Complete clinical response after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for squamous cell cancer of the thoracic oesophagus: is surgery always necessary?

Radiomics applications in the modern management of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

Esophageal cancer ranks among the most lethal malignancies globally, with China accounting for more than half of worldwide esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) cases. Late-stage diagnosis frequently precludes surgical intervention, contributing to poor outcomes. While precise clinical assessment is essential for treatment planning, therapeutic responses and prognosis exhibit substantial inter-patient heterogeneity, underscoring the urgent need for reliable biomarkers to enhance prognostic accuracy and guide personalized therapeutic strategies. Radiomics, an emerging field that extracts high-dimensional features from medical images, provides non-invasive approaches to improve diagnostic accuracy, predict survival, monitor adverse events, detect recurrence, and optimize treatment strategies. Radiomics has shown promising potential in the modern management of ESCC. Here, we review the critical contributions of radiomics to ESCC research and clinical practice, examining its workflow, applications, strengths, and limitations. Radiomics represents a compelling frontier with substantial potential to advance precision medicine for ESCC patients.

Salvage surgery for oesophageal cancer: The need for more intensive surveillance

BACKGROUND

There is currently no consensus on the role, method or frequency of surveillance following curative treatment of oesophageal cancer; re-investigation largely relying on symptom triggers which may delay detection of recurrence and impact survival. We hypothesised that intensive surveillance with endoscopy and imaging was more likely to detect recurrent or new cancer at a curable stage and this study examined the outcomes of this surveillance policy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A prospective database of curatively treated oesophageal carcinoma patients was interrogated for patients with new or recurrent disease detected on surveillance and amenable to salvage surgery. Surveillance was by clinic visits and endoscopy/biopsy 3-monthly to 3 years, 6-montjhly to 5 years and yearly thereafter while computerised tomography (CT) was performed 6-monthly for the first 3 years, annually to 5 years, and subsequently as indicated.

RESULTS

Of 205 patients treated with curative intent, 24 (11.7 %) underwent salvage surgery for 27 incidences of new or recurrent cancer. The median and 5-year survival was 51.8 months and 45.8 %, which was not inferior to the entire cohort of patients treated for cure, which was 30.2 months and 32.6 % respectively (p = 0.498).

CONCLUSIONS

Intensive surveillance identified almost 12 % of patients with recurrent or second primary cancer amenable to salvage surgery, with a non-inferior outcome to the remaining cohort. Further studies will refine surveillance intervals, techniques and follow-up duration for oesophageal cancer as for other GI malignancies.

Patients with complete clinical response after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced esophageal cancer: A Markov decision analysis of esophagectomy versus active surveillance

OBJECTIVE

Chemoradiation followed by esophagectomy is a standard treatment option for patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer (LAEC). Esophagectomy is a high-risk procedure, and recent evidence suggests select patients may benefit from omitting or delaying surgery. This study aims to compare surgery versus active surveillance for LAEC patients with complete clinical response (cCR) after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT).

METHODS

Decision analysis with Markov modeling was used. The base case was a 60-year-old man with T3N0M0 esophageal cancer with cCR after nCRT. The decision was modeled for a 5-year time horizon. Primary outcomes were life-years and quality-adjusted life-years (QALY). Probabilities and utilities were derived through the literature. Deterministic sensitivity analyses were performed using ranges from the literature with consideration for clinical plausibility.

RESULTS

Surgery was favored for survival with an expected life-years of 2.89 versus 2.64. After incorporating quality of life, active surveillance was favored, with an expected QALY of 1.70 versus 1.56. The model was sensitive to probability of recurrence on active surveillance (threshold value 0.598), probability of recurrence being resectable (0.318), and disutility of previous esophagectomy (-0.091). The model was not sensitive to perioperative morbidity and mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study finds that surgery increases life expectancy but decreases QALY. Although the incremental change in QALY for either modality is insufficient to make broad clinical recommendations, our study demonstrates that either approach is acceptable. As probabilities of key factors are further defined in the literature, treatment decisions for patients with LAEC and a cCR after nCRT should consider histology, patient values, and quality of life.

Radiomics nomogram combined with clinical factors for predicting pathological complete response in resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

Introduction

Predicting the efficacy of neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy (NICT) for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESSC) prior to surgery can minimize unnecessary surgical interventions and facilitate personalized treatment strategies. Our goal is to develop and validate an image-based radiomic model using preoperative computed tomography (CT) scans and clinical data to predict pathological complete response (pCR) in resectable ESSC following neoadjuvant immunotherapy.

Methods

We retrospectively collected data from patients diagnosed with ESCC at the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University between January 2018 and May 2023, who received preoperative neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy. Eligible patients were randomly divided into training and validation sets. Radiomic features extracted from preprocessed CT images were used to develop a radiomic model, incorporating Radiomic score (Rad-score) and clinical factors through multivariate logistic regression analysis. The model's performance was assessed for calibration, discrimination, and clinical utility in an independent validation cohort.

Results

We enrolled a total of 105 eligible participants who were randomly divided into two groups: a training set (N=74) and a validation set (N=31). After data dimension reduction and feature selection, we identified 11 radiomic features, which collectively formed the Rad-score. Rad-score had an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.83 (95% CI 0.72-0.93) in the training set and 0.78 (95% CI 0.60-0.95) in the validation set. Multivariate analysis revealed that radiological response and Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Ratio (NLR) were independent predictors of pCR, with p-values of 0.0026 and 0.0414, respectively. We developed and validated a nomogram combining Rad-score and clinical features, achieving AUCs of 0.90 (95% CI 0.82-0.98) in the training set and 0.85 (95% CI 0.70-0.99) in the validation set. The Delong test confirmed the nomogram's superiority over pure radiomic and clinical models. Decision curve analysis (DCA) and integrated discrimination improvement (IDI) assessment supported the clinical value and superiority of the combined model.

Conclusion

The nomogram, which integrates Rad-score and clinical features, offers a precise and reliable method for predicting pCR status in ESCC patients who have undergone neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy. This tool aids in tailoring treatment strategies to individual patients.

Impact of the interval between neoadjuvant immunotherapy and surgery on prognosis in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC): a real-world study

BACKGROUND

The time interval between neoadjuvant immunotherapy and surgery is 6 weeks for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), but whether delayed surgery affects prognosis remains unclear.

METHODS

Clinical data of locally advanced ESCC who underwent neoadjuvant immunotherapy followed by esophagectomy from November 2019 to December 2022 were collected. The surgery outcomes and prognosis were compared between short-interval (time to surgery ≤ 6 weeks) and long-interval groups (time to surgery > 6 weeks).

RESULTS

152 patients were enrolled totally, with a ratio of 91:61 between short-interval and long-interval groups. The rate of pathological complete response in the short-interval and long-interval groups were 34.1% and 24.6% (P = 0.257). Delayed surgery did not have a significantly impact on the number of lymph node dissections (P = 0.133), operative duration (P = 0.689), blood loss (P = 0.837), hospitalization duration (P = 0.293), chest drainage duration (P = 0.886) and postoperative complications (P > 0.050). The 3-year Overall survival (OS) rates were 85.10% in the short-interval group, and 82.07% in the long-interval group (P = 0.435). The 3-year disease-free survival (DFS) rates were 83.41% and 70.86% in the two groups (P = 0.037). Subgroup analysis revealed that patients with a favorable response to immunotherapy (tumor regression grade 0) exhibited inferior 3-year OS (long-interval vs. short-interval: 51.85% vs. 91.08%, P = 0.035) and DFS (long-interval vs. short-interval: 47.40% vs. 91.08%, P = 0.014) in the long-interval group.

CONCLUSIONS

Delayed surgery after neoadjuvant immunotherapy does not further improve pathological response; instead, it resulted in a poorer DFS. Especially for patients with a favorable response to immunotherapy, delayed surgery increases the risk of mortality and recurrence.

International Expert Consensus on Semantics of Multimodal Esophageal Cancer Treatment: Delphi Study

BACKGROUND

Recent developments in esophageal cancer treatment, including studies exploring active surveillance following chemoradiotherapy, have led to a need for clear terminology and definitions regarding different multimodal treatment options.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to reach worldwide consensus on the definitions and semantics of multimodal esophageal cancer treatment.

METHODS

In total, 72 experts working in the field of multimodal esophageal cancer treatment were invited to participate in this Delphi study. The study comprised three Delphi surveys sent out by email and one online meeting. Input for the Delphi survey consisted of terminology obtained from a systematic literature search. Participants were asked to respond to open questions and to indicate whether they agreed or disagreed with different statements. Consensus was reached when there was ≥75% agreement among respondents.

RESULTS

Forty-nine of 72 invited experts (68.1%) participated in the first online Delphi survey, 45 (62.5%) in the second survey, 21 (46.7%) of 45 in the online meeting, and 39 (86.7%) of 45 in the final survey. Consensus on neoadjuvant and definitive chemoradiotherapy with or without surgery was reached for 27 of 31 items (87%). No consensus was reached on follow-up after treatment with definitive chemoradiotherapy.

CONCLUSION(S)

Consensus was reached on most statements regarding terminology and definitions of multimodal esophageal cancer treatment. Implementing uniform criteria facilitates comparison of studies and promotes international research collaborations.

Early regression index (ERI) on MR images as response predictor in esophageal cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemo-radiotherapy: Interim analysis of the prospective ESCAPE trial

PURPOSE

The early regression index (ERI) predicts treatment response in rectal cancer patients. Aim of current study was to prospectively assess tumor response to neoadjuvant chemo-radiotherapy (nCRT) of locally advanced esophageal cancer using ERI, based on MRI.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

From January 2020 to May 2023, 30 patients with esophageal cancer were enrolled in a prospective study (ESCAPE). PET-MRI was performed: i) before nCRT (tpre); ii) at mid-radiotherapy, tmid; iii) after nCRT, 2-6 weeks before surgery (tpost); nCRT delivered 41.4 Gy/23fr with concurrent carboplatin and paclitaxel. For patients that skipped surgery, complete clinical response (cCR) was assessed if patients showed no local relapse after 18 months; patients with pathological complete response (pCR) or with cCR were considered as complete responders (pCR + cCR). GTV volumes were delineated by two observers (Vpre, Vmid, Vpost) on T2w MRI: ERI and other volume regression parameters at tmid and tpost were tested as predictors of pCR + cCR.

RESULTS

Complete data of 25 patients were available at the time of the analysis: 3/25 with complete response at imaging refused surgery and 2/3 were cCR; in total, 10/25 patients showed pCR + cCR (pCR = 8/22). Both ERImid and ERIpost classified pCR + cCR patients, with ERImid showing better performance (AUC:0.78, p = 0.014): A two-variable logistic model combining ERImid and Vpre improved performances (AUC:0.93, p < 0.0001). Inter-observer variability in contouring GTV did not affect the results.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the limited numbers, interim analysis of ESCAPE study suggests ERI as a potential predictor of complete response after nCRT for esophageal cancer. Further validation on larger populations is warranted.

Extensive lymphadenectomy may improve survival in node negative oesophageal cancer

Lymph node metastases are a major prognostic factor in survival of patients with oesophageal cancer. The number of lymph nodes removed during oesophagectomy has been previously proven to be associated with improved survival. The aim of this study was to examine the effect of lymph node harvest on survival specifically in pathologically node negative (pN0) patients with oesophageal cancer. Data were extracted from a prospectively populated single-surgeon database of oesophageal resections for cancer. All consecutive patients with pN0 were included. Patient-specific risk adjusted analysis of overall and disease-free survival was performed to identify the number of lymph nodes associated with improved survival. Inclusion criteria were met by 137 patients (49 squamous cell carcinoma and 88 adenocarcinoma). Adjusted for cancer stage, tumour (histological type, degree of differentiation, lympho-vascular invasion, neo-adjuvant therapy) and patient related factors (age, sex), increased lymph node number was associated with significant improvement in overall (P = 0.045) and disease free (P = 0.030) survival. Lymph node count ≥ 17 was associated with improved overall and disease-free survival. In this cohort of patients with pathologically node-negative oesophageal cancer, lymph node count of 17 or above was associated with significantly improved survival.

Active surveillance for clinical complete responders after chemoradiotherapy for oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Guidelines on the treatment of oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) recommend neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy plus surgery or definitive chemoradiotherapy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcome of patients with a cCR after chemoradiotherapy who underwent active surveillance.

METHODS

Patients with oesophageal SCC who were treated with chemoradiotherapy between January 2016 and June 2022 were identified from an institutional database. Survival and recurrence of patients with a cCR who underwent active surveillance were compared with those of patients who underwent planned surgery. Survival was calculated according to the Kaplan-Meier method and compared between groups using the log rank test.

RESULTS

The 37 patients who underwent active surveillance were older and tumours were more often located in the middle/upper-third of the oesophagus than in the surgery group of 57 patients. Median follow-up was 28.1 (i.q.r. 17.2-47.1) months for the active surveillance group and 20 (12.9-39.1) months for the surgery group. Overall survival was comparable between the two groups, with 3-year survival rates of 50 (95% c.i. 31 to 67) and 59 (40 to 73)% for the active surveillance and surgery groups respectively (P = 0.55). Three-year progression-free survival for patients who underwent active surveillance was better than in the surgery group: 70 (43 to 85) versus 58 (40 to 72)% (P = 0.02). Overall and progression-free survival was comparable between patients in the active surveillance group and 23 patients in the surgery group who had a pCR (ypT0 N0). The overall recurrence rate was comparable between the groups: 7 of 37 (19.4%) in active surveillance group versus 16 of 49 (32.6%) in surgery group (P = 0.26). Locoregional recurrence was noted more often in the active surveillance group and systemic recurrence in the surgery group.

CONCLUSION

Active surveillance is feasible and safe for patients with oesophageal SCC who have a cCR after chemoradiotherapy.

CT-based deep learning radiomics and hematological biomarkers in the assessment of pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: A two-center study

PURPOSE

To evaluate and validate CT-based models using pre- and posttreatment deep learning radiomics features and hematological biomarkers for assessing esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) pathological complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This retrospective study recruited patients with biopsy-proven ESCC who underwent nCRT from two Chinese hospitals between May 2017 and May 2022, divided into a training set (hospital I, 111 cases), an internal validation set (hospital I, 47 cases), and an external validation set (hospital II, 33 cases). We used minimum redundancy maximum relevance (mRMR) and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) as feature selection methods and three classifiers as model construction methods. The assessment of models was performed using area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) and decision curve analysis (DCA).

RESULTS

A total 190 patients were included in our study (60.8 ± 7.08 years, 133 men), and seventy-seven of them (40.5 %) achieved pCR. The logistic regression (LR)-based combined model incorporating neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio, lymphocyte to monocyte ratio, albumin, and radscores performed well both in the internal and external validation sets with AUCs of 0.875 and 0.857 (95 % CI, 0.776-0.964; 0.731-0.984, P <0.05), respectively. DCA demonstrated that nomogram was useful for pCR prediction and produced clinical net benefits.

CONCLUSION

The incorporation of radscores and hematological biomarkers into LR-based model improved pCR prediction after nCRT in ESCC. Enhanced pCR predictability may improve patients selection before surgery, providing clinical application value for the use of active surveillance.

Updates of perioperative multidisciplinary treatment for surgically resectable esophageal cancer

Esophageal cancer has one of the poorest prognoses among all cancer types, due to the propensity for an early spread through the lymphatics and the difficulty to perform surgical treatment. To improve the prognosis, the management of esophageal cancer has been developed through the conduct of several clinical trials worldwide. In western societies, neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy has been established as the standard treatment approach, as indicated by the results of the CROSS trial. Recently, the Japanese JCOG1109 trial demonstrated the significant improvement of survival by neoadjuvant triplet chemotherapy. As an adjuvant treatment, an immune checkpoint inhibitor has shown promising results in the CheckMate-577 trial. Including adjuvant S-1 mono therapy as another option, a randomised control phase III study will determine the ideal treatment for surgically resectable esophageal cancer. Furthermore, the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant cisplatin +5-fluorouracil or DCF plus nivolumab are examined in the JCOG1804E (FRONTiER) study. In addition to definitive chemoradiation therapy, the SANO trial is examining the safety and efficacy of active surveillance after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, which might give us the choice to adopt organ preservation approach. The development of treatment has progressed dramatically with the advent of immunotherapy. Considering the biomarkers to predict the treatment response and prognosis, individualised multidisciplinary treatment strategies should be established for esophageal cancer patients.

Radiotherapy combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors in locally advanced/metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: clinical trials, efficacy and future directions

Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is a common malignancy worldwide and often diagnosed at advanced stages with poor prognosis. Combination of radiotherapy and immunotherapy seems to be a promising approach for treating ESCC. This comprehensive review article summarizes the current state of combination of radiotherapy and immunotherapy in locally advanced/metastatic ESCC, delineates the clinical trials that merit attention, and outlines unresolved issues and future research directions in this field. The clinical trial findings suggest that radio-immunotherapy combination may improve tumor response and overall survival with manageable side effects, highlighting the importance of patient selection and the necessity for further research to optimize treatment strategies. Issues such as irradiation dosage, fractionation regimen, irradiation site and technique of radiotherapy, as well as the timing, sequence and duration of combination therapy will all affect treatment outcomes, justifying further in-depth investigation.

Impact of Delaying Surgery After Chemoradiation on Outcomes for Locally Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Performing selective esophagectomy for locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma may spare patients morbidity, but delayed surgery may infer higher risks. This study evaluated the impact of length of time between chemoradiation and esophagectomy on perioperative outcomes and long-term survival.

METHODS

The impact of surgical timing, stratified by surgery performed < 180 and ≥ 180 days from starting radiation, on perioperative outcomes and survival in patients treated with chemoradiation and esophagectomy for cT1N + M0 and cT2-4, any N, M0 squamous cell carcinoma of the mid-distal esophagus in the National Cancer Database (2006-2016) was evaluated with logistic regression, Kaplan-Meier curves, Cox proportional-hazards methods, and propensity-matched analysis.

RESULTS

Median time between starting radiation and esophagectomy in 1641 patients was 93 (IQR 81-114) days. Most patients (96.8%, n = 1589) had surgery within 180 days of starting radiation, while 52 patients (3.2%) had delayed surgery. Black race and clinical T stage were associated with delayed surgery. Rates of pathologic upstaging, downstaging, complete response, and positive margins were not significantly different between the groups. Patients with delayed surgery had increased major morbidity as measured by a composite of length of hospital stay, readmission, and 30-day mortality [42.3% (22/52) vs 22.3% (355/1589), p = 0.001]. However, delayed surgery was not associated with a significant difference in survival in both univariate [5-year survival 32.8% (95% CI 21.1-50.7) vs 47.3% (44.7-50.1), p = 0.19] and multivariable analysis [hazard ratio (HR) 1.23 (0.85-1.78), p = 0.26].

CONCLUSIONS

Delaying surgery longer than 180 days after starting chemoradiation for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma is associated with worse perioperative outcomes but not long-term survival.

Oncological outcomes of squamous cell carcinoma of the cervical esophagus treated with definitive (chemo-)radiotherapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

To determine the oncological outcomes of cervical esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (CESCC) treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT).

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed according to the PRISMA guidelines.

RESULTS

A total of 1222 patients (median age: 63.0 years, 95% CI 61.0-65.0) were included from 22 studies. The median follow-up time was 34.0 months (n = 1181, 95% CI 26.4-36.0). Estimated pooled OS rates (95% CI) at 1, 3, and 5 years were 77.9% (73.9-82.2), 48.4% (43.2-54.3), and 35.3% (29.7-41.9), respectively. The median OS (95% CI) was 33.4 months (25.8-42.2). Estimated pooled PFS rates (n = 595; 95% CI) at 1, 3, and 5 years were 64.1% (57.9-71.0), 38.0% (33.3-45.5), and 29.8% (23.9-37.1), respectively. The median PFS (95% CI) was 19.8 months (14.9-26.6).

CONCLUSIONS

Definitive CRT is a valuable first-line treatment for the management of CESCC. Further studies should focus on survival predictors able to define stage-based clinical guidelines.

Treatment and Outcomes of Proximal Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

INTRODUCTION

This study evaluated the treatment of proximal (cervical or upper thoracic) esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), for which chemoradiation is the recommended therapy.

METHODS

Treatment and outcomes of patients with cT1-3N0-1M0 proximal esophageal SCC in the National Cancer Database between 2004 and 2016 was evaluated using logistic regression, Kaplan-Meier analysis, and propensity-score matching.

RESULTS

Therapy of 2159 patients was chemoradiation (n = 1500, 69.5%), no treatment (n = 205, 9.5%), surgery (n = 203, 9.4%), radiation alone (n = 190, 8.8%), and chemotherapy alone (n = 61, 2.8%). Factors associated with definitive therapy with either chemoradiation or surgery were younger age, non-Black race, being insured, cervical tumor location, clinical T2 and T3 stage, clinical nodal involvement, and treatment at a research/academic program. Five-year survival was significantly better in patients treated with definitive therapy than patients not treated definitively (34.0% vs. 13.3%, p < 0.001). In multivariable survival analysis, receiving definitive therapy (hazard ratio [HR] 0.39, p = 0.017) was associated with improved survival, while increasing age, male sex, clinical T3 stage, positive clinical nodal involvement, and increasing Charlson Comorbidity Index were associated with worse survival. Esophagectomy was not associated with improved survival in multivariable analysis of the definitive therapy cohort (HR 0.84, p = 0.08) or propensity matched analysis. However, the pathologic complete response was only 33.3% (40/120) for patients who did have an esophagectomy after chemoradiation.

CONCLUSIONS

This national analysis supports definitive chemoradiation for not only cervical but also proximal thoracic esophageal SCC. Routine surgery does not appear to be necessary but may have a role in patients with residual disease after chemoradiation.

Radiation Dose-Effect Relation in Patients with Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A National Cancer Center Data and Literature-Based Analysis

Introduction

Despite receiving definitive chemoradiotherapy (dCRT) with radiation dose (RTD) of 50.4 Gy, survival of esophageal carcinoma was dismal. The effect of RTD in cancer control and radiotoxicity, and the extent to which local-regional control (LRC) influenced survival remain vague. This study aimed at evaluating RTD-effect relationship in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC).

Methods

1440 dRT/CRT-treated ESCC patients were enrolled. Restricted cubic spline regression model was applied to reveal nonlinear relationship between RTD and survival/radiotoxicity. Linear regression analysis (LRA) was performed to evaluate correlations between LRC and overall survival (OS) or progression-free survival (PFS).

Results

For 1440 dRT/CRT-treated ESCC patients, with RTD escalating, hazard ratios (HRs) of OS, PFS, LRC declined until RTD exceeded 60 Gy, then increased. HR of treatment-related mortality was stable until RTD exceeded 60 Gy, then increased. HR of LRC was lower for majority of patients treated with RTD≥60 Gy, except for those with KPS<80, T1-2 lesion, or without lymph node metastasis. LRA revealed strong correlations between LRC and OS/PFS. 45.5% and 44.9% of OS and PFS improvements were owing to improved LRC.

Conclusions

RTD of 60 Gy was well tolerated, with favorable survival resulted of LRC improvement in local-advanced ESCC. Further stratification analyses based on radiation sensitivity will be helpful to determine potential beneficiaries of RTD escalation.

Clinical Utility of Circulating Tumor Cells for Predicting Major Histopathological Response after Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy in Patients with Esophageal Cancer

Background: A “surgery as needed” approach may be offered to patients with esophageal cancer (EC) who achieve major histopathological response (MaHR) after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT). However, the utility of clinical response assessment (CRE) for predicting histopathological response to nCRT remains limited. Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) hold promise as biomarkers of response to nCRT. Methods: We analyzed the clinical utility of post-nCRT CTCs, alone or in combination with CRE, in the prediction of MaHR. We defined MaHR as either the lack or a limited presence (≤10%) of vital residual tumor cells in the resected esophageal specimen in the absence of nodal involvement. Results: Of the 48 study patients, 27 (56%) achieved MaHR. Patients with MaHR had a significantly lower CTCs count compared with those without (3.61 ± 4.53 versus 6.83 ± 5.22 per mL of blood, respectively; P = 0.027). Using a cutoff for positivity of 5 CTCs per mL of blood, the combination of CTCs and CRE allowed achieving a negative predictive value for MaHR of 93% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 70–99%) along with a false negative rate of 5% (95% CI = 1–33%). Conclusion: CTCs count assessed in combination with CRE can potentially help identify patients with EC who achieved MaHR after nCRT.

The Key Clinical Questions of Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy for Resectable Esophageal Cancer—A Review

Over 50% of individuals with esophageal cancer (EC) present with advanced stages of the disease; therefore, their outcome following surgery alone is poor, with only 25%–36% being alive 5 years post-surgery. Based on the evidence that the CROSS and NEOCRTEC5010 trials provided, neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) is now the standard therapy for patients with locally advanced EC. However, there are still many concerning clinical questions that remain controversial such as radiation dose, appropriate patient selection, the design of the radiation field, the time interval between chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and surgery, and esophageal retention. With immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) rapidly becoming a mainstay of cancer therapy, along with radiation, chemotherapy, and surgery, the combination mode of immunotherapy is also becoming a hot topic of discussion. Here, we try to provide constructive suggestions to answer the perplexing problems and clinical concerns for the progress of nCRT for EC in the future.

Surgery or Surveillance for Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma With Clinical Complete Response After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy

We aimed to evaluate the role of esophagectomy in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma with clinically complete response (cCR) after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Data of patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma who achieved cCR after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy between October 2008 and September 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. The criteria for cCR include: (1) tumor resolution on computed tomography, (2) maximum standardized uptake value decrement >35% on positron-emission tomography-computed tomography scan, and (3) a negative endoscopic biopsy result. Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were compared between patients who received surveillance only (surveillance) and those who underwent surgery. A total of 154 patients with cCR, including 54 in the surveillance group and 100 in the surgery group, were included. The 5-year OS rates in the surveillance and surgery groups were 47.9% and 36.9 %, respectively (P= 0.210). The 5-year DFS rates were 38.1% and 28.2%, respectively (P = 0.203). Surgery was not a prognostic factor in the multivariable analysis (OS: HR: 1.26, 95% CI: 0.69-2.33, P = 0.453; DFS: HR: 1.08, 95% CI: 0.60-1.96, P = 0.795). In the surgery group, ypT0N0, ypT+Nany, and ypT0N+ were noted in 54%, 37%, and 9% of patients, respectively. The 5-year OS rates were 55.8%, 22.2%, and 12.4%, respectively (P = 0.001). No survival differences were noted between the surveillance and surgery groups. However, 46% of cCR patients in the surgery group did not have pathological complete response, and their outcomes were poor. Esophagectomy may be the only way to identify patients with residual disease.

Chemoradiotherapy Followed by Active Surveillance Versus Standard Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Individual Patient Data Meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To compare overall survival of patients with a cCR undergoing active surveillance versus standard esophagectomy.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

One-third of patients with esophageal cancer have a pathologically complete response in the resection specimen after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Active surveillance may be of benefit in patients with cCR, determined with diagnostics during response evaluations after chemoradiotherapy.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed comparing overall survival between patients with cCR after chemoradiotherapy undergoing active surveillance versus standard esophagectomy. Authors were contacted to supply individual patient data. Overall and progression-free survival were compared using random effects meta-analysis of randomized or propensity score matched data. Locoregional recurrence rate was assessed. The study-protocol was registered (PROSPERO: CRD42020167070).

RESULTS

Seven studies were identified comprising 788 patients, of which after randomization or propensity score matching yielded 196 active surveillance and 257 standard esophagectomy patients. All authors provided individual patient data. The risk of all-cause mortality for active surveillance was 1.08 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.62-1.87, P = 0.75] after intention-to-treat analysis and 0.93 (95% CI: 0.56-1.54, P = 0.75) after per-protocol analysis. The risk of progression or all-cause mortality for active surveillance was 1.14 (95% CI: 0.83-1.58, P = 0.36). Five-year locoregional recurrence rate during active surveillance was 40% (95% CI: 26%-59%). 95% of active surveillance patients undergoing postponed esophagectomy for locoregional recurrence had radical resection.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall survival was comparable in patients with cCR after chemoradiotherapy undergoing active surveillance or standard esophagectomy. Diagnostic follow-up is mandatory in active surveillance and postponed esophagectomy should be offered to operable patients in case of locoregional recurrence.

Update on Management of Squamous Cell Esophageal Cancer

PURPOSE OF THE REVIEW

Esophageal cancer is the sixth most common cause of cancer death globally. Squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus (ESCC) is the predominant histologic type in the world. Treatment strategies have evolved in the last decade and new paradigms are replacing traditional approaches at all stages of cancer. This review will summarize the epidemiology, diagnosis, staging, and treatment of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

RECENT FINDINGS

Novel approaches to screening may be cost-effective in regions with a high incidence of ESCC. Multi-disciplinary evaluation and treatment has become the standard of care. Endoscopic resection may be an option for early stage ESCC. Minimally invasive esophagectomy can be performed safely as a primary therapy or after-induction chemoradiation. Several recent studies have found a survival benefit to immunotherapy for patients with metastatic or persistent disease. Multi-disciplinary evaluation and multi-modal therapy including cytotoxic chemotherapy, radiation, surgery, and immunotherapy have improved survival compared to surgery alone.

Active Surveillance Versus Immediate Surgery in Clinically Complete Responders After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy for Esophageal Cancer: A Multicenter Propensity Matched Study

OBJECTIVE

This study compared outcomes of patients with esophageal cancer and clinically complete response (cCR) after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) undergoing active surveillance or immediate surgery.

BACKGROUND

Since nearly one-third of patients with esophageal cancer show pathologically complete response after nCRT according to CROSS regimen, the oncological benefit of immediate surgery in cCR is topic of debate.

METHODS

Patients with cCR based on endoscopic biopsies and endoscopic ultrasonography with fine-needle aspiration initially declining or accepting immediate surgery after nCRT were identified between 2011 and 2018. Primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). The secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), rate and timing of distant dissemination, and postoperative outcomes.

RESULTS

Some 98 patients with cCR were identified: 31 in the active surveillance- and 67 in the immediate surgery group with median followup of survivors of 27.7 and 34.8 months, respectively. Propensity score matching resulted in 2 comparable groups (n = 29 in both groups). Patients undergoing active surveillance or immediate surgery had a 3-year OS of 77% and 55% (HR 0.41; 95% CI 0.14-1.20, P = 0.104), respectively. The 3-year PFS was 60% and 54% (HR 1.08; 95% CI 0.44-2.67, P = 0.871), respectively. Patients undergoing active surveillance or immediate surgery had a comparable distant dissemination rate (both groups 28%), radical resection rate (both groups 100%), and severity of postoperative complications (Clav- ien-Dindo grade ≥ 3: 43% vs 45%, respectively).

CONCLUSION

In this retrospective study, OS and PFS in patients with cCR undergoing active surveillance or immediate surgery were not significantly different. Active surveillance with postponed surgery for recurrent disease was not associated with a higher distant dissemination rate or more severe adverse postoperative outcomes.

Omitting surgery in esophageal cancer patients with complete response after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) followed by surgery is a standard treatment modality for locally-advanced esophageal cancer. However, patients who achieve clinical complete response (cCR) after nCRT have been reported to have better prognosis. Further, the role of surgery in these patients is controversial. Thus, this meta-analysis aimed to evaluate whether surgery is still useful in patients with cCR after nCRT.

METHODS

We systematically reviewed the MEDLINE, PubMed, Embase, Cochrane library, and Scopus databases for studies on surgical efficacy in complete responders after concurrent chemoradiotherapy for esophageal cancer. The publication date was set to January 1, 2010-January 31, 2020. The hazard ratio (HR) and risk ratio were used to compare the 2-year overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), incidence of locoregional failure, distant metastasis, and treatment mortality between the nCRT and nCRT plus surgery groups.

RESULTS

Six articles involving 609 patients were included. There was a significant benefit of nCRT for OS (HR = 0.80, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.64-0.99, p = 0.04), but not for DFS (HR = 1.55, 95% CI 0.35-6.86, p = 0.56). The nCRT group tended to have lower mortality than the nCRT plus surgery group (risk ratio = 0.15, 95% CI 0.02-1.18, p = 0.07).

CONCLUSION

Omitting surgery provides better OS in complete responders after nCRT. Adding surgery could increase the morbidity and mortality and decrease the quality of life. Thus, nCRT alone could be a feasible approach for patients with cCR.

Definitive chemoradiotherapy versus neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and esophagectomy for the treatment of esophageal and gastroesophageal carcinoma - A systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

There currently exists limited data comparing definitive chemoradiotherapy to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy with esophagectomy for patients with esophageal carcinoma. While we await more trials, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and observational studies with either propensity score matched or multivariable analyses, to provide a better understanding of the relative efficacy and effectiveness.

METHODS

MEDLINE (Ovid), EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched from database initiation (1946 for MEDLINE, 1974 for EMBASE, and 1995 for Cochrane) up until May 2021. Articles were included if they reported on overall survival or toxicity data. Summary hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated using a random-effects DerSimonian-Laird model.

RESULTS

Eight studies with a total of 16,647 patients were included in this review. Patients receiving neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy with esophagectomy had better overall survival - HR 0.55; 95% CI: 0.49-0.62. Toxicity was similar, between the two treatments.

CONCLUSION

Patients with esophageal carcinoma receiving neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and esophagectomy have better survival than patients receiving definitive chemoradiotherapy. Given the paucity of data and lack of uniform reporting of endpoints, further studies should be conducted.

Recent Progress in the Neoadjuvant Treatment Strategy for Locally Advanced Esophageal Cancer

Neoadjuvant therapies, primarily chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy, are able to improve the overall survival (OS) in patients with locally advanced resectable esophageal cancer (EC) based on the results of several randomized clinical trials. The advantage of neoadjuvant therapy is chiefly attributed to the decreased risk of local-regional recurrence and distant metastasis. Thus, it has been recommended as standard treatment for patients with resectable EC. However, several fundamental problems remain. First, the combination of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (nCT), neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT), and surgery for EC patients with different histological types remain controversial. Furthermore, to reduce the toxicity of preoperative chemotherapy and the risk of complications caused by preoperative radiation therapy, the treatment protocols of nCT and nCRT still need to be investigated and optimized by prospective trials. Moreover, for patients with complete clinical response following neoadjuvant therapy, it is worth ascertaining whether a "watch and wait" surveillance plus surgery-as-needed policy is more favorable, as well as, in addition to preoperative chemoradiotherapy, whether immunotherapy, especially when combined with the traditional neoadjuvant therapy regimens, brings new prospects for EC treatment. In this review, we summarize the recent insights into the research progress and existing problems of neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced resectable EC.

PET Imaging and Rate of Pathologic Complete Response in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

BACKGROUND

For locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), chemoradiation (ChemoRT) followed by surgery offers the best chance of cure, with a 35-50% pathologic complete response (pCR) rate. Given the morbidity of esophagectomy and the possibility of pCR with ChemoRT, a 'watch and wait' strategy has been proposed, particularly for squamous cell carcinoma. The ability to accurately predict which patients will have pCR from ChemoRT is critical in treatment decision making. This study assessed positron emission tomography (PET) in predicting pCR after neoadjuvant ChemoRT for ESCC.

METHODS

ESCC patients treated with ChemoRT followed by surgery were identified. Maximum standard uptake value (SUV), metabolic tumor volume, total lesion glycolysis, and first-order textual features of standard deviation, kurtosis and skewness were measured from PET. Univariable and multivariable generalized linear method analyses were performed. A metabolic complete response (mCR) was defined as a post-therapy PET scan with maximum SUV < 4.0.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven patients underwent ChemoRT followed by surgery, with overall pCR seen in 11 (41%) patients and radiographic mCR seen in 12 (44%) patients. Final pathology for these 12 patients revealed pCR (ypT0N0M0) in 5 (42%) patients and persistent disease in 7 (58%) patients. Univariate analysis did not reveal PET parameters predictive of pCR.

CONCLUSION

Treatment of ESCC with ChemoRT often results in a robust clinical response. Among patients with an mCR after ChemoRT, disease persistence was found in 58%. The inability of PET to predict pCR is important in the context of a 'watch and wait' strategy for ESCC treated with ChemoRT.

[Complete response after neoadjuvant therapy for esophageal cancer : Implications for surgery]

A relevant number of patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma show a locoregional complete response of the tumor in the resected material after neoadjuvant therapy with modern chemotherapy and chemoradiation protocols. Due to a high rate of perioperative morbidity and decreased long-term quality of life following esophagectomy, the current treatment algorithm with neoadjuvant therapy and post-neoadjuvant esophagectomy on principle is critically questioned. An individualized treatment algorithm with extended clinical evaluation of post-neoadjuvant remission status and esophagectomy as needed is discussed. Patients with complete remission after neoadjuvant therapy are identified in an extended restaging protocol. Cases of clinical complete remission are treated with an active surveillance concept with esophagectomy as needed, i.e. surgery only when a local tumor recurrence is detected. Retrospective cohort studies have suggested that the active surveillance concept with esophagectomy as needed does not lead to a deterioration of overall survival rates in the patient collective. European prospective randomized, controlled, noninferiority studies with an oncological endpoint are currently evaluating the possibilities of organ-preserving concepts for clinical complete remission of esophageal cancer.

Liquid biopsy in esophageal cancer: a case report of false-positive circulating tumor DNA detection due to clonal hematopoiesis

Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) analysis is a promising non-invasive technique for active surveillance after chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced resectable esophageal carcinoma. In other malignancies false-positive results in ctDNA analysis have been reported due to clonal hematopoiesis. In this case, we present a 66-year-old male who had adenocarcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction for which he received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and underwent a transhiatal esophagectomy. Postoperatively our patient received follow-up with ctDNA analysis using next generation sequencing (NGS) and droplet digital PCR (ddPCR). This case report illustrates a number of the current challenges in ctDNA diagnostics in esophageal carcinoma. Firstly, the TP53 c.524G>A; p.R175H mutation that was found in preoperative tumor biopsies became detectable in ctDNA only after distant metastases had already been confirmed by clinical symptoms and standard imaging- and biopsy techniques. Secondly our patient repeatedly had false-positive outcomes of ctDNA analysis. Genomic analysis of white blood cells revealed that the origin of these discordant mutations lies in clonal hematopoiesis. Failure to detect TP53 c.524G>A; p.R175H in cell-free DNA (cfDNA) is most likely due to the amount of ctDNA in the cfDNA fraction being below the limit of detection for NGS and ddPCR analyses. Clinicians should be aware of the possibility of finding mutations originating from clonal hematopoiesis when using ctDNA analysis during active surveillance for esophageal carcinoma. We recommend correlation of mutations in cfDNA with mutations in tumor biopsies.

Salvage Esophagectomy

Salvage esophagectomy is an option for patients with recurrent or persistent esophageal cancer after definitive chemoradiation therapy or those who undergo active surveillance after induction chemoradiation therapy. Salvage resection is associated with higher rates of morbidity compared with planned esophagectomy but offers patients with locally advanced disease a chance at improved long-term survival. Salvage resection should be preferentially performed in a multidisciplinary setting by high-volume and experienced surgeons. Technical considerations, such as prior radiation dosage, radiation field, and choice of conduit, should be taken into account.

Surveillance Following Treatment of Esophageal Cancer

We describe the surveillance strategies after esophageal cancer treatment, whether local therapy, induction chemoradiation, or other definitive treatment such as trimodality therapy. We discuss the shortcomings of the different invasive and imaging studies, and the recommended stage-specific surveillance after local and organ-sparing approaches to esophageal cancer treatment.

Syntaphilin downregulation facilitates radioresistance via mediating mitochondria distribution in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

Syntaphilin (SNPH) halts mitochondrial movements and regulates proliferation-motility phenotype switching of cancer cells. We sought to investigate the significance of SNPH-mediated mitochondria distribution in radioresistant (RR) phenotype switching in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). RR ESCC cells were established by long-term exposure to radiation. Effects of SNPH on proliferation, migration, mitochondrial distribution, radiation-induced oxidative damage and radiosensitivity were investigated by overexpressing or silencing SNPH. The mechanisms regulating SNPH expression and the potential molecules mediating the SNPH-re-expression-induced radiosensitization were explored. SNPH expression in specimens from 156 patients was analyzed to evaluate its clinical significance. We found that RR ESCC cells had a sparse mitochondrial network and lower SNPH level. SNPH reconstitution in RR ESCC cells inhibited migration, induced proliferation and mitochondrial aggregation, exacerbated the radiation-induced oxidative damage and ultimately promoted radiosensitization. Mechanistically, ubiquitin-proteasomal degradation and histone modification contributed to SNPH downregulation in RR ESCC cells. Subsequently, we found that CREB dephosphorylation facilitated the SNPH re-expression-induced radiosensitization. Furthermore, SNPH expression was correlated with the radiotherapeutic efficacy and served as an independent prognostic factor for survival of ESCC patients. Our study revealed that low SNPH expression was a novel indicator for radioresistance, and targeting SNPH could be a promising regimen to improve the radiotherapeutic efficiency in ESCC patients.

Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma metachronous to head and neck cancers

BACKGROUND

In some HNSCC patients, a metachronous ESCC may develop. No information is available on the HNSCC-associated ESCCs microenvironment and etiology.

METHODS

Among 134 ESCCs surgically treated between 2009 and 2015, a series of 6 HNSCC-associated ESCCs was collected. A series of 12 sex-, age- and stage-matched ESCCs with no previous oncological medical history was selected for comparison. Histologic assessment of intratumoral inflammatory infiltration and immunohistochemistry for CD4, CD8, CD80, PD1, PD-L1 and p53 were performed. HPV detection/genotyping was assessed by PCR single step and reverse line blot.

RESULTS

HPV DNA was negative in all the HNSCC-associated ESCCs. In comparison to non-HNSCC-associated carcinomas, the 6 cases presented a lower lymphomonocytic infiltration, which also corresponded to a lower prevalence of CD4 + T cell infiltration and, 5/6 cases presented a PD-L1 CPS ≥ 1. All the HNSCC-associated ESCCs resulted positive for p53 immunostaining in ≥50 % of cancer cells.

CONCLUSION

Our study suggests that HPV infection is not an etiological factor associated to ESCC after HNSCC. On the other hand, p53 overexpression is a common finding. Moreover, our data suggest that an altered immune microenvironment, conditioned by a dysregulation in lymphomonocytic infiltration, may be a crucial factor allowing the occurrence of a metachronous ESCC.

Feasibility and Oncological Outcome of Preoperative Chemoradiation With IMRT Dose Intensification for Locally Advanced Esophageal and Gastroesophageal Cancer

PURPOSE

To explore the feasibility and efficacy of a dose intensification with Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy and Simultaneous Integrated Boost (IMRT-SIB) in locally advanced esophageal and gastroesophageal cancer (GEJ).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We retrospectively analyzed a series of 69 patients with esophageal or GEJ cancer treated at our Institute, between 2016 and 2019, with preoperative IMRT and SIB up to 52.5-54 Gy in 25 fractions in 5 weeks and concurrent carboplatin (AUC2) and paclitaxel (50 mg/m2), as in the CROSS regimen.

RESULTS

All patients completed the planned IMRT-SIB program with a median of four (range 1-5) cycles of concurrent paclitaxel/carboplatin. Compliance to IMRT-SIB was 93%, whereas 54% of patients received four to five cycles and 87% at least three cycles of concurrent carboplatin/paclitaxel. Grade 3 toxicity was reported in 19% of patients. Complete clinical response (cCR) was achieved in 48%, and 13% had disease progression after chemoradiation (CRT). Overall, 49% of patients underwent surgery; reasons for non-operation included cCR in cervical tumor location (10%) or cCR and patient decision (13%). A pathologic complete response (pCR) was achieved in 44% of resected patients. Postoperative complications and mortality rates were 21 and 6%, respectively. At a median follow-up of 12 months (6-25), 2-year overall and progression-free (PFS) survival rates were 81 and 54%, respectively. No difference in PFS by histologic type in operated patients was reported. Non-operated cCR patients had higher PFS, including cervical locations and selected cCR patients who decided for non-operation (75 vs 30%, p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

The study reported favorable results in safety and feasibility of the IMRT-SIB dose intensification in our preoperative CRT program. The toxicity was acceptable, allowing a high compliance to intensified radiation doses with dose reduction of concurrent paclitaxel/carboplatin in some patients. The high rate of cCR and pCR suggested this intensified program is effective in the preoperative CRT and, for selected responsive patients, in the non-operative approach to esophageal and GEJ cancer. The 2-year survival rates were promising. A prospective study is being planned to confirm these observations.

Post-Neoadjuvant Surveillance and Surgery as Needed Compared with Post-Neoadjuvant Surgery on Principle in Multimodal Treatment for Esophageal Cancer: A Scoping Review

BACKGROUND

A substantial fraction of patients with esophageal cancer show post-neoadjuvant pathological complete response (pCR). Principal esophagectomy after neoadjuvant treatment is the standard of care for all patients, although surveillance and surgery as needed in case of local recurrence may be a treatment alternative for patients with complete response (CR).

METHODS

We performed a scoping review to describe key characteristics of relevant clinical studies including adults with non-metastatic esophageal cancer receiving multimodal treatment. Until September 2020, relevant studies were identified through systematic searches in the bibliographic databases Medline, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Science Direct, ClinicalTrials, the German study register, and the WHO registry platform.

RESULTS

In total, three completed randomized controlled trials (RCTs, with 468 participants), three planned/ongoing RCTs (with a planned sample size of 752 participants), one non-randomized controlled study (NRS, with 53 participants), ten retrospective cohort studies (with 2228 participants), and one survey on patients' preferences (with 100 participants) were identified. All studies applied neoadjuvant chemoradiation protocols. None of the studies examined neoadjuvant chemotherapeutic protocols. Studies investigated patient populations with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, adenocarcinoma, and mixed cohorts. Important outcomes reported were overall, disease-free and local recurrence-free survival. Limitations of the currently available study pool include heterogeneous chemoradiation protocols, a lack of modern neoadjuvant treatment protocols in RCTs, short follow-up times, the use of heterogeneous diagnostic methods, and different definitions of clinical CR.

CONCLUSION

Although post-neoadjuvant surveillance and surgery as needed compared with post-neoadjuvant surgery on principle has been investigated within different study designs, the currently available results are based on a wide variation of diagnostic tools to identify patients with pCR, short follow-up times, small sample sizes, and variations in therapeutic procedures. A thoroughly planned RCT considering the limitations in the currently available literature will be of great importance to provide patients with CR with the best and less harmful treatment.

Surveillance of Clinically Complete Responders Using Serial 18F-FDG PET/CT Scans in Patients with Esophageal Cancer After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy

Active surveillance for patients with esophageal cancer and a clinically complete response (cCR) after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) is being studied. Active surveillance requires accurate clinical response evaluations. ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT might be able to detect local tumor recurrence after nCRT as soon as the esophagus recovers from radiation-induced esophagitis. The aims of this study were to assess the value of serial ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT scans for detecting local recurrence in patients beyond 3 mo after nCRT and to determine when radiation-induced esophagitis has resolved. Methods: This retrospective multicenter study included patients who had cCR after nCRT, who initially declined surgery, and who subsequently underwent active surveillance. Clinical response evaluations included ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT, endoscopic biopsies, and endoscopic ultrasound with fine-needle aspiration at regular intervals. SUV_max normalized for lean body mass (SUL_max) was measured at the primary tumor site. The percentage change in SUL_max (Δ%SUL_max) between the last follow-up scan and the scan at 3 mo after nCRT was calculated. Tumor recurrence was defined as biopsy-proven vital tumor at the initial tumor site. Results: Of 41 eligible patients, 24 patients had recurrent disease at a median of 6.5 mo after nCRT and 17 patients remained cancer free during a median follow-up of 24 mo after nCRT. Five of 24 patients with tumor recurrence had sudden intense SUL_max increases of greater than 180%. In 19 of 24 patients with tumor recurrence, SUL_max gradually increased (median Δ%SUL_max, +18%), whereas SUL_max decreased (median Δ%SUL_max, -12%) in patients with ongoing cCR (P < 0.001, independent-samples t test). In patients with ongoing cCR, SUL_max was lowest at 11 mo after nCRT. Conclusion: Serial ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT might be a useful tool for detecting tumor recurrence during active surveillance. In patients with ongoing cCR, the lowest SUL_max was reached at 11 mo after nCRT, suggesting that radiation-induced esophagitis had mostly resolved by that time. These findings warrant further evaluation in a larger cohort.

Immune surveillance activation after neoadjuvant therapy for esophageal adenocarcinoma and complete response

After neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for esophageal adenocarcinoma, up to 29% of patients have a pathological complete response (pCR). What to do afterward is still under debate. The aim of this prospective study was to define which local markers of immune response might act as predictors of pCR and of recurrence after pCR. The peritumoral healthy mucosa of the surgical specimen was sampled at esophagectomy and analyzed by immunohistochemistry, flow cytometry and Real-Time PCR. One hundred and twenty-three patients received neoadjuvant therapy for esophageal adenocarcinoma and were included in the study. Significantly higher rate of natural killer (NK) cells (CD57+), intraepithelial CD8 + T lymphocytes and degranulating T- and NK-cells (CD107+) were observed in the healthy mucosa of patients with pCR. Moreover, pCR was characterized by a lower immune-check points gene expression level. T-cell activation markers mRNA levels were significantly lower in patients with pCR and recurrent disease, showing an excellent accuracy in the prediction of the postoperative recurrence. Costimulatory molecules mRNA relative levels tended to be lower in patients with pCR and recurrent disease, showing a good accuracy in the prediction of postoperative recurrence in patients with pCR. The immune profile identified in this study might further be tested in large prospective trials as marker of pCR after neoadjuvant therapy and as predictor of recurrence after pCR.

Multidisciplinary treatment of esophageal cancer: The role of active surveillance after neoadjuvant chemoradiation

The optimal treatment of esophageal cancer is still controversial. Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by radical esophagectomy is a standard treatment. Morbidity after esophagectomy however is still considerable and has an impact on patients' quality of life. Given a pathologic complete response rate of approximately 30% in patients after neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by surgery, active surveillance has been introduced as a new alternative approach. Active surveillance involves regular clinical response evaluations in patients after neoadjuvant therapy to detect residual or recurrent disease. As long as there is no suspicion of disease activity, surgery is withheld. Esophagectomy is reserved for patients presenting with an incomplete response or resectable recurrent disease. Active surveillance after neoadjuvant treatment has been previously applied in other types of malignancy with encouraging results. This paper discusses its role in esophageal cancer.

Neoadjuvant and Definitive Radiochemotherapeutic Approaches in Esophageal Cancer: A Retrospective Evaluation of 122 Cases in Daily Clinical Routine

INTRODUCTION

Esophageal cancer (EC) is a common malignant tumor entity with increasing occurrence. The incidence of esophageal adenocarcinoma (AC), particularly, is constantly rising in the Western world. The mainstays of therapy with curative intent for EC in advanced stages are neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy (neoRCT) with surgery and definitive radiochemotherapy (defRCT).

METHODS

We examined our internal files to identify patients suffering from EC. Palliative cases were excluded. Statistical testing was performed by χ2 test, Student's t test, Kaplan-Meier analyses, and the Mann-Whitney U test.

RESULTS

One hundred and twenty-two cases were included. Histology revealed squamous cell carcinoma in 92 cases and AC in 23 cases. Ninety-five patients underwent defRCT, 27 underwent neoRCT, and 114 (in both therapy regimes) received simultaneous chemotherapy. There was no difference in the overall survival (OS) (p = 0.654; HR 1.145; 95% CI 0.629-2.086) or and progression-free survival (PFS) (p = 0.912) of patients who underwent neoRCT or defRCT. Median OS was 13.5 (2-197) months for defRCT patients and 19.5 (2-134) months for neoRCT patients (p = 0.751). Karnofsky index (KI) with a cut-off of 70% was strongest, but not a significant parameter for OS (p = 0.608) or PFS (p = 0.137).

CONCLUSION

defRCT is a valid and an equal alternative to neoRCT for patients suffering from EC. Selection of patients for therapy is of crucial relevance. Further studies and improvements in follow-up are needed when neoRCT has been completed before surgery, in order to spare the patient undergoing operative treatment if there is complete remission. The identification of valid markers urgently needed to limit treatment side effects.

Accuracy of Detecting Residual Disease After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy for Esophageal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to perform a meta-analysis on the accuracy of endoscopic biopsies, EUS, and 18F-FDG PET(-CT) for detecting residual disease after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) for esophageal cancer.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

After nCRT, one-third of patients have a pathologically complete response in the resection specimen. Before an active surveillance strategy could be offered to these patients, clinically complete responders should be accurately identified.

METHODS

Embase, Medline, Cochrane, and Web-of-Science were searched until February 2018 for studies on accuracy of endoscopic biopsies, EUS, or PET(-CT) for detecting locoregional residual disease after nCRT for squamous cell- or adenocarcinoma. Pooled sensitivities and specificities were calculated using random-effect meta-analyses.

RESULTS

Forty-four studies were included for meta-analyses. For detecting residual disease at the primary tumor site, 12 studies evaluated endoscopic biopsies, 11 qualitative EUS, 14 qualitative PET, 8 quantitative PET using maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), and 7 quantitative PET using percentage reduction of SUVmax (%ΔSUVmax). Pooled sensitivities and specificities were 33% and 95% for endoscopic biopsies, 96% and 8% for qualitative EUS, 74% and 52% for qualitative PET, 69% and 72% for PET-SUVmax, and 73% and 63% for PET-%ΔSUVmax. For detecting residual nodal disease, 11 studies evaluated qualitative EUS with a pooled sensitivity and specificity of 68% and 57%, respectively. In subgroup analyses, sensitivity of PET-%ΔSUVmax and EUS for nodal disease was higher in squamous cell carcinoma than adenocarcinoma.

CONCLUSIONS

Current literature suggests insufficient accuracy of endoscopic biopsies, EUS, and 18F-FDG PET(-CT) as single modalities for detecting residual disease after nCRT for esophageal cancer.

Induction chemoradiotherapy including docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil for locally advanced esophageal cancer

BACKGROUND

Locally advanced esophageal cancer (EC) invading surrounding organs (T4b) is difficult to treat. In general, definitive chemoradiotherapy (d-CRT) has been chosen as treatment for such cases. However, the outcome has not been good. Recently, the effectiveness of d-CRT with docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil (DCF-RT) has been reported. Furthermore, surgery after d-CRT has a better prognosis than d-CRT alone in some reports, although it has a high risk of surgical complications. This study investigated the effectiveness and safety of induction DCF-RT.

METHODS

The subjects were EC patients who underwent induction DCF-RT in Okayama University Hospital between January 2011 and December 2017. Their background characteristics, treatment details, histopathological factors, adverse events during CRT, postoperative complications, and overall survival (OS) were assessed.

RESULTS

A total of 16 cases were performed induction DCF-RT. In 10 cases, death occurred, with 9 cancer-related deaths, and 1 death due to other disease. For all cases, OS was 37.5% at 3 years. 12 cases underwent esophagectomy after DCF-RT. Their OS was 50% at 3 years. 13 patients (81.3%) had Grade 3 febrile neutropenia. In 7 cases (62.5%), fasting for the treatment of diarrhea was needed. Three patients (25%) developed anastomotic leakage. Some recurrent laryngeal nerve paralysis was observed in 6 cases (50%).

CONCLUSION

Although the rates of adverse events and surgical complications were slightly higher than in past reports, they were acceptable. It is useful to perform induction DCF-RT for T4b EC.

Added value of MRI to endoscopic and endosonographic response assessment after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in oesophageal cancer

OBJECTIVES

In order to select oesophageal cancer patients after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) for organ-preserving treatment instead of surgery, a high diagnostic accuracy is required. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether MRI had additional value to gastroscopy with biopsies and endosonographic ultrasound (EUS) with fine needle aspiration (FNA) for the detection of residual tumour after nCRT.

METHODS

Twenty-two patients with oesophageal cancer eligible for nCRT followed by oesophagectomy were prospectively included. All patients underwent (T2- and diffusion-weighted) MRI and gastroscopy+EUS before and after nCRT. Histopathology after oesophagectomy was the reference standard with pathological complete response (pCR) defined as ypT0N0. Diagnostic performance regarding the detection of residual tumour was calculated for gastroscopic biopsies and for EUS-FNA without and with MRI.

RESULTS

Nineteen of the 22 patients (86%) did not achieve pCR after nCRT (7 ypT+N+, 11 ypT+N0, 1 ypT0N+). Biopsies detected residual tumour in 6 of 18 ypT+ patients. After adding MRI, 16 of 18 residual tumours were assessed correctly. EUS-FNA detected 3 out of 8 ypN+ patients, while MRI did not improve detection. Overall, adding MRI improved sensitivity for detection of residual tumour to 89% (17 of 19) from 47% (9 of 19) with endoscopic biopsies and EUS-FNA only.

CONCLUSION

In this small study, the detection of residual tumour after nCRT in oesophageal cancer patients was improved by the addition of MRI to gastroscopy and EUS.

KEY POINTS

• In this small study, the detection of residual tumour after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in oesophageal cancer patients was improved by adding MRI including diffusion-weighted images to gastroscopy and endosonographic ultrasound. • With the addition of MRI assessment to gastroscopy and endosonographic ultrasound, the considerable risk of missing residual tumours decreased from 53 to 11%, while the pitfall was overstaging in one out of three complete responders.

The value of tumor-stroma ratio as predictor of pathologic response after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in esophageal cancer

•

Scoring the tumor-stroma ratio is a simple and reproducible method.

•

Tumor-stroma ratio and response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy are correlated.

•

Stroma-low tumors are likely to respond better to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.

Background and purpose

With currently available techniques, the prediction of pathologic complete response after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy is insufficient. The tumor-stroma ratio (TSR) has proven to be a predictor of survival for several types of cancer, including esophageal. The aim of this study was to investigate the value of TSR in predicting pathologic response after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in esophageal cancer patients.

Materials and methods

Patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma who received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by a resection were selected. Haematoxylin and eosin (H&E) stained sections of diagnostic biopsies were collected and TSR was independently assessed by two investigators. Patients were categorized in stroma-low (≤50% stroma) and stroma-high (>50% stroma) groups for further analyses. The tumor regression grade (TRG) was assessed on H&E stained sections of the resected primary tumor to determine pathologic response.

Results

A total of 94 patients were included in this study, of which 76 patients were categorized as stroma-low and 18 as stroma-high. Forty-two (45%) patients had a major pathologic response (TRG 1–2), whereas 52 (55%) were considered non-responders. After adjustment for gender, tumor type, cT-status and differentiation grade, patients with a stroma-high tumor showed a higher chance of no response compared to patients with a stroma-low tumor (OR 3.57, 95%CI 1.03–12.31, P = 0.04).

Conclusion

TSR showed to have the potential to aid in the prediction of pathologic response in esophageal cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Larger validation studies are necessary before implementing this method in daily practice.

PD-L1 expression, CD8+ and CD4+ lymphocyte rate are predictive of pathological complete response after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for squamous cell cancer of the thoracic esophagus

BACKGROUND

Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CTRT) can effectively downstage esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) in patients with locally advanced disease and prolonged survival have been observed in patients with a pathological complete response (ypCR).

AIMS AND METHODS

This exploratory study aimed to identify immunological predictors of pCR after neoadjuvant CTRT within SCC microenvironment. The tumor regression after neoadjuvant therapy was measured according to the Mandard score system. Eighty-eight consecutive patients with SCC of the thoracic esophagus who received neoadjuvant CTRT were included in this retrospective study. Inclusion criteria were neoadjuvant CTRT and the availability of representative histological samples taken at diagnosis. We investigated immunohistochemical expression of CD4, Tbet, FoxP3, CD8, CD80, PD-L1, and PD-1, in the pretreatment biopsies and correlated the immunohistochemical profiles to patients' outcomes.

RESULTS

After neoadjuvant CTRT, 23 patients had pCR, while 65 ones had partial response, stable disease or progression. PD-L1 expression and CD8+ and CD4+ lymphocyte rate were significantly higher in patients who had ypCR compared to those who had not (10 (0-55) vs 0 (0-0), P = 0.004, 73 (36-147) vs 21 (7-47), P = 0.0006 and 39 (23-74) vs 5 (0-13), P < 0.0001 respectively). The accuracy of expression of PD-L1+, CD8+, and CD4+ lymphocyte rate in identifying responders was AUC = 0.76 (P = 0.001), AUC = 0.81 (P = 0.0001) and AUC = 0.75 (P = 0.0001), respectively. Within the ypCR group, all patients with high infiltration of CD4+ T cell recurred/relapsed while only the 38.9% of those with low CD4+ T cell infiltration did the same (P = 0.058).

CONCLUSIONS

PD-L1 expression and CD8+ and CD4+ lymphocyte rate were predictive of ypCR after neoadjuvant CTRT for SCC of the thoracic esophagus with adequate accuracy. Furthermore, recurrence/relapse was associated with high level of CD4+ T cell infiltration. However, the small sample size prevented to draw definitive conclusions; further studies are necessary to evaluate the prognostic role of these markers.

Diffusion-weighted MRI with ADC mapping for response prediction and assessment of oesophageal cancer: A systematic review

PURPOSE

The aim was to perform a systematic review on the value of diffusion-weighted MRI (DW-MRI) with apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) mapping in the prediction and assessment of response to chemo- and/or radiotherapy in oesophageal cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A systematic search was performed on Pubmed, Embase, Medline and Cochrane databases. Studies that evaluated the ADC for response evaluation before, during or after chemo- and/or radiotherapy were included. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2) was used to assess the quality of the included studies.

RESULTS

Fourteen studies, comprising 516 patients, in which the response to treatment in oesophageal cancer was evaluated on ADC maps were included. Acquisition parameter settings for DW-MRI and ROI placement varied substantially. The reference standard was RECIST or endoscopic assessment in eight non-surgery studies and histopathology after surgery in six studies. A high pre-treatment ADC significantly correlated with good response in three out of 12 studies; conversely, one study reported a significantly higher pre-treatment ADC in poor responders. In five out of eight studies good responders showed a significantly larger relative increase in ADC two weeks after the onset of treatment (range 23-59%) than poor responders (range 1.5-17%). After chemo- and/or radiotherapy ADC results varied considerably, amongst others due to large variation in the interval between completion of therapy and DW-MRI.

CONCLUSION

DW-MRI for response evaluation to chemo- and/or radiotherapy in oesophageal cancer shows variable methods and results. A large relative ADC increase after two weeks of treatment seems most predictive for good response.

Diagnostic performance of MRI for assessment of response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in oesophageal cancer

Background

Patients with a pathological complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) for oesophageal cancer may benefit from non‐surgical management. The aim of this study was to determine the diagnostic performance of visual response assessment of the primary tumour after nCRT on T2‐weighted (T2W) and diffusion‐weighted (DW) MRI.

Methods

Patients with locally advanced oesophageal cancer who underwent T2W‐ and DW‐MRI (1·5 T) before and after nCRT in two hospitals, between July 2013 and September 2017, were included in this prospective study. Three radiologists evaluated T2W images retrospectively using a five‐point score for the assessment of residual tumour in a blinded manner and immediately rescored after adding DW‐MRI. Histopathology of the resection specimen was used as the reference standard; ypT0 represented a pCR. Sensitivity, specificity, area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) and interobserver agreement were calculated.

Results

Twelve of 51 patients (24 per cent) had a pCR. The sensitivity and specificity of T2W‐MRI for detection of residual tumour ranged from 90 to 100 and 8 to 25 per cent respectively. Respective values for T2W + DW‐MRI were 90–97 and 42–50 per cent. AUCs for the three readers were 0·65, 0·66 and 0·68 on T2W‐MRI, and 0·71, 0·70 and 0·70 on T2W + DW‐MRI (P = 0·441, P = 0·611 and P = 0·828 for readers 1, 2 and 3 respectively). The κ value for interobserver agreement improved from 0·24–0·55 on T2W‐MRI to 0·55–0·71 with DW‐MRI.

Conclusion

Preoperative assessment of residual tumour on MRI after nCRT for oesophageal cancer is feasible with high sensitivity, reflecting a low chance of missing residual tumour. However, the specificity was low; this results in overstaging of complete responders as having residual tumour and, consequently, overtreatment.

The current optimal multimodality treatments for oesophageal squamous-cell carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Multimodality treatments including definitive chemoradiotherapy (dCRT) and neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) or chemotherapy (nCT) followed by surgery (S) are frequently used to improve prognosis in locally advanced oesophageal squamous-cell carcinoma (LAESCC), while the optimal multimodality regimen has yet to be defined; therefore, this systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to find out the current best multimodality regimen for LAESCC.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Ovid and Cochrane Library databases for studies comparing nCRT + S with nCT + S or dCRT. The primary outcome was overall survival. The secondary outcomes were the rates of R0 resection, pathologic complete response (pCR), tumor-free lymph nodes (pN0) and postoperative recurrence.

RESULTS

Five studies comparing nCRT + S with nCT + S and fourteen studies comparing nCRT + S with dCRT were finally included. Meta-analysis showed that nCRT + S had higher rates of R0 resection (OR 1.84, 95% CI 1.03-3.29), pCR (OR: 2.90 95% CI 1.37-6.14) and pN0 (OR: 2.55 95% CI 1.54-4.24) with a significant survival advantage (HR 0.72; 95% CI 0.52-0.99) when compared with nCT + S in LAESCC. When nCRT + S was compared with dCRT, nCRT + S yielded a significant survival benefit (HR 0.65; 95% CI 0.56-0.76) and had a significantly lower rate of local recurrence (OR: 0.35 95% CI 0.22-0.57).

CONCLUSION

Current evidence suggests that CRT + S may be the optimal potential curative treatment mode for patients with LAESCC as long as they are suitable for this multimodality regimen.

Clinical complete response after chemoradiotherapy for carcinoma of thoracic esophagus: Is esophagectomy always necessary? A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Although a clinical complete response (cCR) after chemoradiotherapy (CRT) could lead to a better prognosis, the choice of a following strategy, such as surgical or non‐surgical approach, remains controversial.

Methods

All articles relevant to a comparison of surgical and non‐surgical treatment (including further definitive chemoradiotherapy or active surveillance) for esophageal carcinoma patients with a cCR after CRT were retrieved for meta‐analysis. The final date for data retrieval was 30 June 2018.

Results

Four retrospective studies including 648 patients met the inclusion criteria: 620 with squamous cell carcinoma and 28 with adenocarcinoma. The CRT + surgery group had an advantage over the non‐surgery group in regard to two‐year disease‐free survival (DFS); however, the two groups showed similar results in five‐year DFS. The CRT + surgery group had an advantage over the non‐surgery group in two‐year overall survival (OS); nevertheless, the two groups showed similar results in five‐year OS.

Conclusions

Based on the available evidence, the addition of surgery to thoracic locally advanced esophageal carcinoma patients with a cCR after neoadjuvant CRT provided no advantage to long‐term survival. As an exception, the two‐year DFS and OS could be improved. This research conclusion might be more suitable to patients with squamous cell carcinoma.

Comparison of Outcome of Esophagectomy Versus Nonsurgical Treatment for Resectable Esophageal Cancer with Clinical Complete Response to Neoadjuvant Therapy

BACKGROUND

Treatment for patients who have achieved clinical complete response (cCR) after neoadjuvant therapy has not been established, and there is no consensus regarding the indications for either esophagectomy or nonsurgical treatment.

METHODS

Among 1,545 patients with esophageal cancer at Toranomon Hospital between January 2006 and August 2017, 39 who achieved cCR after neoadjuvant treatment were divided into two groups according to treatment: esophagectomy group (n = 18) and nonsurgical treatment group (n = 21) for comparison.

RESULTS

No significant intergroup difference was observed in baseline characteristics. Pathological complete response was confirmed in 13 (72.2%) of the 18 patients who underwent esophagectomy, whereas residual tumor was detected at the location of primary tumor in 2 (11.1%) patients, and lymph node metastasis was found in 3 (16.7%) patients. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) was significantly longer in the esophagectomy group than in the nonsurgical group (p = 0.002). Disease-specific survival (DSS) was significantly longer in the esophagectomy group (p = 0.007). However, no significant intergroup difference was observed in overall survival estimated based on all deaths, including respiratory failure and aspiration pneumonia (p = 0.451).

CONCLUSIONS

With improved diagnostic accuracy, nonsurgical treatment can be an option for patients estimated as cCR after treatment administered in a neoadjuvant setting. However, surgical resection is considered more appropriate because of residual tumor in some patients with cCR and because of superior DSS and RFS following esophagectomy compared with nonsurgical treatment. Future studies must focus on ameliorating late postoperative complications, such as respiratory failure and aspiration pneumonia.

Patients' preferences for treatment after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for oesophageal cancer

Background

After neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) plus surgery for oesophageal cancer, 29 per cent of patients have a pathologically complete response in the resection specimen. Active surveillance after nCRT (instead of standard oesophagectomy) may improve health-related quality of life (HRQoL), but patients need to undergo frequent diagnostic tests and it is unknown whether survival is worse than that after standard oesophagectomy. Factors that influence patients' preferences, and trade-offs that patients are willing to make in their choice between surgery and active surveillance were investigated here.

Methods

A prospective discrete-choice experiment was conducted. Patients with oesophageal cancer completed questionnaires 4–6 weeks after nCRT, before surgery. Patients' preferences were quantified using scenarios based on five aspects: 5-year overall survival, short-term HRQoL, long-term HRQoL, the risk that oesophagectomy is still necessary, and the frequency of clinical examinations using endoscopy and PET–CT. Panel latent class analysis was used.

Results

Some 100 of 104 patients (96·2 per cent) responded. All aspects, except the frequency of clinical examinations, influenced patients' preferences. Five-year overall survival, the chance that oesophagectomy is still necessary and long-term HRQoL were the most important attributes. On average, based on calculation of the indifference point between standard surgery and active surveillance, patients were willing to trade off 16 per cent 5-year overall survival to reduce the risk that oesophagectomy is necessary from 100 per cent (standard surgery) to 35 per cent (active surveillance).

Conclusion

Patients are willing to trade off substantial 5-year survival to achieve a reduction in the risk that oesophagectomy is necessary.