Emerging trends in hospitalisation for fragility fractures in Ireland

Correlation Between Handgrip Strength and Bone Density and Fragility Fracture Risk Among Older Adults: A Cross-Sectional Study

BACKGROUND

Population aging has led to a surge in elderly care needs worldwide. Bone aging, skeletal muscle degeneration, and osteoporosis pose critical health challenges for the elderly. The process of bone and skeletal muscle aging not only impacts the functional abilities but also increases fragility fracture risk. Although a negative correlation between handgrip strength and fragility fracture risk has been identified in elderly populations, there is a lack of related research in Taiwan.

PURPOSE

This cross-sectional study was designed to investigate the association between handgrip strength and two outcome variables, bone density and risk of fragility fracture, in Taiwanese individuals aged 65 years and older with low bone mass.

METHODS

A total of 548 older adults, including 84 men and 464 women, were recruited between August 2019 and July 2021. Bone mineral density T -scores acquired using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scan, the total score for the Taiwan-specific Fracture Risk Assessment (FRAX) tool, and bilateral handgrip strength acquired using a digital hand dynamometer were recorded along with other factors such as comorbidities, dietary habits, and daily activities.

RESULTS

In this study, the mean age was 70.9 ( SD = 5.6) years, mean bone mass index was 24.1 ( SD = 3.5) kg/m 2 , mean FRAX main fracture risk score was 19.5% ( SD = 8.3), and mean FRAX hip fracture risk score was 7.7% ( SD = 5.7). Lumbar and hip T -scores were both significantly correlated with both dominant and nondominant handgrip strength in older woman. Older age; both lower hip and spine T -scores; both lower dominant and nondominant handgrip strengths; having Type 2 diabetes, coronary artery disease, or chronic hepatic disease; and lacking a steady job were significantly associated with a higher risk of fragility fracture.

CONCLUSIONS/IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

The results of this study provide important information regarding the correlation between handgrip strength and several variables, including bone mineral density T -score, FRAX score, comorbidities, and job status, among older adults. Notably, these correlations were found to be particularly strong in the female participants. This information may be used to facilitate the early identification of elderly individuals at a high risk of fragility fractures, enabling the timely development of preventive nursing strategies and the provision of targeted interventions.

Mechanical outcomes of the TFNA, InterTAN and IMHS intramedullary nailing systems for the fixation of proximal femur fractures

INTRODUCTION

Hip fractures have become a major public health priority due to their increasing incidence. Intramedullary (IM) nailing has gained popularity as a surgical technique for managing these fractures. However, comparative studies with extramedullary devices indicate potentially increased mechanical complications associated with IM nailing. Specifically, there have been recent reports of early implant fracture associated with the TFNA system. This study compares the rate of mechanical complications between 3 implants. Secondarily, we analysed the factors associated with implant fracture and all other mechanical complications.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 803 IM nails performed between 2008-2021 for the fixation of proximal femur fractures at a level 1 trauma centre. We recorded patient demographics, AO fracture classification, implant specification and intra-operative parameters such as tip-apex distance, Cleveland index, reduction quality, presence of medial calcar integrity, neck-shaft angle. The outcomes analysed included implant fracture, lag screw cut-out, >10 mm backing out, autodynamisation, periprosthetic fracture, non-union at 6 months and time to revision surgery.

RESULTS

The overall implant fracture rate was 3.1 % (25/803), with no statistically significant difference between the three devices (p = 0.51). The TFNA group included 183 patients with a median follow-up of 1.6 years. The TFNA fracture rate was 2.2 % (4/183) which occurred at 207 +/- 16.66 days post-operatively. The rate of all mechanical complications was 4.9 % in the TFNA group, 12.9 % in the InterTAN group and 17 % in the IMHS group. Non-union (p < 0.001) and increasing lag screw length (p < 0.02) were identified as risk factors for implant fracture and other mechanical complications. The reverse oblique fracture pattern (AO 31 A3.1) was associated with mechanical complications only (p < 0.01). The cumulative survival rates without revision for the TFNA, InterTAN, IMHS groups were 97.8 %, 95.5 % and 87.9 % respectively at 2.5 years.

DISCUSSION

The rates of implant fracture were comparable between the three nailing systems. The TFNA provides effective fixation for proximal femur fractures using a traditional screw without cement augmentation. The TFNA was associated with an overall reduction in mechanical complications compared to the InterTAN and IMHS. Previously reported mechanical complications associated with IM Nails may relate to older device designs.

The decline in transurethral resection of the prostate gland in Irish public hospitals between 2005 and 2021

BACKGROUND

Lower urinary tract symptoms due to an enlarged prostate is a common condition. Transurethral resection of the prostate gland (TURP) has been the gold standard treatment. The objective of this study was to assess the trends in the prevalence of TURP procedures in Irish public hospitals within the period of 2005-2021. In addition, we explore the attitudes and practices of urologist in Ireland on this topic.

METHODS

An analysis using the Hospital In-Patient Enquiry (HIPE) system using code 37203-00 was undertaken. 16,176 discharges contained the code of interest and had undergone a TURP procedure. The data from this cohort was further analysed. In addition, members of the Irish Society of Urology undertook a bespoke questionnaire to understand the TURP surgery practices.

RESULTS

There has been a substantial decline in the prevalence of TURP procedures in Irish public hospitals from 2005 to 2021. The number of patients discharged from Irish hospitals with a TURP procedure was 66% less in 2021 compared to 2005. 75% (n = 36) of urologist surveyed felt that the declining TURP numbers were due to lack of resources, access to theatre/inpatient beds and outsourcing. 91.5% (n = 43) felt that the declining TURP numbers would result in a lack of training opportunities for trainees, 83% (39) felt this has increased morbidity for patients.

CONCLUSIONS

TURP procedures in Irish public hospitals has declined over the 16-year period studied. This decline is a concern for patient morbidity and urology training.

Prevalence of Low Bone Mass and Osteoporosis in Ireland: the Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry (DXA) Health Informatics Prediction (HIP) Project

Osteoporosis is a common disease that has a significant impact on patients, healthcare systems, and society. World Health Organization (WHO) diagnostic criteria for postmenopausal women were established in 1994 to diagnose low bone mass (osteopenia) and osteoporosis using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA)-measured bone mineral density (BMD) to help understand the epidemiology of osteoporosis, and identify those at risk for fracture. These criteria may also apply to men ≥50 years, perimenopausal women, and people of different ethnicity. The DXA Health Informatics Prediction (HIP) project is an established convenience cohort of more than 36,000 patients who had a DXA scan to explore the epidemiology of osteoporosis and its management in the Republic of Ireland where the prevalence of osteoporosis remains unknown. In this article we compare the prevalence of a DXA classification low bone mass (T-score < -1.0) and of osteoporosis (T-score ≤ -2.5) among adults aged ≥40 years without major risk factors or fractures, with one or more major risk factors, and with one or more major osteoporotic fractures. A total of 33,344 subjects met our study inclusion criteria, including 28,933 (86.8%) women; 9362 had no fractures or major risk factors, 14,932 had one or more major clinical risk factors, and 9050 had one or more major osteoporotic fractures. The prevalence of low bone mass and osteoporosis increased significantly with age overall. The prevalence of low bone mass and osteoporosis was significantly greater among men and women with major osteoporotic fractures than healthy controls or those with clinical risk factors. Applying our results to the national population census figure of 5,123,536 in 2022 we estimate between 1,039,348 and 1,240,807 men and women aged ≥50 years have low bone mass, whereas between 308,474 and 498,104 have osteoporosis. These data are important for the diagnosis of osteoporosis in clinical practice, and national policy to reduce the illness burden of osteoporosis. © 2023 The Authors. JBMR Plus published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

Ireland DXA-FRAX may differ significantly and substantially to Web-FRAX

Appropriate use of FRAX reduces the number of people requiring DXA scans, while contemporaneously determining those most at risk. We compared the results of FRAX with and without inclusion of BMD. It suggests clinicians to carefully consider the importance of BMD inclusion in fracture risk estimation or interpretation in individual patients.

PURPOSE

FRAX is a widely accepted tool to estimate the 10-year risk of hip and major osteoporotic fracture in adults. Prior calibration studies suggest this works similarly with or without the inclusion of bone mineral density (BMD). The purpose of the study is to compare within-subject differences between FRAX estimations derived using DXA and Web software with and without the inclusion of BMD.

METHOD

A convenience cohort was used for this cross-sectional study, consisting of 1254 men and women aged between 40 and 90 years who had a DXA scan and complete validated data available for analysis. FRAX 10-year estimations for hip and major osteoporotic fracture were calculated using DXA software (DXA-FRAX) and the Web tool (Web-FRAX), with and without BMD. Agreements between estimates within each individual subject were examined using Bland-Altman plots. We performed exploratory analyses of the characteristics of those with very discordant results.

RESULTS

Overall median DXA-FRAX and Web-FRAX 10-year hip and major osteoporotic fracture risk estimations which include BMD are very similar: 2.9% vs. 2.8% and 11.0% vs. 11% respectively. However, both are significantly lower than those obtained without BMD: 4.9% and 14% respectively, P < 0.001. Within-subject differences between hip fracture estimates with and without BMD were < 3% in 57% of cases, between 3 and 6% in 19% of cases, and > 6% in 24% of cases, while for major osteoporotic fractures such differences are < 10% in 82% of cases, between 10 and 20% in 15% of cases, and > 20% in 3% of cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Although there is excellent agreement between the Web-FRAX and DXA-FRAX tools when BMD is incorporated, sometimes there are very large differences for individuals between results obtained with and without BMD. Clinicians should carefully consider the importance of BMD inclusion in FRAX estimations when assessing individual patients.

Osteoporotic fracture admissions compared to other major medical admissions in Irish public hospitals

Multinational reports suggest Ireland has one of the greatest illness burdens related to osteoporosis. Hospital care represents the costliest portion of health services. We found public hospital bed days for fragility fractures in Ireland increased by 43% between 2008 and 2017 which exceeded those for other common diseases.

INTRODUCTION

Recent multinational reports suggest Ireland has one of the greatest illness burdens related to osteoporosis, manifesting clinically as fragility fractures (FF). International reports show that FF incidence, rate of hospital admission and cost are similar or greater than those for breast cancer, myocardial infarction and stroke. Studies addressing the illness burden of osteoporosis in Ireland are few, and none compares fragility fractures to other common chronic diseases.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of national administrative data for all public hospital admissions was performed on adults aged 50 years and older from January 2008 to December 2017.

RESULTS

In 2017, public hospital bed days for FF totalled 249,887 outnumbering Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD): 131,897; 6 solid cancers (CA): 118,098; myocardial infarction (MI): 83,477; and diabetes mellitus (DM): 31,044. Bed days for FF increased by 43% between 2008 and 2017, in contrast to a 32%, 28% and 31% reduction for CA, MI and DM, respectively, and a 12% increase for COPD. Public hospital bed days for FF in 2016 were greater than MI, stroke, atrial fibrillation and chest pain combined but less than a combination of COPD, pneumonia and lower respiratory tract infection.

CONCLUSION

Osteoporotic fractures represent a large and rapidly increasing illness burden amongst older Irish adults, with substantial care requirements and the resulting onus on our healthcare system. Urgent action is needed to address this public health issue and the services for those at risk of fracture.

Effects of COVID-19 confinement on the incidence and mortality of major osteoporotic fractures: an observational study in Catalonia, Spain

There is little information on how the COVID-19 lockdown influenced the epidemiology of major osteoporotic fractures (MOF). We analyzed the incidence and mortality of MOF in 2020 compared with 2018-2019 in Catalonia, Spain. The incidence of MOF decreased steeply, and post-fracture mortality increased during the lockdown and throughout 2020.

PURPOSE

To analyze the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic and lockdown on major osteoporotic fracture (MOF) incidence and mortality in Catalonia in 2020 and describe how age, sex, and the prior comorbidity burden influenced the epidemiology of MOF types.

METHODS

In this retrospective observational study, data on age and sex in people aged ≥ 50 years with a new diagnosis of MOF in 2018, 2019, and 2020 were collected. Average daily rates (ADR) were estimated overall and for five MOF: hip, distal forearm, proximal humerus, vertebrae, and pelvis. Morbidity was assessed using Adjusted Morbidity Groups. ADR in 2020 and the previous years were compared for overall and site-specific MOF in four consecutive time periods: pre-confinement, lockdown, deconfinement, and post-confinement. Thirty-day post-fracture mortality was assessed. COVID-19-related mortality was obtained from the Catalan COVID-19 register.

RESULTS

From 2018 to 2020, there were 86,412 MOF. The ADR of MOF initially increased in 2020 before the pandemic, decreased steeply during lockdown, and remained lower in the rest of the year. The decrease was steeper in vertebral, pelvic and arm fractures, and lower in hip fractures. Differences were more pronounced in younger age groups and people with fewer comorbidities. Mortality increased throughout 2020, reaching a 2.5-fold increase during lockdown. Excess mortality was directly associated with COVID-19.

CONCLUSIONS

Mobility restrictions due to COVID-19 were associated with a reduction in MOF incidence in Catalonia, especially in younger people and in non-hip fractures. Post-fracture mortality was higher than in previous years due to the high COVID-19 mortality in the elderly.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of routine follow-up for hip fracture patients after dynamic hip screw and intramedullary nail fixation

Introduction

The rising number of hip fractures has incentivised several quality improvement initiatives aimed at improving outcomes. These include the national hip fracture audit and the best practice tariff. Whilst there is an established standard of care for inpatients, the optimal outpatient management of patients after hip fracture fixation remains undefined. We aim to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of routine surgical appointments and provide evidence to support an improved outpatient hip fracture care pathway that focuses on more comprehensive multidisciplinary treatment.

Methods

This study retrospectively examined all patients who underwent either dynamic hip screw or intramedullary nail fixation for hip fragility fracture at our hospital over a 3-year period. Data was obtained from the Irish Hip Fracture Database (IHFD), the national integrated imaging system (NIMIS) and the medical charts. The number of outpatient appointments, postoperative radiographs and estimated cost of these patient encounters was examined. The rate of revision surgery as well as the type and timing of these interventions was also analysed.

Results

We included 272 patients. The mean number of inpatient and outpatient radiographs was 1.13 and 1.54 per patient respectively. There were 428 outpatient appointments scheduled, an average of 1.6 (SD 1.5) per patient. The median length of stay was 12 days (IQR 8-17). Only 16 (5.8%) patients had abnormal X-ray findings and only 8 (2.9%) patients underwent revision surgery. The majority (15/16, 94%) of patients with surgical complications presented with significant symptoms. There was a 13.1% DNA rate resulting in a cost to the health service of €1,400. The combined total cost of follow-up for all patients over the 3 year period was €92,252.

Discussion

Routine postoperative surgical encounters rarely alter a patient's management and contribute significantly to healthcare costs, resources and time loss for patients and their carers. We propose more selective follow-up protocols, adequately resourcing virtual alternatives and an improved outpatient hip fracture care pathway that focuses on comprehensive multidisciplinary treatment such as rehabilitation, fracture prevention and bone health optimisation.

Cost-effectiveness of vitamin D3 supplementation in older adults with vitamin D deficiency in Ireland

Background

This study investigated the cost-effectiveness of vitamin D₃ supplementation in older adults in Ireland, with year-round vitamin D deficiency (serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentration <30 nmol/L) (13% of Irish adults), from the perspective of the Health Service Executive.

Methods

Three age groups were investigated: (1) ≥50 years, (2) ≥60 years and (3) ≥70 years. Based on the clinical literature, vitamin D₃ supplementation may: (1) decrease all-cause mortality by 7% and (2) reduce hip fractures by 16% and non-hip fractures by 20%. A discount rate of 4% was applied to life years and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained, and healthcare costs. The annual healthcare costs per patient used in the model are based on the average annual health resource use over the 5-year time horizon of the model.

Results

The cost/QALY estimates in all three age groups are below the usually acceptable cost-effectiveness threshold of €20 000/QALY. The most cost-effective and least costly intervention was in adults ≥70 years. For this age group, the average annual costs and outcomes would be approximately €5.6 million, 1044 QALYs gained, with a cost/QALY of approximately €5400. The results are most sensitive to the mortality risk reduction following vitamin D₃ supplementation.

Conclusion

The cost-effectiveness of vitamin D₃ supplementation is most robust in adults ≥70 years. Clinical uncertainty in the magnitude of the benefits of vitamin D₃ supplementation could be further addressed by means of: (1) performing a clinical research study or (2) conducting a pilot/regional study, prior to reaching a decision to invest in a nationwide programme.

Clinical features and burden of osteoporotic fractures among the elderly in the USA from 2016 to 2018

This study provides a national estimate of the incidence of hospitalizations and assesses the clinical features and outcomes during inpatient admission due to osteoporotic fractures diagnosed by ICD-10-CM/PCS among the elderly in the USA, using the US Nationwide Inpatient Sample, 2016-2018.

PURPOSE

To provide a national estimate of the incidence of hospitalizations and assess the clinical features and outcomes during inpatient admission due to osteoporotic fractures (OFs) among the elderly in the USA.

METHODS

The study included all inpatients aged 65 years and older who participated in the US Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS). We conducted a retrospective analysis of hospitalizations with OFs diagnosed by the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification/Procedure Coding System (ICD-10-CM/PCS), using the US NIS, 2016-2018. Trends in epidemiological characteristics and outcomes were calculated by annual percentage change (APC).

RESULTS

From 2016 to 2018, there were an estimated 0.16 million hospitalizations for OFs, and the estimated annual incidence rate changed from 995 cases per 1 million persons in 2016 to 1114 cases per 1 million persons in 2018 (APC, 5.8% [95% CI, 0.0 to 12.0]; P > 0.05). Over two-thirds of the patients (68.2%) were age-related osteoporosis with current pathological fracture, and OFs were more likely to occur in vertebra (51.7%) and femur (34.7%). During the hospitalization, the average length of stay (LOS) was 5.83 days, the average cost reached $60,901.04, and the overall mortality was 2.3%. All outcomes including LOS, average cost and mortality did not change significantly in 2016-2018 (all P values for trend were over 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Between 2016 and 2018, the incidence rate of OFs remained relatively stable, but the total number of cases was huge. OFs was predominantly age-related, mostly in vertebrae and femurs, with relatively stable cost and mortality during hospitalization.

Fracture liaison services in Ireland-how do we compare to international standards?

In this first na tional survey of public hospitals in The Republic of Ireland, we found fracture liaison services (FLS) to be heterogeneous, limited in many cases and poorly supported. A national strategy is urgently needed to support the implementation and operation of an FLS, and thus help reduce the burden of fragility fractures for patients and the healthcare system.

INTRODUCTION

Fragility/low-trauma fractures are a global concern, whose incidence is rising as the population ages. Many are preventable, and people with a prior fragility fracture are at particularly high risk of further fractures. This patient group is the target of the International Osteoporosis Foundation (IOF) Capture the Fracture campaign, advocating global adoption of fracture liaison services (FLS), with the aim of preventing secondary fragility fractures. We wished to determine the current availability and standards of an FLS in Ireland, ahead of the launch of a National FLS database.

METHODS

We devised a questionnaire encompassing the thirteen IOF standards for an FLS and asked all 16 public hospitals with an orthopaedic trauma unit in Ireland, to complete for the calendar year 2019 in patients aged ≥ 50 years.

RESULTS

All sites returned the questionnaire, i.e. 100% response rate. Nine hospitals stated that they have an FLS, additionally one non-trauma hospital running a FLS responded, and were included. These 10 FLS had identified and managed 3444 non-hip fractures in the year 2019. This figure represents 19% of the expected non-hip fragility fracture numbers occurring annually in Ireland. Implementation of the IOF standards was very variable. All sites reported being inadequately resourced to provide a high-quality service necessary to be effective.

CONCLUSION

The existence and functioning of FLS in Ireland are heterogeneous and suboptimal. A national policy to support the implementation of this programme in line with international standards of patient care is urgently needed.

Cost of hospitalisation for hip fracture-findings from the Irish hip fracture database

The authors utilised the Irish Hip Fracture Database (IHFD) to quantify the impact of hip fracture on the health service in terms of incidence, bed days and financial costs. The absolute number of hip fracture cases recorded by the IHFD has increased, as has the associated costs of hospitalisation.

INTRODUCTION

Hip fracture places a considerable clinical and financial burden on the healthcare system, with acute hospitalisation accounting for a substantial proportion of the costs incurred. This paper aimed to quantify the cost of hospitalisation for hip fracture in Ireland in terms of bed days and direct hospital costs.

METHODS

The authors analysed 23,494 cases in the Irish Hip Fracture Database (IHFD) from 2014 to 2020. Case numbers and length of stay were analysed annually. Hospital costs for hip fracture were described using the 2020 Activity-Based Funding Price List, which outlines the fees paid to public hospitals for inpatient activity.

RESULTS

For the time period 2014-2020, the total cost of hospitalisation for hip fracture was approximately €296 million, equating to approximately €11,700 per episode of care. The annual cost of hospitalisation increased from approximately €34 million in 2014 to €44 million in 2020. In 2020, the mean length of stay for hip fracture was 17 days accounting for > 62,600 acute hospital bed days.

CONCLUSION

The absolute number of hip fracture cases recorded by the IHFD has increased, as has the cost of hospitalisation. Given the current capacity issues and economic constraints, there is a growing need to prioritise time spent in the most expensive acute hospital setting to the immediate perioperative period and maximise the use of community services and early supportive discharge for the rehabilitation phase.

Vertebral Fractures in Ireland: A Sub-analysis of the DXA HIP Project

Osteoporosis is an important global health problem resulting in fragility fractures. The vertebrae are the commonest site of fracture resulting in extreme illness burden, and having the highest associated mortality. International studies show that vertebral fractures (VF) increase in prevalence with age, similarly in men and women, but differ across different regions of the world. Ireland has one of the highest rates of hip fracture in the world but data on vertebral fractures are limited. In this study we examined the prevalence of VF and associated major risk factors, using a sample of subjects who underwent vertebral fracture assessment (VFA) performed on 2 dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) machines. A total of 1296 subjects aged 40 years and older had a valid VFA report and DXA information available, including 254 men and 1042 women. Subjects had a mean age of 70 years, 805 (62%) had prior fractures, mean spine T-score was - 1.4 and mean total hip T-scores was - 1.2, while mean FRAX scores were 15.4% and 4.8% for major osteoporotic fracture and hip fracture, respectively. Although 95 (7%) had a known VF prior to scanning, 283 (22%) patients had at least 1 VF on their scan: 161 had 1, 61 had 2, and 61 had 3 or more. The prevalence of VF increased with age from 11.5% in those aged 40-49 years to > 33% among those aged ≥ 80 years. Both men and women with VF had significantly lower BMD at each measured site, and significantly higher FRAX scores, P < 0.01. These data suggest VF are common in high risk populations, particularly older men and women with low BMD, previous fractures, and at high risk of fracture. Urgent attention is needed to examine effective ways to identify those at risk and to reduce the burden of VF.

Utility of Osteoporosis Self-Assessment Tool as a Screening Tool for Osteoporosis in Irish Men and Women: Results of the DXA-HIP Project

Many algorithms have been developed and publicised over the past 2 decades for identifying those most likely to have osteoporosis or low BMD, or at increased risk of fragility fracture. The Osteoporosis Self-assessment Tool index (OSTi) is one of the oldest, simplest, and widely used for identifying men and women with low BMD or osteoporosis. OSTi has been validated in many cohorts worldwide but large studies with robust analyses evaluating this or other algorithms in adult populations residing in the Republic of Ireland are lacking, where waiting times for public DXA facilities are long. In this study we evaluated the validity of OSTi in men and women drawn from a sampling frame of more than 36,000 patients scanned at one of 3 centres in the West of Ireland. 18,670 men and women aged 40 years and older had a baseline scan of the lumbar spine femoral neck and total hip available for analysis. 15,964 (86%) were female, 5,343 (29%) had no major clinical risk factors other than age, while 5,093 (27%) had a prior fracture. Approximately 2/3 had a T-score ≤-1.0 at one or more skeletal sites and 1/3 had a T-score ≤-1.0 at all 3 skeletal sites, while 1 in 5 had a DXA T-score ≤-2.5 at one or more skeletal sites and 5% had a T-score ≤-2.5 at all 3 sites. OSTi generally performed well in our population with area under the curve (AUC) values ranging from 0.581 to 0.881 in men and 0.701 to 0.911 in women. The performance of OSTi appeared robust across multiple sub-group analyses. AUC values were greater for women, proximal femur sites, those without prior fractures and those not taking osteoporosis medication. Optimal OSTi cut-points were '2' for men and '0' for women in our study population. OSTi is a simple and effective tool to aid identification of Irish men and women with low BMD or osteoporosis. Use of OSTi could improve the effectiveness of DXA screening programmes for older adults in Ireland.

Discharge destination after hip fracture: findings from the Irish hip fracture database

PURPOSE

Although home continues to be the place from which the majority of patients are admitted, less than one third of patients are Discharged Directly Home (DDH) following hip fracture. Once ready for discharge, DDH as opposed to Discharge to an Alternative Location (DAL), i.e., community care, rehabilitation facility or long-term care, is a high priority for patients and clinicians alike. Not only is DDH integral to the quality of life of patients, it is also an essential driver of the socioeconomic cost of hip fracture care.

METHODS

We analysed 21,819 cases in the Irish Hip Fracture Database from 2013 to 2019. Descriptive and analytical statistics were conducted.

RESULTS

29% (n = 6476) of patients were DDH during the study period. On multivariate analysis, the odds of DDH decreased as age increased (OR 0.28, p < 0.01, 95% CI 0.24-0.34). Patients who were independently mobile prior to fracture were 47% more likely to be DDH (OR 1.47, p < 0.01, 95% CI 1.29-1.68). Those mobilised early post operatively were 24% more likely to be DDH (OR 1.24, p < 0.01, 95% CI 1.06-1.45). Patients who waited > 72 h prior to surgery were 30% less likely to be DDH (OR 0.70, p < 0.01, 95% CI 0.56-0.88).

CONCLUSION

The authors identified patient characteristics that increased the likelihood of DDH, i.e., younger patients independently mobile prior to fracture, who received timely surgery and early post-operative mobilisation. The Irish Hip Fracture Standards (IHFS) incorporate 2 out the 3 modifiable factors identified, which reinforces the importance of the IHFS in improving patient outcomes.

Hip fracture surgery within 36 hours reduces both 30-day and 1-year mortality rates

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Currently the Irish Hip Fracture Standards [IHFS] recommend a Time-to-Surgery [TTS] of within 48 h of admission. The aim of our research is to determine if there was a statistically significant relationship between TTS and 30-day or one-year mortality and to assess whether a 48 h window for surgery is still the most appropriate recommendation.

METHODS USED

This was a single-hospital retrospective review of all of the fragility hip fractures between 1st January 2013 and 31st December 2017. Patient demographics were described using descriptive statistics. Dependent variables of interest were 30-day mortality and one-year mortality. Independent predictor variables analysed included age, ASA grade, fracture type, surgery performed, anaesthesia administered, length of stay and TTS (hours as an interval variable), TTS in less than 36 h (binary variable) and TTS in less than 48 h (binary variable). When the significant predictor variables were identified, in order to control for confounder variables, a multivariate regression analysis was performed to identify which predictors were still significantly associated with the outcome variables even after controlling for all other known confounder variables.

RESULTS

In total, 806 patients were identified. TTS within 36 h was predictive of a significantly lower 30-day mortality when compared to those undergoing surgery after 36 h (p = 0.031). In contrast, TTS within 48 h did not demonstrate a significantly lower 30-day mortality when compared to those undergoing surgery after 48 h (p = 0.104). On multivariate regression analysis, TTS <36 h (p = 0.011) and age (p < 0.0001) were all independently predictive of 30-day mortality. On multivariate regression analysis, both age (p < 0.0001) and TTS < 36 h (p = 0.002) were significantly predictive of one-year mortality.

CONCLUSION

Performing hip fracture surgery within 36 h confers a significant reduction in both 30-day and one-year mortality rates when compared to patients undergoing surgery outside of this time frame. A 36-h window also appears to be superior to a 48-h window because performing surgery within 48 h has no significant impact on the reduction of 30-day mortality rates. We recommend that national guidelines reflect these important findings.

Trends in hip fracture care in the Republic of Ireland from 2013 to 2018: results from the Irish Hip Fracture Database

Hip fractures continue to be one of the most serious and costly injuries suffered by older people globally. This paper describes the development of a national hip fracture audit and summarises the first 6 years of data from the Republic of Ireland. This can help inform care, standards and outcomes of hip fracture patients.

INTRODUCTION

Ireland has one of the highest standardised rates of hip fracture in the world behind northern European countries. The Irish Hip Fracture Database (IHFD) was established in 2012 to drive clinical and organisational improvements in quality and effectiveness of hip fracture care. This paper describes the progression of the IHFD between 2013 and 2018 and identifies trends and areas for improvement.

METHODS

The IHFD is a clinically led, web-based audit, with data collected through the national Hospital Inpatient Enquiry (HIPE) electronic system, the principal source of information from publicly funded acute hospitals in Ireland. Eligible cases are aged ≥ 60 years with hip fracture as defined by IHFD or with other specified hip fracture excluding periprosthetic fractures. As of 2015, all 16 trauma-receiving hospitals within Ireland submitted data. Demographics and adherence to six national quality standards are described.

RESULTS

A total of 17,983 cases were included in the analysis. National coverage has increased from 63% in 2013 to 99% in 2018. Demographic characteristics are unchanged, but higher levels of comorbidity are seen. Internal fixation and hemiarthroplasty are the most common modes of surgical repair with two-thirds of cases receiving spinal rather than general anaesthesia. Increasingly patients are being assessed by a geriatrician (11% in 2013 to 69% in 2018) and receive a bone health assessment (65% in 2013 to 84% in 2018).

CONCLUSION

While some hip fracture standards have improved, further improvements are required to compare favourably internationally. Reduction of surgical delay and ensuring early mobilisation post-operatively are immediate priorities for the IHFD.

Osteoporotic Vertebral Fractures are Common in Hip Fracture Patients and are Under-recognized

INTRODUCTION

The vertebrae are the most common site for osteoporotic fracture. While they can result in disability and increased mortality, only one-third present clinically. People with multiple fractures are at greater risk of future fractures. Most hip fracture patients are neither diagnosed nor treated for their underlying osteoporosis. Computed tomography (CT) studies are often performed on hospitalised patients, can be used to diagnose osteoporosis and are gaining popularity for opportunistic osteoporosis screening by measuring BMD and other bone strength indices. The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence of vertebral fractures on CT pulmonary angiograms (CTPA) in a cohort of hip fracture patients and whether this increased their diagnosis and treatment rates.

METHODS

We retrospectively identified all hip fractures admitted to our institution between 2010 and 2017 to identify those who underwent CTPA scans. An independent, blinded consultant musculoskeletal radiologist reviewed the images for vertebral fractures and quantified severity using Genant criteria. Results were compared to the original radiology report, discharge diagnoses and treatment rates for osteoporosis.

RESULTS

Eleven percent (225/2122) of patients had CTPA images available. Seventy percent (158) were female with a mean age of 78 years (SD: 11). The median length of stay for all patients was 16 days (1-301). Forty percent (90) of patients had at least one vertebral fracture present and 20% (46) had more than one fracture. Only one in 5 radiology reports noted the fractures. 24% of subjects had osteoporosis treatment recorded at hospital discharge and there was no difference between those with vertebral fractures to those without.

CONCLUSION

Many hip fracture patients have undiagnosed spine fractures. A screening strategy which evaluates CT scans for fractures has potential to increase diagnosis and treatment rates of osteoporosis. However, more work is needed to increase awareness.

A multi-site review of second hip fractures across 6 Dublin teaching hospitals

INTRODUCTION

Fragility hip fractures are common and costly. Secondary fracture prevention is a treatment goal following hip fracture; however, the number of those that proceed to fracture their contralateral hip in Ireland is unknown. There are plans to introduce a Fracture Liaison Service Database in Ireland which will aim to prevent secondary fractures. To establish a baseline figure for secondary hip fractures, the injury radiographs of 1284 patients from 6 teaching hospitals over a 1-year period were reviewed.

METHODS

Irish Hip Fracture Datasheets and corresponding injury radiographs were reviewed locally for all hip fractures within each respective teaching hospital for a 1-year period (2019).

RESULTS

A total of 8.7% of all fragility hip fractures across the 6 hospitals were secondary hip fractures (range 4.9-11.5%). 46% occurred within years 1 to 3 following index hip fracture. Forty-eight per cent of patients were started on bone protection medications following their second hip fracture.

DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION

Approximately 1 in 11 hip fractures treated across the 6 teaching hospitals assessed in 2019 was a patient's second hip fracture. We advocate for the widespread availability of Fracture Liaison Services to patients throughout Ireland to assist secondary fracture prevention.

Assessment of previous fracture and anti-osteoporotic medication prescription in hip fracture patients

INTRODUCTION

Hip fracture prevention is an essential component in elderly patient care. History of prior fracture is a significant risk factor for subsequent hip fracture. There are variable rates of treatment for these groups of patients. The aims of this study were to make an assessment of how many hip fracture patients over a 1 year period had a previous fracture and to assess whether or not these patients were on anti-osteoporotic medication.

METHODS

Assessment on whether or not patients had a prior fracture using the national radiology imaging system checking radiology reports for all previous imaging performed. Checking patients bone health status using the hip fracture database for our hospital.

RESULTS

There were 225 hip fractures in 221 patients over a 1-year period. About 42.6% of females and 35.9% of males had a history of previous fracture. Vertebral fractures were the most common type of fracture. We found 7% of patients had a contralateral hip fracture. There were 81% of patients with prior fracture, and 71% of those without prior fracture were on anti-osteoporotic medication.

DISCUSSION

Vertebral fractures were the most common preceding fracture in hip fracture patients. There were many patients with a history of fragility fractures that were not on preventative medication. Overall there were good prescription rates of anti-osteoporotic medication. There were significantly higher rates of prescription amongst females compared with males.

The prevention of osteoporosis and sarcopenia in older adults

Osteoporosis and sarcopenia are common in older adults. Osteoporosis is a systemic skeletal disease characterized by low bone mass and microarchitectural deterioration of bone tissue, with a consequent increase in bone fragility and susceptibility to fracture. Bone fractures can result in changes in posture, pain, the need for surgical repair and functional impairment. Sarcopenia is the progressive and generalized loss of skeletal muscle mass, strength and/or physical performance. Older adults with sarcopenia experience increased risk of frailty, disability, hospitalizations, mortality, and a reduced quality of life. In this narrative review we provide guidance regarding the prevention of both osteoporosis and sarcopenia, including interventions that prevent both conditions from occurring, recommended screening and treatment to prevent progression.

Opportunistic diagnosis of osteoporotic vertebral fractures on standard imaging performed for alternative indications

Osteoporotic vertebral fractures (VFs) are the most common type of osteoporotic fracture. Patients with VF are at increased risk of hip fractures or additional VFs, both of which contribute to patient morbidity and mortality. Early diagnosis of VFs is essential so patients can be prescribed appropriate medical therapy.

Most patients with clinical suspicion for VF have an X-ray of the spine. Many VFs are invisible on X-ray and require further imaging. CT can provide excellent bony detail but uses high doses of ionising radiation. MRI provides excellent soft tissue detail and can distinguish old from new fractures in addition to differentiating osteoporotic VFs from other causes of back pain. Bone scans have a limited role due to poor specificity.

The literature suggests that radiologists frequently miss or do not report VFs when imaging is requested for an alternative clinical indication and when there is no clinical suspicion of VF. Common examples include failure to identify VFs on lateral chest X-rays, sagittal reformats of CT thorax and abdomen, lateral localizers on MRI and scout views on CT.

Failure to diagnose a VF is a missed opportunity to improve management of osteoporosis and reduce risk of further fractures. This article discusses the role of radiographs, CT, MRI and bone scintigraphy in the assessment and recognition of osteoporotic fractures. This article focuses on opportunistic diagnosis of VFs on imaging studies that are performed for other clinical indications. It does not discuss use of dual energy X-ray absorptiometry which is a specific imaging modality for osteoporosis.

The Irish dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) Health Informatics Prediction (HIP) for Osteoporosis Project

PURPOSE

The purpose of the Irish dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) Health Informatics Prediction (HIP) for Osteoporosis Project is to create a large retrospective cohort of adults in Ireland to examine the validity of DXA diagnostic classification, risk assessment tools and management strategies for osteoporosis and osteoporotic fractures for our population.

PARTICIPANTS

The cohort includes 36 590 men and women aged 4-104 years who had a DXA scan between January 2000 and November 2018 at one of 3 centres in the West of Ireland.

FINDINGS TO DATE

36 590 patients had at least 1 DXA scan, 6868 (18.77%) had 2 scans and 3823 (10.45%) had 3 or more scans. There are 364 unique medical disorders, 186 unique medications and 46 DXA variables identified and available for analysis. The cohort includes 10 349 (28.3%) individuals who underwent a screening DXA scan without a clear fracture risk factor (other than age), and 9947 (27.2%) with prevalent fractures at 1 of 44 skeletal sites.

FUTURE PLANS

The Irish DXA HIP Project plans to assess current diagnostic classification and risk prediction algorithms for osteoporosis and fractures, identify the risk predictors for osteoporosis and develop novel, accurate and personalised risk prediction tools, by using the large multicentre longitudinal follow-up cohort. Furthermore, the dataset may be used to assess, and possibly support, multimorbidity management due to the large number of variables collected in this project.

Incidence of Non-Simultaneous Contralateral Second Hip Fractures: A Single-Center Irish Study

Introduction

Hip fractures are a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in the elderly and are also associated with increased healthcare costs. A second contralateral hip fracture can lead to even more complications and healthcare costs. A significant proportion of the Irish hip fracture population does not receive a bone health assessment or falls specialist assessment to reduce the risk of future falls and fractures. This study aimed to analyze the incidence of a non-simultaneous contralateral hip fracture in an Irish population.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed 1,344 patients presenting to our institution with a hip fracture from January 2007 to June 2019. Patients aged ≥ 60 years old presenting with a neck of femur or pertrochanteric fracture were included in our study. We excluded patients who had sub-trochanteric and femoral shaft fractures, high energy fractures, and pathological fractures. We also excluded patients less than 60 years old, as fractures in these younger patients may not be purely related to osteoporosis.

Results

A total of 1,099 hip fractures meeting the inclusion criteria were treated at our unit during the designated time period. A total of 102 (9.3%) patients experienced a second hip fracture. The mean age at first presentation in our institution was 78.5 years old, with a mean time between first and second hip fractures of 37.2 months.

Conclusions

Patients presenting with a second hip fracture may represent 9.3% of the Irish hip fracture population. We hope that this study will help inform on the rate of second hip fractures in an Irish population and help advocate for improved resources and implementation of secondary prevention strategies.

A systematic review of the Irish osteoporotic vertebral fracture literature

INTRODUCTION

Vertebral fractures (VF) are the most common osteoporotic fracture. They are associated with significant morbidity and mortality and are an important predictor of future fractures. The epidemiology of VF in Ireland is limited and a greater understanding of their scale and impact is needed. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review of publications on osteoporotic VF in Ireland.

METHODS

Systematic searches were conducted using PubMed, Medline, Embase, Scopus and Cochrane electronic databases to identify eligible publications from Ireland addressing osteoporotic VF.

RESULTS

Twenty studies met the inclusion criteria out of 1558 citations. All studies were published since 2000. Data was obtained on 182,771 patients with fractures. Nine studies included more than 100 subjects and three included more than 1000. Females accounted for 70% with an overall mean age of 65.2 years (30-94). There was significant heterogeneity in study design, methods and outcome measures including the following: use of administrative claims data on public hospital admissions, surgical and medical interventions, the impact of a fracture liaison service and the osteoporosis economic burden. The prevalence of VF was difficult to ascertain due to definitions used and differences in the study populations. Only two studies systematically reviewed spine imaging using blinded assessors and validated diagnostic criteria to assess the prevalence of fractures in patient cohorts.

CONCLUSIONS

Several studies show that VF are common when addressed systematically and the prevalence may be rising. However, there is a deficit of large studies systematically addressing the epidemiology and their importance in Ireland.

Management of hospitalised osteoporotic vertebral fractures

Management of hospitalised osteoporotic vertebral fracture patients was explored across all major trauma orthopaedic hospitals in Ireland. Findings, based on a survey of orthopaedic doctors and physiotherapists, indicate a lack of standardised clinical care pathways. This study will inform development of clinical audit mechanisms and health service development for this large and growing fracture population in both Ireland and internationally.

PURPOSE

To explore the management of hospitalised vertebral fragility fracture (VFF) patients in Ireland.

METHODS

A cross-sectional survey of orthopaedic doctors (specialist registrar level) and physiotherapists was conducted across all hospitals with major orthopaedic trauma units in Ireland. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics in SPSS (V24).

RESULTS

Responses were achieved from 100% (n = 16) of the hospitals (42 individual physiotherapists and 47 orthopaedic doctors). Conservative management was usual with both orthopaedic doctors (n = 37, 79%) and physiotherapists (n = 40, 96%) reporting prescription of bracing as common practice despite a lack of underpinning evidence. A majority (87%) of the doctors believed osteoporosis medications should commence prior to discharge from the acute setting, but 68% did not agree that responsibility for coordination and delivery of bone health assessment and fracture risk management rested with them. A majority (72%) of physiotherapists reported an absence or were unsure regarding existence of fracture liaison services. 73% of physiotherapists reported prescribing an inpatient or home (78%) exercise programme, including mobility, strength and balance exercise though detail on dose and adherence remain unknown. Wide variance in referral patterns to multi-disciplinary team (MDT) members existed although 79% of orthopaedic doctors supported an MDT approach.

CONCLUSION

Clinical care pathways for the hospitalised VFF population lack standardisation in Ireland. Key challenges reported by orthopaedic doctors and physiotherapists relate to pain management, osteoporosis medication prescription, clarity on indications for bracing and a lack of fracture liaison services. Clinical guidelines, defined clinical care pathways and high-quality clinical research trials are required for VFF management.

The long-term outcomes following internal fixation for intracapsular hip fractures in an Irish tertiary referral centre

BACKGROUND

The burden associated with hip fractures is increasing worldwide. Arthroplasty procedures are more commonly performed for intracapsular fractures due to increased risk of compromise to the femoral head blood supply. However, we know from the Irish Hip Fracture Database that a significant proportion of these fractures undergo internal fixation.

AIMS

We sought to investigate the long-term outcomes for these patients including revision rates, functional outcome and mortality rates.

METHODS

All intracapsular fractures treated by internal fixation (IF) from 2005 to 2009 were identified. Pre-operative anatomical fracture location and level of fracture displacement was established. Hospital records were used to record mortality and revision rates. The modified Harris hip score was our primary functional outcome measure.

RESULT

One hundred twelve intracapsular fractures underwent IF over a 5-year period. The mean age was 68.6 (range 14-95 years). A mean follow-up time of 8.15 years (range 6.7-10.1 years) was achieved. There was a 5-year mortality rate of 36.6%. There was a significantly higher revision rate in displaced fractures (24.4%) than in undisplaced fractures (11.1%) (p = 0.01). We found no difference in functional outcome between displaced fractures [85.9 (± 16.9)] and undisplaced fractures [86.01 (± 18.8)]. Those aged younger than 65 at the time of surgery had a significantly better MHHS (p = 0.02) at long-term follow-up; however, there was a revision rate of 43.8% in this group.

CONCLUSION

Whilst a good functional outcome can be achieved with internal fixation, particularly in younger patients, the risk of requiring revision surgery approaches 50% for these patients.