Islet Transplantation Alone Versus Solitary Pancreas Transplantation: an Outcome-Driven Choice?

Identifying Promising Immunomodulators for Type 1 Diabetes (T1D) and Islet Transplantation

Type 1 diabetes (T1D) is an autoimmune chronic disorder that damages beta cells in the pancreatic islets of Langerhans and results in hyperglycemia due to the loss of insulin. Exogenous insulin therapy can save lives but does not stop disease progression. Thus, an effective therapy may require beta cell restoration and suppression of the autoimmune response. However, currently, there are no treatment options available that can reverse T1D. Within the National Clinical Trial (NCT) database, a majority of over 3000 trials to treat T1D are devoted to insulin therapy. This review focuses on noninsulin pharmacological therapies, specifically immunomodulators. Many investigational new drugs fall under this category, such as the recently FDA-approved CD3 monoclonal antibody teplizumab to delay the onset of T1D. In total, we identified 39 different immunomodulatory investigational drugs. FDA-approved teplizumab for Stage 2 T1D is discussed along with other immunomodulators that have been tested in Phase 3 clinical trials or higher, including otelixizumab (another anti-CD3 monoclonal antibody), daclizumab (an anti-CD25 monoclonal antibody), ladarixin (CXCR1/2 inhibitor), and antithymocyte globulin (ATG). Immunomodulators also play roles in islet transplantation and cellular therapies like FDA-approved Lantidra. Several immunomodulators involved in Phase 3 clinical studies of islet transplantation are also discussed, including alemtuzumab, basiliximab, etanercept, and reparixin, some already FDA-approved for other uses. These include alemtuzumab, basiliximab, etanercept, and reparixin, some of which have been FDA-approved for other uses. This review provides background, mechanism of action, results of completed trials, and adverse effects as well as details regarding ongoing clinical trials for each of these immunomodulators. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03875729, NCT01030861, NCT00129259, NCT00385697, NCT01280682; NCT03929601, NCT04598893, NCT05757713, NCT00678886, NCT01123083, NCT00064714, NCT00468117, NCT04628481, NCT01106157, NCT02215200, NCT00331162, NCT00679042, NCT01220856, NCT01817959.

Skeletal Myoblast Cells Enhance the Function of Transplanted Islets in Diabetic Mice

Islet transplantation (ITx) is an established and safe alternative to pancreas transplantation for type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) patients. However, most ITx recipients lose insulin independence by 3 years after ITx due to early graft loss, such that multiple donors are required to achieve insulin independence. In the present study, we investigated whether skeletal myoblast cells could be beneficial for promoting angiogenesis and maintaining the differentiated phenotypes of islets. In vitro experiments showed that the myoblast cells secreted angiogenesis-related cytokines (vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), hepatocyte growth factor (HGF), and stromal-derived factor-1α (SDF-1α)), contributed to maintenance of differentiated islet phenotypes, and enhanced islet cell insulin secretion capacity. To verify these findings in vivo, we transplanted islets alone or with myoblast cells under the kidney capsule of streptozotocin-induced diabetic mice. Compared with islets alone, the group bearing islets with myoblast cells had a significantly lower average blood glucose level. Histological examination revealed that transplants with islets plus myoblast cells were associated with a significantly larger insulin-positive area and significantly higher number of CD31-positive microvessels compared to islets alone. Furthermore, islets cotransplanted with myoblast cells showed JAK-STAT signaling activation. Our results suggest two possible mechanisms underlying enhancement of islet graft function with myoblast cells cotransplantation: "indirect effects" mediated by angiogenesis and "direct effects" of myoblast cells on islets via the JAK-STAT cascade. Overall, these findings suggest that skeletal myoblast cells enhance the function of transplanted islets, implying clinical potential for a novel ITx procedure involving myoblast cells for patients with diabetes.

Islet transplantation-immunological challenges and current perspectives

Pancreatic islet transplantation is a minimally invasive procedure aiming to reverse the effects of insulin deficiency in patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D) by transplanting pancreatic beta cells. Overall, pancreatic islet transplantation has improved to a great extent, and cellular replacement will likely become the mainstay treatment. We review pancreatic islet transplantation as a treatment for T1D and the immunological challenges faced. Published data demonstrated that the time for islet cell transfusion varied between 2 and 10 h. Approximately 54% of the patients gained insulin independence at the end of the first year, while only 20% remained insulin-free at the end of the second year. Eventually, most transplanted patients return to using some form of exogenous insulin within a few years after the transplantation, which imposed the need to improve immunological factors before transplantation. We also discuss the immunosuppressive regimens, apoptotic donor lymphocytes, anti-TIM-1 antibodies, mixed chimerism-based tolerance induction, induction of antigen-specific tolerance utilizing ethylene carbodiimide-fixed splenocytes, pretransplant infusions of donor apoptotic cells, B cell depletion, preconditioning of isolated islets, inducing local immunotolerance, cell encapsulation and immunoisolation, using of biomaterials, immunomodulatory cells, etc.

Whole-Organ Pancreas and Islets Transplantations in UK: An Overview and Future Directions

Whole-organ pancreas and islets transplantations are two therapeutic options to treat type 1 diabetic patients resistant to optimised medical treatment in whom severe complications develop. Selection of the best option for β-cell replacement depends on several factors such as kidney function, patient comorbidities, and treatment goals. For a patient with end-stage kidney disease, the treatment of choice is often a simultaneous transplant of the pancreas and kidney (SPK). However, it remains a major surgical procedure in patients with multiple comorbidities and therefore it is important to select those who will benefit from it. Additionally, in view of the organ shortage, new strategies to improve outcomes and reduce immune reactions have been developed, including dynamic organ perfusion technologies, pancreas bioengineering, and stem cell therapies. The purpose of this article is to review the indications, surgical techniques, outcomes, and future directions of whole-organ pancreas and islets transplantations.

Benefits and Hurdles of Pancreatic β-Cell Replacement

Insulin represents a life-saving treatment in patients with type 1 diabetes, and technological advancements have improved glucose control in an increasing number of patients. Despite this, adequate control is often still difficult to achieve and insulin remains a therapy and not a cure for the disease. β-cell replacement strategies can potentially restore pancreas endocrine function and aim to maintain normoglycemia; both pancreas and islet transplantation have greatly progressed over the last decades and, in subjects with extreme glycemic variability and diabetes complications, represent a concrete and effective treatment option. Some issues still limit the adoption of this approach on a larger scale. One is represented by the strict selection criteria for the recipient who can benefit from a transplant and maintain the lifelong immunosuppression necessary to avoid organ rejection. Second, with regard to islet transplantation, up to 40% of islets can be lost during hepatic engraftment. Recent studies showed very preliminarily but promising results to overcome these hurdles: the ability to induce β-cell maturation from stem cells may represent a solution to the organ shortage, and the creation of semi-permeable membranes that envelope or package cells in either micro- or macro- encapsulation strategies, together with engineering cells to be hypo-immunogenic, pave the way for developing strategies without immunosuppression. The aim of this review is to describe the state of the art in β-cell replacement with a focus on its efficacy and clinical benefits, on the actual limitations and still unmet needs, and on the latest findings and future directions.

Preferences for Risks and Benefits of Islet Cell Transplantation for Persons With Type 1 Diabetes With History of Episodes of Severe Hypoglycemia: A Discrete-Choice Experiment to Inform Regulatory Decisions

BACKGROUND

The advisory panel for US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recently endorsed pancreatic islet cell transplantation (ICT) therapy for suboptimally controlled type 1 diabetes (T1D), and FDA approval is under consideration. An important part of regulatory approval includes the patient perspective, through discrete choice. We developed a discrete-choice instrument and used it to determine how 90 people with T1D weigh the risks and benefits of ICT to inform regulatory decisions.

METHODS

Sawtooth software created a random, full-profile, balanced-overlap experimental design for a measure with 8 attributes of ICT risks/benefits, each with 3 to 5 levels. We asked 18 random task pairs, sociodemographics, diabetes management, and hypoglycemia questions. Analysis was performed using random parameters logistic regression technique.

RESULTS

The strongest preference was for avoiding the highest chance (15%) of serious procedure-related complications (β = -2.03, P < 0.001). The strongest positive preference was for gaining 5-y insulin independence (β = 1.75, P < 0.001). The desire for 5-y HbA1C-defined clinical treatment success was also strong (β = 1.39, P < 0.001). Subgroup analysis suggested strong gender differences with women showing much higher preferences for all benefits (68% higher for 5-y insulin independence), and men were generally more risk averse than women. Those with high versus low diabetes distress showed 3 times stronger preference for 5-y insulin independence but also twice preference to avoid risks of serious complications.

CONCLUSION

Despite showing the most preference for avoiding serious ICT complications, people with T1D had a strong preference for achieving ICT benefits, especially insulin independence. We identified important attributes of ICT and demonstrated that patients are willing to make these trade-offs, showing support for the introduction of ICT.

Three-dimensional Vascularized β-cell Spheroid Tissue Derived From Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells for Subcutaneous Islet Transplantation in a Mouse Model of Type 1 Diabetes

BACKGROUND

Islet transplantation is an effective replacement therapy for type 1 diabetes (T1D) patients. However, shortage of donor organ for allograft is obstacle for further development of the treatment. Subcutaneous transplantation with stem cell-derived β-cells might overcome this, but poor vascularity in the site is burden for success in the transplantation. We investigated the effect of subcutaneous transplantation of vascularized β-cell spheroid tissue constructed 3-dimensionally using a layer-by-layer (LbL) cell-coating technique in a T1D model mouse.

METHODS

We used MIN6 cells to determine optimal conditions for the coculture of β-cell spheroids, normal human dermal fibroblasts, and human umbilical vein endothelial cells, and then, under those conditions, we constructed vascularized spheroid tissue using human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived β-cells (hiPS β cells). The function of insulin secretion of the vascularized hiPS β-cell spheroid tissue was evaluated in vitro. Furthermore, the function was investigated in T1D model NOD/SCID mice subcutaneously transplanted with the tissue.

RESULTS

In vitro, the vascularized hiPS β-cell spheroid tissue exhibited enhanced insulin secretion. The vascularized hiPS β-cell spheroid tissue also significantly decreased blood glucose levels in diabetic immunodeficient mice when transplanted subcutaneously. Furthermore, host mouse vessels were observed in the explanted vascularized hiPS β-cell spheroid tissue.

CONCLUSIONS

Vascularized hiPS β-cell spheroid tissue decreased blood glucose levels in the diabetic mice. This therapeutic effect was suggested due to host angiogenesis in the graft. This method could lead to a promising regenerative treatment for T1D patients.

Next-gen therapeutics to spare and expand beta-cell mass

The most effective and physiological way to treat hyperglycemia is to restore beta-cell function and to rescue production of endogenous insulin. Increasing evidence suggests that both type 1 and type 2 diabetes are characterized by a significant defect in beta-cell mass, leading to the manifestation of the disease. Novel alternative approaches are needed to spare and expand beta-cell mass in patients with diabetes. This review sets out to describe the latest findings on how to restore the beta-cell mass and function in both forms of diabetes to modulate their progression.

A Strategy to Simultaneously Cure Type 1 Diabetes and Diabetic Nephropathy by Transplant of Composite Islet-Kidney Grafts

In recent years islet cell transplant has proven itself to be a viable clinical option for a select group of diabetic patients. Graft loss after transplant however continues to hinder the long-term success of the procedure. Transplanting the islets as a pre-vascularized composite islet-kidney graft has emerged as a relevant solution. Much groundbreaking research has been done utilizing this model in conjunction with strategies aimed towards islet cell survival and prolongation of function in the host. Transplanting the islet cells as a prevascularized graft under the capsule of the donor kidney as a composite islet-kidney graft has been shown to provide long term durable blood glucose control in large animal studies by limiting graft apoptosis as well as providing a physical barrier against the host immune response. While promising, this technique is limited by long term immunosuppression requirements of the host with its well-known adverse sequelae. Research into tolerance inducing strategies of the host to the allogeneic and xenogeneic islet-kidney graft has shown much promise in the avoidance of long-term immunosuppression. In addition, utilizing xenogeneic tissue grafts could provide a near-limitless supply of organs. The islet-kidney model could provide a durable and long-term cure for diabetes. Here we summarize the most recent data, as well as groundbreaking strategies to avoid long term immunosuppression and promote graft acceptance.

Cutting-edge biotechnological advancement in islet delivery using pancreatic and cellular approaches

There are approximately 1 billion prediabetic people worldwide, and the global cost for diabetes mellitus (DM) is estimated to be $825 billion. In regard to Type 1 DM, transplanting a whole pancreas or its islets has gained the attention of researchers in the last few decades. Recent studies showed that islet transplantation (ILT) containing insulin-producing β cells is the most notable advancement cure for Type 1 DM. However, this procedure has been hindered by shortage and lack of sufficient islet donors and the need for long-term immunosuppression of any potential graft rejection. The strategy of encapsulation may avoid the rejection of stem-cell-derived allogeneic islets or xenogeneic islets. This review article describes various biotechnology features in encapsulation-of-islet-cell therapy for humans, including the use of bile acids.

Protection of Pancreatic Islets Using Theranostic Silencing Nanoparticles in a Baboon Model of Islet Transplantation

The long-term success of pancreatic islet transplantation (Tx) as a cure for type 1 diabetes remains limited. Islet loss after Tx related to apoptosis, inflammation, and other factors continues to limit Tx efficacy. In this project, we demonstrate a novel approach aimed at protecting islets before Tx in nonhuman primates (NHPs) (baboons) by silencing a gene (caspase-3) responsible for induction of apoptosis. This was done using siRNA (siCas-3) conjugated to magnetic nanoparticles (MNs). In addition to serving as carriers for siCas-3, these nanoparticles also act as reporters for MRI, so islets labeled with MN-siCas-3 can be monitored in vivo after Tx. In vitro studies showed the antiapoptotic effect of MN-siCas-3 on islets in culture, resulting in minimal islet loss. For in vivo studies, donor baboon islets were labeled with MN-siCas-3 and infused into recipient diabetic subjects. A dramatic reduction in insulin requirements was observed in animals transplanted with even a marginal number of labeled islets compared with controls. By demonstrating the protective effect of MN-siCas-3 in the challenging NHP model, this study proposes a novel strategy to minimize the number of donor islets required from either cadaveric or living donors.

Mesenchymal Stem Cells: A Trump Card for the Treatment of Diabetes?

The advent of the new revolutionary approach based on regenerative medicine is progressively reshaping the therapeutic scenario of many different diseases, such as cardiovascular diseases and immune diseases, with encouraging results. During the last 10 years, many studies have also proposed the use of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), adult stem cells with several interesting properties already used in different experimental models, for the treatment of diabetes, however, reporting conflicting outcomes. These reasons have given rise to a question: are these cells a real trump card for the biomedical field? Are they really able to outclass the traditional therapies, or at least able to give an advantage over them? In this review, we will discuss the most promising results obtained with MSCs for the treatment of diabetes and its complications, we will compare the different therapeutic treatments applied as well as the most likely mechanisms of action, and overall we will give an in-depth overview of the pros and the cons of the use of MSCs for the therapy of both type-1 and type-2 diabetes.