Correlation Between Symptomatic Gastro-Esophageal Reflux Disease (GERD) and Erosive Esophagitis (EE) Post-vertical Sleeve Gastrectomy (VSG)

The Impact of Educational Handouts on the Compliance Rate for Bariatric Patient Follow-Up Appointments

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Compliance rates for follow-up appointments are an issue for postoperative sleeve gastrectomy (SG) patients. Without consistent reinforcement and monitoring of patient progress, patients tend to gain the weight back, all of the medical improvements made are lost, and the ability to access patients for potential complications is denied. Patients need much reinforcement during their forever bariatric lifestyle, and the lack of consistent reminders may contribute to follow-up noncompliance and recidivism in SG patients. As time progresses, the follow-up appointment compliance rate decreases. Decreased follow-up can lead to a higher risk for complications such as asymptomatic esophagitis, and current recommendations suggest that esophagogastroduodenoscopy screening should occur 3 years postoperatively. After 1 year, the follow-up compliance decreases dramatically so that by the 3-year postoperative period, very few patients are being seen and scheduled for interventions such as an esophagogastroduodenoscopy. The objective of this quality improvement project was to evaluate the effectiveness of a patient educational handout on SG bariatric patient follow-up visit compliance.

METHODS

A quasi-experimental design and retrospective chart review was chosen. An educational handout was developed. Preintervention retrospective chart review consisted of 441 SG patients expecting a follow-up in 12 to 48 months. Postintervention included 3 months of the handout intervention with data collection totaling 198 patients.

RESULTS

Follow-up compliance for 4 year visits noted 0% preintervention/12.2% postintervention ( P = .008), for 3 year visits 13.4% preintervention/12% postintervention ( P = .846), for 2 year visits 26.3% preintervention/28.6% postintervention ( P = .755), for 18 months visits 26.3% preintervention/32.6% postintervention ( P = .365), and for 12 months visits 54.2% preintervention/34.1% postintervention ( P = .011).

CONCLUSIONS

In this quality improvement project, educational handouts did not have a statistical impact on follow-up compliance.

Greater durability of weight loss at ten years with gastric bypass compared to sleeve gastrectomy

INTRODUCTION

Sleeve gastrectomy (SG) and gastric bypass (GB) are the most commonly performed bariatric surgeries. However, there is insufficient data on which leads to greater long-term (10 year) weight loss.

METHODS

Subjects who underwent SG and GB from 2008-2013 were followed up at 2, 5, and 10 years post-operatively for weight and diabetes (DM) outcomes. Percentage total weight loss (%TWL), weight regain ( ≥ 20% from nadir) and DM remission rates were compared.

RESULTS

Subjects (n = 253) who underwent SG (60.9%) and GB (39.1%) were included. The mean age was 41.4 ± 10.6 y, 39.1% were male, and the mean body mass index was 42.1 ± 9.3 kg/m2 with no significant difference between groups. The GB group had a greater proportion of subjects with DM (83.8% vs 19.5%, p < 0.001). At 2 y, %TWL was comparable (GB: 22.3 ± 9.6%, SG: 22.6 ± 10.5%, p = 0.824). However, those who underwent GB had significantly higher %TWL at 5 y (GB: 21.5 ± 8.9%, SG 18.0 ± 11.3%, p = 0.029) and 10 y (GB: 21.0 ± 9.0%, SG: 15.4 ± 12.1%, p = 0.001). The rate of significant weight regain was higher amongst the SG group at both 5 y (SG: 14.7%, GB: 3.8%, p = 0.018) and 10 y (SG: 27.9%, GB: 13.7%, p = 0.037) post-operatively. On multiple linear regression, GB remained significantly associated with greater %TWL at 10 y compared to SG (b = 5.51; adjusted p-value = 0.013), after adjusting for age, sex, pre-operative BMI, pre-operative glycemic status, and surgery year. There was no difference in DM remission rates at 10 y (SG: 26.7%, GB: 19.1%, p = 0.385).

CONCLUSION

GB was able to produce greater %TWL and less weight regain than SG at 5 and 10 years post-operatively. There was no difference in long-term DM remission rates between the two surgeries.

Effect of sleeve gastrectomy on distal esophagus at 5 and 10 years

BACKGROUND

Sleeve gastrectomy (SG) is a primary surgical intervention for obesity management. However, several longitudinal studies have documented the emergence of long-term esophageal consequences, notably gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and its associated complications. This study aimed to assess the occurrence of esophageal complications, including esophagitis and Barret's esophagus (BE), 5 and 10 years after SG, in one medical center.

METHODS

Two cohorts of consecutive patients who underwent SG were studied: patients who underwent a systematic upper gastro-intestinal endoscopy (UGIE) at five years or conversion to RYGB < 5 years (cohort n°1, n = 219), and patients who underwent UGIE at 10 years or converted to RYGB > 5 years (cohort n°2, n = 72). Patients with missing UGIE before or after SG were excluded.

RESULTS

In the cohort n°1, 62.7% of the patients had clinical GERD at the 5-years follow-up (vs. 21.8 before SG, p < 0.0001), 27.4% had esophagitis (vs. 14.2% before SG, p = 0.0006), and 8.3% had BE (vs. 1.8% before SG, p = 0.002) with metaplasia in 1.8%. De novo esophagitis and BE accounted for 19.6% and 7.8%, respectively. In the cohort n°2, at 10 years, 61.5% had clinical GERD (vs.12.5 before SG, p < 0.0001), 23.6% had esophagitis (vs. 9.7% before SG, p = 0.025) including 20.8% de novo, and 8.3% had de novo BE, with metaplasia in 5.6%. De novo esophagitis accounted for 20.8%. One patient developed esophageal adenocarcinoma 10 years after SG. Pre-operative esophagitis was significantly associated with BE on UGIE at 5 or 10 years, while active smoking and preoperative esophagitis were risk factors for esophagitis.

CONCLUSION

This study highlights a significant increase in esophageal complications 5 and 10 years after SG. Pre-operative esophagitis should be considered when choosing a surgical technique for obesity management.

Significant and distinct impacts of sleeve gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass on esophageal acid exposure, esophageal motility, and endoscopic findings: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The lack of standardized objective assessment of esophageal physiology and anatomy contributes to controversies regarding the effects of sleeve gastrectomy (SG) and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) on gastroesophageal reflux disease. This study aimed to investigate esophageal acid exposure, esophageal motility, and endoscopic findings before and after SG and RYGB.

METHODS

This was a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting at least 1 objective measure of esophageal physiology and/or esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) at baseline and after SG or RYGB. The changes in pH test, manometry, and EGD parameters were summarized.

RESULTS

Acid exposure time (AET) and DeMeester score (DMS) significantly increased after SG (mean difference [MD]: 2.1 [95% CI, 0.3-3.9] and 8.6 [95% CI, 2.0-15.2], respectively). After RYGB, both AET and DMS significantly decreased (MD: -4.2 [95% CI, -6.1 to -2.3] and -16.6 [95% CI, -25.4 to -7.8], respectively). Lower esophageal sphincter resting pressure and length significantly decreased after SG (MD: -2.8 [95% CI, -4.6 to -1.1] and -0.1 [95% CI, -0.2 to -0.02], respectively). There were no significant changes in esophageal manometry after RYGB. The relative risks of erosive esophagitis were 2.3 (95% CI, 1.5-3.5) after SG and 0.4 (95% CI, 0.2-0.8) after RYGB. The prevalence rates of Barrett esophagus changed from 0% to 3.6% after SG and from 2.7% to 1.4% after RYGB.

CONCLUSION

SG resulted in the worsening of all objective parameters, whereas RYGB resulted in the improvement in AET, DMS, and EGD findings. Determining the risk factors associated with these outcomes can help in surgical choice.

Management of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease after Sleeve Gastrectomy: Effectiveness of Medical, Endoscopic, and Surgical Therapies

Introduction: Sleeve gastrectomy (SG) has become the most frequently performed bariatric operation in the United States. One of the main disadvantages of this procedure is the risk of developing gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) after the operation. We aimed to analyze different approaches for the treatment of GERD after SG. Methods: A literature review was performed to identify all possible treatment options for post-SG GERD. All the studies were assessed for full eligibility by manual assessment of their aims, methodology, results, and conclusions. Records were individually reviewed by the authors comparing outcomes and complications between procedures. Results: Although some studies have shown improvement or even resolution of GERD symptoms after SG, most patients develop or worsen symptoms. Lifestyle modifications along with medical therapy should be started on patients with GERD after SG. For those who are refractory to medication, endoscopic and surgical therapies can be offered. Conversion to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) is consistently effective in treatment of GERD and is the ideal therapy in patients with associated insufficient weight loss. Endoscopic and alternative surgical procedures are also available and have shown acceptable short-term outcomes. Conclusions: Several treatment options exist for the treatment of GERD after SG. Although conversion to RYGB remains the most effective therapy, other emerging endoscopic and surgical procedures could avoid the potential morbidity of this procedure and should be further evaluated. An evidence-based algorithm for the management of GERD after SG is proposed to guide decision making.

Effectiveness of sleeve gastrectomy plus fundoplication versus sleeve gastrectomy alone for treatment of patients with severe obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (SG) is a widely performed bariatric surgery, but it is associated with an increased risk of gastroesophageal reflux (GERD) in the long term. The addition of fundoplication to laparoscopic SG may improve lower oesophageal sphincter function and reduce postoperative GERD.

OBJECTIVES

This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to compare the efficacy and safety of SG plus fundoplication (SG + F) versus SG alone for the treatment of patients with severe obesity (≥35 kg/m2).

SETTING

Meta-analysis.

METHODS

Three electronic databases were searched from inception until January 2023. Studies were included if they compared outcomes of SG + F versus SG in patients with severe obesity (≥35 kg/m2). The primary outcome was remission of GERD postoperatively. Secondary outcomes were the percentage of excess weight loss, percentage of total weight loss, postoperative complication rate, operative time, and length of stay.

RESULTS

A total of 5 studies with 539 subjects (212 SG + F and 327 SG alone) were included. The mean preoperative body mass index was 42.6 kg/m2. SG + F achieved higher remission of GERD compared with laparoscopic SG (odds ratio [OR] = 13.13; 95% CI, 3.54-48.73; I2 = 0%). However, the percentage of total weight loss was lower in the SG + F group (mean difference [MD] = -2.75, 95% CI, -4.28 to -1.23; I2 = 0%), whereas there was no difference in the percentage of excess weight loss (MD = -0.64; 95% CI, -20.62-19.34; I2 = 83%). There were higher postoperative complications in SG + F (OR = 2.56; 95% CI, 1.12-5.87; I2 = 0%) as well. There was no difference in operative time or length of stay between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSION

SG + F achieved better GERD remission but is associated with lesser weight loss and increased postoperative complications compared with SG alone. Further studies are required to ascertain the overall clinical benefit of SG + F for patients with severe obesity.

Proximal Gastric Pressurization After Sleeve Gastrectomy Associates With Gastroesophageal Reflux

INTRODUCTION

Sleeve gastrectomy (SG) results in persistent or de novo reflux more often than Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB). We investigated pressurization patterns in the proximal stomach on high-resolution manometry (HRM) to determine associations with reflux after SG.

METHODS

Patients undergoing HRM and ambulatory pH-impedance monitoring after SG and RYGB over a 2-year period (2019-2020) were included. For each included patient, 2 symptomatic control patients with HRM and pH-impedance monitoring for reflux symptoms were identified within the same time frame; 15 asymptomatic healthy controls with HRM studies were also studied. Concurrent myotomy and preoperative diagnosis of obstructive motor disorders were exclusions. Conventional HRM metrics, esophagogastric junction (EGJ) pressures, contractile integral (EGJ-CI), acid exposure time (AET), and reflux episode numbers were extracted. Intragastric pressure was sampled at baseline, during swallows, and with straight leg raise maneuver, and compared with intraesophageal pressure and reflux burden.

RESULTS

Patient cohorts included 36 SG patients, 23 RYGB patients, 113 symptomatic controls, and 15 asymptomatic controls. While both SG and RYGB patients pressurized the stomach during swallows and straight leg raise, SG patients had higher AET (median 6.0% vs 0.2%), reflux episode numbers (median 63.0 vs 37.5), and baseline intragastric pressure (median 17.3 mm Hg vs 13.1 mm Hg) ( P < 0.001). SG patients also had lower trans-EGJ pressure gradients when reflux episodes were >80 or AET was >6.0% ( P = 0.018 and 0.08, respectively, compared with no pathologic reflux). On multivariable analysis, SG status and low EGJ-CI independently associated with AET and reflux episode numbers ( P ≤ 0.04).

DISCUSSION

Impaired EGJ barrier function and proximal gastric pressurization after SG are associated with gastroesophageal reflux, especially during strain maneuvers.

Cost-savings of short stay sleeve gastrectomy and walk-in hydration clinic versus conventional inpatient care

OBJECTIVE

We aim to evaluate the cost-saving of the short stay ward (SSW) versus conventional inpatient care following sleeve gastrectomy (LSG). We also compared the readmission rates pre- and post-inception of the intravenous hydration clinic and analyzed the cost-savings.

METHODS

Patients who underwent LSG between December 2021 to March 2022 with SSW care were compared with standard inpatient care. Total costs were analyzed using univariate analysis. With a separate cohort of patients, 30-day readmission rates in the 12-months preceding and following implementation of the IV hydration clinic and associated cost-savings were evaluated.

RESULTS

After matching on the propensity score to within ± 0.1, 20-subjects pairs were retained. The total cost per SSW-subject was significantly lower at $13,647.81 compared to $15,565.27 for conventional inpatient care (p = 0.0302). Lower average ward charges ($667.76 vs $1371.34, p < 0.0001), lower average daily treatment fee per case ($235.68 vs $836.54, p < 0.0001), and lower average laboratory investigation fee ($612.31 vs $797.21, p < 0.0001) accounted for the difference in costs between the groups. Thirty-day readmission rate reduced from 8.9 to 1.8% after implementation of the hydration clinic (p < 0.01) with decreased 30-day readmission cost (S$96,955.57 vs. S$5910.27, p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

SSW for LSG is cost-effective and should be preferred to inpatient management. Walk-in hydration clinics significantly reduced readmission rates and result in tremendous cost-savings.

Gastroesophageal reflux after sleeve gastrectomy: The dimension of the problem

Sleeve gastrectomy is a safe and effective bariatric surgery in terms of weight loss and longterm improvement or resolution of comorbidities. However, its achilles heel is the possible association with the development with the novo and/or worsening of pre-existing gastroesophageal reflux disease. The anatomical and mechanical changes that this technique induces in the esophagogastric junction, support or contradict this hypothesis. Questions such as «what is the natural history of gastroesophageal reflux in the patient undergoing gastric sleeve surgery?», «how many patients after vertical gastrectomy will develop gastroesophageal reflux?» and «how many patients will worsen their previous reflux after this technique?» are intended to be addressed in the present article.

GERD as a Complication of Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy for the Treatment of Obesity: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

INTRODUCTION

The incidence of obesity is increasing in developed societies, and surgical treatment is one treatment option. The most common surgical treatment for obesity is laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG). Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a complication of both obesity and the surgical treatment of obesity.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this study, the PubMed database was searched using the keywords "GERD" and "bariatric surgery", and 987 papers published between 1 July 2017 and 30 June 2022 were retrieved.

RESULTS

Nine papers met the inclusion criteria and were included in the meta-analysis. The articles were analyzed for the de novo occurrence of GERD after the treatment of its symptoms, the occurrence of erosive esophagitis, and Barrett's esophagus. In addition, interesting conclusions are presented from the papers that did not meet the inclusion criteria but shed light on the pathophysiology of GERD in obese patients undergoing LSG.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, the authors draw attention to the need for endoscopic surveillance in patients undergoing LSG, even in the absence of clinical signs of GERD.

Efficacy of Sleeve Gastrectomy with Concomitant Hiatal Hernia Repair versus Sleeve-Fundoplication on Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Resolution: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

(1) Background: There is still disagreement over how sleeve gastrectomy (SG) affects gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). The debate regarding the best option for patients undergoing bariatric surgery who are also affected by GERD and/or hiatal hernia continues to divide the community of bariatric surgeons. While concomitant hiatal hernia repair (SG + HHR) has been proposed as a means of reducing the risk of GERD following SG with varying degrees of success, the addition of a fundoplication (SG + FP) has been suggested in recent years as a way to improve the lower esophageal sphincter's competency. The aim of this study is to systematically review and meta-analyze the efficacy of SG + HHR versus SG + FP on GERD remission in patients with obesity. (2) Methods: A systematic review of the literature was conducted, and studies analyzing the effects of SG + HHR versus SG + FP on postoperative GERD were included. The methodological quality of included trials was evaluated. The primary outcome was postoperative GERD rate, erosive esophagitis, and 12-month weight loss. Secondary outcomes included postoperative complications and mortality. The PRISMA guidelines were used to carry out the present systematic review (PROSPERO Registration Number: CRD42023405600). (3) Results: Fifteen articles with a total of 1164 patients were included in the meta-analysis; 554 patients underwent SG + HHR while 610 underwent SG + FP. In the SG + HHR group, 58.5 ± 28.9% of subjects presented clinical GERD symptoms compared to 20.4 ± 17.5% postoperatively (p < 0.001). In the SG + FP group, 64.8 ± 39.4% were affected by GERD preoperatively compared to only 5 ± 8.1% postoperatively (p < 0.001). SG + FP patients had a significantly greater GERD remission compared to SG + HHR (p < 0.001). Weight loss was similar between groups (p = 0.125). The rate of leaks was 0.18% and 0.33% in the SG + HHR and SG + FP, respectively (p = 0.657), while perforations were significantly higher after SG + FP compared to the SG + HHR group (3.1% versus 0%, p = 0.002). The mortality rate was significantly greater in the SG + FP group (0.5% versus 0%, p = 0.002). (4) Conclusions: This study revealed that both SG with concomitant HHR and sleeve-fundoplication are effective in terms of reflux resolution and weight outcomes, with superiority of SG + FP in terms of GERD control, despite a greater overall complication rate. Both strategies can therefore be suggested as a suitable alternative variant to a conventional SG in subjects with obesity and concomitant hiatal hernia and/or GERD. Studies with extended follow-up and direct comparisons of these surgical approaches to conventional SG are warranted.

Pepsin in saliva for the diagnosis of erosive esophagitis post-sleeve gastrectomy: a prospective observational study

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) has become the preferred bariatric procedure in many countries. However, new onset erosive esophagitis (EE) is a major shortcoming. Current recommendation is esophago-gastro-duodenoscopy (EGD) should be performed routinely at 1 year and subsequently every 2-3 years to enable the early detection of Barrett's or esophageal adenocarcinoma. This would put significant strains on resources and costs of bariatric program. Our study assesses the association between and diagnostic value of salivary pepsin concentration and endoscopically proven EE in post-LSG patients as a surrogate for EGD.

METHODS

Twenty patients on routine post-LSG endoscopy between June and September 2022 were recruited for this correlational pilot study. Under supervision, fasting and post-prandial saliva sample was collected and analyzed by Peptest lateral flow device. EGD examinations were performed, and patients completed a validated 25-item QoLRAD questionnaire.

RESULTS

We found a significant correlation between positive endoscopy findings of EE and salivary pepsin concentrations. The normal group had a lower mean fasting pepsin level (13.13 ng/mL ± 18.97) versus the EE-group (90.55 ng/mL ± 81.28, p = 0.009) and lower mean post-prandial pepsin level (30.50 ng/mL ± 57.72) versus the EE-group (135.09 ng/mL ± 130.17, p = 0.02). The predictive probabilities from the binary regression of fasting and post-prandial pepsin concentrations yield AUC of 0.955 ± 0.044 (95% CI 0.868 to 1.000, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Our study distinctively identified salivary pepsin to have excellent sensitivity and negative predictive value in EE, potentially useful to preclude the need for post-LSG EGD in asymptomatic patients with low salivary pepsin.

Current treatment landscape for obesity in Singapore

The rising prevalence of obesity in Singapore is a harbinger for a corresponding increase in obesity-related complications such as type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and coronary heart disease. Obesity is a complex disease driven by multiple factors, and hence, treatment cannot follow a 'one-size-fits-all' approach. Lifestyle modifications involving dietary interventions, physical activity and behavioural changes remain the cornerstone of obesity management. However, similar to other chronic diseases such as T2DM and hypertension, lifestyle modifications are often insufficient on their own, hence the importance of other treatment modalities including pharmacotherapy, endoscopic bariatric therapy and metabolic-bariatric surgery. Weight loss medications currently approved in Singapore include phentermine, orlistat, liraglutide and naltrexone-bupropion. In recent years, endoscopic bariatric therapies have evolved as an effective, minimally invasive and durable therapeutic option for obesity. Metabolic-bariatric surgery remains the most effective and durable treatment for patients with severe obesity, with an average weight loss of 25%-30% after one year.

Surveillance Endoscopy After Foregut Surgery: Is It Necessary?

Patients undergoing foregut surgeries can have de novo findings or worsening of underlying upper gastrointestinal pathologies including Barrett’s esophagus and gastric intestinal metaplasia. These changes carry a potentially increased risk for malignancy development in the future raising the question of the utility of post-operative surveillance endoscopy after esophagectomy, bariatric and metabolic surgeries (Sleeve gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass), achalasia treatment, and anti-reflux surgery. In this narrative review, we conduct a literature exploration of available data on post-operative endoscopic surveillance findings following the procedures summarizing the prevalence of upper gastrointestinal pathologies and recommendations on the utility of postoperative endoscopy from established medical societies.

Bariatric Surgery in Kidney Transplant Candidates and Recipients: Experience at an Asian Center

Background

Kidney transplant (KT) candidates and recipients with obesity experience more frequent complications such as infection, poorer allograft outcomes, diabetes, and mortality, limiting their eligibility for transplantation. Bariatric surgery (BS) is not commonly performed among KT patients given concerns about immunosuppression absorption, wound healing, infections, and graft outcomes. Its role has not been described before in an Asian KT patient setting.

Methods

A retrospective review of patients who underwent BS at the largest KT center in Singapore from 2008 to 2020 was conducted. Metabolic outcomes, immunosuppression doses, graft outcomes, and mortality were studied.

Results

Seven patients underwent BS and KT (4 underwent BS before KT, 3 underwent BS after KT; 4 underwent sleeve gastrectomy, 3 underwent gastric bypass). Mean total weight losses of 23.8% at 1 year and 18.6% at 5 years post-BS were achieved. Among the five patients with diabetes, glycemic control improved after BS. There were no deaths in the first 90 days or graft loss in the first year after KT and BS. Patients who underwent BS after KT had no significant changes in immunosuppression dose.

Conclusion

BS can be safely performed in KT recipients and candidates and results in sustainable weight losses and improvements in metabolic comorbidities. Although no major complications were observed in our study, close monitoring of this complex group of patients is imperative.

Factors Associated with Increased Severity of Erosive Esophagitis 1 Year After Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy

PURPOSE

Weight reduction decreases gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), but laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) that damages the structure of the stomach may worsen GERD. We aimed to elucidate the factors associated with increased severity of erosive esophagitis (EE) at 1 year after LSG.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data on patients who underwent LSG between February 2007 and March 2016 were reviewed. Endoscopic findings and anthropometric data before and after surgery were recorded. The severity of EE was assessed according to the Los Angeles classification; severe EE was defined as grade C or D esophagitis.

RESULTS

Totally, 316 patients were enrolled. Before LSG, 96 patients (30.4%) had grade A or B EE. One year after LSG, 215 patients (68%) had EE, including 136 (43%) with grade A, 62 (19.6%) with grade B, and 17 (5.4%) with grade C or D EE. One-hundred and twenty-seven of 220 patients (57.7%) without EE before LSG developed de novo EE following LSG. The incidence of severe EE after LSG in patients without pre-operative EE, grade A EE, or grade B EE at baseline was 3.2%, 6.8%, and 50%, respectively. Independent factors for an increased severity of EE after LSG were male gender (OR = 2.55, 95% CI = 1.52-4.28) and post-operative hiatal hernia (OR = 3.17, 95% CI = 1.66-6.06).

CONCLUSION

The prevalence and severity of EE increased after LSG. Male gender and post-operative hiatal hernia are independent factors for an increased severity of EE after LSG. The incidence of severe EE after LSG is low for patients without pre-operative EE or grade A EE at baseline.

Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease as an Indication of Revisional Bariatric Surgery-Indication and Results-a Systematic Review and Metanalysis

This systematic review evaluates the indications and results of revisional bariatric surgery (RBS) in gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). A systematic literature search and meta-analysis was performed for articles published by April 1, 2021. After examining 722 papers involving 17,437 patients, 48 studies were included (n = 915 patients). RBS for GERD was mostly reported after sleeve gastrectomy (n = 796, 87%) and one anastomosis gastric bypass (n = 62, 6.8%) and was performed due to intractable GERD (71.6%), GERD and weight issues (16%), and biliary reflux (6.2%). Mean follow-up of the studies was 31.5 (3-84) months. Pooled estimation of a meta-analysis of studies reported 7% of GERD following primary surgery needing RBS, in which 99% of the patients experienced remission.

The new onset of GERD after sleeve gastrectomy: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

The main adverse effect is gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), with concern on the development of Barrett's esophagus and esophageal adenocarcinoma in the long term. However, the relationship between SG and GERD is complex. The aim of this study is to systematically evaluate all published data existing in the literature to evaluate the effect of sleeve gastrectomy on GERD, esophagitis, BE in order to clarify the long-term clinical sequelae of this procedure.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This systematic review was conducted in accordance with the guidelines for Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review. The work has been reported in line with the PRISMA criteria [19]. We evaluated the quality and risk of bias of this Systematic Review using AMSTAR 2 checklist [20]. Published studies that contained outcome data for primary sleeve gastrectomy associated with the primary and secondary outcomes listed below were included. The UIN for ClinicalTrial.gov Protocol Registration and Results System is: NCT05178446 for the Organization UFoggia.

RESULTS

49 articles were eligible for inclusion that met the following criteria: publications dealing with patients undergoing laparoscopic SG, publications describing pre- and postoperative GERD symptoms and/or esophageal function tests, articles in English, human studies and text complete available.

CONCLUSIONS

We have controversial data on LSG and GERD in the literature as there is a multifactorial relationship between LSG and GERD. The most recent studies have shown satisfactory control of postoperative reflux in most patients and low rates of de novo GERD. These data are leading to wider acceptance of LSG as a bariatric procedure even in obese patients with GERD.

Relationship between gastroesophageal reflux disease and laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a narrative review

This paper aims to revisit the relationship between gastroesophageal reflux disease and laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy in obese patients by reviewing the recent available literature, in the form of a narrative review. The interpretation of the current evidence is challenged by the fact that published data are contradictory and comparison between studies is difficult. Most studies investigate the presence of gastroesophageal reflux disease by assessing only the symptoms reported by patients. A few studies have objectively investigated gastroesophageal reflux disease by functional tests and endoscopic evaluation. Also, the surgical technique of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy plays an important role in the incidence of postoperative gastroesophageal reflux disease. In conclusion, surgeons must be aware of the existence of gastroesophageal reflux disease and, at the same time, patients should be informed regarding the possible effect of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy on gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Renal Outcomes 1 Year After Metabolic Bariatric Surgery in a Multi-ethnic Asian Cohort

PURPOSE

Obesity increases the risk of incident chronic kidney disease (CKD) and is one of the strongest risk factors for new-onset CKD even in the absence of metabolic risk factors. Weight loss has been shown to reduce renal hyperfiltration and proteinuria. Metabolic bariatric surgery (MBS) remains an effective treatment for obesity and its metabolic-related complications. However, literature on its impact on renal function remains limited.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was an observational retrospective study in a tertiary centre in Singapore. MBS cases performed at the centre between 2008 and 2019 were included. The primary outcome measures were estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), calculated using the CKD epidemiology collaboration equation, and albuminuria (defined as urine albumin-creatinine ratio (uACR) > 3.5 mg/mmol) at baseline and 1-year post-MBS.

RESULTS

Five hundred fifty-seven patients were included. One-year post-MBS, median eGFR increased from 110.9 mL/min/1.73 m2 (IQR 92.4 to 121.5) to 112.6 mL/min/1.73 m2 (IQR 97.3 to 122.3), p < 0.001. Median uACR decreased from 1.00 mg/mmol (IQR 0.40 to 3.55) to 0.70 mg/mmol (IQR 0.40 to 1.80) 1-year post-MBS (p = 0.001). 12.9% of patients had improved CKD staging. The proportion of patients with albuminuria decreased from 24.8% at baseline to 1.89% 1-year post-MBS (p < 0.001). One-year post-MBS, the subgroup with reduced eGFR had significant increases in eGFR (p < 0.001), with a trend towards a reduction in uACR.

CONCLUSIONS

MBS had a positive impact on renal function with modest but statistically significant improvement in eGFR and reduction in albuminuria at 1-year post-surgery. Longer-term data is required to investigate the durability of this impact.

Centile Charts for Monitoring of Weight Loss Trajectories After Bariatric Surgery in Asian Patients

BACKGROUND

Following bariatric surgery, accurate charting of weight loss and regain is crucial. Various preoperative factors affect postoperative weight loss, including age, sex, ethnicity, and surgical type. These are not considered by current weight loss metrics, limiting comparison of weight loss outcomes between patients or centers and across time.

METHODS

Patients (n=1022) who underwent sleeve gastrectomy (n=809) and gastric bypass (n=213) from 2008 to 2020 in a single center were reviewed. Weight loss outcomes (% total weight loss) were measured for 60 months postoperatively. Longitudinal centile lines were plotted using the post-estimation predictions of quantile regression models, adjusted for type of procedure, sex, ethnicity, and baseline BMI.

RESULTS

Median regression showed that %TWL was 1.0% greater among males than females (β = +1.1, 95% CI: +0.6 to +1.7, P = <0.0001). Participants who underwent SG had less %TWL compared to GB (β = -1.3, 95% CI: -1.9 to -0.8, P < 0.0001). There was a trend towards less %TWL among the Indian and Malay participants compared to Chinese. Age and diabetes were not significant predictors. Reference centile charts were produced for the overall cohort, as well as specific charts adjusted for type of bariatric procedure, sex, ethnicity, and baseline BMI.

CONCLUSION

Centile charts provide a clinically relevant method for monitoring of weight trajectories postoperatively and aid in realistic and personalised goal setting, and the early identification of "poor responders". This is the first study to present post-bariatric surgery centile charts for an Asian cohort.

Whole genome transcriptome analysis of the stomach resected in human vertical sleeve gastrectomy: cutting more than calories

Vertical sleeve gastrectomy (VSG) is a surgical weight loss procedure that resects 80% of the stomach, creating a tube linking the esophagus to the duodenum. Because of the efficacy and relative simplicity of VSG, it is preferred in the United States, with VSG currently at >61% of bariatric surgeries performed. Surprisingly, there has never been a complete molecular characterization of the human stomach greater curvature's fundus and corpus. Here we compare and contrast the molecular makeup of these regions. We performed a prospective cohort study to obtain gastric tissue samples from patients undergoing elective VSG. Paired fundus and corpus samples were obtained. Whole genome transcriptome analysis was performed by RNA sequencing (N = 10), with key findings validated by qPCR (N = 24). Participants were primarily female (95.8%) and White (79.15%). Mean body mass index, body weight, and age were 46.1 kg/m², 121.6 kg, and 43.29 yr, respectively. Overall, 432 gene transcripts were significantly different between the fundus and the corpus (P < 0.05). A significant correlation was found between the RNA sequencing dataset and qPCR validation, demonstrating robust gene expression differences between the fundus and the corpus. Significant genes included progastricsin, acidic chitinase, and gastokine 1 and 2 in both the fundus and the corpus. Of the very highly expressed genes in both regions, 87% were present in both the stomach's fundus and corpus, indicating substantial overlap. Despite significant overlap in the greater curvature gene signature, regional differences exist within the fundus and the corpus. Given that the mechanism of VSG is partly unresolved, the potential that the resected tissue may express genes that influence long-term body weight regulation is unknown and could influence VSG outcomes.

6-Month Gastrointestinal Quality of Life (QoL) Results after Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty and Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: A Propensity Score Analysis

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is currently the most commonly performed bariatric procedure. Endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty (ESG) is a promising new bariatric technique which is less invasive in its approach. To date no study has compared quality of life (QoL) outcomes between LSG and ESG. The aim of this study is to compare QoL after ESG and LSG using a propensity score analysis.

METHODS

QoL was evaluated by means of Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index (GIQLI) questionnaire before and 6 months after the procedure. Patients were matched for age, sex, preoperative weight, and comorbidities.

RESULTS

Propensity score matching resulted in 23 pairs of patients homogeneous for age (p = 0.3), preoperative BMI (p = 0.3), sex (p = 0.74), and comorbidities (p = 0.9). Post-ESG patients, despite a less important %EWL (39.9 (17.5-58.9)vs 54.9 (46.2-65); p = 0.01) and %TWL (13.4 (7.8-20.9) vs 18.8 (17.6-21.8); p = 0.03), presented better QoL (14 [3-24] vs 13 (- 1-23) ΔGIQLI score; p = 0.79) with clear advantage for the gastrointestinal symptoms subdomain (66.5 (61-70.5) vs 59 (55-63); p = 0.001), while post-LSG patients presented a worsening of GERD symptoms (30.7% vs 0%) and an increased use of PPI therapy (p = 0.004). Resolution or improvement of comorbidities was similar (ESG 53% vs LSG 45.8%; p = 0.79) in both groups.

CONCLUSION

LSG may significantly affect QoL and results in worsening of gastrointestinal symptoms including GERD. ESG is a promising less invasive bariatric endoscopic procedure that demonstrated a positive impact on both QoL and comorbidities, which could lead to greater patient acceptance earlier in their disease or at a younger age.

Preoperative Weight Loss via Very Low Caloric Diet (VLCD) and Its Effect on Outcomes After Bariatric Surgery

INTRODUCTION

The effect of preoperative weight loss via very low caloric diet (VLCD) on long-term weight loss post-bariatric surgery (BS) is conflicting. We analysed its impact on weight loss and other outcomes post-BS.

METHODS

Patients (n = 306) who underwent sleeve gastrectomy or gastric bypass from 2008 to 2018 were studied. VLCD was prescribed for 14 days preoperatively. Patients were followed up for 5 years. Postoperative weight loss was compared in patients with preoperative weight gain or weight loss < 5% (WL < 5%), and weight loss ≥ 5% (WL ≥ 5%). Preoperative WL compared weight before and after VLCD; postoperative WL compared post-VLCD weight and follow-up weight. Total weight loss (TWL) encompassed pre- and postoperative WL.

RESULTS

WL was < 5% in 87.3% and ≥ 5% in 12.7%. There was no significant difference in complication rate, duration of surgery or length of stay, regardless of surgical type. Patients with WL < 5% lost more weight postoperatively compared with WL ≥ 5% for up to 60 months (%postoperative WL at 1 month: WL < 5% = 13.7%, WL ≥ 5% = 10%, p = <0.001; 60 months: WL < 5% = 30.6%, WL ≥ 5% = 23.9%, p = 0.041). However, when TWL and percentage of excess body mass index loss (%EBMIL) were measured, there was no difference beyond 6 months. A predictive multivariable model for 1-year %EBMIL was formed. Significant variables included pre-VLCD BMI and preoperative WL, and the relationship between the two.

CONCLUSION

Preoperative WL via VLCD was associated with reduced postoperative WL after BS, with no significant effect on complications, long-term TWL or %EBMIL. This challenges the notion that preoperative WL via VLCD should be mandated for better postoperative outcomes.

ASMBS position statement on the rationale for performance of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy before and after metabolic and bariatric surgery

The following position statement is issued by the American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery in response to inquiries made to the Society by patients, physicians, society members, hospitals, health insurance payors, the media, and others regarding the need and possible strategies for screening endoscopic examination before metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS), as well as the rationale, indications, and strategies for postoperative surveillance for mucosal abnormalities, including gastroesophageal reflux disease and associated esophageal mucosal injuries (erosive esophagitis and Barrett's esophagus) that may develop in the long term after MBS, specifically for patients undergoing sleeve gastrectomy or Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. The general principles described here may also apply to procedures such as biliopancreatic diversion (BPD) and BPD with duodenal switch (DS); however, the paucity of procedure-specific literature for BPD and DS limits the value of this statement to those procedures. In addition, children with obesity undergoing MBS may have unique considerations and are not specifically addressed in this position statement. This recommendation is based on current clinical knowledge, expert opinion, and published peer-reviewed scientific evidence available at this time. The statement is not intended to be and should not be construed as stating or establishing a local, regional, or national standard of care. The statement will be revised in the future as additional evidence becomes available.

Predictive Factors of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Symptoms Following Open Sleeve Gastrectomy in Brazil Using Clinical Questionnaire

PURPOSE

To evaluate predictors of symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) after sleeve gastrectomy (SG) based on a clinical questionnaire.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This is a cross-sectional study. We included all patients who underwent open SG between May 2013 and March 2017 in a single institution. Patients who could not be contacted or who did not want to participate were excluded. Clinical, demographic, and pre- and postoperative data were collected on medical records. Patients were contacted via telephone and inquired about GERD symptoms postoperatively. Symptoms were quantified using the GERD Questionnaire (GERDq). Patients were divided into three study groups according to GERDq score: asymptomatic (GERDq = 0), mildly symptomatic (GERDq ≤ 8), and severely symptomatic (GERDq > 8). Univariate analysis was performed using ANOVA, Kruskal-Wallis, Dunn, and chi-square tests. A logistic regression model was built for adjusted analysis of the data.

RESULTS

One hundred eighty-nine patients were included. Mean age was 39.7 ± 10.71 years and 45.5% were female. Postoperative median follow-up period was 4.55 years (interquartile range 5.34-3.76). Mean GERDq score was 7.62 ± 10.17. Sixty-four patients were asymptomatic, 63 were mildly symptomatic, and 62 were severely symptomatic. The group of severely symptomatic patients showed a statistically lower preoperative weight when compared to the other groups (p = 0.049), but this association was not observed when analyzing preoperative BMI (p = 0.427). The other variables were not associated with postoperative GERD symptoms, both in univariate and adjusted analysis.

CONCLUSION

No variables were statistically and clinically predictive of GERD occurrence or severity after SG. The pathophysiology of GERD is complex and further studies are needed to elucidate this condition.

Quality assessment for systematic reviews and meta-analyses of cohort studies

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

There is a growing need for valid, efficient, and easy scoring scales to rate the quality of cohort studies. We aimed to develop and validate a quality assessment score to be used for cohort studies.

METHODS

We followed a rigorous process to establish content, face, and construct validity. Most questions were scored at 0 or 1. Inter-rater reliability and test-retest reliability were assessed using the Spearman correlation coefficient (r_s) and Cohen's κ statistic. Internal consistency was measured using the Kuder-Richardson formula 20 (KR20).

RESULTS

The final tool consists of 9 questions with a maximum score of 10. The inter-rater reliability was high with the Spearman correlation coefficient (r_s = .66). Agreement for inclusion was 90%. Test-retest reliability was high. For rater 1, r_s = .91, κ = .38 for scores, and κ = 1 for inclusion. For rater 2, r = .94, 80% agreement for scores, and 100% agreement for inclusion. Internal consistency was reasonable based on 2 studies: KR20 = .21 and KR20 = .65. The novel scale rated highest in efficiency, understandably, ease of use, and ease of interpretation when compared with 3 other scales.

CONCLUSIONS

This novel scale has favorable performance characteristics, is efficient to conduct, and is easy to interpret and will be very helpful for physicians and researchers conducting systematic reviews and meta-analyses.

WHEN SHOULD BE CONVERTED LAPAROSCOPIC SLEEVE GASTRECTOMY TO LAPAROSCOPIC ROUX-EN-Y GASTRIC BYPASS DUE TO GASTROESOPHAGEAL REFLUX?

Background:

Gastroesophageal reflux (GER) is one of the most common indications for conversion of sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) to laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGBP). Objective evaluations are necessary in order to choose the best definitive treatment for these patients.

Aim:

To present and describe the findings of the objective studies for gastroesophageal reflux disease performed before LSG conversion to LRYGBP in order to support the indication for surgery.

Method:

Thirty-nine non-responder patients to proton pump inhibitors treatment after LSG were included in this prospective study. They did not present GER symptoms, esophagitis or hiatal hernia before LSG. Endoscopy, radiology, manometry, 24 h pH monitoring were performed.

Results:

The mean time of appearance of reflux symptoms was 26.8+24.08 months (8-71). Erosive esophagitis was found in 33/39 symptomatic patients (84.6%) and Barrett´s esophagus in five. (12.8%). Manometry and acid reflux test were performed in 38/39 patients. Defective lower esophageal sphincter function was observed independent the grade of esophagitis or Barrett´s esophagus. Pathologic acid reflux with elevated DeMeester´s scores and % of time pH<4 was detected in all these patients. more significant in those with severe esophagitis and Barrett´s esophagus. Radiologic sleeve abnormalities were observed in 35 patients, mainly cardia dilatation (n=18) and hiatal hernia (n=11). Middle gastric stricture was observed in only six patients.

Conclusion:

Patients with reflux symptoms and esophagitis or Barrett´s esophagus after SG present defective lower esophageal sphincter function and increased acid reflux. These conditions support the indication of conversion to LRYGBP.

Laparoscopic Sleeve-Fundoplication for Morbidly Obese Patients with Gastroesophageal Reflux: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Introduction

Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) has rapidly become popular with excellent results. However, LSG may exacerbate or increase the risk of “de novo” gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Adding a fundoplication has been proposed to increase the lower esophageal sphincter competency. The aim of this study was to examine the current evidence and outcomes of sleeve-fundoplication (Sleeve-F).

Materials and Methods

Systematic review and meta-analysis. Web of Science, PubMed, and Embase data sets were consulted.

Results

Six studies (485 patients) met the inclusion criteria. The age of the patient population ranged from 17 to 72 years old and 82% were females. All patients underwent sleeve-fundoplication. Rossetti, Collis-Nissen, and Nissen were the most commonly performed fundoplications. The estimated pooled prevalence of postoperative leak, gastric perforation, and overall complications were 1.0% (95% CI = 0.0–2.0%), 2.9% (95% CI = 0.0–8.3%), and 9.8% (95% CI = 6.7–13.4%), respectively. The pooled reoperation rate was 4.1% (95% CI = 1.3–10%). There was no mortality. At 12-month follow-up, the estimated pooled BMI and %EWL were 29.9 kg/m² (95% CI = 28.5–31.2) and 66.2% (95% CI = 59.3–71.1), respectively, while esophagitis, PPI consumption, and GERD rates were 8.0% (95% CI 3–21%), 7.8% (95% CI 5–13%), and 11% (95% CI 4–26%).

Conclusions

This systematic review and meta-analysis shows that current evidence for Sleeve-F is limited with high postoperative gastric perforation and overall complication rates. Weight loss and GERD resolution seem promising in the short term; however, further studies are warranted to explore long-term effects with instrumental investigations. Sleeve-F should be considered cautiously while future well-structured randomized trials are warranted.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11695-020-05189-6.

The Effect of Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy on Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease

BACKGROUND

The laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) has become one of the most popular surgical weight loss options. Since its inception as a procedure intended to promote durable weight loss, the association between LSG and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) has been a point of debate. First and foremost, it is known that GERD occurs more frequently in the obese population. With the sleeve gastrectomy growing to be the predominant primary bariatric operation in the United States, it is imperative that we understand the impact of LSG on GERD.

OBJECTIVE

To examine the effects of LSG on GERD symptoms.

METHODS

One hundred and ninety-one bariatric surgery candidates completed a Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease-Health-Related Quality of Life (GERD-HRQL) questionnaire before and after undergoing elective LSG (mean follow-up time of 20.4 ± 2.7 months). Values were stratified by the presence or absence of preoperative GERD, GERD medications, age, gender, crural repair, patient satisfaction with present condition, and percent total weight loss (%TWL).

RESULTS

For the entire group, mean weight loss, %TWL, and reduction in BMI were 79 pounds, 28.1%, and 12.7 kg/m² respectively. Within the overall cohort, there was no significant change in GERD symptoms from before to after surgery (mean GERD-HRQL scores were 6.1 before and after surgery, p = 0.981). However, in a subgroup analysis, patients without GERD preoperatively demonstrated a worsening in mean GERD-HRQL scores after surgery (from 2.4 to 4.5, p = 0.0020). The percentage of change in the usage of medications to treat GERD was not statistically significant (from 37 to 32%, p = 0.233). The percent of patients satisfied with their condition postoperatively was significantly increased in those with preoperative GERD, older age, crural repair intraoperatively, and in those with the highest %TWL.

CONCLUSION

These results suggest that while overall LSG does not significantly affect GERD symptoms, patients without GERD preoperatively may be at risk for developing new or worsening GERD symptoms after surgery. It is important to remark that this is a review of the patient's clinical symptoms of GERD, not related to any endoscopic, pathological, or manometry studies. Such studies are necessary to fully establish the effect of LSG on esophageal health.

The Impact of Bariatric Surgery Compared to Medical Therapy on Health-Related Quality of Life in Subjects with Obesity and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

INTRODUCTION

The adverse implications of obesity extend beyond physical health to include negative impact on quality of life (QoL), mood, and eating habits. While bariatric surgery provides successful weight loss and metabolic benefits, studies describe conflicting results on QoL and mood-related outcomes.

METHODS

Patients (n = 140) with class II/III obesity and T2DM were recruited from 2015 to 2019, and stratified based on medical or surgical treatment. Questionnaires including the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, Euro QoL visual analogue scale (EQ-VAS), and Revised 21-item Three-Factor Eating Questionnaire (TFEQ-R21) were recorded at baseline, 6 months, and 12 months after treatment.

RESULTS

At baseline, the surgical group (n = 55) and medical group (n = 85) had no significant difference in questionnaire outcomes. At 6 and 12 months, EQ-VAS was higher in the surgical group (12 months surgical 82.00 ± 12.64, medical 72.81 ± 16.56, p = 0.001), with greater improvement from baseline. HADS-D scores at 12 months were lower in the surgical group (surgical 2.60 ± 2.88, medical 3.90 ± 3.58, p = 0.025). At 12 months, the surgical group also had better TFEQ-R21 scores, with higher cognitive restraint scores (surgical 19.09 ± 3.00, medical 16.69 ± 3.61, p < 0.001), and lower scores for uncontrolled eating (surgical 14.96 ± 3.87, medical 17.89 ± 5.34, p = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

In the treatment of patients with obesity and T2DM, bariatric surgery resulted in improved QoL outcomes at 12 months compared to medical therapy. This could be related to improvement in weight and metabolic outcomes, and altered gut-brain axis communication. This is the first prospective study assessing the impact of bariatric surgery on health-related QoL in Asia compared against a control group who received medical therapy.

Resolution of Erosive Esophagitis After Conversion from Vertical Sleeve Gastrectomy to Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) has become the preferred bariatric procedure in many countries. However, there is one shortcoming of LSG in the long-term follow-up, and this is the onset of gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD) and erosive esophagitis (EE). Conversion to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) is considered an option in patients unresponsive to medical therapy. Currently, there is no evidence of EE improvement or resolution after conversion surgery. In this study, we objectively evaluate the effectiveness of RYGB in management of EE with upper endoscopy (EGD) to identify the significant variables in patients with GERD symptoms post LSG refractory to medical therapy and require conversion surgery.

METHODS

Over a period of 11 years (2008-2019) at Singapore General Hospital, we retrospectively reviewed a prospectively collected database of a cohort of patients whom had conversion surgery to RYGB for refractory GERD and EE after LSG. Patient's endoscopic findings and demographic and anthropometric data were analyzed.

RESULTS

We identified a total of 14 patients who underwent LSG to RYGB conversions for endoscopic proven erosive esophagitis in our unit during the study period. Eight patients (57.1%) had concurrent hiatal hernia repaired. Nine (64.3%) patients were females. The median age of patients in this cohort was 44 (range 30-61) years. Mean weight and BMI were 87.7 kg (± 19.2) and 32.8 (± 3.09) kg/m2, respectively, on the day of conversion surgery. The median time between LSG and revision to RYGB was 36 (range 6-68) months. Seven patients (50%) had complete resolution of GERD symptoms after conversion, and 6 patients (42.9%) had partial resolution. Six out of 7 patients had complete resolution of EE. There were 4 anastomotic strictures (28.6%). Older patients, Indian ethnicity, present of hiatal hernia and lower weight loss after initial LSG were more likely to undergo conversion surgery.

CONCLUSION

Conversion to RYGB after LSG is clinically relevant and may be a feasible solution if patients have ongoing GERD refractory to medical therapy. Ninety-three percent of our patients achieved complete resolution of their GERD symptoms and significant improvement of erosive esophagitis with significant weight loss after conversion. This study has important implications as LSG is increasingly being performed and a proportion of these will need revision surgery for various reasons, particularly GERD which is extremely prevalent.

Associations of Bariatric Interventions With Micronutrient and Endocrine Disturbances

IMPORTANCE

Few studies have described the longitudinal trajectories of serum levels of micronutrients whose deficiencies are associated with serious sequelae following bariatric procedures, such as anemia, osteoporotic fractures, and neuropathies. Furthermore, previous studies comparing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) vs Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) or one-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) procedures may have been limited by selection and confounding biases.

OBJECTIVE

To appraise the spectrum and temporal course of micronutrient deficiencies associated with bone metabolism and erythropoiesis after LSG vs OAGB or LRYGB procedures, using the propensity score as a balancing score.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This prospective, longitudinal comparative effectiveness study was conducted at a high-volume bariatric unit in Singapore from September 1, 2008, to November 30, 2017, with a cutoff date for analysis of September 2018. Patients who underwent adjustable gastric banding, biliopancreatic diversion procedures, and intragastric balloon procedures were excluded. All other patients who underwent bariatric procedures were included. Data were analyzed from September 23 to 30, 2018.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Serial assessment of 13 biochemical parameters at 12 time points for up to 5 years after bariatric procedure. Inverse probability-of-treatment weights were used to obtain estimates of the mean associations of variables assessed with the bariatric surgical interventions. Longitudinal trajectories were analyzed using mixed-effects generalized linear models to apportion the temporal variation of serum micronutrients into fixed-effects and random-effects components.

RESULTS

A total of 688 patients were included in this study, of whom 499 underwent LSG (mean [SD] age, 41.5 [11.3] years; 318 [63.7%] women) and 189 underwent OAGB or LRYGB (mean [SD] age, 48.6 [9.4] years; 112 [59.3%] women). There were no differences during follow-up among patients who underwent LSG vs those who underwent OAGB or LRYGB in intact parathyroid hormone levels (mean difference, 7.05 [95% CI, -28.67 to 42.77] pg/mL; P = .70), serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels (mean difference, -0.72 [95% CI, -1.56 to 0.12] ng/mL; P = .09), or phosphate levels (mean difference, 0.006 [95% CI, -0.052 to 0.064] mg/dL; P = .83). Hemoglobin levels were a mean 0.63 (95% CI, 0.41 to 0.85) g/dL higher among patients who underwent LSG compared with those who underwent OAGB or LRYGB (P < .001), despite no differences in iron concentration levels (mean difference, 1.50 [95% CI, -1.39 to 4.39] µg/dL; P = .31), total iron-binding capacity (mean difference, 4.36 [95% CI, -5.25 to 13.98] µg/dL; P = .37), or ferritin levels (mean difference, 3.0 [95% CI, -13.0 to 18.9] ng/mL; P = .71). Compared with patients who underwent LSG procedures, patients who underwent OAGB or LRYGB had higher folate levels (mean difference, 2.376 [95% CI, 1.716 to 3.036] ng/mL; P < .001) but lower serum magnesium levels (mean difference, -0.25 [95% CI, -0.35 to -0.16] mg/dL; P < .001) and zinc levels (mean difference, -7.58 [95% CI, -9.92 to -5.24] µg/dL; P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

These findings suggest that LSG vs OAGB or LRYGB procedures have differential associations with various micronutrient and metabolic parameters. These differences should be recognized in guidelines for postbariatric nutritional surveillance and prevention.

Leveraging the Gut to Treat Metabolic Disease

25 years ago, the future of treating obesity and diabetes focused on end organs known to be involved in energy balance and glucose regulation, including the brain, muscle, adipose tissue, and pancreas. Today, the most effective therapies are focused around the gut. This includes surgical options, such as vertical sleeve gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, that can produce sustained weight loss and diabetes remission but also extends to pharmacological treatments that simulate or amplify various signals that come from the gut. The purpose of this Review is to discuss the wealth of approaches currently under development that seek to further leverage the gut as a source of novel therapeutic opportunities with the hope that we can achieve the effects of surgical interventions with less invasive and more scalable solutions.