1
|
Schuld GJ, Schlager L, Monschein M, Riss S, Bergmann M, Razek P, Stift A, Unger LW. Does surgeon or hospital volume influence outcome in dedicated colorectal units?-A Viennese perspective. Wien Klin Wochenschr 2025; 137:231-236. [PMID: 39093419 PMCID: PMC12006224 DOI: 10.1007/s00508-024-02405-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2024] [Accepted: 06/30/2024] [Indexed: 08/04/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE A clear relationship between higher surgeon volume and improved outcomes has not been convincingly established in rectal cancer surgery. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of individual surgeon's caseload and hospital volume on perioperative outcome. METHODS We retrospectively analyzed 336 consecutive patients undergoing oncological resection for rectal cancer at two Viennese hospitals between 1 January 2015 and 31 December 2020. The effect of baseline characteristics as well as surgeons' caseloads (low volume: 0-5 cases per year, high volume > 5 cases per year) on postoperative complication rates (Clavien-Dindo Classification groups of < 3 and ≥ 3) were evaluated. RESULTS No differences in baseline characteristics were found between centers in terms of sex, smoking status, or comorbidities of patients. Interestingly, only 14.7% of surgeons met the criteria to be classified as high-volume surgeons, while accounting for 66.3% of all operations. There was a significant difference in outcomes depending on the treating center in univariate and multivariate binary logistic regression analysis (odds ratio (OR) = 2.403, p = 0.008). Open surgery was associated with lower complication rates than minimally invasive approaches in univariate analysis (OR = 0.417, p = 0.003, 95%CI = 0.232-0.739) but not multivariate analysis. This indicated that the center's policy rather than surgeon volume or mode of surgery impact on postoperative outcomes. CONCLUSION Treating center standards impacted on outcome, while individual caseload of surgeons or mode of surgery did not independently affect complication rates in this analysis. The majority of rectal cancer resections are performed by a small number of surgeons in Viennese hospitals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gabor J Schuld
- Division of Visceral Surgery, Dept. of General Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria
| | - Lukas Schlager
- Division of Visceral Surgery, Dept. of General Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria
| | - Matthias Monschein
- Hospital Floridsdorf, Department of General Surgery, Brünner Straße 68, 1221, Vienna, Austria
| | - Stefan Riss
- Division of Visceral Surgery, Dept. of General Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria
| | - Michael Bergmann
- Division of Visceral Surgery, Dept. of General Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria
| | - Peter Razek
- Hospital Floridsdorf, Department of General Surgery, Brünner Straße 68, 1221, Vienna, Austria
| | - Anton Stift
- Division of Visceral Surgery, Dept. of General Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria
| | - Lukas W Unger
- Division of Visceral Surgery, Dept. of General Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ng SK, Baade P, Wittert G, Lam AK, Zhang P, Henderson S, Goodwin B, Aitken JF. Sex differences in the impact of multimorbidity on long-term mortality for patients with colorectal cancer: a population registry-based cohort study. J Public Health (Oxf) 2025:fdaf012. [PMID: 39907084 DOI: 10.1093/pubmed/fdaf012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2024] [Revised: 12/18/2024] [Accepted: 01/15/2025] [Indexed: 02/06/2025] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Women have better survival than men patients with colorectal cancer (CRC), but the extent to which this is due to multimorbidity is unclear. METHODS A population-based study of 1843 patients diagnosed with CRC in Australia. Data included patient's demographics, multimorbidity, tumour histology, cancer stage, and treatment. We estimated the risks of all-cause mortality and cause-specific mortality due to cancer or non-cancer causes. RESULTS Men had lower survival than women (P ≤ 0.010) amongst those diagnosed at Stages I-III (15-year survival: 56.0% vs 68.0%, 48.5% vs 60.7%, 34.8% vs 47.5%, respectively), excepting Stage IV (14.4% vs 12.6%; P = 0.18). Married men exhibit better survival than those who were never married (P = 0.006). Heart attacks (9.9% vs 4.3%, P < 0.001) and emphysema (4.8% vs 2.1%, P = 0.004) were more prevalent in men than women. Comorbid stroke and high cholesterol (adjusted hazard ratio, AHR = 2.22, 95% confidence interval, CI = 1.17-4.21, P = 0.014) and leukaemia (AHR = 6.36, 95% CI = 3.08-13.1, P < 0.001) increased the risk of cancer death for men only. For women, diabetes increased the risk of all-cause death (AHR = 1.38, 95% CI = 1.02-1.86, P = 0.039) and high blood pressure increased the risk of death due to non-cancer causes (AHR = 2.00, 95% CI = 1.36-2.94, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION Separate models of CRC care are needed for men and women with consideration of multimorbidity and social factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shu Kay Ng
- School of Medicine and Dentistry, Griffith University, Gold Coast, QLD 4222, Australia
| | - Peter Baade
- Cancer Council Queensland, Fortitude Valley, QLD 4006, Australia
- Centre for Data Science, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD 4000, Australia
- School of Public Health, University of Queensland, Herston, QLD 4006, Australia
| | - Gary Wittert
- Freemasons Centre for Male Health and Wellbeing, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute and University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia
| | - Alfred K Lam
- School of Medicine and Dentistry, Griffith University, Gold Coast, QLD 4222, Australia
| | - Ping Zhang
- School of Medicine and Dentistry, Griffith University, Gold Coast, QLD 4222, Australia
| | - Saras Henderson
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, Griffith University, Gold Coast, QLD 4215, Australia
| | - Belinda Goodwin
- Cancer Council Queensland, Fortitude Valley, QLD 4006, Australia
- Centre for Health Research, University of Southern Queensland, Springfield Central, QLD 4300, Australia
- Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Carlton, VIC 3053, Australia
| | - Joanne F Aitken
- Cancer Council Queensland, Fortitude Valley, QLD 4006, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kim A, Jeon E, Lee H, Heo H, Woo K. Risk factors for prediabetes in community-dwelling adults: A generalized estimating equation logistic regression approach with natural language processing insights. Res Nurs Health 2024; 47:620-634. [PMID: 38961672 DOI: 10.1002/nur.22413] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2023] [Revised: 05/11/2024] [Accepted: 06/22/2024] [Indexed: 07/05/2024]
Abstract
The global prevalence of prediabetes is expected to reach 8.3% (587 million people) by 2045, with 70% of people with prediabetes developing diabetes during their lifetimes. We aimed to classify community-dwelling adults with a high risk for prediabetes based on prediabetes-related symptoms and to identify their characteristics, which might be factors associated with prediabetes. We analyzed homecare nursing records (n = 26,840) of 1628 patients aged over 20 years. Using a natural language processing algorithm, we classified each nursing episode as either low-risk or high-risk for prediabetes based on the detected number and category of prediabetes-symptom words. To identify differences between the risk groups, we employed t-tests, chi-square tests, and data visualization. Risk factors for prediabetes were identified using multiple logistic regression models with generalized estimating equations. A total of 3270 episodes (12.18%) were classified as potentially high-risk for prediabetes. There were significant differences in the personal, social, and clinical factors between groups. Results revealed that female sex, age, cancer coverage as part of homecare insurance coverage, and family caregivers were significantly associated with an increased risk of prediabetes. Although prediabetes is not a life-threatening disease, uncontrolled blood glucose can cause unfavorable outcomes for other major diseases. Thus, medical professionals should consider the associated symptoms and risk factors of prediabetes. Moreover, the proposed algorithm may support the detection of individuals at a high risk for prediabetes. Implementing this approach could facilitate proactive monitoring and early intervention, leading to reduced healthcare expenses and better health outcomes for community-dwelling adults.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aeri Kim
- College of Nursing, Seoul National University, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Eunjoo Jeon
- Technology Research, Samsung SDS, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Hana Lee
- College of Nursing, Seoul National University, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Hyunsook Heo
- Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Kyungmi Woo
- College of Nursing, Seoul National University, Seoul, South Korea
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Harborg S, Kjærgaard KA, Thomsen RW, Borgquist S, Cronin-Fenton D, Hjorth CF. New Horizons: Epidemiology of Obesity, Diabetes Mellitus, and Cancer Prognosis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2024; 109:924-935. [PMID: 37552777 DOI: 10.1210/clinem/dgad450] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2023] [Revised: 06/30/2023] [Accepted: 07/31/2023] [Indexed: 08/10/2023]
Abstract
The global prevalence of obesity and diabetes mellitus has increased in parallel with increasing cancer incidence, due to environmental and lifestyle factors and population aging. Metabolic diseases are associated with increased cancer risk, so a growing number of patients with cancer have coexistent obesity and/or diabetes mellitus. In this narrative review, we highlight recent evidence on the clinical impact of obesity and diabetes mellitus on the prognosis of prostate, breast, and colorectal cancer, and provide an overview of the underlying mechanisms. There is evidence that obesity is associated with increased risk of recurrence, and all-cause and cancer-specific mortality among adults with prostate, breast, and colorectal cancer. Diabetes mellitus is associated with increased all-cause and cancer-specific mortality for these 3 cancers, beyond any impact of obesity. Evidence also suggests increased risk of colorectal cancer recurrence in patients with diabetes mellitus. The underlying mechanisms are multifactorial and likely include hormonal imbalances and chronic inflammation that promote cancer cell growth. Obesity and diabetes mellitus are associated with increased risk of complications and side effects of cancer treatment. Associated comorbidities such as impaired kidney function, cardiovascular disease, and neuropathies may preclude the use of guideline cancer treatment and are competing causes of death. Cancer patients with metabolic diseases require a designated clinical program and a multidisciplinary approach involving oncologists, endocrinologists, surgeons, nutritionists, and physiotherapists, to ensure coordinated and optimized patient care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sixten Harborg
- Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, 8200 Aarhus N, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus University, 8200 Aarhus N, Denmark
| | - Kasper A Kjærgaard
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus University, 8200 Aarhus N, Denmark
| | - Reimar Wernich Thomsen
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus University, 8200 Aarhus N, Denmark
| | - Signe Borgquist
- Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, 8200 Aarhus N, Denmark
| | - Deirdre Cronin-Fenton
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus University, 8200 Aarhus N, Denmark
| | - Cathrine F Hjorth
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus University, 8200 Aarhus N, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Feng Y, Su M, Liu Y, Peng J, Sun X. Health-related quality of life among cancer survivors: pre-existing chronic conditions are to be given priority. Support Care Cancer 2024; 32:124. [PMID: 38252273 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-024-08315-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2023] [Accepted: 01/09/2024] [Indexed: 01/23/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE This study aimed to describe the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of cancer survivors in China by the five-level EuroQol-5-dimension (EQ-5D-5L) questionnaire and to explore the impact of the comorbidity of pre-existing chronic conditions on HRQoL in cancer survivors. METHODS Data on cancer survivors were obtained from two cross-sectional surveys conducted in Shandong Province, China. The data of the Chinese general population, the Chinese diabetes population, the Chinese hypertension population, and the Chinese urban population from the published studies were used as the controls. The χ2 test was conducted to compare the incidence of five-dimensional problems between the study and control populations. The non-parametric Mann-Whitney U test and Kruskal-Wallis test were performed to examine the differences in EQ-5D-5L utility scores. Besides, the Tobit regression model was used to examine the variables influencing the EQ-5D-5L utility score. RESULTS One thousand fifty-one adult cancer survivors were included. Cancer survivors had significantly lower EQ-5D-5L utility scores (Z = - 15.939, P < 0.001) and EQ-VAS scores (Z = - 11.156, P < 0.001) than the general adult population. The average EQ-5D-5L utility score of hypertensive cancer survivors was lower than that of the hypertensive population (Z = - 1.610, P = 0.107), but the difference was not statistically significant. CONCLUSION Compared to the general population, the HRQoL of cancer survivors was extremely poor in all dimensions of the EQ-5D-5L. Pre-existing chronic conditions had significant antecedent effects on the HRQoL of cancer survivors. Therefore, more attention should be paid to chronic diseases, and effective interventions should be adopted based on this.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yujia Feng
- Centre for Health Management and Policy Research, School of Public Health, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Wenhuaxi Road 44#, Jinan, China
- National Health Commission Key Lab of Health Economics and Policy Research, Shandong University, Jinan, China
| | - Mingzhu Su
- Centre for Health Management and Policy Research, School of Public Health, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Wenhuaxi Road 44#, Jinan, China
- National Health Commission Key Lab of Health Economics and Policy Research, Shandong University, Jinan, China
| | - Yanxiu Liu
- Centre for Health Management and Policy Research, School of Public Health, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Wenhuaxi Road 44#, Jinan, China
- National Health Commission Key Lab of Health Economics and Policy Research, Shandong University, Jinan, China
| | - Jiaqi Peng
- Centre for Health Management and Policy Research, School of Public Health, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Wenhuaxi Road 44#, Jinan, China
- National Health Commission Key Lab of Health Economics and Policy Research, Shandong University, Jinan, China
| | - Xiaojie Sun
- Centre for Health Management and Policy Research, School of Public Health, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Wenhuaxi Road 44#, Jinan, China.
- National Health Commission Key Lab of Health Economics and Policy Research, Shandong University, Jinan, China.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Thomsen MK, Løppenthin KB, Bidstrup PE, Andersen EW, Dalton S, Petersen LN, Pappot H, Mortensen CE, Christensen MB, Frølich A, Lassen U, Johansen C. Impact of multimorbidity and polypharmacy on mortality after cancer: a nationwide registry-based cohort study in Denmark 2005-2017. Acta Oncol 2023; 62:1653-1660. [PMID: 37874076 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2023.2270145] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2023] [Accepted: 10/04/2023] [Indexed: 10/25/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Concurrent chronic diseases and treatment hereof in patients with cancer may increase mortality. In this population-based study we examined the individual and combined impact of multimorbidity and polypharmacy on mortality, across 20 cancers and with 13-years follow-up in Denmark. MATERIALS AND METHODS This nationwide study included all Danish residents with a first primary cancer diagnosed between 1 January 2005 and 31 December 2015, and followed until the end of 2017. We defined multimorbidity as having one or more of 20 chronic conditions in addition to cancer, registered in the five years preceding diagnosis, and polypharmacy as five or more redeemed medications 2-12 months prior to cancer diagnosis. Cox regression analyses were used to estimate the effects of multimorbidity and polypharmacy, as well as the combined effect on mortality. RESULTS A total of 261,745 cancer patients were included. We found that patients diagnosed with breast, prostate, colon, rectal, oropharynx, bladder, uterine and cervical cancer, malignant melanoma, Non-Hodgkin lymphoma, and leukemia had higher mortality when the cancer diagnosis was accompanied by multimorbidity and polypharmacy, while in patients with cancer of the lung, esophagus, stomach, liver, pancreas, kidney, ovarian and brain & central nervous system, these factors had less impact on mortality. CONCLUSION We found that multimorbidity and polypharmacy was associated with higher mortality in patients diagnosed with cancer types that typically have a favorable prognosis compared with patients without multimorbidity and polypharmacy. Multimorbidity and polypharmacy had less impact on mortality in cancers that typically have a poor prognosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mette K Thomsen
- Department of Oncology, Cancer Survivorship and Treatment Late effects CASTLE group, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | | | | | | - Susanne Dalton
- Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | | | | | | - Mikkel B Christensen
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Copenhagen Center for Translational Research, Bispebjerg Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Anne Frølich
- Innovation and Research Center for Multimorbidity and Chronic Conditions, Slagelse, Denmark
- Section of General Practice, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | | - Christoffer Johansen
- Department of Oncology, Cancer Survivorship and Treatment Late effects CASTLE group, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Oncology, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Jefford M, Emery JD, James Martin A, De Abreu Lourenco R, Lisy K, Grunfeld E, Mohamed MA, King D, Tebbutt NC, Lee M, Mehrnejad A, Burgess A, Marker J, Eggins R, Carrello J, Thomas H, Schofield P. SCORE: a randomised controlled trial evaluating shared care (general practitioner and oncologist) follow-up compared to usual oncologist follow-up for survivors of colorectal cancer. EClinicalMedicine 2023; 66:102346. [PMID: 38094163 PMCID: PMC10716007 DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.102346] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2023] [Revised: 11/14/2023] [Accepted: 11/15/2023] [Indexed: 05/27/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND SCORE is the first randomised controlled trial (RCT) to examine shared oncologist and general practitioner (GP) follow-up for survivors of colorectal cancer (CRC). SCORE aimed to show that shared care (SC) was non-inferior to usual care (UC) on the EORTC QLQ-C30 Global Health Status/Quality of Life (GHQ-QoL) scale to 12 months. METHODS The study recruited patients from five public hospitals in Melbourne, Australia between February 2017 and May 2021. Patients post curative intent treatment for stage I-III CRC underwent 1:1 randomisation to SC and UC. SC replaced two oncologist visits with GP visits and included a survivorship care plan and primary care management guidelines. Assessments were at baseline, 6 and 12 months. Difference between groups on GHQ-QoL to 12 months was estimated from a mixed model for repeated measures (MMRM), with a non-inferiority margin (NIM) of -10 points. Secondary endpoints included quality of life (QoL); patient perceptions of care; costs and clinical care processes (CEA tests, recurrences). Registration ACTRN12617000004369p. FINDINGS 150 consenting patients were randomised to SC (N = 74) or UC (N = 76); 11 GPs declined. The mean (SD) GHQ-QoL scores at 12 months were 72 (20.2) for SC versus 73 (17.2) for UC. The MMRM mean estimate of GHQ-QoL across the 6 month and 12 month follow-up was 69 for SC and 73 for UC, mean difference -4.0 (95% CI: -9.0 to 0.9). The lower limit of the 95% CI did not cross the NIM. There was no clear evidence of differences on other QoL, unmet needs or satisfaction scales. At 12 months, the majority preferred SC (40/63; 63%) in the SC group, with equal preference for SC (22/62; 35%) and specialist care (22/62; 35%) in UC group. CEA completion was higher in SC. Recurrences similar between arms. Patients in SC on average incurred USD314 less in health costs versus UC patients. INTERPRETATION SC seems to be an appropriate and cost-effective model of follow-up for CRC survivors. FUNDING Victorian Cancer Agency and Cancer Australia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Jefford
- Department of Health Services Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Australian Cancer Survivorship Centre, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Jon D. Emery
- Centre for Cancer Research and Department of General Practice and Primary Care, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | | | - Richard De Abreu Lourenco
- Centre for Health Economics Research and Evaluation, University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, NSW, Australia
| | - Karolina Lisy
- Department of Health Services Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Australian Cancer Survivorship Centre, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Eva Grunfeld
- Department of Community and Family Medicine and Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - Mustafa Abdi Mohamed
- Department of Health Services Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Dorothy King
- Department of Health Services Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | | | - Margaret Lee
- Department of Medical Oncology, Western Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Ashkan Mehrnejad
- Department of Health Services Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Adele Burgess
- Olivia Newton John Cancer Centre, Heidelberg, VIC, Australia
| | - Julie Marker
- Primary Care Collaborative Cancer Clinical Trials Group, Centre for Cancer Research and Department of General Practice and Primary Care, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Renee Eggins
- NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Joseph Carrello
- NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Hayley Thomas
- NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Penelope Schofield
- Department of Health Services Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
- Department of Psychology and Iverson Health Innovation Research Institute, Swinburne University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Bonhof CS, Mols F, Widdershoven JW, Schoormans D. Colorectal cancer and cardiovascular disease: double the burden when it comes to your health-related quality of life? Acta Oncol 2023; 62:737-743. [PMID: 37609784 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2023.2245131] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2022] [Accepted: 06/28/2023] [Indexed: 08/24/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The prevalence of comorbid cardiovascular disease (CVD) among patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) has increased in the last decades. Previous studies have focused on the impact of comorbid CVD on clinical outcomes in CRC, while its impact on patients' health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is understudied. This study, therefore, relates (new-onset) CVD to HRQoL (i.e., physical, role, cognitive, emotional, and social functioning, and two CVD-related symptom scales fatigue and dyspnea) in a two-year follow-up study among CRC patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS Newly diagnosed CRC patients from four Dutch hospitals were eligible for participation. Patients (N = 327) completed questions on HRQoL (EORTC QLQ-C30) and the presence and timing of CVDs before initial treatment (baseline) and one and two years after diagnosis. RESULTS CRC patients with comorbid CVD at cancer diagnosis (n = 72, 22%) reported significantly worse physical functioning at 2-year follow-up compared with patients who never had comorbid CVD (p < .05). CRC patients with new-onset CVD (n = 36, 11%) reported worse global QoL, worse role functioning, and more fatigue at 1 and 2-year follow-up compared with patients who never had comorbid CVD. In addition, they reported more dyspnea at baseline and worse physical functioning at 2-year follow-up (p < .05). Finally, patients with new-onset CVD reported worse global quality of life at 1-year follow-up and worse role functioning and more fatigue at 2-year follow-up, compared with patients with comorbid CVD at cancer diagnosis (p < .05). All significant differences between the three groups were of clinical relevance. CONCLUSIONS CRC patients with CVD, specifically those with new-onset CVD, reported a significantly and clinically relevant worse HRQoL compared with those who never had comorbid CVD. These findings seem to indicate, although the number is small, that CRC patients might have cardiovascular needs that need to be addressed and that multidisciplinary care is recommended. Larger studies are needed to confirm this.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cynthia S Bonhof
- CoRPS - Center of Research on Psychological disorders and Somatic diseases, Department of Medical and Clinical Psychology, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands
- Department of Research, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Floortje Mols
- CoRPS - Center of Research on Psychological disorders and Somatic diseases, Department of Medical and Clinical Psychology, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands
- Department of Research, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Jos W Widdershoven
- CoRPS - Center of Research on Psychological disorders and Somatic diseases, Department of Medical and Clinical Psychology, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands
- Department of Cardiology, Elisabeth-TweeSteden Hospital, Tilburg, The Netherlands
| | - Dounya Schoormans
- CoRPS - Center of Research on Psychological disorders and Somatic diseases, Department of Medical and Clinical Psychology, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands
- Department of Research, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Chen Y, He L, Lu X, Tang Y, Luo G, Chen Y, Wu C, Liang Q, Xu X. Causes of death among early-onset colorectal cancer population in the United States: a large population-based study. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1094493. [PMID: 37168371 PMCID: PMC10166590 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1094493] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2022] [Accepted: 03/30/2023] [Indexed: 05/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Early-onset colorectal cancer (EOCRC) has an alarmingly increasing trend and arouses increasing attention. Causes of death in EOCRC population remain unclear. Methods Data of EOCRC patients (1975-2018) were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. Distribution of death was calculated, and death risk of each cause was compared with the general population by calculating standard mortality ratios (SMRs) at different follow-up time. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression models were utilized to identify independent prognostic factors for overall survival (OS). Results The study included 36,013 patients, among whom 9,998 (27.7%) patients died of colorectal cancer (CRC) and 6,305 (17.5%) patients died of non-CRC causes. CRC death accounted for a high proportion of 74.8%-90.7% death cases within 10 years, while non-CRC death (especially cardiocerebrovascular disease death) was the major cause of death after 10 years. Non-cancer death had the highest SMR in EOCRC population within the first year after cancer diagnosis. Kidney disease [SMR = 2.10; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.65-2.64] and infection (SMR = 1.92; 95% CI, 1.48-2.46) were two high-risk causes of death. Age at diagnosis, race, sex, year of diagnosis, grade, SEER stage, and surgery were independent prognostic factors for OS. Conclusion Most of EOCRC patients died of CRC within 10-year follow-up, while most of patients died of non-CRC causes after 10 years. Within the first year after cancer diagnosis, patients had high non-CRC death risk compared to the general population. Our findings help to guide risk monitoring and management for US EOCRC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuerong Chen
- Minimally Invasive Tumor Therapies Center, Guangdong Second Provincial General Hospital, Guangzhou, China
| | - Lanping He
- Department of Gastroenterology, Fogang County People’s Hospital, Fogang, China
| | - Xiu Lu
- Minimally Invasive Tumor Therapies Center, Guangdong Second Provincial General Hospital, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yuqun Tang
- Minimally Invasive Tumor Therapies Center, Guangdong Second Provincial General Hospital, Guangzhou, China
| | - Guanshui Luo
- Minimally Invasive Tumor Therapies Center, Guangdong Second Provincial General Hospital, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yuji Chen
- Minimally Invasive Tumor Therapies Center, Guangdong Second Provincial General Hospital, Guangzhou, China
| | - Chaosheng Wu
- Minimally Invasive Tumor Therapies Center, Guangdong Second Provincial General Hospital, Guangzhou, China
| | - Qihua Liang
- Center of Digestive Endoscopology, The Second People’s Hospital of Luoding City, Luoding, China
| | - Xiuhong Xu
- Department of Acupuncture and Massage Rehabilitation, Integrated Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Gheybi K, Buckley E, Vitry A, Roder D. Variations in colorectal cancer pattern of care by age and comorbidity in South Australia. Cancer Med 2023. [PMID: 37084009 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.5901] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2022] [Revised: 03/14/2023] [Accepted: 03/23/2023] [Indexed: 04/22/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Advanced age is associated with decreased likelihood of colorectal cancer treatment. Here, we investigated the extent to which comorbidities are accountable for this lesser treatment. METHODS Using population-based datasets, the pattern of care among CRC cases in South Australia during 2004-2013 was investigated. Models were used to investigate associations of age with each treatment type, and differences in these associations were explored by comorbidity and cancer site. RESULTS The presence of comorbidity was associated with a significantly weaker relationship of age with surgery and chemotherapy. The association of age with surgery also varied for colon and rectal primary cancer sites. Individual comorbidity types varied in their associations with each treatment category. For example, dementia was associated with less chemotherapy provision, however, it was not significantly related to the likelihood of surgery. CONCLUSION This study indicates that the association of age with surgical treatment differed significantly by the CRC subsite. Comorbidity moderated the negative association of age with chemotherapy, and less so, with extent of surgery. Results were novel in indicating associations of multiple individual comorbidity types with CRC treatment modalities. The data suggest that different individual comorbidity types may have different effects on treatment and should be studied separately.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kazzem Gheybi
- University of South Australia Allied Health and Human Performance, South Australia, Adelaide, Australia
- Cancer epidemiology and population health, University of South Australia, South Australia, Adelaide, Australia
- Charles Perkins Centre, School of Medical Sciences, University of Sydney, New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
| | - Elizabeth Buckley
- University of South Australia Allied Health and Human Performance, South Australia, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Agnes Vitry
- University of South Australia Clinical and Health Sciences, South Australia, Adelaide, Australia
| | - David Roder
- University of South Australia Allied Health and Human Performance, South Australia, Adelaide, Australia
- Cancer epidemiology and population health, University of South Australia, South Australia, Adelaide, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Quintana JM, Anton-Ladislao A, Lázaro S, Gonzalez N, Bare M, Fernandez-de-Larrea N, Redondo M, Escobar A, Sarasqueta C, Garcia-Gutierrez S, Aguirre U. Effect of comorbidities on long-term outcomes of colorectal cancer patients. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 2022; 31:e13561. [PMID: 35174571 DOI: 10.1111/ecc.13561] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2020] [Revised: 09/09/2021] [Accepted: 01/26/2022] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The objective of this work is to evaluate the association of comorbidities with various outcomes in patients diagnosed with colon or rectal cancer. METHODS We conducted a prospective cohort study of patients diagnosed with colon or rectal cancer who underwent surgery. Data were gathered on sociodemographic, clinical characteristics, disease course, and the EuroQol EQ-5D and EORTC QLQ-C30 scores, up to 5 years after surgery. The main outcomes of the study were mortality, complications, readmissions, reoperations, and changes in PROMs up to 5 years. Multivariable multilevel logistic regression models were used in the analyses. RESULTS Mortality at some point during the 5-year follow-up was related to cardiocerebrovascular, hemiplegia and/or stroke, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), diabetes, cancer, and dementia. Similarly, complications were related to cardiovascular disease, COPD, diabetes, hepatitis, hepatic or renal pathologies, and dementia; readmissions to cardiovascular disease, COPD, and hepatic pathologies; and reoperations to cerebrovascular and diabetes. Finally, changes in EQ-5D scores at some point during follow-up were related to cardiocerebrovascular disease, COPD, diabetes, pre-existing cancer, hepatic and gastrointestinal pathologies, and changes in EORTC QLQ-C30 scores to cardiovascular disease, COPD, diabetes, and hepatic and gastrointestinal pathologies. CONCLUSIONS Optimising the management of the comorbidities most strongly related to adverse outcomes may help to reduce those events in these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- José M Quintana
- Unidad de Investigación, Hospital Galdakao-Usansolo, Galdakao, Bizkaia, 48960, Spain.,Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Red de Investigación en Servicios Sanitarios y Enfermedades Crónicas (REDISSEC), Galdakao, Bizkaia, 48960, Spain
| | - Ane Anton-Ladislao
- Unidad de Investigación, Hospital Galdakao-Usansolo, Galdakao, Bizkaia, 48960, Spain.,Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Red de Investigación en Servicios Sanitarios y Enfermedades Crónicas (REDISSEC), Galdakao, Bizkaia, 48960, Spain
| | - Santiago Lázaro
- Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Red de Investigación en Servicios Sanitarios y Enfermedades Crónicas (REDISSEC), Galdakao, Bizkaia, 48960, Spain.,Servicio de Cirugía General, Hospital Basurto, Bilbao, Bizkaia, Spain
| | - Nerea Gonzalez
- Unidad de Investigación, Hospital Galdakao-Usansolo, Galdakao, Bizkaia, 48960, Spain.,Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Red de Investigación en Servicios Sanitarios y Enfermedades Crónicas (REDISSEC), Galdakao, Bizkaia, 48960, Spain
| | - Marisa Bare
- Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Red de Investigación en Servicios Sanitarios y Enfermedades Crónicas (REDISSEC), Galdakao, Bizkaia, 48960, Spain.,Unidad de Epidemiología Clínica, Corporacio Parc Tauli, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Nerea Fernandez-de-Larrea
- Centro Nacional de Epidemiología, ISCIII, Madrid, Spain.,Instituto de Salud Carlos III, CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain
| | - Maximino Redondo
- Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Red de Investigación en Servicios Sanitarios y Enfermedades Crónicas (REDISSEC), Galdakao, Bizkaia, 48960, Spain.,Unidad de Investigación, Hospital Costa del Sol, Malaga, Spain
| | - Antonio Escobar
- Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Red de Investigación en Servicios Sanitarios y Enfermedades Crónicas (REDISSEC), Galdakao, Bizkaia, 48960, Spain.,Unidad de Investigación, Hospital Basurto, Bilbao, Bizkaia, Spain
| | - Cristina Sarasqueta
- Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Red de Investigación en Servicios Sanitarios y Enfermedades Crónicas (REDISSEC), Galdakao, Bizkaia, 48960, Spain.,Unidad de Investigación, Hospital Donostia/BioDonostia, Donostia, Guipuzkoa, Spain
| | - Susana Garcia-Gutierrez
- Unidad de Investigación, Hospital Galdakao-Usansolo, Galdakao, Bizkaia, 48960, Spain.,Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Red de Investigación en Servicios Sanitarios y Enfermedades Crónicas (REDISSEC), Galdakao, Bizkaia, 48960, Spain
| | - Urko Aguirre
- Unidad de Investigación, Hospital Galdakao-Usansolo, Galdakao, Bizkaia, 48960, Spain.,Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Red de Investigación en Servicios Sanitarios y Enfermedades Crónicas (REDISSEC), Galdakao, Bizkaia, 48960, Spain
| | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Cuthbert C, Nixon N, Vickers M, Samimi S, Rawson K, Ramjeesingh R, Karim S, Stein B, Laxdal G, Dundas L, Huband D, Daze E, Farrer C, Cheung WY. Top 10 research priorities for early-stage colorectal cancer: a Canadian patient-oriented priority-setting partnership. CMAJ Open 2022; 10:E278-E287. [PMID: 35351780 PMCID: PMC9259415 DOI: 10.9778/cmajo.20210046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Colorectal cancer, one of the most commonly diagnosed cancers, is now being detected earlier and treatments are improving, which means that patients are living longer. Partnering with Canadian clinicians, patients and researchers, we aimed to determine research priorities for those living with early-stage colorectal cancer in Canada. METHODS We followed the well-established priority-setting partnership outlined by the James Lind Alliance to identify and prioritize unanswered questions about early-stage (i.e., stages I-III) colorectal cancer. The study was conducted from September 2018 to September 2020. We surveyed patients, caregivers and clinicians from across Canada between June 2019 and December 2019. We categorized the responses using thematic analysis to generate a list of unique questions. We conducted an interim prioritization survey from April 2020 to July 2020, with patients, caregivers and clinicians, to determine a shorter list of questions, which was then reviewed at a final meeting (involving patients, caregivers and clinicians) in September 2020. At that meeting, we used a consensus-based process to determine the top 10 priorities. RESULTS For the initial survey, 370 responses were submitted by 185 individuals; of the 98 individuals who provided demographic information, 44 (45%) were patients, 16 (16%) were caregivers, 7 (7%) were members of an advocacy group, 26 (27%) were health care professionals and 5 (5%) were categorized as "other." The responses were refined to create a list of 66 unique unanswered questions. Twenty-five respondents answered the interim prioritization survey: 13 patients (52%), 2 caregivers (8%), 3 advocacy group members (12%) and 7 health care professionals (28%). This led to a list of the top 30 questions. The final consensus meeting involved 20 individuals (10 patients [50%], 3 caregivers [15%] and 7 health care professionals [35%]), who agreed to the top 10 research priorities. The priorities covered a range of topics, including screening, treatment, recurrence, management of adverse effects and decision-making. INTERPRETATION We determined the top research priorities for early-stage colorectal cancer using a collaborative partnership of stake-holders from across Canada. The priorities covered a broad range of topics that could be addressed by future research, including improved screening practices, the role of personalized medicine, the management of adverse effects of treatment, decision-making and prevention of recurrence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Colleen Cuthbert
- Faculty of Nursing (Cuthbert, Daze, Farrer) and Department of Oncology, Cumming School of Medicine (Cuthbert, Nixon, Karim, Cheung), University of Calgary; Cancer Care Alberta (Nixon, Rawson, Karim, Cheung) and Patient and Family Engagement Advisory Network for Cancer Care Alberta (Laxdal, Huband), Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alta.; Patient and Family Engagement Advisory Network for Cancer Care Alberta (Dundas), Alberta Health Services, Drumheller, Alta.; The Ottawa Hospital (Vickers) and University of Ottawa (Vickers), Ottawa, Ont.; Hôpital du Sacré-Cœur de Montréal (Samimi) and Colorectal Cancer Canada (Stein), Montréal, Que.; Department of Community Health and Epidemiology (Ramjeesingh), Dalhousie University, and Nova Scotia Cancer Care Centre (Ramjeesingh), Halifax, NS
| | - Nancy Nixon
- Faculty of Nursing (Cuthbert, Daze, Farrer) and Department of Oncology, Cumming School of Medicine (Cuthbert, Nixon, Karim, Cheung), University of Calgary; Cancer Care Alberta (Nixon, Rawson, Karim, Cheung) and Patient and Family Engagement Advisory Network for Cancer Care Alberta (Laxdal, Huband), Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alta.; Patient and Family Engagement Advisory Network for Cancer Care Alberta (Dundas), Alberta Health Services, Drumheller, Alta.; The Ottawa Hospital (Vickers) and University of Ottawa (Vickers), Ottawa, Ont.; Hôpital du Sacré-Cœur de Montréal (Samimi) and Colorectal Cancer Canada (Stein), Montréal, Que.; Department of Community Health and Epidemiology (Ramjeesingh), Dalhousie University, and Nova Scotia Cancer Care Centre (Ramjeesingh), Halifax, NS
| | - Michael Vickers
- Faculty of Nursing (Cuthbert, Daze, Farrer) and Department of Oncology, Cumming School of Medicine (Cuthbert, Nixon, Karim, Cheung), University of Calgary; Cancer Care Alberta (Nixon, Rawson, Karim, Cheung) and Patient and Family Engagement Advisory Network for Cancer Care Alberta (Laxdal, Huband), Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alta.; Patient and Family Engagement Advisory Network for Cancer Care Alberta (Dundas), Alberta Health Services, Drumheller, Alta.; The Ottawa Hospital (Vickers) and University of Ottawa (Vickers), Ottawa, Ont.; Hôpital du Sacré-Cœur de Montréal (Samimi) and Colorectal Cancer Canada (Stein), Montréal, Que.; Department of Community Health and Epidemiology (Ramjeesingh), Dalhousie University, and Nova Scotia Cancer Care Centre (Ramjeesingh), Halifax, NS
| | - Setareh Samimi
- Faculty of Nursing (Cuthbert, Daze, Farrer) and Department of Oncology, Cumming School of Medicine (Cuthbert, Nixon, Karim, Cheung), University of Calgary; Cancer Care Alberta (Nixon, Rawson, Karim, Cheung) and Patient and Family Engagement Advisory Network for Cancer Care Alberta (Laxdal, Huband), Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alta.; Patient and Family Engagement Advisory Network for Cancer Care Alberta (Dundas), Alberta Health Services, Drumheller, Alta.; The Ottawa Hospital (Vickers) and University of Ottawa (Vickers), Ottawa, Ont.; Hôpital du Sacré-Cœur de Montréal (Samimi) and Colorectal Cancer Canada (Stein), Montréal, Que.; Department of Community Health and Epidemiology (Ramjeesingh), Dalhousie University, and Nova Scotia Cancer Care Centre (Ramjeesingh), Halifax, NS
| | - Krista Rawson
- Faculty of Nursing (Cuthbert, Daze, Farrer) and Department of Oncology, Cumming School of Medicine (Cuthbert, Nixon, Karim, Cheung), University of Calgary; Cancer Care Alberta (Nixon, Rawson, Karim, Cheung) and Patient and Family Engagement Advisory Network for Cancer Care Alberta (Laxdal, Huband), Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alta.; Patient and Family Engagement Advisory Network for Cancer Care Alberta (Dundas), Alberta Health Services, Drumheller, Alta.; The Ottawa Hospital (Vickers) and University of Ottawa (Vickers), Ottawa, Ont.; Hôpital du Sacré-Cœur de Montréal (Samimi) and Colorectal Cancer Canada (Stein), Montréal, Que.; Department of Community Health and Epidemiology (Ramjeesingh), Dalhousie University, and Nova Scotia Cancer Care Centre (Ramjeesingh), Halifax, NS
| | - Ravi Ramjeesingh
- Faculty of Nursing (Cuthbert, Daze, Farrer) and Department of Oncology, Cumming School of Medicine (Cuthbert, Nixon, Karim, Cheung), University of Calgary; Cancer Care Alberta (Nixon, Rawson, Karim, Cheung) and Patient and Family Engagement Advisory Network for Cancer Care Alberta (Laxdal, Huband), Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alta.; Patient and Family Engagement Advisory Network for Cancer Care Alberta (Dundas), Alberta Health Services, Drumheller, Alta.; The Ottawa Hospital (Vickers) and University of Ottawa (Vickers), Ottawa, Ont.; Hôpital du Sacré-Cœur de Montréal (Samimi) and Colorectal Cancer Canada (Stein), Montréal, Que.; Department of Community Health and Epidemiology (Ramjeesingh), Dalhousie University, and Nova Scotia Cancer Care Centre (Ramjeesingh), Halifax, NS
| | - Safiya Karim
- Faculty of Nursing (Cuthbert, Daze, Farrer) and Department of Oncology, Cumming School of Medicine (Cuthbert, Nixon, Karim, Cheung), University of Calgary; Cancer Care Alberta (Nixon, Rawson, Karim, Cheung) and Patient and Family Engagement Advisory Network for Cancer Care Alberta (Laxdal, Huband), Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alta.; Patient and Family Engagement Advisory Network for Cancer Care Alberta (Dundas), Alberta Health Services, Drumheller, Alta.; The Ottawa Hospital (Vickers) and University of Ottawa (Vickers), Ottawa, Ont.; Hôpital du Sacré-Cœur de Montréal (Samimi) and Colorectal Cancer Canada (Stein), Montréal, Que.; Department of Community Health and Epidemiology (Ramjeesingh), Dalhousie University, and Nova Scotia Cancer Care Centre (Ramjeesingh), Halifax, NS
| | - Barry Stein
- Faculty of Nursing (Cuthbert, Daze, Farrer) and Department of Oncology, Cumming School of Medicine (Cuthbert, Nixon, Karim, Cheung), University of Calgary; Cancer Care Alberta (Nixon, Rawson, Karim, Cheung) and Patient and Family Engagement Advisory Network for Cancer Care Alberta (Laxdal, Huband), Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alta.; Patient and Family Engagement Advisory Network for Cancer Care Alberta (Dundas), Alberta Health Services, Drumheller, Alta.; The Ottawa Hospital (Vickers) and University of Ottawa (Vickers), Ottawa, Ont.; Hôpital du Sacré-Cœur de Montréal (Samimi) and Colorectal Cancer Canada (Stein), Montréal, Que.; Department of Community Health and Epidemiology (Ramjeesingh), Dalhousie University, and Nova Scotia Cancer Care Centre (Ramjeesingh), Halifax, NS
| | - Garry Laxdal
- Faculty of Nursing (Cuthbert, Daze, Farrer) and Department of Oncology, Cumming School of Medicine (Cuthbert, Nixon, Karim, Cheung), University of Calgary; Cancer Care Alberta (Nixon, Rawson, Karim, Cheung) and Patient and Family Engagement Advisory Network for Cancer Care Alberta (Laxdal, Huband), Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alta.; Patient and Family Engagement Advisory Network for Cancer Care Alberta (Dundas), Alberta Health Services, Drumheller, Alta.; The Ottawa Hospital (Vickers) and University of Ottawa (Vickers), Ottawa, Ont.; Hôpital du Sacré-Cœur de Montréal (Samimi) and Colorectal Cancer Canada (Stein), Montréal, Que.; Department of Community Health and Epidemiology (Ramjeesingh), Dalhousie University, and Nova Scotia Cancer Care Centre (Ramjeesingh), Halifax, NS
| | - Lorilee Dundas
- Faculty of Nursing (Cuthbert, Daze, Farrer) and Department of Oncology, Cumming School of Medicine (Cuthbert, Nixon, Karim, Cheung), University of Calgary; Cancer Care Alberta (Nixon, Rawson, Karim, Cheung) and Patient and Family Engagement Advisory Network for Cancer Care Alberta (Laxdal, Huband), Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alta.; Patient and Family Engagement Advisory Network for Cancer Care Alberta (Dundas), Alberta Health Services, Drumheller, Alta.; The Ottawa Hospital (Vickers) and University of Ottawa (Vickers), Ottawa, Ont.; Hôpital du Sacré-Cœur de Montréal (Samimi) and Colorectal Cancer Canada (Stein), Montréal, Que.; Department of Community Health and Epidemiology (Ramjeesingh), Dalhousie University, and Nova Scotia Cancer Care Centre (Ramjeesingh), Halifax, NS
| | - Diane Huband
- Faculty of Nursing (Cuthbert, Daze, Farrer) and Department of Oncology, Cumming School of Medicine (Cuthbert, Nixon, Karim, Cheung), University of Calgary; Cancer Care Alberta (Nixon, Rawson, Karim, Cheung) and Patient and Family Engagement Advisory Network for Cancer Care Alberta (Laxdal, Huband), Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alta.; Patient and Family Engagement Advisory Network for Cancer Care Alberta (Dundas), Alberta Health Services, Drumheller, Alta.; The Ottawa Hospital (Vickers) and University of Ottawa (Vickers), Ottawa, Ont.; Hôpital du Sacré-Cœur de Montréal (Samimi) and Colorectal Cancer Canada (Stein), Montréal, Que.; Department of Community Health and Epidemiology (Ramjeesingh), Dalhousie University, and Nova Scotia Cancer Care Centre (Ramjeesingh), Halifax, NS
| | - Emily Daze
- Faculty of Nursing (Cuthbert, Daze, Farrer) and Department of Oncology, Cumming School of Medicine (Cuthbert, Nixon, Karim, Cheung), University of Calgary; Cancer Care Alberta (Nixon, Rawson, Karim, Cheung) and Patient and Family Engagement Advisory Network for Cancer Care Alberta (Laxdal, Huband), Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alta.; Patient and Family Engagement Advisory Network for Cancer Care Alberta (Dundas), Alberta Health Services, Drumheller, Alta.; The Ottawa Hospital (Vickers) and University of Ottawa (Vickers), Ottawa, Ont.; Hôpital du Sacré-Cœur de Montréal (Samimi) and Colorectal Cancer Canada (Stein), Montréal, Que.; Department of Community Health and Epidemiology (Ramjeesingh), Dalhousie University, and Nova Scotia Cancer Care Centre (Ramjeesingh), Halifax, NS
| | - Christie Farrer
- Faculty of Nursing (Cuthbert, Daze, Farrer) and Department of Oncology, Cumming School of Medicine (Cuthbert, Nixon, Karim, Cheung), University of Calgary; Cancer Care Alberta (Nixon, Rawson, Karim, Cheung) and Patient and Family Engagement Advisory Network for Cancer Care Alberta (Laxdal, Huband), Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alta.; Patient and Family Engagement Advisory Network for Cancer Care Alberta (Dundas), Alberta Health Services, Drumheller, Alta.; The Ottawa Hospital (Vickers) and University of Ottawa (Vickers), Ottawa, Ont.; Hôpital du Sacré-Cœur de Montréal (Samimi) and Colorectal Cancer Canada (Stein), Montréal, Que.; Department of Community Health and Epidemiology (Ramjeesingh), Dalhousie University, and Nova Scotia Cancer Care Centre (Ramjeesingh), Halifax, NS
| | - Winson Y Cheung
- Faculty of Nursing (Cuthbert, Daze, Farrer) and Department of Oncology, Cumming School of Medicine (Cuthbert, Nixon, Karim, Cheung), University of Calgary; Cancer Care Alberta (Nixon, Rawson, Karim, Cheung) and Patient and Family Engagement Advisory Network for Cancer Care Alberta (Laxdal, Huband), Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alta.; Patient and Family Engagement Advisory Network for Cancer Care Alberta (Dundas), Alberta Health Services, Drumheller, Alta.; The Ottawa Hospital (Vickers) and University of Ottawa (Vickers), Ottawa, Ont.; Hôpital du Sacré-Cœur de Montréal (Samimi) and Colorectal Cancer Canada (Stein), Montréal, Que.; Department of Community Health and Epidemiology (Ramjeesingh), Dalhousie University, and Nova Scotia Cancer Care Centre (Ramjeesingh), Halifax, NS
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Yu SC, Liao KM, Chou CL, Tian YF, Wang JJ, Ho CH, Shiue YL. Impact of Tumor Location on Survival in Patients With Colorectal Cancer: A Retrospective Cohort Study Based on Taiwan’s Cancer Registry Database. CLINICAL MEDICINE INSIGHTS: ONCOLOGY 2022; 16:11795549221111713. [PMID: 35875416 PMCID: PMC9301104 DOI: 10.1177/11795549221111713] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2022] [Accepted: 06/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Colorectal cancer is one of the leading cancers worldwide. This study aimed to investigate the mortality differences between 2 primary tumor locations, the proximal/distal colon and rectosigmoid junction (RSJ)/rectum, after adjusting for comorbidities. Methods: The Taiwan Cancer Registry linked with Taiwan’s National Health Insurance Research Database was used to estimate the 5-year mortality rate among patients with colorectal cancer. A total of 73 769 individuals were enrolled in the study, which included 44 234 patients with proximal and distal colon cancers and 29 535 patients with RSJ and rectal cancers. Potential mortality risk was calculated using Cox regression analysis. Results: The mortality rates due to the location of the cancer in the proximal/distal colon and RSJ/rectum were 45.27% and 42.20%, respectively. After adjustment for age, sex, comorbidities, and clinical stages, the proximal/distal colon had a 1.03-fold higher 5-year overall mortality rate than RSJ/rectal cancer (95% confidence interval = 1.00–1.05). Proximal and distal colon cancers had a worse prognosis and survival than RSJ and rectal colon cancers in women and older patients (⩾70 years). Comorbidities had different effects on mortality in the proximal/distal colon and RSJ/rectum. Conclusions: Tumor location is associated with the prognosis of patients with colorectal cancer. It is important to treat patients beyond their cancer treatment, and to manage their comorbidities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shou-Chun Yu
- Institute of Biomedical Sciences, National Sun Yat-sen University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
- Department of Medical Research, Chi Mei Medical Center, Chiali, Tainan, Taiwan
| | - Kuang-Ming Liao
- Department of Internal Medicine, Chi Mei Medical Center, Chiali, Tainan, Taiwan
| | - Chia-Lin Chou
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Chi Mei Medical Center, Tainan, Taiwan
| | - Yu-Feng Tian
- Division of Gastroenterology & General Surgery, Chi Mei Medical Center, Tainan, Taiwan
- Department of Health and Nutrition, Chia Nan University of Pharmacy and Science, Tainan, Taiwan
| | - Jhi-Joung Wang
- Department of Medical Research, Chi Mei Medical Center, Tainan, Taiwan
| | - Chung-Han Ho
- Department of Medical Research, Chi Mei Medical Center, Tainan, Taiwan
- Department of Information Management, Southern Taiwan University of Science and Technology, Tainan, Taiwan
- Cancer Center, Taipei Municipal Wanfang Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Yow-Ling Shiue
- Institute of Biomedical Sciences, National Sun Yat-sen University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Pasch JA, MacDermid E, Velovski S. Effect of rurality and socioeconomic deprivation on presentation stage and long-term outcomes in patients undergoing surgery for colorectal cancer. ANZ J Surg 2021; 91:1569-1574. [PMID: 33792127 DOI: 10.1111/ans.16734] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2020] [Revised: 02/14/2021] [Accepted: 02/22/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Geographical remoteness and socioeconomic status (SES) are important factors affecting presentation stage and survival for colorectal cancer. A series of patients from a single institution in northern New South Wales was studied to determine if rural isolation or SES affected presentation and survival in patients undergoing resection. METHODS Consecutive colorectal cancer resections performed at Lismore Base Hospital from 2011 to 2019 were identified. Patient residential addresses were categorized by the Modified Monash Model (MMM), an Australian Government definition of rural isolation, and Socioeconomic Index for Areas (SEIFA) quintiles, an Australian Bureau of Statistics index of socioeconomic deprivation. Univariate and Cox regression survival analysis was performed on data from histopathology and clinical notes matched with survival data. RESULTS A total of 405 patients were included in MMM categories 3 (n = 207, 51.1%), 4 (n = 69, 17%) and 5 (n = 129, 31.9) corresponding to large, medium and small rural towns. MMM 3 was associated with emergency cases (25.6% versus 18.7%, P < 0.001), nodal disease (44.4% versus 38.4%, P = 0.018) and T3/4 tumours (82.1% versus 73.7%, P < 0.001) compared with isolated patients without difference in 5-year survival (P = 0.370). Disadvantaged SEIFA quintiles 1/2 demonstrated increased poor differentiation (23.0% versus 15.4%, P < 0.001) and vascular invasion (15.8% versus 9.1%, P < 0.001) with reduced 5-year survival (57.0% versus 70.4%, P = 0.039). Independent predictors of survival included age, emergency cases, group stage, lymphatic invasion and low lymph node yield. CONCLUSION A 'rural reversal' may be present for patients in northern New South Wales; however, SES and established clinicopathological factors are the strongest predictors of survival in our population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James A Pasch
- Department of Surgery, Northern Beaches Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Ewan MacDermid
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Bankstown-Lidcombe Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Northern Clinical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Susan Velovski
- Department of Surgery, Lismore Base Hospital, Lismore, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Galadima HI, Adunlin G, Hughes MS, Cropp CD, Lucero L, Akpinar-Elci M. Racial disparities and treatment trends among young-onset colorectal cancer patients: An analysis of a hospital cancer registry. Cancer Epidemiol 2021; 72:101911. [PMID: 33662693 DOI: 10.1016/j.canep.2021.101911] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2020] [Revised: 02/15/2021] [Accepted: 02/19/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is an increasing trend of colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence and mortality in individuals under the age of 50. The impact of age on the outcomes of CRC remains controversial. This study examined the characteristics and treatment trends of young-onset CRC by comparing patients < 50 years of age to those ≥50. METHODS Data were retrospectively obtained from one of the largest hospital systems in Virginia. The sample included patients diagnosed with CRC from 2008 to 2016. Bivariate analyses were used to describe patients' characteristics. Stratified and multivariate analyses were used to evaluate the association between treatments and age groups in different stages at diagnosis. RESULTS Approximately 11.6 % (n = 522) of the cohort were younger than 50 years old at diagnosis with a mean age of 42.7 (SD = 5.9) years. Compared to their older counterpart (50 and older), young-onset patients were more likely to be African American (28.7 % (n = 150) vs. 23.7 % (n = 944)), to own private insurance (68.5 % (n = 313) vs. 27.6 % (n = 1032)), to have never used tobacco products (50.4 % (n = 237) vs. 43.8 % (n = 1616)), and to be late stage at diagnosis (68.6 % (n = 358) vs. 52.5 % (n = 2090)) (all p < 0.05). For early stage diagnosis, over 98 % of the young-onset treatments were surgery. For late stage diagnosis, the cancer treatment for young onset patients were a combination of surgery (89.4 %), radiation (82.5 %), and chemotherapy (86.3 %). The results of the analyses also demonstrated that patients with young-onset CRC have higher odds for surgery [OR = 1.76, 95 %CI (1.26, 2.47)], radiation [OR = 1.31, 95 %CI (1.17, 1.47)], and chemotherapy [OR = 3.34, 95 %CI (2.62, 4.25)]. CONCLUSIONS Findings confirmed late-stage prevalence among young-onset as well as significant demographic differences with patients' age ≥50. This study is one of few to explore the characteristics and assess treatment of young patients with CRC using U.S hospital data. Moreover, further studies need to clarify the effects of biological properties like genetic influences and environmental factors between races on cancer patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hadiza I Galadima
- School of Community and Environmental Health, College of Health Sciences, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA, United States.
| | - Georges Adunlin
- Department of Pharmaceutical, Social and Administrative Sciences, Samford University, McWhorter School of Pharmacy, Birmingham, AL, United States
| | - Marybeth S Hughes
- Department of Surgery, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, VA, United States
| | - Cheryl D Cropp
- Department of Pharmaceutical, Social and Administrative Sciences, Samford University, McWhorter School of Pharmacy, Birmingham, AL, United States
| | - Luisa Lucero
- School of Community and Environmental Health, College of Health Sciences, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA, United States
| | - Muge Akpinar-Elci
- Center for Global Health, College of Health Sciences, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Boakye D, Walter V, Jansen L, Martens UM, Chang-Claude J, Hoffmeister M, Brenner H. Magnitude of the Age-Advancement Effect of Comorbidities in Colorectal Cancer Prognosis. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2021; 18:59-68. [PMID: 31910379 DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2019.7346] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2019] [Accepted: 08/09/2019] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Comorbidities and old age independently compromise prognosis of patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). The impact of comorbidities could thus be considered as conveying worse prognosis already at younger ages, but evidence is lacking on how much worsening of prognosis with age is advanced to younger ages in comorbid versus noncomorbid patients. We aimed to quantify, for the first time, the impact of comorbidities on CRC prognosis in "age advancement" of worse prognosis. METHODS A total of 4,602 patients aged ≥30 years who were diagnosed with CRC in 2003 through 2014 were recruited into a population-based study in the Rhine-Neckar region of Germany and observed over a median period of 5.1 years. Overall comorbidity was quantified using the Charlson comorbidity index (CCI). Hazard ratios and age advancement periods (AAPs) for comorbidities were calculated from multivariable Cox proportional hazards models for relevant survival outcomes. RESULTS Hazard ratios for CCI scores 1, 2, and ≥3 compared with CCI 0 were 1.25, 1.53, and 2.30 (P<.001) for overall survival and 1.20, 1.48, and 2.03 (P<.001) for disease-free survival, respectively. Corresponding AAP estimates for CCI scores 1, 2, and ≥3 were 5.0 (95% CI, 1.9-8.1), 9.7 (95% CI, 6.1-13.3), and 18.9 years (95% CI, 14.4-23.3) for overall survival and 5.5 (95% CI, 1.5-9.5), 11.7 (95% CI, 7.0-16.4), and 21.0 years (95% CI, 15.1-26.9) for disease-free survival. Particularly pronounced effects of comorbidity on CRC prognosis were observed in patients with stage I-III CRC. CONCLUSIONS Comorbidities advance the commonly observed deterioration of prognosis with age by many years, meaning that at substantially younger ages, comorbid patients with CRC experience survival rates comparable to those of older patients without comorbidity. This first derivation of AAPs may enhance the empirical basis for treatment decisions in patients with comorbidities and highlight the need to incorporate comorbidities into prognostic nomograms for CRC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Boakye
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), and.,Medical Faculty Heidelberg, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Viola Walter
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), and
| | - Lina Jansen
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), and
| | - Uwe M Martens
- SLK-Clinics, Cancer Center Heilbronn-Franken, Heilbronn, Germany
| | - Jenny Chang-Claude
- Unit of Genetic Epidemiology, Division of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Michael Hoffmeister
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), and
| | - Hermann Brenner
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), and.,Division of Preventive Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany; and.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Flynn DE, Mao D, Yerkovich ST, Franz R, Iswariah H, Hughes A, Shaw IM, Tam DPL, Chandrasegaram MD. The impact of comorbidities on post-operative complications following colorectal cancer surgery. PLoS One 2020; 15:e0243995. [PMID: 33362234 PMCID: PMC7757883 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0243995] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2020] [Accepted: 12/01/2020] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Colorectal cancer surgery is complex and can result in severe post-operative complications. Optimisation of surgical outcomes requires a thorough understanding of the background complexity and comorbid status of patients. Aim The aim of this study is to determine whether certain pre-existing comorbidities are associated with high grade post-operative complications following colorectal cancer surgery. The study also aims to define the prevalence of demographic, comorbid and surgical features in a population undergoing colorectal cancer resection. Method A colorectal cancer database at The Prince Charles Hospital was established to capture detailed information on patient background, comorbidities and clinicopathological features. A single-centre retrospective study was undertaken to assess the effect of comorbidities on post-operative outcomes following colorectal cancer resection. Five hundred and thirty-three patients were reviewed between 2010–2018 to assess if specific comorbidities were associated with higher grade post-operative complications. A Clavien-Dindo grade of three or higher was defined as a high grade complication. Results Fifty-eight percent of all patients had an ASA grade of ASA III or above. The average BMI of patients undergoing resection was 28 ± 6.0. Sixteen percent of all patients experienced a high grade complications. Patients with high grade complications had a higher mean average age compared to patients with low grade or no post-operative complications (74 years vs 70 years, p = 0.01). Univariate analysis revealed patients with atrial fibrillation, COPD, ischaemic heart disease and heart failure had an increased risk of high grade complications. Multivariate analysis revealed pre-existing atrial fibrillation (OR 2.70, 95% CI 1.53–4.89, p <0.01) and COPD (OR 2.02 1.07–3.80, p = 0.029) were independently associated with an increased risk of high grade complications. Conclusion Pre-existing atrial fibrillation and COPD are independent risk factors for high grade complications. Targeted perioperative management is necessary to optimise outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David E. Flynn
- Department of General Surgery, The Prince Charles Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
- * E-mail:
| | - Derek Mao
- Department of General Surgery, The Prince Charles Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Stephanie T. Yerkovich
- The Common Good Foundation, The Prince Charles Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Robert Franz
- Department of General Surgery, The Prince Charles Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Harish Iswariah
- Department of General Surgery, The Prince Charles Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Andrew Hughes
- Department of General Surgery, The Prince Charles Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Ian M. Shaw
- Department of General Surgery, The Prince Charles Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Diana P. L. Tam
- Department of General Surgery, The Prince Charles Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Paley EL. Discovery of Gut Bacteria Specific to Alzheimer's Associated Diseases is a Clue to Understanding Disease Etiology: Meta-Analysis of Population-Based Data on Human Gut Metagenomics and Metabolomics. J Alzheimers Dis 2020; 72:319-355. [PMID: 31561379 DOI: 10.3233/jad-190873] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Alzheimer's disease (AD)-associated sequence (ADAS) of cultured fecal bacteria was discovered in human gut targeted screening. This study provides important information to expand our current understanding of the structure/activity relationship of ADAS and putative inhibitors/activators that are potentially involved in ADAS appearance/disappearance. The NCBI database analysis revealed that ADAS presents at a large proportion in American Indian Oklahoman (C&A) with a high prevalence of obesity/diabetes and in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients from the US and China. An Oklahoman non-native group (NNI) showed no ADAS. Comparison of two large US populations reveals that ADAS is more frequent in individuals aged ≥66 and in females. Prevalence and levels of fecal metabolites are altered in the C&A and CRC groups versus controls. Biogenic amines (histamine, tryptamine, tyramine, phenylethylamine, cadaverine, putrescine, agmatine, spermidine) that present in food and are produced by gut microbiota are significantly higher in C&A (e.g., histamine/histidine 95-fold) versus NNI (histamine/histidine 16-fold). The majority of these bio-amines are cytotoxic at concentrations found in food. Inositol phosphate signaling implicated in AD is altered in C&A and CRC. Tryptamine stimulated accumulation of inositol phosphate. The seizure-eliciting tryptamine induced cytoplasmic vacuolization and vesiculation with cell fragmentation. Present additions of ADAS-carriers at different ages including infants led to an ADAS-comprising human sample size of 2,830 from 27 studies from four continents (North America, Australia, Asia, Europe). Levels of food-derived monoamine oxidase inhibitors and anti-bacterial compounds, the potential modulators of ADAS-bacteria growth and biogenic amine production, were altered in C&A versus NNI. ADAS is attributable to potentially modifiable risk factors of AD associated diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elena L Paley
- Expert Biomed, Inc., Miami, FL, USA.,Stop Alzheimers Corp, Miami, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Islam JY, Camacho-Rivera M, Vidot DC. Examining COVID-19 Preventive Behaviors among Cancer Survivors in the United States: An Analysis of the COVID-19 Impact Survey. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2020; 29:2583-2590. [PMID: 32978173 PMCID: PMC7871461 DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-20-0801] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2020] [Revised: 07/06/2020] [Accepted: 09/22/2020] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has impacted adults with chronic diseases, and their health care delivery. Patterns of COVID-19–related preventive behaviors practiced by cancer survivors are unknown, including practices related to canceling doctor's appointments. We evaluated COVID-19–related preventive behaviors among cancer survivors in the United States. Methods: We used nationally representative data of 10,760 U.S. adults from the COVID-19 Impact Survey. We defined cancer survivors as those with a self-reported diagnosis of cancer (n = 854, 7.6%). We present frequencies and χ2 tests to evaluate COVID-19–related preventive behaviors among cancer survivors. We estimated determinants of canceling doctor's appointments among cancer survivors using Poisson regression models. Results: Cancer survivors were more likely to practice preventive behaviors, including social distancing (93%, χ2P < 0.001), wearing a face mask (93%, χ2P < 0.001), and avoiding crowded areas (84%, χ2P < 0.001) compared with adults without cancer. Cancer survivors were more likely to cancel doctor's appointments (41%, χ2P < 0.001), whereas they were less likely to cancel other social activities such as work (19%, χ2P < 0.001) and school-related (13%, χ2P < 0.001) activities. After adjustment for covariates, while non-Hispanic (NH)-Black cancer survivors were less likely to cancel a doctor's appointment compared with NH-White cancer survivors, cancer survivors aged 18 to 29, who were female, and who had least one comorbid condition were more likely. Conclusions: Cancer survivors are adhering to recommended preventive behaviors. Cancer survivor's continuity of care may be impacted by COVID-19, specifically young adults, females, and those with existing comorbid conditions. Impact: Insights into cancer survivors whose care may be most impacted by COVID-19 will be valuable toward surveillance and survivorship of U.S. cancer survivors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica Y Islam
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
| | - Marlene Camacho-Rivera
- Department of Community Health Sciences, SUNY Downstate Health Sciences University, New York, New York
| | - Denise C Vidot
- Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, School of Nursing and Health Studies, University of Miami, Coral Gables, Miami
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Singh B, Hayes SC, Spence RR, Steele ML, Millet GY, Gergele L. Exercise and colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of exercise safety, feasibility and effectiveness. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2020; 17:122. [PMID: 32972439 PMCID: PMC7513291 DOI: 10.1186/s12966-020-01021-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 83] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2020] [Accepted: 09/09/2020] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Background This meta-analysis evaluated the safety, feasibility and effect of exercise among individuals with colorectal cancer. Methods A database search (CINAHL, Ebscohost, MEDLINE, Pubmed, ProQuest Health and Medical Complete, ProQuest Nursing, Science Direct) for randomised, controlled, exercise trials involving individuals with colorectal cancer, published before January 1, 2020 was undertaken. Safety (adverse events), feasibility (withdrawal and adherence rates) and effect data (health outcomes including quality of life, QoL) were abstracted. Risk difference (RD) and standardised mean differences (SMD) were calculated to compare safety and effects between exercise and usual care (UC). Subgroup analyses were conducted to assess whether outcomes differed by exercise mode, duration, supervision and treatment. Risk of bias was assessed using the Physiotherapy Evidence Database tool. Results For the 19 trials included, there was no difference in adverse event risk between exercise and UC (RD = 0.00; 95% CI:–0.01, 0.01, p = 0.92). Median withdrawal rate was 12% (0–22%) and adherence was 86% (42–91%). Significant effects of exercise compared to UC were observed for QoL, fatigue, aerobic fitness, upper-body strength, depression, sleep and reduced body fat (SMD = 0.21–0.66, p < 0.05). Subgroup analyses suggested larger benefits (p < 0.05) for QoL and fatigue for supervised interventions; for QoL, aerobic fitness and reduced body fat for ≥12-week interventions; and for aerobic fitness when interventions were during chemotherapy. Conclusion Although reporting of safety and compliance data was lacking in most trials, findings support that exercise is safe and feasible in colorectal cancer. Further, participation in mixed-mode exercise, including unsupervised exercise, leads to improvements in various health-related outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin Singh
- Univ Lyon, UJM-Saint-Etienne, Inter-university Laboratory of Human Movement Biology, EA 7424, F-42023, Saint-Etienne, France. .,Laboratoire Interuniversitaire de Biologie de la Motricité, Bâtiment IRMIS, 10 rue de la Marandière, 42270, Saint Priest en Jarez, France.
| | - Sandra C Hayes
- Griffith University, Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Rosalind R Spence
- Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Musk Avenue, Kelvin Grove, Queensland, Australia
| | - Megan L Steele
- School of Clinical Medicine, University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Queensland, Australia
| | - Guillaume Y Millet
- Univ Lyon, UJM-Saint-Etienne, Inter-university Laboratory of Human Movement Biology, EA 7424, F-42023, Saint-Etienne, France.,Institut Universitaire de France (IUF), Paris, France
| | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Atallah C, Oduyale O, Stem M, Eltahir A, Almaazmi HH, Efron JE, Safar B. Are academic hospitals better at treating metastatic colorectal cancer? Surgery 2020; 169:248-256. [PMID: 32680747 DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2020.05.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2020] [Revised: 05/03/2020] [Accepted: 05/05/2020] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is a strong association between hospital volume and surgical outcomes in resectable colorectal cancer. The purpose of our study was to investigate the association between hospital facility type and survival of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. METHODS Adults from the National Cancer Database (2010-2015) with a primary diagnosis of colorectal metastases were included and stratified by facility type: community cancer program, comprehensive community cancer program, and academic/research program. The primary outcome was 5-year overall survival, analyzed using Kaplan-Meier survival curves, log-rank test, and the Cox proportional hazards regression model. RESULTS Among the 52,958 included patients, 13.72% were treated at a community cancer program, 49.89% at a comprehensive community cancer program, and 36.29% at an academic/research program. A significant increase in the proportion of patients being treated in an academic/research program has been observed from 2010 to 2015. An academic/research program tended to use more chemotherapy with colorectal radical resection and liver or lung resection and immunotherapy with chemotherapy. In adjusted analysis, the academic/research program had decreased risk of mortality in comparison to the community cancer program and the comprehensive community cancer program (hazard ratio 0.90, 95% confidence interval 0.86-0.94; 0.87, 0.85-0.90; each P < .001; respectively). Similar results were seen after stratifying by metastatic site and treatment type. CONCLUSION The prognosis and overall survival of patients with metastatic disease is better in an academic/research program compared with a community cancer program or a comprehensive community cancer program, with this difference persisting across sites of metastatic disease and treatment types. Further studies are required to validate these results and investigate disparities in the management of metastatic colorectal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chady Atallah
- Colorectal Research Unit, Ravitch Colorectal Division, Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
| | - Oluseye Oduyale
- Colorectal Research Unit, Ravitch Colorectal Division, Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Miloslawa Stem
- Colorectal Research Unit, Ravitch Colorectal Division, Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Ahmed Eltahir
- Colorectal Research Unit, Ravitch Colorectal Division, Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Hamda H Almaazmi
- Colorectal Research Unit, Ravitch Colorectal Division, Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Department of Surgery, George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC
| | - Jonathan E Efron
- Colorectal Research Unit, Ravitch Colorectal Division, Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Bashar Safar
- Colorectal Research Unit, Ravitch Colorectal Division, Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Sweeney‐Magee M, Moustaqim‐Barrette A, Gotay C, Dummer T. A systematic mixed studies review of health behaviour change interventions in colorectal cancer survivors. J Adv Nurs 2020. [DOI: 10.1111/jan.14389] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2019] [Revised: 03/20/2020] [Accepted: 04/01/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Molly Sweeney‐Magee
- School of Population and Public Health University of British Columbia Vancouver British Columbia Canada
| | - Amina Moustaqim‐Barrette
- School of Population and Public Health University of British Columbia Vancouver British Columbia Canada
| | - Carolyn Gotay
- School of Population and Public Health University of British Columbia Vancouver British Columbia Canada
| | - Trevor Dummer
- School of Population and Public Health University of British Columbia Vancouver British Columbia Canada
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Qiang JK, Sutradhar R, Giannakeas V, Bhatia D, Singh S, Lipscombe LL. Impact of diabetes on colorectal cancer stage and mortality risk: a population-based cohort study. Diabetologia 2020; 63:944-953. [PMID: 31993714 DOI: 10.1007/s00125-020-05094-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2019] [Accepted: 12/17/2019] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Abstract
AIMS/HYPOTHESIS Diabetes is associated with an increased incidence of colorectal cancer (CRC). There exists conflicting evidence regarding the impact of diabetes on CRC-specific mortality (herein also referred to as cancer-specific mortality). The objectives of this study were to determine whether diabetes is associated with a more advanced CRC stage at diagnosis and with higher all-cause and cancer-specific mortality. METHODS This retrospective cohort study used linked, population-based health databases from Ontario, Canada. Among individuals diagnosed with CRC from 2007 to 2015, we compared the likelihood of presenting with later- (III or IV) vs early- (I or II) stage CRC between patients with and without diabetes adjusting for relevant covariates. We then determined the association between diabetes and all-cause and CRC-specific mortality, after adjusting for CRC stage at diagnosis and other covariates. RESULTS Of the 44,178 individuals with CRC, 11,822 (26.7%) had diabetes. After adjustment for CRC screening and other covariates, individuals with diabetes were not more likely to present with later-stage CRC (adjusted OR 0.97, 95% CI 0.93, 1.01). Over a median follow-up of 2.63 (interquartile range [IQR] 0.97-5.10) years, diabetes was associated with higher all-cause mortality (adjusted HR 1.08, 95% CI 1.04, 1.12) but similar cancer-specific survival (adjusted HR 1.0, 95% CI 0.95, 1.06). CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION Individuals with diabetes who develop CRC are not more likely to present with a later stage of CRC and have similar cancer-specific mortality compared with those without diabetes. Diabetes was associated with higher all-cause mortality in CRC patients, indicating that greater attention to non-cancer care is needed for CRC survivors with diabetes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Judy K Qiang
- Department of Medicine, Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Rinku Sutradhar
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- ICES, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Vasily Giannakeas
- ICES, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Women's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, 76 Grenville Street, Room 6424, Toronto, ON, M5S 1B2, Canada
| | - Dominika Bhatia
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | - Lorraine L Lipscombe
- Department of Medicine, Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
- ICES, Toronto, ON, Canada.
- Women's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, 76 Grenville Street, Room 6424, Toronto, ON, M5S 1B2, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Luque-Fernandez MA, Gonçalves K, Salamanca-Fernández E, Redondo-Sanchez D, Lee SF, Rodríguez-Barranco M, Carmona-García MC, Marcos-Gragera R, Sánchez MJ. Multimorbidity and short-term overall mortality among colorectal cancer patients in Spain: A population-based cohort study. Eur J Cancer 2020; 129:4-14. [PMID: 32114366 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2020.01.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2019] [Revised: 01/14/2020] [Accepted: 01/17/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Numerous studies have analysed the effect of comorbidity on cancer outcomes, but evidence on the association between multimorbidity and short-term mortality among colorectal cancer patients is limited. We aimed to assess this association and the most frequent patterns of multimorbidity associated with a higher short-term mortality risk among colorectal cancer patients in Spain. METHODS Data were obtained from two Spanish population-based cancer registries and electronic health records. We estimated the unadjusted cumulative incidence of death by comorbidity status at 6 months and 1 year. We used a flexible parametric model to derive the excess mortality hazard ratios (HRs) for multimorbidity after adjusting for sex, age at diagnosis, cancer stage and treatment. We estimated the adjusted cumulative incidence of death by comorbidity status and identified multimorbidity patterns. RESULTS Among the study participants, 1,048 cases were diagnosed with cancers of the colon and rectum, 2 cases with cancer of the anus with overlapping sites of the rectum and 11 cases with anal adenocarcinomas but treated as colorectal cancer patients. Among 1,061 colorectal cancer patients, 171 (16.2%) died before 6 months, 246 (23.3%) died before the 1-year follow-up, and 324 (30.5%) had multimorbidity. Patients with multimorbidity had two times higher mortality risk than those without comorbidities at 6 months (adjusted HR: 2.04; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.30-3.20, p = 0.002). The most frequent multimorbidity pattern was congestive heart failure + diabetes. However, patients with rheumatologic disease + diabetes had two times higher 1-year mortality risk than those without comorbidities (HR: 2.23; 95% CI: 1.23-4.07, p = 0.008). CONCLUSIONS Multimorbidity was a strong independent predictor of short-term mortality at 6 months and 1 year among the colorectal cancer patients in Spain. The identified multimorbidity pattern was consistent. Our findings might help identify patients at a higher risk for poor cancer and treatment outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miguel A Luque-Fernandez
- Noncommunicable Disease and Cancer Epidemiology Group, Instituto de Investigación Biosanitaria de Granada, Ibs.GRANADA, University of Granada, Granada, Spain; Biomedical Network Research Centers of Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP), Madrid; Department of Non-communicable Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
| | - Karen Gonçalves
- Noncommunicable Disease and Cancer Epidemiology Group, Instituto de Investigación Biosanitaria de Granada, Ibs.GRANADA, University of Granada, Granada, Spain; National School of Public Health, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, (ENSP, FIOCRUZ), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | - Elena Salamanca-Fernández
- Noncommunicable Disease and Cancer Epidemiology Group, Instituto de Investigación Biosanitaria de Granada, Ibs.GRANADA, University of Granada, Granada, Spain
| | - Daniel Redondo-Sanchez
- Noncommunicable Disease and Cancer Epidemiology Group, Instituto de Investigación Biosanitaria de Granada, Ibs.GRANADA, University of Granada, Granada, Spain; Biomedical Network Research Centers of Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP), Madrid; Andalusian School of Public Health, Granada, Spain
| | - Shing F Lee
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Tuen Mun Hospital, New Territories West Cluster, Hospital Authority, Hong Kong
| | - Miguel Rodríguez-Barranco
- Noncommunicable Disease and Cancer Epidemiology Group, Instituto de Investigación Biosanitaria de Granada, Ibs.GRANADA, University of Granada, Granada, Spain; Biomedical Network Research Centers of Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP), Madrid; Andalusian School of Public Health, Granada, Spain
| | - Ma C Carmona-García
- Descriptive Epidemiology, Genetics and Cancer Prevention Group, Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBGI), Girona, Spain; Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Català d'Oncologia, Hospital Universitari de Girona Dr. Josep Trueta, Girona, Spain
| | - Rafael Marcos-Gragera
- Descriptive Epidemiology, Genetics and Cancer Prevention Group, Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBGI), Girona, Spain; Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Català d'Oncologia, Hospital Universitari de Girona Dr. Josep Trueta, Girona, Spain; Catalan Institute of Oncology, Epidemiology Unit and Girona Cancer Registry, Oncology Coordination Plan, Department of Health, Autonomous Government of Catalonia, Catalan Institute of Oncology, Girona, Spain; Research Group on Statistics, Econometrics and Health (GRECS), University of Girona, Girona, Spain
| | - María-José Sánchez
- Noncommunicable Disease and Cancer Epidemiology Group, Instituto de Investigación Biosanitaria de Granada, Ibs.GRANADA, University of Granada, Granada, Spain; Biomedical Network Research Centers of Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP), Madrid; Andalusian School of Public Health, Granada, Spain; Universidad de Granada (UGR). Granada, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Mahumud RA, Alam K, Dunn J, Gow J. The burden of chronic diseases among Australian cancer patients: Evidence from a longitudinal exploration, 2007-2017. PLoS One 2020; 15:e0228744. [PMID: 32049978 PMCID: PMC7015395 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0228744] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2019] [Accepted: 01/22/2020] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Cancer is a major public health concern in terms of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Several types of cancer patients suffer from chronic comorbid conditions that are a major clinical challenge for treatment and cancer management. The main objective of this study was to investigate the distribution of the burden of chronic comorbid conditions and associated predictors among cancer patients in Australia over the period of 2007-2017. METHODS The study employed a prospective longitudinal design using data from the Household, Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia survey. The number of chronic comorbid conditions was measured for each respondent. The longitudinal effect was captured using a fixed-effect negative binomial regression model, which predicted the potential factors that played a significant role in the occurrence of chronic comorbid conditions. RESULTS Sixty-one percent of cancer patients experienced at least one chronic disease over the period, and 21% of patients experienced three or more chronic diseases. Age (>65 years old) (incidence rate ratio, IRR = 1.15; 95% confidence interval, CI: 1.05, 1.40), inadequate levels of physical activity (IRR = 1.25; 95% CI: 1.09, 1.59), patients who suffered from extreme health burden (IRR = 2.30; 95% CI: 1.73, 3.05) or moderate health burden (IRR = 1.90; 95% CI: 1.45, 2.48), and patients living in the poorest households (IRR = 1.21; 95% CI: 1.11, 1.29) were significant predictors associated with a higher risk of chronic comorbid conditions. CONCLUSIONS A large number of cancer patients experience an extreme burden of chronic comorbid conditions and the different dimensions of these in cancer survivors have the potential to affect the trajectory of their cancer burden. It is also significant for health care providers, including physical therapists and oncologists, who must manage the unique problems that challenge this population and who should advocate for prevention and evidence-based interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rashidul Alam Mahumud
- Health Economics and Policy Research, Centre for Health, Informatics and Economic Research, University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, Queensland, Australia
- School of Commerce, University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, Queensland, Australia
- Health Economics Research, Health Systems and Population Studies Division, International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh (icddr,b), Dhaka, Bangladesh
- Health and Epidemiology Research, Department of Statistics, Rajshahi, Bangladesh
| | - Khorshed Alam
- Health Economics and Policy Research, Centre for Health, Informatics and Economic Research, University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, Queensland, Australia
- School of Commerce, University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, Queensland, Australia
| | - Jeff Dunn
- Health Economics and Policy Research, Centre for Health, Informatics and Economic Research, University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, Queensland, Australia
- Cancer Research Centre, Cancer Council Queensland, Fortitude Valley, Queensland, Australia
- Prostate Cancer Foundation of Australia, St Leonards, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Jeff Gow
- Health Economics and Policy Research, Centre for Health, Informatics and Economic Research, University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, Queensland, Australia
- School of Commerce, University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, Queensland, Australia
- School of Accounting, Economics and Finance, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Oyeyemi SO, Braaten T, Skeie G, Borch KB. Competing mortality risks analysis of prediagnostic lifestyle and dietary factors in colorectal cancer survival: the Norwegian Women and Cancer Study. BMJ Open Gastroenterol 2019; 6:e000338. [PMID: 31749978 PMCID: PMC6827763 DOI: 10.1136/bmjgast-2019-000338] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2019] [Revised: 09/20/2019] [Accepted: 10/03/2019] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Background It remains unclear whether or which prediagnostic lifestyle and dietary factors influence colorectal cancer (CRC) survival following diagnosis. This study used competing mortality risks analysis to evaluate the association between these factors and CRC survival. Methods A total of 96 889 cancer-free participants of the Norwegian Women and Cancer Study completed the study’s baseline questionnaire on lifestyle and dietary factors between 1996 and 2004. Of the 1861 women who subsequently developed CRC, 550 had CRC as the cause of death, while 110 had a non-CRC cause of death. We used multiple imputation to handle missing data. We performed multivariable competing mortality risks analyses to determine the associations between prediagnostic lifestyle and dietary factors and CRC survival. Cause-specific HRs were estimated by Cox regression and subdistribution HRs were estimated by the Fine-Gray regression with corresponding 95% CIs. Results Following multivariable adjustment, a prediagnostic vitamin D intake of >10 μg/day compared with ≤10 μg/day was associated with better CRC survival (HR=0.75, 95% CI 0.61 to 0.92). Other prediagnostic lifestyle and dietary factors showed no association with CRC survival. The corresponding results obtained from cause-specific Cox and Fine-Gray regressions were similar. Conclusion Our study shows that prediagnostic vitamin D intake could improve CRC survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Tonje Braaten
- Community Medicine, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromso, Norway
| | - Guri Skeie
- Community Medicine, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromso, Norway
| | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Sremanakova J, Jones D, Cooke R, Burden S. Exploring Views of Healthcare Professionals, Researchers, and People Living with and beyond Colorectal Cancer on a Healthy-Eating and Active Lifestyle Resource. Nutrients 2019; 11:E2482. [PMID: 31623177 PMCID: PMC6835229 DOI: 10.3390/nu11102482] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2019] [Revised: 10/03/2019] [Accepted: 10/09/2019] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND People after bowel cancer are at high risk of cancer recurrences and co-morbidities, and therefore strategies are needed to reduce these risks. One promising strategy targets modifiable lifestyle factors including diet and physical activity. However, effective, evidence-based resources in adopting new lifestyle habits are currently lacking. METHODS The Healthy-Eating and Active Lifestyle After Bowel Cancer (HEAL ABC) resource was developed incorporating behavior change theory and World Cancer Research Fund and American Institute of Cancer Research guidelines. Focus groups and telephone interviews were conducted with professionals and survivors (age ≥18 years) to obtain feedback on the resource layout, structure, and content. Recorded data were transcribed verbatim and analyzed using framework analysis. RESULTS Thirty participants evaluated the resource-19 cancer survivors and 11 professionals. Survivors' mean age was 62 years (SD 11.5), 11 (58%) were females and 8 (42%) were male. Professionals were all females and mean age was 40 years (SD 6.06). Both survivors and professionals evaluated the resource as useful and provided suggestions for improvements. CONCLUSIONS HEAL ABC is an evidence-based resource designed to aid cancer survivors in translating their motivation into action. It was valued positively by both survivors and healthcare professionals and viewed as filling a gap in post-treatment advice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jana Sremanakova
- School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL, UK.
| | - Debra Jones
- School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL, UK.
| | - Richard Cooke
- Department of Psychology, University of Liverpool, Bedford Street South, Liverpool L69 7ZA, UK.
| | - Sorrel Burden
- School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Patient-reported outcomes as predictors of survival in patients with bowel cancer: a systematic review. Qual Life Res 2019; 28:2871-2887. [DOI: 10.1007/s11136-019-02255-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/21/2019] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
|