Diabetes and the Built Environment: Evidence and Policies

Neighborhood retail food environment, diet quality and type 2 diabetes incidence in four Dutch cohorts

BACKGROUND

Current evidence on the associations between the food environment and type 2 diabetes (T2D) is inconsistent and did not investigate the behavioral mediating pathway.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether accessibility of food retailers in the residential neighborhood is associated with T2D incidence in four Dutch prospective cohorts, and whether this is mediated by diet quality.

DESIGN

In this prospective multi-cohort study we included four Dutch cohort studies (ntotal=10,249). Nearest distances from all participants' home to supermarkets, fast-food outlets and green grocers were calculated at baseline (2004-2012). Incidence of T2D during follow-up was assessed with cohort-specific measures. T2D incidence ratios (IR) adjusted for demographics, lifestyle and environmental factors were estimated using Poisson regression in each cohort, and results were pooled across cohorts using a random-effects model. In two cohorts (n=7,549), mediation by adherence to the Dutch Healthy Diet index 2015 (DHD15-index, range 0-13) was investigated using linear and Poisson regression analyses.

RESULTS

Over a mean follow-up of 7.5 years, 569 (5.6%) participants developed T2D. Mean(SD) age in the cohorts ranged from 41.1(12.9) to 67.4(6.8) years. No associations were observed between accessibility of different food retailers and T2D incidence (βsupermarket:0.02(-0.01;0.06), βfast-food:-0.01(-0.04;0.03), βgreen grocer:0.01(-0.05;0.07)). Mediation analyses indicated that every 100 meter living further from a supermarket or green grocer was associated with lower adherence to DHD15 (βsupermarket=-0.1 (95%CI:-0.3;0.0), βgreen grocer=-0.1 (95%CI:-0.1;0.0)), whereas living further away from fast-food associated with higher adherence (βfast-food=0.1 (95%CI: 0.0;0.2)). Higher adherence to DHD15 was associated with lower T2D incidence (IR=0.93 (95%CI: 0.88;0.99)).

CONCLUSIONS

Spatial accessibility of food retailers was not associated with risk of T2D. Nevertheless, consistent associations in hypothesized pathways were observed, such that spatial accessibility to healthier food retailers was associated with higher diet quality and spatial accessibility of unhealthier retailers with lower diet quality. Higher diet quality, in turn, was associated with lower T2D risk.

Evidence on the effectiveness and equity of population-based policies to reduce the burden of type 2 diabetes: a narrative review

There is increasing evidence for the effectiveness of population-based policies to reduce the burden of type 2 diabetes. Yet, there are concerns about the equity effects of some policies, whereby socioeconomically disadvantaged populations are not reached or are adversely affected. There is a lack of knowledge on the effectiveness and equity of policies that are both population based (i.e. targeting both at-risk and low-risk populations) and low agency (i.e. not requiring personal resources to benefit from the policy). In this narrative review, we selected 16 policies that were both population based and low agency and reviewed the evidence on their effectiveness and equity. Substantial evidence suggests that fruit and vegetable subsidies, unhealthy food taxes, mass media campaigns, and school nutrition and physical activity education are effective in promoting healthier lifestyle behaviours. Less evidence was available for mandatory food reformulation, reduced portion sizes, marketing restrictions and restriction of availability and promotion of unhealthy products, although the available evidence suggested that these policies were effective in reducing unhealthy food choices. Effects could rarely be quantified across different studies due to substantial heterogeneity. There is an overall lack of evidence on equity effects of population-based policies, although available studies mostly concluded that the policies had favourable equity effects, with the exception of food-labelling policies. Each of the policies is likely to have a relatively modest effect on population-level diabetes risks, which emphasises the importance of combining different policy measures. Future research should consider the type of evidence needed to demonstrate the real-world effectiveness and equity of population-based diabetes prevention policies.

Barriers to integration of health and equity into urban design policies in Regina, Saskatchewan

Although there is extensive literature on the impact of urban design on health, little is known about the barriers to integrating health into urban design policies. As cities increasingly lead efforts to improve health equity and population health, understanding the perspectives and experiences of municipal actors on health and equity is essential. To address this gap, we conducted semi-structured interviews with 30 stakeholders engaged with urban design policy- and decision-making at the City of Regina in Saskatchewan, Canada. We analysed our data using a qualitative thematic framework. Our research uncovered a lack of shared understanding of health among municipal actors. Interviewees identified several barriers to integrating health and equity in urban design policies, including inaccessibility of evidence; insufficient resourcing; fragmented governance structure; limited legal power of local governments in Canada; a deeply ingrained culture of individualism and lack of representation. Our findings underscore the importance of adopting an integrated and holistic approach for healthy and equitable urban design. As urbanization continues to bring a greater share of the world's population into urban areas, it is crucial to understand how municipal governance can foster environments that promote residents' well-being.

The built environment and its association with type 2 diabetes mellitus incidence: A systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal studies

This study aimed to systematically review longitudinal studies examining associations between the incidence of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and built environmental factors. This review adhered to the 2020 PRISMA guidelines. Longitudinal studies examining associations between T2DM incidence and built environmental features were eligible. Built environment constructs corresponded to the following themes: 1) Walkability - factors such as sidewalks/footpaths, crosswalks, parks, and density of businesses and services; (2) Green/open space - size, greenness, and type of available public outdoor spaces; (3) Food environment - ratio of healthful food outlets (e.g., greengrocers, butchers, supermarkets, and health food shops) to unhealthful food outlets (e.g., fast-food outlets, sweet food retailers, and convenience stores). Five databases (e.g., Medline) were searched from inception until July 2023. Qualitative and quantitative synthesis were used to summarise key findings, including a meta-analysis of adjusted Hazard Ratios (aHR). Of 3,343 articles, 16 longitudinal studies from seven countries, published between 2015 and 2023, involving 13,403,902 baseline participants (median of 83,898), were included. In four of the five studies, unhealthful food environment was significantly associated with higher incident T2DM. Five of seven greenspace studies and two of four walkability studies showed that greater greenery and greater walkability were statistically significantly associated with lesser incident T2DM. In pooled analyses, greater T2DM incidence was associated with unhealthful relative to healthful food environments (pooled HR: 1.21; 95% CI: 1.04, 1.42), and T2DM incidence was inversely associated with green/open space environments (pooled HR: 0.82; 95% CI: 0.74, 0.92). Greater walkability was associated with a slight 2% lesser incidence of T2DM (pooled HR: 0.98; 95% CI: 0.98, 0.99). This review underscores consistency in the nature of associations between built environment features related to T2DM. We observed statistically significant inverse or "protective" associations between T2DM and walkability and healthful food environments. These results support calls for policies and guidelines that promote healthful food environments and walkability.

The mediating role of the food environment, greenspace, and walkability in the association between socioeconomic position and type 2 diabetes - The Maastricht Study

AIMS

This study investigates the interplay between socioeconomic position (SEP), the residential food environment, walkability, greenspace, and type 2 diabetes (T2D), particularly whether the environmental factors mediate the association between SEP and T2D.

METHODS

SEP, T2D status, residential Food Environment Healthiness Index (FEHI), number of fast-food outlets (FF), walkability index (WI), and proportion of greenspace (GS) were ascertained in 9188 participants. The associations between SEP, the environment and T2D were modeled with logistic regression and survival analysis. The proportion of mediation of the association between SEP and T2D was estimated with causal mediation analysis.

RESULTS

Lower SEP was associated with higher risk of T2D. Hazard ratios (HR) were 2.03 (95 % CI 1.60-2.58), 1.79 (1.40-2.30) and 1.77 (1.21-2.58) for an interquartile range decrease (IQR) of education, income, and occupation, respectively. HRs for IQR changes of the environmental factors were: FEHI 1.20 (1.00-1.43), FF 0.87 (0.76-0.99), WI 1.23 (0.95-1.58) and GS 1.16 (0.96-1.43). Regression on prevalent T2D yielded similar results. Lower socioeconomic position was associated with a less healthy environment (e.g., FEHI -0.10 (-0.12--0.07) for education). Environmental exposures mediated between 0.1 % (-0.7-0.9) and 2.6 % (0.4-5.2) of the cross-sectional associations and 0.3 % (-8.6-8.6) and 8.5 % (2.3-27.4) of the longitudinal associations.

CONCLUSIONS

People with lower SEP had higher risk and prevalence of T2D and lived in a slightly less healthy residential environment. The association between SEP and T2D is not strongly mediated by FEHI, FF, WI, or GS.

Interactive visualization tool to understand and monitor health disparities in diabetes care and outcomes

Objective

Type 2 diabetes (T2DM) poses a significant public health challenge, with pronounced disparities in control and outcomes. Social determinants of health (SDoH) significantly contribute to these disparities, affecting healthcare access, neighborhood environments, and social context. We discuss the design, development, and use of an innovative web-based application integrating real-world data (electronic health record and geospatial files), to enhance comprehension of the impact of SDoH on T2 DM health disparities.

Methods

We identified a patient cohort with diabetes from the institutional Diabetes Registry (N = 67,699) within the Duke University Health System. Patient-level information (demographics, comorbidities, service utilization, laboratory results, and medications) was extracted to Tableau. Neighborhood-level socioeconomic status was assessed via the Area Deprivation Index (ADI), and geospatial files incorporated additional data related to points of interest (i.e., parks/green space). Interactive Tableau dashboards were developed to understand risk and contextual factors affecting diabetes management at the individual, group, neighborhood, and population levels.

Results

The Tableau-powered digital health tool offers dynamic visualizations, identifying T2DM-related disparities. The dashboard allows for the exploration of contextual factors affecting diabetes management (e.g., food insecurity, built environment) and possesses capabilities to generate targeted patient lists for personalized diabetes care planning.

Conclusion

As part of a broader health equity initiative, this application meets the needs of a diverse range of users. The interactive dashboard, incorporating clinical, sociodemographic, and environmental factors, enhances understanding at various levels and facilitates targeted interventions to address disparities in diabetes care and outcomes. Ultimately, this transformative approach aims to manage SDoH and improve patient care.

The Michigan Men's Diabetes Project Randomized Clinical Control Trial: A Pilot/Feasibility Study of a Peer-Led Diabetes Self-Management and Support Intervention for Black Men With Type 2 Diabetes

Black men are disproportionately affected by type 2 diabetes (T2D) and experience higher diabetes-related complications than non-Hispanic White men. To address the complex barriers in diabetes self-management for Black men, we implemented a 3-month peer-led and empowerment-based Diabetes Self-Management Education (DSME) and Support (DSMS) intervention in Metro Detroit. Twenty-five Black men ≥55 years of age with self-reported T2D were randomized to the intervention group (n=12)-10 hr of DSME and 9 hr of DSMS-or enhanced usual care (EUC) group (n=13)-10 hr of DSME. Peer leaders (n = 3) were trained by certified diabetes care and education specialists (CDCESs) to cofacilitate the support sessions. Outcomes (hemoglobin A1c [HbA1c], diabetes self-care activities, and diabetes distress) were assessed preintervention and postintervention. In the intervention and EUC groups, mean HbA1c decreased by 0.20% (p = .52, SD = 0.99) and 0.13% (p = .68), respectively. General diet (p = .03, M change: 1.32, SD = 1.71) and blood glucose monitoring (p < .05, M change: 0.50, SD = 0.74) scores improved among those in the intervention group. General diet scores also improved in the EUC group: mean change: 1.77, p = .08, although changes were not statistically significant. Changes in diabetes distress scores differed based on the number of sessions attended, with a significant decrease in those attending 7 to 12 sessions (n = 7), >50%, (p = .003, M change: -5.71, SD = 3.20). Implementing a peer-led DSMS program for Black men was feasible, adopted, and led to positive changes in outcomes. Scaling up the intervention and assessing sustainability is warranted.

A review of air pollution as a driver of cardiovascular disease risk across the diabetes spectrum

The prevalence of diabetes is estimated to reach almost 630 million cases worldwide by the year 2045; of current and projected cases, over 90% are type 2 diabetes. Air pollution exposure has been implicated in the onset and progression of diabetes. Increased exposure to fine particulate matter air pollution (PM2.5) is associated with increases in blood glucose and glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) across the glycemic spectrum, including normoglycemia, prediabetes, and all forms of diabetes. Air pollution exposure is a driver of cardiovascular disease onset and exacerbation and can increase cardiovascular risk among those with diabetes. In this review, we summarize the literature describing the relationships between air pollution exposure, diabetes and cardiovascular disease, highlighting how airborne pollutants can disrupt glucose homeostasis. We discuss how air pollution and diabetes, via shared mechanisms leading to endothelial dysfunction, drive increased cardiovascular disease risk. We identify portable air cleaners as potentially useful tools to prevent adverse cardiovascular outcomes due to air pollution exposure across the diabetes spectrum, while emphasizing the need for further study in this particular population. Given the enormity of the health and financial impacts of air pollution exposure on patients with diabetes, a greater understanding of the interventions to reduce cardiovascular risk in this population is needed.

A narrative review of exercise participation among adults with prediabetes or type 2 diabetes: barriers and solutions

Type 2 diabetes (T2D) has been rising in prevalence over the past few decades in the US and worldwide. T2D contributes to significant morbidity and premature mortality, primarily due to cardiovascular disease (CVD). Exercise is a major cornerstone of therapy for T2D as a result of its positive effects on glycemic control, blood pressure, weight loss and cardiovascular risk as well as other measures of health. However, studies show that a majority of people with T2D do not exercise regularly. The reasons given as to why exercise goals are not met are varied and include physiological, psychological, social, cultural and environmental barriers to exercise. One potential cause of inactivity in people with T2D is impaired cardiorespiratory fitness, even in the absence of clinically evident complications. The exercise impairment, although present in both sexes, is greater in women than men with T2D. Women with T2D also experience greater perceived exertion with exercise than their counterparts without diabetes. These physiological barriers are in addition to constructed societal barriers including cultural expectations of bearing the burden of childrearing for women and in some cultures, having limited access to exercise because of additional cultural expectations. People at risk for and with diabetes more commonly experience unfavorable social determinants of health (SDOH) than people without diabetes, represented by neighborhood deprivation. Neighborhood deprivation measures lack of resources in an area influencing socioeconomic status including many SDOH such as income, housing conditions, living environment, education and employment. Higher indices of neighborhood deprivation have been associated with increased risk of all-cause, cardiovascular and cancer related mortality. Unfavorable SDOH is also associated with obesity and lower levels of physical activity. Ideally regular physical activity should be incorporated into all communities as part of a productive and healthy lifestyle. One potential solution to improve access to physical activity is designing and building environments with increased walkability, greenspace and safe recreational areas. Other potential solutions include the use of continuous glucose monitors as real-time feedback tools aimed to increase motivation for physical activity, counseling aimed at improving self-efficacy towards exercise and even acquiring a dog to increase walking time. In this narrative review, we aim to examine some traditional and novel barriers to exercise, as well as present evidence on novel interventions or solutions to overcome barriers to increase exercise and physical activity in all people with prediabetes and T2D.

Rethinking diabetes in the United States

Despite the availability of effective medical treatments, the diabetes epidemic has accelerated in the United States, efforts to translate treatments into routine clinical practice have stalled, and health inequities have persisted. The National Clinical Care Commission (NCCC) was established by the Congress to make recommendations to better leverage federal policies and programs to more effectively prevent and control diabetes and its complications. The NCCC developed a guiding framework that incorporated elements of the Socioecological and Chronic Care Models. It gathered information from both health-related and non-health-related federal agencies, held 12 public meetings, solicited public comments, met with interested parties and key informants, and performed comprehensive literature reviews. The final report of the NCCC was transmitted to the Congress in January 2022. It called for a rethinking of the problem of diabetes in the United States, including the recognition that the lack of progress is due to a failure to confront diabetes as both a complex societal problem as well as a biomedical problem. To prevent and control diabetes, public policies and programs must be aligned to address both social and environmental determinants of health and health care delivery as they impact diabetes. In this article, we discuss the findings and recommendations of the NCCC as they relate to the social and environmental factors that influence the risk of type 2 diabetes and argue that the prevention and control of type 2 diabetes in the U.S. must begin with concrete population-level interventions to address social and environmental determinants of health.

Housing instability and cardiometabolic health in the United States: a narrative review of the literature

Housing instability is variably defined but generally encompasses difficulty paying rent, living in poor or overcrowded conditions, moving frequently, or spending the majority of household income on housing costs. While there is strong evidence that people experiencing homelessness (i.e., lack of regular housing) are at increased risk for cardiovascular disease, obesity, and diabetes, less is known about housing instability and health. We synthesized evidence from 42 original research studies conducted in the United States examining the association of housing instability and cardiometabolic health conditions of overweight/obesity, hypertension, diabetes, and cardiovascular disease. The included studies varied widely in their definitions and methods of measuring housing instability, but all exposure variables were related to housing cost burden, frequency of moves, living in poor or overcrowded conditions, or experiencing eviction or foreclosure, measured at either the individual household level or at a population level. We also included studies examining the impact of receipt of government rental assistance, which serves as a marker of housing instability given that its purpose is to provide affordable housing for low-income households. Overall, we found mixed but generally adverse associations between housing instability and cardiometabolic health, including higher prevalence of overweight/obesity, hypertension, diabetes, and cardiovascular disease; worse hypertension and diabetes control; and higher acute health care utilization among those with diabetes and cardiovascular disease. We propose a conceptual framework for pathways linking housing instability and cardiometabolic disease that could be targeted in future research and housing policies or programs.

Adverse Childhood Experiences, Depression, Patient Activation, and Medication Adherence Among Patients With Uncontrolled Hypertension

BACKGROUND

Identifying potential pathways through which adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) impact health and health behavior remains important, given ACE survivors' increased risk for cardiovascular disease and poor cardiovascular health behaviors. This study examines whether modifiable variables-depression and patient activation-explain the relationship between ACEs and medication adherence.

METHODS

Using baseline data from a pragmatic trial designed to decrease disparities in hypertension control, we conducted regression analyses to examine whether depression and patient activation mediated the association between ACEs and medication adherence. Data were collected between August 2017 and October 2019 (n = 1,818).

RESULTS

Participants were predominantly female (59.4%) and Black or African American (57%) with uncontrolled blood pressure (mean-152.3/85.5 mm Hg). Most participants reported experiencing at least 1 ACE (71%) and approximately 50% reported being adherent to their blood pressure medication. A significant indirect effect between ACEs and medication adherence was found for depression symptoms (Sobel's test z = -5.46, P < 0.001). Patient activation was not a mediator in these relationships.

CONCLUSIONS

Experiencing more depression symptoms significantly accounted for the association between ACEs and medication adherence in a diverse sample of adults with uncontrolled blood pressure. Addressing depression symptoms, which may result from experiences with ACEs and other current stressors, could translate to better medication adherence and, potentially, better blood pressure control among this high-risk group. Given the serious lifetime health implications of ACEs, continued efforts are needed for primary prevention of childhood adversities.

The National Clinical Care Commission Report to Congress: Recommendations to Better Leverage Federal Policies and Programs to Prevent and Control Diabetes

The National Clinical Care Commission (NCCC) was established by Congress to make recommendations to leverage federal policies and programs to more effectively prevent and treat diabetes and its complications. The NCCC developed a guiding framework that incorporated elements of the Socioecological and Chronic Care Models. It surveyed federal agencies and conducted follow-up meetings with representatives from 10 health-related and 11 non-health-related federal agencies. It held 12 public meetings, solicited public comments, met with numerous interested parties and key informants, and performed comprehensive literature reviews. The final report, transmitted to Congress in January 2022, contained 39 specific recommendations, including 3 foundational recommendations that addressed the necessity of an all-of-government approach to diabetes, health equity, and access to health care. At the general population level, the NCCC recommended that the federal government adopt a health-in-all-policies approach so that the activities of non-health-related federal agencies that address agriculture, food, housing, transportation, commerce, and the environment be coordinated with those of health-related federal agencies to affirmatively address the social and environmental conditions that contribute to diabetes and its complications. For individuals at risk for type 2 diabetes, including those with prediabetes, the NCCC recommended that federal policies and programs be strengthened to increase awareness of prediabetes and the availability of, referral to, and insurance coverage for intensive lifestyle interventions for diabetes prevention and that data be assembled to seek approval of metformin for diabetes prevention. For people with diabetes and its complications, the NCCC recommended that barriers to proven effective treatments for diabetes and its complications be removed, the size and competence of the workforce to treat diabetes and its complications be increased, and new payment models be implemented to support access to lifesaving medications and proven effective treatments for diabetes and its complications. The NCCC also outlined an ambitious research agenda. The NCCC strongly encourages the public to support these recommendations and Congress to take swift action.

The National Clinical Care Commission Report to Congress: Leveraging Federal Policies and Programs for Population-Level Diabetes Prevention and Control: Recommendations From the National Clinical Care Commission

The etiology of type 2 diabetes is rooted in a myriad of factors and exposures at individual, community, and societal levels, many of which also affect the control of type 1 and type 2 diabetes. Not only do such factors impact risk and treatment at the time of diagnosis but they also can accumulate biologically from preconception, in utero, and across the life course. These factors include inadequate nutritional quality, poor access to physical activity resources, chronic stress (e.g., adverse childhood experiences, racism, and poverty), and exposures to environmental toxins. The National Clinical Care Commission (NCCC) concluded that the diabetes epidemic cannot be treated solely as a biomedical problem but must also be treated as a societal problem that requires an all-of-government approach. The NCCC determined that it is critical to design, leverage, and coordinate federal policies and programs to foster social and environmental conditions that facilitate the prevention and treatment of diabetes. This article reviews the rationale, scientific evidence base, and content of the NCCC's population-wide recommendations that address food systems; consumption of water over sugar-sweetened beverages; food and beverage labeling; marketing and advertising; workplace, ambient, and built environments; and research. Recommendations relate to specific federal policies, programs, agencies, and departments, including the U.S. Department of Agriculture, the Food and Drug Administration, the Federal Trade Commission, the Department of Housing and Urban Development, the Environmental Protection Agency, and others. These population-level recommendations are transformative. By recommending health-in-all-policies and an equity-based approach to governance, the NCCC Report to Congress has the potential to contribute to meaningful change across the diabetes continuum and beyond. Adopting these recommendations could significantly reduce diabetes incidence, complications, costs, and inequities. Substantial political resolve will be needed to translate recommendations into policy. Engagement by diverse members of the diabetes stakeholder community will be critical to such efforts.

The National Clinical Care Commission Report to Congress: Background, Methods, and Foundational Recommendations

Since the first Federal Commission on Diabetes issued its report in 1975, the diabetes epidemic in the U.S. has accelerated, and efforts to translate advances in diabetes treatment into routine clinical practice have stalled. In 2021, the National Clinical Care Commission (NCCC) delivered a report to Congress that provided recommendations to leverage federal policies and programs to more effectively prevent and treat diabetes and its complications. In the five articles in this series, we present the NCCC's evidence-based recommendations to 1) reduce diabetes-related risks, prevent type 2 diabetes, and avert diabetes complications through changes in federal policies and programs affecting the general population; 2) prevent type 2 diabetes in at-risk individuals through targeted lifestyle and medication interventions; and 3) improve the treatment of diabetes and its complications to improve the health outcomes of people with diabetes. In this first article, we review the successes and limitations of previous federal efforts to combat diabetes. We then describe the establishment of and charge to the NCCC. We discuss the development of a hybrid conceptual model that guided the NCCC's novel all-of-government approach to address diabetes as both a societal and medical problem. We then review the procedures used by the NCCC to gather information from federal agencies, stakeholders, key informants, and the public and to conduct literature reviews. Finally, we review the NCCC's three foundational recommendations: 1) improve the coordination of non-health-related and health-related federal agencies to address the social and environmental conditions that are accelerating the diabetes epidemic; 2) ensure that all Americans at risk for and with diabetes have health insurance and access to health care; and 3) ensure that all federal policies and programs promote health equity in diabetes.

Perceived neighborhood environment walkability and health-related quality of life among predominantly Black and Latino adults in New York City

BACKGROUND

Measures of the built environment such as neighborhood walkability have been associated with health behaviors such as physical activity, the lack of which in turn may contribute to the development of diseases such as obesity, diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and cancer. However, limited research has examined these measures in association with health-related quality of life (HR-QoL), particularly in minoritized populations. We examined the relationship between perceived neighborhood environment and HR-QoL in a sample of mostly Black and Latino residents in New York City (NYC).

METHODS

This study utilized the baseline survey data from the Physical Activity and Redesigned Community Spaces (PARCS) Study among 1252 residents [34.6% Black, 54.1% Latino, 80.1% female, mean(±SD) age = 38.8 ± 12.5) in 54 park neighborhoods in NYC. Perceived built environment was measured using Neighborhood Environment and Walkability Survey, and mental and physical HR-QoL was estimated using Short Form (SF)-12. Using factor analysis, we identified two subscales of neighborhood walkability: enablers (e.g., trails, sidewalks, esthetics) vs. barriers (e.g., high crime and traffic). In addition, we included a third subscale on neighborhood satisfaction. Generalized Estimating Equation models adjusted for demographics and BMI and accounted for the clustering effect within neighborhood. Multiple imputation was used to account for missing data.

RESULTS

Mental HR-QoL was associated with barriers of walkability (β ± SE = - 1.63 ± 0.55, p < 0.01) and neighborhood satisfaction (β ± SE = 1.55 ± 0.66, p = 0.02), after adjusting for covariates. Physical HR-QoL was associated with only barriers of walkability (β ± SE = - 1.13 ± 0.57, p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Among NYC residents living in minoritized neighborhoods, mitigating negative aspects of the neighborhood environment may be more crucial than adding positive features in terms of HR-QoL. Our study points to the need to investigate further the role of the built environment in urban, minoritized communities.

Association of Neighborhood Racial and Ethnic Composition and Historical Redlining With Built Environment Indicators Derived From Street View Images in the US

Importance

Racist policies (such as redlining) create inequities in the built environment, producing racially and ethnically segregated communities, poor housing conditions, unwalkable neighborhoods, and general disadvantage. Studies on built environment disparities are usually limited to measures and data that are available from existing sources or can be manually collected.

Objective

To use built environment indicators generated from online street-level images to investigate the association among neighborhood racial and ethnic composition, the built environment, and health outcomes across urban areas in the US.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This cross-sectional study was conducted using built environment indicators derived from 164 million Google Street View images collected from November 1 to 30, 2019. Race, ethnicity, and socioeconomic data were obtained from the 2019 American Community Survey (ACS) 5-year estimates; health outcomes were obtained from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2020 Population Level Analysis and Community Estimates (PLACES) data set. Multilevel modeling and mediation analysis were applied. A total of 59 231 urban census tracts in the US were included. The online images and the ACS data included all census tracts. The PLACES data comprised survey respondents 18 years or older. Data were analyzed from May 23 to November 16, 2022.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Model-estimated association between image-derived built environment indicators and census tract (neighborhood) racial and ethnic composition, and the association of the built environment with neighborhood racial composition and health.

Results

The racial and ethnic composition in the 59 231 urban census tracts was 1 160 595 (0.4%) American Indian and Alaska Native, 53 321 345 (19.5%) Hispanic, 462 259 (0.2%) Native Hawaiian and other Pacific Islander, 17 166 370 (6.3%) non-Hispanic Asian, 35 985 480 (13.2%) non-Hispanic Black, and 158 043 260 (57.7%) non-Hispanic White residents. Compared with other neighborhoods, predominantly White neighborhoods had fewer dilapidated buildings and more green space indicators, usually associated with good health, and fewer crosswalks (eg, neighborhoods with predominantly minoritized racial or ethnic groups other than Black residents had 6% more dilapidated buildings than neighborhoods with predominantly White residents). Moreover, the built environment indicators partially mediated the association between neighborhood racial and ethnic composition and health outcomes, including diabetes, asthma, and sleeping problems. The most significant mediator was non-single family homes (a measure associated with homeownership), which mediated the association between neighborhoods with predominantly minority racial or ethnic groups other than Black residents and sleeping problems by 12.8% and the association between unclassified neighborhoods and asthma by 24.2%.

Conclusions and Relevance

The findings in this cross-sectional study suggest that large geographically representative data sets, if used appropriately, may provide novel insights on racial and ethnic health inequities. Quantifying the impact of structural racism on social determinants of health is one step toward developing policies and interventions to create equitable built environment resources.

Environmental risk factors of type 2 diabetes-an exposome approach

Type 2 diabetes is one of the major chronic diseases accounting for a substantial proportion of disease burden in Western countries. The majority of the burden of type 2 diabetes is attributed to environmental risks and modifiable risk factors such as lifestyle. The environment we live in, and changes to it, can thus contribute substantially to the prevention of type 2 diabetes at a population level. The 'exposome' represents the (measurable) totality of environmental, i.e. nongenetic, drivers of health and disease. The external exposome comprises aspects of the built environment, the social environment, the physico-chemical environment and the lifestyle/food environment. The internal exposome comprises measurements at the epigenetic, transcript, proteome, microbiome or metabolome level to study either the exposures directly, the imprints these exposures leave in the biological system, the potential of the body to combat environmental insults and/or the biology itself. In this review, we describe the evidence for environmental risk factors of type 2 diabetes, focusing on both the general external exposome and imprints of this on the internal exposome. Studies provided established associations of air pollution, residential noise and area-level socioeconomic deprivation with an increased risk of type 2 diabetes, while neighbourhood walkability and green space are consistently associated with a reduced risk of type 2 diabetes. There is little or inconsistent evidence on the contribution of the food environment, other aspects of the social environment and outdoor temperature. These environmental factors are thought to affect type 2 diabetes risk mainly through mechanisms incorporating lifestyle factors such as physical activity or diet, the microbiome, inflammation or chronic stress. To further assess causality of these associations, future studies should focus on investigating the longitudinal effects of our environment (and changes to it) in relation to type 2 diabetes risk and whether these associations are explained by these proposed mechanisms.

Chronic disease and where you live: Built and natural environment relationships with physical activity, obesity, and diabetes

BACKGROUND

Diabetes is among the most prevalent non-communicable diseases causing significant morbidity and mortality globally. The aetiology and disease development of diabetes are influenced by genetic, lifestyle, and environmental factors. Due to an increasing number of cases each year, it is imperative to improve the understanding of modifiable environmental risk and protective factors. In this study we aimed to analyse associations between built and natural environment features and diabetes prevalence; and two major risk factors: physical activity and obesity and their mediation effects.

METHODS

We analysed relationships between walkability and park availability with physical activity, obesity, and diabetes, using self-reported data from a large cross-sectional survey in British Columbia, Canada (n = 22,418). We validated results with an independent cohort (n = 11,972) in a subset of the analyses. The outcome measures included walking, moderate to vigorous physical activity (MVPA), body mass index (BMI), and diabetes. Built and natural environment features within a 1 km road network buffer around residential postal code centroids were assessed using validated indicators of walkability and park availability. We used general linear multivariable models (GLM) to examine the direct relationship between environmental features, physical activity, obesity, and diabetes respectively. Path models were developed to analyse mediation effects of physical activity and obesity on the association between environmental indicators and diabetes. The relative contribution of direct versus indirect effects was assessed. All models were adjusted for age, gender, income. ethnicity, years lived in neighbourhood and regional accessibility.

RESULTS

Walkable neighbourhoods and areas with greater park availability were associated with lower rates of diabetes. There was a direct association of walkability and park availability on physical activity (highest vs. lowest quintile OR = 1.15; 95% CI: 1.00, 1.33 and OR = 1.28, 95% CI: 1.13, 1.45 respectively), obesity (highest vs. lowest quintile OR = 0.58, 95% CI: 0.49, 0.70 and OR = 0.57, 95% CI: 0.48, 0.68 respectively) and diabetes (highest vs. lowest quintile OR = 0.62, 95% CI: 0.45, 0.85, and OR = 0.63, 95% CI: 0.47, 0.84 respectively). Results were similar in the independent cohort. The associations between diabetes and walkability and park availability respectively were partly mediated by obesity (41% of total association for walkability and 53% of total association for park availability). The mediating effect of physical activity was negligible.

CONCLUSION

Results support investments in walkability through active transportation and transit infrastructure. Changes in zoning and subdivision regulations governing land use actions are required to enable compact mixed-use environments with access to parks and high quality transit service. Future studies including cost-benefit analyses of health-related economic impacts of such investments can contribute to evidence-based decisions for healthier cities.

Social determinants of health impacting adherence to diabetic retinopathy examinations

INTRODUCTION

This study evaluates the association of multidimensional social determinants of health (SDoH) with non-adherence to diabetic retinopathy examinations.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

This was a post-hoc subgroup analysis of adults with diabetes in a prospective cohort study of enrollees in the Washington, DC Medicaid program. At study enrollment, participants were given a comprehensive SDoH survey based on the WHO SDoH model. Adherence to recommended dilated diabetic retinopathy examinations, as determined by qualifying Current Procedural Terminology codes in the insurance claims, was defined as having at least one eye examination in the 2-year period following study enrollment.

RESULTS

Of the 8943 participants enrolled in the prospective study, 1492 (64% female, 91% non-Hispanic Black) were included in this post-hoc subgroup analysis. 47.7% (n=712) were adherent to the recommended biennial diabetic eye examinations. Not having a regular provider (eg, a primary care physician) and having poor housing conditions (eg, overcrowded, inadequate heating) were associated with decreased odds of adherence to diabetic eye examinations (0.45 (95% CI 0.31 to 0.64) and 0.70 (95% CI 0.53 to 0.94), respectively) in the multivariate logistic regression analysis controlling for age, sex, race/ethnicity, overall health status using the Chronic Disability Payment System, diabetes severity using the Diabetes Complications Severity Index, history of eye disease, and history of diabetic eye disease treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

A multidimensional evaluation of SDoH revealed barriers that impact adherence to diabetic retinopathy examinations. Having poor housing conditions and not having a regular provider were associated with poor adherence. A brief SDoH assessment could be incorporated into routine clinical care to identify social risks and connect patients with the necessary resources to improve adherence to diabetic retinopathy examinations.

Development of an instrument to measure perceived gentrification for health research: Perceptions about changes in environments and residents (PACER)

Despite a myriad of potential pathways linking neighborhood change and gentrification to health, existing quantitative measures failed to capture individual-level, self-reported perceptions of these processes. We developed the Perceptions About Change in Environment and Residents (PACER) survey to measure the gentrification-related neighborhood change experienced by individuals relevant to health. We employed a multi-stage process to develop PACER including a scoping review, question refinement, content validity, and cognitive interviews. Content validity and cognitive interviews were assessed within the National Neighborhood Indicators Partnership (NNIP) and for residents of different tenure in both gentrifying and non-gentrifying neighborhoods to ensure PACER considers the complex nature of neighborhood change for different people within different urban contexts. We piloted the instrument to a sample from the resident panel BeHeardPhilly to assess acceptability and data quality. Finally, we assessed internal consistency, dimensionality, and criterion-related validity using Principal Components Analysis (PCA), descriptive statistics, and correlation coefficients. Testing showed good internal consistency for PACER questions, as well as for each of four resulting factors (Feelings, Built Environment, Social Environment, and Affordability). Correlations between factors and other context measures demonstrated strong criterion-related validity. PACER offers an unprecedented tool for measuring and understanding resident perceptions about gentrification-related neighborhood change relevant to health. Rigorously tested and tailored for health, PACER holds utility for application across different settings to examine changes from events that may impact and shift neighborhoods.

Ethnic Disparities in Diabetes

Diabetes disproportionably affects minorities in the United States. Substantial disparities exist in diabetes incidence, glycemic control, complications, mortality, and management. The most important biologic contributors to diabetes disparities are obesity, insulin resistance, and inadequate glycemic control. Providers and health systems must also recognize the behavioral, social, and environmental factors that promote and sustain racial/ethnic differences in diabetes and its complications. Metformin and sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors are the most convenient drugs for treatment of diabetes in minority patients. Multilevel interventions at the patient, provider, health system, community, and policy levels are needed to reduce diabetes disparities in high-risk groups.

Perceived built environment and type 2 diabetes incidence: Exploring potential mediating pathways through physical and mental health, and behavioural factors in a longitudinal study

AIMS

The evidence on the pathways through which the built environment may influence type 2 diabetes (T2D) risk is limited. This study explored whether behavioural, physical and mental health factors mediate the associations between perceived built environment and T2D.

METHODS

Longitudinal data on 36,224 participants aged ≥45 years (The Sax Institute's 45 and Up Study) was analysed. Causal mediation analysis that uses the counterfactual approach to decompose the total effect into direct and indirect effects was performed.

RESULTS

The results showed that physical activity, recreational walking, and BMI mediated around 6%, 11%, and 30%, respectively, of the association between perceived lack of access to local amenities and T2D incidence. Physical activity (4.8% for day-time crime), recreational walking (2.3% for day-time crime), psychological distress (5.2% for day-time, 3.7% for night-time crime), and BMI (29.6% for day-time crime, 17.4% for night-time crime) also partially mediated the effect of perceived crime. Mediated effects appeared larger at wave 3 than the same wave 2 mediators.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings demonstrate that physical activity, psychological distress, and BMI mediate the pathways between the built environment and T2D. Policies aimed to bring amenities closer to homes, prevent crime, and address mental health may help reduce T2D risk.

Objectively Measured Built Environments and Cardiovascular Diseases in Middle-Aged and Older Korean Adults

This study assesses the association between the objectively measured built environment and cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) in 50,741 adults from the Korean Community Health Survey. The CVD outcomes of hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidemia, stroke, and myocardial infarction (MI) or angina were derived from self-reported histories of physician diagnoses. Using ArcGIS software and Korean government databases, this study measured the built environment variables for the 546 administrative areas of Gyeonggi province. A Bayesian spatial multilevel model was performed independently in two age groups (i.e., 40–59 years or ≥60 years). After adjusting for statistical significant individual- and community-level factors with the spatial associations, living far from public transit was associated with an increase in the odds of MI or angina in middle-aged adults, while living in neighborhoods in which fast-food restaurants were concentrated was associated with a decrease in the odds of hypertension and stroke. For adults 60 or older, living farther from public physical-activity (PA) facilities was associated with a 15% increased odds for dyslipidemia, compared with living in neighborhoods nearer to PA facilities. These findings suggest that creating a built environment that provides more opportunities to engage in PA in everyday life should be considered a strategy to reduce the prevalence of CVD.

Association of urban built environment and socioeconomic factors with suicide mortality in high-density cities: A case study of Hong Kong

Population ageing, climate change and urbanization have been occurring rapidly globally. Evidence-based healthy city development is required to improve living quality and mitigate the adverse impact of city living on both physical and mental health. We took a high-density city as an example to explore the association of built environment and suicide mortality and preferably to offer some implications for better future city development. Poisson generalized linear models with generalized estimation equations were employed to regress suicide mortality rate on four urban built environment variables (frontal area density (FAD), sky view factor (SVF), ground coverage ratio (GCR), and street coverage ratio (SCR)), as well as socioeconomic factors, population density, and greenery. The association for different causes of death and within different subgroups was also investigated. Generally, higher FAD and GCR were associated with higher suicide mortality while higher SVF and SCR were associated with lower suicide mortality. Age was a significant effect modifier. An interquartile range increase in FAD, SVF, and GCR was associated with 0.81 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.71-0.92), 1.41 (95% CI 1.04-1.91), and 0.70 (95% CI 0.50-0.98) times the risk of suicide among the people aged over 70, respectively. Higher population density and unmarried status were generally associated with higher suicide rate whereas higher education level was associated with a decreased risk. Unfavorable built environment could increase risks for successful suicide attempts. Better urban development with morphological control mitigating intensifying urban heat island and other micro-environment changes are warranted to promote not only physical but psychological health.