Venous thromboembolism in patients with cancer undergoing surgical exploration

The Risk of Haematoma and Venous Thrombosis Associated With Thromboprophylaxis Use in Breast Cancer Surgery: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review

Background: The routine use of venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis in breast cancer surgery has caused substantial polarity among breast cancer surgeons across the globe. The aim of this study is to assess the use of VTE prophylaxis in breast cancer surgery outcomes. Methods: A comprehensive electronic search was undertaken of all comparative studies that described the role of VTE prophylaxis in breast cancer surgery. Studies that reported on postoperative outcomes between patients who received VTE prophylaxis (prophylaxis) and those who did not (no prophylaxis) were included in the review. A meta-analysis using random-effect model was used to analyse key outcomes, with data presented as odd ratio (OR). Results: A total of 2470 patients from 6 studies were included in this study. Among these patients, 60.9% (n: 1504) received prophylaxis. The haematoma rate in this study is 0.05% (n: 133). The incidence of haematoma was significantly associated with the use of prophylaxis (6.85% versus 3.11%, p : 0.001). Surgical intervention for haematomas was also significantly associated in this group (3.15% versus 0.83%, p : 0.004). However, there was no difference in VTE events between both groups (0.26% versus 0.36%, p : 0.88). Conclusions: The use of VTE prophylaxis in breast cancer surgery is associated with increased haematomas without any benefit in preventing VTE events. Future studies that examine the use of risk assessment tools for VTE prophylaxis in high risk patients may be beneficial.

Risk of Venous Thromboembolism by Cancer Type: A Network Meta-Analysis

Patients with cancer have an increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). Comparing tumor-specific VTE risk is complicated by factors such as surgery, disease stage, and chemotherapy. Network meta-analysis (NMA) using cancer types as network nodes enabled us to estimate VTE rates by leveraging comparisons across cancer types while adjusting for baseline VTE risk in individual studies. This study was conducted to estimate the risk of VTE by cancer type and factors influencing VTE risk. The Embase, MEDLINE, and Cochrane Library repositories were systematically searched to identify clinical trials and observational studies published from 2005 to 2022 that assessed the risk of primary cancer-related VTE among two or more distinct cancer types. Studies with similar cancer populations and study methods reporting VTE occurring within 1 year of diagnosis were included in the NMA. Relative VTE rates across cancer types were estimated with random-effects Bayesian NMAs. Absolute VTE rates were calculated from these estimates using the average VTE incidence in lung cancer (the most frequently reported type) as the "anchor." From 2,603 records reviewed, 30 studies were included in this NMA. The general network described 3,948,752 patients and 18 cancer types: 3.1% experienced VTE within 1 year of diagnosis, with cancer-specific rates ranging from 0.7 to 7.4%. Consistent with existing VTE risk prediction tools, pancreatic cancer was associated with higher-than-average VTE risk. Other cancer types with high VTE risk were brain and ovarian cancers. The relative rankings of VTE risk for certain cancers changed based on disease stage and/or receipt of chemotherapy or surgery.

Risk of venous thromboembolism in patients undergoing gastric cancer surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a common postoperative complication in patients undergoing surgery for gastric cancer (GC). Although VTE incidence may vary among cancers, guidelines rarely stratify preventive methods for postoperative VTE by cancer type. The risk of VTE in patients undergoing surgery for GC remains unclear.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis was undertaken to determine the risk of VTE after GC surgery and discuss the clinical value of pharmacological thromboprophylaxis in these cases. Medline, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for articles published from their inception to September 2022.

RESULTS

Overall, 13 studies (111,936 patients) were included. The overall 1-month incidence of VTE, deep vein thrombosis (DVT), and pulmonary embolism (PE) after GC surgery was 1.8% (95% CI, 0.8-3.1%; I²=98.5%), 1.2% (95% CI, 0.5-2.1%; I²=96.1%), and 0.4% (95% CI, 0.1-1.1%; I²=96.3%), respectively. The prevalence of postoperative VTE was comparable between Asian and Western populations (1.8% vs. 1.8%; P > 0.05). Compared with mechanical prophylaxis alone, mechanical plus pharmacological prophylaxis was associated with a significantly lower 1-month rate of postoperative VTE and DVT (0.6% vs. 2.9% and 0.6% vs. 2.8%, respectively; all P < 0.05), but not PE (P > 0.05). The 1-month postoperative incidence of VTE was not significantly different between laparoscopic and open surgery (1.8% vs. 4.3%, P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Patients undergoing GC surgery do not have a high risk of VTE. The incidence of VTE after GC surgery is not significantly different between Eastern and Western patients. Mechanical plus pharmacological prophylaxis is more effective than mechanical prophylaxis alone in postoperative VTE prevention. The VTE risk is comparable between open and laparoscopic surgery for GC.

Safety and Efficacy of Prophylactic Enoxaparin Adjusted by Anti-Factor Xa Peak Levels in Pancreatic Surgery

BACKGROUND

Recommended prophylactic doses of enoxaparin (Lovenox) are associated with subprophylactic anti-Factor Xa (anti-Xa) levels. This study examines the safety and efficacy of anti-Xa-guided dosing of enoxaparin in pancreatic surgery.

METHODS

Prospectively enrolled patients undergoing pancreatic surgery received enoxaparin dosing adjusted based on peak anti-Xa levels and were compared to a historical cohort of patients.

RESULTS

Baseline characteristics were similar between the intervention and control groups. In the intervention group, 73.9% initially had subprophylactic peak anti-Xa levels. There were no differences in the venous thromboembolism (VTE) rates between the intervention and control groups (0% vs. 7.69%; P = .084), major bleeding events (4.35% vs. 2.56%; P = .627), RBC transfusion (15.2% vs. 25.6%; P = .257), or Hgb on discharge (9.82 vs. 9.44 g/dL; P = .244). Subtherapeutic anti-Xa levels were correlated with a higher BMI (P = .033), longer OR time (P = .011), and length of stay (P = .018).

CONCLUSIONS

Enoxaparin 40 mg once daily is associated with subprophylactic peak anti-Xa levels. Dose adjustment based on anti-Xa levels trended toward a lower rate of in-hospital VTE without an increase in bleeding or transfusion requirement.

Incidence and risk of venous thromboembolism according to primary treatment type in women with endometrial cancer: a population-based study

Background

Current prophylaxes and treatments for venous thromboembolism (VTE) in women with gynecologic cancer are mainly guided by studies on solid cancers because studies in gynecologic cancer did not provide sufficient data. Large-scale studies evaluating the incidence and risk of VTE according to therapeutic modality may guide prophylaxis and treatment of VTE in gynecologic cancer. This study was performed to determine the incidence and risk of VTE according to primary treatment type in Korean women with endometrial cancer.

Methods

We selected 26,256 women newly diagnosed with endometrial cancer between 2009 and 2018 from the Korean Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service database. During the total follow-up period and first six months after primary treatments initiation, the incidence and risk of VTE were evaluated according to primary treatment type, that is, no treatment, surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, or hormone therapy.

Results

VTE occurred in 136 per 10,000 women during the total follow-up period and in 54 per 10,000 women during the first six months with the highest frequency in women that underwent chemotherapy. During the first year, the monthly incidence of VTE decreased with time among women that underwent no treatment, surgery, or hormone therapy and remained unchanged in those that received radiotherapy or chemotherapy. Compared with women that received no treatment, VTE risk, especially of PE significantly increased in women that underwent chemotherapy (VTE: hazard ratio (HR), 2.334; 95% CI, 1.38–3.949; P = 0.002) (PE: HR, 2.742; 95% CI, 1.424–5.278; P = 0.003) or hormone therapy (VTE: HR, 2.073; 95% CI, 1.356–3.17; P = 0.001) (PE: HR, 2.086; 95% CI, 1.19–3.657; P = 0.01) during the total follow-up period and women that underwent only chemotherapy during the first six months (VTE: HR, 2.532; 95% CI, 1.291–4.966; P = 0.007) (PE: HR, 3.366; 95% CI, 1.496–7.576; P = 0.003).

Conclusions

In this cohort study, the incidence and risk of VTE were highest in women with endometrial cancer that underwent chemotherapy as a primary treatment. Notably, the incidence of VTE decreased over time in women that received no treatment, surgery, or hormone therapy. This study can help guide therapies for prophylaxis and treatment of VTE in women with endometrial cancer.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-021-08853-x.

Extended thromboprophylaxis following major abdominal/pelvic cancer-related surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature

BACKGROUND

Postoperative venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a significant source of morbidity and mortality in cancer patients undergoing major abdominopelvic surgery. Many guidelines recommend the use of extended duration postoperative low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) thromboprophylaxis, although the evidence for its overall safety and efficacy is unclear.

AIMS

We sought to assess the 30-day postoperative rates of VTE and bleeding complications following major abdominopelvic cancer surgery and to explore the potential risks and benefits of extended duration thromboprophylaxis with LMWH in such setting.

METHODS

A systematic search of the literature was conducted. Observational studies and RCTs of adult patients that underwent abdominopelvic cancer surgery were included. Pooled proportions for the outcome measures and pooled relative risks for the extended duration thromboprophylaxis analyses were generated.

RESULTS

A total of 68 studies (1,631,118 patients) were included in the analysis. The 30-day postoperative rate of VTE was 1.7% (95%CI: 1.5 to 1.9, I² = 98%). The postoperative rate of clinically-relevant bleeding complications was 3.5% (95%CI: 1.6 to 6.1, I² = 99%). Extended duration thromboprophylaxis was associated with a significant reduction in the incidence of clinical VTE (1.0% vs 2.1%; Risk ratio (RR) 0.48, 95%CI: 0.31 to 0.74; I² = 0), without a significant increase in clinically-relevant bleeding (4.0% vs. 4.9%; RR 1.0, 95%CI: 0.66 to 1.5, I² = 0).

CONCLUSIONS

The overall risk of symptomatic VTE within 30 days of surgery was relatively low. Extended LMWH thromboprophylaxis following major abdominopelvic cancer surgery was associated with a reduced incidence of clinical VTE without an increase in clinically-relevant bleeding.

Incidence and risk of venous thromboembolism according to primary treatment in women with ovarian cancer: A retrospective cohort study

Objective

This study aimed to investigate incidence and risk for venous thromboembolism (VTE) according to primary treatment in women with ovarian cancer.

Methods

We selected 26,863 women newly diagnosed with ovarian cancer between 2009 and 2018 from the Korean Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service databases. During the total follow-up period and the first six months after initiation of primary treatments, incidence and risk of VTE were evaluated according to primary treatment as no treatment, surgery, radiotherapy, or chemotherapy.

Results

The mean follow-up period was 1285.5±6 days. The VTE incidence was highest in women who underwent chemotherapy (306 per 10,000 women). Among women who underwent surgery, VTE was highest in surgery with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (536 per 10,000 women), followed by surgery with adjuvant chemotherapy (360 per 10,000 women) and surgery alone (132 per 10,000 women). During the first 12 months, monthly incidence of VTE decreased. Compared with women with no treatment, risk of VTE significantly increased in women undergoing chemotherapy (HR 1.297; 95% CI, 1.08–1.557; P = 0.005) during the total follow-up period and decreased in women undergoing surgery (HR 0.557; 95% CI, 0.401–0.775; P<0.001) and radiotherapy (HR 0.289; 95% CI, 0.119–0.701; P = 0.006) during the first six months. Among women who underwent surgery, VTE risk significantly increased in surgery with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (HR 4.848; 95% CI, 1.86–12.632; P = 0.001) followed by surgery with adjuvant chemotherapy (HR 2.807; 95% CI, 1.757–4.485; P<0.001) compared with surgery alone during the total follow-up period and in surgery with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (HR 4.223; 95% CI, 1.37–13.022; P = 0.012) during the first six months.

Conclusions

In this large Korean cohort study, incidence and risk of VTE were highest in women with ovarian cancer who underwent chemotherapy and surgery with neoadjuvant chemotherapy as a primary cancer treatment. Incidence of VTE decreased over time.

Incidence and risk factors of VTE in patients with cervical cancer using the Korean national health insurance data

This study investigated incidence and risk factors for venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients with cervical cancer. We selected 49,514 patients newly diagnosed with cervical cancer from the Korean Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service databases. During the total follow-up period and first 6 months after initiation of primary treatments, incidence of VTE, and association of risk factors with VTE occurrence were evaluated according to primary treatments or no treatment, surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy. VTE occurred in 1.15% of patients with cervical cancer. Regardless of the period after initiation of primary treatments, and of VTE, the incidence of thromboembolism was highest in chemotherapy. During the first 12 months, monthly incidence of VTE was highest in chemotherapy and decreased with time in all primary treatments. Compared with no treatment, VTE risk significantly increased for all primary treatments (surgery: HR 1.492; 95% CI 1.186-1.877) (radiotherapy: HR 2.275; 95% CI 1.813-2.855) (chemotherapy: HR 4.378; 95% CI 3.095-6.193) and for chemotherapy during the first 6 months (HR 3.394; 95% CI 2.062-5.588). In this cohort study, incidence and risk of VTE in patients with cervical cancer were the highest when chemotherapy was the primary cancer treatment, and incidence of VTE decreased with time.

Progress in the study of cancer-associated venous thromboembolism

OBJECTIVE

Venous thromboembolism is a major cause of morbidity, mortality, and increased medical costs in tumor patients. In the current review, we summarize the progress made in the study of cancer-associated venous thromboembolism.

METHODS

By searching cancer-associated venous thromboembolism-related literature on PubMed, the epidemiology, pathological mechanisms, risk factors, risk prediction models, and prevention and treatment of cancer-associated venous thromboembolism were reviewed.

RESULTS

The pathophysiological mechanisms of cancer-associated venous thromboembolism are multifactorial. Various blood cell counts (such as platelets and white blood cells) and biomarkers (such as D-dimer and sP-selectin) were considered predictors of thrombosis in cancer patients and were incorporated into the venous thromboembolism risk stratification models. Thromboprophylaxis is currently recommended for all hospitalized cancer patients. In addition, outpatient thromboprophylaxis can be used for selected high-risk patients. Low-molecular-weight heparin was the preferred treatment for cancer-associated venous thromboembolism, but some issues arose in the long-term treatment. In this case, direct oral anticoagulants were a treatment option for tumor patients. The efficacy of direct oral anticoagulant in treating cancer patients is not inferior to low-molecular-weight heparin, but is associated with a higher risk of bleeding. Therefore, there were concerns regarding their safety.

CONCLUSION

Since thrombocytopenia, thrombosis recurrence, and bleeding are common in tumor patients, the selection of anticoagulants in this circumstance is a considerable challenge for clinicians.

Extended duration chemoprophylaxis for venous thromboembolism following abdominopelvic oncologic surgery

Venous thromboembolism (VTE), including deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism, is the most common cause of 30-day morbidity in oncology patients following surgery due to their hypercoagulable state. To combat this, VTE prophylaxis with anticoagulation extending beyond hospital discharge, termed extended duration chemoprophylaxis (EDCP), has been proposed, with the most recent guidelines recommending 28 post-operative days of EDCP. However, the literature has demonstrated poor compliance to these recommendations. We extended the duration of EDCP to 28 days post hospital discharge, effectively creating a standard discharge prescription for all surgical oncology patients. Our aim is to assess our EDCP protocol on patient compliance and VTE rate following major oncologic resection. We performed a retrospective, single institution, cohort study that involved chart review and telephone survey on patients who underwent major open abdominopelvic oncologic resection. A total of 130 patients were included; 60 received EDCP and 68 did not. VTE rate for the EDCP cohort was 0% and 7.4% for the non-EDCP cohort (p = 0.04). 85% of patients were fully compliant with EDCP. No bleeding related complications with EDCP were identified. Our data is consistent with prior literature in demonstrating a lower VTE rate with EDCP without an increase in bleeding related complications and we have demonstrated that it is possible to achieve a high rate of patient compliance with EDCP.