1
|
Warsop ZI, Manzo CA, Yu N, Yusuf B, Kontovounisios C, Celentano V. Patient-reported Outcome Measures in Ileoanal Pouch Surgery: a Systematic Review. J Crohns Colitis 2024; 18:479-487. [PMID: 37758036 DOI: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjad163] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2023] [Revised: 09/14/2023] [Accepted: 09/21/2023] [Indexed: 10/03/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To summarise frequency, type, and heterogeneity of patient-reported outcomes measures [PROMs] in papers reporting on outcomes after ileal pouch anal anastomosis [IPAA]. BACKGROUND Prevalence of ulcerative colitis [UC] has risen in Western countries, and one in three patients requires surgery. IPAA is a frequently performed procedure for UC, and a lack of standardisation is manifest in reporting outcomes for inflammatory bowel disease [IBD] despite the clear need for inclusion of PROMs as primary outcomes in IBD trials. METHODS Scopus, Pubmed, and Web of Science databases were searched from January 2010 to January 2023 for studies investigating outcomes in IPAA surgery. The primary outcome was the proportion of studies reporting outcomes for IPAA surgery for UC, which included PROMs. RESULTS The search identified a total of 8028 studies which, after de-duplication and exclusion, were reduced to 79 articles assessing outcomes after IPAA surgery. In all 44 [55.7%] reported PROMs, with 23 including validated questionnaires and 21 papers using authors' questions, 22 different PROMs were identified, with bowel function as the most investigated item. The majority of studies [67/79, 85%] were retrospective, only 14/79 [18%] were prospective papers and only two were [2.5%] randomised, controlled trials. CONCLUSIONS Only half of the papers reviewed used PROMs. The main reported item is bowel function and urogenital, social, and psychological functions are the most neglected. There is lack of standardisation for use of PROMs in IPAA. Complexity of UC and of outcomes after IPAA demands a change in clinical practice and follow-up, given how crucial PROMs are, compared with their non-routine use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Carlo Alberto Manzo
- Imperial College London School of Medicine, London, UK
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Natalie Yu
- Imperial College London School of Medicine, London, UK
| | - Bilal Yusuf
- Imperial College London School of Medicine, London, UK
| | - Christos Kontovounisios
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Valerio Celentano
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Surgery for Inflammatory Bowel Disease in the Era of Biologic Therapy: A Multicenter Experience from Romania. MEDICINA (KAUNAS, LITHUANIA) 2023; 59:medicina59020337. [PMID: 36837538 PMCID: PMC9963331 DOI: 10.3390/medicina59020337] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2022] [Revised: 02/02/2023] [Accepted: 02/08/2023] [Indexed: 02/12/2023]
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Biologic therapy has fundamentally changed the opportunity of medical treatment to induce and maintain remission in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Nevertheless, the rate of surgery is still at a very high rate, profoundly affecting the quality of life. We aimed to analyze surgical cases at three major IBD units in order to identify the main risk factors and the impact of biologic therapy on pre- and postsurgical outcomes. Material and Methods: This was a multicenter retrospective cohort study that included 56 patients with IBD-related surgical interventions from 3 tertiary care hospitals in Bucharest, Romania. The study was conducted between January 2017 and June 2021. All data were retrospectively collected from the medical records of the patients and included the age at diagnosis, age at the time of surgery, IBD type and phenotype, biologic therapy before or/and after surgery, timing of biologic therapy initiation, extraintestinal manifestations, type of surgery (elective/emergency), early and long-term postoperative complications and a history of smoking. Results: A low rate of surgical interventions was noted in our cohort (10.3%), but half of these occurred in the first year after the IBD diagnosis. A total of 48% of the surgical interventions had been performed in an emergency setting, which seemed to be associated with a high rate of long-term postoperative complications. We found no statistically significant differences between IBD patients undergoing treatments with biologics before surgery and patients who did not receive biologics before the surgical intervention in terms of the IBD phenotype, type of surgery and postoperative complications. Conclusion: Our study showed that biologics initiated before the surgical intervention did not influence the postoperative complications. Moreover, we demonstrated that patients with Crohn's disease and no biologics were the most susceptible to having to undergo surgery. Conclusion: In conclusion, the management of patients with IBD requires a multidisciplinary approach that considers an unpredictable evolution.
Collapse
|
3
|
Lee KE, Faye AS, Vermeire S, Shen B. Perioperative Management of Ulcerative Colitis: A Systematic Review. Dis Colon Rectum 2022; 65:S5-S19. [PMID: 36007165 PMCID: PMC9907776 DOI: 10.1097/dcr.0000000000002588] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with ulcerative colitis may require colectomy for severe disease unresponsive or refractory to pharmacological therapy. Managing ulcerative colitis is complicated because there are many factors at play, including patient optimization and treatment, as the guidance varies on the ideal perioperative use of corticosteroids, immunomodulators, biologics, and small molecule agents. OBJECTIVE A systematic literature review was performed to describe the current status of perioperative management of ulcerative colitis. DATA SOURCES PubMed and Cochrane databases were used. STUDY SELECTION Studies published between January 2000 and January 2022, in any language, were included. Articles regarding pediatric or endoscopic management were excluded. INTERVENTIONS Perioperative management of ulcerative colitis was included. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Successful management, including reducing surgical complication rates, was measured. RESULTS A total of 121 studies were included in this review, including 23 meta-analyses or systematic reviews, 25 reviews, and 51 cohort studies. LIMITATIONS Qualitative review including all study types. The varied nature of study types precludes quantitative comparison. CONCLUSION Indications for colectomy in ulcerative colitis include severe disease unresponsive to medical treatment and colitis-associated neoplasia. Urgent colectomy has a higher mortality rate than elective colectomy. Corticosteroids are associated with postsurgical infectious complications and should be stopped or weaned before surgery. Biologics are not associated with adverse postoperative effects and do not necessarily need to be stopped preoperatively. Additionally, the clinician must assess individuals' comorbidities, nutrition status, and risk of venous thromboembolism. Nutritional imbalance should be corrected, ideally at the preoperative period. Postoperatively, corticosteroids can be tapered on the basis of the length of preoperative corticosteroid use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kate E. Lee
- Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Adam S. Faye
- Division of Gastroenterology, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York
| | - Séverine Vermeire
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Bo Shen
- Center for Inflammatory Bowel Diseases, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Department of Surgery, New York-Presbyterian/Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Cira K, Weber MC, Wilhelm D, Friess H, Reischl S, Neumann PA. The Effect of Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor-Alpha Therapy within 12 Weeks Prior to Surgery on Postoperative Complications in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Clin Med 2022; 11:jcm11236884. [PMID: 36498459 PMCID: PMC9738467 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11236884] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2022] [Revised: 11/07/2022] [Accepted: 11/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
The rate of abdominal surgical interventions and associated postoperative complications in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients is still substantially high. There is an ongoing debate as to whether or not patients who undergo treatment with anti-tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) agents may have an increased risk for general and surgical postoperative complications. Therefore, a systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted in order to assess the effect of anti-TNF-α treatment within 12 weeks (washout period) prior to abdominal surgery on 30-day postoperative complications in patients with IBD. The results of previously published meta-analyses examining the effect of preoperative anti-TNF-α treatment on postoperative complications reported conflicting findings which is why we specifically focus on the effect of anti-TNF-α treatment within 12 weeks prior to surgery. PubMed, Cochrane, Scopus, Web of Science, World Health Organization Trial Registry, ClinicalTrials.gov and reference lists were searched (June 1995−February 2022) to identify studies, investigating effects of anti-TNF-α treatment prior to abdominal surgery on postoperative complications in IBD patients. Pooled odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated and subgroup analyses were performed. In this case, 55 cohort studies (22,714 patients) were included. Overall, postoperative complications (OR, 1.23; 95% CI, 1.04−1.45; p = 0.02), readmission (OR, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.11−1.73; p = 0.004), and intra-abdominal septic complications (OR, 1.89; 95% CI, 1.44−2.49; p < 0.00001) were significantly higher for anti-TNF-α-treated patients. Significantly higher intra-abdominal abscesses and readmission were found for anti-TNF-α-treated CD patients (p = 0.05; p = 0.002). Concomitant treatment with immunosuppressives in <50% of anti-TNF-α-treated patients was associated with significantly lower mortality rates (OR, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.12−0.83; p = 0.02). Anti-TNF-α treatment within 12 weeks prior to surgery is associated with higher short-term postoperative complication rates (general and surgical) for patients with IBD, especially CD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kamacay Cira
- Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, 81675 Munich, Germany
| | - Marie-Christin Weber
- Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, 81675 Munich, Germany
| | - Dirk Wilhelm
- Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, 81675 Munich, Germany
| | - Helmut Friess
- Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, 81675 Munich, Germany
| | - Stefan Reischl
- Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, School of Medicine, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, 81675 Munich, Germany
| | - Philipp-Alexander Neumann
- Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, 81675 Munich, Germany
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
DeLeon MF, Stocchi L. Elective and Emergent Surgery in the Ulcerative Colitis Patient. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 2022; 35:437-444. [PMID: 36591393 PMCID: PMC9797282 DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1758134] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/03/2022]
Abstract
Ulcerative colitis (UC) requires surgical management in 20 to 30% of patients. Indications for surgery include medically refractory disease, dysplasia, cancer, and other complications of UC. Appropriate patient selection for timing and staging of surgery is paramount for optimal outcomes. Restorative proctocolectomy is the preferred standard of care and can afford many patients with excellent quality of life. There have been significant shifts in the treatment of UC-associated dysplasia, with less patients requiring surgery and more entering surveillance programs. There is ongoing controversy surrounding the management of UC-associated colorectal cancer and the techniques that should be used. This article reviews the most recent literature on the indications for elective and emergent surgical intervention for UC and the considerations behind the surgical options.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Luca Stocchi
- Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Kotze PG, Heuthorst L, Lightner AL, Damião AOMC, Bemelman WA. New insights on the surgical management of ulcerative colitis in the 21st century. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 2022; 7:679-688. [DOI: 10.1016/s2468-1253(22)00001-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2021] [Revised: 12/19/2021] [Accepted: 12/21/2021] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
|
7
|
Cohen BL, Fleshner P, Kane SV, Herfarth HH, Palekar N, Farraye FA, Leighton JA, Katz JA, Cohen RD, Gerich ME, Cross RK, Higgins PDR, Tinsley A, Glover S, Siegel CA, Bohl JL, Iskandar H, Ji J, Hu L, Sands BE. Prospective Cohort Study to Investigate the Safety of Preoperative Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitor Exposure in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease Undergoing Intra-abdominal Surgery. Gastroenterology 2022; 163:204-221. [PMID: 35413359 DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2022.03.057] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2021] [Revised: 02/24/2022] [Accepted: 03/31/2022] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Whether preoperative treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) with tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFis) increases the risk of postoperative infectious complications remains controversial. The primary aim of this study was to determine whether preoperative exposure to TNFis is an independent risk factor for postoperative infectious complications within 30 days of surgery. METHODS We conducted a multicenter prospective observational study of patients with IBD undergoing intra-abdominal surgery across 17 sites from the Crohn's & Colitis Foundation Clinical Research Alliance. Infectious complications were categorized as surgical site infections (SSIs) or non-SSIs. Current TNFi exposure was defined as use within 12 weeks of surgery, and serum was collected for drug-level analyses. Multivariable models for occurrence of the primary outcome, any infection, or SSI were adjusted by predefined covariates (age, sex, preoperative steroid use, and disease type), baseline variables significantly associated (P < .05) with any infection or SSI separately, and TNFi exposure status. Exploratory models used TNFi exposure based on serum drug concentration. RESULTS A total of 947 patients were enrolled from September 2014 through June 2017. Current TNFi exposure was reported by 382 patients. Any infection (18.1% vs 20.2%, P = .469) and SSI (12.0% vs 12.6%, P = .889) rates were similar in patients currently exposed to TNFis and those unexposed. In multivariable analysis, current TNFi exposure was not associated with any infection (odds ratio, 1.050; 95% confidence interval, 0.716-1.535) or SSI (odds ratio, 1.249; 95% confidence interval, 0.793-1.960). Detectable TNFi drug concentration was not associated with any infection or SSI. CONCLUSIONS Preoperative TNFi exposure was not associated with postoperative infectious complications in a large prospective multicenter cohort.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin L Cohen
- Dr Henry D. Janowitz Division of Gastroenterology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York; Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio.
| | - Phillip Fleshner
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
| | - Sunanda V Kane
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Hans H Herfarth
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Nicole Palekar
- Department of Gastroenterology, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, Florida
| | - Francis A Farraye
- Department of Medicine and Section of Gastroenterology, Boston Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts; Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida
| | - Jonathan A Leighton
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona
| | - Jeffry A Katz
- Division of Gastroenterology, Case Western Reserve University/University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Russell D Cohen
- University of Chicago Medicine Inflammatory Bowel Disease Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Mark E Gerich
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Raymond K Cross
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Peter D R Higgins
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Andrew Tinsley
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania
| | - Sarah Glover
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
| | - Corey A Siegel
- Section of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire
| | - Jaime L Bohl
- Department of General Surgery, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina; Department of Surgery, Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Virginia Commonwealth University Medical Center, Richmond, Virginia
| | - Heba Iskandar
- Department of Medicine, Division of Digestive Diseases, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Jiayi Ji
- Dr Henry D. Janowitz Division of Gastroenterology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| | - Liangyuan Hu
- Dr Henry D. Janowitz Division of Gastroenterology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| | - Bruce E Sands
- Dr Henry D. Janowitz Division of Gastroenterology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Hanzel J, Almradi A, Istl AC, Yang ML, Fleshner KA, Parker CE, Guizzetti L, Ma C, Singh S, Jairath V. Increased Risk of Infections with Anti-TNF Agents in Patients with Crohn's Disease After Elective Surgery: Meta-Analysis. Dig Dis Sci 2022; 67:646-660. [PMID: 33634430 DOI: 10.1007/s10620-021-06895-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2020] [Accepted: 02/03/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Postoperative complication rates in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) receiving preoperative biologics have been analyzed without considering the surgical context. Emergency surgery may be associated with an increased risk of infectious complications, compared to elective operations. AIMS To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis investigating the relationship between preoperative biologic therapy and postoperative outcomes in Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC), focusing on elective surgery. METHODS Electronic databases were searched up to February 12, 2020, for studies of patients with IBD undergoing elective abdominal surgery receiving biologic therapy within 3 months before surgery compared to no therapy, or another biologic therapy. Certainty of evidence was evaluated using GRADE. The primary outcomes were the rate of infections and total complications within 30 days. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. RESULTS Thirty-three studies were included. Preoperative treatment with anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) therapy in patients with CD undergoing elective surgery was associated with increased odds of infection (OR 2.05; 95% CI 1.40-3.01), but not total complications (OR 1.03; 95% CI 0.71-1.51). In elective surgery for UC, preoperative anti-TNF therapy was not associated with infectious (OR 1.03; 95% CI 0.34-3.07) or total complications (OR 0.67; 95% CI 0.29-1.58). Limited data indicate that emergency surgery did not significantly affect the rate of complications. CONCLUSIONS Anti-TNF therapy prior to elective surgery may increase the odds of postoperative infection in CD, although the certainty of evidence is very low. More evidence is needed, particularly for newer biologics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jurij Hanzel
- Department of Gastroenterology, UMC Ljubljana, University of Ljubljana, Japljeva ulica 2, 1000, Ljubljana, Slovenia.,Alimentiv Inc. (Formerly Robarts Clinical Trials Inc.), 100 Dundas Street, Suite 200, London, ON, 27N6A 5B6, Canada
| | - Ahmed Almradi
- Alimentiv Inc. (Formerly Robarts Clinical Trials Inc.), 100 Dundas Street, Suite 200, London, ON, 27N6A 5B6, Canada.,Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Western University, 1151 Richmond St, London, ON, N6A 3K7, Canada
| | - Alexandra C Istl
- Division of General Surgery, Western University, 1151 Richmond St, London, ON, N6A 3K7, Canada
| | - Mei Lucy Yang
- Division of General Surgery, Western University, 1151 Richmond St, London, ON, N6A 3K7, Canada
| | - Katherine A Fleshner
- Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, 1151 Richmond St, London, ON, N6A 3K7, Canada
| | - Claire E Parker
- Alimentiv Inc. (Formerly Robarts Clinical Trials Inc.), 100 Dundas Street, Suite 200, London, ON, 27N6A 5B6, Canada
| | - Leonardo Guizzetti
- Alimentiv Inc. (Formerly Robarts Clinical Trials Inc.), 100 Dundas Street, Suite 200, London, ON, 27N6A 5B6, Canada
| | - Christopher Ma
- Alimentiv Inc. (Formerly Robarts Clinical Trials Inc.), 100 Dundas Street, Suite 200, London, ON, 27N6A 5B6, Canada.,Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Departments of Medicine and Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, 2500 University Dr NW, Calgary, AB, T2N 1N4, Canada
| | - Siddharth Singh
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Dr, La Jolla, CA, 92093, USA
| | - Vipul Jairath
- Alimentiv Inc. (Formerly Robarts Clinical Trials Inc.), 100 Dundas Street, Suite 200, London, ON, 27N6A 5B6, Canada. .,Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Western University, 1151 Richmond St, London, ON, N6A 3K7, Canada. .,Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Western University, London, ON, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Fleshner P, Melmed GY. Acute Severe Colitis: The Need for Joint Management between Gastroenterologists and Surgeons. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 2022; 35:66-71. [PMID: 35069032 PMCID: PMC8763454 DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1740030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
The management of hospitalized patients with acute, severe ulcerative colitis involves close coordination among a multidisciplinary team. For patients not improving on intravenous corticosteroids, surgical consultation should be sought. The remaining hospital course requires frequent communications between the gastroenterologist managing the medical aspects of care, and the colorectal surgeon involved in planning for potential surgery, to optimize patient outcomes. This comanagement includes joint decision-making around the timing of surgery, minimizing medications associated with postoperative morbidity, addressing nutritional and psychosocial aspects of the patient's condition, and planning for a coordinated postoperative course. In this review, we highlight these aspects of care and the need for coordination and communication between gastroenterologists and surgeons in the management of acute severe colitis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Phillip Fleshner
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California,Address for correspondence Phillip Fleshner, MD, FACS 8737 Beverly Blvd., Suite 101, Los Angeles, CA 90048
| | - Gil Y. Melmed
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Lightner AL, Fleshner PR. Perioperative management of biologic agents in ulcerative colitis. SEMINARS IN COLON AND RECTAL SURGERY 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.scrs.2022.100866] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
|
11
|
Guyton K, Kearney D, Holubar SD. Anastomotic Leak after Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 2021; 34:417-425. [PMID: 34853564 DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1735274] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
There are special considerations when treating anastomotic leak after restorative proctocolectomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. The epidemiology, risk factors, anatomic considerations, diagnosis and management, as well as the short- and long-term consequences to the patient are unique to this patent population. Additionally, there are specific concerns such as "tip of the J" leaks, transanal management of anastomotic leak/presacral sinus, functional outcomes after leak, and considerations of redo pouch procedures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristina Guyton
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - David Kearney
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Stefan D Holubar
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Liu W, Zhou W. Surgery for inflammatory bowel disease in the era of biologics. Shijie Huaren Xiaohua Zazhi 2021; 29:1311-1315. [DOI: 10.11569/wcjd.v29.i22.1311] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Therapy for inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) has changed dramatically in recent years with the wide use of biologics. Despite these advances in medical therapy, surgery still plays an indispensable role in the management of IBD. And with more and more patients receiving biologics, surgeons also need to adapt to the impact of biologics on the disease. The purpose of this article is to review the role of surgery in the treatment of IBD in the era of biologics and the impact of these medications on perioperative outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wei Liu
- Department of General Surgery, IBD Center, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310016, Zhejiang Province, China
| | - Wei Zhou
- Department of General Surgery, IBD Center, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310016, Zhejiang Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Lightner AL, Vaidya P, Holubar S, Warusavitarne J, Sahnan K, Carrano FM, Spinelli A, Zaghiyan K, Fleshner PR. Perioperative safety of tofacitinib in surgical ulcerative colitis patients. Colorectal Dis 2021; 23:2085-2090. [PMID: 33942470 DOI: 10.1111/codi.15702] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2020] [Revised: 02/03/2021] [Accepted: 03/11/2021] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
AIM The literature regarding monoclonal antibodies and increased postoperative complications in inflammatory bowel disease remains controversial. There have been no studies investigating tofacitinib. The aim of this work was to determine preoperative exposure to the small-molecule inhibitor tofacitinib and postoperative outcomes. METHOD We conducted a retrospective review of all adult patients exposed to tofacitinib within 4 weeks of total abdominal colectomy for medically refractory ulcerative colitis between 1 January 2018 and 1 September 2020 at four inflammatory bowel disease referral centres. Data collected included patient demographics and 90-day postoperative morbidity, readmission and reoperation rates. RESULTS Fifty-three patients (32 men, 60%) with ulcerative colitis underwent a total abdominal colectomy (n = 50 laparoscopic, 94%) for medically refractory disease. Previous exposure to monoclonal antibodies included infliximab (n = 34), adalimumab (n = 35), certolizumab pegol (n = 5), vedolizumab (n = 33) and ustekinumab (n = 10). Twenty-seven (51%) patients were on concurrent prednisone at a median daily dose of 30 mg by mouth (range 5-60 mg). There were no postoperative deaths. Ninety-day postoperative complications included ileus (n = 7, 13.2%), superficial surgical site infection (n = 4, 7.5%), intra-abdominal abscess (n = 2, 3.8%) and venous thromboembolism (VTE) (n = 7, 13.2%). Locations of VTE included portomesenteric venous thrombus (n = 4), internal iliac vein (n = 2) and pulmonary embolism (n = 1). Nine (17%) patients were readmitted to hospital and five (9%) patients had a reoperation. CONCLUSION Mirroring the recently issued US Food and Drug Administration black box warning of an increased risk of VTE in medically treated ulcerative colitis patients taking tofacitinib, preoperative tofacitinib exposure may present an increased risk of postoperative VTE events. Consideration should be given for prolonged VTE prophylaxis on hospital discharge.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy L Lightner
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Prashansha Vaidya
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Stefan Holubar
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | | | - Kapil Sahnan
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, St Marks Hospital, London, UK
| | - Francesco Maria Carrano
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Colon and Rectal Surgery Unit, Rozzano, Milan, Italy.,Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Antonino Spinelli
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Karen Zaghiyan
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Phillip R Fleshner
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Holubar SD, Lightner AL, Poylin V, Vogel JD, Gaertner W, Davis B, Davis KG, Mahadevan U, Shah SA, Kane SV, Steele SR, Paquette IM, Feingold DL. The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Surgical Management of Ulcerative Colitis. Dis Colon Rectum 2021; 64:783-804. [PMID: 33853087 DOI: 10.1097/dcr.0000000000002037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Stefan D Holubar
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Amy L Lightner
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Vitaliy Poylin
- McGaw Medical Center of Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Jon D Vogel
- Colorectal Surgery Section, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Wolfgang Gaertner
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Bradley Davis
- Colon and Rectal Surgery, Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, North Carolina
| | | | - Uma Mahadevan
- Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, California
| | - Samir A Shah
- Department of Medicine, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - Sunanda V Kane
- Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Scott R Steele
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Ian M Paquette
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | - Daniel L Feingold
- Section of Colorectal Surgery, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Thompson DT, Hrabe JE. Staged Approaches to Restorative Proctocolectomy with Ileoanal Pouch-When and Why? J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2021; 31:875-880. [PMID: 34182807 DOI: 10.1089/lap.2021.0060] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Restorative proctocolectomy (RPC) with ileal pouch anal-anastomosis (IPAA) is commonly performed for patients with ulcerative colitis, familial adenomatous polyposis, and selected phenotypes of Crohn's disease (CD). Due to concerns about the effects of surgical complications on pouch functional outcomes, debate remains surrounding when and whether RPC with IPAA should be performed in a staged manner. Particularly debated are the timings of the IPAA, whether it is constructed at time of the proctocolectomy and whether to utilize temporary fecal diversion with a loop ileostomy. RPC with IPAA can be performed in one, two, or three stages, with each stage typically separated by 3-6 months. Proponents of a staged approach argue that poor pouch function, which is often a result of IPAA complications, including leak and infection, can be difficult to overcome and mandate additional, major surgeries, and that staging pouch creation and pairing with a protective ileostomy reduce those complications. However, subjecting patients to multiple surgeries and prolonging their time with an ileostomy present unique risks as well. Surgeons' experience and preference and patient characteristics need to be considered when determining operative planning. Highly selected patients with CD can be considered for RPC with IPAA, although with an acknowledgment of inherently higher pouch failure rates. Understanding the short- and long-term consequences of RPC with IPAA construction can help surgeons determine the appropriate approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dakota T Thompson
- Department of Surgery, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
| | - Jennifer E Hrabe
- Department of Surgery, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Olaiya B, Renelus BD, Filon M, Saha S. Trends in Morbidity and Mortality Following Colectomy Among Patients with Ulcerative Colitis in the Biologic Era (2002-2013): A Study Using the National Inpatient Sample. Dig Dis Sci 2021; 66:2032-2041. [PMID: 32676826 DOI: 10.1007/s10620-020-06474-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2019] [Accepted: 07/04/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Total abdominal colectomy (TAC) is a treatment modality of last recourse for patients with severe and/or refractory ulcerative colitis (UC). The goal of this study is to evaluate temporal trends and treatment outcomes following TAC among hospitalized UC patients in the biologic era. METHODS We queried the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) to identify patients older than 18 years with a primary diagnosis of ulcerative colitis (UC) who underwent TAC between 2002 and 2013. We evaluated postoperative morbidity and mortality as outcomes of interest. Logistic regression was used to explore factors associated with postoperative morbidity and mortality after TAC. RESULTS A weighted total of 307,799 UC hospitalizations were identified. Of these, 27,853 (9%) resulted in TAC. Between 2002 and 2013, hospitalizations for UC increased by over 70%; however, TAC rates dropped significantly from 111.1 to 77.1 colectomies per 1000 UC admissions. Overall, 2.2% of patients died after TAC. Mortality rates after TAC decreased from 3.5% in 2002 to 1.4% in 2013. Conversely, morbidity rates were stable throughout the study period. UC patients with emergent admissions, higher comorbidity scores and who had TAC in low volume colectomy hospitals had poorer outcomes. Regardless of admission type, outcomes were worse if TAC was performed more than 24 h after admission. CONCLUSIONS Despite increased hospitalizations for UC, rates of TAC have declined during the post-biologic era. For UC patients who undergo TAC, mortality has declined significantly while morbidity remains stable. Older age, race, emergent admissions and delayed surgery are predictive factors of both postoperative morbidity and mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Babatunde Olaiya
- Department of Internal Medicine, Marshfield Clinic, Marshfield, WI, USA.
| | - Benjamin D Renelus
- Department of Gastroenterology, Brooklyn Methodist, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, Brooklyn, NY, USA
| | - Mikolaj Filon
- School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Sumona Saha
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Systematic review and meta-analysis: risks of postoperative complications with preoperative use of anti-tumor necrosis factor-alpha biologics in inflammatory bowel disease patients. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2021; 33:799-816. [PMID: 33079779 DOI: 10.1097/meg.0000000000001944] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The preoperative use of anti-tumor necrosis factor-alpha (anti-TNF) in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients undergoing surgery has been controversial due to concern for increased risks of postoperative complications. We aimed to determine the effect of preoperative anti-TNF therapy on postoperative complications in IBD patients undergoing abdominal surgery. METHODS A literature search of Google Scholar, PubMed, The Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and CINAHL was performed through October 2019. Studies reporting postoperative complication rates of Crohn's disease (CD), ulcerative colitis (UC), and IBD-unspecified patients with preoperative anti-TNF treatment undergoing abdominal surgery compared to controls without preoperative anti-TNF treatment were included. The main outcomes measured were overall, infectious, and noninfectious postoperative complications. RESULTS Forty-one studies totaling 20 274 patients were included. There was a significant increase in overall complications in all patients treated with anti-TNF vs. controls [odds ratio (OR) = 1.13, 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.01-1.25, P = 0.03, I2 = 6%] with an absolute risk increase (ARI) of 5.5% and a number needed to harm (NNH) of 18. There was also a significant increase in infectious complications in CD patients (OR = 1.44; 95% CI 1.02-2.03, P = 0.04, I2 = 49%, ARI = 5.5%, NNH = 20) only. Contrastingly, there was a significant increase in noninfectious complications in all patients (OR = 1.44, 95% CI 1.13-1.85, P = 0.003, I2 = 8%, ARI = 6.4%, NNH = 16) and UC patients (OR = 1.57, 95% CI 1.15-2.14, P = 0.005, I2 = 25%, ARI = 8.5%, NNH = 12) only. CONCLUSION Preoperative use of anti-TNF agents in IBD patients undergoing abdominal surgery is associated with increases in overall postoperative complications in all patients, infectious postoperative complications in CD patients, and noninfectious postoperative complications in UC patients.
Collapse
|
18
|
Exploring the Relationship between Biologics and Postoperative Surgical Morbidity in Ulcerative Colitis: A Review. J Clin Med 2021; 10:jcm10040710. [PMID: 33670200 PMCID: PMC7916930 DOI: 10.3390/jcm10040710] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2020] [Revised: 02/04/2021] [Accepted: 02/07/2021] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND With the paradigm shift related to the overspread use of biological agents in the treatment of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD), several questions emerged from the surgical perspective. Whether the use of biologicals would be associated with higher rates of postoperative complications in ulcerative colitis (UC) patients still remains controversial. AIMS We aimed to analyze the literature, searching for studies that correlated postoperative complications and preoperative exposure to biologics in UC patients, and synthesize these data qualitatively in order to check the possible impact of biologics on postoperative surgical morbidity in this population. METHODS Included studies were identified by electronic search in the PUBMED database according to the PRISMA (Preferred Items of Reports for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis) guidelines. The quality and bias assessments were performed by MINORS (methodological index for non-randomized studies) criteria for non-randomized studies. RESULTS 608 studies were initially identified, 22 of which were selected for qualitative evaluation. From those, 19 studies (17 retrospective and two prospective) included preoperative anti-TNF. Seven described an increased risk of postoperative complications, and 12 showed no significant increase postoperative morbidity. Only three studies included surgical UC patients with previous use of vedolizumab, two retrospective and one prospective, all with no significant correlation between the drug and an increase in postoperative complication rates. CONCLUSIONS Despite conflicting results, most studies have not shown increased complication rates after abdominal surgical procedures in patients with UC with preoperative exposure to biologics. Further prospective studies are needed to better establish the impact of preoperative biologics and surgical complications in UC.
Collapse
|
19
|
The Japan Society for Surgical Infection: guidelines for the prevention, detection, and management of gastroenterological surgical site infection, 2018. Surg Today 2020; 51:1-31. [PMID: 33320283 PMCID: PMC7788056 DOI: 10.1007/s00595-020-02181-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/30/2020] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
Background The guidelines for the prevention, detection, and management of gastroenterological surgical site infections (SSIs) were published in Japanese by the Japan Society for Surgical Infection in 2018. This is a summary of these guidelines for medical professionals worldwide. Methods We conducted a systematic review and comprehensive evaluation of the evidence for diagnosis and treatment of gastroenterological SSIs, based on the concepts of the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system. The strength of recommendations was graded and voted using the Delphi method and the nominal group technique. Modifications were made to the guidelines in response to feedback from the general public and relevant medical societies. Results There were 44 questions prepared in seven subject areas, for which 51 recommendations were made. The seven subject areas were: definition and etiology, diagnosis, preoperative management, prophylactic antibiotics, intraoperative management, perioperative management, and wound management. According to the GRADE system, we evaluated the body of evidence for each clinical question. Based on the results of the meta-analysis, recommendations were graded using the Delphi method to generate useful information. The final version of the recommendations was published in 2018, in Japanese. Conclusions The Japanese Guidelines for the prevention, detection, and management of gastroenterological SSI were published in 2018 to provide useful information for clinicians and improve the clinical outcome of patients. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1007/s00595-020-02181-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
|
20
|
Law CCY, Koh D, Bao Y, Jairath V, Narula N. Risk of Postoperative Infectious Complications From Medical Therapies in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2020; 26:1796-1807. [PMID: 32047894 DOI: 10.1093/ibd/izaa020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the impact of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) medications on postoperative infection risk within 30 days of surgery. METHODS We searched multiple electronic databases and reference lists of articles dating up to August 2018 for prospective and retrospective studies comparing postoperative infection risk in patients treated with an IBD medication perioperatively with the risk in patients who were not taking that medication. Outcomes were overall infectious complications and intra-abdominal infections within 30 days of surgery. RESULTS Sixty-three studies were included. Overall infectious complications were increased in patients who received anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) agents (odds ratio [OR] 1.26; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.07-1.50) and corticosteroids (OR 1.34; 95% CI, 1.25-1.44) and decreased in those who received 5-aminosalicylic acid (OR 0.63; 95% CI, 0.46-0.87). No difference was observed in those treated with immunomodulators (OR 1.08; 95% CI, 0.94-1.25) or anti-integrin agents (OR 1.06; 95% CI, 0.67-1.69). Both corticosteroids and anti-TNF agents were associated with increased intra-abdominal infection risk (OR 1.63; 95% CI, 1.33-2.00 and OR 1.46; 95% CI, 1.08-1.97, respectively), whereas no impact was observed with 5-aminosalicylates, immunomodulators, or anti-integrin therapy. Twenty-two studies had low risk of bias while the remaining studies had very high risk. CONCLUSIONS Corticosteroids and anti-TNF agents were associated with increased overall postoperative infection risk as well as intra-abdominal infection in IBD patients, whereas no increased risk was observed for immunomodulators or anti-integrin therapy. Although these results may result from residual confounding rather than from a true biological effect, prospective studies that control for potential confounding factors are required to generate higher-quality evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cindy C Y Law
- Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Deborah Koh
- Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Yueyang Bao
- Department of Biology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Vipul Jairath
- Departments of Medicine, Epidemiology, and Biostatistics, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Neeraj Narula
- Division of Gastroenterology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Law CC, Bell C, Koh D, Bao Y, Jairath V, Narula N. Risk of postoperative infectious complications from medical therapies in inflammatory bowel disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2020; 10:CD013256. [PMID: 33098570 PMCID: PMC8094278 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd013256.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Medications used to treat inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) have significantly improved patient outcomes and delayed time to surgery. However, some of these therapies are recognized to increase the general risk of infection and have an unclear impact on postoperative infection risk. OBJECTIVES To assess the impact of perioperative IBD medications on the risk of postoperative infections within 30 days of surgery. SEARCH METHODS We searched the Cochrane IBD Group's Specialized Register (29 October 2019), MEDLINE (January 1966 to October 2019), Embase (January 1985 to October 2019), the Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform from inception up to October 2019, and reference lists of articles. SELECTION CRITERIA Randomized controlled trials, quasi-randomized controlled trials, non-randomized controlled trials, prospective cohort studies, retrospective cohort studies, case-control studies and cross-sectional studies comparing participants treated with an IBD medication preoperatively or within 30 days postoperatively to those who were not taking that medication (either another active medication, placebo, or no treatment). We included published study reports and abstracts. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two review authors independently screened titles and abstracts and extracted data. The primary outcome was postoperative infection within 30 days of surgery. Secondary outcomes included incisional infections and wound dehiscence, intra-abdominal infectious complications and extra-abdominal infections. Three review authors assessed risks of bias using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. We contacted authors for additional information when data were missing. For the primary and secondary outcomes, we calculated odds ratios (ORs) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) using the generic inverse variance method. When applicable, we analyzed adjusted and unadjusted data separately. We evaluated the certainty of the evidence using GRADE. MAIN RESULTS We included 68 observational cohort studies (total number of participants unknown because some studies did not report the number of participants). Of these, 48 studies reported including participants with Crohn's disease, 36 reported including participants with ulcerative colitis and five reported including participants with indeterminate colitis. All 42 studies that reported urgency of surgery included elective surgeries, with 31 (74%) of those also including emergency surgeries. Twenty-four studies had low risk of bias while the rest had very high risk. Based on pooling of adjusted data, we calculated ORs for postoperative total infection rates in participants who received corticosteroids (OR 1.70, 95% CI 1.38 to 2.09; low-certainty evidence), immunomodulators (OR 1.29, 95% CI 0.95 to 1.76; low-certainty evidence), anti-TNF agents (OR 1.60, 95% CI 1.20 to 2.13; very low-certainty evidence) and anti-integrin agents (OR 1.04, 95% CI 0.79 to 1.36; low-certainty evidence). We pooled unadjusted data to assess postoperative total infection rates for the use of aminosalicylates (5-ASA) (OR 0.76, 95% CI 0.51 to 1.14; very low-certainty evidence). One secondary outcome examined was wound-related complications in participants using: corticosteroids (OR 1.41, 95% CI 0.72 to 2.74; very low-certainty evidence), immunomodulators (OR 1.35, 95% CI 0.96 to 1.89; very low-certainty evidence), anti-TNF agents (OR 1.18, 95% CI 0.83 to 1.68; very low-certainty evidence) and anti-integrin agents (OR 1.64, 95% CI 0.77 to 3.50; very low-certainty evidence) compared to controls. Another secondary outcome examined the odds of postoperative intra-abdominal infections in participants using: corticosteroids (OR 1.53, 95% CI 1.28 to 1.84; very low-certainty evidence), 5-ASA (OR 0.77, 95% CI 0.45 to 1.33; very low-certainty evidence), immunomodulators (OR 0.86, 95% CI 0.66 to 1.12; very low-certainty evidence), anti-TNF agents (OR 1.38, 95% CI 1.04 to 1.82; very low-certainty evidence) and anti-integrin agents (OR 0.40, 95% CI 0.14 to 1.20; very low-certainty evidence) compared to controls. Lastly we checked the odds for extra-abdominal infections in participants using: corticosteroids (OR 1.23, 95% CI 0.97 to 1.55; very low-certainty evidence), immunomodulators (OR 1.17, 95% CI 0.80 to 1.71; very low-certainty evidence), anti-TNF agents (OR 1.34, 95% CI 0.96 to 1.87; very low-certainty evidence) and anti-integrin agents (OR 1.15, 95% CI 0.43 to 3.08; very low-certainty evidence) compared to controls. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS The evidence for corticosteroids, 5-ASA, immunomodulators, anti-TNF medications and anti-integrin medications was of low or very low certainty. The impact of these medications on postoperative infectious complications is uncertain and we can draw no firm conclusions about their safety in the perioperative period. Decisions on preoperative IBD medications should be tailored to each person's unique circumstances. Future studies should focus on controlling for potential confounding factors to generate higher-quality evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cindy Cy Law
- Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Conor Bell
- Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Deborah Koh
- Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Yueyang Bao
- Department of Biology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Vipul Jairath
- Department of Medicine, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada
| | - Neeraj Narula
- Division of Gastroenterology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Bislenghi G, Ferrante M, D'Hoore A. Anti-TNF and Pouch Surgery for Ulcerative Colitis: The Ones who Blame for More Complications? Curr Drug Targets 2020; 20:1349-1355. [PMID: 30919776 DOI: 10.2174/1389450120666190328153200] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2018] [Revised: 02/11/2019] [Accepted: 03/14/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Since the approval in 2005 of anti-TNF drugs for the treatment of ulcerative colitis, concerns have been raised about the potential detrimental effect of these agents on postoperative infectious complications related to pouch surgery. Data on this topic are controversial and mostly derived from retrospective underpowered cohort studies largely affected by relevant bias. Three meta-analyses have been published with contradictory results. Moreover, the correlation between serum levels of infliximab at the time of surgery and the occurrence of septic postoperative complication is far to be proven and remains an answered research question. The construction of an ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) as first surgical step in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) refractory to medical treatment seems to be associated with an increased risk of septic complications. Population-based data from the United States show a shift towards stage surgery for patients with refractory UC as a consequence of the widespread use of biological agents and the increased tendency to consider surgery as ultimate resort (step-up approach). In this setting, the classic 3-stage procedure (ileoanal pouch and diversion ileostomy after initial total colectomy) together with the modified 2-stage approach (ileoanal pouch without diversion ileostomy after initial total colectomy) are both effective options. Whether or not a diversion ileostomy could prevent pouch complications at the time of the pouch construction during the second stage of surgery is still a matter of debate. Emerging data seem to claim for increased risk of small bowel obstructions related to the presence of a stoma without proven effect on the prevention of anastomotic leak.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G Bislenghi
- Department of Abdominal Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - M Ferrante
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospitals Leuven, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - A D'Hoore
- Department of Abdominal Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Zanelli J, Chandrapalan S, Patel A, Arasaradnam RP. The impact of pre-operative biologic therapy on post-operative surgical outcomes in ulcerative colitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Therap Adv Gastroenterol 2020; 13:1756284820937089. [PMID: 33281933 PMCID: PMC7685679 DOI: 10.1177/1756284820937089] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2020] [Accepted: 05/31/2020] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Biologic therapy has emerged as an effective modality amongst the medical treatment options available for ulcerative colitis (UC). However, its impact on post-operative care in patients with UC is still debatable. This review evaluates the risk of post-operative complications following biologic treatment in patients with UC. METHODS A systematic search of the relevant databases was conducted with the aim of identifying studies that compared the post-operative complication rates of UC patients who were either exposed or not exposed to a biologic therapy prior to their surgery. Outcomes of interest included both infection-related complications and overall surgical morbidity. Pooled odds-ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using Review Manager 5.3. RESULTS In all, 20 studies, reviewing a total of 12,494 patients with UC, were included in the meta-analysis. Of these, 2254 patients were exposed to a biologic therapy prior to surgery. The pooled ORs for infection-related complications (n = 8067) and overall complications (n = 11,869) were 0.98 (95% CI 0.66-1.45) and 1.14 (95% CI 1.04-1.28), respectively, which suggested that there was no significant association between the use of pre-operative biologic therapy and post-operative complications. Interestingly, the interval between the last dose of biologic therapy and surgery did not influence the risk of having a post-operative infection. CONCLUSIONS This meta-analysis suggests that pre-operative biologic therapy does not increase the overall risk of having post-operative infection-related or other complications. PROSPERO registration id-CRD42019141827.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Abhilasha Patel
- Oxford University Hospitals Foundation NHS Trust, Oxford, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
|
25
|
Surgery for Inflammatory Bowel Disease in the Era of Biologics. J Gastrointest Surg 2020; 24:1430-1435. [PMID: 32253646 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-020-04563-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2020] [Accepted: 02/29/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The advent of monoclonal antibody therapy for the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease has greatly changed the multidisciplinary management of these patients, including surgical approaches. As an increasing number of inflammatory bowel disease patients are being medically managed with monoclonal antibody therapy or combination therapy with immunomodulators, more patients are coming to the operating room having been exposed to these medical therapies. METHODS A search of the relevant literature regarding monoclonal antibody therapy and postoperative outcomes was performed. RESULTS Significant controversy remains regarding the association between monoclonal antibodies and postoperative outcomes. Different classes of monoclonal antibodies may have different impacts on infectious complications. Operations for Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis alter how we think about a change in care in the era of monoclonal antibodies. CONCLUSION In Crohn's disease, intestinal diversion may be considered in patient and disease specific scenarios and in ulcerative colitis, the use of a 3-stage approach to an ileal pouch is now more often used.
Collapse
|
26
|
Uchino M, Ikeuchi H, Shimizu J, Ohge H, Haji S, Mizuguchi T, Mohri Y, Yamashita C, Kitagawa Y, Suzuki K, Kobayashi M, Kobayashi M, Sakamoto F, Yoshida M, Mayumi T, Hirata K, Takesue Y. Association between preoperative tumor necrosis factor alpha inhibitor and surgical site infection after surgery for inflammatory bowel disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Today 2020; 51:32-43. [PMID: 32277281 DOI: 10.1007/s00595-020-02003-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2020] [Accepted: 03/06/2020] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
Tumor necrosis factor-alpha inhibitor (TNFi) treatment is effective for ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD). Although several meta-analyses have been performed to evaluate the association between TNFi treatment and surgical morbidity, the results are controversial. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of the prevention of surgical site infection (SSI) after surgery for UC and CD in patients on TNFis, based on literature published between January 2000 and May 2019 (registered on PROSPERO, No. CRD42019134156). Overall, 2175 UC patients in 13 observational studies (OBSs) and 7084 CD patients in 16 OBSs were included. The incidences of incisional (INC) SSI and organ/space (O/S) SSI after surgery for UC were 179/1985 (9.0%) and 176/2175 (8.1%), respectively. TNFi use was not associated with the incidences of INC SSI (odds ratio (OR) 1.04, 95% confidence interval (CI) (0.47-2.32) or O/S SSI (OR 1.85, 95% CI (0.82-4.20)) after surgery for UC. The INC SSI and O/S SSI incidences after surgery for CD were 289/3089 (9.4%) and 526/7,084 (7.4%), respectively. Preoperative TNFi use was not associated with INC SSI (OR 0.98, 95% CI (0.52-1.83)) or O/S SSI incidence (OR 1.09, 95% CI (0.78-1.52)) after surgery for CD. We did not find a significant association between preoperative TNFi use and SSI in surgery for UC or CD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Motoi Uchino
- Department of Inflammatory Bowel Disease, Hyogo College of Medicine, 1-1, Mukogawacho, Nishinomiya, Hyogo, Japan.
| | - Hiroki Ikeuchi
- Department of Inflammatory Bowel Disease, Hyogo College of Medicine, 1-1, Mukogawacho, Nishinomiya, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Junzo Shimizu
- Department of Surgery, Toyonaka Municipal Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | - Hiroki Ohge
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Hiroshima University Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Seiji Haji
- Department of Surgery, Takatsuki General Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | - Toru Mizuguchi
- Department of Nursing, Surgical Science and Technology, Sapporo Medical University, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Yasuhiko Mohri
- Department of Surgery, Mie Prefectural General Medical Center, Mie, Japan
| | - Chizuru Yamashita
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Aichi, Japan
| | - Yuichi Kitagawa
- Department of Infection Control, National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology, Aichi, Japan
| | - Katsunori Suzuki
- Division of Infection Control and Prevention, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Motomu Kobayashi
- Department of Anesthesiology and Resuscitology, Okayama University Hospital, Okayama, Japan
| | | | - Fumie Sakamoto
- Infection Control Manager, QI Center, St. Luke's International Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Masahiro Yoshida
- Hemodialysis and Surgery, International University of Health and Welfare Ichikawa Hospital, Chiba, Japan
| | - Toshihiko Mayumi
- Department of Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Koichi Hirata
- Department of Surgery, JR Sapporo Hospital, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Yoshio Takesue
- Division of Infection Control and Prevention, Hyogo College of Medicine, Nishinomiya, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Pellino G, Keller DS, Sampietro GM, Carvello M, Celentano V, Coco C, Colombo F, Geccherle A, Luglio G, Rottoli M, Scarpa M, Sciaudone G, Sica G, Sofo L, Zinicola R, Leone S, Danese S, Spinelli A, Delaini G, Selvaggi F. Inflammatory bowel disease position statement of the Italian Society of Colorectal Surgery (SICCR): ulcerative colitis. Tech Coloproctol 2020; 24:397-419. [PMID: 32124113 DOI: 10.1007/s10151-020-02175-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2019] [Accepted: 02/09/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
The Italian Society of Colorectal Surgery (SICCR) promoted the project reported here, which consists of a Position Statement of Italian colorectal surgeons to address the surgical aspects of ulcerative colitis management. Members of the society were invited to express their opinions on several items proposed by the writing committee, based on evidence available in the literature. The results are presented, focusing on relevant points. The present paper is not an alternative to available guidelines; rather, it offers a snapshot of the attitudes of SICCR surgeons about the surgical treatment of ulcerative colitis. The committee was able to identify some points of major disagreement and suggested strategies to improve the quality of available data and acceptance of guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G Pellino
- Colorectal Surgery, Department of Advanced Medical and Surgical Sciences, Università Degli Studi Della Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Policlinico CS, Piazza Miraglia 2, 80138, Naples, Italy
| | - D S Keller
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, NewYork-Presbyterian, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - M Carvello
- Colon and Rectal Surgery Division, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - V Celentano
- Portsmouth Hospitals NHS Trust, Portsmouth, UK.,University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, UK
| | - C Coco
- UOC Chirurgia Generale 2, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli-IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - F Colombo
- L. Sacco University Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - A Geccherle
- IBD Unit, IRCCS Sacro Cuore-Don Calabria, Negrar Di Valpolicella, VR, Italy
| | - G Luglio
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - M Rottoli
- Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Sant'Orsola Hospital, Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - M Scarpa
- General Surgery Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera Di Padova, Padua, Italy
| | - G Sciaudone
- Colorectal Surgery, Department of Advanced Medical and Surgical Sciences, Università Degli Studi Della Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Policlinico CS, Piazza Miraglia 2, 80138, Naples, Italy
| | - G Sica
- Minimally Invasive and Gastro-Intestinal Unit, Department of Surgery, Policlinico Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
| | - L Sofo
- Abdominal Surgery Department, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Catholic University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - R Zinicola
- Department of Emergency Surgery, University Hospital Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - S Leone
- Associazione Nazionale Per Le Malattie Infiammatorie Croniche Dell'Intestino "A.M.I.C.I. Onlus", Milan, Italy
| | - S Danese
- Division of Gastroenterology, IBD Center, Humanitas University, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - A Spinelli
- Colon and Rectal Surgery Division, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - G Delaini
- Department of Surgery, "Pederzoli" Hospital, Peschiera del Garda, Verona, Italy
| | - F Selvaggi
- Colorectal Surgery, Department of Advanced Medical and Surgical Sciences, Università Degli Studi Della Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Policlinico CS, Piazza Miraglia 2, 80138, Naples, Italy.
| | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Yamamoto T, Carvello M, Lightner AL, Spinelli A, Kotze PG. Up-to-date surgery for ulcerative colitis in the era of biologics. Expert Opin Biol Ther 2020; 20:391-398. [PMID: 31948294 DOI: 10.1080/14712598.2020.1718098] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
Introduction: In recent decades, biologics have resulted in significantly improved medical management of ulcerative colitis (UC). Rates of surgery for UC are declining. However, there is still a controversial question of the relation of biologics to postoperative adverse outcomes and the most appropriate timing for operative intervention.Areas covered: In this review, we explore the updated treatment algorithm of acute severe colitis, describe postoperative outcomes in patients exposed to biologics preoperatively, and discuss the primary indications for staging surgery in chronic refractory cases, largely with prolonged medical therapy.Expert opinion: Delaying pouch construction to when patients are in better health is suggested as a safer strategy over the long term. The surgical management of UC patients in the biologic era needs to be individualized, and a case-based multidisciplinary decision is critical for improved outcomes and a reduction of morbidity and mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takayuki Yamamoto
- Inflammatory Bowel Disease Center & Department of Surgery, Yokkaichi Hazu Medical Center, Yokkaichi, Japan
| | - Michele Carvello
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Milano, Italy
| | - Amy Lee Lightner
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Antonino Spinelli
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Milano, Italy.,Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy
| | - Paulo Gustavo Kotze
- IBD outpatient clinics, Colorectal Surgery Unit, Catholic University of Parana (PUCPR), Curitiba, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Kassel L, Hutton A, Zumach G, Rand J. Systematic review of perioperative use of immunosuppressive agents in patients undergoing bariatric surgery. Surg Obes Relat Dis 2019; 16:144-157. [PMID: 31735569 DOI: 10.1016/j.soard.2019.10.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2019] [Revised: 09/14/2019] [Accepted: 10/02/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients who qualify for bariatric surgery are increasingly experiencing co-morbid conditions, which often require management through the use of immunosuppressive agents, such as corticosteroids, tumor necrosis factor-alpha inhibitors, or other immunomodulators, which may increase the risk of infection or wound healing complications. Perioperative management of these agents in bariatric surgery is challenging because of the lack of research in this patient population. With the use of immunosuppressive agents on the rise, the effects of these medications must be understood, both the risks posed in the perioperative period, and the benefit their sustained use may have for co-morbidity management. OBJECTIVES To describe the safety of immunosuppressive agents prior to bariatric surgery. SETTING United States of America. METHODS A systematic review was conducted to answer these questions about commonly encountered immunosuppressive agents. This review includes information from 37 studies to present recommendations and reasoning for the discontinuation and postoperative reinitiation of immunosuppressive agents including, tumor necrosis alpha factor-a inhibitors, methotrexate, and more. RESULTS Research addressing complications of these medications in patients undergoing bariatric surgery is sparse. Information from abdominal or general surgical complications may serve as a basis for conservative recommendations. Data specific to each agent or class are presented below. CONCLUSIONS The use of these agents may be critical for patients' chronic disease management, and the consequences of their impact should be considered by bariatric surgeons. While their immune system effects ultimately lead to disease management, each agent must be handled individually due to the varying effects and the potential for perioperative untoward effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lynn Kassel
- Drake University College of Pharmacy & Health Sciences, Des Moines, Iowa; MercyOne West Des Moines Hospital, West Des Moines, Iowa.
| | | | - Gregory Zumach
- Oregon State University College of Pharmacy, Oregon Health & Science University, Corvallis, Oregon; Good Samaritan Regional Medical Center, Corvallis, Oregon
| | - Joel Rand
- MercyOne West Des Moines Hospital, West Des Moines, Iowa; MercyOne Bariatric Surgery, West Des Moines, Iowa
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
El-Hussuna A, Myrelid P, Holubar SD, Kotze PG, Mackenzie G, Pellino G, Winter D, Davies J, Negoi I, Grewal P, Gallo G, Sahnan K, Rubio-Perez I, Clerc D, Demartines N, Glasbey J, Regueiro M, Sherif AE, Neary P, Pata F, Silverberg M, Clermont S, Chadi SA, Emile S, Buchs N, Millan M, Minaya-Bravo A, Elfeki H, De Simone V, Shalaby M, Gutierrez C, Ozen C, Yalçınkaya A, Rivadeneira D, Sturiale A, Yassin N, Spinelli A, Warusavitarne J, Ioannidis A, Wexner S, Mayol J. Biological Treatment and the Potential Risk of Adverse Postoperative Outcome in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease: An Open-Source Expert Panel Review of the Current Literature and Future Perspectives. CROHN'S & COLITIS 360 2019; 1. [DOI: 10.1093/crocol/otz021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/11/2023] Open
Abstract
AbstractBackgroundThere is widespread concern that treatment with biologic agents may be associated with suboptimal postoperative outcome after surgery for inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD).AimWe aimed to search and analyze the literature regarding the potential association of biologic treatment on adverse postoperative outcome in patients with IBD. We used the subject as a case in point for surgical research. The aim was not to conduct a new systematic review.MethodThis is an updated narrative review written in a collaborative method by authors invited through Twitter via the following hashtags (#OpenSourceResearch and #SoMe4Surgery). The manuscript was presented as slides on Twitter to allow discussion of each section of the paper sequentially. A Google document was created, which was shared across social media, and comments and edits were verified by the primary author to ensure accuracy and consistency.ResultsForty-one collaborators responded to the invitation, and a total of 106 studies were identified that investigated the potential association of preoperative biological treatment on postoperative outcome in patients with IBD. Most of these studies were retrospective observational cohorts: 3 were prospective, 4 experimental, and 3 population-based studies. These studies were previously analyzed in 10 systematic/narrative reviews and 14 meta-analyses. Type of biologic agents, dose, drug concentration, antidrug antibodies, interval between last dose, and types of surgery varied widely among the studies. Adjustment for confounders and bias control ranged from good to very poor. Only 10 studies reported postoperative outcome according to Clavien–Dindo classification.ConclusionAlthough a large number of studies investigated the potential effect of biological treatment on postoperative outcomes, many reported divergent results. There is a need for randomized controlled trials. Future studies should focus on the avoiding the weakness of prior studies we identified. Seeking collaborators and sharing information via Twitter was integral to widening the contributors/authors and peer review for this article and was an effective method of collaboration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Alaa El-Hussuna
- Department of Surgery, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Pär Myrelid
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Stefan D Holubar
- Director of Research, Department of Colon & Rectal Surgery, Cleveland, OH
| | - Paulo G Kotze
- Colorectal Surgery Unit, Catholic University of Parana (PUCPR), Curitiba, Brazil
| | | | - Gianluca Pellino
- Department of Surgery, Università della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Aversa, Italy
| | - Des Winter
- Centre for Colorectal Disease, St Vincent’s University Hospital, Elm Park, Dublin 4, Ireland
| | - Justin Davies
- Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| | - Ionut Negoi
- Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy Bucharest, Romania
| | - Perbinder Grewal
- Department of Cardiovascular, University Hospital Southampton, UK
| | - Gaetano Gallo
- Department of General Surgery, “Magna Graecia” University, Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Kapil Sahnan
- Imperial College Faculty of Medicine, Department of Surgery and St Marks Hospital, London, UK
| | - Ines Rubio-Perez
- General and Digestive Surgery Department, La Paz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| | - Daniel Clerc
- Department of Visceral Surgery, University Hospital CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Nicolas Demartines
- Department of Visceral Surgery, Lausanne University Hospital CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - James Glasbey
- Academic Department of Surgery, University of Birmingham Heritage Building, UK
| | - Miguel Regueiro
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - Ahmed E Sherif
- Department of Clinical Surgery, University of Edinburgh, UK
| | - Peter Neary
- South East Cancer Governance Lead, University Hospital Waterford/Cork, Ireland
| | - Francesco Pata
- Department of Surgery, Sant’Antonio Abate Hospital, Gallarate, Italy
| | - Mark Silverberg
- Mount Sinai Hospital Inflammatory Bowel Disease Centre, University of Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | - Sami A Chadi
- Division of General Surgery, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Sameh Emile
- General Surgery Department, Mansoura Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura City, Egypt
| | - Nicolas Buchs
- Department of Surgery, University Hospitals of Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Monica Millan
- Department of Surgery, Joan XXIII University Hospital, Tarragona, Spain
| | | | - Hossam Elfeki
- Department of General Surgery, Mansoura Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University, Egypt
| | - Veronica De Simone
- Proctology Unit, Catholic University, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, Rome, Italy
| | - Mostafa Shalaby
- Department of General Surgery, Mansoura Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University, Egypt
| | - Celestino Gutierrez
- Department of Suregry, Centre Hospitalier de Redon Ille-et-Vilaine Bretagne-France
| | - Cihan Ozen
- Department of Surgery, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
| | | | - David Rivadeneira
- Colorectal Surgery & Surgical Services, Northwell Health in Huntington, NY, USA
| | - Alssandro Sturiale
- Proctological and Perineal Surgical Unit, Cisanello University Hospital, Pisa, Italy
| | - Nuha Yassin
- Department of surgery, Royal Wolverhampton Hoaspital, UK
| | - Antonino Spinelli
- Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Argyrios Ioannidis
- Department of General, Laparoscopic and Robotic Surgery, Athens Medical Center
| | - Steven Wexner
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, FL
| | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Qiu Y, Zheng Z, Liu G, Zhao X, He A. Effects of preoperative anti-tumour necrosis factor alpha infusion timing on postoperative surgical site infection in inflammatory bowel disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis. United European Gastroenterol J 2019; 7:1198-1214. [PMID: 31700633 DOI: 10.1177/2050640619878998] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2019] [Accepted: 09/03/2019] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Anti-tumour necrosis factor alpha agents (anti-TNF-α) have been widely used in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). However, few published meta-analyses have focused on timing of the last infusion before surgery. We evaluated the relationship between preoperative anti-TNF-α timing and postoperative surgical site infection to provide additional evidence for surgeons to choose appropriate dates for surgery. Methods We searched from inception until January 2019 for studies that documented postoperative complications of adults with IBD who underwent preoperative anti-TNF-α treatment. Primary outcomes of included studies were the odds ratios of preoperative anti-TNF-α time frames (4, 8 and 12 weeks). In addition, surgical site infection and its subtypes (anastomotic leakage, abscesses and wound infection) were analysed. Results Twenty-seven publications were included. No significant difference between anti-TNF-α and control cohorts was observed for most postoperative surgical site infections (or its subtypes) when the preoperative anti-TNF-α infusion time window was within 4, 8 or 12 weeks. Additionally, no significant difference in postoperative complications was observed between preoperative anti-TNF-α windows of within four weeks and more than four weeks. Conclusions In terms of surgical site infection and its subtypes, anti-TNF-α may be safe for ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease patients who receive their last infusion of anti-TNF-α more than four weeks before surgery. We also found no evidence that anti-TNF-α was a risk factor when administered within four weeks, with the exception of subgroup results from a single study. Stratified by time window, use of anti-TNF-α until surgery has the potential to become a more considered strategy in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- YuJie Qiu
- Department of General Surgery, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, PR China.,Tianjin General Surgery Institute, Tianjin, PR China
| | - ZiCheng Zheng
- Department of General Surgery, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, PR China.,Tianjin General Surgery Institute, Tianjin, PR China
| | - Gang Liu
- Department of General Surgery, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, PR China.,Tianjin General Surgery Institute, Tianjin, PR China
| | - XinYu Zhao
- Department of General Surgery, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, PR China.,Tianjin General Surgery Institute, Tianjin, PR China
| | - AnQi He
- Department of General Surgery, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, PR China.,Tianjin General Surgery Institute, Tianjin, PR China
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate differences in surgical approach and postoperative outcomes for patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) before and after the introduction of biologic therapy. BACKGROUND Biologic use has dramatically increased since Food and Drug Administration approval of infliximab. Studies conflict as to the effect of these agents on surgical outcomes with some demonstrating worse surgical outcomes whereas others have found no difference. METHODS We used an administrative, all-payer, all-age group database located in New York State. Patients were included if they had a diagnosis of UC and underwent surgery for their disease from 1995 to 2013. Outcomes were compared for the index admission, at 90-day, and 1-year follow up. RESULTS A total of 7070 patients were included for analysis; 54% patients underwent surgery between 1995 and 2005 and the remaining 46% patients underwent surgery between 2005 and 2013. There was a significant increase in the proportion of patients who underwent at least 3 procedures after 2005(14% vs 9%, P < 0.01). On adjusted analysis, patients undergoing surgery after 2005 had higher likelihood of major events (odd s ratio, OR = 1.42; 95% confidence interval, CI = 1.13-1.78), procedural complications (OR = 1.42; 95% CI = 1.20-1.68), and nonroutine discharge (OR = 3.17; 95% CI = 2.79-3.60) during the index admission. Similar trends for worse adjusted outcomes in patients initially undergoing surgery after 2005 were seen at 90-day and 1-year follow up. CONCLUSIONS Since the introduction of biologic agents in 2005, surgery for patients with UC is more likely to require multiple procedures. Despite robust adjustments, patients having surgery recently have worse postoperative morbidity during the index hospitalization, at 90-day and 1-year follow up. More work is necessary to improve outcomes in these higher risk patients that undergo surgery.
Collapse
|
33
|
Ng KS, Gonsalves SJ, Sagar PM. Ileal-anal pouches: A review of its history, indications, and complications. World J Gastroenterol 2019; 25:4320-4342. [PMID: 31496616 PMCID: PMC6710180 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i31.4320] [Citation(s) in RCA: 69] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2019] [Revised: 03/12/2019] [Accepted: 03/25/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
The ileal pouch anal anastomosis (IPAA) has revolutionised the surgical management of ulcerative colitis (UC) and familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP). Despite refinement in surgical technique(s) and patient selection, IPAA can be associated with significant morbidity. As the IPAA celebrated its 40th anniversary in 2018, this review provides a timely outline of its history, indications, and complications. IPAA has undergone significant modification since 1978. For both UC and FAP, IPAA surgery aims to definitively cure disease and prevent malignant degeneration, while providing adequate continence and avoiding a permanent stoma. The majority of patients experience long-term success, but “early” and “late” complications are recognised. Pelvic sepsis is a common early complication with far-reaching consequences of long-term pouch dysfunction, but prompt intervention (either radiological or surgical) reduces the risk of pouch failure. Even in the absence of sepsis, pouch dysfunction is a long-term complication that may have a myriad of causes. Pouchitis is a common cause that remains incompletely understood and difficult to manage at times. 10% of patients succumb to the diagnosis of pouch failure, which is traditionally associated with the need for pouch excision. This review provides a timely outline of the history, indications, and complications associated with IPAA. Patient selection remains key, and contraindications exist for this surgery. A structured management plan is vital to the successful management of complications following pouch surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kheng-Seong Ng
- John Goligher Colorectal Unit, St. James’s University Hospital, Leeds LS9 7TF, United Kingdom
- Institute of Academic Surgery, University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales 2050, Australia
| | - Simon Joseph Gonsalves
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Huddersfield Royal Infirmary, Calderdale and Huddersfield NHS Foundation Trust, Huddersfield HD3 3EA, United Kingdom
| | - Peter Michael Sagar
- John Goligher Colorectal Unit, St. James’s University Hospital, Leeds LS9 7TF, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Abstract
Every year 16 million operations are performed in Germany. Many patients have an autoimmune disorder, for example rheumatoid arthritis, psoriasis or chronic inflammatory bowel disease, which requires treatment. Immunosuppressants are widely applied. Physicians must make a risk-adapted decision whether the immunosuppressant medication can be continued perioperatively or if certain drugs must be paused and if so, with what risks. The handling of immunosuppressants during the perioperative period is very relevant as many patients, for example with rheumatoid arthritis are in need of a hip or knee replacement or patients with inflammatory bowel disease need an operation due to the chronic illness. The interruption of an immunosuppressant therapy should be discussed in an interdisciplinary board according to the underlying disease, because the continuation of immunosuppressants perioperatively can lead to an increased rate of complications, especially wound healing disorders. If a patient is on a glucocorticoid therapy the following must be considered: during the perioperative period the body has an increased demand for glucocorticoids due to the stress reaction. If glucocorticoids are administered in a dosage of more than 7.5 mg/day equivalent of prednisolone this stress reaction is inhibited. Thus, in these cases a perioperative substitution with hydrocortisone is recommended.
Collapse
|
35
|
Lightner AL. Do medications affect outcomes in pelvic pouch construction? SEMINARS IN COLON AND RECTAL SURGERY 2019. [DOI: 10.1053/j.scrs.2019.01.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
|
36
|
The Effect of Biologics on Postoperative Complications in Children With Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Bowel Resection. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2019; 68:334-338. [PMID: 30247424 DOI: 10.1097/mpg.0000000000002159] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES There has been limited investigation of pediatric patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) who have been treated with biologic agents and undergo operative management. Postoperative complications in the adult setting have been mixed and in the pediatric population the data have been limited. This study compares children with IBD treated with biologic agents to patients treated with nonbiologic therapy before bowel resection. METHODS This is a single-center, retrospective chart review study of 62 children with IBD who underwent bowel resection between 2001 and 2017. Analysis included patient demographics, medications used before surgery, incidence of postoperative complications, indication for surgery, type of operation, and additional surgeries required. Postoperative complications were defined as superficial skin infection, leak at anastomotic site, intra-abdominal abscess, wound dehiscence, and so on. Complications were compared based on medical therapy. RESULTS Of the 62 children reviewed, 21 carried the diagnosis of ulcerative colitis, 40 had Crohn disease, and 1 had IBD-unspecified. Thirty-seven of the patients were treated with infliximab, adalimumab, or vedolizumab before their bowel resection. There were 4 complications documented within 30 days of the operation, with an overall complication rate of 6.45%. There were 2 complications in each of the cohorts, including intra-abdominal abscess (2), abdominal wall abscess (1), and pouchitis (1). CONCLUSION The number of complications was the same between those who did and did not receive a preoperative biologic agent. This study suggests that biologics may be safe to use in patients undergoing bowel resection.
Collapse
|
37
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Surgical outcomes and pouch outcomes in the setting of vedolizumab remains poorly understood. We sought to determine the rate of 30-day postoperative surgical infectious complications and pouch-specific complications among patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) who received vedolizumab within 12 weeks of surgery. METHODS A retrospective chart review between 5/1/2014 and 12/31/2016 of all adult patients with UC who underwent an abdominal operation was performed. Patients with UC who received vedolizumab within 12 weeks of their abdominal operation were compared with patients with UC on anti-TNFα treatment. RESULTS Eighty-eight patients received vedolizumab and 62 received anti-TNFα within 12 weeks of surgery. More vedolizumab-treated patients had superficial surgical site infections (P = 0.047) and mucocutaneous separation at the ileostomy (P = 0.047), but there was no difference in the overall surgical infectious complication rate, deep space SSI, 30-day hospital readmission or return to the operating room. On univariate analysis of SSI among patients with UC, exposure to vedolizumab was not a significant predictor of SSI (P = 0.27), but steroids were predictive of SSI on univariate (P = 0.02) and multivariable analysis (P = 0.02). After ileal pouch anal anastomosis, there was a higher rate of intra-abdominal abscesses (31.3% versus 5.9%) and mucocutaneous separation (18.8% versus 0%) in the vedolizumab group compared with the anti-TNFα group, but statistical significance was not reached. CONCLUSIONS Vedolizumab patients had significantly increased rates of superficial SSI, but not overall infectious complications. Among ileal pouch anal anastomosis patients, peripouch abscess rates were increased among vedolizumab-treated patients, but this did not reach statistical significance. Vedolizumab seems safe in the perioperative period for patients with UC.
Collapse
|
38
|
Kulaylat AS, Kulaylat AN, Schaefer EW, Tinsley A, Williams E, Koltun W, Hollenbeak CS, Messaris E. Association of Preoperative Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor Therapy With Adverse Postoperative Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Abdominal Surgery for Ulcerative Colitis. JAMA Surg 2017; 152:e171538. [PMID: 28614561 DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2017.1538] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Importance Despite the increasing use of anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) therapy in ulcerative colitis, its effects on postoperative outcomes remain unclear, with many patients requiring surgical intervention despite optimal medical management. Objective To assess the association of preoperative use of anti-TNF agents with adverse postoperative outcomes. Design, Setting, and Participants This analysis used insurance claims data from a large national database to identify patients 18 years or older with ulcerative colitis. These insured patients had inpatient and/or outpatient claims between January 1, 2005, and December 31, 2013, with Current Procedural Terminology codes for a subtotal colectomy or total abdominal colectomy, a total proctocolectomy with end ileostomy, or a combined total proctocolectomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Only data regarding the first or index surgical admission within the time frame were abstracted. Use of anti-TNF agents, corticosteroids, and immunomodulators within 90 days of surgery was identified using Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System codes. Inclusion in the study required the patient to have an International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) diagnosis code for ulcerative colitis. Exclusion occurred if the patient had a secondary ICD-9-CM diagnosis code for Crohn disease or if the patient was not continuously enrolled in an insurance plan for at least 180 days before and after the index surgery. Data were collected and analyzed from February 1, 2015, to June 2, 2016. Main Outcomes and Measures Outcomes included 90-day complications, emergency department visits, and readmissions. Multivariable logistic regression was used to model covariates, including anti-TNF agent use, on the occurrence of outcomes. Results Of the 2476 patients identified, 1379 (55.7%) were men, and the mean (SD) age was 42.1 (12.9) years. Among these, 950 (38.4%) underwent subtotal colectomy or total abdominal colectomy, 354 (14.3%) underwent total proctocolectomy with end ileostomy, and 1172 (47.3%) received ileal pouch-anal anastomoses. In univariate analyses, increased postoperative complications were observed among patients in the ileal pouch cohort who received anti-TNF agents preoperatively vs those who did not (137 [45.2%] vs 327 [37.6%]; P = .02) but not among those in the colectomy or proctocolectomy cohorts. An increase in complications was also observed on multivariable analyses among patients in the ileal pouch cohort (odds ratio, 1.38; 95% CI, 1.05-1.82). Conclusions and Relevance Unlike preoperative anti-TNF agent use among patients who underwent colectomy or total proctocolectomy and experienced no significant increase in postoperative complications, anti-TNF agent use within 90 days of surgery among patients who underwent ileal pouch-anal anastomosis was associated with higher 90-day postoperative complication rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Audrey S Kulaylat
- Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, The Pennsylvania State University, Hershey
| | - Afif N Kulaylat
- Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, The Pennsylvania State University, Hershey
| | - Eric W Schaefer
- Department of Public Health Sciences, College of Medicine, The Pennsylvania State University, Hershey
| | - Andrew Tinsley
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, The Pennsylvania State University, Hershey
| | - Emmanuelle Williams
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, The Pennsylvania State University, Hershey
| | - Walter Koltun
- Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, The Pennsylvania State University, Hershey
| | - Christopher S Hollenbeak
- Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, The Pennsylvania State University, Hershey.,Department of Public Health Sciences, College of Medicine, The Pennsylvania State University, Hershey
| | - Evangelos Messaris
- Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, The Pennsylvania State University, Hershey
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Galiano Mejías S, Carretero G, Ferrandiz C, Vanaclocha F, Daudén E, Gómez-García F, Herrera-Ceballos E, Belinchón-Romero I, Sánchez-Carazo J, López-Estebaranz J, Alsina M, Ferrán M, Torrado R, Carrascosa J, Rivera R, Llamas-Velasco M, Jiménez-Puya R, Mendiola MV, Ruiz-Genao D, Descalzo M, de la Cueva Dobao P. Management of Biologic Therapy in Moderate to Severe Psoriasis in Surgical Patients: Data From the Spanish Biobadaderm Registry. ACTAS DERMO-SIFILIOGRAFICAS 2017. [DOI: 10.1016/j.adengl.2016.11.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
|
40
|
Peyrin-Biroulet L, Germain A, Patel AS, Lindsay JO. Systematic review: outcomes and post-operative complications following colectomy for ulcerative colitis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2016; 44:807-16. [PMID: 27534519 DOI: 10.1111/apt.13763] [Citation(s) in RCA: 107] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2015] [Revised: 06/02/2015] [Accepted: 07/22/2016] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Colectomy for ulcerative colitis is associated with short- and long-term complications. Estimates of the frequency of such complications are variable and may have changed since the introduction of biological therapy. Understanding the true burden of surgical complications is important to clinicians in assessing risks and benefits of colectomy vs. continued medical therapy. AIM To ascertain the outcomes of colectomy and ileal pouch surgery in patients with ulcerative colitis in the biologics era. METHODS Embase, MEDLINE and The Cochrane Library were searched for studies (2002-2015) reporting the outcomes of colorectal procedures (total and subtotal colectomy, IPAA with J-, S-, W-pouch) in adults with ulcerative colitis. Conferences proceedings (2011-2015) were hand-searched. RESULTS We identified 28 studies (20,801 patients) reporting outcomes from procedures conducted from 2002-2015. Early complications (≤30 days post-operatively), reported in 10 studies, occurred in 9-65% of patients with ulcerative colitis; late complications (>30 days post-operatively) occurred in 17-55% of patients. Most frequent short-term complications: infectious complications and ileus (mean incidence 20% and 18%). Most frequent long-term complications: pouchitis, faecal incontinence and small bowel obstruction (mean incidence 29%, 21% and 17%). Rates of early infection and late pouch failure decreased from 22% and 13% in 2002-2009 to 11% and 2% in 2010-2015. The mean incidence of post-operative mortality was 1.0% across 11 studies. CONCLUSIONS Early and late complications arise in about one-third of patients undergoing surgery for ulcerative colitis. While colorectal surgical procedures are recommended for a specific group of patients, the post-operative complications associated with these procedures should not be underestimated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L Peyrin-Biroulet
- Inserm U954 and Department of Gastroenterology, Nancy University Hospital, Université de Lorraine, Vandouvre-lès-Nancy, France
| | - A Germain
- Inserm U954 and Department of Digestive Surgery, Nancy University Hospital, Université de Lorraine, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France
| | | | - J O Lindsay
- Department of Gastroenterology, Barts Health NHS Trust, The Royal London Hospital, London, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Galiano Mejías S, Carretero G, Ferrandiz C, Vanaclocha F, Daudén E, Gómez-García FJ, Herrera-Ceballos E, Belinchón-Romero I, Sánchez-Carazo JL, López-Estebaranz JL, Alsina M, Ferrán M, Torrado R, Carrascosa JM, Rivera R, Llamas-Velasco M, Jiménez-Puya R, Mendiola MV, Ruiz-Genao D, Descalzo MA, de la Cueva Dobao P. Management of Biologic Therapy in Moderate to Severe Psoriasis in Surgical Patients: Data From the Spanish Biobadaderm Registry. ACTAS DERMO-SIFILIOGRAFICAS 2016; 108:52-58. [PMID: 27658689 DOI: 10.1016/j.ad.2016.08.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2016] [Revised: 07/02/2016] [Accepted: 08/04/2016] [Indexed: 10/21/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE We now have considerable experience in the use of biologic agents to treat psoriasis, but doubts about management arise in certain clinical settings. Surgery is one of them. Although treatment guidelines advise that biologics be suspended before major surgery, data about actual clinical practices and associated complications are lacking. We aimed to analyze current practice in the clinical management of these cases. METHODS Retrospective study of cases in the Biobadaderm database. We analyzed the management of biologic therapy in patients with psoriasis who underwent surgical procedures. RESULTS Forty-eight of the 2113 patients registered in Biobadaderm underwent surgery. The largest percentage of procedures (31%) involved skin lesions. Biologic treatment was interrupted in 42% of the cases. No postsurgical complications were significantly related to treatment interruption. Likewise we detected no associations between treatment interruption and other variables, such as sex, age, or duration or severity of psoriasis. CONCLUSION Continuity of biologic treatment and the risk of postsurgical complications were not associated in this study, although conclusions are limited by the small sample size.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Galiano Mejías
- Servicio de Dermatología, Hospital Infanta Leonor, Madrid, España.
| | - G Carretero
- Servicio de Dermatología, Hospital Universitario de Gran Canaria Doctor Negrín, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, España
| | - C Ferrandiz
- Servicio de Dermatología, Hospital Universitario Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Universitat Autónoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, España
| | - F Vanaclocha
- Servicio de Dermatología, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, España
| | - E Daudén
- Servicio de Dermatología, Hospital Universitario La Princesa, Madrid, España
| | - F J Gómez-García
- Servicio de Dermatología, Hospital Universitario Reina Sofía, Córdoba, España
| | - E Herrera-Ceballos
- Servicio de Dermatología, Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Victoria, Málaga, España
| | - I Belinchón-Romero
- Servicio de Dermatología, Hospital General Universitario de Alicante, Alicante, España
| | - J L Sánchez-Carazo
- Servicio de Dermatología, Hospital General Universitario de Valencia, Valencia, España
| | - J L López-Estebaranz
- Servicio de Dermatología, Hospital Universitario Fundación Alcorcón, Madrid, España
| | - M Alsina
- Servicio de Dermatología, Hospital Universitario Clinic de Barcelona, Barcelona, España
| | - M Ferrán
- Servicio de Dermatología, Hospital del Mar, Parc de Salut Mar, Barcelona, España
| | - R Torrado
- Servicio de Dermatología, Hospital Universitario de Gran Canaria Doctor Negrín, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, España
| | - J M Carrascosa
- Servicio de Dermatología, Hospital Universitario Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Universitat Autónoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, España
| | - R Rivera
- Servicio de Dermatología, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, España
| | - M Llamas-Velasco
- Servicio de Dermatología, Hospital Universitario La Princesa, Madrid, España
| | - R Jiménez-Puya
- Servicio de Dermatología, Hospital Universitario Reina Sofía, Córdoba, España
| | - Mª V Mendiola
- Servicio de Dermatología, Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Victoria, Málaga, España
| | - D Ruiz-Genao
- Servicio de Dermatología, Hospital Universitario Fundación Alcorcón, Madrid, España
| | - M A Descalzo
- Unidad de Investigación, Fundación Academia Española de Dermatología y Venereología, Madrid, España
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
42
|
Early and late surgical outcomes of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis within a defined population in Sweden. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2016; 28:842-9. [PMID: 26945126 DOI: 10.1097/meg.0000000000000618] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA), has become the procedure of choice in patients requiring reconstructive surgery for ulcerative colitis or familial adenomatous polyposis. The aim of this population-based study was to present data prospectively registered and retrospectively evaluated on the short-term and the long-term results of 124 consecutive IPAA performed chronologically by three surgeons in a single referral centre. MATERIALS AND METHODS All patients who underwent IPAA from 1993 to 2012 were included. Early and late morbidity and mortality were evaluated. RESULTS Early complications were observed in 25 patients. There was one death from cardiac failure, high output stoma occurred in six patients and wound infection occurred in four patients. Complications were associated with higher BMI (P=0.032). Four patients had to be reoperated. Peroperative bleeding was reduced when using an ultrasonically activated scalpel for the perimuscular dissection (P<0.00001). Clavien-Dindo grade III-V affected five patients. Only one patient developed anastomotic leak and septic complications.Late complications occurred in 61 patients. There was no procedure-related mortality. Pouchitis was the most common complication (n=37). Primary sclerosing cholangitis and age younger than 40 years were associated significantly with a three- and two-fold increased risk of pouchitis, respectively. Small bowel obstruction was the second most common complication (n=16), more common in women (P=0.031). The pouch failure rate was low: 2.4%. Clavien-Dindo grade III-V affected 13 patients. CONCLUSION In the hands of experienced high-volume surgeons, IPAA is a safe procedure associated with a relatively low early morbidity as well as an acceptable late morbidity.
Collapse
|
43
|
Ferrari L, Krane MK, Fichera A. Inflammatory bowel disease surgery in the biologic era. World J Gastrointest Surg 2016; 8:363-370. [PMID: 27231514 PMCID: PMC4872064 DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v8.i5.363] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2015] [Revised: 01/13/2016] [Accepted: 03/14/2016] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-α therapy has revolutionized inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) treatment. Infliximab and adalimumab either as monotherapy or in combination with an immunomodulator are able to induce clinical and biological remission in patients with moderate and severe Crohn’s disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC). These new therapies have led to a shift in the goals of IBD management from just controlling clinical symptoms to preventing disease progression. However, despite these advances in medical therapy, surgery is still required in 30%-40% of patients with CD and 20%-30% of patients with UC at some point during their lifetime. While biologics certainly play a major role in the medical treatment of IBD, there is concern about the effects of these anti-TNF-α agents on postoperative complications and morbidity. The purpose of this article is to review the role of surgery in the treatment of IBD in the age of biologics and the impact of these medications on per-operative outcomes. In this manuscript we review the relationship between biologic agents and surgery in the treatment of IBD. We also discuss in detail the periopetative risks and complications.
Collapse
|
44
|
Colectomy rates in patients with ulcerative colitis following treatment with infliximab or ciclosporin: a systematic literature review. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2016; 28:369-82. [PMID: 26825217 DOI: 10.1097/meg.0000000000000568] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
This review aimed to compile all available published data on colectomy rates following treatment using infliximab or ciclosporin in adult ulcerative colitis patients and to analyse colectomy rates, timing to colectomy and postcolectomy mortality for each treatment. We systematically reviewed the literature after 1990 reporting colectomy rates in ulcerative colitis patients treated with infliximab or ciclosporin, excluding articles on paediatric patients, patients with indeterminate colitis or Crohn's disease and bowel surgery not related to ulcerative colitis. We presented weighted mean colectomy rates and mortality rates. Cox's regression was used to assess time to colectomy adjusting for colitis severity, patient age and sex. We tabulated 78 studies reporting on ciclosporin and/or infliximab and colectomy rates or postcolectomy mortality rates. Not all studies reported data in a standardized manner. Infliximab had a significantly lower colectomy rate than ciclosporin at 36 months when analysing all studies, studies directly comparing infliximab and ciclosporin and studies using severe colitis patients, but not at 3, 12 or 24 months. Severity and age were key indicators in the likelihood of undergoing colectomy after treatment. Postcolectomy mortality rates were less than 1.5% for both drugs. This review indicates that long-term colectomy rates following infliximab are significantly lower than ciclosporin in the longer term, and that postcolectomy mortality following infliximab and ciclosporin is very low. However, many key data items were missing from research articles, reducing our ability to establish with more confidence the actual impact of these two drugs on colectomy rates and postcolectomy mortality rates.
Collapse
|
45
|
Seah D, De Cruz P. Review article: the practical management of acute severe ulcerative colitis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2016; 43:482-513. [PMID: 26725569 DOI: 10.1111/apt.13491] [Citation(s) in RCA: 61] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2015] [Revised: 09/10/2015] [Accepted: 11/11/2015] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC) is a life-threatening condition for which optimal management strategies remain ill-defined. AIM To review the evidence regarding the natural history, diagnosis, monitoring and treatment of ASUC to inform an evidence-based approach to management. METHODS Relevant articles addressing the management of ASUC were identified from a search of MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library and conference proceedings. RESULTS Of ASUC, 31-35% is steroid-refractory. Infliximab and ciclosporin salvage therapies have improved patient outcomes in randomised controlled trials. Short-term response rates (within 3 months) have ranged from 40% - 54% for ciclosporin and 46-83% for infliximab. Long-term clinical response rates (≥1 year) have ranged from 42%-50% for ciclosporin and 50-65% for infliximab. Short-term and long-term colectomy rates have been respectively: 26-47% and 36-58% for ciclosporin, and 0-50% and 35-50% for infliximab. Mortality rates for ciclosporin and infliximab-treated patients have been: 0-5% and 0-2%, respectively. At present, management challenges include the selection, timing and assessment of response to salvage therapy, utilisation of therapeutic drug monitoring and long-term maintenance of remission. CONCLUSIONS Optimal management of acute severe ulcerative colitis should be guided by risk stratification using predictive indices of corticosteroid response. Timely commencement and assessment of response to salvage therapy is critical to reducing morbidity and mortality. Emerging pharmacokinetic models and therapeutic drug monitoring may assist clinical decision-making and facilitate a shift towards individualised acute severe ulcerative colitis therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Seah
- Department of Medicine, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Vic., Australia.,Department of Gastroenterology, Austin Health, Melbourne, Vic., Australia
| | - P De Cruz
- Department of Medicine, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Vic., Australia.,Department of Gastroenterology, Austin Health, Melbourne, Vic., Australia.,Department of Gastroenterology, St Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne, Vic., Australia
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Grevenitis P, Thomas A, Lodhia N. Medical Therapy for Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Surg Clin North Am 2015; 95:1159-82, vi. [DOI: 10.1016/j.suc.2015.08.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
|
47
|
Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor-α Antibody Therapy Management Before and After Intestinal Surgery for Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A CCFA Position Paper. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2015; 21:2658-72. [PMID: 26422516 PMCID: PMC4623843 DOI: 10.1097/mib.0000000000000603] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
Biologic therapy with anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α antibody medications has become part of the standard of care for medical therapy for patients with inflammatory bowel disease and may help to avoid surgery in some. However, many of these patients will still require surgical intervention in the form of bowel resection and anastomosis or ostomy formation for the treatment of their disease. Postsurgical studies suggest up to 30% of patients with inflammatory bowel disease may be on or have used anti-TNF-α antibody medications for disease management preoperatively. Significant controversy exists regarding the potential deleterious impact of these medications on the outcomes of surgery, specifically overall and/or infectious complications. In this position statement, we systematically reviewed the literature regarding the potential risk of anti-TNF-α antibody use in the perioperative period, offer recommendations based both on the best-available evidence and expert opinion on the use and timing of anti-TNF-α antibody therapy in the perioperative period, and discuss whether or not the presence of these medications should lead to an alteration in surgical technique such as temporary stoma formation.
Collapse
|
48
|
Cohan JN, Bacchetti P, Varma MG, Finlayson E. Outcomes after ileoanal pouch surgery in frail and older adults. J Surg Res 2015; 198:327-33. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2015.04.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2015] [Revised: 03/27/2015] [Accepted: 04/02/2015] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
|
49
|
The impact of preoperative serum anti-TNFα therapy levels on early postoperative outcomes in inflammatory bowel disease surgery. Ann Surg 2015; 261:487-96. [PMID: 24950263 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000000757] [Citation(s) in RCA: 132] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Assess the impact of preoperative serum antitumor necrosis factor-α (anti-TNFα) drug levels on 30-day postoperative morbidity in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients. BACKGROUND Studies on the association of anti-TNFα drugs and postoperative outcomes in IBD are conflicting due to variable pharmacokinetics of anti-TNFα drugs. It remains to be seen whether preoperative serum anti-TNFα drug levels correlate with postoperative morbidity. METHODS Thirty-day postoperative outcomes of consecutive IBD surgical patients with serum drawn within 7 days preoperatively were studied. The total serum level of 3 anti-TNFα drugs (infliximab, adalimumab, and certolizumab) was measured, with ≥ 0.98 μg/mL considered as detected. Data were also reviewed according to a clinical cutoff value of 3 μg/mL. RESULTS A total of 217 patients [123 with Crohn disease (CD) and 94 with ulcerative colitis (UC)] were analyzed; 75 of 150 (50%) treated with anti-TNFα therapy did not have detected levels at the time of surgery. In the UC cohort, adverse postoperative outcome rates between the undetectable and detectable groups were similar when stratified according to type of UC surgery. In the CD cohort, there was a higher but statistically insignificant rate of adverse outcomes in the detectable versus undetectable groups. Using a cut off level of 3 μg/mL, postoperative morbidity (odds ratio [OR] = 2.5, P = 0.03) and infectious complications (OR = 3.0, P = 0.03) were significantly higher in the ≥ 3 μg/mL group. There were higher rates of postoperative morbidity (P = 0.047) and hospital readmissions (P = 0.04) in the ≥ 8 μg/mL compared with <3 μg/mL group. CONCLUSIONS Increasing preoperative serum anti-TNFα drug levels are associated with adverse postoperative outcomes in CD but not UC patients.
Collapse
|
50
|
Bakkour W, Purssell H, Chinoy H, Griffiths C, Warren R. The risk of post-operative complications in psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis patients on biologic therapy undergoing surgical procedures. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2015; 30:86-91. [DOI: 10.1111/jdv.12997] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2014] [Accepted: 01/07/2015] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- W. Bakkour
- The Dermatology Centre; Manchester Academic Health Science Centre; Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust; University of Manchester; UK
| | - H. Purssell
- The Dermatology Centre; Manchester Academic Health Science Centre; Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust; University of Manchester; UK
| | - H. Chinoy
- Centre for Musculoskeletal Research; Manchester Academic Health Science Centre; University of Manchester; Manchester UK
| | - C.E.M. Griffiths
- The Dermatology Centre; Manchester Academic Health Science Centre; Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust; University of Manchester; UK
| | - R.B. Warren
- The Dermatology Centre; Manchester Academic Health Science Centre; Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust; University of Manchester; UK
| |
Collapse
|