Combined use of conventional smear and liquid-based preparation versus conventional smear for thyroid fine-needle aspiration

Advances in diagnostic liquid-based cytology

Liquid-based cytology (LBC) has changed the landscape of gynaecological cytology. A growing demand exists for LBC in diagnostic cytology, particularly for ancillary testing, such as immunocytochemistry and molecular testing. Ancillary testing solely based on conventional preparation (CP) methods remains challenging. Recently, the increased demand for specialist testing and minimally invasive techniques, such as endoscopic ultrasonography fine-needle aspiration, to obtain cellular samples has led to an increasing demand for ancillary testing on cytology LBC supernatant, slides and cell block (CB). This facilitates the diagnosis and prognosis in cytology samples enabling personalized treatment. An understanding of the history and future prospects of LBC is crucial for its application in routine diagnostics by cytopathologists and cytotechnologists. In this review, we initiated an internet search using the keyword 'liquid-based cytology', and we conducted a literature review to discuss the usefulness of combined diagnosis of LBC and CP, immunocytochemistry and molecular testing and assessed the quality of nucleic acids in diagnostic LBC. High-quality and cell-rich diagnostic LBC surpassed the CP method alone in terms of reliability and versatility of ancillary testing in cytological diagnosis. Conclusively, diagnostic LBC lends itself to various new technologies and is expected to continue evolving with innovations in the future.

Comparison of Liquid-Based Preparations with Conventional Smears in Thyroid Fine-Needle Aspirates: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

To compare conventional smears (CSs) and liquid-based preparations (LBPs) for diagnosing thyroid malignant or suspicious lesions.

METHODS

Studies in the PubMed, SCOPUS, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane database published up to December 2023. We reviewed 17 studies, including 15,861 samples.

RESULTS

The diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) for CS was 23.6674. The area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was 0.879, with sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, and positive predictive value of 0.8266, 0.8668, 0.8969, and 0.7841, respectively. The rate of inadequate specimens was 0.1280. For LBP, the DOR was 25.3587, with an AUC of 0.865. The sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, and positive predictive value were 0.8190, 0.8833, 0.8515, and 0.8562. The rate of inadequate specimens was 0.1729. For CS plus LBP, the AUC was 0.813, with a lower DOR of 9.4557 compared to individual methods. Diagnostic accuracy did not significantly differ among CS, LBP, and CS plus LBP. Subgroup analysis was used to compare ThinPrep and SurePath. The DORs were 29.1494 and 19.7734. SurePath had a significantly higher AUC.

CONCLUSIONS

There was no significant difference in diagnostic accuracy or proportion of inadequate smears between CS and LBP. SurePath demonstrated higher diagnostic accuracy than ThinPrep. Recommendations for fine-needle aspiration cytology should consider cost, feasibility, and accuracy.

Factors Influencing the Sample Adequacy of Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration from Solid Thyroid Nodules for Liquid-Based Cytology: A Demographic, Sonographic, and Technical Perspective

Background and Objectives: To identify factors that influence the sample adequacy of solid thyroid nodules based on ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (FNA) with subsequent liquid-based cytology. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 855 patients who underwent ultrasound-guided FNA at our hospital between July 2019 and July 2020. The final analysis included 801 solid thyroid nodules in 801 patients. After reviewing the demographic data, ultrasonic features, and FNA technique-related factors, we defined 14 potential variables. For cytological results, the Bethesda categories II−VI were defined as adequate sample results. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify factors that influenced sample adequacy. Results: The adequate sample rate was 87.1%. The univariate analysis showed that four factors were related to adequate sampling in patients with thyroid FNA. These factors included age (p < 0.001), nodule orientation (p = 0.0232), calcification (p = 0.0034), and operator experience (p = 0.0286). After the multivariate analysis, five independent factors were identified to improve the diagnostic results of FNA for solid thyroid nodules: (1) the presence of Hashimoto’s thyroiditis (odds ratio (OR) = 1.810; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.076−3.045; p = 0.0254), (2) a taller-than-wide orientation (OR = 2.038; 95% CI: 1.260−3.296; p = 0.0037), (3) the presence of calcification (OR = 1.767; 95% CI: 1.115−2.799; p = 0.0153), (4) four needle passes to obtain material (OR = 1.750; 95% CI: 1.094−2.799; p = 0.0196), and (5) an experienced operator (OR = 0.561; 95% CI: 0.319−0.987; p = 0.0451). Conclusions: A taller-than-wide orientation, the presence of calcification, and the presence of Hashimoto’s thyroiditis were found to affect the sample adequacy of ultrasound-guided FNA with liquid-based cytology. The sample adequacy could be improved when FNA is performed with four needle passes by experienced doctors.

Evaluation of Thyroid Fine-Needle Aspiration Biopsies according to Cytological Methods and Comparison with Histopathological Diagnosis

Objectives:

In this study, we aim to compare the results of aspiration of thyroid nodules evaluated according to the Bethesda category (BC) with tissue diagnoses in the operation materials and to compare the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy rates according to cytology methods.

Methods:

The previous fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) of thyroid nodules of 879 cases diagnosed histopathologically between 2010 and 2017 was examined. The FNAB results determined according to the Bethesda system were matched with tissue diagnoses, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy rates were investigated according to cytology methods.

Results:

Sensitivity, specificity, Positive predictive value (PPV), Negative predictive value (NPV) and accuracy rates were found in all FNAB results (in units of %; Sensitivity; 84.7, Specificity; 81.1, PPV; 74.1, NPV; 89.2, Accuracy; 82.5). All of the cytological evaluation methods of thyroid FNABs were found to be reliable and effective (Generally, the results are 80% and above). Specificity and accuracy rates were close to the general average (82.5%) in all methods. However, in cases evaluated with liquid base cytology (LBC) method and in addition to LBC or conventional smear (CS), the sensitivity rates in cases where cell block (CB) were evaluated together were higher than cases in which LBC and CS were used alone (92.6% and 91.0%). When examined statistically, there was no significant difference concerning sensitivity, specificity and accuracy rates of cytological methods (p>0.05, respectively, p=0.576, 0.065, 0.643).

Conclusion:

In cytopathology, when evaluating thyroid aspirations, it is seen that the LBC method is used instead of CS. In our study, we recommend the use of the LBC method, which seems to have the highest sensitivity (taking into account its technical advantages), instead of CS. However, we think that both CS and LBC methods should be evaluated by supporting them with cell block sections.

Usage and Diagnostic Yield of Fine-Needle Aspiration Cytology and Core Needle Biopsy in Thyroid Nodules: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Literature Published by Korean Authors

Objectives

The usefulness of core needle biopsy (CNB) for the diagnosis of thyroid nodules remains controversial, and preferences vary across hospitals. The purpose of this study was to assess the actual use of CNB in Korea and to analyze the advantages and disadvantages of CNB through a systematic review and meta-analysis of papers published by Korean authors.

Methods

A meta-analysis of full-text publications published in English presenting data from Korea retrieved from the Embase literature database was performed.

Results

CNB led to a significantly lower proportion of non-diagnostic results than fine-needle aspiration (FNA). However, the frequency of atypia of undetermined significance/follicular lesion of undetermined significance (AUS/FLUS) did not decrease as a result of performing CNB in nodules with initial AUS/FLUS results, while it increased in consecutive cases. A subcategory analysis of AUS/FLUS showed that the increased frequency of AUS/FLUS findings on CNB was due to more frequent diagnoses of architectural atypia and follicular neoplasm, which resulted in a higher frequency of inconclusive findings in consecutive cases compared to FNA. Hospitals favoring CNB had a higher proportion of AUS/FLUS diagnoses. Although the complication rate did not differ significantly between CNB and FNA, serious complications of CNB did occur.

Conclusion

A reduced frequency of non-diagnostic results may be a definite advantage of CNB over FNA. However, the increased frequency of diagnoses of architectural atypia and follicular neoplasm should be considered when selecting CNB as a diagnostic tool.

Determining whether surgeons perform thyroid fine-needle aspiration as well as radiologists: an analysis of the adequacy and efficiency of ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration performed by newly trained head and neck surgeons and radiologists

Background

Ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (FNA) cytology is a crucial diagnostic technique used to assess thyroid nodules. In the past, ultrasound-guided FNA was performed mainly by radiologists. However, many surgeons are increasingly being trained for this procedure now. In this study, we aimed to compare the adequacy and efficiency of ultrasound-guided FNA performed by newly trained head and neck surgeons with experienced radiologists in a single institution. We also assessed the malignancy rates in nondiagnostic nodules and the differences between benign and malignant nodules.

Methods

This is a retrospective study. The data from patients who underwent ultrasound-guided FNA performed by surgeons or radiologists in two consecutive years were collected. Medical records, cytology results, and surgical pathology results were analyzed.

Results

During the study period, a total of 2,405 ultrasound-guided FNAs were performed on 2,163 patients. The head and neck surgeons and radiologists performed 1,132 and 1,273 ultrasound-guided FNA procedures, respectively. The nondiagnostic rate was 14.49% for surgeons and 15.40% for radiologists (P=0.533). There were no differences in patient age, gender, nodule size, and other sonographic characteristics between the groups of patients who were treated by radiologists versus surgeons. The median waiting time from biopsy appointment to performing ultrasound-guided FNA was 0 days for head and neck surgeons, and 6 days for radiologists (P<0.001). Of the 40 patients who had a repeat FNA or surgery, 19 (47.50%) had a malignancy. Preoperative information about age, gender, operator, and characteristics of nodules did not predict the outcome of nodules with Bethesda category I.

Conclusions

The adequacy of ultrasound-guided FNAs performed by head and neck surgeons is similar to that of skilled radiologists, while surgeons are more efficient than radiologists. Nondiagnostic FNA reports should not be considered benign, and repeat FNA or selective surgical treatment is recommended.

Trends in Thyroid Fine-Needle Aspiration Cytology Practices: Results From a College of American Pathologists 2016 Practice Survey

CONTEXT.—

The College of American Pathologists periodically surveys laboratories to determine changes in cytopathology practices. We report the results of a 2016 survey concerning thyroid fine-needle aspiration (FNA).

OBJECTIVE.—

To provide a cross-sectional survey of thyroid cytology practices in 2016.

DESIGN.—

In 2016, a survey was sent to 2013 laboratories participating in the College of American Pathologists Non-Gynecologic Cytology Education Program (NGC-A) requesting data from 2015-2016 on several topics relating to thyroid FNA.

RESULTS.—

A total of 878 laboratories (43.6% of 2013) replied to the survey. Radiologists performed the most thyroid FNA procedures in most laboratories (70%; 529 of 756), followed by endocrinologists (18.7%; 141 of 756), and most of these were performed under ultrasound guidance (92.1%; 699 of 759). A total of 32.6% of respondents (251 of 769) provided feedback on unsatisfactory rates for nonpathology providers who performed FNA. Intraprocedural adequacy assessment was primarily performed by attending pathologists (77.4%; 490 of 633) or cytotechnologists (28.4%; 180 of 633). Most laboratories used the Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology (89.8%; 701 of 781) and performed molecular testing based on clinician request (68.1%; 184 of 270) rather than FNA diagnosis. Correlation of thyroid excisions with prior cytology results most often occurred retrospectively (38.4%; 283 of 737) and was used for pathologist interpretive quality assurance purposes.

CONCLUSIONS.—

These survey results offer a snapshot of national thyroid FNA cytology practices in 2016 and indicate that standardized cytology terminology is commonly used; pathologists perform most immediate adequacy assessments for thyroid FNA; laboratories use correlation statistics to evaluate pathologists' performance; and molecular tests are increasingly requested for indeterminate interpretations, but reflex molecular testing is rare.

Diagnostic efficacy of smear plus liquid-based cytology for EUS-FNA of solid pancreatic lesions: A propensity-matched study

Liquid-based cytology (LBC) is a thin-layer slide preparation procedure that was developed to overcome the cell crowding and contamination associated with smear cytology (SC). The present study compared diagnostic efficacy between SC alone and SC combined with LBC (SLBC) using endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) samples of pancreatic lesions.We retrospectively analyzed data derived from 311 consecutive patients. Specimens obtained via EUS-FNA from 179 patients between December 2011 and May 2016 were analyzed by SC, and those obtained from 132 patients between June 2016 and October 2017 were analyzed by SLBC. The 2 groups were compared in terms of adequate sample rate, diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity using propensity score matching.SC and SLBC were compared using propensity score-matching in 204 patients (n = 102 per group). The adequate sample rate did not differ significantly between SLBC (100%) and SC (99.0%, P = 1). Diagnostic sensitivity, negative predictive value and accuracy were better for SLBC than for SC in terms of cytological (93.2% vs 67.4%, 68.4% vs 23.1%, and 94.1% vs 69.6%, P < .01 each, respectively) and cytohistological (95.5% vs 81.5%, 76.5% vs 34.6%, and 96.1% vs 82.4%, P < .01, P = .02, and P < .01, respectively) analyses.SLBC improves the diagnostic efficacy of EUS-FNA for pancreatic lesions compared to LBC.

Clinical Parameter for Deciding the BRAFV600E Mutation Test in Atypia of Undetermined Significance/Follicular Lesion of Undetermined Significance Thyroid Nodules: US Features According to TIRADS

This study aimed to investigate the usefulness of a thyroid imaging reporting and data system (TIRADS) to select thyroid nodules with atypia of undetermined significance/follicular lesion of undetermined significance (AUS/FLUS) cytology for additional BRAF mutation testing. Three hundred three thyroid nodules were included. Statistical analysis was performed at both patient and nodule levels according to BRAF mutation positivity and clinical factors. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to assess independent associations between BRAF mutation positivity and clinical factors. Of 303 AUS/FLUS nodules, 16 (5.3%) of 303 nodules had the BRAF mutation. The frequency of the BRAF mutation according to the TIRADS was 35.7% for category 5, 10.8% for category 4c, 2.5% for category 4b, 1.1% for category 4a, and 0% for category 3 nodules (P < 0.001). On multivariate analysis, BRAF mutation positivity was significantly associated with high suspicion on the TIRADS (odds ratio, 15.247; P < 0.001). In conclusion, the ultrasonography patterns of the TIRADS can be used as a clinical parameter for deciding the BRAF mutation test in thyroid nodules with AUS/FLUS cytology.

Validation of the 2015 American Thyroid Association Management Guidelines for Thyroid Nodules With Benign Cytologic Findings in the Era of the Bethesda System

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study is to investigate follow-up strategies for cytologically benign thyroid nodules according to size and ultrasound (US) pattern according to the 2015 American Thyroid Association (ATA) guidelines in the era of the Bethesda system.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study included 1208 patients with 1230 nodules that were cytologically benign at initial fine-needle aspiration performed from June 2012 to December 2014. False-negative rates (FNRs) were calculated by considering nodule size and US pattern according to the 2015 ATA guidelines and were compared between nodules with the high-suspicion US pattern and nodules with the high- or intermediate-suspicion US patterns according to size.

RESULTS

Twenty-five of the 1230 nodules (2.0%) were malignant. The FNRs were 5.1% (8/158) for nodules with the high-suspicion US pattern and 1.6% (17/1072) for nodules with other US patterns. With regard to nodule size, the FNRs were 3.2% (9/277) for nodules 3 cm or larger and 5.2% (6/115) for nodules 4 cm or larger. The FNRs of nodules with the high-suspicion pattern were not significantly higher than those of nodules with the high- or intermediate-suspicion patterns among nodules 2 cm or larger (2.5% vs 1.9%; p = 0.208), 3 cm or larger (3.4% vs 2.9%; p = 0.498), and 4 cm or larger (5.4% vs 3.8%; p = 0.353).

CONCLUSION

Thyroid nodules with initial benign cytologic findings had a low malignancy rate in the era of the Bethesda system, regardless of US pattern and size. Therefore, any immediate diagnostic intervention may be discouraged in cytologically benign nodules.

Liquid-based cytopathology test as a novel method to identify Aspergillus in patients with pulmonary aspergillosis

Conventional cytopathology examination of respiratory samples can aid in identifying Aspergillus but with poor sensitivity, so this study aimed to assess the potential of the liquid-based cytopathology test (LCT) for improving the identification of Aspergillus in respiratory samples following Papanicolaou's or Special staining with Grocott's methenamine silver or periodic acid-Schiff staining. Paired bronchial brushing samples (n = 54) and sputum samples (n = 117) from 171 patients with pulmonary aspergillosis were prepared as slides using either conventional cytopathology or SurePath LCT. LCT slides were generally superior to conventional slides, showing smaller cell monolayer surface area, clearer background and more distinct stereoscopic cytological features. For Papanicolaou's staining, LCT-prepared slides allowed a higher positive rate of Aspergillus identification than conventional slides for bronchial brushing samples (59.25% vs. 20.37%, P < 0.05) and sputum samples (29.05% vs. 8.55%, P < 0.05). Similarly, Special staining of LCT-prepared slides showed a higher positive rate of Aspergillus identification for bronchial brushing samples (83.33% vs. 57.41%, P < 0.05) and sputum samples (43.59% vs. 19.66%, P < 0.05). This preliminary study suggests that LCT may be better than conventional slide preparation for identifying Aspergillus in respiratory samples from patients with pulmonary aspergillosis.