1
|
Govindaraj R, Agar M, Currow D, Luckett T. Assessing Patient-Reported Outcomes in Routine Cancer Clinical Care Using Electronic Administration and Telehealth Technologies: Realist Synthesis of Potential Mechanisms for Improving Health Outcomes. J Med Internet Res 2023; 25:e48483. [PMID: 38015606 PMCID: PMC10716761 DOI: 10.2196/48483] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2023] [Revised: 07/13/2023] [Accepted: 10/26/2023] [Indexed: 11/29/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The routine measurement of patient-reported outcomes in cancer clinical care using electronic patient-reported outcome measures (ePROMs) is gaining momentum worldwide. However, a deep understanding of the mechanisms underpinning ePROM interventions that could inform their optimal design to improve health outcomes is needed. OBJECTIVE This study aims to identify the implicit mechanisms that underpin the effectiveness of ePROM interventions and develop program theories about how and when ePROM interventions improve health outcomes. METHODS A realist synthesis of the literature about ePROM interventions in cancer clinical care was performed. A conceptual framework of ePROM interventions was constructed to define the scope of the review and frame the initial program theories. Literature searches of Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid Embase, Scopus, and CINAHL, supplemented by citation tracking, were performed to identify relevant literature to develop, refine, and test program theories. Quality appraisal of relevant studies was performed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. RESULTS Overall, 61 studies were included in the realist synthesis: 15 (25%) mixed methods studies, 9 (15%) qualitative studies, 13 (21%) descriptive studies, 21 (34%) randomized controlled trials, and 3 (5%) quasi-experimental studies. In total, 3 initial program theories were developed regarding the salient components of ePROM interventions-remote self-reporting, real-time feedback to clinicians, and clinician-patient telecommunication. The refined theories posit that remote self-reporting enables patients to recognize and report symptoms accurately and empowers them to communicate these to clinicians, real-time feedback prompts clinicians to manage symptoms proactively, and clinician-patient telephone interactions and e-interactions between clinic encounters improve symptom management by reshaping how clinicians and patients communicate. However, the intervention may not achieve the intended benefit if ePROMs become a reminder to patients of their illness and are not meaningful to them and when real-time feedback to clinicians lacks relevance and increases the workload. CONCLUSIONS The key to improving health outcomes through ePROM interventions is enabling better symptom reporting and communication through remote symptom self-reporting, promoting proactive management of symptoms through real-time clinician feedback, and facilitating clinician-patient interactions. Patient engagement with self-reporting and clinician engagement in responding to feedback are vital and may reinforce each other in improving outcomes. Effective ePROM interventions might fundamentally alter how clinicians and patients interact between clinic encounters.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ramkumar Govindaraj
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, Australia
- Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
- IMPACCT - Improving Palliative, Aged and Chronic Care through Clinical Research and Translation, Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Meera Agar
- IMPACCT - Improving Palliative, Aged and Chronic Care through Clinical Research and Translation, Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - David Currow
- IMPACCT - Improving Palliative, Aged and Chronic Care through Clinical Research and Translation, Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- Faculty of Science, Medicine and Health, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia
| | - Tim Luckett
- IMPACCT - Improving Palliative, Aged and Chronic Care through Clinical Research and Translation, Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Sivan M, Rocha Lawrence R, O'Brien P. Digital Patient Reported Outcome Measures Platform for Post-COVID-19 Condition and Other Long-Term Conditions: User-Centered Development and Technical Description. JMIR Hum Factors 2023; 10:e48632. [PMID: 37665334 PMCID: PMC10592725 DOI: 10.2196/48632] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2023] [Revised: 08/22/2023] [Accepted: 09/02/2023] [Indexed: 09/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Post-COVID-19 condition (PCC), colloquially known as long COVID, is a multisystem condition characterized by persistent symptoms beyond 4 weeks after the SARS-CoV-2 infection. More than 60 million people with PCC worldwide need prompt assessment, diagnosis, and monitoring, with many requiring specialist help from a multidisciplinary team of health care professionals (HCPs). Consequently, a scalable digital system is required for both people with PCC and HCPs to capture the breadth of symptoms and their impact on health, using patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and patient-reported experience measures (PREMs). OBJECTIVE We aim to develop and implement a novel PCC digital PROM (DPROM) platform for (1) securely collecting PROM and PREM data from people with PCC, (2) enabling users to monitor symptoms longitudinally and assess response to treatment, (3) generating reports for the electronic health records (EHRs), (4) providing summary reports on PCC services based on national requirements, and (5) facilitating the sharing of relevant data with authorized research teams to accelerate our understanding of this new condition and evaluate new strategies to manage PCC. METHODS We (1) undertook requirement analysis with people with PCC, HCPs, and researchers to identify the needs of the DPROM platform and determine its required functionalities; (2) designed and developed a clinically useful web portal for staff and a mobile app for patients, with a web-based alternative app to improve patient and staff choice, limit the risk of digital exclusion, and account for variability across services; (3) determined the PROMs and PREMs that PCC services would prefer to use on the platform; and (4) designed the summary report function that can be generated for each user for the EHR and for reporting to national health authorities. RESULTS A DPROM platform to record PCC symptom profile, condition severity, functional disability, and quality of life, based on the C19-YRS (Yorkshire Rehabilitation Scale) and other PROMs and PREMs, was developed. Individual-level medical information and details on the COVID-19 illness can be captured systematically. The platform generates easy-to-understand scores, radar plots and line graphs for people with PCC to self-monitor their condition and for HCPs to assess the natural course of the condition and the response to interventions. Clinics can configure a suite of PROMs and PREMs based on their local and national service and commissioning requirements and support research studies which require large-scale data collection on PROMs. The DPROM platform enables automatic aggregate data analysis for services to undertake service evaluation and cost-effectiveness analysis. The DPROM platform generated summary report can be uploaded to the EHRs of people with PCC. CONCLUSIONS A multifunctional DPROM platform to assess, grade, and monitor PCC has been developed. Future research will analyze the system's usability in specialist PCC clinical services and other long-term conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manoj Sivan
- Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Román Rocha Lawrence
- Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Thomsen GN, Christoffersen MN, Lindegaard HM, Davidsen JR, Hartmeyer GN, Assing K, Mortz CG, Martin-Iguacel R, Møller MB, Kjeldsen AD, Havelund T, El Fassi D, Broesby-Olsen S, Maiborg M, Johansson SL, Andersen CL, Vestergaard H, Bjerrum OW. The multidisciplinary approach to eosinophilia. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1193730. [PMID: 37274287 PMCID: PMC10232806 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1193730] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2023] [Accepted: 04/25/2023] [Indexed: 06/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Eosinophilic granulocytes are normally present in low numbers in the bloodstream. Patients with an increased number of eosinophilic granulocytes in the differential count (eosinophilia) are common and can pose a clinical challenge because conditions with eosinophilia occur in all medical specialties. The diagnostic approach must be guided by a thorough medical history, supported by specific tests to guide individualized treatment. Neoplastic (primary) eosinophilia is identified by one of several unique acquired genetic causes. In contrast, reactive (secondary) eosinophilia is associated with a cytokine stimulus in a specific disease, while idiopathic eosinophilia is a diagnosis by exclusion. Rational treatment is disease-directed in secondary cases and has paved the way for targeted treatment against the driver in primary eosinophilia, whereas idiopathic cases are treated as needed by principles in eosinophilia originating from clonal drivers. The vast majority of patients are diagnosed with secondary eosinophilia and are managed by the relevant specialty-e.g., rheumatology, allergy, dermatology, gastroenterology, pulmonary medicine, hematology, or infectious disease. The overlap in symptoms and the risk of irreversible organ involvement in eosinophilia, irrespective of the cause, warrants that patients without a diagnostic clarification or who do not respond to adequate treatment should be referred to a multidisciplinary function anchored in a hematology department for evaluation. This review presents the pathophysiology, manifestations, differential diagnosis, diagnostic workup, and management of (adult) patients with eosinophilia. The purpose is to place eosinophilia in a clinical context, and therefore justify and inspire the establishment of a multidisciplinary team of experts from diagnostic and clinical specialties at the regional level to support the second opinion. The target patient population requires highly specialized laboratory analysis and therapy and occasionally has severe eosinophil-induced organ dysfunction. An added value of a centralized, clinical function is to serve as a platform for education and research to further improve the management of patients with eosinophilia. Primary and idiopathic eosinophilia are key topics in the review, which also address current research and discusses outstanding issues in the field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Hanne Merete Lindegaard
- Department of Rheumatology, Odense University Hospital, Denmark; Research Unit for Rheumatology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark; University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Jesper Rømhild Davidsen
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Odense University Hospital, Denmark; Odense Respiratory Research Unit (ODIN), Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | | | - Kristian Assing
- Department of Clinical Immunology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Charlotte G. Mortz
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy Centre, Odense Research Centre for Anaphylaxis (ORCA), Odense University Hospital, Denmark; University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | | | | | - Anette Drøhse Kjeldsen
- Department of ORL- Head and Neck Surgery and Audiology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark; University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Troels Havelund
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Daniel El Fassi
- Department of Hematology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Sigurd Broesby-Olsen
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy Centre, Odense Research Centre for Anaphylaxis (ORCA), Odense University Hospital, Denmark; University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Michael Maiborg
- Department of Cardiology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | | | - Christen Lykkegaard Andersen
- Department of Hematology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Centre for General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Hanne Vestergaard
- Department of Hematology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Ole Weis Bjerrum
- Department of Hematology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Digital Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Assessing Health-Related Quality of Life in Skull Base Diseases-Analysis of Feasibility and Pitfalls Two Years after Implementation. Healthcare (Basel) 2023; 11:healthcare11040472. [PMID: 36833006 PMCID: PMC9956346 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare11040472] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2022] [Revised: 01/15/2023] [Accepted: 02/03/2023] [Indexed: 02/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) assessment is becoming increasingly important in neurosurgery following the trend toward patient-centered care, especially in the context of skull base diseases. The current study evaluates the systematic assessment of HRQoL using digital patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in a tertiary care center specialized in skull base diseases. The methodology and feasibility to conduct digital PROMs using both generic and disease-specific questionnaires were investigated. Infrastructural and patient-specific factors affecting participation and response rates were analyzed. Since August 2020, 158 digital PROMs were implemented in skull base patients presenting for specialized outpatient consultations. Reduced personnel capacity led to significantly fewer PROMs being conducted during the second versus (vs.) the first year after introduction (mean: 0.77 vs. 2.47 per consultation day, p = 0.0002). The mean age of patients not completing vs. those completing long-term assessments was significantly higher (59.90 vs. 54.11 years, p = 0.0136). Follow-up response rates tended to be increased with recent surgery rather than with the wait-and-scan strategy. Our strategy of conducting digital PROMs appears suitable for assessing HRQoL in skull base diseases. The availability of medical personnel for implementation and supervision was essential. Response rates during follow-up tended to be higher both with younger age and after recent surgery.
Collapse
|
5
|
Nielsen AS, Hanna L, Larsen BF, Appel CW, Osborne RH, Kayser L. Readiness, acceptance and use of digital patient reported outcome in an outpatient clinic. Health Informatics J 2022; 28:14604582221106000. [PMID: 35658693 DOI: 10.1177/14604582221106000] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
Use of digital patient-reported outcomes is being introduced in care of chronic conditions, including Inflammatory Bowel Disease. The aim is to supplement face-to-face follow-up sessions through symptom screening, and to inform follow-up through questions about mental health and quality of life. However, little is known about who is using this as intended. This study aimed to map differences between users and non-users among people with IBD and explore the mechanisms behind. We administered a questionnaire including the Readiness and Enablement Index for Health Technology (ReadHy) and the Service User Technology Acceptability Questionnaire (SUTAQ) to all people with IBD registered at Silkeborg Regional Hospital. Comparison between users and non-users and cluster analysis was conducted. Effect size (Cohen's d) was used to estimate magnitude of difference between groups. The user and non-user groups differed most strongly by level of emotional distress (d = 0.45). Cluster analysis of the ReadHy scales showed profiles have different sets of difficulties and reservations towards digital solutions. These difficulties correlated moderately with SUTAQ dissatisfaction and low acceptability. The dimensions of ReadHy may help to better understand particular needs of people with IBD when accessing digital PROs, which may lead to higher acceptability and improved quality of care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amalie Søgaard Nielsen
- Department of Public Health, 4321University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark; School of Health and Social Development, 2104Deakin University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Lisa Hanna
- School of Health and Social Development, 95522Deakin University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Birgit Furstrand Larsen
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Diagnostic Centre, University Research Clinic for Innovative Patient Pathways, Silkeborg Regional Hospital, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Charlotte W Appel
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Diagnostic Centre, University Research Clinic for Innovative Patient Pathways, Silkeborg Regional Hospital, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | | | - Lars Kayser
- Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Denmark; School of Health and Social Development, Deakin University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Pemmaraju N, Wilson NR, Clementi Doan T, Qiao W, Peterson SK, Zoeller V, Schorr A, Verstovsek S. Myeloproliferative neoplasm questionnaire: assessing patient disease knowledge in the modern digital information era. Leuk Lymphoma 2021; 62:2253-2260. [PMID: 33749512 PMCID: PMC9938727 DOI: 10.1080/10428194.2021.1901096] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
There is growing Internet and social media use among patients with rare blood cancers, notably myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs). A 38-item online questionnaire was developed to assess patients' (n = 983) disease understanding and use of online resources regarding MPN. Many responders (74%) reported unawareness of additional mutations beyond their primary molecular marker(s); 32% were unsure of their prognostic risk stratification. Additionally, 89% reported using online resources (Facebook (61%); Google/Google+ (42%); YouTube (34%); blogs (26%); Twitter (5%)) to seek information about MPN. Despite this, results showed many gaps in patients' basic disease knowledge. Our findings suggest an important difference in social media habits between physicians and patients: physicians are rapidly adopting Twitter as their preferred medium for sharing medical knowledge; however, patients often prefer other social mediums. Educational campaigns should be designed in more personalized ways, aiming to fit a variety of online platforms to maximize reach and impact for patients with MPN.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Naveen Pemmaraju
- The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | | | | | - Wei Qiao
- The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Susan K. Peterson
- The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Vicky Zoeller
- The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | | | - Srdan Verstovsek
- The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Cho Y, Zhang H, Harris MR, Gong Y, Smith EL, Jiang Y. Acceptance and Use of Home-Based Electronic Symptom Self-Reporting Systems in Patients With Cancer: Systematic Review. J Med Internet Res 2021; 23:e24638. [PMID: 33709929 PMCID: PMC7998328 DOI: 10.2196/24638] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2020] [Revised: 01/18/2021] [Accepted: 01/25/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Electronic symptom self-reporting systems (e-SRS) have been shown to improve symptoms and survival in patients with cancer. However, patient engagement in using e-SRS for voluntary symptom self-reporting is less optimal. Multiple factors can potentially affect patients' acceptance and engagement in using home-based e-SRS. However, such factors have not been fully explored in cancer populations. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study is to understand the acceptance and use of home-based e-SRS by patients with cancer and identify associated facilitators and barriers. METHODS PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus, and PsycINFO (January 2010 to March 2020) were searched using a combination of Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terms and keywords such as symptom self-reporting, electronic/technology, cancer, and their synonyms. Included studies focused on the use of home-based e-SRS by patients with cancer and their families. Studies on patients' use of e-SRS in clinical settings only were excluded. Of the 3740 papers retrieved, 33 were included in the final review. Factors associated with patient acceptance and use of e-SRS were extracted and synthesized. RESULTS Most e-SRS were web based (22/33, 66%) or mobile app based (9/33, 27%). The e-SRS initial acceptance, represented by patient enrollment rates, ranged from 40% (22/55) to 100% (100/100). High e-SRS acceptance was rated by 69% (59/85) to 77.6% (337/434) of the patients after they used the system. The e-SRS use, measured by patients' response rates to questionnaires (ranging from 1596/3521, 45.33% to 92%) or system log-on rates (ranging from 4/12, 33% to 99/100, 99%), declined over time in general patterns. Few studies (n=7) reported e-SRS use beyond 6 months, with the response rates ranging from 62% (40/64) to 85.1% (541/636) and the log-on rates ranging from 63.6% (103/162) to 77% (49/64). The availability of compatible devices and technical support, interactive system features, information accessibility, privacy, questionnaire quality, patient physical/psychosocial status, and age were associated with patient acceptance and use of home-based e-SRS. CONCLUSIONS Acceptance and use of home-based e-SRS by patients with cancer varied significantly across studies, as assessed by a variety of approaches. The lack of access to technology has remained a barrier to e-SRS adoption. Interactive system features and personalized questionnaires may increase patient engagement. More studies are needed to further understand patients' long-term use of home-based e-SRS behavior patterns to develop personalized interventions to support symptom self-management and self-reporting of patients with cancer for optimal health outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Youmin Cho
- University of Michigan School of Nursing, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
| | - Huiting Zhang
- University of Michigan School of Nursing, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
| | | | - Yang Gong
- University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston School of Biomedical Informatics, Houston, TX, United States
| | | | - Yun Jiang
- University of Michigan School of Nursing, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
The Role of e-Health in the Delivery of Care for Patients with Hematological Cancers: A Systematic Literature Review. Telemed J E Health 2020; 26:1093-1105. [DOI: 10.1089/tmj.2019.0231] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
|
9
|
Nielsen AS, Kidholm K, Kayser L. Patients' reasons for non-use of digital patient-reported outcome concepts: A scoping review. Health Informatics J 2020; 26:2811-2833. [PMID: 32731773 DOI: 10.1177/1460458220942649] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Data from digitally administered patient reported outcomes (PROs) is used more and more in routine healthcare for long-term conditions as a part of daily clinical practice. This literature study reviews empirical studies of digital PRO to examine patients' reasons for non-use of digitally administered PRO data in routine care. This scoping review searched through PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and PsycINFO databases, reporting on study population, intervention, duration of intervention and motivational factors alongside stated reasons for nonparticipation or dropout for each study. The patients' reasons for not participating, either from study start or by dropout, were analysed through a thematic approach.Fifty-one studies were included, published from 2010 to 2019, mostly from Europe and the Unites States covering different long-term conditions. The reasons for non-use are manifold and cover the themes of ability to use PRO, engagement, emotional distress and technical barriers.Several reasons are given explaining why patients with long-term conditions are not using digitally administered PRO as intended. This should be taken into account in the design phase of digital PRO interventions and considered in conversations with patients during the intervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Kristian Kidholm
- Kristian Kidholm Odense University Hospital, University of Southern Denmark, Denmark
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Nielsen LK, Klausen TW, Jarden M, Frederiksen H, Vangsted AJ, Do T, Kristensen IB, Frølund UC, Andersen CL, Abildgaard N, Gregersen H. Clarithromycin added to bortezomib-cyclophosphamide-dexamethasone impairs health-related quality of life in multiple myeloma patients. Eur J Haematol 2018; 102:70-78. [PMID: 30230047 DOI: 10.1111/ejh.13175] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2018] [Revised: 09/05/2018] [Accepted: 09/07/2018] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The Danish Myeloma Study Group initiated a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blinded phase II study to investigate the efficacy of adding clarithromycin to cyclophosphamide-bortezomib-dexamethasone (VCD) induction therapy in transplant eligible, newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients. The study was prematurely terminated due to severe complications, and no effect of adding clarithromycin was found. The aim of this study was to compare health-related quality of life (HRQoL) between the two groups and to explore the coherence hereof with adverse event (AE) registration by clinicians. METHODS Patients completed three validated HRQoL questionnaires at inclusion, before cyclophosphamide priming, and two months after high-dose therapy (HDT). The mean score difference was interpreted by clinically relevant differences between groups. Spearman's correlation analysis was used to compare patient-reported toxicities with AEs. RESULTS Of 58 included patients, 55 participated in the HRQoL reporting. Before cyclophosphamide priming, patients in the clarithromycin group reported clinically relevant reduced HRQoL for eleven domains with persistent reduction in four domains two months after HDT. Poor correlation between patient-reported toxicities and clinician-reported AEs was observed. CONCLUSIONS Despite the premature study termination, our data demonstrate impaired HRQoL when clarithromycin was added to the VCD regimen. We found clear underreporting of toxicities by clinicians. ClinicalTrials.gov number NCT02573935.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lene Kongsgaard Nielsen
- Quality of Life Research Center, Department of Haematology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | | | - Mary Jarden
- Department of Haematology, University Hospital of Copenhagen at Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Henrik Frederiksen
- Quality of Life Research Center, Department of Haematology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.,Department of Haematology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Annette Juul Vangsted
- Department of Haematology, University Hospital of Copenhagen at Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Trung Do
- Department of Haematology, University Hospital of Copenhagen at Herlev, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | | | | | | - Niels Abildgaard
- Quality of Life Research Center, Department of Haematology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.,Department of Haematology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Henrik Gregersen
- Department of Haematology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|