Insurance Coverage Predicts Mortality in Patients Transferred Between Hospitals: a Cross-Sectional Study

Interfacility Transfer Outcomes Among Children With Complex Chronic Conditions: Associations Between Patient-Level and Hospital-Level Factors and Transfer Outcomes

OBJECTIVES

Determine patient- and referring hospital-level predictors of transfer outcomes among children with 1 or more complex chronic conditions (CCCs) transferred to a large academic medical center.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective chart review of 2063 pediatric inpatient admissions from 2017 to 2019 with at least 1 CCC defined by International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision codes. Charts were excluded if patients were admitted via any route other than transfer from a referring hospital's emergency department or inpatient ward. Patient-level factors were race/ethnicity, payer, and area median income. Hospital-level factors included the clinician type initiating transfer and whether the referring-hospital had an inpatient pediatric ward. Transfer outcomes were rapid response within 24 hours of admission, Pediatric Early Warning Score at admission, and hours to arrival. Regression analyses adjusted for age were used to determine association between patient- and hospital-level predictors with transfer outcomes.

RESULTS

There were no significant associations between patient-level predictors and transfer outcomes. Hospital-level adjusted analyses indicated that transfers from hospitals without inpatient pediatrics wards had lower odds of ICU admission during hospitalization (odds ratio, 0.46; 95% confidence interval, 0.22-0.97) and shorter transfer times (β-coefficient, -2.54; 95% CI, -3.60 to -1.49) versus transfers from hospitals with inpatient pediatrics wards. There were no significant associations between clinician type and transfer outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

For pediatric patients with CCCs, patient-level predictors were not associated with clinical outcomes. Transfers from hospitals without inpatient pediatric wards were less likely to require ICU admission and had shorter interfacility transfer times compared with those from hospitals with inpatient pediatrics wards.

"It's Not That We Care Less": Insights into Health Care Utilization for Comorbid Diabetes and Depression among Latinos

Despite robust knowledge regarding the socio-economic and cultural factors affecting Latino* access to healthcare, limited research has explored service utilization in the context of comorbid conditions like diabetes and depression. This qualitative study, embedded in a larger mixed-methods project, aimed to investigate perceptions held by Latinos and their social support systems (i.e., family members) regarding comorbid diabetes and depression and to identify barriers and facilitators to their help-seeking behaviors and treatment engagement. Bilingual and bicultural researchers conducted eight focus groups with 94 participants in a large U.S. metropolitan area and were primarily conducted in Spanish. The participants either had a diagnosis of diabetes and depression or were closely associated with someone who did. This study identified key individual and structural barriers and facilitators affecting healthcare access and treatment for Latinos living with comorbid diagnoses. A thematic analysis revealed structural barriers to healthcare access, including financial burdens and navigating healthcare institutions. Personal barriers included fears, personal responsibility, and negative family dynamics. Facilitators included accessible information, family support, and spirituality. These findings underscore the need to address these multi-level factors and for healthcare institutions and providers to actively involve Hispanic community members in developing services and interventions.

Process improvement using telemedicine consultation to prevent unnecessary interfacility transfers for low-severity blunt head trauma

OBJECTIVE

Mild traumatic brain injuries (MTBI) associated with intracranial haemorrhage are commonly transferred to tertiary care centres. Recent studies have shown that transfers for low-severity traumatic brain injuries may be unnecessary. Trauma systems can be overwhelmed by low acuity patients justifying standardisation of MTBI transfers. We sought to evaluate the impact of telemedicine services on mitigating unnecessary transfers for those presenting with low-severity blunt head trauma after sustaining a ground level fall (GLF).

METHOD

A process improvement plan was developed by a task force of transfer centre (TC) administrators, emergency department physicians (EDP), trauma surgeons and neurosurgeons (NS) to facilitate the requesting EDP and the NS on-call to converse directly to mitigate unnecessary transfers. Consecutive retrospective chart review was performed on neurosurgical transfer requests between 1 January 2021 and 31 January 2022. A comparison of transfers preintervention and postintervention (1 January 2021 to 12 September 2021)/(13 September 2021 to 31 January 2022) was performed.

RESULTS

The TC received 1091 neurological-based transfer requests during the study period (preintervention group: 406 neurosurgical requests; postintervention group: 353 neurosurgical requests). After consultation with the NS on-call, the number of MTBI patients remaining at their respective ED's with no neurological degradation more than doubled from 15 in the preintervention group to 37 in the postintervention group.

CONCLUSION

TC-mediated telemedicine conversations between the NS and the referring EDP can prevent unnecessary transfers for stable MTBI patients sustaining a GLF if needed. Outlying EDPs should be educated on this process to increase efficacy.

Responding to COVID-19 Through Interhospital Resource Coordination: A Mixed-Methods Evaluation

OBJECTIVES

The COVID-19 pandemic stressed hospital operations, requiring rapid innovations to address rise in demand and specialized COVID-19 services while maintaining access to hospital-based care and facilitating expertise. We aimed to describe a novel hospital system approach to managing the COVID-19 pandemic, including multihospital coordination capability and transfer of COVID-19 patients to a single, dedicated hospital.

METHODS

We included patients who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 by polymerase chain reaction admitted to a 12-hospital network including a dedicated COVID-19 hospital. Our primary outcome was adherence to local guidelines, including admission risk stratification, anticoagulation, and dexamethasone treatment assessed by differences-in-differences analysis after guideline dissemination. We evaluated outcomes and health care worker satisfaction. Finally, we assessed barriers to safe transfer including transfer across different electronic health record systems.

RESULTS

During the study, the system admitted a total of 1209 patients. Of these, 56.3% underwent transfer, supported by a physician-led System Operations Center. Patients who were transferred were older (P = 0.001) and had similar risk-adjusted mortality rates. Guideline adherence after dissemination was higher among patients who underwent transfer: admission risk stratification (P < 0.001), anticoagulation (P < 0.001), and dexamethasone administration (P = 0.003). Transfer across electronic health record systems was a perceived barrier to safety and reduced quality. Providers positively viewed our transfer approach.

CONCLUSIONS

With standardized communication, interhospital transfers can be a safe and effective method of cohorting COVID-19 patients, are well received by health care providers, and have the potential to improve care quality.

Insurance-based inequities in emergency interhospital transfers: an argument for the prioritisation of patient care

Currently there is an inequity in transfer rates of uninsured patients versus their insured counterparts. While this may vary by hospital system, studies indicate that this is a national trend, especially in emergency situations, and represents a prioritisation of profits over ethical obligations. This creates a variety of ethical issues for patients and society that generates a concordance between deontological and utilitarian viewpoints, two generally opposed schools of thought. The prioritisation of profit maximisation in order to provide better care for a select population is insufficient to justify deleterious health outcomes, stress and financial burden on patients. Current policy regarding patient transfers in the emergency department is insufficient to protect the uninsured and must be reevaluated.

Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Interhospital Transfer for Conditions With a Mortality Benefit to Transfer Among Patients With Medicare

IMPORTANCE

Interhospital transfer (IHT) of patients is a common occurrence in modern health care. Racial/ethnic disparities are prevalent throughout US health care, but their presence in IHT is not well characterized.

OBJECTIVE

To determine if there are racial/ethnic disparities in IHT for medical diagnoses for which IHT is associated with a mortality benefit.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This cross-sectional analysis used 2013 data from the Center for Medicare & Medicaid Services 100% Master Beneficiary Summary and Inpatient Claims merged with 2013 American Hospital Association data. Individuals with Medicare aged 65 years or older continuously enrolled in Medicare Part A and B with an inpatient hospitalization claim in 2013 for primary diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction, stroke, sepsis, or respiratory diseases were included. Data analysis occurred from November 2019 through July 2020.

EXPOSURES

Race/ethnicity.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary outcome of interest was IHT. For the primary analysis, a series of logistic regression models were created to estimate the adjusted odds of IHT for Black and Hispanic patients compared with White patients, controlling for patient clinical and demographic variables and incorporating hospital fixed effects. In secondary analyses, subgroup analyses were conducted by diagnosis, hospital teaching status, and hospitalization to hospitals in the top decile of Black and Hispanic patient proportion.

RESULTS

Among 899 557 patients, 734 958 patients were White (81.7%), 84 544 patients were Black (9.4%), and 47 588 patients were Hispanic (5.3%); there were 418 683 men (46.5%), and 306 215 patients (34.0%) were older than 84 years. The mean (SD) age was 76.8 (7.5) years. Among all patients, 20 171 White patients (2.7%), 1913 Black patients (2.3%), and 1062 Hispanic patients (2.2%) underwent IHT. After controlling for patient variables and hospital fixed effects, Black patients had a persistently lower odds of IHT (adjusted odds ratio, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.81-0.92; P < .001), while Hispanic patients had higher odds of IHT (adjusted odds ratio, 1.14; 95% CI, 1.05-1.24; P = .002) compared with White patients.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

This national evaluation of IHT among patients hospitalized with diagnoses previously found to have mortality benefit with transfer found that, compared with White patients, Black patients had persistently lower adjusted odds of transfer after accounting for patient and hospital characteristics and measured across various hospital settings. Meanwhile, Hispanic patients had higher adjusted odds of transfer. This research highlights the need for the development of strategies to mitigate disparate transfer practices by patient race/ethnicity.

Identifying Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Interhospital Transfer: an Observational Study

BACKGROUND

Interhospital transfer (IHT) is often performed to provide patients with specialized care. Racial/ethnic disparities in IHT have been suggested but are not well-characterized.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the association between race/ethnicity and IHT.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional analysis of 2016 National Inpatient Sample data.

PATIENTS

Patients aged ≥ 18 years old with common medical diagnoses at transfer, including acute myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure, arrhythmia, stroke, sepsis, pneumonia, and gastrointestinal bleed.

MAIN MEASURES

We performed a series of logistic regression models to estimate adjusted odds of transfer by race/ethnicity controlling for patient demographics, clinical variables, and hospital characteristics and to identify potential mediators. In secondary analyses, we estimated adjusted odds of transfer among patients at community hospitals (those more likely to transfer patients) and performed subgroup analyses by region and primary medical diagnosis.

KEY RESULTS

Of 5,774,175 weighted hospital admissions, 199,015 (4.5%) underwent IHT, including 4.7% of White patients, compared with 3.9% of Black patients and 3.8% of Hispanic patients. Black (OR 0.83, 95% CI 0.78-0.89) and Hispanic (OR 0.81, 95% CI 0.75-0.87) patients had lower crude odds of transfer compared with White patients, but this became non-significant after adjusting for hospital-level characteristics. In secondary analyses among patients hospitalized at community hospitals, Hispanic patients had lower adjusted odds of transfer (aOR 0.89, 95% CI 0.79-0.98). Disparities in IHT by race/ethnicity varied by region and medical diagnosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Black and Hispanic patients had lower odds of IHT, largely explained by a higher likelihood of being hospitalized at urban teaching hospitals. Racial/ethnic disparities in transfer were demonstrated at community hospitals, in certain geographic regions and among patients with specific diseases.

Intensivists' Direct Management without Residents May Improve the Survival Rate Compared to High-Intensity Intensivist Staffing in Academic Intensive Care Units: Retrospective and Crossover Study Design

BACKGROUND

Medical staff members are concentrated in the intensive care unit (ICU), and medical residents are essentially needed to operate the ICU. However, the recent trend has been to restrict resident working hours. This restriction may lead to a shortage of ICU staff, and there is a chance that regional academic hospitals will face running ICUs without residents in the near future.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective observational study (intensivist crossover design) of medical patients who were transferred to two ICUs from general wards between September 2017 and February 2019 at one academic hospital. We compared the ICU outcomes according to the ICU type (ICU with resident management under high-intensity intensivist staffing vs. ICU with direct management by intensivists without residents).

RESULTS

Of 314 enrolled patients, 70 were primarily managed by residents, and 244 were directly managed by intensivists. The latter patients showed better ICU mortality (29.9% vs. 42.9%, P = 0.042), lower cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) (10.2% vs. 21.4%, P = 0.013), lower continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) (24.2% vs. 40.0%, P = 0.009), and more advanced care planning decisions before death (87.3% vs. 66.7%, P = 0.013) than the former patients. The better ICU mortality (hazard ratio, 1.641; P = 0.035), lower CPR (odds ratio [OR], 2.891; P = 0.009), lower CRRT (OR, 2.602; P = 0.005), and more advanced care planning decisions before death (OR, 4.978; P = 0.007) were also associated with intensivist direct management in the multivariate cox and logistic regression analysis.

CONCLUSION

Intensivist direct management might be associated with better ICU outcomes than resident management under the supervision of an intensivist. Further large-scale prospective randomized trials are required to draw a definitive conclusion.