (OS) in geriatric patients with Glioblastoma (GBM).

METHODS

The SEER 18 Registries was used to identify patients aged 65 and above with GBM from 2000-2016. Patients were categorized into 4 groups based on EOR: Biopsy/Local Excision (B/LE), Subtotal Resection (STR), Gross Total Resection (GTR), and Supratotal Resection (SpTR). Primary endpoint was OS, which was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method and analyzed by the Log-rank and Wilcoxon-Breslow-Gehan test. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression model was utilized to identify factors associated with OS. Likelihood of undergoing SpTR was explored using a multivariable logistic regression model. Results are given as median [IQR] and HR [95 % CI].

RESULTS

Among 17,820 geriatric patients with GBM, median age was 73 years [68-78], 44 % were female, 91 % White, and 8% Hispanic. SpTR was performed in 2907 (16 %), GTR was performed in 2451 (14 %) patients, STR in 4879 (28 %), and B/LE in 7396 (42 %). There was a decline in the proportion of patients treated with SpTR with advancing age (65-69 years, 17 % vs 95+ years, 0%; p < 0.0001), and older age corresponded with a decrease in the odds of undergoing SpTR. In survival analysis, GTR (HR 0.61 [0.58-0.65]) and SpTR (HR 0.65 [0.62-0.68]) were associated with improved survival, even in octogenarian patients.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that aggressive surgical resection is associated with improvement in OS in geriatric patients. These results emphasize that age should not influence surgical strategy, as there is a survival benefit from maximal resection in geriatric patients.

Local treatment for relapsing glioblastoma: A decision-making tree for choosing between reirradiation and second surgery

In case of circumscribed recurrent glioblastoma (rec-GBM), a second surgery (Re-S) and reirradiation (Re-RT) are local strategies to consider. The aim is to provide an algorithm to use in the daily clinical practice. The first step is to consider the life expectancy in order to establish whether the patient should be a candidate for active treatment. In case of a relatively good life expectancy (>3 months) and a confirmed circumscribed disease(i.e. without multiple lesions that are in different lobes/hemispheres), the next step is the assessment of the prognostic factors for local treatments. Based on the existing prognostic score systems, patients who should be excluded from local treatments may be identified; based on the validated prognostic factors, one or the other local treatment may be preferred. The last point is the estimation of expected toxicity, considering patient-related, tumor-related and treatment-related factors impacting on side effects. Lastly, patients with very good prognostic factors may be considered for receiving a combined treatment.

Importance and Evidence of Extent of Resection in Glioblastoma

Maximal safe resection is an essential part of the multidisciplinary care of patients with glioblastoma. A growing body of data shows that gross total resection is an independent prognostic factor associated with improved clinical outcome. The relationship between extent of glioblastoma (GB) resection and clinical benefit depends critically on the balance between cytoreduction and avoiding neurologic morbidity. The definition of the extent of tumor resection, how this is best measured pre- and postoperatively, and its relation to volume of residual tumor is still discussed. We review the literature supporting extent of resection in GB, highlighting the importance of a standardized definition and measurement of extent of resection to allow greater collaboration in research projects and trials. Recent developments in neurosurgical techniques and technologies focused on maximizing extent of resection and safety are discussed.

Carmustine as a Supplementary Therapeutic Option for Glioblastoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most aggressive type of primary malignant brain tumor. Carmustine is used by intravenous injection or local implantation in the resection cavity for gliomas, including GBMs. However, the therapeutic potential of carmustine is not well-recognized. This analysis aimed to evaluate the survival benefits of carmustine in glioma patients, especially those with GBM. Methods: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies regarding carmustine for glioma treatment were searched in PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and Embase from January 1979 to March 2020. Quality assessment was conducted with Jadad and Newcastle-Ottawa scales (NOS). Statistical analysis was conducted by the Revman 5.3 software. Results: Twenty-two eligible RCTs and cohort studies involving 5,821 glioma patients were included. Overall, glioma patients receiving carmustine as an adjuvant therapy had better progression-free survival [PFS; hazard ratio (HR) = 0.85, 95% CI = 0.77-0.94, P = 0.002] and overall survival (OS; HR = 0.85, 95% CI = 0.79-0.92, P < 0.0001) than those without carmustine treatment. Subgroup analysis showed that the OS benefit was observed in GBM (HR = 0.84, 95% CI = 0.78-0.91, P < 0.00001) but not in anaplastic glioma patients (HR = 1.20, 95% CI = 0.70-2.07, P = 0.50). Additionally, both newly diagnosed and recurrent GBM patients who received carmustine treatment showed better OS (HR = 0.86, 95% CI = 0.79-0.95, P = 0.002; HR = 0.77, 95% CI = 0.67-0.89, P = 0.0002, respectively). Both carmustine implantation in resection cavity and intravenous administration significantly prolonged OS (HR = 0.84, 95% CI = 0.78-0.92, P < 0.0001; HR = 0.86, 95% CI = 0.75-0.99, P = 0.04, respectively). Moreover, GBM patients receiving a combined carmustine and temozolomide (TMZ) therapy had longer OS than those receiving TMZ alone (HR = 0.78, 95% CI = 0.63-0.97, P = 0.03). Conclusion: Carmustine implantation in resection cavity provides survival benefit for GBM patients, and it may be a promising supplement to standard therapeutic protocol by offering a bridge between surgical resection and onset of TMZ therapy.

Treatment of recurrent glioblastoma: state-of-the-art and future perspectives

BACKGROUND

Almost all patients affected by glioblastoma experience recurrence of the disease.

AREAS COVERED

Management of recurrent glioblastoma is a clinical challenge, and several elements should be taken into consideration when making treatment choice. Loco-regional treatments may be the best treatment approach in selected cases while systemic therapies or supportive care alone are necessary for other patients. Unfortunately, few drugs have shown clinical in this setting. This lack of effective treatments has made recurrent glioblastoma a disease orphan of an effective approach.

EXPERT OPINION

Results of recent clinical trials offer interesting perspectives and may controvert this axiom.

Guiding Treatment Choices for Elderly Patients with Glioblastoma by a Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The incidence of glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) increases with age; more than half of newly diagnosed patients are older than 65 years. Due to age-dependent decreasing organ functions, comorbidities, functional decline, and increasing risk of social isolation, not all patients are able to tolerate standard therapy of GBM with 6 weeks of radiochemotherapy.

RECENT FINDINGS

A set of alleviated therapies, e.g., chemotherapy or radiotherapy alone, hypofractionated radiotherapies with different total doses and variable fractionation regimens as well as hypofractionated radiotherapy with concomitant and adjuvant chemotherapy, have been evaluated during the last years. However, clinicians are still unsure which therapy would fit best to a given patient. Recently, the predictive value of comprehensive geriatric assessment regarding tolerance of chemotherapy and prediction of early mortality has been validated for older GBM patients in a retrospective trial. Thus, it appears that neuro-oncology is now ready for the prospective implementation of geriatric assessment to guide treatment planning for elderly GBM patients.

Assessing the efficacy of repeat resections in recurrent glioblastoma: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

The inevitable recurrence of glioblastoma (GBM) results in patients often undergoing multiple resections with questionable benefit to overall survival (OS).

OBJECTIVE

To systematically review and analyze prior studies examining the potential added benefit of repeat resection (RR) in recurrent GBM.

METHODS

We performed a PRISMA-compliant systematic review of literature published between 1969 to 2019 involving patients undergoing RR at GBM recurrence.

RESULTS

The search yielded 3994 non-duplicate citations. Final abstraction included 43 articles, with 2 level II and 41 level III studies. The earliest paper we included was published in 1987 [1], and 35 identified papers (81.4%) were published within the last 10 years. The survival data of 9236 patients (55% male) were analyzed, with a median age of 56; 3726 patients underwent RR. In 31 studies with a comparable single-surgery-only cohort, 20 articles reported a statistically significant increase in OS with RR, 7 reported nonsignificant trends toward increased OS with RR, and 4 reported no significant increase in OS with RR. Twenty-two articles with multivariate analyses of Karnofsky performance scores and 17 articles with extent-of-resection reported these as significant prognostic factors of OS. In 26 studies, median OS among all patients was 17.85 months inclusive of median OS following RR totaling 9.6 months. Notably, in 10 studies with data on subsequent progressions (2+ recurrences), 6 studies reported significant increases in OS with subsequent repeat resection (sRR) compared to those not undergoing sRR.

CONCLUSIONS

Recurrent GBM presents a treatment challenge. There appears to be an OS benefit for RR upon first recurrence as well as sRR. Such findings warrant further investigation of the potential benefits of continued surgical intervention after subsequent progressions of GBM.

Biweekly fotemustine schedule for recurrent glioblastoma in the elderly: activity and toxicity assessment of a multicenter study

Aim: To assess the efficacy and safety of alternative fotemustine administration schedule in elderly patients with recurrent glioblastoma. Patients & methods: Patients aged >65 years with recurrent glioblastoma received fotemustine (80 mg/m2; days 1, 15, 30, 45 and 60, and subsequently every 4 weeks). Primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) rate at 6 months. Main secondary end point was safety. Results: 58 patients were enrolled at two centers. PFS at 6 months was 47% (27 patients) and overall response rate was 29%. Median PFS and survival were 6 and 7 months, respectively, and longer in responders versus nonresponders. No grade 3-4 hematological toxicities occurred. Conclusion: The alternative fotemustine administration schedule was an effective and safe treatment for recurrent glioblastoma in elderly patients.

A Meta-Analysis of Survival Outcomes Following Reoperation in Recurrent Glioblastoma: Time to Consider the Timing of Reoperation

Background: Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) inevitably recurs, but no standard regimen has been established for recurrent patients. Reoperation at recurrence alleviates mass effects, and the survival benefit has been reported in many studies. However, in most studies, the effect of reoperation timing on survival benefit was ignored. The aim of this meta-analysis was to investigate whether reoperation provided similar survival benefits in recurrent GBM patients when it was analyzed as a fixed or time-dependent covariate.

Methods: A systematic literature search of PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases was performed to identify original articles that evaluated the associations between reoperation and prognosis in recurrent GBM patients.

Results: Twenty-one articles involving 8,630 patients were included. When reoperation was considered as a fixed covariate, it was associated with better overall survival (OS) and post-progression survival (PPS) (OS: HR = 0.66, 95% CI 0.61-0.71, p < 0.001, I² = 0%; PPS: HR = 0.70, 95% CI 0.57–0.88, p < 0.01, I² = 70.2%). However, such a survival benefit was not observed when reoperation was considered as a time-dependent covariate (OS: HR = 2.19, 95% CI 1.47–3.27, p < 0.001; PPS: HR = 0.95, 95% CI 0.82–1.10, p = 0.51, I² = 0%). The estimate bias caused by ignoring the time-dependent nature of reoperation was further demonstrated by the re-analysis of survival data in three included studies.

Conclusions: The timing of reoperation may have an impact on the survival outcome in recurrent GBM patients, and survival benefits of reoperation in recurrent GBM may be overestimated when analyzed as fixed covariates. Proper analysis methodology should be used in future work to confirm the clinical benefits of reoperation.

Survival in elderly glioblastoma patients treated with bevacizumab-based regimens in the United States

BACKGROUND

The efficacy of bevacizumab (BEV) in elderly patients with glioblastoma remains unclear. We evaluated the effect of BEV on survival in this patient population using the Survival, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare database.

METHODS

This retrospective, cohort study analyzed SEER-Medicare data for patients (aged ≥66 years) diagnosed with glioblastoma from 2006 to 2011. Two cohorts were constructed: one comprised patients who had received BEV (BEV cohort); the other comprised patients who had received any anticancer treatment other than BEV (NBEV cohort). The primary analysis used a multivariate Cox proportional hazards model to compare overall survival in the BEV and NBEV cohorts with initiation of BEV as a time-dependent variable, adjusting for potential confounders (age, gender, Charlson comorbidity index, region, race, radiotherapy after initial surgery, and diagnosis of coronary artery disease). Sensitivity analyses were conducted using landmark survival, propensity score modeling, and the impact of poor Karnofsky Performance Status.

RESULTS

We identified 2603 patients (BEV, n = 597; NBEV, n = 2006). In the BEV cohort, most patients were Caucasian males and were younger with fewer comorbidities and more initial resections. In the primary analysis, the BEV cohort showed a lower risk of death compared with the NBEV cohort (hazard ratio, 0.80; 95% confidence interval, 0.72-0.89; P < .01). The survival benefit of BEV appeared independent of the number of temozolomide cycles or frontline treatment with radiotherapy and temozolomide.

CONCLUSION

BEV exposure was associated with a lower risk of death, providing evidence that there might be a potential benefit of BEV in elderly patients with glioblastoma.

One decade of glioblastoma multiforme surgery in 342 elderly patients: what have we learned?

INTRODUCTION

Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is the most common malignant primary brain tumor in adults with peak incidence in patients older than 65 years. These patients are mostly underrepresented in clinical trials and often undertreated due to concomitant diseases. Recently, different therapeutic approaches for elderly patients with GBM were discussed. To date, there is no defined standard treatment. The aim of the present study is to evaluate the functional and oncological outcome in surgical treatment of elderly patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 342 elderly patients aged ≥ 65 years were retrospectively analyzed in our neurosurgical center. Surgical therapy, adjuvant treatment, overall survival (OS) and functional outcome using Karnofsky performance scale (KPS) and Neurological assessment of neuro-oncology-score were analyzed.

RESULTS

The median age at GBM diagnosis was 73.4 (IQR 9.28) years. Median overall survival was 7.5 (CI 95% 6.0-9.1) months and median preoperative or postoperative KPS was 80 (IQR 20). Surgical resection was performed in 216 (63.2%) patients, in 125 patients (36.5%) patients a stereotactic biopsy was performed. The median OS was significantly higher in patients with gross total resection (GTR) compared to partial resection and biopsy (10.8 months; CI 95% 9.5-12.3). Patients with combined radio- and chemo-therapy (RCT) showed significant longer OS, particularly MGMT-negative GBM. Higher preoperative KPS was found to be associated with improved overall survival.

CONCLUSION

GTR and adjuvant combined RCT provides benefits for overall survival in elderly patients. Therapy decision should be made in regard to preoperative functional status instead of biological age.