Can an integrated orthotic and rehabilitation program decrease pain and improve function after lower extremity trauma?

Inhibition of ErbB2 mitigates secondary denervation after traumatic muscle injury

Secondary denervation has recently been described as part of the sequela of volumetric muscle loss (VML) injury, occurring along with a significantly elevated neurotrophic response, specifically neuregulin-1 (NRG1). This may contribute to chronic functional impairments associated with the injury, representing an overlooked treatment target. Thus, though paradoxical, the goal of this study was to pharmacologically reduce neurotrophic signalling after VML using a monoclonal antibody (Herceptin) that inhibits ErbB2 receptors. We also assessed whether ErbB2 inhibition combined with a myogenic treatment (i.e. minced muscle graft) would have a synergistically beneficial effect on function. Adult male Lewis rats underwent surgical induction of tibialis anterior muscle VML injury and were randomized into one of four groups: VML untreated, VML Herceptin, VML muscle graft and VML muscle graft + Herceptin, with comparisons to the contralateral (uninjured) control muscle. Rats receiving Herceptin were administered the drug (8 mg/kg i.p.) at the time of surgery and thrice per week for the duration of the study (48 days). Terminally individual NMJs were quantitatively evaluated, and maximal in vivo torque was tested. ErbB2 inhibition fully restored the normal rates of NMJ innervation and morphology after VML injury, and improved innervation of de novo myofibres after a muscle-graft treatment. However ErbB2 inhibition did not improve skeletal muscle function alone or in combination with a muscle-graft treatment. We conclude that ErbB2 inhibition is a promising therapeutic option for treating VML injury, yet more work is needed to optimize the translation of improved NMJ characteristics to recover function. KEY POINTS: In cases of complex traumatic musculoskeletal injury, such as volumetric muscle loss (VML), the endogenous ability of skeletal muscle to regenerate and recover function is lost. Innervation, or the connection of a motor axon to each individual myofibre, is a necessary component of myofibre survival and contractile function, which is disrupted after VML. Paradoxically a monocolonal antibody inhibitor of neurotrophic signalling (receptor tyrosine kinase ErbB2; Herceptin) has been shown to improve regeneration in rodent models of nerve injury. Here we show that pharmaceutical ErbB2 inhibition following a rat model of VML improves muscle innervation; however it did not correspondingly recover muscle function. Although ErbB2 inhibition alone is an ineffective treatment for VML injury, its ability to improve innervation is noteworthy and should be considered as an adjunctive or combinatorial therapy option.

The effect of carbon fiber custom dynamic orthosis type on kinematics and kinetics of lower extremity joints in individuals with lower limb traumatic injuries

BACKGROUND

Carbon fiber custom dynamic orthoses have been used to improve gait mechanics after lower limb trauma in military service members, with the goal of restoring function and improving outcomes. However, the effects of commercially available carbon fiber orthoses available to civilians on lower extremity joint kinetics and kinematics are poorly understood.

RESEARCH QUESTION

The aim of this study was to examine the effect of two commercially available orthoses on lower extremity kinematics and kinetics in individuals with lower limb trauma.

METHODS

A total of 23 participants with a lower extremity traumatic injury underwent gait analysis while walking without an orthosis, and while wearing a monolithic carbon fiber orthosis or while wearing a modular carbon fiber orthosis, in a randomized order. Study participants accommodated to each orthosis for three months prior to testing. Joint kinematics and kinetics at the ankle, knee, and hip joints, and ground reaction forces were assessed.

RESULTS

The two study orthoses significantly reduced ankle motion compared to no orthosis, with large effect sizes observed. Peak plantarflexor moment was greater with the modular orthosis compared to the monolithic orthosis. Ankle push-off power did not differ between orthoses but was significantly reduced relative to no orthosis. Push-off power with the study orthoses was over 25% greater as compared to previous studies with military orthoses. Peak loading response power generation at the knee was greater with the monolithic orthosis as compared to the modular orthosis. The kinematics and kinetics at the hip did not differ between orthoses.

SIGNIFICANCE

Orthoses commonly used in civilian settings to treat limb trauma primarily alter joint kinematics and kinetics at the ankle, in a manner consistent with orthoses used in the military. Additionally, despite the apparent large differences in the designs of the two study orthoses, between-orthosis differences on gait mechanics were limited.

Ankle osteoarthritis: Toward new understanding and opportunities for prevention and intervention

The ankle infrequently develops primary osteoarthritis (OA), especially when compared to the hip and the knee. Ankle OA instead generally develops only after trauma. The consequences of end-stage ankle OA can nonetheless be extremely debilitating, with impairment comparable to that of end-stage kidney disease or congestive heart failure. Disconcertingly, evidence suggests that ankle OA can develop more often than is generally appreciated after even low-energy rotational ankle fractures and chronic instability associated with recurrent ankle sprains, albeit at a slower rate than after more severe trauma. The mechanisms whereby ankle OA develops after trauma are poorly understood, but mechanical factors are implicated. A better understanding of the prevalence and mechanical etiology of post-traumatic ankle OA can lead to better prevention and mitigation. New surgical and conservative interventions, including improved ligamentous repair strategies and custom carbon fiber bracing, hold promise for advancing treatment that may prevent residual ankle instability and the development of ankle OA. Studies are needed to fill in key knowledge gaps here related to etiology so that the interventions can target key factors. New technologies, including weight bearing CT and biplane fluoroscopy, offer fresh opportunities to better understand the relationships between trauma, ankle alignment, residual ankle instability, OA development, and foot/ankle function. This paper begins by reviewing the epidemiology of post-traumatic ankle OA, presents evidence suggesting that new treatment options might be successful at preventing ankle OA, and then highlights recent technical advances in understanding of the origins of ankle OA to identify directions for future research.

The Physiatrist's Approach to Limb Loss: Pre-amputation Through Lifelong Care

Limb-loss is a significant medical event with lifelong consequences, impacting various aspects of a patient's well-being. Care for these often-complex patients involves providers from many different specialties working toward a set of patient-centered goals. This article aims to highlight the important role of physiatrists in directing the interdisciplinary care for these patients. Through evidence-based concepts, the authors aim to lay a roadmap for comprehensive, longitudinal management of these patients from pre-amputation assessment through lifelong care.

Influence of Physical Exercise on the Rehabilitation of Volumetric Muscle Loss Injury Reconstructed with Autologous Adipose Tissue

BACKGROUND

In volumetric muscle loss (VML) injuries, spontaneous muscle regeneration capacity is limited. The implantation of autologous adipose tissue in the affected area is an option to treat these lesions; however, the effectiveness of this therapy alone is insufficient for a complete recovery of the damaged muscle. This study examined the influence of treadmill exercise on the rehabilitation of VML injuries reconstructed with autologous adipose tissue, as a strategy to counteract the limitations of spontaneous regeneration observed in these injuries.

METHODS

Forty adult male Wistar rats were divided into eight groups of five individuals each: normal control (NC), regenerative control (RC), VML control (VML), VML injury reconstructed with fresh autologous adipose tissue (FAT), exercise-rehabilitated control (RNC), exercise-rehabilitated regenerative control (RRC), exercise-rehabilitated VML injury (RVML), and exercise-rehabilitated VML injury reconstructed with fresh autologous adipose tissue (RFAT). Histological and histochemical staining techniques were used for the analysis of structural features and histomorphometric parameters of the tibialis anterior muscle. Grip strength tests were conducted to assess muscle force.

RESULTS

Exercise rehabilitation decreased the proportion of disoriented fibers in RFAT vs. FAT group. The percentage of fibrosis was significantly higher in FAT and RFAT groups versus NC and RNC groups but did not vary significantly between FAT and RFAT groups. Overall, muscle grip strength and fiber size increased significantly in the exercise-rehabilitated groups compared to control groups.

CONCLUSIONS

To conclude, rehabilitation with physical exercise tended to normalize the process of muscle repair in a model of VML injury reconstructed with fresh autologous adipose tissue, but it did not reduce the intense fibrosis associated with these injuries.

Changes in functional outcomes in people with high-energy ankle trauma after the use of the ReAktiv Posterior Dynamic Element™ orthosis and a rehabilitation program: A case series

The aim of this study was to examine lower-limb function in 2 patients that received a ReAktiv Posterior Dynamic Element™ (PDE) orthosis and 6-week rehabilitation program after a high-energy trauma injury to the lower limb. Lower-limb function was assessed using the lower extremity functional score, walking performance through the 2-minute walk test, and dynamic mobility and balance through the single-leg balance, timed stair ascent, and the 4-square step test. A 6-week physiotherapy-led rehabilitation program was also implemented. Data showed improvements in lower extremity function, walking performance, mobility, and balance measures after 8 weeks of wearing the ReAktiv PDE™ orthosis and completion of the rehabilitation program. The ReAktiv PDE™ orthosis combined with a lower-limb rehabilitation program shows potential as a treatment option to improve lower-limb function and walking performance and return sufferers of high-energy trauma injury to functional levels seen in healthy cohorts.

Predictors of long-term pain and function in individuals who received a custom dynamic orthosis and device-centric care pathway

INTRODUCTION

Carbon fiber custom dynamic orthoses (CDOs) have been shown to effectively reduce pain and improve function in military service members with lower-limb impairment, but data are limited for civilians.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the long-term outcomes of individuals who completed a CDO-centric care pathway in a civilian clinic by comparing baseline pain, mobility, and function with outcomes at long-term follow-up. To identify baseline characteristics and postintervention outcomes predictive of outcomes at long-term follow-up.

METHODS

Records of 131 adult patients who received a CDO and CDO-centric training were reviewed. Patient-reported measures of pain and physical function and timed assessment of walking and agility collected during routine clinical care were extracted. These patients were contacted on average 4 (±1) years postintervention to complete a survey including measures of pain and physical function.

RESULTS

The 63 participants who responded reported improved or greatly improved function, maximum pain, and typical pain on average, irrespective of age or sex ( P < 0.001). Change in function from baseline to long-term follow-up was predicted by short-term change in function (35.1% of the variance; P < 0.001). Change in pain from baseline to long-term follow-up was predicted by baseline typical pain and change in four square step test time (63% of variance; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Most survey respondents reported positive outcomes. Long-term pain reduction and improved function were predicted by baseline status and by short-term changes associated with receiving a CDO and completing an intensive training program.

The effect of carbon fiber custom dynamic orthosis use and design on center of pressure progression and perceived smoothness in individuals with lower limb trauma

BACKGROUND

Carbon-fiber custom dynamic orthoses are used to improve gait and limb function following lower limb trauma in specialty centers. However, the effects of commercially available orthoses on center of pressure progression and patient perception of orthosis smoothness during walking are poorly understood.

METHODS

In total, 16 participants with a unilateral lower extremity traumatic injury underwent gait analysis when walking without an orthosis, and while wearing monolithic and modular devices, in a randomized order. Device alignment, stiffness, participant rating of perceived device smoothness, center of pressure velocity, and ankle zero moment crossing were assessed.

FINDINGS

The modular device was approximately twice as stiff as the monolithic device. Alignment, smoothness ratings, peak magnitude of center of pressure velocity, and zero moment crossing were not different between study devices. The time to peak center of pressure velocity occurred significantly later for the modular device compared to the monolithic and no orthosis conditions, with large effect sizes observed.

INTERPRETATION

Commercially available orthoses commonly used to treat limb trauma affect the timing of center of pressure progression relative to walking without an orthosis. Despite multiple design differences, monolithic and modular orthoses included in this study did not differ with respect to other measures of center of pressure progression. Perceived smoothness ratings were approximately 40% greater with the study orthoses as compared to previous studies in specialty centers, which may be due to a more gradual center of pressure progression, as indicted by lower peak magnitude of center of pressure velocity with both study orthoses.

Functional and perceptive differences between conventional and advanced ankle foot orthoses in community ambulators post-limb trauma: the injuries managed with advanced bracing of the lower extremity (IM ABLE) study

Introduction

Many military service members and civilians suffer from lower extremity trauma. Despite recent advancements in lower limb bracing technology, it remains unclear whether these newer advanced braces offer improved comfort and functionality compared to conventional options. The IDEO (Intrepid Dynamic Exoskeletal Orthosis), a type of "advanced" orthosis was developed to assist in maintaining high functional performance in patients who have experienced high-energy lower extremity trauma and underwent limb salvage surgeries.

Methods

A cross-sector multi-site initiative was completed to study the efficacy of advanced ankle foot orthoses (AFO) for lower limb trauma and injury compared to a conventional AFO. Following fitting, training, and accommodation, the subjects were assessed in each AFO system for mobility, self-reported function, safety and pain, and preference.

Results

They preferred the advanced over the conventional AFO and the mobility and exertion perception improved with the advanced AFO with no difference in pain or overall health status scores.

Discussion

Thus, an advanced AFO is an option for trauma affecting the lower limb. Long-term studies are required to better understand the accommodation and learning process of using an advanced AFO.

A patient-centered 'test-drive' strategy for ankle-foot orthosis prescription: Protocol for a randomized participant-blinded trial

BACKGROUND

Ankle-foot orthoses (AFOs) are commonly used to overcome mobility limitations related to lower limb musculoskeletal injury. Despite a multitude of AFOs to choose from, there is scant evidence to guide AFO prescription and limited opportunities for AFO users to provide experiential input during the process. To address these limitations in the current prescription process, this study evaluates a novel, user-centered and personalized 'test-drive' strategy using a robotic exoskeleton ('AFO emulator') to emulate commercial AFO mechanical properties (i.e., stiffness). The study will determine if brief, in-lab trials (with emulated or actual AFOs) can predict longer term preference, satisfaction, and mobility outcomes after community trials (with the actual AFOs). Secondarily, it will compare the in-lab experience of walking between actual vs. emulated AFOs.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

In this participant-blinded, randomized crossover study we will recruit up to fifty-eight individuals with lower limb musculoskeletal injuries who currently use an AFO. Participants will walk on a treadmill with three actual AFOs and corresponding emulated AFOs for the "in-lab" assessments. For the community trial assessment, participants will wear each of the actual AFOs for a two-week period during activities of daily living. Performance-based and user-reported measures of preference and mobility will be compared between short- and long-term trials (i.e., in-lab vs. two-week community trials), and between in-lab trials (emulated vs. actual AFOs).

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The study was prospectively registered at www.clininicaltrials.gov (Clinical Trials Study ID: NCT06113159). Date: November 1st 2023. https://classic.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT06113159.

Management of the Mangled Extremity

Mangled extremities represent one of the most challenging injuries. They indicate the need for a comprehensive trauma assessment to rule out coexisting injuries. Treatment options include amputation and attempts at limb salvage. Although both have been associated with chronic disability, new surgical techniques and evolving rehabilitation options offer hope for the future.

Lower Extremity Assistive Devices (LEADs): A Contemporary Literature Review

Lower extremity ambulatory assistive devices (LEADs) are important augments that provide mobility and stability when weightbearing is restricted in the setting of injury, surgery, or balance disorders. In order to optimize patient safety and function when prescribing these devices, it is essential for the orthopaedic surgeon to have a firm understanding of their specific indications, proper fitting, energy demand, biomechanical advantages, and potential complications. Comprehension of normal gait cadence, identification of the functional deficit present and knowledge of available options will assist in safely prescribing the proper device. Over the last decade, newer alternatives to traditional LEADs (canes, crutches, walkers) have become available, including the rolling knee scooter and hands-free single crutch. These have been developed to improve mobility and independence; however, it is necessary to appreciate their limitations when prescribing them to patients. This review will provide an update on normal and pathologic gait biomechanics as well as the most common types of LEADs currently available to the orthopaedic surgeon, their indications, important considerations, proper fitting, associated energy expenditure, and complications.

Research Toward Understanding the Benefits and Limitations of Orthotic Use To Improve Mobility and Balance for Individuals With Neuropathic Conditions

Background

Walking is a vital activity often compromised in individuals with neuropathic conditions. Charcot-Marie-Tooth (CMT) disease and Cerebral Palsy (CP) are two common neurodevelopmental disabilities affecting gait, predisposing to the risk of falls. With guiding scientific evidence limited, there is a critical need to better understand how surgical correction affects mobility, balance confidence, and gait compared to ankle foot orthosis (AFO) bracing. A systematic approach will enable rigorous collaborative research to advance clinical care.

Methods

Key elements of this vision include 1) prospective studies in select patient cohorts to systematically compare conservative vs. surgical management, 2) objective laboratory-based evaluation of patient mobility, balance, and gait using reliable methods, and 3) use of patient-centric outcome measures related to health and mobility.

Results

Valid and reliable standardized tests of physical mobility and balance confidence have been described in the literature. They include 1) the four-square step test, a widely used test of balance and agility that predicts fall risk, 2) the self-selected walking velocity, a measure of general mobility able to detect function change with orthosis use, and 3) the activity specific balance confidence scale, a survey instrument that assesses an individual's level of balance confidence during activity. Additionally, motion capture and ground reaction force data can be used to evaluate whole-body motion and loading, with discriminative biomechanical measures including toe clearance during the swing phase of gait, plantarflexion at 50% of swing, peak ankle plantarflexor moment, and peak ankle push-off power.

Conclusion

The tools needed to support evidence-based practice and inform clinical decision making in these challenging patient populations are all available. Research must now be conducted to better understand the potential benefits and limitations of AFO use in the context of mobility and balance during gait for individuals with neuropathic conditions, particularly relative to those offered by surgical correction.

Clinical Relevance

Following this path of research will provide comparative baseline data on mobility, balance confidence, and gait that can be used to inform an objective criterion-based approach to AFO prescription and the impact of surgical intervention.

Short-term effect of a carbon fiber custom dynamic orthosis and integrated rehabilitation on self-reported physical function, pain, speed, and agility in civilians

BACKGROUND

Ankle-foot orthoses (AFOs) are widely used to restore mobility and reduce pain in individuals with lower extremity pain and disability. The use of a carbon fiber custom dynamic orthosis (CDO) with integrated physical training and psychosocial intervention has been shown to improve outcomes in a military setting, but civilian data are limited.

OBJECTIVES

To use existing clinical data to evaluate the initial effectiveness of an integrated CDO and rehabilitative program and identify baseline characteristics that impact patient response to the intervention.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort.

METHODS

Records of 131 adult patients who received a CDO and device specific training were reviewed. Patient-reported measures of pain and lower extremity function and physical measurements of walking and agility were extracted at baseline and on training completion.

RESULTS

A majority of patients reported improved or greatly improved physical function (92%), maximum pain (69%), and typical pain (55%) and experienced improved or greatly improved walking speed (92%) and agility (52%) irrespective of age and sex. Regression models for examining short-term improvement in pain and physical function accounted for 52% (p < 0.001) and 26% (p < 0.001) of the outcome variance, respectively. Improvement in typical pain was influenced by baseline typical and maximum pain, and functional improvement was influenced by sex and baseline physical function.

CONCLUSIONS

Most patients (92.4%) reported a positive initial outcome after intervention as measured using patient-reported and objective measures.

Carbon fiber ankle-foot orthoses in impaired populations: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Carbon fiber is increasingly being used in ankle-foot orthoses (AFOs). Orthotic devices and carbon fiber-containing devices have been shown to reduce pain and improve function in multiple patient populations. Although the number of publications and interest in carbon fiber AFOs is growing, a systematic evaluation of their effects is lacking.

OBJECTIVES

To characterize the effects of carbon fiber AFOs in impaired individuals.

STUDY DESIGN

Qualitative systematic review.

METHODS

Systematic searches in PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, and Cochrane Library were completed in July 2020. The results were deduplicated, screened, and assessed for quality by independent reviewers. Articles were excluded if they had nonhuman subjects, only healthy subjects, or included active control systems, motors, or other power sources.

RESULTS

Seventy-eight articles were included in the qualitative synthesis. Most articles were of low to moderate methodological quality. Five commonly used devices were identified: the Intrepid Dynamic Exoskeletal Orthosis, ToeOff, WalkOn, Neuro Swing, and Chignon. The devices have unique designs and are associated with specific populations. The Intrepid Dynamic Exoskeletal Orthosis was used in individuals with lower-limb trauma, the Neuro Swing and ToeOff in individuals with neurological disorders, the Chignon in individuals with hemiplegia and stroke, and the WalkOn in people with hemiplegia and cerebral palsy. Each device produced favorable outcomes in their respective populations of interest, such as increased walking speed, reduced pain, or improved balance.

CONCLUSIONS

The mechanical characteristics and designs of carbon fiber AFOs improve outcomes in the populations in which they are most studied. Future literature should diligently report patient population, device used, and fitting procedures.

Novel Metrics for Assessing Mobility During Ground-Standing Transitions

INTRODUCTION

Transitioning between the ground and standing is a required activity for many professions including skilled trades, law enforcement, and military service. However, available assessments are limited and focus primarily on quality of movement. Thus, we developed two novel assessments of functional mobility specific for ground-to-standing transitions: Stand-Prone-Standx2 (SPS2) and Stand-Kneel-Standx2 (SKS2-L/R) tests. The purpose of this study was to determine the psychometrics of these two new measures in able-bodied (AB) service members and in service members with unilateral lower extremity injury (LEI).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 57 AB service members and 31 service members with a traumatic unilateral LEI wearing a custom carbon-fiber ankle-foot orthosis participated in this study. In total, 36 AB and 18 LEI participants returned for a second session to assess intersession reliability. Intraclass correlation coefficients were calculated for intersession and inter-rater comparisons (two-way random model for consistency and single measure). Additionally, performance was compared between legs and groups.

RESULTS

The SPS2 and SKS2 assessments demonstrated excellent inter-rater and intersession reliability in both the AB and LEI groups with all intraclass correlation coefficient values greater than 0.8. Further, the tests were responsive to deficits associated with LEI, with the LEI group having significantly longer times on all assessments compared to the AB group.

CONCLUSIONS

The SPS2 and SKS2 performance measures were found to have excellent inter-rater and intersession reliability in both AB participants and participants with LEI. Further, participants with LEI performed significantly slower than the AB participants. Excellent reliability and responsiveness to deficits associated with LEI support the use of the SPS2 and SKS2 to assess mobility in individuals with LEI. Transitions between the ground and standing occur in many occupational and daily tasks. These reliable performance measures that assess ground-to-stand transitions can be applied widely, in many populations beyond highly functioning service members with LEI.

Passive Dynamic Ankle Foot Orthoses Use in Civilian Patients with Arthritic Conditions of the Foot and Ankle

Background

Nonsurgical interventions such as bracing with ankle foot orthoses (AFOs) aim to assist, restore, and redirect weightbearing forces to address difficulty with mobilization. We identified a custom carbon fiber passive dynamic ankle foot orthosis (PDAFO) that was designed to meet the needs of military combat veterans. We sought to evaluate the off-loading properties of one model of PDAFO (ExoSym) in a civilian population.

Methods

Civilian patients 18 years or older were prescribed a PDAFO by a single surgeon. Pedobarographic data were obtained using the Tekscan F-Scan system. With the insole, participants were instructed to walk at a self-selected pace along a 20 m walkway under 3 conditions: (1) insole placed in between the brace and foot (over); (2) insole placed between the brace and insole of the shoe (under); (3) without the brace, the insole was placed in between the foot and insole of the shoe in both limbs (without).For assessment, forefoot and heel areas were evaluated with respect to maximal force, force*time integral (FTI), maximal contact area, maximal contact pressure, pressure*time integral (PTI), center of force (COF) excursion.

Results

Six patients with arthritic foot and ankle conditions completed pedobarographic assessment for analysis. The brace reduced forefoot maximal force and contact pressures by 66% and 49%, respectively (538 ± 236 to 185 ± 130 N [P < .001], and 99 ± 38 to 50 ± 24 P < .002). Additionally, participants were observed to load the forefoot portion of the brace with double the maximum contact pressures compared to the unbraced foot (204 ± 57 to 99 ± 38 kPa, P < .001).

Conclusion

The results of this study showed that the PDAFO unloaded substantial force and pressure experienced by the forefoot. Participants loaded the brace to a greater extent than when going unbraced. ADAFO can provide measurable pressure relief for patients with arthritic conditions.

Level of Evidence

Level IV, case series.

A Novel Quick Release Mechanism for Ankle Foot Orthosis Struts

BACKGROUND

A posterior dynamic element ankle-foot orthosis (PDEAFO) uses a stiff carbon fibre strut to store and release energy during various mobility tasks, with the strut securely attached to the foot and shank-cuff sections. A design that allows the user to swap struts for specific activities could improve mobility by varying PDEAFO stiffness, but current approaches where bolts securely connect the strut to the orthosis make quick strut swapping time-consuming and impractical.

OBJECTIVES

Design a novel quick release AFO (QRAFO) that can enable daily living strut-swapping and thereby enable better ankle biomechanics for the person's chosen activity.

METHODOLOGY

The novel QRAFO enables device stiffness changes through a quick release mechanism that includes a quick-release key, weight-bearing pin, receptacle anchor, and immobilization pin. A prototype was modelled and simulated with SolidWorks. Mechanical tests were performed with an Instron 4482 machine to evaluate quick release mechanism strength with running and 20° slope downhill walking loads. Quick release efficiency was then evaluated via two quick release functional tests, with four participants wearing a 3D printed QRAFO.

FINDINGS

Simulated stress on the weight bearing pin, anchor, and surrounding carbon fibre structure under running and downhill walking loads did not exceed the yielding stress. Mechanical tests verified the simulation results. Four participants successfully swapped the strut within 25.01 ± 3.66 seconds, outperforming the 60.48 ± 10.88 seconds result for the hand-tightened bolted strut. A learning evaluation with one participant showed that, after approximately 30 swapping iterations, swap time was consistently below 10 seconds.

CONCLUSION

The quick release mechanism accommodated running and slope walking loads, and allowed easy and fast strut removal and attachment, greatly reducing strut swap time compared to screw-anchor connections. Overall, the novel quick release AFO improved strut-swapping time without sacrificing device strength, thereby enabling people to use the most appropriate AFO stiffness for their current activity and hence improve mobility and quality of life.

Common fall-risk indicators are not associated with fall prevalence in a high-functioning military population with lower limb trauma

BACKGROUND

Persons with lower limb trauma are at high risk for falls. Although there is a wide range of measures used to assess stability and fall-risk that include performance measures, temporal-spatial gait parameters, and nonlinear dynamic stability calculations, these measures are typically derived from fall-prone populations, such as older adults. Thus, it is unclear if these commonly used fall-risk indicators are effective at evaluating fall-risk in a younger, higher-functioning population of Service members with lower limb trauma.

METHODS

Twenty-one Service members with lower limb trauma completed a battery of fall-risk assessments that included performance measures (e.g., four-square-step-test), and gait parameters (e.g., step width, step length, step time) and dynamic stability measures (e.g., local divergence exponents) during 10 min of treadmill walking. Participants also reported the number of stumbles and falls over the previous 4 weeks. Negative Binomial and Quasibinomial Regressions were used to evaluate the strength of associations between fall-risk indicators and self-reported falls.

FINDING

Participants reported on average stumbling 6(4) times and falling 2(3) times in the previous 4 weeks. At least one fall was reported by 62% of the participants. None of the fall-risk indicators were significantly associated with fall prevalence in this population of Service members with lower limb trauma (p > 0.1).

INTERPRETATION

Despite the high number of reported falls in this young active population, none of the fall-risk indicators investigated effectively captured and quantified the fall-risk. Further research is needed to identify appropriate fall-risk assessments for young, high-functioning individuals with lower limb trauma.

A modified passive-dynamic ankle-foot orthosis: can it prevent amputation and arthrodesis in patients with ankle-foot trauma?

INTRODUCTION

High-energy lower extremity trauma (HELET) may cause severe damage within the foot-ankle complex. Occasionally, arthrodesis or amputation are the only remaining options to increase activity levels. The modified passive dynamic ankle-foot orthosis (PDAFO) may prove to be a nonsurgical alternative. This study evaluated the effect of a modified PDAFO with a 6-week training program on pain and performance in patients after HELET.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted on seventeen patients who considered an arthrodesis or an amputation after HELET. In an attempt to avoid surgery, the modified PDAFO with a 6-week training program was provided. Pain scores was measured with the Numeric Rating Scale and administered at the start of testing, immediately after the two performance tests and at the end of the day of testing. Performance was evaluated with the 6-min walk test (6MWT) and the Comprehensive high-level activity mobility predictor (CHAMP).

RESULTS

A significant pain reduction was achieved after the treatment procedure. At the start of the test days (p = 0.002), after the 6MWT (p = 0.001), after the CHAMP (p < 0.001) and at the end of the day (p < 0.001). In addition, a significant improvement on performance was observed in the 6MWT (p < 0.001) and the CHAMP (p = 0.01). None of the patients considered a surgical intervention anymore.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients after HELET show a decrease in pain and an improvement in performance after a 6-week training program with modified PD-AFO. The results suggest that the modified PDAFO is an effective alternative for a surgical approach.

Characterizing the Mechanical Stiffness of Passive-Dynamic Ankle-Foot Orthosis Struts

People with lower limb impairment can participate in activities such as running with the use of a passive-dynamic ankle-foot orthosis (PD-AFO). Specifically, the Intrepid Dynamic Exoskeletal Orthosis (IDEO) is a PD-AFO design that includes a carbon-fiber strut, which attaches posteriorly to a custom-fabricated tibial cuff and foot plate and acts in parallel with the impaired biological ankle joint to control sagittal and mediolateral motion, while allowing elastic energy storage and return during the stance phase of running. The strut stiffness affects the extent to which the orthosis keeps the impaired biological ankle in a neutral position by controling sagittal and mediolateral motion. The struts are currently manufactured to a thickness that corresponds with one of five stiffness categories (1 = least stiff, 5 = most stiff) and are prescribed to patients based on their body mass and activity level. However, the stiffness values of IDEO carbon-fiber struts have not been systematically determined, and these values can inform dynamic function and biomimetic PD-AFO prescription and design. The PD-AFO strut primarily deflects in the anterior direction (ankle dorsiflexion), and resists deflection in the posterior direction (ankle plantarflexion) during the stance phase of running. Thus, we constructed a custom apparatus and measured strut stiffness for 0.18 radians (10°) of anterior deflection and 0.09 radians (5°) of posterior deflection. We measured the applied moment and strut deflection to compute angular stiffness, the quotient of moment and angle. The strut moment-angle curves for anterior and posterior deflection were well characterized by a linear relationship. The strut stiffness values for categories 1–5 at 0.18 radians (10°) of anterior deflection were 0.73–1.74 kN·m/rad and at 0.09 radians (5°) of posterior deflection were 0.86–2.73 kN·m/rad. Since a PD-AFO strut acts in parallel with the impaired biological ankle, the strut and impaired biological ankle angular stiffness sum to equal total stiffness. Thus, strut stiffness directly affects total ankle joint stiffness, which in turn affects ankle motion and energy storage and return during running. Future research is planned to better understand how use of a running-specific PD-AFO with different strut stiffness affects the biomechanics and metabolic costs of running in people with lower limb impairment.

IDEO energy-storing orthosis: Effects on lower extremity function and preservation

INTRODUCTION

The Intrepid Dynamic Exoskeletal Orthosis (IDEO) brace is a custom energy-storing orthosis design meant to improve gait, stability, and function after lower extremity injury or limb salvage. Early studies demonstrated the potential for the IDEO to improve functional performance, in conjunction with its paired return to run (RTR) rehabilitation program, compared to other brace types, and an impressively decreased rate of late amputation. The current study aimed to investigate these functional and revision outcomes from our institution to determine which patients may benefit most from IDEO bracing and what factors of the IDEO design and rehabilitation program are most important for improved outcomes after lower extremity trauma and/or loss of function.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of all patients treated with a IDEO style brace at a single military lower extremity trauma referral center between May 2003 and November 2017. We reviewed the medical records for initial diagnosis, post-orthotic rehabilitation program, IDEO use characteristics, pain, change in desire for amputation, and whether patient underwent eventual amputation.

RESULTS

We identified 213 patients with 222 lower extremities treated with IDEO brace. Of these, 76 limbs were treated for combat-related injuries. At one year follow-up, use status could not be determined for 37 extremities (16.7%). Of the 185 limbs with use data available, 116 (61.1%) continued regular brace use, and 37 (15.7%) reported intermittent use. Patients diagnosed with footdrop or weakness were more likely to continue use (OR 2.33, p=0.04), while patients with a previous fusion were less likely to continue use (OR 0.45, p=0.049). Undergoing any dedicated therapy increased chances of continued use (OR 3.37, p<0.001). At final follow-up, 16 patients (7.5%) underwent delayed lower extremity amputations following IDEO treatment. Overall, 27.2% of patients who initially desired amputation eventually underwent amputation despite IDEO brace use. Patients who underwent amputation reported higher pain levels (2 versus 5, p<0.001).

DISCUSSION

In select patients, the IDEO may decrease the desire for delayed amputation and permit higher levels of activity; however, its efficacy appears tied to the rehabilitative regimen, pain levels, and initial diagnosis. These findings should guide post-surgical extremity bracing prescriptions and expectations.

Military Service Members with Major Lower Extremity Fractures Return to Running with a Passive-dynamic Ankle-foot Orthosis: Comparison with a Normative Population

BACKGROUND

Lower extremity fractures represent a high percentage of reported injuries in the United States military and can devastate a service member's career. A passive dynamic ankle-foot orthosis (PD-AFO) with a specialized rehabilitation program was initially designed to treat military service members after complex battlefield lower extremity injuries, returning a select group of motivated individuals back to running. For high-demand users of the PD-AFO, the spatiotemporal gait parameters, agility, and quality of life is not fully understood with respect to uninjured runners.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

Do patients who sustained a lower extremity fracture using a PD-AFO with a specialized rehabilitation program differ from uninjured service members acting as controls, as measured by (1) time-distance and biomechanical parameters associated with running, (2) agility testing (using the Comprehensive High-level Activity Mobility Predictor performance test and Four Square Step Test), and (3) the Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment score.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective data analysis of a longitudinally collected data registry of patients using a PD-AFO from 2015 to 2017 at a single institution. The specific study cohort were patients with a unilateral lower extremity fracture who used the PD-AFO for running. Patients had to be fit with a PD-AFO, have completed rehabilitation, and have undergone a three-dimensional (3-D) running analysis at a self-selected speed at the completion of the program. Of the 90 patients who used the PD-AFO for various reasons, 10 male service members with lower extremity fractures who used a PD-AFO for running (median [range] age 29 years [22 to 41], height 1.8 meters [1.7 to 1.9], weight 91.6 kg [70 to 112]) were compared with 15 uninjured male runners in the military (median age 33 years [21 to 42], height 1.8 meters [1.7 to 1.9], weight 81.6 kg [71.2 to 98.9]). The uninjured runners were active-duty service members who voluntarily participated in a gait analysis at their own self-selected running speeds; to meet eligibility for inclusion as an uninjured control, the members had to be fit for full duty without any medical restrictions, and they had to be able to run 5 miles. The controls were then matched to the study group by age, weight, and height. The primary study outcome variables were the running time-distance parameters and frontal and sagittal plane kinematics of the trunk and pelvis during running. The Four Square Step Test, Comprehensive High-level Activity Mobility Predictor scores, and Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment scores were analyzed for all groups as secondary outcomes. Nonparametric analyses were performed to determine differences between the two groups at p < 0.05.

RESULTS

For the primary outcome, patients with a PD-AFO exhibited no differences compared with uninjured runners in median (range) running velocity (3.9 meters/second [3.4 to 4.2] versus 4.1 meters/second [3.1 to 4.8], median difference 0.2; p = 0.69), cadence (179 steps/minute [169 to 186] versus 173 steps/minute [159 to 191], median difference 5.8; p = 0.43), stride length (2.6 meters [2.4 to 2.9] versus 2.8 meters [2.3 to 3.3], median difference 0.2; p = 0.23), or sagittal plane parameters such as peak pelvic tilt (24° [15° to 33°] versus 22° [14° to 28°], median difference 1.6°; p = 0.43) and trunk forward flexion (16.2° [7.3° to 23°) versus 15.4° [4.2° to 21°), median difference 0.8°; p > 0.99) with the numbers available. For the secondary outcomes, runners with a PD-AFO performed worse in Comprehensive High-level Activity Mobility Predictor performance testing than uninjured runners did, with their four scores demonstrating a median (range) single-limb stance of 35 seconds (32 to 58) versus 60 seconds (60 to 60) (median difference 25 seconds; p < 0.001), t-test result of 15 seconds (13 to 20) versus 13 seconds (10 to 14) (median difference 2 seconds; p < 0.001), and Illinois Agility Test result of 22 seconds (20 to 25) versus 18 seconds (16 to 20) (median difference 4; p < 0.001). Edgren side step test result of 20 meters (16 to 26) versus 24 meters (16 to 29) (median difference 4 meters; p = 0.11) and the Four Square Step Test of 5.5 seconds (4.1 to 7.2) versus 4.2 seconds (3.1 to 7.3) (median difference 1.3 seconds; p = 0.39) were not different between the groups with an effect size of 0.83 and 0.75, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The results of our study demonstrate that service members run with discernible differences in high-level mobility and demonstrate inferior self-reported patient functioning while having no differences in speed and biomechanics compared with their noninjured counterparts with the sample size available. This study is an early report on functional gains of highly motivated service members with major lower extremity injuries who use a PD-AFO and formalized therapy program to run.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, therapeutic study.

Major Extremity Trauma Research Consortium (METRC). Outcomes Following Severe Distal Tibial, Ankle, and/or Mid/Hindfoot Trauma: Comparison of Limb Salvage and Transtibial Amputation (OUTLET)

BACKGROUND

Selecting the best treatment for patients with severe terminal lower-limb injury remains a challenge. For some injuries, amputation may result in better outcomes than limb salvage. This study compared the outcomes of patients who underwent limb salvage with those that would have been achieved had they undergone amputation.

METHODS

This multicenter prospective observational study included patients 18 to 60 years of age in whom a Type-III pilon or IIIB or C ankle fracture, a Type-III talar or calcaneal fracture, or an open or closed blast/crush foot injury had been treated with limb salvage (n = 488) or amputation (n = 151) and followed for 18 months. The primary outcome was the Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment (SMFA). Causal effect estimates of the improvement that amputation would have provided if it had been performed instead of limb salvage were calculated for the SMFA score, physical performance, pain, participation in vigorous activities, and return to work.

RESULTS

The patients who underwent limb salvage would have had small differences in most outcomes had they undergone amputation. The most notable difference was an improvement in the SMFA mobility score of 7 points (95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.0 to 10.7). Improvements were largest for pilon/ankle fractures and complex injury patterns.

CONCLUSIONS

Amputation should be considered a treatment option rather than a last resort for the most complex terminal lower-limb injuries.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Ankle and Pantalar Arthrodesis: End-Stage Salvage in Cavus Foot

Bony alignment is the primary goal in foot and ankle reconstruction of the cavovarus foot. This condition presents as a malalignment causing a medial overload of the ankle articular surface and lateral overload of the hindfoot, midfoot, and forefoot. A painful gait associated with articular degeneration of the numerous joints can lead to a chronic and rigid arthrosis of joints, warranting arthrodesis of the affected joints accordingly.

Virtual reality-based physical therapy for patients with lower extremity injuries: feasibility and acceptability

INTRODUCTION

Traditional physical therapy (PT) requires patients to attend weekly in-office supervised physical therapy appointments. However, between 50% and 70% of patients who would benefit do not receive prescribed PT due to barriers to access. Virtual Reality (VR) provides a platform for remote delivery of PT to address these access barriers.

METHODS

We developed a VR-PT program consisting of training, games, and a progress dashboard for 3 common lower extremity physical therapy exercises. We enrolled orthopaedic trauma patients with lower extremity injuries. Patients completed a VR-PT session, consisting of training and one of the exercise-based games. Pre- and post-VR-PT questionnaires were completed.

RESULTS

We enrolled 15 patients with an average age of 51 years. Fourteen patients said they would enroll in a randomized trial in which they had a 50% chance of receiving VR-PT vs receiving standard of care. When asked to rate their experience using the VR-PT module on a scale from 0-10-with 0 being anchored as "I hated it" and 10 being anchored as "I loved it"-the average rating was 7.5. Patients rated the acceptability of VR-PT as a 3.9 out of 5, the feasibility as a 4.0 out of 5, and the usability as a 67.5 out of 100.

CONCLUSION

The response to VR-PT in this pilot study was positive overall. A VR-based PT program may add value for both patients and clinicians in terms of objective data collection (to aid in compliance monitoring, progression toward goals and exercise safety), increased engagement and increased access.

Translation and adaptation of the German version of the Veterans Rand-36/12 Item Health Survey

BACKGROUND

The translated and culturally adapted German version of the Veterans Rand 36 Items Health Survey (VR-36), and its short form, the VR-12 counterpart, were validated in a German sample of orthopedic (n = 399) and psychosomatic (n = 292) inpatient rehabilitation patients.

METHODS

The instruments were analyzed regarding their acceptance, distributional properties, validity, responsiveness and ability to discriminate between groups by age, sex and clinically specific groups. Eligible study participants completed the VR-36 (n = 169) and the VR-12 (n = 177). They also completed validated patient-reported outcome measures (PROs) including the Euroqol-5 Dimensions 5 Level (EQ-5D-5L); Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale (DASS); Hannover Functional Abilities Questionnaire (HFAQ); and CDC Healthy Days. The VR-12 and the VR-36 were compared to the reference instruments MOS Short Form-12 Items Health Survey (SF-12) version 1.0 and MOS Short Form-36 Items Health Survey (SF-36) version 1.0, using percent of completed items, distributional properties, correlation patterns, distribution measures of known groups validity, and effect size measures.

RESULTS

Item non-response varied between 1.8%/1.1% (SFVR-36/RESF-36) and 6.5%/8.6% (GHVR-36/GHSF-36). PCS was normally distributed (Kolmogorov-Smirnov tests: p > 0.05) with means, standard deviations and ranges very similar between SF-36 (37.5 ± 11.7 [13.8-66.1]) and VR-36 (38.5 ± 10.1 [11.7-67.8]), SF-12 (36.9 ± 10.9 [15.5-61.6]) and VR-12 (36.2 ± 11.5 [12.7-59.3]). MCS was not normally distributed with slightly differing means and ranges between the instruments (MCSVR-36: 36.2 ± 14.2 [12.9-66.6], MCSSF-36: 39.0 ± 15.6 [2.0-73.2], MCSVR-12: 37.2 ± 13.8 [8.4-70.2], MCSSF-12: 39.0 ± 12.3 [17.6-65.4]). Construct validity was established by comparing correlation patterns of the MCSVR and PCSVR with measures of physical and mental health. For both PCSVR and MCSVR there were moderate (≥ 0.3) to high (≥ 0.5) correlations with convergent (PCSVR: 0.55-0.76, MCSVR: 0.60-0.78) and small correlations (< 0.1) with divergent (PCSVR: < 0.12, MCSVR: < 0.16) self-report measures. Known-groups validity was demonstrated for both VR-12 and VR-36 (MCS and PCS) via comparisons of distribution parameters with significant higher mean PCS and MCS scores in both VR instruments found in younger patients with fewer sick days in the last year and a shorter duration of rehabilitation.

CONCLUSIONS

The psychometric analysis confirmed that the German VR is a valid and reliable instrument for use in orthopedic and psychosomatic rehabilitation. Yet further research is needed to evaluate its usefulness in other populations.

Should I Stay or Should I Go? Identifying Intrinsic and Extrinsic Factors in the Decision to Return to Duty Following Lower Extremity Injury

INTRODUCTION

Rehabilitation research of wounded service members (SMs) commonly focuses on physical ability to return to duty (RTD) as a measure of successful recovery. However, numerous factors or barriers may influence a SM's ability and/or desire to RTD after lower extremity musculoskeletal trauma. SMs themselves as well as the clinical care team that works with them daily, often for years at a time, both offer unique perspectives on the influential factors that weigh into decisions to RTD. The purpose of this study was to identify the intrinsic and extrinsic factors patients and clinicians recognized as influencing the decision to RTD after severe lower extremity trauma.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty-two SMs with severe lower extremity trauma (amputation and lower limb salvage) and 30 providers with at least 2 years' experience caring for SMs with similar injuries participated separately in either a SM or provider/clinician focus group. Open-ended questions on factors influencing RTD and other rehabilitation success were discussed. Data analysis consisted of qualitative transcription and participatory active sorting, followed by thematic coding and grouping of qualitative data.

RESULTS

Individual (health condition, personal traits, and career consideration), interpersonal (clinician's impact, family influence, and peer influence), health care system (systems of care, transdisciplinary rehabilitation, and innovation availability), and institutional (policy, benefits, and unit/commander) themes emerged amongst SM patients and clinicians. Expected frequently occurring themes common to both groups were the influence of the team and family unit, as well as career trajectory options after a severe injury. An unexpected theme was acknowledgment of and dissatisfaction with the recent dismantling of institutional systems that support wounded SMs. Patients placed less emphasis on severity of injury and greater emphasis on system and policy barriers than did clinicians.

CONCLUSIONS

Characterization and classification of these clinician and SM-identified factors that influence the decision to RTD after severe lower extremity trauma is expected to improve the efficacy of future rehabilitation efforts and clinical practice guidelines by providing the clinical team the knowledge necessary to recognize modifiable barriers to patient success. A better understanding of factors influencing RTD decision-making may support policies for mitigating RTD barriers, better monitoring of the changing landscape of RTD after lower extremity trauma, improving systems of health care, and/or reducing turnover and facilitating force readiness.

The effect of custom carbon ankle-foot orthosis alignment on roll-over shape and center of pressure velocity

BACKGROUND

Maintaining an optimal rolling of the foot over the ground is thought to increase the stability and efficiency of pathologic gait. Ankle-foot orthoses are often prescribed to improve gait mechanics in individuals with lower extremity injuries; however, their design may compromise how the foot rolls over the ground.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of the sagittal plane ankle-foot orthosis alignment on roll-over shape and center of pressure velocity in individuals with lower limb reconstructions.

STUDY DESIGN

Randomized cross-over study with a control group comparison.

METHODS

In total, 12 individuals with lower limb reconstruction who used a custom carbon ankle-foot orthosis and 12 uninjured controls underwent gait analysis. Ankle-foot orthosis users were tested in their clinically-provided ankle-foot orthosis alignment, with an alignment that was 3° more plantarflexed, and with an alignment that was 3° more dorsiflexed. Components of roll-over shape and center of pressure velocity were calculated from heel strike on the ankle-foot orthosis limb to contralateral heel strike.

RESULTS

Roll-over shape radius was not affected by 3° changes to alignment and was not significantly different from controls. Aligning the ankle-foot orthosis in more dorsiflexion than clinically provided resulted in a smaller peak center of pressure velocity that occurred later in stance.

CONCLUSION

Individuals using custom carbon ankle-foot orthoses can accommodate 3° alterations in the dorsiflexion or plantarflexion alignment.

Custom Dynamic Orthoses and Physical Therapist Intervention for Bilateral Midfoot Amputation: A Case Report

OBJECTIVE

Partial foot amputation is often associated with decreased mobility and function. Recent advances in custom carbon-fiber dynamic ankle-foot orthoses (CDOs) have improved gait, pain, and function following musculoskeletal trauma and can benefit individuals with partial foot amputation. However, limited information is available related to CDO use outside the military. The purpose of this case report is to describe the course of care and outcomes of a civilian provided with CDOs after bilateral transmetatarsal amputation.

CASE DESCRIPTION

A 72-year-old man had a blood-borne bacterial infection (septicemia) of unknown origin at 68 years of age, developed limb-threatening necrosis of the hands and feet, and received bilateral transmetatarsal amputations with skin grafting. The patient initially used foam toe fillers and cushioned shoes but was functionally limited and experienced recurrent ulceration. He was fitted with bilateral CDOs 39 months after amputation and completed device-specific training with a physical therapist.

RESULTS

After 1 week with the CDOs, ankle range of motion during gait was reduced, but greater than 40% increases were observed in bilateral ankle plantarflexor moments and ankle plantarflexion push-off power compared with the toe fillers. With additional therapist-directed training focused on gait and activity performance, ankle plantarflexor moments and plantarflexion push-off power further increased when compared with results after 1 week of CDO use. The patient reported marked improvement in quality of life with the CDOs due to improved walking ability on level and uneven terrain, marked improvement in confidence, and reduced pain.

CONCLUSION

This case reflects the lessons learned and outcomes of a civilian using bilateral CDOs after bilateral transmetatarsal amputation and with poor skin quality. The results from this case study suggest that carbon-fiber CDOs and focused training by a physical therapist can result in improved gait biomechanics, mobility, and quality of life.

Design and evaluation of a modularized ankle-foot orthosis with quick release mechanism

Ankle foot orthosis (AFO) stiffness affects ankle range of motion but can also provide energy storage and return to improve mobility. To perform multiple activities during the day, a person may want to change their AFO stiffness to meet their activity's demand. Carrying multiple AFOs and changing AFOs is inconvenient and could discourage users from engaging in multiple activities. This project will develop a new quick-release mechanism (QRM) that allows users to easily change posterior strut elements to change AFO stiffness. The QRM attaches to the AFO and requires no tools to operate. The proposed QRM includes a quick-release key, weight-bearing pin, receptacle anchor, and immobilization pin. A prototype was modelled with SolidWorks and simulated with SolidWorks Simulation. The QRM was designed to have no mechanical failure during intense activities such as downhill walking and jogging. Unlike a solid screw connection, the QRM needed an additional part to eliminate unsecured motion related to clearance between the quick release key and receptacle anchor. Mechanical test results and measurement data proved no deformation on each part after mechanical testing.Clinical Relevance- The quick release AFO has the potential to improve user's activities range by tuning from stiffness free mode to high stiffness mode.

How New Technology Is Improving Physical Therapy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

As rehabilitation patient volume across the age spectrum increases and reimbursement rates decrease, clinicians are forced to produce favorable outcomes with limited resources and time. The purpose of this review is to highlight new technologies being utilized to improve standardization and outcomes for patients rehabilitating orthopedic injuries ranging from sports medicine to trauma to joint arthroplasty.

RECENT FINDINGS

A proliferation of new technologies in rehabilitation has recently occurred with the hope of improved outcomes, better patient compliance and safety, and return to athletic performance. These include technologies applied directly to the patient such as exoskeletons and instrumented insoles to extrinsic applications such as biofeedback and personalized reference charts. Well-structured randomized trials are ongoing centered around the efficacy and safety of these new technologies to help guide clinical necessity and appropriate application. We present a range of new technologies that may assist a diverse population of orthopedic conditions. Many of these interventions are already supported by level 1 evidence and appear safe and feasible for most clinical settings.

Postsurgical Neuropathy: A Descriptive Review

Postsurgical neuropathies represent an infrequent but potentially devastating complication of surgery that may result in significant morbidity with medicolegal implications. Elucidation of this phenomenon has evolved over the past few decades, with emerging evidence for not only iatrogenic factors contributing to this process but also inflammatory causes. This distinction can be important; for instance, cases in which inflammatory etiologies are suspected may benefit from further investigations including nerve biopsy and may benefit from treatment in the form of immunotherapy. In contrast, postsurgical neuropathies due to perioperative causes including anesthesia, traction, compression, and transection will not benefit in the same manner. This article summarizes early and current literature surrounding the frequency of new neurologic deficits after various surgical types, potential causes including anatomical and inflammatory considerations, and roles for treatment. To capture the scope of the issue, a literature review was conducted for human studies in English via MEDLINE and EMBASE from January 1, 1988 to March 31, 2018. Search terms included anesthesia and/or surgical procedures, operative, peripheral nervous system diseases, trauma, mononeuropathy, polyneuropathy, peripheral nervous system, nerve compression, neuropathy, plexopathy, postoperative, postsurgical, perioperative, complication. We excluded case series with less than 10 patients and review papers. We then narrowed the studies to those presented highlighting key concepts in postsurgical neuropathy.

A novel assessment for Readiness Evaluation during Simulated Dismounted Operations: A reliability study

Objective

To determine the intersession reliability of the Readiness Evaluation during Simulated Dismounted Operations (REDOp), a novel ecologically-based assessment for injured Service Members, provide minimal detectable change values, and normative reference range values. To evaluate the ability to differentiate performance limitations between able-bodied and injured individuals using the REDOp.

Design

Repeated measures design and between group comparison.

Setting

Outpatient rehabilitative care setting.

Participants

Service Members who were able-bodied (n = 32) or sustained a traumatic lower extremity injury (n = 22).

Interventions

During the REDOp, individuals walked over variable terrain as speed and incline progressively increased; they engaged targets; and carried military gear.

Main outcome measures

Endurance measured using total distance traveled; walking stability measured using range of full-body angular momentum; and shooting accuracy, precision, reaction time and acquisition time.

Results

Intersession reliability analyses were conducted on a sub-group of 18 able-bodied Service Members. Interclass correlation coefficient values were calculated for distance traveled (0.91), range of angular momentum about three axes (0.78–0.93), shooting accuracy (0.61), precision (0.47), reaction time (0.21), and acquisition time (0.77). Service Members with lower extremity injury demonstrated significantly less distance traveled with a median distance of 0.89 km compared to 2.73 km for the able-bodied group (p < 0.001). Service Members with lower extremity injury demonstrated significantly less stability in the frontal and sagittal planes than the able-bodied group (p < 0.001). The primary performance limiter was endurance followed by pain for both groups. There was no evidence of ceiling effects.

Conclusions

The REDOp is a highly reliable, military-relevant assessment that can be used to measure performance and identify deficits across the domains of activity tolerance, gait stability, and shooting performance.

Clinical Outcomes with the Intrepid Dynamic Exoskeletal Orthosis: A Retrospective Analysis

INTRODUCTION

Severe lower limb injuries have a negative impact on many aspects of an individual's life. One rehabilitative option for patients who have undergone limb salvage is the Intrepid Dynamic Exoskeletal Orthosis (IDEO). The IDEO is a custom-made dynamic response device which is used to restore function for patients with a wide variety of injuries. Clinical outcomes were routinely collected on patients fit with IDEOs at the Center for the Intrepid, Brooke Army Medical Center. The purpose of this retrospective study was to analyze the clinical outcomes collection process and the patient outcomes collected as part of routine clinical care.

METHODS

The Brooke Army Medical Center IRB approved this study and granted waivers of informed consent and HIPAA authorization. Electronic medical records were reviewed over an 18-month period from July 2014 to January 2016. Records were examined to obtain the date of IDEO delivery, date of outcomes form completion, responses on the forms, and to verify diagnosis or injury. Data gathered included wear time, IDEO comfort, pain with and without the IDEO, Lower Extremity Functional Scale scores with and without the IDEO, and global rating of change questions for everyday activities and high impact activities. Wilcoxon signed-ranked tests were used to compare pain and function with vs. without the IDEO.

RESULTS

During the 18-month period, new IDEOs were delivered to 156 unique patients. Outcomes forms were collected as part of routine clinical care from 90 of these 156 patients (58%). An additional nine forms were collected from patients who received their IDEOs prior to July 2014. In all, 99 outcomes forms were collected. Mean follow-up time from IDEO delivery to outcomes form completion was 35 ± 31 days for the original 90 patients. The most common patient diagnoses were fracture, nerve injury, arthritis, and fusion. Responses on the forms indicated that patients were generally comfortable wearing their IDEOs (8.3 ± 1.3 on a 0-10 scale) and wore them most of the day (10.7 ± 3.4 hours per day). Improvement in pain (from 5.2 ± 2.9 to 1.7 ± 1.6 points on a 0-10 scale) and Lower Extremity Functional Scale scores (from 29.7 ± 16.6 to 59.5 ± 13.6 points) with the IDEO were both more than the minimal clinically important difference and were statistically significant (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

This descriptive retrospective study demonstrated that it was feasible to collect clinical outcomes data which were relevant for characterizing the effects of IDEO use and enabled quantification of improvements in self-reported function and walking pain with the IDEO. Due to the retrospective nature of this study, limitations include missing data and the lack of any performance measures to complement the self-reported data. Clinical outcomes collection continues as a routine part of clinical care and there remains an ongoing aim to collect information on all patients to obtain an accurate assessment of devices and services and ultimately better serve our patients.

Advanced Functional Bracing in Lower Extremity Trauma: Bracing to Improve Function

There are many bracing options for patients with functional limitations of the lower extremity following trauma. The first question that the provider must ask when evaluating a patient with a foot and ankle functional limitation because of weakness or pain is, "what are the patient's expectations?" One option for the patient who desires to return to a higher level of function is a novel, custom dynamic orthosis (CDO) that, when coupled with an advanced rehabilitation program, has improved outcomes in patients following lower extremity trauma who have plateaued after traditional rehabilitation pathways. Although this CDO and rehabilitation program has demonstrated success following lower extremity trauma in heterogenous patient populations, research is ongoing to identify both ideal referral diagnoses or injury characteristics, and to further optimize outcomes with the use of the CDO.

High-Level Performance After the Return to Run Clinical Pathway in Patients Using the Intrepid Dynamic Exoskeletal Orthosis

BACKGROUND

Severe ankle and foot injuries in the US military can result in high-level functional limitation, lost duty days, and medical discharge.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the effectiveness of the Return to Run Clinical Pathway (RTR) in returning patients with lower extremity fractures who utilized the Intrepid Dynamic Exoskeletal Orthosis (IDEO) to high-level mobility.

METHODS

Thirty servicemembers with lower extremity fractures who utilized the IDEO unilaterally and completed the RTR at Naval Medical Center San Diego were included in this retrospective operational review. The Comprehensive High-level Activity Mobility Predictor (CHAMP) and all subtests were completed prior to and after completion of the RTR as part of routine clinical care. An analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was used to compare CHAMP scores before and after the RTR.

RESULTS

Significant improvements were found in the T test (mean change, faster by 5.3 seconds; 95% confidence interval: 3.6, 7.1 seconds; P = .03) and total CHAMP score (mean change, 4.2 points; 95% confidence interval: 3.0, 5.3 points; P<.05). No significant changes were noted in the single-legged stance subtest, the Edgren sidestep test, or the Illinois agility test.

CONCLUSION

The RTR led to improvements in high-level, multidirectional mobility in IDEO users with a history of fractures. Applicability of the intervention used in this study requires further validation before widespread use.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapy, level 4. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2019;49(7):529-535. Epub 13 Feb 2019. doi:10.2519/jospt.2019.8763.

Ankle-foot orthosis alignment affects running mechanics in individuals with lower limb injuries

BACKGROUND

Individuals with severe lower extremity injuries often require ankle-foot orthoses to return to normal activities. Ankle-foot orthoses alignment is a key consideration during the clinical fitting process and may be particularly important during dynamic activities such as running.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate how 3° changes in sagittal plane ankle-foot orthoses alignment affect running mechanics.

STUDY DESIGN

Controlled laboratory study.

METHODS

Twelve participants with unilateral lower limb injury ran overground and lower extremity running mechanics were assessed. Participants wore their passive-dynamic ankle-foot orthoses in three alignments: clinically fit neutral, 3° plantarflexed from clinically fit neutral, and 3° dorsiflexed from clinically fit neutral.

RESULTS

The 3° changes in sagittal alignment significantly influenced ankle mechanics during running. The plantarflexed alignment significantly decreased the peak ankle plantarflexor moment, peak knee extensor moment, and peak ankle and knee power absorption and generation compared to more dorsiflexed alignments. Alignment also altered footstrike angle, with dorsiflexed alignments associated with a more dorsiflexed footstrike pattern and plantarflexed alignments toward a more plantarflexed footstrike pattern. However, alignment did not influence loading rate.

CONCLUSION

Small changes in ankle-foot orthoses alignment significantly altered running mechanics, including footstrike angle, and knee extensor moments. Understanding how ankle-foot orthoses design parameters affect running mechanics may aid the development of evidence-based prescription guidelines and improve function for ankle-foot orthoses users who perform high-impact activities.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Understanding how ankle-foot orthoses alignment impacts biomechanics should be a consideration when fitting passive-dynamic devices for higher impact activities, such as running. Individual running styles, including footstrike patterns, may be affected by small changes in alignment.

Do Spatiotemporal Gait Parameters Improve After Pilon Fracture in Patients Who Use the Intrepid Dynamic Exoskeletal Orthosis?

BACKGROUND

Pilon fractures are high-energy fractures about the ankle observed commonly in both civilian and military trauma populations. Despite surgical management, outcomes are predictably poorly characterized by functional deficits secondary to pain and stiffness. The Intrepid Dynamic Exoskeletal Orthosis (IDEO) and Return-to-Run clinical pathway were initially designed to treat military service members after complex battlefield lower extremity injuries. The IDEO has been used to treat nonbattlefield injuries, but, to our knowledge, it has not been studied specifically among patients with pilon fractures. By studying the use of the IDEO in this patient population, we hope to learn how it might improve ambulation in the community, relieve pain, and return patients to work to better identify patients who might benefit from its use.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

The purpose of this study was to determine whether the IDEO would improve gait parameters including velocity, cadence, stride length, and single-leg stance duration in patients with pilon fractures. Our secondary endpoints of interest were reductions in pain and return to duty.

METHODS

A prospectively collected database of all active-duty IDEO users at a single institution was queried for all patients using the IDEO after a pilon fracture. Patients were included if they were using the IDEO after sustaining a surgically treated pilon fracture and had exhausted all nonoperative therapies. Exclusions were patients with an incomplete gait analysis at the two study time points. Seven patients meeting these criteria were identified. Three-dimensional gait analysis was performed two times: first wearing shoes at a self-selected speed and second after a custom-made IDEO was fabricated for the patient and completion of the Return-to-Run pathway. Patients reported their average pain while ambulating using a numeric rating scale. Gait variables of interest were velocity, cadence, stride length, and single stance time. Return to military service was assessed through the military medical record. To return to duty, a service-specific physical readiness test must be completed.

RESULTS

Median gait velocity improved from 1.1 (interquartile range [IQR], 0.9-1.2) to 1.3 m/s (IQR, 1.2-1.5; p = 0.01). All other variables did not change: cadence 98.4 (IQR, 93.0-107.2) to 104.5 steps/min (IQR, 103.0-109.0; p = 0.13), affected stride length 1.3 (IQR, 1.0-1.4 m) to 1.4 m (IQR, 1.3-1.6 m; p = 0.07), and affected single stance 0.42 (IQR, 0.41-0.47) to 0.43 (IQR, 0.42-0.44; p = 0.80). Pain did not change between time points: 3 (IQR, 2-3) to 2.5 (IQR, 1-3.5; p = 0.90). Three of seven patients returned to duty.

CONCLUSIONS

At self-selected walking speeds, we observed no improvements in gait parameters or pain after application of the IDEO that would likely be considered clinically important, and so the device is unlikely to be worth the cost in this setting. It is possible that for higher demand users such as elite athletes, the IDEO could have a role after severe lower extremity trauma; however, this must be considered speculative until or unless proven in future studies.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, therapeutic study.

Experimental comparisons of passive and powered ankle-foot orthoses in individuals with limb reconstruction

BACKGROUND

Ankle-foot orthoses (AFO) are commonly prescribed to provide functional assistance for patients with lower limb injuries or weakness. Their passive mechanical elements can provide some energy return to improve walking ability, but cannot restore plantar flexor push-off. Powered AFOs provide an assistive torque about the ankle to address the limitations of passive devices, but current designs have yet to be implemented on a large scale clinically.

PURPOSE

To compare passive AFOs to a new untethered, powered AFO design in a clinical population with lower limb reconstruction.

METHODS

A crossover study design, conducted on three individuals with lower limb reconstruction, compared gait mechanics at a standardized speed (based on leg length) in 4 AFO conditions: 1. None (shoes only), 2. Blue Rocker (BR, Allard, USA), 3. Intrepid Dynamic Exoskeletal Orthosis (IDEO), and 4. PowerFoot Orthosis (PFO BionX Medical Technologies, Inc.). The PFO was a custom, battery-powered device whose damping and power were capable to being tuned to meet patient needs. Subjects performed biomechanical gait analysis and metabolic testing at slow, moderate and fast speeds. Dependent variables included total limb power (calculated using a unified deformable segment model), mechanical work, mechanical efficiency, ankle motion, net metabolic cost across three speeds, and performance measures were calculated. Effect sizes (d) were calculated and d > 0.80 denoted a large effect.

RESULTS

Net positive work (d > 1.17) and efficiency (d > 1.43) were greatest in the PFO. There were large effects for between limb differences in positive work for all conditions except the PFO (d = 0.75). The PFO normalized efficiency between the affected and unaffected limbs (d = 0.50), whereas efficiency was less on the affected limb for all other conditions (d > 1.69). Metabolic rate was not consistently lowest in any one AFO condition across speeds. Despite some positive results of the PFO, patient preferred their daily use AFO (2 IDEO, 1 BR). All participants indicated that mass and size were concerns with using the PFO.

CONCLUSIONS

A novel PFO resulted in more biomimetic mechanical work and efficiency than commercially-available and custom passive AFO models. Although the powered AFO provided some biomechanical benefits, further improvements are warranted to improve patient satisfaction.

Passive-dynamic ankle-foot orthosis improves medium-term clinical outcomes after severe lower extremity trauma

Introduction

Individuals with delayed below-knee amputation have previously reported superior clinical outcomes compared with lower limb reconstruction. The UK military have since introduced a passive-dynamic ankle-foot orthosis (PDAFO) into its rehabilitation care pathway to improve limb salvage outcomes. The aims were to determine if wearing a PDAFO improves medium-term clinical outcomes and what influence does multidisciplinary team (MDT) rehabilitation have after PDAFO fitting? Also, what longitudinal changes in clinical outcomes occur with MDT rehabilitation and how do these results compare with patients with previous lower extremity trauma discharged prior to PDAFO availability?

Methods

We retrospectively evaluated levels of mobility, activities of daily living, anxiety, depression and pain in a heterogeneous group of 23 injured UK servicemen 34±11 months after PDAFO provision. We also retrospectively analysed 16 patients across four time points (pre-PDAFO provision, first, second and final inpatient admissions post-PDAFO provision) using identical outcome measures, plus the 6 min walk test.

Results

Outcomes were compared with previous below-knee limb salvage and amputees. Before PDAFO, 74% were able to walk and 4% were able to run independently. At follow-up, this increased to 91% and 57%, respectively. Mean depression and anxiety scores remained stable over time (p>0.05). After 3 weeks, all patients could walk independently (pre-PDAFO=31%). Mean 6 min walk distance significantly increased from 440±75 m (pre-PDAFO) to 533±68 m at last admission (p=0.003). The ability to run increased from 6% to 44% after one admission.

Conclusions

All functional and most psychosocial outcomes in PDAFO users were superior to previous limb salvage and comparable to previous below-knee amputees. The PDAFO facilitated favourable short-term and medium-term changes in all clinical outcome measurements.

Multisite Evaluation of a Custom Energy-Storing Carbon Fiber Orthosis for Patients with Residual Disability After Lower-Limb Trauma

BACKGROUND

The Intrepid Dynamic Exoskeletal Orthosis (IDEO) is a custom energy-storing carbon fiber ankle-foot orthosis developed for lower-extremity trauma patients. Studies conducted at the military treatment facility where the IDEO was developed demonstrated benefits of the IDEO when used with the Return to Run Physical Therapy (RTR PT) program. The current study was designed to determine if results could be replicated at other military treatment facilities and to examine whether early performance gains in patient-reported functional outcomes remained at 12 months.

METHODS

Study participants included service members who had functional deficits that interfered with daily activities at least 1 year after a traumatic unilateral lower-extremity injury at or below the knee. Participants were evaluated before receiving the IDEO, immediately following completion of RTR PT, and at 6 and 12 months. Agility, strength/power, and speed were assessed using well-established performance tests. Self-reported function was measured using the Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment (SMFA). The Orthotics and Prosthetics Users' Survey was administered to assess satisfaction with the IDEO. Of 87 participants with complete baseline data, 6 did not complete any physical therapy and were excluded from the analysis. Follow-up rates immediately following completion of the RTR PT and at 6 and 12 months were 88%, 75%, and 79%, respectively.

RESULTS

Compared with baseline, improvement at completion of RTR PT was observed in all but 1 performance test. SMFA scores for all domains except hand and arm function were lower (improved function) at 6 and 12 months. Satisfaction with the IDEO was high following completion of RTR PT, with some attenuation at the time of follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

This study adds to the evidence supporting the efficacy of the IDEO coupled with RTR PT. However, despite improvement in both performance and self-reported functioning, deficits persist compared with population norms.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Effects of altering heel wedge properties on gait with the Intrepid Dynamic Exoskeletal Orthosis

BACKGROUND

The Intrepid Dynamic Exoskeletal Orthosis is a custom-made dynamic response carbon fiber device. A heel wedge, which sits in the shoe, is an integral part of the orthosis-heel wedge-shoe system. Because the device restricts ankle movement, the system must compensate to simulate plantarflexion and allow smooth forward progression during gait.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the influence of wedge height and durometer on the walking gait of individuals using the Intrepid Dynamic Exoskeletal Orthosis.

STUDY DESIGN

Repeated measures.

METHODS

Twelve individuals walked over level ground with their Intrepid Dynamic Exoskeletal Orthosis and six different heel wedges of soft or firm durometer and 1, 2, or 3 cm height. Center of pressure velocity, joint moments, and roll-over shape were calculated for each wedge.

RESULTS

Height and durometer significantly affected time to peak center of pressure velocity, time to peak internal dorsiflexion and knee extension moments, time to ankle moment zero crossing, and roll-over shape center of curvature anterior-posterior position. Wedge height had a significant influence on peak center of pressure velocity, peak dorsiflexion moment, time to peak knee extension moment, and roll-over shape radius and vertical center of curvature.

CONCLUSION

Changes in wedge height and durometer systematically affected foot loading. Participants preferred wedges which produced ankle moment zero crossing timing, peak internal knee extension moment timing, and roll-over shape center of curvature anterior-posterior position close to that of able-bodied individuals. Clinical relevance Adjusting the heel wedge is a simple, straightforward way to adjust the orthosis-heel wedge-shoe system. Changing wedge height and durometer significantly alters loading of the foot and has great potential to improve an individual's gait.

Energy expenditure in people with transtibial amputation walking with crossover and energy storing prosthetic feet: A randomized within-subject study

BACKGROUND

Energy storing feet are unable to reduce the energy required for normal locomotion among people with transtibial amputation. Crossover feet, which incorporate aspects of energy storing and running specific feet, are designed to maximize energy return while providing stability for everyday activities.

RESEARCH QUESTION

Do crossover prosthetic feet reduce the energy expenditure of walking across a range of speeds, when compared with energy storing feet among people with transtibial amputation due to non-dysvascular causes?

METHODS

A randomized within-subject study was conducted with a volunteer sample of twenty-seven adults with unilateral transtibial amputation due to non-dysvascular causes. Participants were fit with two prostheses. One had an energy storing foot (Össur Variflex) and the other a crossover foot (Össur Cheetah Xplore). Other components, including sockets, suspension, and interface were standardized. Energy expenditure was measured with a portable respirometer (Cosmed K4b2) while participants walked on a treadmill at self-selected slow, comfortable, and fast speeds with each prosthesis. Gross oxygen consumption rates (VO₂ ml/min) were compared between foot conditions. Energy storing feet were used as the baseline condition because they are used by most people with a lower limb prosthesis. Analyses were performed to identify people who may benefit from transition to crossover feet.

RESULTS

On average, participants had lower oxygen consumption in the crossover foot condition compared to the energy storing foot condition at each self-selected walking speed, but this difference was not statistically significant. Participants with farther six-minute walk test distances, higher daily step counts, and higher Medicare Functional Classification Levels at baseline were more likely to use less energy in the crossover foot.

SIGNIFICANCE

Crossover feet may be most beneficial for people with higher activity levels and physical fitness. Further research is needed to examine the effect of crossover feet on energy expenditure during high-level activities.

Assessment of Disability Related to Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome by Use of the Patient-Reported Outcome Measure Information System (PROMIS) and Objective Measures of Physical Performance

BACKGROUND

The National Institutes of Health (NIH)-sponsored Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement System (PROMIS) has been described as a valuable tool for characterizing outcomes among patients with specific musculoskeletal conditions. Additionally, previously proposed objective measures of physical performance among patients with nonarthritic hip abnormalities are costly and not practically incorporated into routine clinical practice.

PURPOSE

(1) To determine the ability of the PROMIS to differentiate between patients with femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) and asymptomatic controls, (2) to determine the effect of FAI on subjects' completion of timed physical performance measures, and (3) to determine whether associations exist between established patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures and subjects' completion of physical performance measures.

STUDY DESIGN

Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

Twenty-two asymptomatic controls (CON group) and 20 patients with FAI completed multiple activities to assess physical ability: self-selected walking velocity (SSWV), timed stair ascent (TSA), four-square step test (FSST), and sit-to-stand five times test (STS5). All subjects also underwent a battery of PRO questionnaires: Visual Analog Scale for Pain (VAS), Modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS), International Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT-33), Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS), and PROMIS. Descriptive analyses were performed and comparisons between groups were made by use of paired t tests with Bonferroni-Holm correction. Spearman's rank correlation coefficients were used to determine associations between physical performance measures and PRO. The magnitude of differences between groups for each measured variable was calculated by use of Cohen's d.

RESULTS

Significant differences between CON and FAI groups were observed for all hip-specific PRO measures (CON vs FAI for all; HOOS 99.2 vs 42.8, P < .001, iHOT-33 99.0 vs 26.6, P < .001, mHHS 99.6 vs 62.2, P < .001). Similarly, PROMIS scores were significantly different between groups for 8 of 9 tested domains. Patients with FAI demonstrated significant decrements in performance of all tested physical measures compared with asymptomatic controls (CON vs FAI, SSWV: 1.51 vs 1.32 m/s, P = .002; TSA: 3.05 vs 5.92 s, P = .017; FSST: 4.83 vs 8.89 s, P = .006; STS5: CON 5.53 vs FAI 10.75 s, P = .005.) Deficits in activities involving hip flexion-TSA, STS5-were strongly associated ( r < -0.7, P < .001) with increased reports of disability.

CONCLUSION

FAI has a negative effect on patient-reported and objectively measured function. Hip-specific and general measures such as PROMIS, FSST, TSA, and STS5 are responsive to FAI-associated debility and may be used to objectively assess surgical or rehabilitative outcomes.

Ankle-foot orthosis bending axis influences running mechanics

Passive-dynamic ankle-foot orthoses (AFOs) are commonly prescribed to improve locomotion for people with lower limb musculoskeletal weakness. The clinical prescription and design process are typically qualitative and based on observational assessment and experience. Prior work examining the effect of AFO design characteristics generally excludes higher impact activities such as running, providing clinicians and researchers limited information to guide the development of objective prescription guidelines. The proximal location of the bending axis may directly influence energy storage and return and resulting running mechanics. The purpose of this study was to determine if the location of an AFO's bending axis influences running mechanics. Marker and force data were recorded as 12 participants with lower extremity weakness ran overground while wearing a passive-dynamic AFO with posterior struts manufactured with central (middle) and off-centered (high and low) bending axes. Lower extremity joint angles, moments, powers, and ground reaction forces were calculated and compared between limbs and across bending axis conditions. Bending axis produced relatively small but significant changes. Ankle range of motion increased as the bending axis shifted distally (p<0.003). Peak ankle power absorption was greater in the low axis than high (p=0.013), and peak power generation was greater in the low condition than middle or high conditions (p<0.009). Half of the participants preferred the middle bending axis, four preferred low and two preferred high. Overall, if greater ankle range of motion is tolerated, a low bending axis provides power and propulsive benefits during running, although individual preference and physical ability should also be considered.

Patient Response to an Integrated Orthotic and Rehabilitation Initiative for Traumatic Injuries: The PRIORITI-MTF Study

Although limb salvage is now possible for many high-energy open fractures and crush injuries to the distal tibia, ankle, hindfoot, and midfoot, orthotic options are limited. The Intrepid Dynamic Exoskeletal Orthosis (IDEO) is a custom, energy-storing carbon fiber orthosis developed for trauma patients undergoing limb salvage. The IDEO differs from other orthoses in that it allows patients with ankle weakness to have more normal ankle biomechanics and increased ankle power. This article describes the design of a study to evaluate the effectiveness of the IDEO when delivered together with a high-intensity, sports medicine-based approach to rehabilitation. It builds on earlier studies by testing the program at military treatment facilities beyond the Brooke Army Medical Center and the Center for the Intrepid where the device was developed. The PRIORITI-MTF study is a multicenter before-after program evaluation where participants at least 1 year out from a traumatic lower extremity injury serve as their own controls. Participants are evaluated before receiving the IDEO, immediately after 4 weeks of physical therapy with the IDEO and at 6 and 12 months after the completion of physical therapy. Primary outcomes include functional performance, measured using well-validated assessments of speed, agility, power, and postural stability and self-reported functioning using the Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment (SMFA) and the Veterans Health Survey (VR-12). Secondary outcomes include pain, depression, posttraumatic stress, and satisfaction with the IDEO.

Limb Salvage With Intrepid Dynamic Exoskeletal Orthosis Versus Transtibial Amputation: A Comparison of Functional Gait Outcomes

OBJECTIVES

To determine if there is a difference in functional gait outcomes between patients with limb injuries treated with either transtibial amputation or limb preservation with the Intrepid Dynamic Exoskeletal Orthosis.

DESIGN

Retrospective prognostic study.

SETTING

Tertiary referral military hospital.

PATIENTS

This study included 10 transtibial amputees and 10 limb preservation patients using the Intrepid Dynamic Exoskeletal Orthosis who were matched by body mass index after excluding for nontraumatic, proximal ipsilateral, contralateral, spine, or traumatic brain injuries. Transtibial amputation patients were also excluded if they did not have a gait study between 6 and 12 months after independent ambulation. Limb preservation were excluded if they did not complete the "Return to Run" program.

INTERVENTIONS

An observational study of functional outcomes using instrumented gait analysis.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Spatiotemporal, kinetic (vertical ground reaction force), unified deformable power, work, and efficiency.

RESULTS

Limb preservation patients walked with a significantly slower cadence (P = 0.036) and spent less time on their affected limb in stance (P = 0.045), and longer in swing (P = 0.019). Amputees had significantly increased maximum positive power in both limbs (P = 0.004 and P = 0.029) and increased maximum negative power on the unaffected limb (P = 0.035). Amputees had significantly increased positive and negative work in the affected limb (P = 0.0009 and P = 0.014) and positive work in the unaffected limb (P = 0.042). There was no significant difference in the kinetic data or efficiency.

CONCLUSIONS

Limb preservation patients spend less time on their affected limb as a percentage of the gait cycle. The unified deformable power demonstrated more dynamic gait in amputees, with peak values closer to normative data.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.