Management of VEGF-Targeted Therapy-Induced Hypertension

Comprehensive analysis of VEGF/VEGFR inhibitor-induced immune-mediated hypertension: integrating pharmacovigilance, clinical data, and preclinical models

Introduction

This study aimed to elucidate the differential immunological mechanisms and characteristics of hypertension induced by VEGF inhibitors (VEGFi) and VEGF receptor inhibitors (VEGFRi), with the goal of optimizing monitoring strategies and treatment protocols.

Methods

We investigated the risk of immune-related adverse events associated with VEGFi/VEGFRi-induced hypertension by analyzing the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database. Findings were corroborated with blood pressure characteristics observed in clinical patients and preclinical models exposed to various VEGF/VEGFRi. Clinical and preclinical studies were conducted to compare immunological responses and hypertension profiles between inhibitor classes. An integrative analysis across cancer types and species was performed, focusing on key signaling pathways.

Results

Analysis of FAERS data, in conjunction with clinical observations, revealed that both VEGFi and VEGFRi significantly elevated the risk of immune-mediated, blood pressure-related adverse events (ROR=7.75, 95% CI: 7.76-7.95). Subsequent clinical and preclinical studies demonstrated differential immunological responses and hypertension profiles between inhibitor classes. VEGFRi exhibited a more rapid onset, greater blood pressure elevation, and higher incidence of immune-mediated adverse events compared to VEGFi (Systolic BP: ROR=0 for VEGFi vs. ROR=12.25, 95% CI: 6.54-22.96 for VEGFRi; Diastolic BP: ROR=5.09, 95% CI: 0.60-43.61 for VEGFi vs. ROR=12.90, 95% CI: 3.73-44.55 for VEGFRi). Integrative analysis across cancer types and species, focusing on key signaling pathways, revealed that VEGF/VEGFRi-induced blood pressure elevation was associated with immunomodulation of the mitogen activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway (R=-0.379, P=0.0435), alterations in triglyceride metabolism (R=-0.664, P=0.0001), modulation of myo-inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate-sensitive calcium release channel activity (R=0.389, P=0.0378), and dysregulation of nitric oxide eNOS activation and metabolism (R=-0.439, P=0.0179).

Discussion

The temporal dynamics of these effects demonstrated greater significance than dose-dependent responses. Both VEGFi and VEGFRi significantly augmented the risk of immune-mediated, blood pressure-related adverse events, with VEGFRi inducing a more rapid and pronounced onset of blood pressure elevation and a higher incidence of immune-related, blood pressure-associated adverse events compared to VEGFi.

Identifying mitigating strategies for endothelial cell dysfunction and hypertension in response to VEGF receptor inhibitors

Vascular endothelial growth factor receptor inhibitors (VEGFRis) improve cancer survival but are associated with treatment-limiting hypertension, often attributed to endothelial cell (EC) dysfunction. Using phosphoproteomic profiling of VEGFRi-treated ECs, drugs were screened for mitigators of VEGFRi-induced EC dysfunction and validated in primary aortic ECs, mice, and canine cancer patients. VEGFRi treatment significantly raised systolic blood pressure (SBP) and increased markers of endothelial and renal dysfunction in mice and canine cancer patients. α-Adrenergic-antagonists were identified as drugs that most oppose the VEGFRi proteomic signature. Doxazosin, one such α-antagonist, prevented EC dysfunction in murine, canine, and human aortic ECs. In mice with sorafenib-induced-hypertension, doxazosin mitigated EC dysfunction but not hypertension or glomerular endotheliosis, while lisinopril mitigated hypertension and glomerular endotheliosis without impacting EC function. Hence, reversing EC dysfunction was insufficient to mitigate VEGFRi-induced-hypertension in this mouse model. Canine cancer patients with VEGFRi-induced-hypertension were randomized to doxazosin or lisinopril and both agents significantly decreased SBP. The canine clinical trial supports safety and efficacy of doxazosin and lisinopril as antihypertensives for VEGFRi-induced-hypertension and the potential of trials in canines with spontaneous cancer to accelerate translation. The overall findings demonstrate the utility of phosphoproteomics to identify EC-protective agents to mitigate cardio-oncology side effects.

The importance of microvascular inflammation in ageing and age-related diseases: a position paper from the ESH working group on small arteries, section of microvascular inflammation

Microcirculation is pervasive and orchestrates a profound regulatory cross-talk with the surrounding tissue and organs. Similarly, it is one of the earliest biological systems targeted by environmental stressors and consequently involved in the development and progression of ageing and age-related disease. Microvascular dysfunction, if not targeted, leads to a steady derangement of the phenotype, which cumulates comorbidities and eventually results in a nonrescuable, very high-cardiovascular risk. Along the broad spectrum of pathologies, both shared and distinct molecular pathways and pathophysiological alteration are involved in the disruption of microvascular homeostasis, all pointing to microvascular inflammation as the putative primary culprit. This position paper explores the presence and the detrimental contribution of microvascular inflammation across the whole spectrum of chronic age-related diseases, which characterise the 21st-century healthcare landscape. The manuscript aims to strongly affirm the centrality of microvascular inflammation by recapitulating the current evidence and providing a clear synoptic view of the whole cardiometabolic derangement. Indeed, there is an urgent need for further mechanistic exploration to identify clear, very early or disease-specific molecular targets to provide an effective therapeutic strategy against the otherwise unstoppable rising prevalence of age-related diseases.

Cardiovascular adverse events of antineoplastic monoclonal antibodies among cancer patients: real-world evidence from a tertiary healthcare system

BACKGROUND

Antineoplastic monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), such as trastuzumab, bevacizumab, and pertuzumab have been the mainstay of therapy in cancer patients. Despite proven efficacy of the monoclonal antibodies, cardiovascular-induced adverse events such as heart failure, hypertension, ischemic heart disease, arrhythmias, thromboembolic events, and hemorrhage remain a major complication. The European society of cardiology address that concern with antineoplastic monoclonal antibodies issuing a guideline to manage and monitor chemotherapy-induced cardiotoxicity. There is limited evidence of the real-world prevalence of cardiovascular (CV) events induced by monoclonal antibodies among patients with cancer in Saudi Arabia.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the prevalence of cardiovascular adverse events among patients with cancer treated with monoclonal antibodies in Saudi Arabia.

METHODS

This is a retrospective study conducted in a tertiary care hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Data were obtained from an electronic medical record of patients with cancer treated with one of the selected monoclonal antibodies, who met the inclusion criteria between January 2005 until June 2015 and have been followed up for at least one year. Patients were stratified into groups according to monoclonal antibodies treatment: trastuzumab, bevacizumab, pertuzumab, and combined mAbs.

RESULTS

A total of 1067 patient were included in the study, within the pre-determined study period. The prevalence of cardiovascular disease among patients with cancer treated with monoclonal antibodies was 16.3%. The prevalence of heart failure was relatively higher in the trastuzumab group (46/626 patients, 7.3%). Among 418 patients treated with bevacizumab, hypertension was the most frequent adverse event, reported in 38 patients (9.1%), followed by thromboembolism reported in 27 patients (6.5%). Treatment discontinuation owing to cardiovascular adverse events was reported in 42/1,067 patients (3.9%).

CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE

Prevalence of antineoplastic monoclonal antibody induced cardiovascular adverse events among patients with cancer is substantially high in Saudi Arabia. There is an urgent need to streamline the practice for identifying high risk patients and flexible referral system for cardio-oncology care.

New advances in the research of clinical treatment and novel anticancer agents in tumor angiogenesis

In 1971, Folkman proposed that tumors could be limited to very small sizes by blocking angiogenesis. Angiogenesis is the generation of new blood vessels from pre-existing vessels, considered to be one of the important processes in tumor growth and metastasis. Angiogenesis is a complex process regulated by various factors and involves many secreted factors and signaling pathways. Angiogenesis is important in the transport of oxygen and nutrients to the tumor during tumor development. Therefore, inhibition of angiogenesis has become an important strategy in the clinical management of many solid tumors. Combination therapies of angiogenesis inhibitors with radiotherapy and chemotherapy are often used in clinical practice. In this article, we will review common targets against angiogenesis, the most common and up-to-date anti-angiogenic drugs and clinical treatments in recent years, including active ingredients from chemical and herbal medicines.

Preexisting hypertension and cancer therapy: evidence, pathophysiology, and management recommendation

Cancer is considered one of the leading causes of mortality worldwide. At the same time, hypertension is recognized as one of the most common comorbidities in cancer patients. Antineoplastic therapies, mainly tyrosine kinase and vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors, have been associated with new-onset hypertension by activation of different pathophysiological pathways. However, the role of preexisting hypertension in cancer patients under treatment has not been thoroughly studied. According to this review, preexisting hypertension is an independent risk factor for increased blood pressure during anticancer therapy. Therefore, physicians should recognize hypertension and its phenotypes (i.e., masked hypertension) as an important modifiable risk factor that should be properly managed prior to the initiation of cancer therapy to avoid premature chemotherapy cessation. The development of onco-hypertension will help establish specific guidelines for managing hypertension in cancer patients.

Inhibition of YAP by lenvatinib in endothelial cells increases blood pressure through ferroptosis

Lenvatinib, a multitarget tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), increases the incidence of severe hypertension and thus the incidence of cardiovascular complications. Inhibition of ferroptosis, a newly recognized type of cell death, alleviates endothelial dysfunction. Here, we report that lenvatinib-induced hypertension is associated with ferroptosis of endothelial cells. RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) showed that lenvatinib led to ferroptosis of endothelial cells and that administration of mouse with ferrostatin-1 (Fer-1), a specific ferroptosis inhibitor, dramatically ameliorated lenvatinib-induced hypertension and reversed lenvatinib-induced impairment of endothelium-dependent relaxation (EDR). Furthermore, lenvatinib significantly reduced glutathione peroxidase 4 (GPX4) expressions in the mouse aorta and human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) and increased lipid peroxidation, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) release, and malondialdehyde (MDA) levels in HUVECs. Immunofluorescence and Western blotting showed that lenvatinib significantly reduced Yes-associated protein (YAP) nuclear translocation but not cytoplasmic YAP expression in HUVECs. The data, generated from both in vivo and in vitro, showed that lenvatinib reduced total YAP (t-YAP) expression and increased the phosphorylation of YAP at both Ser127 and Ser397, without affecting YAP mRNA levels in HUVECs. XMU-MP-1 mediated YAP activation or YAP overexpression effectively attenuated the lenvatinib-induced decrease in GPX4 expression and increases in LDH release and MDA levels. In addition, overexpression of YAP in HUVECs ameliorated lenvatinib-induced decrease in the mRNA and protein levels of spermidine/spermine N (1)-acetyltransferase-1 (SAT1), heme oxygenase-1 (HO-1), and ferritin heavy chain 1 (FTH1). Taken together, our data suggest that lenvatinib-induced inhibition of YAP led to ferroptosis of endothelial cells and subsequently resulted in vascular dysfunction and hypertension.

Mechanism underlying vascular remodeling in relation to circulating CD34-positive cells among older Japanese men

Development of structural atherosclerosis, an established cardiovascular risk factor, requires hematopoietic stem cells known as CD34-positive cells. However, an inverse association between circulating CD34-positive cell count and cardiovascular disease has been reported. These studies evoke a contradiction: characteristics associated with a low risk of developing structural atherosclerosis are also associated with a high risk of cardiovascular disease. To clarify the mechanisms underlying vascular remodeling, we conducted several epidemiological studies of Japanese men aged 60 to 69 years who participated in annual health check-ups. The present study summarizes those epidemiological studies and adds some discussion. From the perspective of endothelial repair activity, there are significant differences between functional versus structural atherosclerosis. Aggressive endothelial repair increases both functional and structural atherosclerosis. Deficient endothelial repair related to a shortage of CD34-positive cells due to consumption furthers functional atherosclerosis but not structural atherosclerosis. Therefore, the lack of structural atherosclerosis does not always reflect a favorable condition for the endothelium. Although further investigation is necessary, the present study suggests that higher endothelial repair activity that leads to structural atherosclerosis might have a beneficial effect on vascular health among older men.

Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) polymorphism rs3025039 and atherosclerosis among older with hypertension

Angiogenesis inhibition therapy causes hypertension by increasing peripheral vascular resistance. Vasa vasorum angiogenesis plays a crucial role in the development of atherosclerosis. Since vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), which contributes to the progress of angiogenesis, is reported to be inversely associated with the minor allele of polymorphism rs3025039, the minor allele of rs3025039 could be inversely associated with atherosclerosis among individuals with hypertension. A cross-sectional study of 1793 older Japanese adults aged 60–89 years with hypertension who participated in general health check-ups was conducted. Atherosclerosis was defined as carotid intima-media thickness (CIMT) ≥ 1.1 mm. The minor allele of polymorphism rs3025020 was positively associated with VEGF. Therefore, in addition to known cardiovascular risk factors, rs3025020 genotype acted as a confounding factor in the present study. Independent of known confounding factors, the minor allele of rs3025039 was inversely associated with atherosclerosis among older Japanese adults with hypertension. The fully adjusted odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for atherosclerosis with the minor allele of rs3025039 was 0.78 (0.64, 0.96). The angiogenesis-related polymorphism rs3025039 was associated with the development of atherosclerosis among older Japanese individuals. This study indicates that the development of atherosclerosis among older individuals might partly indicate a capacity for angiogenesis.

Dual sEH/COX-2 Inhibition Using PTUPB-A Promising Approach to Antiangiogenesis-Induced Nephrotoxicity

Kidney injury from antiangiogenic chemotherapy is a significant clinical challenge, and we currently lack the ability to effectively treat it with pharmacological agents. Thus, we set out to investigate whether simultaneous soluble epoxide hydrolase (sEH) and cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibition using a dual sEH/COX-2 inhibitor PTUPB could be an effective strategy for treating antiangiogenic therapy-induced kidney damage. We used a multikinase inhibitor, sorafenib, which is known to cause serious renal side effects. The drug was administered to male Sprague-Dawley rats that were on a high-salt diet. Sorafenib was administered over the course of 56 days. The study included three experimental groups; 1) control group (naïve rats), 2) sorafenib group [rats treated with sorafenib only (20 mg/kg/day p.o.)], and 3) sorafenib + PTUPB group (rats treated with sorafenib only for the initial 28 days and subsequently coadministered PTUPB (10 mg/kg/day i.p.) from days 28 through 56). Blood pressure was measured every 2 weeks. After 28 days, sorafenib-treated rats developed hypertension (161 ± 4 mmHg). Over the remainder of the study, sorafenib treatment resulted in a further elevation in blood pressure through day 56 (200 ± 7 mmHg). PTUPB treatment attenuated the sorafenib-induced blood pressure elevation and by day 56, blood pressure was 159 ± 4 mmHg. Urine was collected every 2 weeks for biochemical analysis. After 28 days, sorafenib rats developed pronounced proteinuria (9.7 ± 0.2 P/C), which intensified significantly (35.8 ± 3.5 P/C) by the end of day 56 compared with control (2.6 ± 0.4 P/C). PTUPB mitigated sorafenib-induced proteinuria, and by day 56, it reduced proteinuria by 73%. Plasma and kidney tissues were collected on day 56. Kidney histopathology revealed intratubular cast formation, interstitial fibrosis, glomerular injury, and glomerular nephrin loss at day 56 in sorafenib-treated rats. PTUPB treatment reduced histological features by 30%-70% compared with the sorafenib-treated group and restored glomerular nephrin levels. Furthermore, PTUPB also acted on the glomerular permeability barrier by decreasing angiotensin-II-induced glomerular permeability to albumin. Finally, PTUPB improved in vitro the viability of human mesangial cells. Collectively, our data demonstrate the potential of using PTUPB or dual sEH/COX-2 inhibition as a therapeutic strategy against sorafenib-induced glomerular nephrotoxicity.

Anlotinib-Induced Hypertension: Current Concepts and Future Prospects

BACKGROUND

Anlotinib is a new tyrosine kinase inhibitor developed in China that targets the receptors for vascular endothelial growth factor, platelet-derived growth factor, fibroblast growth factor, and stem cell factor. Therefore, anlotinib inhibits tumor angiogenesis, representing a new therapeutic alternative for lung cancer. Hypertension is one of its most common adverse effects, leading to discontinuation of the drug and limited clinical usefulness.

OBJECTIVE

The present review aims to summarize the evidence on the prevalence, physiopathology, and management of anlotinib-induced hypertension, as well as its effect on the cancer prognosis.

METHOD

Searches in Medline, Cochrane Central Library, and Embase were performed using the following terms: anlotinib, adverse effect, hypertension, clinical trial, vascular endothelial growth factor, and antiangiogenic drugs. Citations were also identified by checking the reference sections of selected papers.

RESULTS

Except for a phase I clinical trial with a small sample size (n = 6), almost all the clinical trials on anlotinib have reported the development of anlotinib-induced hypertension. In these trials, the incidence of hypertension ranged from 13% to 67.7%, and that of grade 3/4 hypertension ranged from4.8% to 16%. Alterations in nitric oxide, endothelin-1, microvascular rarefaction, selective vasoconstrictions, and renal injury have been cited as potential mechanisms leading to anlotinib-induced hypertension. When needed, treatment may include general hygienic measures and pharmacotherapy in some cases.

CONCLUSIONS

To effectively manage anlotinib-induced hypertension, early prevention, a reasonable dosage regimen, and appropriate treatment are critical to effectively manage anlotinib-induced hypertension. Additionally, anlotinib-induced hypertension may be considered a marker for predicting efficacy.

Onco-hypertension: An Emerging Specialty

Cancer is one of the leading causes of death worldwide. With the introduction of newer chemotherapeutic agents, targeted therapies, and immunotherapy, the prognosis and survival of patients with cancer has remarkably improved. As a result, patients are living longer and experiencing long-term cardiovascular complications. Hypertension is an important risk factor for cardiovascular diseases. Patients with malignancy have multiple etiologies of hypertension development, worsening, or association. This is because of the complex interplay between cancer type, chemotherapeutic agent, patient age, antihypertensive agent, and preexisting comorbidities in the etiology and pathogenesis of hypertension. Management of hypertension in patients with cancer requires accurate blood pressure measurement and considering factors such as adjuvant therapy and cancer-related pain. There are no set guidelines for management of hypertension in this unique cohort, and the therapy should be individualized based on the treatment guidelines for the general population. Onco-hypertension is an emerging subspeciality and entails a multidisciplinary approach between oncology, primary care physicians, nephrology, and cardiology.

New progress in elucidating the relationship between cancer therapy and cardiovascular toxicity

Onco-cardiology is an emerging field linking cancer with cardiovascular injury. Understanding the mechanism of cardiac injury helps improve the quality of life of cancer survivors. A series of studies on adverse reactions to cancer or oncological treatments has indicated that adverse cardiovascular events related to cancer treatments may occur over a longer period of survival, and even years after therapy has concluded. Current cancer therapies, including chemotherapy, radiotherapy, targeted therapy, and immunotherapy, have been found to have latent cardiovascular toxicity. These toxic effects are often progressive and irreversible and ultimately lead to cardiovascular events such as heart failure, hypertension, coronary heart diseases, arrhythmia, and thromboembolism. Therefore, more emphasis should be placed on revealing the mechanism of cancer treatment-related cardiovascular toxicity. This would help to guide prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of CVDs in cancer survivors.

Risk of hypertension with anti-VEGF monoclonal antibodies in cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 105 phase II/III randomized controlled trials

We performed a meta-analysis to fully investigate the hypertension of anti-VEGF mAbs in cancer patients. Databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) treated with anti-VEGF mAbs till January 2021. The relevant RCTs in cancer patients treated with anti-VEGF mAbs were retrieved and the systematic evaluation was conducted. One hundred and five RCTs and 65358 patients were included. Our study suggests that anti-VEGF mAbs significantly increased the risks of all-grade (RR, 3.22; 95%CI, 2.83-3.65; p < 0.00001; I²=71%) and high-grade (RR, 6.15; 95%CI, 5.58-6.78; p < 0.00001; I²=48%) hypertension in cancer patients. Those risks may be dependent on drug type. Icrucumab did not association with an increased risk of hypertension. The RR of hypertension did not vary significantly according to the type of cancer, line of therapy, and treatment duration. The available data suggested that the use of anti-VEGF mAbs were associated with a significantly increased risk of hypertension.

The Molecular Mechanisms of Cardiotoxicity Induced by HER2, VEGF, and Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors: an Updated Review

AIM

In recent decades, there has been a revolutionary decrease in cancer-related mortality and an increase in survival due to the introduction of novel targeted drugs. Nevertheless, drugs targeting human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER-2), angiogenesis, and other tyrosine kinases also come with unexpected cardiac side effects, including heart failure, hypertension, arterial thrombosis, and arrhythmias, and have mechanisms that are unlike those of classic chemotherapeutic agents. In addition, it is challenging to address some problems, as the existing guidelines need to be more specific, and further large-scale clinical trials and experimental studies are required to confirm the benefit of administering cardioprotective agents to patients treated with targeted therapies. Therefore, an improved understanding of cardiotoxicity becomes increasingly important to minimize the pernicious effects and maximize the beneficial effects of targeted agents.

METHODS

"Cardiotoxicity", "targeted drugs", "HER2", "trastuzumab", "angiogenesis inhibitor", "VEGF inhibitor" and "tyrosine kinase inhibitors" are used as keywords for article searches.

RESULTS

In this article, we report several targeted therapies that induce cardiotoxicity and update knowledge of the clinical evidence, molecular mechanisms, and management measures.

Microvascular Structural Alterations in Cancer Patients Treated With Antiangiogenic Drugs

Objective: Antiangiogenic therapies (tyrosine kinase inhibitors-TKI and direct anti-VEGF monoclonal antibodies) are being increasingly used in the treatment of solid tumors; hypertension represents a common side effect of these agents. Several mechanisms are involved in the development of hypertension, including microvascular rarefaction and other microvascular alterations. Therefore, the aim of our study was to evaluate whether TKI and direct anti-VEGF agents may affect the structure of retinal arterioles or capillary density.

Design and Methods: We investigated 20 patients with a diagnosis of cancer who underwent a treatment with either a TKI or an anti-VEGF antibody. Patients were submitted to ambulatory monitoring blood pressure for blood pressure evaluation. Basal and total capillary density were assessed by capillaroscopy whereas, retinal arteriole morphology was measured by Adaptive Optics. Patients were evaluated before starting the antiangiogenic therapy (T0) and re-evaluated after 3 (T3) and 6 (T6) months after treatment. Fourteen patients completed the study.

Results: Systolic and diastolic blood pressure values were similar in all patients at T3 and T6 compared to T0. However, during the study antihypertensive treatment was optimized (increased dose and/or addition of drugs) in 57% of patients (n = 8). No differences were observed in retinal arteriole structural parameters and in large artery stiffness. Basal capillary density was reduced by antiangiogenic drugs after 3 or 6 months.

Conclusions: Our data suggest that an increase of antihypertensive treatment is necessary in patients treated with a TKI or a direct VEGF inhibitor, confirming pro-hypertensive effects of these drugs. However, under adequate blood pressure control, microvascular structure seem to be partially preserved, since a worsening of basal capillary density but no changes in retinal arteriole morphology were observed.

New Concept of Onco-Hypertension and Future Perspectives

Owing to aging populations, the prevalence of hypertension and associated cardiovascular events has been increasing worldwide. The morbidity and mortality due to cancer have also been increasing with aging populations. Several small-molecule inhibitors have been used in cancer therapy, which have a positive impact on the prognosis and survival of patients with cancer. Consequently, the number of cancer survivors with hypertension has been rapidly increasing. Anticancer therapy, including vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors, increases blood pressure. However, both clinical and laboratory evidence are lacking regarding optimal blood pressure control in patients with hypertension with cancer. Here, we propose the concept of onco-hypertension, which is an evolving subspecialty focused on the complex pathophysiology of hypertension and cancer. In this review, we highlight blood pressure changes in cancer, hypertension induced by anticancer therapy, and optimal blood pressure management in patients with hypertension with cancer. In addition, we discuss needed studies to further establish this new onco-hypertension concept.

What Is the Most Common Cause of Secondary Hypertension?: An Interdisciplinary Discussion

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Traditional statements in medical textbooks pointed that 90 to 95% of cases of hypertension is essential or primary. However, secondary hypertension seems to be common in those patients with resistant forms of hypertension. Appropriate investigation and treatment may have prognostic impact but frequently hypertension remission did not occur raising concerns about the real meaning of secondary hypertension. Here, we provided an interdisciplinary and critical discussion comprising an endocrinologist, a nephrologist, and a cardiologist with expertise in resistant hypertension. We reviewed the literature approaching each one of the recognizable cause of hypertension.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent studies pointed that the most common causes of secondary hypertension are those who overall responses to their treatments do not promote hypertension remission including obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), chronic kidney disease, renovascular hypertension and primary aldosteronism. The authors raised concerns regarding the lack of inclusion of obesity by several societies as a formal cause of hypertension considering not only the biologic plausibility but also the huge impact of weight loss therapies such as bariatric surgery on hypertension remission. In contrast, there is no discussion that a very rare condition-namely pheochromocytoma-is the most "typical" cause of hypertension by promoting hypertension remission in the majority of patients after surgical procedure. Hypertension is a complex condition with multiple environmental and genetics interactions. In clinical practice, it is challenging to prove causality in hypertension. Common conditions largely acceptable as causes of hypertension (OSA, chronic kidney disease, renovascular hypertension, and primary aldosteronism) frequently occur in a setting of an established hypertension background and therefore do not promote hypertension remission in a significant proportion of patients. If obesity becomes largely accepted by several societies as a secondary form of hypertension, this pandemic condition will be certainly the most common cause of hypertension.

Hypertensive Cardiotoxicity in Cancer Treatment-Systematic Analysis of Adjunct, Conventional Chemotherapy, and Novel Therapies-Epidemiology, Incidence, and Pathophysiology

Cardiotoxicity is the umbrella term for cardiovascular side effects of cancer therapies. The most widely recognized phenotype is left ventricular dysfunction, but cardiotoxicity can manifest as arrhythmogenic, vascular, myocarditic and hypertensive toxicities. Hypertension has long been regarded as one of the most prevalent and modifiable cardiovascular risk factors in the general population, but its relevance during the cancer treatment journey may be underestimated. Hypertensive cardiotoxicity occurs de novo in a substantial proportion of treated cancer patients. The pathology is incompletely characterized—natriuresis and renin angiotensin system interactions play a role particularly in conventional treatments, but in novel therapies endothelial dysfunction and the interaction between the cancer and cardiac kinome are implicated. There exists a treatment paradox in that a significant hypertensive response not only mandates anti-hypertensive treatment, but in fact, in certain cancer treatment scenarios, hypertension is a predictor of cancer treatment efficacy and response. In this comprehensive review of over 80,000 patients, we explored the epidemiology, incidence, and mechanistic pathophysiology of hypertensive cardiotoxicity in adjunct, conventional chemotherapy, and novel cancer treatments. Conventional chemotherapy, adjunct treatments, and novel targeted therapies collectively caused new onset hypertension in 33–68% of treated patients. The incidence of hypertensive cardiotoxicity across twenty common novel therapies for any grade hypertension ranged from 4% (imatinib) to 68% (lenvatinib), and high grade 3 or 4 hypertension in <1% (imatinib) to 42% (lenvatinib). The weighted average effect was all-grade hypertension in 24% and grade 3 or 4 hypertension in 8%.

Acute blood pressure elevation associated with biological therapies for cancer: a focus on VEGF signaling pathway inhibitors

INTRODUCTION

Treatment with biological agents interfering with mechanisms of angiogenesis, such as vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) signaling pathway (VSP) inhibitors, was associated with an enhanced risk of acute and severe blood pressure (BP) increase and development of hypertensive emergencies. Areas covered: The present article will review the scientific literature reporting hypertensive emergencies as a complication of biological treatment with VSP inhibitors. Hypertensive emergency is a life-threatening condition characterized by very high BP values (>180/110 mmHg) associated with acute organ damage. The exact mechanism of action is still incompletely clarified. Endothelial dysfunction following reduced bioavailability of nitric oxide has been hypothesized to play an important role in promoting hypertension and the occurrence of acute organ damage. Expert opinion: Prevention, prompt recognition and treatment of hypertensive emergencies associated with treatment with VSP-inhibitors are essential to reduce the risk of adverse events. Not infrequently, the occurrence of hypertensive emergency led to VSP treatment discontinuation, with potential negative consequences on patient overall survival. The present review aims at providing detailed knowledge for the clinician regarding this specific issue, which could be of high impact in usual clinical practice, given the increasing burden of indications to treatment with biological agents targeted to the VEGF pathway.