1
|
Bergman J, Burman J, Gilthorpe JD, Zetterberg H, Jiltsova E, Bergenheim T, Svenningsson A. Intrathecal treatment trial of rituximab in progressive MS: An open-label phase 1b study. Neurology 2018; 91:e1893-e1901. [PMID: 30305449 DOI: 10.1212/wnl.0000000000006500] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2018] [Accepted: 08/03/2018] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To perform a phase 1b assessment of the safety and feasibility of intrathecally delivered rituximab as a treatment for progressive multiple sclerosis (PMS) and to evaluate the effect of treatment on disability and CSF biomarkers during a 1-year follow-up period. METHODS Three doses of rituximab (25 mg with a 1-week interval) were administered in 23 patients with PMS via a ventricular catheter inserted into the right frontal horn and connected to a subcutaneous Ommaya reservoir. Follow-ups were performed at 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months. RESULTS Mild to moderate vertigo and nausea were common but temporary adverse events associated with intrathecal rituximab infusion, which was otherwise well tolerated. The only severe adverse event was a case of low-virulent bacterial meningitis that was treated effectively. Of 7 clinical assessments, only 1 showed statistically significant improvement 1 year after treatment. No treatment effect was observed during the follow-up period among 6 CSF biomarkers. CONCLUSIONS Intrathecal administration of rituximab was well tolerated. However, it may involve a risk for injection-related infections. The lack of a control group precludes conclusions being drawn regarding treatment efficacy. CLINICALTRIALSGOV IDENTIFIER NCT01719159. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE This study provides Class IV evidence that intrathecal rituximab treatment is well tolerated and feasible in PMS but involves a risk of severe infections.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joakim Bergman
- From the Department of Pharmacology and Clinical Neuroscience (J. Bergman, J.D.G., T.B., A.S.), Umeå University; Department of Neurosciences (J. Burman, E.J.), Uppsala University; Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry (H.Z.), Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology at Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg; Clinical Neurochemistry Laboratory (H.Z.), Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Mölndal, Sweden; Department of Molecular Neuroscience (H.Z.), UCL Institute of Neurology, Queen Square; UK Dementia Research Institute at UCL (H.Z.), London; and Department of Clinical Sciences (A.S.), Karolinska Institute Danderyd Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
| | - Joachim Burman
- From the Department of Pharmacology and Clinical Neuroscience (J. Bergman, J.D.G., T.B., A.S.), Umeå University; Department of Neurosciences (J. Burman, E.J.), Uppsala University; Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry (H.Z.), Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology at Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg; Clinical Neurochemistry Laboratory (H.Z.), Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Mölndal, Sweden; Department of Molecular Neuroscience (H.Z.), UCL Institute of Neurology, Queen Square; UK Dementia Research Institute at UCL (H.Z.), London; and Department of Clinical Sciences (A.S.), Karolinska Institute Danderyd Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Jonathan D Gilthorpe
- From the Department of Pharmacology and Clinical Neuroscience (J. Bergman, J.D.G., T.B., A.S.), Umeå University; Department of Neurosciences (J. Burman, E.J.), Uppsala University; Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry (H.Z.), Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology at Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg; Clinical Neurochemistry Laboratory (H.Z.), Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Mölndal, Sweden; Department of Molecular Neuroscience (H.Z.), UCL Institute of Neurology, Queen Square; UK Dementia Research Institute at UCL (H.Z.), London; and Department of Clinical Sciences (A.S.), Karolinska Institute Danderyd Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Henrik Zetterberg
- From the Department of Pharmacology and Clinical Neuroscience (J. Bergman, J.D.G., T.B., A.S.), Umeå University; Department of Neurosciences (J. Burman, E.J.), Uppsala University; Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry (H.Z.), Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology at Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg; Clinical Neurochemistry Laboratory (H.Z.), Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Mölndal, Sweden; Department of Molecular Neuroscience (H.Z.), UCL Institute of Neurology, Queen Square; UK Dementia Research Institute at UCL (H.Z.), London; and Department of Clinical Sciences (A.S.), Karolinska Institute Danderyd Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Elena Jiltsova
- From the Department of Pharmacology and Clinical Neuroscience (J. Bergman, J.D.G., T.B., A.S.), Umeå University; Department of Neurosciences (J. Burman, E.J.), Uppsala University; Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry (H.Z.), Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology at Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg; Clinical Neurochemistry Laboratory (H.Z.), Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Mölndal, Sweden; Department of Molecular Neuroscience (H.Z.), UCL Institute of Neurology, Queen Square; UK Dementia Research Institute at UCL (H.Z.), London; and Department of Clinical Sciences (A.S.), Karolinska Institute Danderyd Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Tommy Bergenheim
- From the Department of Pharmacology and Clinical Neuroscience (J. Bergman, J.D.G., T.B., A.S.), Umeå University; Department of Neurosciences (J. Burman, E.J.), Uppsala University; Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry (H.Z.), Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology at Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg; Clinical Neurochemistry Laboratory (H.Z.), Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Mölndal, Sweden; Department of Molecular Neuroscience (H.Z.), UCL Institute of Neurology, Queen Square; UK Dementia Research Institute at UCL (H.Z.), London; and Department of Clinical Sciences (A.S.), Karolinska Institute Danderyd Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Anders Svenningsson
- From the Department of Pharmacology and Clinical Neuroscience (J. Bergman, J.D.G., T.B., A.S.), Umeå University; Department of Neurosciences (J. Burman, E.J.), Uppsala University; Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry (H.Z.), Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology at Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg; Clinical Neurochemistry Laboratory (H.Z.), Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Mölndal, Sweden; Department of Molecular Neuroscience (H.Z.), UCL Institute of Neurology, Queen Square; UK Dementia Research Institute at UCL (H.Z.), London; and Department of Clinical Sciences (A.S.), Karolinska Institute Danderyd Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Redelings MD, McCoy L, Sorvillo F. Multiple sclerosis mortality and patterns of comorbidity in the United States from 1990 to 2001. Neuroepidemiology 2005; 26:102-7. [PMID: 16374035 DOI: 10.1159/000090444] [Citation(s) in RCA: 54] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a neurodegenerative condition that can result in cognitive and physical disability and shortened life expectancy. However, population-based information is lacking regarding the mortality burden from MS in the United States. We investigated trends in MS mortality rates and examined important comorbidities in the United States from 1990 to 2001. MS deaths were matched by age, sex, and race/ethnicity with randomly selected deaths from other conditions for matched odds ratio comparisons. The overall age-adjusted mortality rate from MS was 1.44/100,000 population. MS mortality rates increased throughout the study period. MS mortality rates were higher in whites than in any other racial/ethnic group, followed by Blacks, Hispanics, American Indians/Alaska Natives, and Asians and Pacific Islanders. Observed mortality rates were more than 10 times lower in Asians and Pacific Islanders than in whites. The odds of pressure ulcers, urinary tract infections, and pneumonia/influenza being reported on the death certificate were higher in MS deaths than in matched controls.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew D Redelings
- Los Angeles County Department of Health Services, School of Public Health, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA , USA.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate the burden of pressure ulcer-associated mortality in the United States and to examine racial/ethnic differences and associated comorbidities. DESIGN A descriptive study with matched odds ratio comparisons. SETTING The United States, 1990-2001. PARTICIPANTS Pressure ulcer-associated deaths were identified from national multiple cause-coded death records from 1990 to 2001. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Age-adjusted mortality rates and matched odds ratio comparisons of pressure ulcer-associated deaths with deaths from other conditions. MAIN RESULTS Between 1990 and 2001, pressure ulcers were reported as a cause of death among 114,380 persons (age-adjusted mortality rate, 3.79 per 100,000 population; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.77-3.81). For 21,365 (18.7%) of these deaths, pressure ulcers were reported as the underlying cause. Nearly 80% of pressure ulcer-associated deaths occurred in persons at least 75 years old. Septicemia was reported in 39.7% of pressure ulcer-associated deaths (matched odds ratio, 11.3; 95% CI, 11.0-11.7). Multiple sclerosis, paralysis, Alzheimer disease, osteoporosis, and Parkinson disease were reported more often in pressure ulcer-associated deaths than in matched controls. Pressure ulcer-associated mortality was higher among blacks than among whites (age-adjusted rate ratio, 4.22; 95% CI, 4.16-4.27). CONCLUSION Pressure ulcers are associated with fatal septic infections and are reported as a cause of thousands of deaths each year in the United States. Incapacitating chronic and neurodegenerative conditions are common comorbidities, and mortality rates in blacks are higher than in other racial/ethnic groups.
Collapse
|
5
|
Isaksson AK, Ahlström G, Gunnarsson LG. Quality of life and impairment in patients with multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2005; 76:64-9. [PMID: 15607997 PMCID: PMC1739311 DOI: 10.1136/jnnp.2003.029660] [Citation(s) in RCA: 60] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The aims of this study were to describe the quality of life in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) given immunological treatment and in those not given immunological treatment and to investigate the relationship between impairment and quality of life. METHODS Twenty nine patients given immunological treatment were matched with the same number of patients not given such treatment. Matching variables were sex, Kurtzke's Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS), years since diagnosis, and age (total n = 58). The patients were interviewed using the self-reported impairment checklist and they answered two questionnaires on quality of life, the 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) and the Subjective Estimation of Quality of Life (SQoL). RESULTS The self-reported impairment checklist captured a more differentiated picture of the patients' symptoms of MS than the EDSS. Health related quality of life was markedly reduced, while the subjective quality of life was less affected. There was a stronger association between self-reported ratings of impairment and health related quality of life on the SF-36 than between impairment and global ratings of quality of life on the SQoL. Subjective quality of life on the SQoL was not directly dependent on impairment expressed in physical limitations. There were no statistically significant differences between the treated and untreated groups. A non-significant trend towards better health related quality of life was found in favour of the treated group with respect to emotional role, physical role, and social function on the SF-36. CONCLUSIONS The self-reported impairment checklist and SF-36 proved to be valuable complements to the well established EDSS in describing the diverse symptoms of MS. Measuring both health related quality of life and subjective wellbeing provides valuable knowledge about the consequences of MS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A-K Isaksson
- Department of Caring Sciences, University of Orebro, S-701 82 Orebro, Sweden.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|