Portal vein thrombosis in liver cirrhosis

Prevalence of portal vein thrombosis in pediatric patients with cirrhosis and intrahepatic non-cirrhotic portal hypertension

INTRODUCTION

Portal vein thrombosis (PVT) has been increasingly diagnosed in pediatric patients owing to the widespread use of non-invasive radiological techniques. Although the prevalence of PVT in adults with cirrhosis and intrahepatic non-cirrhotic portal hypertension ranges from 0.6 to 26 % and 13 to 46 %, respectively, no available data exist in the pediatric population. The prevalence of PVT in children with cirrhotic and intrahepatic non-cirrhotic portal hypertension was evaluated in this study.

METHODS

This retrospective study included children with cirrhosis and intrahepatic non-cirrhotic portal hypertension, which consisted of congenital hepatic fibrosis (CHF) and idiopathic noncirrhotic portal hypertension (INCPH). Patients with extrahepatic portal venous obstruction were excluded from the study. The presence of PVT was evaluated using abdominal Doppler ultrasonography and/or CT. Etiological, clinical, and laboratory findings were compared between the groups.

RESULTS

One hundred and forty-two patients with cirrhosis (mean admission age: 64.6 months ± 66.4, mean follow-up duration: 46.8 months ± 45.6) and 41 patients with non-cirrhotic patients (CHF=16, INCPH = 25, mean admission age: 126 months ± 64.2) were enrolled in this study. The prevalence of PVT was not significantly different between cirrhotic (8.5 %) and non-cirrhotic (9.7 %) patients. The incidence of PVT was significantly higher in patients with biliary atresia than in those with other etiologies in the cirrhotic group (p = 0.022). The frequency of PVT was higher in patients who had Child-Pugh score ≥7 in the cirrhotic group, but the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0066). The PVT group required more liver transplantations than the non-PVT group (p = 0.038).

CONCLUSION

The prevalence of PVT was similar in pediatric patients with cirrhosis and intrahepatic non-cirrhotic portal hypertension in our cohort, which is compatible with adult studies. Biliary atresia is found to be an important risk factor for PVT in our pediatric population. It might be associated with rapid progression of the disease, ascending cholangitis, and embryological abnormalities. These patients should be routinely evaluated to identify portal vein complications and early warning signs during follow-up.

Efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein thrombosis: A meta‑analysis

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with coexisting portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT) is associated with poor patient outcomes. The efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant therapy in patients with HCC with PVTT remain a subject of debate. In the present study, a comprehensive search of electronic databases, including PubMed, Web of Science, Embase and the Cochrane Library, was conducted to identify studies evaluating the outcomes of neoadjuvant therapy in patients with HCC and PVTT. The primary outcomes assessed were overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS), with complication rates as a secondary outcome. A total of six studies comprising 750 patients were included in the present meta-analysis. The neoadjuvant therapy group exhibited significantly superior OS [hazard ratio (HR), 0.39; P<0.001] and RFS (HR, 0.31; P<0.001) compared with the primary hepatectomy control group. Compared with the control group, neoadjuvant radiotherapy improved OS (HR, 0.34; P<0.001) and RFS (HR, 0.24; P=0.004). While the neoadjuvant intervention subgroup exhibited an improved OS compared with controls (HR, 0.37; P=0.001), no significant difference in RFS was observed (HR, 0.11; P=0.095). Geographical analysis revealed that the Chinese subgroup demonstrated a significantly improved OS and RFS (HR, 0.41 for both; P<0.001), compared with the control group. However, the Japanese and Korean subgroups showed no improvement in OS (HR, 0.25; P=0.057) compared with the control group, and the results did not reach statistical significance. There were no significant differences between the groups in terms of blood transfusion, blood loss, operation time, bile leakage, ascites, peritoneal infection, postoperative bleeding, complications or mortality (all P>0.05). Overall, neoadjuvant therapy significantly improved survival outcomes in patients with HCC and PVTT without increasing complication rates, supporting its efficacy and manageable safety profile.

Intestinal obstruction induced by portal vein thrombosis in a female undergoing oral contraceptive therapy: a case report with comprehensive review

Introduction

Portal vein thrombosis (PVT) is a rare medical condition that obstructs blood flow in the portal vein, with cirrhosis as a common predisposing factor. However, its association with oral contraceptive pills (OCPs), particularly with progestins, remains inadequately explored. This case report aims to contribute to this understanding, focusing on the rare presentation of PVT-induced intestinal obstruction in a female on prolonged OCP therapy.

Case presentation

A 45-year-old female presented with severe abdominal pain, vomiting, and constipation. Diagnosis revealed PVT-induced intestinal obstruction, an exceptionally rare occurrence in the context of prolonged OCP therapy. The patient's symptoms improved with conservative management, including rivaroxaban, highlighting the crucial role of early intervention.

Discussion

This case brings attention to the limited literature exploring the link between OCPs and PVT. Despite the generally safe reputation of OCPs, they can induce pro-thrombotic conditions, emphasizing the need for heightened clinical awareness. In this case, the rarity of intestinal obstruction in PVT, compounded by the absence of common risk factors, underscores the diagnostic challenges associated with such presentations.

Conclusion

PVT-induced intestinal obstruction in a patient on prolonged OCP therapy is exceptionally rare, emphasizing the necessity for multidisciplinary management. It provides crucial insights into suspecting, identifying, and treating this uncommon complication in non-cirrhotic individuals, contributing to the limited existing literature on the subject.

Association between endotoxemia and blood no in the portal circulation of cirrhotic patients: results of a pilot study

Pathophysiology of portal vein thrombosis (PVT) in cirrhosis is still not entirely understood. Elevated levels of lipopolysaccharides (LPS) in portal circulation are significantly associated with hypercoagulation, increased platelet activation and endothelial dysfunction. The aim of the study was to investigate if LPS was associated with reduced portal venous flow, the third component of Virchow's triad, and the underlying mechanism. Serum nitrite/nitrate, as a marker of nitric oxide (NO) generation, and LPS were measured in the portal and systemic circulation of 20 patients with cirrhosis undergoing transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) procedure; portal venous flow velocity (PVV) was also measured in each patient and correlated with NO and LPS levels. Serum nitrite/nitrate and LPS were significantly higher in the portal compared to systemic circulation; a significant correlation was found between LPS and serum nitrite/nitrate (R = 0.421; p < 0.01). Median PVV before and after TIPS was 15 cm/s (6-40) and 31 cm/s (14-79), respectively. Correlation analysis of PVV with NO and LPS showed a statistically significant negative correlation of PVV with portal venous NO concentration (R = - 0.576; p = 0.020), but not with LPS. In vitro study with endothelial cells showed that LPS enhanced endothelial NO biosynthesis, which was inhibited by L-NAME, an inhibitor of NO synthase, or TAK-242, an inhibitor of TLR4, the LPS receptor; this effect was accomplished by up-regulation of eNOS and iNOS. The study shows that in cirrhosis, endotoxemia may be responsible for reduced portal venous flow via overgeneration of NO and, therefore, contribute to the development of PVT.

Hypoalbuminemia and Risk of Portal Vein Thrombosis in Cirrhosis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Hypoalbuminemia, as defined by serum albumin (SA) levels ≤35 g/L, is associated to venous and arterial thrombosis in general population and in patients at risk of cardiovascular disease. It is unknown if SA ≤35 g/L is also associated to portal vein thrombosis (PVT) in cirrhosis.

METHODS

Cirrhotic patients enrolled in the Portal vein thrombosis Relevance On Liver cirrhosis: Italian Venous thrombotic Events Registry (PRO-LIVER) study (n = 753), were followed-up for 2 years to assess the risk of PVT, that was diagnosed by Doppler ultrasonography. Child-Pugh classes, Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score, presence of hepatocellular carcinoma and laboratory variables including SA, D-dimer, and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) were measured at baseline.

RESULTS

SA ≤35 g/L was detected in 52% of patients. A logistic multivariate regression analysis showed that higher Child-Pugh class, hepatocellular carcinoma and thrombocytopenia were significantly associated to SA ≤35 g/L. In a subgroup of patients where data regarding hs-CRP and D-dimer were available, SA ≤35 g/L was inversely associated with hs-CRP and D-dimer. During the follow-up, a total of 61 patients experienced PVT. A Kaplan Meier survival analysis showed SA ≤35 g/L was associated to increased risk of PVT compared to SA >35 g/L (P = .005). A multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis showed that male sex, lower platelet count, and SA ≤35 g/L remained associated to PVT after adjusting for confounding factors.

CONCLUSION

Cirrhotic patients with SA ≤35 g/L are at higher risk of experiencing PVT compared to those with SA >35 g/L and could be considered as potential candidates to anticoagulant prophylaxis for PVT prevention.

Portal Vein Thrombosis: State-of-the-Art Review

Background: Portal vein thrombosis (PVT) is a rare disease with an estimated incidence of 2 to 4 cases per 100,000 inhabitants. The most common predisposing conditions for PVT are chronic liver diseases (cirrhosis), primary or secondary hepatobiliary malignancy, major infectious or inflammatory abdominal disease, or myeloproliferative disorders. Methods: PVT can be classified on the basis of the anatomical site, the degree of venous occlusion, and the timing and type of presentation. The main differential diagnosis of PVT, both acute and chronic, is malignant portal vein invasion, most frequently by hepatocarcinoma, or constriction (typically by pancreatic cancer or cholangiocarcinoma). Results: The management of PVT is based on anticoagulation and the treatment of predisposing conditions. The aim of anticoagulation in acute thrombosis is to prevent the extension of the clot and enable the recanalization of the vein to avoid the development of complications, such as intestinal infarction and portal hypertension. Conclusions: The treatment with anticoagulant therapy favors the reduction of portal hypertension, and this allows for a decrease in the risk of bleeding, especially in patients with esophageal varices. The anticoagulant treatment is generally recommended for at least three to six months. Prosecution of anticoagulation is advised until recanalization or lifelong if the patient has an underlying permanent pro-coagulant condition that cannot be corrected or if there is thrombosis extending to the mesenteric veins.

Prevalence of portal vein thrombosis in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: a meta-analysis of observational studies

Portal vein thrombosis (PVT) is a common complication of cirrhosis as a result of portal hypertension and modification in the hemostatic balance. Accumulating evidence now suggests that patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), especially those with advanced forms, have an increased risk of PVT. Hence, we performed a meta-analysis of observational studies to estimate the overall prevalence of PVT in patients with NAFLD and its advanced forms compared with patients with advanced liver diseases from other etiologies. We systematically searched PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science databases from the inception date to December 30th 2022, using predefined keywords, to identify observational studies. Meta-analysis was performed using random-effects modeling. We included five observational studies for a total of 225,571 patients. Of these, 26,840 (11.9%) patients had NAFLD, whereas the PVT prevalence was 8.5% (n = 2,280). When compared with patients with advanced liver diseases from other etiologies, patients with NAFLD and its advanced forms had a higher risk of prevalent PVT (OR 1.34, 100% CI 1.07-1.67 p < 0,01). The between-study heterogeneity was substantial (I2 = 88%). This meta-analysis suggests that compared with patients with advanced liver diseases from other etiologies, patient with NAFLD and its advanced forms had a higher risk of prevalent PVT. Further research is required to understand the complex link between NAFLD/NASH and PVT development.

Long term prophylactic anticoagulation for portal vein thrombosis after splenectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis

AIM

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the anticoagulants for the prevention of portal vein system thrombosis (PVST) in patients with cirrhosis after splenectomy and explore the optimal time of anticoagulant administration.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was performed using PubMed, Embase and China Biology Medicine disc (CBM)databases, so as to screen out studies comparing the prognoses between cirrhotic post-splenectomy patients treated with and without anticoagulants. The parameters that were analyzed included the incidence of PVST and postoperative bleeding.

RESULTS

With a total of 592 subjects, we included 8 studies (6 observational and 2 randomized trials) that fulfilled the inclusion criteria. We found that the incidence of PVST was significantly lower in the anticoagulation group during the first 6 months of anticoagulant administration. And the largest difference in the incidence of PVST between the anticoagulation and control groups was observed at 3 months (odds ratio 0.17(0.11~0.27); P = 0.767; I2 = 0.0%) and 6 months (OR = 0.21(0.11~0.40); P = 0.714; I2 = 0.0%) postoperatively. The incidence of bleeding was not significantly higher in the anticoagulation group (odds ratio 0.71 (0.30~1.71); P = 0.580; I2 = 0.0%).

CONCLUSION

Low-molecular weight heparin (LMWH) and warfarin can decrease the incidence of PVST in post-splenectomy cirrhotic patients without an increased risk of bleeding. And the optimal use time of warfarin is 6 months after splenectomy.

Inter-observer agreement and accuracy of LI-RADS v2018 for differentiating tumor in vein from bland thrombus using gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging

PURPOSE

To assess inter-observer agreement and accuracy of LI-RADS v2018 for differentiating tumor in vein (TIV) from bland thrombus on gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (Gx-MRI). Secondarily, to determine whether a multi-feature model improves accuracy compared to LI-RADS.

METHODS

We retrospectively identified consecutive patients at risk for hepatocellular carcinoma with venous occlusion(s) reported on Gx-MRI. Five radiologists independently classified each occlusion as TIV or bland thrombus using the LI-RADS TIV criterion (enhancing soft tissue in vein). They also evaluated imaging features suggestive of TIV or bland thrombus. Intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) was calculated for individual features. A multi-feature model was developed based on consensus scores of features with > 5% consensus prevalence and > 0.40 ICC. Sensitivity and specificity of the LI-RADS criterion and of the cross-validated multi-feature model were compared.

RESULTS

Ninety-eight patients with 103 venous occlusions (58 TIV, 45 bland thrombus) were included. The LI-RADS criterion provided 0.63 ICC and, depending on the reader, 0.62-0.93 sensitivity and 0.87-1.00 specificity. Five other features had > 5% consensus prevalence and > 0.40 ICC, including three LI-RADS suggestive features and two non-LI-RADS features. The optimal multi-feature model incorporated the LI-RADS criterion and one LI-RADS suggestive feature (occluded or obscured vein contiguous with malignant parenchymal mass). After cross-validation, the multi-feature model did not improve sensitivity or specificity compared to the LI-RADS criterion (P = 0.23 and 0.25, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Using Gx-MRI, the LI-RADS criterion for TIV provides substantial inter-observer agreement, variable sensitivity, and high specificity for differentiating TIV from bland thrombus. A cross-validated multi-feature model did not improve diagnostic performance.

Hepatitis C Cirrhosis, Hepatitis B Superimposed Infection, and the Emergence of an Acute Portal Vein Thrombosis: A Case Report

Acute portal vein thrombosis (PVT) is a complication of liver cirrhosis. The presence of viral infections such as hepatitis B (HBV) and hepatitis C (HCV) can further increase cirrhotic patients' risk of developing PVT, especially in the rare case when there is superinfection with both HBV and HCV. We present a patient with HCV cirrhosis whose clinical condition was decompensated secondary to the development of superimposed HBV infection, who developed acute PVT during hospitalization. This case offers a unique presentation of acute PVT that developed within several days of hospitalization for decompensated liver disease, as proven by the interval absence of portal venous flow on repeat imaging. Despite the workup on the initial presentation being negative for PVT, reconsideration of differentials after the change in our patient's clinical status led to the diagnosis. Active HBV infection was likely the initial trigger for the patient's cirrhosis decompensation and presentation; the subsequent coagulopathy and alteration in the portal blood flow triggered the development of an acute PVT. The risk for both prothrombotic and antithrombotic complications remains high in patients with cirrhosis, a risk that is vastly increased by the presence of superimposedinfections. The diagnosis of thrombotic complications such as PVT can be challenging, thus stressing the importance of repeat imaging in instances where clinical suspicion remains high despite negative imaging. Anticoagulation should be considered for cirrhotic patients with PVT on an individual basis for both prevention and treatment. Prompt diagnosis, early intervention, and close monitoring of patients with PVT are crucial for improving clinical outcomes. The goal of this report is to illustrate diagnostic challenges that accompany the diagnosis of acute PVT in cirrhosis, as well as discuss therapeutic options for optimal management of this condition.

A 10-year Australian experience of rare intraabdominal venous thrombosis with comparison to deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism

OBJECTIVE

Intra-abdominal venous thromboembolism is rare with heterogeneous management. We aim to evaluate these thrombosis and compare them to deep vein thrombosis and/or pulmonary embolism.

METHOD

A 10-year retrospective evaluation of consecutive venous thromboembolism presentations (January 2011-December 2020) at Northern Health, Australia, was conducted. A subanalysis of intraabdominal venous thrombosis involving splanchnic, renal and ovarian veins was performed.

RESULTS

There were 3343 episodes including 113 cases of intraabdominal venous thrombosis (3.4%) - 99 splanchnic vein thrombosis, 10 renal vein thrombosis and 4 ovarian vein thrombosis. Of the splanchnic vein thrombosis presentations, 34 patients (35 cases) had known cirrhosis. Patients with cirrhosis were numerically less likely to be anticoagulated compared to noncirrhotic patients (21/35 vs. 47/64, P  = 0.17). Noncirrhotic patients ( n  = 64) were more likely to have malignancy compared to those with deep vein thrombosis and/or pulmonary embolism (24/64 vs. 543/3230, P  < 0.001), including 10 patients diagnosed at time of splanchnic vein thrombosis presentation. Cirrhotic patients reported more recurrent thrombosis/clot progression (6/34) compared to noncirrhotic patients (3/64) (15.6 vs. 2.3 events/100-person-years; hazard ratio 4.7 (95% confidence interval 1.2-18.9), P  = 0.030) and other venous thromboembolism patients (2.6/100-person-years; hazard ratio 4.7, 95% confidence interval 2.1-10.7; P  < 0.001) with comparable major bleeding rates. All renal vein thrombosis were provoked including five malignant-related cases while three ovarian vein thrombosis occurred postpartum. No recurrent thrombotic or bleeding complications were reported in renal vein thrombosis and ovarian vein thrombosis.

CONCLUSION

These rare intraabdominal venous thromboses are often provoked. Splanchnic vein thrombosis (SVT) patients with cirrhosis have a higher rate of thrombotic complications, while SVT without cirrhosis was associated with more malignancy. Given the concurrent comorbidities, careful assessment and individualized anticoagulation decision is needed.

Gut dysbiosis, endotoxemia and clotting activation: A dangerous trio for portal vein thrombosis in cirrhosis

Liver cirrhosis (LC) is associated with portal venous thrombosis (PVT) in roughly 20% of cirrhotic patients but the underlying mechanism is still unclear. Low-grade endotoxemia by lipopolysaccharides (LPS), a component of outer gut microbiota membrane, is detectable in the portal circulation of LC and could predispose to PVT. LPS may translocate into systemic circulation upon microbiota dysbiosis-induced gut barrier dysfunction, that is a prerequisite for enhanced gut permeability and ensuing endotoxemia. Experimental and clinical studies provided evidence that LPS behaves a pro-thrombotic molecule so promoting clotting and platelet activation. Experiments conducted in the portal circulation of cirrhotic patients showed the existence of LPS-related enhanced thrombin generation as well as endothelial dysfunction, venous stasis, and platelet activation. The review will analyze 1) the pro-thrombotic role of endotoxemia in the context of LC 2) the biological plausibility linking endotoxemia with PVT and 3) the potentially interventional tools to lower endotoxemia and eventually hypercoagulation.

Gut-derived low-grade endotoxaemia, atherothrombosis and cardiovascular disease

Systemic inflammation has been suggested to have a pivotal role in atherothrombosis, but the factors that trigger systemic inflammation have not been fully elucidated. Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) is a component of the membrane of Gram-negative bacteria present in the gut that can translocate into the systemic circulation, causing non-septic, low-grade endotoxaemia. Gut dysbiosis is a major determinant of low-grade endotoxaemia via dysfunction of the intestinal barrier scaffold, which is a prerequisite for LPS translocation into the systemic circulation. Experimental studies have demonstrated that LPS is present in atherosclerotic arteries but not in normal arteries. In atherosclerotic plaques, LPS promotes a pro-inflammatory status that can lead to plaque instability and thrombus formation. Low-grade endotoxaemia affects several cell types, including leukocytes, platelets and endothelial cells, leading to inflammation and clot formation. Low-grade endotoxaemia has been described in patients at risk of or with overt cardiovascular disease, in whom low-grade endotoxaemia was associated with atherosclerotic burden and its clinical sequelae. In this Review, we describe the mechanisms favouring the development of low-grade endotoxaemia, focusing on gut dysbiosis and changes in gut permeability; the plausible biological mechanisms linking low-grade endotoxaemia and atherothrombosis; the clinical studies suggesting that low-grade endotoxaemia is a risk factor for cardiovascular events; and the potential therapeutic tools to improve gut permeability and eventually eliminate low-grade endotoxaemia.

Clinical predictors for thrombus progression in cirrhotic patients with untreated splanchnic vein thrombosis

INTRODUCTION

Splanchnic vein thrombosis (SVT) occurs in a heterogenous group of patients secondary to a variety of risk factors including liver disease. Minimal data regarding natural history and outcomes of SVT exists to inform management decisions. As such, there is equipoise regarding the utility of anticoagulation in cirrhotic patients with SVT. We sought to identify clinical factors predictive of new or progressive thrombosis in a cohort of patients with untreated SVT.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of cirrhotic patients over 18 years of age diagnosed with SVT at the Oregon Health & Science University from 2015 to 2020, excluding those initially treated with anticoagulation. The primary study endpoint was a composite of the following: imaging-confirmed progression of SVT, development of cavernous transformation, intestinal ischemia, portal cholangiopathy or new venous or arterial thrombosis.

RESULTS

261 patients were included in the analysis (median age 61 years, 68% male, 32% female). Forty percent of all patients experienced the primary composite endpoint. Multivariable logistic regression found that only the presence of pancreatitis or abdominal infection at diagnosis was associated with an increased likelihood of experiencing thrombus progression in patients with untreated SVT (OR 3.61, P = 0.02). There was a statistically significant overall survival difference between patients that did and did not experience the primary composite endpoint after controlling for confounding variables. (p = 0.0068).

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, only the presence of pancreatitis or intrabdominal infection were found to be significantly associated with thrombotic progression, with varices identified as marginally non-significant risk factor. Notably, thrombotic progression was associated with a significant reduction in overall survival.

Splenic Vein Thrombosis: A Case Series of Consequential Chronic Pancreatitis and Sequential Myeloproliferative Disorder

We present a case series of two patients with splenic vein thrombosis (SVT), a relatively uncommon condition supposed to occur in the context of pancreatitis or pancreatic malignancies. Splenic vein thrombosis may also be seen in cases of chronic pancreatitis, as in one of our patients. At times, splenic vein thrombosis may present with an incidental, isolated finding of gastric varices on computed tomography pulmonary angiogram (CTPA) while investigating for pulmonary embolus; such a result should prompt further investigation to rule out associated splenic vein thrombosis in a sequence. We attempt to highlight the importance of performing a blood count and hematocrit, supplementary to a liver screen, in another patient where the cause was not related to liver disease, but to myeloproliferative disorder, which resulted in a hyper-thrombotic state and splenic vein thrombosis as a consequence.

Will the collaboration of surgery and external radiotherapy open new avenues for hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein thrombosis?

Portal invasion of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) occurs in 12.5%-40% of patients diagnosed with cancer and yields poor clinical outcomes. Since it is a common cause of inoperability, sorafenib was regarded as the standard treatment for HCC in the Barcelona Clinic of Liver Cancer guidelines. However, the median survival of the Asian population was only approximately 6 mo, and the tumor response rate was less than moderate (< 5%). Various locoregional modalities were performed, including external beam radiotherapy (EBRT), transarterial chemoembolization, hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy, and surgery, alone or in combination. Among them, EBRT is a noninvasive method and can safely treat tumors involving the major vessels. Palliative EBRT has been commonly performed, especially in East Asian countries, where locally invasive HCC is highly prevalent. Although surgery is not commonly indicated, pioneering studies have demonstrated encouraging results in recent decades. Furthermore, the combination of neo- or adjuvant EBRT and surgery has been recently used and has significantly improved the outcomes of HCC patients, as reported in a few randomized studies. Regarding systemic modality, a combination of novel immunotherapy and vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitor showed results superior to that of sorafenib as a first-line agent. Future clinical trials investigating the combined use of these novel agents, surgery, and EBRT are expected to improve the prognosis of HCC with portal invasion.

Can we use non-invasive parameters to predict the development of gastroesophageal varices in cirrhotic patients with and without portal vein thrombosis? An observational study from the western region of Saudi Arabia

Background

The prevention of portal hypertensive complications, including upper gastrointestinal bleeding, is critically important and achieved only through the use of upper endoscopy for the management of oesophageal gastric varices (EGVs). There is a paucity of data and limited utilization of non-invasive predictive parameters to guide the selection of patients who may benefit from endoscopic surveillance, especially in cirrhotic patients with coexistent portal vein thrombosis.

Results

The study was conducted in eight hospitals in the western region of Saudi Arabia over the period of 2015–2017. Among 1349 chronic liver disease patients, eighty-five patients with complete endoscopic findings were included in the study. Twenty-eight patients were diagnosed with non-malignant PVT. Twenty-five patients (89%) developed oesophageal varices, compared with 57 patients with cirrhosis without PVT. A predictive factor for the development of oesophageal varices of statistical significance was hypoalbuminemia in PVT patients (p=0.04). No statistically significant differences were found in other biochemical markers (p<0.05) between the PVT and non-PVT groups.

Conclusions

The prevalence of oesophageal varices is increased in PVT patients. Serum albumin can be utilized as a predictor of varices development in cirrhosis patients.

Usage of Direct Acting Oral Anticoagulants in Cirrhotic and Non-Cirrhotic Portal Vein Thrombosis: A Systematic Review

Thrombosis of the portal vein (PVT) is generally seen in the setting of liver cirrhosis and to a lesser extent in the absence of cirrhosis. There is no clear guidance in relation to approaching treatment with anticoagulation in this condition. The professional societies and guidelines recommend treatment with traditional anticoagulation like low-molecular-weight heparin and vitamin-K antagonists in patients presenting with acute portal vein thrombosis. There is no clarity in relation to treatment in the setting of chronic PVT and in patients with cirrhosis. Also, the role of direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) that are becoming a preferred choice for anticoagulation for various other indications is not clear in the case of PVT. There are a very few studies in the medical literature that have investigated the role of DOACs in patients with PVT in different settings. Thus, we performed a systematic review of the literature to study the use of DOACs in PVT in patients with and without cirrhosis. The results of the available studies show that DOACS appears to be a promising choice for the treatment of patients with PVT. The availability of more data in the future along with better availability of the approved reversal agents for various DOACs is expected to make DOACS a preferred choice for the clinicians to treat patients with PVT.

Treatment of portal vein thrombosis: an updated narrative review

Portal vein thrombosis (PVT) is the most frequent among the splanchnic vein thrombosis, accounting for 90% of cases. More than half of PVT are provoked by liver cirrhosis, solid cancer or myeloproliferative neoplasms. The remaining cases are non-malignant non-cirrhotic PVT and include either unprovoked events or thrombosis secondary to other less common risk factors (e.g. abdominal surgery, intrabdominal inflammations/infections, or hormonal stimuli). Anticoagulant therapy in patients with acute symptomatic PVT should be started early after diagnosis, if no active bleeding, to obtain greater vessel recanalization and reduce the occurrence of portal-hypertension related complications. Gastroesophageal varices do not represent a contraindication to anticoagulant treatment, as long as adequate measures have been undertaken for the prophylaxis of gastroesophageal bleeding. Different treatment options (unfractionated or low molecular weight heparin, vitamin K antagonists and direct oral anticoagulants [DOACs]) can be considered. In this narrative review we will discuss the treatment of PVT in the three most common scenarios (cirrhosis-associated, cancer-associated and non-malignant non-cirrhotic PVT). We will also discuss the role of the DOACs and summarise recent guidelines on this topic.

Efficacy and safety of anticoagulants in liver cirrhosis patients with portal vein thrombosis: A meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the efficacy and safety of anticoagulants in liver cirrhosis patients with portal vein thrombosis (PVT).

METHODS

PubMed, BioMed Central, Cochrane Library and Web of Science were retrieved to identify relevant literature. Forest plots were applied to display the results of the meta-analysis. The odds ratios (ORs) were used as the effect index for the enumeration data, and the effect size was expressed as 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Publication bias was evaluated by funnel plots and Egger's test.

RESULTS

Eight articles included 225 patients with liver cirrhosis and PVT receiving anticoagulants and 232 not receiving anticoagulants. The data demonstrated that the recanalization rate of PVT was significantly higher in patients with anticoagulant treatment than in patients without anticoagulant treatment (OR=5.60; 95% CI: 3.40-9.22; P<0.001). The exacerbation risk of PVT was significantly lower in patients with anticoagulant treatment than in patients without anticoagulant treatment (OR=0.15; 95% CI: 0.04-0.54; P<0.001). A significantly lower portal hypertension bleeding effect was observed in patients with anticoagulant treatment than in patients without anticoagulant treatment (OR=0.21; 95% CI: 0.10-0.45; P<0.001). Low molecular weight heparins (LMWH) were more effective in preventing the PVT exacerbation in liver cirrhosis patients with PVT than warfarin (OR=0.16; 95% CI: 0.08-0.35).

CONCLUSIONS

Anticoagulants were effective and safe in treating patients with liver cirrhosis and PVT as they could increase the PVT recanalization rate and decrease the risks of PVT exacerbation and portal hypertension bleeding.

Janus Kinase-2 Mutation Associated Portal Vein Thrombosis Complicating Liver Cirrhosis and Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Background:

Portal vein thrombosis (PVT) might be a catastrophic event complicating liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

Aim:

role of JAK2 RS V617F mutation as a risk factor for PVT development in liver cirrhosis and HCC.

Methods:

A case control study conducted on 100 PVT patients (76 HCC and 24 liver cirrhosis) additionally, 100 healthy individuals used as a control group. PVT was diagnosed incidentally by Doppler ultrasound during routine follow-up HCC screening. ProthrombinG20210A mutation, MTHFR mutation, Factor V Leiden mutation (VFL), antithrombin III (ATIII), protein C, S, and antiphospholipid antibodies, along with JAK2 RS V617F mutation by real-time polymerase chain reaction all were analyzed.

Results:

Patients with PVT were significantly older (p<0.001), thrombocytopenic (p<0.001), with high alkaline phosphatase (p<0.001). JAK2 RS V617F mutation was found in 28/100 (28%) in idiopathic PVT complicating liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. Cases with positive JAK2 rs V617F mutation were significantly accompanied by protein S deficiency (P 0.03), LA absence (p 0.06), and high frequency of ascites (P 0.03). While, the MTHFR heterozygous mutation (p0.001), ATIII (P 0.02), and VFL (P 0.01) were more frequent with negative JAK2 rs V617F mutation. The comparison between demographic data and thrombophilic parameters in PVT cases revealed that no significant differences were recorded except for male gender, Diabetes Mellitus, splenomegaly significantly increased among HCC cases (p<0.05).

Conclusions:

JAK2 rs V617F mutation must be considered in any case of PVT with liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma without identified thrombophilic risk factors, with potential considerations of evolving myeloproliferative disorders. New diagnostic and therapeutic implications are still awaited.

Risk Factors of Portal Vein Thrombosis after Devascularization Treatment in Patients with Liver Cirrhosis: A Nested Case-Control Study

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed medical records from cirrhosis patients who underwent devascularization for the treatment of portal hypertension in our hospital between January 1, 2008, and December 20, 2014. Patients were followed up to investigate the PVT incidence at different times after surgery. Patients were divided into two groups (PVT, no PVT), and the risk factors for PVT after surgery were determined.

Results

Until October 16, 2015, the median follow-up time of the 124 patients enrolled into this study was 41.43 months (range, 5.47–95.30 months). 61 patients had perioperative PVT, and 21 (16.94%) patients had PVT diagnosed during the follow-up period. Those who had lower preoperative white blood cell counts, larger preoperative portal vein trunk diameter, and no gastric varices were more likely to have perioperative thrombosis. In those without perioperative PVT, a history of hypertension, higher grade of splenomegaly, and higher preoperative levels of creatinine were independent predictors of PVT occurrence during the follow-up period.

Conclusions

The risk factors for perioperative PVT in cirrhotic patients after devascularization were lower preoperative white blood cell count and larger portal vein trunk diameter, with no gastric varices. A history of hypertension, a larger spleen, and higher preoperative creatinine level are independent predictors of PVT during follow-up after surgery in patients without perioperative PVT.

Visceral fat is associated with cirrhotic portal vein thrombosis

Background: Central obesity, due to the accumulation of visceral fat(VF), is one of the main risk factors for venous thrombosis. The aim of this study was to determine if VF may be a risk factor for development of portal vein thrombosis(PVT) in cirrhotic patients.Methods: A total of 214 cirrhotic patients at the outpatient clinic were consecutively included, undergoing an anthropometric evaluation, blood tests and bioimpedance.Results: Median MELDscore was10. Prior liver decompensation occurred in 44.9% of patients and 35.6% of patients had large esophageal varices. Mean body mass index was 28.7 Kg/m2 (39.3%were obese) and mean waist circumference(WC) was 103.8 cm. A 7.5% of patients had PVT at the time of inclusion. PVT was more frequent in males(93.8 vs. 68.2%, p = 0.03). Patients with PVT had a higher WC(111.9 vs. 103.2 cm, p = 0.02) and VF (17.1 vs. 14.5, p = 0.04). PVT was also more frequent in patients with prior decompensation (81.3 vs. 41.9%, p < 0.01) and with large esophageal varices(62.5 vs. 33.3%, p = 0.02). In the simplified multivariate analysis, PVT was independently associated with the presence of portal hypertension(OR 13, 95%CI 1.6-108.3, p = 0.02) and VF(OR 1.2, 95%CI 1.03-1.3, p = 0.01).Conclusion: VF was independently associated with PVT in cirrhotic patients. VF may be more reliable than conventional anthropometric measurements for cirrhotic patients.

Serum Albumin Is Inversely Associated With Portal Vein Thrombosis in Cirrhosis

We analyzed whether serum albumin is independently associated with portal vein thrombosis (PVT) in liver cirrhosis (LC) and if a biologic plausibility exists. This study was divided into three parts. In part 1 (retrospective analysis), 753 consecutive patients with LC with ultrasound-detected PVT were retrospectively analyzed. In part 2, 112 patients with LC and 56 matched controls were entered in the cross-sectional study. In part 3, 5 patients with cirrhosis were entered in the in vivo study and 4 healthy subjects (HSs) were entered in the in vitro study to explore if albumin may affect platelet activation by modulating oxidative stress. In the 753 patients with LC, the prevalence of PVT was 16.7%; logistic analysis showed that only age (odds ratio [OR], 1.024; P = 0.012) and serum albumin (OR, -0.422; P = 0.0001) significantly predicted patients with PVT. Analyzing the 112 patients with LC and controls, soluble clusters of differentiation (CD)40-ligand (P = 0.0238), soluble Nox2-derived peptide (sNox2-dp; P < 0.0001), and urinary excretion of isoprostanes (P = 0.0078) were higher in patients with LC. In LC, albumin was correlated with sCD40L (Spearman's rank correlation coefficient [rs ], -0.33; P < 0.001), sNox2-dp (rs , -0.57; P < 0.0001), and urinary excretion of isoprostanes (rs, -0.48; P < 0.0001) levels. The in vivo study showed a progressive decrease in platelet aggregation, sNox2-dp, and urinary 8-iso prostaglandin F2α-III formation 2 hours and 3 days after albumin infusion. Finally, platelet aggregation, sNox2-dp, and isoprostane formation significantly decreased in platelets from HSs incubated with scalar concentrations of albumin. Conclusion: Low serum albumin in LC is associated with PVT, suggesting that albumin could be a modulator of the hemostatic system through interference with mechanisms regulating platelet activation.

Warfarin versus aspirin prevents portal vein thrombosis after laparoscopic splenectomy and azygoportal disconnection: A randomized clinical trial

INTRODUCTION

Portal vein system thrombosis (PVST) is a common, potentially life-threatening complication after splenectomy. The optimal recognized anticoagulation drugs for preventing PVST in cirrhotic patients after splenectomy remain unclear. The aim of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of warfarin in preventing PVST after laparoscopic splenectomy and azygoportal disconnection (LSD).

METHODS

In this randomized controlled single-center study, 80 cirrhotic patients who underwent LSD were randomly assigned to 2 years of treatment with either warfarin (n = 40) or aspirin (n = 40). The primary outcome was prevention of PVST. Sonographers and radiologists who assessed outcomes were blinded to group assignments. Intention-to-treat analysis was performed.

RESULTS

During the first year, excluding two patients withdrawing from the study, 15 of the 39 warfarin-treated patients (38.5%) and five of the 39 aspirin-treated patients (12.8%) did not develop PVST (P = 0.010). The incidence of PVST in the first 2 postoperative years was significantly lower in the warfarin group than in the aspirin group (F = 7.360, P = 0.008). The warfarin group in paired within-group comparisons had significantly greater improvements in total bilirubin and albumin levels at baseline versus at 6 months postoperatively and in creatinine levels at baseline versus at 12, 18, and 24 months postoperatively respectively (all P < 0.05). In contrast, those paired comparisons of the aspirin group showed no significant differences (all P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Warfarin therapy was safe and effective and significantly reduced the risk of PVST after LSD, compared with aspirin treatment. Warfarin treatment was associated with better liver function protection and renal function improvement than aspirin treatment.

The risk factors of portal vein thrombosis in patients with liver cirrhosis

This study was designed to identify and assess risk factors for portal vein thrombosis (PVT) in patients with cirrhosis. A total of 98 cirrhosis patients with PVT were identified and 101 cirrhosis patients without PVT were chosen as the control group in this retrospective study. Several variables were measured and the two groups PVT and non-PVT were compared statistically. PVT was identified in 98 patients (10%). Significant differences in hematocrit, international normalized ratio, albumin, bilirubin and glucose were determined between the groups (P<0.05). Out of the thrombophilic risk factors in the patients with PVT factor V Leiden was identified in 8.8%, prothrombin gene 6.6% and methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase 2.2%. There was no difference in survival time between groups (P>0.05).

Venous thrombosis in unusual sites: A practical review for the hematologist

Thrombosis of unusual venous sites encompasses a large part of consultative hematology and is encountered routinely by practicing hematologists. Contrary to the more commonly encountered lower extremity venous thrombosis and common cardiovascular disorders, the various thromboses outlined in this review have unique presentations, pathophysiology, workup, and treatments that all hematologists should be aware of. This review attempts to outline the most up to date literature on cerebral, retinal, upper extremity, hepatic, portal, splenic, mesenteric, and renal vein thrombosis, focusing on the incidence, pathophysiology, provoking factors, and current recommended treatments for each type of unusual thrombosis to provide a useful and practical review for the hematologist.

Anticoagulant therapy in patients with liver cirrhosis and portal vein thrombosis: insights for the clinician

Portal vein thrombosis (PVT) is a frequent complication in the natural history of patients with liver cirrhosis (LC). The prevalence of PVT in LC is highly variable, ranging from 0.6% to 25% according to different reports. The impact of PVT on the natural history of LC is unclear, but it seems to negatively affect the prognosis of patients undergoing liver transplantation (LT) by increasing post-LT mortality and delaying waiting time. The antithrombotic treatment of PVT is still challenging as PVT may often remain asymptomatic and incidentally diagnosed, and a spontaneous partial/total regression of PVT is observed in an important proportion of patients, even in the absence of anticoagulation. Recent evidence suggested that the anticoagulant treatment for PVT may favorably affect both ischemic and bleeding outcomes in LC patients. Anticoagulant therapies so far available include unfractioned heparin, low molecular weight heparins (LMWHs) and fondaparinux for acute treatment, and LMWHs and vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) for long-term treatment. No robust data currently support the use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in patients with LC and PVT, as the safety and efficacy of DOACs in this setting is still unclear. This review summarizes current evidence for the evaluation and management of patients with LC and PVT.

Acute intestinal ischaemia from a portal vein thrombosis in a young female smoker on an oral contraceptive

We report the case of a 23-year-old woman who presented with bloody diarrhoea and multiple syncopal events. While the initial diagnosis clinically appeared to be inflammatory bowel disease, she was found to have a portal vein thrombosis (PVT) on MR cholangiopancreatography and acute intestinal ischaemia on colonic biopsy. The aetiology of this patient's PVT is attributed to her acquired prothrombotic state from an estrogen-containing contraceptive pill in conjunction with regular tobacco use. Extensive mesenteric venous thrombosis from an acute PVT has been shown to cause intestinal ischaemia, likely from venous obstruction and reflexive arterial constriction; however, the diagnosis is often delayed until surgery or autopsy. Our case report highlights this patient's clinical presentation, workup and treatment, as part of a review for the risk factors and guidelines recommendations for management of an acute PVT.

The use of nonselective beta blockers is a risk factor for portal vein thrombosis in cirrhotic patients

BACKGROUND/AIM

A reduction in portal vein inflow velocity seems to predispose to the emergence of portal vein thrombosis (PVT). Nonselective β-blockers (NSBBs), used to prevent variceal bleeding, may increase the development of PVT by reducing portal vein inflow velocity. In this retrospective case-control study, we evaluated the risk factors and clinical features of a first event of PVT in 130 cirrhotics, 19 (15%) with (PVT group) and 111 (85%) without PVT (non-PVT group).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patient evaluation and NNBB treatment were carried out according to the AASLD guidelines.

RESULTS

PVT was prevalently partial (84%) and asymptomatic (84%). Patients with PVT were treated with different regimens, and resolution of thrombosis was observed in about 50% of the cases. In both groups, HCV was the most frequent cause of cirrhosis and Child-Pugh score A was prevalent. Ascites and esophageal varices were more frequent in the PVT group (P = 0.05 and <0.000, respectively). Treatment with NSBBs was significantly more frequent in the PVT group than in the non-PVT group (P < 0.000). PVT was associated with higher prevalence of chronic renal disease (P = 0.002), higher PT impairment (P = 0.003) and lower AST and ALT (P = 0.000). At multivariate logistic regression analysis, history of esophageal varices (P = 0.007) and NSBB treatment (P = 0.0003) were independent risk factors significantly associated with PVT.

CONCLUSIONS

Esophageal varices and NSBB treatment were independent risk factors of PVT. Larger studies should evaluate the risk between variceal bleeding and portal vein thrombosis of using NSBBs, particularly in the prevention of first bleeding in nonadvanced liver cirrhosis.

Approach to thrombosis at unusual sites: Splanchnic and cerebral vein thrombosis

Splanchnic vein thrombosis (SVT) and cerebral vein thrombosis (CVT) are two manifestations of unusual site venous thromboembolism (VTE). SVT includes thrombosis in the portal, mesenteric or splenic veins, and the Budd-Chiari syndrome. CVT encompasses thrombosis of the dural venous sinuses and thrombosis of the cerebral veins. Unusual site VTE often represents a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge because of the heterogeneity in clinical presentation, the limited evidence available in the literature on the acute and long-term prognosis of these diseases, and the lack of large randomized controlled trials evaluating different treatment options. This narrative review describes the approach to patients with SVT or CVT by examining the diagnostic process, the assessment of potential risk factors and the appropriate anticoagulant treatment.

Comparison of physical parameter measurements between peripheral and portal blood samples in patients with portal hypertension

BACKGROUND

Measuring portal venous pressure is necessary to examine, diagnose, and treat portal hypertension, but current methods are invasive.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to determine whether a noninvasive peripheral blood measurement could be used to estimate portal venous pressure by investigating correlations between certain physical parameter measurements in the peripheral blood with those obtained in portal blood samples.

METHODS

A total of 128 peripheral and portal blood samples from patients (n= 128) were analyzed for blood rheology and routine blood parameters.

RESULTS

The mean peripheral and portal whole blood viscosities under the shear rates of 200 s-1 (BV 200 s-1) were 2.97 ± 0.50 mPa.s and 3.06 ± 0.39 mPa.s. The mean peripheral and portal BV 30 s-1 values were 3.96 ± 0.79 mPa.s and 4.16 ± 0.64 mPa.s. We observed strong correlations between peripheral and portal blood measurements of BV 200 s-1 (r2= 0.9649), BV 30 s-1 (r2= 0.9622), BV 5 s-1 (r2= 0.9610), and BV 1 s-1 (r2= 0.9623).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results indicate that peripheral blood can be used to evaluate certain parameters in portal blood for use in biofluid mechanics studies, and to provide noninvasive measurement of portal venous pressure.

Portal Vein Thrombosis: Recent Advance

Portal vein thrombosis is a life-threatening vascular disorder of the liver. In this chapter, I will review the recent advance regarding the epidemiology, etiology, management, and prognosis of portal vein thrombosis.

Platelets in liver and renal disease

This review will discuss how 2 common and morbid conditions, renal disease and liver disease, alter platelet number and function. It will review the impact of thrombocytopenia on bleeding complications in patients with these disorders and whether the low platelet count actually correlates with bleeding risk. Emerging data also suggest that platelets are much more than bystanders in both renal and liver disease, but instead play an active role in the pathobiology of these disorders. This review will briefly cover the emerging information on novel roles of platelets in the biology of renal and liver disease.

Portal vein thrombosis relevance on liver cirrhosis: Italian Venous Thrombotic Events Registry

Portal vein thrombosis may occur in cirrhosis; nevertheless, its prevalence, and predictors are still elusive. To investigate this issue, the Italian Society of Internal Medicine undertook the "Portal vein thrombosis Relevance On Liver cirrhosis: Italian Venous thrombotic Events Registry" (PRO-LIVER). This prospective multicenter study includes consecutive cirrhotic patients undergoing Doppler ultrasound examination of the portal area to evaluate the prevalence and incidence of portal vein thrombosis over a 2-year scheduled follow-up. Seven hundred and fifty-three (68 % men; 64 ± 12 years) patients were included in the present analysis. Fifty percent of the cases were cirrhotic outpatients. Viral (44 %) etiology was predominant. Around half of the patients had a mild-severity disease according to the Child-Pugh score; hepatocellular carcinoma was present in 20 %. The prevalence of ultrasound-detected portal vein thrombosis was 17 % (n = 126); it was asymptomatic in 43 % of the cases. Notably, more than half of the portal vein thrombosis patients (n = 81) were not treated with anticoagulant therapy. Logistic step-forward multivariate analysis demonstrated that previous portal vein thrombosis (p < 0.001), Child-Pugh Class B + C (p < 0.001), hepatocellular carcinoma (p = 0.01), previous upper gastrointestinal bleeding (p = 0.030) and older age (p = 0.012) were independently associated with portal vein thrombosis. Portal vein thrombosis is a frequent complication of cirrhosis, particularly in patients with moderate-severe liver failure. The apparent undertreatment of patients with portal vein thrombosis is a matter of concern and debate, which should be addressed by planning interventional trials especially with newer oral anticoagulants. Clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT01470547.

Incidence and clinical presentation of portal vein thrombosis in cirrhotic patients

BACKGROUND

Portal vein thrombosis (PVT) is due to many risk factors, but its pathogenesis is still not clearly understood. To identify the risk factors for PVT, we analyzed the clinical characteristics and complications associated with PVT in cirrhotic patients.

METHODS

We studied patients with liver cirrhosis who were admitted to our unit from April 2009 to December 2014. The patients were divided into the PVT and non-PVT groups, and were compared by variables including gender, age, the etiology of cirrhosis, stage of cirrhosis, complications, imaging, and treatment.

RESULTS

PVT was found in 45 (9.8%) of 461 cirrhotic patients admitted to our hospital. Most patients (45.9%) had hepatitis B virus (HBV)-related cirrhosis, with a similar distribution of etiologies between the groups. However, there was no positive relationship between PVT and etiologies of cirrhosis. Most patients (71.5%) were in the stage of hepatic decompensation. No statistically significant differences were found in complications including esophageal varices, ascites, and hepatic encephalopathy between the groups. However, there was a significant positive correlation between hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and PVT (P<0.01). In 30 patients with PVT, thrombosis occurred in the portal vein and/or portal branches, 37.8% were diagnosed on ultrasound.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of PVT was 9.8%, mainly in patients with HBV-related cirrhosis. The development of PVT was associated with the severity of liver disease and HCC.

Comparison of Systemic Thrombolysis Versus Indirect Thrombolysis via the Superior Mesenteric Artery in Patients with Acute Portal Vein Thrombosis

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of indirect thrombolysis via the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) in patients with acute portal vein thrombosis.

METHODS

Over 10 years, we studied the safety and efficacy of indirect thrombolysis via the SMA in 34 patients with acute portal vein thrombosis. Eighteen patients were categorized as the systemic thrombolysis (ST) group and 16 as the catheter thrombolysis (CT) group. The ST group was administered low-molecular-weight heparin, and patients in the CT group received catheter thrombolysis. Clinical data, such as comorbidities, laboratory test results, therapeutic methods, and prognosis, were recorded. All the patients underwent a routine clinical follow-up that was performed by inpatient examinations or outpatient visits at a mean follow-up time of 34 months.

RESULTS

The thrombus score was significantly higher in the ST group (3.67 ± 1.19) than in the CT group (2.38 ± 0.62) after 2 weeks of treatment (P < 0.05). The average period of symptom alleviated was longer in the ST group (3.29 ± 1.59 days) than in the CT group (2.07 ± 0.73 days, P < 0.05). Five patients (4 in the ST group and 1 in the CT group) underwent a laparotomy because of peritonitis after thrombolysis for 24 hr. One patient died of a malignant tumor after 18 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Indirect thrombolysis via the SMA is safer and more effective for patients with portal vein thrombosis compared with systemic thrombolysis.

Radiotherapy as valid modality for hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombosis

Although the current standard treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with portal vein tumor thrombosis (PVTT) is sorafenib, many previous studies have established the need for a reliable local modality for PVTT control, which is a major cause of liver function deterioration and metastasis. Additionally, there is growing evidence for the prognostic significance of PVTT classification according to the location of tumor thrombosis. Favorable outcomes can be obtained by applying local modalities, including surgery or transarterial chemoembolization, especially in second-order or distal branch PVTT. Rapid control of PVTT could maintain or improve liver function and reduce intrahepatic as well as distant metastasis. Radiotherapy (RT) is one of the main locoregional treatment modalities in oncologic fields, but has rarely been used in HCC because of concerns regarding hepatic toxicity. However, with the development of advanced techniques, RT has been increasingly applied in HCC management. Randomized studies have yet to definitively prove the benefit of RT, but several comparative studies have justified the application of RT in HCC. The value of RT is especially noticeable in HCC with PVTT; several prospective and retrospective studies have reported favorable outcomes, including a 40% to 60% objective response rate and median overall survival of 15 mo to 20 mo in responders. In this review, we evaluate the role of RT as an alternative local modality in HCC with PVTT.

Outcomes of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt creation for flow-enabled dissolution of spleno-mesenterico-portal venous thrombosis

PURPOSE

To evaluate the outcomes of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) for flow-enabled clearance of portal (PVT), splenic (SVT) and/or superior mesenteric (MVT) vein thrombosis.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this single-center study, 12 patients underwent TIPS using Viatorr covered stent-grafts (W.L. Gore & Associates, Flagstaff, AZ, USA) from 2008-2014 for PVT as a primary (n=8) or secondary (n=4) indication. TIPS were not accompanied by pharmacomechanical clot disruption; rather, shunts served to increase portal blood flow to allow flow-mediated physiologic clot dissolution. Pre- and post-TIPS cross-sectional imaging were used to assess clot location, size, and clearance, defined by resolution (vessel patency with no clot), reduction (decrease in clot size), stability (no change in clot size), or extension (increase in clot size).

RESULTS

The cohort included 5 men and 7 women (median age 63 years, range 45-73 years, median MELD score 15) with 30 non-occlusive and asymptomatic thrombi spanning main or intrahepatic PVT (n=15/30, 50%), SVT (n=6/30, 20%), and MVT (n=9/30, 30%). TIPS were generally created with 10mm covered stent-grafts; mean final portosystemic pressure gradient was 8mmHg. At mean 190 days post-TIPS, 58% (n=7/12) had clot resolution, 33% (n=4/12) had clot reduction, and 8% (n=1/12) had stable clot; there were no cases of clot extension. Resolution rate was 67% for PVT (10/15), SVT (4/6), and MVT (6/9). Two of 12 (17%) patients underwent successful liver transplant post-TIPS.

CONCLUSION

TIPS prompts dissolution of or decrease in PVT, SVT, and MVT in cirrhotic patients. This may be a useful approach notwithstanding omission of pharmacomechanical methods.

Splenectomy Causes 10-Fold Increased Risk of Portal Venous System Thrombosis in Liver Cirrhosis Patients

BACKGROUND Portal venous system thrombosis (PVST) is a life-threatening complication of liver cirrhosis. We conducted a retrospective study to comprehensively analyze the prevalence and risk factors of PVST in liver cirrhosis. MATERIAL AND METHODS All cirrhotic patients without malignancy admitted between June 2012 and December 2013 were eligible if they underwent contrast-enhanced CT or MRI scans. Independent predictors of PVST in liver cirrhosis were calculated in multivariate analyses. Subgroup analyses were performed according to the severity of PVST (any PVST, main portal vein [MPV] thrombosis >50%, and clinically significant PVST) and splenectomy. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were reported. RESULTS Overall, 113 cirrhotic patients were enrolled. The prevalence of PVST was 16.8% (19/113). Splenectomy (any PVST: OR=11.494, 95%CI=2.152-61.395; MPV thrombosis >50%: OR=29.987, 95%CI=3.247-276.949; clinically significant PVST: OR=40.415, 95%CI=3.895-419.295) and higher hemoglobin (any PVST: OR=0.974, 95%CI=0.953-0.996; MPV thrombosis >50%: OR=0.936, 95%CI=0.895-0.980; clinically significant PVST: OR=0.935, 95%CI=0.891-0.982) were the independent predictors of PVST. The prevalence of PVST was 13.3% (14/105) after excluding splenectomy. Higher hemoglobin was the only independent predictor of MPV thrombosis >50% (OR=0.952, 95%CI=0.909-0.997). No independent predictors of any PVST or clinically significant PVST were identified in multivariate analyses. Additionally, PVST patients who underwent splenectomy had a significantly higher proportion of clinically significant PVST but lower MELD score than those who did not undergo splenectomy. In all analyses, the in-hospital mortality was not significantly different between cirrhotic patient with and without PVST. CONCLUSIONS Splenectomy may increase by at least 10-fold the risk of PVST in liver cirrhosis independent of severity of liver dysfunction.

Hyperhomocysteinemia and MTHFR C677T polymorphism in patients with portal vein thrombosis complicating liver cirrhosis

BACKGROUND

Portal vein thrombosis (PVT) is serious complication of liver cirrhosis (LC), especially in the presence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The liver plays a key role in homocysteine (Hcy) metabolism: mild hyperhomocysteinemia (HHcy) has been described in LC. HHcy is a risk factor for deep vein thrombosis. Methylen-tetrahydrofolate-reductase (MTHFR) C677T polymorphism is the commonest determinant of mild HHcy and has been involved also in cancer development.

AIM

To investigate a possible relation between HHcy, MTHFR status, HCC and PVT in patients affected by LC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

100 patients affected by LC, 38 with (PVT group, 24 with HCC) and 62 without PVT (LC group, 14 with HCC) sex-, age-, liver disease stage and etiology-matched were assessed for thrombophilia, smoking status, plasma Hcy, MTHFRC677T polymorphism and homocysteine-related vitamin status.

RESULTS

A higher prevalence of HCC, HHcy and MTHFR TT status was observed in PVT group. No significant difference in vitamin status was observed between groups. Patients with HCC showed significantly higher plasma Hcy and higher prevalence of HHcy than patients without HCC. They had also higher prevalence of MTHFR TT status. In patients with TT status (n=11) and HCC, 10 had HHcy e 9 had PVT.

CONCLUSIONS

Mild HHcy is associated to LC may have a role in PVT development and assessment of plasma Hcy may be suggested in patients with LC (especially if complicated by HCC). Association between HCC and MTHFR TT status is intriguing, due the postulated role for this polymorphism in cancer: it may represent a possible link between HCC and PVT.

Clinical impact of combined transarterial chemoembolization and radiotherapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombosis: An external validation study

PURPOSE

To evaluate the relationship between portal vein tumor thrombosis (PVTT) response and clinical outcomes in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treated with transarterial chemoembolization followed by radiotherapy (TACE-RT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study enrolled 329 patients in the training set and 179 patients in the validation set. All patients who were treated with TACE-RT from 2002 to 2008 and satisfied the inclusion criteria were enrolled in the study. The median follow-up period was 11.7 months (range, 1.6-108.6) in the training set and 11.9 months (range, 1.7-105.1) in the validation set.

RESULTS

After TACE-RT, PVTT response was complete or partial in 32 (9.7%) and 134 (40.7%) patients of the training set and in 18 (10.1%) and 96 (53.6%) patients in the validation set, respectively. Failure to obtain PVTT response was significantly related with elevated post-treatment Child-Pugh score (P<0.001). Furthermore, progression-free survival was significantly related with PVTT response (P<0.001, hazard ratio 0.33, 95% confidence interval 0.25-0.42) in multivariate analysis. In receiver-operating characteristics analysis of 1-year progression prediction, the PVTT response showed an area under the curve of 0.74. Most of the findings were successfully reproduced in the independent external validation set.

CONCLUSIONS

Positive PVTT response was closely associated with favorable clinical outcomes. The PVTT response to TACE-RT reduces metastasis and makes it possible to maintain normal liver function and achieve longer survival.

Efficacy and safety of anticoagulation in more advanced portal vein thrombosis in patients with liver cirrhosis

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Portal vein thrombosis (PVT) is a frequent event in patients with cirrhosis. The effects of anticoagulation on these patients were still unclear, especially for more advanced PVT. The aim of this study was to retrospectively assess the resolution of PVT and liver disease progression in a large cohort of cirrhotic patients with PVT with or without anticoagulation therapy.

METHODS

We analyzed data from 66 cirrhotic patients with PVT from January 2002 to June 2014. Thirty patients were anticoagulated with warfarin and 36 patients were untreated. PVT and hepatic decompensation were evaluated.

RESULTS

For anticoagulated patients, the thrombosis had improved in 15 (68.2%) patients, was stable in four patients (18.2%), and progressed in three patients (13.6%). For untreated patients, the thrombosis had improved in four patients (25%), was stable in six patients (37.5%), and progressed in six patients (37.5%). The anticoagulation group had significantly better recanalization rates than the untreated group (P=0.011). Degree of superior mesenteric vein (P=0.032, hazard ratio: 15.4; 95% confidence interval: 1.3-200) was a significant predictor. In addition, anticoagulation can effectively improve PVT with a degree less than 75% in the main portal vein compared with untreated patients (6/6 vs. 2/6, P=0.030). The probability of hepatic decompensation at 1 year was 15.6 and 17.9% between the anticoagulation and the untreated groups (P=0.847). Albumin (P=0.06, hazard ratio: 0.860; 95% confidence interval: 0.772-0.959) was a significant predictor.

CONCLUSION

Anticoagulation with warfarin might result in the resolution of more advanced PVT effectively and safely in patients with liver cirrhosis. In addition, we did not demonstrate the benefit of anticoagulation for the decompensation or death.

Novel insights into the development of portal vein thrombosis in cirrhosis patients

The prognostic impact of portal vein thrombosis (PVT) in liver cirrhosis remains controversial among studies, primarily because the risk stratification of PVT is often lacking. A definition of clinically significant PVT should be proposed and actively improved. Moreover, the risk factors for the development of PVT in liver cirrhosis should be fully recognized to screen and identify high-risk patients. Currently, well-recognized risk factors include a reduced portal vein flow velocity, a worse liver function, splenectomy, liver transplantation, and factor V Leiden and prothrombin G20210A mutations. Novel risk factors include an increased flow volume of portosystemic collateral vessel, thrombopoietin receptor agnonists, and non-selective beta-blockers. In contrast to the traditional perspectives, the abnormalities of procoagulant and anticoagulant factors may not contribute to the development of PVT in liver cirrhosis. Further studies should explore the role of other risk factors, such as antiphospholipid antibodies, methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase C677T gene mutation, hyperhomocysteinemia, and myeloproliferative neoplasms.

Risk factors for nontumoral portal vein thrombosis in patients with liver cirrhosis

AIM: To identify the risk factors for nontumoral portal vein thrombosis (PVT) in patients with liver cirrhosis, and analyze the risk factors influencing the origin of PVT.

METHODS: We performed a retrospective study of 171 cirrhotic patients who were diagnosed with the disease at our hospital between September 2013 and December 2014. CT and color Doppler ultrasound were used to diagnose PVT. Of the patients included, 34 had PVT (experiment group), and 137 had not (control group). We collected the clinical features and laboratory indexes of the two groups. Logistic regression model (Wald test) was used to screen independent risk factors. The diagnostic performance of each risk factor was determined by plotting the ROC curve and determining the optimal threshold.

RESULTS: D-dimer (DD) (OR = 12.021, P = 0.001), width of main portal vein (OR = 28.574, P = 0.001), and portal vein velocity flow (OR = 19.568, P = 0.002) differed statistically between the two groups. Unconditional Logistic regression analysis indicated that DD and width of main portal vein were independent risk factors for PVT in cirrhosis patients, and their area under the curve was 0.669 and 0.742, respectively.

CONCLUSION: Width of main portal vein and DD are independent risk factors for PVT in cirrhosis patients. Wider diameter of main portal vein and higher DD are associated with a higher incidence of PVT.