Direct oral anticoagulants and warfarin in patients with cirrhosis: a comparison of outcomes

Efficacy and Safety of Direct Oral Anticoagulants Compared to Warfarin in Patients with Cirrhosis and Splanchnic Vein Thrombosis

OBJECTIVE

The incidence of splanchnic vein thrombosis (SVT) is reported to be <25 times lower than that of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary emboli, which occur in 70 to 270/100,000 cases in the general population. Current guidelines recommend initial treatment with therapeutic low-molecular-weight heparin followed by a transition to a vitamin K antagonist (VKA) or a direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) in patients with cirrhosis who develop SVT without severe liver dysfunction. This, however, is based on observational data. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of anticoagulant therapy in patients with cirrhosis who present with SVT and receive either a DOAC or a VKA.

METHODS

This multicenter retrospective cohort study was conducted from December 2021 to November 2022. Patients between the ages of 18 and 75 years with cirrhosis and acute SVT who received either a VKA or a DOAC between July 2019 and July 2021 were eligible for inclusion. The primary outcome was the efficacy of treatment, defined as a new thrombotic event. The secondary outcome was the safety of treatment, defined as the development of major bleeding. Readmission data were followed up at 6 and 10 months. Bivariate analysis was conducted to assess the relationship between the medication groups and each outcome and summarized as odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Statistical significance was set at 5% for all of the comparisons.

RESULTS

A total of 80 patients from 50 hospitals were included in this study. Sixty-one patients (59.02% male) received DOACs and 19 (57.89% male) received a VKA. Of the patients who received DOACs, 41 (67.21%) received apixaban, one (1.64%) received dabigatran, and 19 (31.15%) received rivaroxaban. The results from the bivariate analysis revealed no significant differences between DOACs and warfarin for both the efficacy (OR 1.46, 95% CI 0.44-4.84, P = 0.53) and safety outcomes (OR 1.03, 95% CI 0.04-26.43, P = 1) at 10 months.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of DOACs in patients with cirrhosis who present with SVT may be efficacious and safe compared with warfarin. The findings from our study may inform power analyses for well-conducted randomized trials to confirm these findings.

The Effectiveness and Safety of Rivaroxaban and Edoxaban in the Treatment of Lower Extremity Deep Vein Thrombosis

INTRODUCTION

Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is a medical condition characterized by forming a blood clot, or thrombus, in one of the deep veins, typically in the legs. It is a type of venous thromboembolism, which refers to the formation of blood clots in the veins. It is caused by Virchow's triad (stasis, hypercoagulation, and endothelial injury).

OBJECTIVE

Our main objective is to explore the effectiveness and safety of rivaroxaban and edoxaban in treating lower extremity DVT.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study involving 406 patients subjected to DVT treatment using direct oral anticoagulants (edoxaban and rivaroxaban) at our hospital. We recruited adult patients (aged 18 years and more) diagnosed with lower extremity DVT and received treatment with either rivaroxaban or edoxaban as the primary anticoagulant therapy for DVT. We excluded patients who received treatment with other anticoagulant medications (warfarin and heparin) as the primary therapy for DVT.

RESULTS

The groups showed statistically significant differences in red blood cell count and hemoglobin levels, with the edoxaban group having high values. However, the 2 groups observed no statistically significant differences in creatinine clearance, white blood cell count, platelet count, C-reactive protein, and D-dimer levels. The difference in the incidence of pulmonary embolism between the 2 groups was statistically significant (P value < 0.001). The edoxaban group had fewer pulmonary embolism patients than the rivaroxaban group. The reduction in recurrent thrombosis was significantly higher in the rivaroxaban group compared to the edoxaban group. There were no significant differences in the major bleeding at various sites across the 2 treatment groups (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Rivaroxaban's pharmacokinetic profile includes rapid absorption and a relatively short half-life. It means that once administered, rivaroxaban quickly reaches its peak concentration in the blood and is subsequently eliminated from the body within a relatively short period. Edoxaban's pharmacokinetic profile may include slower absorption and a longer half-life than rivaroxaban. It can result in a slower rate of achieving peak concentration and a more prolonged presence in the bloodstream. These results emphasize the need for careful consideration of anticoagulant therapy in patients with underlying cancer and underscore the importance of managing risks while providing adequate anticoagulation to prevent thrombotic events.

Recommendations for the safe use of direct oral anticoagulants in patients with cirrhosis based on a systematic review of pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic and safety data

PURPOSE

The popularity of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) is increasing among patients with cirrhosis. Cirrhosis has a major impact on the pharmacokinetics of drugs, potentially increasing adverse events. Safe use of drugs in cirrhosis requires a diligent risk-benefit analysis. The aim of this study is to develop practice recommendations for safe use of DOACs in cirrhosis based on a systematic review of pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic and safety data.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic literature search to identify studies on pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and safety of DOACs in cirrhosis. Data were collected and presented in summary tables by severity of cirrhosis using the Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP) classification. A multidisciplinary expert panel evaluated the results and classified the DOACs according to safety.

RESULTS

Fifty four studies were included. All DOACs were classified as 'no additional risks known' for CTP A. For CTP B, apixaban, dabigatran and edoxaban were classified as 'no additional risks known'. Apixaban and edoxaban showed fewer adverse events in patients with cirrhosis, while dabigatran may be less impacted by severity of cirrhosis based on its pharmacokinetic profile. Rivaroxaban was classified as 'unsafe' in CTP B and C based on significant pharmacokinetic alterations. Due to lack of data, apixaban, dabigatran and edoxaban were classified as 'unknown' for CTP C.

CONCLUSION

DOACs can be used in patients with CTP A cirrhosis, and apixaban, dabigatran and edoxaban can also be used in CTP B. It is recommended to avoid rivaroxaban in CTP B and C. There is insufficient evidence to support safe use of other DOACs in CTP C cirrhosis.

Prothrombin conversion and thrombin decay in patients with cirrhosis-role of prothrombin and antithrombin deficiencies

BACKGROUND

Thrombin generation (TG) in the presence of thrombomodulin (TG-TM) in the plasma of patients with cirrhosis (PWC) is tilted toward a hypercoagulable phenotype. Low protein C and elevated factor VIII levels play a role, but other determinants, such as the prothrombin/antithrombin pair, must also be studied.

OBJECTIVES

The objectives were (i) to quantitatively assess the subprocesses (prothrombin conversion and thrombin decay) and (ii) to understand the underlying mechanism by studying TG dynamics after prothrombin and antithrombin plasma level correction in PWC.

METHODS

We studied TG-TM in plasma samples of 36 healthy controls (HCs) and 41 PWC with prothrombin and antithrombin levels of <70% and after their correction. We initiated coagulation with an intermediate picomolar concentration of tissue factor. We determined the overall thrombin potential, prothrombin conversion, and thrombin decay.

RESULTS

TG-TM was increased in PWC compared with HC due to impaired thrombin inhibition. Indeed, thrombin decay capacity (min-1) decreased from 0.37 (0.35-0.40) in HC to 0.33 (0.30-0.37) in the Child-Turcotte-Pugh A (CTP-A; P = .09), 0.27 (0.26-0.30) in the CTP-B (P < .001), and 0.20 (0.19-0.20) in the CTP-C (P < .001) group. Concomitant correction of prothrombin and antithrombin increased endogenous thrombin potential with prothrombin conversion surpassing thrombin decay. By contrast, when we corrected only antithrombin, TG-TM was normalized and even consistent with a hypocoagulable phenotype in the CTP-C group.

CONCLUSION

Our results highlight that in PWC, hypercoagulability (evidenced in the presence of TM) is due to impaired thrombin decay, whereas low prothrombin levels do not translate into decreased prothrombin conversion, likely due to altered TM-activated protein C negative feedback.

Direct Oral Anticoagulants Versus Traditional Anticoagulation in Cirrhotic Patients with Portal Vein Thrombosis: Updated Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

This systematic review aimed to evaluate the comparative effectiveness and safety of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) compared to traditional anticoagulation (vitamin K antagonists or low-molecular-weight heparins) in cirrhotic patients with portal vein thrombosis (PVT).

METHODS

We conducted a literature search in PubMed and Embase databases up to May 2024. Studies were selected according to the PICOS criteria, focusing on cirrhotic patients with PVT treated with DOACs (dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, or edoxaban) compared to traditional anticoagulation.

RESULTS

Our systematic review included four observational studies conducted in Japan, China, and the United States, involving a total of 223 patients with cirrhosis and PVT. The included studies collectively suggested that anticoagulation therapy, including DOACs, was associated with improved recanalization rates and reduced progression of PVT in patients with liver cirrhosis, without a significant increase in bleeding complications. Specifically, edoxaban demonstrated superior effectiveness in reducing PVT volume compared to traditional anticoagulation, while maintaining a favorable safety profile.

CONCLUSION

DOACs may provide a promising therapeutic option for PVT in cirrhotic patients. Further research is needed to confirm the potential benefits and risks of DOACs in this population.

Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Direct Oral Anticoagulants and Warfarin in Cirrhotic Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE

Currently, there is limited evidence regarding the use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) for patients with liver cirrhosis (LC). We performed a meta-analysis to compare the efficacy and safety of DOACs versus warfarin in this population.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Embase and Scopus databases from inception to August 2024. Clinical studies comparing the use of DOACs with warfarin in cirrhotic patients were included. Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% CIs were estimated by either fixed or random effects models. Primary efficacy outcomes were ischemic stroke/thromboembolism (IS/TE) and all-cause death, the primary safety outcomes were the bleeding risks.

RESULTS

Sixteen studies were included (16 829 individuals). DOACs had similar benefits in preventing IS/TE (HR = 0.87, 95% CI: 0.69-1.10), but DOACs were significantly associated with reduced risk of all-cause death (HR = 0.87, 95% CI: 0.79-0.97). On the other hand, we observed significantly reduced risks of any bleeding (HR = 0.60; 95%CI: 0.37-0.95), major bleeding (HR = 0.72; 95%CI: 0.63-0.82), intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) (HR = 0.47; 95%CI: 0.30-0.73), and gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) (HR = 0.72, 95% CI: 0.60-0.87) in patients receiving DOACs. Results were consistent in cirrhotic patients with AF. Furthermore, DOACs reduced the incidence of major bleeding (HR = 0.65, 95%CI: 0.55-0.78) and ICH (HR = 0.17, 95%CI: 0.04-0.76) in patients with moderate to severe cirrhosis.

CONCLUSION

Our study demonstrates that DOACs, compared with warfarin, exerted comparable efficacy and better safety and may represent a safer alternative to warfarin in cirrhotic patients.

Risk of Bleeding in Liver Cirrhosis Receiving Direct Oral Anticoagulants: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

 Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are effective for the management of thromboembolic disorders. However, bleeding remains a major concern in cirrhotic patients receiving DOACs.

METHODS

 PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases were searched. The incidence of bleeding episodes in cirrhotic patients receiving DOACs was pooled. Odds ratios (ORs) were calculated to compare the incidence of bleeding episodes in cirrhotic patients who received DOACs versus those who received conventional anticoagulants and did not receive anticoagulants.

RESULTS

 Twenty-nine studies were included. All bleeding, major bleeding, fatal bleeding, gastrointestinal bleeding, and intracranial hemorrhage episodes were observed in 310/2,469, 100/1,388, 2/611, 166/1,886, and 5/1,147 cirrhotic patients receiving DOACs, respectively. Their pooled incidences were 13, 6, 0, 8, and 0%, respectively. They became higher in subgroup analyses of studies with advanced age, a longer treatment duration, and Child-Turcotte-Pugh class C. Compared with conventional anticoagulants, DOACs were associated with lower incidences of all bleeding (OR = 0.71, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.52-0.98) and major bleeding (OR = 0.55, 95% CI = 0.37-0.83) in cirrhotic patients, but not those of fatal bleeding (OR = 0.21, 95% CI = 0.04-1.28), gastrointestinal bleeding (OR = 0.78, 95% CI = 0.52-1.17), or intracranial hemorrhage (OR = 0.36, 95% CI = 0.12-1.12). The incidences of all bleeding (OR = 1.04, 95% CI = 0.22-4.79) and major bleeding (OR = 0.96, 95% CI = 0.26-3.61) did not significantly differ between cirrhotic patients with portal vein thrombosis (PVT) who received DOACs and those who did not receive anticoagulants.

CONCLUSION

 DOACs carry a low risk of bleeding in liver cirrhosis. Age, treatment duration, and Child-Turcotte-Pugh class may be associated with bleeding in cirrhotic patients receiving DOACs. The risk of bleeding is not increased by DOACs in cirrhotic patients with PVT.

Direct oral anticoagulants for the treatment of splanchnic vein thrombosis: A state of art

Splanchnic vein thrombosis (SVT) is a manifestation of venous thromboembolism in an unusual site. Portal, mesenteric, and splenic veins are the most common vessels involved in SVT which occurs mainly in patients with liver cirrhosis, although non-cirrhotic patients could be affected as well. Thrombosis of hepatic veins, also known as Budd-Chiari syndrome, is another manifestation of SVT. Prompt diagnosis and intervention are mandatory in order to increase the recalization rate and reduce the risk of thrombus progression and hypertensive complications. Traditional anticoagulation with heparin and vitamin-K antagonists is the treatment of choice in these cases. However, recent studies have shown promising results on the efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in this setting. Available results are mainly based on retrospective studies with small sample size, but first clinical trials have been published in the last years. This manuscript aims to provide an updated overview of the current evidence regarding the role of DOACs for SVT in both cirrhotic and non-cirrhotic patients.

Anticoagulation for Atrial Fibrillation in Patients with Decompensated Liver Cirrhosis: Bold and Brave?

Atrial fibrillation is frequently diagnosed in patients with liver cirrhosis, especially in those with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis or alcoholic etiology. Anticoagulant treatment is recommended for thromboembolic protection in patients with atrial fibrillation. Considering the impaired coagulation balance in liver cirrhosis, predisposing patients to bleed or thrombotic events, the anticoagulant treatment is still a matter of debate. Although patients with liver cirrhosis were excluded from the pivotal studies that confirmed the efficacy and safety of the anticoagulant treatment in patients with atrial fibrillation, data from real-life cohorts demonstrated that the anticoagulant treatment in patients with liver cirrhosis could be safe. This review aimed to evaluate the recent data regarding the safety and efficacy of anticoagulant treatment in patients with decompensated liver cirrhosis. Direct oral anticoagulants are safer than warfarin in patients with compensated liver cirrhosis. In Child-Pugh class C liver cirrhosis, direct oral anticoagulants are contraindicated. New bleeding and ischemic risk scores should be developed especially for patients with liver cirrhosis, and biomarkers for bleeding complications should be implemented in clinical practice to personalize this treatment in a very difficult population represented by decompensated liver cirrhosis patients.

Prescribing Trends of Oral Anticoagulants in US Patients With Cirrhosis and Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation

Background Many patients with cirrhosis have concurrent nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). Data are lacking regarding recent oral anticoagulant (OAC) usage trends among US patients with cirrhosis and NVAF. Methods and Results Using MarketScan claims data (2012-2019), we identified patients with cirrhosis and NVAF eligible for OACs (CHA2DS2-VASc score ≥2 [men] or ≥3 [women]). We calculated the yearly proportion of patients prescribed a direct OAC (DOAC), warfarin, or no OAC. We stratified by high-risk features (decompensated cirrhosis, thrombocytopenia, coagulopathy, chronic kidney disease, or end-stage renal disease). Among 32 487 patients (mean age=71.6 years, 38.5% women, 15.1% with decompensated cirrhosis, mean CHA2DS2-VASc=4.2), 44.6% used OACs within 180 days of NVAF diagnosis, including DOACs (20.2%) or warfarin (24.4%). Compared with OAC nonusers, OAC users were less likely to have decompensated cirrhosis (18.6% versus 10.7%), thrombocytopenia (19.5% versus 12.5%), or chronic kidney disease/end-stage renal disease (15.5% versus 14.0%). Between 2012 and 2019, warfarin use decreased by 21.0% (32.0% to 11.0%), whereas DOAC use increased by 30.6% (7.4% to 38.0%), and among all DOACs between 2012 and 2019, apixaban was the most commonly prescribed (46.1%). Warfarin use decreased and DOAC use increased in all subgroups, including in compensated and decompensated cirrhosis, thrombocytopenia, coagulopathy, chronic kidney disease/end-stage renal disease, and across CHA2DS2-VASc categories. Among OAC users (2012-2019), DOAC use increased by 58.9% (18.7% to 77.6%). Among DOAC users, the greatest proportional increase was with apixaban (61.2%; P<0.001). Conclusions Among US patients with cirrhosis and NVAF, DOAC use has increased substantially and surpassed warfarin, including in decompensated cirrhosis. Nevertheless, >55% of patients remain untreated, underscoring the need for clearer treatment guidance.

Safety of direct oral anticoagulants in patients with liver disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), such as apixaban, edoxaban, rivaroxaban, or dabigatran, are an effective treatment for atrial fibrillation (AF) and deep venous thromboembolism. We hope to evaluate the safety of DOACs versus warfarin/low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) in improving bleeding events in patients with different severity of the liver disease.

METHODS

We systematically searched the Cochrane Library, PubMed, and Embase databases for studies reporting the effects of DOACs in patients with liver cirrhosis. A random-effects model or fixed-effects model was selected to pool risk ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI).

RESULTS

A total of 18 studies involving 41,447 participants was included in this meta-analysis. Compare with warfarin/ LMWH, the use of DOACs significantly reduced the incidence of all bleeding (RR: 0.76; 95%CI: 0.66 to 0.87), major bleeding (RR: 0.51; 95%CI: 0.28 to 0.91), intracranial hemorrhage (RR: 0.50; 95%CI: 0.31 to 0.81), and gastrointestinal bleeding (RR: 0.76, 95% CI: 0.60 to 0.97), and all-cause death in patients with liver disease (RR: 0.77; 95%CI: 0.62 to 0.95). Similar results were observed in atrial fibrillation patients with liver disease and cirrhosis subgroups. Furthermore, the pooled estimates of the Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP) class indicated that DOACs reduced the incidence of all bleeding (RR: 0.61; 95%CI: 0.45 to 0.82), gastrointestinal bleeding (RR 0.55; 95%CI: 0.37 to 0.83), and all-cause death (RR: 0.62; 95%CI: 0.49 to 0.79) in patients with mild to moderate cirrhosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study demonstrates that DOACs significantly reduce the risk of bleeding in patients with liver disease compared with warfarin/LMWH.

Investigational drugs in early clinical development for portal hypertension

INTRODUCTION

Advanced chronic liver disease is considered a reversible condition after removal of the primary aetiological factor. This has led to a paradigm shift in which portal hypertension (PH) is a reversible complication of cirrhosis. The pharmacologic management of PH is centered on finding targets to modify the natural history of cirrhosis and PH.

AREAS COVERED

This paper offers an overview of the use of pharmacological strategies in early clinical development that modify PH. Papers included were selected from searching clinical trials sites and PubMed from the last 10 years.

EXPERT OPINION

A paradigm shift has generated a new concept of PH in cirrhosis as a reversible complication of a potentially curable disease. Decreasing portal pressure to prevent decompensation and further complications of cirrhosis that may lead liver transplantation or death is a goal. Therapeutic strategies also aspire achieve total or partial regression of fibrosis thus eliminating the need for treatment or screening of PH.

Anticoagulation Considerations in Liver Disease

Coagulopathy of liver disease is a complex pathology that may result in thrombosis and/or bleeding complications. Routine laboratory values are not always reflective of the degree of these risks. Additionally, prophylaxis and treatment of venous thromboembolism in patients with cirrhosis require careful evaluation when selecting and monitoring drug therapy for these indications. Therefore, this article aims to provide insight regarding coagulopathy of liver disease, influence on laboratory values, and anticoagulant therapy considerations for critical care nurses assuming care for patients with cirrhosis.

Efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants versus vitamin K antagonist for portal vein thrombosis in cirrhosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION AND AIM

Portal vein thrombosis (PVT) is associated with a higher risk of liver-related complications. Recent guidelines recommend direct-acting anticoagulants (DOAC) in patients with cirrhosis and non-tumoral PVT. However, data on the efficacy and safety of DOAC in these patients remain limited. We aim to investigate the efficacy and safety of DOAC compared to vitamin K antagonists (VKA) to treat non-tumoral PVT in patients with cirrhosis.

METHODS

We performed a systematic search of six electronic databases using MeSH term and free text. We selected all studies comparing the use of DOACs with vitamin K antagonist to treat PVT in cirrhosis. The primary outcome was PVT recanalization. Secondary outcomes were and PVT progression, major bleeding, variceal bleeding and death.

RESULTS

From 944 citations, we included 552 subjects from a total of 11 studies (10 observational and 1 randomized trial) that fulfilled the inclusion criteria. We found that DOAC were associated with a higher pooled rate of PVT recanalization (RR = 1.67, 95%CI: 1.02, 2.74, I2 = 79%) and lower pooled risk of PVT progression (RR = 0.14, 95%CI: 0.03-0.57, I2 = 0%). The pooled risk of major bleeding (RR = 0.29, 95%CI: 0.08-1.01, I2 = 0%), variceal bleeding (RR = 1.29, 95%CI: 0.64-2.59, I2 = 0%) and death (RR = 0.31, 95%CI: 0.01-9.578, I2 = 80%) was similar between DOAC and VKA.

CONCLUSION

For the treatment of PVT in patients with cirrhosis, the bleeding risk was comparable between DOAC and VKA. However, DOAC were associated with a higher pooled rate of PVT recanalization. Dedicated randomized studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Direct oral anticoagulant use in special populations

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The pivotal phase III trials demonstrating efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in the treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE) or nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) excluded patients with important and common comorbidities, including obesity, advanced chronic kidney disease, cirrhosis, cancer and antiphospholipid antibody syndrome. Despite the lack of large prospective randomized control trials in these patient populations, the use of DOACs has led to a wealth of efficacy and safety data within these groups.

RECENT FINDINGS

Retrospective studies, meta-analyses, national databases and pharmacokinetic data have shed light on the efficacy and safety of DOACs in these patient populations. Although DOACs should be avoided in those with high-risk triple positive antiphospholipid antibody syndrome, advanced cirrhosis, advanced kidney disease and intact gastrointestinal cancers, and used with caution in genitourinary cancers, their use extends beyond the inclusion criteria of the initial randomized control trials.

SUMMARY

DOACs have revolutionized anticoagulant management and have become the cornerstone for VTE treatment and stroke prevention in NVAF. The decision to use DOACs must be individualized. Patient preference, underlying comorbidities and informed consent must always be considered when selecting the most appropriate anticoagulant.

Anticoagulation in atrial fibrillation and liver disease: a pooled-analysis of > 20000 patients

AIMS

Anticoagulation for atrial-fibrillation (AF) patients with liver-disease represents a clinical dilemma. We sought to evaluate the efficacy/safety of different anticoagulation, i.e. vitamin-K-antagonist (VKA) and non-VKA oral-anticoagulants (NOACs) in such patient group.

METHODS AND RESULTS

This was a pooled-analysis enrolling up-to-date clinical data. Two subsets: subset A (VKA vs. Non-Anticoagulation) and subset B (NOACs vs. VKA) were pre-specified. The study outcomes were ischemic-stroke(IS)/thromboembolism(TE), major-bleeding (MB), intracranial-bleeding (ICB), gastrointestinal-bleeding (GIB) and all-cause mortality.A total of 20,042 patients' data were analyzed (subset A: N = 10275, subset B: N = 9767). Overall mean age: 71±11 years, mean CHA2DS2-VASc score: 4.0±1.8, mean HAS-BLED score: 3.6±1.2. The majority of the patients had Child-Pugh category (A-B). As compared with Non-Anticoagulation, VKA seemed to reduce the risk of IS/TE (OR: 0.60, P = 0.05), but heighten the risk of all-bleeding-events including MB (OR: 2.81, P = 0.01), ICB (OR: 1.60, P = 0.01), and GIB (OR: 3.32, P = 0.01). When compared with VKA, NOACs had similar efficacy in reducing the risk of IS/TE (OR: 0.82, P = 0.64), significantly lower risk of MB (OR: 0.54, P = 0.0003) and ICB (OR: 0.35, P < 0.0001), and trend towards reduced risk of GIB (OR: 0.72, P = 0.12) and all-cause mortality (OR: 0.79, P = 0.35). The favorable effects were maintained in subgroups of individual NOAC.

CONCLUSIONS

VKA appears to reduce the risk of IS/TE but increase all-bleeding-events. NOACs have similar effect in reducing the risk of IS/TE and have significantly lower risk of MB and ICB as compared with VKA. NOACs seem to be associated with better clinical outcome than VKA in patients with mild-moderate liver disease.

Safety of direct oral anticoagulants in patients with mild to moderate cirrhosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

To evaluate major bleeding in cirrhosis with use of traditional anticoagulation or direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), using a standardized definition. Anticoagulation in patients with cirrhosis is often a clinical conundrum for providers as the necessary balance between thrombotic and bleeding risk is complicated by end organ damage. Recent meta-analyses have sought to evaluate the safety and efficacy of direct oral anticoagulants in patients with liver disease. These recent analyses are limited by various bleeding definitions, broad inclusion criteria, and few indications for anticoagulation. We sought to conduct a meta-analysis using a validated definition for major bleeding and compare rates between traditional anticoagulation and DOACs in patients with cirrhosis. Articles were eligible for inclusion if the international society on thrombosis and hemostasis (ISTH) definition of a major bleed was the primary safety outcome. Additionally, only articles including patients with cirrhosis and receiving treatment with anticoagulation for an indication for stroke prevention or venous thromboembolism were eligible. Eligible articles needed a DOAC comparator group against traditional anticoagulant medication. Seven studies met inclusion criteria and compiled data for 683 patients in the meta-analysis. Pooled trial analysis demonstrated no statistically significant difference in the primary outcome of ISTH major bleeding (OR 0.55, 95%CI 0.28-1.07, I² 0%). Individual secondary outcomes of all bleeding, intracerebral hemorrhage, or gastrointestinal bleeding also demonstrated no significant difference between DOACs and traditional anticoagulation. Use of DOACs in patients with mild to moderate cirrhosis carries similar risk to use of traditional anticoagulation.

2020 Clinical Update in Liver Transplantation

The gold standard treatment of end-stage liver disease continues to be liver transplantation (LT). The challenges of LT require skilled anesthesiologists to anticipate physiologic changes associated with end-stage liver disease and surgical considerations that affect multiple organ systems. While on the waiting list, patients may be placed on new anticoagulation medications that can confound already complex coagulopathy in LT patients. Pain management often is an afterthought for such a complex procedure, but appropriate medications can help control pain while limiting opioid medications. Surgical stress and medications for immunosuppression can affect perioperative glucose management in ways that have implications for patient and graft survival. The coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic in 2020 provided a new challenge for anesthesiologists. The uncertainty of the novel respiratory virus challenged providers beyond just LT patients.

Direct oral anticoagulants for unusual-site venous thromboembolism

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are currently the preferred oral anticoagulant treatment for most of the patients with deep vein thrombosis of the lower extremities and/or pulmonary embolism. DOACs have several advantages over vitamin K antagonists, such as availability of fixed dosages, fewer drug interactions, faster onset of action, shorter half-life, and lower risk of major and intracranial bleeding. Although the evidence on the use of DOACs in patients with unusual-site venous thromboembolism (VTE) is limited to a few, small randomized controlled trials, these drugs are increasingly used in clinical practice, and several observational cohort studies have been published recently. This narrative review will describe the latest evidence for the use of the DOACs in patients with thrombosis in atypical locations (splanchnic, cerebral, upper extremity, ovarian, and renal vein thrombosis) and will provide some practical advice for their use in patients with unusual-site VTE.

Efficacy and Safety of Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation and Liver Disease: a Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Liver disease is associated with increased bleeding risk. The efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) is a subject of contention in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients with liver disease.

METHODS

Electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library) were searched to retrieve studies on the efficacy and safety of DOACs versus warfarin in AF patients with liver disease from January 1980 to April 2020. A meta-analysis was conducted using a random-effects model.

RESULTS

Six studies involving 41,859 patients were included. Compared with warfarin, DOACs demonstrated significant reduction in ischemic stroke (HR, 0.68; 95% CI (0.54-0.86)), major bleeding (0.74 (0.59-0.92)), and intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) (0.48 (0.40-0.58)), with no significant effect on gastrointestinal bleeding (P = 0.893) in AF patients with liver disease. Similar results were observed in regular-dose, reduced-dose, and active liver disease subgroups, albeit Asian patients had a slight reduction in major bleeding (P = 0.055). Furthermore, the pooled estimates of individual DOAC subgroups indicated that dabigatran and apixaban led to greater safety in major bleeding (P < 0.001), ICH (P < 0.001), and gastrointestinal bleeding (P < 0.005) in these patients. The same trends were observed in AF patients with cirrhosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that DOACs significantly reduce the risk of ischemic stroke, major bleeding, and ICH, with no significant effect on the risk of gastrointestinal bleeding in AF patients with liver disease compared with warfarin.

Real-world use of nonvitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant in atrial fibrillation patients with liver disease: A meta-analysis

Several studies have investigated the effectiveness and safety of nonvitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) vs vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and liver disease. Herein, we conducted a meta‐analysis to compare the effect of NOACs with VKAs in patients with AF and liver disease. We also conducted a subsidiary analysis to compare the risk of liver injury between NOACs and VKA in AF patients. We systematically searched the PubMed and Embase databases from January 2009 to May 2020 for the relevant studies. Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were selected and pooled using a random‐effects model. A total of six cohorts were included. Compared with VKA use, the use of NOACs was associated with reduced risks of stroke or systemic embolism (HR 0.68, 95% CI 0.49‐0.93), all‐cause death (HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.63‐0.75), and intracranial bleeding (HR 0.49, 95% CI 0.40‐0.59), whereas the outcomes of major bleeding (HR 0.72, 95% CI 0.51‐1.01) and gastrointestinal bleeding (HR 0.84, 95% CI 0.51‐1.36) were not significantly different between groups in AF patients with liver disease. Moreover, compared with VKA use, the use of NOACs was associated with a reduced risk of liver injury (HR 0.72, 95% CI 0.61‐0.84) in AF patients. Compared with VKAs, the use of NOACs was associated with reduced risks of stroke or systemic embolism, all‐cause death, and intracranial bleeding in AF patients with liver disease, and associated with a reduced risk of liver injury in AF patients.

Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Patients with Liver Disease in the Era of Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease Global Epidemic: A Narrative Review

Atrial fibrillation (AF) and venous thromboembolism (VTE) are highly prevalent and relevant healthcare issues. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are now the first-choice for anticoagulant treatment of these conditions displaying a better efficacy/safety profile than vitamin-K antagonists, mainly due to significantly reduced risk of major bleeding, especially of intracranial haemorrhage. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is the most common liver disease in developed countries showing a continuously growing prevalence. Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), its evolutive form, will be the leading cause for liver transplantation by 2020. NAFLD is independently associated with an increased risk of abnormalities of cardiac structure and function, including cardiac rhythm disorders (mainly AF). Moreover, data suggest an increased risk of unprovoked VTE associated with NAFLD/NASH. Therefore, a growing number of patients with chronic liver disease (CLD) will be candidate for anticoagulant therapy in the near future. Cirrhosis of any etiology is characterized by an unstable thrombosis/bleeding haemostatic balance, making anticoagulant therapy particularly challenging in this condition. Given that patients with significant active liver disease and cirrhosis were excluded from all pivotal randomized controlled trials on DOACs, this comprehensive review aims at critically discussing real-world evidence, including the latest population studies, regarding the use of DOACs in patients with CLD/cirrhosis.