In Vitro and In Vivo Evaluation of Lipofufol, a New Triple Stealth Liposomal Formulation of Modulated 5-Fu: Impact on Efficacy and Toxicity

Pegylated liposome encapsulating docetaxel using microfluidic mixing technique: Process optimization and results in breast cancer models

The development of nanoparticles could help to improve the efficacy/toxicity balance of drugs. This project aimed to develop liposomes and immunoliposomes using microfluidic mixing technology.Various formulation tests were carried out to obtain liposomes that met the established specifications. The liposomes were then characterized in terms of size, polydispersity index (PDI), docetaxel encapsulation rate and lamellarity. Antiproliferative activity was tested in human breast cancer models ranging from near-negative (MDA-MB-231), positive (MDA-MB-453) to HER2 positive. Pharmacokinetic studies were performed in C57BL/6 mice.Numerous batches of liposomes were synthesised using identical molar ratios and by varying the microfluidic parameters TFR, FRR and buffer. All synthesized liposomes have a size < 200 nm, but only Lipo-1, Lipo-6, Lipo-7, Lipo-8 have a PDI < 0.2, which meets our initial requirements. The size of the liposomes was correlated with the total FRR, for a 1:1 FRR the size is 122.2 ± 12.3 nm, whereas for a 1:3 FRR the size obtained is 163.4 ± 34.0 nm (p = 0.019. Three batches of liposomes were obtained with high docetaxel encapsulation rates > 80 %. Furthermore, in vitro studies on breast cancer cell lines demonstrated the efficacy of liposomes obtained by microfluidic mixing technique. These liposomes also showed improved pharmacokinetics compared to free docetaxel, with a longer half-life and higher AUC (3-fold and 3.5-fold increase for the immunoliposome, respectively).This suggests that switching to the microfluidic process will produce batches of liposomes with the same characteristics in terms of in vitro properties and efficacy, as well as the ability to release the encapsulated drug over time in vivo. This time-efficiency of the microfluidic technique is critical, especially in the early stages of development.

Dihydropyrimidine Dehydrogenase-Mediated Resistance to 5-Fluorouracil: Mechanistic Investigation and Solution

5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) is one of the most widely used chemotherapeutics for the treatment of cancers associated with the aerodigestive tract, breast, and colorectal system. The efficacy of 5-FU is majorly affected by dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) as it degrades more than 80% of administered 5-FU into an inactive metabolite, dihydrofluorouracil. Herein we discuss the molecular mechanism of this inactivation by analyzing the interaction pattern and electrostatic complementarity of the DPD-5-FU complex. The basis of DPD overexpression in cancer cell lines due to significantly distinct levels of the miRNAs (miR-134, miR-27b, and miR-27a) compared to normal cells has also been outlined. Additionally, some kinases including sphingosine kinase 2 (SphK2) have been reported to correlate with DPD expression. Currently, to address this problem various strategies are reported in the literature, including 5-FU analogues (bypass the DPD-mediated inactivation), DPD downregulators (regulate the DPD expression levels in tumors), inhibitors (as promising adjuvants), and formulation development loaded with 5-FU (liposomes, nanoparticles, nanogels, etc.), which are briefly discussed in this Review.

Liposomal Drug Delivery And Its Potential Impact On Cancer Research

Liposomes are one of the most versatile drug carriers due to their functional properties, such as higher biocompatibility, the ability to encapsulate hydrophilic and hydrophobic products, and higher biodegradability. Liposomes are a better and more significant nanocarrier for cancer therapy. The key to developing a better cancer-targeted nanocarrier is the development of targeted liposomes using various approaches. Several traditional and novel liposome preparation methods are briefly discussed in this mini-review. The current state of liposome targeting, active and passive liposome targeting in cancer therapy, ligand directed targeting (antibody, aptamer, and protein/peptide-mediated targeting), and other miscellaneous approaches such as stimuli-responsive liposome-based targeting, autophagy inhibition mediated targeting, and curcumin loaded liposomal targeting are all discussed within. All of this gathered and compiled information will shed new light on liposome targeting strategies in cancer treatment and will pique the interest of aspiring researchers and academicians.

Antitumor Effect of 5-Fluorouracil-Loaded Liposomes Containing n-3 Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids in Two Different Colorectal Cancer Cell Lines

It has been shown that long-chain n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (n-3 PUFAs) could act synergistically with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) to kill cancer cells. To facilitate their simultaneous transport in the bloodstream, we synthesized, for the first time, liposomes (LIPUFU) containing 5-FU in the aqueous core and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA)/eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) at a ratio of 1:2 in the lipid bilayer. LIPUFU werestable with uniform size of 154 ± 4 nm, PDI of 0.19 ± 0.03 and zeta potential of -41 ± 2 mV. They contained 557 ± 210 μmol/l DHA, 1467 ± 362 μmol/l EPA, and 9.8 ± 1.1 μmol/l 5-FU. Control liposomes without (LIP) or with only 5-FU (LIFU) or n-3 PUFAs (LIPU) were produced in a similar way. The effects of these different liposomal formulations on the cell cycle, growth, and apoptosis were evaluated in two human colorectal cancer (CRC) cell lines differing in sensitivity to 5-FU, using fluorescence-activated cell sorting analyses. LIPUFU were more cytotoxic than LIP, LIFU, and LIPU in both LS174T (p53+/+, bax-/-) and HT-29 (p53-/0, bax+/+) cell lines. Similar to LIFU, LIPUFU increased the percentage of cells in S phase, apoptosis, and/or necrosis. The cytotoxic potential of LIPUFU was confirmed in vivo by tumor growth inhibition in the chicken chorioallantoic membrane model. These results suggest that LIPUFU could be considered to facilitate the simultaneous transport of 5-FU and n-3 PUFAs to the tumor site, in particular in case of CRC liver metastases.

Drug delivery to tumours using a novel 5-FU derivative encapsulated into lipid nanocapsules

In this work, a novel lipophilic 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) derivative was synthesised and encapsulated into lipid nanocapsules (LNC). 5-FU was modified with lauric acid to give a lipophilic mono-lauroyl-derivative (5-FU-C12, MW of about 342 g/mol, yield of reaction 70%). 5-FU-C12 obtained was efficiently encapsulated into LNC (encapsulation efficiency above 90%) without altering the physico-chemical characteristics of LNC. The encapsulation of 5-FU-C12 led to an increased stability of the drug when in contact with plasma being the drug detectable until 3 h following incubation. Cytotoxicity assay carried out using MTS on 2D cell culture showed that 5-FU-C12-loaded LNC had an enhanced cytotoxic effect on glioma (9L) and human colorectal (HTC-116) cancer cell line in comparison with 5-FU or 5-FU-C12. Then, HCT-116 tumour spheroids were cultivated and the reduction of spheroid volume was measured following treatment with drug-loaded LNC and drugs alone. Similar reduction on spheroids volume was observed following the treatment with drug-loaded LNC, 5-FU-C12 and 5-FU alone, while blank LNC displayed a reduction in cell viability only at high concentration. Globally, our data suggest that the encapsulation increased the activity of the 5-FU-C12. However, in-depth evaluations of LNC permeability into spheroids are needed to disclose the potential of these nanosystems for cancer treatment.

Turning cold tumors into hot tumors: harnessing the potential of tumor immunity using nanoparticles

INTRODUCTION

Immune checkpoint inhibitors have considerably changed the landscape of oncology. However apart from world-acclaimed success stories limited to melanoma and lung cancer, many solid tumors failed to respond to immune checkpoint inhibitors due to limited immunogenicity, unfavorable tumor micro-environments (TME), lack of infiltrating T lymphocytes or increases in Tregs. Areas covered: Combinatorial strategies are foreseen as the future of immunotherapy and using cytotoxics or modulating agents is expected to boost the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors. In this respect, nanoparticles displaying unique pharmacokinetic features such as tumor targeting properties, optimal payload delivery and long-lasting interferences with TME, are promising candidates for such combinations. This review covers the basis, expectancies, limits and pitfalls of future combination between nanoparticles and immune check point inhibitors. Expert opinion: Nanoparticles allow optimal delivery of variety of payloads in tumors while sparing healthy tissue, thus triggering immunogenic cell death. Depleting tumor stroma could further help immune cells and monoclonal antibodies to better circulate in the TME, plus immune-modulating properties of the charged cytotoxics. Finally, nanoparticles themselves present immunogenicity and antigenicity likely to boost immune response at the tumor level.

Pharmacokinetics variability: Why nanoparticles are not just magic-bullets in oncology

Developing nanoparticles to improve the specificity of anticancer agents towards tumor tissue and to better control drug delivery is a rising strategy in oncology. An increasing number of forms (e.g., conjugated nanoparticles, liposomes, immunoliposomes…) are now available on the shelves and numerous other scaffolds (e.g., dendrimeres, nanospheres, squalenes …) are currently at various stages of development. However, as of today most nanoparticles made available remain lipidic carriers. Pharmacokinetic variability is a major, yet largely underestimated issue with liposomal nanoparticles. A wide variety of causes (e.g., tumor type and disease staging, comorbidities, patient's immune system) can explain this variability, which can in return negatively impact pharmacodynamic endpoints such as poor efficacy or severe toxicities. This review aims to cover the main causes for erratic pharmacokinetics observed with most nanoparticles, especially liposomes used in oncology. Should the main causes of such variability be identified, specific studies in non-clinical or clinical development stages could be undertaken using dedicated models (i.e., mechanistic or semi-mechanistic mathematical models such as PBPK approaches) to better describe nanoparticles pharmacokinetics and decipher PK/PD relationships. In addition, identifying relevant biomarkers or parameters likely to impact nanoparticles pharmacokinetics would allow for either the modification of their characteristics to reduce the influence of the expected variability during development phases or the development of biomarker-based adaptive dosing strategies to maintain an optimal efficacy/toxicity balance. Broadly, we call for the development of comprehensive distribution studies and state-of-the-art modeling support to better understand and anticipate nanoparticle pharmacokinetics in oncology.

Seek and destroy: improving PK/PD profiles of anticancer agents with nanoparticles

INTRODUCTION

The Pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics (PK/PD) relationships with cytotoxics are usually based on a steepening concentration-effect relationship; the greater the drug amount, the greater the effect. The Maximum Tolerated Dose paradigm, finding the balance between efficacy, while keeping toxicities at their manageable level, has been the rule of thumb for the last 50-years. Developing nanodrugs is an appealing strategy to help broaden this therapeutic window. The fact that efficacy and toxicity with cytotoxics are intricately linked is primarily due to the complete lack of specificity toward the tumor tissue during their distribution phase. Because nanoparticles are expected to better target tumor tissue while sparing healthy cells, accumulating large amounts of cytotoxics in tumors could be achieved in a safer way. Areas covered: This review aims at presenting how nanodrugs present unique features leading to reconsidering PK/PD relationships of anticancer agents. Expert commentary: The constant interplay between carrier PK, interactions with cancer cells, payload release, payload PK, target expression and target engagement, makes picturing the exact PK/PD relationships of nanodrugs particularly challenging. However, those improved PK/PD relationships now make the once contradictory higher efficacy and lower toxicities requirement an achievable goal in cancer patients.

Targeted delivery of nano-PTX to the brain tumor-associated macrophages

Nanoparticles containing mixed lipid monolayer shell, biodegradable polymer core and rabies virus glycoprotein (RVG) peptide as brain targeting ligand, were developed for brain targeted delivery of paclitaxel (PTX) to treat malignant glioma. RVG conjugated PTX loaded NPs (RVG-PTX-NPs) had the desirable size (~140 nm), narrow size distribution and spherical shape. RVG-PTX-NPs showed poor uptake by neurons and selective targeting to the brain tumor associated macrophages (TAMs) with controlled release and tumor specific toxicity. In vivo studies revealed that RVG-PTX-NPs were significant to cross the blood-brain barrier (BBB) and had specific targeting to the brain. Most importantly, RVG-PTX-NPs showed effectiveness for anti-glioma therapy on human glioma of mice model. We concluded that RVG-PTX-NPs provided an effective approach for brain-TAMs targeted delivery for the treatment of glioma.

Preparation of a Thermosensitive Gel Composed of a mPEG-PLGA-PLL-cRGD Nanodrug Delivery System for Pancreatic Tumor Therapy

It is hypothesized that a gel (NP-Gel) composed of thermosensitive gel (Gel) and nanoparticles (NP) can prolong drug release time and overcome the drug resistance of pancreatic tumor cells. Paclitaxel (PTX)-loaded monomethoxy (polyethylene glycol)-poly(d,l-lactide-co-glycolide)-poly(l-lysine)-cyclic peptide (arginine-glycine-aspartic-glutamic-valine acid) (mPEG-PLGA-PLL-cRGD) NP and NP-Gel were designed, optimized, and characterized using dynamic light scattering, transmission electron microscopy, high efficiency liquid chromatography, and rheological analyses. Aspc-1/PTX cell was used in a cell uptake test. A 3D cell model was used to mimic PTX elimination in tissue. The in vivo sustained release and antitumor effects were studied in Aspc-1/PTX-loaded nude mice with xerographic and in situ tumors. The NP were 133.7 ± 28.3 nm with 85.03% entrapped efficiency, 1.612% loaded ratio, and suitable rheological properties. PTX was released as NP from NP-Gel, greatly prolonging the release and elimination times to afford long-term effects. NP-Gel enhanced the uptake of PTX by Aspc-1/PTX cells more than using NP or the Gel alone. Gel and NP-Gel remained solid in the tumor and stayed over 50 days versus the several days of NP in solution. NP-Gel exhibited a much higher inhibition rate in vivo than in solution, NP, or the Gel alone. In conclusion, the antitumor effects of NP-Gel might arise from synergic effects from NP and the Gel. NP primarily reversed drug resistance, while the Gel prolonged release time considerably in situ. This preparation proved effective with a very small PTX dose (250 μg/kg) and exhibited few toxic effects in normal tissue.

Biodistribution, tumor uptake and efficacy of 5-FU-loaded liposomes: why size matters

PURPOSE

We have investigated the impact of particle size on the biodistribution, tumor uptake and antiproliferative efficacy of 5-FU-loaded liposomes.

METHODS

Three different batches of pegylated liposomes varying in size (i.e., 70, 120 and 250 nm respectively) were tested. The active compounds encapsulated were an equimolar mix of 5-FU, 2'-deoxyinosine and folinic acid. Liposomes were subsequently tested on the human breast cancer model MDA231 cells, a model previously found to be resistant to 5-FU. In vitro, antiproliferative efficacy and microscopy studies of liposomes uptake were carried out. In vivo, comparative biodistribution and efficacy studies were performed in tumor-bearing mice.

RESULTS

Difference in size did not change in vitro antiproliferative activity. Fluorescence-Microscopy studies showed that liposomes were mainly uptaken by tumor cells through a direct internalization process, regardless of their size. Biodistribution profiles in tumor-bearing mice revealed higher accumulation of small liposomes in tumors throughout time as compared with normal and large liposomes (p < 0.05). Additionally, we observed that the bigger were the tumors, the more vascularised they were and the greater was the difference in accumulation between small and large liposomes. Consequently, in vivo efficacy studies showed at study conclusion that a 68% reduction in tumor size was achieved with small liposomes (p < 0.05), whereas larger liposomes failed to reduce significantly tumor growth. Similarly, at study conclusion a trend towards higher survival-rate in animals treated with smaller liposomes was observed.

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that particle size is critical to achieve higher selectivity and efficacy in experimental oncology, including in resistant tumors.