Post-Gastric Bypass Hypoglycemia

Canagliflozin or acarbose versus placebo to ameliorate post-bariatric hypoglycaemia - The HypoBar I randomized clinical trial protocol

INTRODUCTION

Post-bariatric hypoglycaemia (PBH) is a rare yet disabling clinical condition, mostly reported after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) surgery. RYGB is one of the most widely used and effective bariatric procedures. The pathophysiology of PBH remains unclear, and treatment options are limited in effectiveness and/or carry significant side effects. Acarbose slows carbohydrates digestion and absorption and is generally considered first-line pharmacological treatment for PBH but its gastrointestinal side effects limit patient compliance. Canagliflozin inhibits intestinal and renal sodium-dependent glucose absorption and reduces postprandial excursions of glucose, insulin and incretins after RYGB - effects that could be beneficial in ameliorating PBH.

AIMS

The trial aims to investigate how blood glucose levels are affected during daily living in subjects with PBH during treatment with canagliflozin or acarbose compared with placebo, and to study the meal-induced entero-endocrine mechanisms implied in the treatment responses.

METHODS

In a double-blinded, randomized, crossover clinical trial, HypoBar I will investigate the effectiveness in reducing the risk of PBH, safety, ambulatory glucose profile and entero-endocrine responses when PBH is treated with canagliflozin 300 mg twice daily during a 4-week intervention period, compared with acarbose 50 mg thrice daily or placebo.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

HypoBar I is approved by the Local regulatory entities. Results will be published in peer-reviewed journals.

CONCLUSION

If effective, well-tolerated and safe, canagliflozin could be a novel treatment for people with PBH. HypoBar I might also unravel new mechanisms underlying PBH, potentially identifying new treatment targets.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

EudraCT number 2022-000157-87.

Laparoscopic Gastric Bypass Reversal with Concomitant Sleeve Gastrectomy (SG) for Refractory Hypoglycemia: an Unusual Procedure

INTRODUCTION

Post-bariatric surgery hypoglycemia is usually seen in patients with a history of gastric bypass surgery [1], and few experience severe symptoms [2]. The pathophysiology of post-gastric bypass surgery hypoglycemia is not well understood, and many theories have been proposed: excessive GLP-1, nesidioblastosis, and increased glucose effectiveness [3]. Thus, the etiology of this condition is complex. Laparoscopic GBP reversal is a very unusual procedure and indications may include excessive weight loss, unexplained GI tract symptoms, and severe hypoglycemia. Hypoglycemia should be managed non-surgically at first, but in case of medical therapy failure, surgical options may be considered. Surgical options include gastrostomy tube placement, gastric bypass reversal [4], or gastric bypass reversal with concomitant sleeve gastrectomy [5-7]. A partial reversal was also mentioned in the literature [6]. Laparoscopic conversion to a sleeve gastrectomy for hypoglycemia is unusual and converting an open gastric bypass to a laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy is exceptional, even never reported. In this video (run time 6 min and 48 s), we present our procedure, which was performed by adopting a new technique.

PATIENT AND METHODS

A 52-year-old lady was referred to us for hypoglycemia following an open gastric bypass revision that was done in 2012. Her past surgical history includes 2 laparoscopic gastric band surgeries with subsequent removal of the bands, open bypass surgery in 2007 and open bypass surgery revision in 2012. History goes back to 12 months ago when the patient started complaining of fatigue, lassitude, and symptoms consistent with Whipple's triad. OGTT (oral glucose tolerance test) showed low glucose levels at 2 h (2.7 mmol/l) and at 3 h (3.3 mmol/l). Serum insulin level and C-peptide were normal. The patient was diagnosed as having early dumping syndrome (reactive hypoglycemia). She was started on sitagliptin 1 tab once daily with dietary changes. Despite this management, she was hospitalized several times for worsening of her symptoms. When referred to our department, the patient asked about the possibility of a laparoscopic intervention, since she has suffered a lot from her previous laparotomy incisions. The laparoscopic surgery intervention was discussed with the patient and it was a challenging option in this case. The patient was placed in the lithotomy position with the surgeon standing between the patient's legs. An 11-mm trocar was inserted above the umbilicus. Under vision, 4 other trocars were inserted: a 12-mm trocar in the right midclavicular line and three 5-mm trocars in the epigastrium, left anterior axillary line, and left midclavicular line, respectively. We started with adhesiolysis in order to identify the gastro-jejunostomy and to free the abdominal esophagus. A subtle hiatal hernia was also reduced. Then, the jejuno-jejunostomy was identified, and the alimentary limb was measured. The latter was 70 cm in length, and the decision was to resect it, keeping the jejuno-jejunal anastomosis in place. The gastric pouch was divided just above the gastro-jejunal anastomosis. The alimentary limb was then exteriorized. Then, the gastric remnant was freed from its omental attachment. The gastric remnant and the gastric pouch were calibrated with a 40-Fr Faucher tube, and appropriate sequential firing was done using endo-GIA. A gastro-gastrostomy was fashioned by the end of the sleeve division to create the gastric tube.

RESULTS

The operative time was 245 min, with minor blood loss (less than 250 cc). The perioperative course was uneventful, with no intra-operative or post-operative morbidity. An upper GI series was done on post-operative day 2 and showed no evidence of leak. It has been 11 months since the procedure and the patient has become normoglycemic. Her last FBS was 4.4 mmol and she is currently free of symptoms.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

Post-bariatric surgery hypoglycemia is a challenging condition, for both surgeons and endocrinologists. Our patient has suffered severe symptoms that were refractory to medical treatment and dietary modifications. Few papers have discussed LGBP conversion to a sleeve gastrectomy for hypoglycemia, but results from small series are showing promising results. Our case was challenging because of the patient's previous multiple open surgeries and the technique we have adopted is unique, since we have fashioned the sleeve by firing 2 separate gastric pouches (gastric pouch and gastric remnant) to create a gastric tube and by performing a gastro-gastrostomy with intra-corporeal sutures.

Features of oral glucose tolerance tests in patients after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass with and without hypoglycaemia symptoms in daily life: It's all about speed

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the glucose and insulin profiles during an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) in symptomatic and asymptomatic patients.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

This retrospective study consisted of two groups that had undergone RYGB. The symptomatic (S) group (n = 27) had an OGTT at presentation, whereas the asymptomatic (A) group (n = 99) had an OGTT 1 year after RYGB. Each group was subdivided into two groups, namely, those with glycaemia <54 mg/dL (S1/A1) and those with glycaemia >54 mg/dL (S2/A2) during OGTT. Most of the patients underwent OGTT preoperatively.

RESULTS

Preoperatively, the glucose and insulin levels, as well as the speed of increase and decrease, were similar in all groups. Postoperatively, the minimum glucose levels during the OGTT did not differ between the symptomatic and asymptomatic groups (55 ± 19 vs. 54 ± 17 mg/dL) or between the S1 and A1 subgroups (39 ± 7 vs. 43 ± 8 mg/dL). The peak glucose values were higher in the symptomatic versus the asymptomatic group (236 ± 52 vs. 189 ± 43 mg/dL; P <0.05) and in the S1 and S2 versus the A1 and A2 subgroups. The speed of glucose increase and decline was significantly higher in the symptomatic group versus the asymptomatic group, with the speed of glucose decline being the highest in the S1 subgroup.

CONCLUSION

Assessing hypoglycaemia after a gastric bypass remains challenging. Our study suggests that the main difference in glucose dynamics between symptomatic and asymptomatic patients might be the speed of glucose and insulin increase and decline during OGTT rather than the absolute values obtained.

Use of flash glucose monitoring for post-bariatric hypoglycaemia diagnosis and management

Our aim was to assess the potential of flash glucose monitoring (FGM) for diagnostic workup of suspected post-bariatric hypoglycaemia (PBH). Patients (N = 13) with suspected PBH underwent a food and symptoms diary (FSD) record along with FGM over 14 days. Targeted data analysis confirmed the occurrence of low glucose events in parallel to meal-triggered symptoms. Glycaemic variability, as assessed by Mean Absolute Glucose change (MAG change), was increased, while a higher risk of glycaemic excursions towards both hyper and hypoglycaemia (ADRRFGMGT) was observed in those with more frequent and severe hypoglycaemia. The herein described hypoglycaemia risk index (LBGIFGMGT) with a cut-off value of 4.6 showed to have 100% sensitivity and 100% specificity for PBH. This pilot proof-of-concept study highlighted that FSD coupled with FGM followed by targeted data analysis, provides relevant insights towards PBH diagnosis and grading in a user-friendly and easy to implement study protocol. Furthermore, LBGIFGMGT demonstrated to be an excellent index for PBH diagnosis. The unexpected improvement of glucose profile noticed along the monitoring time also unravels a possible application for PBH management.

Pregnancy after bariatric surgery: a narrative literature review and discussion of impact on pregnancy management and outcome

Bariatric surgery (BS) is regarded to be the most effective treatment of obesity with long lasting beneficial effects including weight loss and improvement of metabolic disorders. A considerable number of women undergoing BS are at childbearing age.Although the surgery mediated weight loss has a positive effect on pregnancy outcome, the procedures might be associated with adverse outcomes as well, for example micronutrient deficiencies, iron or B12 deficiency anemia, dumping syndrome, surgical complications such as internal hernias, and small for gestational age (SGA) offspring, possibly due to maternal undernutrition. Also, there is no international consensus concerning the ideal time to conception after BS. Hence, the present narrative review intents to summarize the available literature concerning the most common challenges which arise before and during pregnancy after BS, such as fertility related considerations, vitamin and nutritional deficiencies and their adequate compensation through supplementation, altered glucose metabolism and its implications for gestational diabetes screening, the symptoms and treatment of dumping syndrome, surgical complications and the impact of BS on pregnancy outcome. The impact of different bariatric procedures on pregnancy and fetal outcome will also be discussed, as well as general considerations concerning the monitoring and management of pregnancies after BS.Whereas BS leads to the mitigation of many obesity-related pregnancy complications, such as gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), pregnancy induced hypertension and fetal macrosomia; those procedures pose new risks which might lead to adverse outcomes for mothers and offspring, for example nutritional deficiencies, anemia, altered maternal glucose metabolism and small for gestational age children.

Fertility, Pregnancy and Lactation After Bariatric Surgery - a Consensus Statement from the OEGGG

Bariatric surgery is recommended when other weight loss interventions, such as lifestyle modification or medications, have failed. A considerable number of women undergoing bariatric surgery are of childbearing age; hence, it is necessary to be aware of the effects of bariatric surgery on pregnancy for managing these patients. Although bariatric surgery is associated with positive effects on cardiovascular and metabolic parameters, side effects such as anaemia, the risk of developing internal hernia, altered glucose metabolism and the risk of small for gestational age offspring have to be considered. Pregnant women with a history of gastric bypass should not undergo the oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) due to the high risk of hypoglycaemia. There are no contraindications for vaginal delivery and breastfeeding. This paper has been published as a consensus statement by the Austrian Society of Gynaecology and Obstetrics (OEGGG).

Effect of alcohol ingestion on plasma glucose kinetics after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery

BACKGROUND

Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery (RYGB) increases the rate of alcohol absorption so that peak blood alcohol concentration is 2-fold higher after surgery compared with concentrations reached after consuming the same amount presurgery. Because high doses of alcohol can lead to hypoglycemia, patients may be at increased risk of developing hypoglycemia after alcohol ingestion.

OBJECTIVES

We conducted 2 studies to test the hypothesis that the consumption of approximately 2 standard drinks of alcohol would decrease glycemia more after RYGB than before surgery.

SETTING

Single-center prospective randomized trial.

METHODS

We evaluated plasma glucose concentrations and glucose kinetics (assessed by infusing a stable isotopically labelled glucose tracer) after ingestion of a nonalcoholic drink (placebo) or an alcoholic drink in the following groups: (1) 5 women before RYGB (body mass index = 43 ± 5 kg/m²) and 10 ± 2 months after RYGB (body mass index = 31 ± 7 kg/m²; study 1), and (2) 8 women who had undergone RYGB surgery 2.2 ± 1.2 years earlier (body mass index = 30 ± 5 kg/m²; study 2) RESULTS: Compared with the placebo drink, alcohol ingestion decreased plasma glucose both before and after surgery, but the reduction was greater before (glucose nadir placebo = -.4 ± 1.0 mg/dL versus alcohol = -9.6 ± 1.5 mg/dL) than after (glucose nadir placebo = -1.0 ± 1.6 mg/dL versus alcohol = -5.5 ± 2.6 mg/dL; P < .001) surgery. This difference was primarily due to an alcohol-induced early increase followed by a subsequent decrease in the rate of glucose appearance into systemic circulation.

CONCLUSION

RYGB does not increase the risk of hypoglycemia after consumption of a moderate dose of alcohol.

An unusual presentation of post gastric bypass hypoglycemia with both postprandial and fasting hypoglycemia

There has been an increasing awareness of post gastric bypass hypoglycemia (PGBH). Histopathologic findings from such patients who underwent partial/total pancreatomy, however, can vary widely from minimal changes to classic nesidioblastosis, making the pathologic diagnosis challenging. PGBH typically presents as postprandial hypoglycemia, as opposed to insulinoma, which presents as fasting hypoglycemia. Herein, we describe an unusual case of a patient with PGBH who initially presented with postprandial hypoglycemia three years after surgery, but later developed fasting hyperinsulinemic hypoglycemia as the disease progressed. Our hypothesis for this phenomenon is that this disease is progressive, and later in its course, the insulin release becomes dissociated from food stimulation and is increased at baseline. Future studies are needed to investigate the prevalence as well as etiology of this progression from postprandial to fasting hypoglycemia. Learning points: •• There has been an increasing awareness of post gastric bypass hypoglycemia (PGBH). •• Histopathologically, PGBH can vary from minimal changes to nesidioblastosis. •• Although uncommon, patients with PGBH after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass may present with both postprandial and fasting hyperinsulinemic hypoglycemia as disease progresses. •• Our hypothesis for this phenomenon is that the insulin release becomes dissociated from food stimulation and is increased at baseline with disease progression.

Non-pharmacological Treatment Options in the Management of Diabetes Mellitus

The global prevalence of diabetes, especially type 2 diabetes mellitus, has reached epidemic proportions in the last few decades of the 20th century because of the obesity pandemic resulting from adverse lifestyles. Diabetes as a consequence of obesity (diabesity), continues to increase exponentially in the 21st century. Although there are a multitude of drugs for the effective management of diabesity with modest benefits, most patients will require insulin for control of diabetes at some stage that would worsen obesity, and thereby diabesity. Therefore, effective non-pharmacological therapy needs to be expedited in all patients with diabesity. These measures include medical nutrition interventions, change of lifestyles and bariatric surgery. Non-pharmacological interventions are also useful for the effective management of even type 1 diabetes mellitus when used along with insulin therapy especially in those with obesity. This review summarises the current evidence base for the non-pharmacological interventions in the management of diabetes.

Hypoglycemia Following Bariatric Surgery: Our 31-Year Experience

PURPOSE

The purposes of this study are to identify the cumulative incidence of post-bariatric surgery hypoglycemia (PBSH), describe its symptomatology, and characterize treatment patterns at a large academic institution.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All patients who underwent bariatric surgery at a single institution from 1985 to 2015 were identified using a clinical database, administrative billing data identified patients who were treated for hypoglycemia, and chart reviews were performed to make a diagnosis of PBSH based on Whipple's triad. PBSH cases were reviewed including patient diabetes history, symptomatology, and treatment measures. Univariate analyses were performed to identify correlations based on symptomatology, laboratory values, and treatments utilized.

RESULTS

Ninety (2.6%) of 3487 patients were diagnosed with PBSH with preoperative median age of 43 years, mean BMI of 50.0 kg/m², and median glycated hemoglobin of 6.0%. Median time-to-first hypoglycemic event was 40.6 months. No factors were identified which predict symptom severity or resolution. The 24 (27%) patients who received pharmacotherapy to treat hypoglycemia were younger, had lower nadir blood glucose levels, and more frequent symptoms. Sixty-nine (79%) cases eventually resolved.

CONCLUSIONS

PBSH onset and severity are highly variable. Successful management of these patients can prove difficult and should include dietary therapy, the selective use of pharmacotherapy and surgery, and the use of a multidisciplinary team including bariatric surgeons and endocrinologists.

Incidence and Predictors of Hypoglycemia 1 Year After Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy

INTRODUCTION

Hypoglycemia is a known adverse event following gastric bypass. The incidence of hypoglycemia after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is still under investigation. The aim of our study was to verify the presence of oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT)-related hypoglycemia after LSG and to identify any baseline predictors of its occurrence.

METHODS

We analyzed 197 consecutive non-diabetic morbid obese patients that underwent LSG. All patients were studied before and 12 months after LSG. Evaluation included anthropometric parameters, 3-h OGTT for blood glucose (BG), insulin and c-peptide, lipid profile, interleukin-6 (IL-6), tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α), highly sensitive C-reactive protein (hsCRP), and leptin. Hypoglycemia was defined as BG ≤ 2.7 mmol/l.

RESULTS

After surgery, 180 patients completed the OGTT. Eleven patients did not complete the test for gastric intolerance, and in six patients, the test was stopped earlier for the onset of severe symptomatic hypoglycemia. Of the patients, 61/186 (32.8%) had at least one OGTT-related hypoglycemia. The highest frequency of hypoglycemic events occurred 150' after glucose load (20.2%). At baseline, patients with hypoglycemic events after surgery (Hypo) were younger (40 ± 11 vs 46 ± 10 years; p < 0.001), less obese (BMI 46 ± 5.7 vs 48.4 ± 7.9 kg/m²; p < 0.05), and had a worse lipid profile as compared to patients without hypoglycemic events (N-Hypo). Moreover, after LSG, Hypo patients compared with N-Hypo presented a higher weight loss (%EBMIL 80 ± 20 vs 62 ± 21%; p < 0.001). Low age, low fasting glucose, and high triglyceride levels before LSG were independent predictors of hypoglycemia development after surgery (r ² = 0.131).

CONCLUSION

These findings confirm the high incidence of post-prandial hypoglycemia 1 year after LSG. Hypoglycemia is more frequent in younger patients with lower fasting glucose and higher triglyceride levels before surgery.

Postgastric bypass hypoglycaemia in a patient with end-stage renal disease: a diagnostic and management pitfall

Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) surgery is currently one of the most popular procedures to aid weight loss. Hypoglycaemia associated with gastric bypass surgery is an underdiagnosed but life-threatening potential consequence of the surgical procedure. We present a case of a 44-year-old woman with end-stage renal disease presenting with refractory hypoglycaemia after 10 years of RYGB. Extensive history and work-up excluded medications, renal disease, insulinoma and dumping syndrome as the cause of hypoglycaemia. Dietary modifications or pharmacological trial of drugs did not ameliorate her symptoms with progressive worsening of hypoglycaemia leading to continuous dextrose infusion. Distal pancreatectomy was performed with subsequent resolution of hypoglycaemia. Surgical pathology results showed diffuse hyperplastic islet cells, confirming the diagnosis of postgastric bypass hypoglycaemia.

[Conversional and endoscopic procedures following bariatric surgery]

The Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) is the therapy of choice in bariatric surgery. Sleeve gastrectomy and gastric banding are showing higher rates of treatment failure, reducing obesity-associated morbidity and body weight insufficiently. Moreover, gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) can occur refractory to medication. Therefore, a laparoscopic conversion to RYGB can be reasonable as long as specific conditions are fulfilled.Endoscopic procedures are currently being applied to revise bariatric procedures. Therapy failure following RYGB occurs in up to 20 % of cases. Transoral outlet reduction is the minimally invasive method of choice to reduce gastrojejunal anastomosis of the alimentary limb. The diameter of a gastric sleeve can be unwantedly enlarged as well; that can be reduced by placement of a longitudinal full-thickness suture.Severe hypoglycemic episodes can be present in patients following RYGB. Hypoglycemic episodes have to be diagnosed first and can be treated conventionally. Alternatively, a laparoscopic approach according to Branco-Zorron can be used for non-responders. Hypoglycemic episodes can thus be prevented and body weight reduction can be assured.Conversional and endoscopic procedures can be used in patients with treatment failure following bariatric surgery. Note that non-invasive approaches should have been applied intensively before a revisional procedure is performed.

FROM COMPLEX EVOLVING TO SIMPLE: CURRENT REVISIONAL AND ENDOSCOPIC PROCEDURES FOLLOWING BARIATRIC SURGERY

Background

Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) is a standard therapy in bariatric surgery. Sleeve gastrectomy and gastric banding, although with good results in the literature, are showing higher rates of treatment failure to reduce obesity-associated morbidity and body weight. Other problems after bariatric may occur, as band erosion, gastroesophageal reflux disease and might be refractory to medication. Therefore, a laparoscopic conversion to a RYGB can be an effective alternative, as long as specific indications for revision are fulfilled.

Objective

The objective of this study was to analyse own and literature data on revisional bariatric procedures to evaluate best alternatives to current practice.

Methods

Institutional experience and systematic review from the literature on revisional bariatric surgery.

Results

Endoscopic procedures are recently applied to ameliorate failure and complications of bariatric procedures. Therapy failure following RYGB occurs in up to 20%. Transoral outlet reduction is currently an alternative method to reduce the gastrojejunal anastomosis. The diameter and volume of sleeve gastrectomy can enlarge as well, which can be reduced by endoscopic full-thickness sutures longitudinally. Dumping syndrome and severe hypoglycemic episodes (neuroglycopenia) can be present in patients following RYGB. The hypoglycemic episodes have to be evaluated and usually can be treated conventionally. To avoid partial pancreatectomy or conversion to normal anatomy, a new laparoscopic approach with remnant gastric resection and jejunal interposition can be applied in non-responders alternatively. Hypoglycemic episodes are ameliorated while weight loss is sustained.

Conclusion

Revisional and endoscopic procedures following bariatric surgery in patients with collateral symptomatic or treatment failure can be applied. Conventional non-surgical approaches should have been applied intensively before a revisional surgery will be indicated. Former complex surgical revisional procedures are evolving to less complicated endoscopic solutions.