T1 and T2 mapping in the identification of acute myocardial injury in patients with NSTEMI

The current landscape of imaging recommendations in cardiovascular clinical guidelines: toward an imaging-guided precision medicine

The purpose of this article is to provide an overview on the role of CT scan and MRI according to selected guidelines by the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA). ESC and ACC/AHA guidelines were systematically reviewed for recommendations to CT and MRI use in specific cardiovascular (CV) clinical categories. All recommendations were collected in a dataset, including the class of recommendation, the level of evidence (LOE), the specific imaging technique, the clinical purpose of the recommendation and the recommending Society. Among the 43 included guidelines (ESC: n = 18, ACC/AHA: n = 25), 26 (60.4%) contained recommendations for CT scan or MRI (146 recommendations: 62 for CT and 84 for MRI). Class of recommendation IIa (32.9%) was the most represented, followed by I (28.1%), IIb (24%) and III (11.9%). MRI recommendations more frequently being of higher class (I: 36.9%, IIa: 29.8%, IIb: 21.4%, III: 11.9%) as compared to CT (I: 16.1%, IIa: 37.1%, IIb: 27.4%, III: 19.4%). Most of recommendation (55.5%) were based on expert opinion (LOE C). The use of cardiac CT and cardiac MR in the risk assessment, diagnosis, therapeutic and procedural planning is in continuous development, driven by an increasing need to evolve toward an imaging-guided precision medicine, combined with cost-effectiveness and healthcare sustainability. These developments must be accompanied by an increased availability of high-performance scanners in healthcare facilities and should emphasize the need of increasing the number of radiologists fully trained in cardiac imaging.

Cardiac magnetic resonance in arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathies

Over the past few years, the approach to the 'arrhythmic patient' has profoundly changed. An early clinical presentation of arrhythmia is often accompanied by non-specific symptoms and followed by inconclusive electrocardiographic findings. In this scenario, cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) has been established as a clinical tool of fundamental importance for a correct prognostic stratification of the arrhythmic patient. This technique provides a high-spatial-resolution tomographic evaluation of the heart, which allows studying accurately the ventricular volumes, identifying even segmental kinetic anomalies and properly detecting diffuse or focal tissue alterations through an excellent tissue characterization, while depicting different patterns of fibrosis distribution, myocardial edema or fatty substitution. Through these capabilities, CMR has a pivotal role for the adequate management of the arrhythmic patient, allowing the identification of those phenotypic manifestations characteristic of structural heart diseases. Therefore, CMR provides valuable information to reclassify the patient within the wide spectrum of potentially arrhythmogenic heart diseases, the definition of which remains the major determinants for both an adequate treatment and a poor prognosis. The purpose of this review study was to focus on the role of CMR in the evaluation of the main cardiac clinical entities associated with arrhythmogenic phenomena and to present a brief debate on the main pathophysiological mechanisms involved in the arrhythmogenesis process.

CMR in the diagnosis of ischemic heart disease

Cardiovascular magnetic resonance has always been more often used in the last 10 years in evaluation of heart disease. Role in diagnosis of ischemia and in evaluation of myocardial infarction is well established by many scientific papers and included in current guidelines. High accuracy in evaluation of stress-induced ischemia, tissue characterization and functional parameters are the pillars the make the method widely used. In this paper are described role and techniques in diagnosis of ischemia, myocardial infarction and its sequelae.

Cardiovascular magnetic resonance native T2 and T2* quantitative values for cardiomyopathies and heart transplantations: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The clinical application of cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) T2 and T2* mapping is currently limited as ranges for healthy and cardiac diseases are poorly defined. In this meta-analysis we aimed to determine the weighted mean of T2 and T2* mapping values in patients with myocardial infarction (MI), heart transplantation, non-ischemic cardiomyopathies (NICM) and hypertension, and the standardized mean difference (SMD) of each population with healthy controls. Additionally, the variation of mapping outcomes between studies was investigated.

METHODS

The PRISMA guidelines were followed after literature searches on PubMed and Embase. Studies reporting CMR T2 or T2* values measured in patients were included. The SMD was calculated using a random effects model and a meta-regression analysis was performed for populations with sufficient published data.

RESULTS

One hundred fifty-four studies, including 13,804 patient and 4392 control measurements, were included. T2 values were higher in patients with MI, heart transplantation, sarcoidosis, systemic lupus erythematosus, amyloidosis, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) and myocarditis (SMD of 2.17, 1.05, 0.87, 1.39, 1.62, 1.95, 1.90 and 1.33, respectively, P <  0.01) compared with controls. T2 values in iron overload patients (SMD = - 0.54, P = 0.30) and Anderson-Fabry disease patients (SMD = 0.52, P = 0.17) did both not differ from controls. T2* values were lower in patients with MI and iron overload (SMD of - 1.99 and - 2.39, respectively, P <  0.01) compared with controls. T2* values in HCM patients (SMD = - 0.61, P = 0.22), DCM patients (SMD = - 0.54, P = 0.06) and hypertension patients (SMD = - 1.46, P = 0.10) did not differ from controls. Multiple CMR acquisition and patient demographic factors were assessed as significant covariates, thereby influencing the mapping outcomes and causing variation between studies.

CONCLUSIONS

The clinical utility of T2 and T2* mapping to distinguish affected myocardium in patients with cardiomyopathies or heart transplantation from healthy myocardium seemed to be confirmed based on this meta-analysis. Nevertheless, variation of mapping values between studies complicates comparison with external values and therefore require local healthy reference values to clinically interpret quantitative values. Furthermore, disease differentiation seems limited, since changes in T2 and T2* values of most cardiomyopathies are similar.

Coronary artery disease (CAD) extension-derived risk stratification for asymptomatic diabetic patients: usefulness of low-dose coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) in detecting high-risk profile patients

BACKGROUND

As one of the most frequent risk factors for cardiovascular disease, type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is one of the largest causes of death. However, an acute cardiac presentation is not uncommon in diabetic patients, and the current investigative approach remains often inadequate. The aim of our study was to retrospectively stratify the risk of asymptomatic T2DM patients using low-dose 640-slice coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

CCTA examinations of 62 patients (mean age, 65 years) with previous diagnosis of type 2 diabetes and without cardiac symptoms were analyzed. Image acquisition was performed using a 640-slice CT. Per-patient, per-vessel and per-plaque analyses were performed. Stratification risk was evaluated according to the ESC guidelines. The patients were followed up after 2.21 ± 0.56 years from CCTA examination.

RESULTS

Coronary artery disease (CAD) was found in 58 patients (93.55%) presenting 290 plaques. Analysis of all samples showed severe-to-occlusive atherosclerosis in 24 patients (38.7% of cases). However, over the degree of stenosis, 23 patients were evaluated at high risk considering the extension of CAD. Good agreement was shown by the correlation of CAD extension/risk estimation and MACE incidence, according to a Kaplan-Meier survival analysis (p value = 0.001), with a 7.25-fold increased risk (HR 7.25 CI 2.13-24.7; p value = 0.002).

CONCLUSION

Our study confirms the high capability of CCTA to properly stratify the CV risk of asymptomatic T2DM patients. Its use could be recommended if we consider how current investigative strategies to correctly assess these patients often seem inadequate.

Accelerated free-breathing whole-heart 3D T2 mapping with high isotropic resolution

Purpose

To enable free‐breathing whole‐heart 3D T₂ mapping with high isotropic resolution in a clinically feasible and predictable scan time. This 3D motion‐corrected undersampled signal matched (MUST) T₂ map is achieved by combining an undersampled motion‐compensated T₂‐prepared Cartesian acquisition with a high‐order patch‐based reconstruction.

Methods

The 3D MUST‐T₂ mapping acquisition consists of an electrocardiogram‐triggered, T₂‐prepared, balanced SSFP sequence with nonselective saturation pulses. Three undersampled T₂‐weighted volumes are acquired using a 3D Cartesian variable‐density sampling with increasing T₂ preparation times. A 2D image‐based navigator is used to correct for respiratory motion of the heart and allow 100% scan efficiency. Multicontrast high‐dimensionality undersampled patch‐based reconstruction is used in concert with dictionary matching to generate 3D T₂ maps. The proposed framework was evaluated in simulations, phantom experiments, and in vivo (10 healthy subjects, 2 patients) with 1.5‐mm³ isotropic resolution. Three‐dimensional MUST‐T₂ was compared against standard multi‐echo spin‐echo sequence (phantom) and conventional breath‐held single‐shot 2D SSFP T₂ mapping (in vivo).

Results

Three‐dimensional MUST‐T₂ showed high accuracy in phantom experiments (R² > 0.99). The precision of T₂ values was similar for 3D MUST‐T₂ and 2D balanced SSFP T₂ mapping in vivo (5 ± 1 ms versus 4 ± 2 ms, P = .52). Slightly longer T₂ values were observed with 3D MUST‐T₂ in comparison to 2D balanced SSFP T₂ mapping (50.7 ± 2 ms versus 48.2 ± 1 ms, P < .05). Preliminary results in patients demonstrated T₂ values in agreement with literature values.

Conclusion

The proposed approach enables free‐breathing whole‐heart 3D T₂ mapping with high isotropic resolution in about 8 minutes, achieving accurate and precise T₂ quantification of myocardial tissue in a clinically feasible scan time.

Quantitative cardiac MRI

Cardiac MRI has become an indispensable imaging modality in the investigation of patients with suspected heart disease. It has emerged as the gold standard test for cardiac function, volumes, and mass and allows noninvasive tissue characterization and the assessment of myocardial perfusion. Quantitative MRI already has a key role in the development and incorporation of machine learning in clinical imaging, potentially offering major improvements in both workflow efficiency and diagnostic accuracy. As the clinical applications of a wide range of quantitative cardiac MRI techniques are being explored and validated, we are expanding our capabilities for earlier detection, monitoring, and risk stratification of disease, potentially guiding personalized management decisions in various cardiac disease models. In this article we review established and emerging quantitative techniques, their clinical applications, highlight novel advances, and appraise their clinical diagnostic potential. Level of Evidence: 2 Technical Efficacy: Stage 1 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2020;51:693-711.