An environmental and economic analysis of emission reduction strategies for container ships with emphasis on the improved energy efficiency indexes

Techno-economic and environmental analysis for the application of renewable energy sources in seaports

Ports have an indisputable effect on the decarbonization of urban areas, helping to minimize air and environmental pollution and achieve sustainable development. In this instance, it is crucial to do research that can advance our understanding of how to increase ports' energy independence by utilizing renewable energy sources. The current study aims to study the environmental benefits and techno-economic challenges of converting three Egyptian ports to eco-friendly green ports by using solar panels, offshore wind turbines, and hydrogen fuel cells. The study shows that from a technical point of view, the required green power to be installed at Alexandria, Port Said, and Suez ports is around 13 MW, 5 MW, and 1.5 MW, respectively. Furthermore, the environmental analysis findings demonstrate that integrating green energy will significantly lower emissions in seaports. It is anticipated that the ports of Alexandria, Port Said, and Suez will achieve annual reductions in carbon dioxide emissions of roughly 68,7 k-tons, 25,8 k-tons, and 6,4 k-tons, respectively. From an economic point of view, the ports could be supplied with green energy from wind turbines for a cost of between 0.115 and 0.125 USD/kWh, while solar panels have a cost range of 0.098 to 0.129 USD/kWh. Additionally, hydrogen fuel cell systems cost about 0.102 USD/kWh.

Real-time energy consumption and air pollution emission during the transpacific crossing of a container ship

This study presents the real-time energy consumption of a container ship’s generator engine on two round-trips from the West Coast of the US to the East Asian ports and analyzes the ship’s PM₁₀, PM_2.5, NO_x, SO_x, CO, and HC emissions, shore power usage, and factors affecting energy consumption. The average total energy consumption and air emissions for the two round trips were 1.72 GWh and 42.1 tons, respectively. The transpacific crossing segment had the highest average energy consumption (2848 ± 361 kWh) and pollutant emission rate (78.9 ± 10.0 kg h⁻¹). On the other hand, the West Coast of the US had the least energy consumption due to shore power adoption. Furthermore, switching from heavy fuel oil (HFO) to ultra-low-sulfur fuel oil (ULSFO) greatly reduced the emissions of PM and SO_x by > 96% and NO_x by 17.0%. However, CO and HC increased by 16.9% and 36.1%, respectively, implying incomplete combustion. In addition, the energy consumption was influenced by the number of reefers and wind. Therefore, this study recommends further research on energy-efficient reefers, generator engine optimization, and shore power adoption to reduce emissions from container ships.

Environmental protection and energy efficiency improvement by using natural gas fuel in maritime transportation

Emissions from vessels are a major environmental concern because of their impacts on the deterioration of the environment, especially global warming of the atmosphere. Therefore, the International Maritime Organization (IMO) concerns significant care to environmental protection through the reduction of exhaust emission and improvement of energy efficiency through technical and operational measures. Among the suggested measures from IMO, the alternative fuel such as natural gas has the priority to be used instead of fossil fuels. The present paper calculates the effect of using natural gas in a dual-fuel engine from environmental and energy efficiency perspectives. As a case study, a container ship has been investigated. The results of the analysis show that the percent of CO₂, NOx, and SOx emission reduction corresponding to using a dual-fuel engine operated by natural gas instead of a diesel engine operated by heavy fuel oil is about 30.4%, 85.3%, and 97%, respectively. Moreover, it found that NOx and SOx emission rates of the dual-fuel engine comply with the IMO 2016 and 2020 limits, respectively. Furthermore, the Energy Efficiency Design Index value in the case of using dual-fuel engine is lower than the value by using diesel engine by about 30%, and this value will be 77.18%, 86.84%, and 99.27% of the required value for the first, second, and third phases, respectively, as recommended by IMO.

Evaluation of the environmental and economic impacts of electric propulsion systems onboard ships: case study passenger vessel

The International Maritime Organization (IMO) announced that maritime transport share by 2.89% in global greenhouse gases. Electric propulsion system appears as a promising option for reducing ship emissions, especially for high-powered vessels. The aim of the current paper is to investigate the environmental and economic impact of using electric propulsion systems. Simple eco-environmental model was presented to assess the best propulsion system for passenger ships. A comparison between diesel electric (DE) and combined gas turbine electric and steam (COGES) propulsion systems is conducted. As a case study, one of the cruise ships is selected. The results showed specific environmental benefits of COGES over DE propulsion option. From the design and operational viewpoints, COGES propulsion system is more energy efficient than DE by 9.3% and 27.55%, respectively. Economically, the values of the life cycle costs are 5,013 and 6,042 $/kW for DE and COGES systems, respectively. Finally, COGES seems as a greener option with a life-cycle cost-effectiveness of 612, 1970, and 6 $/ton for NOx, SOx, and CO2 emissions, respectively.

Numerical analysis of economic and environmental benefits of marine fuel conversion from diesel oil to natural gas for container ships

Shipping is a significant contributor to global greenhouse gas (GHG) and air pollutant emissions. These emissions mainly come from using diesel fuel for power generation. In this paper, the natural gas is proposed as an alternative marine fuel to be used instead of conventional marine diesel oil. Numerical analysis of environmental and economic benefits of the natural gas-diesel dual-fuel engine is carried out. As a case study, a container ship of class A7 owned by Hapag-Lloyd has been investigated. The results show that the proposed dual-fuel engine achieves environmental benefits for reducing carbon dioxide (CO₂), nitrogen oxides (NOx), sulfur oxides (SOx), particulate matter (PM), and carbon monoxide (CO) emissions by 20.1%, 85.5%, 98%, 99%, and 55.7% with cost effectiveness of 109, 840, 9864, 27761, and 4307 US$/ton, respectively. The results show that the conversion process to the dual-fuel engine will comply with the current and future IMO regulations regarding air pollutant emissions. On the other hand, using the proposed dual-fuel engine on the container ship will improve the ship energy efficiency index by 29.6 % with annual fuel cost saving of 4.77 million US dollars.

Harnessing wind energy on merchant ships: case study Flettner rotors onboard bulk carriers

Shipping faces challenges of reducing the dependence on fossil fuels to align with the international regulations of ship emissions reduction. The maritime industry is in urgent need of searching about alternative energy sources for ships. This paper highlights the applicability of harnessing wind power for ships. Flettner rotors as a clean propulsion technology for commercial ships are introduced. As a case study, one of the bulk carrier ships operating between Damietta port in Egypt and Dunkirk port in France has been investigated. The results showed the high influence of the interaction between ship course and wind speed and direction on the net output power of Flettner rotors. The average net output power for each rotor will be 384 kW/h. Economically, the results reveal that the use of Flettner rotors will contribute to considerable savings, up to 22.28% of the annual ship's fuel consumption. The pay-back period of the proposed concept will be 6 years with a considerable value of levelized cost of energy. Environmentally, NOx and CO2 emissions will be reduced by 270.4 and 9272 ton/year with cost-effectiveness of $1912 and $55.8/ton, respectively, at annual interest rate of 10%.