The role of extended lymphadenectomy for adenocarcinoma of the head of the pancreas: strength of the evidence

TRIANGLE operation, combined with adequate adjuvant chemotherapy, can improve the prognosis of pancreatic head cancer: A retrospective study

BACKGROUND

The TRIANGLE operation involves the removal of all tissues within the triangle bounded by the portal vein-superior mesenteric vein, celiac axis-common hepatic artery, and superior mesenteric artery to improve patient prognosis. Although previously promising in patients with locally advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), data are limited regarding the long-term oncological outcomes of the TRIANGLE operation among resectable PDAC patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD).

AIM

To evaluate the safety of the TRIANGLE operation during PD and the prognosis in patients with resectable PDAC.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included patients who underwent PD for pancreatic head cancer between January 2017 and April 2023, with or without the TRIANGLE operation. Patients were divided into the PDTRIANGLE and PDnon-TRIANGLE groups. Surgical and survival outcomes were compared between the two groups. Adequate adjuvant chemotherapy was defined as adjuvant chemotherapy ≥ 6 months.

RESULTS

The PDTRIANGLE and PDnon-TRIANGLE groups included 52 and 55 patients, respectively. There were no significant differences in the baseline characteristics or perioperative indexes between the two groups. Furthermore, the recurrence rate was lower in the PDTRIANGLE group than in the PDnon-TRIANGLE group (48.1% vs 81.8%, P < 0.001), and the local recurrence rate of PDAC decreased from 37.8% to 16.0%. Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that PDTRIANGLE (HR = 0.424; 95%CI: 0.256-0.702; P = 0.001), adequate adjuvant chemotherapy ≥ 6 months (HR = 0.370; 95%CI: 0.222-0.618; P < 0.001) and margin status (HR = 2.255; 95%CI: 1.252-4.064; P = 0.007) were found to be independent factors for the recurrence rate.

CONCLUSION

The TRIANGLE operation is safe for PDAC patients undergoing PD. Moreover, it reduces the local recurrence rate of PDAC and may improve survival in patients who receive adequate adjuvant chemotherapy.

Complete resection and arterial reconstruction for primary sarcoma arising from superior mesenteric artery

In the treatment of retroperitoneal sarcoma involving major vessels, complete resection with vascular reconstruction is challenging. We describe the case of a 72-year-old man who presented with 8 months of abdominal pain. Diagnostic workup revealed occlusion of the celiac trunk and the origin of the superior mesenteric artery due to a soft tissue sarcoma. Radical resection of the tumor and vessels was performed. Guided by intraoperative angiography, arterial reconstruction was performed without mesenteric ischemia. All arterial margins were negative. At the 6-year follow-up, the patient was alive with no evidence of recurrence.

The Landmark Series: Management of Small Bowel Neuroendocrine Tumors

Surgical resection is the foundation for treatment of small bowel neuroendocrine tumors (SBNETs). Guidelines for surgical management of SBNETs rely on retrospective data, which suggest that primary tumor resection and cytoreduction improve symptoms, prevent future complications, and lengthen survival. In advanced NETs, improvement in progression-free survival has been reported in large, randomized, controlled trials of various medical treatments, including somatostatin analogues, targeted therapy, and peptide receptor radionuclide therapy. This review discusses important studies influencing the management of SBNETs and the limitations of current evidence regarding surgical interventions for SBNETs.

Risk Stratification for the Intensive Care Unit Following Pancreaticoduodenectomy

INTRODUCTION

In view of the limited capacities in intensive care units and the increasing economic burden, identification of risk factors could allow better and more efficient planning. Therefore, the aim of this study was to assess independent risk factors for the duration of intensive care unit stay after pancreatoduodenectomy (PD).

METHODS

147 patients who underwent pancreatoduodenectomy in the time period from 2013 to 2015 were identified from a prospective database and a retrospective analysis was performed. The primary endpoint was length of time spent in the ICU. A retrograde analysis was performed using univariate and multivariate regression analysis. All pre-, intra- and postoperative parameters were considered in the analysis.

RESULTS

The median time spent in the intensive care unit (ICU) is one day. The univariate analysis demonstrated increased pack years, cerebrovascular events, anticoagulation, elevated creatinine and CA 19-9 as preoperative risk factors. In multivariate analysis, antihypertensive medication (AHT; OR 2.46; 95% CI 1.57 - 3.87; p = 0.05), operation time (OR 1.01; 95% CI 1.00 - 1.01; p = 0.03), extended LAD (OR 5.46; 95% CI 2.77 - 10.75; p = 0.01) and severe PPH (OR 4.01; 95% CI 2.07 - 7.76; p = 0.04) are significant risk factors for longer ICU stay.

DISCUSSION

Patients with cardiovascular risk factors and elevated preoperative creatinine level are at greater risk for a prolonged ICU stay. Risk and benefit of an extended LAD should be weighed during the operation. Median duration on ICU/IMC after PD is one day or less for patients without risk factors. Whether routine monitoring in the ICU/IMC after PD is necessary must be clarified in further studies.

Open and Minimal Approaches to Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma

Surgical options and approaches to pancreatic cancer are changing in the current era. Neoadjuvant treatment strategies for pancreatic cancer combined with the increased use of minimal access surgical techniques mean that the modern pancreatic surgeon requires mastering a number of surgical approaches with to optimally manage patients. Whilst traditional open surgery remains the most frequent approach for surgery, the specific steps during surgery may need to be modified in light of the aforementioned neoadjuvant treatments. Robotic and laparoscopic approaches to pancreatic resection are feasible, but these surgical methods remain in their infancy. In this review article, we summarise the current surgical approaches to pancreatic cancer and how these are adapted to the minimal access setting with discussion of the patient outcome data.

En bloc resection of visceral aorta and right kidney due to aortic sarcoma using temporary extracorporeal bypass grafting

Aortic sarcomas have not been linked to Lynch syndrome in humans, although other soft tissue malignancies have been. We report the case of a 31-year-old man with Lynch syndrome, who presented with abdominal pain and severe claudication. The clinical and diagnostic workup revealed near occlusion of the infrarenal aorta due to aortic angiosarcoma. En bloc resection of the visceral and infrarenal aorta with right nephrectomy was performed, facilitated by temporary extracorporeal bypass to the visceral arteries. The aorta was reconstructed with a bifurcated Dacron graft. At the 24-month follow-up examination, the patient was free of disease but was experiencing chronic diarrhea.

Management of pancreatic head adenocarcinoma: From where to where?

Pancreatic head adenocarcinoma (PHAC) is one of the most aggressive malignancies, and it has low long-term survival rates. Surgery is the only option for long-term survival. The difficulties associated with PHAC include higher frequencies of regional or distant lymph node metastases and vascular involvement, and positive resection margins in pancreatic and retroperitoneal tissues. Radical resections increase margin negativity and life expectancy; however, the extend of the surgery applied is controversial. Thus, western and eastern centers may use different approaches. Multiorgan, peripancreatic nerve plexus, and vascular resections have been discussed in relation to radical surgery for pancreatic cancer as have the roles of neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapy regimens. Determining the appropriate limits for surgery, standardizing definitions and surgical techniques according to guidelines, and centralizing pancreatic surgery within high-volume institutions to reduce mortality and morbidity rates are among the most important issues to consider. In this review, we evaluate the basic concepts underlying and the roles of radical surgery for PHAC, and lymphadenectomy, nerve plexus, retroperitoneal tissue, vascular, and multivisceral resections, total pancreatectomy, and liver metastases are discussed.

Clinical Management: Resectable Disease

Despite the identification of more active systemic therapy combinations for pancreatic cancer, cures remain elusive and feasible only in patients with localized, operable disease. When examining outcome data from phase III adjuvant trials conducted during the past decade, the survival for patients with localized disease has improved, likely owing to a combination of factors including more active adjuvant therapy and improved surgical and perioperative care. Perhaps the greatest recent change in the care of patients with localized pancreatic cancer has been the extension of surgery to tumors previously thought to be inoperable because of involvement of major blood vessels. These so-called "borderline resectable pancreatic cancers" have now been objectively defined, and their management is being studied in randomized trials. This has been made feasible by the availability of more active systemic therapy combinations that are increasingly being used in the neoadjuvant setting. Given the increasing activity of systemic regimens, the challenges in delivering such therapy in the postoperative setting, and the numerous novel agents in late stages of clinical development, it is reasonable to hypothesize that the neoadjuvant setting may eventually become the standard of care for patients with resectable disease.

The Surgical Management of Small Bowel Neuroendocrine Tumors: Consensus Guidelines of the North American Neuroendocrine Tumor Society

Small bowel neuroendocrine tumors (SBNETs) have been increasing in frequency over the past decades, and are now the most common type of small bowel tumor. Consequently, general surgeons and surgical oncologists are seeing more patients with SBNETs in their practices than ever before. The management of these patients is often complex, owing to their secretion of hormones, frequent presentation with advanced disease, and difficulties with making the diagnosis of SBNETs. Despite these issues, even patients with advanced disease can have long-term survival. There are a number of scenarios which commonly arise in SBNET patients where it is difficult to determine the optimal management from the published data. To address these challenges for clinicians, a consensus conference was held assembling experts in the field to review and discuss the available literature and patterns of practice pertaining to specific management issues. This paper summarizes the important elements from these studies and the recommendations of the group for these questions regarding the management of SBNET patients.

Progress in treatment of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a malignant tumor of the digestive system with a high degree of malignancy, accounting for about 90% of cases of pancreatic cancer. It has an occult onset and progresses rapidly, with a poor treatment effect and prognosis. It is one of malignant tumors with the worst prognosis. Surgical resection, as the only effective treatment, can be performed in only 20%-30% of patients, and the average period of survival after surgery is still less than 2 years. The main treatment strategy for PDAC are surgery-based individualized treatment modalities under comprehensive multidisciplinary collaboration. Currently, the therapeutic effect on pancreatic cancer is still not satisfactory. In recent years, various treatments for PDAC is becoming a hot spot of research. This article reviews the progress in the treatment of PDAC in terms of radical surgery, palliative surgery, adjuvant therapy, and other treatment opinions.

Perioperative Computed Tomography Assessments of the Pancreas Predict Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease After Pancreaticoduodenectomy

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) has become a clinically important issue. Although pancreatic exocrine insufficiency has been reported to be a main cause of NAFLD after PD, a clinically practical examination to assess the pancreatic exocrine function has not been established. The aim of this study was to evaluate risk factors for NAFLD after PD with a focus on perioperative computed tomography (CT) assessments of the pancreas.A retrospective review of 245 patients followed for more than 6 months after PD was conducted. We evaluated several pancreatic CT parameters, including the pancreatic parenchymal thickness, pancreatic duct-to-parenchymal ratio, pancreatic attenuation, and remnant pancreatic volume (RPV) on pre- and/or postoperative CT around 6 months after surgery. The variables, including the pancreatic CT parameters, were compared between the groups with and without NAFLD after PD.The incidence of NAFLD after PD was 19.2%. A multivariate analysis identified 5 independent risk factors for NAFLD after PD: a female gender (odds ratio [OR] 5.66, P < 0.001), RPV < 12 mL (OR 4.73, P = 0.001), preoperative pancreatic attenuation of <30 Hounsfield units (OR 4.50, P = 0.002), dissection of the right-sided nerve plexus around the superior mesenteric artery (OR 3.02, P = 0.017) and a preoperative serum carbohydrate antigen 19-9 level of ≥70 U/mL (OR 2.58, P = 0.029).Our results showed that 2 pancreatic CT parameters, the degree of preoperative pancreatic attenuation and RPV, significantly influence the development of NAFLD after PD. Perioperative CT assessments of the pancreas may be helpful for predicting NAFLD after PD.

The lymphatic system and pancreatic cancer

This review summarizes current knowledge of the biology, pathology and clinical understanding of lymphatic invasion and metastasis in pancreatic cancer. We discuss the clinical and biological consequences of lymphatic invasion and metastasis, including paraneoplastic effects on immune responses and consider the possible benefit of therapies to treat tumors that are localized to lymphatics. A review of current techniques and methods to study interactions between tumors and lymphatics is presented.

Surgical treatment of pancreatic head cancer: concept revolutions and arguments

As we have a deeper and more thorough understanding of the biological behavior of pancreatic head cancer, surgical treatment concepts of this lethal disease are changing all the time. Meanwhile, numerous arguments emerge. Thus, we will probe into the focuses and arguments in the surgical treatment of pancreatic head cancer in this article, including the scope of lymphadenectomy, total mesopancreas excision (TMpE), vascular resection, minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD), palliative resection, surgery for recurrent disease and surgery for primary pancreatic cancer and liver metastasis.

Extended Versus Standard Lymphadenectomy for Pancreatic Head Cancer: Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

INTRODUCTION

The evidence for improved prognostic assessment and long-term survival for extended pancreatoduodenectomy (EPD) compared to standard pancreatoduodenectomy (SPD) in patients with carcinoma of the head of the pancreas has not been considered from only randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

METHODS

The aim of this study was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of the outcomes comparing SPD and EPD in RCTs. Searches were performed on MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane databases using MeSH keyword combinations: 'pancreatic cancer', 'pancreaticoduodenectomy', 'extended', 'randomized' and 'lymphadenectomy'. RCTs published up to 2014 were included. Overall post-operative survival, morbidity, 30-day mortality and length of hospital stay were the outcomes assessed.

RESULTS

Five eligible RCTs with 546 participants were included (EPD = 276 and SPD = 270). EPD was associated with a significantly higher number of excised lymph nodes (LNs) compared to SPD (mean difference = 15.73, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 9.41-22.04; P < 0.00001; I(2) = 88%). LN metastasis was detected in 58-68 and 55-70% of patients who had EPD and SPD, respectively. EPD did not improve overall survival (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.88, 95% CI = 0.75-1.03; P = 0.11) but did worsen post-operative morbidity compared to SPD (risk ratio (RR) = 1.23; 95% CI = 1.01-1.50; P = 0.004; I(2) = 9%). There were no differences in the 30-day mortality (RR = 0.81; 95% CI = 0.32-2.06; P = 0.66; I(2) = 0%) or length of hospital stay (mean difference = 1.39, 95% CI = -2.31 to 5.09; P = 0.46; I(2) = 67%).

CONCLUSION

SPD is associated with reduced morbidity, but equivalent long-term benefits compared to patients undergoing EPD.

Pathological confirmation of para-aortic lymph node status as a potential criterion for the selection of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma patients for radical resection with regional lymph node dissection

BACKGROUND

Para-aortic lymph node (PAN) metastasis traditionally has been defined as distant metastasis. Many studies suggest that lymph node metastasis in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is one of the strongest prognostic factors for patient survival; however, the status of the PAN was not examined separately from regional lymph node metastasis in these reports. Here, we investigated whether regional lymph node metastasis without PAN metastasis in ICC can be classified as resectable disease and whether curative resection can have a prognostic impact.

METHODS

Between 1998 and 2010, a total of 47 ICC patients underwent hepatic resection and systematic lymphadenectomy with curative intent. We routinely dissected the PANs and had frozen-section pathological examinations performed intraoperatively. If PAN metastases were identified, curative resection was abandoned. We retrospectively investigated the prognostic factors for patient survival after curative resection for ICC without PAN metastases, with particular attention paid to the prognostic impact of lymphadenectomy.

RESULTS

Univariate analysis identified concomitant portal vein resection, concomitant hepatic artery resection, intraoperative blood loss, intraoperative transfusion, and residual tumor as significant negative prognostic factors. However, lymph node status was not identified as a significant prognostic factor. The 14 patients with node-positive cancer had a survival rate of 20 % at 5 years. Based on multivariate analysis, intraoperative transfusion was an independent prognostic factor associated with a poor prognosis (risk ratio = 4.161; P = 0.0056).

CONCLUSIONS

Regional lymph node metastasis in ICC should be classified as resectable disease, because the survival rate after surgical intervention was acceptable when PAN metastasis was pathologically negative.

Long-term survival after resection of pancreatic cancer: A single-center retrospective analysis

AIM: To retrospectively analyze factors affecting the long-term survival of patients with pancreatic cancer who underwent pancreatic resection.

METHODS: From January 2000 to December 2011, 195 patients underwent pancreatic resection in our hospital. The prognostic factors after pancreatic resection were analyzed in all 195 patients. After excluding the censored cases within an observational period, the clinicopathological characteristics of 20 patients who survived ≥ 5 (n = 20) and < 5 (n = 76) years were compared. For this comparison, we analyzed the patients who underwent surgery before June 2008 and were observed for more than 5 years. For statistical analyses, the log-rank test was used to compare the cumulative survival rates, and the χ² and Mann-Whitney tests were used to compare the two groups. The Cox-Hazard model was used for a multivariate analysis, and P values less than 0.05 were considered significant. A multivariate analysis was conducted on the factors that were significant in the univariate analysis.

RESULTS: The median survival for all patients was 27.1 months, and the 5-year actuarial survival rate was 34.5%. The median observational period was 595 d. With the univariate analysis, the UICC stage was significantly associated with survival time, and the CA19-9 ≤ 200 U/mL, DUPAN-2 ≤ 180 U/mL, tumor size ≤ 20 mm, R0 resection, absence of lymph node metastasis, absence of extrapancreatic neural invasion, and absence of portal invasion were favorable prognostic factors. The multivariate analysis showed that tumor size ≤ 20 mm (HR = 0.40; 95%CI: 0.17-0.83, P = 0.012) and negative surgical margins (R0 resection) (HR = 0.48; 95%CI: 0.30-0.77, P = 0.003) were independent favorable prognostic factors. Among the 96 patients, 20 patients survived for 5 years or more, and 76 patients died within 5 years after operation. Comparison of the 20 5-year survivors with the 76 non-survivors showed that lower concentrations of DUPAN-2 (79.5 vs 312.5 U/mL, P = 0.032), tumor size ≤ 20 mm (35% vs 8%, P = 0.008), R0 resection (95% vs 61%, P = 0.004), and absence of lymph node metastases (60% vs 18%, P = 0.036) were significantly associated with the 5-year survival.

CONCLUSION: Negative surgical margins and a tumor size ≤ 20 mm were independent favorable prognostic factors. Histologically curative resection and early tumor detection are important factors in achieving long-term survival.

Role of extended lymphadenectomy in the treatment of pancreatic head adenocarcinoma: review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Extended lymph node dissection has been established as the method of choice in the treatment of many digestive malignancies, but its role in the treatment of adenocarcinoma of the pancreas remains controversial.

OBJECTIVES

The goal is to evaluate the role of extended lymph node dissection in pancreatic head adenocarcinoma and to review how it affects survival, morbidity, mortality and post-operative quality of life.

METHODS

A computerized search was made of the Medline database from January 1973 to October 2012. Fifteen non-duplicated studies, four randomized and 11 non-randomized, comparing extended radical pancreaticoduodenectomy (ERP) and standard pancreaticoduodenectomy were reviewed. Five-year overall survivals were compared using the MetaXL software in eight of these studies, where the necessary data were available.

RESULTS

The 5-year survival after ERP ranged from 6 to 33.4% and the local recurrence incidence from 8 to 36.1%, while the incidence of severe diarrhoea, one of the main complications, ranged from 10.8 to 42.4%. Meta-analysis showed that there was no significant difference in the 5-year overall survival (95% confidence interval (CI): -0.21-0.20, Z=0.07, P=0.94) for randomized control trials, (95% CI: -0.51-0.02, Z=1.85, P=0.07) for non-randomized control trials and (95% CI: -0.26-0.06, Z=1.20, P=0.23) for all the studies.

CONCLUSIONS

Although ERP is a safe procedure, it did not offer a significant improvement in survival, while at the same time leading to an increased incidence of severe diarrhoea for at least 1 year, thus leaving the standard pancreaticoduodenectomy as the surgical method of choice for the treatment of pancreatic head adenocarcinoma.

Lymph node retrieval in pancreaticoduodenectomy specimens: does educating the pathologist matter?

BACKGROUND

Many previous studies have suggested that the number of lymph nodes retrieved should serve as a benchmark for assessing the adequacy of the resection. The aim was to retrospectively observe the impact of nodal retrieval after educating the pathologist.

METHODS

Patients undergoing a pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) between September 2005 and March 2009 were included in the study. The PDs performed between September 2005 and March 2008 were designated as Group A. The pathologists were educated regarding the importance of nodal counts in PD by the surgeon on the 1st April 2008. PDs performed between April 2008 and March 2009 were designated as Group B.

RESULTS

Ninety-eight PDs performed by a single surgeon (D.R.J.) for peri-ampullary malignancy were evaluated. The median number of lymph nodes retrieved in Group A was 11(3-32) nodes. The median number of lymph nodes retrieved in Group B was 22 (10-29) nodes (P < 0.001).The lymph node ratio (positive/total nodes), median number of positive nodes retrieved, and the node positivity (node positive compared to node negative) rate did not change.

DISCUSSION

A single intervention with the pathologists did impact the number of lymph nodes retrieved from PD specimens. However, the lymph node ratio and lymph node positivity rate remained unchanged. The pathologist is critical to nodal retrieval in PD, but the use of this lymph node number for benchmark of surgical adequacy may be simplistic.

Mesopancreas: a boundless structure, namely R1 risk in pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic head carcinoma

BACKGROUND

The mesopancreatic resection margin after pancreaticoduodenectomy for carcinoma of the head of the pancreas is of great interest with respect to curative resection, since the neoplastic involvement of this margin was shown to be the primary site for R1 resection. In this review the current knowledges of the surgical anatomy of the so-called mesopancreas and the mesopancreas excision techniques are summarized.

METHODS

References were identified by searching Pubmed database using the search terms "mesopancreas" and "meso-pancreatoduodenum" until June 2013 and through searches of the authors' own files. Five studies were included in this review.

RESULTS

Original contributions with regard to the anatomy of the retropancreatic area and specific technical descriptions of so-called "total mesopancreas excision" provided by published studies are pointed out.

CONCLUSIONS

Because there is no "meso" of the pancreas, and due to the continuity of the mesopancreatic and para-aortic areas, surgical dissection should be extended to the left of the superior mesenteric artery and include the para-aortic area to achieve the most complete possible resection of the so-called mesopancreas and minimize the rate of R1 resections due to mesopancreatic margin involvement. This extended mesopancreatic resection cannot be accomplished en bloc even if the removal of the dissected mesopancreatic tissues is performed en bloc with the head, uncus, and neck of the pancreas, i.e., with the pancreaticoduodenectomy specimen.

Computed tomography-based diagnostics might be insufficient in the determination of pancreatic cancer unresectability

AIM

To inquire into a question of an overestimation of arterial involvement in patients with pancreatic cancer (PC).

METHODS

Radiology data were compared with the findings from 51 standard, 58 extended and 17 total pancreaticoduodenectomies; 9 distal resections with celiac artery (CA) excision; and 28 palliations for PC. The survival of 11 patients with controversial computed tomography (CT) and endoscopic ultrasound data with regard to arterial invasion, after R0/R1 procedures (false-positive CT results, Group A), was compared to survival after eight R2 resections (false-negative CT results, Group B) and after 12 bypass procedures for locally advanced cancer (true-positive CT results, Group C).

RESULTS

In all of the cases in group A, operative exploration revealed no arterial invasion, which was predicted by CT. The one-year survival in Group A was 88.9%, and the two-year survival was 26.7%, with a median follow-up of 22 mo. One-year survival was not attained in groups B and C, with a significant difference in survival (P a-b = 0.0029, P b-c = 0.003).

CONCLUSION

Arterial encasement on CT does not necessarily indicate arterial invasion. Whenever PC is considered unresectable, endoUS should be used. In patients with controversial CT an EUS data for peripancreatic arteries involvement radical resection might be possible, providing survival benefits as compared to R2- resections or palliative surgery.

Is there a disadvantage to radical lymph node dissection in colon cancer?

BACKGROUND

The necessity for radical lymph node dissection for solid tumours was discussed in the past controversially. The aim of this study was to correlate the oncologic results of radical surgery for colon cancer with potential complications.

METHODS

A total of 1,453 patients with R0-resected colon cancer operated on between 1978 and 2004 were analysed in a prospective database. The follow-up was at least 5 years. Rates of survival, locoregional and distant recurrences and complications were calculated.

RESULTS

To compare the oncological outcome, the time frame was divided into five periods. In the last cohort (2000-2004), we observed in stage I-III tumours a 5-year cancer-related survival rate of 90.1 %, compared to 82.1 % in the first cohort (1978-1984) (p = 0.061). The local recurrence rate could be reduced from 6.5 to 3.2 % in the same cohorts (p = 0.059). It reached the level of significance in the multivariate analysis. The rates of distant metastases did not change. For patients with stage III, the 5-year cancer survival rates increased from 62.0 to 81.8 % (p = 0.005). Morbidity and mortality were comparable to other studies even to those with limited lymph node dissections.

CONCLUSION

Radical lymph node dissection in colon cancer is not associated with obvious disadvantages to the patient. Specific considerable side effects were not observed when the preparation is performed in embryonic planes preserving the autonomous nerves. The complication rates were not increased compared to other studies, even to those with limited lymphatic dissection. In addition, radical lymph node dissection in colon cancer may improve survival.

Phase I trial of preoperative intratumoral injection of immature dendritic cells and OK-432 for resectable pancreatic cancer patients

PURPOSE

To determine the feasibility, safety and histological change of preoperative endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle injection (PEU-FNI) of immature DCs (iDCs) with OK-432 in pancreatic cancer patients.

METHODS

Nine patients enrolled in the trial (DC group) and were compared with 15 patients operated on without iDC injection (non-DC group). Adverse events of PEU-FNI and postoperative complications were evaluated according to CTC-AE ver.3.0 and the Clavien-Dindo classification/ISGPF definition, respectively. Histological changes within the tumor and lymph nodes were evaluated by immunohistochemical examination of infiltrating inflammatory cells (CD4+, CD8+, Foxp3+ and CD83+).

RESULTS

There were no severe toxicities following PEU-FNI, except for one transient grade 3 fever, and there were no significant differences in the incidence of postoperative complications between the two groups. Colliquative necrosis and diffusely scattered TUNEL-positive cells were observed at the injection sites. CD83+ cells significantly accumulated in the regional lymph nodes of the DC group as well as Foxp3+ cells in the regional and distant lymph nodes. The two DC group patients, one of which was stage IV with distant lymph node metastasis, survived more than 5 years without requiring adjuvant theraphy.

CONCLUSION

PEU-FNI was feasible and safe, and further study needs to confirm and enhance antitumor responses.

Standard versus extended lymphadenectomy in radical pancreatoduodenectomy for ductal adenocarcinoma of the head of the pancreas: long-term results of a Japanese multicenter randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

The value of pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) with extended lymphadenectomy for pancreatic cancer has been evaluated by many retrospective studies and 3 randomized controlled trials (RCT). However, the protocols used and the results found in the 3 RCTs were diverse. Therefore, a multicenter RCT was proposed in 1998 to evaluate the primary end point of long-term survival and the secondary end points of morbidity, mortality and quality of life of patients undergoing standard versus extended lymphadenectomy in radical PD for pancreatic cancer.

METHODS

From March 2000 to May 2003, 112 patients with potentially curable pancreatic head cancer were enrolled and intraoperatively randomized to a standard or extended lymphadenectomy group. No resected patients received any adjuvant treatments.

RESULTS

A hundred and one eligible patients were analyzed. Demographic and histopathological characteristics of the two groups were similar. The mean operating time, intraoperative blood loss and number of retrieved lymph nodes were greater in the extended group, but the other operative results were comparable.

CONCLUSIONS

Although this multicenter RCT was conducted in a strict setting, extended lymphadenectomy in radical PD did not benefit long-term survival in patients with resectable pancreatic head cancer and led to levels of morbidity, mortality and quality of life comparable to those found after standard lymphadenectomy.

Metastatic lymph node ratio as an important prognostic factor in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Overall five year survival following pancreaticoduodenectomy for ductal adenocarcinoma is poor with typical reported rates in the literature of 8-27%. The aim of this study was to identify the histological variables best able to predict long-term survival in these patients.

METHODS

A prospective database of patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy between April 2002 and June 2009 was analysed to identify patients with histologically proven pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Patients with ampullary tumours, cholangiocarcinoma, duodenal adenocarcinoma and neuroendocrine tumours were excluded. The histology reports for these patients were reviewed. Uni-variate and multi-variate survival analysis was performed to identify variables useful in predicting long-term outcome.

RESULTS

134 patients underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma during this period. 5 year survival in this series was 18.6%. Uni-variate analysis identified nodal status and the metastatic to resected lymph node ratio as predictors of survival. Using multi-variate Cox Regression analysis a metastatic to lymph node ratio of >15% (p < 0.01) and the presence of perineural invasion (p < 0.05) were identified as independent predictors of patient survival. Metastatic to resected lymph node ratio is better able to stratify prognosis than nodal status alone with 5 year survival of those with N0 disease being 55.6% and 12.9% for N1 disease. However for those with <15% of resected nodes positive, 5 year survival was 21.7% and in those with >15% nodes positive it was 5.2% (p = 0.0017).

CONCLUSION

The metastatic to resected lymph node ratio can provide significant prognostic information in those patients with node positive disease after pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

Recurrence after surgical resection of gastrinoma: who, when, where and why?

BACKGROUND

Surgery prolongs survival in patients with gastrinomas, but postoperative recurrences are frequent and controversies still exist about the optimal surgical procedures.

AIM

The aim of this study is to analyze biological and morphological recurrences and to search for risk factors.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between 1990 and 2008, 22 patients (five with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1) who underwent curative resection for gastrinoma were evaluated every 6 months for biological and morphological recurrences. All patients were disease-free postresection.

RESULTS

The median postoperative follow-up was 37 months (range, 7-204 months). A biological recurrence was observed in 59% of cases, after a median time of 16.5 months (range, 7-90 months). A morphological recurrence was reported in 32% of cases, in the liver (86%) or lymph nodes (43%), after a median time of 21 months (range, 8-91 months). The median delay between biological and morphological recurrence was 3 months (range, 0-69 months). At recurrence, all patients were offered a second treatment (surgical resection in 71% of cases). One and 5 year overall survival were 100 and 76%, respectively. One and 5 year biological disease-free survival (DFS) were 76 and 27%, respectively. One and 5 year morphological DFS were 90 and 62%, respectively. Tumor size of at least 20 mm (P=0.008) and pancreatic location (P=0.04) of the primary tumor had significant effect on morphological DFS. Overall survival was significantly lower in patients with primary tumor of at least 20 mm (P=0.01).

CONCLUSION

(a) Recurrence occurs in nearly two out of three patients operated upon for gastrinoma, most often detected through biological tests; (b) lymph nodes and liver are the most frequent sites of relapse and patients benefit from second treatment; (c) risk factors for recurrences are as follows: size of at least 20 mm; and the pancreatic location of the primary tumor.

The influence of total nodes examined, number of positive nodes, and lymph node ratio on survival after surgical resection and adjuvant chemoradiation for pancreatic cancer: a secondary analysis of RTOG 9704

PURPOSE

Lymph node status is an important predictor of survival in pancreatic cancer. We performed a secondary analysis of Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) 9704, an adjuvant chemotherapy and chemoradiation trial, to determine the influence of lymph node factors--number of positive nodes (NPN), total nodes examined (TNE), and lymph node ratio (LNR ratio of NPN to TNE)--on OS and disease-free survival (DFS).

PATIENT AND METHODS

Eligible patients from RTOG 9704 form the basis of this secondary analysis of lymph node parameters. Actuarial estimates for OS and DFS were calculated using Kaplan-Meier methods. Cox proportional hazards models were performed to evaluate associations of NPN, TNE, and LNR with OS and DFS. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards models were also performed.

RESULTS

There were 538 patients enrolled in the RTOG 9704 trial. Of these, 445 patients were eligible with lymph nodes removed. Overall median NPN was 1 (min-max, 0-18). Increased NPN was associated with worse OS (HR=1.06, p=0.001) and DFS (HR=1.05, p=0.01). In multivariate analyses, both NPN and TNE were associated with OS and DFS. TNE>12, and >15 were associated with increased OS for all patients, but not for node-negative patients (n=142). Increased LNR was associated with worse OS (HR=1.01, p<0.0001) and DFS (HR=1.006, p=0.002).

CONCLUSION

In patients who undergo surgical resection followed by adjuvant chemoradiation, TNE, NPN, and LNR are associated with OS and DFS. This secondary analysis of a prospective, cooperative group trial supports the influence of these lymph node parameters on outcomes after surgery and adjuvant therapy using contemporary techniques.

Advances in early diagnosis and therapy of pancreatic cancer

BACKGROUND

Pancreatic cancer remains a devastating disease with a 5-year survival rate of less than 5%. Recent advances in diagnostic methods and therapeutic approaches have increased the possibility of improving the existing poor prognosis.

DATA SOURCES

English-language articles reporting early diagnosis and therapy of pancreatic cancer were searched from the MEDLINE and PubMed databases, Chinese-language articles were from CHKD (China Hospital Knowledge Database).

RESULT

The current literature about pancreatic cancer was reviewed from three aspects: statistics, screening and early detection, and therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Early detection and screening of pancreatic cancer currently should be limited to high risk patients. Surgical resection is the only curative approach available, with some recent improvement in outcomes. Gemcitabine has been a standard treatment during the last decade. Gemcitabine-based combination treatment, especially combined with newer molecular targeted agents, is promising. The rationale for radiotherapy is controversial, but with the recent development of modern radiation delivery techniques, radiotherapy should be intensified. Patients with borderline pancreatic cancer could benefit from neoadjuvant therapy but more evidence is needed and the best neoadjuvant regimen is still to be determined.

Pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy after transhiatal esophagectomy sparing the right gastroepiploic vessels and gastric tube

INTRODUCTION

Pancreaticoduodenectomy after transhiatal esophagectomy is a technically demanding procedure in sense of preserving the blood supply to the gastric tube.

CASE REPORT

We report a case of pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic head cancer, 13 years after a transhiatal esophagectomy, sparing the gastric tube and the right gastroepiploic artery and vein.

DISCUSSION

This type of operation is less time-consuming and less invasive, since no further reconstruction of the alimentary tract or the vascular system is applied.

Current opinion on lymphadenectomy in pancreatic cancer surgery

BACKGROUND

Adenocarcinoma of the pancreas exhibits aggressive behavior in growth, inducing an extremely poor prognosis with an overall median 5-year survival rate of only 1%-4%. Curative resection is the only potential therapeutic opportunity.

DATA SOURCES

A PubMed search of relevant articles published up to 2009 was performed to identify information about the value of lymphadenectomy and its extent in curative resection of pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

RESULTS

Despite recent advances in chemotherapy, radiotherapy or even immunotherapy, surgery still remains the major factor that affects the outcome. The initial promising performance in Japan gave conflicting results in Western countries for the extended and more radical pancreatectomy; it has failed to prove beneficial. Four prospective, randomized trials on extended versus standard lymphadenectomy during pancreatic cancer surgery have shown no improvement in long-term survival by the extended resection. The exact lymph node status, including malignant spread and the total number retrieved as well as the lymph node ratio, is the most important prognostic factor. Positive lymph nodes after pancreatectomy are present in 70%. Paraaortic lymph node spread indicates poor prognosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Undoubtedly, a standard lymphadenectomy including >15 lymph nodes must be no longer preferred in patients with the usual head location. The extended lymphadenectomy does not have any place, unless in randomized trials. In cases with body or tail location, the radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy gives promising results. Nevertheless, accurate localization and detailed examination of the resected specimen are required for better staging.

Radical surgery for pancreatic malignancy in the elderly

BACKGROUND

Improving life expectancy is associated with increasing incidence of pancreatic cancer. We reviewed morbidity and mortality in patients aged 65 years and older undergoing curative intent surgery in two centers in the Czech Republic.

METHODS

Data were retrieved by retrospective analysis of the medical records over the period 2000-2007. In total, 60 patients were included. The mean age was 71 years (median 70 years; range 65-85 years). Most patients (43, 72%) underwent hemipancreatoduodenectomy, combined in 4 with portomesenterial vessel resection. Twelve patients (20%) had distal pancreatectomy and 5 patients (8%) total pancreatectomy.

RESULTS

Overall morbidity was 28%. Only 10 patients (18%) developed serious surgical complications in terms of pancreatic leak (5, 8%), biliary leak (2, 3%), and intra-abdominal inflammatory collection (4, 7%). Four patients (6.6%) died within 30 days. The 1-year survival was 62.8%.

CONCLUSION

We can conclude that age per se is not a contraindication to surgery. Patient's overall general condition, co-existing co-morbidities, and ability to get over with any potential complications are more important. and IAP.

Laparoscopic surgery for pancreatic tumors

The rapid growth of minimally invasive technology and experience in recent decades has revolutionized many aspects of oncologic surgery. Adoption of laparoscopic pancreatectomy has been slow due to the inherent anatomic complexity of pancreatic surgery, as well as concerns of perioperative complications and compromised oncologic results. With increasing surgeon experience and growing data, laparoscopic pancreatic resection is generating considerable attention and enthusiasm. This article provides an overview of laparoscopic pancreatic tumor surgery with respect to tumor biology and technical approaches. Current applications of laparoscopic approaches to left pancreatectomy, tumor enucleation, central pancreatectomy, and pancreaticoduodenectomy for treatment of pancreatic tumors are considered in light of available evidence demonstrating feasibility, safety, and oncologic efficacy. Future directions in minimally invasive pancreatic surgery are explored.

Outcomes in pancreatic cancer surgery

The increase in surgery for pancreatic cancer during the last 3 decades can be correlated with a gradual decline in operative mortality and postoperative complications. Although not all surgeons (nor all hospitals) can have equal outcomes, the definition and tabulation of these outcomes have been difficult. This article asks several pertinent questions: (1) what is the scientific rationale for pancreatic resection? (2) what are the best available results at this time? (3) who should be performing pancreatic resections? The article analyzes results of resection for adenocarcinoma of the exocrine pancreas, and excludes duodenal and ampullary cancers, pancreatic endocrine tumors, and tumors of less malignant potential.

Redefining resection margin status in pancreatic cancer

Curative resection is crucial to survival in pancreatic cancer; however, despite optimization and standardization of surgical procedures, this is not always achieved. This review highlights that the rates of microscopic margin involvement (R1) vary markedly between studies and, although resection margin status is believed to be a key prognostic factor, the rates of margin involvement and local tumour recurrence or overall survival of pancreatic cancer patients are often incongruent. Recent studies indicate that the discrepancy between margin status and clinical outcome is caused by frequent underreporting of microscopic margin involvement. Lack of standardization of pathological examination, confusing nomenclature and controversy regarding the definition of microscopic margin involvement have resulted in the wide variation of reported R1 rates that precludes meaningful comparison of data and clinicopathological correlation.

Extended pancreatoduonectomy

Pancreatoduodenectomy remains a conventional procedure for pancreatic head cancer, however, it has been associated with high incidence of recurrence and low survival rate due to the specific characteristics of biological behavior of pancreatic head cancer, leading to the introduction of extended pancreatoduodenectomy with an attempt to improve the curative resection rate. With the latest literature review, this article presents the evidence for extended pancreatoduodenectomy from a pathological and anatomical point of view, and also described the standardized procedures, indications, and risk of extended pancreaticoduodenectomy for lymphadenectomy, neural clearance and combined vascular resection. Extended pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic head cancer significantly improves resection rate but doesn't increase surgical risk.

Surgical strategies for treatment of malignant pancreatic tumors: extended, standard or local surgery?

Tumor related pancreatic surgery has progressed significantly during recent years. Pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) with lymphadenectomy, including vascular resection, still presents the optimal surgical procedure for carcinomas in the head of pancreas. For patients with small or low-grade malignant neoplasms, as well as small pancreatic metastases located in the mid-portion of pancreas, central pancreatectomy (CP) is emerging as a safe and effective option with a low risk of developing de-novo exocrine and/or endocrine insufficiency. Total pancreatectomy (TP) is not as risky as it was years ago and can nowadays safely be performed, but its indication is limited to locally extended tumors that cannot be removed by PD or distal pancreatectomy (DP) with tumor free surgical margins. Consequently, TP has not been adopted as a routine procedure by most surgeons. On the other hand, an aggressive attitude is required in case of advanced distal pancreatic tumors, provided that safe and experienced surgery is available. Due to the development of modern instruments, laparoscopic operations became more and more successful, even in malignant pancreatic diseases. This review summarizes the recent literature on the above mentioned topics.