Comparison of single-port and multi-port Retzius-sparing robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy

Pathologic and Short-Term Oncologic Outcomes of Prostate Cancer Patients Following Transvesical Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy

PURPOSE

To study the pathologic and short-term oncological and survival outcomes following Transvesical Single-Port Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective review was performed on prospectively collected data on 169 patients with low and intermediate-risks prostate cancer, who either underwent Single-Port Transvesical or Multi-Port Transperitoneal Radical Prostatectomy by a single surgeon between 2015 and 2022. Preoperative clinicopathologic characteristics, as well as final histopathology outcomes, were compared. Univariate Cox proportional hazard analysis was used to evaluate the impact of the surgical approach on biochemical recurrence-free survival within 12 months.

RESULTS

Single-Port Transvesical and Multi-Port Transperitoneal Robotic Radical Prostatectomy were completed in 85 and 84 patients, respectively. Preoperative clinicopathologic features were similar between the 2 groups. In terms of histopathology outcomes, the 2 groups had identical final Gleason Grades, T stage, as well as the rates of adverse pathological features and positive surgical margins (P = >0.05). Despite the lower median number of nodes in the single-port cohort of 2 (0-5) compared to 6 (4-9) in the multi-port cohort (P = <0.001), there remained no statistically significant difference in the rates of lymph node invasion (P = 0.08). At a median follow-up of 12 months, there were no differences in the biochemical recurrence-free survival rates among both groups (P = 0.38). Univariate Cox proportional hazard analysis did not consider surgical approach to be an independent predictor of biochemical recurrence (HR 0.53, 95%CI 0.13-2.23, P = 0.39).

CONCLUSION

In well-selected patients, single-port transvesical robotic radical prostatectomy provided a similar short-term oncologic control as the multi-port approach with similar surgical margin status and 1-year biochemical recurrence rates.

A Hybrid Approach to Hood-Sparing Robotic Prostatectomy to Maximize Functional Outcomes and Maintain Early Oncologic Efficacy

Background: We detail our approach and experience with a hybrid version of the endopelvic hood-sparing (HS) robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) using the da Vinci robotic platform. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the records of 200 patients who underwent RARP by a single surgeon. Patients were propensity-matched into three cohorts depending on biopsy and prostatectomy Gleason Grade Groups: traditional retropubic (RP) (n = 80), retzius-sparing (RS) (n = 40), and HS (n = 80). Patient characteristics and oncologic and functional outcomes were examined. Zero pads per day defined return of continence. Erections suitable for penetrative intercourse with/without medications defined return of sexual function. Results: Patient characteristics were similar between cohorts excluding prostate-specific antigen levels (p = 0.014), which were significantly lower in the RS cohort (7.1 ± 5.3 ng/mL) compared with RP (9.2 ± 9.3 ng/mL) and HS (8.8 ± 8.9 ng/mL). Clinically significant positive margin rates were significantly higher (p = 0.046) in the RS cohort (32.5%) compared with RP (17.5%) and HS (13.9%). Biochemical recurrence and metastasis rates were similar between all cohorts. Median time to continence was significantly lower for RS and HS-RARP (p < 0.001) compared with RP-RARP at 1.3, 1.6, and 5.4 months, respectively. Median time to return of sexual function was significantly lower for RS and HS-RARP (p < 0.001) compared with RP-RARP at 4.0, 7.7, and 15.1 months, respectively. Conclusions: Our hybrid HS-RARP approach provides functional outcomes similar to RS-RARP with the early oncologic control of traditional RP-RARP.

Comparing the safety and efficacy of single-port versus multi-port robotic-assisted techniques in urological surgeries: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Comparing the safety and efficacy of single-port (SP) versus multi-port (MP) robotic-assisted techniques in urological surgeries.

METHODS

A systematic review and cumulative meta-analysis was performed using PRISMA criteria for primary outcomes of interest, and quality assessment followed AMSTAR. Four databases were systematically searched: Embase, PubMed, The Cochrane Library, and Web of Science. The search time range is from database creation to December 2022. Stata16 was used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

There were 17 studies involving 5015 patients. In urological surgeries, single-port robotics had shorter length of stay (WMD = - 0.63, 95% Cl [- 1.06, - 0.21], P < 0.05), less estimated blood loss (WMD = - 19.56, 95% Cl [- 32.21, - 6.91], P < 0.05), less lymph node yields (WMD = - 3.35, 95% Cl [- 5.16, - 1.55], P < 0.05), less postoperative opioid use (WMD = - 5.86, 95% Cl [- 8.83, - 2.88], P < 0.05). There were no statistically significant differences in operative time, positive margins rate, overall complications rate, and major complications rate.

CONCLUSION

Single-port robotics appears to have similar perioperative outcomes to multi-port robotics in urological surgery. In radical prostatectomy, single-port robotics has shown some advantages, but the specific suitability of single-port robots for urological surgical types needs to be further explored.

Recent advances in single-site/incision robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy

INTRODUCTION

Single-site robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (ssRARP) has been successfully applied to treat prostate cancer. This review aims to describe the recent advances of surgical approaches, working accesses and novel robotic platforms in ssRARP.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A systematic literature search was performed by searching the PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science and Scopus databases in December 2022 to identify all literature related to ssRARP.

RESULTS

A total of 48 relevant studies were found worldwide from 2008 to 2023. Since the introduction of ssRARP, various modifications of this technique in surgical approaches, working accesses and novel robotic platforms have been developed. The application of ssRARP using the da Vinci SP platform has shown great superiority with encouraging clinical outcomes.

DISCUSSION

There has been a potential shift toward ssRARP using the da Vinci SP platform due to its potential advantages in terms of lower blood loss, minimal postoperative pain, better cosmetic outcome and rapid recovery. More convincing evidence, further technical improvement and higher cost-effectiveness are needed for its widespread acceptance.

Perioperative results of single-port vs multi-port robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy via peritoneal approach: a meta-analysis

To compare the perioperative outcomes of single-port robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (SP-RARP) and multiport robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (MP-RARP) via transperitoneal approach, we conducted a comprehensive database search of eligible studies up to October 2022 and compared their results. This study was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, and a leave-one-out sensitivity analysis was performed to control for heterogeneity and risk of bias. A total of six articles were included, involving 926 patients, among which 256 underwent SP-RARP and 670 underwent MP-RARP. Comparing the two, SP-RARP was associated with shorter hospitalization time (- 0.5 days; 95% CI - 1.02, - 0.06, p < 0.05) and less intraoperative blood loss (- 29.88 ml; 95% CI - 45.66, - 14.10, p < 0.05). However, there were no significant differences in any complications, operative time, positive surgical margins, or short-term follow-up outcomes (continence and potency at 3 months). These findings provide reference data for the selection of surgical methods in performing transperitoneal RP and support further research on the broad applicability of the SP platform.