Factors associated with infection following open distal radius fractures

Timing of Type I Open Distal Radius Fracture Fixation Does Not Affect Early Complication Rates

Purpose

There is limited published evidence regarding the optimal management of type I open fractures of the distal radius. The purpose of this study was to compare short-term complication rates among open fractures of the distal radius, with attention to the timing of management of type I fractures. Our hypothesis was that there would not be a temporal association between treatment and infection for type I open distal radius fractures (DRFs).

Methods

A retrospective review of all open DRFs at a single level-1 trauma center over a 10-year period was performed. Patients were grouped based on Gustilo Anderson open fracture classification. The primary outcome measures were superficial and deep infection rates in all patients with a minimum of 6-month follow-up. A subgroup analysis was performed for Gustilo Anderson type I injuries with a 3-month follow-up based on time to surgery.

Results

Seventy-one patients with open DRFs were included for analysis with an average follow-up of 16.7 months. There was a higher rate of deep infection (30%) and average number of revision surgeries (3.0) in the type III cohort compared with both type II (4% and 0.6) and type I (0% and 0.39) cohorts. A subgroup analysis of 63 type I fractures with a minimum of 3-month follow-up revealed zero infections, with no difference in other complications or number of revision surgeries among patients definitively managed within 24 hours, 24-72 hours, and greater than 72 hours. Two patients were managed nonoperatively, without complication.

Conclusions

Type I open DRFs differ from higher grade DRFs with regard to demographics and injury characteristics, along with infection, complication, and reoperation rates. With no infections in the type I DRF cohort and no difference in complication rates based on time to debridement, our data suggest that it is safe to manage type I open DRFs similarly to closed injuries regarding surgical timing.

Type of study/level of evidence

Therapeutic III.

Postoperative Complications After Operative Treatment of Open Versus Closed Distal Radius Fractures: A Propensity Score Matched Analysis

Purpose

The primary objective was to use a large sample size to compare 30-day infection rates and other perioperative outcomes between operatively treated open and closed distal radius fractures.

Methods

Patients in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database who underwent open reduction and internal fixation of a distal radius fracture between 2008 and 2018 were identified using Current Procedural Terminology codes and stratified into open (OF) and closed fractures (CF). A 10:1 (CF:OF) nearest neighbor propensity score matching was used to address demographic differences. Infection rate and other outcomes were compared between groups.

Results

A total 17,536 CF and 401 OF were treated by open reduction and internal fixation. After matching, baseline demographics were not statistically different (P > .05). There was a statistically significant increase in deep surgical site infections between OF and CF (0.2% vs 0.02%, P < .05). The OF cohort had a higher rate of significant adverse events (7.2% vs 1.6%, P < .05), return to the operating room (3.5% vs 0.9%, P < .05), mean length of stay (1.8 vs 0.7 days, P < .05), and operative time (90.8 vs 73.7 minutes, P < .05), but no difference in time from admission to the operating room (0.4 vs 0.3 days).

Conclusions

There was a statistically but probably not clinically impactful increase in 30-day deep surgical site infections in OF compared to CF. Patients with OF had significantly longer operative times and length of stay, and more often returned to the OR. This suggests that many OF patients do not carry a clinically increased short-term risk of infection when compared to CF patients.

Type of study/level of evidence

Prognostic, Level III.

Comparison of Early Versus Late Debridement Outcomes in the Management of Open Distal Radius Fractures

PURPOSE

The optimal timing for surgical treatment of open distal radius fractures remains an area of debate. The purpose of this study was to examine the outcomes of open distal radius fractures treated surgically before or after 24 hours.

METHODS

A multicenter retrospective review was performed on all open distal radius fractures treated over 11 years. Patient demographics, injury mechanism, and initial treatment were recorded. Fracture severity was graded by the Gustilo-Anderson classification. Comparisons were made between those treated surgically within and after 24 hours. Outcomes examined included infection, revision surgery, osteomyelitis, and nonunion.

RESULTS

A total of 230 cases met the inclusion criteria. The cohorts of early and delayed surgical intervention were similar with regard to preoperative demographics. The most common mechanism of injury was motor vehicle accident. Approximately 40% of cases were graded as type I, 40% as type II, and 20% as type III. Mean time to debridement in the group treated after 24 hours was 5 days. A mean postoperative follow-up of greater than 6 months was obtained in both cohorts. Similar outcomes were found between cohorts with respect to postoperative infection, revision surgery, osteomyelitis, and nonunion.

CONCLUSIONS

Similar outcomes with regards to infection, revision, osteomyelitis, and nonunion were found between open distal radius fractures treated emergently versus those managed in a delayed fashion. Patient- and injury-specific factors are important in dictating care.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic IIB.

Association of Timing With Postoperative Complications in the Management of Open Distal Radius Fractures

BACKGROUND

This study investigates whether open distal radius fractures (ODRFs) treated after 24 hours from time of injury have an increased risk of infection or overall complication profile compared with those treated within 24 hours.

METHODS

Retrospective review was performed of all patients treated for ODRF over a 6-year period at a single large academic institution. Postoperative complications included surgical site infections, need for revision irrigation and debridement, delayed soft tissue healing, loss of reduction, nonunion, and malunion.

RESULTS

One-hundred twenty patients were treated for ODRF. Mean (SD) age at time of injury was 59.92 (17.68) years. Twenty patients (16.7%) had postoperative complications. Regarding mechanism of injury, 78 (65.0%) had a low-energy and 42 (35.0%) had a high-energy injury. Age and fracture grade were not significant factors. Mean (SD) open wound size was 1.18 (1.57) cm. Mean (SD) time from injury presentation to the emergency department (ED) and first dose of intravenous antibiotics was 3.07 (4.05) hours and mean (SD) time from presentation to the ED and operative treatment was 11.90 (6.59) hours, which did not show a significant association with postoperative complications. Twenty-four patients (20.0%) were treated greater than 24 hours after presentation to the ED, which was not significantly distinct from those treated within 24 hours.

CONCLUSION

Patients with ODRFs treated after 24 hours were not associated with a greater risk of postoperative complications. Factors including age, energy and mechanism of injury, and fracture grade did not alter outcome in any statistically significant manner.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.

Infection Rate in Type I Open Distal Radius Fractures Surgically Treated >24 Hours Post-Injury: A Comparison Study

PURPOSE

To determine how time to surgical debridement and fixation affects infection and complication rate in type I open distal radius fractures by comparing patients treated within 24 hours with those treated >24 hours post-injury.

METHODS

A retrospective review identified 62 patients who sustained a type I open distal radius fracture that was treated surgically. Patients were stratified into groups based on time to surgical intervention. An additional analysis was performed on patients with an isolated type I open distal radius fracture treated as an inpatient or outpatient. The primary outcome measure was infection rate. Secondary outcome measures were complications, reoperations, and readmissions.

RESULTS

Thirty-eight patients underwent surgery ≤24 hours post-injury at an average of 14 hours. Twenty-four patients underwent surgery >24 hours post-injury at an average of 72 hours. There were a total of 9 complications in 8 patients (14.5%). The overall infection rate was 1.6%, with only 1 deep infection occurring in the group treated ≤24 hours post-injury. There were 7 reoperations (11.3%) and 1 readmission (1.6%). No differences were found between groups in any outcome measure. In the 27 patients with an isolated fracture, there were no differences in any outcome measure when treated as an inpatient or outpatient.

CONCLUSIONS

We suggest that type I open distal radius fractures could be safely treated surgically >24 hours post-injury without increased risk of infection.

Factors predicting complications following open reduction and internal fixation of intra-articular distal radius fracture

Objective

This study aimed to determine the incidence and predictors of the complications after open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of intra-articular distal radius fracture (IADRF) with a minimum follow-up of 12 months.

Methods

Medical records and outpatient follow-up records were retrospectively reviewed to collect medical, surgical, and complication data on consecutive patients who had undergone an ORIF procedure for an IADRF between January 2019 and June 2022. Data included demographics, comorbidities, injury, surgical characteristics, and laboratory findings on admission. A multivariate logistic regression model was constructed to identify the significant predictors, with a composite of any complications occurring within 12 months after the operation as the outcome variable and potentially a range of clinical data as the independent variables. The magnitude of the relationship was indicated by the odds ratio (OR) and the 95% confidence interval (CI).

Results

During the study period, 474 patients were included, and 64 had documented complications (n = 73), representing an accumulated rate of 13.5%. Among them, carpal tunnel syndrome was the most common, followed by tenosynovitis caused by tendon irritation/rupture, superficial or deep wound infection, complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) type 1, radial shortening (≥4 mm), plate/screw problems, and others. The multivariate results showed the following factors significantly associated with increased risk of complications: experience of DRF surgery with <30 cases (OR: 2.2, 95% CI: 1.6-3.5), AO type C fracture (OR: 1.7, 95% CI: 1.2-2.9), initial lunate facet collapse of ≥5 mm (OR: 4.2, 95% CI: 1.4-8.9), and use of temporary external fixation before index surgery (OR: 2.4, 95% CI: 1.5-4.3).

Conclusions

These findings may aid in patient counseling and quality improvement initiatives, and IADRF should be directed by an experienced surgeon.

Open hand fractures: a prospective analysis of functional outcomes and risk factors for infection after initial management in the emergency department

PURPOSE

Open hand fractures are common orthopaedic injuries, historically managed with early debridement in the operating room. Recent studies suggest immediate operative treatment may not be necessary but have been limited by poor follow-up and lack of functional outcomes. This study sought to prospectively evaluate these injuries treated initially in the emergency department (ED), without immediate operative intervention, to determine long-term infectious and functional outcomes using the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire (MHQ).

METHODS

Adult patients with open hand fractures managed initially in the ED at a Level-I trauma center were considered for inclusion (2012-2016). Follow-up and MHQ administration occurred at 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 6 months, and 1 year. Logistic regression and Kruskal-Wallis testing were used for analysis.

RESULTS

Eighty-one patients (110 fractures) were included. Most had Gustilo Type III injuries (65%). Injury mechanisms most commonly included saw/cut (40%) and crush (28%). Nearly half of all patients (46%) had additional injuries involving a nailbed or tendon. Fifteen percent of patients had surgery within 30 days. The average follow-up was 8.9 months, with 68% of patients completing at least 12 months. Eleven patients (14%) developed an infection, of which 4 (5%) required surgery. Subsequent surgery and laceration size were associated with increased odds of infection, and at one-year, functional outcomes were not significantly different regardless of fracture classification, injury mechanism, or surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Initial ED management of open hand fractures results in reasonable infection rates compared to similar literature and functional recovery demonstrated by MHQ score improvements over time.

Outcomes of Type I Open Distal Radius Fractures: A Comparison of Delayed and Urgent Open Reduction Internal Fixation

BACKGROUND

Type I open distal radius fractures treated with open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) have demonstrated minimal risk of infection. For this reason, they may not require urgent surgical treatment. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of patients with type I open distal radius fractures treated with delayed ORIF compared with urgent ORIF.

METHODS

We identified all Gustilo-Anderson type I open distal radius fractures that had undergone ORIF using volar plating over a 5-year period. Patients were stratified into those treated urgently within 24 hours and those scheduled for delayed surgery. Outcomes including functional scores, complications, reoperations, and radiographic measures were compared.

RESULTS

Twenty-four patients (17 treated urgently and 7 treated delayed) had open type I distal radius fractures. All patients were started on empiric antibiotics at initial presentation-patients in the delayed treatment group were prescribed oral antibiotics, whereas those admitted for urgent treatment received intravenous antibiotics. There were no infections in either group and a single reoperation in each group. The mean postoperative Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score was 29 (range = 0-77) and did not differ significantly between delayed (mean = 19) and urgent (mean = 38) treatment. Rate of complications and radiographic measures did not differ significantly between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Type I open distal radius fractures appear amenable to delayed outpatient ORIF provided that the wound is clean at the time of initial presentation and that antibiotics are initiated appropriately. Further prospective studies comparing delayed and urgent treatment strategies are warranted.

Outcomes of Primary Volar Locking Plate Fixation of Open Distal Radius Fractures

Background: Few studies have reported the outcomes of primary volar locking plate fixation in Gustilo and Anderson type II and IIIA open distal radius fractures. We report the outcomes of treatment of Gustilo and Anderson type II and IIIA open distal radius fractures using primary volar locking plate fixation. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 24 patients with open distal radius fractures who were treated using primary volar locking plate fixation. The range of motion (ROM) and modified Mayo wrist scores were measured to assess functional outcomes. Radiological outcomes included the bone union period, radial inclination, volar tilt, radial length and ulnar variance. Results: Functional outcomes, including mean ROM in flexion (39.1°) and extension (52.5°), improved following primary volar locking plate treatment. Radiological outcomes were as follows. Mean bone union period, radial length and ulnar variance were 7.8 months, 10.4 and 0.7 mm, respectively. Two patients had superficial wound infection 2 weeks after surgery and one patient had non-union of the radius that required implant removal, autologous iliac crest bone graft and plate re-fixation. Conclusions: Primary volar locking plate fixation is a safe and reliable treatment option for Gustilo and Anderson type II and IIIA open distal radius fractures. By providing firm stabilisation and allowing early ROM exercise, primary volar locking plate fixation resulted in good functional and radiological outcomes. Level of Evidence: Level IV (Therapeutic).

A Review of Surgically Treated Distal Radius Fractures in a University Hospital

Introduction:

Distal radius fracture (DRF) is the most common orthopaedic injury with a reported incidence of 17.5%. It is commonly seen in young males and elderly females. Over the last two decades, there is an increasing tendency to treat DRF surgically by open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) with plate and screws owing to improved device design, better fixation and operative technique. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the demographic characteristics, type and method of fixation, and outcome in all surgically treated DRF cases from 2014 to 2018 in a university hospital.

Materials and methods:

A retrospective review of all surgically treated DRF cases with one year follow-up in a tertiary hospital in Malaysia was done. Patients who left the follow-up clinic before one-year post-surgery or before fracture union were excluded. A total of 82 patients with 88 DRF were finally included into the study and outcome in terms of union time and need of multiple surgeries were analysed along with the predictors.

Results:

In this study, mean age of the patient was 46.2 years. Motor vehicle accident was the commonest cause of the fracture and AO Type C fracture was the commonest fracture type. Seventeen (19.3%) out of 88 fractures were compound fracture. Open reduction and internal fixation with volar plate was the most common surgical technique done in this series (93.2%). Three (3.5%) out of 88 fractures required multiple surgeries and eighty-three (94.3%) DRF cases were united before nine months of the surgery in this study. There was statistically significant association between clinical type of the fracture and the union time (p-value <0.05).

Conclusion:

There was a 1.7:1 male-female ratio with AO-C fracture being the most common type of fracture. The most common method of fixation was ORIF with volar locked plate. Patients with closed fractures have a higher rate of union compared to open fractures at nine months.

Risk of surgical site infection in hand trauma, and the impact of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic: A cohort study

BACKGROUND

Despite the ubiquity of hand trauma, there remains insufficient published data to reliably inform these patients of surgical site infection (SSI) risk. We describe the risk of SSI in a single-centre cohort of patients with hand trauma, with an analysis of the impact of the coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic.

METHODS

Retrospective data collection of consecutive patients who underwent surgery for hand and wrist trauma in a single plastic surgery centre over two, three-month periods. Demographic, injury and operative details, alongside prophylactic antibiotic use, were recorded. Burn injuries and wounds infected at presentation were excluded. Presence of SSI at 30 days (90 days if a surgical implant was used) was assessed.

RESULTS

Overall, 556 patients - 'Pre-COVID-19' (n = 310) and 'During COVID-19' (n = 246) - were included. Risk of SSI was 3.6% in the aggregated cohort. Female patients were more likely to develop an SSI, even when adjusted for their greater prevalence of bite aetiologies (adj OR 2.5; 95% CI, 1.00-6.37 and p < 0.05). The absolute risk of SSI in the 'Pre-COVID-19' group was 2.3% and 5.3% in the 'During COVID-19' group. The relative risk of developing an SSI in the 'During COVID-19' group was 2.34 (95% CI, 0.95-5.78 and p = 0.06). Baseline characteristics were equivalent between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

The risk of SSI in hand trauma is the same as the nationally estimated risk for all surgeries; 3-5%. Changes in presentation and practice associated with the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic did not appear to alter the risk of SSI in patients undergoing surgery for hand trauma.

Infection after Open Long Bone Fractures: Can we Improve on Prophylaxis?

INTRODUCTION

Current standards recommend antibiotic prophylaxis administered after open fracture injury. The purpose of this study was to assess culture results in patients with open fracture-associated infections, hypothesizing that cultures obtained do not vary by Gustilo-Anderson (GA) classification.

METHODS

We examined cultured bacterial species from patients with open long bone fractures that underwent irrigation and debridement at a Level 1 trauma center (2008-2016), evaluating our current and two hypothetical antibiotic protocols to assess whether they provided appropriate coverage. The antibiotic protocols included protocols 1 (cefazolin, with gentamicin added for type III fractures), 2 (vancomycin and cefepime) and 3 (ceftriaxone).

RESULTS

GA classification was not associated with bacterial gram stain (P = 0.161), nor was it predictive of mono- versus polymicrobial infection (P = 0.094). Of 42 culture-positive infections, 31 were type III and 11 were type I or II fractures. 27% of the infections for type I or II fractures were caused by organisms targeted by protocol 1 (OR 0.18, 95% CI 0.04-0.82; P = 0.027). There was no difference in coverage by fracture type among protocol 2 (P = 0.771) or protocol 3 (P = 0.891). For type III fractures, protocol 2 provided 94% appropriate coverage compared to 68% and 61% coverage by protocols 1 and 3, respectively.

CONCLUSION

For open fractures complicated by infection, isolated bacterial organisms do not correlate with GA open fracture classification, suggesting that hypothetical protocol 2 should be used for all fracture types. Protocol 2's broad coverage, across all GA fracture types, may prevent infection by organisms not covered by current antibiotic prophylaxis.

Common Complications of Distal Radial Fractures

Distal radial fractures are associated with good outcomes; however, although they occur at low rates, complications can significantly impair treatment success. Therefore, the treating surgeon should be aware of potential complications associated with each treatment type and how to best prevent them. Although certain patient-specific and fracture-specific factors may increase the risk of adverse outcomes, most are nonmodifiable risk factors at the time of presentation, so it is imperative that every effort is made to mitigate these risk factors to prevent long-term morbidity. Patients should be well-informed about these complications and potential symptoms so that they can be addressed expeditiously.

Can Open Hand Injuries Wait for Their Surgery in a Tertiary Hospital?

Objective  Open hand injuries are routinely admitted and planned for surgery acutely, competing with other surgical emergencies. This retrospective study aims to evaluate if a delay in timing to surgery for open hand injuries led to an increased rate of infection. Materials and Methods  All patients who sustained open hand injuries and underwent semi-emergent day surgery from January 1, 2015 to December 31, 2016 were included. Outcome of postoperative infection was analyzed against demographic data, injury details, and delay from trauma to therapy. Results  There were 232 cases (91% males) included, with 92.0% performed under local anesthesia. Deep seated postoperative infection was seen in 1.3%, which was not significantly associated with delay to surgery. Conclusion  We had comparable infection rates as compared with published literature. Delayed timing of surgical treatment in open hand injuries was not associated with increased rates of deep-seated infection. Managing open hand injuries as semi-emergent surgeries may be acceptable given the low infection rates.

Management of Large Segmental Bone Defects at the Knee With Intramedullary Stabilized Antibiotic Spacers During Two-Stage Treatment of Endoprosthetic Joint Infection

BACKGROUND

Following debridement of infected prostheses that require reconstruction with an endoprosthetic replacement (EPR), instability related to segmental residual bone defects present a challenge in management with 2-stage reimplantation.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed all patients treated for revision total joint or endoprosthetic infection at the knee from 1998 to 2018. At our institution, patients with skeletal defects >6 cm following explant of prosthesis and debridement (stage 1) were managed with intramedullary nail-stabilized antibiotic spacers. Following stage 1, antimicrobial therapy included 6 weeks of intravenous antibiotics and a minimum of 6 weeks of oral antibiotics. Following resolution of inflammatory markers and negative tissue cultures, reimplantation (stage 2) of an EPR was performed.

RESULTS

Twenty-one patients at a mean age of 54 ± 21 years were treated for prosthetic joint infection at the knee. Polymicrobial growth was detected in 38% of cases, followed by coagulase-negative staphylococci (24%) and Staphylococcus aureus (19%). Mean residual skeletal defect after stage 1 treatment was 20 cm. Prosthetic joint infection eradication was achieved in 18 (86%) patients, with a mean Musculoskeletal Tumor Society score of 77% and mean knee range of motion of 100°. Patients with polymicrobial infections had a greater number of surgeries prior to infection (P = .024), and were more likely to require additional debridement prior to EPR (odds ratio 12.0, P = .048).

CONCLUSION

Management of large segmental skeletal defects at the knee following explant using intramedullary stabilized antibiotic spacers maintain stability and result in high rates of limb salvage with conversion to an endoprosthesis.

A Reevaluation of the Risk of Infection Based on Time to Debridement in Open Fractures: Results of the GOLIATH Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies and Limited Trial Data

BACKGROUND

Open fractures are one of the leading causes of disability worldwide. The threshold time to debridement that reduces the infection rate is unclear.

METHODS

We searched all available databases to identify observational studies and randomized trials related to open fracture care. We then conducted an extensive meta-analysis of the observational studies, using raw and adjusted estimates, to determine if there was an association between the timing of initial debridement and infection.

RESULTS

We identified 84 studies (18,239 patients) for the primary analysis. In unadjusted analyses comparing various "late" time thresholds for debridement versus "early" thresholds, there was an association between timing of debridement and surgical site infection (odds ratio [OR] = 1.29, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.11 to 1.49, p < 0.001, I2 = 30%, 84 studies, n = 18,239). For debridement performed between 12 and 24 hours versus earlier than 12 hours, the OR was higher in tibial fractures (OR = 1.37, 95% CI = 1.00 to 1.87, p = 0.05, I2 = 19%, 12 studies, n = 2,065), and even more so in Gustilo type-IIIB tibial fractures (OR = 1.46, 95% CI = 1.13 to 1.89, p = 0.004, I2 = 23%, 12 studies, n = 1,255). An analysis of Gustilo type-III fractures showed a progressive increase in the risk of infection with time. Critical time thresholds included 12 hours (OR = 1.51, 95% CI = 1.28 to 1.78, p < 0.001, I2 = 0%, 16 studies, n = 3,502) and 24 hours (OR = 2.17, 95% CI = 1.73 to 2.72, p < 0.001, I2 = 0%, 29 studies, n = 5,214).

CONCLUSIONS

High-grade open fractures demonstrated an increased risk of infection with progressive delay to debridement.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic Level IV. See Instruction for Authors for a complete description of the levels of evidence.

Readmissions After Distal Radius Fracture Open Reduction and Internal Fixation: An Analysis of 11,124 Patients

Purpose:

Distal radius fracture (DRF) open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) is a common surgical procedure. This study assesses reasons and risk factors for readmission after DRF ORIF using the large sample size and follow-up of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database.

Methods:

Adult patients who underwent DRF ORIF were identified in the 2011 to 2016 National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. Patient demographics, comorbidity status, hospital metrics, and 30-day perioperative outcomes were tabulated. Readmission, time to readmission, and reason for readmission were assessed. Reasons for readmission were categorized. Risk factors for readmission were assessed with multivariate analyses.

Results:

Of 11,124 patients who underwent DRF ORIF, 196 (1.76%) were readmitted within 30 days. Based on multivariate analysis, predictors of readmission (P < 0.05) were as follows: American Society of Anesthesiologist class > 3 (Odds ratio [OR] = 2.87), functionally dependent status (OR = 2.25), diabetes with insulin use (OR = 1.97), and staying in hospital after the index surgery (inpatient procedure, OR = 2.04). Readmissions occurred at approximately 14 days postoperatively. Of the recorded reasons for readmission after DRF ORIF, approximately one quarter were for surgical reasons, whereas over 75% of readmissions were for medical reasons unrelated to the surgery.

Conclusion:

This study found the rate of 30-day unplanned readmissions after DRF ORIF to be 1.76%. Demographic, comorbid, and perioperative factors predictive of readmission were defined. Most postoperative readmissions were for medical reasons unrelated to the surgical site and occurred at an average of approximately 2 weeks postoperatively. Multivariate analysis found that patients with increased American Society of Anesthesiologist class > 3, functional dependence, insulin-dependent diabetes, and those who underwent inpatient surgery for any reason were at a greater risk for readmission. Understanding these factors may aid in patient counseling and quality improvement initiatives, and this information should be used for risk stratification and risk adjustment of quality measures.

Surgical Site Infection After Open Upper Extremity Fracture and the Effect of Urgent Operative Intervention

OBJECTIVES

To identify which factors are predictive of surgical site infection in upper extremity fractures, and to assess whether the timing of operative debridement influences infection risk.

DESIGN

Retrospective database review.

SETTING

Hospitals participating in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database.

PATIENTS

Patients in the NSQIP database with fractures involving the upper extremity.

INTERVENTION

Surgical management of upper extremity fracture, including operative debridement for open injuries.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Surgical site infection, including both superficial and deep infections.

RESULTS

A total of 22,578 patients were identified, including 1298 patients with open injuries (5.7% of total). The overall wound infection rate was 0.79%. Patients with open injuries were found to have a higher incidence of infection compared with those with closed injuries (1.7% vs. 0.7%, P < 0.001). Independent risk factors for 30-day infection included open fracture diagnosis, obesity, smoking, and American Society of Anesthesiolgists class >2 (all P < 0.05). Of patients with open fractures, 79.7% were taken expediently to the operating room. The rate of infection did not differ based on whether surgery was performed expediently or not (1.8% vs. 1.1%, P = 0.431).

CONCLUSIONS

Based on an analysis of the NSQIP database, the overall risk of surgical site infection following intervention for open or closed upper extremity fractures remains low. Risk factors for infection include open injury, obesity, and cigarette smoking. There was no difference in the infection rate based on the urgency of operative debridement.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Evaluating Outcomes Following Open Fractures of the Distal Radius

PURPOSE

A paucity of evidence exists regarding the optimal treatment of open fractures of the distal radius. The purpose of this study was to compare short-term complication rates between various treatment options following open fractures of the distal radius.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of all open fractures of the distal radius at a single level 1 trauma center over a 10-year period. The primary outcome measure was the number of minor and major complications. Demographic and clinical characteristics of patients across treatment and outcome groups were compared and models were used to describe the relationships between outcome and treatment.

RESULTS

Ninety patients met the inclusion criteria for evaluation. An even distribution between high-energy (n = 45) and low-energy (n = 45) injuries was seen with 61 fractures Gustilo I (67%), 19 Gustilo II (22%), and 10 Gustilo III (11%). The majority of fractures were intra-articular (n = 48 AO type C vs n = 42 AO type A/B). Fractures were treated with immediate open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) in 67 cases (74%), external fixation in 12 (13%), initial external fixation followed by ORIF at a later time in 8 (9%), or closed reduction and percutaneous pinning in 3 (4%). We observed 33 complications (37%) of which 24 were major and 9 minor. Mechanism of injury and type of treatment were the only variables shown to correlate with an increased rate of complications.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that open fractures of the distal radius treated by immediate ORIF at the time of index debridement can result in satisfactory outcomes compared with other forms of treatment.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic IV.

Osteomyelitis Risk Factors Related to Combat Trauma Open Upper Extremity Fractures: A Case-Control Analysis

OBJECTIVE

To determine risk factors for osteomyelitis in US military personnel with combat-related, extremity long bone (humerus, radius, and ulna) open fractures.

DESIGN

Retrospective observational case-control study.

SETTING

US military regional hospital in Germany and tertiary care military hospitals in the United States (2003-2009).

PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS

Sixty-four patients with open upper extremity fractures who met diagnostic osteomyelitis criteria (medical record review verification) were classified as cases. Ninety-six patients with open upper extremity fractures who did not meet osteomyelitis diagnostic criteria were included as controls.

INTERVENTION

Not applicable.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Multivariable odds ratios (ORs; 95% confidence interval [CI]).

RESULTS

Among patients with surgical implants, osteomyelitis cases had longer time to definitive orthopaedic surgery compared with controls (median: 26 vs. 11 days; P < 0.001); however, there was no significant difference with timing of radiographic union. Being injured between 2003 and 2006, use of antibiotic beads, Gustilo-Anderson [GA] fracture classification (highest with GA-IIIb: [OR: 22.20; CI: 3.60-136.95]), and Orthopaedic Trauma Association Open Fracture Classification skin variable (highest with extensive degloving [OR: 15.61; CI: 3.25-74.86]) were independently associated with osteomyelitis risk. Initial stabilization occurring outside of the combat zone was associated with reduced risk of osteomyelitis.

CONCLUSIONS

Open upper extremity fractures with severe soft-tissue damage have the highest risk of developing osteomyelitis. The associations with injuries sustained 2003-2006 and location of initial stabilization are likely from evolving trauma system recommendations and practice patterns during the timeframe.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Incidence of complications and secondary procedure following distal radius fractures treated by volar locking plate (VLP)

Objective

To investigate the incidence of postoperative overall complications or secondary procedures following distal radius fractures treated by volar locking plate (VLP)

Methods

Electronic medical records (EMR) of 1152 patients with 1175 distal radius fractures treated by volar locking plate between January 2013 and September 2018 were retrospectively reviewed and the data were extracted. The picture archiving and communication system (PACS) was inquired to assess the fracture severity and to determine the fracture type. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to identify the associated risk factors.

Results

During the median follow-up period of 6 months, a total of 138 complications in 131 patients were determined, indicating the accumulated rate of 11.7%; there were 68 cases of secondary procedures, with the rate of 5.8%. The independent associated factors for postoperative overall complications were AO type C fracture (OR, 2.6; 95%CI, 1.2 to 4.0), open fracture (OR, 4.2; 95%CI, 1.9 to 6.5), and significant collapse of the lunate fossa (OR, 2.9; 95%CI, 13 to 4.3), and for secondary procedures were significant collapse of the lunate fossa (OR, 3.7; 95%CI, 1.7 to 6.4) and the low-volume of surgeons (OR, 95%CI, 1.2 to 3.6)

Conclusions

Identification of these factors is of importance for the risk assessment of postoperative complications and the additional need of surgery. For patients with the above factors, especially those with combined risk factors, optimized operation scheme and high-volume surgeon should be considered to prevent or reduce the complications.

Management of High Energy Distal Radius Injuries

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

High energy distal radius are commonly multi-fragmentary with significant comminution and/or bone loss. They can also be associated with ligamentous and soft tissue injury and neurovascular compromise. As such, reconstruction of these injuries can be challenging. This paper will review the relevant anatomy, different methods of fixation, and present techniques for difficult fractures.

RECENT FINDINGS

Volar locked plating is a successful, very common method of treatment for distal radius fractures, but dorsal plating, fragment specific fixation, spanning bridge plating, and external fixation are sometimes necessary, particularly in higher energy injuries characterized by metaphyseal comminution, small volar fragments, intra-articular free fragments or lunate facet subsidence. Extended flexor carpi radialis (FCR), dorsal, and flexor carpi ulnaris (FCU) exposures can assist in visualizing the fracture site. There are many different modes of fixation for distal radius fractures, and successful outcome depends on selection of appropriate fixation based on the fracture pattern and status of the soft tissues.

Treatment of open upper limb injuries with infection prevention and negative pressure wound therapy: a systematic review

OBJECTIVE

Open upper limb injuries requiring soft reconstruction can pose a dilemma for trauma surgeons when considering the treatment options. The British Orthopaedic Association and British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons Standard for Trauma (BOAST) have addressed the management of severe open lower limb fractures with the creation of the BOAST 4 guidelines. However, no such gold standard exists for the treatment of open injuries of the upper limb. Furthermore, treatment of these injuries is often more difficult and requires complicated strategies. Since the advent of negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT), there has been an improvement in wound care, though a focused review of its use in wound closure and infection prevention in the upper limb has not been published. We examine wound care management for open upper limb injuries with regard to the dressings applied, NPWT, wound closure and infection prevention.

METHOD

A systematic search of Medline, Cochrane and Google Scholar was performed using the key words. The key word searches were performed by two independent reviewers and 8,792 papers were found. Manuscripts between 1990 and 2010 were included, with the addition of key manuscripts before this date. Each manuscript was assessed by the two authors independently for methodology and validity Results: Approximately 120 manuscripts fulfilled selection criteria examining the influence of NPWT on open upper and lower limb injuries, and those examining infection risk in the same injuries. Of these 120 manuscripts, 28 were suitable for inclusion in the review. The systematic review is presented, allied to the BOAST 4 principles, examining the use of NPWT and the tools available for infection prevention for wounds of the upper and lower limb. The use of NPWT in conjunction with antibiotic-bead therapy improved the way in which open fractures of both the upper and lower limb are treated.

CONCLUSION

Production of guidelines is warranted for the treatment of upper limb injuries. The treatment options available for wound closure and infection prevention that are used in the treatment of open injuries of the lower limb could be adopted to open injuries of the upper limb.

Timing of Treatment of Open Fractures of the Distal Radius in Patients Younger Than 65 Years

The authors aimed to characterize surgical and functional outcomes of open fractures of the distal radius in patients younger than 65 years. At their level I trauma center, the authors conducted a retrospective review of 92 patients (age range, 16-64 years) who had 94 open fractures of the distal radius (average follow-up, 30 months; range, 3-95 months). Sixty-four fractures received definitive treatment at the time of initial débridement; 30 received definitive fixation and soft tissue coverage after staged débridement. Primary surgical outcome was development of deep surgical site infection requiring repeat surgical débridement; secondary surgical outcome was surgical complications requiring reoperation. Functional outcome was assessed by wrist range of motion. Overall infection rate was 15% (14 of 94 fractures). Seven (11%) of 64 fractures in the immediate definitive fixation group developed infection compared with 7 (23%) of 30 fractures in the staged treatment group (P=.13). Twenty-one (33%) of 64 fractures in the immediate definitive fixation group required reoperation compared with 15 (50%) of 30 in the staged treatment group (P=.11). Deep surgical site infections and surgical complications associated with open fractures of the distal radius are driven by soft tissue injury. [Orthopedics. 2019; 42(4):219-225.].

Outcomes of Staged Treatment for Complex Distal Radius Fractures

Introduction Distal radius fractures are common, but the results and complications of treatment with early external fixation and staged open reduction internal fixation have not been previously reported. Materials and methods Patients who received staged distal radius fracture treatment from 1/1/2008 to 12/31/2015 at the University of Alabama at Birmingham were identified. Patient, injury, and treatment characteristics, as well as complications, were collected from the medical record. Results There were 50 fractures in 47 patients, with mean follow-up of 9.3 months. Thirty-eight were open and 45 were intra-articular. For definitive treatment, 41 received a volar approach and nine a dorsal approach. Twenty wrists experienced one or more complications, including two non-unions. Five patients developed infections - one Kirschner wire site infection, one external fixator (ex-fix) pin site infection, and three deep infections. All deep infections occurred in tobacco users. The rate of deep infection with volar approach was 2.4%, compared to 22.2% with dorsal approach. Ex-fix pin sites overlapped radiographically with the plate in 20 fractures, with three deep infections in this group (15%) and no deep infections in the group without overlap. None of these differences reached statistical significance. Conclusions This protocol results in reliable healing of complex fractures, with a 96% union rate. However, 40% sustained complications. We conclude that this protocol is useful for temporizing complex fractures but caution that the complication rate is high. Since recent literature indicates that low-grade open distal radius fractures do not require emergent debridement and that immediate internal fixation is safe, complications might be avoided by restricting this protocol to complex or physiologically unstable patients.

Open Distal Radius Fractures: Timing and Strategies for Surgical Management

Open distal radius fractures are rare injuries with few studies to guide treatment. Degree of soft tissue injury and contamination may be a primary consideration to dictate timing and operative intervention. Antibiotics should be started as early as possible and include a first-generation cephalosporin. Surgical fixation remains a matter of surgeon preference: although studies support the use of definitive internal fixation, many surgeons address contaminated injuries with external fixation. Although postoperative outcomes are similar to closed injuries for low-grade open distal radius fractures, high-grade injuries with more complex fracture patterns carry a high risk of complications, poor outcomes, and repeat surgical procedures.

Open Fractures of the Hand: Review of Pathogenesis and Introduction of a New Classification System

Open fractures of the hand are a common and varied group of injuries. Although at increased risk for infection, open fractures of the hand are more resistant to infection than other open fractures. Numerous unique factors in the hand may play a role in the altered risk of postinjury infection. Current systems for the classification of open fractures fail to address the unique qualities of the hand. This article proposes a novel classification system for open fractures of the hand, taking into account the factors unique to the hand that affect its risk for developing infection after an open fracture.

Antibiotic Management and Operative Debridement in Open Fractures of the Hand and Upper Extremity: A Systematic Review

Open fractures of the hand are thought to be less susceptible to infection than other open fractures because of the increased blood supply to the area. Current evidence for all open fractures shows that antibiotic use and the extent of contamination are predictive of infection risk, but time to debridement is not. We reviewed in a systematic review the available literature on open fractures of the hand and upper extremity to determine infection rates based on the timing of debridement and antibiotic administration. We continue to recommend prompt debridement and treatment of most open fractures of the upper extremity.

Conversion of external fixation to open reduction and internal fixation for complex distal radius fractures

INTRODUCTION

Distal radius fractures are common injuries treated in a multitude of ways. One treatment paradigm not extensively studied is initial treatment by external fixation (EF) followed by conversion to open reduction internal fixation (ORIF). Such a paradigm may be beneficial in damage control situations, when there is extensive soft tissue injury, or when appropriate personnel/hospital resources are not available for immediate internal fixation.

HYPOTHESIS

There is no increased risk of infection when converting EF to ORIF in the treatment of complex distal radius fractures when conversion occurs early or if EF pin sites are overlapped by the definitive fixation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Using an IRB approved protocol, medical records over nine years were queried to identify patients with distal radius fractures that had undergone initial EF and were later converted to ORIF. Charts were reviewed for demographic data, injury characteristics, operative details, time to conversion from EF to ORIF, assessment of whether the EF pin sites overlapped the definitive fixation, presence of infection after ORIF, complications, and occupational therapy measurements of range of motion and strength.

RESULTS

In total, 16 patients were identified, only one of which developed an infection following conversion to ORIF. Fisher's exact testing showed that infection did not depend on open fracture, time to conversion of one week or less, presence of EF pin sites overlapping definitive fixation, fracture classification, high energy mechanism of injury, or concomitant injury to the DRUJ.

DISCUSSION

Planned staged conversion from EF to ORIF for complex distal radius fractures does not appear to result in an increased rate of infection if conversion occurs early or if the EF pin sites are overlapped by definitive fixation. This treatment paradigm may be reasonable for treating complex distal radius fractures in damage control situations, when there is extensive soft tissue injury, or when appropriate personnel/hospital resources are not available for immediate internal fixation.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV, retrospective case series.

Open Fractures of the Hand: Review of Pathogenesis and Introduction of a New Classification System

Open fractures of the hand are a common and varied group of injuries. Although at increased risk for infection, open fractures of the hand are more resistant to infection than other open fractures. Numerous unique factors in the hand may play a role in the altered risk of postinjury infection. Current systems for the classification of open fractures fail to address the unique qualities of the hand. This article proposes a novel classification system for open fractures of the hand, taking into account the factors unique to the hand that affect its risk for developing infection after an open fracture.

Management of complications of distal radius fractures

Treating a fracture of the distal radius may require the surgeon to make a difficult decision between surgical treatment and nonsurgical management. The use of surgical fixation has recently increased because of complications associated with conservative treatment. However, conservative action may be necessary depending on certain patient factors. The treating surgeon must be aware of the possible complications associated with distal radius fracture treatments to prevent their occurrence. Prevention can be achieved with a proper understanding of the mechanism of these complications. This article discusses the most recent evidence on how to manage and prevent complications following a fracture of the distal radius.

Factors influencing infection rates after open fractures of the radius and/or ulna

PURPOSE

To investigate factors associated with the development of deep infection in patients with open fractures of the radius and/or ulna.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 296 open fractures of the radius and/or ulna. Of these patients, 200 had at least 6-month follow-up and were included in this study. The following variables were examined for each patient: time from injury to antibiotic administration, time from injury to operative debridement, Gustilo-Anderson classification, type of antibiotic received, and host characteristics such as age, diabetes, and tobacco use. Outcome parameters included the presence of deep infection and fracture union.

RESULTS

The overall rate of deep infection was 5% (10 of 200). No type 1 fractures (of 41) developed deep infection. In contrast, 4% (2 of 48) of type 2 and 7% (8 of 110) of type 3 fractures developed infection. Of 200 patients, 28 received antibiotics in less than 3 hours and underwent debridement in less than 6 hours from the time of injury; however, they did not have lower rates of infection. Similar findings were noted when nonunion was used as the outcome, and the association between Gustilo-Anderson classification and the development of nonunion was statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

Factors such as time to antibiotics and time to operative debridement were not predictors for either rate of deep infection or nonunion in open fractures of the radius and/or ulna. The type of fracture as outlined by the Gustilo-Anderson classification was the factor most strongly associated with the development of deep infection and nonunion in these fractures.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic III.

Safety of immediate open reduction and internal fixation of geriatric open fractures of the distal radius

INTRODUCTION AND AIM

There is a paucity of literature regarding outcomes of open fractures of the distal radius. No study has detailed this injury or treatment strategy in the geriatric population. The purpose of this study was to determine the safety of immediate open reduction and internal fixation of geriatric open fractures of the distal radius.

METHODS

A total of 21 geriatric patients with open fractures of the distal radius treated with a single definitive procedure were identified from a prospectively collected database. We reviewed patient demographics, injury characteristics and treatment specifics. Our primary outcome was surgical-site infection defined by need for antibiotics or repeat surgery. Our secondary outcome was need for other re-operation. Patients were contacted and functional scores obtained.

RESULTS

Patients were followed up for an average of 26 months. One deep infection and one nonunion occurred, and they required repeat surgery. Four minor operative complications occurred, including stiffness requiring manipulation and prominent fixation devices requiring removal. Patients maintained an average wrist flexion-extension arc of 89° and pronation-supination arc of 137°. The average QuickDASH (shortened disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand questionnaire) score was 17.4, indicating minimal disability of the upper extremity.

CONCLUSIONS

Immediate open reduction and internal fixation of geriatric open fractures of the distal radius yields adequate functional results with low risk of major complications.

A study of hand injury and emergency management in a developing country

Background:

Injury to the underlying structures of the hand carries the potential for serious handicap. To reduce this risk, even the smallest hand injuries require proper medical care.

Aims:

To assess wound healing, mobility, and the ability to perform normal essential function post-operatively in open hand injuries associated with fracture.

Materials and Methods:

Thirty patients with 45 metacarpal and phalangeal fractures of the hand were divided into three groups: Group 1 (n = 13) cases with single fractures of hand, excluding thumb; Group 2 (n = 9) cases with multiple fracture of hand, excluding thumb; Group 3 (n = 8) cases with fractures involving thumb and first metacarpal. Tendon injuries were repaired. For fractures, Kirschner wire fixation was done. In two cases with multiple fractures, Joshi's external support system (JESS) fixator was applied. Patients were followed up for 12 weeks.

Results:

One patient with proximal phalangeal fracture developed extension lag. No stiffness was observed in any of the cases treated by intramedullary Kirschner wire fixation. No non-union or delayed union was observed following cross-wire fixation with two Kirschner wires. Two case of open fracture developed superficial infection. Two patients with multiple fractures developed angulation at fracture site after the Kirschner wires were removed 4 weeks postoperatively, and two cases of multiple fractures developed hypertrophic non-union.

Conclusions:

Delicate handling of tissues, preservation of gliding planes for tendons, prevention of infection, accurate reduction and fixation, and early and appropriate physiotherapy affect prognosis in case of hand injuries.

Outcomes after volar plate fixation of low-grade open and closed distal radius fractures are similar

BACKGROUND

Low-grade (Gustilo and Anderson Type I or II) open distal radius fractures (DRFs) have been treated by volar locking plate fixation. However, it is unclear whether the outcomes after volar locking plate fixation for low-grade open DRFs are comparable to those for closed DRFs.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

We asked whether low-grade open DRFs had worse DASH scores and higher infection rates than closed DRFs when the DRFs were treated by volar plate fixation.

METHODS

Twenty consecutive patients treated by volar locking plate fixation for low-grade open DRFs constituted the open fracture group, and 40 patients were selected from among the total number of patients treated by volar, locking plate fixation for closed DRFs as the closed fracture group. Complications including infection were recorded. Clinical outcomes and radiographic assessments were performed postoperatively at 3 months and 1 year.

RESULTS

At 3 postoperative months, wrist flexion and extension, grip strengths, and DASH scores were better in the closed fracture group; however, no difference was observed postoperatively between the two groups in terms of any functional outcome measure at 1 year. Any of the radiographic parameters were not different between the groups. There were no differences in infection rate and in any other complication rate between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Although functional outcomes of open DRFs were inferior to those of closed DRFs at 3 months, at 1 year, outcomes of low-grade open DRFs were found to be comparable to those of closed DRFs when volar plate fixation was used.

Outcomes following operative treatment of open fractures of the distal radius: a case control study

PURPOSE

To report radiographic, clinical, and patient-based functional outcomes following contemporary operative treatment of patients who sustained an open distal radius fracture and compare them to a similar group of patients treated operatively for closed distal radius fractures.

METHODS

Over five years, 601 patients with a distal radius fracture presented to our academic medical center, including one Level 1 trauma hospital, and were prospectively enrolled in an upper extremity trauma database. Patients with open distal radius fractures underwent irrigation, debridement, and operative fixation within 24 hours of presentation. Closed distal radius fractures requiring operative fixation were treated electively. Retrospective review of the database identified eighteen open fractures of the distal radius (11 type I, 6 type II, 1 type IIIa). The open fracture patients were individually matched with eighteen closed distal radius fracture patients who underwent surgical fixation based on age, sex, injury to dominant extremity, fracture pattern, and method of fracture fixation. Clinical, radiographic, patient- based functional outcomes, and complications were recorded at routine postoperative intervals.

RESULTS

Follow-up was greater than 77% in both groups at all time points. The open and closed groups were similar in regards to age, gender, BMI, race, tobacco use, income, employment status, hand dominance, injury to dominant extremity, mechanism of injury, fracture classification, method of fracture fixation, and presence of concomitant injury. Postoperative complications and reoperation rates were similar between the open and closed groups. Union rates and radiographic alignment one year postoperatively were similar between the open and closed fracture groups. At final follow-up, range of motion parameters, grip strengths, DASH indices, and subjective pain scores were similar between both groups.

DISCUSSION

Open distal radius fractures treated with early debridement and fixation achieved similar outcomes to surgically treated closed fractures of the distal radius when followed for a year or more postoperatively.

Avoiding and treating perioperative complications of distal radius fractures

Numerous methods of treatment are available for the management of distal radius fractures, with modern trends favoring volar fixed-angle distal radius plates. Whatever the method of fixation, recognition, management, and prevention of the known associated complications are essential to achieve a good outcome. This article reviews the common preventable complications that are associated with operative treatment of distal radius fractures, including tendon injuries, inadequate reduction, subsidence or collapse, intra-articular placement of pegs or screws, nerve injuries, complex regional pain syndrome, carpal tunnel syndrome, and compartment syndrome.

Open fractures of the distal radius: the effects of delayed debridement and immediate internal fixation on infection rates and the need for secondary procedures

PURPOSE

There are few clinical data evaluating the outcome of surgery for open distal radius fractures based on treatment method. Specifically, the major contributing factors to infection are largely unknown. The purpose of this study is to determine the effect of early versus delayed debridement and the choice of initial external versus internal fixation on infection rates and the need for secondary procedures.

METHODS

Thirty-two patients with open distal radius fractures were identified from a database. Ten debridements were early (<6 h after hospital admission), and 22 debridements were delayed (>6 h after hospital admission). There were 10 treating surgeons for the 32 patients in this study. Based on the attending surgeon's preference and experience, 20 fractures were treated with external fixation, 7 with plating, and 5 with planned staged conversion from external fixation to plating. The cohort included 19 grade I, 11 grade II, and 3 grade IIIA open injuries.

RESULTS

There were no infections, regardless of the time to debridement or the use of immediate plating. Other complications requiring secondary procedures occurred more frequently in patients treated with a planned staged conversion from external fixation to plating than in the patients treated with either external fixation or plating.

CONCLUSIONS

We did not encounter infections for grade I and grade II open distal radius fractures, and infections do not appear to be related to either the time to debridement or the initial type of fracture fixation. Plating might be safe at the initial debridement, but temporary external fixation with a staged conversion to plating increases the risk of complications, which necessitates corrective secondary procedures.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic III.

The implications of chronic pain models for rehabilitation of distal radius fracture

Distal radius fracture (DRF) is the most common fracture and usually occurs as a result of a fall. Most patients recover following DRF with minimal residual pain or disability; however, a small subset of patients continue to experience pain and disability even one year after the injury. Currently, there are no practice guidelines for early identification and treatment of patients who are potentially at greater risk of developing these adverse outcomes. As a result, hand therapy management of patients following DRF does not incorporate screening of these at-risk patients. The objective of this paper is to apply constructs from learned helplessness and cognitive-behavioural models of chronic pain in assessing the psychosocial risk profile of patients following DRF. We have also integrated key findings derived from studies addressing personal and life-style factors in assessing this risk profile. This framework is proposed as a basis to categorize patients as higher or lower psychosocial risk for developing chronic pain and disability following DRF. We outline a model depicting the RACE approach (Reducing pain, Activating, Cognitive reshaping, Empowering) towards the management of patients following DRF. The model suggests that patients with minimal psychosocial risk factors are managed based on their injury profile and those with higher psychosocial risk are treated with the risk-based RACE approach. Using a biopsychosocial RACE approach to prognosis and treatment, hand therapy intervention can be customized for patients recovering from DRF. In future, researchers can conduct clinical trials to compare the RACE-based treatment approach to routine hand therapy in mitigating the risk of chronic pain and disability in patients with elevated risk profile for adverse outcomes following DRF.