Contrast-Enhanced Mammography and Radiomics Analysis for Noninvasive Breast Cancer Characterization: Initial Results

Development and Validation of a Deep Learning System to Differentiate HER2-Zero, HER2-Low, and HER2-Positive Breast Cancer Based on Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI

BACKGROUND

Previous studies explored MRI-based radiomic features for differentiating between human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-zero, HER2-low, and HER2-positive breast cancer, but deep learning's effectiveness is uncertain.

PURPOSE

This study aims to develop and validate a deep learning system using dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) for automated tumor segmentation and classification of HER2-zero, HER2-low, and HER2-positive statuses.

STUDY TYPE

Retrospective.

POPULATION

One thousand two hundred ninety-four breast cancer patients from three centers who underwent DCE-MRI before surgery were included in the study (52 ± 11 years, 811/204/279 for training/internal testing/external testing).

FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE

3 T scanners, using T1-weighted 3D fast spoiled gradient-echo sequence, T1-weighted 3D enhanced fast gradient-echo sequence and T1-weighted turbo field echo sequence.

ASSESSMENT

An automated model segmented tumors utilizing DCE-MRI data, followed by a deep learning models (ResNetGN) trained to classify HER2 statuses. Three models were developed to distinguish HER2-zero, HER2-low, and HER2-positive from their respective non-HER2 categories.

STATISTICAL TESTS

Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) was used to evaluate the segmentation performance of the model. Evaluation of the model performances for HER2 statuses involved receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis and the area under the curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity. The P-values <0.05 were considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

The automatic segmentation network achieved DSC values of 0.85 to 0.90 compared to the manual segmentation across different sets. The deep learning models using ResNetGN achieved AUCs of 0.782, 0.776, and 0.768 in differentiating HER2-zero from others in the training, internal test, and external test sets, respectively. Similarly, AUCs of 0.820, 0.813, and 0.787 were achieved for HER2-low vs. others, and 0.792, 0.745, and 0.781 for HER2-positive vs. others, respectively.

DATA CONCLUSION

The proposed DCE-MRI-based deep learning system may have the potential to preoperatively distinct HER2 expressions of breast cancers with therapeutic implications.

EVIDENCE LEVEL

4 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 3.

An updated overview of radiomics-based artificial intelligence (AI) methods in breast cancer screening and diagnosis

Current imaging methods for diagnosing breast cancer (BC) are associated with limited sensitivity and specificity and modest positive predictive power. The recent progress in image analysis using artificial intelligence (AI) has created great promise to improve BC diagnosis and subtype differentiation. In this case, novel quantitative computational methods, such as radiomics, have been developed to enhance the sensitivity and specificity of early BC diagnosis and classification. The potential of radiomics in improving the diagnostic efficacy of imaging studies has been shown in several studies. In this review article, we discuss the radiomics workflow and current handcrafted radiomics methods in the diagnosis and classification of BC based on the most recent studies on different imaging modalities, e.g., MRI, mammography, contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM), ultrasound imaging, and digital breast tumosynthesis (DBT). We also discuss current challenges and potential strategies to improve the specificity and sensitivity of radiomics in breast cancer to help achieve a higher level of BC classification and diagnosis in the clinical setting. The growing field of AI incorporation with imaging information has opened a great opportunity to provide a higher level of care for BC patients.

Contrast-Enhanced Mammography Radiomics Analysis for Preoperative Prediction of Breast Cancer Molecular Subtypes

BACKGROUND

Predicting breast cancer molecular subtypes can help guide individualised clinical treatment of patients who need the rational preoperative treatment. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of preoperative prediction of breast cancer molecular subtypes by contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) radiomic features.

METHODS

This retrospective two-centre study included women with breast cancer who underwent CEM preoperatively between August 2016 and May 2022. We included 356 patients with 386 lesions, which were grouped into training (n = 162), internal test (n = 160) and external test sets (n = 64). Radiomics features were extracted from low-energy (LE) images and recombined (RC) images and selected. Three dichotomous tasks were established according to postoperative immunohistochemical results: Luminal vs. non-Luminal, human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER2)-enriched vs. non-HER2-enriched, and triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) vs. non-TNBC. For each dichotomous task, the LE, RC, and LE+RC radiomics models were built by the support vector machine classifier. The prediction performance of the models was assessed by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Then, the accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were calculated for the models. DeLong's test was utilised to compare the AUCs.

RESULTS

Radiomics models based on CEM are valuable for predicting breast cancer molecular subtypes. The LE+RC model achieved the best performance in the test set. The LE+RC model predicted Luminal, HER2-enriched, and TNBC subtypes with AUCs of 0.93, 0.89, and 0.87 in the internal test set and 0.82, 0.83, and 0.69 in the external test set, respectively. In addition, the LE model performed more satisfactorily than the RC model.

CONCLUSION

CEM radiomics features can effectively predict breast cancer molecular subtypes preoperatively, and the LE+RC model has the best predictive performance.

Artificial intelligence-based classification of breast lesion from contrast enhanced mammography: a multicenter study

PURPOSE

The authors aimed to establish an artificial intelligence (AI)-based method for preoperative diagnosis of breast lesions from contrast enhanced mammography (CEM) and to explore its biological mechanism.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study includes 1430 eligible patients who underwent CEM examination from June 2017 to July 2022 and were divided into a construction set (n=1101), an internal test set (n=196), and a pooled external test set (n=133). The AI model adopted RefineNet as a backbone network, and an attention sub-network, named convolutional block attention module (CBAM), was built upon the backbone for adaptive feature refinement. An XGBoost classifier was used to integrate the refined deep learning features with clinical characteristics to differentiate benign and malignant breast lesions. The authors further retrained the AI model to distinguish in situ and invasive carcinoma among breast cancer candidates. RNA-sequencing data from 12 patients were used to explore the underlying biological basis of the AI prediction.

RESULTS

The AI model achieved an area under the curve of 0.932 in diagnosing benign and malignant breast lesions in the pooled external test set, better than the best-performing deep learning model, radiomics model, and radiologists. Moreover, the AI model has also achieved satisfactory results (an area under the curve from 0.788 to 0.824) for the diagnosis of in situ and invasive carcinoma in the test sets. Further, the biological basis exploration revealed that the high-risk group was associated with the pathways such as extracellular matrix organization.

CONCLUSIONS

The AI model based on CEM and clinical characteristics had good predictive performance in the diagnosis of breast lesions.

Validation of artificial intelligence contrast mammography in diagnosis of breast cancer: Relationship to histopathological results

INTRODUCTION

Contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) is used for characterization of breast lesions with increased diagnostic accuracy compared to digital mammography (DM). Artificial intelligence (AI) approaches are emerging with accuracies equal to an average radiologist. However, most studies trained deep learning (DL) models on DM images and there is a paucity in literature for discovering the application of AI using CEM.

OBJECTIVES

To develop and test a DL model that classifies CEM images and produces corresponding highlights of lesions detected.

METHODS

Fully annotated 2006 images of 326 females available from the previously published Categorized Digital Database for Contrast Enhanced Mammography images (CDD-CESM) were used for training. We developed a DL multiview contrast mammography model (MVCM) for classification of CEM low energy and recombined images. An external test set of 288 images of 37 females not included in the training was used for validation. Correlation with histopathological results and follow-up was considered the standard reference. The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board and patient informed consent was obtained.

RESULTS

Assessment was done on an external test set of 37 females (mean age, 51.31 years ± 11.07 [SD]) with AUC-ROC for AI performance 0.936; (95 % CI: 0.898, 0.973; p < 0.001) and the best cut off value for prediction of malignancy using AI score = 0.28. Findings were then correlated with histopathological results and follow up which revealed a sensitivity of 75 %, specificity 96.3 %, total accuracy of 90.1 %, positive predictive value (PPV) 87.1 %, and negative predictive value (NPV) 92 %, p-value (<0.001). Diagnostic indices of radiologists were sensitivity 88.9 %, specificity 92.6 %, total accuracy 91.7 %, PPV 80 %, and NPV 96.2 %, p-value (<0.001).

CONCLUSION

A deep learning multiview CEM model was developed and evaluated in a cohort of female participants and showed promising results in detecting breast cancer. This warrants further studies, external training, and validation.

CEM immediately after contrast-enhanced CT: a one-step staging of breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) is a promising technique. We evaluated the diagnostic potential of CEM performed immediately after contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CE-CT).

METHODS

Fifty patients with breast cancer underwent first CE-CT and then CEM without additional contrast material injection. Two independent radiologists evaluated CEM images. The sensitivity of CEM for detecting index and additional malignant lesions was compared with that of mammography/ultrasonography by the McNemar test, using histopathology as a reference standard. Interobserver agreement for detection of malignant lesions, for classifying index tumors, and for evaluating index tumor size and extent was assessed using Cohen κ. Pearson correlation was used for correlating index tumor size/extent at CEM or mammography/ultrasonography with histopathology.

RESULTS

Of the 50 patients, 30 (60%) had unifocal disease while 20 (40%) had multicentric or multifocal disease; 5 of 20 patients with multicentric disease (25%) had bilateral involvement, for a total of 78 malignant lesions, including 72 (92%) invasive ductal and 6 (8%) invasive lobular carcinomas. Sensitivity was 63/78 (81%, 95% confidence interval 70.27-88.82) for unenhanced breast imaging and 78/78 (100%, 95.38-100) for CEM (p < 0.001). The interobserver agreement for overall detection of malignant lesions, for classifying index tumor, and for evaluating index tumor size/extent were 0.94, 0.95, and 0.86 κ, respectively. For index tumor size/extent, correlation coefficients as compared with histological specimens were 0.50 for mammography/ultrasonography and 0.75 for CEM (p ≤ 0.010).

CONCLUSIONS

CEM acquired immediately after CE-CT without injection of additional contrast material showed a good performance for local staging of breast cancer.

RELEVANCE STATEMENT

When the CEM suite is near to the CE-CT acquisition room, CEM acquired immediately after, without injection of additional contrast material, could represent a way for local staging of breast cancer to be explored in larger prospective studies.

KEY POINTS

• CEM represents a new accurate tool in the field of breast imaging. • An intravenous injection of iodine-based contrast material is required for breast gland evaluation. • CEM after CE-CT could provide a one-stop tool for breast cancer staging.

State-of-the-art for contrast-enhanced mammography

Contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) is an emerging breast imaging technology with promise for breast cancer screening, diagnosis, and procedural guidance. However, best uses of CEM in comparison with other breast imaging modalities such as tomosynthesis, ultrasound, and MRI remain inconclusive in many clinical settings. This review article summarizes recent peer-reviewed literature, emphasizing retrospective reviews, prospective clinical trials, and meta-analyses published from 2020 to 2023. The intent of this article is to supplement prior comprehensive reviews and summarize the current state-of-the-art of CEM.

Empowering breast cancer diagnosis and radiology practice: advances in artificial intelligence for contrast-enhanced mammography

Artificial intelligence (AI) applications in breast imaging span a wide range of tasks including decision support, risk assessment, patient management, quality assessment, treatment response assessment and image enhancement. However, their integration into the clinical workflow has been slow due to the lack of a consensus on data quality, benchmarked robust implementation, and consensus-based guidelines to ensure standardization and generalization. Contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) has improved sensitivity and specificity compared to current standards of breast cancer diagnostic imaging i.e., mammography (MG) and/or conventional ultrasound (US), with comparable accuracy to MRI (current diagnostic imaging benchmark), but at a much lower cost and higher throughput. This makes CEM an excellent tool for widespread breast lesion characterization for all women, including underserved and minority women. Underlining the critical need for early detection and accurate diagnosis of breast cancer, this review examines the limitations of conventional approaches and reveals how AI can help overcome them. The Methodical approaches, such as image processing, feature extraction, quantitative analysis, lesion classification, lesion segmentation, integration with clinical data, early detection, and screening support have been carefully analysed in recent studies addressing breast cancer detection and diagnosis. Recent guidelines described by Checklist for Artificial Intelligence in Medical Imaging (CLAIM) to establish a robust framework for rigorous evaluation and surveying has inspired the current review criteria.

Peri-lesion regions in differentiating suspicious breast calcification-only lesions specifically on contrast enhanced mammography

PURPOSE

The explore the added value of peri-calcification regions on contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) in the differential diagnosis of breast lesions presenting as only calcification on routine mammogram.

METHODS

Patients who underwent CEM because of suspicious calcification-only lesions were included. The test set included patients between March 2017 and March 2019, while the validation set was collected between April 2019 and October 2019. The calcifications were automatically detected and grouped by a machine learning-based computer-aided system. In addition to extracting radiomic features on both low-energy (LE) and recombined (RC) images from the calcification areas, the peri-calcification regions, which is generated by extending the annotation margin radially with gradients from 1 mm to 9 mm, were attempted. Machine learning (ML) models were built to classify calcifications into malignant and benign groups. The diagnostic matrices were also evaluated by combing ML models with subjective reading.

RESULTS

Models for LE (significant features: wavelet-LLL_glcm_Imc2_MLO; wavelet-HLL_firstorder_Entropy_MLO; wavelet-LHH_glcm_DifferenceVariance_CC; wavelet-HLL_glcm_SumEntropy_MLO;wavelet-HLH_glrlm_ShortRunLowGray LevelEmphasis_MLO; original_firstorder_Entropy_MLO; original_shape_Elongation_MLO) and RC (significant features: wavelet-HLH_glszm_GrayLevelNonUniformityNormalized_MLO; wavelet-LLH_firstorder_10Percentile_CC; original_firstorder_Maximum_MLO; wavelet-HHH_glcm_Autocorrelation_MLO; original_shape_Elongation_MLO; wavelet-LHL_glszm_GrayLevelNonUniformityNormalized_MLO; wavelet-LLH_firstorder_RootMeanSquared_MLO) images were set up with 7 features. Areas under the curve (AUCs) of RC models are significantly better than those of LE models with compact and expanded boundary (RC v.s. LE, compact: 0.81 v.s. 0.73, p < 0.05; expanded: 0.89 v.s. 0.81, p < 0.05) and RC models with 3 mm boundary extension yielded the best performance compared to those with other sizes (AUC = 0.89). Combining with radiologists' reading, the 3mm-boundary RC model achieved a sensitivity of 0.871 and negative predictive value of 0.937 with similar accuracy of 0.843 in predicting malignancy.

CONCLUSIONS

The machine learning model integrating intra- and peri-calcification regions on CEM has the potential to aid radiologists' performance in predicting malignancy of suspicious breast calcifications.

Is contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) an alternative to MRI in assessing the response to primary systemic therapy of breast cancer?

PURPOSE

To evaluate the accuracy of contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the assessing radiological response to primary systemic therapy (PST).

METHOD

Prospective study between February 2021 and October 2022. Women with breast cancer and indication of PST were enrolled. CEM and MRI were performed before and after PST, and the findings, including size and radiological response pattern, were compared with the size of the residual lesion measured in surgical specimens and its Miller-Payne classification (considered the gold standard). Two of four independent radiologists, with 2 years of CEM experience and 10 years of MRI experience, reviewed the images while being blinded to the results of the other technique. The agreement between measurements was evaluated using the Pearson correlation coefficient (r) and Lin's coefficient.

RESULTS

Forty-eight women with breast cancer who required PST were enrolled in the study, with a mean age of 57.21 ± 10.14 years. A total of thirty-three participants (68.75 %) completed the study. The correlation between CEM and MRI measurements was high before PST (r: 0.97), and local staging was identical for 45 out of 48 patients. MRI demonstrated better accuracy in predicting residual tumor size than CEM, with Lin's coefficient 0.91 and 0.73, respectively. However, no significant differences were observed in predicting response to therapy. Both methods tended to overestimate the size and degree of response in our study, with mean overestimations of 2.87 mm in CEM and 0.51 mm in MRI.

CONCLUSION

CEM was found to be as accurate as MRI in predicting response to PST, indicating its potential as an alternative imaging technique, but further research is necessary.

Artificial intelligence to support person-centred care in breast imaging - A scoping review

AIM

To overview Artificial Intelligence (AI) developments and applications in breast imaging (BI) focused on providing person-centred care in diagnosis and treatment for breast pathologies.

METHODS

The scoping review was conducted in accordance with the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology. The search was conducted on MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Web of science, IEEE explore and arxiv during July 2022 and included only studies published after 2016, in French and English. Combination of keywords and Medical Subject Headings terms (MeSH) related to breast imaging and AI were used. No keywords or MeSH terms related to patients, or the person-centred care (PCC) concept were included. Three independent reviewers screened all abstracts and titles, and all eligible full-text publications during a second stage.

RESULTS

3417 results were identified by the search and 106 studies were included for meeting all criteria. Six themes relating to the AI-enabled PCC in BI were identified: individualised risk prediction/growth and prediction/false negative reduction (44.3%), treatment assessment (32.1%), tumour type prediction (11.3%), unnecessary biopsies reduction (5.7%), patients' preferences (2.8%) and other issues (3.8%). The main BI modalities explored in the included studies were magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (31.1%), mammography (27.4%) and ultrasound (23.6%). The studies were predominantly retrospective, and some variations (age range, data source, race, medical imaging) were present in the datasets used.

CONCLUSIONS

The AI tools for person-centred care are mainly designed for risk and cancer prediction and disease management to identify the most suitable treatment. However, further studies are needed for image acquisition optimisation for different patient groups, improvement and customisation of patient experience and for communicating to patients the options and pathways of disease management.

Intra- and peritumoral radiomics for predicting malignant BiRADS category 4 breast lesions on contrast-enhanced spectral mammography: a multicenter study

OBJECTIVE

To construct and test a nomogram based on intra- and peritumoral radiomics and clinical factors for predicting malignant BiRADS 4 lesions on contrast-enhanced spectral mammography.

METHODS

A total of 884 patients with BiRADS 4 lesions were enrolled from two centers. For each lesion, five ROIs were defined using the intratumoral region (ITR), peritumoral regions (PTRs) of 5 and 10 mm around the tumor, and ITR plus PTRs of 5 mm and 10 mm. Five radiomics signatures were established by LASSO after selecting features. A nomogram was built using selected signatures and clinical factors by multivariable logistic regression analysis. The performance of the nomogram was assessed with the AUC, decision curve analysis, and calibration curves, and also compared with the radiomics model, clinical model, and radiologists.

RESULTS

The nomogram built by three radiomics signatures (constructed from ITR, 5 mm PTR, and ITR + 10 mm PTR) and two clinical factors (age and BiRADS category) showed powerful predictive ability in internal and external test sets with AUCs of 0.907 and 0.904, respectively. The calibration curves, decision curve analysis, showed favorable predictive performance of the nomogram. In addition, radiologists improved the diagnostic performance with the help of nomogram.

CONCLUSION

The nomogram established via intratumoral and peritumoral radiomics features and clinical risk factors had the best performance in distinguishing benign and malignant BiRADS 4 lesions, which could help radiologists improve diagnostic capabilities.

KEY POINTS

• Radiomics features from peritumoral regions in contrast-enhanced spectral mammography images may provide valuable information for the diagnosis of benign and malignant breast imaging reporting and data system category 4 breast lesions. • The nomogram incorporated intra- and peritumoral radiomics features and clinical variables have good application prospects in assisting clinical decision-makers.

Conventional ultrasound and contrast-enhanced ultrasound radiomics in breast cancer and molecular subtype diagnosis

Objectives

This study aimed to explore the value of conventional ultrasound (CUS) and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) radiomics to diagnose breast cancer and predict its molecular subtype.

Method

A total of 170 lesions (121 malignant, 49 benign) were selected from March 2019 to January 2022. Malignant lesions were further divided into six categories of molecular subtype: (non-)Luminal A, (non-)Luminal B, (non-)human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) overexpression, (non-)triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), hormone receptor (HR) positivity/negativity, and HER2 positivity/negativity. Participants were examined using CUS and CEUS before surgery. Regions of interest images were manually segmented. The pyradiomics toolkit and the maximum relevance minimum redundancy algorithm were utilized to extract and select features, multivariate logistic regression models of CUS, CEUS, and CUS combined with CEUS radiomics were then constructed and evaluated by fivefold cross-validation.

Results

The accuracy of the CUS combined with CEUS model was superior to CUS model (85.4% vs. 81.3%, p<0.01). The accuracy of the CUS radiomics model in predicting the six categories of breast cancer is 68.2% (82/120), 69.3% (83/120), 83.7% (100/120), 86.7% (104/120), 73.5% (88/120), and 70.8% (85/120), respectively. In predicting breast cancer of Luminal A, HER2 overexpression, HR-positivity, and HER2 positivity, CEUS video improved the predictive performance of CUS radiomics model [accuracy=70.2% (84/120), 84.0% (101/120), 74.5% (89/120), and 72.5% (87/120), p<0.01].

Conclusion

CUS radiomics has the potential to diagnose breast cancer and predict its molecular subtype. Moreover, CEUS video has auxiliary predictive value for CUS radiomics.

Whole-Tumor ADC Texture Analysis Is Able to Predict Breast Cancer Receptor Status

There are different breast cancer molecular subtypes with differences in incidence, treatment response and outcome. They are roughly divided into estrogen and progesterone receptor (ER and PR) negative and positive cancers. In this retrospective study, we included 185 patients augmented with 25 SMOTE patients and divided them into two groups: the training group consisted of 150 patients and the validation cohort consisted of 60 patients. Tumors were manually delineated and whole-volume tumor segmentation was used to extract first-order radiomic features. The ADC-based radiomics model reached an AUC of 0.81 in the training cohort and was confirmed in the validation set, which yielded an AUC of 0.93, in differentiating ER/PR positive from ER/PR negative status. We also tested a combined model using radiomics data together with ki67% proliferation index and histological grade, and obtained a higher AUC of 0.93, which was also confirmed in the validation group. In conclusion, whole-volume ADC texture analysis is able to predict hormonal status in breast cancer masses.

Predicting Malignancy of Breast Imaging Findings Using Quantitative Analysis of Contrast-Enhanced Mammography (CEM)

We sought to develop new quantitative approaches to characterize the spatial distribution of mammographic density and contrast enhancement of suspicious contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) findings to improve malignant vs. benign classifications of breast lesions. We retrospectively analyzed all breast lesions that underwent CEM imaging and tissue sampling at our institution from 2014–2020 in this IRB-approved study. A penalized linear discriminant analysis was used to classify lesions based on the averaged histograms of radial distributions of mammographic density and contrast enhancement. T-tests were used to compare the classification accuracies of density, contrast, and concatenated density and contrast histograms. Logistic regression and AUC-ROC analyses were used to assess if adding demographic and clinical data improved the model accuracy. A total of 159 suspicious findings were evaluated. Density histograms were more accurate in classifying lesions as malignant or benign than a random classifier (62.37% vs. 48%; p < 0.001), but the concatenated density and contrast histograms demonstrated a higher accuracy (71.25%; p < 0.001) than the density histograms alone. Including the demographic and clinical data in our models led to a higher AUC-ROC than concatenated density and contrast images (0.81 vs. 0.70; p < 0.001). In the classification of invasive vs. non-invasive malignancy, the concatenated density and contrast histograms demonstrated no significant improvement in accuracy over the density histograms alone (77.63% vs. 78.59%; p = 0.504). Our findings suggest that quantitative differences in the radial distribution of mammographic density could be used to discriminate malignant from benign breast findings; however, classification accuracy was significantly improved with the addition of contrast-enhanced imaging data from CEM. Adding patient demographic and clinical information further improved the classification accuracy.

Mammography-based radiomics analysis and imaging features for predicting the malignant risk of phyllodes tumours of the breast

AIM

To determine whether the mammography (MG)-based radiomics analysis and MG/ultrasound (US) imaging features could predict the malignant risk of phyllodes tumours (PTs) of the breast.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Seventy-five patients with PTs were included retrospectively (39 with benign PTs, 36 with borderline/malignant PTs) and divided into thetraining (n=52) and validation groups (n=23). The clinical information, MG and US imaging characteristics, and histogram features were extracted from craniocaudal (CC) and mediolateral oblique (MLO) images. The lesion region of interest (ROI) and perilesional ROI were delineated. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to determine the malignant factors of PTs. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were generated, and the area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity were calculated.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference found in the clinical or MG/US features between benign and borderline/malignant PTs. In the lesion ROI, variance in the CC view and mean and variance in the MLO view were independent predictors. The AUC was 0.942, sensitivity and specificity were 96.3% and 92%, respectively, in the training group. In the validation group, the AUC was 0.879, the sensitivity was 91.7%, and the specificity was 81.8%. In the perilesional ROI, the AUCs were 0.904 and 0.939, sensitivities were 88.9% and 91.7%, and the specificities were 92% and 90.9% in the training and validation groups, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

MG-based radiomic features could predict the risk of malignancy of patients with PTs and may be used as a potential tool to differentiate benign and borderline/malignant PTs.

Overview of Artificial Intelligence in Breast Cancer Medical Imaging

The heavy global burden and mortality of breast cancer emphasize the importance of early diagnosis and treatment. Imaging detection is one of the main tools used in clinical practice for screening, diagnosis, and treatment efficacy evaluation, and can visualize changes in tumor size and texture before and after treatment. The overwhelming number of images, which lead to a heavy workload for radiologists and a sluggish reporting period, suggests the need for computer-aid detection techniques and platform. In addition, complex and changeable image features, heterogeneous quality of images, and inconsistent interpretation by different radiologists and medical institutions constitute the primary difficulties in breast cancer screening and imaging diagnosis. The advancement of imaging-based artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted tumor diagnosis is an ideal strategy for improving imaging diagnosis efficient and accuracy. By learning from image data input and constructing algorithm models, AI is able to recognize, segment, and diagnose tumor lesion automatically, showing promising application prospects. Furthermore, the rapid advancement of "omics" promotes a deeper and more comprehensive recognition of the nature of cancer. The fascinating relationship between tumor image and molecular characteristics has attracted attention to the radiomic and radiogenomics, which allow us to perform analysis and detection on the molecular level with no need for invasive operations. In this review, we integrate the current developments in AI-assisted imaging diagnosis and discuss the advances of AI-based breast cancer precise diagnosis from a clinical point of view. Although AI-assisted imaging breast cancer screening and detection is an emerging field and draws much attention, the clinical application of AI in tumor lesion recognition, segmentation, and diagnosis is still limited to research or in limited patients' cohort. Randomized clinical trials based on large and high-quality cohort are lacking. This review aims to describe the progress of the imaging-based AI application in breast cancer screening and diagnosis for clinicians.

Contextual Features and Information Bottleneck-Based Multi-Input Network for Breast Cancer Classification from Contrast-Enhanced Spectral Mammography

In computer-aided diagnosis methods for breast cancer, deep learning has been shown to be an effective method to distinguish whether lesions are present in tissues. However, traditional methods only classify masses as benign or malignant, according to their presence or absence, without considering the contextual features between them and their adjacent tissues. Furthermore, for contrast-enhanced spectral mammography, the existing studies have only performed feature extraction on a single image per breast. In this paper, we propose a multi-input deep learning network for automatic breast cancer classification. Specifically, we simultaneously input four images of each breast with different feature information into the network. Then, we processed the feature maps in both horizontal and vertical directions, preserving the pixel-level contextual information within the neighborhood of the tumor during the pooling operation. Furthermore, we designed a novel loss function according to the information bottleneck theory to optimize our multi-input network and ensure that the common information in the multiple input images could be fully utilized. Our experiments on 488 images (256 benign and 232 malignant images) from 122 patients show that the method's accuracy, precision, sensitivity, specificity, and f1-score values are 0.8806, 0.8803, 0.8810, 0.8801, and 0.8806, respectively. The qualitative, quantitative, and ablation experiment results show that our method significantly improves the accuracy of breast cancer classification and reduces the false positive rate of diagnosis. It can reduce misdiagnosis rates and unnecessary biopsies, helping doctors determine accurate clinical diagnoses of breast cancer from multiple CESM images.

Radiomic Features Applied to Contrast Enhancement Spectral Mammography: Possibility to Predict Breast Cancer Molecular Subtypes in a Non-Invasive Manner

We aimed to investigate the association between the radiomic features of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM) images and a specific receptor pattern of breast neoplasms. In this single-center retrospective study, we selected patients with neoplastic breast lesions who underwent CESM before a biopsy and surgical assessment between January 2013 and February 2022. Radiomic analysis was performed on regions of interest selected from recombined CESM images. The association between the features and each evaluated endpoint (ER, PR, Ki-67, HER2+, triple negative, G2-G3 expressions) was investigated through univariate logistic regression. Among the significant and highly correlated radiomic features, we selected only the one most associated with the endpoint. From a group of 321 patients, we enrolled 205 malignant breast lesions. The median age at the exam was 50 years (interquartile range (IQR) 45-58). NGLDM_Contrast was the only feature that was positively associated with both ER and PR expression (p-values = 0.01). NGLDM_Coarseness was negatively associated with Ki-67 expression (p-value = 0.02). Five features SHAPE Volume(mL), SHAPE_Volume(vx), GLRLM_RLNU, NGLDM_Busyness and GLZLM_GLNU were all positively and significantly associated with HER2+; however, all of them were highly correlated. Radiomic features of CESM images could be helpful to predict particular molecular subtypes before a biopsy.

Contrast-enhanced mammography in breast cancer screening

Contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) is a promising vascular-based breast imaging technique with high diagnostic performance in detecting breast cancer. Dual-energy acquisition using low and high energy x-ray spectra following intravenous iodinated contrast injection provides both anatomic and functional information in the same examination. The low-energy images are equivalent to standard digital mammography and the post-processed recombined images depict enhancement analogous to contrast-enhanced breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Thus, CEM has the potential to detect abnormal morphologic features as well as neovascularity associated with breast cancer. Since its emergence in 2011, CEM has consistently demonstrated superior performance compared with standard mammography and mammography plus ultrasound, particularly in women with dense breasts, with high sensitivity approaching that of MRI, supporting its use as a cost-effective diagnostic and screening tool. CEM has been primarily used in the diagnostic setting to evaluate patients with screening abnormalities or with symptomatic breasts, to perform preoperative staging of newly diagnosed breast cancer, and to evaluate response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. More recently, CEM has been performed to screen women who have an intermediate to high lifetime risk of developing breast cancer. In addition to its high diagnostic performance, CEM is less expensive and more accessible than MRI and potentially better tolerated by patients. Minor drawbacks to CEM include a slightly increased radiation dose compared with standard mammography and a low risk for contrast allergy reaction. The aim of this study is to review the background, current literature, and future applications of CEM in breast cancer screening.

Quantitative Analysis of Contrast-enhanced Mammography for Risk Stratification of Benign Versus Malignant Disease and Molecular Subtype

OBJECTIVE

To assess quantitative enhancement of benign, high-risk, and malignant lesions and differences in molecular subtype and grade of malignant lesions on contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM).

METHODS

This IRB-approved retrospective study included women who underwent CEM for diagnostic work-up of a breast lesion between 2014 and 2020. Inclusion criteria were women who had diagnostic work-up with CEM and had BI-RADS 1 or 2 with one year follow-up, BI-RADS 3 with tissue diagnosis or stability for 2 years, or BI-RADS 4 or 5 with tissue diagnosis. An enhancement ratio was calculated for all lesions. This was obtained by drawing a region of interest within the lesion and a second region of interest in the nonenhancing background tissue using a program developed with MATLAB. Descriptive statistics were evaluated using chi-squared tests, Fisher exact tests, and analysis of variance. A logistic regression model was used to predict cancer outcome using the enhancement ratio. Statistical significance was defined as P < 0.05.

RESULTS

There were 332 lesions in 210 women that met study criteria. Of the 332 lesions, 50.9% (169/332) were malignant, 5.7% (19/332) were high-risk, and 43.4% (144/332) were benign. Enhancement intensity of malignant lesions was higher than benign lesions. Odds ratio for quantitative enhancement of malignant lesions was 30.15 (P < 0.0001). Enhancement ratio above 1.49 had an 84.0% sensitivity and 84.0% specificity for malignancy. HER2-enriched breast cancers had significantly higher mean enhancement ratios (P = 0.0062).

CONCLUSION

Quantitative enhancement on CEM demonstrated that malignant breast lesions had higher mean enhancement intensity than benign lesions.

Mammography-based Radiomics in Breast Cancer: A Scoping Review of Current Knowledge and Future Needs

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

Breast cancer is a highly complex heterogeneous disease. Current validated prognostic factors (e.g., histological grade, lymph node involvement, receptor status, and proliferation index), as well as multigene tests (e.g., Oncotype DX and PAM50) are helpful to describe breast cancer characteristics and predict the chance of recurrence risk and survival. Nevertheless, they are invasive and cannot capture a complete heterogeneity of the entire breast tumor resulting in up to 30% of patients being either over- or under-treated for breast cancer. Furthermore, multigene testings are time consuming and expensive. Radiomics is emerging as a reliable, accurate, non-invasive, and cost-effective approach of using quantitative image features to classify breast cancer characteristics and predict patient outcomes. Several recent radiomics reviews have been conducted in breast cancer, however, specific mammography-based radiomics studies have not been well discussed. This scoping review aims to assess and summarize the current evidence on the potential usefulness of mammography-based (i.e., digital mammography, digital breast tomosynthesis, and contrast-enhanced mammography) radiomics in predicting factors that describe breast cancer characteristics, recurrence, and survival.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

PubMed database and eligible text reference were searched using relevant keywords to identify studies published between 2015 and December 19, 2020. Studies collected were screened and assessed based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria.

RESULTS

Eighteen eligible studies were included and organized into three main sections: radiomics predicting breast cancer characteristics, radiomics predicting breast cancer recurrence and survival, and radiomics integrating with clinical data. Majority of publications reported retrospective studies while three studies examined prospective cohorts. Encouraging results were reported, suggesting the potential clinical value of mammography-based radiomics. Further efforts are required to standardize radiomics approaches and catalogue reproducible and relevant mammographic radiomic features. The role of integrating radiomics with other information is discussed.

CONCLUSION

The potential role of mammography-based radiomics appears promising but more efforts are required to further evaluate its reliability as a routine clinical tool.

How Dual-Energy Contrast-Enhanced Spectral Mammography Can Provide Useful Clinical Information About Prognostic Factors in Breast Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review of Literature

Introduction

In the past decade, a new technique derived from full-field digital mammography has been developed, named contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM). The aim of this study was to define the association between CESM findings and usual prognostic factors, such as estrogen receptors, progesterone receptors, HER2, and Ki67, in order to offer an updated overview of the state of the art for the early differential diagnosis of breast cancer and following personalized treatments.

Materials and Methods

According to the PRISMA guidelines, two electronic databases (PubMed and Scopus) were investigated, using the following keywords: breast cancer AND (CESM OR contrast enhanced spectral mammography OR contrast enhanced dual energy mammography) AND (receptors OR prognostic factors OR HER2 OR progesterone OR estrogen OR Ki67). The search was concluded in August 2021. No restriction was applied to publication dates.

Results

We obtained 28 articles from the research in PubMed and 114 articles from Scopus. After the removal of six replicas that were counted only once, out of 136 articles, 37 articles were reviews. Eight articles alone have tackled the relation between CESM imaging and ER, PR, HER2, and Ki67. When comparing radiological characterization of the lesions obtained by either CESM or contrast-enhanced MRI, they have a similar association with the proliferation of tumoral cells, as expressed by Ki-67. In CESM-enhanced lesions, the expression was found to be 100% for ER and 77.4% for PR, while moderate or high HER2 positivity was found in lesions with non-mass enhancement and with mass closely associated with a non-mass enhancement component. Conversely, the non-enhancing breast cancer lesions were not associated with any prognostic factor, such as ER, PR, HER2, and Ki67, which may be associated with the probability of showing enhancement. Radiomics on CESM images has the potential for non-invasive characterization of potentially heterogeneous tumors with different hormone receptor status.

Conclusions

CESM enhancement is associated with the proliferation of tumoral cells, as well as to the expression of estrogen and progesterone receptors. As CESM is a relatively young imaging technique, a few related works were found; this may be due to the “off-label” modality. In the next few years, the role of CESM in breast cancer diagnostics will be more thoroughly investigated.

Application of 18F-FDG PET-CT Images Based Radiomics in Identifying Vertebral Multiple Myeloma and Bone Metastases

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to explore the application of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT) image radiomics in the identification of spine multiple myeloma (MM) and bone metastasis (BM), and whether this method could improve the classification diagnosis performance compared with traditional methods.

Methods

This retrospective study collected a total of 184 lesions from 131 patients between January 2017 and January 2021. All images were visually evaluated independently by two physicians with 20 years of experience through the double-blind method, while the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) of each lesion was recorded. A total of 279 radiomics features were extracted from the region of interest (ROI) of CT and PET images of each lesion separately by manual method. After the reliability test, the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression and 10-fold cross-validation were used to perform dimensionality reduction and screening of features. Two classification models of CT and PET were derived from CT images and PET images, respectively and constructed using the multivariate logistic regression algorithm. In addition, the ComModel was constructed by combining the PET model and the conventional parameter SUVmax. The performance of the three classification diagnostic models, as well as the human experts and SUVmax, were evaluated and compared, respectively.

Results

A total of 8 and 10 features were selected from CT and PET images for the construction of radiomics models, respectively. Satisfactory performance of the three radiomics models was achieved in both the training and the validation groups (Training: AUC: CT: 0.909, PET: 0.949, ComModel: 0.973; Validation: AUC: CT: 0.897, PET: 0.929, ComModel: 0.948). Moreover, the PET model and ComModel showed significant improvement in diagnostic performance between the two groups compared to the human expert (Training: P = 0.01 and P = 0.001; Validation: P = 0.018 and P = 0.033), and no statistical difference was observed between the CT model and human experts (P = 0.187 and P = 0.229, respectively).

Conclusion

The radiomics model constructed based on 18F-FDG PET/CT images achieved satisfactory diagnostic performance for the classification of MM and bone metastases. In addition, the radiomics model showed significant improvement in diagnostic performance compared to human experts and PET conventional parameter SUVmax.

Diagnostic Accuracy of Contrast-Enhanced, Spectral Mammography (CESM) and 3T Magnetic Resonance Compared to Full-Field Digital Mammography plus Ultrasound in Breast Lesions: Results of a (Pilot) Open-Label, Single-Centre Prospective Study

Introduction: To assess the diagnostic accuracy of CESM and 3T MRI compared to full-field digital mammography (FFDM), plus US, in the evaluation of advanced breast lesions. Materials and Methods: Consenting women with suspicious findings underwent FFDM, US, CESM and 3T MRI. Breast lesions were histologically assessed, with histology being the gold standard. Two experienced breast radiologists, blinded to cancer status, read the images. Diagnostic accuracy of (1) CESM as an adjunct to FFDM and US, and (2) 3T MRI as an adjunct to CESM compared to FFDM and US, was assessed. Measures of accuracy were sensitivity (Se), specificity (Sp), positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV). Results: There were 118 patients included along with 142 histologically characterized lesions. K agreement values were 0.69, 0.68, 0.63 and 0.56 for concordance between the gold standard and FFDM, FFDM + US, CESM and MRI, respectively (p < 0.001, for all). K concordance for CESM was 0.81 with FFDM + US and 0.73 with MRI (p value < 0.001 for all). Conclusions: CESM may represent a valuable alternative and/or an integrating technique to MRI in the evaluation of breast cancer patients.

Association between quantitative and qualitative image features of contrast-enhanced mammography and molecular subtypes of breast cancer

Background

The molecular subtype of breast cancer is one of the most important factors affecting patient prognosis. The study aimed to analyze the association between quantitative and qualitative features of contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) images and breast cancer molecular subtypes.

Methods

This retrospective double-center study included women who underwent CEM between November 2017 and April 2020. Each patient had at least 1 malignant lesion confirmed by pathology. The CEM images were evaluated by 2 radiologists to obtain quantitative and qualitative image features. The molecular subtypes were studied as dichotomous outcomes, including luminal versus non-luminal, human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER2)-enriched versus non-HER2-enriched, and triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) versus non-TNBC subtypes. The association between the image features and molecular subtypes was analyzed by multivariate logistic regression, with odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) provided.

Results

A total of 151 patients with 160 malignant lesions were included in the study. For quantitative features, a higher standard deviation of lesion density was associated with non-luminal (OR =0.88, 95% CI: 0.81 to 0.96, P=0.004) and HER2-enriched breast cancers (OR =1.16, 95% CI: 1.04 to 1.28, P=0.006). The relative degree of enhancement (RDE) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were not associated with molecular subtypes. However, a higher CNR/lesion size (OR =1.06, 95% CI: 1.01 to 1.12, P=0.012) was associated with luminal subtype cancers, and a higher RDE/lesion size (OR =0.94, 95% CI: 0.88 to 1.00, P=0.035) or a higher CNR/lesion size (OR =0.94, 95% CI: 0.88-1.00, P=0.038) was associated with non-TNBCs. For qualitative features, the presence of calcification was associated with HER2-enriched breast cancers (OR =2.91, 95% CI: 1.10 to 7.67, P=0.031). The presence of architectural distortion was associated with luminal cancer (OR =14.50, 95% CI: 1.91 to 110.14, P=0.010) and non-TNBC (OR =0.05, 95% CI: 0.00 to 0.43, P=0.022). Non-mass enhancement (OR =2.78, 95% CI: 1.08 to 7.14, P=0.033) was associated with HER2-enriched breast cancers. An association remained after adjustments for age, breast thickness, and breast density (all adjusted P<0.050).

Conclusions

The quantitative and qualitative imaging features of CEM could contribute to distinguishing breast cancer molecular subtypes.

Deep learning analysis of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography to determine histoprognostic factors of malignant breast tumours

Objective

To evaluate if a deep learning model can be used to characterise breast cancers on contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM).

Methods

This retrospective mono-centric study included biopsy-proven invasive cancers with an enhancement on CESM. CESM images include low-energy images (LE) comparable to digital mammography and dual-energy subtracted images (DES) showing tumour angiogenesis. For each lesion, histologic type, tumour grade, estrogen receptor (ER) status, progesterone receptor (PR) status, HER-2 status, Ki-67 proliferation index, and the size of the invasive tumour were retrieved. The deep learning model used was a CheXNet-based model fine-tuned on CESM dataset. The area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was calculated for the different models: images by images and then by majority voting combining all the incidences for one tumour.

Results

In total, 447 invasive breast cancers detected on CESM with pathological evidence, in 389 patients, which represented 2460 images analysed, were included. Concerning the ER, the deep learning model on the DES images had an AUC of 0.83 with the image-by-image analysis and of 0.85 for the majority voting. For the triple-negative analysis, a high AUC was observable for all models, in particularity for the model on LE images with an AUC of 0.90 for the image-by-image analysis and 0.91 for the majority voting. The AUC for the other histoprognostic factors was lower.

Conclusion

Deep learning analysis on CESM has the potential to determine histoprognostic tumours makers, notably estrogen receptor status, and triple-negative receptor status.

Key Points

• A deep learning model developed for chest radiography was adapted by fine-tuning to be used on contrast-enhanced spectral mammography.

• The adapted models allowed to determine for invasive breast cancers the status of estrogen receptors and triple-negative receptors.

• Such models applied to contrast-enhanced spectral mammography could provide rapid prognostic and predictive information.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00330-022-08538-4.

Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography/Computed Tomography Image-Based Radiomics for Discriminating Vertebral Bone Metastases From Benign Bone Lesions in Patients With Tumors

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to investigate the feasibility of Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography/Computed Tomography (SPECT/CT) image-based radiomics in differentiating bone metastases from benign bone lesions in patients with tumors. Methods: A total of 192 lesions from 132 patients (134 in the training group, 58 in the validation group) diagnosed with vertebral bone metastases or benign bone lesions were enrolled. All images were evaluated and diagnosed independently by two physicians with more than 20 years of diagnostic experience for qualitative classification, the images were imported into MaZda software in Bitmap (BMP) format for feature extraction. All radiomics features were selected by least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression and 10-fold cross-validation algorithms after the process of normalization and correlation analysis. Based on these selected features, two models were established: The CT model and SPECT model (radiomics features were derived from CT and SPECT images, respectively). In addition, a combination model (ComModel) combined CT and SPECT features was developed in order to better evaluate the predictive performance of radiomics models. Subsequently, the diagnostic performance between each model was separately evaluated by a confusion matrix. Results: There were 12, 13, and 18 features contained within the CT, SPECT, and ComModel, respectively. The constructed radiomics models based on SPECT/CT images to discriminate between bone metastases and benign bone lesions not only had high diagnostic efficacy in the training group (AUC of 0.894, 0.914, 0.951 for CT model, SPECT model, and ComModel, respectively), but also performed well in the validation group (AUC; 0.844, 0.871, 0.926). The AUC value of the human experts was 0.849 and 0.839 in the training and validation groups, respectively. Furthermore, both SPECT model and ComModel show higher classification performance than human experts in the training group (P = 0.021 and P = 0.001, respectively) and the validation group (P = 0.037 and P = 0.007, respectively). All models showed better diagnostic accuracy than human experts in the training group and the validation group. Conclusion: Radiomics derived from SPECT/CT images could effectively discriminate between bone metastases and benign bone lesions. This technique may be a new non-invasive way to help prevent unnecessary delays in diagnosis and a potential contribution in disease staging and treatment planning.

Diagnostic Value of Radiomics Analysis in Contrast-Enhanced Spectral Mammography for Identifying Triple-Negative Breast Cancer

Purpose

To evaluate the value of radiomics analysis in contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM) for the identification of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC).

Method

CESM images of 367 pathologically confirmed breast cancer patients (training set: 218, testing set: 149) were retrospectively analyzed. Cranial caudal (CC), mediolateral oblique (MLO), and combined models were built on the basis of the features extracted from subtracted images on CC, MLO, and the combination of CC and MLO, respectively, in the tumour region. The performance of the models was evaluated through receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, the Hosmer-Lemeshow test, and decision curve analysis (DCA). The areas under ROC curves (AUCs) were compared through the DeLong test.

Results

The combined CC and MLO model had the best AUC and sensitivity of 0.90 (95% confidence interval: 0.85–0.96) and 0.97, respectively. The Hosmer–Lemeshow test yielded a non-significant statistic with p-value of 0.59. The clinical usefulness of the combined CC and MLO model was confirmed if the threshold was between 0.02 and 0.81 in the DCA.

Conclusions

Machine learning models based on subtracted images in CESM images were valuable for distinguishing TNBC and NTNBC. The model with the combined CC and MLO features had the best performance compared with models that used CC or MLO features alone.

Contrast-enhanced mammography for the assessment of screening recalls: a two-centre study

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the potential of contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) for reducing the biopsy rate of screening recalls.

METHODS

Recalled women were prospectively enrolled to undergo CEM alongside standard assessment (SA) through additional views, tomosynthesis, and/or ultrasound. Exclusion criteria were symptoms, implants, allergy to contrast agents, renal failure, and pregnancy. SA and CEM were independently evaluated by one of six radiologists, who recommended biopsy or 2-year follow-up. Biopsy rates according to SA or recombined CEM (rCEM) were compared with the McNemar's test. Diagnostic performance was calculated considering lesions with available final histopathology.

RESULTS

Between January 2019 and July 2021, 220 women were enrolled, 207 of them (median age 56.6 years) with 225 suspicious findings analysed. Three of 207 patients (1.4%) developed mild self-limiting adverse reactions to iodinated contrast agent. Overall, 135/225 findings were referred for biopsy, 90/225 by both SA and rCEM, 41/225 by SA alone and 4/225 by rCEM alone (2/4 being one DCIS and one invasive carcinoma). The rCEM biopsy rate (94/225, 41.8%, 95% CI 35.5-48.3%) was 16.4% lower (p < 0.001) than the SA biopsy rate (131/225, 58.2%, 95% CI 51.7-64.5%). Considering the 124/135 biopsies with final histopathology (44 benign, 80 malignant), rCEM showed a 93.8% sensitivity (95% CI 86.2-97.3%) and a 65.9% specificity (95% CI 51.1-78.1%), all 5 false negatives being ductal carcinoma in situ detectable as suspicious calcifications on low-energy images.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to SA, the rCEM-based work-up would have avoided biopsy for 37/225 (16.4%) suspicious findings. Including low-energy images in interpretation provided optimal overall CEM sensitivity.

KEY POINTS

• The work-up of suspicious findings detected at mammographic breast cancer screening still leads to a high rate of unnecessary biopsies, involving between 2 and 6% of screened women. • In 207 recalled women with 225 suspicious findings, recombined images of contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) showed a 93.8% sensitivity and a 65.9% specificity, all 5 false negatives being ductal carcinoma in situ detectable on low-energy images as suspicious calcifications. • CEM could represent an easily available one-stop shop option for the morphofunctional assessment of screening recalls, potentially reducing the biopsy rate by 16.4%.

Contrast-enhanced mammography: what the radiologist needs to know

Contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) is a combination of standard mammography and iodinated contrast material administration. During the last decade, CEM has found its place in breast imaging protocols: after i.v. administration of iodinated contrast material, low-energy and high-energy images are retrieved in one acquisition using a dual-energy technique, and a recombined image is constructed enabling visualisation of areas of contrast uptake. The increased incorporation of CEM into everyday clinical practice is reflected in the installation of dedicated equipment worldwide, the (commercial) availability of systems from different vendors, the number of CEM examinations performed, and the number of scientific articles published on the subject. It follows that ever more radiologists will be confronted with this technique, and thus be required to keep up to date with the latest developments in the field. Most importantly, radiologists must have sufficient knowledge on how to interpret CEM images and be acquainted with common artefacts and pitfalls. This comprehensive review provides a practical overview of CEM technique, including CEM-guided biopsy; reading, interpretation and structured reporting of CEM images, including the accompanying learning curve, CEM artefacts and interpretation pitfalls; indications for CEM; disadvantages of CEM; and future developments.

Radiomics Predicts for Distant Metastasis in Locally Advanced Human Papillomavirus-Positive Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Simple Summary

There is strong evidence that locally advanced human papillomavirus positive (HPV+) oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) carries a significantly better prognosis than HPV negative OPSCC, suggesting the possibility of treatment de-escalation and, therefore, toxicity reduction in this patient population. The lack of success in clinical trials towards this end presses the need to risk stratify locally advanced HPV+ OPSCC patients who can safely have treatment de-escalated. The present study had recourse to radiomics for this purpose and showed that radiomics has the ability to discriminate patients with locally advanced HPV+ OPSCC who went on to develop distant metastasis after completion of definitive chemoradiation or radiation alone. The implications of this study aid in demonstrating the potential pivotal role of radiomics in predictive risk assessment and personalizing therapy for this patient population.

Abstract

(1) Background and purpose: clinical trials have unsuccessfully tried to de-escalate treatment in locally advanced human papillomavirus positive (HPV+) oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) with the goal of reducing treatment toxicity. The aim of this study was to explore the role of radiomics for risk stratification in this patient population to guide treatment. (2) Methods: the study population consisted of 225 patients with locally advanced HPV+ OPSCC treated with curative-intent radiation or chemoradiation therapy. Appearance of distant metastasis was used as the endpoint event. Radiomics data were extracted from the gross tumor volumes (GTVs) identified on the planning CT, with gray level being discretized using three different bin widths (8, 16, and 32). The data extracted for the groups with and without distant metastasis were subsequently balanced using three different algorithms including synthetic minority over-sampling technique (SMOTE), adaptive synthetic sampling (ADASYN), and borderline SMOTE. From these different combinations, a total of nine radiomics datasets were derived. Top features that minimized redundancy while maximizing relevance to the endpoint were selected individually and collectively for the nine radiomics datasets to build support vector machine (SVM) based predictive classifiers. Performance of the developed classifiers was evaluated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. (3) Results: of the 225 locally advanced HPV+ OPSCC patients being studied, 9.3% had developed distant metastases at last follow-up. SVM classifiers built for the nine radiomics dataset using either their own respective top features or the top consensus ones were all able to differentiate the two cohorts at a level of excellence or beyond, with ROC area under curve (AUC) ranging from 0.84 to 0.95 (median = 0.90). ROC comparisons further revealed that the majority of the built classifiers did not distinguish the two cohorts significantly better than each other. (4) Conclusions: radiomics demonstrated discriminative ability in distinguishing patients with locally advanced HPV+ OPSCC who went on to develop distant metastasis after completion of definitive chemoradiation or radiation alone and may serve to risk stratify this patient population with the purpose of guiding the appropriate therapy.

Incorporating the clinical and radiomics features of contrast-enhanced mammography to classify breast lesions: a retrospective study

Background

Contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) is a promising breast imaging technique. A limited number of studies have focused on the radiomics analysis of CEM. We intended to explore whether a model constructed with both clinical and radiomics features of CEM can better classify benign and malignant breast lesions.

Methods

This retrospective, double-center study included women who underwent CEM between August 2017 and February 2020. The data from Center 1 were used as training set and the data from Center 2 were used as external testing set (training: testing =2:1). Models were constructed with the clinical, radiomics, and clinical + radiomics features of CEM. The clinical features included patient age and clinical image features interpreted by the radiologists. The radiomics features were extracted from high-energy (HE), low-energy (LE), and dual-energy subtraction (DES) images of CEM. The Mann-Whitney U test, Pearson correlation and Boruta's approach were used to select the radiomics features. Random Forest (RF) and logistic regression were used to establish the models. For the testing set, the areas under the curve (AUCs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were employed to evaluate the performance of the models. For the training set, the mean AUCs were obtained by performing internal validation for 100 iterations and then compared by the Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests.

Results

A total of 226 women (mean age: 47.4±10.1 years) with 226 pathologically proven breast lesions (101 benign; 125 malignant) were included. For the external testing set, the AUCs were 0.964 (95% CI: 0.918-1.000) for the combined model, 0.947 (95% CI: 0.891-0.997) for the radiomics model, and 0.882 (95% CI: 0.803-0.962) for the clinical model. In the internal validation process, the combined model achieved a mean AUC of 0.934±0.030, which was significantly higher than those of the radiomics (mean AUC =0.921±0.031, adjusted P<0.050) and clinical models (mean AUC =0.907±0.036; adjusted P<0.050).

Conclusions

Incorporating both clinical and radiomics features of CEM may achieve better classification results for breast lesions.

AI-enhanced breast imaging: Where are we and where are we heading?

Significant advances in imaging analysis and the development of high-throughput methods that can extract and correlate multiple imaging parameters with different clinical outcomes have led to a new direction in medical research. Radiomics and artificial intelligence (AI) studies are rapidly evolving and have many potential applications in breast imaging, such as breast cancer risk prediction, lesion detection and classification, radiogenomics, and prediction of treatment response and clinical outcomes. AI has been applied to different breast imaging modalities, including mammography, ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging, in different clinical scenarios. The application of AI tools in breast imaging has an unprecedented opportunity to better derive clinical value from imaging data and reshape the way we care for our patients. The aim of this study is to review the current knowledge and future applications of AI-enhanced breast imaging in clinical practice.

Differentiating Breast Tumors from Background Parenchymal Enhancement at Contrast-Enhanced Mammography: The Role of Radiomics-A Pilot Reader Study

Background: The purpose of this study was to assess the effectiveness of the radiomic analysis of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM) in discriminating between breast cancers and background parenchymal enhancement (BPE). Methods: This retrospective study included 38 patients that underwent CESM examinations for clinical purposes between January 2019–December 2020. A total of 57 malignant breast lesions and 23 CESM examinations with 31 regions of BPE were assessed through radiomic analysis using MaZda software. The parameters that demonstrated to be independent predictors for breast malignancy were exported into the B11 program and a k-nearest neighbor classifier (k-NN) was trained on the initial groups of patients and was tested using a validation group. Histopathology results obtained after surgery were considered the gold standard. Results: Radiomic analysis found WavEnLL_s_2 parameter as an independent predictor for breast malignancies with a sensitivity of 68.42% and a specificity of 83.87%. The prediction model that included CH1D6SumAverg, CN4D6Correlat, Kurtosis, Perc01, Perc10, Skewness, and WavEnLL_s_2 parameters had a sensitivity of 73.68% and a specificity of 80.65%. Higher values were obtained of WavEnLL_s_2 and the prediction model for tumors than for BPEs. The comparison between the ROC curves provided by the WaveEnLL_s_2 and the entire prediction model did not show statistically significant results (p = 0.0943). The k-NN classifier based on the parameter WavEnLL_s_2 had a sensitivity and specificity on training and validating groups of 71.93% and 45.16% vs. 60% and 44.44%, respectively. Conclusion: Radiomic analysis has the potential to differentiate CESM between malignant lesions and BPE. Further quantitative insight into parenchymal enhancement patterns should be performed to facilitate the role of BPE in personalized clinical decision-making and risk assessment.

Diagnostic performance of perilesional radiomics analysis of contrast-enhanced mammography for the differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions

OBJECTIVE

To conduct perilesional region radiomics analysis of contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) images to differentiate benign and malignant breast lesions.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

This retrospective study included patients who underwent CEM from November 2017 to February 2020. Lesion contours were manually delineated. Perilesional regions were automatically obtained. Seven regions of interest (ROIs) were obtained for each lesion, including the lesion ROI, annular perilesional ROIs (1 mm, 3 mm, 5 mm), and lesion + perilesional ROIs (1 mm, 3 mm, 5 mm). Overall, 4,098 radiomics features were extracted from each ROI. Datasets were divided into training and testing sets (1:1). Seven classification models using features from the seven ROIs were constructed using LASSO regression. Model performance was assessed by the AUC with 95% CI.

RESULTS

Overall, 190 women with 223 breast lesions (101 benign; 122 malignant) were enrolled. In the testing set, the annular perilesional ROI of 3-mm model showed the highest AUC of 0.930 (95% CI: 0.882-0.977), followed by the annular perilesional ROI of 1 mm model (AUC = 0.929; 95% CI: 0.881-0.978) and the lesion ROI model (AUC = 0.909; 95% CI: 0.857-0.961). A new model was generated by combining the predicted probabilities of the lesion ROI and annular perilesional ROI of 3-mm models, which achieved a higher AUC in the testing set (AUC = 0.940).

CONCLUSIONS

Annular perilesional radiomics analysis of CEM images is useful for diagnosing breast cancers. Adding annular perilesional information to the radiomics model built on the lesion information may improve the diagnostic performance.

KEY POINTS

• Radiomics analysis of the annular perilesional region of 3 mm in CEM images may provide valuable information for the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant breast lesions. • The radiomics information from the lesion region and the annular perilesional region may be complementary. Combining the predicted probabilities of the models constructed by the features from the two regions may improve the diagnostic performance of radiomics models.

Identify the triple-negative and non-triple-negative breast cancer by using texture features of medicale ultrasonic image: A STROBE-compliant study

The study aimed to explore the value of ultrasound (US) texture analysis in the differential diagnosis of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) and non-TNBC.Retrospective analysis was done on 93 patients with breast cancer (35 patients with TNBC and 38 patients with non-TNBC) who were admitted to Taizhou people's hospital from July 2015 to June 2019. All lesions were pathologically proven at surgery. US images of all patients were collected. Texture analysis of US images was performed using MaZda software package. The differences between textural features in TNBC and non-TNBC were assessed. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was used to compare the diagnostic performance of textural parameters showing significant difference.Five optimal texture feature parameters were extracted from gray level run-length matrix, including gray level non-uniformity (GLNU) in horizontal direction, vertical gray level non-uniformity, GLNU in the 45 degree direction, run length non-uniformity in 135 degree direction, GLNU in the 135 degree direction. All these texture parameters were statistically higher in TNBC than in non-TNBC (P <.05). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis indicated that at a threshold of 268.9068, GLNU in horizontal direction exhibited best diagnostic performance for differentiating TNBC from non-TNBC. Logistic regression model established based on all these parameters showed a sensitivity of 69.3%, specificity of 91.4% and area under the curve of 0.834.US texture features were significantly different between TNBC and non-TNBC, US texture analysis can be used for preliminary differentiation of TNBC from non-TNBC.

Radiomic Analysis of Contrast-Enhanced Mammography With Different Image Types: Classification of Breast Lesions

Objective: A limited number of studies have focused on the radiomic analysis of contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM). We aimed to construct several radiomics-based models of CEM for classifying benign and malignant breast lesions.

Materials and Methods: The retrospective, double-center study included women who underwent CEM between November 2013 and February 2020. Radiomic analysis was performed using high-energy (HE), low-energy (LE), and dual-energy subtraction (DES) images from CEM. Datasets were randomly divided into the training and testing sets at a ratio of 7:3. The maximum relevance minimum redundancy (mRMR) method and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) logistic regression were used to select the radiomic features and construct the best classification models. The performances of the models were assessed by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) with a 95% confidence interval (CI). Leave-group-out cross-validation (LGOCV) for 100 rounds was performed to obtain the mean AUCs, which were compared by the Wilcoxon rank-sum test and the Kruskal–Wallis rank-sum test.

Results: A total of 192 women with 226 breast lesions (101 benign; 125 malignant) were enrolled. The median age was 48 years (range, 22–70 years). For the classification of breast lesions, the AUCs of the best models were 0.931 (95% CI: 0.873–0.989) for HE, 0.897 (95% CI: 0.807–0.981) for LE, 0.882 (95% CI: 0.825–0.987) for DES images and 0.960 (95% CI: 0.910–0.998) for all of the CEM images in the testing set. According to LGOCV, the models constructed with the HE images and all of the CEM images showed the highest mean AUCs for the training (0.931 and 0.938, respectively; P < 0.05 for both) and testing sets (0.892 and 0.889, respectively; P = 0.55 for both), which were significantly higher than those of the two models constructed with the LE and DES images in the training (0.912 and 0.899, respectively; all P < 0.05) and testing sets (0.866 and 0.862, respectively; all P < 0.05).

Conclusions: Radiomic analysis of CEM images was valuable for classifying benign and malignant breast lesions. The use of HE images or all three types of CEM images can achieve the best performance.

Radiomics: A Primer for Breast Radiologists

Radiomics has a long-standing history in breast imaging with computer-aided detection (CAD) for screening mammography developed in the late 20th century. Although conventional CAD had widespread adoption, the clinical benefits for experienced breast radiologists were debatable due to high false-positive marks and subsequent increased recall rates. The dramatic growth in recent years of artificial intelligence-based analysis, including machine learning and deep learning, has provided numerous opportunities for improved modern radiomics work in breast imaging. There has been extensive radiomics work in mammography, digital breast tomosynthesis, MRI, ultrasound, PET-CT, and combined multimodality imaging. Specific radiomics outcomes of interest have been diverse, including CAD, prediction of response to neoadjuvant therapy, lesion classification, and survival, among other outcomes. Additionally, the radiogenomics subfield that correlates radiomics features with genetics has been very proliferative, in parallel with the clinical validation of breast cancer molecular subtypes and gene expression assays. Despite the promise of radiomics, there are important challenges related to image normalization, limited large unbiased data sets, and lack of external validation. Much of the radiomics work to date has been exploratory using single-institution retrospective series for analysis, but several promising lines of investigation have made the leap to clinical practice with commercially available products. As a result, breast radiologists will increasingly be incorporating radiomics-based tools into their daily practice in the near future. Therefore, breast radiologists must have a broad understanding of the scope, applications, and limitations of radiomics work.

Radiomics and Artificial Intelligence Analysis with Textural Metrics Extracted by Contrast-Enhanced Mammography in the Breast Lesions Classification

The aim of the study was to estimate the diagnostic accuracy of textural features extracted by dual-energy contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) images, by carrying out univariate and multivariate statistical analyses including artificial intelligence approaches. In total, 80 patients with known breast lesion were enrolled in this prospective study according to regulations issued by the local Institutional Review Board. All patients underwent dual-energy CEM examination in both craniocaudally (CC) and double acquisition of mediolateral oblique (MLO) projections (early and late). The reference standard was pathology from a surgical specimen for malignant lesions and pathology from a surgical specimen or fine needle aspiration cytology, core or Tru-Cut needle biopsy, and vacuum assisted breast biopsy for benign lesions. In total, 104 samples of 80 patients were analyzed. Furthermore, 48 textural parameters were extracted by manually segmenting regions of interest. Univariate and multivariate approaches were performed: non-parametric Wilcoxon–Mann–Whitney test; receiver operating characteristic (ROC), linear classifier (LDA), decision tree (DT), k-nearest neighbors (KNN), artificial neural network (NNET), and support vector machine (SVM) were utilized. A balancing approach and feature selection methods were used. The univariate analysis showed low accuracy and area under the curve (AUC) for all considered features. Instead, in the multivariate textural analysis, the best performance considering the CC view (accuracy (ACC) = 0.75; AUC = 0.82) was reached with a DT trained with leave-one-out cross-variation (LOOCV) and balanced data (with adaptive synthetic (ADASYN) function) and a subset of three robust textural features (MAD, VARIANCE, and LRLGE). The best performance (ACC = 0.77; AUC = 0.83) considering the early-MLO view was reached with a NNET trained with LOOCV and balanced data (with ADASYN function) and a subset of ten robust features (MEAN, MAD, RANGE, IQR, VARIANCE, CORRELATION, RLV, COARSNESS, BUSYNESS, and STRENGTH). The best performance (ACC = 0.73; AUC = 0.82) considering the late-MLO view was reached with a NNET trained with LOOCV and balanced data (with ADASYN function) and a subset of eleven robust features (MODE, MEDIAN, RANGE, RLN, LRLGE, RLV, LZLGE, GLV_GLSZM, ZSV, COARSNESS, and BUSYNESS). Multivariate analyses using pattern recognition approaches, considering 144 textural features extracted from all three mammographic projections (CC, early MLO, and late MLO), optimized by adaptive synthetic sampling and feature selection operations obtained the best results (ACC = 0.87; AUC = 0.90) and showed the best performance in the discrimination of benign and malignant lesions.

Contrast-enhanced Mammography: How Does It Work?

Contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) is an imaging technique that uses iodinated contrast medium to improve visualization of breast lesions and assessment of tumor neovascularity. Through modifications in x-ray energy, high- and low-energy images of the breast are combined to highlight areas of contrast medium pooling. The use of contrast material introduces different workflows, artifacts, and risks related to the contrast medium dose. In addition, the need to acquire multiple images in each view introduces different workflows, artifacts, and risks associated with the radiation dose. Although CEM and conventional mammography share many underlying principles, it is important to understand how these two mammographic examinations differ and the mechanisms that facilitate image contrast at CEM. ^©RSNA, 2021.

Contrast-enhanced Mammography: State of the Art

Contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) has emerged as a viable alternative to contrast-enhanced breast MRI, and it may increase access to vascular imaging while reducing examination cost. Intravenous iodinated contrast materials are used in CEM to enhance the visualization of tumor neovascularity. After injection, imaging is performed with dual-energy digital mammography, which helps provide a low-energy image and a recombined or iodine image that depict enhancing lesions in the breast. CEM has been demonstrated to help improve accuracy compared with digital mammography and US in women with abnormal screening mammographic findings or symptoms of breast cancer. It has also been demonstrated to approach the accuracy of breast MRI in preoperative staging of patients with breast cancer and in monitoring response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. There are early encouraging results from trials evaluating CEM in the screening of women who are at an increased risk of breast cancer. Although CEM is a promising tool, it slightly increases radiation dose and carries a small risk of adverse reactions to contrast materials. This review details the CEM technique, diagnostic and screening uses, and future applications, including artificial intelligence and radiomics.

Additive value of texture analysis based on breast MRI for distinguishing between benign and malignant non-mass enhancement in premenopausal women

BACKGROUND

Non-mass enhancement (NME) is a diagnostic dilemma and highly reliant on the experience of the radiologists. Texture analysis (TA) could serve as an objective method to quantify lesion characteristics. However, it remains unclear what role TA plays in a predictive model based on routine MRI characteristics. The purpose of this study was to explore the value of TA in distinguishing between benign and malignant NME in premenopausal women.

METHODS

Women in whom NME was histologically proven (n = 147) were enrolled (benign: 58; malignant: 89) was retrospective. Then, 102 and 45 patients were classified as the training and validation groups, respectively. Scanning sequences included Fat-suppressed T2-weighted and fat-suppressed contrast-enhanced T1-weighted which were acquired on a 1.5T MRI system. Clinical and routine MR characteristics (CRMC) were evaluated by two radiologists according to the Breast Imaging and Reporting and Data system (2013). Texture features were extracted from all post-contrast sequences in the training group. The combination model was built and then assessed in the validation group. Pearson's chi-square test and Mann-Whitney U test were used to compare categorical variables and continuous variables, respectively. Logistic regression analysis and receiver operating characteristic curve were employed to assess the diagnostic performance of CRMC, TA, and their combination model in NME diagnosis.

RESULTS

The combination model showed superior diagnostic performance in differentiating between benign and malignant NME compared to that of CRMC or TA alone (AUC, 0.887 vs 0.832 vs 0.74). Moreover, compared to CRMC, the model showed high specificity (72.5% vs 80%). The results obtained in the validation group confirmed the model was promising.

CONCLUSIONS

With the combined use of TA and CRMC could afford an improved diagnostic performance in differentiating between benign and malignant NME.

Comprehensive classification models based on amygdala radiomic features for Alzheimer's disease and mild cognitive impairment

The amygdala is an important part of the medial temporal lobe and plays a pivotal role in the emotional and cognitive function. The aim of this study was to build and validate comprehensive classification models based on amygdala radiomic features for Alzheimer's disease (AD) and amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI). For the amygdala, 3360 radiomic features were extracted from 97 AD patients, 53 aMCI patients and 45 normal controls (NCs) on the three-dimensional T1-weighted magnetization-prepared rapid gradient echo (MPRAGE) images. We used maximum relevance and minimum redundancy (mRMR) and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) to select the features. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to build three classification models (AD-NC group, AD-aMCI group, and aMCI-NC group). Finally, internal validation was assessed. After two steps of feature selection, there were 5 radiomic features remained in the AD-NC group, 16 features remained in the AD-aMCI group and the aMCI-NC group, respectively. The proposed logistic classification analysis based on amygdala radiomic features achieves an accuracy of 0.90 and an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.93 for AD vs. NC classification, an accuracy of 0.81 and an AUC of 0.84 for AD vs. aMCI classification, and an accuracy of 0.75 and an AUC of 0.80 for aMCI vs. NC classification. Amygdala radiomic features might be early biomarkers for detecting microstructural brain tissue changes during the AD and aMCI course. Logistic classification analysis demonstrated the promising classification performances for clinical applications among AD, aMCI and NC groups.

Improving the Diagnostic Accuracy of Breast BI-RADS 4 Microcalcification-Only Lesions Using Contrast-Enhanced Mammography

BACKGROUND

Contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) is a novel breast imaging technique that can provide additional information of breast tissue blood supply. This study aimed to test the possibility of CEM in improving the diagnostic accuracy of Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) 4 calcification-only lesions with consideration of morphology and distribution.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Data of patients with suspicious malignant calcification-only lesions (BI-RADS 4) on low-energy CEM and proved pathologic diagnoses were retrospectively collected. Two junior radiologists independently reviewed the two sets of CEM images, low-energy images (LE) to describe the calcifications by morphology and distribution type, and recombined images (CE) to record the presence of enhancement. Low-risk and high-risk groups were divided by calcification morphology, distribution, and both, respectively. Positive predictive values and misdiagnosis rates (MDR) were compared between LE-only reading and CE reading. Diagnostic performance was also tested using machine learning method.

RESULTS

The study included 74 lesions (26 malignant and 48 benign). Positive predictive values were significantly higher and MDRs were significantly lower using CE images than using LE alone for both the low-risk morphology type and low-risk distribution type (P < .05). MDRs were significantly lower when using CE images (18.18%-24.00%) than using LE images alone in low-risk group (76.36%-80.00%) (P < .05). Using a machine learning method, significant improvements in the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve were observed in both low-risk and high-risk groups.

CONCLUSION

CEM has the potential to aid in the diagnosis of BI-RADS 4 calcification-only lesions; in particular, those presented as low risk in morphology and/or distribution may benefit more.

Radiomics in Breast Imaging from Techniques to Clinical Applications: A Review

Recent advances in computer technology have generated a new area of research known as radiomics. Radiomics is defined as the high throughput extraction and analysis of quantitative features from imaging data. Radiomic features provide information on the gray-scale patterns, inter-pixel relationships, as well as shape and spectral properties of radiological images. Moreover, these features can be used to develop computational models that may serve as a tool for personalized diagnosis and treatment guidance. Although radiomics is becoming popular and widely used in oncology, many problems such as overfitting and reproducibility issues remain unresolved. In this review, we will outline the steps of radiomics used for oncology, specifically addressing applications for breast cancer patients and focusing on technical issues.

Utility of Targeted Ultrasound to Predict Malignancy Among Lesions Detected on Contrast-Enhanced Digital Mammography

BACKGROUND. Targeted ultrasound (US) can be performed to characterize and potentially biopsy areas of enhancement detected on contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM). OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to assess the utility of targeted US in predicting malignancy of lesions with indeterminate or suspicious enhancement on CEM. METHODS. One thousand consecutive CEM examinations with same-day targeted breast US at one institution between October 2013 and May 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. All patients with indeterminate or suspicious enhancement detected on CEM that underwent US evaluation were included. Patients with palpable or symptomatic lesions, those with suspicious findings on low-energy mammograms or images obtained with another modality, and those with less than 1 year of follow-up were excluded. Medical records, imaging, and pathology data were reviewed. Histopathologic analysis was used as the reference standard for biopsied lesions, and follow-up imaging was used for unbiopsied lesions. Associations between pathologic diagnosis, presence of a US correlate, and lesion characteristics were assessed by Fisher exact, chi-square, and Wilcox-on rank sum tests. RESULTS. Among 153 enhancing lesions detected on CEM in 144 patients, 47 (31%) had a US correlate. The frequency of a correlate between CEM and US was significantly higher among enhancing masses (28/43 [65%]) than among lesions exhibiting nonmass enhancement (19/110 [17%]) (p < .001). The likelihood of malignancy was significantly greater among lesions with a US correlate (12/47 [26%]) than among those without a US correlate (11/106 [10%]) (p = .03), and among mass lesions (11/43 [26%]) than among nonmass lesions (12/110 [11%]) (p = .04). The PPV of US-guided biopsy after CEM-directed US was 32%. CONCLUSION. Enhancing CEM-detected lesions that have a US correlate are more likely to be malignant and can be evaluated with US-guided biopsy to obviate additional breast MRI. CLINICAL IMPACT. CEM-directed US of enhancing lesions is useful given that lesions with a US correlate are more likely to be malignant and can be used as targets for US-guided biopsy until a CEM biopsy system becomes commercially available.

Radiomic Analysis in Contrast-Enhanced Spectral Mammography for Predicting Breast Cancer Histological Outcome

Contrast-Enhanced Spectral Mammography (CESM) is a recently introduced mammographic method with characteristics particularly suitable for breast cancer radiomic analysis. This work aims to evaluate radiomic features for predicting histological outcome and two cancer molecular subtypes, namely Human Epidermal growth factor Receptor 2 (HER2)-positive and triple-negative. From 52 patients, 68 lesions were identified and confirmed on histological examination. Radiomic analysis was performed on regions of interest (ROIs) selected from both low-energy (LE) and ReCombined (RC) CESM images. Fourteen statistical features were extracted from each ROI. Expression of estrogen receptor (ER) was significantly correlated with variation coefficient and variation range calculated on both LE and RC images; progesterone receptor (PR) with skewness index calculated on LE images; and Ki67 with variation coefficient, variation range, entropy and relative smoothness indices calculated on RC images. HER2 was significantly associated with relative smoothness calculated on LE images, and grading tumor with variation coefficient, entropy and relative smoothness calculated on RC images. Encouraging results for differentiation between ER+/ER-, PR+/PR-, HER2+/HER2-, Ki67+/Ki67-, High-Grade/Low-Grade and TN/NTN were obtained. Specifically, the highest performances were obtained for discriminating HER2+/HER2- (90.87%), ER+/ER- (83.79%) and Ki67+/Ki67- (84.80%). Our results suggest an interesting role for radiomics in CESM to predict histological outcomes and particular tumors' molecular subtype.