Collaborative Care for Depression among Patients with Limited English Proficiency: a Systematic Review

Quality of Psychiatric Care for Immigrants and People With a Non-English Language Preference: A Systematic Scoping Review

OBJECTIVE

Immigrants and persons with a non-English language preference (NELP) face unique challenges in the mental health care system. This systematic scoping review aimed to evaluate the literature for disparities in psychiatric care delivery, beyond access and utilization barriers, experienced by these two populations.

METHODS

The authors queried four databases: PubMed, PsycInfo, Web of Science, and CINAHL. Studies published between August 1993 and August 2023 were selected if they had a population that included immigrants to English-language countries or patients with a NELP and a mental illness, had a relevant comparison group, and included outcome measures focused on quality of psychiatric care delivery. Studies focusing solely on care access or utilization, studies without original data, case reports, and commentaries were excluded.

RESULTS

The search identified 2,860 studies. Seventeen studies were included for full-text review (Cohen's κ=0.96). Large variability was found in the measures of quality used in the studies. Outcome variables were involuntary treatment rate, symptom management, unmet needs, medication use and monitoring, diagnosis, and psychiatric referral. Immigrants were more likely than nonimmigrants to receive involuntary treatments in all seven pertinent studies. An insufficient number of studies focused on other outcome measures, limiting analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

Many studies highlighted differences in care, especially with regard to involuntary hospitalization. Outcome measures varied and deviated from established quality metrics. Insufficient data were available to determine whether the identified differences in care represent a care delivery gap. Studies that use standardized measures would assist in evaluating the quality of care received by immigrants and patients with a NELP.

Randomized controlled trial to assess medication adherence and health-related quality of life through a collaborative pharmacist-psychiatrist approach to patient education in patients with depression in India

Background

Depression is a common but severe mental health disorder affecting individuals globally. Medication non-adherence and low health-related quality of life (HRQoL) are the major challenges associated with the treatment of patients with depression.

Materials and methods

A prospective Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) was conducted in the psychiatry outpatient department of a tertiary care hospital for six months. Patients were assigned to either a control group receiving usual care or a test group receiving collaborative care using simple randomization technique. The eligible patients diagnosed with depression were enrolled and the data were collected from patient's care records, prescriptions, patient interviews, patient representatives and healthcare professionals. The intervention in the test group consisted of comprehensive patient education, including a thorough counseling session with a research clinical pharmacist. Counseling sessions included information on the disease, medications prescribed, possible side effects, compliance with medications and overall treatment. The data collected from both patient groups was analyzed for medication adherence using the Medication Adherence Rating Scale (MARS) and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) using the WHOQOL-BREF questionnaire. Statistical analyses were performed using a student t-test with a significance level of P value < 0.05.

Results

The collaborative care group showed a statistically significant improvement in medication adherence, with a mean increase of 1.67 ± 0.25 (P < 0.001), compared with a mean increase of 0.69 ± 0.05 (P < 0.05) for the usual care group. Similarly, HRQoL scores also improved significantly more in the collaborative care group, with a mean increase of 28.01 ± 2.05 (P < 0.001), compared with a mean increase of 12.46 ± 0.26 (P < 0.05) for the usual care group.

Conclusion

This study concluded that pharmacist-psychiatrist collaborative patient education can significantly improve the medication adherence and HRQoL of the patients with depression. Statistically significant increases in medication adherence and HRQoL were observed in the collaborative group.

Depression Treatment After a Positive Depression Screen Result

Importance

As primary care practices increase depression screening, it is unknown whether screening is associated with appropriate and equitable treatment.

Objective

To investigate factors associated with initial treatment among patients who screen positive for depression and/or suicidal ideation (SI).

Design, Setting, and Participants

Cohort study using electronic health record data from September 2017 to September 2021, from a large US academic health system. Participants were adult primary care patients with elevated depressive symptoms (Patient Health Questionnaire-9 score ≥10) and/or SI, excluding patients with baseline depression, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, or dementia. Data were analyzed from December 30, 2022, to February 17, 2024.

Exposure

Patient characteristics including gender, age, preferred language, and race and ethnicity.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Primary outcome was antidepressant or mental health referral ordered at screening. Secondary outcomes were antidepressant/referral and antidepressant/referral or follow-up visit within 8 weeks.

Results

Of 60 062 patients screened, 3980 (7%) reported elevated depressive symptoms or SI. The cohort was 68.1% women (2711), and the mean (SD) age was 46.5 (17.6) years; 0.8% were 12.4% African American or Black (493), American Indian or Alaska Native (30), 24.8% Asian (988), 14.6% Latino/Latina/Latinx (582), 1.5% Pacific Islander (58), and 36.9% White (1470), and 9.0% other/unknown (359); 5.6% preferred a non-English language (223). Approximately 38% (1518) received antidepressants/referrals when screened (including 44% of 461 patients [203] with SI). By 8 weeks, 2785 patients (70%) received antidepressant/referral and/or follow-up (including 75% of 783 patients with SI). In multivariable logistic regression models adjusting for site and clustered on primary care physician, there were no statistically significant differences in the primary outcome by gender, preferred language, or health insurance. African American or Black and Asian patients had lower estimated probabilities of treatment ordered when screened (34.0% [95% CI, 28.4%-39.6%] for Black patients and 35.4% [95% CI, 31.5%-39.4%] for Asian patients) than White patients (40.5% [95% CI 37.4%-43.5%]). Estimated treatment decreased with increasing age (46.4% [95% CI, 41.2%-51.5%] for patients aged 18-30 years and 17.5% [95% CI, 12.1%-22.9%] for patients aged ≥75 years). Patients with SI had greater estimated treatment than those without SI (43.5% [95% CI, 39.9%-47.1%] vs 35.2% [95% CI, 33.0%-37.5%]), although treatment was overall low for this high-risk group. Secondary outcomes were consistent, although there were no statistically significant differences in follow-up visits for African American or Black and Asian patients compared with White patients.

Conclusions and Relevance

In this cohort study, moderate rates of initial treatment among patients with elevated depressive symptoms and/or SI were found. Targeted interventions are needed for patients at risk of undertreatment, including patients with SI, African American or Black and Asian patients, and older adults.

Systematic Review of Pain Research Among Limited English Proficiency Patient Populations in Health care

BACKGROUND

Pain remains a global health problem affecting all populations. There is limited knowledge, however, about the effect of limited English proficiency (LEP) on pain care and outcomes.

AIM

This systematic review determines the current state of pain research for LEP populations.

METHOD

We searched peer-reviewed studies in PubMed, CINAHL, PsychInfo, and Google Scholar from 1970 to 2021. Two authors independently screened abstracts and full texts, evaluated the quality of the studies using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool, and extracted study characteristics, content, and findings into Microsoft Excel.

RESULTS

Twenty-five studies met our inclusion criteria. Of the 25 articles, 15 were quantitative, three were mixed methods, five were qualitative, one was quasi-experimental, and one was a randomized controlled trial. Four studies addressed all items of the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. Most pain research among patients with LEP was conducted in the United States (n = 17) and in hospital settings (n = 16). The majority of studies focused on one language (n = 15) with Spanish (n = 8) being the most studied language. Sample sizes ranged from seven to 18,593. Studies focused on three main themes: pain communication (n = 14), pain management (n =5) and/or outcomes (n = 1), and pain prevalence (n = 3).

CONCLUSIONS

The findings revealed that the pain research on LEP populations is still in its infancy, with varied areas of focus using descriptive research designs. More pain intervention research for LEP populations is needed to reduce pain disparities.

Association between English Proficiency and Kidney Disease Knowledge and Communication Quality among Patients with ESKD

Key Points

In one hospital-based safety-net dialysis unit, only one half of patients with ESKD knew their cause of kidney failure, which did not differ by English proficiency status. Patients with limited English proficiency (versus English-proficient patients) reported poorer communication with the dialysis care team (less listening, fewer clear explanations, less time spent). We highlight the need for tailored, patient-centered communication between limited English-proficient patients and dialysis care team members.

Background

ESKD is a chronic health condition for which communication between health care teams and patients is important to guide patient self-management activities. Yet, little is known about the quality of communication among patients with ESKD and their care team members. We examined the influence of patient's limited English proficiency (LEP) status on communication experiences at one dialysis center.

Methods

A survey was administered to adults receiving ESKD care at a dialysis unit within a public health care delivery system between July 2022 and February 2023, to ascertain kidney disease knowledge and perceptions of communication quality with the dialysis care team. Multivariable logistic and ordinal logistic regression models adjusted for age and sex were used to determine associations between LEP status and CKD knowledge.

Results

Among 93 eligible patients, 88.2% (n =82) completed the survey. Approximately 37.8% (n =31) had LEP, mean age was 58.8 years, 68.3% were men, mean dialysis vintage was 3.9 years, and 25% had a positive depression screen (LEP 30%; English-proficient 22%). A higher proportion of English-proficient patients screened positive for limited health literacy compared to those with LEP (74.5% versus 38.7%, P = 0.002). Overall, knowledge of assigned cause of ESKD (53.4%) and CKD/transplant knowledge (57.3%) was suboptimal. After adjustment, LEP status was not significantly associated with knowing the correct cause of kidney failure (odds ratio, 0.49; 95% confidence interval, 0.19 to 1.27) but was significantly associated with having a higher score on a CKD/transplant knowledge scale (odds ratio, 3.99; 95% confidence interval, 1.66 to 9.58). Patients with LEP reported poorer communication quality with dialysis providers and staff (less listening, fewer clear explanations, less time spent with patients) compared with English-proficient patients, although differences were not statistically significant.

Conclusions

Overall communication between patients with ESKD and members of the dialysis care team was suboptimal, regardless of English proficiency. Interventions to enhance communication for ESKD patients are needed.

Bring It Up: An Adapted Collaborative Care Model for Depression in a Safety-Net Primary Care Clinic

Objective

Over 90 clinical trials demonstrate the efficacy of the collaborative care model (CoCM) to treat depression in primary care but there is significant variability in real-world CoCM implementation and scalability. This study aimed to determine the feasibility and effectiveness of an adapted CoCM in a safety-net primary care setting.

Methods

Bring It Up! (BIU) is a pilot trial comparing an adapted CoCM (intervention group) to usual care (historical controls) for primary care safety-net clinic patients with depression. Inclusion criteria: (1) age ≥18; (2) Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) score ≥10; and (3) major depressive disorder diagnosis. Patients who completed ≥6 months of treatment upon rolling enrollment (April 1, 2018-October 31, 2019) were included. Historical controls completed ≥6 months of usual care in 2017. BIU included all aspects of CoCM except accountable care and leveraged existing staff rather than a dedicated care manager. The primary outcome was depression remission (PHQ-9 <5) within 6 months. Secondary outcomes included depression response, adherence to treatment guidelines and care coordination process. Data were extracted from the electronic health record.

Results

Thirty-six patients received the intervention; 41 controls received usual care. Depression remission was achieved in 33.3% of intervention patients and 0% of controls (p = 0.001). Of intervention patients, 44.4% achieved ≥50% reduction in PHQ-9 compared to 4.9% of controls (p = 0.003). Further, 66.7% of intervention patients had guideline-recommended antidepressant medication titration compared to 26.9% of controls (p = 0.003); 94.4% of intervention patients had PHQ-9 repeated compared to 53.7% of controls (p < 0.001).

Conclusions

An adapted CoCM was feasible and improved depression care in a safety-net clinic.

Meeting a need: development and validation of PubMed search filters for immigrant populations

Objective

There is a need for additional comprehensive and validated filters to find relevant references more efficiently in the growing body of research on immigrant populations. Our goal was to create reliable search filters that direct librarians and researchers to pertinent studies indexed in PubMed about health topics specific to immigrant populations.

Methods

We applied a systematic and multi-step process that combined information from expert input, authoritative sources, automation, and manual review of sources. We established a focused scope and eligibility criteria, which we used to create the development and validation sets. We formed a term ranking system that resulted in the creation of two filters: an immigrant-specific and an immigrant-sensitive search filter.

Results

When tested against the validation set, the specific filter sensitivity was 88.09%, specificity 97.26%, precision 97.88%, and the NNR 1.02. The sensitive filter sensitivity was 97.76%when tested against the development set. The sensitive filter had a sensitivity of 97.14%, specificity of 82.05%, precision of 88.59%, accuracy of 90.94%, and NNR [See Table 1] of 1.13 when tested against the validation set.

Conclusion

We accomplished our goal of developing PubMed search filters to help researchers retrieve studies about immigrants. The specific and sensitive PubMed search filters give information professionals and researchers options to maximize the specificity and precision or increase the sensitivity of their search for relevant studies in PubMed. Both search filters generated strong performance measurements and can be used as-is, to capture a subset of immigrant-related literature, or adapted and revised to fit the unique research needs of specific project teams (e.g. remove US-centric language, add location-specific terminology, or expand the search strategy to include terms for the topic/s being investigated in the immigrant population identified by the filter). There is also a potential for teams to employ the search filter development process described here for their own topics and use.

Venciendo la Depresión: A Pilot Study of Telehealth-Delivered Behavioral Activation for Depressed Spanish-Speaking Latinxs

Latinxs are substantially impacted by depression. The research literature has documented barriers (e.g., stigma, limited English proficiency, and lack of transportation) contributing to the underutilization of behavioral health services among Spanish-speaking Latinxs (SSLs). Telehealth can be broadly defined as the provision of healthcare information and services through the use of telecommunications technology. Behavioral Activation (BA) has well established empirical support for reducing symptoms of depression among ethnic minority groups. The unprecedent challenges associated with accessing in-person behavioral health services during the COVID-19 pandemic have underscored the need to examine alternate methods for treatment delivery. Thus, the proposed study aimed to conduct a feasibility study to determine the viability of telehealth-delivered BA for SSLs. Twenty-five SSL participants met eligibility criteria and were enrolled in the intervention and 17 participants completed treatment. The majority of participants experienced significant improvements in depressive symptoms and positive affect. These treatment gains were sustained at one-month follow-up. The present study offers promising preliminary data to support the acceptability and feasibility of telehealth-delivered BA, with the potential to lessen barriers to care by offering readily accessible behavioral health services for depressed individuals in underserved communities.

Open to interpretation: An integrated primary care behavioral health training approach for treating linguistically diverse patients

INTRODUCTION

Integrated primary care settings serve an increasingly high volume of linguistically diverse patients. In English language-dominant countries, limited English proficiency (LEP) is associated with disparities in access and quality of behavioral health (BH) care. Interpretive services (IS) aim to address these disparities by assisting in the delivery of clinical care between patients and providers who speak different languages. Yet, there is a need for greater emphasis on the utilization of IS in clinical training for BH professionals (e.g., psychology, social work, counseling, and family therapy).

METHOD

In this conceptual article, we describe a BH practicum rotation for predoctoral psychology trainees in a free, student-run integrated primary care clinic that largely serves uninsured adults with LEP. First, we discuss our training model which includes a 90-min didactic lecture on IS for BH and supervised applied clinical experiences (e.g., psychotherapy, warm handoffs, and consultation). Then, we present vignettes prepared by trainees about the challenges and benefits associated with delivering BH care with IS at the predoctoral level of training.

RESULTS

From the practicum experience, clinical psychology trainees reported improved knowledge and competencies in utilizing IS as well as generalizable skills for delivering BH care with a focus on multicultural practice.

DISCUSSION

We recommend that other integrated primary care BH training sites consider emphasizing training in IS. This article concludes with recommendations for implementation and dissemination of our training model on other sites. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

Continuity of Care Versus Language Concordance as an Intervention to Reduce Hospital Readmissions From Home Health Care

BACKGROUND

Language concordance between health care practitioners and patients have recently been shown to lower the risk of adverse health events. Continuity of care also been shown to have the same impact.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this paper is to examine the relative effectiveness of both continuity of care and language concordance as alternative or complementary interventions to improve health outcomes of people with limited English proficiency.

DESIGN

A multivariable logistic regression model using rehospitalization as the dependent variable was built. The variable of interest was created to compare language concordance and continuity of care.

PARTICIPANTS

The final sample included 22,103 patients from the New York City area between 2010 and 2015 who were non-English-speaking and admitted to their home health site following hospital discharge.

MEASURES

The odds ratio (OR) average marginal effect (AME) of each included variable was calculated for model analysis.

RESULTS

When compared with low continuity of care and high language concordance, high continuity of care and high language concordance significantly decreased readmissions (OR=0.71, 95% CI: 0.62-0.80, P<0.001, AME=-4.95%), along with high continuity of care and low language concordance (OR=0.80, 95% CI: 0.74-0.86, P<0.001, AME=-3.26%). Low continuity of care and high language concordance did not significantly impact readmissions (OR=1.04, 95% CI: 0.86-1.26, P=0.672, AME=0.64%).

CONCLUSION

In the US home health system, enhancing continuity of care for those with language barriers may be helpful to address disparities and reduce hospital readmission rates.

Detection of Depression-Related Tweets in Mexico Using Crosslingual Schemes and Knowledge Distillation

Mental health problems are one of the various ills that afflict the world’s population. Early diagnosis and medical care are public health problems addressed from various perspectives. Among the mental illnesses that most afflict the population is depression; its early diagnosis is vitally important, as it can trigger more severe illnesses, such as suicidal ideation. Due to the lack of homogeneity in current diagnostic tools, the community has focused on using AI tools for opportune diagnosis. Unfortunately, there is a lack of data that allows the use of IA tools for the Spanish language. Our work has a cross-lingual scheme to address this issue, allowing us to identify Spanish and English texts. The experiments demonstrated the methodology’s effectiveness with an F1-score of 0.95. With this methodology, we propose a method to solve a classification problem for depression tweets (or short texts) by reusing English language databases with insufficient data to generate a classification model, such as in the Spanish language. We also validated the information obtained with public data to analyze the behavior of depression in Mexico during the COVID-19 pandemic. Our results show that the use of these methodologies can serve as support, not only in the diagnosis of depression, but also in the construction of different language databases that allow the creation of more efficient diagnostic tools.

A Digital Single-Session Intervention Platform for Youth Mental Health: Cultural Adaptation, Evaluation, and Dissemination

BACKGROUND

Despite the proliferation of evidence-based digital mental health programs for young people, their low uptake and inconsistent implementation preclude them from benefiting youths at scale. Identifying effective implementation strategies for evidence-based supports is especially critical in regions where treatment access is lowest owing to mental health provider shortages.

OBJECTIVE

The goal of this academic-community partnership, funded by the City of San Antonio Metropolitan Health District, was to culturally adapt, disseminate, and gauge the acceptability and utility of an evidence-based digital mental health platform-Project Youth Empowerment and Support (YES)-among English- and Spanish-speaking youths living in south Texas.

METHODS

Project YES is an open-access, anonymous platform containing 3 evidence-based, self-guided interventions for youth mental health. Project YES was culturally adapted via focus groups and co-design sessions with San Antonio youths with lived experience of depression and anxiety; translated into Spanish; and disseminated throughout San Antonio, Texas, via community and school partnerships.

RESULTS

During the project period (April 2021 to December 2021), 1801 San Antonio youths began and 894 (49.64%) of them completed a 30-minute, single-session intervention within Project YES (aged 11-17 years; n=718, 39.87% male; n=961, 53.36% female; and n=3, 0.17% intersex; n=1477, 82.01% Hispanic; n=77, 4.28% non-Hispanic White; n=113, 6.27% Black; n=28, 1.55% Asian; and n=93, 5.16% other). This completion rate (49.64%) surpassed those previously observed for Project YES (eg, 34% when disseminated via social media). San Antonio youths rated Project YES as highly acceptable across all metrics, both in English and Spanish. In addition, the youths who completed Project YES-ENGLISH reported significant improvements in hopelessness (Cohen d=0.33; P<001), self-hate (Cohen d=0.27; P<001), and perceived agency (Cohen d=0.25; P<001) from before to after the intervention, and the youths who completed Project YES-SPANISH reported significant improvements in self-hate (Cohen d=0.37; P=.049) from before to after the intervention.

CONCLUSIONS

The results indicate that Project YES-an open-access, free, and anonymous web-based single-session intervention platform-is an acceptable, accessible, and applicable mental health support for English- and Spanish-speaking San Antonio youths.

"We are the sun for our community:" Partnering with community health workers/promotores to adapt, deliver and evaluate a home-based collaborative care model to improve equity in access to quality depression care for older U.S. Latino adults who are underserved

Background

While depression is a leading cause of poor health, less than half of older adults receive adequate care. Inequities in both access and outcomes are even more pronounced for socially disadvantaged older adults. The collaborative care model (CCM) has potential to reduce this burden through community-based organizations (CBOs) who serve these populations. However, CCM has been understudied in diverse cultural and resource-constrained contexts. We evaluated the implementation and effectiveness of PEARLS, a home-based CCM adapted with and for community health workers/promotores (CHWs/Ps).

Methods

We used an instrumental case study design. Our case definition is a community-academic partnership to build CHW/P capacity for evidence-based depression care for older U.S. Latino adults in the Inland Empire region of California (2017-2020). We aimed to understand adaptations to fit local context; acceptability, feasibility, and fidelity; clinical effectiveness; and contextual determinants of implementation success or failure. Data sources included quantitative and qualitative administrative and evaluation data from participants and providers. We used descriptive statistics and paired t-tests to characterize care delivery and evaluate effectiveness post-intervention, and deductive thematic analysis to answer other aims.

Findings

This case study included 152 PEARLS participants and nine data sources (N = 67 documents). The CBO including their CHWs/Ps partnered with the external implementation team made adaptations to PEARLS content, context, and implementation strategies to support CHWs/Ps and older adults. PEARLS was acceptable, feasible and delivered with fidelity. Participants showed significant reductions in depression severity at 5 months (98% clinical response rate [mean (SD), 13.7 (3.9) drop in pre/post PHQ-9; p < 0.001] and received support for 2.6 social needs on average. PEARLS delivery was facilitated by its relative advantage, adaptability, and trialability; the team's collective efficacy, buy-in, alignment with organization mission, and ongoing reflection and evaluation during implementation. Delivery was challenged by weak partnerships with clinics for participant referral, engagement, reimbursement, and sustainability post-grant funding.

Discussion

This case study used existing data to learn how home-based CCM was adapted by and for CHWs/Ps to reduce health inequities in late-life depression and depression care among older Latino immigrants. The CBOs and CHWs/Ps strong trust and rapport, addressing social and health needs alongside depression care, and regular internal and external coaching and consultation, appeared to drive successful implementation and effectiveness.

The Integration of Behavioral Health and Primary Care for Hispanic/Latino Patients with Depression and Comorbid PTSD

Comorbid PTSD and depression are notably high within primary care settings serving low-income and/or immigrant Hispanic/Latino populations. There is limited research examining how comorbid PTSD impacts the response to depression treatment for patients within these settings. The purpose of this study was to examine PTSD-depression comorbidity and its association with treatment outcomes among Hispanic/Latino patients enrolled in an integrated behavioral health intervention for depression. Participants were Hispanic/Latino adult primary care patients who met the criteria for depression and were not currently in treatment. Depression and anxiety severity were assessed at baseline and the 6 and 12 month follow-ups. Outcomes were compared between participants who met the criteria for a PTSD diagnosis and those that did not. Depression and anxiety scores significantly decreased through the 1-year intervention period regardless of PTSD diagnosis. More research is needed to understand what elements of culturally adapted, linguistically concordant treatment benefit diverse patients the most.

Equitability of Depression Screening After Implementation of General Adult Screening in Primary Care

IMPORTANCE

Depression is a debilitating and costly medical condition that is often undertreated. Men, racial and ethnic minority individuals, older adults, and those with language barriers are at increased risk for undertreatment of depression. Disparities in screening may contribute to undertreatment.

OBJECTIVE

To examine depression screening rates among populations at risk for undertreatment of depression during and after rollout of general screening.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This cohort study from September 1, 2017, to December 31, 2019, of electronic health record data from 52 944 adult patients at 6 University of California, San Francisco, primary care facilities assessed depression screening rates after implementation of a general screening policy. Patients were excluded if they had a baseline diagnosis of depression, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, or dementia.

EXPOSURES

Screening year, including rollout (September 1, 2017, to December 31, 2017) and each subsequent calendar year (January 1 to December 31, 2018, and January 1 to December 31, 2019).

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Rates of depression screening performed by medical assistants using the Patient Health Questionnaire-2. Data collected included age, sex, race and ethnicity, and language preference (English vs non-English); to compare English and non-English language preference groups and also assess depression screening by race and ethnicity within the English-speaking group, a single language-race-ethnicity variable with non-English language preference and English language preference categories was created. In multivariable analyses, the likelihood of being screened was evaluated using annual logistic regression models for 2018 and 2019, examining sex, age, language-race-ethnicity, and comorbidities, with adjustment for primary care site.

RESULTS

There were 52 944 unique, eligible patients with 1 or more visits in one of the 6 primary care practices during the entire study period (59% female; mean [SD] age, 48.9 [17.6] years; 178 [0.3%] American Indian/Alaska Native, 13 241 [25.0%] English-speaking Asian, 3588 [6.8%] English-speaking Black/African American, 4744 [9.0%] English-speaking Latino/Latina/Latinx, 760 [1.4%] Pacific Islander, 22 689 [42.9%] English-speaking White, 4857 [9.0%] English-speaking other [including individuals who indicated race and ethnicity as other and individuals for whom race and ethnicity data were missing or unknown], and 2887 [5.5%] with language barriers [non-English language preference]). Depression screening increased from 40.5% at rollout (2017) to 88.8% (2019). In 2018, the likelihood of being screened decreased with increasing age (adusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.89 [95% CI, 0.82-0.98] for ages 45-54 and aOR, 0.75 [95% CI, 0.65-0.85] for ages 75 and older compared with ages 18-30); and, except for Spanish-speaking patients, patients with limited English proficiency were less likely to be screened for depression than English-speaking White patients (Chinese language preference: aOR, 0.59 [95% CI, 0.51-0.67]; other non-English language preference: aOR, 0.55 [95% CI, 0.47-0.64]). By 2019, depression screening had increased dramatically for all at-risk groups, and for most, disparities had disappeared; the odds of screening were only still significantly lower for men compared with women (aOR, 0.87 [95% CI, 0.81 to 0.93]).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this cohort study in a large academic health system, full implementation of depression screening was associated with a substantial increase in screening rates among groups at risk for undertreatment of depression. In addition, depression screening disparities narrowed over time for most groups, suggesting that routine depression screening in primary care may reduce screening disparities and improve recognition and appropriate treatment of depression for all patients.

A View of the Development of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measures, Their Clinical Integration, Electronification, and Potential Impact on Rehabilitation Service Delivery

Recognition of the importance of a patient's perception of their status and experience has become central to medical care and its evaluation. This recognition has led to a growing reliance on the use of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). Nevertheless, although awareness of PROMs and acceptance of their utility has increased markedly, few of us have a good insight into their development; their utility relative to clinician-rated and performance measures such as the FIM and 6-minute walk test or how their "electronification" and incorporation into electronic health records (EHRs) may improve the individualization, value, and quality of medical care. In all, the goal of this commentary is to provide some insight into historical factors and technology developments that we believe have shaped modern clinical PROMs as they relate to medicine in general and to rehabilitation in particular. In addition, we speculate that while the growth of PROM use may have been triggered by an increased emphasis on the centrality of the patient in their care, future uptake will be shaped by their embedding in EHRs and used to improve clinical decision support though their integration with other sources of clinical and sociodemographic data.

Telephone-based depression self-management in Hispanic adults with epilepsy: a pilot randomized controlled trial

Depression is associated with adverse outcomes in epilepsy but is undertreated in this population. Project UPLIFT, a telephone-based depression self-management program, was developed for adults with epilepsy and has been shown to reduce depressive symptoms in English-speaking patients. There remains an unmet need for accessible mental health programs for Hispanic adults with epilepsy. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility, acceptability, and effects on depressive symptoms of a culturally adapted version of UPLIFT for the Hispanic community. Hispanic patients with elevated depressive symptoms (n = 72) were enrolled from epilepsy clinics in New York City and randomized to UPLIFT or usual care. UPLIFT was delivered in English or Spanish to small groups in eight weekly telephone sessions. Feasibility was assessed by recruitment, retention, and adherence rates and acceptability was assessed by self-reported satisfaction with the intervention. Depressive symptoms (PHQ-9 scores) were compared between study arms over 12 months. The mean age was 43.3±11.3, 71% of participants were female and 67% were primary Spanish speakers. Recruitment (76% consent rate) and retention rates (86–93%) were high. UPLIFT participants completed a median of six out of eight sessions and satisfaction ratings were high, but rates of long-term practice were low. Rates of clinically significant depressive symptoms (PHQ-9 ≥5) were lower in UPLIFT versus usual care throughout follow-up (63% vs. 72%, 8 weeks; 40% vs. 70%, 6 months; 47% vs. 70%, 12 months). Multivariable-adjusted regressions demonstrated statistically significant differences at 6 months (OR = 0.24, 95% CI, 0.06–0.93), which were slightly reduced at 12 months (OR = 0.30, 95% CI, 0.08–1.16). Results suggest that UPLIFT is feasible and acceptable among Hispanic adults with epilepsy and demonstrate promising effects on depressive symptoms. Larger trials in geographically diverse samples are warranted.

A Novel Approach to Depression Care: Efficacy of an Adapted Interpersonal Therapy in a Large, Urban Primary Care Setting

The Collaborative Care Model (CoCM), in which social workers, primary care physicians, and a consulting psychiatrist work as a team, is an established approach to the treatment of common mental health conditions in primary care settings. Following implementation of a CoCM depression care program at our hospital-based academic primary care practice, we observed a low rate of retention with the use of problem solving therapy/behavioral activation (PST/BA). Our aim in this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of interpersonal psychotherapy (IPT), an evidence-based, flexible strategy that focuses on the relationship between depression and interpersonal challenges, compared to PST/BA. In 2015, most patients enrolled in our CoCM received PST/BA. In 2016, most patients received IPT. Patients who were enrolled and discharged from our CoCM depression care program in the years 2015 and 2016 and received either PST/BA or IPT, were included. Our primary measure was the difference in change in PHQ-9 score between the PST/BA and the IPT groups. Secondary outcomes included the difference in the change in GAD-7 score and measures of glycemic and blood pressure control between the two groups. Two hundred thirty four patients were included in our analysis. One hundred sixty five received PST/BA and 69 received IPT. There was no difference between groups in baseline demographics or measures of depression, anxiety, presence of hypertension, or presence of prediabetes/diabetes. Our primary analysis demonstrated a greater decrease in PHQ-9 score in patients receiving IPT (9.93) compared to those receiving PST/BA (5.41) (p < 0.0001). The proportion of patients achieving a clinical response (PHQ-9 < 10) was also greater in the IPT group (71%) compared to the PST/BA group (44%). In a CoCM depression care program, IPT was a more effective strategy in improving depression symptoms as measured by PHQ-9 scores than PST/BA.

Achieving Mental Health Equity: Collaborative Care

The literature supports the effectiveness of systems-based integrated care models, particularly collaborative care, to improve access, quality of care, and health outcomes for behavioral health conditions. There is growing evidence for the promise of collaborative care to reduce behavioral health disparities for racial and ethnic, low-income, and other at-risk populations. Using rapid literature review, this article highlights what is known about how collaborative care may promote health equity for behavioral health conditions, by reducing disparities in access, quality, and outcomes of care. Further, it explores innovative intervention and engagement strategies to promote behavioral health equity for at-risk groups.

Advancing mental health equality: a mapping review of interventions, economic evaluations and barriers and facilitators

BACKGROUND

This work aimed to identify studies of interventions seeking to address mental health inequalities, studies assessing the economic impact of such interventions and factors which act as barriers and those that can facilitate interventions to address inequalities in mental health care.

METHODS

A systematic mapping method was chosen. Studies were included if they: (1) focused on a population with: (a) mental health disorders, (b) protected or other characteristics putting them at risk of experiencing mental health inequalities; (2) addressed an intervention focused on addressing mental health inequalities; and (3) met criteria for one or more of three research questions: (i) primary research studies (any study design) or systematic reviews reporting effectiveness findings for an intervention or interventions, (ii) studies reporting economic evaluation findings, (iii) primary research studies (any study design) or systematic reviews identifying or describing, potential barriers or facilitators to interventions. A bibliographic search of MEDLINE, HMIC, ASSIA, Social Policy & Practice, Sociological Abstracts, Social Services Abstracts and PsycINFO spanned January 2008 to December 2018. Study selection was performed according to inclusion criteria. Data were extracted and tabulated to map studies and summarise published research on mental health inequalities. A visual representation of the mapping review (a mapping diagram) is included.

RESULTS

Overall, 128 studies met inclusion criteria: 115 primary studies and 13 systematic reviews. Of those, 94 looked at interventions, 6 at cost-effectiveness and 36 at barriers and facilitators. An existing taxonomy of disparities interventions was used and modified to categorise interventions by type and strategy. Most of the identified interventions focused on addressing socioeconomic factors, race disparities and age-related issues. The most frequently used intervention strategy was providing psychological support. Barriers and associated facilitators were categorised into groups including (not limited to) access to care, communication issues and financial constraints.

CONCLUSIONS

The mapping review was useful in assessing the spread of literature and identifying highly researched areas versus prominent gaps. The findings are useful for clinicians, commissioners and service providers seeking to understand strategies to support the advancement of mental health equality for different populations and could be used to inform further research and support local decision-making.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

Not applicable.

The Role of the Patient-Centered Medical Home in Treating Depression

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review discusses the role of the patient-centered medical home (PCMH) in treating depression, focusing on findings from primary care-based studies and their implications for the PCMH.

RECENT FINDINGS

Pharmacotherapy, psychotherapy, and collaborative care are evidence-based treatments for depression that can be delivered in primary care and extended to diverse populations. Recent research aligns with the core components of the PCMH model. The core components of the PCMH are critical elements of depression treatment. Comprehensive care within the PCMH addresses medical and behavioral health concerns, including depression. Psychiatric and psychological care must be flexibly delivered so services remain accessible yet patient-centered. To ensure the quality and safety of treatment, depression symptoms must be consistently monitored. Coordination within and occasionally outside of the PCMH is needed to ensure patients receive the appropriate level of care. More research is needed to empirically evaluate depression treatment within the PCMH.

Challenges and Opportunities to Meet the Mental Health Needs of Underserved and Disenfranchised Populations in the United States

This article investigates the gap in access to and quality of mental health care in the United States. This work first discusses how minority populations are most affected by the treatment gap. It summarizes recent literature on the topic for better understanding the needs of psychiatrically underserved and disenfranchised populations and the causes of mental health disparities. It reviews some of the barriers to behavioral health care, including lack of insurance coverage, lack of community-based interventions, unequal access to evidence-based practices, stigma, mental health workforce shortages, and geographical maldistribution of providers. Second, it reviews opportunities to address these disparities. The article provides examples of effective interventions that researchers worldwide have already implemented to address the gap of mental health services within the collaborative care model and global mental health initiatives. Telepsychiatry and improvements in training of the mental health workforce are also listed as useful implementations to overcome the treatment gap for patients seeking mental health care.

How language barriers influence provider workload for home health care professionals: A secondary analysis of interview data

BACKGROUND

Increasingly, patients with limited English proficiency are accessing home health care services in the United States. Few studies have examined how language barriers influence provider role implementation or workload in the home health care setting.

OBJECTIVES

To explore home health care professionals' perspectives about how workload changes from managing language barriers influence quality and safety in home health care.

DESIGN

A qualitative secondary data analysis using a summative content analysis approach was used to analyze existing semi-structured interview data.

SETTING

A large urban home health care agency located on the East Coast of the United States.

PARTICIPANTS

Thirty five home health care providers [31 registered nurses, 3 physical therapists, 1 occupational therapist].

RESULTS

A total of 142 discrete incidents emerged from the analysis. Overall, home health care providers experienced distinct shifts in how they implemented their roles that added to their workload and time spent with Limited English Proficiency patients and family members. Providers were concerned about interpretation accuracy and perceived it as potentially posing risks to patient safety. Changes in work patterns, therefore, sought to maximize patient safety.

CONCLUSIONS

Home health care providers decision-making about how they adapt practice when faced with a language barrier is a sequence of actions based on awareness of the patient's language preference and if they spoke another language. Subsequent choices showed proactive behaviors to manage increased workload shaped by their perceived risk of the threats posed by the quality of interpreter services. Future research should develop quantitative models examining differences in workload when caring for limited English proficiency versus English speaking patients as well as the relationship between visit length and patient outcomes to determine optimal quality models.

Community Engagement and Planning versus Resources for Services for Implementing Depression Quality Improvement: Exploratory Analysis for Black and Latino Adults

Objective

Racial/ethnic minorities experience disparities in depression1 and there is a paucity of evidence-based interventions to improve depression care access and outcomes. Community Partners in Care (CPIC) is a community-partnered study of depression care quality improvement (QI) in under-resourced, urban communities: Community Engagement and Planning (CEP) for multi-sector coalitions, and Resources for Services (RS) for program technical assistance.2 CEP demonstrated benefits for the overall CPIC study population; effects for Black and Latino sub-populations are unknown.

Methods

This sub-analysis examines outcomes for 409 Latino and 488 Black (non-Latino) adults recruited from 90 programs who completed baseline or 6-month follow-up. Regression analyses were used to estimate CEP vs RS intervention effects on primary (Mental Health Related Quality of Life [MHRQL], Patient Health Questionnaire-9 [PHQ-9]) and community-prioritized (mental wellness, physical activity, risk for homelessness) outcomes at 6-months.

Results

Baseline characteristics did not differ significantly by intervention in either group. In the adjusted analysis for Black adults, CEP resulted in decreased odds of poor MHRQL (OR: .62, 95% CI=.41-.94, P=.028) with a trend for reducing homelessness risk (OR: .60, .35-1.05, P=.69). For Latino adults, CEP resulted in greater probability of mental wellness (OR: 1.81, 1.05-3.13, P=.034) and a trend for increased physical activity (OR: 1.52, .93-2.49, P=.091).

Conclusions

Exploratory analyses of CEP for depression quality improvement suggests significant 6-month benefits in mental health outcomes for Black and Latino participants and trends for improvement in community-prioritized outcomes for both groups. Findings may inform research in multi-sector coalitions to promote equity in depression care.

Community Engagement and Planning versus Resources for Services for Implementing Depression Quality Improvement: Exploratory Analysis for Black and Latino Adults

OBJECTIVE

Racial/ethnic minorities experience disparities in depression1 and there is a paucity of evidence-based interventions to improve depression care access and outcomes. Community Partners in Care (CPIC) is a community-partnered study of depression care quality improvement (QI) in under-resourced, urban communities: Community Engagement and Planning (CEP) for multi-sector coalitions, and Resources for Services (RS) for program technical assistance.2 CEP demonstrated benefits for the overall CPIC study population; effects for Black and Latino sub-populations are unknown.

METHODS

This sub-analysis examines outcomes for 409 Latino and 488 Black (non-Latino) adults recruited from 90 programs who completed baseline or 6-month follow-up. Regression analyses were used to estimate CEP vs RS intervention effects on primary (Mental Health Related Quality of Life [MHRQL], Patient Health Questionnaire-9 [PHQ-9]) and community-prioritized (mental wellness, physical activity, risk for homelessness) outcomes at 6-months.

RESULTS

Baseline characteristics did not differ significantly by intervention in either group. In the adjusted analysis for Black adults, CEP resulted in decreased odds of poor MHRQL (OR: .62, 95% CI=.41-.94, P=.028) with a trend for reducing homelessness risk (OR: .60, .35-1.05, P=.69). For Latino adults, CEP resulted in greater probability of mental wellness (OR: 1.81, 1.05-3.13, P=.034) and a trend for increased physical activity (OR: 1.52, .93-2.49, P=.091).

CONCLUSIONS

Exploratory analyses of CEP for depression quality improvement suggests significant 6-month benefits in mental health outcomes for Black and Latino participants and trends for improvement in community-prioritized outcomes for both groups. Findings may inform research in multi-sector coalitions to promote equity in depression care.