Therapeutic strategy for treating aortoesophageal fistulas

Clinical Characteristics and Early Surgical Outcomes of Aortoesophageal Fistula

BACKGROUND

The incidence and prognosis of aortoesophageal fistula (AEF) has not been clarified. The clinical characteristics and surgical outcomes of AEF were investigated.

METHODS

The clinical data of patients who underwent surgical treatment of AEF from January 2020 to December 2021 that were registered in the Japan Cardiovascular Surgery Database (JCVSD) were analyzed.

RESULTS

During the period, 123 patients (aged 71.0 years [interquartile range, 61.0-78.0 years]; 76.4% men) underwent surgical treatment of AEF. The prevalence of secondary AEF was 61%. Secondary AEF after aortic grafting was the most frequent (n = 40 [32.5%]), followed by AEF after thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR; n = 30 [24.4%]). Operative mortality occurred in 23 patients (18.7%). TEVAR for AEF (P = .019). Univariable logistic regression analyses showed postoperative bleeding (P = .047), stroke (P = .004), renal failure (P < .001), newly required hemodialysis (P = .023), pneumonia (P = .003), multisystem failure (P < .001), and dyslipidemia (P = .02) were associated with risk factors of operative mortality after surgical treatment of AEF.

CONCLUSIONS

This nationwide study on the surgical treatment of AEF demonstrated a higher incidence of secondary AEF than primary AEF. Open surgical repair and TEVAR for AEF were both associated with high operative mortality. TEVAR and dyslipidemia were risk factors for operative mortality. Precautions and further improved treatment strategies for AEF are still required.

Outcomes of Endovascular Treatment for Infectious Thoracic Aortic Diseases

PURPOSE

To investigate the effectiveness and safety of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for infectious aortic diseases.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients who underwent TEVAR for infectious aortic diseases including infected thoracic aortic aneurysm, aortobronchial fistula (ABF), and aortoenteric fistula from December 2011 to October 2022 at 4 institutions were retrospectively studied. The primary outcome of the study was overall survival, whereas the secondary outcome was comprehensive adverse events. Comprehensive adverse events were defined as a combination of deaths, aortic events, and infectious adverse events.

RESULTS

A total of 28 patients were included in the analysis, with 13 patients having infected thoracic aortic aneurysms, 12 ABFs, and 3 aortoenteric fistulae. Seven patients (25%) underwent additional procedures (abscess drainage, 6 cases; total esophagectomy, 1 case). The mean follow-up period was 30.0 months (SD ± 33.9). The 1-year and 5-year survival rates were 85.7% and 67.9%, respectively. The 1-year and 5-year aorta-related complication-free survival rates were 64.3% and 42.9%, respectively. On univariate analysis, the presence of an ABF was associated with a higher risk of comprehensive adverse events (odds ratio = 11; P = .038).

CONCLUSIONS

TEVAR might be a promising treatment for infectious thoracic aortic diseases. Among the infectious pathologies, ABF was considered ominous in terms of late outcomes.

Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair For The Management of Aorto-Esophageal Fistulae: A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVE

Aorto-esophageal fistula (AEF) is a rare condition consisting in a fistula between the aorta and the esophagus. The thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) has become an accepted treatment for initial AEF management, but large series are not available and outcomes are questionable. This study aims at evaluating the current evidence of TEVAR in AEF.

METHODS

A search on PubMed/MEDLINE and EMBASE was conducted up to June 2023. Data on article type, patients' demographics, cause and type of AEF, clinical presentation, time from clinical presentation to TEVAR, strategies, mortality, and follow-up were analyzed.

RESULTS

106 reports published between 1997 and 2023 were deemed eligible for this study (92 case reports; 14 case-series). A total of 163 patients (mean age: 58.9±16.5 years), diagnosed with AEF and treated with TEVAR (with or without staged surgical repair of the esophagus or the aorta) were included. A thoracic aortic aneurysm (34.4%) was the most common cause of AEF, followed by esophageal cancer (25.2%), foreign body in esophagus (13.5%) and post-TEVAR complication (9.8%). Primary AEF were 129 (79.1%), and secondary AEF were 34 (20.9%). TEVAR alone was performed 80 times (49.1%), while TEVAR with staged esophageal or aortic surgery 83 times (50.9%). The overall 30-day mortality was 11.7% (n=19): 18.8% in TEVAR alone and 4.8% in TEVAR with staged surgery, respectively (p=0.006). Mean follow-up time was 12.3±14.7 months. The overall 6-month mortality was 34.4% (n=56): 48.8% in TEVAR alone and 20.5% in TEVAR with staged surgery (p<0.001). Bleeding for recurrence of AEF and sepsis were the main causes of death.

CONCLUSIONS

In case of AEF, TEVAR can be urgently performed for bleeding management and hemodynamic control. TEVAR alone is a valuable yet not definitive procedure. Instead, TEVAR followed by surgical repair may provide better outcomes and should be recommended, when possible.

CLINICAL IMPACT

This review summarizes the published papers on endovascular aortic repair for the treatment of aorto-esophageal fistulae. The clinicians can find several important details on how to manage the presence of an esophageal fistulae wich represents a potential life-threatening problem for the patients. The implantation of a thoracic endovascular aortic prosthesis represents a fast and reliable procedure in case of emergency but a second step surgical repair provides better outcomes and should be recommended in suitable patients.

Aorto-esophageal Fistula Management

Aorto-esophageal fistula is a rare but life-threatening source of massive upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Prompt diagnosis and intervention are key for patient survival. Treatments consist of aortic resection, thoracic endovascular aortic repair, esophagectomy with diversion, and primary esophageal repair. The appropriate treatment is dependent on patient hemodynamics and fitness and familiarity with operative approaches by the treating team.

Achieving Hemostasis With a Foley Catheter for Hemorrhagic Shock Caused by an Aortoesophageal Fistula of an Infected Thoracic Aortic Aneurysm With Dissection: A Case Report

Aortoesophageal fistulas (AEFs) are a rare complication of thoracic aortic aneurysms. Moreover, the associated massive bleeding from the upper gastrointestinal tract results in a very high mortality rate. In this report, we describe a successful experience in using a Foley catheter to save a patient's life. A 46-year-old man was admitted for an infected thoracic aortic aneurysm with dissection. Seven days after admission, emergency thoracic aortic stent graft insertion was performed due to esophageal perforation of the thoracic aortic aneurysm. Three hours after starting surgery, a diagnosis of continuous fresh blood hematemesis and an acute exacerbation of an AEF associated with an infected thoracic aortic aneurysm was established. The patient's blood pressure was no longer maintained due to massive bleeding. We temporarily placed a Foley catheter in the middle esophagus. Hemostasis with a Foley catheter was temporary and stopped the bleeding out of the body. The patient required intensive care to control the bleeding into the left thoracic cavity, and veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation had to be instituted for the worsening oxygenation. Increased intra-esophageal pressure due to balloon tamponade was considered a possible postoperative complication. The patient faced several complications and challenges during the intraoperative management, but a prompt response to these complications and challenges saved the patient's life. The efficacy of a Foley catheter in rapidly and effectively responding to active bleeding in critical settings was reaffirmed as a crucial aspect of life-saving procedures.

Surgical treatment of graft infection combined with aortoesophageal fistula after TEVAR: a retrospective single-center, single-arm study

OBJECTIVE

Aortoesophageal fistula (AEF) secondary to thoracic aortic endovascular repair (TEVAR) is rare and fatal. The author reports the treatment methods and outcomes of 10 patients with a TEVAR graft infection and an aortoesophageal fistula.

METHOD

A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of 10 patients who developed a secondary AEF and a graft infection after TEVAR from March 2018 to March 2024.

RESULT

The perioperative mortality rate was 70%. Two patients had TEVAR only and all died of bleeding and infection. Eight patients underwent open surgery, five died within 30 days, four of them died due to massive bleeding, the one patient died of a serious infection after surgery. Three patients recovered well and were discharged. One patient died of severe pneumonia 3 months after discharge, and two patients survived for 6 years and 3 months, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Extra-anatomical bypass reconstruction is feasible for treating graft infection combined with aortoesophageal fistula after TEVAR but related to bad outcomes in most of the patients. It is reserved for highly select patients and is performed at centers with experience with this procedure.

Upper gastrointestinal bleeding from primary aortoesophageal fistula in a patient with aneurism of the thoracoabdominal aorta: Case report and literature review

Key Clinical Message

Upper gastrointestinal bleeding due to primary aortoesophageal fistula is a rare clinical condition burdened with high mortality rate. However, the outcomes are closely related to the level of clinical awareness, the complementary and multidisciplinary approach during the diagnostic workup, and the selected treatment option.

Abstract

We present an atypical case of an aneurysm of the thoracoabdominal aorta complicated with primary aortoesophageal fistula (AEF). A 55-year-old male with no previous diseases, presented with prolonged and intense back pain and upper gastrointestinal bleeding. The gastroscopy detected an unusual culprit lesion in the distal esophagus resembling an esophageal wall defect, and the computed tomography revealed an aneurysm of the thoracoabdominal aorta, remarkable surrounding hematoma, and active contrast extravasation. Despite the urgent surgical repair, a lethal outcome occurred. AEF patients require high clinical awareness and complementary multidisciplinary approach in order to provide a rapid diagnosis and optimal treatment.

Aortoesophageal fistula due to esophageal cancer: a case report of successful management

BACKGROUND

Aortoesophageal fistula (AEF) is a rare but potentially life-threatening condition. The best treatment for the AEF due to esophageal carcinoma is still unresolved. Here, we report a rare case of AEF caused by esophageal cancer, that was successfully treated with emergency thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR), followed by esophagectomy and gastric tube reconstruction.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 64-year-old man presented with loss of consciousness and hypotension during chemoradiotherapy for advanced esophageal cancer. Enhanced computed tomography showed extravasation from the descending aorta into the esophagus at the tumor site. We performed emergency TEVAR for the AEF, which stabilized the hemodynamics. We then performed thoracoscopic subtotal esophagectomy on day 4 after TEVAR to prevent graft infection, followed by gastric tube reconstruction on day 30 after TEVAR. At 9 months after the onset of AEF, the patient continues to receive outpatient chemotherapy and leads a normal daily life.

CONCLUSION

TEVAR is a useful hemostatic procedure for AEF. If the patient is in good condition and can continue treatment for esophageal cancer, esophagectomy and reconstruction after TEVAR should be performed to prevent graft infection and maintain quality of life.

Novel Prediction Score for Arterial-Esophageal Fistula in Patients with Esophageal Cancer Bleeding: A Multicenter Study

PURPOSE

To develop and internally validate a novel prediction score to predict the occurrence of arterial-esophageal fistula (AEF) in esophageal cancer bleeding.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study enrolled patients with esophageal cancer bleeding in the emergency department. The primary outcome was the diagnosis of AEF. The patients were randomly divided into a derivation group and a validation group. In the derivation stage, a predictive model was developed using logistic regression analysis. Subsequently, internal validation of the model was conducted in the validation cohort during the validation stage to assess its discrimination ability.

RESULTS

A total of 257 patients were enrolled in this study. All participants were randomized to a derivation cohort (n = 155) and a validation cohort (n = 102). AEF occurred in 22 patients (14.2%) in the derivation group and 14 patients (13.7%) in the validation group. A predictive model (HEARTS-Score) comprising five variables (hematemesis, active bleeding, serum creatinine level >1.2 mg/dL, prothrombin time >13 s, and previous stent implantation) was established. The HEARTS-Score demonstrated a high discriminative ability in both the derivation and validation cohorts, with c-statistics of 0.90 (95% CI 0.82-0.98) and 0.82 (95% CI 0.72-0.92), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

By employing this novel prediction score, clinicians can make more objective risk assessments, optimizing diagnostic strategies and tailoring treatment approaches.

A successful endovascular aortic repair of aortoesophageal fistula following esophagectomy: a case report and literature review

BACKGROUND

Aortoesophageal fistula (AEF) is an extremely rare and highly fatal complication leading to a high risk of morbidity and mortality. Successful management of AEF after esophagectomy for esophageal carcinoma has rarely been reported in the literature.

CASE PRESENTATION

Here we present a rare case of a 44-year-old female with complications of AEF after esophagectomy for esophageal carcinoma, mainly presented as vomiting of blood. Both computed tomographic and computed tomography angiography of the chest showed bilateral pleural effusion and atelectasis, while gastroscopy showed large gastrointestinal bleeding. Emergency surgery was performed that included the removal of the mediastinal abscess, left lower pulmonary wedge resection, and thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR), followed by supportive treatment. The surgery went successful, and the patient was followed up for 1 year after discharge and showed good recovery. We also reviewed previous literature on the history, causes, pathophysiology, clinical presentation, diagnosis, and treatment of AEF after esophagectomy for esophageal adenocarcinoma.

CONCLUSIONS

In our case, thoracotomy combined with TEVAR was effective in treating AEF after esophagectomy for esophageal adenocarcinoma. This case provides successful experiences for clinical diagnosis and treatment of AEF after esophagectomy for esophageal carcinoma.

Successful management following combined thoracic endovascular aortic repair and minimally invasive esophagectomy for primary aortoesophageal fistula: A case report

Aortoesophageal fistula (AEF) is a rare but life-threatening pathology. We report a case of a primary AEF that was successfully managed with temporary thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) and esophagectomy with video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery. A 73-year-old man was transferred to the emergency department with a complaint of hematemesis. A computed tomography scan identified an AEF due to aortic aneurysm. We placed a stent using TEVAR for the purpose of hemodynamic stasis, and the operation was performed 23 h after admission. Right video-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy (VATS-E) was chosen, and a cervical esophagostomy and a feeding gastrostomy tube was constructed. Infection had been effectively controlled postoperatively. Four months after the first operation, we performed esophageal reconstruction. At the 70-month follow-up examination, the patient had no signs of mediastinitis. VATS-E immediately after hemostabilization by TEVAR is useful management for primary AEF.

Beating Total Arch Replacement for Aortoesophageal Fistula Involving the Aortic Arch

Aortoesophageal fistula is a challenging condition, especially when the aortic arch is involved. Optimal treatment, including surgical approach and adjunctive procedures for organ protection, remains debatable. We describe our strategy for treating aortoesophageal fistula involving the aortic arch using total arch replacement with the heart beating ("beating total arch replacement") under partial cardiopulmonary bypass.

Refractory esophageal-mediastinal fistula successfully treated with endoluminal vacuum therapy and enteral nutrition using a double-lumen elemental diet tube: a case report

BACKGROUND

Aortic-esophageal fistula (AEF) after thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) has a high fatality rate and is difficult to treat. Endoluminal vacuum therapy (EVT) has recently appeared and proven to be a useful method for anastomotic leakage.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 76-year-old man underwent aortic arch replacement for a stent graft infection after TEVAR. Persistent mediastinitis and pyothorax were observed after aortic arch replacement, and further examination revealed an esophageal-mediastinal fistula (EMF). Over-the-scope clip (OTSC®) closure was performed to treat EMF but achieved no cure. Then, the patient was referred to our hospital. First, we removed the OTSC® that interfered with the treatment using the remOVE System® and started EVT using a double-lumen elemental diet tube (W-EDT®). The vacuum sponge was affixed to the vacuum side of W-EDT®, and enteral nutrition administered through W-EDT was combined with EVT. EMF was cured 11 days after EVT, and the patient was able to feed himself.

CONCLUSION

The combination of EVT and enteral nutrition feeding using W-EDT® is a successful novel procedure to treat refractory EMF.

Esophageal reconstruction as the first step for treating secondary aortoesophageal fistula due to thoracic endovascular aortic stent infection

BACKGROUND

The surgical strategy for aortoesophageal fistula (AEF) depends on the experience of each surgeon, and there is no consensus on the strategy to be adopted. We propose our two-stage operation compromising esophagectomy and reconstruction as the first step and in situ aortic graft replacement as the second step after 7 days for treating AEF secondary to thoracic aortic stent graft infection.

CASE PRESENTATION

A diagnosis of AEF was made in a 70-year-old man with a history of multiple aortic interventions. The patient underwent esophageal resection and reconstruction with a pedicled stomach roll endoscopically in the right thoracic cavity. Postoperatively, enteral feeding was resumed via a feeding tube placed in the jejunum to maintain adequate nutritional status. There was no evidence of either anastomotic leakage or necrosis. Seven days later, the patient underwent removal of the infected stent graft and in situ graft replacement via a redo left thoracotomy. After the surgery, the patient was able to start oral intake relatively early. Although more than 6 months has passed since the patient was discharged, no recurrence of infection has been observed.

CONCLUSIONS

The benefit of our strategy is the radical treatment for secondary AEF and the early resumption of oral intake.

Aortoesophageal fistula complicated by mycotic aneurysm secondary to endoscopic procedures: A case report

Aortoesophageal fistula (AEF) is a rare cause of upper gastrointestinal bleeding that often receives little attention in the emergency department. The classic presentation includes the Chiari triad of central chest pain, sentinel arterial bleeding, and subsequent evacuation after an asymptomatic period. For patients suspected of having AEF, a CT scan with IV contrast is the preferred diagnostic modality. In our patient, the presence of an aortic wall outpouching, ectopic gas, periaortic fat stranding, and leukocytosis, even in the absence of fever and positive blood culture, suggested mycotic aneurysm with AEF. The unique aspect of this case report is the occurrence of AEF as a rare complication of endoscopic procedures, which should be considered. Treatment options for AEF include surgery and thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR). TEVAR is a good option for stabilizing the patient's condition and reducing mortality in the short term. Once the patient's condition is suitable for AEF repair surgery, surgical intervention can be performed.

Aortoesophageal Fistula Occurring Due to Aortic Aneurysm

Upper gastrointestinal bleeding is a rare presentation of the aortoesophageal fistula (AEF) and is usually caused by thoracic aortic aneurysms. We present the case of a 61-year-old male who presented with chest pain and hematemesis. A chest X-ray showed a widened mediastinum. The patient underwent computed tomography angiography (CTA), which showed the presence of a large aneurysm in the aorta, which caused compression of the trachea, esophagus, and left pulmonary artery. Additionally, there was evidence of an AEF. It was decided to perform an emergency surgical intervention on the patient. However, the patient had multiple episodes of hematemesis and expired.

Chicken Bone Ingestion Leads to Aortoesophageal Fistula With Catastrophic Bleeding

Aortoesophageal fistula (AEF) is an uncommon, but potentially fatal cause of upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Aortoesophageal fistulas caused by foreign body ingestion are rare but devastating. The classic clinical triad of AEF consists of mid-thoracic pain or dysphagia, a herald episode of hematemesis, followed by fatal exsanguination after a symptom-free period (Chiari's triad). Computed tomography angiography (CTA) is the preferred diagnostic tool for identifying AEF and is substantially more sensitive than upper endoscopy for detecting AEF. Endoscopy can detect AEF as it might show pulsatile blood, pulsatile mass, hematoma, or adherent blood clot in the esophagus, or a deep esophageal tear. However, endoscopy has a low sensitivity and may delay definitive treatment. Several management options for AEF have been suggested; however, the definitive treatment is surgery performed on the thoracic aorta and esophagus, including esophagectomy, surgical replacement of the thoracic aorta, thoracic endovascular aortic repair, or omental flap. We report a case of a 63-year-old man who presented with hematemesis 2 weeks after chicken bone ingestion.

Aorticoesophagal Fistula Combined with Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding after Endovascular Dissection of Thoracic Aortic Aneurysm

Aortoesophageal fistula (AEF) is a relatively rare and potentially fatal disease. Secondary AEF is rare but is associated with serious complications and high mortality. There are rare cases of esophageal mediastinal fistula after descending aortic aneurysm stent implantation. We report the case of a 76-year-old man who had upper abdominal distension, without obvious inducement, for 3 months and felt fullness after a meal, accompanied by anorexia. A chest computer tomography (CT) examination of the abdomen was performed with the outside hospital. Descending thoracic aortic aneurysm was discovered and was treated with stent implantation. The patient was transferred to our hospital to continue treatment, mainly because of an esophageal mediastinal fistula. Finally, the thoracic aortic aneurysm was diagnosed as AEF after stent implantation, combined with the diagnosis of upper gastrointestinal bleeding. We hope that, through this case, we can explain the possible causes of bronchial mediastinal fistula after stent implantation of descending aortic aneurysm and the mechanism of upper gastrointestinal bleeding.

Management of life-threatening aortoesophageal fistula: experiences learned from eight patients

BACKGROUND

Aortoesophageal fistula (AEF) is a rare but fatal condition causing massive upper gastrointestinal bleeding.

PURPOSE

To report our experiences in the management of life-threatening AEF.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of eight patients (seven men, one woman; mean age = 59.4 years; age range = 43‒76 years) presenting with AEF between 2005 and 2018 were recruited from three different Korean hospitals. The medical records of these patients were reviewed for patient demographics, clinical features, diagnostic and therapeutic modalities, and outcomes.

RESULTS

Two patients died as a result of massive hemorrhage before endovascular or surgical treatment could be undertaken. Of the six patients who were treated, five underwent endovascular interventions: embolization of the fistula using n-butyl cyanoacrylate (NBCA) and subsequent thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) in two patients; TEVAR alone in two patients; and NBCA embolization alone in one patient. Among them, three patients who received TEVAR with or without NBCA embolization in a timely fashion recovered and were discharged. One patient who received delayed TEVAR died of disseminated intravascular coagulation, and one who received NBCA embolization alone died of hemorrhagic shock, both dying within three days of treatment. The remaining patient who underwent surgical aortic repair is alive after 13 years.

CONCLUSION

Rapid identification and surgical treatment are necessary to increase the likelihood of survival, if emergency surgery is feasible. TEVAR in a timely fashion facilitates hemodynamic stabilization by rapidly controlling hemorrhage and saves the patient's life.

Aorto-esophageal fistula caused by fishbone ingestion: a case report on staged endovascular and endoscopic treatment

BACKGROUND

Aorto-esophageal fistula (AEF) caused by foreign bodies ingestion is a rare but devastating disorder. Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) has become a widely accepted intervention for treating aorto-esophageal fistulas. As for post-TEVAR esophageal defect, secondary esophagectomy has been the recommended choice for most of the AEFs, but there is no general consensus with regard to the need of secondary surgeries for patients in the absence of clear signs of reinfection or bleeding. We herein presented a case of an AEF caused by fishbone ingestion, after successful TEVAR, the esophageal lesion was closed endoscopically.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 38-year-old male presented with esophageal fistula for 4 months. He was diagnosed with AEF because of Chiari's triad after fishbone ingestion 4 months ago. Emergency thoracic aortic stent implantation was done, and given broad spectrum antibiotics and blood transfusion. His symptoms were improved, and discharged with an esophageal fistula left to heal itself. Nevertheless, after 4 months, re-examination of esophago-gastro-duodenoscopy revealed that the diameter of the fistula was changed from 3 to 6 mm. He was then admitted to our hospital for esophageal fistula repair. Laboratory examinations and chest computed tomography showed no signs of active infection, and endoscopic closure of the fistula was achieved with 4 clips. After that, he was discharged and gradually returned to normal diet.

CONCLUSION

For AEFs in the absence of active infection with repaired aorta but persistent esophageal fistula, endoscopic closure by endoclips might be an effective treatment choice.

Surgical Treatment for Primary Mycotic Aneurysms Using Endovascular Therapy, Focusing on Patient Selection: Single-Center Experience

Background: Mycotic aneurysms (MAs) are relatively rare but life-threatening. Some recent reports have described the use of endovascular therapy for their treatment; however, this still is a controversial treatment, and a definite target population has not been determined. Methods: We performed surgery on 34 patients with MAs from March 2005 to March 2019. Twenty patients who underwent open surgery (OS) first comprised the OS group, and 14 patients who underwent endovascular therapy first comprised the stent-graft (SG) group. We analyzed between-group differences, long-term outcomes, and risk factors for death retrospectively. Patients in the OS group had a higher initial white blood cell count than those in the SG group (p = 0.047). The SG group had more patients with a low albumin concentration (≤2.0 mg/dL) than did the OS group (p = 0.026). Results: There were no significant differences in the operative mortality rates between the groups (p = 0.773). Additional procedures were required more often in the SG than the OS group (p = 0.0013). The overall survival rate as estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method was 88% at 1 month, 67% at 1 year, 57% at 3 years, and 45% at 10 years. In the univariable analysis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) was a risk factor for death (p = 0.003). Conclusions: Endovascular therapy for MAs produced reasonable outcomes when patient selection was based on the activity level, nutritional condition, and degree of inflammation. Endovascular therapy may become an option for patients with a low albumin concentration or COPD despite the fact that additional procedures may be needed.

Lethal aorto-oesophageal fistula 16 years after aortic prosthetic reconstruction: Delayed rupture as cause of death

The development of aorto-oesophageal fistula (AOF) is a rare complication following thoracic aortic repair. Mortality is high, in most cases due to fatal haematemesis. The clinical onset is variable, occurring approximately one year after surgery. We report a case of a lethal AOF in a 58-year-old man. He underwent open vascular surgery 16 years prior to his death due to a rupture of the descending thoracic aorta. In the early 2000s, the open vascular approach was replaced by thoracic endovascular aortic repair. As a result of this approach, the number of surgical complications has reduced, with the exception of AOF.

Thoracoscopy-thoracotomy approach for an aortoesophageal fistula: a case report

An aortoesophageal fistula is often fatal, and standard radical surgery is highly invasive because both bilateral thoracotomy and laparotomy are required. We successfully incorporated thoracoscopic esophagectomy into this procedure for a 43-year-old man with an aortoesophageal fistula. After detaching the esophagus from the adjacent tissue, and leaving just the fistula in the right thoracoscopic procedure, we performed an open aortic graft replacement. Subsequently, we created an omental pedicle graft and wrapped it over the graft. Through this thoracoscopy-thoracostomy approach, minimal destruction of the right thoracic wall was achieved and the successful dissection of the diseased esophagus could be carried out while reducing the amount of bleeding during anticoagulation for cardiopulmonary bypass, and the field of view for the aortic replacement was not disturbed during left thoracotomy. Four months later, we reconstructed the esophagus by a pedunculated small intestinal graft through the ante-thoracic route. A thoracoscopy-thoracotomy approach is therefore considered to be effective and useful for treating a patient with an aortoesophageal fistula.

Risk Factors for Mortality in Patients with Aortoesophageal Fistula Related to Aortic Lesions

Objective

Aortoesophageal fistula (AEF) related to aortic aneurysm and dissection is an uncommon but life-threatening condition. We performed a systematic review of risk factors for mortality and factors associated with the prognosis of AEF.

Methods

A systematic search of the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases was performed. Clinical characteristics, diagnostic methods, and treatments were assessed in terms of their ability to predict mortality.

Results

The systematic review identified 184 eligible articles including 219 patients with AEF. Multivariable Cox regression revealed positive correlations of hemorrhagic shock (hazard ratio (HR): 1.824, 95% CI: 1.217-2.735, P = 0.004), sepsis (HR: 1.714, 95% CI: 1.112-2.641, P = 0.015), multiorgan failure (HR: 3.060, 95% CI: 1.470-6.368, P = 0.003), and conservative treatment (HR: 5.257, 95% CI: 3.405-8.116, P < 0.001) with mortality and a negative correlation between combination therapy (aortic graft replacement and esophagectomy) and mortality (HR: 0.319, 95% CI: 0.125-0.813, P = 0.017). Kaplan–Meier survival analysis showed that the 1-year cumulative survival rate was 42.5 ± 3.8%. The overall fistula-related mortality rate was 47.0% (103/219). The most common causes of death were bleeding (54.9%) and infection (29.2%).

Conclusions

We found that hemorrhagic shock, sepsis, and multiorgan failure were risk factors for death in patients with AEF. Additionally, conservative treatment was associated with a higher rate of mortality, while combined aortic graft replacement and esophagectomy improved the prognosis.

Surgical treatment for secondary aortoesophageal fistula

Background

Aortoesophageal fistula (AEF) is a relatively rare condition that is often life-threatening. Secondary AEF is a complication of previous surgery, which can be more critical and challenging than primary AEF. The number of secondary AEF is increasing due to increase in the number of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR). Although TEVAR has become a successful alternative surgical strategy for thoracic aortic aneurysms, secondary AEF after TEVAR might be critical than other secondary AEF because of severe adhesion between the esophagus and residual thoracic aortic wall.

Methods

This study analyzed six patients with secondary AEF who were treated at Tokyo Medical University Hospital between 2011 and 2016. These participants included four patients who had undergone TEVAR and two who had undergone total arch replacement.

Results

Although they were subsequently hospitalized for a long period, open surgical repair was completed in two patients who had undergone total arch replacement. TEVAR alone was performed in two patients who had undergone TEVAR and they were discharged without major complications shortly. Combined repair of TEVAR as a bridge to open surgery was planned for two patients who had undergone TEVAR. However, reconstruction of the aorta and esophagus could not be completed in these patients due to severe adhesions, and they died during hospitalization.

Conclusions

Definitive open repair was successfully performed in patients with secondary AEF after total arch replacement. However, in the patients with secondary AEF after TEVAR, severe adhesion between the aorta and esophagus led to difficulty in performing a successful definitive open repair. The strategy for secondary AEF should, therefore, be decided considering the etiology of secondary AEF. In secondary AEF after TEVAR, definitive open repair is difficult to complete because of catastrophic complication, and palliative treatment using TEVAR without reconstruction of aorta and esophagus can be an alternative.

Aortoesophageal fistula treated with staged aortic stent graft and subsequent homograft interposition

Aortoesophageal fistula (AEF) is a rare complication of esophageal interventions. We present a 49-year-old woman who underwent Roux-en-Y gastric bypass with a recurrent gastrojejunal anastomotic leak requiring covered esophageal stent placement. She presented 1 month later with abdominal pain, leukocytosis, and hematemesis. A computed tomography scan demonstrated migration of the esophageal stent with aortic erosion concerning for AEF. She underwent emergent endovascular exclusion of an AEF to the descending thoracic aorta with subsequent esophageal resection and diversion and aortic endograft explant, resection, and homograft repair on postoperative day 6 allowing for staged removal of prosthetic material and maintenance of inline flow.

[Surgical treatment of a patient with traumatic rupture of the aortic arch and late oesophageal perforation]

Described herein is a clinical case report regarding a patient presenting with traumatic rupture of the aortic isthmus with the development of a pseudoaneurysm occupying virtually the entire posterior mediastinum and measuring 20?10 cm in size. He was immediately treated as an emergency to undergo prosthetic reconstruction of the portion of the aortic arch and descending thoracic aorta by means of temporary bypass grafting with a synthetic graft in order to protect the visceral organs. The postoperative period was complicated by oesophageal perforation with the formation of an oesophago-paraprosthetic fistula, infection of the vascular graft, accompanied by the development of pleural empyema and mediastinitis. A second operative procedure was performed, consisting of subclavian-iliac bypass grafting on the right with a polytetrafluoroethylene graft measuring 20 mm in diameter, exclusion of the intrathoracic portion of the oesophagus, creation of a gastro- and oesophagostoma, retrieval of the vascular graft followed by suturing of the aorta, pleurectomy, decortication of the lung, and removal of the empyemic sac on the left. There was no evidence of ischaemia of the spinal cord or visceral arteries. One month postoperatively, he underwent a traumatological stage and 4 months thereafter plasty of the oesophagus with an isoperistaltic gastric pedicle, extirpation of the thoracic portion of the oesophagus, to be later on followed by closure of the oesophagostoma. The patient experienced no difficulties either while walking or during other physical activities, with the ankle-brachial index amounting to 0.9. With time, he developed difficult-to-correct pulmonary hypertension. Unfortunately, the patient eventually died of acute cardiopulmonary insufficiency 9 years after right-sided extra-anatomical subclavian-iliac bypass grafting.

A two-stage reconstruction for aortoesophageal fistula after replacement of thoracic aorta for Stanford Type B dissecting aortic aneurysm: esophagectomy and a double-tract reconstruction using the pedicled jejunum: a case report and literature review

An aortoesophageal fistula (AEF) is a rare, potentially fatal condition, and esophagectomy is usually performed simultaneously with aortic surgery. However, esophageal reconstruction method has not been established. This case report describes a two-stage operation for AEF after replacement of thoracic aorta for Stanford Type B dissecting aortic aneurysm. A 61-year-old man who had underwent total arch replacement with frozen elephant trunk for Stanford Type B dissecting aortic aneurysm 3 years ago admitted to the hospital with high fever. Based on the computed tomography and endoscopic findings, he was diagnosed with having aortoesophageal fistula (AEF). After administration of antibiotics with fasting foods and drinks for a month, he underwent the second aortic replacement, thoracic esophagectomy, cervical esophagostomy, gastrostomy and omental wrapping. After 3 months, he underwent double-tract reconstruction using the pedicled jejunal transfer with supercharge and superdrainage via the subcutaneous route. After reconstruction surgery, the patient was doing well. Two-stage reconstruction was a safe procedure for AEF case who underwent aortic replacement, esophagectomy and omental wrapping. The pedicled jejunum reconstruction via subcutaneous route is an optional procedure for second reconstruction surgery.

Repair of aortoesophageal fistula with homograft aortic replacement and primary esophageal closure

OBJECTIVES

The presence of a fistula between the thoracic aorta and the esophagus is a rare and highly fatal condition. This study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of the surgical treatment of an aortoesophageal fistula (AEF).

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed patients with AEF who underwent surgery at our institution.

RESULTS

Between 2007 and 2018, a total of 10 patients who underwent surgery for AEF. The mean age was 63 ± 12 years, and 6 patients were men. Four patients had primary AEFs and 6 patients had secondary AEFs (3 graft replacements and 3 thoracic endovascular aortic repairs). The timing of AEF since graft replacement or thoracic endovascular aortic repairs was 21.6 ± 27 days. We performed aortic replacement with a prosthetic graft (4 patients) or a homograft (5 patients) and extra-anatomical bypass due to a previous aortic graft infection (1 patient). As a treatment of the esophagus, we conducted primary repair in 7 of 10 patients. The median lengths of hospital and intensive care unit stay were 59 days (range, 9-225 days) and 6.3 days (range, 1-87 days), respectively. Seven patients achieved oral feeding after a median 10.3 postoperative days (range, 7-78 postoperative days). Two of the 10 patients died of sepsis at 9 and 74 days postoperatively.

CONCLUSIONS

The strategy for patients with AEF should be individualized. Our surgical strategy for AEF, which includes simultaneous aortic graft replacement and primary repair of esophagus in the same operative field, is feasible and promising.

Latissimus Dorsi Muscle Flap with a Distally Based Serratus Anterior Extension for Salvaging Aortic Graft Infection

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.

Aortoesophageal fistula: review of trends in the last decade

We reviewed articles on aortoesophageal fistula (AEF) published between January, 2009 and December, 2018. Postoperative aortic disease was the most common cause of AEF, followed by primary aortic aneurysm, bone ingestion, and thoracic cancer. Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) was the most common initial therapy for primary aortic disease, rather than graft replacement. Secondary AEF developed between 1 and 268 months, and between 1 and 11 months after the initial therapy for aortic disease and thoracic cancer, respectively. TEVAR trended to be preferred over surgery for aortic lesions because of its minimal invasiveness and certified hemostasis. In contrast, esophagectomy was preferred for esophageal lesions to remove the infectious source. A combination of surgery for the aorta (TEVAR, graft replacement or repair) and esophagus (esophagectomy, esophageal stent or repair) was usually adopted. Each graft replacement or esophagectomy was associated with a favorable prognosis for aortic or esophageal surgery, and the combination of graft replacement and esophagectomy generally improved the prognosis remarkably. Antibiotic therapy was given to 65 patients, with 20 receiving multiple antibiotics aimed at strong effects and the type of antibiotic described as broad-spectrum in 29 patients. Meropenem, vancomycin, and fluconazole were the most popular antibiotics used to prevent graft or stent infection. In conclusion, graft replacement and esophagectomy can achieve a favorable prognosis for patients with AEF, but strong, broad-spectrum antibiotic therapy might be required to prevent sepsis after surgery.

Massive hemorrhage from an aortoesophageal fistula caused by esophageal stent implantation: A case report and literature review

RATIONALE

Aortoesophageal fistula (AEF) is the direct communication between the aorta and esophagus, which can cause fatal hemorrhage, and its incidence increased with the use of an esophageal stent (ES).

PATIENT CONCERNS

A 79-year-old man was admitted due to hemodynamic shock with massive hematemesis caused by AEF 1 month after the implantation of an ES.

DIAGNOSES

Computed tomography angiography visualized an AEF with an ulcer-like projection on the aortic arch where the ES was placed. Angiography of the aorta revealed extravasation of contrast media from the aortic arch into the stented esophagus, which confirmed the diagnosis.

INTERVENTIONS

Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) was performed for massive hematemesis caused by ES-related, AEF but did not solve the underlying problem, leading to the second fatal hemorrhage.

LESSONS

TEVAR for the unique treatment of ES-related AEF is feasible in certain cases but may lead to collapse after a specific period.

Surgical Management for Aortoesophageal Fistula After Endovascular Aortic Repair

This case demonstrates successful surgical management of a 6-cm-long aortoesophageal fistula from an infected stent graft. A 69-year-old woman with a penetrating descending thoracic aortic ulcer underwent endovascular aortic repair. Two weeks later, she presented with nausea and melena, and she was found to have an infected stent graft on imaging. She underwent a two-stage procedure encompassing aortic arch debranching and extra-anatomic aortic bypass in stage 1, and stent graft resection, primary esophageal repair, intercostal and omental flap, and jejunostomy tube placement in stage 2. She was discharged 1 month later and is doing well 1.5 years after the operation.

First Result of a Tailored Progressive Multistep Approach for the Treatment of Aorto-esophageal Fistulae

BACKGROUND

Aorto-esophageal fistulae (AEFs) are a rare but serious and life-threatening disease of the mediastinum. Especially, AEF in the presence of infected stent grafts, for example, after thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) is only curable by a multistage interdisciplinary surgical approach. This study presents the results of our four-stage approach consisting of bridging TEVAR, esophagectomy, complete stent removal followed by total bovine tube aortic replacement (TBTAR), and finally esophageal reconstruction.

METHODS

A case series of four patients from our department receiving a four-stage treatment of AEF is presented in this study. Retrospective database analysis focusing on overall survival, duration of intensive care unit and total hospital stay until discharge, complications, surgical time frame, and completion of chosen surgical treatment course was performed.

RESULTS

Overall, four patients surgically treated for AEF since May 2015 were included. A 30-day mortality was 0%, and overall survival at 1 year was 75%. All patients survived more than 5 months and could be discharged after TEVAR and esophagectomy. TBTAR could be performed in two of four patients (50%). Esophageal reconstruction was completed in all patients. Average follow-up was 20.3 ± 1.7 months or until death.

CONCLUSION

The acute management of AEF using this approach seems satisfactory, especially for reducing acute short-term mortality. Complete restoration of the circulatory system and digestive tract remains challenging and is associated with high morbidity. We support the application of bridging TEVAR with a staggered approach to further surgical treatment individually tailored to the patient.

Complex two-stage open surgical repair of an aortoesophageal fistula after thoracic endovascular aortic repair

Aortoesophageal fistula after thoracic endovascular aortic repair is a rare but fatal complication, and no clear guidelines exist in the literature for optimal management. Herein, we report a complex case of a patient with an infected thoracic endograft that led to an aortoesophageal fistula. The treatment comprised a two-stage open surgical approach-an extra-anatomic aortic bypass in the first stage, followed by explantation of the infected endograft with ligation of the descending thoracic aorta in the second. This approach controls the focus of infection while allowing flow to the aorta distal to the infected endograft, minimizing visceral ischemia time.

Total surgical repair for secondary aortoesophageal fistula: two case reports

We present two consecutive patients with secondary aortoesophageal fistula (AEF) who successfully underwent total repair including partial esophagectomy, removal of infected vascular prosthesis, graft replacement, and esophageal reconstruction using gastric tube concomitant to omental wrapping for staged operation in short phase. One 81-year-old male who had undergone thoracic endovascular aortic repair and another 69-year-old male who had undergone graft replacement of the descending thoracic aorta were referred to our hospital for treatment of AEF. In the first operation, partial esophagectomy, removal of infected vascular prosthesis, and graft replacement were performed via left rib-cross thoracotomy. About half a day after the operation when the patients became hemodynamically stable, esophageal reconstruction was started. The gastric tube was prepared via median laparotomy and introduced to the left thoracic cavity with the omentum through the enlarged hiatus. Thereafter, the gastric tube was anastomosed to the oral side of the esophageal stump via left thoracotomy with the same wound similar to the first operation. Finally, the graft positioned parallel to the gastric tube was completely wrapped by the omentum. Both patients could ingest orally 4 weeks after surgery and maintained no recurrence of infection.

An aorto--oesophageal fistula following endograft: sealing of fistulae with omentum and replacement of the aorta

Aorto-oesophageal fistulae represent <10% of all aortoenteric fistulae and occur in 1.9% of patients who undergo thoracic endovascular aortic repair for treatment of thoracic aortic aneurysms. Untreated patients have a mortality close to 100%. A 74-year-old man had aorto-oesophageal fistulae secondary to thoracic endovascular aortic repair. He had a functioning left internal thoracic artery graft to the left anterior descending artery and a calcific distal aortic arch. He underwent replacement of the thoracic aorta and sealing of the fistulous tract with omentum, and the latter was used to wrap the neoaorta.

Massive hemorrhage following definitive esophageal chemoradiation: teaching case of a fatal aortoesophageal fistula and lessons learned

Esophageal self‐expandable metal stents and radiotherapy are valuable in combination for palliation and definitive treatment of esophageal cancer. However, risk of aortoesophageal fistula is significant in patients with evidence of malignant aortic invasion. Use of thoracic endovascular repair may represent an approach to early intervention in high‐risk patients.

Complications and Perioperative Management of Patients Undergoing Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair

Endovascular treatments have become increasingly common for patients with a variety of thoracic aortic pathologies. Although considered less invasive than traditional open surgical approaches, they are nonetheless complex procedures. Patients undergo manipulation of an often calcified aorta near the origin of the carotid and subclavian vessels and have stents placed in a curved vessel adjacent to a perpetually beating heart. These stents can obstruct blood flow to the spinal cord, induce an inflammatory response, and in rare cases erode into the adjacent trachea or esophagus. Renal complications range from contrast-induced nephropathy to hypotension and ischemia to dissection. Emboli can lead to strokes and mesenteric ischemia. These patients have complex medical histories, and skilled perioperative management is critical to achieving the best clinical outcomes. Here, we review the medical management of the most common complications in these patients including stroke, spinal cord ischemia, renal injury, retrograde dissections, aortoesophageal and aortobronchial fistulas, postimplantation syndrome, mesenteric ischemia, and endograft failure.

Surgical strategy of esophageal resection and reconstruction for aortoesophageal fistula

Aortoesophageal fistula is a critical and life-threatening disease. The cardiovascular strategy for graft replacement has been widely discussed. However, the surgical strategy of esophageal resection and reconstruction for aortoesophageal fistula has rarely been discussed. The objective of this study is to establish a surgical strategy and procedure of esophageal resection and reconstruction for aortoesophageal fistula. Eleven patients with aortoesophageal fistula who underwent aortic graft replacement and esophagectomy between 2008 and 2015 at Kobe University Hospital were enrolled in this study. Patient characteristics, operative methods, and clinical outcomes were obtained by retrospective chart review. All 11 patients underwent graft replacement, esophagectomy, and omental wrapping. Ten esophagectomies were simultaneously accomplished in the same operative field as aortic graft replacement. Seven patients underwent subtotal esophagectomy from a left thoracotomy, and three patients underwent upper hemiesophagectomy from a median sternotomy. The other patient underwent staged esophagectomy from a right thoracotomy. Seven of 11 patients (63.6%) successfully underwent staged esophageal reconstruction. Pedicled jejunal transfer with supercharge and superdrainage were performed in six patients, and ileocecal reconstruction was performed in one patient. Median survival time in the patients with esophageal reconstruction was 21 months while that in the patients without esophageal reconstruction was 10 months. Six of 7 patients (85.7%) who underwent esophageal reconstructions were alive. Our surgical strategy for aortoesophageal fistula, which includes simultaneous graft replacement and esophagectomy in the same operative field and staged reconstruction by pedicled jejunal transfer to ensure omental wrapping, is feasible and promising.