Anaerobic co-digestion of microalgal biomass, sugarcane vinasse, and residual glycerol from biodiesel using simplex-centroid mixture design: methane potential, synergic effect, and microbial diversity

Microalgal biomass (MB) is a promising feedstock for bioenergy production. Nonetheless, the cell recalcitrance and the low C/N ratio limit the methane yield during anaerobic digestion. As an alternative to overcome these challenges, MB co-digestion with different feedstocks has been proposed. Thus, this study evaluated the anaerobic co-digestion (AcoD) of MB cultivated in wastewater with sugarcane vinasse (VIN) and residual glycerol from biodiesel production (GLY). Batch tests were conducted using augmented simplex-centroid mixture design to investigate the impact of AcoD on methane production (SMP), synergistic effects, and the influence on microbial community. When compared to MB digestion, 150 NmL CH4.g-1VS, binary and ternary AcoD achieved SMP increases from 120 to 337%. The combination of 16.7:16.7:66.7 (MB:VIN:GLY) showed the highest SMP for a ternary mixture (631 NmL CH4.g-1VS). Optimal synergies ranged from 1.3 to 1.4 and were primarily found for the MB:GLY AcoD. Acetoclastic Methanosaeta genus was predominant, regardless the combination between substrates. Despite the largest SMP obtained from the MB:GLY AcoD, other ternary mixtures were also highly synergetic and therefore had strong potential as a strategic renewable energy source.

Anaerobic co-digestion of coffee waste with other organic substrates: A mixture experimental design

The viability of the anaerobic co-digestion of coffee waste (CFW) with other organic waste (cow manure-CM, food waste-FW, anaerobic sludge-AS) was investigated through measurements of biogas generation of various mixtures of the above substrates. The experiments were designed following the principles of mixture experimental design. Four different mixtures were tested anaerobically at 37 °C in 500 mL and 1 L anaerobic vessels. AS was used in some mixtures as an inoculum. The results were fitted to two empirical models in which biogas generation was the dependent variable and the fractions of the components in the mixture were the independent variables. According to the empirical models, the co-digestion of CFW with AS appeared to have a positive (synergistic) effect, generating 201 mL g^-1 VS_mixture, which was 12% higher than the amount generated from the mono-digestion of AS (179 mL g^-1 VS). On the other hand, the co-digestion of CFW with CM and of CFW with FW had a negative (antagonistic) effect on biogas generation indicating that CFW inhibits biogas generation when mixed with CM and FW. Although the mono-digestion of CM resulted in an average of 149 mL g^-1 VS of biogas, when CM was combined with CFW in a mixture, biogas generation was highly reduced by 43.8%-85.1%, depending on the CFW content of the mixtures, which was 25% and 50%, respectively. When co-digesting CFW with FW, the biogas generated was 7.02 mL g^-1 VS that was obtained only from the FW in the mixture.

Resource allocation and compensation during development in holometabolous insects

We provide an extensive review on current knowledge and future research paths on the topic of resource allocation and compensation during development in holometabolous insects, emphasizing the role of resource management during development, and how compensatory mechanisms may be acting to remediate nutritional deficiencies carried over from earlier stages of development. We first review resource allocation in "open" and "closed" developmental stages and then move on to the topic of modelling resource allocation and its trade-offs. In doing so, we review novel methodological developments such as response-surface methods and mixture experiments as well as nutritional geometry. We also dwell on the fascinating topic of compensatory physiology and behavior. We finish by discussing future research paths, among them the emerging field of nutrigenomics and gut microbiome, which will shed light into the yet poorly understood role of the symbiotic microbiota in nutrient compensation or assimilation.