1
|
Tewarie IA, Hulsbergen AFC, Jessurun CAC, Rendon LF, Mekary RA, Smith TR, Broekman MLD. Risk Factors of Second Local Recurrence in Surgically Treated Recurrent Brain Metastases: An Exploratory Analysis. World Neurosurg 2022; 167:e639-e647. [PMID: 36028114 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2022.08.066] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2022] [Revised: 08/12/2022] [Accepted: 08/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A first local recurrence is common after resection or radiotherapy for brain metastasis (BM). However, patients with BMs can develop multiple local recurrences over time. Published data on second local recurrences are scarce. This study aimed to report predictors associated with a second local recurrence in patients with BMs who underwent a craniotomy for a first locally recurrent BM. METHODS Patients were identified from a database at Brigham and Women's Hospital in Boston. Hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals for predictors of a second local recurrence were computed using a Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS Of 170 identified surgically treated first locally recurrent lesions, 74 (43.5%) progressed to second locally recurrent lesions at a median of 7 months after craniotomy. Subtotal resection of the first local BM recurrence was significantly associated with shorter time to second local recurrence (hazard ratio = 2.09; 95% confidence interval, 1.27-3.45). Infratentorial location was associated with a worse second local recurrence prognosis (hazard ratio = 2.22; 95% confidence interval, 1.24-3.96). CONCLUSIONS A second local recurrence occurred after 43.5% of craniotomies for first recurrent lesions. Subtotal resection and infratentorial location were the strongest risk factors for worse second local recurrence prognosis following resection of first recurrent BM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ishaan Ashwini Tewarie
- Computational Neurosciences Outcomes Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Department of Neurosurgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands; School of Pharmacy, Massachusetts College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Department of Neurosurgery, Haaglanden Medical Center, The Hague, The Netherlands
| | - Alexander F C Hulsbergen
- Computational Neurosciences Outcomes Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Department of Neurosurgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands; School of Pharmacy, Massachusetts College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Department of Neurosurgery, Haaglanden Medical Center, The Hague, The Netherlands
| | - Charissa A C Jessurun
- Computational Neurosciences Outcomes Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Department of Neurosurgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands; School of Pharmacy, Massachusetts College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Department of Neurosurgery, Haaglanden Medical Center, The Hague, The Netherlands
| | - Luis F Rendon
- Computational Neurosciences Outcomes Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Rania A Mekary
- Computational Neurosciences Outcomes Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; School of Pharmacy, Massachusetts College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Timothy R Smith
- Computational Neurosciences Outcomes Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Marike L D Broekman
- Computational Neurosciences Outcomes Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Department of Neurosurgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands; School of Pharmacy, Massachusetts College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Department of Neurosurgery, Haaglanden Medical Center, The Hague, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Borgers JSW, Tobin RP, Torphy RJ, Vorwald VM, Van Gulick RJ, Amato CM, Cogswell DT, Chimed TS, Couts KL, Van Bokhoven A, Raeburn CD, Lewis KD, Wisell J, McCarter MD, Mushtaq RR, Robinson WA. Melanoma Metastases to the Adrenal Gland Are Highly Resistant to Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2021; 19:jnccn20283. [PMID: 34348236 DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2020.7800] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2020] [Accepted: 12/16/2020] [Indexed: 12/07/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Adrenal gland metastases (AGMs) are common in advanced-stage melanoma, occurring in up to 50% of patients. The introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has markedly altered the outcome of patients with melanoma. However, despite significant successes, anecdotal evidence has suggested that treatment responses in AGMs are significantly lower than in other metastatic sites. We sought to investigate whether having an AGM is associated with altered outcomes and whether ICI responses are dampened in the adrenal glands. PATIENTS AND METHODS We retrospectively compared ICI responses and overall survival (OS) in 68 patients with melanoma who were diagnosed with an AGM and a control group of 100 patients without AGMs at a single institution. Response was determined using RECIST 1.1. OS was calculated from time of ICI initiation, anti-PD-1 initiation, initial melanoma diagnosis, and stage IV disease diagnosis. Tumor-infiltrating immune cells were characterized in 9 resected AGMs using immunohistochemical analysis. RESULTS Response rates of AGMs were significantly lower compared with other metastatic sites in patients with AGMs (16% vs 22%) and compared with those without AGMs (55%). Patients with AGMs also had significantly lower median OS compared with those without AGMs (3.1 years vs not reached, respectively). We further observed that despite this, AGMs exhibited high levels of tumor-infiltrating immune cells. CONCLUSIONS In this cohort of patients with melanoma, those diagnosed with an AGM had lower ICI response rates and OS. These results suggest that tissue-specific microenvironments of AGMs present unique challenges that may require novel, adrenal gland-directed therapies or surgical resection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica S W Borgers
- 1Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
- 2The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; and
| | - Richard P Tobin
- 1Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
- 3Center for Rare Melanomas
- 4International Melanoma Biorepository, Center for Rare Melanomas
| | - Robert J Torphy
- 1Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Victoria M Vorwald
- 1Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
- 3Center for Rare Melanomas
- 4International Melanoma Biorepository, Center for Rare Melanomas
| | - Robert J Van Gulick
- 3Center for Rare Melanomas
- 4International Melanoma Biorepository, Center for Rare Melanomas
- 5Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine
| | - Carol M Amato
- 3Center for Rare Melanomas
- 4International Melanoma Biorepository, Center for Rare Melanomas
- 5Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine
| | - Dasha T Cogswell
- 1Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
- 3Center for Rare Melanomas
- 4International Melanoma Biorepository, Center for Rare Melanomas
| | | | - Kasey L Couts
- 4International Melanoma Biorepository, Center for Rare Melanomas
- 5Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine
| | | | - Christopher D Raeburn
- 7Division of GI, Trauma, and Endocrine Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Karl D Lewis
- 4International Melanoma Biorepository, Center for Rare Melanomas
- 5Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine
| | - Joshua Wisell
- 4International Melanoma Biorepository, Center for Rare Melanomas
- 6Department of Pathology, and
| | - Martin D McCarter
- 1Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
- 3Center for Rare Melanomas
- 4International Melanoma Biorepository, Center for Rare Melanomas
| | - Rao R Mushtaq
- 5Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine
| | - William A Robinson
- 3Center for Rare Melanomas
- 4International Melanoma Biorepository, Center for Rare Melanomas
- 5Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Váraljai R, Horn S, Sucker A, Piercianek D, Schmitt V, Carpinteiro A, Becker KA, Reifenberger J, Roesch A, Felsberg J, Reifenberger G, Sure U, Schadendorf D, Helfrich I. Integrative Genomic Analyses of Patient-Matched Intracranial and Extracranial Metastases Reveal a Novel Brain-Specific Landscape of Genetic Variants in Driver Genes of Malignant Melanoma. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13040731. [PMID: 33578810 PMCID: PMC7916600 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13040731] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2021] [Revised: 01/28/2021] [Accepted: 02/08/2021] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Development of brain metastases in advanced melanoma patients is a frequent event that limits patients' quality of life and survival. Despite recent insights into melanoma genetics, systematic analyses of genetic alterations in melanoma brain metastasis formation are lacking. Moreover, whether brain metastases harbor distinct genetic alterations beyond those observed at different anatomic sites of the same patient remains unknown. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN AND RESULTS In our study, 54 intracranial and 18 corresponding extracranial melanoma metastases were analyzed for mutations using targeted next generation sequencing of 29 recurrently mutated driver genes in melanoma. In 11 of 16 paired samples, we detected nucleotide modifications in brain metastases that were absent in matched metastases at extracranial sites. Moreover, we identified novel genetic variants in ARID1A, ARID2, SMARCA4 and BAP1, genes that have not been linked to brain metastases before; albeit most frequent mutations were found in ARID1A, ARID2 and BRAF. Conclusion: Our data provide new insights into the genetic landscape of intracranial melanoma metastases supporting a branched evolution model of metastasis formation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Renáta Váraljai
- Skin Cancer Unit of the Dermatology Department, Medical Faculty, West German Cancer Center, University Duisburg-Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany; (R.V.); (S.H.); (A.S.); (A.R.); (D.S.)
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Essen/Düsseldorf, 45147 Essen, Germany; (D.P.); (G.R.); (U.S.)
| | - Susanne Horn
- Skin Cancer Unit of the Dermatology Department, Medical Faculty, West German Cancer Center, University Duisburg-Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany; (R.V.); (S.H.); (A.S.); (A.R.); (D.S.)
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Essen/Düsseldorf, 45147 Essen, Germany; (D.P.); (G.R.); (U.S.)
- Faculty Rudolf-Schönheimer-Institute for Biochemistry, University of Leipzig, 04103 Leipzig, Germany
| | - Antje Sucker
- Skin Cancer Unit of the Dermatology Department, Medical Faculty, West German Cancer Center, University Duisburg-Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany; (R.V.); (S.H.); (A.S.); (A.R.); (D.S.)
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Essen/Düsseldorf, 45147 Essen, Germany; (D.P.); (G.R.); (U.S.)
| | - Daniela Piercianek
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Essen/Düsseldorf, 45147 Essen, Germany; (D.P.); (G.R.); (U.S.)
- Department of Neurosurgery, Medical Faculty, West German Cancer Center, University Duisburg-Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany
| | - Verena Schmitt
- Institute of Anatomy, Medical Faculty, University Duisburg-Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany;
| | - Alexander Carpinteiro
- Department of Molecular Biology, Medical Faculty, University Duisburg-Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany; (A.C.); (K.A.B.)
| | - Katrin Anne Becker
- Department of Molecular Biology, Medical Faculty, University Duisburg-Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany; (A.C.); (K.A.B.)
| | - Julia Reifenberger
- Department of Dermatology, Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine University, 40225 Düsseldorf, Germany;
| | - Alexander Roesch
- Skin Cancer Unit of the Dermatology Department, Medical Faculty, West German Cancer Center, University Duisburg-Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany; (R.V.); (S.H.); (A.S.); (A.R.); (D.S.)
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Essen/Düsseldorf, 45147 Essen, Germany; (D.P.); (G.R.); (U.S.)
| | - Jörg Felsberg
- Institute of Neuropathology, Heinrich Heine University, 40225 Düsseldorf, Germany;
| | - Guido Reifenberger
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Essen/Düsseldorf, 45147 Essen, Germany; (D.P.); (G.R.); (U.S.)
- Institute of Neuropathology, Heinrich Heine University, 40225 Düsseldorf, Germany;
| | - Ulrich Sure
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Essen/Düsseldorf, 45147 Essen, Germany; (D.P.); (G.R.); (U.S.)
- Department of Neurosurgery, Medical Faculty, West German Cancer Center, University Duisburg-Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany
| | - Dirk Schadendorf
- Skin Cancer Unit of the Dermatology Department, Medical Faculty, West German Cancer Center, University Duisburg-Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany; (R.V.); (S.H.); (A.S.); (A.R.); (D.S.)
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Essen/Düsseldorf, 45147 Essen, Germany; (D.P.); (G.R.); (U.S.)
| | - Iris Helfrich
- Skin Cancer Unit of the Dermatology Department, Medical Faculty, West German Cancer Center, University Duisburg-Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany; (R.V.); (S.H.); (A.S.); (A.R.); (D.S.)
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Essen/Düsseldorf, 45147 Essen, Germany; (D.P.); (G.R.); (U.S.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +49-201-723-1648; Fax: +49-201-723-5525
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Outcomes of Treatment for Melanoma Brain Metastases. J Skin Cancer 2020; 2020:7520924. [PMID: 33282420 PMCID: PMC7685861 DOI: 10.1155/2020/7520924] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2020] [Revised: 09/13/2020] [Accepted: 10/15/2020] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Historically, melanoma with brain metastases has a poor prognosis. In this retrospective medical record review, we report basic clinicopathological parameters and the outcomes of patients with melanoma and brain metastases treated with different treatment modalities before the era of immunotherapy and modern radiotherapy technique. Methods Patients with metastatic melanoma were treated with surgery, radiotherapy, and/or systemic therapy from 1998 to 2017. In our study, they were identified and stratified depending on treatment methods. Overall survival was defined as the time from the date of brain metastases to the death or last follow-up (2019 June 1st). Survival curves were estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method that was employed to calculate the hazard ratio. Results Six (12%) of 50 patients are still alive as of the last follow-up. The median overall survival from the onset of brain metastases was 11 months. The longest survival time was observed in patients treated by surgery followed by radiotherapy, surgery followed by radiotherapy and systemic therapy, and also radiotherapy followed by systemic therapy. The shortest survival was observed in the best supportive care group and patients treated by systemic therapy only. Conclusions Patients with brain metastases achieved better overall survival when treated by combined treatment modalities: surgery followed by radiotherapy (26.6 months overall survival), combining surgery, radiotherapy, and systemic therapy (18.7 months overall survival), and also radiotherapy followed by systemic therapy (13.8 months overall survival).
Collapse
|
5
|
Herrera-Rios D, Mughal SS, Teuber-Hanselmann S, Pierscianek D, Sucker A, Jansen P, Schimming T, Klode J, Reifenberger J, Felsberg J, Keyvani K, Brors B, Sure U, Reifenberger G, Schadendorf D, Helfrich I. Macrophages/Microglia Represent the Major Source of Indolamine 2,3-Dioxygenase Expression in Melanoma Metastases of the Brain. Front Immunol 2020; 11:120. [PMID: 32117271 PMCID: PMC7013086 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.00120] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2019] [Accepted: 01/16/2020] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
The manifestation of brain metastases in patients with advanced melanoma is a common event that limits patient's survival and quality of life. The immunosuppressive properties of the brain parenchyma are very different compared to the rest of the body, making it plausible that the current success of cancer immunotherapies is specifically limited here. In melanoma brain metastases, the reciprocal interplay between immunosuppressive mediators such as indoleamine 2, 3-dioxygenase (IDO) or programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) in the context of neoplastic transformation are far from being understood. Therefore, we analyzed the immunoreactive infiltrate (CD45, CD3, CD8, Forkhead box P3 [FoxP3], CD11c, CD23, CD123, CD68, Allograft Inflammatory factor 1[AIF-1]) and PD-L1 with respect to IDO expression and localization in melanoma brain metastases but also in matched metastases at extracranial sites to correlate intra- and interpatient data with therapy response and survival. Comparative tissue analysis identified macrophages/microglia as the major source of IDO expression in melanoma brain metastases. In contrast to the tumor infiltrating lymphocytes, melanoma cells per se exhibited low IDO expression levels paralleled by cell surface presentation of PD-L1 in intracranial metastases. Absolute numbers and pattern of IDO-expressing cells in metastases of the brain correlated with recruitment and localization of CD8+ T cells, implicating dynamic impact on the regulation of T cell function in the brain parenchyma. However, paired analysis of matched intra- and extracranial metastases identified significantly lower fractions of cytotoxic CD8+ T cells in intracranial metastases while all other immune cell populations remain unchanged. In line with the already established clinical benefit for PD-L1 expression in extracranial melanoma metastases, Kaplan-Meier analyses correlated PD-L1 expression in brain metastases with favorable outcome in advanced melanoma patients undergoing immune checkpoint therapy. In summary, our data provide new insights into the landscape of immunosuppressive factors in melanoma brain metastases that may be useful in the implication of novel therapeutic strategies for patients undergoing cancer immunotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dayana Herrera-Rios
- Skin Cancer Unit of the Dermatology Department, Medical Faculty, West German Cancer Center, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Essen/Düsseldorf, Essen, Germany
| | - Sadaf S Mughal
- Division of Applied Bioinfomatics, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sarah Teuber-Hanselmann
- Medical Faculty, West German Cancer Center, Institute of Neuropathology, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Daniela Pierscianek
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Essen/Düsseldorf, Essen, Germany.,Department of Neurosurgery, Medical Faculty, West German Cancer Center, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Antje Sucker
- Skin Cancer Unit of the Dermatology Department, Medical Faculty, West German Cancer Center, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Essen/Düsseldorf, Essen, Germany
| | - Philipp Jansen
- Skin Cancer Unit of the Dermatology Department, Medical Faculty, West German Cancer Center, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Essen/Düsseldorf, Essen, Germany
| | - Tobias Schimming
- Skin Cancer Unit of the Dermatology Department, Medical Faculty, West German Cancer Center, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Essen/Düsseldorf, Essen, Germany
| | - Joachim Klode
- Skin Cancer Unit of the Dermatology Department, Medical Faculty, West German Cancer Center, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Essen/Düsseldorf, Essen, Germany
| | - Julia Reifenberger
- Department of Dermatology, Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Jörg Felsberg
- Medical Faculty, Institute of Neuropathology, Heinrich Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Kathy Keyvani
- Medical Faculty, West German Cancer Center, Institute of Neuropathology, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Benedikt Brors
- Division of Applied Bioinfomatics, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Ulrich Sure
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Essen/Düsseldorf, Essen, Germany.,Department of Neurosurgery, Medical Faculty, West German Cancer Center, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Guido Reifenberger
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Essen/Düsseldorf, Essen, Germany.,Medical Faculty, Institute of Neuropathology, Heinrich Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Dirk Schadendorf
- Skin Cancer Unit of the Dermatology Department, Medical Faculty, West German Cancer Center, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Essen/Düsseldorf, Essen, Germany
| | - Iris Helfrich
- Skin Cancer Unit of the Dermatology Department, Medical Faculty, West German Cancer Center, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Essen/Düsseldorf, Essen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Achrol AS, Rennert RC, Anders C, Soffietti R, Ahluwalia MS, Nayak L, Peters S, Arvold ND, Harsh GR, Steeg PS, Chang SD. Brain metastases. Nat Rev Dis Primers 2019; 5:5. [PMID: 30655533 DOI: 10.1038/s41572-018-0055-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 664] [Impact Index Per Article: 110.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
An estimated 20% of all patients with cancer will develop brain metastases, with the majority of brain metastases occurring in those with lung, breast and colorectal cancers, melanoma or renal cell carcinoma. Brain metastases are thought to occur via seeding of circulating tumour cells into the brain microvasculature; within this unique microenvironment, tumour growth is promoted and the penetration of systemic medical therapies is limited. Development of brain metastases remains a substantial contributor to overall cancer mortality in patients with advanced-stage cancer because prognosis remains poor despite multimodal treatments and advances in systemic therapies, which include a combination of surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, immunotherapy and targeted therapies. Thus, interest abounds in understanding the mechanisms that drive brain metastases so that they can be targeted with preventive therapeutic strategies and in understanding the molecular characteristics of brain metastases relative to the primary tumour so that they can inform targeted therapy selection. Increased molecular understanding of the disease will also drive continued development of novel immunotherapies and targeted therapies that have higher bioavailability beyond the blood-tumour barrier and drive advances in radiotherapies and minimally invasive surgical techniques. As these discoveries and innovations move from the realm of basic science to preclinical and clinical applications, future outcomes for patients with brain metastases are almost certain to improve.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Achal Singh Achrol
- Department of Neurosurgery and Neurosciences, John Wayne Cancer Institute and Pacific Neuroscience Institute, Santa Monica, CA, USA.
| | - Robert C Rennert
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of California-San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA.
| | - Carey Anders
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | | | - Manmeet S Ahluwalia
- Burkhardt Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Lakshmi Nayak
- Center for Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Solange Peters
- Medical Oncology, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Nils D Arvold
- Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Luke's Cancer Center, Duluth, MN, USA
| | - Griffith R Harsh
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of California-Davis, School of Medicine, Sacramento, CA, USA
| | - Patricia S Steeg
- Women's Malignancies Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Center, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Steven D Chang
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of California-Davis, School of Medicine, Sacramento, CA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Buga AM, Docea AO, Albu C, Malin RD, Branisteanu DE, Ianosi G, Ianosi SL, Iordache A, Calina D. Molecular and cellular stratagem of brain metastases associated with melanoma. Oncol Lett 2019; 17:4170-4175. [PMID: 30944612 DOI: 10.3892/ol.2019.9933] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2018] [Accepted: 12/17/2018] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Tumors of the central nervous system are the most prevalent complications of melanoma, especially in the late stage of disease. Melanoma, lung and breast cancer are the leading cause of secondary tumors in the brain, the majority of them having a poor outcome. Brain dissemination is developed in half of stage IV melanomas and these cases can increase up to 75%, having a major impact on the quality of life. This review will focus on recent findings that provide new ways to potentially prevent brain metastases in malignant melanoma. The key of these findings is based on the heterogeneity of the melanoma and of the brain metastases at genetic levels. This new era of technologies provides new tools in understanding the dissemination mechanisms of malignant cells. The cellular and molecular changes, the immune status of the patient and the blood-brain barrier permeability are key regulators of cancer cell dissemination. Understanding these mechanisms can render new hope in preventing brain metastases by focusing on melanoma and new pharmacologic approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ana-Maria Buga
- Department of Functional Science, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova, 200349 Craiova, Romania.,Department of Toxicology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova, 200349 Craiova, Romania
| | - Anca Oana Docea
- Department of Toxicology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova, 200349 Craiova, Romania
| | - Carmen Albu
- Department of Neurology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova, 200349 Craiova, Romania
| | - Ramona Denise Malin
- Department of Neurology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova, 200349 Craiova, Romania
| | | | - Gabriel Ianosi
- Department of Surgery, Dermatopharmacy and Cosmetology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova, 200349 Craiova, Romania
| | - Simona Laura Ianosi
- Department of Dermatology, Dermatopharmacy and Cosmetology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova, 200349 Craiova, Romania
| | - Andrei Iordache
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Dermatopharmacy and Cosmetology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova, 200349 Craiova, Romania
| | - Daniela Calina
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Dermatopharmacy and Cosmetology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova, 200349 Craiova, Romania
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Barriers to Effective Drug Treatment for Brain Metastases: A Multifactorial Problem in the Delivery of Precision Medicine. Pharm Res 2018; 35:177. [PMID: 30003344 DOI: 10.1007/s11095-018-2455-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2018] [Accepted: 06/30/2018] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
The treatment of metastatic lesions in the brain represents a serious unmet medical need in the field of neuro-oncology. Even though many effective compounds have demonstrated success in treating peripheral (non-CNS) tumors with targeted agents, one aspect of this lack of success in the brain may be related to poor delivery of otherwise effective compounds. Many factors can influence the brain delivery of these agents, but one key barrier is a heterogeneously "leaky" BBB that expresses efflux transporters that limit the BBB permeability for many targeted agents. Future success in therapeutics for brain metastases must take into account the adequate delivery of "active, free drug" to the target, and may include combinations of targeted drugs that are appropriate to address each individual patient's tumor type. This review discusses some issues that are pertinent to precision medicine for brain metastases, using specific examples of tumor types that have a high incidence of brain metastases.
Collapse
|
9
|
Wilhelm I, Fazakas C, Molnár K, Végh AG, Haskó J, Krizbai IA. Foe or friend? Janus-faces of the neurovascular unit in the formation of brain metastases. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2018; 38:563-587. [PMID: 28920514 PMCID: PMC5888855 DOI: 10.1177/0271678x17732025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2017] [Revised: 07/13/2017] [Accepted: 08/21/2017] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Despite the potential obstacle represented by the blood-brain barrier for extravasating malignant cells, metastases are more frequent than primary tumors in the central nervous system. Not only tightly interconnected endothelial cells can hinder metastasis formation, other cells of the brain microenvironment (like astrocytes and microglia) can also be very hostile, destroying the large majority of metastatic cells. However, malignant cells that are able to overcome these harmful mechanisms may benefit from the shielding and even support provided by cerebral endothelial cells, astrocytes and microglia, rendering the brain a sanctuary site against anti-tumor strategies. Thus, cells of the neurovascular unit have a Janus-faced attitude towards brain metastatic cells, being both destructive and protective. In this review, we present the main mechanisms of brain metastasis formation, including those involved in extravasation through the brain vasculature and survival in the cerebral environment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Imola Wilhelm
- Institute of Biophysics, Biological Research Centre, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Szeged, Hungary
- Institute of Life Sciences, Vasile Goldiş Western University of Arad, Arad, Romania
| | - Csilla Fazakas
- Institute of Biophysics, Biological Research Centre, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Szeged, Hungary
| | - Kinga Molnár
- Institute of Biophysics, Biological Research Centre, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Szeged, Hungary
| | - Attila G Végh
- Institute of Biophysics, Biological Research Centre, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Szeged, Hungary
| | - János Haskó
- Institute of Biophysics, Biological Research Centre, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Szeged, Hungary
| | - István A Krizbai
- Institute of Biophysics, Biological Research Centre, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Szeged, Hungary
- Institute of Life Sciences, Vasile Goldiş Western University of Arad, Arad, Romania
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Zila N, Bileck A, Muqaku B, Janker L, Eichhoff OM, Cheng PF, Dummer R, Levesque MP, Gerner C, Paulitschke V. Proteomics-based insights into mitogen-activated protein kinase inhibitor resistance of cerebral melanoma metastases. Clin Proteomics 2018. [PMID: 29541007 PMCID: PMC5844114 DOI: 10.1186/s12014-018-9189-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background MAP kinase inhibitor (MAPKi) therapy for BRAF mutated melanoma is characterized by high response rates but development of drug resistance within a median progression-free survival (PFS) of 9-12 months. Understanding mechanisms of resistance and identifying effective therapeutic alternatives is one of the most important scientific challenges in melanoma. Using proteomics, we want to specifically gain insight into the pathophysiological process of cerebral metastases. Methods Cerebral metastases from melanoma patients were initially analyzed by a LC-MS shotgun approach performed on a QExactive HF hybrid quadrupole-orbitrap mass spectrometer. For further validation steps after bioinformatics analysis, a targeted LC-QQQ-MS approach, as well as Western blot, immunohistochemistry and immunocytochemistry was performed. Results In this pilot study, we were able to identify 5977 proteins by LC-MS analysis (data are available via ProteomeXchange with identifier PXD007592). Based on PFS, samples were classified into good responders (PFS ≥ 6 months) and poor responders (PFS [Formula: see text] 3 months). By evaluating these proteomic profiles according to gene ontology (GO) terms, KEGG pathways and gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA), we could characterize differences between the two distinct groups. We detected an EMT feature (up-regulation of N-cadherin) as classifier between the two groups, V-type proton ATPases, cell adhesion proteins and several transporter and exchanger proteins to be significantly up-regulated in poor responding patients, whereas good responders showed an immune activation, among other features. We identified class-discriminating proteins based on nearest shrunken centroids, validated and quantified this signature by a targeted approach and could correlate parts of this signature with resistance using the CPL/MUW proteome database and survival of patients by TCGA analysis. We further validated an EMT-like signature as a major discriminator between good and poor responders on primary melanoma cells derived from cerebral metastases. Higher immune activity is demonstrated in patients with good response to MAPKi by immunohistochemical staining of biopsy samples of cerebral melanoma metastases. Conclusions Employing proteomic analysis, we confirmed known extra-cerebral resistance mechanisms in the cerebral metastases and further discovered possible brain specific mechanisms of drug efflux, which might serve as treatment targets or as predictive markers for these kinds of metastasis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nina Zila
- 1Department of Dermatology, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090 Vienna, Austria.,2Department of Analytical Chemistry, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,3University of Applied Sciences (FH Campus Wien), Vienna, Austria
| | - Andrea Bileck
- 2Department of Analytical Chemistry, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Besnik Muqaku
- 2Department of Analytical Chemistry, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Lukas Janker
- 2Department of Analytical Chemistry, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Ossia M Eichhoff
- Department of Dermatology, University of Zurich, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Phil F Cheng
- Department of Dermatology, University of Zurich, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Reinhard Dummer
- Department of Dermatology, University of Zurich, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Mitchell P Levesque
- Department of Dermatology, University of Zurich, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Christopher Gerner
- 2Department of Analytical Chemistry, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Verena Paulitschke
- 1Department of Dermatology, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090 Vienna, Austria.,Department of Dermatology, University of Zurich, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Rodenburg RJ, Hanssens PE, Ho VKY, Beerepoot LV. Validation of the Chowdhury overall survival score in patients with melanoma brain metastasis treated with Gamma Knife Radiosurgery. J Neurooncol 2018; 138:391-399. [PMID: 29470692 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-018-2808-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2017] [Accepted: 02/16/2018] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
Melanoma brain metastases (MBM) are common in patients with stage IV disease. For Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) on MBM, risk scores such as RPA and melanoma-GPA aid to identify prognostic subgroups. This study aimed to validate the overall survival (OS) risk score developed by Chowdhury et al. in our center's patient cohort. A total of 104 MBM patients were treated with GKRS between 1/1/2002 and 31/12/2014 in our institution. Patients were categorized according to RPA, melanoma-GPA and Chowdhury OS score. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate overall survival, and predicted survival probabilities were calculated for calibration. Cox proportional hazards regressions were performed to identify additional risk factors. Overall, median follow-up time was 80 months, while median OS (mOS) after GKRS was 6 months. Stratified according to the Chowdhury OS score, mOS in the high, medium and low risk group was 3.4, 7.1, and 10.0 months, respectively. The addition of other patient or disease characteristics to the Chowdhury OS model did not improve its performance. The C-index of the melanoma-GPA was 0.46 while the Chowdhury OS had an index of 0.67. In comparison with the RPA and melanoma-GPA, the Chowdhury OS score more accurately distinguished between separate risk groups among patients with MBM treated with GKRS. Contrary to the original study by Chowdhury, follow-up time was sufficient here for the low-risk group to reach the mOS time of 10 months.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R J Rodenburg
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - P E Hanssens
- Gamma Knife Center Tilburg, Elisabeth-Tweesteden Hospital, Tilburg, The Netherlands
| | - V K Y Ho
- Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization (IKNL), Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - L V Beerepoot
- Department of Internal Medicine, Elisabeth-Tweesteden Hospital, Tilburg, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Nordmann N, Hubbard M, Nordmann T, Sperduto PW, Clark HB, Hunt MA. Effect of Gamma Knife Radiosurgery and Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor Antagonists on Metastatic Melanoma. Cureus 2017; 9:e1943. [PMID: 29468099 PMCID: PMC5811164 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.1943] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Learning objectives To evaluate radiation-induced changes in patients with brain metastasis secondary to malignant melanoma who received treatment with Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) and programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) receptor antagonists. Introduction Stereotactic radiosurgery and chemotherapeutics are used together for treatment of metastatic melanoma and have been linked to delayed radiation-induced vasculitic leukoencephalopathy (DRIVL). There have been reports of more intense interactions with new immunotherapeutics targeting PD-1 receptors, but their interactions have not been well described and may result in an accelerated response to GKRS. Here we present data on subjects treated with this combination from a single institution. Methods Records from patients who underwent treatment for metastatic melanoma to the brain with GKRS from 2011 to 2016 were reviewed. Demographics, date of brain metastasis diagnosis, cause of death when applicable, immunotherapeutics, and imaging findings were recorded. The timing of radiation therapy and medications were also documented. Results A total of 79 subjects were treated with GKRS, and 66 underwent treatment with both GKRS and immunotherapy. Regarding the 30 patients treated with anti-PD-1 immunotherapy, 21 patients received pembrolizumab, seven patients received nivolumab, and two patients received pembrolizumab and nivolumab. Serial imaging was available for interpretation in 25 patients, with 13 subjects who received GKRS and anti-PD-1 immunotherapy less than six weeks of each other. While four subjects had indeterminate/mixed findings on subsequent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), nine subjects were noted to have progression. Two of these patients showed progression but subsequent imaging revealed a decrease in progression or improvement on MRI to previously targeted lesions by GKRS. None of the 13 subjects had surgery following their combined therapies. Conclusions This data suggests that there is need for further investigation of the role for concurrent treatment with PD-1 inhibitors and GKRS to enhance the treatment of metastatic melanoma. We present data on 13 patients who appear to have some radiologic benefit to this treatment combination, two of whom had radiographic pseudoprogression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Paul W Sperduto
- Minneapolis Radiation Oncology & Gamma Knife Center, University of Minnesota
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Young GJ, Bi WL, Wu WW, Johanns TM, Dunn GP, Dunn IF. Management of intracranial melanomas in the era of precision medicine. Oncotarget 2017; 8:89326-89347. [PMID: 29179523 PMCID: PMC5687693 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.19223] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2016] [Accepted: 04/24/2017] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Melanoma is the most lethal of skin cancers, in part because of its proclivity for rapid and distant metastasis. It is also potentially the most neurotropic cancer in terms of probability of CNS metastasis from the primary lesion. Despite surgical resection and radiotherapy, prognosis remains guarded for patients with brain metastases. Over the past five years, a new domain of personalized therapy has emerged for advanced melanoma patients with the introduction of BRAF and other MAP kinase pathway inhibitors, immunotherapy, and combinatory therapeutic strategies. By targeting critical cellular signaling pathways and unleashing the adaptive immune response against tumor antigens, a subset of melanoma patients have demonstrated remarkable responses to these treatments. Over time, acquired resistance to these modalities inexorably develops, providing new challenges to overcome. We review the rapidly evolving terrain for intracranial melanoma treatment, address likely and potential mechanisms of resistance, as well as evaluate promising future therapeutic approaches currently under clinical investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Grace J Young
- Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Wenya Linda Bi
- Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.,Department of Cancer Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Winona W Wu
- Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Tanner M Johanns
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.,Center for Human Immunology and Immunotherapy Programs, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Gavin P Dunn
- Center for Human Immunology and Immunotherapy Programs, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.,Department of Neurological Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Ian F Dunn
- Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Gampa G, Vaidhyanathan S, Sarkaria JN, Elmquist WF. Drug delivery to melanoma brain metastases: Can current challenges lead to new opportunities? Pharmacol Res 2017. [PMID: 28634084 DOI: 10.1016/j.phrs.2017.06.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Melanoma has a high propensity to metastasize to the brain, and patients with melanoma brain metastases (MBM) have an extremely poor prognosis. The recent approval of several molecularly-targeted agents (e.g., BRAF, MEK inhibitors) and biologics (anti-CTLA-4, anti-PD-1 and anti-PD-L1 antibodies) has brought new hope to patients suffering from this formerly untreatable and lethal disease. Importantly, there have been recent reports of success in some clinical studies examining the efficacy of both targeted agents and immunotherapies that show similar response rates in both brain metastases and extracranial disease. While these studies are encouraging, there remains significant room for improvement in the treatment of MBM, given the lack of durable response and the development of resistance to current therapies. Critical questions remain regarding mechanisms that lead to this lack of durable response and development of resistance, and how those mechanisms may differ in systemic sites versus brain metastases. One issue that may not be fully appreciated is that the delivery of several small molecule molecularly-targeted therapies to the brain is often restricted due to active efflux at the blood-brain barrier (BBB) interface. Inadequate local drug concentrations may be partially responsible for the development of unique patterns of resistance at metastatic sites in the brain. It is clear that there can be local, heterogeneous BBB breakdown in MBM, as exemplified by contrast-enhancement on T1-weighted MR imaging. However, it is possible that the successful treatment of MBM with small molecule targeted therapies will depend, in part, on the ability of these therapies to penetrate an intact BBB and reach the protected micro-metastases (so called "sub-clinical" disease) that escape early detection by contrast-enhanced MRI, as well as regions of tumor within MRI-detectable metastases that may have a less compromised BBB. The emergence of resistance in MBM may be related to several diverse, yet interrelated, factors including the distinct microenvironment of the brain and inadequate brain penetration of targeted therapies to specific regions of tumor. The tumor microenvironment has been ascribed to play a key role in steering the course of disease progression, by dictating changes in expression of tumor drivers and resistance-related signaling mechanisms. Therefore, a key issue to consider is how changes in drug delivery, and hence local drug concentrations within a metastatic microenvironment, will influence the development of resistance. Herein we discuss our perspective on several critical questions that focus on many aspects relevant to the treatment of melanoma brain metastases; the answers to which may lead to important advances in the treatment of this devastating disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gautham Gampa
- Brain Barriers Research Center, Department of Pharmaceutics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Shruthi Vaidhyanathan
- Brain Barriers Research Center, Department of Pharmaceutics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | | | - William F Elmquist
- Brain Barriers Research Center, Department of Pharmaceutics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Wang S, Wang A, Lin J, Xie Y, Wu L, Huang H, Bian J, Yang X, Wan X, Zhao H, Huang J. Brain metastases from hepatocellular carcinoma: recent advances and future avenues. Oncotarget 2017; 8:25814-25829. [PMID: 28445959 PMCID: PMC5421971 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.15730] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2016] [Accepted: 02/07/2017] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
The incidence of brain metastases from hepatocellular carcinoma (BMHCC) is becoming more frequent than that of the past as a result of prolonged survival of patients with HCC. Compared with brain metastases from other types of cancer, BMHCC tends to exhibit a high incidence of intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) and poor liver function. Unfortunately, the prognosis is extremely poor for patients with BMHCC owing to the limited treatment selection. Currently, optimal treatment requires multidisciplinary approaches including surgery, whole-brain radiation therapy and stereotactic radiosurgery. Besides these traditional approaches, novel treatments such as target therapy and immunotherapy provide an opportunity to improve the survival of these patients. This review provides an overview of the incidence, characteristics, prognosis, and current and potential future management strategies for BMHCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shanshan Wang
- Department of Liver Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Anqiang Wang
- Department of Liver Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Jianzhen Lin
- Department of Liver Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Yuan Xie
- Department of Liver Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Liangcai Wu
- Department of Liver Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Hanchun Huang
- Department of Liver Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Jin Bian
- Department of Liver Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Xiaobo Yang
- Department of Liver Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Xueshuai Wan
- Department of Liver Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Haitao Zhao
- Department of Liver Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
- Center of Translational Medicine, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Jiefu Huang
- Department of Liver Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Chamberlain MC, Baik CS, Gadi VK, Bhatia S, Chow LQM. Systemic therapy of brain metastases: non-small cell lung cancer, breast cancer, and melanoma. Neuro Oncol 2017; 19:i1-i24. [PMID: 28031389 PMCID: PMC5193029 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/now197] [Citation(s) in RCA: 163] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Brain metastases (BM) occur frequently in many cancers, particularly non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), breast cancer, and melanoma. The development of BM is associated with poor prognosis and has an adverse impact on survival and quality of life. Commonly used therapies for BM such as surgery or radiotherapy are associated with only modest benefits. However, recent advances in systemic therapy of many cancers have generated considerable interest in exploration of those therapies for treatment of intracranial metastases.This review discusses the epidemiology of BM from the aforementioned primary tumors and the challenges of using systemic therapies for metastatic disease located within the central nervous system. Cumulative data from several retrospective and small prospective studies suggest that molecularly targeted systemic therapies may be an effective option for the treatment of BM from NSCLC, breast cancer, and melanoma, either as monotherapy or in conjunction with other therapies. Larger prospective studies are warranted to further characterize the efficacy and safety profiles of these targeted agents for the treatment of BM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marc C Chamberlain
- Seattle Cancer Center Alliance, Seattle, Washington (M.C.C., C.S.B., V.K.G., S.B., L.Q.M.C.); Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington (C.S.B., V.K.G., L.Q.M.C.); Departments of Neurology and Neurological Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington (M.C.C.); Division of Medical Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington (C.S.B., V.K.G., S.B., L.Q.M.C)
| | - Christina S Baik
- Seattle Cancer Center Alliance, Seattle, Washington (M.C.C., C.S.B., V.K.G., S.B., L.Q.M.C.); Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington (C.S.B., V.K.G., L.Q.M.C.); Departments of Neurology and Neurological Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington (M.C.C.); Division of Medical Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington (C.S.B., V.K.G., S.B., L.Q.M.C)
| | - Vijayakrishna K Gadi
- Seattle Cancer Center Alliance, Seattle, Washington (M.C.C., C.S.B., V.K.G., S.B., L.Q.M.C.); Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington (C.S.B., V.K.G., L.Q.M.C.); Departments of Neurology and Neurological Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington (M.C.C.); Division of Medical Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington (C.S.B., V.K.G., S.B., L.Q.M.C)
| | - Shailender Bhatia
- Seattle Cancer Center Alliance, Seattle, Washington (M.C.C., C.S.B., V.K.G., S.B., L.Q.M.C.); Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington (C.S.B., V.K.G., L.Q.M.C.); Departments of Neurology and Neurological Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington (M.C.C.); Division of Medical Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington (C.S.B., V.K.G., S.B., L.Q.M.C)
| | - Laura Q M Chow
- Seattle Cancer Center Alliance, Seattle, Washington (M.C.C., C.S.B., V.K.G., S.B., L.Q.M.C.); Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington (C.S.B., V.K.G., L.Q.M.C.); Departments of Neurology and Neurological Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington (M.C.C.); Division of Medical Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington (C.S.B., V.K.G., S.B., L.Q.M.C)
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Gampa G, Vaidhyanathan S, Resman BW, Parrish KE, Markovic SN, Sarkaria JN, Elmquist WF. Challenges in the delivery of therapies to melanoma brain metastases. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2016; 2:309-325. [PMID: 28546917 DOI: 10.1007/s40495-016-0072-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Brain metastases are a major cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with advanced melanoma. Recent approval of several molecularly-targeted agents and biologics has brought hope to patients with this previously untreatable disease. However, patients with symptomatic melanoma brain metastases have often been excluded from pivotal clinical trials. This may be in part attributed to the fact that several of the approved small molecule molecularly-targeted agents are substrates for active efflux at the blood-brain barrier, limiting their effective delivery to brain metastases. We believe that successful treatment of melanoma brain metastases will depend on the ability of these agents to traverse the blood-brain barrier and reach micrometastases that are often not clinically detectable. Moreover, overcoming the emergence of a unique pattern of resistance, possibly through adequate delivery of combination targeted therapies in brain metastases will be important in achieving a durable response. These concepts, and the current challenges in the delivery of new treatments to melanoma brain metastases, are discussed in this review.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gautham Gampa
- Brain Barriers Research Center, Department of Pharmaceutics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - Shruthi Vaidhyanathan
- Brain Barriers Research Center, Department of Pharmaceutics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - Brynna-Wilken Resman
- Brain Barriers Research Center, Department of Pharmaceutics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - Karen E Parrish
- Brain Barriers Research Center, Department of Pharmaceutics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | | | | | - William F Elmquist
- Brain Barriers Research Center, Department of Pharmaceutics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Kircher DA, Silvis MR, Cho JH, Holmen SL. Melanoma Brain Metastasis: Mechanisms, Models, and Medicine. Int J Mol Sci 2016; 17:E1468. [PMID: 27598148 PMCID: PMC5037746 DOI: 10.3390/ijms17091468] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2016] [Revised: 08/02/2016] [Accepted: 08/26/2016] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
The development of brain metastases in patients with advanced stage melanoma is common, but the molecular mechanisms responsible for their development are poorly understood. Melanoma brain metastases cause significant morbidity and mortality and confer a poor prognosis; traditional therapies including whole brain radiation, stereotactic radiotherapy, or chemotherapy yield only modest increases in overall survival (OS) for these patients. While recently approved therapies have significantly improved OS in melanoma patients, only a small number of studies have investigated their efficacy in patients with brain metastases. Preliminary data suggest that some responses have been observed in intracranial lesions, which has sparked new clinical trials designed to evaluate the efficacy in melanoma patients with brain metastases. Simultaneously, recent advances in our understanding of the mechanisms of melanoma cell dissemination to the brain have revealed novel and potentially therapeutic targets. In this review, we provide an overview of newly discovered mechanisms of melanoma spread to the brain, discuss preclinical models that are being used to further our understanding of this deadly disease and provide an update of the current clinical trials for melanoma patients with brain metastases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David A Kircher
- Department of Oncological Sciences, University of Utah Health Sciences Center, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA.
| | - Mark R Silvis
- Department of Surgery, University of Utah Health Sciences Center, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA.
| | - Joseph H Cho
- Department of Oncological Sciences, University of Utah Health Sciences Center, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA.
| | - Sheri L Holmen
- Department of Oncological Sciences, University of Utah Health Sciences Center, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA.
- Department of Surgery, University of Utah Health Sciences Center, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA.
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah Health Sciences Center, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Vemurafenib in leptomeningeal carcinomatosis from melanoma: a case report of near-complete response and prolonged survival. Melanoma Res 2016; 26:312-5. [DOI: 10.1097/cmr.0000000000000257] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
|
20
|
Farber SH, Tsvankin V, Narloch JL, Kim GJ, Salama AKS, Vlahovic G, Blackwell KL, Kirkpatrick JP, Fecci PE. Embracing rejection: Immunologic trends in brain metastasis. Oncoimmunology 2016; 5:e1172153. [PMID: 27622023 DOI: 10.1080/2162402x.2016.1172153] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2015] [Revised: 03/22/2016] [Accepted: 03/23/2016] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Brain metastases represent the most common type of brain tumor. These tumors offer a dismal prognosis and significantly impact quality of life for patients. Their capacity for central nervous system (CNS) invasion is dependent upon induced disruptions to the blood-brain barrier (BBB), alterations to the brain microenvironment, and mechanisms for escaping CNS immunosurveillance. In the emerging era of immunotherapy, understanding how metastases are influenced by the immunologic peculiarities of the CNS will be crucial to forging therapeutic advances. In this review, the immunology of brain metastasis is explored.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Harrison Farber
- Duke Brain Tumor Immunotherapy Program, Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA; The Preston Robert Tisch Brain Tumor Center, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Vadim Tsvankin
- Duke Brain Tumor Immunotherapy Program, Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA; The Preston Robert Tisch Brain Tumor Center, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Jessica L Narloch
- The Preston Robert Tisch Brain Tumor Center, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA; Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Grace J Kim
- The Preston Robert Tisch Brain Tumor Center, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA; Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - April K S Salama
- Division of Medical Oncology, Duke University Medical Center , Durham, NC, USA
| | - Gordana Vlahovic
- The Preston Robert Tisch Brain Tumor Center, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA; Division of Medical Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Kimberly L Blackwell
- The Preston Robert Tisch Brain Tumor Center, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA; Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - John P Kirkpatrick
- The Preston Robert Tisch Brain Tumor Center, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA; Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Peter E Fecci
- Duke Brain Tumor Immunotherapy Program, Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA; The Preston Robert Tisch Brain Tumor Center, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA; Department of Pathology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Chowdhury IH, Ojerholm E, McMillan MT, Miller D, Kolker JD, Kurtz G, Dorsey JF, Nagda SN, Geiger GA, Brem S, O'Rourke DM, Zager EL, Gangadhar T, Schuchter L, Lee JYK, Alonso-Basanta M. Novel risk scores for survival and intracranial failure in patients treated with radiosurgery alone to melanoma brain metastases. Radiat Oncol 2015; 10:248. [PMID: 26626714 PMCID: PMC4666036 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-015-0553-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2015] [Accepted: 11/23/2015] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) alone is an increasingly common treatment strategy for brain metastases. However, existing prognostic tools for overall survival (OS) were developed using cohorts of patients treated predominantly with approaches other than SRS alone. Therefore, we devised novel risk scores for OS and distant brain failure (DF) for melanoma brain metastases (MBM) treated with SRS alone. Methods and materials We retrospectively reviewed 86 patients treated with SRS alone for MBM from 2009-2014. OS and DF were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox proportional hazards modeling identified clinical risk factors. Risk scores were created based on weighted regression coefficients. OS scores range from 0-10 (0 representing best OS), and DF risk scores range from 0-5 (0 representing lowest risk of DF). Predictive power was evaluated using c-index statistics. Bootstrapping with 200 resamples tested model stability. Results The median OS was 8.1 months from SRS, and 54 (70.1 %) patients had DF at a median of 3.3 months. Risk scores for OS were predicated on performance status, extracranial disease (ED) status, number of lesions, and gender. Median OS for the low-risk group (0-3 points) was not reached. For the moderate-risk (4-6 points) and high-risk (6.5-10) groups, median OS was 7.6 months and 2.4 months, respectively (p < .0001). Scores for DF were predicated on performance status, ED status, and number of lesions. Median time to DF for the low-risk group (0 points) was not reached. For the moderate-risk (1-2 points) and high-risk (3-5 points) groups, time to DF was 4.8 and 2.0 months, respectively (p < .0001). The novel scores were more predictive (c-index = 0.72) than melanoma-specific graded prognostic assessment or RTOG recursive partitioning analysis tools (c-index = 0.66 and 0.57, respectively). Conclusions We devised novel risk scores for MBM treated with SRS alone. These scores have implications for prognosis and treatment strategy selection (SRS versus whole-brain radiotherapy).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Imran H Chowdhury
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Civic Center Boulevard - TRC 2 West, Philadelphia, 19104, PA, USA.
| | - Eric Ojerholm
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Civic Center Boulevard - TRC 2 West, Philadelphia, 19104, PA, USA.
| | - Matthew T McMillan
- Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce Street, 4 Silverstein, Philadelphia, 19104, PA, USA.
| | - Denise Miller
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce Street - 3 Silverstein, Philadelphia, 19104, PA, USA.
| | - James D Kolker
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Civic Center Boulevard - TRC 2 West, Philadelphia, 19104, PA, USA.
| | - Goldie Kurtz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Civic Center Boulevard - TRC 2 West, Philadelphia, 19104, PA, USA.
| | - Jay F Dorsey
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Civic Center Boulevard - TRC 2 West, Philadelphia, 19104, PA, USA.
| | - Suneel N Nagda
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Civic Center Boulevard - TRC 2 West, Philadelphia, 19104, PA, USA.
| | - Geoffrey A Geiger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Civic Center Boulevard - TRC 2 West, Philadelphia, 19104, PA, USA.
| | - Steven Brem
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce Street - 3 Silverstein, Philadelphia, 19104, PA, USA.
| | - Donald M O'Rourke
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce Street - 3 Silverstein, Philadelphia, 19104, PA, USA.
| | - Eric L Zager
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce Street - 3 Silverstein, Philadelphia, 19104, PA, USA.
| | - Tara Gangadhar
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Civic Center Boulevard, Philadelphia, 19104, PA, USA.
| | - Lynn Schuchter
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Civic Center Boulevard, Philadelphia, 19104, PA, USA.
| | - John Y K Lee
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce Street - 3 Silverstein, Philadelphia, 19104, PA, USA.
| | - Michelle Alonso-Basanta
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Civic Center Boulevard - TRC 2 West, Philadelphia, 19104, PA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Puhalla S, Elmquist W, Freyer D, Kleinberg L, Adkins C, Lockman P, McGregor J, Muldoon L, Nesbit G, Peereboom D, Smith Q, Walker S, Neuwelt E. Unsanctifying the sanctuary: challenges and opportunities with brain metastases. Neuro Oncol 2015; 17:639-51. [PMID: 25846288 PMCID: PMC4482864 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/nov023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2014] [Accepted: 01/18/2015] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
While the use of targeted therapies, particularly radiosurgery, has broadened therapeutic options for CNS metastases, patients respond minimally and prognosis remains poor. The inability of many systemic chemotherapeutic agents to penetrate the blood-brain barrier (BBB) has limited their use and allowed brain metastases to become a burgeoning clinical challenge. Adequate preclinical models that appropriately mimic the metastatic process, the BBB, and blood-tumor barriers (BTB) are needed to better evaluate therapies that have the ability to enhance delivery through or penetrate into these barriers and to understand the mechanisms of resistance to therapy. The heterogeneity among and within different solid tumors and subtypes of solid tumors further adds to the difficulties in determining the most appropriate treatment approaches and methods of laboratory and clinical studies. This review article discusses therapies focused on prevention and treatment of CNS metastases, particularly regarding the BBB, and the challenges and opportunities these therapies present.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shannon Puhalla
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (S.P.); Department of Pharmaceutics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota (W.E.); Department of Hematology/Oncology, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California (D.F.); Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland (L.K.); Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Amarillo, Texas (C.A.); Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy, West Virginia University and the Mary Babb Randolph Cancer Center, Morgantown, West Virginia (P.L.); Department of Neurological Surgery, The Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio (J.M.); Blood Brain-Barrier Program, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon (L.M., E.N.); Dotter Radiology/Neuroradiology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon (G.N.); Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio (D.P.); School of Pharmacy, Texas Tech University, Health Sciences Center, Amarillo, Texas (Q.S.); Department of Psychiatry, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon (S.W.); Portland Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Portland, Oregon (E.N.)
| | - William Elmquist
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (S.P.); Department of Pharmaceutics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota (W.E.); Department of Hematology/Oncology, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California (D.F.); Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland (L.K.); Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Amarillo, Texas (C.A.); Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy, West Virginia University and the Mary Babb Randolph Cancer Center, Morgantown, West Virginia (P.L.); Department of Neurological Surgery, The Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio (J.M.); Blood Brain-Barrier Program, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon (L.M., E.N.); Dotter Radiology/Neuroradiology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon (G.N.); Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio (D.P.); School of Pharmacy, Texas Tech University, Health Sciences Center, Amarillo, Texas (Q.S.); Department of Psychiatry, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon (S.W.); Portland Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Portland, Oregon (E.N.)
| | - David Freyer
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (S.P.); Department of Pharmaceutics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota (W.E.); Department of Hematology/Oncology, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California (D.F.); Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland (L.K.); Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Amarillo, Texas (C.A.); Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy, West Virginia University and the Mary Babb Randolph Cancer Center, Morgantown, West Virginia (P.L.); Department of Neurological Surgery, The Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio (J.M.); Blood Brain-Barrier Program, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon (L.M., E.N.); Dotter Radiology/Neuroradiology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon (G.N.); Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio (D.P.); School of Pharmacy, Texas Tech University, Health Sciences Center, Amarillo, Texas (Q.S.); Department of Psychiatry, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon (S.W.); Portland Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Portland, Oregon (E.N.)
| | - Lawrence Kleinberg
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (S.P.); Department of Pharmaceutics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota (W.E.); Department of Hematology/Oncology, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California (D.F.); Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland (L.K.); Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Amarillo, Texas (C.A.); Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy, West Virginia University and the Mary Babb Randolph Cancer Center, Morgantown, West Virginia (P.L.); Department of Neurological Surgery, The Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio (J.M.); Blood Brain-Barrier Program, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon (L.M., E.N.); Dotter Radiology/Neuroradiology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon (G.N.); Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio (D.P.); School of Pharmacy, Texas Tech University, Health Sciences Center, Amarillo, Texas (Q.S.); Department of Psychiatry, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon (S.W.); Portland Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Portland, Oregon (E.N.)
| | - Chris Adkins
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (S.P.); Department of Pharmaceutics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota (W.E.); Department of Hematology/Oncology, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California (D.F.); Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland (L.K.); Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Amarillo, Texas (C.A.); Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy, West Virginia University and the Mary Babb Randolph Cancer Center, Morgantown, West Virginia (P.L.); Department of Neurological Surgery, The Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio (J.M.); Blood Brain-Barrier Program, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon (L.M., E.N.); Dotter Radiology/Neuroradiology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon (G.N.); Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio (D.P.); School of Pharmacy, Texas Tech University, Health Sciences Center, Amarillo, Texas (Q.S.); Department of Psychiatry, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon (S.W.); Portland Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Portland, Oregon (E.N.)
| | - Paul Lockman
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (S.P.); Department of Pharmaceutics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota (W.E.); Department of Hematology/Oncology, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California (D.F.); Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland (L.K.); Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Amarillo, Texas (C.A.); Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy, West Virginia University and the Mary Babb Randolph Cancer Center, Morgantown, West Virginia (P.L.); Department of Neurological Surgery, The Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio (J.M.); Blood Brain-Barrier Program, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon (L.M., E.N.); Dotter Radiology/Neuroradiology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon (G.N.); Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio (D.P.); School of Pharmacy, Texas Tech University, Health Sciences Center, Amarillo, Texas (Q.S.); Department of Psychiatry, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon (S.W.); Portland Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Portland, Oregon (E.N.)
| | - John McGregor
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (S.P.); Department of Pharmaceutics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota (W.E.); Department of Hematology/Oncology, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California (D.F.); Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland (L.K.); Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Amarillo, Texas (C.A.); Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy, West Virginia University and the Mary Babb Randolph Cancer Center, Morgantown, West Virginia (P.L.); Department of Neurological Surgery, The Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio (J.M.); Blood Brain-Barrier Program, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon (L.M., E.N.); Dotter Radiology/Neuroradiology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon (G.N.); Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio (D.P.); School of Pharmacy, Texas Tech University, Health Sciences Center, Amarillo, Texas (Q.S.); Department of Psychiatry, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon (S.W.); Portland Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Portland, Oregon (E.N.)
| | - Leslie Muldoon
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (S.P.); Department of Pharmaceutics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota (W.E.); Department of Hematology/Oncology, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California (D.F.); Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland (L.K.); Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Amarillo, Texas (C.A.); Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy, West Virginia University and the Mary Babb Randolph Cancer Center, Morgantown, West Virginia (P.L.); Department of Neurological Surgery, The Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio (J.M.); Blood Brain-Barrier Program, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon (L.M., E.N.); Dotter Radiology/Neuroradiology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon (G.N.); Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio (D.P.); School of Pharmacy, Texas Tech University, Health Sciences Center, Amarillo, Texas (Q.S.); Department of Psychiatry, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon (S.W.); Portland Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Portland, Oregon (E.N.)
| | - Gary Nesbit
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (S.P.); Department of Pharmaceutics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota (W.E.); Department of Hematology/Oncology, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California (D.F.); Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland (L.K.); Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Amarillo, Texas (C.A.); Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy, West Virginia University and the Mary Babb Randolph Cancer Center, Morgantown, West Virginia (P.L.); Department of Neurological Surgery, The Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio (J.M.); Blood Brain-Barrier Program, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon (L.M., E.N.); Dotter Radiology/Neuroradiology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon (G.N.); Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio (D.P.); School of Pharmacy, Texas Tech University, Health Sciences Center, Amarillo, Texas (Q.S.); Department of Psychiatry, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon (S.W.); Portland Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Portland, Oregon (E.N.)
| | - David Peereboom
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (S.P.); Department of Pharmaceutics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota (W.E.); Department of Hematology/Oncology, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California (D.F.); Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland (L.K.); Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Amarillo, Texas (C.A.); Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy, West Virginia University and the Mary Babb Randolph Cancer Center, Morgantown, West Virginia (P.L.); Department of Neurological Surgery, The Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio (J.M.); Blood Brain-Barrier Program, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon (L.M., E.N.); Dotter Radiology/Neuroradiology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon (G.N.); Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio (D.P.); School of Pharmacy, Texas Tech University, Health Sciences Center, Amarillo, Texas (Q.S.); Department of Psychiatry, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon (S.W.); Portland Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Portland, Oregon (E.N.)
| | - Quentin Smith
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (S.P.); Department of Pharmaceutics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota (W.E.); Department of Hematology/Oncology, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California (D.F.); Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland (L.K.); Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Amarillo, Texas (C.A.); Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy, West Virginia University and the Mary Babb Randolph Cancer Center, Morgantown, West Virginia (P.L.); Department of Neurological Surgery, The Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio (J.M.); Blood Brain-Barrier Program, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon (L.M., E.N.); Dotter Radiology/Neuroradiology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon (G.N.); Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio (D.P.); School of Pharmacy, Texas Tech University, Health Sciences Center, Amarillo, Texas (Q.S.); Department of Psychiatry, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon (S.W.); Portland Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Portland, Oregon (E.N.)
| | - Sara Walker
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (S.P.); Department of Pharmaceutics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota (W.E.); Department of Hematology/Oncology, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California (D.F.); Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland (L.K.); Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Amarillo, Texas (C.A.); Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy, West Virginia University and the Mary Babb Randolph Cancer Center, Morgantown, West Virginia (P.L.); Department of Neurological Surgery, The Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio (J.M.); Blood Brain-Barrier Program, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon (L.M., E.N.); Dotter Radiology/Neuroradiology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon (G.N.); Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio (D.P.); School of Pharmacy, Texas Tech University, Health Sciences Center, Amarillo, Texas (Q.S.); Department of Psychiatry, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon (S.W.); Portland Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Portland, Oregon (E.N.)
| | - Edward Neuwelt
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (S.P.); Department of Pharmaceutics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota (W.E.); Department of Hematology/Oncology, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California (D.F.); Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland (L.K.); Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Amarillo, Texas (C.A.); Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy, West Virginia University and the Mary Babb Randolph Cancer Center, Morgantown, West Virginia (P.L.); Department of Neurological Surgery, The Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio (J.M.); Blood Brain-Barrier Program, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon (L.M., E.N.); Dotter Radiology/Neuroradiology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon (G.N.); Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio (D.P.); School of Pharmacy, Texas Tech University, Health Sciences Center, Amarillo, Texas (Q.S.); Department of Psychiatry, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon (S.W.); Portland Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Portland, Oregon (E.N.)
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Giannini I, Cutrignelli DA, Resta L, Gentile A, Vincenti L. Metastatic melanoma of the gallbladder: report of two cases and a review of the literature. Clin Exp Med 2015; 16:295-300. [PMID: 25929736 DOI: 10.1007/s10238-015-0353-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2015] [Accepted: 04/20/2015] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Melanoma is one of the most aggressive and highly metastatic cancers. The most common sites of distant metastases are soft tissues, lung, liver, skin and brain, whereas only few patients develop gastrointestinal metastases. Metastatic involvement of the gallbladder is rare and more often part of a widespread disease than a solitary lesion. The "gold-standard" treatment of metastatic melanoma of the gallbladder remains unclear. We report two cases of patients with past history of cutaneous melanoma who developed visceral metastases. The first patient was asymptomatic and had a widespread disease with metastatic involvement of both the spleen and the gallbladder. The second patient had an isolated metastasis of the gallbladder and complained of upper abdominal pain. The chosen treatment was open cholecystectomy (and splenectomy) in the first case and laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the second. A review of the literature is provided.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- I Giannini
- General Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, University "A. Moro" of Bari, Policlinico. Piazza G. Cesare, 11, 70124, Bari, Italy.
| | - D A Cutrignelli
- Complex Operating Unit of Plastic Aesthetic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, University "A. Moro" of Bari, Bari, Italy
| | - L Resta
- Department of Emergence and Organ Transplantation, Institute of Pathological Anatomy, University "A. Moro" of Bari, Bari, Italy
| | - A Gentile
- Department of Emergence and Organ Transplantation, Institute of Pathological Anatomy, University "A. Moro" of Bari, Bari, Italy
| | - L Vincenti
- General Surgery Unit, Policlinico of Bari, Bari, Italy
| |
Collapse
|