Mesenteric vascular thromboembolism in inflammatory bowel disease: a single center experience

Splanchnic Vein Thrombosis in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: An Observational Study from the ENEIDA Registry and Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Thromboembolic events are frequent among patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). However, there is little information on the prevalence, features and outcomes of splanchnic vein thrombosis (SVT) in patients with IBD.

AIMS

To describe the clinical features and outcomes of SVT in patients with IBD and to perform a systematic review of these data with published cases and series.

METHODS

A retrospective observational study from the Spanish nationwide ENEIDA registry was performed. A systematic search of the literature was performed to identify studies with at least one case of SVT in IBD patients.

RESULTS

A new cohort of 49 episodes of SVT from the Eneida registry and 318 IBD patients with IBD identified from the literature review (sixty studies: two multicentre, six single-centre and fifty-two case reports or case series) were analysed. There was a mild predominance of Crohn's disease and the most frequent clinical presentation was abdominal pain with or without fever followed by the incidental finding in cross-sectional imaging techniques. The most frequent SVT location was the main portal trunk in two-thirds of the cases, followed by the superior mesenteric vein. Anticoagulation therapy was prescribed in almost 90% of the cases, with a high rate of radiologic resolution of SVT. Thrombophilic conditions other than IBD itself were found in at least one-fifth of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

SVT seems to be a rare (or underdiagnosed) complication in IBD patients. SVT is mostly associated with disease activity and evolves suitably when anticoagulation therapy is started.

Role of mesenteric component in Crohn’s disease: A friend or foe?

Crohn’s disease (CD) is a complex and relapsing gastrointestinal disease with mesenteric alterations. The mesenteric neural, vascular, and endocrine systems actively take part in the gut dysbiosis-adaptive immunity-mesentery-body axis, and this axis has been proven to be bidirectional. The abnormalities of morphology and function of the mesenteric component are associated with intestinal inflammation and disease progress of CD via responses to afferent signals, neuropeptides, lymphatic drainage, adipokines, and functional cytokines. The hypertrophy of mesenteric adipose tissue plays important roles in the pathogenesis of CD by secreting large amounts of adipokines and representing a rich source of proinflammatory or profibrotic cytokines. The vascular alteration, including angiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis, is concomitant in the disease course of CD. Of note, the enlarged and obstructed lymphatic vessels, which have been described in CD patients, are likely related to the early onset submucosa edema and being a cause of CD. The function of mesenteric lymphatics is influenced by endocrine of mesenteric nerves and adipocytes. Meanwhile, the structure of the mesenteric lymphatic vessels in hypertrophic mesenteric adipose tissue is mispatterned and ruptured, which can lead to lymph leakage. Leaky lymph factors can in turn stimulate adipose tissue to proliferate and effectively elicit an immune response. The identification of the role of mesentery and the crosstalk between mesenteric tissues in intestinal inflammation may shed light on understanding the underlying mechanism of CD and help explore new therapeutic targets.

Liver-side of inflammatory bowel diseases: Hepatobiliary and drug-induced disorders

Hepatobiliary disorders are among the most common extraintestinal manifestations in inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD), both in Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis (UC), and therefore represent a diagnostic challenge. Immune-mediated conditions include primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) as the main form, variant forms of PSC (namely small-duct PSC, PSC-autoimmune hepatitis overlap syndrome and IgG4-related sclerosing cholangitis) and granulomatous hepatitis. PSC is by far the most common, presenting in up to 8% of IBD patients, more frequently in UC. Several genetic foci have been identified, but environmental factors are preponderant on disease pathogenesis. The course of the two diseases is typically independent. PSC diagnosis is based mostly on typical radiological findings and exclusion of secondary cholangiopathies. Risk of cholangiocarcinoma is significantly increased in PSC, as well as the risk of colorectal cancer in patients with PSC and IBD-related colitis. No disease-modifying drugs are approved to date. Thus, PSC management is directed against symptoms and complications and includes medical therapies for pruritus, endoscopic treatment of biliary stenosis and liver transplant for end-stage liver disease. Other non-immune-mediated hepatobiliary disorders are gallstone disease, whose incidence is higher in IBD and reported in up to one third of IBD patients, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, pyogenic liver abscess and portal vein thrombosis. Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is an important issue in IBD, since most IBD therapies may cause liver toxicity; however, the incidence of serious adverse events is low. Thiopurines and methotrexate are the most associated with DILI, while the risk related to anti-tumor necrosis factor-α and anti-integrins is low. Data on hepatotoxicity of newer drugs approved for IBD, like anti-interleukin 12/23 and tofacitinib, are still scarce, but the evidence from other rheumatic diseases is reassuring. Hepatitis B reactivation during immunosuppressive therapy is a major concern in IBD, and adequate screening and vaccination is warranted. On the other hand, hepatitis C reactivation does not seem to be a real risk, and hepatitis C antiviral treatment does not influence IBD natural history. The approach to an IBD patient with abnormal liver function tests is complex due to the wide range of differential diagnosis, but it is of paramount importance to make a quick and accurate diagnosis, as it may influence the therapeutic management.

Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Short Bowel Syndrome

Short bowel syndrome / intestinal failure (SBS/IF) is a rare and debilitating disease process that mandates a multidisciplinary approach in its management. Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), in particular Crohn's disease (CD), predisposes patients to development of SBS/IF. This review discusses SBS/IF from the perspective of IBD, with an emphasis on prevention and treatment in the setting of CD. The aims of this review are to emphasize the unique treatment goals of the newly diagnosed SBS/IF patient, and highlight the role of both medical and surgical therapies in the management of IBD-related SBS/IF, including intestinal transplantation.

Atypical Clinical Presentation of Crohn's Disease with Superior Mesenteric Vein Obstruction and Protein-losing Enteropathy

We herein report a 44-year-old man suffering from systemic edema due to protein-losing enteropathy (PLE) with superior mesenteric vein (SMV) obstruction and development of collateral veins, which subsequently proved to be a chronic result of thrombosis and a complication of Crohn's disease (CD). PLE was supposedly induced by both intestinal erosion and thrombosis-related lymphangiectasia, which was histologically proven in his surgically-resected ileal stenosis. Elemental diet and anti-TNFα agent improved his hypoalbuminemia after surgery. The rarity of the simultaneous coexistence of SMV obstruction and PLE and the precedence of these complications over typical abdominal symptoms of CD made the clinical course complex.

The Role of the Mesentery in Crohn's Disease: The Contributions of Nerves, Vessels, Lymphatics, and Fat to the Pathogenesis and Disease Course

Crohn's disease (CD) is a complex gastrointestinal disorder involving multiple levels of cross talk between the immunological, neural, vascular, and endocrine systems. The current dominant theory in CD is based on the unidirectional axis of dysbiosis-innate immunity-adaptive immunity-mesentery-body system. Emerging clinical evidence strongly suggests that the axis be bidirectional. The morphologic and/or functional abnormalities in the mesenteric structures likely contribute to the disease progression of CD, to a less extent the disease initiation. In addition to adipocytes, mesentery contains nerves, blood vessels, lymphatics, stromal cells, and fibroblasts. By the secretion of adipokines that have endocrine functions, the mesenteric fat tissue exerts its activity in immunomodulation mainly through response to afferent signals, neuropeptides, and functional cytokines. Mesenteric nerves are involved in the pathogenesis and prognosis of CD mainly through neuropeptides. In addition to angiogenesis observed in CD, lymphatic obstruction, remodeling, and impaired contraction maybe a cause and consequence of CD. Lymphangiogenesis and angiogenesis play a concomitant role in the progress of chronic intestinal inflammation. Finally, the interaction between neuropeptides, adipokines, and vascular and lymphatic endothelia leads to adipose tissue remodeling, which makes the mesentery an active participator, not a bystander, in the disease initiation and precipitation CD. The identification of the role of mesentery, including the structure and function of mesenteric nerves, vessels, lymphatics, and fat, in the intestinal inflammation in CD has important implications in understanding its pathogenesis and clinical management.

Short Bowel Syndrome and Malabsorption - Causes and Prevention

Background

The short bowel syndrome (SBS) is a condition caused by extensive intestinal resection for a variety of conditions. The etiology varies by age group. Necrotizing enterocolitis is the leading cause in infants. In older children, trauma and malignancies are most common. Postoperative SBS has become most common in adults, followed by mesenteric vascular disease and cancer/irradiation.

Methods

Systematic literature review.

Results

Prevention of SBS should be given high priority. Each of the etiologies has been evaluated and strategies to prevent extensive resection have been developed. These include a thoughtful approach to reoperation, early identification of complications, e.g. intestinal ischemia, reducing radiation enteritis, and bowel-conserving therapies in diseases such as Crohn's disease.

Conclusion

Several operative strategies to prevent SBS are useful. Timing and extent of reoperation need careful consideration. Minimizing intestinal resection, bowel-conserving techniques for complications such as fistula or strictures, and remodeling procedures are important.

Non-surgical porto-mesenteric vein thrombosis is associated with worse long-term outcomes in inflammatory bowel diseases

Objective: Our aim was to assess the risk factors for non-surgery-related portal and mesenteric vein thrombosis (PMVT) and its impact on the outcomes of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD).

Methods: All patients with a concurrent diagnosis of IBD and PMVT between January 2004 and October 2013 were identified from the electronic medical record (study group; n = 20). Patients were matched for age, sex, and IBD phenotype with control IBD patients who had no PMVT, with a ratio of 1:3 (control group; n = 60). Risk factors for PMVT and IBD-related outcomes at one year after diagnosis of PMVT were compared between the two groups.

Results: Of the 20 patients in the Study group, 6 (30%) had UC, 14 (70%) had CD and 11 (55%) were male. On multivariable analysis, inpatient status (odds ratio [OR] 6.88; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.88–25.12) and baseline corticosteroid use (OR 4.39; 95% CI 1.27–15.19) were found to be independent risk factors for the development of PMVT. At one-year follow-up, PMVT patients were more likely to have an adverse outcome of IBD, including subsequent emergency room visit (26.3% vs. 1.7%; P = 0.003), hospitalization for medical management (60.0% vs. 20.0%; P = 0.001) or IBD-related surgery (65.0% vs. 26.7%; P = 0.003) than the non-PMVT controls. In multivariable analysis, PMVT (OR 5.19; 95% CI 1.07–25.28) and inpatient status (OR 8.92; 95% CI 1.33–59.84) were found to be independent risk factors for poor outcome, whereas baseline immunomodulator use (OR 0.07; 95% CI 0.01–0.51) was found to be a protective factor.

Conclusions: IBD patients who were inpatients or receiving corticosteroid therapy had an increased risk of the development of PMVT. The presence of PMVT was associated with poor clinical outcomes in IBD.

Portal venous thrombosis after distal pancreatectomy: clinical outcomes

AIM

Outcomes of patients developing portal vein (PV) thrombosis (PVT) after distal pancreatectomy (DP) are unknown. The goal of this study was to identify risk factors for PVT and describe the long-term outcomes in these patients.

METHODS

Patients undergoing DP without repair or reconstruction of the PV between 2001 and 2011 were included. Patients that showed evidence of PVT on pre-operative imaging were excluded from the study. Location and extent of thrombosis was determined by post-operative computed tomography or ultrasound imaging in all patients. Evidence of systemic thrombosis (if present) in addition to PVT was also documented.

RESULTS

In the study period, 991 patients underwent DP and 21 (2.1%) patients were diagnosed with PVT. Pancreatic neoplasm was the most frequent indication for operation (n = 11). Thrombus occurred in the main PV in 15 and the right branch of the PV in 8 patients. Complete PV occlusion occurred in nine patients with a median time to diagnosis of 16 days (range 5-85 days). Seventeen patients were anticoagulated for a median duration of 6 months (range 3.3-36 months) after the diagnosis of PVT. Over a median follow-up of 22 months, resolution of PVT occurred in seven patients. Predictors of non-resolution of PVT included anesthesia time >180 min (p = 0.025), DM type II (p = 0.03), BMI >30 Kg/m(2) (p = 0.03), occlusive PVT (p < 0.001), or thrombus in a sectoral branch (p = 0.02). Anticoagulation therapy did not influence the frequency of thrombus resolution and was complicated by gastrointestinal hemorrhage in four patients. There was no mortality as a direct result of PVT or anticoagulation.

CONCLUSION

PVT after distal pancreatectomy is a rare complication. Serious complications as a direct result of PVT in this setting are uncommon and are not dependent on thrombus resolution. Although anticoagulation does not appear to influence the rate of PVT resolution in this small retrospective series, we support the use of anticoagulation until larger, controlled studies define clear advantages or disadvantages.

Intra-abdominal venous thrombosis after colectomy in pediatric patients with chronic ulcerative colitis: incidence, treatment, and outcomes

PURPOSE

Children with chronic ulcerative colitis (CUC) are at increased risk for venous thromboembolism, especially after colectomy procedures. We aim to review our patients with CUC who underwent a colectomy and suffered intra-abdominal thrombosis; moreover we wanted to define thrombotic incidence and outcomes

METHODS

In this is IRB approved retrospective study, we reviewed our patients who underwent colectomy for CUC from January 1999 to December 2011 for development of intra-abdominal thrombosis.

RESULTS

Of 366 patients with CUC who underwent colectomy, 15 (4%) were diagnosed with a venous thromboembolism. All patients presented with acute abdominal pain. The locations of thrombus formation varied: 13 (87%) developed thrombi in the portal vein, 4 (27%) in the splenic vein, 2 (13%) in the superior mesenteric vein, 1 (7%) in the hepatic vein, and 1 (7%) in the hepatic artery. The mean number of post-operative days at diagnosis of thrombus was 38.7 days (range 3-180 days). Fourteen patients (93%) underwent anticoagulation for treatment. The mean number of days of anticoagulant therapy until documented resolution of thrombus on imaging was 96.3 days (range 14-364 days). All thrombi resolved with therapy. There was no mortality during follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Four percent of our pediatric patients with chronic ulcerative colitis who underwent colectomy developed symptomatic intra-abdominal venous thromboembolism. 3 to 6 months of anticoagulant therapy is adequate treatment in almost all patients. Practitioners should have a high index of suspicion for intra-abdominal venous thrombus when these patients complain of abdominal pain postoperatively. Based on our experience, prophylactic anticoagulation should be strongly considered peri-operatively in this population.

Clinical presentation of venous thromboembolism in inflammatory bowel disease

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are at increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE), but data on frequency, site of thrombosis and risk factors are limited. We sought to determine prevalence, incidence as well as location and clinical features of first VTE among IBD patients.

METHODS

We evaluated a cohort of 2811 IBD patients for a history of symptomatic, objectively confirmed first VTE, recruited from 14 referral centers. Patients with VTE before IBD diagnosis or cancer were excluded. Incidence rates were calculated based on person-years from IBD diagnosis to first VTE or end of follow-up, respectively.

RESULTS

2784 patients (total observation time 24,778 person-years) were analyzed. Overall, of 157 IBD patients with a history of VTE, 142 (90.4%) had deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and/or pulmonary embolism (PE), whereas 15 (9.6%) had cerebral, portal, mesenteric, splenic or internal jugular vein thrombosis. The prevalence and incidence rate of all VTE was 5.6% and 6.3 per 1000 person years, respectively. Patients with VTE were older at IBD diagnosis than those without VTE (34.4±14.8years vs 32.1±14.4years, p=0.045), but did not differ regarding sex, underlying IBD and disease duration. 121 (77.1%) VTE were unprovoked, 122 (77.7%) occurred in outpatients and 78 (60.9%) in patients with active disease. Medication at first VTE included corticosteroids (42.3%), thiopurines (21.2%), and infliximab (0.7%).

CONCLUSION

VTE is frequent in IBD patients. Most of them are unprovoked and occur in outpatients. DVT and PE are most common and unusual sites of thrombosis are rare.

Liver abnormalities in bowel diseases

Liver abnormalities are often seen in bowel diseases. Whether these represent aspects of two separate diseases, or if one is causing the other, is not always easy to decide. Extraintestinal manifestations of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) or coeliac disease are frequently observed. Of these extraintestinal manifestations, hepatic disorders are among the most common. Primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) and primary biliary cirrhosis are the most frequent hepatic disorders in IBD and coeliac disease, respectively. Genetic studies have lately elucidated the associations between IBD and PSC, but there is still a long way until we have complete understanding of the molecular aetiology and pathophysiology of these conditions. There is no curative treatment available for PSC, besides liver transplantation. Steatosis and cholelithiasis are also common in IBD, as are signs of hepatic injury due to IBD treatment. Less common liver abnormalities include liver abscesses, hepatic thromboembolic events, granulomatous liver disease and hepatic amyloidosis.

Indications for intestinal transplantation: recognizing the scope and limits of total parenteral nutrition

Total parenteral nutrition (TPN) is currently the treatment of choice for patients with intestinal failure. Intestinal failure in adults is mostly due to short bowel syndrome, which is most often caused by ischemia and Crohn's disease. However, TPN fails in a substantial number of cases. For patients with TPN failure, intestinal transplantation (ITx) may be offered as a treatment. TPN failure is considered to be present either if nutrition itself is not possible or if complications of TPN occur. These complications can, for example, originate from recurrent line infections or thrombosis. As TPN is usually a lifelong therapy and is associated with substantial impairment of the quality of life, the tolerance of each patient to this procedure is another important consideration in the decision making about whether to perform transplantation. The survival rates of intestinal transplant recipients have now reached the same level as that of recipients of other solid organ transplants. A five-yr survival of up to 80% has been reported in specialized centers, whereas registry data show rates of <80%. Although in about one-third of patients, isolated ITx is sufficient, patients with concurrent liver disease (mostly due to TPN) benefit from combined intestinal and liver transplantation. In some cases, multivisceral transplantation is necessary. Here, we review the current indications for ITx with a special focus on TPN.

Portomesenteric vein thrombosis in patients with inflammatory bowel disease

BACKGROUND

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is associated with a high risk of deep venous thromboembolism. However, few data are available so far on portomesenteric vein thrombosis (PMVT). The aim of this study was to describe the characteristics of PMVT in patients with IBD.

METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted at 13 GETAID (Groupe d'Etude Thérapeutique des Affections Inflammatoires du Tube Digestif) centers from January 1995 to June 2010. The following data were collected, using a standardized questionnaire: characteristics of IBD, disease status at the time of PMVT, PMVT characteristics and mode of discovery, concomitant prothrombotic disorders, anticoagulant therapy, and evolution of PMVT.

RESULTS

Fifty cases (29 men and 21 women; median age, 41 years) were identified, including 14 patients with ulcerative colitis and 36 with Crohn's disease. Thirty-one patients (62%) presented with acute PMVT. Twenty-four patients had previously undergone surgical treatment, and IBD was active in 23 cases (77%) of acute thrombosis. The discovery of PMVT was fortuitous in 40% of our cases. Among the 43 patients screened for a prothrombotic disorder, abnormalities were observed in 17 patients (40%) (mainly hyperhomocysteinemia, n = 12). Forty-four patients (88%) were treated with anticoagulants. Recanalization of the vein was significantly more successful in patients with acute thrombosis (65% versus 37%, P = 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

PMVT can occur when IBD is inactive, and its diagnosis was fortuitous in 40% of our cases. Screening for prothrombotic disorders is essential because it is positive in more than one third of cases.

The role of portal vein thrombosis in the clinical course of inflammatory bowel diseases: report on three cases and review of the literature

Inflammatory bowel diseases are associated with an increased risk of vascular complications. The most important are arterial and venous thromboembolisms, which are considered as specific extraintestinal manifestations of inflammatory bowel diseases. Among venous thromboembolism events, portal vein thrombosis has been described in inflammatory bowel diseases. We report three cases of portal vein thrombosis occurring in patients with active inflammatory bowel disease. In two of them, hepatic abscess was present. Furthermore, we performed a systematic review based on the clinical literature published on this topic.

Clinical and radiographic presentation of superior mesenteric vein thrombosis in Crohn's disease: a single center experience

BACKGROUND

Mesenteric vein thrombosis (MVT) is a rare and frequently underdiagnosed complication of Crohn's disease (CD). This study describes the clinical and radiological characteristics of CD /patients with superior mesenteric vein thrombosis (MVT) diagnosed by CT/MRI.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The database of Crohn's disease patients treated in Sheba Medical Center between 2005-2010 was searched for MVT diagnosis. Imaging studies of identified patients were retrieved and reviewed by an experienced abdominal radiologist. MVT was defined by superior mesenteric vein obliteration and/or thrombus in the vessel lumen on abdominal imaging. The clinical and radiologic data of these patients were collected from the medical records.

RESULTS

MVT was demonstrated in 6/460 CD patients. Five patients had stricturing disease, and one patient had a combined fistulizing and stricturing disease phenotype. All patients had small bowel disease, but 3/6 also had colonic involvement. No patient had a prior thromboembolic history or demonstrable hypercoagulability. One patient had an acute SMV thrombus demonstrable on CT scanning, the remaining patients showed an obliteration of superior mesenteric vein. Two patients received anticoagulation upon diagnosis of thrombosis. No subsequent thromboembolic events were recorded.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of mesenteric vein thrombosis is likely to be underestimated in patients with Crohn's disease. Both CT and MRI imaging demonstrate the extent of enteric disease and coincident SMV thrombosis. In our cohort, thrombosis was associated with stricturing disease of the small bowel. The clinical impact of SMV thrombosis and whether anticoagulation is mandatory for all of these patients remains to be determined.

Portal vein thrombosis in inflammatory bowel diseases: a single-center case series

BACKGROUND AND METHODS

Portal vein thrombosis (PVT) has been reported as a complication of IBD in some case reports. We describe the presentation, diagnostic approaches, underlying risks factors and clinical outcome of 8 IBD patients with PVT. CASE-SERIES: The patients presented with partial PVT (4 patients) or portal cavernoma. Five patients had undergone surgery. In 2 patients portal biliopathy was diagnosed after detection of PVT. In 4 patients, the diagnosis of PVT was made while IBD was in remission. Five patients showed at least one risk factor for hypercoagulability: lupus anti-coagulant (one patient), increased von Willebrand factor (2 patients) or homocysteine levels (4 patients). Four patients received anticoagulant therapy for 6 months. None experienced other thrombotic events during a median of 5 years (range 2-8 years).

CONCLUSION

PVT is a potential complication of IBD, usually associated with acquired or inherited risks factors for hypercoagulability and with a benign outcome.