Mixed Neuroendocrine-Nonneuroendocrine Neoplasms (MiNENs): Unifying the Concept of a Heterogeneous Group of Neoplasms

Sinonasal Teratocarcinosarcoma: A Case Report in a 13-Year-Old Male

Teratocarcinosarcoma is rare malignant sinonasal neoplasm with immature and malignant endodermal, mesodermal, and neuroepithelial elements resembling immature teratoma, commonly with SMARCA4 loss or activating CTNNB1 mutation. The carcinoma component may be either squamous or adenocarcinoma and the mesenchymal component may be composed of spindle cells, cartilage, bone, smooth muscle, or skeletal muscle. Due to the uncommon nature of this malignancy, there are frequently diagnostic difficulties that result in management problems. Herein we report a teratocarcinosarcoma arising in the nasal cavity of a 13-year-old boy with CTNNB1 activating mutation and copy number variations by next-generation sequencing along with an abnormal karyotype. This tumor must be included in the differential of neoplasms with immature elements, more likely seen in pediatric patients.

Long-term survival with complete remission after irinotecan plus cisplatin therapy for metachronous liver metastasis from a gastric mixed neuroendocrine-non-neuroendocrine neoplasm: a case report

Gastric mixed neuroendocrine-non-neuroendocrine neoplasm, which consists of both exocrine and endocrine components, is rare and exhibits aggressive biological behavior and poor prognosis. A 64-year-old man underwent investigation for abdominal pain. An endoscopic examination revealed a 30-mm protruded lesion in the gastric antrum for which distal gastrectomy with lymph node dissection was performed. Histopathological examination showed two distinct components, an adenocarcinoma component and neuroendocrine carcinoma component, with immunohistochemical staining positive for CD56, chromogranin A, and synaptophysin. The final diagnosis was mixed neuroendocrine-non-neuroendocrine neoplasm, pT2, pN3, M0, stage IIIA. Multiple liver metastases were detected 3 months after surgery. The patient received irinotecan plus cisplatin therapy, which was effective, and the liver metastases disappeared. The patient remains alive, without any recurrence, more than 10 years after surgery. We present a rare case of gastric mixed neuroendocrine-non-neuroendocrine neoplasm and review the literature to contribute to improving our understanding of this kind of tumor.

Oligometastatic Mixed Neuroendocrine Adenocarcinoma of the Esophago-Gastric Junction: A Case of Successful Multidisciplinary Management, the Lessons Learnt and Review of the Literature

Background: Mixed neuroendocrine-non-neuroendocrine neoplasms (MiNENs) of the esophago-gastric junction (EGJ) are rare aggressive malignant neoplasms, with, currently, limited evidence regarding the appropriate therapeutic approach. Methods: Herein, we report multimodal treatment management of a patient with oligometastatic MiNEN of EGJ (Siewert III), discuss the lessons learnt, and provide a review of the literature. Results: A 69-year-old female was diagnosed with a locally advanced EGJ tumor and three liver metastases (cT4, cN+, M1). Although the initial histology from biopsy revealed adenocarcinoma, the histopathology of a lymph node biopsy from staging laparoscopy revealed infiltration of neuroendocrine carcinoma cells. Thus, the diagnosis of a mixed neuroendocrine adenocarcinoma was set, and systemic chemotherapy with etoposide and cisplatin was initiated. A major clinical response led to conversion surgical resection of the primary tumor and metastases, followed by adjuvant therapy with immunotherapy. The patient is free of disease at the 3-year follow-up. A review of the literature on similar cases of EGJ or gastric MiNENs revealed a limited number of cases. Out of the 39 patients, 20 of them (51.3%) suffered from advanced-stage disease. The MiNEN diagnosis typically occurred after surgical resection. Systemic chemotherapy against the neuroendocrine component demonstrated significant response rates, while in cases in which conversion surgery was offered, prolongation of survival was demonstrated. Conclusions: Our case and the existing literature on MiNENs of EGJ underline the need for a personalized treatment approach following thorough interpretation of comprehensive pretherapeutic staging. Conversion radical surgery with curative intent could be considered in cases of major or complete clinical response to induction chemotherapy with potentially favorable outcomes.

The Expression of Neuroendocrine Markers in a Small Subset of Ameloblastoma with Implications of Clusterin

Immunohistochemically, ameloblastomas often express CD56; however, novel neuroendocrine markers such as synaptophysin (SYP), insulinoma-associated protein 1 (INSM1), and chromogranin A (CgA) remain unexplored. We analyzed 36 ameloblastoma specimens for CD56, SYP, CgA, and clusterin (CLU) and examined limited samples for INSM1 expression by performing immunohistochemistry, transmission electron microscopy, and reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction. Our findings indicate that the limited cells were positive for CD56, SYP, CgA, INSM1, and CLU expression in 72% (26/36), 14% (5/36), 0% (0/40), 80% (4/5), and 22% (8/36) of the cases, respectively. CD56 expression correlated with older age, but not with subtype, SYP, and CLU expression. However, SYP-positive cases were exclusively found in CD56- and CLU-positive cases, and SYP and CLU expression were significantly correlated. Selected cases had dense-core granules and NCAM1 and SYP mRNA expression. This study is the first to suggest neuroendocrine differentiation in ameloblastomas, as indicated by SYP and INSM1 immunoexpression and the presence of dense-core granules, which are consistent with the recent World Health Organization classification of Head and Neck Tumors guidelines. SYP-positive and CgA-negative phenotypes may characterize neuroendocrine differentiation in ameloblastoma. Although the underlying molecular mechanism remains unclear, CLU expression may be associated with neuroendocrine differentiation.

The tumour histopathology "glossary" for AI developers

The applications of artificial intelligence (AI) and deep learning (DL) are leading to significant advances in cancer research, particularly in analysing histopathology images for prognostic and treatment-predictive insights. However, effective translation of these computational methods requires computational researchers to have at least a basic understanding of histopathology. In this work, we aim to bridge that gap by introducing essential histopathology concepts to support AI developers in their research. We cover the defining features of key cell types, including epithelial, stromal, and immune cells. The concepts of malignancy, precursor lesions, and the tumour microenvironment (TME) are discussed and illustrated. To enhance understanding, we also introduce foundational histopathology techniques, such as conventional staining with hematoxylin and eosin (HE), antibody staining by immunohistochemistry, and including the new multiplexed antibody staining methods. By providing this essential knowledge to the computational community, we aim to accelerate the development of AI algorithms for cancer research.

The road ahead: a brief guide to navigating the 2022 WHO classification of endocrine and neuroendocrine tumours

The most recent WHO classification of endocrine and neuroendocrine tumours has brought about significant changes in the diagnosis and grading of these lesions. For instance, pathologists now have the ability to stratify subsets of thyroid and adrenal neoplasms using various histological features and composite risk assessment models. Moreover, novel recommendations on how to approach endocrine neoplasia involve additional immunohistochemical analyses, and the recognition and implementation of these key markers is essential for modernising diagnostic capabilities. Additionally, an improved understanding of tumour origin has led to the renaming of several entities, resulting in the emergence of terminology not yet universally recognised. The adjustments in nomenclature and prognostication may pose a challenge for the clinical team, and care providers might be eager to engage in a dialogue with the diagnosing pathologist, as treatment guidelines have not fully caught up with these recent changes. Therefore, it is crucial for a surgical pathologist to be aware of the knowledge behind the implementation of changes in the WHO classification scheme. This review article will delve into the most significant diagnostic and prognostic changes related to lesions in the parathyroid, thyroid, adrenal glands and the gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine system. Additionally, the author will briefly share his personal reflections on the clinical implementation, drawing from a couple of years of experience with these new algorithms.

Mixed neuroendocrine non-neuroendocrine tumors: The quest for evidence

Mixed neuroendocrine non-neuroendocrine neoplasms (MiNENs) are rare mixed tumors containing both neuroendocrine and non-neuroendocrine components that occupy at least 30% of the whole tumor. Biologically, both components appear to derive from an identical cellular precursor undergoing early dual differentiation or late transdifferentiation. While our understanding of MiNENs has improved in recent years, many areas of uncertainty remain. In this context, setting diagnostic criteria capable of capturing the continuum of disease biology while providing clinically meaningful information in terms of prognosis and response to treatments appears vital to advance the field and improve patients' outcomes. Evidence is needed to generate robust classification schemes, and multi-institutional cooperation will likely play a crucial role in building adequately powered cohorts to address some of the most pressing questions discussed in this Editorial. What is the minimum representation for each component needed to define MiNENs? How can the epidemiology of MiNENs change according to different diagnostic definitions? How can we generate the clinical evidence needed to optimize the management of MiNENs?

Mixed neuroendocrine-nonneuroendocrine epithelial neoplasm of muscle invasive bladder cancer: a clinicopathologic case study

Mixed neuroendocrine-nonneuroendocrine epithelial neoplasms are rare malignant neoplasms that may occur in the bladder with highly aggressive behavior. Because of its worse prognosis, when compared to the pure urothelial carcinoma without the neuroendocrine component, the bladder mixed neuroendocrine-nonneuroendocrine epithelial neoplasm may be considered a distinct clinicopathologic entity. We present a case of mixed neuroendocrine-nonneuroendocrine epithelial neoplasm occurring in the urinary bladder of an elderly female with a personal history of chronic kidney disease, drug-resistant urinary tract infections, and neurogenic bladder. Her presenting symptoms included complaints of abdominal pain, urinary urgency, oliguria, dysuria, and occasional hematuria. Recognition of the clinicopathologic features of these rare aggressive neoplasms is important for accurate early diagnosis, necessitating appropriate therapeutic management.

Gastric cancer-Epidemiology, modifiable and non-modifiable risk factors, challenges and opportunities: An updated review

Gastric cancer represents a significant global health challenge due to its high mortality and incidence rates, particularly in Eastern Asia, Eastern Europe, and South America. This comprehensive review synthesizes the latest epidemiological data and explores both modifiable and non-modifiable risk factors associated with gastric cancer, aiming to delineate the multifactorial etiology of this disease. Modifiable risk factors include Helicobacter pylori infection, obesity, dietary habits, smoking and alcohol consumption, whereas nonmodifiable factors comprise genetic predispositions, age, family history and male gender. The interplay of these factors significantly impacts the risk and progression of gastric cancer, suggesting potential preventive strategies. The challenges in treating gastric cancer are considerable, largely because of the late-stage diagnosis and the heterogeneity of the disease, which complicate effective treatment regimens. Current treatment strategies involve a combination of surgery, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and targeted therapies. The FLOT regimen (5-FU, Leucovorin, Oxaliplatin and Docetaxel) is now a standard for resectable cases in Europe and the US, showing superior survival and response rates over ECF and ECX regimens. For HER2-positive gastric cancer, trastuzumab combined with chemotherapy improves overall survival, as demonstrated by the ToGA trial. Additionally, immune checkpoint inhibitors like pembrolizumab and nivolumab offer promising results. However, the five-year survival rate remains low, underscoring the urgency for improved therapeutic approaches. Recent advancements in molecular biology and cancer genomics have begun to pave the way for personalized medicine in gastric cancer care, focusing on molecular targeted therapies and immunotherapy. This review also highlights the critical need for better screening methods that could facilitate early detection and treatment, potentially improving the prognosis. By integrating epidemiological insights with new therapeutic strategies, this article aims to thoroughly understand of gastric cancer's dynamics and outline a framework for future research and clinical management, advocating for a multidisciplinary approach to tackle this formidable disease.

Amphicrine carcinoma of the right colon, a report of a case and review of literature

Mixed neuroendocrine and non-neuroendocrine neoplasms, recently recognized in the WHO classification as (MiNEN), are rare tumors of the gastrointestinal tract. These tumors are composed of two distinct cellular components; a well- or poorly differentiated neuroendocrine tumor and a non-neuroendocrine tumor, usually in the form of an adenocarcinoma, either admixed with or adjacent to one another. A rarer phenotype is a tumor in which the endocrine and epithelial cell features occur within the same cell; i.e. amphicrine carcinoma. Herein, we report the case of an 80-year-old female patient who presented with melena, and who, on biopsy was diagnosed as amphicrine carcinoma that was mismatch repair deficient (MMRd) with loss of MLH1/PMS2 nuclear expression by immunohistochemistry. The histological and immunohistochemical findings of this rare entity are presented with review of pertinent literature.

An Italian real-world multicenter study of patients with advanced mixed neuroendocrine non-neuroendocrine neoplasms (MiNENs) of the gastro-entero-pancreatic system treated with chemotherapy

PURPOSE

The aim of this study is to describe the clinical management of an Italian series of patients with advanced gastro-entero-pancreatic (GEP) MiNENs treated in clinical practice.

METHODS

Clinical records of patients from four Italian referral Centers were retrospectively analyzed to correlate clinical/biological data with clinical outcomes. All the surgical specimens were centrally reviewed.

RESULTS

Clinical data and surgical samples of 51 patients during 1995-2015 were analyzed. Sites of origin were: 32 colorectal, 14 gastro-esophageal, and 5 pancreatobiliary. Twenty-one out of fifty-one (42.2%) developed metachronous distant metastases. Only 5/51 (9.8%) patients received peri-operative therapy, and 23/51 (45.1%) first-line chemotherapy, mostly fluoropyrimidines/oxaliplatin. The NEN component was poorly differentiated in the whole population. Patients with Ki67 index < 55% in the NEC component had a significantly longer median overall survival (OS) (35.3 months; 95% CI 27.1-41.0) than those with Ki67 ≥ 55% (11.9 months; 95% CI 9.1-14.0) P = 0.0005. The median OS was 14 months (95% CI 10.1-19.1) in the whole cohort, with 11.4 months (95% CI 6.2-20.2) in patients who received a first-line therapy.

CONCLUSION

This study confirms that GEP-MiNENs represent a complex disease and that over the past years the clinical management has been predominantly guided by the subjective judgment of the clinicians. Although, in this series, the NEC component appeared mostly responsible for the systemic spread and prognosis on the whole neoplasm, the lack of strong prognostic and predictive factors universally recognized seems to condition their management so far. Future prospective clinical and biomolecular studies could help clinicians to improve clinical management of GEP-MiNENs.

Well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors of the appendix: Diagnosis, differentials, and disease progression

Well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors are the most common neoplasm of the appendix. They are graded and staged using World Health Organization and American Joint Committee on Cancer criteria, respectively. They may be invisible grossly or form rounded yellow nodules, sometimes in the appendiceal tip. They show classic neuroendocrine tumor features microscopically, forming nests and cords of monotonous cells with salt-and-pepper chromatin and amphophilic cytoplasm. They are positive for neuroendocrine markers by immunohistochemistry, but their molecular characteristics are not well defined. pT-category staging relies primarily on tumor size, though higher-stage cases may involve the subserosa or mesoappendix. Few entities enter the differential diagnosis, but lesions such as goblet cell adenocarcinoma, poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma, and mixed neuroendocrine-non-neuroendocrine neoplasm may be considered. Appendiceal neuroendocrine tumors may metastasize to regional lymph nodes, but farther spread is rare. The most consistently proven risk factor for such spread is tumor size, though different studies have proposed different cutoffs. Other potential risk factors include lymphovascular invasion and margin positivity. Tumors smaller than 1 cm can be treated by appendectomy, while hemicolectomy is recommended for tumors larger than 2 cm. Proper treatment for cases measuring 1-2 cm remains a matter of debate.

An Overview of Altered Pathways Associated with Sensitivity to Platinum-Based Chemotherapy in Neuroendocrine Tumors: Strengths and Prospects

Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) are a diverse group of malignancies with a shared phenotype but varying prognosis and response to current treatments. Based on their morphological features and rate of proliferation, NENs can be classified into two main groups with a distinct clinical behavior and response to treatment: (i) well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) or carcinoids (with a low proliferation rate), and (ii) poorly differentiated small- or large-cell neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs) (with a high proliferation rate). For certain NENs (such as pancreatic tumors, higher-grade tumors, and those with DNA damage repair defects), chemotherapy is the main therapeutic approach. Among the different chemotherapic agents, cisplatin and carboplatin, in combination with etoposide, have shown the greatest efficacy in treating NECs compared to NETs. The cytotoxic effects of cisplatin and carboplatin are primarily due to their binding to DNA, which interferes with normal DNA transcription and/or replication. Consistent with this, NECs, which often have mutations in pathways involved in DNA repair (such as Rb, MDM2, BRCA, and PTEN), have a high response to platinum-based chemotherapy. Identifying mutations that affect molecular pathways involved in the initiation and progression of NENs can be crucial in predicting the response to platinum chemotherapy. This review aims to highlight targetable mutations that could serve as predictors of therapeutic response to platinum-based chemotherapy in NENs.

Appendiceal Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: A Comprehensive Review

ABSTRACT

Appendiceal neuroendocrine neoplasm (NEN) is the most common adult appendiceal malignant tumor, constituting 16% of gastrointestinal NENs. They are versatile tumors with varying morphology, immunohistochemistry, secretory properties, and cancer genomics. They are slow growing and clinically silent, to begin with, or present with features of nonspecific vague abdominal pain. Most acute presentations are attributed clinically to appendicitis, with most cases detected incidentally on pathology after an appendectomy. Approximately 40% of them present clinically with features of hormonal excess, which is likened to the functional secretory nature of their parent cell of origin. The symptoms of carcinoid syndrome render their presence clinically evident. However, slow growing and symptomatically silent in its initial stages, high-grade neuroendocrine tumors and neuroendocrine carcinomas of the appendix are aggressive and usually have hepatic and lymph node metastasis at presentation. This review article focuses on imaging characteristics, World Health Organization histopathological classification and grading, American Joint Committee on Cancer/Union or International Cancer Control, European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society staging, European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society standardized guidelines for reporting, data interpretation, early-stage management protocols, and advanced-stage appendiceal NENs. Guidelines are also set for the follow-up and reassessment. The role of targeted radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and high-dose somatostatin analogs in treating advanced disease are discussed, along with types of ablative therapies and liver transplantation for tumor recurrence. The search for newer location-specific biomarkers in NEN is also summarized. Regarding the varying aggressiveness of the tumor, there is a scope for research in the field, with plenty of data yet to be discovered.

Oropharyngeal Mixed Neuroendocrine-Nonneuroendocrine Neoplasm (MiNEN): A Case Report and Literature Review

Mixed neuroendocrine-nonneuroendocrine (MiNEN) neoplasms in the head and neck are exceptionally rare biphasic tumors with unclear pathogenesis and an aggressive clinical behavior. This is the first reported case of an oropharyngeal MiNEN with the nonneuroendocrine component being an HPV-associated adenocarcinoma. The tumor arose in a 56 year-old male with history of long-term cigarette smoking and was composed of an adenocarcinoma intermixed with a small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma. P16 immunohistochemical stain and HPV16/18 in-situ hybridization were strongly and diffusely expressed in both components.

Mixed neuroendocrine and adenocarcinoma of gastrointestinal tract: A complex diagnosis and therapeutic challenge

In this editorial we comment on the manuscript describing a case of adenocarcinoma mixed with a neuroendocrine carcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction. Mixed neuroendocrine and non-neuroendocrine neoplasms of the gastrointestinal system are rare heterogeneous group of tumors characterized by a high malignant potential, rapid growth, and poor prognosis. Due to the rarity of these cancers, the standard therapy is poorly defined. The diagnosis of these tumors is based on combination of morphological features, immunohistochemical and neuroendocrine and epithelial cell markers. Both endocrine and epithelial cell components can act independently of each other and thus, careful grading of each component separately is required. These cancers are aggressive in nature and the potential of each component has paramount importance in the choice of treatment and response. Regardless of the organ of origin, these tumors portend poor prognosis with increased proportion of neuroendocrine component. Multidisciplinary services and strategies are required for the management of these mixed malignancies to provide the best oncological outcomes. The etiopathogenesis of these mixed tumors remains obscure but poses interesting question. We briefly discuss a few salient points in this editorial.

Ureter mixed neuroendocrine-non-neuroendocrine neoplasm: a case report and literature review

Cases of mixed neuroendocrine-non-neuroendocrine neoplasms (MiNENs) of the urinary system are rare, and reports of primary MiNENs in the ureter are lacking. Herein, we present the case of a 71-year-old man who presented with painless gross hematuria and weight loss. Contrast-enhanced abdominal computed tomography (CT) revealed a tumor, comprising small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (SCNEC) and adenocarcinomatous components, attached to the ureter. The SCNEC components were strongly positive for synaptophysin, CD56 and INSM1 and adenocarcinomatous components were strongly positive for CDX2 and cytokeratin 20, respectively. Four weeks post-surgery, the patient received four cycles of cisplatin-based chemotherapy; the 7-month follow-up CT confirmed that he was healthy without disease recurrence. The occurrence of MiNEN in the ureter with SCNEC and adenocarcinomatous components is extremely rare, wherein histopathological and immunohistochemical features aid in the diagnosis MiNEN. With its aggressive nature, MiNEN can only be effectively treated by early diagnosis and radical surgery.

Mixed neuroendocrine non-neuroendocrine neoplasms in gastroenteropancreatic tract

Mixed neuroendocrine non-neuroendocrine neoplasms (MiNENs) are a heterogeneous group of malignant neoplasms that can settle in the gastroenteropancreatic tract. They are composed of a neuroendocrine (NE) and a non-NE component in at least 30% of each tumour. The non-NE component can include different histological combinations of glandular, squamous, mucinous and sarcomatoid phenotypes, and one or both of the components can be low-or high grade malignant. Recent changes in the nomenclature of these neoplasms might lead to great deal of confusion, and the lack of specific clinical trials is the main reason why their management is difficult. The review aims to clarify the definition of MiNEN and analyze available evidence about their diagnosis and treatment options according to their location and extension through careful analysis of the available data. It would be important to reach a general consensus on their diagnosis in order to construct a classification that remains stable over time and facilitates the design of clinical trials that, due to their low incidence, will require long recruitment periods.

Gastric mixed neuroendocrine non-neuroendocrine neoplasms

The uncommon tumour known as gastric mixed neuroendocrine-non-neuroendocrine neoplasms (G-MiNENs) is made up of parts of neuroendocrine carcinoma and adenocarcinoma. The biological and clinical features are different from those of gastric adenocarcinoma. Their pathophysiology, diagnostic standards, and clinical behaviour have all been the subject of lengthy debates, and their nomenclature has undergone multiple changes. Its emergence has created new challenges in the classification and diagnosis of gastric tumours. This review will update information on the topic, covering molecular aspects, diagnostic criteria, treatment, and prognostic factor discovery. It will also provide a historical context that will aid in understanding the evolution of the idea and nomenclature of mixed gastric tumours. Additionally, it will provide the reader a thorough understanding of this difficult topic of cancer that is applicable to real-world situations.

Retroperitoneal mixed neuroendocrine non-neuroendocrine neoplasm: A case report and review of literature

The existence of both neuroendocrine and non-neuroendocrine histology in variable proportion in a lesion has been described by the World Health Organisation (WHO) as mixed neuroendocrine and non-neuroendocrine neoplasm (MiNEN). The pathogenesis of this tumour remains controversial but molecular studies point towards a common monoclonal origin. Tumours are classified as functioning and nonfunctioning based on substances secreted. The nonfunctioning tumours may be discovered due to its local effect. Presented is a 66-year-old male with an intra-abdominal mass, underwent laparotomy and excision biopsy with transient right lower limb lymphoedema. Histology confirmed retroperitoneal MiNEN with no evidence of tumour recurrence 12 months following surgery. MiNENs should be considered as a differential diagnosis in patients with intra-abdominal mass. Surgical resection is recommended as this may offer the best treatment option.

A Review of the Evolving Role of Radiotherapy in the Treatment of Neuroendocrine Neoplasms

BACKGROUND

Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) are rare tumours that develop from neuroendocrine cells in various parts of the body. The management of this disease poses a significant challenge because of the heterogeneous clinical presentation and varying degrees of aggressiveness. A multidisciplinary approach is often required in complex clinical situations. Radiotherapy (RT) plays a key role in managing NETs in both curative and palliative settings.

SUMMARY

In this review, we summarize and discuss recent developments in the field of advanced RT in early-stage, locally advanced, and metastatic NENs. We highlight limitations in current approaches and discuss future potential treatment strategies for patients with NENs.

Colorectal neuroendocrine carcinoma and mixed neuroendocrine-non-neuroendocrine neoplasm: Prognostic factors and PD-L1 expression

Colorectal neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC) and mixed neuroendocrine-non-neuroendocrine neoplasm (MiNEN) are rare malignancies with unclear boundaries and poor prognoses. Our study aimed to conduct a comparative analysis of these diseases, identify prognostic factors, and explore potential therapeutic targets. We collected and analyzed clinicopathological data of NEC and MiNEN in our hospital from 2011 to 2020. Immunohistochemical staining for PD-L1, BRAF V600E, and mismatch repair proteins was performed. We identified 14 NEC and 7 MiNEN cases. Demographic data, including median overall survival (17.1 months for NEC and 18.5 months for MiNEN), did not significantly differ. NEC showed a higher tendency to occur in the rectum and sigmoid colon (p = 0.025) and had fewer cases with metastatic adenocarcinoma components in lymph nodes (p = 0.009) compared to MiNEN. Adverse prognostic factors were age ≥70 years (p = 0.012), N2 nodal status (p = 0.032), and stage IV disease (p = 0.013) based on multivariate Cox regression analysis. We identified five PD-L1 positive cases, two BRAF V600E mutated cases, and one Lynch syndrome case with MSH2 and MSH6 loss. Patients with colorectal NEC or MiNEN exhibited poor survival rates. Adverse prognostic factors included older age, N2 nodal status, and distant metastasis. Potential therapeutic avenues such as immune checkpoint and BRAF inhibitors were suggested for patients with these carcinomas.

Primary Oral Mixed Neuroendocrine-Non-neuroendocrine Neoplasm (MiNEN): A Rare Case Report and Review of the Literature

Mixed neuroendocrine-non-neuroendocrine neoplasms (MiNENs) are rare tumors recently characterized by the presence of both neuroendocrine and non-neuroendocrine components within the same tumor tissue. Although MiNEN found their place in the WHO classification for various organs, this composite tumor in the head and neck region remains exceptionally rare. We present a case of primary oral MiNEN in a 64-year-old male located on the left side of lower gingiva. Biopsy raised suspicion of neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC) and the patient underwent partial mandibulectomy. The resected specimen showed two distinct components of NEC and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) with the confirmation of immunohistochemical markers. There has been no sign of recurrence nor metastasis 6 years after the surgery. In addition, we have conducted a review of published cases with potential relevance to this entity, resulting in five cases. The diverse terminology reinforces the need for a standardized classification system of oral/head and neck MiNENs.

Gene expression profiling of pancreatic neuroendocrine carcinoma and mixed neuroendocrine-non-neuroendocrine neoplasm

Pancreatic neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC) and mixed neuroendocrine-non-neuroendocrine neoplasm (MiNEN) are rare pancreatic malignant tumors, and comprehensive gene analyses are scarce. In this study, six NECs and six MiNENs were collected, immunohistochemistry for synaptophysin, chromogranin A, INSM1, Ki-67, and Rb was conducted, and KRAS mutational status was examined. Among these cases, comprehensive gene expression analysis of oncogene pathways using nCounter® were performed with six NECs and four MiNENs, and those data were compared with that of three pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas (PDACs), with that of three normal pancreatic ducts, and with each other. By dividing NEC and MiNEN cases into KRAS-mutated group and KRAS-wild group, the difference of clinicopathological data and gene expression profiling data were examined between the two groups. Compared to the data of normal pancreatic epithelium, all 13 cancer-related pathways were upregulated in PDAC, MiNEN, and NEC group with more upregulation in this order. Compared to the data of PDAC, genes of DNA Damage repair pathway was most upregulated both in NECs and MiNENs. Regarding the difference between KRAS-mutated and KRAS-wild groups, several genes were differentially expressed between the two, where MMP7 was the upregulated gene with highest p-value and NKD1 was the downregulated gene with highest p-value in KRAS-mutated group. From the extent of upregulation of 13 pathways, MiNEN was considered more progressed stage than PDAC, and NEC was considered more progressed than MiNEN. From the comparison of KRAS-mutated and KRAS-wild NECs and MiNENs, several differentially expressed genes were identified in this study.

Clinical impact of mixed pulmonary carcinoma and carcinoid: the driver from their mono-clonal origin

The combination of neuroendocrine/non neuroendocrine lung tumors (CNNELT) mentioned in the last edition of the World Health Organization (WHO) of Thoracic Tumors refers to small cell carcinoma (SCLC) or large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) mixed with any other non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC). Typical Carcinoid (TC)/Atypical Carcinoid (AC) combined with NSCLC is not included among this category. However, case reports of TC/AC combined with NSCLC have been described. We previously reported 2 cases of lung adenocarcinoma (LUA) mixed with carcinoid sharing mutations in both components supporting the hypothesis of a clonal origin. We extended our analysis to other four cases of mixed NSCLC-carcinoid by performing targeted-DNA and RNA-based NGS analysis in both primary and their paired lymph nodes metastasis. In all cases, LUA and AC components shared at least 1 common mutation (KRAS driver mutation p.Gly12Val in cases 1 and 3, AKAP13-RET fusion in case 2, and missense KRAS driver mutation p.Gly12Ala in case 4, reinforcing the hypothesis of a clonal origin. Moreover, the same mutation was detected in the metastasis constituted only by AC (cases 2 and 4). Although it is a rare malignancy in the lung, mixed LUA and TC/AC could be included among the histotypes for which a deep molecular characterization of both components is needed to identify the presence of potential druggable genetic alterations.

Clinicopathological characteristics of co-existing or mixed colorectal cancer and neuroendocrine tumor: Report of five cases

Coexisting or mixed type of colorectal tumors has been rarely reported. This study was designed to investigate clinicopathological characteristics of co-existing or mixed colorectal adenocarcinoma and highly differentiated neuroendocrine tumor (NET-G1). To do that, clinicopathological characteristics of five cases of co-existing or mixed colorectal adenocarcinoma and NET-G1 admitted to our institution between 2017 and 2021 were retrospectively analyzed and literature review was conducted. Four patients were male and one female, aged 62-75 years old. Among them, four cases were diagnosed with rectal cancer and one case of colon cancer. Gross examination found that one patient was diagnosed with multiple colon polyps including three malignant polyps, and the remaining four cases of ulcerous masses. The tumors infiltrated into the muscle layer in two cases, and three cases with tumors infiltrating into surrounding adipose tissues. Microscopic examination revealed one patient developed poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma and four cases of moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma. Four patients had adenocarcinoma and NET-G1 in colon, and one case of adenocarcinoma in colon and NET-G1 in appendix. To conclude, co-existing or mixed colorectal tumors are extremely rare in clinical settings. Clinicopathological characteristics of five cases of co-existing or mixed adenocarcinoma and NET-G1 are diverse and adenocarcinoma is more aggressive in most affected patients.

The Driver Role of Pathologists in Endocrine Oncology: What Clinicians Seek in Pathology Reports

Endocrine neoplasia represents an increasingly broad spectrum of disorders. Endocrine neoplasms range from incidental findings to potentially lethal malignancies. In this paper, we cover the impact of pathology in the interpretation of the clinic-pathological, genetic, and radiographic features underpinning these neoplasms. We highlight the critical role of multidisciplinary interactions in structuring a rational diagnostic and efficient therapeutic plan and emphasize the role of histopathological input in decision-making. In this context, standardized pathology reporting and second opinion endocrine pathology review represent relevant tools to improve the overall diagnostic workup of patients affected by endocrine tumors in every specific scenario. In fact, although a relevant proportion of cases may be correctly identified based on clinical presentation and biochemical/imaging investigations, a subset of cases presents with atypical findings that may lead to an inappropriate diagnosis and treatment plan based on a wrong pathological diagnosis if all pieces of the puzzle are not correctly considered. Pathologists have a responsibility to actively guide clinicians before and during surgical procedures to prevent unnecessary interventions. In all areas of endocrine pathology, pathologists must understand the complexity of tissue preservation and assay sensitivities and specificities to ensure the optimal quality and interpretation of diagnostic material. Finally, pathologists are central actors in tumor tissue biobanking, which is an expanding field in oncology that should be promoted while adhering to strict ethical and methodological standards.

Small Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of the Parotid Gland: An Uncommon Example of Incompletely Encapsulated Tumor Including S100 Protein-Positive Clear Cells

Small cell carcinoma is rare in salivary glands and has recently been termed small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma. We herein describe an uncommon example arising in the parotid gland. The patient was a 75 yearold Japanese male who had swelling in the right parotid area. He underwent a superficial lobectomy and, after a histological diagnosis was made, a total parotidectomy. Histologically, the tumor had a thick hyalinized capsule that was incomplete, beyond which the tumor invaded into the surrounding parotid parenchyma. The tumor consisted of typical small basophilic cells intermingled with bland clear cells, between which a gradual transition was observed both inside and outside the capsule. Small basophilic cells were immunoreactive for chromograninA as well as synaptophysin, while clear cells were positive for S100 protein. The Ki-67 labeling rate reached 30-40% at the high points of small basophilic cells, but clear cells were minimally labelled. The present case was considered a dedifferentiated carcinoma of the parotid gland, possibly with acinic cell carcinoma as a precursor. This tumor could also be considered a "mixed exocrine-endocrine carcinoma," which may explain the histogenesis of neuroendocrine carcinomas in non-endocrine organs that are not included in the diffuse (dispersed) neuroendocrine system, such as the parotid gland.

Gastric Amphicrine Carcinoma Showing Neuroendocrine and Pancreatic Acinar Cell Differentiation. Lesson from a Challenging Case Opening New Perspectives in the Diagnostic Work-Up of Gastric Neuroendocrine Neoplasms

Amphicrine carcinomas are epithelial neoplasms composed of cells with co-existing exocrine-neuroendocrine phenotype and are challenging lesions from both diagnostic and therapeutic perspectives.Here, we report the case of a 63-year-old male patient with a gastric nodule that was endoscopically biopsied, revealing histological features of a type 3 well-differentiated gastric neuroendocrine tumor (NET). At imaging, the lesion was single and limited to the stomach, but did not present In-111Octreotide uptake, despite SSTR2A immunohistochemical expression. The patient underwent a wedge resection of the gastric wall, with a final pathological diagnosis of amphicrine carcinoma with pancreatic acinar cell and neuroendocrine features (pT1b). Predictive immunohistochemistry showed microsatellite stability and negative HER2 status. Hotspot targeted deep sequencing of 57 genes showed no somatic mutation, in agreement with the low mutational burden reported for gastric amphicrine carcinomas. Due to a low stage of the tumor and the poor performance status of the patient, no additional oncological treatment was administered. The patient was disease-free after 18 months.This unusual case highlights the importance of considering amphicrine carcinoma in the diagnostic work-up of gastric type 3 NET. This can be done by including in the immunohistochemical panel non-neuroendocrine markers, such as the pancreatic acinar cell and glandular ones. Correct pathological diagnosis is pivotal to determine the appropriate staging (NET vs exocrine one) for surgical and oncological management.

Digestive MiNENs: Could histological classification and molecular characterization drive clinical outcome and therapeutic approach?

Mixed neuroendocrine-non-neuroendocrine neoplasms (MiNENs) are epithelial neoplasms in which neuroendocrine and non-neuroendocrine discrete components are combined, each of which constitutes ≥ 30% of the neoplasm. The finding of an additional neuroendocrine component seems to characterize the tumor's biological behavior. Few studies have proved MiNENs histogenetic and molecular characterization, and the development of molecular markers for more accurate classification of MiNENs represents a clinical need. However, a common origin of the neuroendocrine and non-neuroendocrine components from a pluripotent cancer stem cell could be suggested. The optimal clinical management of MiNENS is largely unknown. Whenever feasible, curative-intent resection should be performed for localized disease; in advanced disease, the treatment should be targeted to the component responsible for the metastatic spreading. This paper provides a revision of the current knowledge on MiNENs, focusing on available evidence about their molecular characterization to suggest a prognostic stratification of these rare forms.

Spatial and temporal heterogeneity of digestive neuroendocrine neoplasms

Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) are initially monoclonal neoplasms that progressively become polyclonal, with very different genotypic and phenotypic characteristics leading to biological differences, including the Ki-67 proliferation index, morphology, or sensitivity to treatments. Whereas inter-patient heterogeneity has been well described, intra-tumor heterogeneity has been little studied. However, NENs present a high degree of heterogeneity, both spatially within the same location or between different lesions, and through time. This can be explained by the emergence of tumor subclones with different behaviors. These subpopulations can be distinguished by the Ki-67 index, but also by the expression of hormonal markers or by differences in the intensity of uptake on metabolic imaging, such as ⁶⁸Ga-somatostatin receptor and Fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography. As these features are directly related to prognosis, it seems mandatory to move toward a standardized, improved selection of the tumor areas to be studied to be as predictive as possible. The temporal evolution of NENs frequently leads to changes in tumor grade over time, with impact on prognosis and therapeutic decision-making. However, there is no recommendation regarding systematic biopsy of NEN recurrence or progression, and which lesion to sample. This review aims to summarize the current state of knowledge, the main hypotheses, and the main implications regarding intra-tumor spatial and temporal heterogeneity in digestive NENs.

Evolving landscape of clinical trials in gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms in the past two decades

BACKGROUND

Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEP-NENs) are heterogenous malignancies that require well-designed trials to develop effective management strategies. This cross-sectional study aimed to illustrate the current landscape of clinical trials in GEP-NENs to provide insights for future research.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We reviewed all clinical trials registered on ClinicalTrials.gov between 1 January 2000 and 31 December 2021 with GEP-NEN in the 'condition or disease' field.

RESULTS

We included 206 eligible trials. Most trials enrolled less than 50 patients (59.8%) and were sponsored by institutions other than government or industry (67.0%). Most trials were conducted in high-income countries (86.6%) and countries located in Europe (30.1%) or Northern America (29.6%). The overall result reporting rates of GEP-NEN trials was 41.4%, and the median time from primary completion to result reporting was 101 months. Characteristics that improved the reporting of results included larger sample size, tumor differentiation specification for inclusion, progression-free survival as primary endpoint, industry sponsorship, and multicenter or multinational participation (all P < 0.05). Compared with trials registered between 2000 and 2011 (n = 28), trials registered between 2012 and 2021 (n = 178) were more likely to specify the Ki-67 index for inclusion (68.0% vs 35.7%, P = 0.002) and to be conducted outside Europe or Northern America (16.4% vs 3.7%, P = 0.02), while the sample size and the sponsorship did not change significantly.

CONCLUSIONS

Novel management options have been explored for GEP-NENs with more specific inclusion criteria during the past two decades. More efforts are needed to promote international collaborations in clinical trials and enhance timely result dissemination.

Carcinoma adenoneuroendocrino mixto en la ampolla de Váter: reporte de caso

La neoplasia neuroendocrina no neuroendocrina mixta es una neoplasia mixta con un componente neuroendocrino combinado con un componente no neuroendocrino. Esta presenta una incidencia baja y estudios limitados, pero con evidencia de ser una entidad agresiva asociada a una pobre supervivencia. Presentamos el caso de una mujer de 58 años que ingresó por un cuadro clínico de dolor abdominal en el hipocondrio izquierdo asociado a ictericia generalizada y picos febriles con diagnóstico imagenológico de dilatación de la vía biliar secundaria a coledocolitiasis distal, por lo que se realizó una colangiopancreatografía retrógrada endoscópica (CPRE) en la que se encontró una papila mayor de aspecto neoplásico a la cual se le realizó una biopsia analizada histopatológicamente y se confirmó el diagnóstico de carcinoma mixto con componente de carcinoma neuroendocrino pobremente diferenciado de alto grado y componente de carcinoma mucinoso, por lo cual se decidió programar una pancreatoduodenectomía.

Clinicopathological characteristics of mixed neuroendocrine-non-neuroendocrine neoplasms in gastrointestinal tract

BACKGROUND

In 2019, the World Health Organization (WHO) classification system updated the definition of mixed neuroendocrine non-neuroendocrine neoplasms (MiNENs), previously known as mixed adenoneuroendocrine carcinomas (MANECs). The clinicopathological characteristics of this new definition remains to be clarified.

METHODS

We analyzed the clinical data of 43 patients diagnosed with MiNENs in Wuhan Union Hospital from 2011 to 2020 according to the definition of MiNENs proposed in 2019.

RESULTS

Among the 43 patients with MiNENs, the top two most common sites were stomach and colon, and 69.8% were males. Nearly half (21/43) of the patients were diagnosed at TNM stage III, and about 53.5% (23/43) of patients were the neuroendocrine neoplasm dominant type. Among the non-neuroendocrine tumor components of 43 MiNENs patients, adenocarcinoma accounted for 95.3% (41/43) and squamous cell carcinoma accounted for 4.7% (2/43)；95.3% (41/43) of the neuroendocrine neoplasm components were neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC) and 4.7% (2/43) were neuroendocrine tumor (NET). Approximately 60.5% (26/43) neuroendocrine components had a Ki-67 index ≥ 55%. In addition, we further compared the prognosis of different subtypes of the MiNENs based on the neuroendocrine neoplasm component and non-neuroendocrine neoplasm component, and the results showed that there was no significant difference in survival between different subtypes of MiNENs (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

MiNENs can exhibit diverse clinicopathological characteristics, and there is no significant difference in prognosis among MiNENs subtypes, indicating that the definition of MiNENs can well summarize the prognosis of this type of tumor.

Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms Larger than 4 cm: A Retrospective Observational Study of Surgery, Histology, and Outcome

BACKGROUND

Pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (pNENs) are often detected as large primary lesions, even with distant metastases, and their prognosis may be difficult to predict.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, we retrieved data of patients treated for a large pNEN in our Surgical Unit (1979-2017) to evaluate the possible prognostic role of clinic-pathological features and surgery. Cox-proportional hazard regression models were used to find possible associations among some variables (clinical features, surgery, and histology) and survival at univariate and multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

Among 333 pNENs, we identified 64 patients (19%) with a lesion > 4 cm. Patients' median age was 61 years, median tumor size was 6.0 cm, and 35 (55%) patients had distant metastases at diagnosis. There were 50 (78%) nonfunctioning pNENs, and 31 tumors localized in the body/tail region of the pancreas. Overall, 36 patients underwent a standard pancreatic resection (with 13 associated liver resection/ablation). Regarding histology, 67% of pNENs were N1, and 34% were grade 2. After a median follow-up of 48 months (up to 33 years), 42 patients died of disease. Median survival after surgery was 79 months, and six patients experienced recurrence (median DFS 94 months). At multivariate analysis, distant metastases were associated with a worse outcome, while having undergone radical tumor resection was a protective factor.

CONCLUSIONS

In our experience, about 20% of pNENs have a size > 4 cm, 78% are nonfunctioning, and 55% show distant metastases at diagnosis. Nevertheless, a long-term survival of more than five years may be achieved after surgery.

Mixed neuroendocrine-non-neuroendocrine neoplasm with mucinous adenocarcinoma and amphicrine carcinoma components in the bile duct: an autopsy case

We report the first case of bile duct mixed neuroendocrine-non-neuroendocrine neoplasm (MiNEN) that had a mucinous carcinoma component. An 88-year-old man with biliary obstruction was diagnosed as having distal bile duct cancer using imaging examinations and endoscopic biopsy. The patient received the best supportive care without surgical resection for 13 months until death. An autopsy revealed a bulky mass involving the distal bile duct and multiple metastases in intra-abdominal lymph nodes, the liver, and the lungs. The primary cancer was microscopically diagnosed as a MiNEN, which consisted of mucinous adenocarcinoma and large cell-type neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC) components. Metastatic lesions in the liver and lungs were composed of only NEC with rich extracellular mucin without adenocarcinoma cells. Using electron microscopy and immunohistochemistry, it was proved that all NEC cells in both primary and metastatic lesions had amphicrine features. On the basis of pathological findings, we thought that the MiNEN was initially derived from a mucinous adenocarcinoma that dedifferentiated to amphicrine NEC cells with mucin production.

Deficient Mismatch Repair Proteins in Gastric Mixed Neuroendocrine Non-Neuroendocrine Neoplasm: A Rare Case Report

Mixed neuroendocrine non-neuroendocrine neoplasm (MiNEN) is a rare type of gastric carcinoma with controversial diagnosis and treatment. Recent data implies that deficiency mismatch repair proteins inducing microsatellite instability are considered one of the potential drivers of this disease. Hence, we report a stomach MiNEN with MMR protein loss. An admitted 60-year-old woman complained of epigastric pain. The pathological analysis of the gastro-endoscopic biopsy specimen revealed gastric adenocarcinoma. The radiological staging was cT3N1M0; therefore, she received D2 distal gastrectomy. Suspecting neuroendocrine component admix with adenocarcinoma part on the resected specimen microscopy, applying biomarkers including AE 1/3, synaptophysin, and chromogranin A to confirm the diagnosis of MiNEN. The neuroendocrine part was classified as neuroendocrine tumor grade 2 with Ki 67 at 16.5%. To further understand the molecular characterization of this disease, we evaluated mismatch protein expression by staining MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, and PMS2 antibodies. Interestingly, both components lost MLH1 and PMS2 proteins. Her radical surgery followed oxaliplatin/capecitabine adjuvant chemotherapy. The patient is still well after eight cycles of chemotherapy. dMMR gastric MiNENs and dMMR gastric cancer share many clinical and genetic characteristics. Further studies are necessary to survey the role of dMMR in the prognosis and treatment of this entity.

Olfactory Neuroblastoma: Morphological Reappraisal and Molecular Insights with Quantum Leap in Clinical Perspectives

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The purpose of review is to provide a comprehensive review of the literature focusing on the recent advances in the diagnosis, molecular underpinning, and targeted therapy of olfactory neuroblastoma (ONB).

RECENT FINDINGS

Studies focused on the molecular fingerprinting of ONB are critical to engage new promising treatment strategies. Molecular-based subtype classifications have been proposed (basal-like ONB and neural-like ONB) but are not widely used. The rationale for implementation of DNA methylation analysis and IDH2 sequencing in routine work-up for ONB is gaining recognition. Expression of somatostatin receptors (SSTR) in ONB open new avenues for both, diagnostic (especially metastatic disease) and new treatment protocols with somatostatin analogs. Olfactory carcinoma is proposed as a unifying diagnostic terminology pertinent to epithelial divergent differentiation in olfactory neuroblastoma. Molecular (genetic and epigenetic) efforts on olfactory neuroblastoma are promising; however further refinement is needed for employment of these biomarkers as clinical standard of care. Ongoing and future multi-institutional collaborative studies will contribute to further understanding of ONB biology and aid the development of targeted treatments for this disease.

Patient-derived tumor organoids for personalized medicine in a patient with rare hepatocellular carcinoma with neuroendocrine differentiation: a case report

Background

Hepatocellular carcinoma with neuroendocrine differentiation (HCC-NED) is a very rare subtype of primary liver cancer. Treatment allocation in these patients therefore remains a challenge.

Methods

We report the case of a 74-year-old man with a HCC-NED. The tumor was surgically removed in curative intent. Histopathological work-up revealed poorly differentiated hepatocellular carcinoma (Edmondson-Steiner grade IV) with diffuse expression of neuroendocrine markers synaptophysin and chromogranin. Three months after resection, multifocal recurrence of the HCC-NED was observed. In the meantime, tumor organoids have been generated from the resected HCC-NED and extensively characterized. Sensitivity to a number of drugs approved for the treatment of HCC or neuroendocrine carcinomas was tested in vitro.

Results

Based on the results of the in vitro drug screening, etoposide and carboplatin are used as first line palliative combination treatment. With genomic analysis revealing a NTRK1-mutation of unknown significance (kinase domain) and tumor organoids found to be sensitive to entrectinib, a pan-TRK inhibitor, the patient was treated with entrectinib as second line therapy. After only two weeks, treatment is discontinued due to deterioration of the patient’s general condition.

Conclusion

The rapid establishment of patient-derived tumor organoids allows in vitro drug testing and thereby personalized treatment choices, however clinical translation remains a challenge. To the best of our knowledge, this report provides a first proof-of-principle for using organoids for personalized medicine in this rare subtype of primary liver cancer.

Tumors that simultaneously display features of liver, nerve and hormone-producing cells are very rare. In such cases, the most appropriate treatment choice is not well defined. Here, we describe the generation of three-dimensional miniature tumors, called organoids, from the patient’s tumor tissue, that can be grown and studied in a culture dish. These organoids closely mimic the patient’s tumor and allowed us to test different drugs to identify the most effective therapy for informed treatment choice. What we describe in this study is an emerging approach for a practice known as personalized medicine, that aims to provide a more tailored treatment to patients. In summary, we demonstrate that this approach can be useful in a rare cancer type and that it holds significant potential to guide treatment decision in other patients with aggressive cancers.

Meier, Nuciforo, Coto-Llerena et al. report a rare case of a patient with hepatocellular carcinoma with neuroendocrine differentiation. The authors establish organoids that recapitulate the genetic features of the patient’s tumor and are used for ex vivo drug testing to guide therapy selection in the patient.

RB1-deficient squamous cell carcinoma: the proposed source of combined Merkel cell carcinoma

Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is an aggressive cutaneous neuroendocrine (NE) carcinoma arising from integration of Merkel cell polyomavirus (MCPyV) DNA into a host cell or from ultraviolet light-induced genetic damage (proportions vary geographically). Tumors in the latter group include those with "pure" NE phenotype and those "combined" with other elements, most often squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). We performed comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) of MCPyV+ and MCPyV- (pure and combined) tumors, to better understand their mutational profiles and shed light on their pathogenesis. Supplemental immunohistochemistry for Rb expression was also undertaken. After eliminating low quality samples, 37 tumors were successfully analyzed (14 MCPyV+, 8 pure MCPyV- and 15 combined MCPyV-). The SCC and NE components were sequenced separately in 5 combined tumors. Tumor mutational burden was lower in MCPyV+ tumors (mean 1.66 vs. 29.9/Mb, P < 0.0001). MCPyV- tumors featured frequent mutations in TP53 (95.6%), RB1 (87%), and NOTCH family genes (95.6%). No recurrently mutated genes were identified in MCPyV+ tumors. Mutational overlap in the NE and SCC components of combined tumors was substantial ('similarity index' >24% in 4/5 cases). Loss of Rb expression correlated with RB1 mutational (P < 0.0001) and MCPyV- status (P < 0.0001) in MCCs and it was observed more frequently in the SCC component of combined MCC than in a control group of conventional cutaneous SCC (P = 0.0002). Our results (i) support existing evidence that MCPyV+ and MCPyV- MCCs are pathogenetically distinct entities (ii) concur with earlier studies linking the NE and SCC components of combined MCCs via shared genetic profiles and (iii) lend credence to the proposal that an Rb-deficient subset of SCC's is the source of phenotypically divergent combined MCCs.

A rare case of poorly differentiated mixed neuroendocrine-nonneuroendocrine tumor of the caecum with long term survival: A case report

A 59-year-old woman presented with flushing attacks accompanied by tachycardia and hypotension, which lasted approximately 30 to 60 minutes, underwent 18 years ago a gastrointestinal tumor resection. The histologic examination revealed a poorly differentiated mixed neuroendocrine/adenocarcinoma located in the caecum with regional metastases. Postoperatively, the patient received combined chemotherapy of 5-fluorouracil with interferon for six months and since has remained asymptomatic. Her examination revealed positivity for chromogranin A (CgA) and a-Fetoprotein (aFP) (580 ng/24 h, normal range 27–94, and 10 IU/mL, normal range 0–6, respectively). Urinary 5-hydroxy indole acetic acid excretion was remarkably high (41.8 mg/24 h, normal range 2–10 mg/24 h). An abdominal Magnetic Resonance Imaging scan revealed multiple focal loci in the liver whose histological examination revealed a carcinoid tumor confirmed by an Octreoscan. Additional uptake was noted on the right shoulder and the right sternum-clavicle joint confirmed by Tc-99m MDP scan. The patient received somatostatin analogue therapy followed by long-acting release octreotide analogue therapy (30 mg/month) showing a partial improvement of relevant biomarkers. Two years later, carcinoid syndrome symptoms reappeared and due to the tumors expression of somatostatin receptors the patient received peptide receptor radionuclide therapy with 177Lu-DOTATATE that resulted in both clinical and biochemical improvements.

Pancreatic Adeno-MiNEN, a Rare Newly Defined Entity with Challenging Diagnosis and Treatment: A Case Report with Systematic Literature Review and Pooled Analysis

Mixed neuroendocrine non-neuroendocrine neoplasms (MiNEN) are a peculiar entity that can occur throughout the whole gastrointestinal trait, and pancreatic localization is rare. Their main characteristic is the presence of at least a neuroendocrine and an epithelial component, each accounting for at least 30% of the tumour mass. The presence of epithelial ductal component defines adeno-MiNEN. We report a case of a 59-year-old woman affected by pancreatic adeno-MiNEN with challenging diagnosis and successfully treated. A systematic literature review and pooled analysis was also performed, aiming to define the management and outcomes of pancreatic adeno-MiNEN. Out of 190 identified records, 15 studies including 28 patients affected by pancreatic-adeno-MiNEN were included in the analysis. Pancreatic adeno-MiNEN occurred mainly in males (82.8%) and at a mean age of 61.7 (range: 24-82) years. Pre-operative diagnosis was possible only in 14.2% of cases. At presentation, the majority had already advanced disease (TNM stage III (53.8%) and stage IV 19.3%). Adjuvant therapy was performed in 55% of patients, and the tumour recurrence rate was in 30% of cases. Median disease-free survival (DFS) was 12 months (range: 0-216 months) with a 5-year DFS of 16.6%, while the median overall survival (OS) was 12 months (range: 0-288 months) with a 5-year OS of 23.5%. Pancreatic adeno-MiNENs are rare; as they have very heterogenous behaviour, they are rarely diagnosed preoperatively and have poor prognosis. Treatment of localised MiNEN still relies on radical surgical resection, which seems essential to achieve a good oncological prognosis. International registry on MiNEN is necessary to improve the knowledge on this rare tumour and to improve its outcomes.

Long-term survival of gastric mixed neuroendocrine-non-neuroendocrine neoplasm: Two case reports

BACKGROUND

Gastric mixed neuroendocrine-non-neuroendocrine neoplasm (MiNEN), which consists of neuroendocrine and non-neuroendocrine components, is quite rare. Until now, most data on gastric MiNEN come from clinical cases, without large-scale retrospective studies or controlled clinical trials. Consequently, no consensus regarding the origin, molecular characteristics, or appropriate treatment of MiNEN has been reached so far. We conducted chemotherapy of irinotecan plus cisplatin (IP regimen) and surgery in two patients with gastric MiNEN, which had never been used in treating this kind of tumor, leading to their long-term survival for more than 3 and 7 years, respectively.

CASE SUMMARY

We present two patients (one male and one female) with gastric MiNEN, with the primary manifestation of recurrent upper abdominal pain. After they were referred to our hospital, a diagnosis of gastric MiNEN was defined with the help of CT scan, and histopathological and immunohistochemical examinations on the samples of gastrointestinal endoscopy or radical surgery. The male patient (case 1) were found to have metastases in the reginal lymph nodes and the left liver. He received four cycles of IP regimens first, then the gastrectomy and partial left liver resection, followed by additional two cycles of IP chemotherapy. The female patient (case 2) underwent a laparoscopic gastrectomy, and received six cycles of IP regimen. She was found to have metastatic lesions in the right lung 2 years after that, and underwent video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) of the lower lobe of the right lung. The two patients have now survived for more than 3 years and 7 years, respectively, without any evidence of recurrence or metastases.

CONCLUSION

IP regimen, combined with curative-intent surgery if feasible, could be considered as the priority in the choice of front-line chemotherapy for gastric MiNEN.

Intra-ampullary papillary-tubular neoplasm combined with ampullary neuroendocrine carcinoma: A case report

BACKGROUND

The ampulla of Vater is an anatomically and histologically complex region giving rise to a heterogenous group of tumors. This is, to the best of our knowledge, the first case of intra-ampullary papillary-tubular neoplasm combined with ampullary neuroendocrine carcinoma reported in the literature.

CASE SUMMARY

A 61-year-old woman presented to the emergency department for evaluation of painless jaundice. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) of the abdomen and chest showed a periampullary tumor mass measuring 15 mm × 12 mm × 14 mm, with no evidence of locoregional and distant metastases, for which she underwent pancreatoduodenectomy. Histopathologic examination of a resected specimen revealed an intra-ampullary papillary tubular neoplasm with high-grade dysplasia in combination with poorly differentiated grade 3 neuroendocrine carcinoma with a mitotic count of more than 20 mitoses per 10 high power fields and Ki-67 index of 100%. No positive lymph nodes were identified. Her postoperative course was uneventful. Postoperatively, she remained under close surveillance. Multiple liver metastases were observed on follow-up CT 8 mo after the surgery, so systemic therapy with cisplatin and etoposide was initiated.

CONCLUSION

The simultaneous occurrence of neuroendocrine and non-neuroendocrine tumors in the ampulla of Vater is rare and the pathogenesis of such tumors is largely unknown. Due to unpredictable clinical behavior and lack of solid evidence on optimal treatment strategy, close patient surveillance is advised after radical resection of the primary tumor.

Mixed Neuroendocrine – Nonneuroendocrine Neoplasm Arising in Barrett\'s Esophagus

Barrett's esophagus, which results from chronic gastroesophageal reflux disease, is a known precursor to dysplasia and ultimately esophageal adenocarcinoma. Mixed neuroendocrine – nonneuroendocrine neoplasm (MiNEN) is a rare and heterogenous group of neoplasm with aggressive clinical behavior in general. There have been rare reports of MiNEN arising in Barrett's esophagus, and its pathogenesis remains unclear. Surgical resection with lymph node dissection remains the most effective treatment of MiNEN of the esophagus to date, although the evidence on its optimal treatment is scant.

The classification of neuroendocrine neoplasms of the lung and digestive system according to WHO, 5th edition: similarities, differences, challenges, and unmet needs

Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) are a group of disease entities sharing common morphological, ultrastructural and immunophenotypical features, yet with distinct biological behavior and clinical outcome, ranging from benign to frankly malignant. Accordingly, a spectrum of therapeutic options for each single entity is available, including somatostatin analogues (SSA), mTOR-inhibitors, peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT), non-platinum and platinum chemotherapy. In the last few decades, several attempts have been made to better stratify these lesions refining the pathological classifications, so as to obtain an optimal correspondence between the scientific terminology and, the predictive and prognostic features of each disease subtype, and achieve a global Classification encompassing NENs arising at different anatomical sites. The aim of this review was to analyze, compare and discuss the main features and issues of the latest WHO Classifications of NENs of the lung and the digestive system, in order to point out the strengths and limitations of our current understanding of these complex diseases.

Transcription Factor Expression in Sinonasal Neuroendocrine Neoplasms and Olfactory Neuroblastoma (ONB): Hyams' Grades 1-3 ONBs Expand the Spectrum of SATB2 and GATA3-Positive Neoplasms

Sinonasal neuroendocrine neoplasms (SN-NENs) are rare and mostly include neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC), whereas neuroendocrine tumor (NET) is exceptional in this site. Olfactory neuroblastoma (ONB) is a malignant neuroectodermal neoplasm arising in the nasal cavity. Albeit crucial for correct patients' management, the distinction of high grade ONB from NEC is challenging and requires additional diagnostic markers. The transcription factor SATB2 has been recently introduced in routine diagnostics as an immunohistochemical marker of distal intestine differentiation. No specific data are available about SATB2 and GATA3 expression in SN-NENs. GATA3, SATB2, and, for comparison, CDX2 expression were investigated in a series of epithelial and non-epithelial SN-NENs. We collected 26 cases of ONB and 7 cases of epithelial SN-NENs diagnosed and treated in our Institution. ONBs were graded according to Hyams' system and epithelial NENs were reclassified into 5 NECs, 1 MiNEN, and 1 amphicrine carcinoma. Immunohistochemistry was performed using standard automated protocols. Hyams' grades 1-3 ONBs stained diffusely and intensely for SATB2, whereas grade 4 ONBs and NECs were globally negative. The non-neuroendocrine component of MiNEN and the amphicrine carcinoma were strongly positive. GATA3 was heterogeneously and unpredictably expressed in Hyams' grades 1-3 ONBs, whereas grade 4 ONBs and NECs were completely negative. CDX2 was negative in all cases. Our study identifies, for the first time, SATB2 and GATA3 expression as features of Hyams' grades 1-3 ONBs, expands the spectrum of SATB2 and GATA3-positive neoplasms, and suggests that Hyams' grade 4 ONBs are not only clinically but also biologically different from low graded ONBs.

Mixed neuroendocrine-non-neuroendocrine neoplasms of the digestive system: A mini-review

Mixed neuroendocrine-non-neuroendocrine neoplasms (MiNENs) are rare mixed tumors containing both neuroendocrine (NE) and non-NE components. Each component must occupy at least 30% of the tumor volume by definition. Recent molecular evidence suggests MiNENs are clonal neoplasms and potentially harbor targetable mutations similar to conventional carcinomas. There have been multiple changes in the nomenclature and classification of MiNENs which has created some confusion among pathologists on how to integrate the contributions of each component in a MiNEN, an issue which in turn has resulted in confusion in communication with front-line treating oncologists. This mini review summarizes our current understanding of MiNENs and outline diagnosis, prognosis, and management of these neoplasms. The authors emphasize the importance of treating the most aggressive component of the tumor regardless of its percentage volume.

Combined Neuroendocrine and Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Sinonasal Tract: A Morphologic and Immunohistochemical Analysis and Review of Literature

Sinonasal malignancies constitute 3% of head and neck cancers, with squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) the most common histology. Neuroendocrine carcinomas (NEC) are rare, with a subset showing neuroendocrine carcinoma and a non-neuroendocrine component. The pathogenesis of these combined tumors is largely unknown, and TP53 driver mutations may play a role. A database search for combined NEC was performed across two institutions (UNM and UCSF) spanning 15 years. Excluding NUT midline carcinoma, 3 cases met inclusion criteria. All were morphologically NEC + SCC and underwent a comprehensive immunohistochemical evaluation. Tumors demonstrated two components histologically: moderately to poorly differentiated SCC and high-grade NEC. Divergent differentiation was confirmed with lineage-specific markers. Only one patient received neoadjuvant chemotherapy prior to surgery, with a remarkable response (a marked decrease in the size of the primary lesion and resolution of liver metastases). Immunohistochemical staining for p53 was increased in 2 of 3 cases (both components), suggesting a role in the carcinogenesis of these tumors. Aberrant expression of beta-catenin was not identified. One case tested positive for p16, which can be seen in high grade NECs due to inactivation of Rb gene. Additionally, both cases with a small cell NEC component expressed PD-L1, suggesting that immunotherapy may be an effective treatment. Findings in this study support the role of p53 mutation in a subset of combined NEC + SCC of the sinonasal tract. Recognition of this rare entity is essential for optimal management of these aggressive neoplasms.