Prediction of methane production from co-digestion of lignocellulosic biomass with sludge based on the major compositions of lignocellulosic biomass

Anaerobic co-digestion of microalgal biomass, sugarcane vinasse, and residual glycerol from biodiesel using simplex-centroid mixture design: methane potential, synergic effect, and microbial diversity

Microalgal biomass (MB) is a promising feedstock for bioenergy production. Nonetheless, the cell recalcitrance and the low C/N ratio limit the methane yield during anaerobic digestion. As an alternative to overcome these challenges, MB co-digestion with different feedstocks has been proposed. Thus, this study evaluated the anaerobic co-digestion (AcoD) of MB cultivated in wastewater with sugarcane vinasse (VIN) and residual glycerol from biodiesel production (GLY). Batch tests were conducted using augmented simplex-centroid mixture design to investigate the impact of AcoD on methane production (SMP), synergistic effects, and the influence on microbial community. When compared to MB digestion, 150 NmL CH4.g-1VS, binary and ternary AcoD achieved SMP increases from 120 to 337%. The combination of 16.7:16.7:66.7 (MB:VIN:GLY) showed the highest SMP for a ternary mixture (631 NmL CH4.g-1VS). Optimal synergies ranged from 1.3 to 1.4 and were primarily found for the MB:GLY AcoD. Acetoclastic Methanosaeta genus was predominant, regardless the combination between substrates. Despite the largest SMP obtained from the MB:GLY AcoD, other ternary mixtures were also highly synergetic and therefore had strong potential as a strategic renewable energy source.

Sewage sludge pretreatment: current status and future prospects

Sewage sludge is regarded by wastewater treatment plants as problematic, from a financial and managerial point of view. Thus, a variety of disposal routes are used, but the most popular is methane fermentation. The proportion of macromolecular compounds in sewage sludges varies, and substrates treated in methane fermentation provide different amounts of biogas with various quality and quantity. Depending on the equipment and financial capabilities for methane fermentation, different methods of sewage sludge pretreatment are available. This review presents the challenges associated with the recalcitrant structure of sewage sludge and the presence of process inhibitors. We also examined the diverse methods of sewage sludge pretreatment that increase methane yield. Moreover, in the field of biological sewage sludge treatment, three future study propositions are proposed: improved pretreatment of sewage sludge using biological methods, assess the changes in microbial consortia caused with pretreatment methods, and verification of microbial impact on biomass degradation.

Additional ratios of hydrolysates from lignocellulosic digestate at different hydrothermal temperatures influencing anaerobic digestion performance

Hydrothermal treatment (HT) is envisaged as a promising technology to treat the lignocellulosic biomass. HT temperature is an important parameter influencing the hydrolysate compositions such as organic compounds and potential inhibitors, and therefore affect the subsequential anaerobic digestion (AD) process. Herein, HT-AD was employed to treat the wheat straw-derived digestate. The HT temperature of 190 °C was proved to be the best performance with a higehst reducing sugar yield (45.05 mg g^-1) in the hydrolysate and a highest methane yield (120.8 mL g_TS^-1) from the AD of the hydrolysate, which was 42.5% higher than the methane yield in the control without the hydrolysate addition (84.8 mL g_TS^-1). 3-Furaldehyde was the dominant organic in the hydrolysates. The HT temperature of 210 °C led to the presence of AD inhibitory moieties (e.g., phenols and furans) in the hydrolysate, resulting in a low methane yield. Although the treatments with the addition of 100% hydrolysate outperformed those of 50% hydrolysate in the methane yields in the late stage, the latter had higher methane yields in the first stage, suggesting that the additional ratios of hydrolysates should be carefully considered in AD, especially the detrimental effects of inhibitors and adaptability issues of AD consortia. The MiSeq sequencing showed that the hydrolysis/acidogenesis was dominant in the first stage, while methanogenesis became dominant in the late stage with the acetoclastic/hydrogenotrophic methanogens (Methanosarcina and Methanobacterium) enriched in the hydrolysate-feeding reactors. These findings demonstrated that a integration of HT-AD was a promising approach for the digestate valorization and to reduce the potential carbon emission from waste treatments.

Investigation on the effect of different additives on anaerobic co-digestion of corn straw and sewage sludge: Comparison of biochar, Fe3O4, and magnetic biochar

The co-digestion of corn straw and sewage sludge with different additives (biochar, magnetic biochar, Fe₃O₄) were investigated. The highest cumulative methane yield of 245.15 mL/g VS_added was obtained with the Fe₃O₄ addition ratio of 5 g/kg, which was 60.47% higher than that of the control run (without additives). The lag phase time was shortened from 5.46 to 3.82 days with a biochar dosage of 5 g/kg. The performance of Fe₃O₄ on methane production from the co-digestion process was better than that of the biochar and magnetic biochar. The direct interspecies electron transfer (DIET) was enhanced with regard to the increased concentration of acetic acid and decreased concentration of propionic acid. Microbial community analysis showed that the Geobacter and Methanosarcina were selectively enriched on the surface of Fe₃O₄, promoting the DIET and acetoclastic methanogenesis pathway. The cost-benefit analysis proved that the strategy of recycling Fe₃O₄ additive has the best economic benefit.

Challenges and Future Perspectives of Promising Biotechnologies for Lignocellulosic Biorefinery

Lignocellulose is a kind of renewable bioresource containing abundant polysaccharides, which can be used for biochemicals and biofuels production. However, the complex structure hinders the final efficiency of lignocellulosic biorefinery. This review comprehensively summarizes the hydrolases and typical microorganisms for lignocellulosic degradation. Moreover, the commonly used bioprocesses for lignocellulosic biorefinery are also discussed, including separated hydrolysis and fermentation, simultaneous saccharification and fermentation and consolidated bioprocessing. Among these methods, construction of microbial co-culturing systems via consolidated bioprocessing is regarded as a potential strategy to efficiently produce biochemicals and biofuels, providing theoretical direction for constructing efficient and stable biorefinery process system in the future.