Cabergoline in acromegaly

Growth Hormone Action as a Target in Cancer: Significance, Mechanisms, and Possible Therapies

Growth hormone (GH) is a pituitary-derived endocrine hormone required for normal postnatal growth and development. Hypo- or hypersecretion of endocrine GH results in 2 pathologic conditions, namely GH deficiency (GHD) and acromegaly. Additionally, GH is also produced in nonpituitary and tumoral tissues, where it acts rather as a cellular growth factor with an autocrine/paracrine mode of action. An increasingly persuasive and large body of evidence over the last 70 years concurs that GH action is implicit in escalating several cancer-associated events, locally and systemically. This pleiotropy of GH's effects is puzzling, but the association with cancer risk automatically raises a concern for patients with acromegaly and for individuals treated with GH. By careful assessment of the available knowledge on the fundamental concepts of cancer, suggestions from epidemiological and clinical studies, and the evidence from specific reports, in this review we aimed to help clarify the distinction of endocrine vs autocrine/paracrine GH in promoting cancer and to reconcile the discrepancies between experimental and clinical data. Along this discourse, we critically weigh the targetability of GH action in cancer-first by detailing the molecular mechanisms which posit GH as a critical node in tumor circuitry; and second, by enumerating the currently available therapeutic options targeting GH action. On the basis of our discussion, we infer that a targeted intervention on GH action in the appropriate patient population can benefit a sizable subset of current cancer prognoses.

Effect of Cabergoline on weight and glucose metabolism in patients with acromegaly

PURPOSE

Cabergoline (CAB) has shown to have benefic effects on the metabolism in different clinical settings but its metabolic role in acromegaly disease has not been studied yet. Aim of our study was to evaluate the impact of CAB on glucose metabolism and weight in patients with acromegaly.

METHODS

All patients with acromegaly undergoing continuous treatment with CAB for at least 6 months were retrospectively screened. Exclusion criteria were discontinuation of CAB for more than one month, change of antidiabetic or other therapy for acromegaly, concomitant untreated hormonal deficiency, initiation of pregnancy and/or breastfeeding. All patients were evaluated in terms of biochemical disease control, glucose metabolism and weight at baseline (T0) and after the introduction of CAB therapy at 6 (T6) and 12 months (T12).

RESULTS

Twenty-six patients (15 females and 11 males) were evaluated at T0 and T6 and 19 patients (12 females and 7 males) were also evaluated at T12. Insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) and prolactin (PRL) levels were significantly lower at T6 and T12 compared to baseline (p < 0.001 for IGF-I, p < 0.05 for PRL) even if no further differences were observed between T12 and T6. Considering the entire cohort, no differences were appreciated regarding the metabolic parameters but a significant reduction in weight and body mass index (BMI) was observed at both T6 (p = 0.009 for weight, p = 0.021 for BMI) and T12 (p = 0.014 for weight, p = 0.017 for BMI) compared to baseline.

CONCLUSION

Our results confirm the efficacy of CAB in providing a significant improvement in the biochemical disease control but do not demonstrate a marked benefit on glucose metabolism of acromegaly patients. In such patients, CAB appears to have a rapid effect on weight and BMI, with significant changes noticeable as early as 6 months and persisting for at least 12 months.

Central and peripheral regulation of the GH/IGF-1 axis: GHRH and beyond

The regulation of growth hormone (GH) synthesis and secretion by somatotroph cells of the anterior pituitary is a highly complex process, mediated by a variety of neuroendocrine and peripheral influences. In particular, a key role is played by the hypothalamic peptides growth hormone-releasing hormone (GHRH) and somatostatin, which regulate the somatotroph axis with opposite actions, stimulating and inhibiting GH release, respectively. Since the discovery of GHRH about 50 years ago, many pathophysiological studies have explored the underlying intricate hormonal balance that regulates GHRH secretion and its interplay with the somatotroph axis. Various molecules and pathophysiological states have been shown to modulate the release of GH, GHRH, somatostatin and GH secretagogues. Collectively, the available evidence demonstrates how a vast number of neural and peripheral signals are conveyed and integrated to orchestrate a finely tuned response of the somatotroph axis that adapts to the body's varying needs for growth, metabolism, and repair. The present review aims to summarize the available evidence regarding the key regulators involved in the modulation of the somatotroph axis in humans, presenting detailed molecular insights on the signaling cascades at play. The interplay between different mechanisms governing somatotroph secretion is highlighted, underscoring the nuanced interdependence that maintains homeostasis and facilitates the body's ability to respond to internal and external stimuli.

Acromegaly management in the Nordic countries: A Delphi consensus survey

OBJECTIVE

Acromegaly is associated with increased morbidity and mortality if left untreated. The therapeutic options include surgery, medical treatment, and radiotherapy. Several guidelines and recommendations on treatment algorithms and follow-up exist. However, not all recommendations are strictly evidence-based. To evaluate consensus on the treatment and follow-up of patients with acromegaly in the Nordic countries.

METHODS

A Delphi process was used to map the landscape of acromegaly management in Denmark, Sweden, Norway, Finland, and Iceland. An expert panel developed 37 statements on the treatment and follow-up of patients with acromegaly. Dedicated endocrinologists (n = 47) from the Nordic countries were invited to rate their extent of agreement with the statements, using a Likert-type scale (1-7). Consensus was defined as ≥80% of panelists rating their agreement as ≥5 or ≤3 on the Likert-type scale.

RESULTS

Consensus was reached in 41% (15/37) of the statements. Panelists agreed that pituitary surgery remains first line treatment. There was general agreement to recommend first-generation somatostatin analog (SSA) treatment after failed surgery and to consider repeat surgery. In addition, there was agreement to recommend combination therapy with first-generation SSA and pegvisomant as second- or third-line treatment. In more than 50% of the statements, consensus was not achieved. Considerable disagreement existed regarding pegvisomant monotherapy, and treatment with pasireotide and dopamine agonists.

CONCLUSION

This consensus exploration study on the management of patients with acromegaly in the Nordic countries revealed a relatively large degree of disagreement among experts, which mirrors the complexity of the disease and the shortage of evidence-based data.

Real-world value of cabergoline in the treatment of acromegaly

Cabergoline is an ergot derivative long-acting dopamine receptor 2 (DR2) selective agonist administered orally and widely used for the treatment of prolactin-secreting adenomas and Parkinson's disease. DR2 is expressed in most somatotroph adenomas. In acromegaly, cabergoline is used off-label and its role is limited by the relatively modest efficacy for achieving hormonal remission and thus, it is largely indicated in patients with mild elevation of GH/IGF-I postoperatively. It can be given as monotherapy, usually at a higher weekly dose than usually required to treat prolactinomas, but also as an add-on treatment in patients partially responding to the somatostatin receptor ligands octreotide or lanreotide. IGF-1 normalization with cabergoline can be achieved in about a third of the patients. Low baseline IGF-1 level (below 1.5 x ULN) before cabergoline initiation is a good predictor for remission. Combination treatment with the GH receptor antagonist pegvisomant can also be beneficial. The inexpensive, well-tolerated and convenient oral administration of cabergoline makes it an attractive medical therapy for active acromegaly.

Feline Comorbidities: Hypersomatotropism-induced diabetes in cats

PRACTICAL RELEVANCE

Diabetes mellitus is the second-most common feline endocrinopathy, affecting an estimated 1/200 cats. While the underlying causes vary, around 15-25% of cats with diabetes mellitus develop the condition secondarily to progressive growth hormone (GH)-induced insulin resistance. This typically results in a form of diabetes that is challenging to manage, whereby the response to insulin is very variable or high doses are required to achieve even minimal diabetic control.

CLINICAL CHALLENGES

Although uncontrolled chronic excessive GH may result in phenotypic changes that raise suspicion for acromegaly, many cats with hypersomatotropism (HST) do not have these changes. In these situations, a clinician's index of suspicion may be increased by the presence of less dramatic changes such as marked polyphagia, stertor or uncontrolled diabetes mellitus. The current diagnostic test of choice is demonstration of a markedly increased serum insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF1) concentration, but some affected cats will have only a marginal increase; additionally, chronic insulin administration in cats results in an increase in serum IGF1, making the diagnosis less clear cut and requiring additional confirmatory tests.

EVIDENCE BASE

Over the past two decades, HST has increasingly been recognised as an underlying cause of diabetes mellitus in cats. This review, which focuses on diagnosis and treatment, utilises data from observational studies, clinical trials and case series, as well as drawing on the experience of the authors in managing this condition.

Efficacy and Safety of Pegvisomant in the Treatment of Acromegaly

Pegvisomant, the first and currently only clinically available growth hormone receptor antagonist, is an effective therapeutic option for the medical treatment of acromegaly, a rare disorder characterized by excessive growth hormone secretion. With now over 20 years of real world experience, its safety and efficacy is well-established. However, several aspects of its clinical use are still controversially discussed. The high cost of pegvisomant has limited its use in several countries, and recent studies have reported a lower efficacy than the initial clinical trials. A reported increase in tumor volume under therapy varies between studies and has been attributed to either actual growth or re-expansion after cessation of somatostatin receptor ligand therapy. Furthermore, different combinations of pegvisomant and other therapeutic agents aiming at reduction of acromegaly disease activity have been proposed to increase or retain effectiveness while lowering side effects and cost. This review aims to assess current clinical data on the safety and efficacy of pegvisomant while also addressing controversies surrounding its use.

Dissecting the in vitro efficacy of octreotide and cabergoline in GH- and GH/PRL-secreting pituitary tumors

CONTEXT

Cabergoline (CAB) is an off-label medical therapy for acromegaly, overshadowed by first-generation somatostatin receptor ligands, e.g. octreotide (OCT).

OBJECTIVE

Head-to-head comparison between OCT and CAB in inhibiting growth hormone (GH) secretion in primary cultures of GH- and GH/PRL-secreting tumors. To investigate the role of somatostatin (SST) and dopamine type 2 (D2R) receptor expression.

DESIGN

To evaluate the antisecretory effect of OCT and CAB, together with receptor mRNA expression, in 23 tumor cultures.

SETTING AND PATIENTS

Acromegaly patients referred to the Erasmus Medical Center (Rotterdam, The Netherlands).

INTERVENTIONS

72-hour OCT and CAB treatment (10 nM).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

GH concentrations in cell culture media.

RESULTS

OCT showed a slightly higher efficacy compared with CAB (GH decrease -39.5% vs. -32.5%, p = 0.079). The effect of the two drugs was superimposable in GH/PRL co-secreting tumors (-42.1% vs. -44.8%), where SST1 and D2R had a higher expression compared to the pure GH-secreting ones (p = 0.020 and p = 0.026). OCT was more effective than CAB in 8/23 cultures, while CAB was more effective than OCT in 3/23 (CAB + group). In CAB + tumors, SST1 expression was higher compared to the other groups (p = 0.034). At ROC curve analysis, SST1 and D2R discriminated between GH and GH/PRL co-secretion (AUC 0.856, p = 0.013; AUC 0.822, p = 0.024). SST1 was the best predictor of CAB response (≥50% GH reduction, AUC 0.913, p = 0.006; 80% sensitivity, 94% specificity).

CONCLUSIONS

OCT is 5-10% more effective than CAB in vitro. SST1 mRNA expression can represent a reliable marker of GH/PRL co-secreting tumors showing a preferential response to CAB treatment.

Hormone supply to the pituitary gland: A comprehensive investigation of female‑related tumors (Review)

The hypothalamus acts on the pituitary gland after signal integration, thus regulating various physiological functions of the body. The pituitary gland includes the adenohypophysis and neurohypophysis, which differ in structure and function. The hypothalamus-hypophysis axis controls the secretion of adenohypophyseal hormones through the pituitary portal vein system. Thyroid-stimulating hormone, adrenocorticotropic hormone, gonadotropin, growth hormone (GH), and prolactin (PRL) are secreted by the adenohypophysis and regulate the functions of the body in physiological and pathological conditions. The aim of this review was to summarize the functions of female-associated hormones (GH, PRL, luteinizing hormone, and follicle-stimulating hormone) in tumors. Their pathophysiology was described and the mechanisms underlying female hormone-related diseases were investigated.

Growth hormone secreting pituitary adenomas show distinct extrasellar extension patterns compared to nonfunctional pituitary adenomas

PURPOSE

Patterns of extension of pituitary adenomas (PA) may vary according to PA subtype. Understanding extrasellar extension patterns in growth hormone PAs (GHPA) vis-a-vis nonfunctional PAs (NFPAs) may provide insights into the biology of GHPA and future treatment avenues.

METHODS

Preoperative MR imaging (MRI) in 179 consecutive patients treated surgically for NFPA (n = 139) and GHPA (n = 40) were analyzed to determine patterns of extrasellar growth. Extension was divided into two principal directions: cranio-caudal (measured by infrasellar/suprasellar extension), and lateral cavernous sinus invasion (CSI) determined by Knosp grading score of 3-4. Suprasellar extension was defined as tumor extension superior to the tuberculum sellae- dorsum sellae line, and inferior extension as invasion through the sellar floor into the sphenoid sinus or clivus. Categorical analysis was performed using Fisher's exact test.

RESULTS

GHPAs were overall more likely to remain purely intrasellar compared to NFPA (50% vs 26%, p < 0.001). GHPAs, however, were 7 times more likely to exhibit isolated infrasellar extension compared to NFPA (20% vs 2.8%, p = 0.001). Conversely, NFPAs were twice as likely to exhibit isolated suprasellar extension compared to GHPA (60% vs 28%, p < 0.001), as well as combined suprasellar/infrasellar extension (25% vs 3%, p = 0.011). There were no overall differences in CSI between the two subgroups.

DISCUSSION

GHPA and NFPA demonstrate distinct extrasellar extension patterns on MRI. GHPAs show proclivity for inferior extension with bony invasion, whereas NFPAs are more likely to exhibit suprasellar extension through the diaphragmatic aperture. These distinctions may have implications into the biology and future treatment of PAs.

Efficacy of cabergoline add-on therapy in patients with acromegaly resistance to somatostatin analogs treatment and the review of literature

Objective

It is reported that adding cabergoline to somatostatin analog (SSA) normalizes IGF-1 levels approximately in one-third of patients with acromegaly. We investigated the effect of combination therapy and potential predictors of response in patients with acromegaly who do not respond to SSA therapy alone.

Methods

Fifty acromegaly patients (M/F 23/27, mean age 50.88 ± 12.34 years) were divided into two groups as the active and control groups in this connection. Before and after treatment, we not only evaluated serum GH and IGF-1 levels and tumor size but also analyzed the factors relevant to the effect of the combined therapy.

Results

Adding cabergoline to SSA treatment led to IGF-1 normalization in 42% (21/50) of patients. Mean GH levels decreased from 2.64 ± 1.79 to 1.34 ± 0.99 ng/mL (p < .0001) and IGF-1 levels decreased from 432.92 ± 155.61 to 292.52 ± 126.15 ng/mL (p < .0001). GH and IGF-1 reduction in percent (%) were significantly higher in the controlled group (63% to 40%, p = 0.023 and 45% to 19%, p = 0.0001). Moreover, tumor size decrease was significantly higher in controlled group (-3.6 cm to -1.66 cm, p = 0.005).

Conclusion

According to the results of our study, the addition of cabergoline to SSA normalized IGF-1 levels in a considerable amount of acromegaly patients with a moderately elevated IGF-1 level, regardless of serum PRL levels. Besides, cabergoline treatment was also influential in patients with higher IGF-1 levels despite a lower remission rate.

Approach to the Patient With Treatment-resistant Acromegaly

Although most tumors in patients with acromegaly are benign and are cured or controlled by surgery and/or first-generation somatostatin receptor ligands therapy, some can behave more aggressively and are resistant to these standard therapies. Acromegaly, if left untreated, is a rare and chronic disorder, commonly caused by a GH-producing pituitary adenoma and is associated with significant comorbidities and an increased mortality. Transsphenoidal surgery is considered the mainstay of acromegaly management, but medical therapy has an increasingly important role. However, disease activity is not fully controlled in a significant number of patients treated with surgery and/or high-dose first-generation somatostatin receptor ligand monotherapy. In these circumstances, therefore, repeated surgery, second-line medical therapy, and radiotherapy, alone or combined as multimodal therapeutic strategies should be considered, in a patient-centered perspective.

Oral Octreotide: A Review of Recent Clinical Trials and Practical Recommendations for Its Use in the Treatment of Patients With Acromegaly

OBJECTIVE

Acromegaly is characterized by chronic growth hormone (GH) and insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) hypersecretion, often caused by a GH-secreting pituitary adenoma. Surgery remains first line, but medical therapy is essential if surgery is contraindicated, does not achieve remission, or does not prevent recurrence despite apparent surgical remission. Oral octreotide capsules (OOC) that combine octreotide with a transient permeability enhancer technology are the first oral somatostatin receptor ligand (SRL) approved in the US for acromegaly.

METHODS

We review the literature and clinical trial data of OOC for patients with acromegaly and discuss clinical assessment of OOC use, potential drug-drug interactions, drug initiation, dose titration, and monitoring of drug efficacy and tolerability.

RESULTS

Four pivotal clinical trials involving a total of 238 patients with acromegaly treated with OOC effective suppression of serum GH and IGF-I levels, maintenance of disease control, decreased breakthrough symptoms and symptomatic improvement with noninferiority of OOC to injectable SRLs (iSRLs) in maintaining biochemical response. Additionally, the safety profile of OOC is comparable to that of iSRLs. Most patients who completed the clinical trials of OOC have also expressed preference to oral compared to iSRL administration.

CONCLUSION

OOC is an effective treatment option for patients with acromegaly who previously responded to iSRLs, with the benefits of avoiding injection-related side effects. This article provides a review of the pharmacology, safety, and efficacy and offers practical recommendations on utilization of OOCs to treat iSRL-responsive patients with acromegaly.

Transient Permeation Enhancer® (TPE®) technology for oral delivery of octreotide: a technological evaluation

INTRODUCTION

The FDA approval of oral semaglutide for type 2 diabetes (2019) and oral octreotide for acromegaly (2020) is evidence that selected niche peptides can be administered orally if formulated with selected intestinal permeation enhancers.

AREAS COVERED

We evaluated the oral octreotide formulation, MYCAPSSA® (Chiasma Pharmaceuticals, Needham, MA, USA). An outline of the current standard of care in acromegaly and the benefits of oral octreotide versus depot injections is provided. We discuss the Transient Permeation Enhancer (TPE®) technology used and detail the safety and efficacy data from animal models and clinical trials.

EXPERT OPINION

TPE® is an oily suspension of octreotide that includes a number of excipients that can transiently alter epithelial barrier integrity by opening of intestinal epithelial tight junctions arising from transcellular perturbation. Phase I studies using 20 mg octreotide capsules yielded a relative oral bioavailability of ~0.7% and primary endpoints were achieved in two Phase III studies. The oral octreotide dose required to achieve these endpoints was over 200 times that of the 0.1 mg immediate-release subcutaneous injection, a reminder of the difficulty in achieving oral absorption of macromolecules. Many acromegaly patients will prefer a convenient twice-daily oral formulation of octreotide compared to monthly depot injections.

Somatostatin-Dopamine Chimeric Molecules in Neuroendocrine Neoplasms

Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) are a widely heterogeneous family of neoplasms arising from neuroendocrine cells, which are interspersed throughout the body. Despite NENs are relatively rare, their incidence and prevalence are constantly increasing probably due to the improvement in earlier diagnosis and patients’ management. When surgery is not curative, particularly for patients with metastatic disease, several medical options are available. Somatostatin analogues (SSA) are the first-line medical therapy for well-differentiated NENs. Interestingly, the heterodimerization of somatostatin receptors (SSTs) with dopamine receptors (DRs) has been discovered in NENs. This phenomenon results in hybrid receptors with enhanced functional activity. On these bases, chimeric molecules embracing somatostatin and dopamine features have been recently developed. The aim of this review is to provide a comprehensive overview of the available preclinical and clinical data regarding chimeric somatostatin-dopamine agonists as a new class of “magic bullet” in the therapy of NENs.

Pasireotide in the Personalized Treatment of Acromegaly

The delay in controlling the disease in patients who do not respond to first-line treatment with first generation somatostatin receptor ligands (first-generation SRLs) can be quantified in years, as every modification in the medical therapy requires some months to be fully evaluated. Considering this, acromegaly treatment should benefit from personalized medicine therapeutic approach by using biomarkers identifying drug response. Pasireotide has been positioned mostly as a compound to be used in first-generation SRLs resistant patients and after surgical failure, but sufficient data are now available to indicate it is a first line therapy for patients with certain characteristics. Pasireotide has been proved to be useful in patients in which hyperintensity T2 MRI signal is shown and in those depicting low SST2 and high expression of SST5, low or mutated AIP condition and sparsely granulated immunohistochemical pattern. This combination of clinical and pathological characteristics is unique for certain patients and seems to cluster in the same cases, strongly suggesting an etiopathogenic link. Thus, in this paper we propose to include this clinico-pathologic phenotype in the therapeutic algorithm, which would allow us to use as first line medical treatment those compounds with the highest potential for achieving the fastest control of GH hypersecretion as well as a positive effect upon tumor shrinkage, therefore accelerating the implementation of precision medicine for acromegaly. Moreover, we suggest the development, validation and clinical use of a pasireotide acute test, able to identify patients responsive to pasireotide LAR as the acute octreotide test is able to do for SRLs.

Medical Treatment Landscape for Active Acromegaly in A Pituitary Center in Israel

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate current real-life experience with medical treatment for active acromegaly in a large cohort.

METHODS

Data on demographic parameters, blood tests, imaging studies, and treatments were extracted from the medical records.

RESULTS

The cohort included 87 patients (43 male) with active acromegaly. The mean age at diagnosis was 40.2±11.4 years, and the mean duration of follow-up was 7.9±5.8 years. Seventy patients presented with a macroadenoma. Mean baseline insulin growth factor 1 (IGF-1) (n = 67) was 3.2±1.9 × upper limit of normal (ULN). Surgery and radiotherapy were performed in 75 and 10 patients, respectively. Currently, 38 subjects receive somatostatin analogues, pegvisomant as a monotherapy is given to 8 patients, pasireotide is given to 17 patients, cabegoline to 4 patients, estrogen to 2 females, and SSAs combined with pegvisomant to 10 patients. Eight patients are not being actively treated, including 4 following radiotherapy. Good biochemical control (IGF-1 <1.3 × ULN) was achieved in 76 patients (87%), and 11 patients (13%) are currently uncontrolled (IGF-1 >1.3 × ULN). Seventy-eight percent of controlled patients are being given 1 medication; 11% are on combination therapy; 4 patients are well controlled after radiotherapy and 2 are partially controlled without any treatment. The main adverse effects of treatment were diabetes mellitus in 7 patients (on pasireotide) and symptomatic cholelithiasis in 5 patients.

CONCLUSION

Active acromegaly can be controlled medically in most patients, with a low rate of adverse effects. This study displays the characteristic variety of treatment options available for active acromegaly.

Emerging drugs for the treatment of acromegaly

INTRODUCTION

Acromegaly is a disease characterized by elevated growth hormone (GH) and insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) levels. Surgery is the only curative treatment, while medical therapies are administered life-long. To date, almost 30% of patients treated with the currently available medical therapies do not achieve biochemical control.

AREAS COVERED

This review focuses on new drugs in development for acromegaly. In detail, we provide an overview of the new molecules designed to improve disease control rate (such as novel somotostatin receptor ligands and antisense oligonucleotides), as well as the new formulations of existing medications aiming to improve patients' compliance (e.g. oral or long-acting subcutaneous octreotide).

EXPERT OPINION

The constant progresses in the medical treatment of acromegaly could lead to an individualized therapy based on tumor, as well as patient's characteristics. Besides disease control, patient's need represents a major target of medical treatment in chronic diseases such as acromegaly, in order to improve compliance to therapy and patients' quality of life.

Hyperprolactinemia in Acromegaly is Related to Prolactin Secretion by Somatolactotroph Tumours

The aim of this study is to assess differences in patient characteristics, tumour characteristics and hormone levels between acromegalic patients with and without hyperprolactinemia. 44 patients of the University Hospital of Brussels, Belgium with acromegaly who were diagnosed between January 2007 and July 2018 were included in this study. Nineteen patients were classified in the hyperprolactinemia group and 25 patients were classified in the normoprolactinemia group. No significant differences between acromegalic patients with and without hyperprolactinemia were found in age at diagnosis, gender, presence of hyperprolactinemia symptoms, insulin-like growth factor 1, growth hormone and testosterone levels, tumour volume, tumour invasiveness, immunohistochemistry of growth hormone and prolactin, Ki-67 index and mitotic index. However, for a cut-off of 10% of prolactin-positive cells, there was a trend towards a higher percentage of prolactin-positive tumours in hyperprolactinemia patients (p=0.054) and higher mean prolactin level in case of positive prolactin immunostaining (p=0.007)). In our study there were no differences in characteristics between acromegaly patients with hyper- and normoprolactinemia. An association between the serum prolactin level and the positivity of prolactin immunohistochemistry of the adenoma tissue was found. The absence of a difference in tumour volume between patients with hyper- and normoprolactinemia suggests that the hyperprolactinemia is likely to be caused by the co-secretion of growth hormone and prolactin by the tumour. Finally, for the first time, the cut-off of 10% of prolactin cells was validated for the diagnosis of somatolactotroph tumours in acromegaly.

Octreotide-Resistant Acromegaly: Challenges and Solutions

Acromegaly is a rare and severe disease caused by an increased and autonomous secretion of growth hormone (GH), thus resulting in high circulating levels of insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1). Comorbidities and mortality rate are closely related to the disease duration. However, in most cases achieving biochemical control means reducing or even normalizing mortality and restoring normal life expectancy. Current treatment for acromegaly includes neurosurgery, radiotherapy and medical therapy. Transsphenoidal surgery often represents the recommended first-line treatment. First-generation somatostatin receptor ligands (SRLs) are the drug of choice in patients with persistent disease after surgery and are suggested as first-line treatment for those ineligible for surgery. However, only about half of patients treated with octreotide (or lanreotide) achieve biochemical control. Other available drugs approved for clinical use are the second-generation SRL pasireotide, the dopamine agonist cabergoline, and the GH-receptor antagonist pegvisomant. In the present paper, we revised the current literature about the management of acromegaly, aiming to highlight the most relevant and recent therapeutic strategies proposed for patients resistant to first-line medical therapy. Furthermore, we discussed the potential molecular mechanisms involved in the variable response to first-generation SRLs. Due to the availability of different medical therapies, the choice for the most appropriate drug can be currently based also on the peculiar clinical characteristics of each patient.

Acromegaly in the elderly patients

BACKGROUND

Acromegaly is a rare disease characterized by a chronic exposition to growth hormone (GH) and insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1), caused in most cases by a pituitary GH-secreting adenoma. Chronic GH excess induces systemic complications (metabolic, cardiovascular, respiratory, neoplastic, and musculoskeletal) and increased mortality if not appropriately treated. Recent epidemiological data report an improved life span of patients with acromegaly probably due to better acromegaly management; additionally, the number of pituitary incidentaloma in general population also increased over time due to more frequent imaging. Therefore, the number of elderly patients, newly diagnosed with acromegaly or in follow-up, is expected to grow in the coming years and clinicians will need to be aware of particularities in managing these patients.

PURPOSE

This review aims to explore different aspects of acromegaly of the elderly patients, focusing on epidemiology, diagnosis, clinical presentation, complications, and management options.

METHODS

Available literature has been assessed through PubMed (data until August 2019) by specific keywords.

CONCLUSIONS

Available data on acromegaly in the elderly patient are sparse, but point to important differences. Further studies are needed comparing elderly with younger patients with acromegaly to better define a tailored diagnostic and therapeutic management.

Biochemical Control in Acromegaly With Multimodality Therapies: Outcomes From a Pituitary Center and Changes Over Time

PURPOSE

To determine the prevalence of insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) normalization with long-term multimodality therapy in a pituitary center and to assess changes over time.

METHODS

Patients with acromegaly (N = 409), with ≥1 year of data after surgery and at least 2 subsequent clinic visits were included in long-term analysis (N = 266). Biochemical data, clinical characteristics, and therapeutic interventions were reviewed retrospectively.

RESULTS

At diagnosis, mean [standard deviation] age was 43.4 [14.3] years, body mass index was 28.5 (24.9-32.1) kg/m2 (median, interquartile range), serum IGF-1 index (IGF-1 level/upper limit of normal) was 2.3 [1.7-3.1], and 80.5% had macroadenomas. Patients with transsphenoidal surgery after 2006 were older [46.6 ± 14.3 vs 40.0 ± 13.4 years; P < 0.001]. Age and tumor size correlated inversely. Overall (N = 266), 93.2% achieved a normal IGF-1 level during 9.9 [5.0-15.0] years with multimodality therapy. The interval to first normal IGF-1 level following failed surgical remission was shorter after 2006: 14.0 (95% confidence interval, 10.0-20.0) versus 27.5 (22.0-36.0) months (P = 0.002). Radiation therapy and second surgery were rarer after 2006: 28 (22%) versus 62 (47.0%); P < 0.001 and 12 (9.4%) versus 28 (21.2%); P = 0.010, respectively. Age at diagnosis increased over time periods, possibly reflecting increased detection of acromegaly in older patients with milder disease. Male gender, older age, smaller tumor and lower IGF-1 index at diagnosis predicted long-term sustained IGF-1 control after surgery without adjuvant therapies.

CONCLUSION

The vast majority of patients with acromegaly can be biochemically controlled with multimodality therapy in the current era. Radiotherapy and repeat pituitary surgery became less frequently utilized over time. Long-term postoperative IGF-1 control without use of adjuvant therapies has improved.

COMPARATIVE EFFICACY OF MEDICAL TREATMENT FOR ACROMEGALY: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND NETWORK META-ANALYSIS OF INTEGRATED RANDOMIZED TRIALS AND OBSERVATIONAL STUDIES

Objective: Comprehensive evidence comparing different medications for acromegaly is scarce. The aim of this study was to perform a network meta-analysis based on evidence from both randomized trials and observational studies of medical treatments for acromegaly. Methods: Electronic databases were searched for both observational studies and randomized trials that enrolled acromegaly patients treated with medications of interest. Simulated trials were generated by a machine learning algorithm and then synthesized with Bayesian random-effects network meta-analyses. The main outcome was the rate of insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) control after medical treatment. Results: We included 90 studies (100 arms, 4,523 patients) before matching. After matching, 28 simulated trials were generated. Balance of matched arms was checked by spatial distance and correlation matrix. Cotreatment with somatostatin receptor ligands and pegvisomant was the most effective treatment compared with other treatments. In unselected patients, pegvisomant was better than octreotide long-acting release (logOR, 0.85; 95% credible interval [CrI], 0.05 to 1.65) or lanreotide (logOR, 1.09, 95% CrI, 0.05 to 2.14), and the mean absolute IGF-1 control rate ranged from 40 to 60%. In partially responsive patients, cotreatment with somatostatin receptor ligands and pegvisomant was similar to pegvisomant monotherapy, ranking as the most two effective treatments, and the mean absolute IGF-1 control rate was over 60%. Conclusion: Our analysis suggested that the combination of data from observational studies and randomized trials in network meta-analysis was feasible. The findings of this network meta-analysis provided robust evidence supporting the current guidelines in treatment strategy for acromegaly. Abbreviations: CrI = credible interval; DA = dopamine agonist; GH = growth hormone; IGF-1 = insulin-like growth factor 1; ITT = intention-to-treat; LAN = lanreotide; LAN-ATG = lanreotide autogel; OCT = octreotide; OCT-LAR = octreotide long acting repeatable; OR = odds ratio; PEG = pegvisomant; PP = per-protocol; SRL = somatostatin receptor ligand.

Treatment of Pituitary and Other Tumours with Cabergoline: New Mechanisms and Potential Broader Applications

Cabergoline is a dopamine agonist that has been used as the first-line treatment option for prolactin-secreting pituitary adenomas for several decades. It not only suppresses hormone production from these prolactinomas, but also causes tumour shrinkage. Recent studies revealed some novel mechanisms by which cabergoline suppresses tumour cell proliferation and induces cell death. In this article, we review the most recent findings in cabergoline studies, focusing on its anti-tumour function. These studies suggest the potential broader clinical use of cabergoline in the treatment of other tumours such as breast cancer, pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours, and lung cancer.

Pasireotide-LAR in acromegaly patients treated with a combination therapy: a real-life study

PURPOSE

Little data are available regarding the safety and efficacy of switching to Pasireotide-LAR monotherapy in acromegaly patients with partial resistance to first-generation somatostatin agonists (1gSRL) who require combination treatment with cabergoline or pegvisomant.

METHOD

In this monocentric prospective study within a tertiary university hospital, 15 consecutive acromegalic adults partially resistant to 1gSRL treated with octreotide LAR or lanreotide SR, and cabergoline (n = 4, 3.5 mg/week) or pegvisomant (n = 11, median dose 100 mg/week), were switched to Pasireotide-LAR (8 with 40 mg/month; 7 with 60 mg/month). Immunohistochemical expression level of SSTR5 and the granulation pattern of nine somatotroph adenomas were retrospectively determined to test for a correlation with the therapeutic efficacy of Pasireotide-LAR.

RESULTS

Median IGF-1 concentration at the first evaluation (median 3 months) was similar to baseline (1.0 vs 1.1 ULN). 11/15 patients had IGF-1 levels ≤1.3 ULN before and after the switch but individual changes were variable. Hyperglycemia was frequent and greater in diabetic patients. 7/15 patients stopped Pasireotide-LAR due to lack of control of IGF-1 or intolerance. 8/15 patients received Pasireotide-LAR for a median of 29 months with IGF-1 levels ≤1.3 ULN and acceptable glucose tolerance (median HbA1c 6.1%). Two patients required initiation of oral antidiabetic treatment. The intensity of SSTR5 expression and the granulation pattern of adenomas were of limited value for the prediction of Pasireotide-LAR effectiveness.

CONCLUSION

Pasireotide-LAR may represent a suitable therapeutic alternative in a subset of acromegalic patients requiring combination therapy involving a 1gSRL.

A Consensus Statement on acromegaly therapeutic outcomes

The 11th Acromegaly Consensus Conference in April 2017 was convened to update recommendations on therapeutic outcomes for patients with acromegaly. Consensus guidelines on the medical management of acromegaly were last published in 2014; since then, new pharmacological agents have been developed and new approaches to treatment sequencing have been considered. Thirty-seven experts in the management of patients with acromegaly reviewed the current literature and assessed changes in drug approvals, clinical practice standards and clinical opinion. They considered current treatment outcome goals with a focus on the impact of current and emerging somatostatin receptor ligands, growth hormone receptor antagonists and dopamine agonists on biochemical, clinical, tumour mass and surgical outcomes. The participants discussed factors that would determine pharmacological choices as well as the proposed place of each agent in the guidelines. We present consensus recommendations highlighting how acromegaly management could be optimized in clinical practice.

Increasing frequency of combination medical therapy in the treatment of acromegaly with the GH receptor antagonist pegvisomant

Pegvisomant monotherapy is effective and safe in treatment of acromegaly. However, some clinicians combine pegvisomant with somatostatin analogues (SSA) or dopamine agonist (DA). In this analysis of ACROSTUDY, a long-term non-interventional study, the use of combination regimens was evaluated. Based on their baseline treatment, 2043 patients were retrospectively categorized as: long-acting SSA combined with pegvisomant, 'Combo SSA' 768 patients (38%); DA combined with pegvisomant, 'Combo DA' 123 (6%); pegvisomant monotherapy, 'Peg mono' 1128 (55%). Treatment patterns changed over the 10-year period, with recent patients more likely to receive any combination (20% in 2003 vs 54% in 2012). Combo SSA use varied widely among countries from 22% to 78%. Exposure periods of the three treatment modalities were defined from pegvisomant start until the last visit in ACROSTUDY; patients could switch treatment categories. At year 4, IGF-I was normal in 62% of Combo SSA, 63% of Combo DA and 65% of Peg mono groups. Pegvisomant was initiated as daily injections in 94% of patients in the Peg mono group, 66% of Combo SSA and 91% of Combo DA patients. During 6169 years of treatment exposure, 3424 adverse events (AEs) were reported in 946 (51%) patients, of which 617 (18%) were serious and 401 (12%) were considered treatment related. The reported incidence of serious AEs and treatment-related non-serious AEs were similar among the three treatment modalities. This analysis describes real-world clinical care and shows favorable efficacy and safety for Peg mono and combinations. Novel findings include an increased use of combination therapy over time and variability in treatment modalities between countries.

Dopamine Agonists for Pituitary Adenomas

Dopamine agonists (DA) are well established as first-line therapy for prolactinomas. These tumors express high levels of dopamine 2 receptors (D2R), leading to the strong efficacy of DA in reducing tumor size and hormonal secretion. Other pituitary tumor subtypes express D2R to varying degrees, leading to an extensive body of research into potential off-label use of DA in non-prolactinoma pituitary tumors. Preclinical models of Cushing's disease, acromegaly, and nonfunctioning pituitary tumors (NFPT) demonstrate D2R expression in cell lines and cultured tumors as well as effectiveness of DA in reducing hormonal secretion in functioning tumors and arresting tumor proliferation. Clinical studies have shown some efficacy of DA in treatment of these tumors. In Cushing's disease, DA therapy results in normalization of urinary cortisol levels in approximately 25% of patients, but reported rates of tumor shrinkage are very low; in acromegaly, DA therapy leads to normalization of insulin-like growth factor I and tumor shrinkage in approximately one-third of patients, and improved responses when used in combination with somatostatin receptor ligands. Among patients with NFPT, pooled results show 30% experience reduction of tumor size and 58% show stabilization of disease. DA therapy appears to have some clinical benefit in patients with non-prolactinoma pituitary tumors, and may be an option for medical therapy in some clinical scenarios.

European Society of Endocrinology Clinical Practice Guidelines for the management of aggressive pituitary tumours and carcinomas

BACKGROUND

Pituitary tumours are common and easily treated by surgery or medical treatment in most cases. However, a small subset of pituitary tumours does not respond to standard medical treatment and presents with multiple local recurrences (aggressive pituitary tumours) and in rare occasion with metastases (pituitary carcinoma). The present European Society of Endocrinology (ESE) guideline aims to provide clinical guidance on diagnosis, treatment and follow-up in aggressive pituitary tumours and carcinomas.

METHODS

We decided upfront, while acknowledging that literature on aggressive pituitary tumours and carcinomas is scarce, to systematically review the literature according to the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) system. The review focused primarily on first- and second-line treatment in aggressive pituitary tumours and carcinomas. We included 14 single-arm cohort studies (total number of patients = 116) most on temozolomide treatment (n = 11 studies, total number of patients = 106). A positive treatment effect was seen in 47% (95% CI: 36-58%) of temozolomide treated. Data from the recently performed ESE survey on aggressive pituitary tumours and carcinomas (165 patients) were also used as backbone for the guideline. SELECTED RECOMMENDATION: (i) Patients with aggressive pituitary tumours should be managed by a multidisciplinary expert team. (ii) Histopathological analyses including pituitary hormones and proliferative markers are needed for correct tumour classification. (iii) Temozolomide monotherapy is the first-line chemotherapy for aggressive pituitary tumours and pituitary carcinomas after failure of standard therapies; treatment evaluation after 3 cycles allows identification of responder and non-responder patients. (iv) In patients responding to first-line temozolomide, we suggest continuing treatment for at least 6 months in total. Furthermore, the guideline offers recommendations for patients who recurred after temozolomide treatment, for those who did not respond to temozolomide and for patients with systemic metastasis.

Recent Progress in the Medical Therapy of Pituitary Tumors

Management of pituitary tumors is multidisciplinary, with medical therapy playing an increasingly important role. With the exception of prolactin-secreting tumors, surgery is still considered the first-line treatment for the majority of pituitary adenomas. However, medical/pharmacological therapy plays an important role in controlling hormone-producing pituitary adenomas, especially for patients with acromegaly and Cushing disease (CD). In the case of non-functioning pituitary adenomas (NFAs), pharmacological therapy plays a minor role, the main objective of which is to reduce tumor growth, but this role requires further studies. For pituitary carcinomas and atypical adenomas, medical therapy, including chemotherapy, acts as an adjuvant to surgery and radiation therapy, which is often required to control these aggressive tumors. In the last decade, knowledge about the pathophysiological mechanisms of various pituitary adenomas has increased, thus novel medical therapies that target specific pathways implicated in tumor synthesis and hormonal over secretion are now available. Advancement in patient selection and determination of prognostic factors has also helped to individualize therapy for patients with pituitary tumors. Improvements in biochemical and "tumor mass" disease control can positively affect patient quality of life, comorbidities and overall survival. In this review, the medical armamentarium for treating CD, acromegaly, prolactinomas, NFA, and carcinomas/aggressive atypical adenomas will be presented. Pharmacological therapies, including doses, mode of administration, efficacy, adverse effects, and use in special circumstances are provided. Medical therapies currently under clinical investigation are also briefly discussed.