Impact of deep learning reconstruction on intracranial 1.5 T magnetic resonance angiography

Deep Learning Reconstruction for Enhanced Resolution and Image Quality in Breath-Hold MRCP: A Preliminary Study

OBJECTIVE

This preliminary study aims to assess the image quality of enhanced-resolution deep learning reconstruction (ER-DLR) in magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) and compare it with non-ER-DLR MRCP images.

METHODS

Our retrospective study incorporated 34 patients diagnosed with biliary and pancreatic disorders. We obtained MRCP images using a single breath-hold MRCP on a 3T MRI system. We reconstructed MRCP images with ER-DLR (matrix = 768 × 960) and without ER-DLR (matrix = 256 × 320). Quantitative evaluation involved measuring the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast, contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) between the common bile duct and periductal tissues, and slope. Two radiologists independently scored image noise, contrast, artifacts, sharpness, and overall image quality for the 2 image types using a 4-point scale. Results are expressed as median and interquartile range (IQR), and we compared quantitative and qualitative scores employing the Wilcoxon test.

RESULTS

In quantitative analyses, ER-DLR significantly improved SNR (21.08 [IQR: 14.85, 31.5] vs 15.07 [IQR: 9.57, 25.23], P  < 0.001), CNR (19.29 [IQR: 13.87, 24.98] vs 11.23 [IQR: 8.98, 15.74], P  < 0.001), contrast (0.96 [IQR: 0.94, 0.97] vs 0.9 [IQR: 0.87, 0.92], P  < 0.001), and slope of MRCP (0.62 [IQR: 0.56, 0.66] vs 0.49 [IQR: 0.45, 0.53], P  < 0.001). The qualitative evaluation demonstrated significant improvements in the perceived noise ( P  < 0.001), contrast ( P  = 0.013), sharpness ( P  < 0.001), and overall image quality ( P  < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

ER-DLR markedly increased the resolution, SNR, and CNR of breath-hold-MRCP compared to cases without ER-DLR.

Accelerated intracranial time-of-flight MR angiography with image-based deep learning image enhancement reduces scan times and improves image quality at 3-T and 1.5-T

PURPOSE

Three-dimensional time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography (TOF-MRA) is effective for cerebrovascular disease assessment, but clinical application is limited by long scan times and low spatial resolution. Recent advances in deep learning-based reconstruction have shown the potential to improve image quality and reduce scan times. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of accelerated intracranial TOF-MRA using deep learning-based image enhancement (TOF-DL) compared to conventional TOF-MRA (TOF-Con) at both 3-T and 1.5-T.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this retrospective study, patients who underwent both conventional and 40% accelerated TOF-MRA protocols on 1.5-T or 3-T scanners from July 2022 to March 2023 were included. A commercially available DL-based image enhancement algorithm was applied to the accelerated MRA. Quantitative image quality assessments included signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), contrast ratio (CR), and vessel sharpness (VS), while qualitative assessments were conducted using a five-point Likert scale. Cohen's d was used to compare the quantitative image metrics, and a cumulative link mixed regression model analyzed the readers' scores.

RESULTS

A total of 129 patients (mean age, 64 years ± 12 [SD], 99 at 3-T and 30 at 1.5-T) were included. TOF-DL showed significantly higher SNR, CNR, CR, and VS compared to TOF-Con (CNR = 183.89 vs. 45.58; CR = 0.63 vs. 0.59; VS = 0.73 vs. 0.61; all p < 0.001). The improvement in VS was more pronounced at 1.5-T (Cohen's d = 2.39) compared to 3-T HR and routine (Cohen's d = 0.83 and 0.75, respectively). TOF-DL also outperformed TOF-Con in qualitative image parameters, enhancing the visibility of small- and medium-sized vessels, regardless of the degree of resolution and field strength. TOF-DL showed comparable diagnostic accuracy (AUC: 0.77-0.85) to TOF-Con (AUC: 0.79-0.87) but had higher specificity for steno-occlusive lesions.

CONCLUSIONS

Accelerated intracranial MRA with deep learning-based reconstruction reduces scan times by 40% and significantly enhances image quality over conventional TOF-MRA at both 3-T and 1.5-T.

Enhancing Radiologist Productivity with Artificial Intelligence in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI): A Narrative Review

Artificial intelligence (AI) shows promise in streamlining MRI workflows by reducing radiologists' workload and improving diagnostic accuracy. Despite MRI's extensive clinical use, systematic evaluation of AI-driven productivity gains in MRI remains limited. This review addresses that gap by synthesizing evidence on how AI can shorten scanning and reading times, optimize worklist triage, and automate segmentation. On 15 November 2024, we searched PubMed, EMBASE, MEDLINE, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Library for English-language studies published between 2000 and 15 November 2024, focusing on AI applications in MRI. Additional searches of grey literature were conducted. After screening for relevance and full-text review, 67 studies met inclusion criteria. Extracted data included study design, AI techniques, and productivity-related outcomes such as time savings and diagnostic accuracy. The included studies were categorized into five themes: reducing scan times, automating segmentation, optimizing workflow, decreasing reading times, and general time-saving or workload reduction. Convolutional neural networks (CNNs), especially architectures like ResNet and U-Net, were commonly used for tasks ranging from segmentation to automated reporting. A few studies also explored machine learning-based automation software and, more recently, large language models. Although most demonstrated gains in efficiency and accuracy, limited external validation and dataset heterogeneity could reduce broader adoption. AI applications in MRI offer potential to enhance radiologist productivity, mainly through accelerated scans, automated segmentation, and streamlined workflows. Further research, including prospective validation and standardized metrics, is needed to enable safe, efficient, and equitable deployment of AI tools in clinical MRI practice.

Super-Resolution Deep Learning Reconstruction for T2*-Weighted Images: Improvement in Microbleed Lesion Detection and Image Quality

Super-resolution deep learning reconstruction (SR-DLR) is a promising tool for improving image quality by enhancing spatial resolution compared to conventional deep learning reconstruction (DLR). This study aimed to evaluate whether SR-DLR improves microbleed detection and visualization in brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) compared to DLR. This retrospective study included 69 patients (66.2 ± 13.8 years; 44 females) who underwent 3 T brain MRI with T2*-weighted 2D gradient echo and 3D flow-sensitive black blood imaging (reference standard) between June and August 2024. T2*-weighted images were reconstructed using SR-DLR and DLR. Three blinded readers detected microbleeds and assessed image quality, including microbleed and normal structure visibility, sharpness, noise, artifacts, and overall quality. Quantitative analysis involved measuring signal intensity along the septum pellucidum. Microbleed detection performance was analyzed using jackknife alternative free-response receiver operating characteristic analysis, while image quality was analyzed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test and paired t-test. SR-DLR significantly outperformed DLR in microbleed detection (figure of merit: 0.690 vs. 0.645, p < 0.001). SR-DLR also demonstrated higher sensitivity for microbleed detection. Qualitative analysis showed better microbleed visualization for two readers (p < 0.001) and improved image sharpness for all readers (p ≤ 0.008). Quantitative analysis revealed enhanced sharpness, especially in full width at half maximum and edge rise slope (p < 0.001). SR-DLR improved image sharpness and quality, leading to better microbleed detection and visualization in brain MRI compared to DLR.

Deep learning-based reconstruction for three-dimensional volumetric brain MRI: a qualitative and quantitative assessment

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the performance of a deep learning reconstruction (DLR) based on Adaptive-Compressed sensing (CS)-Network for brain MRI and validate it in a clinical setting.

METHODS

Ten healthy volunteers and 22 consecutive patients were prospectively enrolled. Volunteers underwent 3D brain MRI including T1 without CS factor (9:16 min, reference standard); with CS factor of 2 without DLR (CS2, 4:6 min); with CS factor of 2 with DLR (DLR-CS2); with CS factor of 4 without DLR (CS4, 2:6 min); and with CS factor of 4 with DLR (DLR-CS4). The patients' MRI included the CS2 and DLR-CS4. The volumes of lateral ventricles, hippocampus, choroid plexus, and white matter hypointensity were calculated and compared among the sequences. Three radiologists independently assessed anatomical conspicuity, overall image quality, artifacts, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and sharpness using a 5-point scale for each sequence.

RESULTS

Applying acceleration factors of 2 and 4 reduced the scan time to 65.4% and 33.5%, respectively, of that of the reference standard. Volumes of all the measured subregions showed no significant differences among different sequences in all participants. In qualitative analysis, the interrater agreement was excellent (κ = 0.844-0.926). In volunteers, quality of DLR-CS4 were comparable to those of CS2 for all metrics except for the overall image quality and SNR despite a 51.2% scan time reduction. In patients, DLR-CS4 showed quality comparable to that of CS2 for all metrics.

CONCLUSIONS

DLR allowed the scan time reduction by at least half without sacrificing image quality and volumetric quantification accuracy, supporting its reliability and efficiency.

Advancing clinical MRI exams with artificial intelligence: Japan's contributions and future prospects

In this narrative review, we review the applications of artificial intelligence (AI) into clinical magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) exams, with a particular focus on Japan's contributions to this field. In the first part of the review, we introduce the various applications of AI in optimizing different aspects of the MRI process, including scan protocols, patient preparation, image acquisition, image reconstruction, and postprocessing techniques. Additionally, we examine AI's growing influence in clinical decision-making, particularly in areas such as segmentation, radiation therapy planning, and reporting assistance. By emphasizing studies conducted in Japan, we highlight the nation's contributions to the advancement of AI in MRI. In the latter part of the review, we highlight the characteristics that make Japan a unique environment for the development and implementation of AI in MRI examinations. Japan's healthcare landscape is distinguished by several key factors that collectively create a fertile ground for AI research and development. Notably, Japan boasts one of the highest densities of MRI scanners per capita globally, ensuring widespread access to the exam. Japan's national health insurance system plays a pivotal role by providing MRI scans to all citizens irrespective of socioeconomic status, which facilitates the collection of inclusive and unbiased imaging data across a diverse population. Japan's extensive health screening programs, coupled with collaborative research initiatives like the Japan Medical Imaging Database (J-MID), enable the aggregation and sharing of large, high-quality datasets. With its technological expertise and healthcare infrastructure, Japan is well-positioned to make meaningful contributions to the MRI-AI domain. The collaborative efforts of researchers, clinicians, and technology experts, including those in Japan, will continue to advance the future of AI in clinical MRI, potentially leading to improvements in patient care and healthcare efficiency.

Applications of artificial intelligence in interventional oncology: An up-to-date review of the literature

Interventional oncology provides image-guided therapies, including transarterial tumor embolization and percutaneous tumor ablation, for malignant tumors in a minimally invasive manner. As in other medical fields, the application of artificial intelligence (AI) in interventional oncology has garnered significant attention. This narrative review describes the current state of AI applications in interventional oncology based on recent literature. A literature search revealed a rapid increase in the number of studies relevant to this topic recently. Investigators have attempted to use AI for various tasks, including automatic segmentation of organs, tumors, and treatment areas; treatment simulation; improvement of intraprocedural image quality; prediction of treatment outcomes; and detection of post-treatment recurrence. Among these, the AI-based prediction of treatment outcomes has been the most studied. Various deep and conventional machine learning algorithms have been proposed for these tasks. Radiomics has often been incorporated into prediction and detection models. Current literature suggests that AI is potentially useful in various aspects of interventional oncology, from treatment planning to post-treatment follow-up. However, most AI-based methods discussed in this review are still at the research stage, and few have been implemented in clinical practice. To achieve widespread adoption of AI technologies in interventional oncology procedures, further research on their reliability and clinical utility is necessary. Nevertheless, considering the rapid research progress in this field, various AI technologies will be integrated into interventional oncology practices in the near future.

Super-resolution Deep Learning Reconstruction for 3D Brain MR Imaging: Improvement of Cranial Nerve Depiction and Interobserver Agreement in Evaluations of Neurovascular Conflict

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

To determine if super-resolution deep learning reconstruction (SR-DLR) improves the depiction of cranial nerves and interobserver agreement when assessing neurovascular conflict in 3D fast asymmetric spin echo (3D FASE) brain MR images, as compared to deep learning reconstruction (DLR).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study involved reconstructing 3D FASE MR images of the brain for 37 patients using SR-DLR and DLR. Three blinded readers conducted qualitative image analyses, evaluating the degree of neurovascular conflict, structure depiction, sharpness, noise, and diagnostic acceptability. Quantitative analyses included measuring edge rise distance (ERD), edge rise slope (ERS), and full width at half maximum (FWHM) using the signal intensity profile along a linear region of interest across the center of the basilar artery.

RESULTS

Interobserver agreement on the degree of neurovascular conflict of the facial nerve was generally higher with SR-DLR (0.429-0.923) compared to DLR (0.175-0.689). SR-DLR exhibited increased subjective image noise compared to DLR (p ≥ 0.008). However, all three readers found SR-DLR significantly superior in terms of sharpness (p < 0.001); cranial nerve depiction, particularly of facial and acoustic nerves, as well as the osseous spiral lamina (p < 0.001); and diagnostic acceptability (p ≤ 0.002). The FWHM (mm)/ERD (mm)/ERS (mm-1) for SR-DLR and DLR was 3.1-4.3/0.9-1.1/8795.5-10,703.5 and 3.3-4.8/1.4-2.1/5157.9-7705.8, respectively, with SR-DLR's image sharpness being significantly superior (p ≤ 0.001).

CONCLUSION

SR-DLR enhances image sharpness, leading to improved cranial nerve depiction and a tendency for greater interobserver agreement regarding facial nerve neurovascular conflict.

Iterative Motion Correction Technique with Deep Learning Reconstruction for Brain MRI: A Volunteer and Patient Study

The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of iterative motion correction (IMC) on reducing artifacts in brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with deep learning reconstruction (DLR). The study included 10 volunteers (between September 2023 and December 2023) and 30 patients (between June 2022 and July 2022) for quantitative and qualitative analyses, respectively. Volunteers were instructed to remain still during the first MRI with fluid-attenuated inversion recovery sequence (FLAIR) and to move during the second scan. IMCoff DLR images were reconstructed from the raw data of the former acquisition; IMCon and IMCoff DLR images were reconstructed from the latter acquisition. After registration of the motion images, the structural similarity index measure (SSIM) was calculated using motionless images as reference. For qualitative analyses, IMCon and IMCoff FLAIR DLR images of the patients were reconstructed and evaluated by three blinded readers in terms of motion artifacts, noise, and overall quality. SSIM for IMCon images was 0.952, higher than that for IMCoff images (0.949) (p < 0.001). In qualitative analyses, although noise in IMCon images was rated as increased by two of the three readers (both p < 0.001), all readers agreed that motion artifacts and overall quality were significantly better in IMCon images than in IMCoff images (all p < 0.001). In conclusion, IMC reduced motion artifacts in brain FLAIR DLR images while maintaining similarity to motionless images.

Super-resolution deep learning reconstruction approach for enhanced visualization in lumbar spine MR bone imaging

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to assess the effectiveness of super-resolution deep-learning-based reconstruction (SR-DLR), which leverages k-space data, on the image quality of lumbar spine magnetic resonance (MR) bone imaging using a 3D multi-echo in-phase sequence.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this retrospective study, 29 patients who underwent lumbar spine MRI, including an MR bone imaging sequence between January and April 2023, were analyzed. Images were reconstructed with and without SR-DLR (Matrix sizes: 960 × 960 and 320 × 320, respectively). The signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of the vertebral body and spinal canal and the contrast and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) between the vertebral body and spinal canal were quantitatively evaluated. Furthermore, the slope at half-peak points of the profile curve drawn across the posterior border of the vertebral body was calculated. Two radiologists independently assessed image noise, contrast, artifacts, sharpness, and overall image quality of both image types using a 4-point scale. Interobserver agreement was evaluated using weighted kappa coefficients, and quantitative and qualitative scores were compared via the Wilcoxon signed-rank test.

RESULTS

SNRs of the vertebral body and spinal canal were notably improved in images with SR-DLR (p < 0.001). Contrast and CNR were significantly enhanced with SR-DLR compared to those without SR-DLR (p = 0.023 and p = 0.022, respectively). The slope of the profile curve at half-peak points across the posterior border of the vertebral body and spinal canal was markedly higher with SR-DLR (p < 0.001). Qualitative scores (noise: p < 0.001, contrast: p < 0.001, artifact p = 0.042, sharpness: p < 0.001, overall image quality: p < 0.001) were superior in images with SR-DLR compared to those without. Kappa analysis indicated moderate to good agreement (noise: κ = 0.56, contrast: κ = 0.51, artifact: κ = 0.46, sharpness: κ = 0.76, overall image quality: κ = 0.44).

CONCLUSION

SR-DLR, which is based on k-space data, has the potential to enhance the image quality of lumbar spine MR bone imaging utilizing a 3D gradient echo in-phase sequence.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

The application of SR-DLR can lead to improvements in lumbar spine MR bone imaging quality.

Optimizing High-Resolution MR Angiography: The Synergistic Effects of 3D Wheel Sampling and Deep Learning-Based Reconstruction

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to assess the utility of the combined use of 3D wheel sampling and deep learning-based reconstruction (DLR) for intracranial high-resolution (HR)-time-of-flight (TOF)-magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) at 3 T.

METHODS

This prospective study enrolled 20 patients who underwent head MRI at 3 T, including TOF-MRA. We used 3D wheel sampling called "fast 3D" and DLR for HR-TOF-MRA (spatial resolution, 0.39 × 0.59 × 0.5 mm 3 ) in addition to conventional MRA (spatial resolution, 0.39 × 0.89 × 1 mm 3 ). We compared contrast and contrast-to-noise ratio between the blood vessels (basilar artery and anterior cerebral artery) and brain parenchyma, full width at half maximum in the P3 segment of the posterior cerebral artery among 3 protocols. Two board-certified radiologists evaluated noise, contrast, sharpness, artifact, and overall image quality of 3 protocols.

RESULTS

The contrast and contrast-to-noise ratio of fast 3D-HR-MRA with DLR are comparable or higher than those of conventional MRA and fast 3D-HR-MRA without DLR. The full width at half maximum was significantly lower in fast 3D-MRA with and without DLR than in conventional MRA ( P = 0.006, P < 0.001). In qualitative evaluation, fast 3D-MRA with DLR had significantly higher sharpness and overall image quality than conventional MRA and fast 3D-MRA without DLR (sharpness: P = 0.021, P = 0.001; overall image quality: P = 0.029, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of 3D wheel sampling and DLR can improve visualization of arteries in intracranial TOF-MRA.

Verification of image quality improvement by deep learning reconstruction to 1.5 T MRI in T2-weighted images of the prostate gland

This study aimed to evaluate whether the image quality of 1.5 T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the prostate is equal to or higher than that of 3 T MRI by applying deep learning reconstruction (DLR). To objectively analyze the images from the 13 healthy volunteers, we measured the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) of the images obtained by the 1.5 T scanner with and without DLR, as well as for images obtained by the 3 T scanner. In the subjective, T2W images of the prostate were visually evaluated by two board-certified radiologists. The SNRs and CNRs in 1.5 T images with DLR were higher than that in 3 T images. Subjective image scores were better for 1.5 T images with DLR than 3 T images. The use of the DLR technique in 1.5 T MRI substantially improved the SNR and image quality of T2W images of the prostate gland, as compared to 3 T MRI.

Recent trends in AI applications for pelvic MRI: a comprehensive review

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is an essential tool for evaluating pelvic disorders affecting the prostate, bladder, uterus, ovaries, and/or rectum. Since the diagnostic pathway of pelvic MRI can involve various complex procedures depending on the affected organ, the Reporting and Data System (RADS) is used to standardize image acquisition and interpretation. Artificial intelligence (AI), which encompasses machine learning and deep learning algorithms, has been integrated into both pelvic MRI and the RADS, particularly for prostate MRI. This review outlines recent developments in the use of AI in various stages of the pelvic MRI diagnostic pathway, including image acquisition, image reconstruction, organ and lesion segmentation, lesion detection and classification, and risk stratification, with special emphasis on recent trends in multi-center studies, which can help to improve the generalizability of AI.

High Resolution TOF-MRA Using Compressed Sensing-based Deep Learning Image Reconstruction for the Visualization of Lenticulostriate Arteries: A Preliminary Study

PURPOSE

To investigate the visibility of the lenticulostriate arteries (LSAs) in time-of-flight (TOF)-MR angiography (MRA) using compressed sensing (CS)-based deep learning (DL) image reconstruction by comparing its image quality with that obtained by the conventional CS algorithm.

METHODS

Five healthy volunteers were included. High-resolution TOF-MRA images with the reduction (R)-factor of 1 were acquired as full-sampling data. Images with R-factors of 2, 4, and 6 were then reconstructed using CS-DL and conventional CS (the combination of CS and sensitivity conceding; CS-SENSE) reconstruction, respectively. In the quantitative assessment, the number of visible LSAs (identified by two radiologists), length of each depicted LSA (evaluated by one radiological technologist), and normalized mean squared error (NMSE) value were assessed. In the qualitative assessment, the overall image quality and the visibility of the peripheral LSA were visually evaluated by two radiologists.

RESULTS

In the quantitative assessment of the DL-CS images, the number of visible LSAs was significantly higher than those obtained with CS-SENSE in the R-factors of 4 and 6 (Reader 1) and in the R-factor of 6 (Reader 2). The length of the depicted LSAs in the DL-CS images was significantly longer in the R-factor 6 compared to the CS-SENSE result. The NMSE value in CS-DL was significantly lower than in CS-SENSE for R-factors of 4 and 6. In the qualitative assessment of DL-CS images, the overall image quality was significantly higher than that obtained with CS-SENSE in the R-factors 4 and 6 (Reader 1) and in the R-factor 4 (Reader 2). The visibility of the peripheral LSA was significantly higher than that shown by CS-SENSE in all R-factors (Reader 1) and in the R-factors 2 and 4 (Reader 2).

CONCLUSION

CS-DL reconstruction demonstrated preserved image quality for the depiction of LSAs compared to the conventional CS-SENSE when the R-factor is elevated.

The impact of large language models on radiology: a guide for radiologists on the latest innovations in AI

The advent of Deep Learning (DL) has significantly propelled the field of diagnostic radiology forward by enhancing image analysis and interpretation. The introduction of the Transformer architecture, followed by the development of Large Language Models (LLMs), has further revolutionized this domain. LLMs now possess the potential to automate and refine the radiology workflow, extending from report generation to assistance in diagnostics and patient care. The integration of multimodal technology with LLMs could potentially leapfrog these applications to unprecedented levels.However, LLMs come with unresolved challenges such as information hallucinations and biases, which can affect clinical reliability. Despite these issues, the legislative and guideline frameworks have yet to catch up with technological advancements. Radiologists must acquire a thorough understanding of these technologies to leverage LLMs' potential to the fullest while maintaining medical safety and ethics. This review aims to aid in that endeavor.

Deep Learning-Based High-Resolution Magnetic Resonance Angiography (MRA) Generation Model for 4D Time-Resolved Angiography with Interleaved Stochastic Trajectories (TWIST) MRA in Fast Stroke Imaging

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study is to improve the qualitative and quantitative image quality of the time-resolved angiography with interleaved stochastic trajectories technique (4D-TWIST-MRA) using deep neural network (DNN)-based MR image reconstruction software.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 520 consecutive patients underwent 4D-TWIST-MRA for ischemic stroke or intracranial vessel stenosis evaluation. Four-dimensional DNN-reconstructed MRA (4D-DNR) was generated using commercially available software (SwiftMR v.3.0.0.0, AIRS Medical, Seoul, Republic of Korea). Among those evaluated, 397 (76.3%) patients received concurrent time-of-flight MRA (TOF-MRA) to compare the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), image quality, noise, sharpness, vascular conspicuity, and degree of venous contamination with a 5-point Likert scale. Two radiologists independently evaluated the detection rate of intracranial aneurysm in TOF-MRA, 4D-TWIST-MRA, and 4D-DNR in separate sessions. The other 123 (23.7%) patients received 4D-TWIST-MRA due to a suspicion of acute ischemic stroke. The confidence level and decision time for large vessel occlusion were evaluated in these patients.

RESULTS

In qualitative analysis, 4D-DNR demonstrated better overall image quality, sharpness, vascular conspicuity, and noise reduction compared to 4D-TWIST-MRA. Moreover, 4D-DNR exhibited a higher SNR than 4D-TWIST-MRA. The venous contamination and aneurysm detection rates were not significantly different between the two MRA images. When compared to TOF-MRA, 4D-CE-MRA underestimated the aneurysm size (2.66 ± 0.51 vs. 1.75 ± 0.62, p = 0.029); however, 4D-DNR showed no significant difference in size compared to TOF-MRA (2.66 ± 0.51 vs. 2.10 ± 0.41, p = 0.327). In the diagnosis of large vessel occlusion, 4D-DNR showed a better confidence level and shorter decision time than 4D-TWIST-MRA.

CONCLUSION

DNN reconstruction may improve the qualitative and quantitative image quality of 4D-TWIST-MRA, and also enhance diagnostic performance for intracranial aneurysm and large vessel occlusion.

Deep learning denoising reconstruction enables faster T2-weighted FLAIR sequence acquisition with satisfactory image quality

INTRODUCTION

Deep learning reconstruction (DLR) technologies are the latest methods attempting to solve the enduring problem of reducing MRI acquisition times without compromising image quality. The clinical utility of this reconstruction technique is yet to be fully established. This study aims to assess whether a commercially available DLR technique applied to 2D T2-weighted FLAIR brain images allows a reduction in scan time, without compromising image quality and thus diagnostic accuracy.

METHODS

47 participants (24 male, mean age 55.9 ± 18.7 SD years, range 20-89 years) underwent routine, clinically indicated brain MRI studies in March 2022, that included a standard-of-care (SOC) T2-weighted FLAIR sequence, and an accelerated acquisition that was reconstructed using the DLR denoising product. Overall image quality, lesion conspicuity, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), and artefacts for each sequence, and preferred sequence on direct comparison, were subjectively assessed by two readers.

RESULTS

There was a strong preference for SOC FLAIR sequence for overall image quality (P = 0.01) and head-to-head comparison (P < 0.001). No difference was observed for lesion conspicuity (P = 0.49), perceived SNR (P = 1.0), and perceived CNR (P = 0.84). There was no difference in motion (P = 0.57) nor Gibbs ringing (P = 0.86) artefacts. Phase ghosting (P = 0.038) and pseudolesions were significantly more frequent (P < 0.001) on DLR images.

CONCLUSION

DLR algorithm allowed faster FLAIR acquisition times with comparable image quality and lesion conspicuity. However, an increased incidence and severity of phase ghosting artefact and presence of pseudolesions using this technique may result in a reduction in reading speed, efficiency, and diagnostic confidence.

Improving Diagnostic Performance of MRI for Temporal Lobe Epilepsy With Deep Learning-Based Image Reconstruction in Patients With Suspected Focal Epilepsy

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the diagnostic performance and image quality of 1.5-mm slice thickness MRI with deep learning-based image reconstruction (1.5-mm MRI + DLR) compared to routine 3-mm slice thickness MRI (routine MRI) and 1.5-mm slice thickness MRI without DLR (1.5-mm MRI without DLR) for evaluating temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study included 117 MR image sets comprising 1.5-mm MRI + DLR, 1.5-mm MRI without DLR, and routine MRI from 117 consecutive patients (mean age, 41 years; 61 female; 34 patients with TLE and 83 without TLE). Two neuroradiologists evaluated the presence of hippocampal or temporal lobe lesions, volume loss, signal abnormalities, loss of internal structure of the hippocampus, and lesion conspicuity in the temporal lobe. Reference standards for TLE were independently constructed by neurologists using clinical and radiological findings. Subjective image quality, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were analyzed. Performance in diagnosing TLE, lesion findings, and image quality were compared among the three protocols.

RESULTS

The pooled sensitivity of 1.5-mm MRI + DLR (91.2%) for diagnosing TLE was higher than that of routine MRI (72.1%, P < 0.001). In the subgroup analysis, 1.5-mm MRI + DLR showed higher sensitivity for hippocampal lesions than routine MRI (92.7% vs. 75.0%, P = 0.001), with improved depiction of hippocampal T2 high signal intensity change (P = 0.016) and loss of internal structure (P < 0.001). However, the pooled specificity of 1.5-mm MRI + DLR (76.5%) was lower than that of routine MRI (89.2%, P = 0.004). Compared with 1.5-mm MRI without DLR, 1.5-mm MRI + DLR resulted in significantly improved pooled accuracy (91.2% vs. 73.1%, P = 0.010), image quality, SNR, and CNR (all, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The use of 1.5-mm MRI + DLR enhanced the performance of MRI in diagnosing TLE, particularly in hippocampal evaluation, because of improved depiction of hippocampal abnormalities and enhanced image quality.

Exploring the impact of super-resolution deep learning on MR angiography image quality

PURPOSE

The aim of this study is to assess the effect of super-resolution deep learning-based reconstruction (SR-DLR), which uses k-space properties, on image quality of intracranial time-of-flight (TOF) magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) at 3 T.

METHODS

This retrospective study involved 35 patients who underwent intracranial TOF-MRA using a 3-T MRI system with SR-DLR based on k-space properties in October and November 2022. We reconstructed MRA with SR-DLR (matrix = 1008 × 1008) and MRA without SR-DLR (matrix = 336 × 336). We measured the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast, and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) in the basilar artery (BA) and the anterior cerebral artery (ACA) and the sharpness of the posterior cerebral artery (PCA) using the slope of the signal intensity profile curve at the half-peak points. Two radiologists evaluated image noise, artifacts, contrast, sharpness, and overall image quality of the two image types using a 4-point scale. We compared quantitative and qualitative scores between images with and without SR-DLR using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test.

RESULTS

The SNRs, contrasts, and CNRs were all significantly higher in images with SR-DLR than those without SR-DLR (p < 0.001). The slope was significantly greater in images with SR-DLR than those without SR-DLR (p < 0.001). The qualitative scores in MRAs with SR-DLR were all significantly higher than MRAs without SR-DLR (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

SR-DLR with k-space properties can offer the benefits of increased spatial resolution without the associated drawbacks of longer scan times and reduced SNR and CNR in intracranial MRA.

Preliminary assessment of automated radiology report generation with generative pre-trained transformers: comparing results to radiologist-generated reports

PURPOSE

In this preliminary study, we aimed to evaluate the potential of the generative pre-trained transformer (GPT) series for generating radiology reports from concise imaging findings and compare its performance with radiologist-generated reports.

METHODS

This retrospective study involved 28 patients who underwent computed tomography (CT) scans and had a diagnosed disease with typical imaging findings. Radiology reports were generated using GPT-2, GPT-3.5, and GPT-4 based on the patient's age, gender, disease site, and imaging findings. We calculated the top-1, top-5 accuracy, and mean average precision (MAP) of differential diagnoses for GPT-2, GPT-3.5, GPT-4, and radiologists. Two board-certified radiologists evaluated the grammar and readability, image findings, impression, differential diagnosis, and overall quality of all reports using a 4-point scale.

RESULTS

Top-1 and Top-5 accuracies for the different diagnoses were highest for radiologists, followed by GPT-4, GPT-3.5, and GPT-2, in that order (Top-1: 1.00, 0.54, 0.54, and 0.21, respectively; Top-5: 1.00, 0.96, 0.89, and 0.54, respectively). There were no significant differences in qualitative scores about grammar and readability, image findings, and overall quality between radiologists and GPT-3.5 or GPT-4 (p > 0.05). However, qualitative scores of the GPT series in impression and differential diagnosis scores were significantly lower than those of radiologists (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Our preliminary study suggests that GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 have the possibility to generate radiology reports with high readability and reasonable image findings from very short keywords; however, concerns persist regarding the accuracy of impressions and differential diagnoses, thereby requiring verification by radiologists.

Fairness of artificial intelligence in healthcare: review and recommendations

In this review, we address the issue of fairness in the clinical integration of artificial intelligence (AI) in the medical field. As the clinical adoption of deep learning algorithms, a subfield of AI, progresses, concerns have arisen regarding the impact of AI biases and discrimination on patient health. This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of concerns associated with AI fairness; discuss strategies to mitigate AI biases; and emphasize the need for cooperation among physicians, AI researchers, AI developers, policymakers, and patients to ensure equitable AI integration. First, we define and introduce the concept of fairness in AI applications in healthcare and radiology, emphasizing the benefits and challenges of incorporating AI into clinical practice. Next, we delve into concerns regarding fairness in healthcare, addressing the various causes of biases in AI and potential concerns such as misdiagnosis, unequal access to treatment, and ethical considerations. We then outline strategies for addressing fairness, such as the importance of diverse and representative data and algorithm audits. Additionally, we discuss ethical and legal considerations such as data privacy, responsibility, accountability, transparency, and explainability in AI. Finally, we present the Fairness of Artificial Intelligence Recommendations in healthcare (FAIR) statement to offer best practices. Through these efforts, we aim to provide a foundation for discussing the responsible and equitable implementation and deployment of AI in healthcare.

Feasibility study of super-resolution deep learning-based reconstruction using k-space data in brain diffusion-weighted images

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the influence of super-resolution deep learning-based reconstruction (SR-DLR), which utilizes k-space data, on the quality of images and the quantitation of the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) for diffusion-weighted images (DWI) in brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed on 34 patients who had undergone DWI using a 3 T MRI system with SR-DLR reconstruction based on k-space data in August 2022. DWI was reconstructed with SR-DLR (Matrix = 684 × 684) and without SR-DLR (Matrix = 228 × 228). Measurements were made of the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) in white matter (WM) and grey matter (GM), and the full width at half maximum (FWHM) of the septum pellucidum. Two radiologists assessed image noise, contrast, artifacts, blur, and the overall quality of three image types using a four-point scale. Quantitative and qualitative scores between images with and without SR-DLR were compared using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test.

RESULTS

Images with SR-DLR showed significantly higher SNRs and CNRs than those without SR-DLR (p < 0.001). No statistically significant variances were found in the apparent diffusion coefficients (ADCs) in WM and GM between images with and without SR-DLR (ADC in WM, p = 0.945; ADC in GM, p = 0.235). Moreover, the FWHM without SR-DLR was notably lower compared to that with SR-DLR (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

SR-DLR has the potential to augment the quality of DWI in DL MRI scans without significantly impacting ADC quantitation.

Recent advances in artificial intelligence for cardiac CT: Enhancing diagnosis and prognosis prediction

Recent advances in artificial intelligence (AI) for cardiac computed tomography (CT) have shown great potential in enhancing diagnosis and prognosis prediction in patients with cardiovascular disease. Deep learning, a type of machine learning, has revolutionized radiology by enabling automatic feature extraction and learning from large datasets, particularly in image-based applications. Thus, AI-driven techniques have enabled a faster analysis of cardiac CT examinations than when they are analyzed by humans, while maintaining reproducibility. However, further research and validation are required to fully assess the diagnostic performance, radiation dose-reduction capabilities, and clinical correctness of these AI-driven techniques in cardiac CT. This review article presents recent advances of AI in the field of cardiac CT, including deep-learning-based image reconstruction, coronary artery motion correction, automatic calcium scoring, automatic epicardial fat measurement, coronary artery stenosis diagnosis, fractional flow reserve prediction, and prognosis prediction, analyzes current limitations of these techniques and discusses future challenges.

Current State of Artificial Intelligence in Clinical Applications for Head and Neck MR Imaging

Due primarily to the excellent soft tissue contrast depictions provided by MRI, the widespread application of head and neck MRI in clinical practice serves to assess various diseases. Artificial intelligence (AI)-based methodologies, particularly deep learning analyses using convolutional neural networks, have recently gained global recognition and have been extensively investigated in clinical research for their applicability across a range of categories within medical imaging, including head and neck MRI. Analytical approaches using AI have shown potential for addressing the clinical limitations associated with head and neck MRI. In this review, we focus primarily on the technical advancements in deep-learning-based methodologies and their clinical utility within the field of head and neck MRI, encompassing aspects such as image acquisition and reconstruction, lesion segmentation, disease classification and diagnosis, and prognostic prediction for patients presenting with head and neck diseases. We then discuss the limitations of current deep-learning-based approaches and offer insights regarding future challenges in this field.

New trend in artificial intelligence-based assistive technology for thoracic imaging

Although there is no solid agreement for artificial intelligence (AI), it refers to a computer system with intelligence similar to that of humans. Deep learning appeared in 2006, and more than 10 years have passed since the third AI boom was triggered by improvements in computing power, algorithm development, and the use of big data. In recent years, the application and development of AI technology in the medical field have intensified internationally. There is no doubt that AI will be used in clinical practice to assist in diagnostic imaging in the future. In qualitative diagnosis, it is desirable to develop an explainable AI that at least represents the basis of the diagnostic process. However, it must be kept in mind that AI is a physician-assistant system, and the final decision should be made by the physician while understanding the limitations of AI. The aim of this article is to review the application of AI technology in diagnostic imaging from PubMed database while particularly focusing on diagnostic imaging in thorax such as lesion detection and qualitative diagnosis in order to help radiologists and clinicians to become more familiar with AI in thorax.

Multiparametric MRI: From Simultaneous Rapid Acquisition Methods and Analysis Techniques Using Scoring, Machine Learning, Radiomics, and Deep Learning to the Generation of Novel Metrics

ABSTRACT

With the recent advancements in rapid imaging methods, higher numbers of contrasts and quantitative parameters can be acquired in less and less time. Some acquisition models simultaneously obtain multiparametric images and quantitative maps to reduce scan times and avoid potential issues associated with the registration of different images. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has the potential to provide complementary information on a target lesion and thus overcome the limitations of individual techniques. In this review, we introduce methods to acquire multiparametric MRI data in a clinically feasible scan time with a particular focus on simultaneous acquisition techniques, and we discuss how multiparametric MRI data can be analyzed as a whole rather than each parameter separately. Such data analysis approaches include clinical scoring systems, machine learning, radiomics, and deep learning. Other techniques combine multiple images to create new quantitative maps associated with meaningful aspects of human biology. They include the magnetic resonance g-ratio, the inner to the outer diameter of a nerve fiber, and the aerobic glycolytic index, which captures the metabolic status of tumor tissues.

Clinical Impact of Deep Learning Reconstruction in MRI

Deep learning has been recognized as a paradigm-shifting tool in radiology. Deep learning reconstruction (DLR) has recently emerged as a technology used in the image reconstruction process of MRI, which is an essential procedure in generating MR images. Denoising, which is the first DLR application to be realized in commercial MRI scanners, improves signal-to-noise ratio. When applied to lower magnetic field-strength scanners, the signal-to-noise ratio can be increased without extending the imaging time, and image quality is comparable to that of higher-field-strength scanners. Shorter imaging times decrease patient discomfort and reduce MRI scanner running costs. The incorporation of DLR into accelerated acquisition imaging techniques, such as parallel imaging or compressed sensing, shortens the reconstruction time. DLR is based on supervised learning using convolutional layers and is divided into the following three categories: image domain, k-space learning, and direct mapping types. Various studies have reported other derivatives of DLR, and several have shown the feasibility of DLR in clinical practice. Although DLR efficiently reduces Gaussian noise from MR images, denoising makes image artifacts more prominent, and a solution to this problem is desired. Depending on the training of the convolutional neural network, DLR may change the imaging features of lesions and obscure small lesions. Therefore, radiologists may need to adopt the habit of questioning whether any information has been lost on images that appear clean. ^©RSNA, 2023 Quiz questions for this article are available in the supplemental material.

Clinical applications of artificial intelligence in liver imaging

This review outlines the current status and challenges of the clinical applications of artificial intelligence in liver imaging using computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging based on a topic analysis of PubMed search results using latent Dirichlet allocation. LDA revealed that "segmentation," "hepatocellular carcinoma and radiomics," "metastasis," "fibrosis," and "reconstruction" were current main topic keywords. Automatic liver segmentation technology using deep learning is beginning to assume new clinical significance as part of whole-body composition analysis. It has also been applied to the screening of large populations and the acquisition of training data for machine learning models and has resulted in the development of imaging biomarkers that have a significant impact on important clinical issues, such as the estimation of liver fibrosis, recurrence, and prognosis of malignant tumors. Deep learning reconstruction is expanding as a new technological clinical application of artificial intelligence and has shown results in reducing contrast and radiation doses. However, there is much missing evidence, such as external validation of machine learning models and the evaluation of the diagnostic performance of specific diseases using deep learning reconstruction, suggesting that the clinical application of these technologies is still in development.

Detection of intracranial aneurysms using deep learning-based CAD system: usefulness of the scores of CNN's final layer for distinguishing between aneurysm and infundibular dilatation

PURPOSE

We evaluated the diagnostic performance of a clinically available deep learning-based computer-assisted diagnosis software for detecting unruptured aneurysms (UANs) using magnetic resonance angiography and assessed the functionality of the convolutional neural network (CNN) final layer score for distinguishing between UAN and infundibular dilatation (ID).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

EIRL brain aneurysm (EIRL_BA) was used in this study. The subjects were 117 UAN and/or ID cases including 100 UAN lesions (average sizes of 2.56 ± 1.45 mm) and 40 ID lesions (average sizes of 1.75 ± 0.41 mm) in any of internal carotid artery, middle cerebral artery, and anterior communicating artery, and 123 normal controls. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of EIRL_BA were determined for UAN and ID or UAN only. Furthermore, the relationship between the lesion category and score was examined using a linear regression analysis model, and the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to assess whether the scores represent UAN-like characteristics.

RESULTS

EIRL_BA showed a total of 203 candidates (an average of 1.73/case) in UAN and/or ID cases and 98 candidates (an average of 0.80/case) in normal controls. For diagnosing either UAN/ID, EIRL_BA showed an overall sensitivity of 80%, specificity of 84.2%, and accuracy of 83.7%, resulting in the positive likelihood ratio of 5.0. For diagnosing UAN only, the overall sensitivity of 89.0, specificity of 82.6%, and accuracy of 83.2% resulting in the positive likelihood ratio of 5.1. In a linear regression analysis, the scores significantly increased in the candidates' first and second ranks in UAN (p < 0.05) but not in ID. An ROC analysis using the score for diagnosing UAN showed an area under the curve of 0.836.

CONCLUSION

EIRL_BA is applicable for detecting small UAN, and the CNN's final layer scores may be an effective index for discriminating UAN and ID and representing the likelihood of UAN.

Proposal to Improve the Image Quality of Short-Acquisition Time-Dedicated Breast Positron Emission Tomography Using the Pix2pix Generative Adversarial Network

This study aimed to evaluate the ability of the pix2pix generative adversarial network (GAN) to improve the image quality of low-count dedicated breast positron emission tomography (dbPET). Pairs of full- and low-count dbPET images were collected from 49 breasts. An image synthesis model was constructed using pix2pix GAN for each acquisition time with training (3776 pairs from 16 breasts) and validation data (1652 pairs from 7 breasts). Test data included dbPET images synthesized by our model from 26 breasts with short acquisition times. Two breast radiologists visually compared the overall image quality of the original and synthesized images derived from the short-acquisition time data (scores of 1−5). Further quantitative evaluation was performed using a peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR) and structural similarity (SSIM). In the visual evaluation, both readers revealed an average score of >3 for all images. The quantitative evaluation revealed significantly higher SSIM (p < 0.01) and PSNR (p < 0.01) for 26 s synthetic images and higher PSNR for 52 s images (p < 0.01) than for the original images. Our model improved the quality of low-count time dbPET synthetic images, with a more significant effect on images with lower counts.

Deep learning reconstruction for the evaluation of neuroforaminal stenosis using 1.5T cervical spine MRI: comparison with 3T MRI without deep learning reconstruction

PURPOSE

To compare image quality and interobserver agreement in evaluations of neuroforaminal stenosis between 1.5T cervical spine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with deep learning reconstruction (DLR) and 3T MRI without DLR.

METHODS

In this prospective study, 21 volunteers (mean age: 42.4 ± 11.9 years; 17 males) underwent cervical spine T2-weighted sagittal 1.5T and 3T MRI on the same day. The 1.5T and 3T MRI data were used to reconstruct images with (1.5T-DLR) and without (3T-nonDLR) DLR, respectively. Regions of interest were marked on the spinal cord to calculate non-uniformity (NU; standard deviation/signal intensity × 100), as an indicator of image noise. Two blinded radiologists evaluated the images in terms of the depiction of structures, artifacts, noise, overall image quality, and neuroforaminal stenosis. The NU value and the subjective image quality scores were compared between 1.5T-DLR and 3T-nonDLR using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Interobserver agreement in evaluations of neuroforaminal stenosis for 1.5T-DLR and 3T-nonDLR was evaluated using Cohen's weighted kappa analysis.

RESULTS

The NU value for 1.5T-DLR was 8.4, which was significantly better than that for 3T-nonDLR (10.3; p < 0.001). Subjective image scores were significantly better for 1.5T-DLR than 3T-nonDLR images (p < 0.037). Interobserver agreement (95% confidence intervals) in the evaluations of neuroforaminal stenosis was significantly superior for 1.5T-DLR (0.920 [0.916-0.924]) than 3T-nonDLR (0.894 [0.889-0.898]).

CONCLUSION

By using DLR, image quality and interobserver agreement in evaluations of neuroforaminal stenosis on 1.5T cervical spine MRI could be improved compared to 3T MRI without DLR.