Enthesitis in Psoriatic Arthritis, the Sonographic Perspective

Ultrasonography for the assessment of enthesitis in psoriatic arthritis: systematic review with meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

The specificity of US for enthesitis in PsA is unclear. The objective was to analyse the specificity of US enthesitis in Mode B and using power Doppler for the diagnosis of PsA through a systematic review with meta-analysis.

METHODS

Systematic review in PubMed 2010 to June 2023 of studies of adult patients with confirmed PsA with or without a control group of non-PsA patients, reporting information on US enthesitis. Data were analysed on (i) the prevalence of US enthesitis (presence of at least one enthesitis) in PsA patients and non-PsA patients, (ii) specificity and sensitivity of US enthesitis and then specifically power Doppler for PsA diagnosis and (iii) most specific localizations of enthesitis in PsA patients. Pooled percentages and means were evaluated using univariate random effects meta-analysis.

RESULTS

In 76 articles, 5927 patients with PsA were compared with 3423 controls (59.0% of whom had psoriasis). The prevalence of US enthesitis was 73.7% (95% CI 56.6-90.9%) in PsA patients vs 12.6% (2.6-22.3%) in controls. The pooled specificity and sensitivity of Mode B US were 73.2% (59.3-87.0%) and 62.1% (47.9-76.4%); and of power Doppler, were 97.9% (96.5-99.5%) and 14.7% (8.2-21.2%), respectively. The site most frequently involved in PsA but not in controls was the Achilles tendon, in which erosions and power Doppler activity were most discriminant.

CONCLUSION

In this systematic review, US enthesitis was highly prevalent in PsA patients. Evidencing enthesitis by US was found to be reasonably specific and could contribute to the diagnosis of PsA; power Doppler was highly specific, however it was rarely present.

DEUS Enthesitis Index (DEI): a new tool integrating ultrasound and clinical examination for enthesitis assessment in spondyloarthritis

OBJECTIVES

(1) To develop a composite score, the DEUS (Defining Enthesitis on Ultrasound in Spondyloarthritis) Enthesitis Index (DEI), which integrates ultrasound and clinical examination findings for enthesitis assessment in patients with spondyloarthritis (SpA); (2) to examine the relationships between DEI and clinical features in this population, compared to the clinical examination of the entheses alone.

METHODS

This was a cross-sectional, observational, multicentric study involving 20 rheumatology centres across 11 countries. Ultrasound and clinical examinations were performed bilaterally on the lower limb large entheses (ie, quadriceps tendon, proximal and distal patellar tendons, Achilles tendon and plantar fascia) in 413 patients with SpA, including 224 patients with axial SpA and 189 patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA). A score of 1.0 for clinical enthesitis and 1.0 for ultrasound enthesitis was assigned for each of the 10 entheses evaluated. The total DEI score, which combines clinical and ultrasound findings, ranged from 0 to 20 per patient. Logistic and gamma regression models based on DEI were compared with those derived solely from clinical enthesitis assessment to evaluate their relative performance in explaining disease-related outcomes.

RESULTS

Among patients with SpA, the median DEI was 1.0 (IQR 0.0-3.0). DEI showed significant associations with SpA disease activity and severity indices in regression analyses, except for the Disease Activity in Psoriatic Arthritis score in patients with PsA. Compared with the clinical examination alone of the same entheses, DEI models exhibited a significantly better fit with C-reactive protein levels and ultrasound-detected structural damage at the enthesis (ie, enthesophytes and bone erosions). By contrast, the clinical examination alone models showed a significantly stronger fit with SpA disease activity indices and patient-reported outcomes compared with the DEI.

CONCLUSIONS

DEI is a novel tool that integrates both ultrasound and clinical examination findings for enthesitis assessment, potentially ensuring a more reliable evaluation of this key domain in SpA.

Psoriatic arthritis in Jordan: a cross-sectional study of disease characteristics, patient-reported outcomes, and disease activity

BACKGROUND

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a chronic, inflammatory rheumatic disease. We aim to describe the characteristics of PsA patients and examine factors affecting their psychological and physical well-being.

METHODS

This multicenter, cross-sectional study enrolled consecutive PsA patients from rheumatology clinics over six months. Data was collected through questionnaires and chart reviews. Disease activity was assessed using Disease Activity in Psoriatic Arthritis (DAPSA) and Psoriatic Arthritis Impact of Disease-12 (PsAID-12), with fibromyalgia and psychological well-being screened via Fibromyalgia Rapid Screening Tool (FiRST) and Patient Health Questionnaire-4 (PHQ-4), respectively.

RESULTS

The study enrolled 105 patients with a mean age of 45.6 ± 12.9, and 46.7% (N = 49) were males. The predominant disease type was polyarthritis (80%, N = 84), with 90.5% (N = 95) having psoriasis (PSO). Arthritis and PSO were diagnosed simultaneously in 18 patients (17.1%), arthritis preceded PSO in 11 patients (10.5%) by 3.5 ± 3.8 years, and PSO preceded arthritis in 76 patients (72.4%) by 10.65 ± 11.27 years. The diagnostic delay of PsA was 3.1 ± 4.9 years. Methotrexate was used by 50.5% (N = 53) and 20% (N = 21) used anti-TNF. Severe disease activity, according to DAPSA scores, was present in 38.1%, positive screening for fibromyalgia in 29.5% (N = 31), and 35.2% (N = 37) had severe depression and anxiety-related symptoms. Using multivariate regression analysis, Obesity (OR = 3.267, 95% CI: 1.015-10.513) and the presence of CVD (OR = 4.769, 95% CI: 1.121-20.293) were predictors of bone erosions. PsAID-12 scores and ESR were associated with severe depression and anxiety-related symptoms (95% OR: 1.443-4.459 and 1.001:1.078), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with PsA often face diagnostic delays, with fibromyalgia, depression, and anxiety being common, resulting in poorer patient-reported outcomes.

Relationship Between Ultrasound and Physical Examination in the Assessment of Enthesitis in Patients With Spondyloarthritis: Results From the DEUS Multicenter Study

OBJECTIVE

The study objectives were (i) to explore the agreement between the Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) ultrasound lesions of enthesitis and physical examination in assessing enthesitis in patients with spondyloarthritis (SpA) and (ii) to investigate the prevalence and clinical relevance of subclinical enthesitis in this population.

METHODS

Twenty rheumatology centers participated in this cross-sectional study. Patients with SpA, including axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA), underwent both ultrasound scan and physical examination of large lower limb entheses. The OMERACT ultrasound lesions of enthesitis were considered, along with a recently proposed definition for "active enthesitis" by our group. Subclinical enthesitis was defined as the presence of "active enthesitis" in ≥1 enthesis in patients with SpA without clinical enthesitis (ie, number of positive entheses on physical examination and Leeds Enthesitis Index score = 0).

RESULTS

A total of 4,130 entheses in 413 patients with SpA (224 with axSpA and 189 with PsA) were evaluated through ultrasound and physical examination. Agreement between ultrasound and physical examination ranged from moderate (ie, enthesophytes) to almost perfect (ie, power Doppler and "active enthesitis"). Patellar tendon entheses demonstrated the highest agreement, whereas Achilles tendon insertion showed the lowest. Among 158 (38.3%) of 413 patients with SpA with clinical enthesitis, 108 (68.4%) exhibited no "active enthesitis" on ultrasound. Conversely, of those 255 without clinical enthesitis, 39 (15.3%) showed subclinical enthesitis. Subclinical enthesitis was strongly associated with local structural damage. However, no differences were observed regarding the demographic and clinical profiles of patients with SpA with and without subclinical enthesitis.

CONCLUSION

Our study underscores the need for a comprehensive tool integrating ultrasound and physical examination for assessing enthesitis in patients with SpA.

Ultrasound assessment of Achilles enthesitis: a dedicated training program

OBJECTIVE

To describe an intensive and multimodal ultrasound (US) training program focused on Achilles enthesitis and to illustrate the learning curve of trainees without experience.

METHODS

Three medical students (trainees) and two rheumatologists experienced in musculoskeletal US (trainers) were involved in the training program, which encompassed one preliminary theoretical-practical meeting and five scanning sessions (two patients per session). The students and one expert performed the US examination of the Achilles enthesis bilaterally. The trainees acquired representative images and assessed the presence of Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) US abnormalities of enthesitis. The experts provided feedback addressing trainees' misinterpretations, and the quality of the acquired images was evaluated. A dedicated questionnaire was used to evaluate the students' confidence. After each session, five sets of static images (total=100 images of most commonly scanned entheses) were provided and scored by the students according to OMERACT US definitions. Total agreement and prevalence and bias adjusted kappa (PABAK) were used to evaluate the concordance between the trainees and the expert sonographer.

RESULTS

The total agreement and PABAK significantly improved between the first and fifth scanning sessions (76.2% versus 92.9%, p<0.01, and 0.5 versus 0.79, p<0.01) and between the first and fifth static image sets (64.5% versus 81.9%, p<0.01, and 0.29 versus 0.74, p<0.01). Image quality did not significantly improve (p=0.34). A significant increase in trainees' confidence was registered (p<0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

The described training program rapidly improved the students' performance in the US assessment of Achilles enthesitis, appearing to be an effective starting model for the future development of pathology-oriented teaching programs for the US in rheumatology.

Practical Use of Ultrasound in Modern Rheumatology-From A to Z

During the past 20 years, the use of ultrasound (US) in rheumatology has increased tremendously, and has become a valuable tool in rheumatologists' hands, not only for assessment of musculoskeletal structures like joints and peri-articular tissues, but also for evaluation of nerves, vessels, lungs, and skin, as well as for increasing the accuracy in a number of US-guided aspirations and injections. The US is currently used as the imaging method of choice for establishing an early diagnosis, assessing disease activity, monitoring treatment efficacy, and assessing the remission state of inflammatory joint diseases. It is also used as a complementary tool for the assessment of patients with degenerative joint diseases like osteoarthritis, and in the detection of crystal deposits for establishing the diagnosis of metabolic arthropathies (gout, calcium pyrophosphate deposition disease). The US has an added value in the diagnostic process of polymyalgia rheumatica and giant-cell arteritis, and is currently included in the classification criteria. A novel use of US in the assessment of the skin and lung involvement in connective tissue diseases has the potential to replace more expensive and risky imaging modalities. This narrative review will take a close look at the most recent evidence-based data regarding the use of US in the big spectrum of rheumatic diseases.

Additional Value of Ultrasound in Patients with Psoriatic Arthritis within Treatment Target

Background: In psoriatic arthritis (PsA), musculoskeletal ultrasound is a complementary tool to physical examination, useful even in patients in remission to detect subclinical activity. Objectives: The objective of the study was to assess the ultrasound prevalence of active enthesitis and synovitis in patients who reached the therapeutic target. Methods: This cross-sectional study included patients with at least 6 months of therapy with a targeted synthetic or biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drug who were in treatment target (i.e., DAPSA < 14). Patients underwent bilateral clinical and ultrasound examination of the elbow lateral epicondyle, quadriceps insertion, distal patellar tendon insertion, and Achilles enthesis for assessing enthesitis, and hand and foot joints for assessing synovitis. Enthesitis and synovitis were considered active if the power Doppler signal showed at least a score of one. Results: The study included 51 PsA patients, women (52.9%), with an average age of 55 years. Although the patients were within the DAPSA treatment target, 21.6% had at least one painful enthesis at clinical examination, 19.6% had ultrasound evidence of at least one active enthesitis and 15.7% had ultrasound signs of at least one active synovitis. Conclusions: Among PsA patients thought to be within the therapeutic target, ultrasound detected a non-negligible percentage of active enthesitis and synovitis.

Comparing Ultrasound and MRI Evaluations of the Hamstring Tendon for Predicting Autograft Size in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Background

Adequate graft size and length are crucial factors in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Accurate identification of patients who may be at risk for an insufficient length or size of the hamstring tendon (HT) can aid surgeons in preoperative planning.

Purpose

To evaluate whether magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or ultrasound could more accurately predict the size of the semitendinosus tendon (ST) and gracilis tendon (GT) and to investigate the correlation between anthropometry, graft size, and imaging measurements to find a predictive formula.

Study Design

Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods

Included in the study were 36 patients who underwent ACL reconstruction with HT autograft at our institution between July 2021 and May 2022. Anthropometric data and MRI and ultrasound measurements were collected preoperatively. The length and diameter of the HT were recorded intraoperatively. Correlations between anthropometry, graft size, and imaging measurements were analyzed. Linear regression analysis was performed to construct a prediction formula.

Results

The intraoperative graft diameters of the ST and GT were weakly to moderately associated with their cross-sectional areas as measured by MRI and ultrasound. MRI and ultrasound interpreted 11.9% to 15.7% and 18.4% to 41.7% of the variation in the graft diameter of the HT, with an accuracy of 50.0% to 55.6% and 69.4% to 86.1%, respectively. The intraoperative lengths of the ST and GT were both associated with patient height and tendon lengths as measured by ultrasound. Additionally, intraoperative GT length was associated with patient weight. Four formulas combining relevant anthropometric parameters and imaging measurements were calculated from multilinear regression analysis, explaining up to 46.3% of the variance in the size of HT.

Conclusion

Ultrasound and MRI alone showed limited ability to predict the graft diameter of the ST and GT, while ultrasound could more accurately predict the graft size than MRI. Among the different anthropometric variables, height was the most influential in predicting tendon length.

Advantages of ultrasound imaging for the early diagnosis of psoriatic arthritis in patients with moderate to severe psoriasis

Background

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is an immune-mediated form of chronic inflammatory arthritis associated with psoriasis (PsO). It constitutes a significant comorbidity of PsO and is distinguished by the presence of widespread musculoskeletal inflammation.

Objective

The aim of this study is to precisely detect asymptomatic PsA using ultrasound (US) examinations and to distinguish between various stages of PsO.

Methods

All patients with moderate-to-severe PsO, who consented to undergo musculoskeletal US examinations during their hospitalization between September 2020 and January 2022, were enrolled in the study. We compared patients' demographic characteristics, comorbidities, disease duration, relevant laboratory parameters, and musculoskeletal US findings.

Results

A total of 547 patients with PsO were included in the study, and 114 of them received a diagnosis of PsA. Furthermore, 16.45 % of patients with moderate to severe PsO displayed subclinical PsA. We observed a significantly higher frequency of abnormal US findings in patients with PsA compared to those without PsA, with a sensitivity of 95.61 % and a specificity of 79.22 %. Additionally, the incidence of enthesitis and synovitis varied significantly between PsA and non-PsA patients, and they were identified as independent variables predicting the presence of PsA. Furthermore, the interphalangeal joint, knee joint, and calcaneal tendon were the most frequently affected areas in PsA, as indicated by the observed US changes.

Conclusion

Ultrasound examination proves to be a valuable tool for detecting subclinical PsA, facilitating early screening of the condition. Particular attention should be directed towards changes in the interphalangeal joint, knee joint, and calcaneal tendon when reviewing ultrasound images of asymptomatic patients.

Ultrasonographic Insights into Peripheral Psoriatic Arthritis: Updates in Diagnosis and Monitoring

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a chronic inflammatory arthritis associated with psoriasis, characterized by heterogeneous clinical manifestations and variable disease progression. Ultrasonography has emerged as a valuable tool in the diagnosis and monitoring of PsA, providing real-time visualization of joint and soft tissue abnormalities. This review highlights recent advancements in ultrasonographic techniques for the assessment of PsA, including the identification of typical features, the role of power Doppler imaging in detecting active inflammation, and the potential of ultrasound for guiding treatment decisions. Additionally, we discuss the utility of ultrasound in assessing treatment response and monitoring disease progression in patients with PsA, with a focus on novel imaging modalities. By elucidating the evolving role of ultrasonography in PsA management, this article aims to enhance clinicians' understanding of its utility in facilitating early diagnosis, optimizing treatment strategies, and improving patient outcomes.

A clinical review of structural damage in psoriatic arthritis for dermatologists: From pathogenesis to ongoing controversies

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a chronic inflammatory disease that often goes unrecognized in patients with psoriasis. As a result, patients may develop significant structural damage before diagnosis and initiation of adequate treatment. Dermatologists are in an unique position to identify early signs and symptoms of PsA. Here, we briefly review the pathogenesis of PsA, differences in PsA presentation within real-world dermatology practice versus rheumatology clinical trials, and imaging modalities that can be used to assess structural damage. We then discuss several ongoing controversies related to prediction, assessment, and treatment of PsA-related structural damage. Debated questions include the following: (1) Does subclinical enthesitis predict progression from psoriasis to PsA?, (2) Does methotrexate inhibit progression of structural damage?, (3) Does structural damage correlate with clinical disease activity?, and (4) Can progression from psoriasis to PsA be prevented? Evidence presented herein suggests that dermatologists, together with rheumatologists, can play important roles in the early diagnosis and treatment of PsA, thereby potentially preventing irreversible structural damage.

Detection of subclinical enthesitis by ultrasonography in patients with psoriasis and controls

INTRODUCTION

Psoriasis is a widespread chronic inflammatory skin disease; enthesitis is inflammation of the tendon, ligament, and joint capsule insertion, prevalent in patients with psoriatic arthritis.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of study to evaluate the utility of the Madrid Sonography Enthesitis Index scoring system for accurate detection of subclinical enthesitis in patients with Psoriasis compared with healthy controls. Another objective was to assess increase in enthesis area and Psoriatic arthritis incidence, in a prospective 1-year follow-up.

METHOD

Patients aged ≥18 years who were diagnosed with Psoriasis, without musculoskeletal complaints, and who did not have any clinical sign and/or symptom of enthesitis and synovitis were included in the study. The patients and healthy controls were evaluated with ultrasonography. Ultrasonography evaluation consisted of the detection of gray-scale enthesitis and power Doppler signal in the enthesis areas. The Madrid Sonography Enthesitis Index scoring system was used to quantify the extent of the sonographic enthesis abnormalities.

RESULTS

The mean MASEI score, structure, thickness, erosion, and calcification were significantly higher in the Psoriasis group than in the control group. The mean MASEI score, structure, erosion, and calcification measurements were significantly higher at the last examination when compared to the first examination. The triceps was the most commonly affected tendon in both groups.

CONCLUSION

Ultrasonography is an important tool for diagnosis and follow-up of subclinical enthesitis in patients with psoriasis. Regardless of disease duration and severity, patients should be screened using ultrasonography at yearly intervals.

The Current Advancement in Psoriasis

The study on psoriasis disease helps improve the condition and treatment options day by day in dermatology. In the current scenario, research is ongoing to make the best interventions possible for managing the disease. Psoriasis is one of the most common dermatological conditions wherein chronic inflammation of the skin occurs, characterized by the formation of a rash with scaly, itchy patches over the body surface. The condition is mainly related to the immune system wherein epidermal hyperplasia occurs with infiltration of immune cells. Many factors can trigger psoriasis. Environmental, emotional, hereditary, and personal habits are responsible for the conditions. The current research helps to gain a complete understanding, and the basic knowledge of the state with recent advancements in treatment strategies and characteristic features can also be studied. The main aim is to know the disease's primary root cause and management. It involves the main sites of the body. The most commonly affected parts are the scalp, trunks, knees, elbow, and ankle. It is a chronic long-term disease. Sometimes it may be painful. Itching, bleeding, and disturbed sleep patterns are common symptoms. Most commonly involves the upper epidermal surface. The prevalence of the condition has been increased as it is associated with other comorbidities. The main focus of the treatment is to restrict skin cell multiplication and remove scaly surfaces. This review discusses the advancement in the treatment, its initiation, progression, current symptoms, and disease development. The study also includes basic knowledge about the types of psoriatic disease with its specific features and mechanisms.

Enthesitis in patients with psoriatic arthritis: A nationwide data from the Chinese Registry of Psoriatic Arthritis (CREPAR)

BACKGROUND

The clinical features of enthesitis in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) have been reported in some Western countries, but data in China are very limited. This study aimed to describe the characteristics of enthesitis in Chinese patients with PsA and compared them with those in other cohorts.

METHODS

Patients with PsA enrolled in the Chinese Registry of Psoriatic Arthritis (CREPAR) (December 2018 to June 2021) were included. Data including demographics, clinical characteristics, disease activity measures, and treatment were collected at enrollment. Enthesitis was assessed by the Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada (SPARCC), Maastricht ankylosing spondylitis enthesitis score (MASES), and Leeds enthesitis index (LEI) indices. A multivariable logistic model was used to identify factors related to enthesitis. We also compared our results with those of other cohorts.

RESULTS

In total, 1074 PsA patients were included, 308 (28.7%) of whom had enthesitis. The average number of enthesitis was 3.3 ± 2.8 (range: 1.0-18.0). More than half of the patients (165, 53.6%) had one or two tender entheseal sites. Patients with enthesitis had an earlier age of onset for both psoriasis and arthritis, reported a higher proportion of PsA duration over 5 years, and had a higher percentage of axial involvement and greater disease activity. Multivariable logistic regression showed that axial involvement (odds ratio [OR] 2.21, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.59-3.08; P <0.001), psoriasis area and severity index (PASI) (OR: 1.03, 95% CI: 1.01-1.04; P = 0.002), and disease activity score 28-C reactive protein (DAS28-CRP) (OR: 1.25, 95% CI: 1.01-1.55; P = 0.037) were associated with enthesitis. Compared with the results of other studies, Chinese patients with enthesitis had a younger age, lower body mass index (BMI), a higher rate of positive human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-B27, more frequent dactylitis, and a higher proportion of conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs' (csDMARDs) use.

CONCLUSIONS

Enthesitis is a common condition among Chinese patients with PsA. It is important to evaluate entheses in both peripheral and axial sites.

Doppler Signal and Bone Erosions at the Enthesis Are Independently Associated With Ultrasound Joint Erosive Damage in Psoriatic Arthritis

OBJECTIVE

To explore the association of the Outcome Measures in Rheumatology ultrasound (US) entheseal abnormalities with the presence of US joint bone erosions in psoriatic arthritis (PsA).

METHODS

Consecutive patients with PsA were included in this cross-sectional study. Demographic and clinical variables were collected. A bilateral US assessment was carried out at the following entheses: plantar fascia, and the quadriceps, patellar (proximal and distal), and Achilles tendons. The following US entheseal abnormalities were registered: hypoechogenicity, thickening, Doppler signal < 2 mm from the bony cortex, calcification/enthesophyte, and bone erosion. The presence of US joint bone erosions was investigated at the second and fifth metacarpophalangeal joints, ulnar head, and fifth metatarsophalangeal (MTP) joint, bilaterally, as well as at the level of the most inflamed joint on physical examination. Multiple linear regression analysis was performed to identify clinical and/or US variables associated with US-detected joint bone erosions.

RESULTS

A total of 104 patients with PsA were enrolled. At least 1 joint bone erosion was found in 47 of 104 patients (45.2%). Bone erosions were most frequently detected at the fifth MTP joint level (42/208 joints [20.2 %] in 32/104 patients [30.8%]). In the multivariate model, only a power Doppler (PD) signal at the enthesis (P < 0.001, standardized β = 0.51), bone erosions at the enthesis (P = 0.02, standardized β = 0.20), PsA disease duration (P = 0.04, standardized β = 0.17), and greyscale joint synovitis (P = 0.03, standardized β = 0.42) were associated with US-detected joint bone erosions.

CONCLUSION

PD signal and bone erosions at the enthesis represent sonographic biomarkers of a more severe subset of PsA in terms of US-detected joint erosive damage.

Reliability assessment of the definition of ultrasound enthesitis in SpA: results of a large, multicentre, international, web-based study

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the reliability of the OMERACT US Task Force definition of US enthesitis in SpA.

METHODS

In this web exercise, based on the evaluation of 101 images and 39 clips of the main entheses of the lower limbs, the elementary components included in the OMERACT definition of US enthesitis in SpA (hypoechoic areas, entheseal thickening, power Doppler signal at the enthesis, enthesophytes/calcifications, bone erosions) were assessed by 47 rheumatologists from 37 rheumatology centres in 15 countries. Inter- and intra-observer reliability of the US components of enthesitis was calculated using Light's kappa, Cohen's kappa, Prevalence And Bias Adjusted Kappa (PABAK) and their 95% CIs.

RESULTS

Bone erosions and power Doppler signal at the enthesis showed the highest overall inter-reliability [Light's kappa: 0.77 (0.76-0.78), 0.72 (0.71-0.73), respectively; PABAK: 0.86 (0.86-0.87), 0.73 (0.73-0.74), respectively], followed by enthesophytes/calcifications [Light's kappa: 0.65 (0.64-0.65), PABAK: 0.67 (0.67-0.68)]. This was moderate for entheseal thickening [Light's kappa: 0.41 (0.41-0.42), PABAK: 0.41 (0.40-0.42)], and fair for hypoechoic areas [Light's kappa: 0.37 (0.36-0.38); PABAK: 0.37 (0.37-0.38)]. A similar trend was observed in the intra-reliability exercise, although this was characterized by an overall higher degree of reliability for all US elementary components compared with the inter-observer evaluation.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this multicentre, international, web-based study show a good reliability of the OMERACT US definition of bone erosions, power Doppler signal at the enthesis and enthesophytes/calcifications. The low reliability of entheseal thickening and hypoechoic areas raises questions about the opportunity to revise the definition of these two major components for the US diagnosis of enthesitis.

Ultrasound Enthesitis in Psoriasis Patients with or without Psoriatic Arthritis, a Cross-Sectional Analysis

Background and objectives: The main objective of the current study was to describe the prevalence of enthesitis at different sites in a group of patients with psoriasis with or without psoriatic arthritis (PsA). Materials and Methods: The study included adult patients with psoriasis who underwent clinical examination, laboratory tests and ultrasound examination of the entheses. The enthesitis ultrasound scores (BUSES, MASEI, GUESS) were evaluated; the presence of OMERACT-defined enthesitis was also recorded for each scan site. Results: The study included 16 (57.1%) patients with PsA and 12 (42.9%) patients with psoriasis, with an increased average body mass index (29.3 kg/m2). Compared to psoriasis patients, PsA patients had a higher prevalence of nail psoriasis (68.8% compared to 33.3%; p = 0.063). There were no significant differences regarding the clinical examination of entheses between patients with psoriasis and patients with PsA (p = 0.459). Ultrasound scores, BUSES, GUESS and MASEI proved to have statistically significant higher median values in PsA patients compared to psoriasis patients. Compared to psoriasis patients, PsA patients had a significantly higher prevalence of OMERACT-defined enthesitis of the quadriceps tendon and inferior patellar ligament (both 81.3% compared to 25.0%, p = 0.003). Clinical examination of the lateral epicondyle and of the superior patellar ligament was consistent with their ultrasound examination (κ = 0.357, p = 0.043, respectively, κ = 0.404, p = 0.008). Conclusions: Clinical enthesitis scores do not differ between psoriasis and PsA patients. All analyzed ultrasound scores are significantly higher in patients with PsA. OMERACT-defined enthesitis has the ability to discriminate sonographic enthesitis between the two subgroups for bilateral quadriceps and inferior patellar tendon enthesitis. Bilateral ultrasound damage of entheses can suggest a PsA diagnosis.