1
|
Miszczyk M, Rajwa P, Yanagisawa T, Nowicka Z, Shim SR, Laukhtina E, Kawada T, von Deimling M, Pradere B, Rivas JG, Gandaglia G, van den Bergh RCN, Goldner G, Supiot S, Zilli T, Trinh QD, Nguyen PL, Briganti A, Ost P, Ploussard G, Shariat SF. The Efficacy and Safety of Metastasis-directed Therapy in Patients with Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Prospective Studies. Eur Urol 2024; 85:125-138. [PMID: 37945451 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2023.10.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 26.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2023] [Revised: 09/15/2023] [Accepted: 10/16/2023] [Indexed: 11/12/2023]
Abstract
CONTEXT Despite the lack of level 1 evidence, metastasis-directed therapy (MDT) is used widely in the management of metastatic prostate cancer (mPCa) patients. Data are continuously emerging from well-designed prospective studies. OBJECTIVE To summarise and report the evidence on oncological and safety outcomes of MDT in the management of mPCa patients. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION We searched the PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases for prospective studies assessing progression-free survival (PFS), local control (LC), androgen deprivation therapy (ADT)-free survival (ADT-FS), overall survival (OS), and/or adverse events (AEs) in mPCa patients treated with MDT. A meta-analysis was performed for 1- and 2-yr PFS, LC, ADT-FS, OS, and rate of AEs. Meta-regression and sensitivity analysis were performed to account for heterogeneity and identify moderators. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS We identified 22 prospective studies (n = 1137), including two randomised controlled trials (n = 116). Two studies were excluded from the meta-analysis (n = 120). The estimated 2-yr PFS was 46% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 36-56%) or 42% (95% CI: 33-52%) after excluding studies using biochemical or ADT-related endpoints. The estimated 2-yr LC, ADT-FS, and OS were 97% (95% CI: 94-98%), 55% (95% CI: 44-65%), and 97% (95% CI: 95-98%), respectively. Rates of treatment-related grade 2 and ≥3 AEs were 2.4% (95% CI: 0.2-7%) and 0.3% (95% CI: 0-1%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS MDT is a promising treatment strategy associated with favourable PFS, excellent LC, and a low toxicity profile that allows oligorecurrent hormone-sensitive patients to avoid or defer ADT-related toxicity. Integration of MDT with other therapies offers a promising research direction, in particular, in conjunction with systemic treatments and as a component of definitive care for oligometastatic PCa. However, in the absence of randomised trials, using MDT for treatment intensification remains an experimental approach, and the impact on OS is uncertain. PATIENT SUMMARY Direct treatment of metastases is a promising option for selected prostate cancer patients. It can delay hormone therapy and is being investigated as a way of intensifying treatment at the expense of manageable toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marcin Miszczyk
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; IIIrd Radiotherapy and Chemotherapy Department, Maria Skłodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Gliwice, Poland
| | - Pawel Rajwa
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Medical University of Silesia, Zabrze, Poland
| | - Takafumi Yanagisawa
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Okayama, Japan
| | - Zuzanna Nowicka
- Department of Biostatistics and Translational Medicine, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland
| | - Sung Ryul Shim
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, Konyang University, Daejeon, Republic of Korea
| | - Ekaterina Laukhtina
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Tatsushi Kawada
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Japan
| | - Markus von Deimling
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Benjamin Pradere
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, La Croix Du Sud Hospital, Quint-Fonsegrives, France
| | - Juan Gómez Rivas
- Department of Urology, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain
| | - Giorgio Gandaglia
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Gregor Goldner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Stephane Supiot
- Department of Radiotherapy, ICO René Gauducheau, Saint-Herblain, France
| | - Thomas Zilli
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Oncological Institute of Southern Switzerland (IOSI-EOC), Bellinzona, Switzerland
| | - Quoc-Dien Trinh
- Division of Urological Surgery and Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Paul L Nguyen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Piet Ost
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Iridium Network, Wilrijk, Belgium
| | | | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic; Division of Urology, Hourani Center for Applied Scientific Research, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman, Jordan; Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA; Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Song Y, Zhang Y, Wang H, Zhao M, Guan F, Li Z, Yue J. Case Report: MR-LINAC-guided adaptive radiotherapy for gastric cancer. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1159197. [PMID: 37746250 PMCID: PMC10514477 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1159197] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2023] [Accepted: 08/22/2023] [Indexed: 09/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The stomach is one of the most deformable organs. Its shape can be easily affected by breathing movements, and daily diet, and it also varies when the body position is different. The susceptibility of stomach has made it challenging to treat gastric cancer using the conventional image-guided radiotherapy, i.e., the techniques based on kilovoltage X-ray imaging. The magnetic resonance imaging guided radiotherapy (MRgRT) is usually implemented using a hybrid system MR-LINAC. It is feasible to implement adaptive radiotherapy using MR-LINAC for deformable organs such as stomach. In this case report, we present our clinical experience to treat a gastric cancer patient using MR-LINAC. Case description The patient is a 58-year-old male who started having black stools with no apparent cause a year ago. Gastroscopy result showed pancreatic cancer, pathology: adenocarcinoma on gastric cancer biopsy, adenocarcinoma on gastric body minor curvature biopsy. The patient was diagnosed with gastric cancer (adenocarcinoma, cTxN+M1, stage IV, HER-2 positive). The patient was treated in 25 fractions with radiotherapy using MR-LINAC with online adaptive treatment plans daily. The target area in daily MR images varied considerably when compared with the target area on the CT simulation images. During the course of treatment, there have even been instances where the planned target area where the patient received radiotherapy did not cover the lesion of the day. Conclusion Online adaptive MRgRT can be a meaningful innovation for treating malignancies in the upper abdomen. The results in the current study are promising and are indicative for further optimizing online adaptive MRgRT in patients with inoperable tumors of the upper abdomen.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yajun Song
- Department of Graduate, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, China
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, China
| | - Yun Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, China
| | - Huadong Wang
- Department of Graduate, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, China
- Department of Radiation Physics, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, China
| | - Mengyu Zhao
- Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China
| | - Fada Guan
- Department of Therapeutic Radiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States
| | - Zhenjiang Li
- Department of Radiation Physics, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, China
| | - Jinbo Yue
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Xie X, Zhang P, Ran C, Liu L, Hu J, Lei P, Liang P. Global research status and hotspots of radiotherapy for prostate cancer: a bibliometric analysis based on Web of Science from 2010-2022. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1135052. [PMID: 37637069 PMCID: PMC10450940 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1135052] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2022] [Accepted: 07/26/2023] [Indexed: 08/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Radiotherapy (RT) is one of the important treatments for various cancer types and its application to prostate cancer (PCa) has also gradually gained increasing attention. However, there is a lack of comprehensive and objective studies on the overall status of research on RT for PCa. This article aims to summarize and quantify the dynamic trends of RT in PCa by using bibliometrics. Methods Studies on RT for PCa were screened from the Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC) database between 1 January 2010 and 21 November 2022 to collate and quantify information characteristics by analyzing parameters including annual publications, countries/regions, institutions and authors with the aid of the bibliometric software CiteSpace and VOSviewer. In addition, research trends and hotspots were explored by analyzing keywords and co-cited references. Results A total of 21338 documents were retrieved. The United States of America (USA) ranked first and maintained the leading position among all countries in the number of publications (8489) and total citations (266342). The University of Toronto was the most active institution in total publications (n=587). Paul L Nguyen enjoyed the most publications (n=179), and Michael J Zelefsky enjoyed the most co-citations (n=3376). INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS published the most papers (n=1026), and was the most frequently co-cited journal (n=78550). The largest and closest cluster in the reference cluster analysis was "oligorecurrent prostate cancer". The timeline view of keywords reveals that cluster "biochemical recurrence(BCR)" is ongoing. Moreover, keywords burstness analysis showed that "radiation dosimetry", "dose rate brachytherapy(BT)", "salvage radiotherapy", "stereotactic body radiotherapy(SBRT)", "guideline", and "multicenter" were the terms with great bursts in the past a few years. Conclusion The application of RT targeting oligometastatic prostate cancer(OMPC) has garnered considerable attention among researchers. SBRT and BT have become hot topics in the field. Additionally, the BCR of PCa has long been a critical issue requiring extensive research and resolution, and salvage radiotherapy has currently emerged as a closely related research focus. Related large-scale multicenter studies have been conducted over the past few years, providing valuable insights. More high-quality research is expected to be employed to guide clinical decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaodu Xie
- Department of Urology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, ;China
| | - Peng Zhang
- Department of Urology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, ;China
| | - Chongjun Ran
- Department of Urology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, ;China
| | - Lumiao Liu
- Department of Anesthesiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Jian Hu
- Department of Urology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, ;China
| | - Pan Lei
- Department of Urology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, ;China
| | - Peihe Liang
- Department of Urology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, ;China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Cuccia F, Tamburo M, Piras A, Mortellaro G, Iudica A, Daidone A, Federico M, Zagardo V, Ferini G, Marletta F, Spatola C, Fazio I, Filosto S, Pergolizzi S, Ferrera G. Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Lymph-Nodal Oligometastatic Prostate Cancer: A Multicenter Retrospective Experience. MEDICINA (KAUNAS, LITHUANIA) 2023; 59:1442. [PMID: 37629732 PMCID: PMC10456704 DOI: 10.3390/medicina59081442] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2023] [Revised: 07/25/2023] [Accepted: 08/07/2023] [Indexed: 08/27/2023]
Abstract
Background: The favorable role of SBRT for lymph-nodal oligometastases from prostate cancer has been reported by several retrospective and prospective experiences, suggesting a more indolent natural history of disease when compared to patients with bone oligometastases. This retrospective multicenter study evaluates the outcomes of a cohort of patients treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy for lymph-nodal oligometastases. Methods: Inclusion criteria were up to five lymph-nodal oligometastases detected either with Choline-PET or PSMA-PET in patients naïve for ADT or already ongoing with systemic therapy and at least 6 Gy per fraction for SBRT. Only patients with exclusive lymph-nodal disease were included. The primary endpoint of the study was LC; a toxicity assessment was retrospectively performed following CTCAE v4.0. Results: A total of 100 lymph-nodal oligometastases in 69 patients have been treated with SBRT between April 2015 and November 2022. The median age was 73 years (range, 60-85). Oligometastatic disease was mainly detected with Choline-PET in 47 cases, while the remaining were diagnosed using PSMA-PET, with most of the patients treated to a single lymph-nodal metastasis (48/69 cases), two in 14 cases, and three in the remaining cases. The median PSA prior to SBRT was 1.35 ng/mL (range, 0.3-23.7 ng/mL). Patients received SBRT with a median total dose of 35 Gy (range, 30-40 Gy) in a median number of 5 (range, 3-6) fractions. With a median follow-up of 16 months (range, 7-59 months), our LC rates were 95.8% and 86.3% at 1 and 2 years. DPFS rates were 90.4% and 53.4%, respectively, at 1 and 2 years, with nine patients developing a sequential oligometastatic disease treated with a second course of SBRT. Polymetastatic disease-free survival (PMFS) at 1 and 2 years was 98% and 96%. Six patients needed ADT after SBRT for a median time of ADT-free survival of 15 months (range, 6-22 months). The median OS was 16 months (range, 7-59) with 1- and 2-year rates of both 98%. In multivariate analysis, higher LC rates and the use of PSMA-PET were related to improved DPFS rates, and OS was significantly related to a lower incidence of distant progression. No G3 or higher adverse events were reported. Conclusions: In our experience, lymph-nodal SBRT for oligometastatic prostate cancer is a safe and effective option for ADT delay with no severe toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Cuccia
- Radiation Oncology, ARNAS Civico Hospital, 90100 Palermo, Italy; (G.M.)
| | - Maria Tamburo
- Radiotherapy Unit, Cannizzaro Hospital, 95100 Catania, Italy; (M.T.)
| | - Antonio Piras
- Radioterapia Oncologica, Villa Santa Teresa, 90100 Palermo, Italy; (A.P.); (A.D.)
- RI.MED Foundation, 90100 Palermo, Italy
- Department of Health Promotion, Mother and Child Care, Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties, Molecular and Clinical Medicine, University of Palermo, 90100 Palermo, Italy
| | | | - Arianna Iudica
- Radiotherapy Unit, AOU Policlinico-VE, 95100 Catania, Italy; (A.I.); (C.S.)
| | - Antonino Daidone
- Radioterapia Oncologica, Villa Santa Teresa, 90100 Palermo, Italy; (A.P.); (A.D.)
| | - Manuela Federico
- Radiotherapy Unit, Casa di Cura Macchiarella, 90100 Palermo, Italy; (M.F.); (I.F.)
| | - Valentina Zagardo
- Radiation Oncology Unit, REM Radioterapia, 95100 Viagrande, CT, Italy
| | - Gianluca Ferini
- Radiation Oncology Unit, REM Radioterapia, 95100 Viagrande, CT, Italy
| | | | - Corrado Spatola
- Radiotherapy Unit, AOU Policlinico-VE, 95100 Catania, Italy; (A.I.); (C.S.)
| | - Ivan Fazio
- Radiotherapy Unit, Casa di Cura Macchiarella, 90100 Palermo, Italy; (M.F.); (I.F.)
| | - Sergio Filosto
- Radiation Oncology Unit, La Maddalena Dipartimento Oncologico di III Livello, 90100 Palermo, Italy;
| | - Stefano Pergolizzi
- Department of Radiological Science, University of Messina, 98121 Messina, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Ferrera
- Radiation Oncology, ARNAS Civico Hospital, 90100 Palermo, Italy; (G.M.)
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Reginelli A, Giacobbe G, Del Canto MT, Alessandrella M, Balestrucci G, Urraro F, Russo GM, Gallo L, Danti G, Frittoli B, Stoppino L, Schettini D, Iafrate F, Cappabianca S, Laghi A, Grassi R, Brunese L, Barile A, Miele V. Peritoneal Carcinosis: What the Radiologist Needs to Know. Diagnostics (Basel) 2023; 13:diagnostics13111974. [PMID: 37296826 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13111974] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2023] [Revised: 05/17/2023] [Accepted: 05/30/2023] [Indexed: 06/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Peritoneal carcinosis is a condition characterized by the spread of cancer cells to the peritoneum, which is the thin membrane that lines the abdominal cavity. It is a serious condition that can result from many different types of cancer, including ovarian, colon, stomach, pancreatic, and appendix cancer. The diagnosis and quantification of lesions in peritoneal carcinosis are critical in the management of patients with the condition, and imaging plays a central role in this process. Radiologists play a vital role in the multidisciplinary management of patients with peritoneal carcinosis. They need to have a thorough understanding of the pathophysiology of the condition, the underlying neoplasms, and the typical imaging findings. In addition, they need to be aware of the differential diagnoses and the advantages and disadvantages of the various imaging methods available. Imaging plays a central role in the diagnosis and quantification of lesions, and radiologists play a critical role in this process. Ultrasound, computed tomography, magnetic resonance, and PET/CT scans are used to diagnose peritoneal carcinosis. Each imaging procedure has advantages and disadvantages, and particular imaging techniques are recommended based on patient conditions. Our aim is to provide knowledge to radiologists regarding appropriate techniques, imaging findings, differential diagnoses, and treatment options. With the advent of AI in oncology, the future of precision medicine appears promising, and the interconnection between structured reporting and AI is likely to improve diagnostic accuracy and treatment outcomes for patients with peritoneal carcinosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alfonso Reginelli
- Department of Precision Medicine, University of Campania "L. Vanvitelli", 80138 Naples, Italy
| | - Giuliana Giacobbe
- General and Emergency Radiology Department, "Antonio Cardarelli" Hospital, 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Maria Teresa Del Canto
- Department of Precision Medicine, University of Campania "L. Vanvitelli", 80138 Naples, Italy
| | - Marina Alessandrella
- Department of Precision Medicine, University of Campania "L. Vanvitelli", 80138 Naples, Italy
| | - Giovanni Balestrucci
- Department of Precision Medicine, University of Campania "L. Vanvitelli", 80138 Naples, Italy
| | - Fabrizio Urraro
- Department of Precision Medicine, University of Campania "L. Vanvitelli", 80138 Naples, Italy
| | - Gaetano Maria Russo
- Department of Precision Medicine, University of Campania "L. Vanvitelli", 80138 Naples, Italy
| | - Luigi Gallo
- Department of Precision Medicine, University of Campania "L. Vanvitelli", 80138 Naples, Italy
| | - Ginevra Danti
- Department of Radiology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, 50134 Florence, Italy
| | - Barbara Frittoli
- Department of Radiology, Spedali Civili Hospital, 25123 Brescia, Italy
| | - Luca Stoppino
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital of Foggia, 71122 Foggia, Italy
| | - Daria Schettini
- Department of Radiology, Villa Scassi Hospital, Corso Scassi 1, 16121 Genova, Italy
| | - Franco Iafrate
- Department of Radiological, Oncological and Pathological Sciences, Policlinico Umberto I, Sapienza University of Rome, Viale Regina Elena 324, 00161 Rome, Italy
| | - Salvatore Cappabianca
- Department of Precision Medicine, University of Campania "L. Vanvitelli", 80138 Naples, Italy
| | - Andrea Laghi
- Department of Medical Surgical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Sapienza-University of Rome, Radiology Unit-Sant'Andrea University Hospital, 00189 Rome, Italy
| | - Roberto Grassi
- Department of Precision Medicine, University of Campania "L. Vanvitelli", 80138 Naples, Italy
| | - Luca Brunese
- Department of Medicine and Health Sciences "Vincenzo Tiberio", University of Molise, 86100 Campobasso, Italy
| | - Antonio Barile
- Department of Applied Clinical Sciences and Biotechnology, University of L'Aquila, 67100 L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Vittorio Miele
- Department of Translational Research, Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Dmochowska N, Milanova V, Mukkamala R, Chow KK, Pham NTH, Srinivasarao M, Ebert LM, Stait-Gardner T, Le H, Shetty A, Nelson M, Low PS, Thierry B. Nanoparticles Targeted to Fibroblast Activation Protein Outperform PSMA for MRI Delineation of Primary Prostate Tumors. SMALL (WEINHEIM AN DER BERGSTRASSE, GERMANY) 2023; 19:e2204956. [PMID: 36840671 DOI: 10.1002/smll.202204956] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2022] [Revised: 01/23/2023] [Indexed: 05/25/2023]
Abstract
Accurate delineation of gross tumor volumes remains a barrier to radiotherapy dose escalation and boost dosing in the treatment of solid tumors, such as prostate cancer. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of tumor targets has the power to enable focal dose boosting, particularly when combined with technological advances such as MRI-linear accelerator. Fibroblast activation protein (FAP) is overexpressed in stromal components of >90% of epithelial carcinomas. Herein, the authors compare targeted MRI of prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA) with FAP in the delineation of orthotopic prostate tumors. Control, FAP, and PSMA-targeting iron oxide nanoparticles were prepared with modification of a lymphotropic MRI agent (FerroTrace, Ferronova). Mice with orthotopic LNCaP tumors underwent MRI 24 h after intravenous injection of nanoparticles. FAP and PSMA nanoparticles produced contrast enhancement on MRI when compared to control nanoparticles. FAP-targeted MRI increased the proportion of tumor contrast-enhancing black pixels by 13%, compared to PSMA. Analysis of changes in R2 values between healthy prostates and LNCaP tumors indicated an increase in contrast-enhancing pixels in the tumor border of 15% when targeting FAP, compared to PSMA. This study demonstrates the preclinical feasibility of PSMA and FAP-targeted MRI which can enable targeted image-guided focal therapy of localized prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicole Dmochowska
- Future Industries Institute, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, 5095, Australia
| | - Valentina Milanova
- Future Industries Institute, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, 5095, Australia
| | - Ramesh Mukkamala
- Department of Chemistry and Institute for Drug Discovery, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, 47907, USA
| | - Kwok Keung Chow
- Future Industries Institute, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, 5095, Australia
| | - Nguyen T H Pham
- Key Centre for Polymers and Colloids, School of Chemistry, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, 2006, Australia
| | - Madduri Srinivasarao
- Department of Chemistry and Institute for Drug Discovery, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, 47907, USA
| | - Lisa M Ebert
- Centre for Cancer Biology, University of South Australia; SA Pathology; Cancer Clinical Trials Unit, Royal Adelaide Hospital; Adelaide Medical School, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, 5000, Australia
| | - Timothy Stait-Gardner
- Nanoscale Organisation and Dynamics Group, Western Sydney University, Sydney, New South Wales, 2560, Australia
| | - Hien Le
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, 5000, Australia
| | - Anil Shetty
- Ferronova Pty Ltd, Mawson Lakes, South Australia, 5095, Australia
| | - Melanie Nelson
- Ferronova Pty Ltd, Mawson Lakes, South Australia, 5095, Australia
| | - Philip S Low
- Department of Chemistry and Institute for Drug Discovery, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, 47907, USA
| | - Benjamin Thierry
- Future Industries Institute, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, 5095, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Francolini G, Morelli I, Carnevale MG, Grassi R, Nardone V, Loi M, Valzano M, Salvestrini V, Livi L, Desideri I. Integration between Novel Imaging Technologies and Modern Radiotherapy Techniques: How the Eye Drove the Chisel. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:5277. [PMID: 36358695 PMCID: PMC9656145 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14215277] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2022] [Revised: 10/17/2022] [Accepted: 10/24/2022] [Indexed: 03/12/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Targeted dose-escalation and reduction of dose to adjacent organs at risk have been the main goal of radiotherapy in the last decade. Prostate cancer benefited the most from this process. In recent years, the development of Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) and Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) radically changed clinical practice, also thanks to the availability of modern imaging techniques. The aim of this paper is to explore the relationship between diagnostic imaging and prostate cancer radiotherapy techniques. MATERIALS AND METHODS Aiming to provide an overview of the integration between modern imaging and radiotherapy techniques, we performed a non-systematic search of papers exploring the predictive value of imaging before treatment, the role of radiomics in predicting treatment outcomes, implementation of novel imaging in RT planning and influence of imaging integration on use of RT in current clinical practice. Three independent authors (GF, IM and ID) performed an independent review focusing on these issues. Key references were derived from a PubMed query. Hand searching and clinicaltrials.gov were also used, and grey literature was searched for further papers of interest. The final choice of papers included was discussed between all co-authors. RESULTS This paper contains a narrative report and a critical discussion of the role of new modern techniques in predicting outcomes before treatment, in radiotherapy planning and in the integration with systemic therapy in the management of prostate cancer. Also, the role of radiomics in a tailored treatment approach is explored. CONCLUSIONS Integration between diagnostic imaging and radiotherapy is of great importance for the modern treatment of prostate cancer. Future clinical trials should be aimed at exploring the real clinical benefit of complex workflows in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giulio Francolini
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, 50134 Florence, Italy
| | - Ilaria Morelli
- Department of Biomedical, Experimental and Clinical Sciences “Mario Serio”, University of Florence, 50134 Florence, Italy
| | - Maria Grazia Carnevale
- Department of Biomedical, Experimental and Clinical Sciences “Mario Serio”, University of Florence, 50134 Florence, Italy
| | - Roberta Grassi
- Department of Precision Medicine, University of Campania “L. Vanvitelli”, 80138 Naples, Italy
- Italian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology (SIRM), SIRM Foundation, 20122 Milan, Italy
| | - Valerio Nardone
- Department of Precision Medicine, University of Campania “L. Vanvitelli”, 80138 Naples, Italy
- Italian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology (SIRM), SIRM Foundation, 20122 Milan, Italy
| | - Mauro Loi
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, 50134 Florence, Italy
| | - Marianna Valzano
- Department of Biomedical, Experimental and Clinical Sciences “Mario Serio”, University of Florence, 50134 Florence, Italy
| | - Viola Salvestrini
- Department of Biomedical, Experimental and Clinical Sciences “Mario Serio”, University of Florence, 50134 Florence, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Livi
- Department of Biomedical, Experimental and Clinical Sciences “Mario Serio”, University of Florence, 50134 Florence, Italy
| | - Isacco Desideri
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, 50134 Florence, Italy
- Department of Biomedical, Experimental and Clinical Sciences “Mario Serio”, University of Florence, 50134 Florence, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Ultra-Hypofractionated Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Localized Prostate Cancer: Clinical Outcomes, Patterns of Recurrence, Feasibility of Definitive Salvage Treatment, and Competing Oncological Risk. Biomedicines 2022; 10:biomedicines10102446. [PMID: 36289708 PMCID: PMC9598896 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines10102446] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2022] [Revised: 09/22/2022] [Accepted: 09/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
A cohort of 650 patients treated for localized prostate cancer (PCa) with CyberKnifeTM ultra-hypofractionated radiotherapy between 2011 and 2018 was retrospectively analyzed in terms of survival, patterns of failure, and outcomes of second-line definitive salvage therapies. The analysis was performed using survival analysis including the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression analysis. At a median follow-up of 49.4 months, the main pattern of failure was local-regional failure (7.4% in low-, and 13% in intermediate/high-risk group at five years), followed by distant metastases (3.6% in low-, and 6% in intermediate/high-risk group at five years). Five-year likelihood of developing a second malignancy was 7.3%; however, in the vast majority of the cases, the association with prior irradiation was unlikely. The 5-year overall survival was 90.2% in low-, and 88.8% in intermediate/high-risk patients. The independent prognostic factors for survival included age (HR 1.1; 95% CI 1.07-1.14) and occurrence of a second malignancy (HR 3.67; 95% CI 2.19-6.15). Definitive local salvage therapies were feasible in the majority of the patients with local-regional failure, and uncommonly in patients with distant metastases, with an estimated second-line progression free survival of 67.8% at two years. Competing oncological risks and age were significantly more important for patients' survival compared to primary disease recurrence.
Collapse
|
9
|
Granata V, Fusco R, Belli A, Danti G, Bicci E, Cutolo C, Petrillo A, Izzo F. Diffusion weighted imaging and diffusion kurtosis imaging in abdominal oncological setting: why and when. Infect Agent Cancer 2022; 17:25. [PMID: 35681237 PMCID: PMC9185934 DOI: 10.1186/s13027-022-00441-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2022] [Accepted: 05/30/2022] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
This article provides an overview of diffusion kurtosis (DKI) imaging in abdominal oncology. DKI allows for more data on tissue structures than the conventional diffusion model (DWI). However, DKI requires high quality images at b-values greater than 1000 s/mm2 and high signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) that traditionally MRI systems are not able to acquire and therefore there are generally amplified anatomical distortions on the images due to less homogeneity of the field. Advances in both hardware and software on modern MRI scanners have currently enabled ultra-high b-value imaging and offered the ability to apply DKI to multiple extracranial sites. Previous studies have evaluated the ability of DKI to characterize and discriminate tumor grade compared to conventional DWI. Additionally, in several studies the DKI sequences used were based on planar echo (EPI) acquisition, which is susceptible to motion, metal and air artefacts and prone to low SNRs and distortions, leading to low quality images for some small lesions, which may affect the accuracy of the results. Another problem is the optimal b-value of DKI, which remains to be explored and not yet standardized, as well as the manual selection of the ROI, which could affect the accuracy of some parameters.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vincenza Granata
- Division of Radiology, "Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale - IRCCS di Napoli", I-80131, Naples, Italy.
| | | | - Andrea Belli
- Division of Hepatobiliary Surgical Oncology, "Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale - IRCCS di Napoli", I-80131, Naples, Italy
| | - Ginevra Danti
- Department of Radiology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy.,Italian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology, SIRM Foundation, Milan, Italy
| | - Eleonora Bicci
- Department of Radiology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | - Carmen Cutolo
- Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry, University of Salerno, Salerno, Italy
| | - Antonella Petrillo
- Division of Radiology, "Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale - IRCCS di Napoli", I-80131, Naples, Italy
| | - Francesco Izzo
- Division of Hepatobiliary Surgical Oncology, "Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale - IRCCS di Napoli", I-80131, Naples, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
MR-Guided Adaptive Radiotherapy for OAR Sparing in Head and Neck Cancers. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14081909. [PMID: 35454816 PMCID: PMC9028510 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14081909] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2022] [Revised: 03/24/2022] [Accepted: 03/29/2022] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Normal tissue toxicities in head and neck cancer persist as a cause of decreased quality of life and are associated with poorer treatment outcomes. The aim of this article is to review organ at risk (OAR) sparing approaches available in MR-guided adaptive radiotherapy and present future developments which hope to improve treatment outcomes. Increasing the spatial conformity of dose distributions in radiotherapy is an important first step in reducing normal tissue toxicities, and MR-guided treatment devices presents a new opportunity to use biological information to drive treatment decisions on a personalized basis. Abstract MR-linac devices offer the potential for advancements in radiotherapy (RT) treatment of head and neck cancer (HNC) by using daily MR imaging performed at the time and setup of treatment delivery. This article aims to present a review of current adaptive RT (ART) methods on MR-Linac devices directed towards the sparing of organs at risk (OAR) and a view of future adaptive techniques seeking to improve the therapeutic ratio. This ratio expresses the relationship between the probability of tumor control and the probability of normal tissue damage and is thus an important conceptual metric of success in the sparing of OARs. Increasing spatial conformity of dose distributions to target volume and OARs is an initial step in achieving therapeutic improvements, followed by the use of imaging and clinical biomarkers to inform the clinical decision-making process in an ART paradigm. Pre-clinical and clinical findings support the incorporation of biomarkers into ART protocols and investment into further research to explore imaging biomarkers by taking advantage of the daily MR imaging workflow. A coherent understanding of this road map for RT in HNC is critical for directing future research efforts related to sparing OARs using image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT).
Collapse
|
11
|
Karagiannis V, Wichmann V, Saarinen J, Eigeliene N, Andersen H, Jekunen A. Radiotherapy treatment modification for prostate cancer patients based on PSMA-PET/CT. Radiat Oncol 2022; 17:19. [PMID: 35093103 PMCID: PMC8800353 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-022-01989-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2021] [Accepted: 01/13/2022] [Indexed: 01/28/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prostate cancer is the most common cancer among men, and its diagnosis and treatment are improving. Our study evaluated how PSMA-PET/CT prior to treatment planning might improve the optimal management of prostate cancer radiotherapy. METHODS This retrospective pilot study included 43 prostate cancer (PCa) patients referred to our radiation oncologist department, from the urology department, for radiation therapy. 18F-PSMA-PET/CT was ordered by the radiation oncologists mainly due to the lack of resent image staging. The patients were divided into three different groups according to their initially planned treatments: radical radiation therapy (RT) (newly diagnosed PCa patients), salvage RT (patients with biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy), or oligometastatic RT (oligometastatic PCa patients with good response after systemic treatment). RESULTS Following PSMA-PET/CT, the initially planned RT was changed for 60.5% of the patients due to new findings (metastases and/or recurrent disease). The final treatment choice was effected by PSMA-PET/CT outcome in 60.5% (26/43) of the patients, and in 50% (16/32) of patients, the radiation treatment plan changed following PSMA-PET/CT. Only 39.5% (17/43) of the patients who underwent PSMA-PET/CT were treated according to their initial treatment plans. CONCLUSIONS Our results indicate that PSMA-PET/CT impacts treatment decisions and the selection of RT as well as adjuvant treatment protocols in the management of prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vasileios Karagiannis
- Department of Oncology, Vaasa Central Hospital, Hietalahdenkatu 2-4, 65130 Vaasa, Finland
| | - Viktor Wichmann
- Department of Oncology, Vaasa Central Hospital, Hietalahdenkatu 2-4, 65130 Vaasa, Finland
- Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
| | - Juha Saarinen
- Department of Oncology, Vaasa Central Hospital, Hietalahdenkatu 2-4, 65130 Vaasa, Finland
- Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
| | - Natalja Eigeliene
- Department of Oncology, Vaasa Central Hospital, Hietalahdenkatu 2-4, 65130 Vaasa, Finland
- Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
| | - Heidi Andersen
- Department of Oncology, Vaasa Central Hospital, Hietalahdenkatu 2-4, 65130 Vaasa, Finland
- Tema Cancer, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Antti Jekunen
- Department of Oncology, Vaasa Central Hospital, Hietalahdenkatu 2-4, 65130 Vaasa, Finland
- Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Francolini G, Ciccone LP, Di Cataldo V, Detti B, Simontacchi G, Loi M, Mangoni M, Desideri I, Meattini I, Livi L. May Different Treatment Volumes and Technical Approaches Have an Impact on Second Malignancies Risk? J Clin Oncol 2021; 39:3762-3763. [PMID: 34534000 DOI: 10.1200/jco.21.01790] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Giulio Francolini
- Giulio Francolini, MD, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, University of Florence, Radiation Oncology Unit, Florence, Italy; Lucia Pia Ciccone, MD, Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences "M. Serio," University of Florence, Florence, Italy; Vanessa Di Cataldo, MD, Cyberknife Center, Istituto Fiorentino di Cura ed Assistenza (IFCA), University of Florence, Florence, Italy; Beatrice Detti, MD, Gabriele Simontacchi, MD, and Mauro Loi, MD, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, University of Florence, Radiation Oncology Unit, Florence, Italy; Monica Mangoni, MD, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, University of Florence, Radiation Oncology Unit, Florence, Italy, Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences "M. Serio," University of Florence, Florence, Italy; Isacco Desideri, MD, Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences "M. Serio," University of Florence, Florence, Italy; and Icro Meattini, MD, and Lorenzo Livi, MD, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, University of Florence, Radiation Oncology Unit, Florence, Italy, Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences "M. Serio," University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Lucia Pia Ciccone
- Giulio Francolini, MD, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, University of Florence, Radiation Oncology Unit, Florence, Italy; Lucia Pia Ciccone, MD, Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences "M. Serio," University of Florence, Florence, Italy; Vanessa Di Cataldo, MD, Cyberknife Center, Istituto Fiorentino di Cura ed Assistenza (IFCA), University of Florence, Florence, Italy; Beatrice Detti, MD, Gabriele Simontacchi, MD, and Mauro Loi, MD, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, University of Florence, Radiation Oncology Unit, Florence, Italy; Monica Mangoni, MD, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, University of Florence, Radiation Oncology Unit, Florence, Italy, Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences "M. Serio," University of Florence, Florence, Italy; Isacco Desideri, MD, Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences "M. Serio," University of Florence, Florence, Italy; and Icro Meattini, MD, and Lorenzo Livi, MD, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, University of Florence, Radiation Oncology Unit, Florence, Italy, Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences "M. Serio," University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Vanessa Di Cataldo
- Giulio Francolini, MD, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, University of Florence, Radiation Oncology Unit, Florence, Italy; Lucia Pia Ciccone, MD, Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences "M. Serio," University of Florence, Florence, Italy; Vanessa Di Cataldo, MD, Cyberknife Center, Istituto Fiorentino di Cura ed Assistenza (IFCA), University of Florence, Florence, Italy; Beatrice Detti, MD, Gabriele Simontacchi, MD, and Mauro Loi, MD, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, University of Florence, Radiation Oncology Unit, Florence, Italy; Monica Mangoni, MD, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, University of Florence, Radiation Oncology Unit, Florence, Italy, Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences "M. Serio," University of Florence, Florence, Italy; Isacco Desideri, MD, Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences "M. Serio," University of Florence, Florence, Italy; and Icro Meattini, MD, and Lorenzo Livi, MD, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, University of Florence, Radiation Oncology Unit, Florence, Italy, Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences "M. Serio," University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Beatrice Detti
- Giulio Francolini, MD, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, University of Florence, Radiation Oncology Unit, Florence, Italy; Lucia Pia Ciccone, MD, Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences "M. Serio," University of Florence, Florence, Italy; Vanessa Di Cataldo, MD, Cyberknife Center, Istituto Fiorentino di Cura ed Assistenza (IFCA), University of Florence, Florence, Italy; Beatrice Detti, MD, Gabriele Simontacchi, MD, and Mauro Loi, MD, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, University of Florence, Radiation Oncology Unit, Florence, Italy; Monica Mangoni, MD, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, University of Florence, Radiation Oncology Unit, Florence, Italy, Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences "M. Serio," University of Florence, Florence, Italy; Isacco Desideri, MD, Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences "M. Serio," University of Florence, Florence, Italy; and Icro Meattini, MD, and Lorenzo Livi, MD, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, University of Florence, Radiation Oncology Unit, Florence, Italy, Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences "M. Serio," University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Gabriele Simontacchi
- Giulio Francolini, MD, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, University of Florence, Radiation Oncology Unit, Florence, Italy; Lucia Pia Ciccone, MD, Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences "M. Serio," University of Florence, Florence, Italy; Vanessa Di Cataldo, MD, Cyberknife Center, Istituto Fiorentino di Cura ed Assistenza (IFCA), University of Florence, Florence, Italy; Beatrice Detti, MD, Gabriele Simontacchi, MD, and Mauro Loi, MD, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, University of Florence, Radiation Oncology Unit, Florence, Italy; Monica Mangoni, MD, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, University of Florence, Radiation Oncology Unit, Florence, Italy, Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences "M. Serio," University of Florence, Florence, Italy; Isacco Desideri, MD, Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences "M. Serio," University of Florence, Florence, Italy; and Icro Meattini, MD, and Lorenzo Livi, MD, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, University of Florence, Radiation Oncology Unit, Florence, Italy, Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences "M. Serio," University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Mauro Loi
- Giulio Francolini, MD, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, University of Florence, Radiation Oncology Unit, Florence, Italy; Lucia Pia Ciccone, MD, Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences "M. Serio," University of Florence, Florence, Italy; Vanessa Di Cataldo, MD, Cyberknife Center, Istituto Fiorentino di Cura ed Assistenza (IFCA), University of Florence, Florence, Italy; Beatrice Detti, MD, Gabriele Simontacchi, MD, and Mauro Loi, MD, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, University of Florence, Radiation Oncology Unit, Florence, Italy; Monica Mangoni, MD, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, University of Florence, Radiation Oncology Unit, Florence, Italy, Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences "M. Serio," University of Florence, Florence, Italy; Isacco Desideri, MD, Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences "M. Serio," University of Florence, Florence, Italy; and Icro Meattini, MD, and Lorenzo Livi, MD, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, University of Florence, Radiation Oncology Unit, Florence, Italy, Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences "M. Serio," University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Monica Mangoni
- Giulio Francolini, MD, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, University of Florence, Radiation Oncology Unit, Florence, Italy; Lucia Pia Ciccone, MD, Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences "M. Serio," University of Florence, Florence, Italy; Vanessa Di Cataldo, MD, Cyberknife Center, Istituto Fiorentino di Cura ed Assistenza (IFCA), University of Florence, Florence, Italy; Beatrice Detti, MD, Gabriele Simontacchi, MD, and Mauro Loi, MD, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, University of Florence, Radiation Oncology Unit, Florence, Italy; Monica Mangoni, MD, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, University of Florence, Radiation Oncology Unit, Florence, Italy, Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences "M. Serio," University of Florence, Florence, Italy; Isacco Desideri, MD, Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences "M. Serio," University of Florence, Florence, Italy; and Icro Meattini, MD, and Lorenzo Livi, MD, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, University of Florence, Radiation Oncology Unit, Florence, Italy, Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences "M. Serio," University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Isacco Desideri
- Giulio Francolini, MD, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, University of Florence, Radiation Oncology Unit, Florence, Italy; Lucia Pia Ciccone, MD, Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences "M. Serio," University of Florence, Florence, Italy; Vanessa Di Cataldo, MD, Cyberknife Center, Istituto Fiorentino di Cura ed Assistenza (IFCA), University of Florence, Florence, Italy; Beatrice Detti, MD, Gabriele Simontacchi, MD, and Mauro Loi, MD, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, University of Florence, Radiation Oncology Unit, Florence, Italy; Monica Mangoni, MD, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, University of Florence, Radiation Oncology Unit, Florence, Italy, Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences "M. Serio," University of Florence, Florence, Italy; Isacco Desideri, MD, Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences "M. Serio," University of Florence, Florence, Italy; and Icro Meattini, MD, and Lorenzo Livi, MD, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, University of Florence, Radiation Oncology Unit, Florence, Italy, Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences "M. Serio," University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Icro Meattini
- Giulio Francolini, MD, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, University of Florence, Radiation Oncology Unit, Florence, Italy; Lucia Pia Ciccone, MD, Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences "M. Serio," University of Florence, Florence, Italy; Vanessa Di Cataldo, MD, Cyberknife Center, Istituto Fiorentino di Cura ed Assistenza (IFCA), University of Florence, Florence, Italy; Beatrice Detti, MD, Gabriele Simontacchi, MD, and Mauro Loi, MD, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, University of Florence, Radiation Oncology Unit, Florence, Italy; Monica Mangoni, MD, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, University of Florence, Radiation Oncology Unit, Florence, Italy, Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences "M. Serio," University of Florence, Florence, Italy; Isacco Desideri, MD, Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences "M. Serio," University of Florence, Florence, Italy; and Icro Meattini, MD, and Lorenzo Livi, MD, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, University of Florence, Radiation Oncology Unit, Florence, Italy, Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences "M. Serio," University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Livi
- Giulio Francolini, MD, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, University of Florence, Radiation Oncology Unit, Florence, Italy; Lucia Pia Ciccone, MD, Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences "M. Serio," University of Florence, Florence, Italy; Vanessa Di Cataldo, MD, Cyberknife Center, Istituto Fiorentino di Cura ed Assistenza (IFCA), University of Florence, Florence, Italy; Beatrice Detti, MD, Gabriele Simontacchi, MD, and Mauro Loi, MD, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, University of Florence, Radiation Oncology Unit, Florence, Italy; Monica Mangoni, MD, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, University of Florence, Radiation Oncology Unit, Florence, Italy, Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences "M. Serio," University of Florence, Florence, Italy; Isacco Desideri, MD, Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences "M. Serio," University of Florence, Florence, Italy; and Icro Meattini, MD, and Lorenzo Livi, MD, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, University of Florence, Radiation Oncology Unit, Florence, Italy, Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences "M. Serio," University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
1.5T Magnetic Resonance-Guided Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Localized Prostate Cancer: Preliminary Clinical Results of Clinician- and Patient-Reported Outcomes. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13194866. [PMID: 34638348 PMCID: PMC8508440 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13194866] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2021] [Revised: 09/25/2021] [Accepted: 09/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Magnetic resonance-guided stereotactic body radiotherapy (MRgSBRT) offers the potential for achieving better prostate cancer (PC) treatment outcomes. This study reports the preliminary clinical results of 1.5T MRgSBRT in localized PC, based on both clinician-reported outcome measurement (CROM) and patient-reported outcome measurement (PROM). METHODS Fifty-one consecutive localized PC patients were prospectively enrolled with a median follow-up of 199 days. MRgSBRT was delivered in five fractions of 7.25-8 Gy with daily online adaptation. Clinician-reported gastrointestinal (GI) and genitourinary (GU) adverse events based on the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Scale v. 5.0 were assessed. The Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite Questionnaire was collected at baseline, 1 month, and every 3 months thereafter. Serial prostate-specific antigen measurements were longitudinally recorded. RESULTS The maximum cumulative clinician-reported grade ≥ 2 acute GU and GI toxicities were 11.8% (6/51) and 2.0% (1/51), respectively, while grade ≥ 2 subacute GU and GI toxicities were 2.3% (1/43) each. Patient-reported urinary, bowel, and hormonal domain summary scores were reduced at 1 month, then gradually returned to baseline levels, with the exception of the sexual domain. Domain-specific subscale scores showed similar longitudinal changes. All patients had early post-MRgSBRT biochemical responses. CONCLUSIONS The finding of low toxicity supports the accumulation of clinical evidence for 1.5T MRgSBRT in localized PC.
Collapse
|
14
|
Sandoval ML, Youssef I, Latifi K, Grass GD, Torres-Roca J, Rosenberg S, Yamoah K, Johnstone PA. Non-Adaptive MR-Guided Radiotherapy for Prostate SBRT: Less Time, Equal Results. J Clin Med 2021; 10:3396. [PMID: 34362179 PMCID: PMC8347281 DOI: 10.3390/jcm10153396] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2021] [Revised: 07/20/2021] [Accepted: 07/28/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The use of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is widely utilized for treatment of localized prostate cancer. Magnetic-resonance-guided radiotherapy (MRgRT) was introduced in 2014 and has recently been implemented in SBRT for prostate cancer as it provides an opportunity for smaller margins and adaptive daily planning. Currently, the only publications of MRgRT for prostate SBRT describe European clinical experiences which utilized adaptive planning. However, adaptive planning adds significantly to the time required for daily treatment. OBJECTIVES Since prostate SBRT has demonstrated acceptable toxicity for several years, we did not consider daily adaptation critical to the process of prostate SBRT. After Institutional Review Board approval, we analyzed and now report our experience using MRgRT without adaptation. METHODS Between 25 September 2019 and 21 December 2020, 35 consecutive patients were treated with MRgRT prostate SBRT at our center. Patients treated with MRgRT included favorable intermediate risk (43%) and unfavorable intermediate risk (54%), and only one patient had low-risk prostate cancer. Nine patients (25%) received adjuvant leuprolide for a median of 4.5 months (range 4-6 m). Our clinical pathway allows for a maximum prostate gland volume of 60 cc; median prostate volume of this cohort was 35.0 cc (range 17-58.4 cc). Median pre-treatment PSA was 6.30 (range 2.55-16.77). Each patient was treated with 36.25 Gy delivered in five fractions over 2 weeks with urethral sparing to a maximal dose of 35 Gy. Target volumes included the prostate gland and proximal seminal vesicles with a 3 mm margin. RESULTS Median follow-up as of 26 May 2021 was 11.97 months (range 4.37-19.80). First follow-up data are available for all patients, with a median of 1.10 month from completion of treatment (0.63-3.40). The median PSA at first visit was 2.75 (range 0.02-9.00) with a median AUA symptom score of 9 (range 1-24). Second follow-up data are available for 34 patients at a median of 4.45 months (range 2.57-8.90). At second follow-up, the median PSA was 1.60 (range 0.02-5.40) with a median AUA symptom score of 6 (range 1-33). Seventeen patients had third follow-up data with a median of 9.77 months (range 4.70-12.33) after SBRT. The median PSA was 1.13 (range 0.02-4.73) with an AUA score of 9 (2-22) at the third follow-up. We observed a statistically significant decrease in PSA between pre-treatment and at first follow-up (p < 0.005). The most common toxicity was grade 2 urethritis, managed in all cases by tamsulosin. One patient developed grade 2 tenesmus relieved by topical steroids. No cases of grade ≥ 3 toxicity were seen in our patient population. CONCLUSIONS By avoiding the extra time required for plan adaptation, MRgRT without daily adaptation allows for successful prostate SBRT with manageable toxicity. We continue to reserve our limited adaptive treatment slots for preoperative pancreatic and ultra-central lung SBRT patients, which require time-intensive respiratory gating and adaptive planning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria L. Sandoval
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL 33612, USA; (M.L.S.); (K.L.); (G.D.G.); (J.T.-R.); (S.R.); (K.Y.)
| | - Irini Youssef
- Department of Radiation Oncology, SUNY Downstate Health Sciences University, Brooklyn, NY 11203, USA;
| | - Kujtim Latifi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL 33612, USA; (M.L.S.); (K.L.); (G.D.G.); (J.T.-R.); (S.R.); (K.Y.)
| | - G. Daniel Grass
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL 33612, USA; (M.L.S.); (K.L.); (G.D.G.); (J.T.-R.); (S.R.); (K.Y.)
| | - Javier Torres-Roca
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL 33612, USA; (M.L.S.); (K.L.); (G.D.G.); (J.T.-R.); (S.R.); (K.Y.)
| | - Stephen Rosenberg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL 33612, USA; (M.L.S.); (K.L.); (G.D.G.); (J.T.-R.); (S.R.); (K.Y.)
| | - Kosj Yamoah
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL 33612, USA; (M.L.S.); (K.L.); (G.D.G.); (J.T.-R.); (S.R.); (K.Y.)
| | - Peter A. Johnstone
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL 33612, USA; (M.L.S.); (K.L.); (G.D.G.); (J.T.-R.); (S.R.); (K.Y.)
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Rogowski P, Trapp C, von Bestenbostel R, Schmidt-Hegemann NS, Shi R, Ilhan H, Kretschmer A, Stief C, Ganswindt U, Belka C, Li M. Outcomes of metastasis-directed therapy of bone oligometastatic prostate cancer. Radiat Oncol 2021; 16:125. [PMID: 34193194 PMCID: PMC8247211 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-021-01849-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2021] [Accepted: 06/24/2021] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The aim of this work was to investigate the outcome of metastasis-directed radiotherapy (MDT) in prostate cancer patients with bone metastases following current ESTRO/EORTC subclassifications for oligometastatic disease. Methods Clinical data of 80 consecutive oligometastatic patients with 115 bone lesions receiving MDT between 2011 and 2019 were retrospectively evaluated. Hormone-sensitive (77.5%) and castrate-resistant (22.5%) patients were included. MDT was delivered with conventional fractionated or stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) techniques. Kaplan–Meier method, log rank test, as well as Cox regression were used to calculate local control (LC) and biochemical and clinical progression-free survival (bPFS/cPFS). Results At the time of MDT 31% of patients had de-novo synchronous oligometastatic disease, 46% had de-novo metachronous oligorecurrence after primary treatment and 23% had either de-novo oligoprogressive disease, repeat oligometastatic disease or induced oligometastatic disease. The median BED3 was 93.3 Gy (range 75.8–95.3 Gy). Concomitant ADT was administered in 69% of patients. After a median follow-up of 23 months the median bPFS and cPFS were 16.5 and 21.5 months, respectively. The 2-year LC rate was 98.3%. In multivariate analysis, age ≤ 70 (HR = 2.60, 95% CI 1.20–5.62, p = 0.015) and concomitant ADT (HR = 0.26, 95% CI 0.12–0.58, p = 0.001) significantly correlated with cPFS. Category of oligometastatic disease and hormone-sensitivity were predictive for cPFS in univariate analysis. Of 45 patients with biochemical relapse, nineteen patients (42.2%) had repeat oligometastatic disease. Fourteen patients (31%) underwent a second course of MDT. No patients experienced grade ≥ 3 toxicities. Conclusions MDT is safe and offers high local control rates in bone oligometastases of prostate cancer. At 2 years after treatment, more than 2 out of 5 patients are progression-free. Trial registration Retrospectively registered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul Rogowski
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Christian Trapp
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Rieke von Bestenbostel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | | | - Run Shi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Harun Ilhan
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | | | - Christian Stief
- Department of Urology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Ute Ganswindt
- Department of Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology, Innsbruck Medical University, Anichstr. 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Claus Belka
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Munich, Germany
| | - Minglun Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|